blob: c595a932ac4470122484e78f3317da05835bccba (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
# Tooling to generate interpreters
Documentation for the instruction definitions in `Python/bytecodes.c`
("the DSL") is [here](interpreter_definition.md).
What's currently here:
- `lexer.py`: lexer for C, originally written by Mark Shannon
- `plexer.py`: OO interface on top of lexer.py; main class: `PLexer`
- `parser.py`: Parser for instruction definition DSL; main class `Parser`
- `generate_cases.py`: driver script to read `Python/bytecodes.c` and
write `Python/generated_cases.c.h`
- `test_generator.py`: tests, require manual running using `pytest`
Note that there is some dummy C code at the top and bottom of
`Python/bytecodes.c`
to fool text editors like VS Code into believing this is valid C code.
## A bit about the parser
The parser class uses a pretty standard recursive descent scheme,
but with unlimited backtracking.
The `PLexer` class tokenizes the entire input before parsing starts.
We do not run the C preprocessor.
Each parsing method returns either an AST node (a `Node` instance)
or `None`, or raises `SyntaxError` (showing the error in the C source).
Most parsing methods are decorated with `@contextual`, which automatically
resets the tokenizer input position when `None` is returned.
Parsing methods may also raise `SyntaxError`, which is irrecoverable.
When a parsing method returns `None`, it is possible that after backtracking
a different parsing method returns a valid AST.
Neither the lexer nor the parsers are complete or fully correct.
Most known issues are tersely indicated by `# TODO:` comments.
We plan to fix issues as they become relevant.
|
