diff options
311 files changed, 19148 insertions, 36369 deletions
@@ -1,2 +1,43 @@ # Ignore CI build directory build/ +xcuserdata +cmake-build-debug/ +.idea/ +bazel-bin +bazel-genfiles +bazel-googletest +bazel-out +bazel-testlogs +# python +*.pyc + +# Visual Studio files +*.sdf +*.opensdf +*.VC.opendb +*.suo +*.user +_ReSharper.Caches/ +Win32-Debug/ +Win32-Release/ +x64-Debug/ +x64-Release/ + +# Ignore autoconf / automake files +Makefile.in +aclocal.m4 +configure +build-aux/ +autom4te.cache/ +googletest/m4/libtool.m4 +googletest/m4/ltoptions.m4 +googletest/m4/ltsugar.m4 +googletest/m4/ltversion.m4 +googletest/m4/lt~obsolete.m4 + +# Ignore generated directories. +googlemock/fused-src/ +googletest/fused-src/ + +# macOS files +.DS_Store diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index 3204dfa..0e17bc2 100644 --- a/.travis.yml +++ b/.travis.yml @@ -1,17 +1,69 @@ # Build matrix / environment variable are explained on: -# http://about.travis-ci.org/docs/user/build-configuration/ +# https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build/ # This file can be validated on: # http://lint.travis-ci.org/ +sudo: false +language: cpp + +# Define the matrix explicitly, manually expanding the combinations of (os, compiler, env). +# It is more tedious, but grants us far more flexibility. +matrix: + include: + - os: linux + compiler: gcc + sudo : true + install: ./ci/install-linux.sh && ./ci/log-config.sh + script: ./ci/build-linux-bazel.sh + - os: linux + compiler: clang + sudo : true + install: ./ci/install-linux.sh && ./ci/log-config.sh + script: ./ci/build-linux-bazel.sh + - os: linux + group: deprecated-2017Q4 + compiler: gcc + install: ./ci/install-linux.sh && ./ci/log-config.sh + script: ./ci/build-linux-autotools.sh + - os: linux + group: deprecated-2017Q4 + compiler: gcc + env: BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 + - os: linux + group: deprecated-2017Q4 + compiler: clang + env: BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1 + - os: linux + group: deprecated-2017Q4 + compiler: clang + env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 + - os: linux + compiler: clang + env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 NO_EXCEPTION=ON NO_RTTI=ON COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX=ON + - os: osx + compiler: gcc + env: BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1 + - os: osx + compiler: gcc + env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 + - os: osx + compiler: clang + env: BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1 + if: type != pull_request + - os: osx + env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 + if: type != pull_request + +# These are the install and build (script) phases for the most common entries in the matrix. They could be included +# in each entry in the matrix, but that is just repetitive. install: -# /usr/bin/gcc is 4.6 always, but gcc-X.Y is available. -- if [ "$CXX" = "g++" ]; then export CXX="g++-4.9" CC="gcc-4.9"; fi -# /usr/bin/clang is 3.4, lets override with modern one. -- if [ "$CXX" = "clang++" ] && [ "$TRAVIS_OS_NAME" = "linux" ]; then export CXX="clang++-3.7" CC="clang-3.7"; fi -- echo ${PATH} -- echo ${CXX} -- ${CXX} --version -- ${CXX} -v + - ./ci/install-${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}.sh + - . ./ci/env-${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}.sh + - ./ci/log-config.sh + +script: ./ci/travis.sh + +# For sudo=false builds this section installs the necessary dependencies. addons: apt: # List of whitelisted in travis packages for ubuntu-precise can be found here: @@ -22,25 +74,8 @@ addons: - ubuntu-toolchain-r-test - llvm-toolchain-precise-3.7 packages: - - gcc-4.9 - g++-4.9 - clang-3.7 - - valgrind -os: - - linux - - osx -language: cpp -compiler: - - gcc - - clang -script: ./travis.sh -env: - matrix: - - GTEST_TARGET=googletest SHARED_LIB=OFF STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=OFF BUILD_TYPE=debug VERBOSE_MAKE=true VERBOSE - - GTEST_TARGET=googlemock SHARED_LIB=OFF STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=OFF BUILD_TYPE=debug VERBOSE_MAKE=true VERBOSE - - GTEST_TARGET=googlemock SHARED_LIB=OFF STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=OFF BUILD_TYPE=debug CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 VERBOSE_MAKE=true VERBOSE -# - GTEST_TARGET=googletest SHARED_LIB=ON STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=ON BUILD_TYPE=release VERBOSE_MAKE=false -# - GTEST_TARGET=googlemock SHARED_LIB=ON STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=ON BUILD_TYPE=release VERBOSE_MAKE=false + notifications: email: false -sudo: false diff --git a/BUILD.bazel b/BUILD.bazel new file mode 100644 index 0000000..41a0985 --- /dev/null +++ b/BUILD.bazel @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +# +# Author: misterg@google.com (Gennadiy Civil) +# +# Bazel Build for Google C++ Testing Framework(Google Test) + +package(default_visibility = ["//visibility:public"]) + +licenses(["notice"]) + +config_setting( + name = "windows", + values = {"cpu": "x64_windows"}, +) + +config_setting( + name = "windows_msvc", + values = {"cpu": "x64_windows_msvc"}, +) + +config_setting( + name = "has_absl", + values = {"define": "absl=1"}, +) + +# Google Test including Google Mock +cc_library( + name = "gtest", + srcs = glob( + include = [ + "googletest/src/*.cc", + "googletest/src/*.h", + "googletest/include/gtest/**/*.h", + "googlemock/src/*.cc", + "googlemock/include/gmock/**/*.h", + ], + exclude = [ + "googletest/src/gtest-all.cc", + "googletest/src/gtest_main.cc", + "googlemock/src/gmock-all.cc", + "googlemock/src/gmock_main.cc", + ], + ), + hdrs = glob([ + "googletest/include/gtest/*.h", + "googlemock/include/gmock/*.h", + ]), + copts = select( + { + ":windows": [], + ":windows_msvc": [], + "//conditions:default": ["-pthread"], + }, + ), + defines = select( + { + ":has_absl": [ + "GTEST_HAS_ABSL=1", + ], + "//conditions:default": [], + }, + ), + includes = [ + "googlemock", + "googlemock/include", + "googletest", + "googletest/include", + ], + linkopts = select({ + ":windows": [], + ":windows_msvc": [], + "//conditions:default": [ + "-pthread", + ], + }), + deps = select( + { + ":has_absl": [ + "@com_google_absl//absl/debugging:failure_signal_handler", + "@com_google_absl//absl/debugging:stacktrace", + "@com_google_absl//absl/debugging:symbolize", + "@com_google_absl//absl/strings", + "@com_google_absl//absl/types:optional", + "@com_google_absl//absl/types:variant", + ], + "//conditions:default": [], + }, + ), +) + +cc_library( + name = "gtest_main", + srcs = [ + "googlemock/src/gmock_main.cc", + ], + deps = [":gtest"], +) + +# The following rules build samples of how to use gTest. +cc_library( + name = "gtest_sample_lib", + srcs = [ + "googletest/samples/sample1.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample2.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample4.cc", + ], + hdrs = [ + "googletest/samples/prime_tables.h", + "googletest/samples/sample1.h", + "googletest/samples/sample2.h", + "googletest/samples/sample3-inl.h", + "googletest/samples/sample4.h", + ], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gtest_samples", + size = "small", + #All Samples except: + #sample9 ( main ) + #sample10 (main and takes a command line option and needs to be separate) + srcs = [ + "googletest/samples/sample1_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample3_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample4_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample5_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample7_unittest.cc", + "googletest/samples/sample8_unittest.cc", + ], + deps = [ + "gtest_sample_lib", + ":gtest_main", + ], +) + +cc_test( + name = "sample9_unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest/samples/sample9_unittest.cc"], + deps = [":gtest"], +) + +cc_test( + name = "sample10_unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest/samples/sample10_unittest.cc"], + deps = [ + ":gtest", + ], +) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 8d2b552..f8a97fa 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/CMakeLists.txt @@ -1,14 +1,31 @@ -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.2) +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.4) + +if (POLICY CMP0048) + cmake_policy(SET CMP0048 NEW) +endif (POLICY CMP0048) project( googletest-distribution ) enable_testing() +include(CMakeDependentOption) +if (CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 2.8.5) + set(CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR "bin" CACHE STRING "User executables (bin)") + set(CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR "lib${LIB_SUFFIX}" CACHE STRING "Object code libraries (lib)") + set(CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR "include" CACHE STRING "C header files (include)") + mark_as_advanced(CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR) +else() + include(GNUInstallDirs) +endif() + option(BUILD_GTEST "Builds the googletest subproject" OFF) #Note that googlemock target already builds googletest option(BUILD_GMOCK "Builds the googlemock subproject" ON) +cmake_dependent_option(INSTALL_GTEST "Enable installation of googletest. (Projects embedding googletest may want to turn this OFF.)" ON "BUILD_GTEST OR BUILD_GMOCK" OFF) +cmake_dependent_option(INSTALL_GMOCK "Enable installation of googlemock. (Projects embedding googlemock may want to turn this OFF.)" ON "BUILD_GMOCK" OFF) + if(BUILD_GMOCK) add_subdirectory( googlemock ) elseif(BUILD_GTEST) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0ebdfcc --- /dev/null +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ +# How to become a contributor and submit your own code + +## Contributor License Agreements + +We'd love to accept your patches! Before we can take them, we +have to jump a couple of legal hurdles. + +Please fill out either the individual or corporate Contributor License Agreement +(CLA). + + * If you are an individual writing original source code and you're sure you + own the intellectual property, then you'll need to sign an + [individual CLA](https://developers.google.com/open-source/cla/individual). + * If you work for a company that wants to allow you to contribute your work, + then you'll need to sign a + [corporate CLA](https://developers.google.com/open-source/cla/corporate). + +Follow either of the two links above to access the appropriate CLA and +instructions for how to sign and return it. Once we receive it, we'll be able to +accept your pull requests. + +## Contributing A Patch + +1. Submit an issue describing your proposed change to the + [issue tracker](https://github.com/google/googletest). +1. Please don't mix more than one logical change per submittal, + because it makes the history hard to follow. If you want to make a + change that doesn't have a corresponding issue in the issue + tracker, please create one. +1. Also, coordinate with team members that are listed on the issue in + question. This ensures that work isn't being duplicated and + communicating your plan early also generally leads to better + patches. +1. If your proposed change is accepted, and you haven't already done so, sign a + Contributor License Agreement (see details above). +1. Fork the desired repo, develop and test your code changes. +1. Ensure that your code adheres to the existing style in the sample to which + you are contributing. +1. Ensure that your code has an appropriate set of unit tests which all pass. +1. Submit a pull request. + +If you are a Googler, it is preferable to first create an internal change and +have it reviewed and submitted, and then create an upstreaming pull +request here. + +## The Google Test and Google Mock Communities ## + +The Google Test community exists primarily through the +[discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework) +and the GitHub repository. +Likewise, the Google Mock community exists primarily through their own +[discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock). +You are definitely encouraged to contribute to the +discussion and you can also help us to keep the effectiveness of the +group high by following and promoting the guidelines listed here. + +### Please Be Friendly ### + +Showing courtesy and respect to others is a vital part of the Google +culture, and we strongly encourage everyone participating in Google +Test development to join us in accepting nothing less. Of course, +being courteous is not the same as failing to constructively disagree +with each other, but it does mean that we should be respectful of each +other when enumerating the 42 technical reasons that a particular +proposal may not be the best choice. There's never a reason to be +antagonistic or dismissive toward anyone who is sincerely trying to +contribute to a discussion. + +Sure, C++ testing is serious business and all that, but it's also +a lot of fun. Let's keep it that way. Let's strive to be one of the +friendliest communities in all of open source. + +As always, discuss Google Test in the official GoogleTest discussion group. +You don't have to actually submit code in order to sign up. Your participation +itself is a valuable contribution. + +## Style + +To keep the source consistent, readable, diffable and easy to merge, +we use a fairly rigid coding style, as defined by the [google-styleguide](https://github.com/google/styleguide) project. All patches will be expected +to conform to the style outlined [here](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html). + +## Requirements for Contributors ### + +If you plan to contribute a patch, you need to build Google Test, +Google Mock, and their own tests from a git checkout, which has +further requirements: + + * [Python](https://www.python.org/) v2.3 or newer (for running some of + the tests and re-generating certain source files from templates) + * [CMake](https://cmake.org/) v2.6.4 or newer + * [GNU Build System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Build_System) + including automake (>= 1.9), autoconf (>= 2.59), and + libtool / libtoolize. + +## Developing Google Test ## + +This section discusses how to make your own changes to Google Test. + +### Testing Google Test Itself ### + +To make sure your changes work as intended and don't break existing +functionality, you'll want to compile and run Google Test's own tests. +For that you can use CMake: + + mkdir mybuild + cd mybuild + cmake -Dgtest_build_tests=ON ${GTEST_DIR} + +Make sure you have Python installed, as some of Google Test's tests +are written in Python. If the cmake command complains about not being +able to find Python (`Could NOT find PythonInterp (missing: +PYTHON_EXECUTABLE)`), try telling it explicitly where your Python +executable can be found: + + cmake -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=path/to/python -Dgtest_build_tests=ON ${GTEST_DIR} + +Next, you can build Google Test and all of its own tests. On \*nix, +this is usually done by 'make'. To run the tests, do + + make test + +All tests should pass. + +### Regenerating Source Files ## + +Some of Google Test's source files are generated from templates (not +in the C++ sense) using a script. +For example, the +file include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h.pump is used to generate +gtest-type-util.h in the same directory. + +You don't need to worry about regenerating the source files +unless you need to modify them. You would then modify the +corresponding `.pump` files and run the '[pump.py](googletest/scripts/pump.py)' +generator script. See the [Pump Manual](googletest/docs/PumpManual.md). + +## Developing Google Mock ### + +This section discusses how to make your own changes to Google Mock. + +#### Testing Google Mock Itself #### + +To make sure your changes work as intended and don't break existing +functionality, you'll want to compile and run Google Test's own tests. +For that you'll need Autotools. First, make sure you have followed +the instructions above to configure Google Mock. +Then, create a build output directory and enter it. Next, + + ${GMOCK_DIR}/configure # try --help for more info + +Once you have successfully configured Google Mock, the build steps are +standard for GNU-style OSS packages. + + make # Standard makefile following GNU conventions + make check # Builds and runs all tests - all should pass. + +Note that when building your project against Google Mock, you are building +against Google Test as well. There is no need to configure Google Test +separately. @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +Copyright 2008, Google Inc. +All rights reserved. + +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +met: + + * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. + * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +distribution. + * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +this software without specific prior written permission. + +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +"AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am new file mode 100644 index 0000000..433eefe --- /dev/null +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +## Process this file with automake to produce Makefile.in +ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I m4 + +AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign + +# Build . before src so that our all-local and clean-local hooks kicks in at +# the right time. +SUBDIRS = googletest googlemock + +EXTRA_DIST = \ + BUILD.bazel \ + CMakeLists.txt \ + README.md \ + WORKSPACE @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ # Google Test # [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/google/googletest.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/google/googletest) -[![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/4o38plt0xbo1ubc8/branch/master?svg=true)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BillyDonahue/googletest/branch/master) +[![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/4o38plt0xbo1ubc8/branch/master?svg=true)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/GoogleTestAppVeyor/googletest/branch/master) Welcome to **Google Test**, Google's C++ test framework! @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ maintain and release them together. Please see the project page above for more information as well as the mailing list for questions, discussions, and development. There is -also an IRC channel on OFTC (irc.oftc.net) #gtest available. Please +also an IRC channel on [OFTC](https://webchat.oftc.net/) (irc.oftc.net) #gtest available. Please join us! -Getting started information for **Google Test** is available in the -[Google Test Primer](googletest/docs/Primer.md) documentation. +Getting started information for **Google Test** is available in the +[Google Test Primer](googletest/docs/primer.md) documentation. **Google Mock** is an extension to Google Test for writing and using C++ mock classes. See the separate [Google Mock documentation](googlemock/README.md). @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ in its interior [googletest/README.md](googletest/README.md) file. ## Features ## - * An [XUnit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XUnit) test framework. + * An [xUnit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XUnit) test framework. * Test discovery. * A rich set of assertions. * User-defined assertions. @@ -60,9 +60,12 @@ the following notable projects: * [Protocol Buffers](https://github.com/google/protobuf), Google's data interchange format. * The [OpenCV](http://opencv.org/) computer vision library. + * [tiny-dnn](https://github.com/tiny-dnn/tiny-dnn): header only, dependency-free deep learning framework in C++11. ## Related Open Source Projects ## +[GTest Runner](https://github.com/nholthaus/gtest-runner) is a Qt5 based automated test-runner and Graphical User Interface with powerful features for Windows and Linux platforms. + [Google Test UI](https://github.com/ospector/gtest-gbar) is test runner that runs your test binary, allows you to track its progress via a progress bar, and displays a list of test failures. Clicking on one shows failure text. Google @@ -73,6 +76,9 @@ listener for Google Test that implements the [TAP protocol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Anything_Protocol) for test result output. If your test runner understands TAP, you may find it useful. +[gtest-parallel](https://github.com/google/gtest-parallel) is a test runner that +runs tests from your binary in parallel to provide significant speed-up. + ## Requirements ## Google Test is designed to have fairly minimal requirements to build @@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ effort to support other platforms (e.g. Solaris, AIX, and z/OS). However, since core members of the Google Test project have no access to these platforms, Google Test may have outstanding issues there. If you notice any problems on your platform, please notify -<googletestframework@googlegroups.com>. Patches for fixing them are +[googletestframework@googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/googletestframework). Patches for fixing them are even more welcome! ### Linux Requirements ### @@ -97,7 +103,7 @@ package (as described below): ### Windows Requirements ### - * Microsoft Visual C++ v7.1 or newer + * Microsoft Visual C++ 2015 or newer ### Cygwin Requirements ### @@ -108,35 +114,9 @@ package (as described below): * Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger or newer * Xcode Developer Tools -### Requirements for Contributors ### - -We welcome patches. If you plan to contribute a patch, you need to -build Google Test and its own tests from a git checkout (described -below), which has further requirements: - - * [Python](https://www.python.org/) v2.3 or newer (for running some of - the tests and re-generating certain source files from templates) - * [CMake](https://cmake.org/) v2.6.4 or newer - -## Regenerating Source Files ## - -Some of Google Test's source files are generated from templates (not -in the C++ sense) using a script. -For example, the -file include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h.pump is used to generate -gtest-type-util.h in the same directory. - -You don't need to worry about regenerating the source files -unless you need to modify them. You would then modify the -corresponding `.pump` files and run the '[pump.py](googletest/scripts/pump.py)' -generator script. See the [Pump Manual](googletest/docs/PumpManual.md). - -### Contributing Code ### +## Contributing change -We welcome patches. Please read the -[Developer's Guide](googletest/docs/DevGuide.md) -for how you can contribute. In particular, make sure you have signed -the Contributor License Agreement, or we won't be able to accept the -patch. +Please read the [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](CONTRIBUTING.md) for details on +how to contribute to this project. Happy testing! diff --git a/WORKSPACE b/WORKSPACE new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1d5d388 --- /dev/null +++ b/WORKSPACE @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +workspace(name = "com_google_googletest") + +# Abseil +http_archive( + name = "com_google_absl", + urls = ["https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/archive/master.zip"], + strip_prefix = "abseil-cpp-master", +) diff --git a/appveyor.yml b/appveyor.yml index d613fd6..b1da655 100644 --- a/appveyor.yml +++ b/appveyor.yml @@ -4,68 +4,101 @@ os: Visual Studio 2015 environment: matrix: - - Toolset: v140 - - Toolset: v120 - - Toolset: v110 - - Toolset: v100 + - compiler: msvc-15-seh + generator: "Visual Studio 15 2017" + APPVEYOR_BUILD_WORKER_IMAGE: Visual Studio 2017 -platform: - - Win32 - - x64 + - compiler: msvc-15-seh + generator: "Visual Studio 15 2017 Win64" + APPVEYOR_BUILD_WORKER_IMAGE: Visual Studio 2017 + enabled_on_pr: yes + + - compiler: msvc-14-seh + generator: "Visual Studio 14 2015" + enabled_on_pr: yes + + - compiler: msvc-14-seh + generator: "Visual Studio 14 2015 Win64" + + - compiler: gcc-5.3.0-posix + generator: "MinGW Makefiles" + cxx_path: 'C:\mingw-w64\i686-5.3.0-posix-dwarf-rt_v4-rev0\mingw32\bin' + + - compiler: gcc-6.3.0-posix + generator: "MinGW Makefiles" + cxx_path: 'C:\mingw-w64\i686-6.3.0-posix-dwarf-rt_v5-rev1\mingw32\bin' configuration: -# - Release - Debug build: verbosity: minimal -artifacts: - - path: '_build/Testing/Temporary/*' - name: test_results - -before_build: +install: - ps: | - Write-Output "Configuration: $env:CONFIGURATION" - Write-Output "Platform: $env:PLATFORM" - $generator = switch ($env:TOOLSET) - { - "v140" {"Visual Studio 14 2015"} - "v120" {"Visual Studio 12 2013"} - "v110" {"Visual Studio 11 2012"} - "v100" {"Visual Studio 10 2010"} + Write-Output "Compiler: $env:compiler" + Write-Output "Generator: $env:generator" + if (-not (Test-Path env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER)) { + Write-Output "This is *NOT* a pull request build" + } else { + Write-Output "This is a pull request build" + if (-not (Test-Path env:enabled_on_pr) -or $env:enabled_on_pr -ne "yes") { + Write-Output "PR builds are *NOT* explicitly enabled" + } } - if ($env:PLATFORM -eq "x64") - { - $generator = "$generator Win64" + + # git bash conflicts with MinGW makefiles + if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") { + $env:path = $env:path.replace("C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin;", "") + if ($env:cxx_path -ne "") { + $env:path += ";$env:cxx_path" + } } build_script: - ps: | - if (($env:TOOLSET -eq "v100") -and ($env:PLATFORM -eq "x64")) - { - return + # Only enable some builds for pull requests, the AppVeyor queue is too long. + if ((Test-Path env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER) -And (-not (Test-Path env:enabled_on_pr) -or $env:enabled_on_pr -ne "yes")) { + return } md _build -Force | Out-Null cd _build - & cmake -G "$generator" -DCMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES="Debug;Release" -Dgtest_build_tests=ON -Dgtest_build_samples=ON -Dgmock_build_tests=ON .. + $conf = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=$env:configuration"} else {"-DCMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES=Debug;Release"} + # Disable test for MinGW (gtest tests fail, gmock tests can not build) + $gtest_build_tests = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-Dgtest_build_tests=OFF"} else {"-Dgtest_build_tests=ON"} + $gmock_build_tests = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-Dgmock_build_tests=OFF"} else {"-Dgmock_build_tests=ON"} + & cmake -G "$env:generator" $conf -Dgtest_build_samples=ON $gtest_build_tests $gmock_build_tests .. if ($LastExitCode -ne 0) { throw "Exec: $ErrorMessage" } - & cmake --build . --config $env:CONFIGURATION + $cmake_parallel = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-j2"} else {"/m"} + & cmake --build . --config $env:configuration -- $cmake_parallel if ($LastExitCode -ne 0) { throw "Exec: $ErrorMessage" } + +skip_commits: + files: + - '**/*.md' + test_script: - ps: | - if (($env:Toolset -eq "v100") -and ($env:PLATFORM -eq "x64")) - { - return + # Only enable some builds for pull requests, the AppVeyor queue is too long. + if ((Test-Path env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER) -And (-not (Test-Path env:enabled_on_pr) -or $env:enabled_on_pr -ne "yes")) { + return } - - & ctest -C $env:CONFIGURATION --output-on-failure + if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") { + return # No test available for MinGW + } + & ctest -C $env:configuration --timeout 600 --output-on-failure if ($LastExitCode -ne 0) { throw "Exec: $ErrorMessage" } + +artifacts: + - path: '_build/CMakeFiles/*.log' + name: logs + - path: '_build/Testing/**/*.xml' + name: test_results diff --git a/ci/build-linux-autotools.sh b/ci/build-linux-autotools.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..cc404e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/build-linux-autotools.sh @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +set -e + +. ci/get-nprocessors.sh + +# Create the configuration script +autoreconf -i + +# Run in a subdirectory to keep the sources clean +mkdir build || true +cd build +../configure + +make -j ${NPROCESSORS:-2} diff --git a/ci/build-linux-bazel.sh b/ci/build-linux-bazel.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..3f1c784 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/build-linux-bazel.sh @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +set -e + +bazel build --curses=no //...:all +bazel test --curses=no //...:all +bazel test --curses=no //...:all --define absl=1 diff --git a/ci/env-linux.sh b/ci/env-linux.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..9086b1f --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/env-linux.sh @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +# +# This file should be sourced, and not executed as a standalone script. +# + +# TODO() - we can check if this is being sourced using $BASH_VERSION and $BASH_SOURCE[0] != ${0}. + +if [ "${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}" = "linux" ]; then + if [ "$CXX" = "g++" ]; then export CXX="g++-4.9" CC="gcc-4.9"; fi + if [ "$CXX" = "clang++" ]; then export CXX="clang++-3.7" CC="clang-3.7"; fi +fi diff --git a/ci/env-osx.sh b/ci/env-osx.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..31c8835 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/env-osx.sh @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +# +# This file should be sourced, and not executed as a standalone script. +# + +# TODO() - we can check if this is being sourced using $BASH_VERSION and $BASH_SOURCE[0] != ${0}. + +if [ "${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}" = "linux" ]; then + if [ "$CXX" = "clang++" ]; then export CXX="clang++-3.7" CC="clang-3.7"; fi +fi diff --git a/ci/get-nprocessors.sh b/ci/get-nprocessors.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..43635e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/get-nprocessors.sh @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +# This file is typically sourced by another script. +# if possible, ask for the precise number of processors, +# otherwise take 2 processors as reasonable default; see +# https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/speeding-up-the-build/#Makefile-optimization +if [ -x /usr/bin/getconf ]; then + NPROCESSORS=$(/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) +else + NPROCESSORS=2 +fi + +# as of 2017-09-04 Travis CI reports 32 processors, but GCC build +# crashes if parallelized too much (maybe memory consumption problem), +# so limit to 4 processors for the time being. +if [ $NPROCESSORS -gt 4 ] ; then + echo "$0:Note: Limiting processors to use by make from $NPROCESSORS to 4." + NPROCESSORS=4 +fi diff --git a/ci/install-linux.sh b/ci/install-linux.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..02a1943 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/install-linux.sh @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +set -eu + +if [ "${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}" != linux ]; then + echo "Not a Linux build; skipping installation" + exit 0 +fi + + +if [ "${TRAVIS_SUDO}" = "true" ]; then + echo "deb [arch=amd64] http://storage.googleapis.com/bazel-apt stable jdk1.8" | \ + sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bazel.list + curl https://bazel.build/bazel-release.pub.gpg | sudo apt-key add - + sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y bazel gcc-4.9 g++-4.9 clang-3.7 +elif [ "${CXX}" = "clang++" ]; then + # Use ccache, assuming $HOME/bin is in the path, which is true in the Travis build environment. + ln -sf /usr/bin/ccache $HOME/bin/${CXX}; + ln -sf /usr/bin/ccache $HOME/bin/${CC}; +fi diff --git a/ci/install-osx.sh b/ci/install-osx.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..6550ff5 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/install-osx.sh @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +set -eu + +if [ "${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}" != "osx" ]; then + echo "Not a macOS build; skipping installation" + exit 0 +fi + +brew install ccache diff --git a/ci/log-config.sh b/ci/log-config.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..5fef119 --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/log-config.sh @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +set -e + +# ccache on OS X needs installation first +# reset ccache statistics +ccache --zero-stats + +echo PATH=${PATH} + +echo "Compiler configuration:" +echo CXX=${CXX} +echo CC=${CC} +echo CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS} + +echo "C++ compiler version:" +${CXX} --version || echo "${CXX} does not seem to support the --version flag" +${CXX} -v || echo "${CXX} does not seem to support the -v flag" + +echo "C compiler version:" +${CC} --version || echo "${CXX} does not seem to support the --version flag" +${CC} -v || echo "${CXX} does not seem to support the -v flag" diff --git a/ci/travis.sh b/ci/travis.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..9ff3bad --- /dev/null +++ b/ci/travis.sh @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env sh +set -evx + +. ci/get-nprocessors.sh + +# if possible, ask for the precise number of processors, +# otherwise take 2 processors as reasonable default; see +# https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/speeding-up-the-build/#Makefile-optimization +if [ -x /usr/bin/getconf ]; then + NPROCESSORS=$(/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) +else + NPROCESSORS=2 +fi +# as of 2017-09-04 Travis CI reports 32 processors, but GCC build +# crashes if parallelized too much (maybe memory consumption problem), +# so limit to 4 processors for the time being. +if [ $NPROCESSORS -gt 4 ] ; then + echo "$0:Note: Limiting processors to use by make from $NPROCESSORS to 4." + NPROCESSORS=4 +fi +# Tell make to use the processors. No preceding '-' required. +MAKEFLAGS="j${NPROCESSORS}" +export MAKEFLAGS + +env | sort + +# Set default values to OFF for these variables if not specified. +: "${NO_EXCEPTION:=OFF}" +: "${NO_RTTI:=OFF}" +: "${COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX:=OFF}" + +mkdir build || true +cd build +cmake -Dgtest_build_samples=ON \ + -Dgtest_build_tests=ON \ + -Dgmock_build_tests=ON \ + -Dcxx_no_exception=$NO_EXCEPTION \ + -Dcxx_no_rtti=$NO_RTTI \ + -DCMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX=$COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX \ + -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=$CXX_FLAGS \ + -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=$BUILD_TYPE \ + .. +make +CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE=1 make test diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac new file mode 100644 index 0000000..751b9ba --- /dev/null +++ b/configure.ac @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +AC_INIT([Google C++ Mocking and Testing Frameworks], + [1.8.0], + [googlemock@googlegroups.com], + [googletest]) + +# Provide various options to initialize the Autoconf and configure processes. +AC_PREREQ([2.59]) +AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([./README.md]) +AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux]) +AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile]) +AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([googletest googlemock]) + +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE + +# Output the generated files. No further autoconf macros may be used. +AC_OUTPUT diff --git a/googlemock/CHANGES b/googlemock/CHANGES index d6f2f76..4328ece 100644 --- a/googlemock/CHANGES +++ b/googlemock/CHANGES @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Google Test): * New feature: --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks for detecting leaked mocks. * New feature: ACTION_TEMPLATE for defining templatized actions. * New feature: the .After() clause for specifying expectation order. - * New feature: the .With() clause for for specifying inter-argument + * New feature: the .With() clause for specifying inter-argument constraints. * New feature: actions ReturnArg<k>(), ReturnNew<T>(...), and DeleteArg<k>(). diff --git a/googlemock/CMakeLists.txt b/googlemock/CMakeLists.txt index beb259a..bac2e3b 100644 --- a/googlemock/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/googlemock/CMakeLists.txt @@ -37,8 +37,13 @@ endif() # as ${gmock_SOURCE_DIR} and to the root binary directory as # ${gmock_BINARY_DIR}. # Language "C" is required for find_package(Threads). -project(gmock CXX C) -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.2) +if (CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 3.0) + project(gmock CXX C) +else() + cmake_policy(SET CMP0048 NEW) + project(gmock VERSION 1.9.0 LANGUAGES CXX C) +endif() +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.4) if (COMMAND set_up_hermetic_build) set_up_hermetic_build() @@ -69,6 +74,8 @@ include_directories("${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include" # <= VS 2010 <= 10 <= 1600 Use Google Tests's own tuple. # VS 2012 11 1700 std::tr1::tuple + _VARIADIC_MAX=10 # VS 2013 12 1800 std::tr1::tuple +# VS 2015 14 1900 std::tuple +# VS 2017 15 >= 1910 std::tuple if (MSVC AND MSVC_VERSION EQUAL 1700) add_definitions(/D _VARIADIC_MAX=10) endif() @@ -81,32 +88,55 @@ endif() # Google Mock libraries. We build them using more strict warnings than what # are used for other targets, to ensure that Google Mock can be compiled by # a user aggressive about warnings. -cxx_library(gmock - "${cxx_strict}" - "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" - src/gmock-all.cc) - -cxx_library(gmock_main - "${cxx_strict}" - "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" - src/gmock-all.cc - src/gmock_main.cc) +if (MSVC) + cxx_library(gmock + "${cxx_strict}" + "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" + src/gmock-all.cc) + + cxx_library(gmock_main + "${cxx_strict}" + "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" + src/gmock-all.cc + src/gmock_main.cc) +else() + cxx_library(gmock "${cxx_strict}" src/gmock-all.cc) + target_link_libraries(gmock gtest) + cxx_library(gmock_main "${cxx_strict}" src/gmock_main.cc) + target_link_libraries(gmock_main gmock) +endif() # If the CMake version supports it, attach header directory information # to the targets for when we are part of a parent build (ie being pulled # in via add_subdirectory() rather than being a standalone build). if (DEFINED CMAKE_VERSION AND NOT "${CMAKE_VERSION}" VERSION_LESS "2.8.11") - target_include_directories(gmock INTERFACE "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include") - target_include_directories(gmock_main INTERFACE "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + target_include_directories(gmock SYSTEM INTERFACE "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + target_include_directories(gmock_main SYSTEM INTERFACE "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include") endif() ######################################################################## # # Install rules -install(TARGETS gmock gmock_main - DESTINATION lib) -install(DIRECTORY ${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include/gmock - DESTINATION include) +if(INSTALL_GMOCK) + install(TARGETS gmock gmock_main + RUNTIME DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR}" + LIBRARY DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}" + ARCHIVE DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}") + install(DIRECTORY "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include/gmock" + DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR}") + + # configure and install pkgconfig files + configure_file( + cmake/gmock.pc.in + "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gmock.pc" + @ONLY) + configure_file( + cmake/gmock_main.pc.in + "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gmock_main.pc" + @ONLY) + install(FILES "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gmock.pc" "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gmock_main.pc" + DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}/pkgconfig") +endif() ######################################################################## # @@ -143,7 +173,7 @@ if (gmock_build_tests) cxx_test(gmock_link_test gmock_main test/gmock_link2_test.cc) cxx_test(gmock_test gmock_main) - if (CMAKE_USE_PTHREADS_INIT) + if (DEFINED GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD) cxx_test(gmock_stress_test gmock) endif() @@ -154,23 +184,33 @@ if (gmock_build_tests) ############################################################ # C++ tests built with non-standard compiler flags. - cxx_library(gmock_main_no_exception "${cxx_no_exception}" - "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" src/gmock-all.cc src/gmock_main.cc) - - cxx_library(gmock_main_no_rtti "${cxx_no_rtti}" - "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" src/gmock-all.cc src/gmock_main.cc) + if (MSVC) + cxx_library(gmock_main_no_exception "${cxx_no_exception}" + "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" src/gmock-all.cc src/gmock_main.cc) - if (NOT MSVC OR MSVC_VERSION LESS 1600) # 1600 is Visual Studio 2010. - # Visual Studio 2010, 2012, and 2013 define symbols in std::tr1 that - # conflict with our own definitions. Therefore using our own tuple does not - # work on those compilers. - cxx_library(gmock_main_use_own_tuple "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" + cxx_library(gmock_main_no_rtti "${cxx_no_rtti}" "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" src/gmock-all.cc src/gmock_main.cc) - cxx_test_with_flags(gmock_use_own_tuple_test "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" - gmock_main_use_own_tuple test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc) + if (MSVC_VERSION LESS 1600) # 1600 is Visual Studio 2010. + # Visual Studio 2010, 2012, and 2013 define symbols in std::tr1 that + # conflict with our own definitions. Therefore using our own tuple does not + # work on those compilers. + cxx_library(gmock_main_use_own_tuple "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" + "${gtest_dir}/src/gtest-all.cc" src/gmock-all.cc src/gmock_main.cc) + + cxx_test_with_flags(gmock_use_own_tuple_test "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" + gmock_main_use_own_tuple test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc) + endif() + else() + cxx_library(gmock_main_no_exception "${cxx_no_exception}" src/gmock_main.cc) + target_link_libraries(gmock_main_no_exception gmock) + + cxx_library(gmock_main_no_rtti "${cxx_no_rtti}" src/gmock_main.cc) + target_link_libraries(gmock_main_no_rtti gmock) + + cxx_library(gmock_main_use_own_tuple "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" src/gmock_main.cc) + target_link_libraries(gmock_main_use_own_tuple gmock) endif() - cxx_test_with_flags(gmock-more-actions_no_exception_test "${cxx_no_exception}" gmock_main_no_exception test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc) diff --git a/googlemock/README.md b/googlemock/README.md index 332beab..ad374de 100644 --- a/googlemock/README.md +++ b/googlemock/README.md @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ We hope you find it useful! * Does automatic verification of expectations (no record-and-replay needed). * Allows arbitrary (partial) ordering constraints on function calls to be expressed,. - * Lets a user extend it by defining new matchers and actions. + * Lets an user extend it by defining new matchers and actions. * Does not use exceptions. * Is easy to learn and use. @@ -53,18 +53,18 @@ the Apache License, which is different from Google Mock's license. If you are new to the project, we suggest that you read the user documentation in the following order: - * Learn the [basics](../googletest/docs/Primer.md) of + * Learn the [basics](../../master/googletest/docs/primer.md) of Google Test, if you choose to use Google Mock with it (recommended). - * Read [Google Mock for Dummies](docs/ForDummies.md). + * Read [Google Mock for Dummies](../../master/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md). * Read the instructions below on how to build Google Mock. You can also watch Zhanyong's [talk](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYpCyLI47rM) on Google Mock's usage and implementation. Once you understand the basics, check out the rest of the docs: - * [CheatSheet](docs/CheatSheet.md) - all the commonly used stuff + * [CheatSheet](../../master/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md) - all the commonly used stuff at a glance. - * [CookBook](docs/CookBook.md) - recipes for getting things done, + * [CookBook](../../master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md) - recipes for getting things done, including advanced techniques. If you need help, please check the @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ posting a question on the Google Mock is not a testing framework itself. Instead, it needs a testing framework for writing tests. Google Mock works seamlessly -with [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/), but -you can also use it with [any C++ testing framework](googlemock/ForDummies.md#Using_Google_Mock_with_Any_Testing_Framework). +with [Google Test](https://github.com/google/googletest), but +you can also use it with [any C++ testing framework](../../master/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md#using-google-mock-with-any-testing-framework). ### Requirements for End Users ### @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ You must use the bundled version of Google Test when using Google Mock. You can also easily configure Google Mock to work with another testing framework, although it will still need Google Test. Please read ["Using_Google_Mock_with_Any_Testing_Framework"]( - docs/ForDummies.md#Using_Google_Mock_with_Any_Testing_Framework) + ../../master/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md#using-google-mock-with-any-testing-framework) for instructions. Google Mock depends on advanced C++ features and thus requires a more @@ -125,6 +125,47 @@ build Google Mock and its tests, which has further requirements: ### Building Google Mock ### +#### Using CMake #### + +If you have CMake available, it is recommended that you follow the +[build instructions][gtest_cmakebuild] +as described for Google Test. + +If are using Google Mock with an +existing CMake project, the section +[Incorporating Into An Existing CMake Project][gtest_incorpcmake] +may be of particular interest. +To make it work for Google Mock you will need to change + + target_link_libraries(example gtest_main) + +to + + target_link_libraries(example gmock_main) + +This works because `gmock_main` library is compiled with Google Test. +However, it does not automatically add Google Test includes. +Therefore you will also have to change + + if (CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 2.8.11) + include_directories("${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + endif() + +to + + if (CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 2.8.11) + include_directories(BEFORE SYSTEM + "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include" "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + else() + target_include_directories(gmock_main SYSTEM BEFORE INTERFACE + "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include" "${gmock_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + endif() + +This will addtionally mark Google Mock includes as system, which will +silence compiler warnings when compiling your tests using clang with +`-Wpedantic -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion`. + + #### Preparing to Build (Unix only) #### If you are using a Unix system and plan to use the GNU Autotools build @@ -292,42 +333,12 @@ may need to tweak your compiler and/or linker flags. Please see the If you have custom matchers defined using `MatcherInterface` or `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`, you'll need to update their definitions to use the new matcher API ( -[monomorphic](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Writing_New_Monomorphic_Matchers), -[polymorphic](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Matchers)). +[monomorphic](./docs/CookBook.md#writing-new-monomorphic-matchers), +[polymorphic](./docs/CookBook.md#writing-new-polymorphic-matchers)). Matchers defined using `MATCHER()` or `MATCHER_P*()` aren't affected. -### Developing Google Mock ### - -This section discusses how to make your own changes to Google Mock. - -#### Testing Google Mock Itself #### - -To make sure your changes work as intended and don't break existing -functionality, you'll want to compile and run Google Test's own tests. -For that you'll need Autotools. First, make sure you have followed -the instructions above to configure Google Mock. -Then, create a build output directory and enter it. Next, - - ${GMOCK_DIR}/configure # try --help for more info - -Once you have successfully configured Google Mock, the build steps are -standard for GNU-style OSS packages. - - make # Standard makefile following GNU conventions - make check # Builds and runs all tests - all should pass. - -Note that when building your project against Google Mock, you are building -against Google Test as well. There is no need to configure Google Test -separately. - -#### Contributing a Patch #### - -We welcome patches. -Please read the [Developer's Guide](docs/DevGuide.md) -for how you can contribute. In particular, make sure you have signed -the Contributor License Agreement, or we won't be able to accept the -patch. - Happy testing! [gtest_readme]: ../googletest/README.md "googletest" +[gtest_cmakebuild]: ../googletest/README.md#using-cmake "Using CMake" +[gtest_incorpcmake]: ../googletest/README.md#incorporating-into-an-existing-cmake-project "Incorporating Into An Existing CMake Project" diff --git a/googlemock/cmake/gmock.pc.in b/googlemock/cmake/gmock.pc.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c441642 --- /dev/null +++ b/googlemock/cmake/gmock.pc.in @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +libdir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR@ +includedir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_INCLUDEDIR@ + +Name: gmock +Description: GoogleMock (without main() function) +Version: @PROJECT_VERSION@ +URL: https://github.com/google/googletest +Libs: -L${libdir} -lgmock @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ +Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@ @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ diff --git a/googlemock/cmake/gmock_main.pc.in b/googlemock/cmake/gmock_main.pc.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c377dba --- /dev/null +++ b/googlemock/cmake/gmock_main.pc.in @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +libdir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR@ +includedir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_INCLUDEDIR@ + +Name: gmock_main +Description: GoogleMock (with main() function) +Version: @PROJECT_VERSION@ +URL: https://github.com/google/googletest +Libs: -L${libdir} -lgmock_main @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ +Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@ @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ diff --git a/googlemock/configure.ac b/googlemock/configure.ac index 3b740f2..cb5e1a6 100644 --- a/googlemock/configure.ac +++ b/googlemock/configure.ac @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ m4_include(../googletest/m4/acx_pthread.m4) AC_INIT([Google C++ Mocking Framework], - [1.7.0], + [1.8.0], [googlemock@googlegroups.com], [gmock]) @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ AC_ARG_VAR([GTEST_VERSION], [The version of Google Test available.]) HAVE_BUILT_GTEST="no" -GTEST_MIN_VERSION="1.7.0" +GTEST_MIN_VERSION="1.8.0" AS_IF([test "x${enable_external_gtest}" = "xyes"], [# Begin filling in variables as we are able. @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ AS_IF([test "x${HAVE_BUILT_GTEST}" = "xyes"], GTEST_LDFLAGS=`${GTEST_CONFIG} --ldflags` GTEST_LIBS=`${GTEST_CONFIG} --libs` GTEST_VERSION=`${GTEST_CONFIG} --version`], - [AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([../googletest]) - # GTEST_CONFIG needs to be executable both in a Makefile environmont and + [ + # GTEST_CONFIG needs to be executable both in a Makefile environment and # in a shell script environment, so resolve an absolute path for it here. GTEST_CONFIG="`pwd -P`/../googletest/scripts/gtest-config" GTEST_CPPFLAGS='-I$(top_srcdir)/../googletest/include' diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md index ef4451b..d54dd16 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ can specify it by appending `_WITH_CALLTYPE` to any of the macros described in the previous two sections and supplying the calling convention as the first argument to the macro. For example, ``` - MOCK_METHOD_1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n)); + MOCK_METHOD1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n)); MOCK_CONST_METHOD2_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Bar, int(double x, double y)); ``` where `STDMETHODCALLTYPE` is defined by `<objbase.h>` on Windows. @@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ divided into several categories: |`Ne(value)` |`argument != value`| |`IsNull()` |`argument` is a `NULL` pointer (raw or smart).| |`NotNull()` |`argument` is a non-null pointer (raw or smart).| +|`VariantWith<T>(m)` |`argument` is `variant<>` that holds the alternative of +type T with a value matching `m`.| |`Ref(variable)` |`argument` is a reference to `variable`.| |`TypedEq<type>(value)`|`argument` has type `type` and is equal to `value`. You may need to use this instead of `Eq(value)` when the mock function is overloaded.| @@ -227,7 +229,7 @@ The `argument` can be either a C string or a C++ string object: `ContainsRegex()` and `MatchesRegex()` use the regular expression syntax defined -[here](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#regular-expression-syntax). +[here](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#regular-expression-syntax). `StrCaseEq()`, `StrCaseNe()`, `StrEq()`, and `StrNe()` work for wide strings as well. @@ -249,7 +251,7 @@ match them more flexibly, or get more informative messages, you can use: | `SizeIs(m)` | `argument` is a container whose size matches `m`. E.g. `SizeIs(2)` or `SizeIs(Lt(2))`. | | `UnorderedElementsAre(e0, e1, ..., en)` | `argument` has `n + 1` elements, and under some permutation each element matches an `ei` (for a different `i`), which can be a value or a matcher. 