From 0b7b6fdff3b5bd7974c80a891598aa81ed634e61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guido van Rossum Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:51:13 +0000 Subject: Patch #1549 by Thomas Herve. This changes the rules for when __hash__ is inherited slightly, by allowing it to be inherited when one or more of __lt__, __le__, __gt__, __ge__ are overridden, as long as __eq__ and __ne__ aren't. --- Lib/test/test_richcmp.py | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- Objects/typeobject.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_richcmp.py b/Lib/test/test_richcmp.py index f412a89..db6d31f 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_richcmp.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_richcmp.py @@ -85,6 +85,35 @@ class Vector: raise ValueError, "Cannot compare vectors of different length" return other + +class SimpleOrder(object): + """ + A simple class that defines order but not full comparison. + """ + + def __init__(self, value): + self.value = value + + def __lt__(self, other): + if not isinstance(other, SimpleOrder): + return True + return self.value < other.value + + def __gt__(self, other): + if not isinstance(other, SimpleOrder): + return False + return self.value > other.value + + +class DumbEqualityWithoutHash(object): + """ + A class that define __eq__, but no __hash__: it shouldn't be hashable. + """ + + def __eq__(self, other): + return False + + opmap = { "lt": (lambda a,b: a< b, operator.lt, operator.__lt__), "le": (lambda a,b: a<=b, operator.le, operator.__le__), @@ -330,8 +359,39 @@ class ListTest(unittest.TestCase): for op in opmap["lt"]: self.assertIs(op(x, y), True) + +class HashableTest(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Test hashability of classes with rich operators defined. + """ + + def test_simpleOrderHashable(self): + """ + A class that only defines __gt__ and/or __lt__ should be hashable. + """ + a = SimpleOrder(1) + b = SimpleOrder(2) + self.assert_(a < b) + self.assert_(b > a) + self.assert_(a.__hash__ is not None) + + def test_notHashableException(self): + """ + If a class is not hashable, it should raise a TypeError with an + understandable message. + """ + a = DumbEqualityWithoutHash() + try: + hash(a) + except TypeError, e: + self.assertEquals(str(e), + "unhashable type: 'DumbEqualityWithoutHash'") + else: + raise test_support.TestFailed("Should not be here") + + def test_main(): - test_support.run_unittest(VectorTest, NumberTest, MiscTest, DictTest, ListTest) + test_support.run_unittest(VectorTest, NumberTest, MiscTest, DictTest, ListTest, HashableTest) if __name__ == "__main__": test_main() diff --git a/Objects/typeobject.c b/Objects/typeobject.c index e418137..74a00b1 100644 --- a/Objects/typeobject.c +++ b/Objects/typeobject.c @@ -3230,28 +3230,22 @@ inherit_special(PyTypeObject *type, PyTypeObject *base) type->tp_flags |= Py_TPFLAGS_DICT_SUBCLASS; } -/* Map rich comparison operators to their __xx__ namesakes */ -static char *name_op[] = { - "__lt__", - "__le__", - "__eq__", - "__ne__", - "__gt__", - "__ge__", - "__cmp__", - /* These are only for overrides_hash(): */ - "__hash__", +static char *hash_name_op[] = { + "__eq__", + "__cmp__", + "__hash__", + NULL }; static int overrides_hash(PyTypeObject *type) { - int i; + char **p; PyObject *dict = type->tp_dict; assert(dict != NULL); - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { - if (PyDict_GetItemString(dict, name_op[i]) != NULL) + for (p = hash_name_op; *p; p++) { + if (PyDict_GetItemString(dict, *p) != NULL) return 1; } return 0; @@ -4846,7 +4840,7 @@ slot_tp_hash(PyObject *self) func = lookup_method(self, "__hash__", &hash_str); - if (func != NULL) { + if (func != NULL && func != Py_None) { PyObject *res = PyEval_CallObject(func, NULL); Py_DECREF(func); if (res == NULL) @@ -4971,6 +4965,15 @@ slot_tp_setattro(PyObject *self, PyObject *name, PyObject *value) return 0; } +static char *name_op[] = { + "__lt__", + "__le__", + "__eq__", + "__ne__", + "__gt__", + "__ge__", +}; + static PyObject * half_richcompare(PyObject *self, PyObject *other, int op) { -- cgit v0.12