From ffdd22f1af66ffefc1b37b454b5df6ffacc5da61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 06:24:54 +0000 Subject: Repair an incomprehensible comment. --- Objects/obmalloc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Objects/obmalloc.c b/Objects/obmalloc.c index b576123..435c4b6 100644 --- a/Objects/obmalloc.c +++ b/Objects/obmalloc.c @@ -326,8 +326,8 @@ simply haven't yet gotten to one of the higher-address blocks. The offset from the pool_header to the start of "the next" virgin block is stored in the pool_header nextoffset member, and the largest value of nextoffset that makes sense is stored in the maxnextoffset member when a pool is initialized. -All the blocks in a pool have been passed out at least when and only when -nextoffset > maxnextoffset. +All the blocks in a pool have been passed out at least once when and only +when nextoffset > maxnextoffset. Major obscurity: While the usedpools vector is declared to have poolp -- cgit v0.12