0 to 10 arguments are allowed. | | `UnorderedElementsAreArray({ e0, e1, ..., en })`, `UnorderedElementsAreArray(array)`, or `UnorderedElementsAreArray(array, count)` | The same as `UnorderedElementsAre()` except that the expected element values/matchers come from an initializer list, STL-style container, or C-style array. | -| `WhenSorted(m)` | When `argument` is sorted using the `<` operator, it matches container matcher `m`. E.g. `WhenSorted(UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3))` verifies that `argument` contains elements `1`, `2`, and `3`, ignoring order. | +| `WhenSorted(m)` | When `argument` is sorted using the `<` operator, it matches container matcher `m`. E.g. `WhenSorted(ElementsAre(1, 2, 3))` verifies that `argument` contains elements `1`, `2`, and `3`, ignoring order. | | `WhenSortedBy(comparator, m)` | The same as `WhenSorted(m)`, except that the given comparator instead of `<` is used to sort `argument`. E.g. `WhenSortedBy(std::greater<int>(), ElementsAre(3, 2, 1))`. | Notes: @@ -347,7 +349,7 @@ You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers: ## Matchers as Test Assertions ## -|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](../../googletest/docs/Primer.md#assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| +|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](../../googletest/docs/primer.md#assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| |:---------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |`EXPECT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a non-fatal failure if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`. | diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index 0460d35..8809b0e 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -18,8 +18,9 @@ You must always put a mock method definition (`MOCK_METHOD*`) in a `public:` section of the mock class, regardless of the method being mocked being `public`, `protected`, or `private` in the base class. This allows `ON_CALL` and `EXPECT_CALL` to reference the mock function -from outside of the mock class. (Yes, C++ allows a subclass to change -the access level of a virtual function in the base class.) Example: +from outside of the mock class. (Yes, C++ allows a subclass to specify +a different access level than the base class on a virtual function.) +Example: ``` class Foo { @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ Note that the mock class doesn't define `AppendPacket()`, unlike the real class. That's fine as long as the test doesn't need to call it. Next, you need a way to say that you want to use -`ConcretePacketStream` in production code, and use `MockPacketStream` +`ConcretePacketStream` in production code and to use `MockPacketStream` in tests. Since the functions are not virtual and the two classes are unrelated, you must specify your choice at _compile time_ (as opposed to run time). @@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is: * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called. - * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. + * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, they can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call" warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all @@ -294,7 +295,7 @@ There are some caveats though (I don't like them just as much as the next guy, but sadly they are side effects of C++'s limitations): 1. `NiceMock<MockFoo>` and `StrictMock<MockFoo>` only work for mock methods defined using the `MOCK_METHOD*` family of macros **directly** in the `MockFoo` class. If a mock method is defined in a **base class** of `MockFoo`, the "nice" or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. In particular, nesting `NiceMock` and `StrictMock` (e.g. `NiceMock<StrictMock<MockFoo> >`) is **not** supported. - 1. The constructors of the base mock (`MockFoo`) cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which happens to be banned by the [Google C++ style guide](http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml). + 1. The constructors of the base mock (`MockFoo`) cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which happens to be banned by the [Google C++ style guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html). 1. During the constructor or destructor of `MockFoo`, the mock object is _not_ nice or strict. This may cause surprises if the constructor or destructor calls a mock method on `this` object. (This behavior, however, is consistent with C++'s general rule: if a constructor or destructor calls a virtual method of `this` object, that method is treated as non-virtual. In other words, to the base class's constructor or destructor, `this` object behaves like an instance of the base class, not the derived class. This rule is required for safety. Otherwise a base constructor may use members of a derived class before they are initialized, or a base destructor may use members of a derived class after they have been destroyed.) Finally, you should be **very cautious** about when to use naggy or strict mocks, as they tend to make tests more brittle and harder to maintain. When you refactor your code without changing its externally visible behavior, ideally you should't need to update any tests. If your code interacts with a naggy mock, however, you may start to get spammed with warnings as the result of your change. Worse, if your code interacts with a strict mock, your tests may start to fail and you'll be forced to fix them. Our general recommendation is to use nice mocks (not yet the default) most of the time, use naggy mocks (the current default) when developing or debugging tests, and use strict mocks only as the last resort. @@ -705,7 +706,7 @@ type `m` accepts): 1. When both `T` and `U` are built-in arithmetic types (`bool`, integers, and floating-point numbers), the conversion from `T` to `U` is not lossy (in other words, any value representable by `T` can also be represented by `U`); and 1. When `U` is a reference, `T` must also be a reference (as the underlying matcher may be interested in the address of the `U` value). -The code won't compile if any of these conditions isn't met. +The code won't compile if any of these conditions aren't met. Here's one example: @@ -1029,9 +1030,10 @@ a value that satisfies matcher `m`. For example: -> | `Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3))` | Matches `x` where `x.number >= 3`. | +| Expression | Description | |:-----------------------------|:-----------------------------------| -> | `Property(&Foo::name, StartsWith("John "))` | Matches `x` where `x.name()` starts with `"John "`. | +| `Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3))` | Matches `x` where `x.number >= 3`. | +| `Property(&Foo::name, StartsWith("John "))` | Matches `x` where `x.name()` starts with `"John "`. | Note that in `Property(&Foo::baz, ...)`, method `baz()` must take no argument and be declared as `const`. @@ -1229,7 +1231,7 @@ that references the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be deleted. Therefore, if you have some complex matcher that you want to use again -and again, there is no need to build it everytime. Just assign it to a +and again, there is no need to build it every time. Just assign it to a matcher variable and use that variable repeatedly! For example, ``` @@ -1401,7 +1403,7 @@ edge from node A to node B wherever A must occur before B, we can get a DAG. We use the term "sequence" to mean a directed path in this DAG. Now, if we decompose the DAG into sequences, we just need to know which sequences each `EXPECT_CALL()` belongs to in order to be able to -reconstruct the orginal DAG. +reconstruct the original DAG. So, to specify the partial order on the expectations we need to do two things: first to define some `Sequence` objects, and then for each @@ -1680,7 +1682,7 @@ This also works when the argument is an output iterator: ``` using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SeArrayArgument; +using ::testing::SetArrayArgument; class MockRolodex : public Rolodex { public: @@ -1919,9 +1921,9 @@ using ::testing::_; // second argument DoThis() receives. ``` -Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no -lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you -really? +Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but your version +of C++ has no lambdas, so you have to define your own action. :-( +Or do you really? Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem: @@ -2180,7 +2182,7 @@ the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be deleted. If you have some complex action that you want to use again and again, -you may not have to build it from scratch everytime. If the action +you may not have to build it from scratch every time. If the action doesn't have an internal state (i.e. if it always does the same thing no matter how many times it has been called), you can assign it to an action variable and use that variable repeatedly. For example: @@ -2227,77 +2229,71 @@ versus ## Mocking Methods That Use Move-Only Types ## -C++11 introduced <em>move-only types</em>. A move-only-typed value can be moved from one object to another, but cannot be copied. `std::unique_ptr<T>` is probably the most commonly used move-only type. +C++11 introduced *move-only types*. A move-only-typed value can be moved from +one object to another, but cannot be copied. `std::unique_ptr<T>` is +probably the most commonly used move-only type. -Mocking a method that takes and/or returns move-only types presents some challenges, but nothing insurmountable. This recipe shows you how you can do it. +Mocking a method that takes and/or returns move-only types presents some +challenges, but nothing insurmountable. This recipe shows you how you can do it. +Note that the support for move-only method arguments was only introduced to +gMock in April 2017; in older code, you may find more complex +[workarounds](#LegacyMoveOnly) for lack of this feature. -Let’s say we are working on a fictional project that lets one post and share snippets called “buzzes”. Your code uses these types: +Let’s say we are working on a fictional project that lets one post and share +snippets called “buzzes”. Your code uses these types: -``` +```cpp enum class AccessLevel { kInternal, kPublic }; class Buzz { public: - explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { … } + explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { ... } ... }; class Buzzer { public: virtual ~Buzzer() {} - virtual std::unique_ptr<Buzz> MakeBuzz(const std::string& text) = 0; - virtual bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) = 0; + virtual std::unique_ptr<Buzz> MakeBuzz(StringPiece text) = 0; + virtual bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, int64_t timestamp) = 0; ... }; ``` -A `Buzz` object represents a snippet being posted. A class that implements the `Buzzer` interface is capable of creating and sharing `Buzz`. Methods in `Buzzer` may return a `unique_ptr<Buzz>` or take a `unique_ptr<Buzz>`. Now we need to mock `Buzzer` in our tests. - -To mock a method that returns a move-only type, you just use the familiar `MOCK_METHOD` syntax as usual: - -``` -class MockBuzzer : public Buzzer { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(const std::string& text)); - … -}; -``` - -However, if you attempt to use the same `MOCK_METHOD` pattern to mock a method that takes a move-only parameter, you’ll get a compiler error currently: - -``` - // Does NOT compile! - MOCK_METHOD2(ShareBuzz, bool(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp)); -``` - -While it’s highly desirable to make this syntax just work, it’s not trivial and the work hasn’t been done yet. Fortunately, there is a trick you can apply today to get something that works nearly as well as this. +A `Buzz` object represents a snippet being posted. A class that implements the +`Buzzer` interface is capable of creating and sharing `Buzz`es. Methods in +`Buzzer` may return a `unique_ptr<Buzz>` or take a +`unique_ptr<Buzz>`. Now we need to mock `Buzzer` in our tests. -The trick, is to delegate the `ShareBuzz()` method to a mock method (let’s call it `DoShareBuzz()`) that does not take move-only parameters: +To mock a method that accepts or returns move-only types, you just use the +familiar `MOCK_METHOD` syntax as usual: -``` +```cpp class MockBuzzer : public Buzzer { public: - MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(const std::string& text)); - MOCK_METHOD2(DoShareBuzz, bool(Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp)); - bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) { - return DoShareBuzz(buzz.get(), timestamp); - } + MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(StringPiece text)); + MOCK_METHOD2(ShareBuzz, bool(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, int64_t timestamp)); }; ``` -Note that there's no need to define or declare `DoShareBuzz()` in a base class. You only need to define it as a `MOCK_METHOD` in the mock class. - -Now that we have the mock class defined, we can use it in tests. In the following code examples, we assume that we have defined a `MockBuzzer` object named `mock_buzzer_`: +Now that we have the mock class defined, we can use it in tests. In the +following code examples, we assume that we have defined a `MockBuzzer` object +named `mock_buzzer_`: -``` +```cpp MockBuzzer mock_buzzer_; ``` -First let’s see how we can set expectations on the `MakeBuzz()` method, which returns a `unique_ptr<Buzz>`. +First let’s see how we can set expectations on the `MakeBuzz()` method, which +returns a `unique_ptr<Buzz>`. -As usual, if you set an expectation without an action (i.e. the `.WillOnce()` or `.WillRepeated()` clause), when that expectation fires, the default action for that method will be taken. Since `unique_ptr<>` has a default constructor that returns a null `unique_ptr`, that’s what you’ll get if you don’t specify an action: +As usual, if you set an expectation without an action (i.e. the `.WillOnce()` or +`.WillRepeated()` clause), when that expectation fires, the default action for +that method will be taken. Since `unique_ptr<>` has a default constructor +that returns a null `unique_ptr`, that’s what you’ll get if you don’t specify an +action: -``` +```cpp // Use the default action. EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("hello")); @@ -2305,32 +2301,13 @@ As usual, if you set an expectation without an action (i.e. the `.WillOnce()` or EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("hello")); ``` -If you are not happy with the default action, you can tweak it. Depending on what you need, you may either tweak the default action for a specific (mock object, mock method) combination using `ON_CALL()`, or you may tweak the default action for all mock methods that return a specific type. The usage of `ON_CALL()` is similar to `EXPECT_CALL()`, so we’ll skip it and just explain how to do the latter (tweaking the default action for a specific return type). You do this via the `DefaultValue<>::SetFactory()` and `DefaultValue<>::Clear()` API: - -``` - // Sets the default action for return type std::unique_ptr<Buzz> to - // creating a new Buzz every time. - DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<Buzz>>::SetFactory( - [] { return MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal); }); - - // When this fires, the default action of MakeBuzz() will run, which - // will return a new Buzz object. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("hello")).Times(AnyNumber()); +If you are not happy with the default action, you can tweak it as usual; see +[Setting Default Actions](#OnCall). - auto buzz1 = mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("hello"); - auto buzz2 = mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("hello"); - EXPECT_NE(nullptr, buzz1); - EXPECT_NE(nullptr, buzz2); - EXPECT_NE(buzz1, buzz2); +If you just need to return a pre-defined move-only value, you can use the +`Return(ByMove(...))` action: - // Resets the default action for return type std::unique_ptr<Buzz>, - // to avoid interfere with other tests. - DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<Buzz>>::Clear(); -``` - -What if you want the method to do something other than the default action? If you just need to return a pre-defined move-only value, you can use the `Return(ByMove(...))` action: - -``` +```cpp // When this fires, the unique_ptr<> specified by ByMove(...) will // be returned. EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("world")) @@ -2341,81 +2318,87 @@ What if you want the method to do something other than the default action? If y Note that `ByMove()` is essential here - if you drop it, the code won’t compile. -Quiz time! What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is performed more than once (e.g. you write `….WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once. +Quiz time! What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is +performed more than once (e.g. you write +`.WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first +time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only +value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a +run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once. -If you need your mock method to do more than just moving a pre-defined value, remember that you can always use `Invoke()` to call a lambda or a callable object, which can do pretty much anything you want: +If you need your mock method to do more than just moving a pre-defined value, +remember that you can always use a lambda or a callable object, which can do +pretty much anything you want: -``` +```cpp EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("x")) - .WillRepeatedly(Invoke([](const std::string& text) { - return std::make_unique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal); - })); + .WillRepeatedly([](StringPiece text) { + return MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal); + }); EXPECT_NE(nullptr, mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("x")); EXPECT_NE(nullptr, mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("x")); ``` -Every time this `EXPECT_CALL` fires, a new `unique_ptr<Buzz>` will be created and returned. You cannot do this with `Return(ByMove(...))`. +Every time this `EXPECT_CALL` fires, a new `unique_ptr<Buzz>` will be +created and returned. You cannot do this with `Return(ByMove(...))`. -Now there’s one topic we haven’t covered: how do you set expectations on `ShareBuzz()`, which takes a move-only-typed parameter? The answer is you don’t. Instead, you set expectations on the `DoShareBuzz()` mock method (remember that we defined a `MOCK_METHOD` for `DoShareBuzz()`, not `ShareBuzz()`): +That covers returning move-only values; but how do we work with methods +accepting move-only arguments? The answer is that they work normally, although +some actions will not compile when any of method's arguments are move-only. You +can always use `Return`, or a [lambda or functor](#FunctionsAsActions): -``` - EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, DoShareBuzz(NotNull(), _)); +```cpp + using ::testing::Unused; - // When one calls ShareBuzz() on the MockBuzzer like this, the call is - // forwarded to DoShareBuzz(), which is mocked. Therefore this statement - // will trigger the above EXPECT_CALL. - mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal), - ::base::Now()); + EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, ShareBuzz(NotNull(), _)) .WillOnce(Return(true)); + EXPECT_TRUE(mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal)), + 0); + + EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, ShareBuzz(_, _)) .WillOnce( + [](std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Unused) { return buzz != nullptr; }); + EXPECT_FALSE(mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(nullptr, 0)); ``` -Some of you may have spotted one problem with this approach: the `DoShareBuzz()` mock method differs from the real `ShareBuzz()` method in that it cannot take ownership of the buzz parameter - `ShareBuzz()` will always delete buzz after `DoShareBuzz()` returns. What if you need to save the buzz object somewhere for later use when `ShareBuzz()` is called? Indeed, you'd be stuck. +Many built-in actions (`WithArgs`, `WithoutArgs`,`DeleteArg`, `SaveArg`, ...) +could in principle support move-only arguments, but the support for this is not +implemented yet. If this is blocking you, please file a bug. -Another problem with the `DoShareBuzz()` we had is that it can surprise people reading or maintaining the test, as one would expect that `DoShareBuzz()` has (logically) the same contract as `ShareBuzz()`. +A few actions (e.g. `DoAll`) copy their arguments internally, so they can never +work with non-copyable objects; you'll have to use functors instead. -Fortunately, these problems can be fixed with a bit more code. Let's try to get it right this time: +##### Legacy workarounds for move-only types {#LegacyMoveOnly} -``` +Support for move-only function arguments was only introduced to gMock in April +2017. In older code, you may encounter the following workaround for the lack of +this feature (it is no longer necessary - we're including it just for +reference): + +```cpp class MockBuzzer : public Buzzer { public: - MockBuzzer() { - // Since DoShareBuzz(buzz, time) is supposed to take ownership of - // buzz, define a default behavior for DoShareBuzz(buzz, time) to - // delete buzz. - ON_CALL(*this, DoShareBuzz(_, _)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke([](Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp) { - delete buzz; - return true; - })); - } - - MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(const std::string& text)); - - // Takes ownership of buzz. MOCK_METHOD2(DoShareBuzz, bool(Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp)); - bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) { - return DoShareBuzz(buzz.release(), timestamp); + bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) override { + return DoShareBuzz(buzz.get(), timestamp); } }; ``` -Now, the mock `DoShareBuzz()` method is free to save the buzz argument for later use if this is what you want: +The trick is to delegate the `ShareBuzz()` method to a mock method (let’s call +it `DoShareBuzz()`) that does not take move-only parameters. Then, instead of +setting expectations on `ShareBuzz()`, you set them on the `DoShareBuzz()` mock +method: -``` - std::unique_ptr<Buzz> intercepted_buzz; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, DoShareBuzz(NotNull(), _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke([&intercepted_buzz](Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp) { - // Save buzz in intercepted_buzz for analysis later. - intercepted_buzz.reset(buzz); - return false; - })); +```cpp + MockBuzzer mock_buzzer_; + EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, DoShareBuzz(NotNull(), _)); - mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(std::make_unique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal), - Now()); - EXPECT_NE(nullptr, intercepted_buzz); + // When one calls ShareBuzz() on the MockBuzzer like this, the call is + // forwarded to DoShareBuzz(), which is mocked. Therefore this statement + // will trigger the above EXPECT_CALL. + mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal), 0); ``` -Using the tricks covered in this recipe, you are now able to mock methods that take and/or return move-only types. Put your newly-acquired power to good use - when you design a new API, you can now feel comfortable using `unique_ptrs` as appropriate, without fearing that doing so will compromise your tests. + ## Making the Compilation Faster ## @@ -2482,12 +2465,12 @@ MockFoo::~MockFoo() {} ## Forcing a Verification ## -When it's being destoyed, your friendly mock object will automatically +When it's being destroyed, your friendly mock object will automatically verify that all expectations on it have been satisfied, and will generate [Google Test](../../googletest/) failures if not. This is convenient as it leaves you with one less thing to worry about. That is, unless you are not sure if your mock object will -be destoyed. +be destroyed. How could it be that your mock object won't eventually be destroyed? Well, it might be created on the heap and owned by the code you are @@ -3347,6 +3330,7 @@ For example, when using an `ACTION` as a stub action for mock function: int DoSomething(bool flag, int* ptr); ``` we have: + | **Pre-defined Symbol** | **Is Bound To** | |:-----------------------|:----------------| | `arg0` | the value of `flag` | @@ -3508,6 +3492,7 @@ is asked to infer the type of `x`? If you are writing a function that returns an `ACTION` object, you'll need to know its type. The type depends on the macro used to define the action and the parameter types. The rule is relatively simple: + | **Given Definition** | **Expression** | **Has Type** | |:---------------------|:---------------|:-------------| | `ACTION(Foo)` | `Foo()` | `FooAction` | @@ -3515,7 +3500,7 @@ the action and the parameter types. The rule is relatively simple: | `ACTION_P(Bar, param)` | `Bar(int_value)` | `BarActionP<int>` | | `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Bar, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p1))` | `Bar<t1, ..., t_m>(int_value)` | `FooActionP<t1, ..., t_m, int>` | | `ACTION_P2(Baz, p1, p2)` | `Baz(bool_value, int_value)` | `BazActionP2<bool, int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Baz, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, p2))` | `Baz<t1, ..., t_m>(bool_value, int_value)` | `FooActionP2<t1, ..., t_m, bool, int>` | +| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Baz, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, p2))`| `Baz<t1, ..., t_m>(bool_value, int_value)` | `FooActionP2<t1, ..., t_m, bool, int>` | | ... | ... | ... | Note that we have to pick different suffixes (`Action`, `ActionP`, @@ -3670,6 +3655,6 @@ This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the user can figure it out. -[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values) +[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values) explains how to extend the printer to do a better job at printing your particular type than to dump the bytes. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md b/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index f4bab75..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,132 +0,0 @@ - - -If you are interested in understanding the internals of Google Mock, -building from source, or contributing ideas or modifications to the -project, then this document is for you. - -# Introduction # - -First, let's give you some background of the project. - -## Licensing ## - -All Google Mock source and pre-built packages are provided under the [New BSD License](http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php). - -## The Google Mock Community ## - -The Google Mock community exists primarily through the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock), the -[issue tracker](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues) and, to a lesser extent, the [source control repository](../). You are definitely encouraged to contribute to the -discussion and you can also help us to keep the effectiveness of the -group high by following and promoting the guidelines listed here. - -### Please Be Friendly ### - -Showing courtesy and respect to others is a vital part of the Google -culture, and we strongly encourage everyone participating in Google -Mock development to join us in accepting nothing less. Of course, -being courteous is not the same as failing to constructively disagree -with each other, but it does mean that we should be respectful of each -other when enumerating the 42 technical reasons that a particular -proposal may not be the best choice. There's never a reason to be -antagonistic or dismissive toward anyone who is sincerely trying to -contribute to a discussion. - -Sure, C++ testing is serious business and all that, but it's also -a lot of fun. Let's keep it that way. Let's strive to be one of the -friendliest communities in all of open source. - -### Where to Discuss Google Mock ### - -As always, discuss Google Mock in the official [Google C++ Mocking Framework discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock). You don't have to actually submit -code in order to sign up. Your participation itself is a valuable -contribution. - -# Working with the Code # - -If you want to get your hands dirty with the code inside Google Mock, -this is the section for you. - -## Checking Out the Source from Subversion ## - -Checking out the Google Mock source is most useful if you plan to -tweak it yourself. You check out the source for Google Mock using a -[Subversion](http://subversion.tigris.org/) client as you would for any -other project hosted on Google Code. Please see the instruction on -the [source code access page](../) for how to do it. - -## Compiling from Source ## - -Once you check out the code, you can find instructions on how to -compile it in the [README](../README.md) file. - -## Testing ## - -A mocking framework is of no good if itself is not thoroughly tested. -Tests should be written for any new code, and changes should be -verified to not break existing tests before they are submitted for -review. To perform the tests, follow the instructions in [README](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/README) and -verify that there are no failures. - -# Contributing Code # - -We are excited that Google Mock is now open source, and hope to get -great patches from the community. Before you fire up your favorite IDE -and begin hammering away at that new feature, though, please take the -time to read this section and understand the process. While it seems -rigorous, we want to keep a high standard of quality in the code -base. - -## Contributor License Agreements ## - -You must sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) before we can -accept any code. The CLA protects you and us. - - * If you are an individual writing original source code and you're sure you own the intellectual property, then you'll need to sign an [individual CLA](http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html). - * If you work for a company that wants to allow you to contribute your work to Google Mock, then you'll need to sign a [corporate CLA](http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html). - -Follow either of the two links above to access the appropriate CLA and -instructions for how to sign and return it. - -## Coding Style ## - -To keep the source consistent, readable, diffable and easy to merge, -we use a fairly rigid coding style, as defined by the [google-styleguide](https://github.com/google/styleguide) project. All patches will be expected -to conform to the style outlined [here](https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/cppguide.xml). - -## Submitting Patches ## - -Please do submit code. Here's what you need to do: - - 1. Normally you should make your change against the SVN trunk instead of a branch or a tag, as the latter two are for release control and should be treated mostly as read-only. - 1. Decide which code you want to submit. A submission should be a set of changes that addresses one issue in the [Google Mock issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/issues/list). Please don't mix more than one logical change per submittal, because it makes the history hard to follow. If you want to make a change that doesn't have a corresponding issue in the issue tracker, please create one. - 1. Also, coordinate with team members that are listed on the issue in question. This ensures that work isn't being duplicated and communicating your plan early also generally leads to better patches. - 1. Ensure that your code adheres to the [Google Mock source code style](#Coding_Style.md). - 1. Ensure that there are unit tests for your code. - 1. Sign a Contributor License Agreement. - 1. Create a patch file using `svn diff`. - 1. We use [Rietveld](http://codereview.appspot.com/) to do web-based code reviews. You can read about the tool [here](https://github.com/rietveld-codereview/rietveld/wiki). When you are ready, upload your patch via Rietveld and notify `googlemock@googlegroups.com` to review it. There are several ways to upload the patch. We recommend using the [upload\_gmock.py](../scripts/upload_gmock.py) script, which you can find in the `scripts/` folder in the SVN trunk. - -## Google Mock Committers ## - -The current members of the Google Mock engineering team are the only -committers at present. In the great tradition of eating one's own -dogfood, we will be requiring each new Google Mock engineering team -member to earn the right to become a committer by following the -procedures in this document, writing consistently great code, and -demonstrating repeatedly that he or she truly gets the zen of Google -Mock. - -# Release Process # - -We follow the typical release process for Subversion-based projects: - - 1. A release branch named `release-X.Y` is created. - 1. Bugs are fixed and features are added in trunk; those individual patches are merged into the release branch until it's stable. - 1. An individual point release (the `Z` in `X.Y.Z`) is made by creating a tag from the branch. - 1. Repeat steps 2 and 3 throughout one release cycle (as determined by features or time). - 1. Go back to step 1 to create another release branch and so on. - - ---- - -This page is based on the [Making GWT Better](http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html) guide from the [Google Web Toolkit](http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/) project. Except as otherwise [noted](http://code.google.com/policies.html#restrictions), the content of this page is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/). diff --git a/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md b/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md index 444151e..16083e7 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Mock **(the SVN trunk version)** -- **if you use a released version of Google Mock, please read the documentation for that specific version instead.** +This page lists all documentation markdown files for Google Mock **(the +current git version)** +-- **if you use a former version of Google Mock, please read the +documentation for that specific version instead (e.g. by checking out +the respective git branch/tag).** * [ForDummies](ForDummies.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Mock. * [CheatSheet](CheatSheet.md) -- a quick reference. @@ -8,5 +11,5 @@ This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Mock **(the SVN trunk ve To contribute code to Google Mock, read: - * [DevGuide](DevGuide.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [Pump Manual](../googletest/docs/PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Mock's source files. + * [CONTRIBUTING](../CONTRIBUTING.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. + * [Pump Manual](../../googletest/docs/PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Mock's source files. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md index 0da4cbe..566a34e 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Using Google Mock involves three basic steps: # Why Google Mock? # While mock objects help you remove unnecessary dependencies in tests and make them fast and reliable, using mocks manually in C++ is _hard_: - * Someone has to implement the mocks. The job is usually tedious and error-prone. No wonder people go great distance to avoid it. - * The quality of those manually written mocks is a bit, uh, unpredictable. You may see some really polished ones, but you may also see some that were hacked up in a hurry and have all sorts of ad hoc restrictions. + * Someone has to implement the mocks. The job is usually tedious and error-prone. No wonder people go great distances to avoid it. + * The quality of those manually written mocks is a bit, uh, unpredictable. You may see some really polished ones, but you may also see some that were hacked up in a hurry and have all sorts of ad-hoc restrictions. * The knowledge you gained from using one mock doesn't transfer to the next. In contrast, Java and Python programmers have some fine mock frameworks, which automate the creation of mocks. As a result, mocking is a proven effective technique and widely adopted practice in those communities. Having the right tool absolutely makes the difference. @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Admittedly, this test is contrived and doesn't do much. You can easily achieve t ## Using Google Mock with Any Testing Framework ## If you want to use something other than Google Test (e.g. [CppUnit](http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit/) or -[CxxTest](http://cxxtest.tigris.org/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: +[CxxTest](https://cxxtest.com/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: ``` int main(int argc, char** argv) { // The following line causes Google Mock to throw an exception on failure, @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ sometimes causes the test program to crash. You'll still be able to notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure. A better solution is to use Google Test's -[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events) +[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events) to report a test failure to your testing framework properly. You'll need to implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it should be straightforward. @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ The macro can be followed by some optional _clauses_ that provide more informati This syntax is designed to make an expectation read like English. For example, you can probably guess that ``` -using ::testing::Return;... +using ::testing::Return; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) .Times(5) .WillOnce(Return(100)) @@ -251,7 +252,8 @@ EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); A list of built-in matchers can be found in the [CheatSheet](CheatSheet.md). For example, here's the `Ge` (greater than or equal) matcher: ``` -using ::testing::Ge;... +using ::testing::Ge; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(Ge(100))); ``` @@ -280,7 +282,8 @@ First, if the return type of a mock function is a built-in type or a pointer, th Second, if a mock function doesn't have a default action, or the default action doesn't suit you, you can specify the action to be taken each time the expectation matches using a series of `WillOnce()` clauses followed by an optional `WillRepeatedly()`. For example, ``` -using ::testing::Return;... +using ::testing::Return; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) .WillOnce(Return(100)) .WillOnce(Return(200)) @@ -290,7 +293,8 @@ EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) This says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called _exactly three times_ (Google Mock inferred this from how many `WillOnce()` clauses we've written, since we didn't explicitly write `Times()`), and will return 100, 200, and 300 respectively. ``` -using ::testing::Return;... +using ::testing::Return; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) .WillOnce(Return(100)) .WillOnce(Return(200)) @@ -317,7 +321,8 @@ Instead of returning 100, 101, 102, ..., consecutively, this mock function will Time for another quiz! What do you think the following means? ``` -using ::testing::Return;... +using ::testing::Return; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) .Times(4) .WillOnce(Return(100)); @@ -331,7 +336,8 @@ So far we've only shown examples where you have a single expectation. More reali By default, when a mock method is invoked, Google Mock will search the expectations in the **reverse order** they are defined, and stop when an active expectation that matches the arguments is found (you can think of it as "newer rules override older ones."). If the matching expectation cannot take any more calls, you will get an upper-bound-violated failure. Here's an example: ``` -using ::testing::_;... +using ::testing::_; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); // #1 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(10)) // #2 .Times(2); @@ -347,7 +353,8 @@ By default, an expectation can match a call even though an earlier expectation h Sometimes, you may want all the expected calls to occur in a strict order. To say this in Google Mock is easy: ``` -using ::testing::InSequence;... +using ::testing::InSequence; +... TEST(FooTest, DrawsLineSegment) { ... { @@ -365,7 +372,7 @@ By creating an object of type `InSequence`, all expectations in its scope are pu In this example, we test that `Foo()` calls the three expected functions in the order as written. If a call is made out-of-order, it will be an error. -(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](CookBook#Expecting_Partially_Ordered_Calls.md).) +(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](CookBook.md#expecting-partially-ordered-calls).) ## All Expectations Are Sticky (Unless Said Otherwise) ## Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. How would you test that the turtle is asked to go to the origin _exactly twice_ (you want to ignore any other instructions it receives)? @@ -373,7 +380,8 @@ Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. H After you've come up with your answer, take a look at ours and compare notes (solve it yourself first - don't cheat!): ``` -using ::testing::_;... +using ::testing::_; +... EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(_, _)) // #1 .Times(AnyNumber()); EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(0, 0)) // #2 diff --git a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md index 5eac83f..9008c63 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ You cannot mock a variadic function (i.e. a function taking ellipsis The problem is that in general, there is _no way_ for a mock object to know how many arguments are passed to the variadic method, and what the arguments' types are. Only the _author of the base class_ knows -the protocol, and we cannot look into his head. +the protocol, and we cannot look into their head. Therefore, to mock such a function, the _user_ must teach the mock object how to figure out the number of arguments and their types. One @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ interface, which then can be easily mocked. It's a bit of work initially, but usually pays for itself quickly. This Google Testing Blog -[post](http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) +[post](https://testing.googleblog.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) says it excellently. Check it out. ## My mock object needs to do complex stuff. It's a lot of pain to specify the actions. Google Mock sucks! ## @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ See this [recipe](CookBook.md#mocking_side_effects) for more details and an exam If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are some other resources you can use: - 1. read other [documentation](Documentation.md), 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock/topics), 1. ask it on [googlemock@googlegroups.com](mailto:googlemock@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) before you can post.). diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_5/CheatSheet.md deleted file mode 100644 index 3c7bed4..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/CheatSheet.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,525 +0,0 @@ - - -# Defining a Mock Class # - -## Mocking a Normal Class ## - -Given -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual ~Foo(); - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual string Describe(const char* name) = 0; - virtual string Describe(int type) = 0; - virtual bool Process(Bar elem, int count) = 0; -}; -``` -(note that `~Foo()` **must** be virtual) we can define its mock as -``` -#include <gmock/gmock.h> - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(Describe, string(const char* name)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Describe, string(int type)); - MOCK_METHOD2(Process, bool(Bar elem, int count)); -}; -``` - -To create a "nice" mock object which ignores all uninteresting calls, -or a "strict" mock object, which treats them as failures: -``` -NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; // The type is a subclass of MockFoo. -StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo; // The type is a subclass of MockFoo. -``` - -## Mocking a Class Template ## - -To mock -``` -template <typename Elem> -class StackInterface { - public: - ... - virtual ~StackInterface(); - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual void Push(const Elem& x) = 0; -}; -``` -(note that `~StackInterface()` **must** be virtual) just append `_T` to the `MOCK_*` macros: -``` -template <typename Elem> -class MockStack : public StackInterface<Elem> { - public: - ... - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const Elem& x)); -}; -``` - -## Specifying Calling Conventions for Mock Functions ## - -If your mock function doesn't use the default calling convention, you -can specify it by appending `_WITH_CALLTYPE` to any of the macros -described in the previous two sections and supplying the calling -convention as the first argument to the macro. For example, -``` - MOCK_METHOD_1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD2_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Bar, int(double x, double y)); -``` -where `STDMETHODCALLTYPE` is defined by `<objbase.h>` on Windows. - -# Using Mocks in Tests # - -The typical flow is: - 1. Import the Google Mock names you need to use. All Google Mock names are in the `testing` namespace unless they are macros or otherwise noted. - 1. Create the mock objects. - 1. Optionally, set the default actions of the mock objects. - 1. Set your expectations on the mock objects (How will they be called? What wil they do?). - 1. Exercise code that uses the mock objects; if necessary, check the result using [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) assertions. - 1. When a mock objects is destructed, Google Mock automatically verifies that all expectations on it have been satisfied. - -Here is an example: -``` -using ::testing::Return; // #1 - -TEST(BarTest, DoesThis) { - MockFoo foo; // #2 - - ON_CALL(foo, GetSize()) // #3 - .WillByDefault(Return(1)); - // ... other default actions ... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Describe(5)) // #4 - .Times(3) - .WillRepeatedly(Return("Category 5")); - // ... other expectations ... - - EXPECT_EQ("good", MyProductionFunction(&foo)); // #5 -} // #6 -``` - -# Setting Default Actions # - -Google Mock has a **built-in default action** for any function that -returns `void`, `bool`, a numeric value, or a pointer. - -To customize the default action for functions with return type `T` globally: -``` -using ::testing::DefaultValue; - -DefaultValue<T>::Set(value); // Sets the default value to be returned. -// ... use the mocks ... -DefaultValue<T>::Clear(); // Resets the default value. -``` - -To customize the default action for a particular method, use `ON_CALL()`: -``` -ON_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .With(multi_argument_matcher) ? - .WillByDefault(action); -``` - -# Setting Expectations # - -`EXPECT_CALL()` sets **expectations** on a mock method (How will it be -called? What will it do?): -``` -EXPECT_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .With(multi_argument_matcher) ? - .Times(cardinality) ? - .InSequence(sequences) * - .After(expectations) * - .WillOnce(action) * - .WillRepeatedly(action) ? - .RetiresOnSaturation(); ? -``` - -If `Times()` is omitted, the cardinality is assumed to be: - - * `Times(1)` when there is neither `WillOnce()` nor `WillRepeatedly()`; - * `Times(n)` when there are `n WillOnce()`s but no `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 1; or - * `Times(AtLeast(n))` when there are `n WillOnce()`s and a `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 0. - -A method with no `EXPECT_CALL()` is free to be invoked _any number of times_, and the default action will be taken each time. - -# Matchers # - -A **matcher** matches a _single_ argument. You can use it inside -`ON_CALL()` or `EXPECT_CALL()`, or use it to validate a value -directly: - -| `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` | Asserts that `value` matches `matcher`. | -|:------------------------------|:----------------------------------------| -| `ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher)` | The same as `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)`, except that it generates a **fatal** failure. | - -Built-in matchers (where `argument` is the function argument) are -divided into several categories: - -## Wildcard ## -|`_`|`argument` can be any value of the correct type.| -|:--|:-----------------------------------------------| -|`A<type>()` or `An<type>()`|`argument` can be any value of type `type`. | - -## Generic Comparison ## - -|`Eq(value)` or `value`|`argument == value`| -|:---------------------|:------------------| -|`Ge(value)` |`argument >= value`| -|`Gt(value)` |`argument > value` | -|`Le(value)` |`argument <= value`| -|`Lt(value)` |`argument < value` | -|`Ne(value)` |`argument != value`| -|`IsNull()` |`argument` is a `NULL` pointer (raw or smart).| -|`NotNull()` |`argument` is a non-null pointer (raw or smart).| -|`Ref(variable)` |`argument` is a reference to `variable`.| -|`TypedEq<type>(value)`|`argument` has type `type` and is equal to `value`. You may need to use this instead of `Eq(value)` when the mock function is overloaded.| - -Except `Ref()`, these matchers make a _copy_ of `value` in case it's -modified or destructed later. If the compiler complains that `value` -doesn't have a public copy constructor, try wrap it in `ByRef()`, -e.g. `Eq(ByRef(non_copyable_value))`. If you do that, make sure -`non_copyable_value` is not changed afterwards, or the meaning of your -matcher will be changed. - -## Floating-Point Matchers ## - -|`DoubleEq(a_double)`|`argument` is a `double` value approximately equal to `a_double`, treating two NaNs as unequal.| -|:-------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`FloatEq(a_float)` |`argument` is a `float` value approximately equal to `a_float`, treating two NaNs as unequal. | -|`NanSensitiveDoubleEq(a_double)`|`argument` is a `double` value approximately equal to `a_double`, treating two NaNs as equal. | -|`NanSensitiveFloatEq(a_float)`|`argument` is a `float` value approximately equal to `a_float`, treating two NaNs as equal. | - -The above matchers use ULP-based comparison (the same as used in -[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/)). They -automatically pick a reasonable error bound based on the absolute -value of the expected value. `DoubleEq()` and `FloatEq()` conform to -the IEEE standard, which requires comparing two NaNs for equality to -return false. The `NanSensitive*` version instead treats two NaNs as -equal, which is often what a user wants. - -## String Matchers ## - -The `argument` can be either a C string or a C++ string object: - -|`ContainsRegex(string)`|`argument` matches the given regular expression.| -|:----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------| -|`EndsWith(suffix)` |`argument` ends with string `suffix`. | -|`HasSubstr(string)` |`argument` contains `string` as a sub-string. | -|`MatchesRegex(string)` |`argument` matches the given regular expression with the match starting at the first character and ending at the last character.| -|`StartsWith(prefix)` |`argument` starts with string `prefix`. | -|`StrCaseEq(string)` |`argument` is equal to `string`, ignoring case. | -|`StrCaseNe(string)` |`argument` is not equal to `string`, ignoring case.| -|`StrEq(string)` |`argument` is equal to `string`. | -|`StrNe(string)` |`argument` is not equal to `string`. | - -`StrCaseEq()`, `StrCaseNe()`, `StrEq()`, and `StrNe()` work for wide -strings as well. - -## Container Matchers ## - -Most STL-style containers support `==`, so you can use -`Eq(expected_container)` or simply `expected_container` to match a -container exactly. If you want to write the elements in-line, -match them more flexibly, or get more informative messages, you can use: - -| `Contains(e)` | `argument` contains an element that matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. | -|:--------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`ElementsAre(e0, e1, ..., en)`|`argument` has `n + 1` elements, where the i-th element matches `ei`, which can be a value or a matcher. 0 to 10 arguments are allowed.| -|`ElementsAreArray(array)` or `ElementsAreArray(array, count)`|The same as `ElementsAre()` except that the expected element values/matchers come from a C-style array.| -| `ContainerEq(container)` | The same as `Eq(container)` except that the failure message also includes which elements are in one container but not the other. | - -These matchers can also match: - - 1. a native array passed by reference (e.g. in `Foo(const int (&a)[5])`), and - 1. an array passed as a pointer and a count (e.g. in `Bar(const T* buffer, int len)` -- see [Multi-argument Matchers](#Multiargument_Matchers.md)). - -where the array may be multi-dimensional (i.e. its elements can be arrays). - -## Member Matchers ## - -|`Field(&class::field, m)`|`argument.field` (or `argument->field` when `argument` is a plain pointer) matches matcher `m`, where `argument` is an object of type _class_.| -|:------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Key(e)` |`argument.first` matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. E.g. `Contains(Key(Le(5)))` can verify that a `map` contains a key `<= 5`.| -|`Pair(m1, m2)` |`argument` is an `std::pair` whose `first` field matches `m1` and `second` field matches `m2`. | -|`Property(&class::property, m)`|`argument.property()` (or `argument->property()` when `argument` is a plain pointer) matches matcher `m`, where `argument` is an object of type _class_.| - -## Matching the Result of a Function or Functor ## - -|`ResultOf(f, m)`|`f(argument)` matches matcher `m`, where `f` is a function or functor.| -|:---------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------| - -## Pointer Matchers ## - -|`Pointee(m)`|`argument` (either a smart pointer or a raw pointer) points to a value that matches matcher `m`.