From c3a787e090dce76149ae86d70d4fecea3c285a40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guido van Rossum Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 05:52:47 +0000 Subject: Surprising fix for SF bug 563060: module can be used as base class. Change the module constructor (module_init) to have the signature __init__(name:str, doc=None); this prevents the call from type_new() to succeed. While we're at it, prevent repeated calling of module_init for the same module from leaking the dict, changing the semantics so that __dict__ is only initialized if NULL. Also adding a unittest, test_module.py. This is an incompatibility with 2.2, if anybody was instantiating the module class before, their argument list was probably empty; so this can't be backported to 2.2.x. --- Lib/test/test_module.py | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Objects/moduleobject.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Lib/test/test_module.py diff --git a/Lib/test/test_module.py b/Lib/test/test_module.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..566bb89 --- /dev/null +++ b/Lib/test/test_module.py @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +# Test the module type + +from test_support import verify, vereq, verbose, TestFailed + +import sys +module = type(sys) + +# An uninitialized module has no __dict__ or __name__, and __doc__ is None +foo = module.__new__(module) +verify(foo.__dict__ is None) +try: + s = foo.__name__ +except AttributeError: + pass +else: + raise TestFailed, "__name__ = %s" % repr(s) +vereq(foo.__doc__, None) + +# Regularly initialized module, no docstring +foo = module("foo") +vereq(foo.__name__, "foo") +vereq(foo.__doc__, None) +vereq(foo.__dict__, {"__name__": "foo", "__doc__": None}) + +# ASCII docstring +foo = module("foo", "foodoc") +vereq(foo.__name__, "foo") +vereq(foo.__doc__, "foodoc") +vereq(foo.__dict__, {"__name__": "foo", "__doc__": "foodoc"}) + +# Unicode docstring +foo = module("foo", u"foodoc\u1234") +vereq(foo.__name__, "foo") +vereq(foo.__doc__, u"foodoc\u1234") +vereq(foo.__dict__, {"__name__": "foo", "__doc__": u"foodoc\u1234"}) + +# Reinitialization should not replace the __dict__ +foo.bar = 42 +d = foo.__dict__ +foo.__init__("foo", "foodoc") +vereq(foo.__name__, "foo") +vereq(foo.__doc__, "foodoc") +vereq(foo.bar, 42) +vereq(foo.__dict__, {"__name__": "foo", "__doc__": "foodoc", "bar": 42}) +verify(foo.__dict__ is d) + +if verbose: + print "All OK" diff --git a/Objects/moduleobject.c b/Objects/moduleobject.c index 807adfa..9cd7f31 100644 --- a/Objects/moduleobject.c +++ b/Objects/moduleobject.c @@ -147,10 +147,23 @@ _PyModule_Clear(PyObject *m) /* Methods */ static int -module_init(PyModuleObject *m, PyObject *args, PyObject *kw) +module_init(PyModuleObject *m, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds) { - m->md_dict = PyDict_New(); - if (m->md_dict == NULL) + static char *kwlist[] = {"name", "doc", NULL}; + PyObject *dict, *name = Py_None, *doc = Py_None; + if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "S|O", kwlist, + &name, &doc)) + return -1; + dict = m->md_dict; + if (dict == NULL) { + dict = PyDict_New(); + if (dict == NULL) + return -1; + m->md_dict = dict; + } + if (PyDict_SetItemString(dict, "__name__", name) < 0) + return -1; + if (PyDict_SetItemString(dict, "__doc__", doc) < 0) return -1; return 0; } -- cgit v0.12