From 334e00c275e11af0e775c32945250fe1ee71fbe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guido van Rossum Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:26:45 +0000 Subject: Fix two mentions of 2.1 instead of 2.0.1. Not worth fixing this in the 2.0.1c1 release (which has already been built and pushed out to SF and py.org), but will be correct in the 2.0.1 final release. Does this require a matching update in the license as quoted in the docs? --- LICENSE | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE index 03339ae..f806b5a 100644 --- a/LICENSE +++ b/LICENSE @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ License (GPL) was very desirable. CNRI and the Free Software Foundation (FSF) interacted to develop enabling wording changes to the Python license. Python 1.6.1 is essentially the same as Python 1.6, with a few minor bug fixes, and with a different license that enables -later versions to be GPL-compatible. Python 2.1 is a derivative work +later versions to be GPL-compatible. Python 2.0.1 is a derivative work of Python 1.6.1, as well as of Python 2.0. After Python 2.0 was released by BeOpen.com, Guido van Rossum and the @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Licensee. This License Agreement does not grant permission to use PSF trademarks or trade name in a trademark sense to endorse or promote products or services of Licensee, or any third party. -8. By copying, installing or otherwise using Python 2.1, Licensee +8. By copying, installing or otherwise using Python 2.0.1, Licensee agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this License Agreement. -- cgit v0.12