| -|:-----------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| - -## Multiargument Matchers ## - -These are matchers on tuple types. They can be used in -`.With()`. The following can be used on functions with <i>two<br> -arguments</i> `x` and `y`: - -|`Eq()`|`x == y`| -|:-----|:-------| -|`Ge()`|`x >= y`| -|`Gt()`|`x > y` | -|`Le()`|`x <= y`| -|`Lt()`|`x < y` | -|`Ne()`|`x != y`| - -You can use the following selectors to pick a subset of the arguments -(or reorder them) to participate in the matching: - -|`AllArgs(m)`|Equivalent to `m`. Useful as syntactic sugar in `.With(AllArgs(m))`.| -|:-----------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Args<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(m)`|The `k` selected (using 0-based indices) arguments match `m`, e.g. `Args<1, 2>(Contains(5))`.| - -## Composite Matchers ## - -You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers: - -|`AllOf(m1, m2, ..., mn)`|`argument` matches all of the matchers `m1` to `mn`.| -|:-----------------------|:---------------------------------------------------| -|`AnyOf(m1, m2, ..., mn)`|`argument` matches at least one of the matchers `m1` to `mn`.| -|`Not(m)` |`argument` doesn't match matcher `m`. | - -## Adapters for Matchers ## - -|`MatcherCast<T>(m)`|casts matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`.| -|:------------------|:--------------------------------------| -|`SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)`| [safely casts](V1_5_CookBook#Casting_Matchers.md) matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`. | -|`Truly(predicate)` |`predicate(argument)` returns something considered by C++ to be true, where `predicate` is a function or functor.| - -## Matchers as Predicates ## - -|`Matches(m)`|a unary functor that returns `true` if the argument matches `m`.| -|:-----------|:---------------------------------------------------------------| -|`ExplainMatchResult(m, value, result_listener)`|returns `true` if `value` matches `m`, explaining the result to `result_listener`.| -|`Value(x, m)`|returns `true` if the value of `x` matches `m`. | - -## Defining Matchers ## - -| `MATCHER(IsEven, "") { return (arg % 2) == 0; }` | Defines a matcher `IsEven()` to match an even number. | -|:-------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------| -| `MATCHER_P(IsDivisibleBy, n, "") { *result_listener << "where the remainder is " << (arg % n); return (arg % n) == 0; }` | Defines a macher `IsDivisibleBy(n)` to match a number divisible by `n`. | -| `MATCHER_P2(IsBetween, a, b, "is between %(a)s and %(b)s") { return a <= arg && arg <= b; }` | Defines a matcher `IsBetween(a, b)` to match a value in the range [`a`, `b`]. | - -**Notes:** - - 1. The `MATCHER*` macros cannot be used inside a function or class. - 1. The matcher body must be _purely functional_ (i.e. it cannot have any side effect, and the result must not depend on anything other than the value being matched and the matcher parameters). - 1. You can use `PrintToString(x)` to convert a value `x` of any type to a string. - -## Matchers as Test Assertions ## - -|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/GoogleTestPrimer#Assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| -|:---------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`EXPECT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a non-fatal failure if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`. | - -# Actions # - -**Actions** specify what a mock function should do when invoked. - -## Returning a Value ## - -|`Return()`|Return from a `void` mock function.| -|:---------|:----------------------------------| -|`Return(value)`|Return `value`. | -|`ReturnArg<N>()`|Return the `N`-th (0-based) argument.| -|`ReturnNew<T>(a1, ..., ak)`|Return `new T(a1, ..., ak)`; a different object is created each time.| -|`ReturnNull()`|Return a null pointer. | -|`ReturnRef(variable)`|Return a reference to `variable`. | - -## Side Effects ## - -|`Assign(&variable, value)`|Assign `value` to variable.| -|:-------------------------|:--------------------------| -| `DeleteArg<N>()` | Delete the `N`-th (0-based) argument, which must be a pointer. | -| `SaveArg<N>(pointer)` | Save the `N`-th (0-based) argument to `*pointer`. | -| `SetArgReferee<N>(value)` | Assign value to the variable referenced by the `N`-th (0-based) argument. | -|`SetArgumentPointee<N>(value)`|Assign `value` to the variable pointed by the `N`-th (0-based) argument.| -|`SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last)`|Copies the elements in source range [`first`, `last`) to the array pointed to by the `N`-th (0-based) argument, which can be either a pointer or an iterator. The action does not take ownership of the elements in the source range.| -|`SetErrnoAndReturn(error, value)`|Set `errno` to `error` and return `value`.| -|`Throw(exception)` |Throws the given exception, which can be any copyable value. Available since v1.1.0.| - -## Using a Function or a Functor as an Action ## - -|`Invoke(f)`|Invoke `f` with the arguments passed to the mock function, where `f` can be a global/static function or a functor.| -|:----------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Invoke(object_pointer, &class::method)`|Invoke the {method on the object with the arguments passed to the mock function. | -|`InvokeWithoutArgs(f)`|Invoke `f`, which can be a global/static function or a functor. `f` must take no arguments. | -|`InvokeWithoutArgs(object_pointer, &class::method)`|Invoke the method on the object, which takes no arguments. | -|`InvokeArgument<N>(arg1, arg2, ..., argk)`|Invoke the mock function's `N`-th (0-based) argument, which must be a function or a functor, with the `k` arguments.| - -The return value of the invoked function is used as the return value -of the action. - -When defining a function or functor to be used with `Invoke*()`, you can declare any unused parameters as `Unused`: -``` - double Distance(Unused, double x, double y) { return sqrt(x*x + y*y); } - ... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo("Hi", _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(Distance)); -``` - -In `InvokeArgument<N>(...)`, if an argument needs to be passed by reference, wrap it inside `ByRef()`. For example, -``` - InvokeArgument<2>(5, string("Hi"), ByRef(foo)) -``` -calls the mock function's #2 argument, passing to it `5` and `string("Hi")` by value, and `foo` by reference. - -## Default Action ## - -|`DoDefault()`|Do the default action (specified by `ON_CALL()` or the built-in one).| -|:------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------| - -**Note:** due to technical reasons, `DoDefault()` cannot be used inside a composite action - trying to do so will result in a run-time error. - -## Composite Actions ## - -|`DoAll(a1, a2, ..., an)`|Do all actions `a1` to `an` and return the result of `an` in each invocation. The first `n - 1` sub-actions must return void. | -|:-----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`IgnoreResult(a)` |Perform action `a` and ignore its result. `a` must not return void. | -|`WithArg<N>(a)` |Pass the `N`-th (0-based) argument of the mock function to action `a` and perform it. | -|`WithArgs<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(a)`|Pass the selected (0-based) arguments of the mock function to action `a` and perform it. | -|`WithoutArgs(a)` |Perform action `a` without any arguments. | - -## Defining Actions ## - -| `ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }` | Defines an action `Sum()` to return the sum of the mock function's argument #0 and #1. | -|:--------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }` | Defines an action `Plus(n)` to return the sum of the mock function's argument #0 and `n`. | -| `ACTION_Pk(Foo, p1, ..., pk) { statements; }` | Defines a parameterized action `Foo(p1, ..., pk)` to execute the given `statements`. | - -The `ACTION*` macros cannot be used inside a function or class. - -# Cardinalities # - -These are used in `Times()` to specify how many times a mock function will be called: - -|`AnyNumber()`|The function can be called any number of times.| -|:------------|:----------------------------------------------| -|`AtLeast(n)` |The call is expected at least `n` times. | -|`AtMost(n)` |The call is expected at most `n` times. | -|`Between(m, n)`|The call is expected between `m` and `n` (inclusive) times.| -|`Exactly(n) or n`|The call is expected exactly `n` times. In particular, the call should never happen when `n` is 0.| - -# Expectation Order # - -By default, the expectations can be matched in _any_ order. If some -or all expectations must be matched in a given order, there are two -ways to specify it. They can be used either independently or -together. - -## The After Clause ## - -``` -using ::testing::Expectation; -... -Expectation init_x = EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitX()); -Expectation init_y = EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitY()); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .After(init_x, init_y); -``` -says that `Bar()` can be called only after both `InitX()` and -`InitY()` have been called. - -If you don't know how many pre-requisites an expectation has when you -write it, you can use an `ExpectationSet` to collect them: - -``` -using ::testing::ExpectationSet; -... -ExpectationSet all_inits; -for (int i = 0; i < element_count; i++) { - all_inits += EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitElement(i)); -} -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .After(all_inits); -``` -says that `Bar()` can be called only after all elements have been -initialized (but we don't care about which elements get initialized -before the others). - -Modifying an `ExpectationSet` after using it in an `.After()` doesn't -affect the meaning of the `.After()`. - -## Sequences ## - -When you have a long chain of sequential expectations, it's easier to -specify the order using **sequences**, which don't require you to given -each expectation in the chain a different name. <i>All expected<br> -calls</i> in the same sequence must occur in the order they are -specified. - -``` -using ::testing::Sequence; -Sequence s1, s2; -... -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Reset()) - .InSequence(s1, s2) - .WillOnce(Return(true)); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetSize()) - .InSequence(s1) - .WillOnce(Return(1)); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Describe(A<const char*>())) - .InSequence(s2) - .WillOnce(Return("dummy")); -``` -says that `Reset()` must be called before _both_ `GetSize()` _and_ -`Describe()`, and the latter two can occur in any order. - -To put many expectations in a sequence conveniently: -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -{ - InSequence dummy; - - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; -} -``` -says that all expected calls in the scope of `dummy` must occur in -strict order. The name `dummy` is irrelevant.) - -# Verifying and Resetting a Mock # - -Google Mock will verify the expectations on a mock object when it is destructed, or you can do it earlier: -``` -using ::testing::Mock; -... -// Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj; -// returns true iff successful. -Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_obj); -... -// Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj; -// also removes the default actions set by ON_CALL(); -// returns true iff successful. -Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_obj); -``` - -You can also tell Google Mock that a mock object can be leaked and doesn't -need to be verified: -``` -Mock::AllowLeak(&mock_obj); -``` - -# Mock Classes # - -Google Mock defines a convenient mock class template -``` -class MockFunction<R(A1, ..., An)> { - public: - MOCK_METHODn(Call, R(A1, ..., An)); -}; -``` -See this [recipe](V1_5_CookBook#Using_Check_Points.md) for one application of it. - -# Flags # - -| `--gmock_catch_leaked_mocks=0` | Don't report leaked mock objects as failures. | -|:-------------------------------|:----------------------------------------------| -| `--gmock_verbose=LEVEL` | Sets the default verbosity level (`info`, `warning`, or `error`) of Google Mock messages. |
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_5/CookBook.md deleted file mode 100644 index 26e153c..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/CookBook.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3250 +0,0 @@ - - -You can find recipes for using Google Mock here. If you haven't yet, -please read the [ForDummies](V1_5_ForDummies.md) document first to make sure you understand -the basics. - -**Note:** Google Mock lives in the `testing` name space. For -readability, it is recommended to write `using ::testing::Foo;` once in -your file before using the name `Foo` defined by Google Mock. We omit -such `using` statements in this page for brevity, but you should do it -in your own code. - -# Creating Mock Classes # - -## Mocking Private or Protected Methods ## - -You must always put a mock method definition (`MOCK_METHOD*`) in a -`public:` section of the mock class, regardless of the method being -mocked being `public`, `protected`, or `private` in the base class. -This allows `ON_CALL` and `EXPECT_CALL` to reference the mock function -from outside of the mock class. (Yes, C++ allows a subclass to change -the access level of a virtual function in the base class.) Example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - ... - virtual bool Transform(Gadget* g) = 0; - - protected: - virtual void Resume(); - - private: - virtual int GetTimeOut(); -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Transform, bool(Gadget* g)); - - // The following must be in the public section, even though the - // methods are protected or private in the base class. - MOCK_METHOD0(Resume, void()); - MOCK_METHOD0(GetTimeOut, int()); -}; -``` - -## Mocking Overloaded Methods ## - -You can mock overloaded functions as usual. No special attention is required: - -``` -class Foo { - ... - - // Must be virtual as we'll inherit from Foo. - virtual ~Foo(); - - // Overloaded on the types and/or numbers of arguments. - virtual int Add(Element x); - virtual int Add(int times, Element x); - - // Overloaded on the const-ness of this object. - virtual Bar& GetBar(); - virtual const Bar& GetBar() const; -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Add, int(Element x)); - MOCK_METHOD2(Add, int(int times, Element x); - - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetBar, const Bar&()); -}; -``` - -**Note:** if you don't mock all versions of the overloaded method, the -compiler will give you a warning about some methods in the base class -being hidden. To fix that, use `using` to bring them in scope: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - using Foo::Add; - MOCK_METHOD1(Add, int(Element x)); - // We don't want to mock int Add(int times, Element x); - ... -}; -``` - -## Mocking Class Templates ## - -To mock a class template, append `_T` to the `MOCK_*` macros: - -``` -template <typename Elem> -class StackInterface { - ... - // Must be virtual as we'll inherit from StackInterface. - virtual ~StackInterface(); - - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual void Push(const Elem& x) = 0; -}; - -template <typename Elem> -class MockStack : public StackInterface<Elem> { - ... - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const Elem& x)); -}; -``` - -## Mocking Nonvirtual Methods ## - -Google Mock can mock non-virtual functions to be used in what we call _hi-perf -dependency injection_. - -In this case, instead of sharing a common base class with the real -class, your mock class will be _unrelated_ to the real class, but -contain methods with the same signatures. The syntax for mocking -non-virtual methods is the _same_ as mocking virtual methods: - -``` -// A simple packet stream class. None of its members is virtual. -class ConcretePacketStream { - public: - void AppendPacket(Packet* new_packet); - const Packet* GetPacket(size_t packet_number) const; - size_t NumberOfPackets() const; - ... -}; - -// A mock packet stream class. It inherits from no other, but defines -// GetPacket() and NumberOfPackets(). -class MockPacketStream { - public: - MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(GetPacket, const Packet*(size_t packet_number)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(NumberOfPackets, size_t()); - ... -}; -``` - -Note that the mock class doesn't define `AppendPacket()`, unlike the -real class. That's fine as long as the test doesn't need to call it. - -Next, you need a way to say that you want to use -`ConcretePacketStream` in production code, and use `MockPacketStream` -in tests. Since the functions are not virtual and the two classes are -unrelated, you must specify your choice at _compile time_ (as opposed -to run time). - -One way to do it is to templatize your code that needs to use a packet -stream. More specifically, you will give your code a template type -argument for the type of the packet stream. In production, you will -instantiate your template with `ConcretePacketStream` as the type -argument. In tests, you will instantiate the same template with -`MockPacketStream`. For example, you may write: - -``` -template <class PacketStream> -void CreateConnection(PacketStream* stream) { ... } - -template <class PacketStream> -class PacketReader { - public: - void ReadPackets(PacketStream* stream, size_t packet_num); -}; -``` - -Then you can use `CreateConnection<ConcretePacketStream>()` and -`PacketReader<ConcretePacketStream>` in production code, and use -`CreateConnection<MockPacketStream>()` and -`PacketReader<MockPacketStream>` in tests. - -``` - MockPacketStream mock_stream; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_stream, ...)...; - .. set more expectations on mock_stream ... - PacketReader<MockPacketStream> reader(&mock_stream); - ... exercise reader ... -``` - -## Mocking Free Functions ## - -It's possible to use Google Mock to mock a free function (i.e. a -C-style function or a static method). You just need to rewrite your -code to use an interface (abstract class). - -Instead of calling a free function (say, `OpenFile`) directly, -introduce an interface for it and have a concrete subclass that calls -the free function: - -``` -class FileInterface { - public: - ... - virtual bool Open(const char* path, const char* mode) = 0; -}; - -class File : public FileInterface { - public: - ... - virtual bool Open(const char* path, const char* mode) { - return OpenFile(path, mode); - } -}; -``` - -Your code should talk to `FileInterface` to open a file. Now it's -easy to mock out the function. - -This may seem much hassle, but in practice you often have multiple -related functions that you can put in the same interface, so the -per-function syntactic overhead will be much lower. - -If you are concerned about the performance overhead incurred by -virtual functions, and profiling confirms your concern, you can -combine this with the recipe for [mocking non-virtual methods](#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods.md). - -## Nice Mocks and Strict Mocks ## - -If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock -will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is: - - * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called. - * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. - -However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call" -warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all -of them as errors. Google Mock lets you make the decision on a -per-mock-object basis. - -Suppose your test uses a mock class `MockFoo`: - -``` -TEST(...) { - MockFoo mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -If a method of `mock_foo` other than `DoThis()` is called, it will be -reported by Google Mock as a warning. However, if you rewrite your -test to use `NiceMock<MockFoo>` instead, the warning will be gone, -resulting in a cleaner test output: - -``` -using ::testing::NiceMock; - -TEST(...) { - NiceMock<MockFoo> mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -`NiceMock<MockFoo>` is a subclass of `MockFoo`, so it can be used -wherever `MockFoo` is accepted. - -It also works if `MockFoo`'s constructor takes some arguments, as -`NiceMock<MockFoo>` "inherits" `MockFoo`'s constructors: - -``` -using ::testing::NiceMock; - -TEST(...) { - NiceMock<MockFoo> mock_foo(5, "hi"); // Calls MockFoo(5, "hi"). - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -The usage of `StrictMock` is similar, except that it makes all -uninteresting calls failures: - -``` -using ::testing::StrictMock; - -TEST(...) { - StrictMock<MockFoo> mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... - - // The test will fail if a method of mock_foo other than DoThis() - // is called. -} -``` - -There are some caveats though (I don't like them just as much as the -next guy, but sadly they are side effects of C++'s limitations): - - 1. `NiceMock<MockFoo>` and `StrictMock<MockFoo>` only work for mock methods defined using the `MOCK_METHOD*` family of macros **directly** in the `MockFoo` class. If a mock method is defined in a **base class** of `MockFoo`, the "nice" or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. In particular, nesting `NiceMock` and `StrictMock` (e.g. `NiceMock<StrictMock<MockFoo> >`) is **not** supported. - 1. The constructors of the base mock (`MockFoo`) cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which happens to be banned by the [Google C++ style guide](http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml). - 1. During the constructor or destructor of `MockFoo`, the mock object is _not_ nice or strict. This may cause surprises if the constructor or destructor calls a mock method on `this` object. (This behavior, however, is consistent with C++'s general rule: if a constructor or destructor calls a virtual method of `this` object, that method is treated as non-virtual. In other words, to the base class's constructor or destructor, `this` object behaves like an instance of the base class, not the derived class. This rule is required for safety. Otherwise a base constructor may use members of a derived class before they are initialized, or a base destructor may use members of a derived class after they have been destroyed.) - -Finally, you should be **very cautious** when using this feature, as the -decision you make applies to **all** future changes to the mock -class. If an important change is made in the interface you are mocking -(and thus in the mock class), it could break your tests (if you use -`StrictMock`) or let bugs pass through without a warning (if you use -`NiceMock`). Therefore, try to specify the mock's behavior using -explicit `EXPECT_CALL` first, and only turn to `NiceMock` or -`StrictMock` as the last resort. - -## Simplifying the Interface without Breaking Existing Code ## - -Sometimes a method has a long list of arguments that is mostly -uninteresting. For example, - -``` -class LogSink { - public: - ... - virtual void send(LogSeverity severity, const char* full_filename, - const char* base_filename, int line, - const struct tm* tm_time, - const char* message, size_t message_len) = 0; -}; -``` - -This method's argument list is lengthy and hard to work with (let's -say that the `message` argument is not even 0-terminated). If we mock -it as is, using the mock will be awkward. If, however, we try to -simplify this interface, we'll need to fix all clients depending on -it, which is often infeasible. - -The trick is to re-dispatch the method in the mock class: - -``` -class ScopedMockLog : public LogSink { - public: - ... - virtual void send(LogSeverity severity, const char* full_filename, - const char* base_filename, int line, const tm* tm_time, - const char* message, size_t message_len) { - // We are only interested in the log severity, full file name, and - // log message. - Log(severity, full_filename, std::string(message, message_len)); - } - - // Implements the mock method: - // - // void Log(LogSeverity severity, - // const string& file_path, - // const string& message); - MOCK_METHOD3(Log, void(LogSeverity severity, const string& file_path, - const string& message)); -}; -``` - -By defining a new mock method with a trimmed argument list, we make -the mock class much more user-friendly. - -## Alternative to Mocking Concrete Classes ## - -Often you may find yourself using classes that don't implement -interfaces. In order to test your code that uses such a class (let's -call it `Concrete`), you may be tempted to make the methods of -`Concrete` virtual and then mock it. - -Try not to do that. - -Making a non-virtual function virtual is a big decision. It creates an -extension point where subclasses can tweak your class' behavior. This -weakens your control on the class because now it's harder to maintain -the class' invariants. You should make a function virtual only when -there is a valid reason for a subclass to override it. - -Mocking concrete classes directly is problematic as it creates a tight -coupling between the class and the tests - any small change in the -class may invalidate your tests and make test maintenance a pain. - -To avoid such problems, many programmers have been practicing "coding -to interfaces": instead of talking to the `Concrete` class, your code -would define an interface and talk to it. Then you implement that -interface as an adaptor on top of `Concrete`. In tests, you can easily -mock that interface to observe how your code is doing. - -This technique incurs some overhead: - - * You pay the cost of virtual function calls (usually not a problem). - * There is more abstraction for the programmers to learn. - -However, it can also bring significant benefits in addition to better -testability: - - * `Concrete`'s API may not fit your problem domain very well, as you may not be the only client it tries to serve. By designing your own interface, you have a chance to tailor it to your need - you may add higher-level functionalities, rename stuff, etc instead of just trimming the class. This allows you to write your code (user of the interface) in a more natural way, which means it will be more readable, more maintainable, and you'll be more productive. - * If `Concrete`'s implementation ever has to change, you don't have to rewrite everywhere it is used. Instead, you can absorb the change in your implementation of the interface, and your other code and tests will be insulated from this change. - -Some people worry that if everyone is practicing this technique, they -will end up writing lots of redundant code. This concern is totally -understandable. However, there are two reasons why it may not be the -case: - - * Different projects may need to use `Concrete` in different ways, so the best interfaces for them will be different. Therefore, each of them will have its own domain-specific interface on top of `Concrete`, and they will not be the same code. - * If enough projects want to use the same interface, they can always share it, just like they have been sharing `Concrete`. You can check in the interface and the adaptor somewhere near `Concrete` (perhaps in a `contrib` sub-directory) and let many projects use it. - -You need to weigh the pros and cons carefully for your particular -problem, but I'd like to assure you that the Java community has been -practicing this for a long time and it's a proven effective technique -applicable in a wide variety of situations. :-) - -## Delegating Calls to a Fake ## - -Some times you have a non-trivial fake implementation of an -interface. For example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - virtual ~Foo() {} - virtual char DoThis(int n) = 0; - virtual void DoThat(const char* s, int* p) = 0; -}; - -class FakeFoo : public Foo { - public: - virtual char DoThis(int n) { - return (n > 0) ? '+' : - (n < 0) ? '-' : '0'; - } - - virtual void DoThat(const char* s, int* p) { - *p = strlen(s); - } -}; -``` - -Now you want to mock this interface such that you can set expectations -on it. However, you also want to use `FakeFoo` for the default -behavior, as duplicating it in the mock object is, well, a lot of -work. - -When you define the mock class using Google Mock, you can have it -delegate its default action to a fake class you already have, using -this pattern: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Normal mock method definitions using Google Mock. - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThis, char(int n)); - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThat, void(const char* s, int* p)); - - // Delegates the default actions of the methods to a FakeFoo object. - // This must be called *before* the custom ON_CALL() statements. - void DelegateToFake() { - ON_CALL(*this, DoThis(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThis)); - ON_CALL(*this, DoThat(_, _)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThat)); - } - private: - FakeFoo fake_; // Keeps an instance of the fake in the mock. -}; -``` - -With that, you can use `MockFoo` in your tests as usual. Just remember -that if you don't explicitly set an action in an `ON_CALL()` or -`EXPECT_CALL()`, the fake will be called upon to do it: - -``` -using ::testing::_; - -TEST(AbcTest, Xyz) { - MockFoo foo; - foo.DelegateToFake(); // Enables the fake for delegation. - - // Put your ON_CALL(foo, ...)s here, if any. - - // No action specified, meaning to use the default action. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, _)); - - int n = 0; - EXPECT_EQ('+', foo.DoThis(5)); // FakeFoo::DoThis() is invoked. - foo.DoThat("Hi", &n); // FakeFoo::DoThat() is invoked. - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); -} -``` - -**Some tips:** - - * If you want, you can still override the default action by providing your own `ON_CALL()` or using `.WillOnce()` / `.WillRepeatedly()` in `EXPECT_CALL()`. - * In `DelegateToFake()`, you only need to delegate the methods whose fake implementation you intend to use. - * The general technique discussed here works for overloaded methods, but you'll need to tell the compiler which version you mean. To disambiguate a mock function (the one you specify inside the parentheses of `ON_CALL()`), see the "Selecting Between Overloaded Functions" section on this page; to disambiguate a fake function (the one you place inside `Invoke()`), use a `static_cast` to specify the function's type. - * Having to mix a mock and a fake is often a sign of something gone wrong. Perhaps you haven't got used to the interaction-based way of testing yet. Or perhaps your interface is taking on too many roles and should be split up. Therefore, **don't abuse this**. We would only recommend to do it as an intermediate step when you are refactoring your code. - -Regarding the tip on mixing a mock and a fake, here's an example on -why it may be a bad sign: Suppose you have a class `System` for -low-level system operations. In particular, it does file and I/O -operations. And suppose you want to test how your code uses `System` -to do I/O, and you just want the file operations to work normally. If -you mock out the entire `System` class, you'll have to provide a fake -implementation for the file operation part, which suggests that -`System` is taking on too many roles. - -Instead, you can define a `FileOps` interface and an `IOOps` interface -and split `System`'s functionalities into the two. Then you can mock -`IOOps` without mocking `FileOps`. - -## Delegating Calls to a Real Object ## - -When using testing doubles (mocks, fakes, stubs, and etc), sometimes -their behaviors will differ from those of the real objects. This -difference could be either intentional (as in simulating an error such -that you can test the error handling code) or unintentional. If your -mocks have different behaviors than the real objects by mistake, you -could end up with code that passes the tests but fails in production. - -You can use the _delegating-to-real_ technique to ensure that your -mock has the same behavior as the real object while retaining the -ability to validate calls. This technique is very similar to the -delegating-to-fake technique, the difference being that we use a real -object instead of a fake. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AtLeast; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MockFoo() { - // By default, all calls are delegated to the real object. - ON_CALL(*this, DoThis()) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&real_, &Foo::DoThis)); - ON_CALL(*this, DoThat(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&real_, &Foo::DoThat)); - ... - } - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, ...); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, ...); - ... - private: - Foo real_; -}; -... - - MockFoo mock; - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, DoThis()) - .Times(3); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, DoThat("Hi")) - .Times(AtLeast(1)); - ... use mock in test ... -``` - -With this, Google Mock will verify that your code made the right calls -(with the right arguments, in the right order, called the right number -of times, etc), and a real object will answer the calls (so the -behavior will be the same as in production). This gives you the best -of both worlds. - -## Delegating Calls to a Parent Class ## - -Ideally, you should code to interfaces, whose methods are all pure -virtual. In reality, sometimes you do need to mock a virtual method -that is not pure (i.e, it already has an implementation). For example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - virtual ~Foo(); - - virtual void Pure(int n) = 0; - virtual int Concrete(const char* str) { ... } -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Mocking a pure method. - MOCK_METHOD1(Pure, void(int n)); - // Mocking a concrete method. Foo::Concrete() is shadowed. - MOCK_METHOD1(Concrete, int(const char* str)); -}; -``` - -Sometimes you may want to call `Foo::Concrete()` instead of -`MockFoo::Concrete()`. Perhaps you want to do it as part of a stub -action, or perhaps your test doesn't need to mock `Concrete()` at all -(but it would be oh-so painful to have to define a new mock class -whenever you don't need to mock one of its methods). - -The trick is to leave a back door in your mock class for accessing the -real methods in the base class: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Mocking a pure method. - MOCK_METHOD1(Pure, void(int n)); - // Mocking a concrete method. Foo::Concrete() is shadowed. - MOCK_METHOD1(Concrete, int(const char* str)); - - // Use this to call Concrete() defined in Foo. - int FooConcrete(const char* str) { return Foo::Concrete(str); } -}; -``` - -Now, you can call `Foo::Concrete()` inside an action by: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Concrete(_)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(&foo, &MockFoo::FooConcrete)); -``` - -or tell the mock object that you don't want to mock `Concrete()`: - -``` -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - ON_CALL(foo, Concrete(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&foo, &MockFoo::FooConcrete)); -``` - -(Why don't we just write `Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concrete)`? If you do -that, `MockFoo::Concrete()` will be called (and cause an infinite -recursion) since `Foo::Concrete()` is virtual. That's just how C++ -works.) - -# Using Matchers # - -## Matching Argument Values Exactly ## - -You can specify exactly which arguments a mock method is expecting: - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)) - .WillOnce(Return('a')); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat("Hello", bar)); -``` - -## Using Simple Matchers ## - -You can use matchers to match arguments that have a certain property: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::Return; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(Ge(5))) // The argument must be >= 5. - .WillOnce(Return('a')); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat("Hello", NotNull())); - // The second argument must not be NULL. -``` - -A frequently used matcher is `_`, which matches anything: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::NotNull; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, NotNull())); -``` - -## Combining Matchers ## - -You can build complex matchers from existing ones using `AllOf()`, -`AnyOf()`, and `Not()`: - -``` -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::HasSubstr; -using ::testing::Ne; -using ::testing::Not; -... - // The argument must be > 5 and != 10. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(AllOf(Gt(5), - Ne(10)))); - - // The first argument must not contain sub-string "blah". - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(Not(HasSubstr("blah")), - NULL)); -``` - -## Casting Matchers ## - -Google Mock matchers are statically typed, meaning that the compiler -can catch your mistake if you use a matcher of the wrong type (for -example, if you use `Eq(5)` to match a `string` argument). Good for -you! - -Sometimes, however, you know what you're doing and want the compiler -to give you some slack. One example is that you have a matcher for -`long` and the argument you want to match is `int`. While the two -types aren't exactly the same, there is nothing really wrong with -using a `Matcher<long>` to match an `int` - after all, we can first -convert the `int` argument to a `long` before giving it to the -matcher. - -To support this need, Google Mock gives you the -`SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` function. It casts a matcher `m` to type -`Matcher<T>`. To ensure safety, Google Mock checks that (let `U` be the -type `m` accepts): - - 1. Type `T` can be implicitly cast to type `U`; - 1. When both `T` and `U` are built-in arithmetic types (`bool`, integers, and floating-point numbers), the conversion from `T` to `U` is not lossy (in other words, any value representable by `T` can also be represented by `U`); and - 1. When `U` is a reference, `T` must also be a reference (as the underlying matcher may be interested in the address of the `U` value). - -The code won't compile if any of these conditions isn't met. - -Here's one example: - -``` -using ::testing::SafeMatcherCast; - -// A base class and a child class. -class Base { ... }; -class Derived : public Base { ... }; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThis, void(Derived* derived)); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - // m is a Matcher<Base*> we got from somewhere. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(SafeMatcherCast<Derived*>(m))); -``` - -If you find `SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` too limiting, you can use a similar -function `MatcherCast<T>(m)`. The difference is that `MatcherCast` works -as long as you can `static_cast` type `T` to type `U`. - -`MatcherCast` essentially lets you bypass C++'s type system -(`static_cast` isn't always safe as it could throw away information, -for example), so be careful not to misuse/abuse it. - -## Selecting Between Overloaded Functions ## - -If you expect an overloaded function to be called, the compiler may -need some help on which overloaded version it is. - -To disambiguate functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object, -use the `Const()` argument wrapper. - -``` -using ::testing::ReturnRef; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetBar, const Bar&()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Bar bar1, bar2; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetBar()) // The non-const GetBar(). - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar1)); - EXPECT_CALL(Const(foo), GetBar()) // The const GetBar(). - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar2)); -``` - -(`Const()` is defined by Google Mock and returns a `const` reference -to its argument.) - -To disambiguate overloaded functions with the same number of arguments -but different argument types, you may need to specify the exact type -of a matcher, either by wrapping your matcher in `Matcher<type>()`, or -using a matcher whose type is fixed (`TypedEq<type>`, `An<type>()`, -etc): - -``` -using ::testing::An; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Matcher; -using ::testing::TypedEq; - -class MockPrinter : public Printer { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Print, void(int n)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Print, void(char c)); -}; - -TEST(PrinterTest, Print) { - MockPrinter printer; - - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(An<int>())); // void Print(int); - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(Matcher<int>(Lt(5)))); // void Print(int); - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(TypedEq<char>('a'))); // void Print(char); - - printer.Print(3); - printer.Print(6); - printer.Print('a'); -} -``` - -## Performing Different Actions Based on the Arguments ## - -When a mock method is called, the _last_ matching expectation that's -still active will be selected (think "newer overrides older"). So, you -can make a method do different things depending on its argument values -like this: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Return; -... - // The default case. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return('b')); - - // The more specific case. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(Lt(5))) - .WillRepeatedly(Return('a')); -``` - -Now, if `foo.DoThis()` is called with a value less than 5, `'a'` will -be returned; otherwise `'b'` will be returned. - -## Matching Multiple Arguments as a Whole ## - -Sometimes it's not enough to match the arguments individually. For -example, we may want to say that the first argument must be less than -the second argument. The `With()` clause allows us to match -all arguments of a mock function as a whole. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Ne; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, InRange(Ne(0), _)) - .With(Lt()); -``` - -says that the first argument of `InRange()` must not be 0, and must be -less than the second argument. - -The expression inside `With()` must be a matcher of type -`Matcher<tr1::tuple<A1, ..., An> >`, where `A1`, ..., `An` are the -types of the function arguments. - -You can also write `AllArgs(m)` instead of `m` inside `.With()`. The -two forms are equivalent, but `.With(AllArgs(Lt()))` is more readable -than `.With(Lt())`. - -You can use `Args<k1, ..., kn>(m)` to match the `n` selected arguments -against `m`. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Args; -using ::testing::Lt; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Blah(_, _, _)) - .With(AllOf(Args<0, 1>(Lt()), Args<1, 2>(Lt()))); -``` - -says that `Blah()` will be called with arguments `x`, `y`, and `z` where -`x < y < z`. - -As a convenience and example, Google Mock provides some matchers for -2-tuples, including the `Lt()` matcher above. See the [CheatSheet](V1_5_CheatSheet.md) for -the complete list. - -## Using Matchers as Predicates ## - -Have you noticed that a matcher is just a fancy predicate that also -knows how to describe itself? Many existing algorithms take predicates -as arguments (e.g. those defined in STL's `<algorithm>` header), and -it would be a shame if Google Mock matchers are not allowed to -participate. - -Luckily, you can use a matcher where a unary predicate functor is -expected by wrapping it inside the `Matches()` function. For example, - -``` -#include <algorithm> -#include <vector> - -std::vector<int> v; -... -// How many elements in v are >= 10? -const int count = count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), Matches(Ge(10))); -``` - -Since you can build complex matchers from simpler ones easily using -Google Mock, this gives you a way to conveniently construct composite -predicates (doing the same using STL's `<functional>` header is just -painful). For example, here's a predicate that's satisfied by any -number that is >= 0, <= 100, and != 50: - -``` -Matches(AllOf(Ge(0), Le(100), Ne(50))) -``` - -## Using Matchers in Google Test Assertions ## - -Since matchers are basically predicates that also know how to describe -themselves, there is a way to take advantage of them in -[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) assertions. It's -called `ASSERT_THAT` and `EXPECT_THAT`: - -``` - ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher); // Asserts that value matches matcher. - EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher); // The non-fatal version. -``` - -For example, in a Google Test test you can write: - -``` -#include <gmock/gmock.h> - -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::Le; -using ::testing::MatchesRegex; -using ::testing::StartsWith; -... - - EXPECT_THAT(Foo(), StartsWith("Hello")); - EXPECT_THAT(Bar(), MatchesRegex("Line \\d+")); - ASSERT_THAT(Baz(), AllOf(Ge(5), Le(10))); -``` - -which (as you can probably guess) executes `Foo()`, `Bar()`, and -`Baz()`, and verifies that: - - * `Foo()` returns a string that starts with `"Hello"`. - * `Bar()` returns a string that matches regular expression `"Line \\d+"`. - * `Baz()` returns a number in the range [5, 10]. - -The nice thing about these macros is that _they read like -English_. They generate informative messages too. For example, if the -first `EXPECT_THAT()` above fails, the message will be something like: - -``` -Value of: Foo() - Actual: "Hi, world!" -Expected: starts with "Hello" -``` - -**Credit:** The idea of `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_THAT` was stolen from the -[Hamcrest](http://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/) project, which adds -`assertThat()` to JUnit. - -## Using Predicates as Matchers ## - -Google Mock provides a built-in set of matchers. In case you find them -lacking, you can use an arbitray unary predicate function or functor -as a matcher - as long as the predicate accepts a value of the type -you want. You do this by wrapping the predicate inside the `Truly()` -function, for example: - -``` -using ::testing::Truly; - -int IsEven(int n) { return (n % 2) == 0 ? 1 : 0; } -... - - // Bar() must be called with an even number. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Truly(IsEven))); -``` - -Note that the predicate function / functor doesn't have to return -`bool`. It works as long as the return value can be used as the -condition in statement `if (condition) ...`. - -## Matching Arguments that Are Not Copyable ## - -When you do an `EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(bar))`, Google Mock saves -away a copy of `bar`. When `Foo()` is called later, Google Mock -compares the argument to `Foo()` with the saved copy of `bar`. This -way, you don't need to worry about `bar` being modified or destroyed -after the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed. The same is true when you use -matchers like `Eq(bar)`, `Le(bar)`, and so on. - -But what if `bar` cannot be copied (i.e. has no copy constructor)? You -could define your own matcher function and use it with `Truly()`, as -the previous couple of recipes have shown. Or, you may be able to get -away from it if you can guarantee that `bar` won't be changed after -the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed. Just tell Google Mock that it should -save a reference to `bar`, instead of a copy of it. Here's how: - -``` -using ::testing::Eq; -using ::testing::ByRef; -using ::testing::Lt; -... - // Expects that Foo()'s argument == bar. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(Eq(ByRef(bar)))); - - // Expects that Foo()'s argument < bar. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(Lt(ByRef(bar)))); -``` - -Remember: if you do this, don't change `bar` after the -`EXPECT_CALL()`, or the result is undefined. - -## Validating a Member of an Object ## - -Often a mock function takes a reference to object as an argument. When -matching the argument, you may not want to compare the entire object -against a fixed object, as that may be over-specification. Instead, -you may need to validate a certain member variable or the result of a -certain getter method of the object. You can do this with `Field()` -and `Property()`. More specifically, - -``` -Field(&Foo::bar, m) -``` - -is a matcher that matches a `Foo` object whose `bar` member variable -satisfies matcher `m`. - -``` -Property(&Foo::baz, m) -``` - -is a matcher that matches a `Foo` object whose `baz()` method returns -a value that satisfies matcher `m`. - -For example: - -> | `Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3))` | Matches `x` where `x.number >= 3`. | -|:-----------------------------|:-----------------------------------| -> | `Property(&Foo::name, StartsWith("John "))` | Matches `x` where `x.name()` starts with `"John "`. | - -Note that in `Property(&Foo::baz, ...)`, method `baz()` must take no -argument and be declared as `const`. - -BTW, `Field()` and `Property()` can also match plain pointers to -objects. For instance, - -``` -Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3)) -``` - -matches a plain pointer `p` where `p->number >= 3`. If `p` is `NULL`, -the match will always fail regardless of the inner matcher. - -What if you want to validate more than one members at the same time? -Remember that there is `AllOf()`. - -## Validating the Value Pointed to by a Pointer Argument ## - -C++ functions often take pointers as arguments. You can use matchers -like `NULL`, `NotNull()`, and other comparison matchers to match a -pointer, but what if you want to make sure the value _pointed to_ by -the pointer, instead of the pointer itself, has a certain property? -Well, you can use the `Pointee(m)` matcher. - -`Pointee(m)` matches a pointer iff `m` matches the value the pointer -points to. For example: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::Pointee; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Pointee(Ge(3)))); -``` - -expects `foo.Bar()` to be called with a pointer that points to a value -greater than or equal to 3. - -One nice thing about `Pointee()` is that it treats a `NULL` pointer as -a match failure, so you can write `Pointee(m)` instead of - -``` - AllOf(NotNull(), Pointee(m)) -``` - -without worrying that a `NULL` pointer will crash your test. - -Also, did we tell you that `Pointee()` works with both raw pointers -**and** smart pointers (`linked_ptr`, `shared_ptr`, `scoped_ptr`, and -etc)? - -What if you have a pointer to pointer? You guessed it - you can use -nested `Pointee()` to probe deeper inside the value. For example, -`Pointee(Pointee(Lt(3)))` matches a pointer that points to a pointer -that points to a number less than 3 (what a mouthful...). - -## Testing a Certain Property of an Object ## - -Sometimes you want to specify that an object argument has a certain -property, but there is no existing matcher that does this. If you want -good error messages, you should define a matcher. If you want to do it -quick and dirty, you could get away with writing an ordinary function. - -Let's say you have a mock function that takes an object of type `Foo`, -which has an `int bar()` method and an `int baz()` method, and you -want to constrain that the argument's `bar()` value plus its `baz()` -value is a given number. Here's how you can define a matcher to do it: - -``` -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; - -class BarPlusBazEqMatcher : public MatcherInterface<const Foo&> { - public: - explicit BarPlusBazEqMatcher(int expected_sum) - : expected_sum_(expected_sum) {} - - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(const Foo& foo, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return (foo.bar() + foo.baz()) == expected_sum_; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "bar() + baz() equals " << expected_sum_; - } - - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "bar() + baz() does not equal " << expected_sum_; - } - private: - const int expected_sum_; -}; - -inline Matcher<const Foo&> BarPlusBazEq(int expected_sum) { - return MakeMatcher(new BarPlusBazEqMatcher(expected_sum)); -} - -... - - EXPECT_CALL(..., DoThis(BarPlusBazEq(5)))...; -``` - -## Matching Containers ## - -Sometimes an STL container (e.g. list, vector, map, ...) is passed to -a mock function and you may want to validate it. Since most STL -containers support the `==` operator, you can write -`Eq(expected_container)` or simply `expected_container` to match a -container exactly. - -Sometimes, though, you may want to be more flexible (for example, the -first element must be an exact match, but the second element can be -any positive number, and so on). Also, containers used in tests often -have a small number of elements, and having to define the expected -container out-of-line is a bit of a hassle. - -You can use the `ElementsAre()` matcher in such cases: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::ElementsAre; -using ::testing::Gt; -... - - MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, void(const vector<int>& numbers)); -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAre(1, Gt(0), _, 5))); -``` - -The above matcher says that the container must have 4 elements, which -must be 1, greater than 0, anything, and 5 respectively. - -`ElementsAre()` is overloaded to take 0 to 10 arguments. If more are -needed, you can place them in a C-style array and use -`ElementsAreArray()` instead: - -``` -using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; -... - - // ElementsAreArray accepts an array of element values. - const int expected_vector1[] = { 1, 5, 2, 4, ... }; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector1))); - - // Or, an array of element matchers. - Matcher<int> expected_vector2 = { 1, Gt(2), _, 3, ... }; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector2))); -``` - -In case the array needs to be dynamically created (and therefore the -array size cannot be inferred by the compiler), you can give -`ElementsAreArray()` an additional argument to specify the array size: - -``` -using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; -... - int* const expected_vector3 = new int[count]; - ... fill expected_vector3 with values ... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector3, count))); -``` - -**Tips:** - - * `ElementAre*()` works with _any_ container that implements the STL iterator concept (i.e. it has a `const_iterator` type and supports `begin()/end()`) and supports `size()`, not just the ones defined in STL. It will even work with container types yet to be written - as long as they follows the above pattern. - * You can use nested `ElementAre*()` to match nested (multi-dimensional) containers. - * If the container is passed by pointer instead of by reference, just write `Pointee(ElementsAre*(...))