diff options
author | Krystian Kuzniarek <krystian.kuzniarek@gmail.com> | 2019-07-26 12:46:27 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Krystian Kuzniarek <krystian.kuzniarek@gmail.com> | 2019-07-30 09:16:21 (GMT) |
commit | d384b8831ffce3c5c15c7154e40e60b9300357fb (patch) | |
tree | 95ef0c1189c18088848d722bcc47edd765be9e56 /googletest/docs/primer.md | |
parent | 2134e3fd857d952e03ce76064fad5ac6e9036104 (diff) | |
download | googletest-d384b8831ffce3c5c15c7154e40e60b9300357fb.zip googletest-d384b8831ffce3c5c15c7154e40e60b9300357fb.tar.gz googletest-d384b8831ffce3c5c15c7154e40e60b9300357fb.tar.bz2 |
fix numbering of ordered lists in Markdown
Diffstat (limited to 'googletest/docs/primer.md')
-rw-r--r-- | googletest/docs/primer.md | 32 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/googletest/docs/primer.md b/googletest/docs/primer.md index 388df3b..e441ceb 100644 --- a/googletest/docs/primer.md +++ b/googletest/docs/primer.md @@ -15,26 +15,26 @@ So what makes a good test, and how does googletest fit in? We believe: that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. googletest isolates the tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, googletest allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging. -1. Tests should be well *organized* and reflect the structure of the tested +2. Tests should be well *organized* and reflect the structure of the tested code. googletest groups related tests into test suites that can share data and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch projects and start to work on a new code base. -1. Tests should be *portable* and *reusable*. Google has a lot of code that is +3. Tests should be *portable* and *reusable*. Google has a lot of code that is platform-neutral, its tests should also be platform-neutral. googletest works on different OSes, with different compilers, with or without exceptions, so googletest tests can work with a variety of configurations. -1. When tests fail, they should provide as much *information* about the problem +4. When tests fail, they should provide as much *information* about the problem as possible. googletest doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile cycle. -1. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores +5. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores and let them focus on the test *content*. googletest automatically keeps track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them in order to run them. -1. Tests should be *fast*. With googletest, you can reuse shared resources +6. Tests should be *fast*. With googletest, you can reuse shared resources across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making tests depend on each other. @@ -245,9 +245,9 @@ To create a test: 1. Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function, These are ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. -1. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, +2. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, use the various googletest assertions to check values. -1. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the +3. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds. @@ -309,16 +309,16 @@ To create a fixture: 1. Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:` as we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. -1. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. -1. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare +2. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. +3. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as **`Setup()`** with a small `u` - Use `override` in C++11 to make sure you spelled it correctly -1. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any +4. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read the [FAQ](faq.md). -1. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. +5. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to access objects and subroutines in the test fixture: @@ -422,11 +422,11 @@ would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`. When these tests run, the following happens: 1. googletest constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1` ). -1. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . -1. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . -1. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. -1. `t1` is destructed. -1. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time +2. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . +3. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . +4. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. +5. `t1` is destructed. +6. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time running the `DequeueWorks` test. **Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. |