diff options
author | Gennadiy Civil <misterg@google.com> | 2018-06-11 15:40:35 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Gennadiy Civil <misterg@google.com> | 2018-06-11 15:40:35 (GMT) |
commit | 8f87d00398228925b1542b81710a9015c8f68e7b (patch) | |
tree | a383d30b17b861537037174038fc3e15daa6e055 /googletest/docs/FAQ.md | |
parent | de47b0d30c1d2a2072eb1c2a2e852d6aaa028931 (diff) | |
download | googletest-8f87d00398228925b1542b81710a9015c8f68e7b.zip googletest-8f87d00398228925b1542b81710a9015c8f68e7b.tar.gz googletest-8f87d00398228925b1542b81710a9015c8f68e7b.tar.bz2 |
Rename AdvancedGuide.md to advanced.md and adjust the links.
Part of documentation rationalization work
Diffstat (limited to 'googletest/docs/FAQ.md')
-rw-r--r-- | googletest/docs/FAQ.md | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/googletest/docs/FAQ.md b/googletest/docs/FAQ.md index 362f81b..a886bdc 100644 --- a/googletest/docs/FAQ.md +++ b/googletest/docs/FAQ.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ If you cannot find the answer to your question here, and you have read -[Primer](primer.md) and [AdvancedGuide](AdvancedGuide.md), send it to +[Primer](primer.md) and [AdvancedGuide](advanced.md), send it to googletestframework@googlegroups.com. ## Why should I use Google Test instead of my favorite C++ testing framework? ## @@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ list can help you decide whether it is for you too. * `SCOPED_TRACE` helps you understand the context of an assertion failure when it comes from inside a sub-routine or loop. * You can decide which tests to run using name patterns. This saves time when you want to quickly reproduce a test failure. * Google Test can generate XML test result reports that can be parsed by popular continuous build system like Hudson. - * Simple things are easy in Google Test, while hard things are possible: in addition to advanced features like [global test environments](AdvancedGuide.md#global-set-up-and-tear-down) and tests parameterized by [values](AdvancedGuide.md#value-parameterized-tests) or [types](docs/AdvancedGuide.md#typed-tests), Google Test supports various ways for the user to extend the framework -- if Google Test doesn't do something out of the box, chances are that a user can implement the feature using Google Test's public API, without changing Google Test itself. In particular, you can: - * expand your testing vocabulary by defining [custom predicates](AdvancedGuide.md#predicate-assertions-for-better-error-messages), - * teach Google Test how to [print your types](AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values), - * define your own testing macros or utilities and verify them using Google Test's [Service Provider Interface](AdvancedGuide.md#catching-failures), and - * reflect on the test cases or change the test output format by intercepting the [test events](AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events). + * Simple things are easy in Google Test, while hard things are possible: in addition to advanced features like [global test environments](advanced.md#global-set-up-and-tear-down) and tests parameterized by [values](advanced.md#value-parameterized-tests) or [types](docs/advanced.md#typed-tests), Google Test supports various ways for the user to extend the framework -- if Google Test doesn't do something out of the box, chances are that a user can implement the feature using Google Test's public API, without changing Google Test itself. In particular, you can: + * expand your testing vocabulary by defining [custom predicates](advanced.md#predicate-assertions-for-better-error-messages), + * teach Google Test how to [print your types](advanced.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values), + * define your own testing macros or utilities and verify them using Google Test's [Service Provider Interface](advanced.md#catching-failures), and + * reflect on the test cases or change the test output format by intercepting the [test events](advanced.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events). ## I'm getting warnings when compiling Google Test. Would you fix them? ## @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ EXPECT_TRUE(internal::Func(12345)); ## I would like to run a test several times with different parameters. Do I need to write several similar copies of it? ## -No. You can use a feature called [value-parameterized tests](AdvancedGuide.md#Value_Parameterized_Tests) which +No. You can use a feature called [value-parameterized tests](advanced.md#Value_Parameterized_Tests) which lets you repeat your tests with different parameters, without defining it more than once. ## How do I test a file that defines main()? ## @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ expression syntax (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). On Windows, it uses a limited variant of regular expression syntax. For more details, see the -[regular expression syntax](AdvancedGuide.md#Regular_Expression_Syntax). +[regular expression syntax](advanced.md#Regular_Expression_Syntax). ## I have a fixture class Foo, but TEST\_F(Foo, Bar) gives me error "no matching function for call to Foo::Foo()". Why? ## |