`. - * The order of elements _matters_ for `ElementsAre*()`. Therefore don't use it with containers whose element order is undefined (e.g. `hash_map`). - -## Sharing Matchers ## - -Under the hood, a Google Mock matcher object consists of a pointer to -a ref-counted implementation object. Copying matchers is allowed and -very efficient, as only the pointer is copied. When the last matcher -that references the implementation object dies, the implementation -object will be deleted. - -Therefore, if you have some complex matcher that you want to use again -and again, there is no need to build it everytime. Just assign it to a -matcher variable and use that variable repeatedly! For example, - -``` - Matcher<int> in_range = AllOf(Gt(5), Le(10)); - ... use in_range as a matcher in multiple EXPECT_CALLs ... -``` - -# Setting Expectations # - -## Ignoring Uninteresting Calls ## - -If you are not interested in how a mock method is called, just don't -say anything about it. In this case, if the method is ever called, -Google Mock will perform its default action to allow the test program -to continue. If you are not happy with the default action taken by -Google Mock, you can override it using `DefaultValue<T>::Set()` -(described later in this document) or `ON_CALL()`. - -Please note that once you expressed interest in a particular mock -method (via `EXPECT_CALL()`), all invocations to it must match some -expectation. If this function is called but the arguments don't match -any `EXPECT_CALL()` statement, it will be an error. - -## Disallowing Unexpected Calls ## - -If a mock method shouldn't be called at all, explicitly say so: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .Times(0); -``` - -If some calls to the method are allowed, but the rest are not, just -list all the expected calls: - -``` -using ::testing::AnyNumber; -using ::testing::Gt; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Gt(10))) - .Times(AnyNumber()); -``` - -A call to `foo.Bar()` that doesn't match any of the `EXPECT_CALL()` -statements will be an error. - -## Expecting Ordered Calls ## - -Although an `EXPECT_CALL()` statement defined earlier takes precedence -when Google Mock tries to match a function call with an expectation, -by default calls don't have to happen in the order `EXPECT_CALL()` -statements are written. For example, if the arguments match the -matchers in the third `EXPECT_CALL()`, but not those in the first two, -then the third expectation will be used. - -If you would rather have all calls occur in the order of the -expectations, put the `EXPECT_CALL()` statements in a block where you -define a variable of type `InSequence`: - -``` - using ::testing::_; - using ::testing::InSequence; - - { - InSequence s; - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, DoThat(_)) - .Times(2); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(6)); - } -``` - -In this example, we expect a call to `foo.DoThis(5)`, followed by two -calls to `bar.DoThat()` where the argument can be anything, which are -in turn followed by a call to `foo.DoThis(6)`. If a call occurred -out-of-order, Google Mock will report an error. - -## Expecting Partially Ordered Calls ## - -Sometimes requiring everything to occur in a predetermined order can -lead to brittle tests. For example, we may care about `A` occurring -before both `B` and `C`, but aren't interested in the relative order -of `B` and `C`. In this case, the test should reflect our real intent, -instead of being overly constraining. - -Google Mock allows you to impose an arbitrary DAG (directed acyclic -graph) on the calls. One way to express the DAG is to use the -[After](V1_5_CheatSheet#The_After_Clause.md) clause of `EXPECT_CALL`. - -Another way is via the `InSequence()` clause (not the same as the -`InSequence` class), which we borrowed from jMock 2. It's less -flexible than `After()`, but more convenient when you have long chains -of sequential calls, as it doesn't require you to come up with -different names for the expectations in the chains. Here's how it -works: - -If we view `EXPECT_CALL()` statements as nodes in a graph, and add an -edge from node A to node B wherever A must occur before B, we can get -a DAG. We use the term "sequence" to mean a directed path in this -DAG. Now, if we decompose the DAG into sequences, we just need to know -which sequences each `EXPECT_CALL()` belongs to in order to be able to -reconstruct the orginal DAG. - -So, to specify the partial order on the expectations we need to do two -things: first to define some `Sequence` objects, and then for each -`EXPECT_CALL()` say which `Sequence` objects it is part -of. Expectations in the same sequence must occur in the order they are -written. For example, - -``` - using ::testing::Sequence; - - Sequence s1, s2; - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, A()) - .InSequence(s1, s2); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, B()) - .InSequence(s1); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, C()) - .InSequence(s2); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, D()) - .InSequence(s2); -``` - -specifies the following DAG (where `s1` is `A -> B`, and `s2` is `A -> -C -> D`): - -``` - +---> B - | - A ---| - | - +---> C ---> D -``` - -This means that A must occur before B and C, and C must occur before -D. There's no restriction about the order other than these. - -## Controlling When an Expectation Retires ## - -When a mock method is called, Google Mock only consider expectations -that are still active. An expectation is active when created, and -becomes inactive (aka _retires_) when a call that has to occur later -has occurred. For example, in - -``` - using ::testing::_; - using ::testing::Sequence; - - Sequence s1, s2; - - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")) // #1 - .Times(AnyNumber()) - .InSequence(s1, s2); - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "Data set is empty.")) // #2 - .InSequence(s1); - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "User not found.")) // #3 - .InSequence(s2); -``` - -as soon as either #2 or #3 is matched, #1 will retire. If a warning -`"File too large."` is logged after this, it will be an error. - -Note that an expectation doesn't retire automatically when it's -saturated. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, _)); // #1 - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")); // #2 -``` - -says that there will be exactly one warning with the message `"File -too large."`. If the second warning contains this message too, #2 will -match again and result in an upper-bound-violated error. - -If this is not what you want, you can ask an expectation to retire as -soon as it becomes saturated: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, _)); // #1 - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")) // #2 - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -Here #2 can be used only once, so if you have two warnings with the -message `"File too large."`, the first will match #2 and the second -will match #1 - there will be no error. - -# Using Actions # - -## Returning References from Mock Methods ## - -If a mock function's return type is a reference, you need to use -`ReturnRef()` instead of `Return()` to return a result: - -``` -using ::testing::ReturnRef; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Bar bar; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetBar()) - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar)); -``` - -## Combining Actions ## - -Want to do more than one thing when a function is called? That's -fine. `DoAll()` allow you to do sequence of actions every time. Only -the return value of the last action in the sequence will be used. - -``` -using ::testing::DoAll; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, bool(int n)); -}; -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillOnce(DoAll(action_1, - action_2, - ... - action_n)); -``` - -## Mocking Side Effects ## - -Sometimes a method exhibits its effect not via returning a value but -via side effects. For example, it may change some global state or -modify an output argument. To mock side effects, in general you can -define your own action by implementing `::testing::ActionInterface`. - -If all you need to do is to change an output argument, the built-in -`SetArgumentPointee()` action is convenient: - -``` -using ::testing::SetArgumentPointee; - -class MockMutator : public Mutator { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Mutate, void(bool mutate, int* value)); - ... -}; -... - - MockMutator mutator; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, Mutate(true, _)) - .WillOnce(SetArgumentPointee<1>(5)); -``` - -In this example, when `mutator.Mutate()` is called, we will assign 5 -to the `int` variable pointed to by argument #1 -(0-based). - -`SetArgumentPointee()` conveniently makes an internal copy of the -value you pass to it, removing the need to keep the value in scope and -alive. The implication however is that the value must have a copy -constructor and assignment operator. - -If the mock method also needs to return a value as well, you can chain -`SetArgumentPointee()` with `Return()` using `DoAll()`: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Return; -using ::testing::SetArgumentPointee; - -class MockMutator : public Mutator { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(MutateInt, bool(int* value)); -}; -... - - MockMutator mutator; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, MutateInt(_)) - .WillOnce(DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(5), - Return(true))); -``` - -If the output argument is an array, use the -`SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last)` action instead. It copies the -elements in source range `[first, last)` to the array pointed to by -the `N`-th (0-based) argument: - -``` -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::SetArrayArgument; - -class MockArrayMutator : public ArrayMutator { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Mutate, void(int* values, int num_values)); - ... -}; -... - - MockArrayMutator mutator; - int values[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, Mutate(NotNull(), 5)) - .WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(values, values + 5)); -``` - -This also works when the argument is an output iterator: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SeArrayArgument; - -class MockRolodex : public Rolodex { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(GetNames, void(std::back_insert_iterator<vector<string> >)); - ... -}; -... - - MockRolodex rolodex; - vector<string> names; - names.push_back("George"); - names.push_back("John"); - names.push_back("Thomas"); - EXPECT_CALL(rolodex, GetNames(_)) - .WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(names.begin(), names.end())); -``` - -## Changing a Mock Object's Behavior Based on the State ## - -If you expect a call to change the behavior of a mock object, you can use `::testing::InSequence` to specify different behaviors before and after the call: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -using ::testing::Return; - -... - { - InSequence seq; - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, IsDirty()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(true)); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, Flush()); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, IsDirty()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(false)); - } - my_mock.FlushIfDirty(); -``` - -This makes `my_mock.IsDirty()` return `true` before `my_mock.Flush()` is called and return `false` afterwards. - -If the behavior change is more complex, you can store the effects in a variable and make a mock method get its return value from that variable: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SaveArg; -using ::testing::Return; - -ACTION_P(ReturnPointee, p) { return *p; } -... - int previous_value = 0; - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, GetPrevValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(ReturnPointee(&previous_value)); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, UpdateValue(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(SaveArg<0>(&previous_value)); - my_mock.DoSomethingToUpdateValue(); -``` - -Here `my_mock.GetPrevValue()` will always return the argument of the last `UpdateValue()` call. - -## Setting the Default Value for a Return Type ## - -If a mock method's return type is a built-in C++ type or pointer, by -default it will return 0 when invoked. You only need to specify an -action if this default value doesn't work for you. - -Sometimes, you may want to change this default value, or you may want -to specify a default value for types Google Mock doesn't know -about. You can do this using the `::testing::DefaultValue` class -template: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(CalculateBar, Bar()); -}; -... - - Bar default_bar; - // Sets the default return value for type Bar. - DefaultValue<Bar>::Set(default_bar); - - MockFoo foo; - - // We don't need to specify an action here, as the default - // return value works for us. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, CalculateBar()); - - foo.CalculateBar(); // This should return default_bar. - - // Unsets the default return value. - DefaultValue<Bar>::Clear(); -``` - -Please note that changing the default value for a type can make you -tests hard to understand. We recommend you to use this feature -judiciously. For example, you may want to make sure the `Set()` and -`Clear()` calls are right next to the code that uses your mock. - -## Setting the Default Actions for a Mock Method ## - -You've learned how to change the default value of a given -type. However, this may be too coarse for your purpose: perhaps you -have two mock methods with the same return type and you want them to -have different behaviors. The `ON_CALL()` macro allows you to -customize your mock's behavior at the method level: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AnyNumber; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::Return; -... - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(_)) - .WillByDefault(Return(-1)); - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(0)) - .WillByDefault(Return(0)); - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(Gt(0))) - .WillByDefault(Return(1)); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Sign(_)) - .Times(AnyNumber()); - - foo.Sign(5); // This should return 1. - foo.Sign(-9); // This should return -1. - foo.Sign(0); // This should return 0. -``` - -As you may have guessed, when there are more than one `ON_CALL()` -statements, the news order take precedence over the older ones. In -other words, the **last** one that matches the function arguments will -be used. This matching order allows you to set up the common behavior -in a mock object's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase and -specialize the mock's behavior later. - -## Using Functions/Methods/Functors as Actions ## - -If the built-in actions don't suit you, you can easily use an existing -function, method, or functor as an action: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Sum, int(int x, int y)); - MOCK_METHOD1(ComplexJob, bool(int x)); -}; - -int CalculateSum(int x, int y) { return x + y; } - -class Helper { - public: - bool ComplexJob(int x); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Helper helper; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Sum(_, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(CalculateSum)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, ComplexJob(_)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(&helper, &Helper::ComplexJob)); - - foo.Sum(5, 6); // Invokes CalculateSum(5, 6). - foo.ComplexJob(10); // Invokes helper.ComplexJob(10); -``` - -The only requirement is that the type of the function, etc must be -_compatible_ with the signature of the mock function, meaning that the -latter's arguments can be implicitly converted to the corresponding -arguments of the former, and the former's return type can be -implicitly converted to that of the latter. So, you can invoke -something whose type is _not_ exactly the same as the mock function, -as long as it's safe to do so - nice, huh? - -## Invoking a Function/Method/Functor Without Arguments ## - -`Invoke()` is very useful for doing actions that are more complex. It -passes the mock function's arguments to the function or functor being -invoked such that the callee has the full context of the call to work -with. If the invoked function is not interested in some or all of the -arguments, it can simply ignore them. - -Yet, a common pattern is that a test author wants to invoke a function -without the arguments of the mock function. `Invoke()` allows her to -do that using a wrapper function that throws away the arguments before -invoking an underlining nullary function. Needless to say, this can be -tedious and obscures the intent of the test. - -`InvokeWithoutArgs()` solves this problem. It's like `Invoke()` except -that it doesn't pass the mock function's arguments to the -callee. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeWithoutArgs; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(ComplexJob, bool(int n)); -}; - -bool Job1() { ... } -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, ComplexJob(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs(Job1)); - - foo.ComplexJob(10); // Invokes Job1(). -``` - -## Invoking an Argument of the Mock Function ## - -Sometimes a mock function will receive a function pointer or a functor -(in other words, a "callable") as an argument, e.g. - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThis, bool(int n, bool (*fp)(int))); -}; -``` - -and you may want to invoke this callable argument: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(...); - // Will execute (*fp)(5), where fp is the - // second argument DoThis() receives. -``` - -Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no -lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you -really? - -Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem: - -``` - InvokeArgument<N>(arg_1, arg_2, ..., arg_m) -``` - -will invoke the `N`-th (0-based) argument the mock function receives, -with `arg_1`, `arg_2`, ..., and `arg_m`. No matter if the argument is -a function pointer or a functor, Google Mock handles them both. - -With that, you could write: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<1>(5)); - // Will execute (*fp)(5), where fp is the - // second argument DoThis() receives. -``` - -What if the callable takes an argument by reference? No problem - just -wrap it inside `ByRef()`: - -``` -... - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, bool(bool (*fp)(int, const Helper&))); -... -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::ByRef; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Helper helper; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(5, ByRef(helper))); - // ByRef(helper) guarantees that a reference to helper, not a copy of it, - // will be passed to the callable. -``` - -What if the callable takes an argument by reference and we do **not** -wrap the argument in `ByRef()`? Then `InvokeArgument()` will _make a -copy_ of the argument, and pass a _reference to the copy_, instead of -a reference to the original value, to the callable. This is especially -handy when the argument is a temporary value: - -``` -... - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(bool (*f)(const double& x, const string& s))); -... -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - - MockFoo foo; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(5.0, string("Hi"))); - // Will execute (*f)(5.0, string("Hi")), where f is the function pointer - // DoThat() receives. Note that the values 5.0 and string("Hi") are - // temporary and dead once the EXPECT_CALL() statement finishes. Yet - // it's fine to perform this action later, since a copy of the values - // are kept inside the InvokeArgument action. -``` - -## Ignoring an Action's Result ## - -Sometimes you have an action that returns _something_, but you need an -action that returns `void` (perhaps you want to use it in a mock -function that returns `void`, or perhaps it needs to be used in -`DoAll()` and it's not the last in the list). `IgnoreResult()` lets -you do that. For example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::Return; - -int Process(const MyData& data); -string DoSomething(); - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Abc, void(const MyData& data)); - MOCK_METHOD0(Xyz, bool()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Abc(_)) - // .WillOnce(Invoke(Process)); - // The above line won't compile as Process() returns int but Abc() needs - // to return void. - .WillOnce(IgnoreResult(Invoke(Process))); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Xyz()) - .WillOnce(DoAll(IgnoreResult(Invoke(DoSomething)), - // Ignores the string DoSomething() returns. - Return(true))); -``` - -Note that you **cannot** use `IgnoreResult()` on an action that already -returns `void`. Doing so will lead to ugly compiler errors. - -## Selecting an Action's Arguments ## - -Say you have a mock function `Foo()` that takes seven arguments, and -you have a custom action that you want to invoke when `Foo()` is -called. Trouble is, the custom action only wants three arguments: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - MOCK_METHOD7(Foo, bool(bool visible, const string& name, int x, int y, - const map<pair<int, int>, double>& weight, - double min_weight, double max_wight)); -... - -bool IsVisibleInQuadrant1(bool visible, int x, int y) { - return visible && x >= 0 && y >= 0; -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(IsVisibleInQuadrant1)); // Uh, won't compile. :-( -``` - -To please the compiler God, you can to define an "adaptor" that has -the same signature as `Foo()` and calls the custom action with the -right arguments: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -bool MyIsVisibleInQuadrant1(bool visible, const string& name, int x, int y, - const map<pair<int, int>, double>& weight, - double min_weight, double max_wight) { - return IsVisibleInQuadrant1(visible, x, y); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(MyIsVisibleInQuadrant1)); // Now it works. -``` - -But isn't this awkward? - -Google Mock provides a generic _action adaptor_, so you can spend your -time minding more important business than writing your own -adaptors. Here's the syntax: - -``` - WithArgs<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(action) -``` - -creates an action that passes the arguments of the mock function at -the given indices (0-based) to the inner `action` and performs -it. Using `WithArgs`, our original example can be written as: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::WithArgs; -... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(IsVisibleInQuadrant1))); - // No need to define your own adaptor. -``` - -For better readability, Google Mock also gives you: - - * `WithoutArgs(action)` when the inner `action` takes _no_ argument, and - * `WithArg<N>(action)` (no `s` after `Arg`) when the inner `action` takes _one_ argument. - -As you may have realized, `InvokeWithoutArgs(...)` is just syntactic -sugar for `WithoutArgs(Inovke(...))`. - -Here are more tips: - - * The inner action used in `WithArgs` and friends does not have to be `Invoke()` -- it can be anything. - * You can repeat an argument in the argument list if necessary, e.g. `WithArgs<2, 3, 3, 5>(...)`. - * You can change the order of the arguments, e.g. `WithArgs<3, 2, 1>(...)`. - * The types of the selected arguments do _not_ have to match the signature of the inner action exactly. It works as long as they can be implicitly converted to the corresponding arguments of the inner action. For example, if the 4-th argument of the mock function is an `int` and `my_action` takes a `double`, `WithArg<4>(my_action)` will work. - -## Ignoring Arguments in Action Functions ## - -The selecting-an-action's-arguments recipe showed us one way to make a -mock function and an action with incompatible argument lists fit -together. The downside is that wrapping the action in -`WithArgs<...>()` can get tedious for people writing the tests. - -If you are defining a function, method, or functor to be used with -`Invoke*()`, and you are not interested in some of its arguments, an -alternative to `WithArgs` is to declare the uninteresting arguments as -`Unused`. This makes the definition less cluttered and less fragile in -case the types of the uninteresting arguments change. It could also -increase the chance the action function can be reused. For example, -given - -``` - MOCK_METHOD3(Foo, double(const string& label, double x, double y)); - MOCK_METHOD3(Bar, double(int index, double x, double y)); -``` - -instead of - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -double DistanceToOriginWithLabel(const string& label, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} - -double DistanceToOriginWithIndex(int index, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} -... - - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithLabel)); - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithIndex)); -``` - -you could write - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::Unused; - -double DistanceToOrigin(Unused, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} -... - - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); -``` - -## Sharing Actions ## - -Just like matchers, a Google Mock action object consists of a pointer -to a ref-counted implementation object. Therefore copying actions is -also allowed and very efficient. When the last action that references -the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be -deleted. - -If you have some complex action that you want to use again and again, -you may not have to build it from scratch everytime. If the action -doesn't have an internal state (i.e. if it always does the same thing -no matter how many times it has been called), you can assign it to an -action variable and use that variable repeatedly. For example: - -``` - Action<bool(int*)> set_flag = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(5), - Return(true)); - ... use set_flag in .WillOnce() and .WillRepeatedly() ... -``` - -However, if the action has its own state, you may be surprised if you -share the action object. Suppose you have an action factory -`IncrementCounter(init)` which creates an action that increments and -returns a counter whose initial value is `init`, using two actions -created from the same expression and using a shared action will -exihibit different behaviors. Example: - -``` - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis()) - .WillRepeatedly(IncrementCounter(0)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat()) - .WillRepeatedly(IncrementCounter(0)); - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 1. - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 2. - foo.DoThat(); // Returns 1 - Blah() uses a different - // counter than Bar()'s. -``` - -versus - -``` - Action<int()> increment = IncrementCounter(0); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis()) - .WillRepeatedly(increment); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat()) - .WillRepeatedly(increment); - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 1. - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 2. - foo.DoThat(); // Returns 3 - the counter is shared. -``` - -# Misc Recipes on Using Google Mock # - -## Forcing a Verification ## - -When it's being destoyed, your friendly mock object will automatically -verify that all expectations on it have been satisfied, and will -generate [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) failures -if not. This is convenient as it leaves you with one less thing to -worry about. That is, unless you are not sure if your mock object will -be destoyed. - -How could it be that your mock object won't eventually be destroyed? -Well, it might be created on the heap and owned by the code you are -testing. Suppose there's a bug in that code and it doesn't delete the -mock object properly - you could end up with a passing test when -there's actually a bug. - -Using a heap checker is a good idea and can alleviate the concern, but -its implementation may not be 100% reliable. So, sometimes you do want -to _force_ Google Mock to verify a mock object before it is -(hopefully) destructed. You can do this with -`Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_object)`: - -``` -TEST(MyServerTest, ProcessesRequest) { - using ::testing::Mock; - - MockFoo* const foo = new MockFoo; - EXPECT_CALL(*foo, ...)...; - // ... other expectations ... - - // server now owns foo. - MyServer server(foo); - server.ProcessRequest(...); - - // In case that server's destructor will forget to delete foo, - // this will verify the expectations anyway. - Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(foo); -} // server is destroyed when it goes out of scope here. -``` - -**Tip:** The `Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations()` function returns a -`bool` to indicate whether the verification was successful (`true` for -yes), so you can wrap that function call inside a `ASSERT_TRUE()` if -there is no point going further when the verification has failed. - -## Using Check Points ## - -Sometimes you may want to "reset" a mock object at various check -points in your test: at each check point, you verify that all existing -expectations on the mock object have been satisfied, and then you set -some new expectations on it as if it's newly created. This allows you -to work with a mock object in "phases" whose sizes are each -manageable. - -One such scenario is that in your test's `SetUp()` function, you may -want to put the object you are testing into a certain state, with the -help from a mock object. Once in the desired state, you want to clear -all expectations on the mock, such that in the `TEST_F` body you can -set fresh expectations on it. - -As you may have figured out, the `Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations()` -function we saw in the previous recipe can help you here. Or, if you -are using `ON_CALL()` to set default actions on the mock object and -want to clear the default actions as well, use -`Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_object)` instead. This function does what -`Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_object)` does and returns the -same `bool`, **plus** it clears the `ON_CALL()` statements on -`mock_object` too. - -Another trick you can use to achieve the same effect is to put the -expectations in sequences and insert calls to a dummy "check-point" -function at specific places. Then you can verify that the mock -function calls do happen at the right time. For example, if you are -exercising code: - -``` -Foo(1); -Foo(2); -Foo(3); -``` - -and want to verify that `Foo(1)` and `Foo(3)` both invoke -`mock.Bar("a")`, but `Foo(2)` doesn't invoke anything. You can write: - -``` -using ::testing::MockFunction; - -TEST(FooTest, InvokesBarCorrectly) { - MyMock mock; - // Class MockFunction<F> has exactly one mock method. It is named - // Call() and has type F. - MockFunction<void(string check_point_name)> check; - { - InSequence s; - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar("a")); - EXPECT_CALL(check, Call("1")); - EXPECT_CALL(check, Call("2")); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar("a")); - } - Foo(1); - check.Call("1"); - Foo(2); - check.Call("2"); - Foo(3); -} -``` - -The expectation spec says that the first `Bar("a")` must happen before -check point "1", the second `Bar("a")` must happen after check point "2", -and nothing should happen between the two check points. The explicit -check points make it easy to tell which `Bar("a")` is called by which -call to `Foo()`. - -## Mocking Destructors ## - -Sometimes you want to make sure a mock object is destructed at the -right time, e.g. after `bar->A()` is called but before `bar->B()` is -called. We already know that you can specify constraints on the order -of mock function calls, so all we need to do is to mock the destructor -of the mock function. - -This sounds simple, except for one problem: a destructor is a special -function with special syntax and special semantics, and the -`MOCK_METHOD0` macro doesn't work for it: - -``` - MOCK_METHOD0(~MockFoo, void()); // Won't compile! -``` - -The good news is that you can use a simple pattern to achieve the same -effect. First, add a mock function `Die()` to your mock class and call -it in the destructor, like this: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - // Add the following two lines to the mock class. - MOCK_METHOD0(Die, void()); - virtual ~MockFoo() { Die(); } -}; -``` - -(If the name `Die()` clashes with an existing symbol, choose another -name.) Now, we have translated the problem of testing when a `MockFoo` -object dies to testing when its `Die()` method is called: - -``` - MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo; - MockBar* bar = new MockBar; - ... - { - InSequence s; - - // Expects *foo to die after bar->A() and before bar->B(). - EXPECT_CALL(*bar, A()); - EXPECT_CALL(*foo, Die()); - EXPECT_CALL(*bar, B()); - } -``` - -And that's that. - -## Using Google Mock and Threads ## - -**IMPORTANT NOTE:** What we describe in this recipe is **NOT** true yet, -as Google Mock is not currently thread-safe. However, all we need to -make it thread-safe is to implement some synchronization operations in -`<gtest/internal/gtest-port.h>` - and then the information below will -become true. - -In a **unit** test, it's best if you could isolate and test a piece of -code in a single-threaded context. That avoids race conditions and -dead locks, and makes debugging your test much easier. - -Yet many programs are multi-threaded, and sometimes to test something -we need to pound on it from more than one thread. Google Mock works -for this purpose too. - -Remember the steps for using a mock: - - 1. Create a mock object `foo`. - 1. Set its default actions and expectations using `ON_CALL()` and `EXPECT_CALL()`. - 1. The code under test calls methods of `foo`. - 1. Optionally, verify and reset the mock. - 1. Destroy the mock yourself, or let the code under test destroy it. The destructor will automatically verify it. - -If you follow the following simple rules, your mocks and threads can -live happily togeter: - - * Execute your _test code_ (as opposed to the code being tested) in _one_ thread. This makes your test easy to follow. - * Obviously, you can do step #1 without locking. - * When doing step #2 and #5, make sure no other thread is accessing `foo`. Obvious too, huh? - * #3 and #4 can be done either in one thread or in multiple threads - anyway you want. Google Mock takes care of the locking, so you don't have to do any - unless required by your test logic. - -If you violate the rules (for example, if you set expectations on a -mock while another thread is calling its methods), you get undefined -behavior. That's not fun, so don't do it. - -Google Mock guarantees that the action for a mock function is done in -the same thread that called the mock function. For example, in - -``` - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(1)) - .WillOnce(action1); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(2)) - .WillOnce(action2); -``` - -if `Foo(1)` is called in thread 1 and `Foo(2)` is called in thread 2, -Google Mock will execute `action1` in thread 1 and `action2` in thread -2. - -Google Mock does _not_ impose a sequence on actions performed in -different threads (doing so may create deadlocks as the actions may -need to cooperate). This means that the execution of `action1` and -`action2` in the above example _may_ interleave. If this is a problem, -you should add proper synchronization logic to `action1` and `action2` -to make the test thread-safe. - - -Also, remember that `DefaultValue<T>` is a global resource that -potentially affects _all_ living mock objects in your -program. Naturally, you won't want to mess with it from multiple -threads or when there still are mocks in action. - -## Controlling How Much Information Google Mock Prints ## - -When Google Mock sees something that has the potential of being an -error (e.g. a mock function with no expectation is called, a.k.a. an -uninteresting call, which is allowed but perhaps you forgot to -explicitly ban the call), it prints some warning messages, including -the arguments of the function and the return value. Hopefully this -will remind you to take a look and see if there is indeed a problem. - -Sometimes you are confident that your tests are correct and may not -appreciate such friendly messages. Some other times, you are debugging -your tests or learning about the behavior of the code you are testing, -and wish you could observe every mock call that happens (including -argument values and the return value). Clearly, one size doesn't fit -all. - -You can control how much Google Mock tells you using the -`--gmock_verbose=LEVEL` command-line flag, where `LEVEL` is a string -with three possible values: - - * `info`: Google Mock will print all informational messages, warnings, and errors (most verbose). At this setting, Google Mock will also log any calls to the `ON_CALL/EXPECT_CALL` macros. - * `warning`: Google Mock will print both warnings and errors (less verbose). This is the default. - * `error`: Google Mock will print errors only (least verbose). - -Alternatively, you can adjust the value of that flag from within your -tests like so: - -``` - ::testing::FLAGS_gmock_verbose = "error"; -``` - -Now, judiciously use the right flag to enable Google Mock serve you better! - -## Running Tests in Emacs ## - -If you build and run your tests in Emacs, the source file locations of -Google Mock and [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) -errors will be highlighted. Just press `<Enter>` on one of them and -you'll be taken to the offending line. Or, you can just type `C-x `` -to jump to the next error. - -To make it even easier, you can add the following lines to your -`~/.emacs` file: - -``` -(global-set-key "\M-m" 'compile) ; m is for make -(global-set-key [M-down] 'next-error) -(global-set-key [M-up] '(lambda () (interactive) (next-error -1))) -``` - -Then you can type `M-m` to start a build, or `M-up`/`M-down` to move -back and forth between errors. - -## Fusing Google Mock Source Files ## - -Google Mock's implementation consists of dozens of files (excluding -its own tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in -fewer files instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gmock_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory -(starting with release 1.2.0). Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above -installed on your machine, just go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gmock_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h`, `gmock/gmock.h`, and `gmock-gtest-all.cc` in it. -These three files contain everything you need to use Google Mock (and -Google Test). Just copy them to anywhere you want and you are ready -to write tests and use mocks. You can use the -[scrpts/test/Makefile](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/scripts/test/Makefile) file as an example on how to compile your tests -against them. - -# Extending Google Mock # - -## Writing New Matchers Quickly ## - -The `MATCHER*` family of macros can be used to define custom matchers -easily. The syntax: - -``` -MATCHER(name, "description string") { statements; } -``` - -will define a matcher with the given name that executes the -statements, which must return a `bool` to indicate if the match -succeeds. Inside the statements, you can refer to the value being -matched by `arg`, and refer to its type by `arg_type`. - -The description string documents what the matcher does, and is used to -generate the failure message when the match fails. Since a -`MATCHER()` is usually defined in a header file shared by multiple C++ -source files, we require the description to be a C-string _literal_ to -avoid possible side effects. It can be empty (`""`), in which case -Google Mock will use the sequence of words in the matcher name as the -description. - -For example: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, "") { return (arg % 7) == 0; } -``` -allows you to write -``` - // Expects mock_foo.Bar(n) to be called where n is divisible by 7. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, Bar(IsDivisibleBy7())); -``` -or, -``` - // Verifies that the value of some_expression is divisible by 7. - EXPECT_THAT(some_expression, IsDivisibleBy7()); -``` -If the above assertion fails, it will print something like: -``` - Value of: some_expression - Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 27 -``` -where the description `"is divisible by 7"` is automatically calculated from the -matcher name `IsDivisibleBy7`. - -Optionally, you can stream additional information to a hidden argument -named `result_listener` to explain the match result. For example, a -better definition of `IsDivisibleBy7` is: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, "") { - if ((arg % 7) == 0) - return true; - - *result_listener << "the remainder is " << (arg % 7); - return false; -} -``` - -With this definition, the above assertion will give a better message: -``` - Value of: some_expression - Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 27 (the remainder is 6) -``` - -You should let `MatchAndExplain()` print _any additional information_ -that can help a user understand the match result. Note that it should -explain why the match succeeds in case of a success (unless it's -obvious) - this is useful when the matcher is used inside -`Not()`. There is no need to print the argument value itself, as -Google Mock already prints it for you. - -**Notes:** - - 1. The type of the value being matched (`arg_type`) is determined by the context in which you use the matcher and is supplied to you by the compiler, so you don't need to worry about declaring it (nor can you). This allows the matcher to be polymorphic. For example, `IsDivisibleBy7()` can be used to match any type where the value of `(arg % 7) == 0` can be implicitly converted to a `bool`. In the `Bar(IsDivisibleBy7())` example above, if method `Bar()` takes an `int`, `arg_type` will be `int`; if it takes an `unsigned long`, `arg_type` will be `unsigned long`; and so on. - 1. Google Mock doesn't guarantee when or how many times a matcher will be invoked. Therefore the matcher logic must be _purely functional_ (i.e. it cannot have any side effect, and the result must not depend on anything other than the value being matched and the matcher parameters). This requirement must be satisfied no matter how you define the matcher (e.g. using one of the methods described in the following recipes). In particular, a matcher can never call a mock function, as that will affect the state of the mock object and Google Mock. - -## Writing New Parameterized Matchers Quickly ## - -Sometimes you'll want to define a matcher that has parameters. For that you -can use the macro: -``` -MATCHER_P(name, param_name, "description string") { statements; } -``` - -For example: -``` -MATCHER_P(HasAbsoluteValue, value, "") { return abs(arg) == value; } -``` -will allow you to write: -``` - EXPECT_THAT(Blah("a"), HasAbsoluteValue(n)); -``` -which may lead to this message (assuming `n` is 10): -``` - Value of: Blah("a") - Expected: has absolute value 10 - Actual: -9 -``` - -Note that both the matcher description and its parameter are -printed, making the message human-friendly. - -In the matcher definition body, you can write `foo_type` to -reference the type of a parameter named `foo`. For example, in the -body of `MATCHER_P(HasAbsoluteValue, value)` above, you can write -`value_type` to refer to the type of `value`. - -Google Mock also provides `MATCHER_P2`, `MATCHER_P3`, ..., up to -`MATCHER_P10` to support multi-parameter matchers: -``` -MATCHER_Pk(name, param_1, ..., param_k, "description string") { statements; } -``` - -Please note that the custom description string is for a particular -**instance** of the matcher, where the parameters have been bound to -actual values. Therefore usually you'll want the parameter values to -be part of the description. Google Mock lets you do that using -Python-style interpolations. The following syntaxes are supported -currently: - -| `%%` | a single `%` character | -|:-----|:-----------------------| -| `%(*)s` | all parameters of the matcher printed as a tuple | -| `%(foo)s` | value of the matcher parameter named `foo` | - -For example, -``` - MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, "is in range [%(low)s, %(hi)s]") { - return low <= arg && arg <= hi; - } - ... - EXPECT_THAT(3, InClosedRange(4, 6)); -``` -would generate a failure that contains the message: -``` - Expected: is in range [4, 6] -``` - -If you specify `""` as the description, the failure message will -contain the sequence of words in the matcher name followed by the -parameter values printed as a tuple. For example, -``` - MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, "") { ... } - ... - EXPECT_THAT(3, InClosedRange(4, 6)); -``` -would generate a failure that contains the text: -``` - Expected: in closed range (4, 6) -``` - -For the purpose of typing, you can view -``` -MATCHER_Pk(Foo, p1, ..., pk, "description string") { ... } -``` -as shorthand for -``` -template <typename p1_type, ..., typename pk_type> -FooMatcherPk<p1_type, ..., pk_type> -Foo(p1_type p1, ..., pk_type pk) { ... } -``` - -When you write `Foo(v1, ..., vk)`, the compiler infers the types of -the parameters `v1`, ..., and `vk` for you. If you are not happy with -the result of the type inference, you can specify the types by -explicitly instantiating the template, as in `Foo<long, bool>(5, false)`. -As said earlier, you don't get to (or need to) specify -`arg_type` as that's determined by the context in which the matcher -is used. - -You can assign the result of expression `Foo(p1, ..., pk)` to a -variable of type `FooMatcherPk<p1_type, ..., pk_type>`. This can be -useful when composing matchers. Matchers that don't have a parameter -or have only one parameter have special types: you can assign `Foo()` -to a `FooMatcher`-typed variable, and assign `Foo(p)` to a -`FooMatcherP<p_type>`-typed variable. - -While you can instantiate a matcher template with reference types, -passing the parameters by pointer usually makes your code more -readable. If, however, you still want to pass a parameter by -reference, be aware that in the failure message generated by the -matcher you will see the value of the referenced object but not its -address. - -You can overload matchers with different numbers of parameters: -``` -MATCHER_P(Blah, a, "description string 1") { ... } -MATCHER_P2(Blah, a, b, "description string 2") { ... } -``` - -While it's tempting to always use the `MATCHER*` macros when defining -a new matcher, you should also consider implementing -`MatcherInterface` or using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()` instead (see -the recipes that follow), especially if you need to use the matcher a -lot. While these approaches require more work, they give you more -control on the types of the value being matched and the matcher -parameters, which in general leads to better compiler error messages -that pay off in the long run. They also allow overloading matchers -based on parameter types (as opposed to just based on the number of -parameters). - -## Writing New Monomorphic Matchers ## - -A matcher of argument type `T` implements -`::testing::MatcherInterface<T>` and does two things: it tests whether a -value of type `T` matches the matcher, and can describe what kind of -values it matches. The latter ability is used for generating readable -error messages when expectations are violated. - -The interface looks like this: - -``` -class MatchResultListener { - public: - ... - // Streams x to the underlying ostream; does nothing if the ostream - // is NULL. - template <typename T> - MatchResultListener& operator<<(const T& x); - - // Returns the underlying ostream. - ::std::ostream* stream(); -}; - -template <typename T> -class MatcherInterface { - public: - virtual ~MatcherInterface(); - - // Returns true iff the matcher matches x; also explains the match - // result to 'listener'. - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const = 0; - - // Describes this matcher to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const = 0; - - // Describes the negation of this matcher to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const; -}; -``` - -If you need a custom matcher but `Truly()` is not a good option (for -example, you may not be happy with the way `Truly(predicate)` -describes itself, or you may want your matcher to be polymorphic as -`Eq(value)` is), you can define a matcher to do whatever you want in -two steps: first implement the matcher interface, and then define a -factory function to create a matcher instance. The second step is not -strictly needed but it makes the syntax of using the matcher nicer. - -For example, you can define a matcher to test whether an `int` is -divisible by 7 and then use it like this: -``` -using ::testing::MakeMatcher; -using ::testing::Matcher; -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; - -class DivisibleBy7Matcher : public MatcherInterface<int> { - public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int n, MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return (n % 7) == 0; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is divisible by 7"; - } - - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is not divisible by 7"; - } -}; - -inline Matcher<int> DivisibleBy7() { - return MakeMatcher(new DivisibleBy7Matcher); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(DivisibleBy7())); -``` - -You may improve the matcher message by streaming additional -information to the `listener` argument in `MatchAndExplain()`: - -``` -class DivisibleBy7Matcher : public MatcherInterface<int> { - public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int n, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - const int remainder = n % 7; - if (remainder != 0) { - *listener << "the remainder is " << remainder; - } - return remainder == 0; - } - ... -}; -``` - -Then, `EXPECT_THAT(x, DivisibleBy7());` may general a message like this: -``` -Value of: x -Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 23 (the remainder is 2) -``` - -## Writing New Polymorphic Matchers ## - -You've learned how to write your own matchers in the previous -recipe. Just one problem: a matcher created using `MakeMatcher()` only -works for one particular type of arguments. If you want a -_polymorphic_ matcher that works with arguments of several types (for -instance, `Eq(x)` can be used to match a `value` as long as `value` == -`x` compiles -- `value` and `x` don't have to share the same type), -you can learn the trick from `<gmock/gmock-matchers.h>` but it's a bit -involved. - -Fortunately, most of the time you can define a polymorphic matcher -easily with the help of `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`. Here's how you can -define `NotNull()` as an example: - -``` -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::PolymorphicMatcher; - -class NotNullMatcher { - public: - // To implement a polymorphic matcher, first define a COPYABLE class - // that has three members MatchAndExplain(), DescribeTo(), and - // DescribeNegationTo(), like the following. - - // In this example, we want to use NotNull() with any pointer, so - // MatchAndExplain() accepts a pointer of any type as its first argument. - // In general, you can define MatchAndExplain() as an ordinary method or - // a method template, or even overload it. - template <typename T> - bool MatchAndExplain(T* p, - MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { - return p != NULL; - } - - // Describes the property of a value matching this matcher. - void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is not NULL"; } - - // Describes the property of a value NOT matching this matcher. - void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is NULL"; } -}; - -// To construct a polymorphic matcher, pass an instance of the class -// to MakePolymorphicMatcher(). Note the return type. