summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAbseil Team <absl-team@google.com>2020-12-21 20:41:17 (GMT)
committerDerek Mauro <dmauro@google.com>2020-12-22 17:15:41 (GMT)
commitca4b7c9ff4d8a5c37ac51795b03ffe934958aeff (patch)
tree9b90d078223828eb4acf5b274e4cc3c5cb79ecfd
parent4f6fa70870de48cf0db655acc9cb8c30b2760ec9 (diff)
downloadgoogletest-ca4b7c9ff4d8a5c37ac51795b03ffe934958aeff.zip
googletest-ca4b7c9ff4d8a5c37ac51795b03ffe934958aeff.tar.gz
googletest-ca4b7c9ff4d8a5c37ac51795b03ffe934958aeff.tar.bz2
Googletest export
Give each of Naggy/Nice/StrictMock a base class whose constructor runs before the mocked class's constructor, and a destructor that runs after the mocked class's destructor, so that any mock methods run in either the constructor or destructor use the same strictness as other calls. PiperOrigin-RevId: 348511612
-rw-r--r--googlemock/docs/cook_book.md10
-rw-r--r--googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h104
-rw-r--r--googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h22
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc39
4 files changed, 121 insertions, 54 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md b/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
index cfe5858..cd64150 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
@@ -429,16 +429,6 @@ limitations):
2. `NiceMock<MockFoo>` and `StrictMock<MockFoo>` may not work correctly if the
destructor of `MockFoo` is not virtual. We would like to fix this, but it
requires cleaning up existing tests.
-3. During the constructor or destructor of `MockFoo`, the mock object is *not*
- nice or strict. This may cause surprises if the constructor or destructor
- calls a mock method on `this` object. (This behavior, however, is consistent
- with C++'s general rule: if a constructor or destructor calls a virtual
- method of `this` object, that method is treated as non-virtual. In other
- words, to the base class's constructor or destructor, `this` object behaves
- like an instance of the base class, not the derived class. This rule is
- required for safety. Otherwise a base constructor may use members of a
- derived class before they are initialized, or a base destructor may use
- members of a derived class after they have been destroyed.)
Finally, you should be **very cautious** about when to use naggy or strict
mocks, as they tend to make tests more brittle and harder to maintain. When you
diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h
index 69afa1b..8230058 100644
--- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h
+++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h
@@ -90,10 +90,51 @@ constexpr bool HasStrictnessModifier() {
return decltype(StrictnessModifierProbe(std::declval<const T&>()))::value;
}
+// Base classes that register and deregister with testing::Mock to alter the
+// default behavior around uninteresting calls. Inheriting from one of these
+// classes first and then MockClass ensures the MockClass constructor is run
+// after registration, and that the MockClass destructor runs before
+// deregistration. This guarantees that MockClass's constructor and destructor
+// run with the same level of strictness as its instance methods.
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__clang__))
+// We need to mark these classes with this declspec to ensure that
+// the empty base class optimization is performed.
+#define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS __declspec(empty_bases)
+#else
+#define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS
+#endif
+
+template <typename Base>
+class NiceMockImpl {
+ public:
+ NiceMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(this); }
+
+ ~NiceMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(this); }
+};
+
+template <typename Base>
+class NaggyMockImpl {
+ public:
+ NaggyMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(this); }
+
+ ~NaggyMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(this); }
+};
+
+template <typename Base>
+class StrictMockImpl {
+ public:
+ StrictMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(this); }
+
+ ~StrictMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(this); }
+};
+
} // namespace internal
template <class MockClass>
-class NiceMock : public MockClass {
+class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NiceMock
+ : private internal::NiceMockImpl<MockClass>,
+ public MockClass {
public:
static_assert(
!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
@@ -102,8 +143,8 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
"https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/"
"cook_book.md#the-nice-the-strict-and-the-naggy-nicestrictnaggy");
NiceMock() : MockClass() {
- ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
// Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
@@ -115,21 +156,16 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
// made explicit.
