1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
|
# Object layout
## Common header
Each Python object starts with two fields:
* ob_refcnt
* ob_type
which form the header common to all Python objects, for all versions,
and hold the reference count and class of the object, respectively.
## Pre-header
Since the introduction of the cycle GC, there has also been a pre-header.
Before 3.11, this pre-header was two words in size.
It should be considered opaque to all code except the cycle GC.
### 3.13
In 3.13, the values array is embedded into the object, so there is no
need for a values pointer (it is just a fixed offset into the object).
So the pre-header is these two fields:
* weakreflist
* dict_pointer
If the object has no physical dictionary, then the ``dict_pointer``
is set to `NULL`.
<details>
<summary> 3.12 </summary>
### 3.12
In 3.12, the pointer to the list of weak references is added to the
pre-header. In order to make space for it, the ``dict`` and ``values``
pointers are combined into a single tagged pointer:
* weakreflist
* dict_or_values
If the object has no physical dictionary, then the ``dict_or_values``
has its low bit set to one, and points to the values array.
If the object has a physical dictionary, then the ``dict_or_values``
has its low bit set to zero, and points to the dictionary.
The untagged form is chosen for the dictionary pointer, rather than
the values pointer, to enable the (legacy) C-API function
`_PyObject_GetDictPtr(PyObject *obj)` to work.
</details>
<details>
<summary> 3.11 </summary>
### 3.11
In 3.11 the pre-header was extended to include pointers to the VM managed ``__dict__``.
The reason for moving the ``__dict__`` to the pre-header is that it allows
faster access, as it is at a fixed offset, and it also allows object's
dictionaries to be lazily created when the ``__dict__`` attribute is
specifically asked for.
In the 3.11 the non-GC part of the pre-header consists of two pointers:
* dict
* values
The values pointer refers to the ``PyDictValues`` array which holds the
values of the objects's attributes.
Should the dictionary be needed, then ``values`` is set to ``NULL``
and the ``dict`` field points to the dictionary.
</details>
## Layout of a "normal" Python object
A "normal" Python object is one that doesn't inherit from a builtin
class, doesn't have slots.
### 3.13
In 3.13 the values are embedded into the object, as follows:
* weakreflist
* dict_or_values
* GC 1
* GC 2
* ob_refcnt
* ob_type
* Inlined values:
* Flags
* values 0
* values 1
* ...
* Insertion order bytes
This has all the advantages of the layout used in 3.12, plus:
* Access to values is even faster as there is one less load
* Fast access is mostly maintained when the `__dict__` is materialized
![Layout of "normal" object in 3.13](./object_layout_313.png)
For objects with opaque parts defined by a C extension,
the layout is much the same as for 3.12
![Layout of "full" object in 3.13](./object_layout_full_313.png)
<details>
<summary> 3.12 </summary>
### 3.12:
In 3.12, the header and pre-header form the entire object for "normal"
Python objects:
* weakreflist
* dict_or_values
* GC 1
* GC 2
* ob_refcnt
* ob_type
![Layout of "normal" object in 3.12](./object_layout_312.png)
There are several advantages to this layout:
* It allows lazy `__dict__`s, as described above.
* The regular layout allows us to create tailored traversal and deallocation
functions based on layout, rather than inheritance.
* Multiple inheritance works properly,
as the weakrefs and dict are always at the same offset.
The full layout object, with an opaque part defined by a C extension,
and `__slots__` looks like this:
![Layout of "full" object in 3.12](./object_layout_full_312.png)
</details>
|