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<NotNullMatcher> NotNull() { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(NotNullMatcher()); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(NotNull())); // The argument must be a non-NULL pointer. -``` - -**Note:** Your polymorphic matcher class does **not** need to inherit from -`MatcherInterface` or any other class, and its methods do **not** need -to be virtual. - -Like in a monomorphic matcher, you may explain the match result by -streaming additional information to the `listener` argument in -`MatchAndExplain()`. - -## Writing New Cardinalities ## - -A cardinality is used in `Times()` to tell Google Mock how many times -you expect a call to occur. It doesn't have to be exact. For example, -you can say `AtLeast(5)` or `Between(2, 4)`. - -If the built-in set of cardinalities doesn't suit you, you are free to -define your own by implementing the following interface (in namespace -`testing`): - -``` -class CardinalityInterface { - public: - virtual ~CardinalityInterface(); - - // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality. - virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0; - - // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality. - virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0; - - // Describes self to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const = 0; -}; -``` - -For example, to specify that a call must occur even number of times, -you can write - -``` -using ::testing::Cardinality; -using ::testing::CardinalityInterface; -using ::testing::MakeCardinality; - -class EvenNumberCardinality : public CardinalityInterface { - public: - virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const { - return (call_count % 2) == 0; - } - - virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const { - return false; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "called even number of times"; - } -}; - -Cardinality EvenNumber() { - return MakeCardinality(new EvenNumberCardinality); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(3)) - .Times(EvenNumber()); -``` - -## Writing New Actions Quickly ## - -If the built-in actions don't work for you, and you find it -inconvenient to use `Invoke()`, you can use a macro from the `ACTION*` -family to quickly define a new action that can be used in your code as -if it's a built-in action. - -By writing -``` -ACTION(name) { statements; } -``` -in a namespace scope (i.e. not inside a class or function), you will -define an action with the given name that executes the statements. -The value returned by `statements` will be used as the return value of -the action. Inside the statements, you can refer to the K-th -(0-based) argument of the mock function as `argK`. For example: -``` -ACTION(IncrementArg1) { return ++(*arg1); } -``` -allows you to write -``` -... WillOnce(IncrementArg1()); -``` - -Note that you don't need to specify the types of the mock function -arguments. Rest assured that your code is type-safe though: -you'll get a compiler error if `*arg1` doesn't support the `++` -operator, or if the type of `++(*arg1)` isn't compatible with the mock -function's return type. - -Another example: -``` -ACTION(Foo) { - (*arg2)(5); - Blah(); - *arg1 = 0; - return arg0; -} -``` -defines an action `Foo()` that invokes argument #2 (a function pointer) -with 5, calls function `Blah()`, sets the value pointed to by argument -#1 to 0, and returns argument #0. - -For more convenience and flexibility, you can also use the following -pre-defined symbols in the body of `ACTION`: - -| `argK_type` | The type of the K-th (0-based) argument of the mock function | -|:------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------| -| `args` | All arguments of the mock function as a tuple | -| `args_type` | The type of all arguments of the mock function as a tuple | -| `return_type` | The return type of the mock function | -| `function_type` | The type of the mock function | - -For example, when using an `ACTION` as a stub action for mock function: -``` -int DoSomething(bool flag, int* ptr); -``` -we have: -| **Pre-defined Symbol** | **Is Bound To** | -|:-----------------------|:----------------| -| `arg0` | the value of `flag` | -| `arg0_type` | the type `bool` | -| `arg1` | the value of `ptr` | -| `arg1_type` | the type `int*` | -| `args` | the tuple `(flag, ptr)` | -| `args_type` | the type `std::tr1::tuple<bool, int*>` | -| `return_type` | the type `int` | -| `function_type` | the type `int(bool, int*)` | - -## Writing New Parameterized Actions Quickly ## - -Sometimes you'll want to parameterize an action you define. For that -we have another macro -``` -ACTION_P(name, param) { statements; } -``` - -For example, -``` -ACTION_P(Add, n) { return arg0 + n; } -``` -will allow you to write -``` -// Returns argument #0 + 5. -... WillOnce(Add(5)); -``` - -For convenience, we use the term _arguments_ for the values used to -invoke the mock function, and the term _parameters_ for the values -used to instantiate an action. - -Note that you don't need to provide the type of the parameter either. -Suppose the parameter is named `param`, you can also use the -Google-Mock-defined symbol `param_type` to refer to the type of the -parameter as inferred by the compiler. For example, in the body of -`ACTION_P(Add, n)` above, you can write `n_type` for the type of `n`. - -Google Mock also provides `ACTION_P2`, `ACTION_P3`, and etc to support -multi-parameter actions. For example, -``` -ACTION_P2(ReturnDistanceTo, x, y) { - double dx = arg0 - x; - double dy = arg1 - y; - return sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy); -} -``` -lets you write -``` -... WillOnce(ReturnDistanceTo(5.0, 26.5)); -``` - -You can view `ACTION` as a degenerated parameterized action where the -number of parameters is 0. - -You can also easily define actions overloaded on the number of parameters: -``` -ACTION_P(Plus, a) { ... } -ACTION_P2(Plus, a, b) { ... } -``` - -## Restricting the Type of an Argument or Parameter in an ACTION ## - -For maximum brevity and reusability, the `ACTION*` macros don't ask -you to provide the types of the mock function arguments and the action -parameters. Instead, we let the compiler infer the types for us. - -Sometimes, however, we may want to be more explicit about the types. -There are several tricks to do that. For example: -``` -ACTION(Foo) { - // Makes sure arg0 can be converted to int. - int n = arg0; - ... use n instead of arg0 here ... -} - -ACTION_P(Bar, param) { - // Makes sure the type of arg1 is const char*. - ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<const char*, arg1_type>(); - - // Makes sure param can be converted to bool. - bool flag = param; -} -``` -where `StaticAssertTypeEq` is a compile-time assertion in Google Test -that verifies two types are the same. - -## Writing New Action Templates Quickly ## - -Sometimes you want to give an action explicit template parameters that -cannot be inferred from its value parameters. `ACTION_TEMPLATE()` -supports that and can be viewed as an extension to `ACTION()` and -`ACTION_P*()`. - -The syntax: -``` -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ActionName, - HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(kind1, name1, ..., kind_m, name_m), - AND_n_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, ..., p_n)) { statements; } -``` - -defines an action template that takes _m_ explicit template parameters -and _n_ value parameters, where _m_ is between 1 and 10, and _n_ is -between 0 and 10. `name_i` is the name of the i-th template -parameter, and `kind_i` specifies whether it's a `typename`, an -integral constant, or a template. `p_i` is the name of the i-th value -parameter. - -Example: -``` -// DuplicateArg<k, T>(output) converts the k-th argument of the mock -// function to type T and copies it to *output. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(DuplicateArg, - // Note the comma between int and k: - HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k, typename, T), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(output)) { - *output = T(std::tr1::get<k>(args)); -} -``` - -To create an instance of an action template, write: -``` - ActionName<t1, ..., t_m>(v1, ..., v_n) -``` -where the `t`s are the template arguments and the -`v`s are the value arguments. The value argument -types are inferred by the compiler. For example: -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - int n; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _)) - .WillOnce(DuplicateArg<1, unsigned char>(&n)); -``` - -If you want to explicitly specify the value argument types, you can -provide additional template arguments: -``` - ActionName<t1, ..., t_m, u1, ..., u_k>(v1, ..., v_n) -``` -where `u_i` is the desired type of `v_i`. - -`ACTION_TEMPLATE` and `ACTION`/`ACTION_P*` can be overloaded on the -number of value parameters, but not on the number of template -parameters. Without the restriction, the meaning of the following is -unclear: - -``` - OverloadedAction<int, bool>(x); -``` - -Are we using a single-template-parameter action where `bool` refers to -the type of `x`, or a two-template-parameter action where the compiler -is asked to infer the type of `x`? - -## Using the ACTION Object's Type ## - -If you are writing a function that returns an `ACTION` object, you'll -need to know its type. The type depends on the macro used to define -the action and the parameter types. The rule is relatively simple: -| **Given Definition** | **Expression** | **Has Type** | -|:---------------------|:---------------|:-------------| -| `ACTION(Foo)` | `Foo()` | `FooAction` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Foo, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS())` | `Foo<t1, ..., t_m>()` | `FooAction<t1, ..., t_m>` | -| `ACTION_P(Bar, param)` | `Bar(int_value)` | `BarActionP<int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Bar, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p1))` | `Bar<t1, ..., t_m>(int_value)` | `FooActionP<t1, ..., t_m, int>` | -| `ACTION_P2(Baz, p1, p2)` | `Baz(bool_value, int_value)` | `BazActionP2<bool, int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Baz, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, p2))` | `Baz<t1, ..., t_m>(bool_value, int_value)` | `FooActionP2<t1, ..., t_m, bool, int>` | -| ... | ... | ... | - -Note that we have to pick different suffixes (`Action`, `ActionP`, -`ActionP2`, and etc) for actions with different numbers of value -parameters, or the action definitions cannot be overloaded on the -number of them. - -## Writing New Monomorphic Actions ## - -While the `ACTION*` macros are very convenient, sometimes they are -inappropriate. For example, despite the tricks shown in the previous -recipes, they don't let you directly specify the types of the mock -function arguments and the action parameters, which in general leads -to unoptimized compiler error messages that can baffle unfamiliar -users. They also don't allow overloading actions based on parameter -types without jumping through some hoops. - -An alternative to the `ACTION*` macros is to implement -`::testing::ActionInterface<F>`, where `F` is the type of the mock -function in which the action will be used. For example: - -``` -template <typename F>class ActionInterface { - public: - virtual ~ActionInterface(); - - // Performs the action. Result is the return type of function type - // F, and ArgumentTuple is the tuple of arguments of F. - // - // For example, if F is int(bool, const string&), then Result would - // be int, and ArgumentTuple would be tr1::tuple<bool, const string&>. - virtual Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) = 0; -}; - -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Action; -using ::testing::ActionInterface; -using ::testing::MakeAction; - -typedef int IncrementMethod(int*); - -class IncrementArgumentAction : public ActionInterface<IncrementMethod> { - public: - virtual int Perform(const tr1::tuple<int*>& args) { - int* p = tr1::get<0>(args); // Grabs the first argument. - return *p++; - } -}; - -Action<IncrementMethod> IncrementArgument() { - return MakeAction(new IncrementArgumentAction); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Baz(_)) - .WillOnce(IncrementArgument()); - - int n = 5; - foo.Baz(&n); // Should return 5 and change n to 6. -``` - -## Writing New Polymorphic Actions ## - -The previous recipe showed you how to define your own action. This is -all good, except that you need to know the type of the function in -which the action will be used. Sometimes that can be a problem. For -example, if you want to use the action in functions with _different_ -types (e.g. like `Return()` and `SetArgumentPointee()`). - -If an action can be used in several types of mock functions, we say -it's _polymorphic_. The `MakePolymorphicAction()` function template -makes it easy to define such an action: - -``` -namespace testing { - -template <typename Impl> -PolymorphicAction<Impl> MakePolymorphicAction(const Impl& impl); - -} // namespace testing -``` - -As an example, let's define an action that returns the second argument -in the mock function's argument list. The first step is to define an -implementation class: - -``` -class ReturnSecondArgumentAction { - public: - template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> - Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const { - // To get the i-th (0-based) argument, use tr1::get<i>(args). - return tr1::get<1>(args); - } -}; -``` - -This implementation class does _not_ need to inherit from any -particular class. What matters is that it must have a `Perform()` -method template. This method template takes the mock function's -arguments as a tuple in a **single** argument, and returns the result of -the action. It can be either `const` or not, but must be invokable -with exactly one template argument, which is the result type. In other -words, you must be able to call `Perform<R>(args)` where `R` is the -mock function's return type and `args` is its arguments in a tuple. - -Next, we use `MakePolymorphicAction()` to turn an instance of the -implementation class into the polymorphic action we need. It will be -convenient to have a wrapper for this: - -``` -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicAction; -using ::testing::PolymorphicAction; - -PolymorphicAction<ReturnSecondArgumentAction> ReturnSecondArgument() { - return MakePolymorphicAction(ReturnSecondArgumentAction()); -} -``` - -Now, you can use this polymorphic action the same way you use the -built-in ones: - -``` -using ::testing::_; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThis, int(bool flag, int n)); - MOCK_METHOD3(DoThat, string(int x, const char* str1, const char* str2)); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(ReturnSecondArgument()); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, _, _)) - .WillOnce(ReturnSecondArgument()); - ... - foo.DoThis(true, 5); // Will return 5. - foo.DoThat(1, "Hi", "Bye"); // Will return "Hi". -``` - -## Teaching Google Mock How to Print Your Values ## - -When an uninteresting or unexpected call occurs, Google Mock prints -the argument values to help you debug. The `EXPECT_THAT` and -`ASSERT_THAT` assertions also print the value being validated when the -test fails. Google Mock does this using the user-extensible value -printer defined in `<gmock/gmock-printers.h>`. - -This printer knows how to print the built-in C++ types, native arrays, -STL containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For -other types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hope you the -user can figure it out. - -Did I say that the printer is `extensible`? That means you can teach -it to do a better job at printing your particular type than to dump -the bytes. To do that, you just need to define `<<` for your type: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Foo { ... }; - -// It's important that the << operator is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Foo. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Foo& foo) { - return os << foo.DebugString(); // Whatever needed to print foo to os. -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -Sometimes, this might not be an option. For example, your team may -consider it dangerous or bad style to have a `<<` operator for `Foo`, -or `Foo` may already have a `<<` operator that doesn't do what you -want (and you cannot change it). Don't despair though - Google Mock -gives you a second chance to get it right. Namely, you can define a -`PrintTo()` function like this: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Foo { ... }; - -// It's important that PrintTo() is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Foo. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -void PrintTo(const Foo& foo, ::std::ostream* os) { - *os << foo.DebugString(); // Whatever needed to print foo to os. -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -What if you have both `<<` and `PrintTo()`? In this case, the latter -will override the former when Google Mock is concerned. This allows -you to customize how the value should appear in Google Mock's output -without affecting code that relies on the behavior of its `<<` -operator. - -**Note:** When printing a pointer of type `T*`, Google Mock calls -`PrintTo(T*, std::ostream* os)` instead of `operator<<(std::ostream&, T*)`. -Therefore the only way to affect how a pointer is printed by Google -Mock is to define `PrintTo()` for it. Also note that `T*` and `const T*` -are different types, so you may need to define `PrintTo()` for both. - -Why does Google Mock treat pointers specially? There are several reasons: - - * We cannot use `operator<<` to print a `signed char*` or `unsigned char*`, since it will print the pointer as a NUL-terminated C string, which likely will cause an access violation. - * We want `NULL` pointers to be printed as `"NULL"`, but `operator<<` prints it as `"0"`, `"nullptr"`, or something else, depending on the compiler. - * With some compilers, printing a `NULL` `char*` using `operator<<` will segfault. - * `operator<<` prints a function pointer as a `bool` (hence it always prints `"1"`), which is not very useful.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/Documentation.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_5/Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 315b0a2..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Mock **version 1.5.0** -- **if you use a different version of Google Mock, please read the documentation for that specific version instead.** - - * [ForDummies](V1_5_ForDummies.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Mock. - * [CheatSheet](V1_5_CheatSheet.md) -- a quick reference. - * [CookBook](V1_5_CookBook.md) -- recipes for doing various tasks using Google Mock. - * [FrequentlyAskedQuestions](V1_5_FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Mock, read: - - * DevGuide -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [Pump Manual](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/PumpManual) -- how we generate some of Google Mock's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_5/ForDummies.md deleted file mode 100644 index fcc3b56..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/ForDummies.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,439 +0,0 @@ - - -(**Note:** If you get compiler errors that you don't understand, be sure to consult [Google Mock Doctor](V1_5_FrequentlyAskedQuestions#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error.md).) - -# What Is Google C++ Mocking Framework? # -When you write a prototype or test, often it's not feasible or wise to rely on real objects entirely. A **mock object** implements the same interface as a real object (so it can be used as one), but lets you specify at run time how it will be used and what it should do (which methods will be called? in which order? how many times? with what arguments? what will they return? etc). - -**Note:** It is easy to confuse the term _fake objects_ with mock objects. Fakes and mocks actually mean very different things in the Test-Driven Development (TDD) community: - - * **Fake** objects have working implementations, but usually take some shortcut (perhaps to make the operations less expensive), which makes them not suitable for production. An in-memory file system would be an example of a fake. - * **Mocks** are objects pre-programmed with _expectations_, which form a specification of the calls they are expected to receive. - -If all this seems too abstract for you, don't worry - the most important thing to remember is that a mock allows you to check the _interaction_ between itself and code that uses it. The difference between fakes and mocks will become much clearer once you start to use mocks. - -**Google C++ Mocking Framework** (or **Google Mock** for short) is a library (sometimes we also call it a "framework" to make it sound cool) for creating mock classes and using them. It does to C++ what [jMock](http://www.jmock.org/) and [EasyMock](http://www.easymock.org/) do to Java. - -Using Google Mock involves three basic steps: - - 1. Use some simple macros to describe the interface you want to mock, and they will expand to the implementation of your mock class; - 1. Create some mock objects and specify its expectations and behavior using an intuitive syntax; - 1. Exercise code that uses the mock objects. Google Mock will catch any violation of the expectations as soon as it arises. - -# Why Google Mock? # -While mock objects help you remove unnecessary dependencies in tests and make them fast and reliable, using mocks manually in C++ is _hard_: - - * Someone has to implement the mocks. The job is usually tedious and error-prone. No wonder people go great distance to avoid it. - * The quality of those manually written mocks is a bit, uh, unpredictable. You may see some really polished ones, but you may also see some that were hacked up in a hurry and have all sorts of ad hoc restrictions. - * The knowledge you gained from using one mock doesn't transfer to the next. - -In contrast, Java and Python programmers have some fine mock frameworks, which automate the creation of mocks. As a result, mocking is a proven effective technique and widely adopted practice in those communities. Having the right tool absolutely makes the difference. - -Google Mock was built to help C++ programmers. It was inspired by [jMock](http://www.jmock.org/) and [EasyMock](http://www.easymock.org/), but designed with C++'s specifics in mind. It is your friend if any of the following problems is bothering you: - - * You are stuck with a sub-optimal design and wish you had done more prototyping before it was too late, but prototyping in C++ is by no means "rapid". - * Your tests are slow as they depend on too many libraries or use expensive resources (e.g. a database). - * Your tests are brittle as some resources they use are unreliable (e.g. the network). - * You want to test how your code handles a failure (e.g. a file checksum error), but it's not easy to cause one. - * You need to make sure that your module interacts with other modules in the right way, but it's hard to observe the interaction; therefore you resort to observing the side effects at the end of the action, which is awkward at best. - * You want to "mock out" your dependencies, except that they don't have mock implementations yet; and, frankly, you aren't thrilled by some of those hand-written mocks. - -We encourage you to use Google Mock as: - - * a _design_ tool, for it lets you experiment with your interface design early and often. More iterations lead to better designs! - * a _testing_ tool to cut your tests' outbound dependencies and probe the interaction between your module and its collaborators. - -# Getting Started # -Using Google Mock is easy! Inside your C++ source file, just `#include` `<gtest/gtest.h>` and `<gmock/gmock.h>`, and you are ready to go. - -# A Case for Mock Turtles # -Let's look at an example. Suppose you are developing a graphics program that relies on a LOGO-like API for drawing. How would you test that it does the right thing? Well, you can run it and compare the screen with a golden screen snapshot, but let's admit it: tests like this are expensive to run and fragile (What if you just upgraded to a shiny new graphics card that has better anti-aliasing? Suddenly you have to update all your golden images.). It would be too painful if all your tests are like this. Fortunately, you learned about Dependency Injection and know the right thing to do: instead of having your application talk to the drawing API directly, wrap the API in an interface (say, `Turtle`) and code to that interface: - -``` -class Turtle { - ... - virtual ~Turtle() {} - virtual void PenUp() = 0; - virtual void PenDown() = 0; - virtual void Forward(int distance) = 0; - virtual void Turn(int degrees) = 0; - virtual void GoTo(int x, int y) = 0; - virtual int GetX() const = 0; - virtual int GetY() const = 0; -}; -``` - -(Note that the destructor of `Turtle` **must** be virtual, as is the case for **all** classes you intend to inherit from - otherwise the destructor of the derived class will not be called when you delete an object through a base pointer, and you'll get corrupted program states like memory leaks.) - -You can control whether the turtle's movement will leave a trace using `PenUp()` and `PenDown()`, and control its movement using `Forward()`, `Turn()`, and `GoTo()`. Finally, `GetX()` and `GetY()` tell you the current position of the turtle. - -Your program will normally use a real implementation of this interface. In tests, you can use a mock implementation instead. This allows you to easily check what drawing primitives your program is calling, with what arguments, and in which order. Tests written this way are much more robust (they won't break because your new machine does anti-aliasing differently), easier to read and maintain (the intent of a test is expressed in the code, not in some binary images), and run _much, much faster_. - -# Writing the Mock Class # -If you are lucky, the mocks you need to use have already been implemented by some nice people. If, however, you find yourself in the position to write a mock class, relax - Google Mock turns this task into a fun game! (Well, almost.) - -## How to Define It ## -Using the `Turtle` interface as example, here are the simple steps you need to follow: - - 1. Derive a class `MockTurtle` from `Turtle`. - 1. Take a virtual function of `Turtle`. Count how many arguments it has. - 1. In the `public:` section of the child class, write `MOCK_METHODn();` (or `MOCK_CONST_METHODn();` if you are mocking a `const` method), where `n` is the number of the arguments; if you counted wrong, shame on you, and a compiler error will tell you so. - 1. Now comes the fun part: you take the function signature, cut-and-paste the _function name_ as the _first_ argument to the macro, and leave what's left as the _second_ argument (in case you're curious, this is the _type of the function_). - 1. Repeat until all virtual functions you want to mock are done. - -After the process, you should have something like: - -``` -#include <gmock/gmock.h> // Brings in Google Mock. -class MockTurtle : public Turtle { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD0(PenUp, void()); - MOCK_METHOD0(PenDown, void()); - MOCK_METHOD1(Forward, void(int distance)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Turn, void(int degrees)); - MOCK_METHOD2(GoTo, void(int x, int y)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetX, int()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetY, int()); -}; -``` - -You don't need to define these mock methods somewhere else - the `MOCK_METHOD*` macros will generate the definitions for you. It's that simple! Once you get the hang of it, you can pump out mock classes faster than your source-control system can handle your check-ins. - -**Tip:** If even this is too much work for you, you'll find the -`gmock_gen.py` tool in Google Mock's `scripts/generator/` directory (courtesy of the [cppclean](http://code.google.com/p/cppclean/) project) useful. This command-line -tool requires that you have Python 2.4 installed. You give it a C++ file and the name of an abstract class defined in it, -and it will print the definition of the mock class for you. Due to the -complexity of the C++ language, this script may not always work, but -it can be quite handy when it does. For more details, read the [user documentation](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/scripts/generator/README). - -## Where to Put It ## -When you define a mock class, you need to decide where to put its definition. Some people put it in a `*_test.cc`. This is fine when the interface being mocked (say, `Foo`) is owned by the same person or team. Otherwise, when the owner of `Foo` changes it, your test could break. (You can't really expect `Foo`'s maintainer to fix every test that uses `Foo`, can you?) - -So, the rule of thumb is: if you need to mock `Foo` and it's owned by others, define the mock class in `Foo`'s package (better, in a `testing` sub-package such that you can clearly separate production code and testing utilities), and put it in a `mock_foo.h`. Then everyone can reference `mock_foo.h` from their tests. If `Foo` ever changes, there is only one copy of `MockFoo` to change, and only tests that depend on the changed methods need to be fixed. - -Another way to do it: you can introduce a thin layer `FooAdaptor` on top of `Foo` and code to this new interface. Since you own `FooAdaptor`, you can absorb changes in `Foo` much more easily. While this is more work initially, carefully choosing the adaptor interface can make your code easier to write and more readable (a net win in the long run), as you can choose `FooAdaptor` to fit your specific domain much better than `Foo` does. - -# Using Mocks in Tests # -Once you have a mock class, using it is easy. The typical work flow is: - - 1. Import the Google Mock names from the `testing` namespace such that you can use them unqualified (You only have to do it once per file. Remember that namespaces are a good idea and good for your health.). - 1. Create some mock objects. - 1. Specify your expectations on them (How many times will a method be called? With what arguments? What should it do? etc.). - 1. Exercise some code that uses the mocks; optionally, check the result using Google Test assertions. If a mock method is called more than expected or with wrong arguments, you'll get an error immediately. - 1. When a mock is destructed, Google Mock will automatically check whether all expectations on it have been satisfied. - -Here's an example: - -``` -#include "path/to/mock-turtle.h" -#include <gmock/gmock.h> -#include <gtest/gtest.h> -using ::testing::AtLeast; // #1 - -TEST(PainterTest, CanDrawSomething) { - MockTurtle turtle; // #2 - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown()) // #3 - .Times(AtLeast(1)); - - Painter painter(&turtle); // #4 - - EXPECT_TRUE(painter.DrawCircle(0, 0, 10)); -} // #5 - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // The following line must be executed to initialize Google Mock - // (and Google Test) before running the tests. - ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -As you might have guessed, this test checks that `PenDown()` is called at least once. If the `painter` object didn't call this method, your test will fail with a message like this: - -``` -path/to/my_test.cc:119: Failure -Actual function call count doesn't match this expectation: -Actually: never called; -Expected: called at least once. -``` - -**Tip 1:** If you run the test from an Emacs buffer, you can hit `<Enter>` on the line number displayed in the error message to jump right to the failed expectation. - -**Tip 2:** If your mock objects are never deleted, the final verification won't happen. Therefore it's a good idea to use a heap leak checker in your tests when you allocate mocks on the heap. - -**Important note:** Google Mock requires expectations to be set **before** the mock functions are called, otherwise the behavior is **undefined**. In particular, you mustn't interleave `EXPECT_CALL()`s and calls to the mock functions. - -This means `EXPECT_CALL()` should be read as expecting that a call will occur _in the future_, not that a call has occurred. Why does Google Mock work like that? Well, specifying the expectation beforehand allows Google Mock to report a violation as soon as it arises, when the context (stack trace, etc) is still available. This makes debugging much easier. - -Admittedly, this test is contrived and doesn't do much. You can easily achieve the same effect without using Google Mock. However, as we shall reveal soon, Google Mock allows you to do _much more_ with the mocks. - -## Using Google Mock with Any Testing Framework ## -If you want to use something other than Google Test (e.g. [CppUnit](http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/cppunit/index.php?title=Main_Page) or -[CxxTest](http://cxxtest.tigris.org/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // The following line causes Google Mock to throw an exception on failure, - // which will be interpreted by your testing framework as a test failure. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - ... whatever your testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -This approach has a catch: it makes Google Mock throw an exception -from a mock object's destructor sometimes. With some compilers, this -sometimes causes the test program to crash. You'll still be able to -notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure. - -A better solution is to use Google Test's -[event listener API](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/GoogleTestAdvancedGuide#Extending_Google_Test_by_Handling_Test_Events) -to report a test failure to your testing framework properly. You'll need to -implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it -should be straightforward. - -If this turns out to be too much work, we suggest that you stick with -Google Test, which works with Google Mock seamlessly (in fact, it is -technically part of Google Mock.). If there is a reason that you -cannot use Google Test, please let us know. - -# Setting Expectations # -The key to using a mock object successfully is to set the _right expectations_ on it. If you set the expectations too strict, your test will fail as the result of unrelated changes. If you set them too loose, bugs can slip through. You want to do it just right such that your test can catch exactly the kind of bugs you intend it to catch. Google Mock provides the necessary means for you to do it "just right." - -## General Syntax ## -In Google Mock we use the `EXPECT_CALL()` macro to set an expectation on a mock method. The general syntax is: - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .Times(cardinality) - .WillOnce(action) - .WillRepeatedly(action); -``` - -The macro has two arguments: first the mock object, and then the method and its arguments. Note that the two are separated by a comma (`,`), not a period (`.`). (Why using a comma? The answer is that it was necessary for technical reasons.) - -The macro can be followed by some optional _clauses_ that provide more information about the expectation. We'll discuss how each clause works in the coming sections. - -This syntax is designed to make an expectation read like English. For example, you can probably guess that - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .Times(5) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(150)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(200)); -``` - -says that the `turtle` object's `GetX()` method will be called five times, it will return 100 the first time, 150 the second time, and then 200 every time. Some people like to call this style of syntax a Domain-Specific Language (DSL). - -**Note:** Why do we use a macro to do this? It serves two purposes: first it makes expectations easily identifiable (either by `grep` or by a human reader), and second it allows Google Mock to include the source file location of a failed expectation in messages, making debugging easier. - -## Matchers: What Arguments Do We Expect? ## -When a mock function takes arguments, we must specify what arguments we are expecting; for example: - -``` -// Expects the turtle to move forward by 100 units. -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(100)); -``` - -Sometimes you may not want to be too specific (Remember that talk about tests being too rigid? Over specification leads to brittle tests and obscures the intent of tests. Therefore we encourage you to specify only what's necessary - no more, no less.). If you care to check that `Forward()` will be called but aren't interested in its actual argument, write `_` as the argument, which means "anything goes": - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... -// Expects the turtle to move forward. -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); -``` - -`_` is an instance of what we call **matchers**. A matcher is like a predicate and can test whether an argument is what we'd expect. You can use a matcher inside `EXPECT_CALL()` wherever a function argument is expected. - -A list of built-in matchers can be found in the [CheatSheet](V1_5_CheatSheet.md). For example, here's the `Ge` (greater than or equal) matcher: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(Ge(100))); -``` - -This checks that the turtle will be told to go forward by at least 100 units. - -## Cardinalities: How Many Times Will It Be Called? ## -The first clause we can specify following an `EXPECT_CALL()` is `Times()`. We call its argument a **cardinality** as it tells _how many times_ the call should occur. It allows us to repeat an expectation many times without actually writing it as many times. More importantly, a cardinality can be "fuzzy", just like a matcher can be. This allows a user to express the intent of a test exactly. - -An interesting special case is when we say `Times(0)`. You may have guessed - it means that the function shouldn't be called with the given arguments at all, and Google Mock will report a Google Test failure whenever the function is (wrongfully) called. - -We've seen `AtLeast(n)` as an example of fuzzy cardinalities earlier. For the list of built-in cardinalities you can use, see the [CheatSheet](V1_5_CheatSheet.md). - -The `Times()` clause can be omitted. **If you omit `Times()`, Google Mock will infer the cardinality for you.** The rules are easy to remember: - - * If **neither** `WillOnce()` **nor** `WillRepeatedly()` is in the `EXPECT_CALL()`, the inferred cardinality is `Times(1)`. - * If there are `n WillOnce()`'s but **no** `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 1, the cardinality is `Times(n)`. - * If there are `n WillOnce()`'s and **one** `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 0, the cardinality is `Times(AtLeast(n))`. - -**Quick quiz:** what do you think will happen if a function is expected to be called twice but actually called four times? - -## Actions: What Should It Do? ## -Remember that a mock object doesn't really have a working implementation? We as users have to tell it what to do when a method is invoked. This is easy in Google Mock. - -First, if the return type of a mock function is a built-in type or a pointer, the function has a **default action** (a `void` function will just return, a `bool` function will return `false`, and other functions will return 0). If you don't say anything, this behavior will be used. - -Second, if a mock function doesn't have a default action, or the default action doesn't suit you, you can specify the action to be taken each time the expectation matches using a series of `WillOnce()` clauses followed by an optional `WillRepeatedly()`. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(200)) - .WillOnce(Return(300)); -``` - -This says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called _exactly three times_ (Google Mock inferred this from how many `WillOnce()` clauses we've written, since we didn't explicitly write `Times()`), and will return 100, 200, and 300 respectively. - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(200)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(300)); -``` - -says that `turtle.GetY()` will be called _at least twice_ (Google Mock knows this as we've written two `WillOnce()` clauses and a `WillRepeatedly()` while having no explicit `Times()`), will return 100 the first time, 200 the second time, and 300 from the third time on. - -Of course, if you explicitly write a `Times()`, Google Mock will not try to infer the cardinality itself. What if the number you specified is larger than there are `WillOnce()` clauses? Well, after all `WillOnce()`s are used up, Google Mock will do the _default_ action for the function every time (unless, of course, you have a `WillRepeatedly()`.). - -What can we do inside `WillOnce()` besides `Return()`? You can return a reference using `ReturnRef(variable)`, or invoke a pre-defined function, among [others](V1_5_CheatSheet#Actions.md). - -**Important note:** The `EXPECT_CALL()` statement evaluates the action clause only once, even though the action may be performed many times. Therefore you must be careful about side effects. The following may not do what you want: - -``` -int n = 100; -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) -.Times(4) -.WillOnce(Return(n++)); -``` - -Instead of returning 100, 101, 102, ..., consecutively, this mock function will always return 100 as `n++` is only evaluated once. Similarly, `Return(new Foo)` will create a new `Foo` object when the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed, and will return the same pointer every time. If you want the side effect to happen every time, you need to define a custom action, which we'll teach in the [CookBook](V1_5_CookBook.md). - -Time for another quiz! What do you think the following means? - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) -.Times(4) -.WillOnce(Return(100)); -``` - -Obviously `turtle.GetY()` is expected to be called four times. But if you think it will return 100 every time, think twice! Remember that one `WillOnce()` clause will be consumed each time the function is invoked and the default action will be taken afterwards. So the right answer is that `turtle.GetY()` will return 100 the first time, but **return 0 from the second time on**, as returning 0 is the default action for `int` functions. - -## Using Multiple Expectations ## -So far we've only shown examples where you have a single expectation. More realistically, you're going to specify expectations on multiple mock methods, which may be from multiple mock objects. - -By default, when a mock method is invoked, Google Mock will search the expectations in the **reverse order** they are defined, and stop when an active expectation that matches the arguments is found (you can think of it as "newer rules override older ones."). If the matching expectation cannot take any more calls, you will get an upper-bound-violated failure. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); // #1 -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(10)) // #2 - .Times(2); -``` - -If `Forward(10)` is called three times in a row, the third time it will be an error, as the last matching expectation (#2) has been saturated. If, however, the third `Forward(10)` call is replaced by `Forward(20)`, then it would be OK, as now #1 will be the matching expectation. - -**Side note:** Why does Google Mock search for a match in the _reverse_ order of the expectations? The reason is that this allows a user to set up the default expectations in a mock object's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase and then customize the mock by writing more specific expectations in the test body. So, if you have two expectations on the same method, you want to put the one with more specific matchers **after** the other, or the more specific rule would be shadowed by the more general one that comes after it. - -## Ordered vs Unordered Calls ## -By default, an expectation can match a call even though an earlier expectation hasn't been satisfied. In other words, the calls don't have to occur in the order the expectations are specified. - -Sometimes, you may want all the expected calls to occur in a strict order. To say this in Google Mock is easy: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence;... -TEST(FooTest, DrawsLineSegment) { - ... - { - InSequence dummy; - - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown()); - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(100)); - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenUp()); - } - Foo(); -} -``` - -By creating an object of type `InSequence`, all expectations in its scope are put into a _sequence_ and have to occur _sequentially_. Since we are just relying on the constructor and destructor of this object to do the actual work, its name is really irrelevant. - -In this example, we test that `Foo()` calls the three expected functions in the order as written. If a call is made out-of-order, it will be an error. - -(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](V1_5_CookBook.md).) - -## All Expectations Are Sticky (Unless Said Otherwise) ## -Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. How would you test that the turtle is asked to go to the origin _exactly twice_ (you want to ignore any other instructions it receives)? - -After you've come up with your answer, take a look at ours and compare notes (solve it yourself first - don't cheat!): - -``` -using ::testing::_;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(_, _)) // #1 - .Times(AnyNumber()); -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(0, 0)) // #2 - .Times(2); -``` - -Suppose `turtle.GoTo(0, 0)` is called three times. In the third time, Google Mock will see that the arguments match expectation #2 (remember that we always pick the last matching expectation). Now, since we said that there should be only two such calls, Google Mock will report an error immediately. This is basically what we've told you in the "Using Multiple Expectations" section above. - -This example shows that **expectations in Google Mock are "sticky" by default**, in the sense that they remain active even after we have reached their invocation upper bounds. This is an important rule to remember, as it affects the meaning of the spec, and is **different** to how it's done in many other mocking frameworks (Why'd we do that? Because we think our rule makes the common cases easier to express and understand.). - -Simple? Let's see if you've really understood it: what does the following code say? - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... -for (int i = n; i > 0; i--) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)); -} -``` - -If you think it says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called `n` times and will return 10, 20, 30, ..., consecutively, think twice! The problem is that, as we said, expectations are sticky. So, the second time `turtle.GetX()` is called, the last (latest) `EXPECT_CALL()` statement will match, and will immediately lead to an "upper bound exceeded" error - this piece of code is not very useful! - -One correct way of saying that `turtle.GetX()` will return 10, 20, 30, ..., is to explicitly say that the expectations are _not_ sticky. In other words, they should _retire_ as soon as they are saturated: - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... -for (int i = n; i > 0; i--) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -} -``` - -And, there's a better way to do it: in this case, we expect the calls to occur in a specific order, and we line up the actions to match the order. Since the order is important here, we should make it explicit using a sequence: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -using ::testing::Return; -... -{ - InSequence s; - - for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); - } -} -``` - -By the way, the other situation where an expectation may _not_ be sticky is when it's in a sequence - as soon as another expectation that comes after it in the sequence has been used, it automatically retires (and will never be used to match any call). - -## Uninteresting Calls ## -A mock object may have many methods, and not all of them are that interesting. For example, in some tests we may not care about how many times `GetX()` and `GetY()` get called. - -In Google Mock, if you are not interested in a method, just don't say anything about it. If a call to this method occurs, you'll see a warning in the test output, but it won't be a failure. - -# What Now? # -Congratulations! You've learned enough about Google Mock to start using it. Now, you might want to join the [googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion group and actually write some tests using Google Mock - it will be fun. Hey, it may even be addictive - you've been warned. - -Then, if you feel like increasing your mock quotient, you should move on to the [CookBook](V1_5_CookBook.md). You can learn many advanced features of Google Mock there -- and advance your level of enjoyment and testing bliss.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_5/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7593243..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_5/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,624 +0,0 @@ - - -Please send your questions to the -[googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion -group. If you need help with compiler errors, make sure you have -tried [Google Mock Doctor](#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error.md) first. - -## I wrote some matchers. After I upgraded to a new version of Google Mock, they no longer compile. What's going on? ## - -After version 1.4.0 of Google Mock was released, we had an idea on how -to make it easier to write matchers that can generate informative -messages efficiently. We experimented with this idea and liked what -we saw. Therefore we decided to implement it. - -Unfortunately, this means that if you have defined your own matchers -by implementing `MatcherInterface` or using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`, -your definitions will no longer compile. Matchers defined using the -`MATCHER*` family of macros are not affected. - -Sorry for the hassle if your matchers are affected. We believe it's -in everyone's long-term interest to make this change sooner than -later. Fortunately, it's usually not hard to migrate an existing -matcher to the new API. Here's what you need to do: - -If you wrote your matcher like this: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` - -you'll need to change it to: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` -(i.e. rename `Matches()` to `MatchAndExplain()` and give it a second -argument of type `MatchResultListener*`.) - -If you were also using `ExplainMatchResultTo()` to improve the matcher -message: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the lastest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - - virtual void ExplainMatchResultTo(MyType value, - ::std::ostream* os) const { - // Prints some helpful information to os to help - // a user understand why value matches (or doesn't match). - *os << "the Foo property is " << value.GetFoo(); - } - ... -}; -``` - -you should move the logic of `ExplainMatchResultTo()` into -`MatchAndExplain()`, using the `MatchResultListener` argument where -the `::std::ostream` was used: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - *listener << "the Foo property is " << value.GetFoo(); - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` - -If your matcher is defined using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -you should rename the `Matches()` method to `MatchAndExplain()` and -add a `MatchResultListener*` argument (the same as what you need to do -for matchers defined by implementing `MatcherInterface`): -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -If your polymorphic matcher uses `ExplainMatchResultTo()` for better -failure messages: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -void ExplainMatchResultTo(const MyGreatMatcher& matcher, - MyType value, - ::std::ostream* os) { - // Prints some helpful information to os to help - // a user understand why value matches (or doesn't match). - *os << "the Bar property is " << value.GetBar(); -} -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -you'll need to move the logic inside `ExplainMatchResultTo()` to -`MatchAndExplain()`: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - *listener << "the Bar property is " << value.GetBar(); - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -For more information, you can read these -[two](V1_5_CookBook#Writing_New_Monomorphic_Matchers.md) -[recipes](V1_5_CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Matchers.md) -from the cookbook. As always, you -are welcome to post questions on `googlemock@googlegroups.com` if you -need any help. - -## When using Google Mock, do I have to use Google Test as the testing framework? I have my favorite testing framework and don't want to switch. ## - -Google Mock works out of the box with Google Test. However, it's easy -to configure it to work with any testing framework of your choice. -[Here](V1_5_ForDummies#Using_Google_Mock_with_Any_Testing_Framework.md) is how. - -## How am I supposed to make sense of these horrible template errors? ## - -If you are confused by the compiler errors gcc threw at you, -try consulting the _Google Mock Doctor_ tool first. What it does is to -scan stdin for gcc error messages, and spit out diagnoses on the -problems (we call them diseases) your code has. - -To "install", run command: -``` -alias gmd='<path to googlemock>/scripts/gmock_doctor.py' -``` - -To use it, do: -``` -<your-favorite-build-command> <your-test> 2>&1 | gmd -``` - -For example: -``` -make my_test 2>&1 | gmd -``` - -Or you can run `gmd` and copy-n-paste gcc's error messages to it. - -## Can I mock a variadic function? ## - -You cannot mock a variadic function (i.e. a function taking ellipsis -(`...