template <typename A>
explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
- ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
NiceMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
: MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
std::forward<An>(args)...) {
- ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
- }
-
- ~NiceMock() { // NOLINT
- ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
private:
@@ -137,7 +173,9 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
};
template <class MockClass>
-class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
+class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NaggyMock
+ : private internal::NaggyMockImpl<MockClass>,
+ public MockClass {
static_assert(
!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
"Can't apply NaggyMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
@@ -147,8 +185,8 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
public:
NaggyMock() : MockClass() {
- ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
// Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
@@ -160,21 +198,16 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
// made explicit.
template <typename A>
explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
- ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
NaggyMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
: MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
std::forward<An>(args)...) {
- ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
- }
-
- ~NaggyMock() { // NOLINT
- ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
private:
@@ -182,7 +215,9 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
};
template <class MockClass>
-class StrictMock : public MockClass {
+class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS StrictMock
+ : private internal::StrictMockImpl<MockClass>,
+ public MockClass {
public:
static_assert(
!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
@@ -191,8 +226,8 @@ class StrictMock : public MockClass {
"https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/"
"cook_book.md#the-nice-the-strict-and-the-naggy-nicestrictnaggy");
StrictMock() : MockClass() {
- ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
// Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
@@ -204,27 +239,24 @@ class StrictMock : public MockClass {
// made explicit.
template <typename A>
explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
- ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
StrictMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
: MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
std::forward<An>(args)...) {
- ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
- }
-
- ~StrictMock() { // NOLINT
- ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
- internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+ static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+ "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
}
private:
GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(StrictMock);
};
+#undef GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS
+
} // namespace testing
#endif // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h
index ac21550..d42d4cb 100644
--- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h
+++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h
@@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ template <typename F> class TypedExpectation;
// Helper class for testing the Expectation class template.
class ExpectationTester;
+// Helper classes for implementing NiceMock, StrictMock, and NaggyMock.
+template <typename MockClass>
+class NiceMockImpl;
+template <typename MockClass>
+class StrictMockImpl;
+template <typename MockClass>
+class NaggyMockImpl;
+
// Protects the mock object registry (in class Mock), all function
// mockers, and all expectations.
//
@@ -413,14 +421,12 @@ class GTEST_API_ Mock {
template <typename F>
friend class internal::FunctionMocker;
- template <typename M>
- friend class NiceMock;
-
- template <typename M>
- friend class NaggyMock;
-
- template <typename M>
- friend class StrictMock;
+ template <typename MockClass>
+ friend class internal::NiceMockImpl;
+ template <typename MockClass>
+ friend class internal::NaggyMockImpl;
+ template <typename MockClass>
+ friend class internal::StrictMockImpl;
// Tells Google Mock to allow uninteresting calls on the given mock
// object.
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
index 0a201ed..25558eb 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
@@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ class NotDefaultConstructible {
explicit NotDefaultConstructible(int) {}
};
+class CallsMockMethodInDestructor {
+ public:
+ ~CallsMockMethodInDestructor() { OnDestroy(); }
+ MOCK_METHOD(void, OnDestroy, ());
+};
+
// Defines some mock classes needed by the tests.
class Foo {
@@ -302,6 +308,13 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
nice.DoThis();
}
+TEST(NiceMockTest, IsNiceInDestructor) {
+ {
+ NiceMock<CallsMockMethodInDestructor> nice_on_destroy;
+ // Don't add an expectation for the call before the mock goes out of scope.
+ }
+}
+
TEST(NiceMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNaggy(&nice_foo));
@@ -405,6 +418,22 @@ TEST(NaggyMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
naggy.DoThis();
}
+TEST(NaggyMockTest, IsNaggyInDestructor) {
+ const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
+ GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning";
+ CaptureStdout();
+
+ {
+ NaggyMock<CallsMockMethodInDestructor> naggy_on_destroy;
+ // Don't add an expectation for the call before the mock goes out of scope.
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(),
+ HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call"));
+
+ GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag;
+}
+
TEST(NaggyMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo;
EXPECT_TRUE(Mock::IsNaggy(&naggy_foo));
@@ -489,6 +518,16 @@ TEST(StrictMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
strict.DoThis();
}
+TEST(StrictMockTest, IsStrictInDestructor) {
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+ {
+ StrictMock<CallsMockMethodInDestructor> strict_on_destroy;
+ // Don't add an expectation for the call before the mock goes out of
+ // scope.
+ },
+ "Uninteresting mock function call");
+}
+
TEST(StrictMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNaggy(&strict_foo));