`) arguments) directly in Google Mock. - -The problem is that in general, there is _no way_ for a mock object to -know how many arguments are passed to the variadic method, and what -the arguments' types are. Only the _author of the base class_ knows -the protocol, and we cannot look into his head. - -Therefore, to mock such a function, the _user_ must teach the mock -object how to figure out the number of arguments and their types. One -way to do it is to provide overloaded versions of the function. - -Ellipsis arguments are inherited from C and not really a C++ feature. -They are unsafe to use and don't work with arguments that have -constructors or destructors. Therefore we recommend to avoid them in -C++ as much as possible. - -## MSVC gives me warning C4301 or C4373 when I define a mock method with a const parameter. Why? ## - -If you compile this using Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 SP1: -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual void Bar(const int i) = 0; -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, void(const int i)); -}; -``` -You may get the following warning: -``` -warning C4301: 'MockFoo::Bar': overriding virtual function only differs from 'Foo::Bar' by const/volatile qualifier -``` - -This is a MSVC bug. The same code compiles fine with gcc ,for -example. If you use Visual C++ 2008 SP1, you would get the warning: -``` -warning C4373: 'MockFoo::Bar': virtual function overrides 'Foo::Bar', previous versions of the compiler did not override when parameters only differed by const/volatile qualifiers -``` - -In C++, if you _declare_ a function with a `const` parameter, the -`const` modifier is _ignored_. Therefore, the `Foo` base class above -is equivalent to: -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual void Bar(int i) = 0; // int or const int? Makes no difference. -}; -``` - -In fact, you can _declare_ Bar() with an `int` parameter, and _define_ -it with a `const int` parameter. The compiler will still match them -up. - -Since making a parameter `const` is meaningless in the method -_declaration_, we recommend to remove it in both `Foo` and `MockFoo`. -That should workaround the VC bug. - -Note that we are talking about the _top-level_ `const` modifier here. -If the function parameter is passed by pointer or reference, declaring -the _pointee_ or _referee_ as `const` is still meaningful. For -example, the following two declarations are _not_ equivalent: -``` -void Bar(int* p); // Neither p nor *p is const. -void Bar(const int* p); // p is not const, but *p is. -``` - -## I have a huge mock class, and Microsoft Visual C++ runs out of memory when compiling it. What can I do? ## - -We've noticed that when the `/clr` compiler flag is used, Visual C++ -uses 5~6 times as much memory when compiling a mock class. We suggest -to avoid `/clr` when compiling native C++ mocks. - -## I can't figure out why Google Mock thinks my expectations are not satisfied. What should I do? ## - -You might want to run your test with -`--gmock_verbose=info`. This flag lets Google Mock print a trace -of every mock function call it receives. By studying the trace, -you'll gain insights on why the expectations you set are not met. - -## How can I assert that a function is NEVER called? ## - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .Times(0); -``` - -## I have a failed test where Google Mock tells me TWICE that a particular expectation is not satisfied. Isn't this redundant? ## - -When Google Mock detects a failure, it prints relevant information -(the mock function arguments, the state of relevant expectations, and -etc) to help the user debug. If another failure is detected, Google -Mock will do the same, including printing the state of relevant -expectations. - -Sometimes an expectation's state didn't change between two failures, -and you'll see the same description of the state twice. They are -however _not_ redundant, as they refer to _different points in time_. -The fact they are the same _is_ interesting information. - -## I get a heap check failure when using a mock object, but using a real object is fine. What can be wrong? ## - -Does the class (hopefully a pure interface) you are mocking have a -virtual destructor? - -Whenever you derive from a base class, make sure its destructor is -virtual. Otherwise Bad Things will happen. Consider the following -code: - -``` -class Base { - public: - // Not virtual, but should be. - ~Base() { ... } - ... -}; - -class Derived : public Base { - public: - ... - private: - std::string value_; -}; - -... - Base* p = new Derived; - ... - delete p; // Surprise! ~Base() will be called, but ~Derived() will not - // - value_ is leaked. -``` - -By changing `~Base()` to virtual, `~Derived()` will be correctly -called when `delete p` is executed, and the heap checker -will be happy. - -## The "newer expectations override older ones" rule makes writing expectations awkward. Why does Google Mock do that? ## - -When people complain about this, often they are referring to code like: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. However, I have to write the expectations in the -// reverse order. This sucks big time!!! -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -The problem is that they didn't pick the **best** way to express the test's -intent. - -By default, expectations don't have to be matched in _any_ particular -order. If you want them to match in a certain order, you need to be -explicit. This is Google Mock's (and jMock's) fundamental philosophy: it's -easy to accidentally over-specify your tests, and we want to make it -harder to do so. - -There are two better ways to write the test spec. You could either -put the expectations in sequence: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. Using a sequence, we can write the expectations -// in their natural order. -{ - InSequence s; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -} -``` - -or you can put the sequence of actions in the same expectation: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -Back to the original questions: why does Google Mock search the -expectations (and `ON_CALL`s) from back to front? Because this -allows a user to set up a mock's behavior for the common case early -(e.g. in the mock's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase) -and customize it with more specific rules later. If Google Mock -searches from front to back, this very useful pattern won't be -possible. - -## Google Mock prints a warning when a function without EXPECT\_CALL is called, even if I have set its behavior using ON\_CALL. Would it be reasonable not to show the warning in this case? ## - -When choosing between being neat and being safe, we lean toward the -latter. So the answer is that we think it's better to show the -warning. - -Often people write `ON_CALL`s in the mock object's -constructor or `SetUp()`, as the default behavior rarely changes from -test to test. Then in the test body they set the expectations, which -are often different for each test. Having an `ON_CALL` in the set-up -part of a test doesn't mean that the calls are expected. If there's -no `EXPECT_CALL` and the method is called, it's possibly an error. If -we quietly let the call go through without notifying the user, bugs -may creep in unnoticed. - -If, however, you are sure that the calls are OK, you can write - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(...); -``` - -instead of - -``` -ON_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillByDefault(...); -``` - -This tells Google Mock that you do expect the calls and no warning should be -printed. - -Also, you can control the verbosity using the `--gmock_verbose` flag. -If you find the output too noisy when debugging, just choose a less -verbose level. - -## How can I delete the mock function's argument in an action? ## - -If you find yourself needing to perform some action that's not -supported by Google Mock directly, remember that you can define your own -actions using -[MakeAction()](V1_5_CookBook#Writing_New_Actions.md) or -[MakePolymorphicAction()](V1_5_CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Actions.md), -or you can write a stub function and invoke it using -[Invoke()](V1_5_CookBook#Using_Functions_Methods_Functors.md). - -## MOCK\_METHODn()'s second argument looks funny. Why don't you use the MOCK\_METHODn(Method, return\_type, arg\_1, ..., arg\_n) syntax? ## - -What?! I think it's beautiful. :-) - -While which syntax looks more natural is a subjective matter to some -extent, Google Mock's syntax was chosen for several practical advantages it -has. - -Try to mock a function that takes a map as an argument: -``` -virtual int GetSize(const map<int, std::string>& m); -``` - -Using the proposed syntax, it would be: -``` -MOCK_METHOD1(GetSize, int, const map<int, std::string>& m); -``` - -Guess what? You'll get a compiler error as the compiler thinks that -`const map<int, std::string>& m` are **two**, not one, arguments. To work -around this you can use `typedef` to give the map type a name, but -that gets in the way of your work. Google Mock's syntax avoids this -problem as the function's argument types are protected inside a pair -of parentheses: -``` -// This compiles fine. -MOCK_METHOD1(GetSize, int(const map<int, std::string>& m)); -``` - -You still need a `typedef` if the return type contains an unprotected -comma, but that's much rarer. - -Other advantages include: - 1. `MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, int, bool)` can leave a reader wonder whether the method returns `int` or `bool`, while there won't be such confusion using Google Mock's syntax. - 1. The way Google Mock describes a function type is nothing new, although many people may not be familiar with it. The same syntax was used in C, and the `function` library in `tr1` uses this syntax extensively. Since `tr1` will become a part of the new version of STL, we feel very comfortable to be consistent with it. - 1. The function type syntax is also used in other parts of Google Mock's API (e.g. the action interface) in order to make the implementation tractable. A user needs to learn it anyway in order to utilize Google Mock's more advanced features. We'd as well stick to the same syntax in `MOCK_METHOD*`! - -## My code calls a static/global function. Can I mock it? ## - -You can, but you need to make some changes. - -In general, if you find yourself needing to mock a static function, -it's a sign that your modules are too tightly coupled (and less -flexible, less reusable, less testable, etc). You are probably better -off defining a small interface and call the function through that -interface, which then can be easily mocked. It's a bit of work -initially, but usually pays for itself quickly. - -This Google Testing Blog -[post](http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) -says it excellently. Check it out. - -## My mock object needs to do complex stuff. It's a lot of pain to specify the actions. Google Mock sucks! ## - -I know it's not a question, but you get an answer for free any way. :-) - -With Google Mock, you can create mocks in C++ easily. And people might be -tempted to use them everywhere. Sometimes they work great, and -sometimes you may find them, well, a pain to use. So, what's wrong in -the latter case? - -When you write a test without using mocks, you exercise the code and -assert that it returns the correct value or that the system is in an -expected state. This is sometimes called "state-based testing". - -Mocks are great for what some call "interaction-based" testing: -instead of checking the system state at the very end, mock objects -verify that they are invoked the right way and report an error as soon -as it arises, giving you a handle on the precise context in which the -error was triggered. This is often more effective and economical to -do than state-based testing. - -If you are doing state-based testing and using a test double just to -simulate the real object, you are probably better off using a fake. -Using a mock in this case causes pain, as it's not a strong point for -mocks to perform complex actions. If you experience this and think -that mocks suck, you are just not using the right tool for your -problem. Or, you might be trying to solve the wrong problem. :-) - -## I got a warning "Uninteresting function call encountered - default action taken.." Should I panic? ## - -By all means, NO! It's just an FYI. - -What it means is that you have a mock function, you haven't set any -expectations on it (by Google Mock's rule this means that you are not -interested in calls to this function and therefore it can be called -any number of times), and it is called. That's OK - you didn't say -it's not OK to call the function! - -What if you actually meant to disallow this function to be called, but -forgot to write `EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()).Times(0)`? While -one can argue that it's the user's fault, Google Mock tries to be nice and -prints you a note. - -So, when you see the message and believe that there shouldn't be any -uninteresting calls, you should investigate what's going on. To make -your life easier, Google Mock prints the function name and arguments -when an uninteresting call is encountered. - -## I want to define a custom action. Should I use Invoke() or implement the action interface? ## - -Either way is fine - you want to choose the one that's more convenient -for your circumstance. - -Usually, if your action is for a particular function type, defining it -using `Invoke()` should be easier; if your action can be used in -functions of different types (e.g. if you are defining -`Return(value)`), `MakePolymorphicAction()` is -easiest. Sometimes you want precise control on what types of -functions the action can be used in, and implementing -`ActionInterface` is the way to go here. See the implementation of -`Return()` in `include/gmock/gmock-actions.h` for an example. - -## I'm using the set-argument-pointee action, and the compiler complains about "conflicting return type specified". What does it mean? ## - -You got this error as Google Mock has no idea what value it should return -when the mock method is called. `SetArgumentPointee()` says what the -side effect is, but doesn't say what the return value should be. You -need `DoAll()` to chain a `SetArgumentPointee()` with a `Return()`. - -See this [recipe](V1_5_CookBook#Mocking_Side_Effects.md) for more details and an example. - - -## My question is not in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/w/list), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock/topics), - 1. ask it on [googlemock@googlegroups.com](mailto:googlemock@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/issues/list) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the revision number if you check out from SVN directly) of Google Mock you use (Google Mock is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_6/CheatSheet.md deleted file mode 100644 index 91de1d2..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/CheatSheet.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,534 +0,0 @@ - - -# Defining a Mock Class # - -## Mocking a Normal Class ## - -Given -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual ~Foo(); - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual string Describe(const char* name) = 0; - virtual string Describe(int type) = 0; - virtual bool Process(Bar elem, int count) = 0; -}; -``` -(note that `~Foo()` **must** be virtual) we can define its mock as -``` -#include "gmock/gmock.h" - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(Describe, string(const char* name)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Describe, string(int type)); - MOCK_METHOD2(Process, bool(Bar elem, int count)); -}; -``` - -To create a "nice" mock object which ignores all uninteresting calls, -or a "strict" mock object, which treats them as failures: -``` -NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; // The type is a subclass of MockFoo. -StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo; // The type is a subclass of MockFoo. -``` - -## Mocking a Class Template ## - -To mock -``` -template <typename Elem> -class StackInterface { - public: - ... - virtual ~StackInterface(); - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual void Push(const Elem& x) = 0; -}; -``` -(note that `~StackInterface()` **must** be virtual) just append `_T` to the `MOCK_*` macros: -``` -template <typename Elem> -class MockStack : public StackInterface<Elem> { - public: - ... - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const Elem& x)); -}; -``` - -## Specifying Calling Conventions for Mock Functions ## - -If your mock function doesn't use the default calling convention, you -can specify it by appending `_WITH_CALLTYPE` to any of the macros -described in the previous two sections and supplying the calling -convention as the first argument to the macro. For example, -``` - MOCK_METHOD_1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD2_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Bar, int(double x, double y)); -``` -where `STDMETHODCALLTYPE` is defined by `<objbase.h>` on Windows. - -# Using Mocks in Tests # - -The typical flow is: - 1. Import the Google Mock names you need to use. All Google Mock names are in the `testing` namespace unless they are macros or otherwise noted. - 1. Create the mock objects. - 1. Optionally, set the default actions of the mock objects. - 1. Set your expectations on the mock objects (How will they be called? What wil they do?). - 1. Exercise code that uses the mock objects; if necessary, check the result using [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) assertions. - 1. When a mock objects is destructed, Google Mock automatically verifies that all expectations on it have been satisfied. - -Here is an example: -``` -using ::testing::Return; // #1 - -TEST(BarTest, DoesThis) { - MockFoo foo; // #2 - - ON_CALL(foo, GetSize()) // #3 - .WillByDefault(Return(1)); - // ... other default actions ... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Describe(5)) // #4 - .Times(3) - .WillRepeatedly(Return("Category 5")); - // ... other expectations ... - - EXPECT_EQ("good", MyProductionFunction(&foo)); // #5 -} // #6 -``` - -# Setting Default Actions # - -Google Mock has a **built-in default action** for any function that -returns `void`, `bool`, a numeric value, or a pointer. - -To customize the default action for functions with return type `T` globally: -``` -using ::testing::DefaultValue; - -DefaultValue<T>::Set(value); // Sets the default value to be returned. -// ... use the mocks ... -DefaultValue<T>::Clear(); // Resets the default value. -``` - -To customize the default action for a particular method, use `ON_CALL()`: -``` -ON_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .With(multi_argument_matcher) ? - .WillByDefault(action); -``` - -# Setting Expectations # - -`EXPECT_CALL()` sets **expectations** on a mock method (How will it be -called? What will it do?): -``` -EXPECT_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .With(multi_argument_matcher) ? - .Times(cardinality) ? - .InSequence(sequences) * - .After(expectations) * - .WillOnce(action) * - .WillRepeatedly(action) ? - .RetiresOnSaturation(); ? -``` - -If `Times()` is omitted, the cardinality is assumed to be: - - * `Times(1)` when there is neither `WillOnce()` nor `WillRepeatedly()`; - * `Times(n)` when there are `n WillOnce()`s but no `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 1; or - * `Times(AtLeast(n))` when there are `n WillOnce()`s and a `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 0. - -A method with no `EXPECT_CALL()` is free to be invoked _any number of times_, and the default action will be taken each time. - -# Matchers # - -A **matcher** matches a _single_ argument. You can use it inside -`ON_CALL()` or `EXPECT_CALL()`, or use it to validate a value -directly: - -| `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` | Asserts that `value` matches `matcher`. | -|:------------------------------|:----------------------------------------| -| `ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher)` | The same as `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)`, except that it generates a **fatal** failure. | - -Built-in matchers (where `argument` is the function argument) are -divided into several categories: - -## Wildcard ## -|`_`|`argument` can be any value of the correct type.| -|:--|:-----------------------------------------------| -|`A<type>()` or `An<type>()`|`argument` can be any value of type `type`. | - -## Generic Comparison ## - -|`Eq(value)` or `value`|`argument == value`| -|:---------------------|:------------------| -|`Ge(value)` |`argument >= value`| -|`Gt(value)` |`argument > value` | -|`Le(value)` |`argument <= value`| -|`Lt(value)` |`argument < value` | -|`Ne(value)` |`argument != value`| -|`IsNull()` |`argument` is a `NULL` pointer (raw or smart).| -|`NotNull()` |`argument` is a non-null pointer (raw or smart).| -|`Ref(variable)` |`argument` is a reference to `variable`.| -|`TypedEq<type>(value)`|`argument` has type `type` and is equal to `value`. You may need to use this instead of `Eq(value)` when the mock function is overloaded.| - -Except `Ref()`, these matchers make a _copy_ of `value` in case it's -modified or destructed later. If the compiler complains that `value` -doesn't have a public copy constructor, try wrap it in `ByRef()`, -e.g. `Eq(ByRef(non_copyable_value))`. If you do that, make sure -`non_copyable_value` is not changed afterwards, or the meaning of your -matcher will be changed. - -## Floating-Point Matchers ## - -|`DoubleEq(a_double)`|`argument` is a `double` value approximately equal to `a_double`, treating two NaNs as unequal.| -|:-------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`FloatEq(a_float)` |`argument` is a `float` value approximately equal to `a_float`, treating two NaNs as unequal. | -|`NanSensitiveDoubleEq(a_double)`|`argument` is a `double` value approximately equal to `a_double`, treating two NaNs as equal. | -|`NanSensitiveFloatEq(a_float)`|`argument` is a `float` value approximately equal to `a_float`, treating two NaNs as equal. | - -These matchers use ULP-based comparison (the same as used in -[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/)). They -automatically pick a reasonable error bound based on the absolute -value of the expected value. `DoubleEq()` and `FloatEq()` conform to -the IEEE standard, which requires comparing two NaNs for equality to -return false. The `NanSensitive*` version instead treats two NaNs as -equal, which is often what a user wants. - -## String Matchers ## - -The `argument` can be either a C string or a C++ string object: - -|`ContainsRegex(string)`|`argument` matches the given regular expression.| -|:----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------| -|`EndsWith(suffix)` |`argument` ends with string `suffix`. | -|`HasSubstr(string)` |`argument` contains `string` as a sub-string. | -|`MatchesRegex(string)` |`argument` matches the given regular expression with the match starting at the first character and ending at the last character.| -|`StartsWith(prefix)` |`argument` starts with string `prefix`. | -|`StrCaseEq(string)` |`argument` is equal to `string`, ignoring case. | -|`StrCaseNe(string)` |`argument` is not equal to `string`, ignoring case.| -|`StrEq(string)` |`argument` is equal to `string`. | -|`StrNe(string)` |`argument` is not equal to `string`. | - -`ContainsRegex()` and `MatchesRegex()` use the regular expression -syntax defined -[here](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/V1_6_AdvancedGuide#Regular_Expression_Syntax). -`StrCaseEq()`, `StrCaseNe()`, `StrEq()`, and `StrNe()` work for wide -strings as well. - -## Container Matchers ## - -Most STL-style containers support `==`, so you can use -`Eq(expected_container)` or simply `expected_container` to match a -container exactly. If you want to write the elements in-line, -match them more flexibly, or get more informative messages, you can use: - -| `Contains(e)` | `argument` contains an element that matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. | -|:--------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `Each(e)` | `argument` is a container where _every_ element matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. | -| `ElementsAre(e0, e1, ..., en)` | `argument` has `n + 1` elements, where the i-th element matches `ei`, which can be a value or a matcher. 0 to 10 arguments are allowed. | -| `ElementsAreArray(array)` or `ElementsAreArray(array, count)` | The same as `ElementsAre()` except that the expected element values/matchers come from a C-style array. | -| `ContainerEq(container)` | The same as `Eq(container)` except that the failure message also includes which elements are in one container but not the other. | -| `Pointwise(m, container)` | `argument` contains the same number of elements as in `container`, and for all i, (the i-th element in `argument`, the i-th element in `container`) match `m`, which is a matcher on 2-tuples. E.g. `Pointwise(Le(), upper_bounds)` verifies that each element in `argument` doesn't exceed the corresponding element in `upper_bounds`. | - -These matchers can also match: - - 1. a native array passed by reference (e.g. in `Foo(const int (&a)[5])`), and - 1. an array passed as a pointer and a count (e.g. in `Bar(const T* buffer, int len)` -- see [Multi-argument Matchers](#Multiargument_Matchers.md)). - -where the array may be multi-dimensional (i.e. its elements can be arrays). - -## Member Matchers ## - -|`Field(&class::field, m)`|`argument.field` (or `argument->field` when `argument` is a plain pointer) matches matcher `m`, where `argument` is an object of type _class_.| -|:------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Key(e)` |`argument.first` matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. E.g. `Contains(Key(Le(5)))` can verify that a `map` contains a key `<= 5`.| -|`Pair(m1, m2)` |`argument` is an `std::pair` whose `first` field matches `m1` and `second` field matches `m2`. | -|`Property(&class::property, m)`|`argument.property()` (or `argument->property()` when `argument` is a plain pointer) matches matcher `m`, where `argument` is an object of type _class_.| - -## Matching the Result of a Function or Functor ## - -|`ResultOf(f, m)`|`f(argument)` matches matcher `m`, where `f` is a function or functor.| -|:---------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------| - -## Pointer Matchers ## - -|`Pointee(m)`|`argument` (either a smart pointer or a raw pointer) points to a value that matches matcher `m`.| -|:-----------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| - -## Multiargument Matchers ## - -Technically, all matchers match a _single_ value. A "multi-argument" -matcher is just one that matches a _tuple_. The following matchers can -be used to match a tuple `(x, y)`: - -|`Eq()`|`x == y`| -|:-----|:-------| -|`Ge()`|`x >= y`| -|`Gt()`|`x > y` | -|`Le()`|`x <= y`| -|`Lt()`|`x < y` | -|`Ne()`|`x != y`| - -You can use the following selectors to pick a subset of the arguments -(or reorder them) to participate in the matching: - -|`AllArgs(m)`|Equivalent to `m`. Useful as syntactic sugar in `.With(AllArgs(m))`.| -|:-----------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Args<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(m)`|The tuple of the `k` selected (using 0-based indices) arguments matches `m`, e.g. `Args<1, 2>(Eq())`.| - -## Composite Matchers ## - -You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers: - -|`AllOf(m1, m2, ..., mn)`|`argument` matches all of the matchers `m1` to `mn`.| -|:-----------------------|:---------------------------------------------------| -|`AnyOf(m1, m2, ..., mn)`|`argument` matches at least one of the matchers `m1` to `mn`.| -|`Not(m)` |`argument` doesn't match matcher `m`. | - -## Adapters for Matchers ## - -|`MatcherCast<T>(m)`|casts matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`.| -|:------------------|:--------------------------------------| -|`SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)`| [safely casts](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Casting_Matchers) matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`. | -|`Truly(predicate)` |`predicate(argument)` returns something considered by C++ to be true, where `predicate` is a function or functor.| - -## Matchers as Predicates ## - -|`Matches(m)(value)`|evaluates to `true` if `value` matches `m`. You can use `Matches(m)` alone as a unary functor.| -|:------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`ExplainMatchResult(m, value, result_listener)`|evaluates to `true` if `value` matches `m`, explaining the result to `result_listener`. | -|`Value(value, m)` |evaluates to `true` if `value` matches `m`. | - -## Defining Matchers ## - -| `MATCHER(IsEven, "") { return (arg % 2) == 0; }` | Defines a matcher `IsEven()` to match an even number. | -|:-------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------| -| `MATCHER_P(IsDivisibleBy, n, "") { *result_listener << "where the remainder is " << (arg % n); return (arg % n) == 0; }` | Defines a macher `IsDivisibleBy(n)` to match a number divisible by `n`. | -| `MATCHER_P2(IsBetween, a, b, std::string(negation ? "isn't" : "is") + " between " + PrintToString(a) + " and " + PrintToString(b)) { return a <= arg && arg <= b; }` | Defines a matcher `IsBetween(a, b)` to match a value in the range [`a`, `b`]. | - -**Notes:** - - 1. The `MATCHER*` macros cannot be used inside a function or class. - 1. The matcher body must be _purely functional_ (i.e. it cannot have any side effect, and the result must not depend on anything other than the value being matched and the matcher parameters). - 1. You can use `PrintToString(x)` to convert a value `x` of any type to a string. - -## Matchers as Test Assertions ## - -|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/V1_6_Primer#Assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| -|:---------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`EXPECT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a non-fatal failure if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`. | - -# Actions # - -**Actions** specify what a mock function should do when invoked. - -## Returning a Value ## - -|`Return()`|Return from a `void` mock function.| -|:---------|:----------------------------------| -|`Return(value)`|Return `value`. If the type of `value` is different to the mock function's return type, `value` is converted to the latter type <i>at the time the expectation is set</i>, not when the action is executed.| -|`ReturnArg<N>()`|Return the `N`-th (0-based) argument.| -|`ReturnNew<T>(a1, ..., ak)`|Return `new T(a1, ..., ak)`; a different object is created each time.| -|`ReturnNull()`|Return a null pointer. | -|`ReturnPointee(ptr)`|Return the value pointed to by `ptr`.| -|`ReturnRef(variable)`|Return a reference to `variable`. | -|`ReturnRefOfCopy(value)`|Return a reference to a copy of `value`; the copy lives as long as the action.| - -## Side Effects ## - -|`Assign(&variable, value)`|Assign `value` to variable.| -|:-------------------------|:--------------------------| -| `DeleteArg<N>()` | Delete the `N`-th (0-based) argument, which must be a pointer. | -| `SaveArg<N>(pointer)` | Save the `N`-th (0-based) argument to `*pointer`. | -| `SaveArgPointee<N>(pointer)` | Save the value pointed to by the `N`-th (0-based) argument to `*pointer`. | -| `SetArgReferee<N>(value)` | Assign value to the variable referenced by the `N`-th (0-based) argument. | -|`SetArgPointee<N>(value)` |Assign `value` to the variable pointed by the `N`-th (0-based) argument.| -|`SetArgumentPointee<N>(value)`|Same as `SetArgPointee<N>(value)`. Deprecated. Will be removed in v1.7.0.| -|`SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last)`|Copies the elements in source range [`first`, `last`) to the array pointed to by the `N`-th (0-based) argument, which can be either a pointer or an iterator. The action does not take ownership of the elements in the source range.| -|`SetErrnoAndReturn(error, value)`|Set `errno` to `error` and return `value`.| -|`Throw(exception)` |Throws the given exception, which can be any copyable value. Available since v1.1.0.| - -## Using a Function or a Functor as an Action ## - -|`Invoke(f)`|Invoke `f` with the arguments passed to the mock function, where `f` can be a global/static function or a functor.| -|:----------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Invoke(object_pointer, &class::method)`|Invoke the {method on the object with the arguments passed to the mock function. | -|`InvokeWithoutArgs(f)`|Invoke `f`, which can be a global/static function or a functor. `f` must take no arguments. | -|`InvokeWithoutArgs(object_pointer, &class::method)`|Invoke the method on the object, which takes no arguments. | -|`InvokeArgument<N>(arg1, arg2, ..., argk)`|Invoke the mock function's `N`-th (0-based) argument, which must be a function or a functor, with the `k` arguments.| - -The return value of the invoked function is used as the return value -of the action. - -When defining a function or functor to be used with `Invoke*()`, you can declare any unused parameters as `Unused`: -``` - double Distance(Unused, double x, double y) { return sqrt(x*x + y*y); } - ... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo("Hi", _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(Distance)); -``` - -In `InvokeArgument<N>(...)`, if an argument needs to be passed by reference, wrap it inside `ByRef()`. For example, -``` - InvokeArgument<2>(5, string("Hi"), ByRef(foo)) -``` -calls the mock function's #2 argument, passing to it `5` and `string("Hi")` by value, and `foo` by reference. - -## Default Action ## - -|`DoDefault()`|Do the default action (specified by `ON_CALL()` or the built-in one).| -|:------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------| - -**Note:** due to technical reasons, `DoDefault()` cannot be used inside a composite action - trying to do so will result in a run-time error. - -## Composite Actions ## - -|`DoAll(a1, a2, ..., an)`|Do all actions `a1` to `an` and return the result of `an` in each invocation. The first `n - 1` sub-actions must return void. | -|:-----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`IgnoreResult(a)` |Perform action `a` and ignore its result. `a` must not return void. | -|`WithArg<N>(a)` |Pass the `N`-th (0-based) argument of the mock function to action `a` and perform it. | -|`WithArgs<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(a)`|Pass the selected (0-based) arguments of the mock function to action `a` and perform it. | -|`WithoutArgs(a)` |Perform action `a` without any arguments. | - -## Defining Actions ## - -| `ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }` | Defines an action `Sum()` to return the sum of the mock function's argument #0 and #1. | -|:--------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }` | Defines an action `Plus(n)` to return the sum of the mock function's argument #0 and `n`. | -| `ACTION_Pk(Foo, p1, ..., pk) { statements; }` | Defines a parameterized action `Foo(p1, ..., pk)` to execute the given `statements`. | - -The `ACTION*` macros cannot be used inside a function or class. - -# Cardinalities # - -These are used in `Times()` to specify how many times a mock function will be called: - -|`AnyNumber()`|The function can be called any number of times.| -|:------------|:----------------------------------------------| -|`AtLeast(n)` |The call is expected at least `n` times. | -|`AtMost(n)` |The call is expected at most `n` times. | -|`Between(m, n)`|The call is expected between `m` and `n` (inclusive) times.| -|`Exactly(n) or n`|The call is expected exactly `n` times. In particular, the call should never happen when `n` is 0.| - -# Expectation Order # - -By default, the expectations can be matched in _any_ order. If some -or all expectations must be matched in a given order, there are two -ways to specify it. They can be used either independently or -together. - -## The After Clause ## - -``` -using ::testing::Expectation; -... -Expectation init_x = EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitX()); -Expectation init_y = EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitY()); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .After(init_x, init_y); -``` -says that `Bar()` can be called only after both `InitX()` and -`InitY()` have been called. - -If you don't know how many pre-requisites an expectation has when you -write it, you can use an `ExpectationSet` to collect them: - -``` -using ::testing::ExpectationSet; -... -ExpectationSet all_inits; -for (int i = 0; i < element_count; i++) { - all_inits += EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitElement(i)); -} -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .After(all_inits); -``` -says that `Bar()` can be called only after all elements have been -initialized (but we don't care about which elements get initialized -before the others). - -Modifying an `ExpectationSet` after using it in an `.After()` doesn't -affect the meaning of the `.After()`. - -## Sequences ## - -When you have a long chain of sequential expectations, it's easier to -specify the order using **sequences**, which don't require you to given -each expectation in the chain a different name. <i>All expected<br> -calls</i> in the same sequence must occur in the order they are -specified. - -``` -using ::testing::Sequence; -Sequence s1, s2; -... -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Reset()) - .InSequence(s1, s2) - .WillOnce(Return(true)); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetSize()) - .InSequence(s1) - .WillOnce(Return(1)); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Describe(A<const char*>())) - .InSequence(s2) - .WillOnce(Return("dummy")); -``` -says that `Reset()` must be called before _both_ `GetSize()` _and_ -`Describe()`, and the latter two can occur in any order. - -To put many expectations in a sequence conveniently: -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -{ - InSequence dummy; - - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; -} -``` -says that all expected calls in the scope of `dummy` must occur in -strict order. The name `dummy` is irrelevant.) - -# Verifying and Resetting a Mock # - -Google Mock will verify the expectations on a mock object when it is destructed, or you can do it earlier: -``` -using ::testing::Mock; -... -// Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj; -// returns true iff successful. -Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_obj); -... -// Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj; -// also removes the default actions set by ON_CALL(); -// returns true iff successful. -Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_obj); -``` - -You can also tell Google Mock that a mock object can be leaked and doesn't -need to be verified: -``` -Mock::AllowLeak(&mock_obj); -``` - -# Mock Classes # - -Google Mock defines a convenient mock class template -``` -class MockFunction<R(A1, ..., An)> { - public: - MOCK_METHODn(Call, R(A1, ..., An)); -}; -``` -See this [recipe](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Using_Check_Points) for one application of it. - -# Flags # - -| `--gmock_catch_leaked_mocks=0` | Don't report leaked mock objects as failures. | -|:-------------------------------|:----------------------------------------------| -| `--gmock_verbose=LEVEL` | Sets the default verbosity level (`info`, `warning`, or `error`) of Google Mock messages. |
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_6/CookBook.md deleted file mode 100644 index f5975a0..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/CookBook.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3342 +0,0 @@ - - -You can find recipes for using Google Mock here. If you haven't yet, -please read the [ForDummies](V1_6_ForDummies.md) document first to make sure you understand -the basics. - -**Note:** Google Mock lives in the `testing` name space. For -readability, it is recommended to write `using ::testing::Foo;` once in -your file before using the name `Foo` defined by Google Mock. We omit -such `using` statements in this page for brevity, but you should do it -in your own code. - -# Creating Mock Classes # - -## Mocking Private or Protected Methods ## - -You must always put a mock method definition (`MOCK_METHOD*`) in a -`public:` section of the mock class, regardless of the method being -mocked being `public`, `protected`, or `private` in the base class. -This allows `ON_CALL` and `EXPECT_CALL` to reference the mock function -from outside of the mock class. (Yes, C++ allows a subclass to change -the access level of a virtual function in the base class.) Example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - ... - virtual bool Transform(Gadget* g) = 0; - - protected: - virtual void Resume(); - - private: - virtual int GetTimeOut(); -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Transform, bool(Gadget* g)); - - // The following must be in the public section, even though the - // methods are protected or private in the base class. - MOCK_METHOD0(Resume, void()); - MOCK_METHOD0(GetTimeOut, int()); -}; -``` - -## Mocking Overloaded Methods ## - -You can mock overloaded functions as usual. No special attention is required: - -``` -class Foo { - ... - - // Must be virtual as we'll inherit from Foo. - virtual ~Foo(); - - // Overloaded on the types and/or numbers of arguments. - virtual int Add(Element x); - virtual int Add(int times, Element x); - - // Overloaded on the const-ness of this object. - virtual Bar& GetBar(); - virtual const Bar& GetBar() const; -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Add, int(Element x)); - MOCK_METHOD2(Add, int(int times, Element x); - - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetBar, const Bar&()); -}; -``` - -**Note:** if you don't mock all versions of the overloaded method, the -compiler will give you a warning about some methods in the base class -being hidden. To fix that, use `using` to bring them in scope: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - using Foo::Add; - MOCK_METHOD1(Add, int(Element x)); - // We don't want to mock int Add(int times, Element x); - ... -}; -``` - -## Mocking Class Templates ## - -To mock a class template, append `_T` to the `MOCK_*` macros: - -``` -template <typename Elem> -class StackInterface { - ... - // Must be virtual as we'll inherit from StackInterface. - virtual ~StackInterface(); - - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual void Push(const Elem& x) = 0; -}; - -template <typename Elem> -class MockStack : public StackInterface<Elem> { - ... - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const Elem& x)); -}; -``` - -## Mocking Nonvirtual Methods ## - -Google Mock can mock non-virtual functions to be used in what we call _hi-perf -dependency injection_. - -In this case, instead of sharing a common base class with the real -class, your mock class will be _unrelated_ to the real class, but -contain methods with the same signatures. The syntax for mocking -non-virtual methods is the _same_ as mocking virtual methods: - -``` -// A simple packet stream class. None of its members is virtual. -class ConcretePacketStream { - public: - void AppendPacket(Packet* new_packet); - const Packet* GetPacket(size_t packet_number) const; - size_t NumberOfPackets() const; - ... -}; - -// A mock packet stream class. It inherits from no other, but defines -// GetPacket() and NumberOfPackets(). -class MockPacketStream { - public: - MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(GetPacket, const Packet*(size_t packet_number)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(NumberOfPackets, size_t()); - ... -}; -``` - -Note that the mock class doesn't define `AppendPacket()`, unlike the -real class. That's fine as long as the test doesn't need to call it. - -Next, you need a way to say that you want to use -`ConcretePacketStream` in production code, and use `MockPacketStream` -in tests. Since the functions are not virtual and the two classes are -unrelated, you must specify your choice at _compile time_ (as opposed -to run time). - -One way to do it is to templatize your code that needs to use a packet -stream. More specifically, you will give your code a template type -argument for the type of the packet stream. In production, you will -instantiate your template with `ConcretePacketStream` as the type -argument. In tests, you will instantiate the same template with -`MockPacketStream`. For example, you may write: - -``` -template <class PacketStream> -void CreateConnection(PacketStream* stream) { ... } - -template <class PacketStream> -class PacketReader { - public: - void ReadPackets(PacketStream* stream, size_t packet_num); -}; -``` - -Then you can use `CreateConnection<ConcretePacketStream>()` and -`PacketReader<ConcretePacketStream>` in production code, and use -`CreateConnection<MockPacketStream>()` and -`PacketReader<MockPacketStream>` in tests. - -``` - MockPacketStream mock_stream; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_stream, ...)...; - .. set more expectations on mock_stream ... - PacketReader<MockPacketStream> reader(&mock_stream); - ... exercise reader ... -``` - -## Mocking Free Functions ## - -It's possible to use Google Mock to mock a free function (i.e. a -C-style function or a static method). You just need to rewrite your -code to use an interface (abstract class). - -Instead of calling a free function (say, `OpenFile`) directly, -introduce an interface for it and have a concrete subclass that calls -the free function: - -``` -class FileInterface { - public: - ... - virtual bool Open(const char* path, const char* mode) = 0; -}; - -class File : public FileInterface { - public: - ... - virtual bool Open(const char* path, const char* mode) { - return OpenFile(path, mode); - } -}; -``` - -Your code should talk to `FileInterface` to open a file. Now it's -easy to mock out the function. - -This may seem much hassle, but in practice you often have multiple -related functions that you can put in the same interface, so the -per-function syntactic overhead will be much lower. - -If you are concerned about the performance overhead incurred by -virtual functions, and profiling confirms your concern, you can -combine this with the recipe for [mocking non-virtual methods](#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods.md). - -## Nice Mocks and Strict Mocks ## - -If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock -will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is: - - * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called. - * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. - -However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call" -warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all -of them as errors. Google Mock lets you make the decision on a -per-mock-object basis. - -Suppose your test uses a mock class `MockFoo`: - -``` -TEST(...) { - MockFoo mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -If a method of `mock_foo` other than `DoThis()` is called, it will be -reported by Google Mock as a warning. However, if you rewrite your -test to use `NiceMock<MockFoo>` instead, the warning will be gone, -resulting in a cleaner test output: - -``` -using ::testing::NiceMock; - -TEST(...) { - NiceMock<MockFoo> mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -`NiceMock<MockFoo>` is a subclass of `MockFoo`, so it can be used -wherever `MockFoo` is accepted. - -It also works if `MockFoo`'s constructor takes some arguments, as -`NiceMock<MockFoo>` "inherits" `MockFoo`'s constructors: - -``` -using ::testing::NiceMock; - -TEST(...) { - NiceMock<MockFoo> mock_foo(5, "hi"); // Calls MockFoo(5, "hi"). - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -The usage of `StrictMock` is similar, except that it makes all -uninteresting calls failures: - -``` -using ::testing::StrictMock; - -TEST(...) { - StrictMock<MockFoo> mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... - - // The test will fail if a method of mock_foo other than DoThis() - // is called. -} -``` - -There are some caveats though (I don't like them just as much as the -next guy, but sadly they are side effects of C++'s limitations): - - 1. `NiceMock<MockFoo>` and `StrictMock<MockFoo>` only work for mock methods defined using the `MOCK_METHOD*` family of macros **directly** in the `MockFoo` class. If a mock method is defined in a **base class** of `MockFoo`, the "nice" or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. In particular, nesting `NiceMock` and `StrictMock` (e.g. `NiceMock<StrictMock<MockFoo> >`) is **not** supported. - 1. The constructors of the base mock (`MockFoo`) cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which happens to be banned by the [Google C++ style guide](http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml). - 1. During the constructor or destructor of `MockFoo`, the mock object is _not_ nice or strict. This may cause surprises if the constructor or destructor calls a mock method on `this` object. (This behavior, however, is consistent with C++'s general rule: if a constructor or destructor calls a virtual method of `this` object, that method is treated as non-virtual. In other words, to the base class's constructor or destructor, `this` object behaves like an instance of the base class, not the derived class. This rule is required for safety. Otherwise a base constructor may use members of a derived class before they are initialized, or a base destructor may use members of a derived class after they have been destroyed.) - -Finally, you should be **very cautious** when using this feature, as the -decision you make applies to **all** future changes to the mock -class. If an important change is made in the interface you are mocking -(and thus in the mock class), it could break your tests (if you use -`StrictMock`) or let bugs pass through without a warning (if you use -`NiceMock`). Therefore, try to specify the mock's behavior using -explicit `EXPECT_CALL` first, and only turn to `NiceMock` or -`StrictMock` as the last resort. - -## Simplifying the Interface without Breaking Existing Code ## - -Sometimes a method has a long list of arguments that is mostly -uninteresting. For example, - -``` -class LogSink { - public: - ... - virtual void send(LogSeverity severity, const char* full_filename, - const char* base_filename, int line, - const struct tm* tm_time, - const char* message, size_t message_len) = 0; -}; -``` - -This method's argument list is lengthy and hard to work with (let's -say that the `message` argument is not even 0-terminated). If we mock -it as is, using the mock will be awkward. If, however, we try to -simplify this interface, we'll need to fix all clients depending on -it, which is often infeasible. - -The trick is to re-dispatch the method in the mock class: - -``` -class ScopedMockLog : public LogSink { - public: - ... - virtual void send(LogSeverity severity, const char* full_filename, - const char* base_filename, int line, const tm* tm_time, - const char* message, size_t message_len) { - // We are only interested in the log severity, full file name, and - // log message. - Log(severity, full_filename, std::string(message, message_len)); - } - - // Implements the mock method: - // - // void Log(LogSeverity severity, - // const string& file_path, - // const string& message); - MOCK_METHOD3(Log, void(LogSeverity severity, const string& file_path, - const string& message)); -}; -``` - -By defining a new mock method with a trimmed argument list, we make -the mock class much more user-friendly. - -## Alternative to Mocking Concrete Classes ## - -Often you may find yourself using classes that don't implement -interfaces. In order to test your code that uses such a class (let's -call it `Concrete`), you may be tempted to make the methods of -`Concrete` virtual and then mock it. - -Try not to do that. - -Making a non-virtual function virtual is a big decision. It creates an -extension point where subclasses can tweak your class' behavior. This -weakens your control on the class because now it's harder to maintain -the class' invariants. You should make a function virtual only when -there is a valid reason for a subclass to override it. - -Mocking concrete classes directly is problematic as it creates a tight -coupling between the class and the tests - any small change in the -class may invalidate your tests and make test maintenance a pain. - -To avoid such problems, many programmers have been practicing "coding -to interfaces": instead of talking to the `Concrete` class, your code -would define an interface and talk to it. Then you implement that -interface as an adaptor on top of `Concrete`. In tests, you can easily -mock that interface to observe how your code is doing. - -This technique incurs some overhead: - - * You pay the cost of virtual function calls (usually not a problem). - * There is more abstraction for the programmers to learn. - -However, it can also bring significant benefits in addition to better -testability: - - * `Concrete`'s API may not fit your problem domain very well, as you may not be the only client it tries to serve. By designing your own interface, you have a chance to tailor it to your need - you may add higher-level functionalities, rename stuff, etc instead of just trimming the class. This allows you to write your code (user of the interface) in a more natural way, which means it will be more readable, more maintainable, and you'll be more productive. - * If `Concrete`'s implementation ever has to change, you don't have to rewrite everywhere it is used. Instead, you can absorb the change in your implementation of the interface, and your other code and tests will be insulated from this change. - -Some people worry that if everyone is practicing this technique, they -will end up writing lots of redundant code. This concern is totally -understandable. However, there are two reasons why it may not be the -case: - - * Different projects may need to use `Concrete` in different ways, so the best interfaces for them will be different. Therefore, each of them will have its own domain-specific interface on top of `Concrete`, and they will not be the same code. - * If enough projects want to use the same interface, they can always share it, just like they have been sharing `Concrete`. You can check in the interface and the adaptor somewhere near `Concrete` (perhaps in a `contrib` sub-directory) and let many projects use it. - -You need to weigh the pros and cons carefully for your particular -problem, but I'd like to assure you that the Java community has been -practicing this for a long time and it's a proven effective technique -applicable in a wide variety of situations. :-) - -## Delegating Calls to a Fake ## - -Some times you have a non-trivial fake implementation of an -interface. For example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - virtual ~Foo() {} - virtual char DoThis(int n) = 0; - virtual void DoThat(const char* s, int* p) = 0; -}; - -class FakeFoo : public Foo { - public: - virtual char DoThis(int n) { - return (n > 0) ? '+' : - (n < 0) ? '-' : '0'; - } - - virtual void DoThat(const char* s, int* p) { - *p = strlen(s); - } -}; -``` - -Now you want to mock this interface such that you can set expectations -on it. However, you also want to use `FakeFoo` for the default -behavior, as duplicating it in the mock object is, well, a lot of -work. - -When you define the mock class using Google Mock, you can have it -delegate its default action to a fake class you already have, using -this pattern: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Normal mock method definitions using Google Mock. - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThis, char(int n)); - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThat, void(const char* s, int* p)); - - // Delegates the default actions of the methods to a FakeFoo object. - // This must be called *before* the custom ON_CALL() statements. - void DelegateToFake() { - ON_CALL(*this, DoThis(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThis)); - ON_CALL(*this, DoThat(_, _)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThat)); - } - private: - FakeFoo fake_; // Keeps an instance of the fake in the mock. -}; -``` - -With that, you can use `MockFoo` in your tests as usual. Just remember -that if you don't explicitly set an action in an `ON_CALL()` or -`EXPECT_CALL()`, the fake will be called upon to do it: - -``` -using ::testing::_; - -TEST(AbcTest, Xyz) { - MockFoo foo; - foo.DelegateToFake(); // Enables the fake for delegation. - - // Put your ON_CALL(foo, ...)s here, if any. - - // No action specified, meaning to use the default action. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, _)); - - int n = 0; - EXPECT_EQ('+', foo.DoThis(5)); // FakeFoo::DoThis() is invoked. - foo.DoThat("Hi", &n); // FakeFoo::DoThat() is invoked. - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); -} -``` - -**Some tips:** - - * If you want, you can still override the default action by providing your own `ON_CALL()` or using `.WillOnce()` / `.WillRepeatedly()` in `EXPECT_CALL()`. - * In `DelegateToFake()`, you only need to delegate the methods whose fake implementation you intend to use. - * The general technique discussed here works for overloaded methods, but you'll need to tell the compiler which version you mean. To disambiguate a mock function (the one you specify inside the parentheses of `ON_CALL()`), see the "Selecting Between Overloaded Functions" section on this page; to disambiguate a fake function (the one you place inside `Invoke()`), use a `static_cast` to specify the function's type. - * Having to mix a mock and a fake is often a sign of something gone wrong. Perhaps you haven't got used to the interaction-based way of testing yet. Or perhaps your interface is taking on too many roles and should be split up. Therefore, **don't abuse this**. We would only recommend to do it as an intermediate step when you are refactoring your code. - -Regarding the tip on mixing a mock and a fake, here's an example on -why it may be a bad sign: Suppose you have a class `System` for -low-level system operations. In particular, it does file and I/O -operations. And suppose you want to test how your code uses `System` -to do I/O, and you just want the file operations to work normally. If -you mock out the entire `System` class, you'll have to provide a fake -implementation for the file operation part, which suggests that -`System` is taking on too many roles. - -Instead, you can define a `FileOps` interface and an `IOOps` interface -and split `System`'s functionalities into the two. Then you can mock -`IOOps` without mocking `FileOps`. - -## Delegating Calls to a Real Object ## - -When using testing doubles (mocks, fakes, stubs, and etc), sometimes -their behaviors will differ from those of the real objects. This -difference could be either intentional (as in simulating an error such -that you can test the error handling code) or unintentional. If your -mocks have different behaviors than the real objects by mistake, you -could end up with code that passes the tests but fails in production. - -You can use the _delegating-to-real_ technique to ensure that your -mock has the same behavior as the real object while retaining the -ability to validate calls. This technique is very similar to the -delegating-to-fake technique, the difference being that we use a real -object instead of a fake. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AtLeast; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MockFoo() { - // By default, all calls are delegated to the real object. - ON_CALL(*this, DoThis()) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&real_, &Foo::DoThis)); - ON_CALL(*this, DoThat(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&real_, &Foo::DoThat)); - ... - } - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, ...); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, ...); - ... - private: - Foo real_; -}; -... - - MockFoo mock; - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, DoThis()) - .Times(3); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, DoThat("Hi")) - .Times(AtLeast(1)); - ... use mock in test ... -``` - -With this, Google Mock will verify that your code made the right calls -(with the right arguments, in the right order, called the right number -of times, etc), and a real object will answer the calls (so the -behavior will be the same as in production). This gives you the best -of both worlds. - -## Delegating Calls to a Parent Class ## - -Ideally, you should code to interfaces, whose methods are all pure -virtual. In reality, sometimes you do need to mock a virtual method -that is not pure (i.e, it already has an implementation). For example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - virtual ~Foo(); - - virtual void Pure(int n) = 0; - virtual int Concrete(const char* str) { ... } -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Mocking a pure method. - MOCK_METHOD1(Pure, void(int n)); - // Mocking a concrete method. Foo::Concrete() is shadowed. - MOCK_METHOD1(Concrete, int(const char* str)); -}; -``` - -Sometimes you may want to call `Foo::Concrete()` instead of -`MockFoo::Concrete()`. Perhaps you want to do it as part of a stub -action, or perhaps your test doesn't need to mock `Concrete()` at all -(but it would be oh-so painful to have to define a new mock class -whenever you don't need to mock one of its methods). - -The trick is to leave a back door in your mock class for accessing the -real methods in the base class: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Mocking a pure method. - MOCK_METHOD1(Pure, void(int n)); - // Mocking a concrete method. Foo::Concrete() is shadowed. - MOCK_METHOD1(Concrete, int(const char* str)); - - // Use this to call Concrete() defined in Foo. - int FooConcrete(const char* str) { return Foo::Concrete(str); } -}; -``` - -Now, you can call `Foo::Concrete()` inside an action by: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Concrete(_)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(&foo, &MockFoo::FooConcrete)); -``` - -or tell the mock object that you don't want to mock `Concrete()`: - -``` -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - ON_CALL(foo, Concrete(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&foo, &MockFoo::FooConcrete)); -``` - -(Why don't we just write `Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concrete)`? If you do -that, `MockFoo::Concrete()` will be called (and cause an infinite -recursion) since `Foo::Concrete()` is virtual. That's just how C++ -works.) - -# Using Matchers # - -## Matching Argument Values Exactly ## - -You can specify exactly which arguments a mock method is expecting: - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)) - .WillOnce(Return('a')); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat("Hello", bar)); -``` - -## Using Simple Matchers ## - -You can use matchers to match arguments that have a certain property: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::Return; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(Ge(5))) // The argument must be >= 5. - .WillOnce(Return('a')); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat("Hello", NotNull())); - // The second argument must not be NULL. -``` - -A frequently used matcher is `_`, which matches anything: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::NotNull; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, NotNull())); -``` - -## Combining Matchers ## - -You can build complex matchers from existing ones using `AllOf()`, -`AnyOf()`, and `Not()`: - -``` -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::HasSubstr; -using ::testing::Ne; -using ::testing::Not; -... - // The argument must be > 5 and != 10. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(AllOf(Gt(5), - Ne(10)))); - - // The first argument must not contain sub-string "blah". - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(Not(HasSubstr("blah")), - NULL)); -``` - -## Casting Matchers ## - -Google Mock matchers are statically typed, meaning that the compiler -can catch your mistake if you use a matcher of the wrong type (for -example, if you use `Eq(5)` to match a `string` argument). Good for -you! - -Sometimes, however, you know what you're doing and want the compiler -to give you some slack. One example is that you have a matcher for -`long` and the argument you want to match is `int`. While the two -types aren't exactly the same, there is nothing really wrong with -using a `Matcher<long>` to match an `int` - after all, we can first -convert the `int` argument to a `long` before giving it to the -matcher. - -To support this need, Google Mock gives you the -`SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` function. It casts a matcher `m` to type -`Matcher<T>`. To ensure safety, Google Mock checks that (let `U` be the -type `m` accepts): - - 1. Type `T` can be implicitly cast to type `U`; - 1. When both `T` and `U` are built-in arithmetic types (`bool`, integers, and floating-point numbers), the conversion from `T` to `U` is not lossy (in other words, any value representable by `T` can also be represented by `U`); and - 1. When `U` is a reference, `T` must also be a reference (as the underlying matcher may be interested in the address of the `U` value). - -The code won't compile if any of these conditions isn't met. - -Here's one example: - -``` -using ::testing::SafeMatcherCast; - -// A base class and a child class. -class Base { ... }; -class Derived : public Base { ... }; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThis, void(Derived* derived)); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - // m is a Matcher<Base*> we got from somewhere. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(SafeMatcherCast<Derived*>(m))); -``` - -If you find `SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` too limiting, you can use a similar -function `MatcherCast<T>(m)`. The difference is that `MatcherCast` works -as long as you can `static_cast` type `T` to type `U`. - -`MatcherCast` essentially lets you bypass C++'s type system -(`static_cast` isn't always safe as it could throw away information, -for example), so be careful not to misuse/abuse it. - -## Selecting Between Overloaded Functions ## - -If you expect an overloaded function to be called, the compiler may -need some help on which overloaded version it is. - -To disambiguate functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object, -use the `Const()` argument wrapper. - -``` -using ::testing::ReturnRef; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetBar, const Bar&()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Bar bar1, bar2; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetBar()) // The non-const GetBar(). - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar1)); - EXPECT_CALL(Const(foo), GetBar()) // The const GetBar(). - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar2)); -``` - -(`Const()` is defined by Google Mock and returns a `const` reference -to its argument.) - -To disambiguate overloaded functions with the same number of arguments -but different argument types, you may need to specify the exact type -of a matcher, either by wrapping your matcher in `Matcher<type>()`, or -using a matcher whose type is fixed (`TypedEq<type>`, `An<type>()`, -etc): - -``` -using ::testing::An; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Matcher; -using ::testing::TypedEq; - -class MockPrinter : public Printer { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Print, void(int n)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Print, void(char c)); -}; - -TEST(PrinterTest, Print) { - MockPrinter printer; - - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(An<int>())); // void Print(int); - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(Matcher<int>(Lt(5)))); // void Print(int); - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(TypedEq<char>('a'))); // void Print(char); - - printer.Print(3); - printer.Print(6); - printer.Print('a'); -} -``` - -## Performing Different Actions Based on the Arguments ## - -When a mock method is called, the _last_ matching expectation that's -still active will be selected (think "newer overrides older"). So, you -can make a method do different things depending on its argument values -like this: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Return; -... - // The default case. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return('b')); - - // The more specific case. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(Lt(5))) - .WillRepeatedly(Return('a')); -``` - -Now, if `foo.DoThis()` is called with a value less than 5, `'a'` will -be returned; otherwise `'b'` will be returned. - -## Matching Multiple Arguments as a Whole ## - -Sometimes it's not enough to match the arguments individually. For -example, we may want to say that the first argument must be less than -the second argument. The `With()` clause allows us to match -all arguments of a mock function as a whole. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Ne; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, InRange(Ne(0), _)) - .With(Lt()); -``` - -says that the first argument of `InRange()` must not be 0, and must be -less than the second argument. - -The expression inside `With()` must be a matcher of type -`Matcher<tr1::tuple<A1, ..., An> >`, where `A1`, ..., `An` are the -types of the function arguments. - -You can also write `AllArgs(m)` instead of `m` inside `.With()`. The -two forms are equivalent, but `.With(AllArgs(Lt()))` is more readable -than `.With(Lt())`. - -You can use `Args<k1, ..., kn>(m)` to match the `n` selected arguments -(as a tuple) against `m`. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Args; -using ::testing::Lt; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Blah(_, _, _)) - .With(AllOf(Args<0, 1>(Lt()), Args<1, 2>(Lt()))); -``` - -says that `Blah()` will be called with arguments `x`, `y`, and `z` where -`x < y < z`. - -As a convenience and example, Google Mock provides some matchers for -2-tuples, including the `Lt()` matcher above. See the [CheatSheet](V1_6_CheatSheet.md) for -the complete list. - -Note that if you want to pass the arguments to a predicate of your own -(e.g. `.With(Args<0, 1>(Truly(&MyPredicate)))`), that predicate MUST be -written to take a `tr1::tuple` as its argument; Google Mock will pass the `n` -selected arguments as _one_ single tuple to the predicate. - -## Using Matchers as Predicates ## - -Have you noticed that a matcher is just a fancy predicate that also -knows how to describe itself? Many existing algorithms take predicates -as arguments (e.g. those defined in STL's `<algorithm>` header), and -it would be a shame if Google Mock matchers are not allowed to -participate. - -Luckily, you can use a matcher where a unary predicate functor is -expected by wrapping it inside the `Matches()` function. For example, - -``` -#include <algorithm> -#include <vector> - -std::vector<int> v; -... -// How many elements in v are >= 10? -const int count = count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), Matches(Ge(10))); -``` - -Since you can build complex matchers from simpler ones easily using -Google Mock, this gives you a way to conveniently construct composite -predicates (doing the same using STL's `<functional>` header is just -painful). For example, here's a predicate that's satisfied by any -number that is >= 0, <= 100, and != 50: - -``` -Matches(AllOf(Ge(0), Le(100), Ne(50))) -``` - -## Using Matchers in Google Test Assertions ## - -Since matchers are basically predicates that also know how to describe -themselves, there is a way to take advantage of them in -[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) assertions. It's -called `ASSERT_THAT` and `EXPECT_THAT`: - -``` - ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher); // Asserts that value matches matcher. - EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher); // The non-fatal version. -``` - -For example, in a Google Test test you can write: - -``` -#include "gmock/gmock.h" - -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::Le; -using ::testing::MatchesRegex; -using ::testing::StartsWith; -... - - EXPECT_THAT(Foo(), StartsWith("Hello")); - EXPECT_THAT(Bar(), MatchesRegex("Line \\d+")); - ASSERT_THAT(Baz(), AllOf(Ge(5), Le(10))); -``` - -which (as you can probably guess) executes `Foo()`, `Bar()`, and -`Baz()`, and verifies that: - - * `Foo()` returns a string that starts with `"Hello"`. - * `Bar()` returns a string that matches regular expression `"Line \\d+"`. - * `Baz()` returns a number in the range [5, 10]. - -The nice thing about these macros is that _they read like -English_. They generate informative messages too. For example, if the -first `EXPECT_THAT()` above fails, the message will be something like: - -``` -Value of: Foo() - Actual: "Hi, world!" -Expected: starts with "Hello" -``` - -**Credit:** The idea of `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_THAT` was stolen from the -[Hamcrest](http://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/) project, which adds -`assertThat()` to JUnit. - -## Using Predicates as Matchers ## - -Google Mock provides a built-in set of matchers. In case you find them -lacking, you can use an arbitray unary predicate function or functor -as a matcher - as long as the predicate accepts a value of the type -you want. You do this by wrapping the predicate inside the `Truly()` -function, for example: - -``` -using ::testing::Truly; - -int IsEven(int n) { return (n % 2) == 0 ? 1 : 0; } -... - - // Bar() must be called with an even number. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Truly(IsEven))); -``` - -Note that the predicate function / functor doesn't have to return -`bool`. It works as long as the return value can be used as the -condition in statement `if (condition) ...`. - -## Matching Arguments that Are Not Copyable ## - -When you do an `EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(bar))`, Google Mock saves -away a copy of `bar`. When `Foo()` is called later, Google Mock -compares the argument to `Foo()` with the saved copy of `bar`. This -way, you don't need to worry about `bar` being modified or destroyed -after the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed. The same is true when you use -matchers like `Eq(bar)`, `Le(bar)`, and so on. - -But what if `bar` cannot be copied (i.e. has no copy constructor)? You -could define your own matcher function and use it with `Truly()`, as -the previous couple of recipes have shown. Or, you may be able to get -away from it if you can guarantee that `bar` won't be changed after -the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed. Just tell Google Mock that it should -save a reference to `bar`, instead of a copy of it. Here's how: - -``` -using ::testing::Eq; -using ::testing::ByRef; -using ::testing::Lt; -... - // Expects that Foo()'s argument == bar. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(Eq(ByRef(bar)))); - - // Expects that Foo()'s argument < bar. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(Lt(ByRef(bar)))); -``` - -Remember: if you do this, don't change `bar` after the -`EXPECT_CALL()`, or the result is undefined. - -## Validating a Member of an Object ## - -Often a mock function takes a reference to object as an argument. When -matching the argument, you may not want to compare the entire object -against a fixed object, as that may be over-specification. Instead, -you may need to validate a certain member variable or the result of a -certain getter method of the object. You can do this with `Field()` -and `Property()`. More specifically, - -``` -Field(&Foo::bar, m) -``` - -is a matcher that matches a `Foo` object whose `bar` member variable -satisfies matcher `m`. - -``` -Property(&Foo::baz, m) -``` - -is a matcher that matches a `Foo` object whose `baz()` method returns -a value that satisfies matcher `m`. - -For example: - -> | `Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3))` | Matches `x` where `x.number >= 3`. | -|:-----------------------------|:-----------------------------------| -> | `Property(&Foo::name, StartsWith("John "))` | Matches `x` where `x.name()` starts with `"John "`. | - -Note that in `Property(&Foo::baz, ...)`, method `baz()` must take no -argument and be declared as `const`. - -BTW, `Field()` and `Property()` can also match plain pointers to -objects. For instance, - -``` -Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3)) -``` - -matches a plain pointer `p` where `p->number >= 3`. If `p` is `NULL`, -the match will always fail regardless of the inner matcher. - -What if you want to validate more than one members at the same time? -Remember that there is `AllOf()`. - -## Validating the Value Pointed to by a Pointer Argument ## - -C++ functions often take pointers as arguments. You can use matchers -like `NULL`, `NotNull()`, and other comparison matchers to match a -pointer, but what if you want to make sure the value _pointed to_ by -the pointer, instead of the pointer itself, has a certain property? -Well, you can use the `Pointee(m)` matcher. - -`Pointee(m)` matches a pointer iff `m` matches the value the pointer -points to. For example: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::Pointee; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Pointee(Ge(3)))); -``` - -expects `foo.Bar()` to be called with a pointer that points to a value -greater than or equal to 3. - -One nice thing about `Pointee()` is that it treats a `NULL` pointer as -a match failure, so you can write `Pointee(m)` instead of - -``` - AllOf(NotNull(), Pointee(m)) -``` - -without worrying that a `NULL` pointer will crash your test. - -Also, did we tell you that `Pointee()` works with both raw pointers -**and** smart pointers (`linked_ptr`, `shared_ptr`, `scoped_ptr`, and -etc)? - -What if you have a pointer to pointer? You guessed it - you can use -nested `Pointee()` to probe deeper inside the value. For example, -`Pointee(Pointee(Lt(3)))` matches a pointer that points to a pointer -that points to a number less than 3 (what a mouthful...). - -## Testing a Certain Property of an Object ## - -Sometimes you want to specify that an object argument has a certain -property, but there is no existing matcher that does this. If you want -good error messages, you should define a matcher. If you want to do it -quick and dirty, you could get away with writing an ordinary function. - -Let's say you have a mock function that takes an object of type `Foo`, -which has an `int bar()` method and an `int baz()` method, and you -want to constrain that the argument's `bar()` value plus its `baz()` -value is a given number. Here's how you can define a matcher to do it: - -``` -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; - -class BarPlusBazEqMatcher : public MatcherInterface<const Foo&> { - public: - explicit BarPlusBazEqMatcher(int expected_sum) - : expected_sum_(expected_sum) {} - - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(const Foo& foo, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return (foo.bar() + foo.baz()) == expected_sum_; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "bar() + baz() equals " << expected_sum_; - } - - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "bar() + baz() does not equal " << expected_sum_; - } - private: - const int expected_sum_; -}; - -inline Matcher<const Foo&> BarPlusBazEq(int expected_sum) { - return MakeMatcher(new BarPlusBazEqMatcher(expected_sum)); -} - -... - - EXPECT_CALL(..., DoThis(BarPlusBazEq(5)))...; -``` - -## Matching Containers ## - -Sometimes an STL container (e.g. list, vector, map, ...) is passed to -a mock function and you may want to validate it. Since most STL -containers support the `==` operator, you can write -`Eq(expected_container)` or simply `expected_container` to match a -container exactly. - -Sometimes, though, you may want to be more flexible (for example, the -first element must be an exact match, but the second element can be -any positive number, and so on). Also, containers used in tests often -have a small number of elements, and having to define the expected -container out-of-line is a bit of a hassle. - -You can use the `ElementsAre()` matcher in such cases: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::ElementsAre; -using ::testing::Gt; -... - - MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, void(const vector<int>& numbers)); -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAre(1, Gt(0), _, 5))); -``` - -The above matcher says that the container must have 4 elements, which -must be 1, greater than 0, anything, and 5 respectively. - -`ElementsAre()` is overloaded to take 0 to 10 arguments. If more are -needed, you can place them in a C-style array and use -`ElementsAreArray()` instead: - -``` -using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; -... - - // ElementsAreArray accepts an array of element values. - const int expected_vector1[] = { 1, 5, 2, 4, ... }; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector1))); - - // Or, an array of element matchers. - Matcher<int> expected_vector2 = { 1, Gt(2), _, 3, ... }; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector2))); -``` - -In case the array needs to be dynamically created (and therefore the -array size cannot be inferred by the compiler), you can give -`ElementsAreArray()` an additional argument to specify the array size: - -``` -using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; -... - int* const expected_vector3 = new int[count]; - ... fill expected_vector3 with values ... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector3, count))); -``` - -**Tips:** - - * `ElementAre*()` works with _any_ container that implements the STL iterator concept (i.e. it has a `const_iterator` type and supports `begin()/end()`) and supports `size()`, not just the ones defined in STL. It will even work with container types yet to be written - as long as they follows the above pattern. - * You can use nested `ElementAre*()` to match nested (multi-dimensional) containers. - * If the container is passed by pointer instead of by reference, just write `Pointee(ElementsAre*(...))`. - * The order of elements _matters_ for `ElementsAre*()`. Therefore don't use it with containers whose element order is undefined (e.g. `hash_map`). - -## Sharing Matchers ## - -Under the hood, a Google Mock matcher object consists of a pointer to -a ref-counted implementation object. Copying matchers is allowed and -very efficient, as only the pointer is copied. When the last matcher -that references the implementation object dies, the implementation -object will be deleted. - -Therefore, if you have some complex matcher that you want to use again -and again, there is no need to build it everytime. Just assign it to a -matcher variable and use that variable repeatedly! For example, - -``` - Matcher<int> in_range = AllOf(Gt(5), Le(10)); - ... use in_range as a matcher in multiple EXPECT_CALLs ... -``` - -# Setting Expectations # - -## Ignoring Uninteresting Calls ## - -If you are not interested in how a mock method is called, just don't -say anything about it. In this case, if the method is ever called, -Google Mock will perform its default action to allow the test program -to continue. If you are not happy with the default action taken by -Google Mock, you can override it using `DefaultValue<T>::Set()` -(described later in this document) or `ON_CALL()`. - -Please note that once you expressed interest in a particular mock -method (via `EXPECT_CALL()`), all invocations to it must match some -expectation. If this function is called but the arguments don't match -any `EXPECT_CALL()` statement, it will be an error. - -## Disallowing Unexpected Calls ## - -If a mock method shouldn't be called at all, explicitly say so: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .Times(0); -``` - -If some calls to the method are allowed, but the rest are not, just -list all the expected calls: - -``` -using ::testing::AnyNumber; -using ::testing::Gt; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Gt(10))) - .Times(AnyNumber()); -``` - -A call to `foo.Bar()` that doesn't match any of the `EXPECT_CALL()` -statements will be an error. - -## Expecting Ordered Calls ## - -Although an `EXPECT_CALL()` statement defined earlier takes precedence -when Google Mock tries to match a function call with an expectation, -by default calls don't have to happen in the order `EXPECT_CALL()` -statements are written. For example, if the arguments match the -matchers in the third `EXPECT_CALL()`, but not those in the first two, -then the third expectation will be used. - -If you would rather have all calls occur in the order of the -expectations, put the `EXPECT_CALL()` statements in a block where you -define a variable of type `InSequence`: - -``` - using ::testing::_; - using ::testing::InSequence; - - { - InSequence s; - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, DoThat(_)) - .Times(2); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(6)); - } -``` - -In this example, we expect a call to `foo.DoThis(5)`, followed by two -calls to `bar.DoThat()` where the argument can be anything, which are -in turn followed by a call to `foo.DoThis(6)`. If a call occurred -out-of-order, Google Mock will report an error. - -## Expecting Partially Ordered Calls ## - -Sometimes requiring everything to occur in a predetermined order can -lead to brittle tests. For example, we may care about `A` occurring -before both `B` and `C`, but aren't interested in the relative order -of `B` and `C`. In this case, the test should reflect our real intent, -instead of being overly constraining. - -Google Mock allows you to impose an arbitrary DAG (directed acyclic -graph) on the calls. One way to express the DAG is to use the -[After](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CheatSheet#The_After_Clause) clause of `EXPECT_CALL`. - -Another way is via the `InSequence()` clause (not the same as the -`InSequence` class), which we borrowed from jMock 2. It's less -flexible than `After()`, but more convenient when you have long chains -of sequential calls, as it doesn't require you to come up with -different names for the expectations in the chains. Here's how it -works: - -If we view `EXPECT_CALL()` statements as nodes in a graph, and add an -edge from node A to node B wherever A must occur before B, we can get -a DAG. We use the term "sequence" to mean a directed path in this -DAG. Now, if we decompose the DAG into sequences, we just need to know -which sequences each `EXPECT_CALL()` belongs to in order to be able to -reconstruct the orginal DAG. - -So, to specify the partial order on the expectations we need to do two -things: first to define some `Sequence` objects, and then for each -`EXPECT_CALL()` say which `Sequence` objects it is part -of. Expectations in the same sequence must occur in the order they are -written. For example, - -``` - using ::testing::Sequence; - - Sequence s1, s2; - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, A()) - .InSequence(s1, s2); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, B()) - .InSequence(s1); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, C()) - .InSequence(s2); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, D()) - .InSequence(s2); -``` - -specifies the following DAG (where `s1` is `A -> B`, and `s2` is `A -> -C -> D`): - -``` - +---> B - | - A ---| - | - +---> C ---> D -``` - -This means that A must occur before B and C, and C must occur before -D. There's no restriction about the order other than these. - -## Controlling When an Expectation Retires ## - -When a mock method is called, Google Mock only consider expectations -that are still active. An expectation is active when created, and -becomes inactive (aka _retires_) when a call that has to occur later -has occurred. For example, in - -``` - using ::testing::_; - using ::testing::Sequence; - - Sequence s1, s2; - - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")) // #1 - .Times(AnyNumber()) - .InSequence(s1, s2); - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "Data set is empty.")) // #2 - .InSequence(s1); - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "User not found.")) // #3 - .InSequence(s2); -``` - -as soon as either #2 or #3 is matched, #1 will retire. If a warning -`"File too large."` is logged after this, it will be an error. - -Note that an expectation doesn't retire automatically when it's -saturated. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, _)); // #1 - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")); // #2 -``` - -says that there will be exactly one warning with the message `"File -too large."`. If the second warning contains this message too, #2 will -match again and result in an upper-bound-violated error. - -If this is not what you want, you can ask an expectation to retire as -soon as it becomes saturated: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, _)); // #1 - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")) // #2 - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -Here #2 can be used only once, so if you have two warnings with the -message `"File too large."`, the first will match #2 and the second -will match #1 - there will be no error. - -# Using Actions # - -## Returning References from Mock Methods ## - -If a mock function's return type is a reference, you need to use -`ReturnRef()` instead of `Return()` to return a result: - -``` -using ::testing::ReturnRef; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Bar bar; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetBar()) - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar)); -``` - -## Returning Live Values from Mock Methods ## - -The `Return(x)` action saves a copy of `x` when the action is -_created_, and always returns the same value whenever it's -executed. Sometimes you may want to instead return the _live_ value of -`x` (i.e. its value at the time when the action is _executed_.). - -If the mock function's return type is a reference, you can do it using -`ReturnRef(x)`, as shown in the previous recipe ("Returning References -from Mock Methods"). However, Google Mock doesn't let you use -`ReturnRef()` in a mock function whose return type is not a reference, -as doing that usually indicates a user error. So, what shall you do? - -You may be tempted to try `ByRef()`: - -``` -using testing::ByRef; -using testing::Return; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(GetValue, int()); -}; -... - int x = 0; - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(ByRef(x))); - x = 42; - EXPECT_EQ(42, foo.GetValue()); -``` - -Unfortunately, it doesn't work here. The above code will fail with error: - -``` -Value of: foo.GetValue() - Actual: 0 -Expected: 42 -``` - -The reason is that `Return(value)` converts `value` to the actual -return type of the mock function at the time when the action is -_created_, not when it is _executed_. (This behavior was chosen for -the action to be safe when `value` is a proxy object that references -some temporary objects.) As a result, `ByRef(x)` is converted to an -`int` value (instead of a `const int&`) when the expectation is set, -and `Return(ByRef(x))` will always return 0. - -`ReturnPointee(pointer)` was provided to solve this problem -specifically. It returns the value pointed to by `pointer` at the time -the action is _executed_: - -``` -using testing::ReturnPointee; -... - int x = 0; - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(ReturnPointee(&x)); // Note the & here. - x = 42; - EXPECT_EQ(42, foo.GetValue()); // This will succeed now. -``` - -## Combining Actions ## - -Want to do more than one thing when a function is called? That's -fine. `DoAll()` allow you to do sequence of actions every time. Only -the return value of the last action in the sequence will be used. - -``` -using ::testing::DoAll; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, bool(int n)); -}; -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillOnce(DoAll(action_1, - action_2, - ... - action_n)); -``` - -## Mocking Side Effects ## - -Sometimes a method exhibits its effect not via returning a value but -via side effects. For example, it may change some global state or -modify an output argument. To mock side effects, in general you can -define your own action by implementing `::testing::ActionInterface`. - -If all you need to do is to change an output argument, the built-in -`SetArgPointee()` action is convenient: - -``` -using ::testing::SetArgPointee; - -class MockMutator : public Mutator { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Mutate, void(bool mutate, int* value)); - ... -}; -... - - MockMutator mutator; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, Mutate(true, _)) - .WillOnce(SetArgPointee<1>(5)); -``` - -In this example, when `mutator.Mutate()` is called, we will assign 5 -to the `int` variable pointed to by argument #1 -(0-based). - -`SetArgPointee()` conveniently makes an internal copy of the -value you pass to it, removing the need to keep the value in scope and -alive. The implication however is that the value must have a copy -constructor and assignment operator. - -If the mock method also needs to return a value as well, you can chain -`SetArgPointee()` with `Return()` using `DoAll()`: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Return; -using ::testing::SetArgPointee; - -class MockMutator : public Mutator { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(MutateInt, bool(int* value)); -}; -... - - MockMutator mutator; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, MutateInt(_)) - .WillOnce(DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(5), - Return(true))); -``` - -If the output argument is an array, use the -`SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last)` action instead. It copies the -elements in source range `[first, last)` to the array pointed to by -the `N`-th (0-based) argument: - -``` -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::SetArrayArgument; - -class MockArrayMutator : public ArrayMutator { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Mutate, void(int* values, int num_values)); - ... -}; -... - - MockArrayMutator mutator; - int values[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, Mutate(NotNull(), 5)) - .WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(values, values + 5)); -``` - -This also works when the argument is an output iterator: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SeArrayArgument; - -class MockRolodex : public Rolodex { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(GetNames, void(std::back_insert_iterator<vector<string> >)); - ... -}; -... - - MockRolodex rolodex; - vector<string> names; - names.push_back("George"); - names.push_back("John"); - names.push_back("Thomas"); - EXPECT_CALL(rolodex, GetNames(_)) - .WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(names.begin(), names.end())); -``` - -## Changing a Mock Object's Behavior Based on the State ## - -If you expect a call to change the behavior of a mock object, you can use `::testing::InSequence` to specify different behaviors before and after the call: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -using ::testing::Return; - -... - { - InSequence seq; - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, IsDirty()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(true)); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, Flush()); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, IsDirty()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(false)); - } - my_mock.FlushIfDirty(); -``` - -This makes `my_mock.IsDirty()` return `true` before `my_mock.Flush()` is called and return `false` afterwards. - -If the behavior change is more complex, you can store the effects in a variable and make a mock method get its return value from that variable: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SaveArg; -using ::testing::Return; - -ACTION_P(ReturnPointee, p) { return *p; } -... - int previous_value = 0; - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, GetPrevValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(ReturnPointee(&previous_value)); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, UpdateValue(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(SaveArg<0>(&previous_value)); - my_mock.DoSomethingToUpdateValue(); -``` - -Here `my_mock.GetPrevValue()` will always return the argument of the last `UpdateValue()` call. - -## Setting the Default Value for a Return Type ## - -If a mock method's return type is a built-in C++ type or pointer, by -default it will return 0 when invoked. You only need to specify an -action if this default value doesn't work for you. - -Sometimes, you may want to change this default value, or you may want -to specify a default value for types Google Mock doesn't know -about. You can do this using the `::testing::DefaultValue` class -template: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(CalculateBar, Bar()); -}; -... - - Bar default_bar; - // Sets the default return value for type Bar. - DefaultValue<Bar>::Set(default_bar); - - MockFoo foo; - - // We don't need to specify an action here, as the default - // return value works for us. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, CalculateBar()); - - foo.CalculateBar(); // This should return default_bar. - - // Unsets the default return value. - DefaultValue<Bar>::Clear(); -``` - -Please note that changing the default value for a type can make you -tests hard to understand. We recommend you to use this feature -judiciously. For example, you may want to make sure the `Set()` and -`Clear()` calls are right next to the code that uses your mock. - -## Setting the Default Actions for a Mock Method ## - -You've learned how to change the default value of a given -type. However, this may be too coarse for your purpose: perhaps you -have two mock methods with the same return type and you want them to -have different behaviors. The `ON_CALL()` macro allows you to -customize your mock's behavior at the method level: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AnyNumber; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::Return; -... - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(_)) - .WillByDefault(Return(-1)); - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(0)) - .WillByDefault(Return(0)); - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(Gt(0))) - .WillByDefault(Return(1)); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Sign(_)) - .Times(AnyNumber()); - - foo.Sign(5); // This should return 1. - foo.Sign(-9); // This should return -1. - foo.Sign(0); // This should return 0. -``` - -As you may have guessed, when there are more than one `ON_CALL()` -statements, the news order take precedence over the older ones. In -other words, the **last** one that matches the function arguments will -be used. This matching order allows you to set up the common behavior -in a mock object's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase and -specialize the mock's behavior later. - -## Using Functions/Methods/Functors as Actions ## - -If the built-in actions don't suit you, you can easily use an existing -function, method, or functor as an action: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Sum, int(int x, int y)); - MOCK_METHOD1(ComplexJob, bool(int x)); -}; - -int CalculateSum(int x, int y) { return x + y; } - -class Helper { - public: - bool ComplexJob(int x); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Helper helper; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Sum(_, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(CalculateSum)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, ComplexJob(_)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(&helper, &Helper::ComplexJob)); - - foo.Sum(5, 6); // Invokes CalculateSum(5, 6). - foo.ComplexJob(10); // Invokes helper.ComplexJob(10); -``` - -The only requirement is that the type of the function, etc must be -_compatible_ with the signature of the mock function, meaning that the -latter's arguments can be implicitly converted to the corresponding -arguments of the former, and the former's return type can be -implicitly converted to that of the latter. So, you can invoke -something whose type is _not_ exactly the same as the mock function, -as long as it's safe to do so - nice, huh? - -## Invoking a Function/Method/Functor Without Arguments ## - -`Invoke()` is very useful for doing actions that are more complex. It -passes the mock function's arguments to the function or functor being -invoked such that the callee has the full context of the call to work -with. If the invoked function is not interested in some or all of the -arguments, it can simply ignore them. - -Yet, a common pattern is that a test author wants to invoke a function -without the arguments of the mock function. `Invoke()` allows her to -do that using a wrapper function that throws away the arguments before -invoking an underlining nullary function. Needless to say, this can be -tedious and obscures the intent of the test. - -`InvokeWithoutArgs()` solves this problem. It's like `Invoke()` except -that it doesn't pass the mock function's arguments to the -callee. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeWithoutArgs; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(ComplexJob, bool(int n)); -}; - -bool Job1() { ... } -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, ComplexJob(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs(Job1)); - - foo.ComplexJob(10); // Invokes Job1(). -``` - -## Invoking an Argument of the Mock Function ## - -Sometimes a mock function will receive a function pointer or a functor -(in other words, a "callable") as an argument, e.g. - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThis, bool(int n, bool (*fp)(int))); -}; -``` - -and you may want to invoke this callable argument: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(...); - // Will execute (*fp)(5), where fp is the - // second argument DoThis() receives. -``` - -Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no -lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you -really? - -Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem: - -``` - InvokeArgument<N>(arg_1, arg_2, ..., arg_m) -``` - -will invoke the `N`-th (0-based) argument the mock function receives, -with `arg_1`, `arg_2`, ..., and `arg_m`. No matter if the argument is -a function pointer or a functor, Google Mock handles them both. - -With that, you could write: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<1>(5)); - // Will execute (*fp)(5), where fp is the - // second argument DoThis() receives. -``` - -What if the callable takes an argument by reference? No problem - just -wrap it inside `ByRef()`: - -``` -... - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, bool(bool (*fp)(int, const Helper&))); -... -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::ByRef; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Helper helper; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(5, ByRef(helper))); - // ByRef(helper) guarantees that a reference to helper, not a copy of it, - // will be passed to the callable. -``` - -What if the callable takes an argument by reference and we do **not** -wrap the argument in `ByRef()`? Then `InvokeArgument()` will _make a -copy_ of the argument, and pass a _reference to the copy_, instead of -a reference to the original value, to the callable. This is especially -handy when the argument is a temporary value: - -``` -... - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(bool (*f)(const double& x, const string& s))); -... -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - - MockFoo foo; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(5.0, string("Hi"))); - // Will execute (*f)(5.0, string("Hi")), where f is the function pointer - // DoThat() receives. Note that the values 5.0 and string("Hi") are - // temporary and dead once the EXPECT_CALL() statement finishes. Yet - // it's fine to perform this action later, since a copy of the values - // are kept inside the InvokeArgument action. -``` - -## Ignoring an Action's Result ## - -Sometimes you have an action that returns _something_, but you need an -action that returns `void` (perhaps you want to use it in a mock -function that returns `void`, or perhaps it needs to be used in -`DoAll()` and it's not the last in the list). `IgnoreResult()` lets -you do that. For example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::Return; - -int Process(const MyData& data); -string DoSomething(); - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Abc, void(const MyData& data)); - MOCK_METHOD0(Xyz, bool()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Abc(_)) - // .WillOnce(Invoke(Process)); - // The above line won't compile as Process() returns int but Abc() needs - // to return void. - .WillOnce(IgnoreResult(Invoke(Process))); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Xyz()) - .WillOnce(DoAll(IgnoreResult(Invoke(DoSomething)), - // Ignores the string DoSomething() returns. - Return(true))); -``` - -Note that you **cannot** use `IgnoreResult()` on an action that already -returns `void`. Doing so will lead to ugly compiler errors. - -## Selecting an Action's Arguments ## - -Say you have a mock function `Foo()` that takes seven arguments, and -you have a custom action that you want to invoke when `Foo()` is -called. Trouble is, the custom action only wants three arguments: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - MOCK_METHOD7(Foo, bool(bool visible, const string& name, int x, int y, - const map<pair<int, int>, double>& weight, - double min_weight, double max_wight)); -... - -bool IsVisibleInQuadrant1(bool visible, int x, int y) { - return visible && x >= 0 && y >= 0; -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(IsVisibleInQuadrant1)); // Uh, won't compile. :-( -``` - -To please the compiler God, you can to define an "adaptor" that has -the same signature as `Foo()` and calls the custom action with the -right arguments: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -bool MyIsVisibleInQuadrant1(bool visible, const string& name, int x, int y, - const map<pair<int, int>, double>& weight, - double min_weight, double max_wight) { - return IsVisibleInQuadrant1(visible, x, y); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(MyIsVisibleInQuadrant1)); // Now it works. -``` - -But isn't this awkward? - -Google Mock provides a generic _action adaptor_, so you can spend your -time minding more important business than writing your own -adaptors. Here's the syntax: - -``` - WithArgs<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(action) -``` - -creates an action that passes the arguments of the mock function at -the given indices (0-based) to the inner `action` and performs -it. Using `WithArgs`, our original example can be written as: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::WithArgs; -... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(IsVisibleInQuadrant1))); - // No need to define your own adaptor. -``` - -For better readability, Google Mock also gives you: - - * `WithoutArgs(action)` when the inner `action` takes _no_ argument, and - * `WithArg<N>(action)` (no `s` after `Arg`) when the inner `action` takes _one_ argument. - -As you may have realized, `InvokeWithoutArgs(...)` is just syntactic -sugar for `WithoutArgs(Inovke(...))`. - -Here are more tips: - - * The inner action used in `WithArgs` and friends does not have to be `Invoke()` -- it can be anything. - * You can repeat an argument in the argument list if necessary, e.g. `WithArgs<2, 3, 3, 5>(...)`. - * You can change the order of the arguments, e.g. `WithArgs<3, 2, 1>(...)`. - * The types of the selected arguments do _not_ have to match the signature of the inner action exactly. It works as long as they can be implicitly converted to the corresponding arguments of the inner action. For example, if the 4-th argument of the mock function is an `int` and `my_action` takes a `double`, `WithArg<4>(my_action)` will work. - -## Ignoring Arguments in Action Functions ## - -The selecting-an-action's-arguments recipe showed us one way to make a -mock function and an action with incompatible argument lists fit -together. The downside is that wrapping the action in -`WithArgs<...>()` can get tedious for people writing the tests. - -If you are defining a function, method, or functor to be used with -`Invoke*()`, and you are not interested in some of its arguments, an -alternative to `WithArgs` is to declare the uninteresting arguments as -`Unused`. This makes the definition less cluttered and less fragile in -case the types of the uninteresting arguments change. It could also -increase the chance the action function can be reused. For example, -given - -``` - MOCK_METHOD3(Foo, double(const string& label, double x, double y)); - MOCK_METHOD3(Bar, double(int index, double x, double y)); -``` - -instead of - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -double DistanceToOriginWithLabel(const string& label, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} - -double DistanceToOriginWithIndex(int index, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} -... - - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithLabel)); - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithIndex)); -``` - -you could write - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::Unused; - -double DistanceToOrigin(Unused, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} -... - - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); -``` - -## Sharing Actions ## - -Just like matchers, a Google Mock action object consists of a pointer -to a ref-counted implementation object. Therefore copying actions is -also allowed and very efficient. When the last action that references -the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be -deleted. - -If you have some complex action that you want to use again and again, -you may not have to build it from scratch everytime. If the action -doesn't have an internal state (i.e. if it always does the same thing -no matter how many times it has been called), you can assign it to an -action variable and use that variable repeatedly. For example: - -``` - Action<bool(int*)> set_flag = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(5), - Return(true)); - ... use set_flag in .WillOnce() and .WillRepeatedly() ... -``` - -However, if the action has its own state, you may be surprised if you -share the action object. Suppose you have an action factory -`IncrementCounter(init)` which creates an action that increments and -returns a counter whose initial value is `init`, using two actions -created from the same expression and using a shared action will -exihibit different behaviors. Example: - -``` - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis()) - .WillRepeatedly(IncrementCounter(0)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat()) - .WillRepeatedly(IncrementCounter(0)); - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 1. - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 2. - foo.DoThat(); // Returns 1 - Blah() uses a different - // counter than Bar()'s. -``` - -versus - -``` - Action<int()> increment = IncrementCounter(0); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis()) - .WillRepeatedly(increment); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat()) - .WillRepeatedly(increment); - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 1. - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 2. - foo.DoThat(); // Returns 3 - the counter is shared. -``` - -# Misc Recipes on Using Google Mock # - -## Making the Compilation Faster ## - -Believe it or not, the _vast majority_ of the time spent on compiling -a mock class is in generating its constructor and destructor, as they -perform non-trivial tasks (e.g. verification of the -expectations). What's more, mock methods with different signatures -have different types and thus their constructors/destructors need to -be generated by the compiler separately. As a result, if you mock many -different types of methods, compiling your mock class can get really -slow. - -If you are experiencing slow compilation, you can move the definition -of your mock class' constructor and destructor out of the class body -and into a `.cpp` file. This way, even if you `#include` your mock -class in N files, the compiler only needs to generate its constructor -and destructor once, resulting in a much faster compilation. - -Let's illustrate the idea using an example. Here's the definition of a -mock class before applying this recipe: - -``` -// File mock_foo.h. -... -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Since we don't declare the constructor or the destructor, - // the compiler will generate them in every translation unit - // where this mock class is used. - - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(const char* str)); - ... more mock methods ... -}; -``` - -After the change, it would look like: - -``` -// File mock_foo.h. -... -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // The constructor and destructor are declared, but not defined, here. - MockFoo(); - virtual ~MockFoo(); - - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(const char* str)); - ... more mock methods ... -}; -``` -and -``` -// File mock_foo.cpp. -#include "path/to/mock_foo.h" - -// The definitions may appear trivial, but the functions actually do a -// lot of things through the constructors/destructors of the member -// variables used to implement the mock methods. -MockFoo::MockFoo() {} -MockFoo::~MockFoo() {} -``` - -## Forcing a Verification ## - -When it's being destoyed, your friendly mock object will automatically -verify that all expectations on it have been satisfied, and will -generate [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) failures -if not. This is convenient as it leaves you with one less thing to -worry about. That is, unless you are not sure if your mock object will -be destoyed. - -How could it be that your mock object won't eventually be destroyed? -Well, it might be created on the heap and owned by the code you are -testing. Suppose there's a bug in that code and it doesn't delete the -mock object properly - you could end up with a passing test when -there's actually a bug. - -Using a heap checker is a good idea and can alleviate the concern, but -its implementation may not be 100% reliable. So, sometimes you do want -to _force_ Google Mock to verify a mock object before it is -(hopefully) destructed. You can do this with -`Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_object)`: - -``` -TEST(MyServerTest, ProcessesRequest) { - using ::testing::Mock; - - MockFoo* const foo = new MockFoo; - EXPECT_CALL(*foo, ...)...; - // ... other expectations ... - - // server now owns foo. - MyServer server(foo); - server.ProcessRequest(...); - - // In case that server's destructor will forget to delete foo, - // this will verify the expectations anyway. - Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(foo); -} // server is destroyed when it goes out of scope here. -``` - -**Tip:** The `Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations()` function returns a -`bool` to indicate whether the verification was successful (`true` for -yes), so you can wrap that function call inside a `ASSERT_TRUE()` if -there is no point going further when the verification has failed. - -## Using Check Points ## - -Sometimes you may want to "reset" a mock object at various check -points in your test: at each check point, you verify that all existing -expectations on the mock object have been satisfied, and then you set -some new expectations on it as if it's newly created. This allows you -to work with a mock object in "phases" whose sizes are each -manageable. - -One such scenario is that in your test's `SetUp()` function, you may -want to put the object you are testing into a certain state, with the -help from a mock object. Once in the desired state, you want to clear -all expectations on the mock, such that in the `TEST_F` body you can -set fresh expectations on it. - -As you may have figured out, the `Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations()` -function we saw in the previous recipe can help you here. Or, if you -are using `ON_CALL()` to set default actions on the mock object and -want to clear the default actions as well, use -`Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_object)` instead. This function does what -`Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_object)` does and returns the -same `bool`, **plus** it clears the `ON_CALL()` statements on -`mock_object` too. - -Another trick you can use to achieve the same effect is to put the -expectations in sequences and insert calls to a dummy "check-point" -function at specific places. Then you can verify that the mock -function calls do happen at the right time. For example, if you are -exercising code: - -``` -Foo(1); -Foo(2); -Foo(3); -``` - -and want to verify that `Foo(1)` and `Foo(3)` both invoke -`mock.Bar("a")`, but `Foo(2)` doesn't invoke anything. You can write: - -``` -using ::testing::MockFunction; - -TEST(FooTest, InvokesBarCorrectly) { - MyMock mock; - // Class MockFunction<F> has exactly one mock method. It is named - // Call() and has type F. - MockFunction<void(string check_point_name)> check; - { - InSequence s; - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar("a")); - EXPECT_CALL(check, Call("1")); - EXPECT_CALL(check, Call("2")); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar("a")); - } - Foo(1); - check.Call("1"); - Foo(2); - check.Call("2"); - Foo(3); -} -``` - -The expectation spec says that the first `Bar("a")` must happen before -check point "1", the second `Bar("a")` must happen after check point "2", -and nothing should happen between the two check points. The explicit -check points make it easy to tell which `Bar("a")` is called by which -call to `Foo()`. - -## Mocking Destructors ## - -Sometimes you want to make sure a mock object is destructed at the -right time, e.g. after `bar->A()` is called but before `bar->B()` is -called. We already know that you can specify constraints on the order -of mock function calls, so all we need to do is to mock the destructor -of the mock function. - -This sounds simple, except for one problem: a destructor is a special -function with special syntax and special semantics, and the -`MOCK_METHOD0` macro doesn't work for it: - -``` - MOCK_METHOD0(~MockFoo, void()); // Won't compile! -``` - -The good news is that you can use a simple pattern to achieve the same -effect. First, add a mock function `Die()` to your mock class and call -it in the destructor, like this: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - // Add the following two lines to the mock class. - MOCK_METHOD0(Die, void()); - virtual ~MockFoo() { Die(); } -}; -``` - -(If the name `Die()` clashes with an existing symbol, choose another -name.) Now, we have translated the problem of testing when a `MockFoo` -object dies to testing when its `Die()` method is called: - -``` - MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo; - MockBar* bar = new MockBar; - ... - { - InSequence s; - - // Expects *foo to die after bar->A() and before bar->B(). - EXPECT_CALL(*bar, A()); - EXPECT_CALL(*foo, Die()); - EXPECT_CALL(*bar, B()); - } -``` - -And that's that. - -## Using Google Mock and Threads ## - -**IMPORTANT NOTE:** What we describe in this recipe is **ONLY** true on -platforms where Google Mock is thread-safe. Currently these are only -platforms that support the pthreads library (this includes Linux and Mac). -To make it thread-safe on other platforms we only need to implement -some synchronization operations in `"gtest/internal/gtest-port.h"`. - -In a **unit** test, it's best if you could isolate and test a piece of -code in a single-threaded context. That avoids race conditions and -dead locks, and makes debugging your test much easier. - -Yet many programs are multi-threaded, and sometimes to test something -we need to pound on it from more than one thread. Google Mock works -for this purpose too. - -Remember the steps for using a mock: - - 1. Create a mock object `foo`. - 1. Set its default actions and expectations using `ON_CALL()` and `EXPECT_CALL()`. - 1. The code under test calls methods of `foo`. - 1. Optionally, verify and reset the mock. - 1. Destroy the mock yourself, or let the code under test destroy it. The destructor will automatically verify it. - -If you follow the following simple rules, your mocks and threads can -live happily togeter: - - * Execute your _test code_ (as opposed to the code being tested) in _one_ thread. This makes your test easy to follow. - * Obviously, you can do step #1 without locking. - * When doing step #2 and #5, make sure no other thread is accessing `foo`. Obvious too, huh? - * #3 and #4 can be done either in one thread or in multiple threads - anyway you want. Google Mock takes care of the locking, so you don't have to do any - unless required by your test logic. - -If you violate the rules (for example, if you set expectations on a -mock while another thread is calling its methods), you get undefined -behavior. That's not fun, so don't do it. - -Google Mock guarantees that the action for a mock function is done in -the same thread that called the mock function. For example, in - -``` - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(1)) - .WillOnce(action1); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(2)) - .WillOnce(action2); -``` - -if `Foo(1)` is called in thread 1 and `Foo(2)` is called in thread 2, -Google Mock will execute `action1` in thread 1 and `action2` in thread -2. - -Google Mock does _not_ impose a sequence on actions performed in -different threads (doing so may create deadlocks as the actions may -need to cooperate). This means that the execution of `action1` and -`action2` in the above example _may_ interleave. If this is a problem, -you should add proper synchronization logic to `action1` and `action2` -to make the test thread-safe. - - -Also, remember that `DefaultValue<T>` is a global resource that -potentially affects _all_ living mock objects in your -program. Naturally, you won't want to mess with it from multiple -threads or when there still are mocks in action. - -## Controlling How Much Information Google Mock Prints ## - -When Google Mock sees something that has the potential of being an -error (e.g. a mock function with no expectation is called, a.k.a. an -uninteresting call, which is allowed but perhaps you forgot to -explicitly ban the call), it prints some warning messages, including -the arguments of the function and the return value. Hopefully this -will remind you to take a look and see if there is indeed a problem. - -Sometimes you are confident that your tests are correct and may not -appreciate such friendly messages. Some other times, you are debugging -your tests or learning about the behavior of the code you are testing, -and wish you could observe every mock call that happens (including -argument values and the return value). Clearly, one size doesn't fit -all. - -You can control how much Google Mock tells you using the -`--gmock_verbose=LEVEL` command-line flag, where `LEVEL` is a string -with three possible values: - - * `info`: Google Mock will print all informational messages, warnings, and errors (most verbose). At this setting, Google Mock will also log any calls to the `ON_CALL/EXPECT_CALL` macros. - * `warning`: Google Mock will print both warnings and errors (less verbose). This is the default. - * `error`: Google Mock will print errors only (least verbose). - -Alternatively, you can adjust the value of that flag from within your -tests like so: - -``` - ::testing::FLAGS_gmock_verbose = "error"; -``` - -Now, judiciously use the right flag to enable Google Mock serve you better! - -## Running Tests in Emacs ## - -If you build and run your tests in Emacs, the source file locations of -Google Mock and [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) -errors will be highlighted. Just press `<Enter>` on one of them and -you'll be taken to the offending line. Or, you can just type `C-x `` -to jump to the next error. - -To make it even easier, you can add the following lines to your -`~/.emacs` file: - -``` -(global-set-key "\M-m" 'compile) ; m is for make -(global-set-key [M-down] 'next-error) -(global-set-key [M-up] '(lambda () (interactive) (next-error -1))) -``` - -Then you can type `M-m` to start a build, or `M-up`/`M-down` to move -back and forth between errors. - -## Fusing Google Mock Source Files ## - -Google Mock's implementation consists of dozens of files (excluding -its own tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in -fewer files instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gmock_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory -(starting with release 1.2.0). Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above -installed on your machine, just go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gmock_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h`, `gmock/gmock.h`, and `gmock-gtest-all.cc` in it. -These three files contain everything you need to use Google Mock (and -Google Test). Just copy them to anywhere you want and you are ready -to write tests and use mocks. You can use the -[scrpts/test/Makefile](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/scripts/test/Makefile) file as an example on how to compile your tests -against them. - -# Extending Google Mock # - -## Writing New Matchers Quickly ## - -The `MATCHER*` family of macros can be used to define custom matchers -easily. The syntax: - -``` -MATCHER(name, description_string_expression) { statements; } -``` - -will define a matcher with the given name that executes the -statements, which must return a `bool` to indicate if the match -succeeds. Inside the statements, you can refer to the value being -matched by `arg`, and refer to its type by `arg_type`. - -The description string is a `string`-typed expression that documents -what the matcher does, and is used to generate the failure message -when the match fails. It can (and should) reference the special -`bool` variable `negation`, and should evaluate to the description of -the matcher when `negation` is `false`, or that of the matcher's -negation when `negation` is `true`. - -For convenience, we allow the description string to be empty (`""`), -in which case Google Mock will use the sequence of words in the -matcher name as the description. - -For example: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, "") { return (arg % 7) == 0; } -``` -allows you to write -``` - // Expects mock_foo.Bar(n) to be called where n is divisible by 7. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, Bar(IsDivisibleBy7())); -``` -or, -``` -using ::testing::Not; -... - EXPECT_THAT(some_expression, IsDivisibleBy7()); - EXPECT_THAT(some_other_expression, Not(IsDivisibleBy7())); -``` -If the above assertions fail, they will print something like: -``` - Value of: some_expression - Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 27 -... - Value of: some_other_expression - Expected: not (is divisible by 7) - Actual: 21 -``` -where the descriptions `"is divisible by 7"` and `"not (is divisible -by 7)"` are automatically calculated from the matcher name -`IsDivisibleBy7`. - -As you may have noticed, the auto-generated descriptions (especially -those for the negation) may not be so great. You can always override -them with a string expression of your own: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, std::string(negation ? "isn't" : "is") + - " divisible by 7") { - return (arg % 7) == 0; -} -``` - -Optionally, you can stream additional information to a hidden argument -named `result_listener` to explain the match result. For example, a -better definition of `IsDivisibleBy7` is: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, "") { - if ((arg % 7) == 0) - return true; - - *result_listener << "the remainder is " << (arg % 7); - return false; -} -``` - -With this definition, the above assertion will give a better message: -``` - Value of: some_expression - Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 27 (the remainder is 6) -``` - -You should let `MatchAndExplain()` print _any additional information_ -that can help a user understand the match result. Note that it should -explain why the match succeeds in case of a success (unless it's -obvious) - this is useful when the matcher is used inside -`Not()`. There is no need to print the argument value itself, as -Google Mock already prints it for you. - -**Notes:** - - 1. The type of the value being matched (`arg_type`) is determined by the context in which you use the matcher and is supplied to you by the compiler, so you don't need to worry about declaring it (nor can you). This allows the matcher to be polymorphic. For example, `IsDivisibleBy7()` can be used to match any type where the value of `(arg % 7) == 0` can be implicitly converted to a `bool`. In the `Bar(IsDivisibleBy7())` example above, if method `Bar()` takes an `int`, `arg_type` will be `int`; if it takes an `unsigned long`, `arg_type` will be `unsigned long`; and so on. - 1. Google Mock doesn't guarantee when or how many times a matcher will be invoked. Therefore the matcher logic must be _purely functional_ (i.e. it cannot have any side effect, and the result must not depend on anything other than the value being matched and the matcher parameters). This requirement must be satisfied no matter how you define the matcher (e.g. using one of the methods described in the following recipes). In particular, a matcher can never call a mock function, as that will affect the state of the mock object and Google Mock. - -## Writing New Parameterized Matchers Quickly ## - -Sometimes you'll want to define a matcher that has parameters. For that you -can use the macro: -``` -MATCHER_P(name, param_name, description_string) { statements; } -``` -where the description string can be either `""` or a string expression -that references `negation` and `param_name`. - -For example: -``` -MATCHER_P(HasAbsoluteValue, value, "") { return abs(arg) == value; } -``` -will allow you to write: -``` - EXPECT_THAT(Blah("a"), HasAbsoluteValue(n)); -``` -which may lead to this message (assuming `n` is 10): -``` - Value of: Blah("a") - Expected: has absolute value 10 - Actual: -9 -``` - -Note that both the matcher description and its parameter are -printed, making the message human-friendly. - -In the matcher definition body, you can write `foo_type` to -reference the type of a parameter named `foo`. For example, in the -body of `MATCHER_P(HasAbsoluteValue, value)` above, you can write -`value_type` to refer to the type of `value`. - -Google Mock also provides `MATCHER_P2`, `MATCHER_P3`, ..., up to -`MATCHER_P10` to support multi-parameter matchers: -``` -MATCHER_Pk(name, param_1, ..., param_k, description_string) { statements; } -``` - -Please note that the custom description string is for a particular -**instance** of the matcher, where the parameters have been bound to -actual values. Therefore usually you'll want the parameter values to -be part of the description. Google Mock lets you do that by -referencing the matcher parameters in the description string -expression. - -For example, -``` - using ::testing::PrintToString; - MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, - std::string(negation ? "isn't" : "is") + " in range [" + - PrintToString(low) + ", " + PrintToString(hi) + "]") { - return low <= arg && arg <= hi; - } - ... - EXPECT_THAT(3, InClosedRange(4, 6)); -``` -would generate a failure that contains the message: -``` - Expected: is in range [4, 6] -``` - -If you specify `""` as the description, the failure message will -contain the sequence of words in the matcher name followed by the -parameter values printed as a tuple. For example, -``` - MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, "") { ... } - ... - EXPECT_THAT(3, InClosedRange(4, 6)); -``` -would generate a failure that contains the text: -``` - Expected: in closed range (4, 6) -``` - -For the purpose of typing, you can view -``` -MATCHER_Pk(Foo, p1, ..., pk, description_string) { ... } -``` -as shorthand for -``` -template <typename p1_type, ..., typename pk_type> -FooMatcherPk<p1_type, ..., pk_type> -Foo(p1_type p1, ..., pk_type pk) { ... } -``` - -When you write `Foo(v1, ..., vk)`, the compiler infers the types of -the parameters `v1`, ..., and `vk` for you. If you are not happy with -the result of the type inference, you can specify the types by -explicitly instantiating the template, as in `Foo<long, bool>(5, false)`. -As said earlier, you don't get to (or need to) specify -`arg_type` as that's determined by the context in which the matcher -is used. - -You can assign the result of expression `Foo(p1, ..., pk)` to a -variable of type `FooMatcherPk<p1_type, ..., pk_type>`. This can be -useful when composing matchers. Matchers that don't have a parameter -or have only one parameter have special types: you can assign `Foo()` -to a `FooMatcher`-typed variable, and assign `Foo(p)` to a -`FooMatcherP<p_type>`-typed variable. - -While you can instantiate a matcher template with reference types, -passing the parameters by pointer usually makes your code more -readable. If, however, you still want to pass a parameter by -reference, be aware that in the failure message generated by the -matcher you will see the value of the referenced object but not its -address. - -You can overload matchers with different numbers of parameters: -``` -MATCHER_P(Blah, a, description_string_1) { ... } -MATCHER_P2(Blah, a, b, description_string_2) { ... } -``` - -While it's tempting to always use the `MATCHER*` macros when defining -a new matcher, you should also consider implementing -`MatcherInterface` or using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()` instead (see -the recipes that follow), especially if you need to use the matcher a -lot. While these approaches require more work, they give you more -control on the types of the value being matched and the matcher -parameters, which in general leads to better compiler error messages -that pay off in the long run. They also allow overloading matchers -based on parameter types (as opposed to just based on the number of -parameters). - -## Writing New Monomorphic Matchers ## - -A matcher of argument type `T` implements -`::testing::MatcherInterface<T>` and does two things: it tests whether a -value of type `T` matches the matcher, and can describe what kind of -values it matches. The latter ability is used for generating readable -error messages when expectations are violated. - -The interface looks like this: - -``` -class MatchResultListener { - public: - ... - // Streams x to the underlying ostream; does nothing if the ostream - // is NULL. - template <typename T> - MatchResultListener& operator<<(const T& x); - - // Returns the underlying ostream. - ::std::ostream* stream(); -}; - -template <typename T> -class MatcherInterface { - public: - virtual ~MatcherInterface(); - - // Returns true iff the matcher matches x; also explains the match - // result to 'listener'. - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const = 0; - - // Describes this matcher to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const = 0; - - // Describes the negation of this matcher to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const; -}; -``` - -If you need a custom matcher but `Truly()` is not a good option (for -example, you may not be happy with the way `Truly(predicate)` -describes itself, or you may want your matcher to be polymorphic as -`Eq(value)` is), you can define a matcher to do whatever you want in -two steps: first implement the matcher interface, and then define a -factory function to create a matcher instance. The second step is not -strictly needed but it makes the syntax of using the matcher nicer. - -For example, you can define a matcher to test whether an `int` is -divisible by 7 and then use it like this: -``` -using ::testing::MakeMatcher; -using ::testing::Matcher; -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; - -class DivisibleBy7Matcher : public MatcherInterface<int> { - public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int n, MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return (n % 7) == 0; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is divisible by 7"; - } - - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is not divisible by 7"; - } -}; - -inline Matcher<int> DivisibleBy7() { - return MakeMatcher(new DivisibleBy7Matcher); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(DivisibleBy7())); -``` - -You may improve the matcher message by streaming additional -information to the `listener` argument in `MatchAndExplain()`: - -``` -class DivisibleBy7Matcher : public MatcherInterface<int> { - public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int n, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - const int remainder = n % 7; - if (remainder != 0) { - *listener << "the remainder is " << remainder; - } - return remainder == 0; - } - ... -}; -``` - -Then, `EXPECT_THAT(x, DivisibleBy7());` may general a message like this: -``` -Value of: x -Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 23 (the remainder is 2) -``` - -## Writing New Polymorphic Matchers ## - -You've learned how to write your own matchers in the previous -recipe. Just one problem: a matcher created using `MakeMatcher()` only -works for one particular type of arguments. If you want a -_polymorphic_ matcher that works with arguments of several types (for -instance, `Eq(x)` can be used to match a `value` as long as `value` == -`x` compiles -- `value` and `x` don't have to share the same type), -you can learn the trick from `"gmock/gmock-matchers.h"` but it's a bit -involved. - -Fortunately, most of the time you can define a polymorphic matcher -easily with the help of `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`. Here's how you can -define `NotNull()` as an example: - -``` -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::PolymorphicMatcher; - -class NotNullMatcher { - public: - // To implement a polymorphic matcher, first define a COPYABLE class - // that has three members MatchAndExplain(), DescribeTo(), and - // DescribeNegationTo(), like the following. - - // In this example, we want to use NotNull() with any pointer, so - // MatchAndExplain() accepts a pointer of any type as its first argument. - // In general, you can define MatchAndExplain() as an ordinary method or - // a method template, or even overload it. - template <typename T> - bool MatchAndExplain(T* p, - MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { - return p != NULL; - } - - // Describes the property of a value matching this matcher. - void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is not NULL"; } - - // Describes the property of a value NOT matching this matcher. - void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is NULL"; } -}; - -// To construct a polymorphic matcher, pass an instance of the class -// to MakePolymorphicMatcher(). Note the return type. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<NotNullMatcher> NotNull() { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(NotNullMatcher()); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(NotNull())); // The argument must be a non-NULL pointer. -``` - -**Note:** Your polymorphic matcher class does **not** need to inherit from -`MatcherInterface` or any other class, and its methods do **not** need -to be virtual. - -Like in a monomorphic matcher, you may explain the match result by -streaming additional information to the `listener` argument in -`MatchAndExplain()`. - -## Writing New Cardinalities ## - -A cardinality is used in `Times()` to tell Google Mock how many times -you expect a call to occur. It doesn't have to be exact. For example, -you can say `AtLeast(5)` or `Between(2, 4)`. - -If the built-in set of cardinalities doesn't suit you, you are free to -define your own by implementing the following interface (in namespace -`testing`): - -``` -class CardinalityInterface { - public: - virtual ~CardinalityInterface(); - - // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality. - virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0; - - // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality. - virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0; - - // Describes self to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const = 0; -}; -``` - -For example, to specify that a call must occur even number of times, -you can write - -``` -using ::testing::Cardinality; -using ::testing::CardinalityInterface; -using ::testing::MakeCardinality; - -class EvenNumberCardinality : public CardinalityInterface { - public: - virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const { - return (call_count % 2) == 0; - } - - virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const { - return false; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "called even number of times"; - } -}; - -Cardinality EvenNumber() { - return MakeCardinality(new EvenNumberCardinality); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(3)) - .Times(EvenNumber()); -``` - -## Writing New Actions Quickly ## - -If the built-in actions don't work for you, and you find it -inconvenient to use `Invoke()`, you can use a macro from the `ACTION*` -family to quickly define a new action that can be used in your code as -if it's a built-in action. - -By writing -``` -ACTION(name) { statements; } -``` -in a namespace scope (i.e. not inside a class or function), you will -define an action with the given name that executes the statements. -The value returned by `statements` will be used as the return value of -the action. Inside the statements, you can refer to the K-th -(0-based) argument of the mock function as `argK`. For example: -``` -ACTION(IncrementArg1) { return ++(*arg1); } -``` -allows you to write -``` -... WillOnce(IncrementArg1()); -``` - -Note that you don't need to specify the types of the mock function -arguments. Rest assured that your code is type-safe though: -you'll get a compiler error if `*arg1` doesn't support the `++` -operator, or if the type of `++(*arg1)` isn't compatible with the mock -function's return type. - -Another example: -``` -ACTION(Foo) { - (*arg2)(5); - Blah(); - *arg1 = 0; - return arg0; -} -``` -defines an action `Foo()` that invokes argument #2 (a function pointer) -with 5, calls function `Blah()`, sets the value pointed to by argument -#1 to 0, and returns argument #0. - -For more convenience and flexibility, you can also use the following -pre-defined symbols in the body of `ACTION`: - -| `argK_type` | The type of the K-th (0-based) argument of the mock function | -|:------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------| -| `args` | All arguments of the mock function as a tuple | -| `args_type` | The type of all arguments of the mock function as a tuple | -| `return_type` | The return type of the mock function | -| `function_type` | The type of the mock function | - -For example, when using an `ACTION` as a stub action for mock function: -``` -int DoSomething(bool flag, int* ptr); -``` -we have: -| **Pre-defined Symbol** | **Is Bound To** | -|:-----------------------|:----------------| -| `arg0` | the value of `flag` | -| `arg0_type` | the type `bool` | -| `arg1` | the value of `ptr` | -| `arg1_type` | the type `int*` | -| `args` | the tuple `(flag, ptr)` | -| `args_type` | the type `std::tr1::tuple<bool, int*>` | -| `return_type` | the type `int` | -| `function_type` | the type `int(bool, int*)` | - -## Writing New Parameterized Actions Quickly ## - -Sometimes you'll want to parameterize an action you define. For that -we have another macro -``` -ACTION_P(name, param) { statements; } -``` - -For example, -``` -ACTION_P(Add, n) { return arg0 + n; } -``` -will allow you to write -``` -// Returns argument #0 + 5. -... WillOnce(Add(5)); -``` - -For convenience, we use the term _arguments_ for the values used to -invoke the mock function, and the term _parameters_ for the values -used to instantiate an action. - -Note that you don't need to provide the type of the parameter either. -Suppose the parameter is named `param`, you can also use the -Google-Mock-defined symbol `param_type` to refer to the type of the -parameter as inferred by the compiler. For example, in the body of -`ACTION_P(Add, n)` above, you can write `n_type` for the type of `n`. - -Google Mock also provides `ACTION_P2`, `ACTION_P3`, and etc to support -multi-parameter actions. For example, -``` -ACTION_P2(ReturnDistanceTo, x, y) { - double dx = arg0 - x; - double dy = arg1 - y; - return sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy); -} -``` -lets you write -``` -... WillOnce(ReturnDistanceTo(5.0, 26.5)); -``` - -You can view `ACTION` as a degenerated parameterized action where the -number of parameters is 0. - -You can also easily define actions overloaded on the number of parameters: -``` -ACTION_P(Plus, a) { ... } -ACTION_P2(Plus, a, b) { ... } -``` - -## Restricting the Type of an Argument or Parameter in an ACTION ## - -For maximum brevity and reusability, the `ACTION*` macros don't ask -you to provide the types of the mock function arguments and the action -parameters. Instead, we let the compiler infer the types for us. - -Sometimes, however, we may want to be more explicit about the types. -There are several tricks to do that. For example: -``` -ACTION(Foo) { - // Makes sure arg0 can be converted to int. - int n = arg0; - ... use n instead of arg0 here ... -} - -ACTION_P(Bar, param) { - // Makes sure the type of arg1 is const char*. - ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<const char*, arg1_type>(); - - // Makes sure param can be converted to bool. - bool flag = param; -} -``` -where `StaticAssertTypeEq` is a compile-time assertion in Google Test -that verifies two types are the same. - -## Writing New Action Templates Quickly ## - -Sometimes you want to give an action explicit template parameters that -cannot be inferred from its value parameters. `ACTION_TEMPLATE()` -supports that and can be viewed as an extension to `ACTION()` and -`ACTION_P*()`. - -The syntax: -``` -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ActionName, - HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(kind1, name1, ..., kind_m, name_m), - AND_n_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, ..., p_n)) { statements; } -``` - -defines an action template that takes _m_ explicit template parameters -and _n_ value parameters, where _m_ is between 1 and 10, and _n_ is -between 0 and 10. `name_i` is the name of the i-th template -parameter, and `kind_i` specifies whether it's a `typename`, an -integral constant, or a template. `p_i` is the name of the i-th value -parameter. - -Example: -``` -// DuplicateArg<k, T>(output) converts the k-th argument of the mock -// function to type T and copies it to *output. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(DuplicateArg, - // Note the comma between int and k: - HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k, typename, T), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(output)) { - *output = T(std::tr1::get<k>(args)); -} -``` - -To create an instance of an action template, write: -``` - ActionName<t1, ..., t_m>(v1, ..., v_n) -``` -where the `t`s are the template arguments and the -`v`s are the value arguments. The value argument -types are inferred by the compiler. For example: -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - int n; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _)) - .WillOnce(DuplicateArg<1, unsigned char>(&n)); -``` - -If you want to explicitly specify the value argument types, you can -provide additional template arguments: -``` - ActionName<t1, ..., t_m, u1, ..., u_k>(v1, ..., v_n) -``` -where `u_i` is the desired type of `v_i`. - -`ACTION_TEMPLATE` and `ACTION`/`ACTION_P*` can be overloaded on the -number of value parameters, but not on the number of template -parameters. Without the restriction, the meaning of the following is -unclear: - -``` - OverloadedAction<int, bool>(x); -``` - -Are we using a single-template-parameter action where `bool` refers to -the type of `x`, or a two-template-parameter action where the compiler -is asked to infer the type of `x`? - -## Using the ACTION Object's Type ## - -If you are writing a function that returns an `ACTION` object, you'll -need to know its type. The type depends on the macro used to define -the action and the parameter types. The rule is relatively simple: -| **Given Definition** | **Expression** | **Has Type** | -|:---------------------|:---------------|:-------------| -| `ACTION(Foo)` | `Foo()` | `FooAction` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Foo, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS())` | `Foo<t1, ..., t_m>()` | `FooAction<t1, ..., t_m>` | -| `ACTION_P(Bar, param)` | `Bar(int_value)` | `BarActionP<int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Bar, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p1))` | `Bar<t1, ..., t_m>(int_value)` | `FooActionP<t1, ..., t_m, int>` | -| `ACTION_P2(Baz, p1, p2)` | `Baz(bool_value, int_value)` | `BazActionP2<bool, int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Baz, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, p2))` | `Baz<t1, ..., t_m>(bool_value, int_value)` | `FooActionP2<t1, ..., t_m, bool, int>` | -| ... | ... | ... | - -Note that we have to pick different suffixes (`Action`, `ActionP`, -`ActionP2`, and etc) for actions with different numbers of value -parameters, or the action definitions cannot be overloaded on the -number of them. - -## Writing New Monomorphic Actions ## - -While the `ACTION*` macros are very convenient, sometimes they are -inappropriate. For example, despite the tricks shown in the previous -recipes, they don't let you directly specify the types of the mock -function arguments and the action parameters, which in general leads -to unoptimized compiler error messages that can baffle unfamiliar -users. They also don't allow overloading actions based on parameter -types without jumping through some hoops. - -An alternative to the `ACTION*` macros is to implement -`::testing::ActionInterface<F>`, where `F` is the type of the mock -function in which the action will be used. For example: - -``` -template <typename F>class ActionInterface { - public: - virtual ~ActionInterface(); - - // Performs the action. Result is the return type of function type - // F, and ArgumentTuple is the tuple of arguments of F. - // - // For example, if F is int(bool, const string&), then Result would - // be int, and ArgumentTuple would be tr1::tuple<bool, const string&>. - virtual Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) = 0; -}; - -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Action; -using ::testing::ActionInterface; -using ::testing::MakeAction; - -typedef int IncrementMethod(int*); - -class IncrementArgumentAction : public ActionInterface<IncrementMethod> { - public: - virtual int Perform(const tr1::tuple<int*>& args) { - int* p = tr1::get<0>(args); // Grabs the first argument. - return *p++; - } -}; - -Action<IncrementMethod> IncrementArgument() { - return MakeAction(new IncrementArgumentAction); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Baz(_)) - .WillOnce(IncrementArgument()); - - int n = 5; - foo.Baz(&n); // Should return 5 and change n to 6. -``` - -## Writing New Polymorphic Actions ## - -The previous recipe showed you how to define your own action. This is -all good, except that you need to know the type of the function in -which the action will be used. Sometimes that can be a problem. For -example, if you want to use the action in functions with _different_ -types (e.g. like `Return()` and `SetArgPointee()`). - -If an action can be used in several types of mock functions, we say -it's _polymorphic_. The `MakePolymorphicAction()` function template -makes it easy to define such an action: - -``` -namespace testing { - -template <typename Impl> -PolymorphicAction<Impl> MakePolymorphicAction(const Impl& impl); - -} // namespace testing -``` - -As an example, let's define an action that returns the second argument -in the mock function's argument list. The first step is to define an -implementation class: - -``` -class ReturnSecondArgumentAction { - public: - template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> - Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const { - // To get the i-th (0-based) argument, use tr1::get<i>(args). - return tr1::get<1>(args); - } -}; -``` - -This implementation class does _not_ need to inherit from any -particular class. What matters is that it must have a `Perform()` -method template. This method template takes the mock function's -arguments as a tuple in a **single** argument, and returns the result of -the action. It can be either `const` or not, but must be invokable -with exactly one template argument, which is the result type. In other -words, you must be able to call `Perform<R>(args)` where `R` is the -mock function's return type and `args` is its arguments in a tuple. - -Next, we use `MakePolymorphicAction()` to turn an instance of the -implementation class into the polymorphic action we need. It will be -convenient to have a wrapper for this: - -``` -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicAction; -using ::testing::PolymorphicAction; - -PolymorphicAction<ReturnSecondArgumentAction> ReturnSecondArgument() { - return MakePolymorphicAction(ReturnSecondArgumentAction()); -} -``` - -Now, you can use this polymorphic action the same way you use the -built-in ones: - -``` -using ::testing::_; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThis, int(bool flag, int n)); - MOCK_METHOD3(DoThat, string(int x, const char* str1, const char* str2)); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(ReturnSecondArgument()); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, _, _)) - .WillOnce(ReturnSecondArgument()); - ... - foo.DoThis(true, 5); // Will return 5. - foo.DoThat(1, "Hi", "Bye"); // Will return "Hi". -``` - -## Teaching Google Mock How to Print Your Values ## - -When an uninteresting or unexpected call occurs, Google Mock prints the -argument values and the stack trace to help you debug. Assertion -macros like `EXPECT_THAT` and `EXPECT_EQ` also print the values in -question when the assertion fails. Google Mock and Google Test do this using -Google Test's user-extensible value printer. - -This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL -containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other -types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the -user can figure it out. -[Google Test's advanced guide](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/V1_6_AdvancedGuide#Teaching_Google_Test_How_to_Print_Your_Values) -explains how to extend the printer to do a better job at -printing your particular type than to dump the bytes.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/Documentation.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_6/Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index dcc9156..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Mock **1.6** -- **if you use a released version of Google Mock, please read the documentation for that specific version instead.** - - * [ForDummies](V1_6_ForDummies.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Mock. - * [CheatSheet](V1_6_CheatSheet.md) -- a quick reference. - * [CookBook](V1_6_CookBook.md) -- recipes for doing various tasks using Google Mock. - * [FrequentlyAskedQuestions](V1_6_FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Mock, read: - - * [DevGuide](DevGuide.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [Pump Manual](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/V1_6_PumpManual) -- how we generate some of Google Mock's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_6/ForDummies.md deleted file mode 100644 index 19ee63a..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/ForDummies.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,439 +0,0 @@ - - -(**Note:** If you get compiler errors that you don't understand, be sure to consult [Google Mock Doctor](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_FrequentlyAskedQuestions#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error).) - -# What Is Google C++ Mocking Framework? # -When you write a prototype or test, often it's not feasible or wise to rely on real objects entirely. A **mock object** implements the same interface as a real object (so it can be used as one), but lets you specify at run time how it will be used and what it should do (which methods will be called? in which order? how many times? with what arguments? what will they return? etc). - -**Note:** It is easy to confuse the term _fake objects_ with mock objects. Fakes and mocks actually mean very different things in the Test-Driven Development (TDD) community: - - * **Fake** objects have working implementations, but usually take some shortcut (perhaps to make the operations less expensive), which makes them not suitable for production. An in-memory file system would be an example of a fake. - * **Mocks** are objects pre-programmed with _expectations_, which form a specification of the calls they are expected to receive. - -If all this seems too abstract for you, don't worry - the most important thing to remember is that a mock allows you to check the _interaction_ between itself and code that uses it. The difference between fakes and mocks will become much clearer once you start to use mocks. - -**Google C++ Mocking Framework** (or **Google Mock** for short) is a library (sometimes we also call it a "framework" to make it sound cool) for creating mock classes and using them. It does to C++ what [jMock](http://www.jmock.org/) and [EasyMock](http://www.easymock.org/) do to Java. - -Using Google Mock involves three basic steps: - - 1. Use some simple macros to describe the interface you want to mock, and they will expand to the implementation of your mock class; - 1. Create some mock objects and specify its expectations and behavior using an intuitive syntax; - 1. Exercise code that uses the mock objects. Google Mock will catch any violation of the expectations as soon as it arises. - -# Why Google Mock? # -While mock objects help you remove unnecessary dependencies in tests and make them fast and reliable, using mocks manually in C++ is _hard_: - - * Someone has to implement the mocks. The job is usually tedious and error-prone. No wonder people go great distance to avoid it. - * The quality of those manually written mocks is a bit, uh, unpredictable. You may see some really polished ones, but you may also see some that were hacked up in a hurry and have all sorts of ad hoc restrictions. - * The knowledge you gained from using one mock doesn't transfer to the next. - -In contrast, Java and Python programmers have some fine mock frameworks, which automate the creation of mocks. As a result, mocking is a proven effective technique and widely adopted practice in those communities. Having the right tool absolutely makes the difference. - -Google Mock was built to help C++ programmers. It was inspired by [jMock](http://www.jmock.org/) and [EasyMock](http://www.easymock.org/), but designed with C++'s specifics in mind. It is your friend if any of the following problems is bothering you: - - * You are stuck with a sub-optimal design and wish you had done more prototyping before it was too late, but prototyping in C++ is by no means "rapid". - * Your tests are slow as they depend on too many libraries or use expensive resources (e.g. a database). - * Your tests are brittle as some resources they use are unreliable (e.g. the network). - * You want to test how your code handles a failure (e.g. a file checksum error), but it's not easy to cause one. - * You need to make sure that your module interacts with other modules in the right way, but it's hard to observe the interaction; therefore you resort to observing the side effects at the end of the action, which is awkward at best. - * You want to "mock out" your dependencies, except that they don't have mock implementations yet; and, frankly, you aren't thrilled by some of those hand-written mocks. - -We encourage you to use Google Mock as: - - * a _design_ tool, for it lets you experiment with your interface design early and often. More iterations lead to better designs! - * a _testing_ tool to cut your tests' outbound dependencies and probe the interaction between your module and its collaborators. - -# Getting Started # -Using Google Mock is easy! Inside your C++ source file, just `#include` `"gtest/gtest.h"` and `"gmock/gmock.h"`, and you are ready to go. - -# A Case for Mock Turtles # -Let's look at an example. Suppose you are developing a graphics program that relies on a LOGO-like API for drawing. How would you test that it does the right thing? Well, you can run it and compare the screen with a golden screen snapshot, but let's admit it: tests like this are expensive to run and fragile (What if you just upgraded to a shiny new graphics card that has better anti-aliasing? Suddenly you have to update all your golden images.). It would be too painful if all your tests are like this. Fortunately, you learned about Dependency Injection and know the right thing to do: instead of having your application talk to the drawing API directly, wrap the API in an interface (say, `Turtle`) and code to that interface: - -``` -class Turtle { - ... - virtual ~Turtle() {} - virtual void PenUp() = 0; - virtual void PenDown() = 0; - virtual void Forward(int distance) = 0; - virtual void Turn(int degrees) = 0; - virtual void GoTo(int x, int y) = 0; - virtual int GetX() const = 0; - virtual int GetY() const = 0; -}; -``` - -(Note that the destructor of `Turtle` **must** be virtual, as is the case for **all** classes you intend to inherit from - otherwise the destructor of the derived class will not be called when you delete an object through a base pointer, and you'll get corrupted program states like memory leaks.) - -You can control whether the turtle's movement will leave a trace using `PenUp()` and `PenDown()`, and control its movement using `Forward()`, `Turn()`, and `GoTo()`. Finally, `GetX()` and `GetY()` tell you the current position of the turtle. - -Your program will normally use a real implementation of this interface. In tests, you can use a mock implementation instead. This allows you to easily check what drawing primitives your program is calling, with what arguments, and in which order. Tests written this way are much more robust (they won't break because your new machine does anti-aliasing differently), easier to read and maintain (the intent of a test is expressed in the code, not in some binary images), and run _much, much faster_. - -# Writing the Mock Class # -If you are lucky, the mocks you need to use have already been implemented by some nice people. If, however, you find yourself in the position to write a mock class, relax - Google Mock turns this task into a fun game! (Well, almost.) - -## How to Define It ## -Using the `Turtle` interface as example, here are the simple steps you need to follow: - - 1. Derive a class `MockTurtle` from `Turtle`. - 1. Take a _virtual_ function of `Turtle` (while it's possible to [mock non-virtual methods using templates](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods), it's much more involved). Count how many arguments it has. - 1. In the `public:` section of the child class, write `MOCK_METHODn();` (or `MOCK_CONST_METHODn();` if you are mocking a `const` method), where `n` is the number of the arguments; if you counted wrong, shame on you, and a compiler error will tell you so. - 1. Now comes the fun part: you take the function signature, cut-and-paste the _function name_ as the _first_ argument to the macro, and leave what's left as the _second_ argument (in case you're curious, this is the _type of the function_). - 1. Repeat until all virtual functions you want to mock are done. - -After the process, you should have something like: - -``` -#include "gmock/gmock.h" // Brings in Google Mock. -class MockTurtle : public Turtle { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD0(PenUp, void()); - MOCK_METHOD0(PenDown, void()); - MOCK_METHOD1(Forward, void(int distance)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Turn, void(int degrees)); - MOCK_METHOD2(GoTo, void(int x, int y)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetX, int()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetY, int()); -}; -``` - -You don't need to define these mock methods somewhere else - the `MOCK_METHOD*` macros will generate the definitions for you. It's that simple! Once you get the hang of it, you can pump out mock classes faster than your source-control system can handle your check-ins. - -**Tip:** If even this is too much work for you, you'll find the -`gmock_gen.py` tool in Google Mock's `scripts/generator/` directory (courtesy of the [cppclean](http://code.google.com/p/cppclean/) project) useful. This command-line -tool requires that you have Python 2.4 installed. You give it a C++ file and the name of an abstract class defined in it, -and it will print the definition of the mock class for you. Due to the -complexity of the C++ language, this script may not always work, but -it can be quite handy when it does. For more details, read the [user documentation](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/scripts/generator/README). - -## Where to Put It ## -When you define a mock class, you need to decide where to put its definition. Some people put it in a `*_test.cc`. This is fine when the interface being mocked (say, `Foo`) is owned by the same person or team. Otherwise, when the owner of `Foo` changes it, your test could break. (You can't really expect `Foo`'s maintainer to fix every test that uses `Foo`, can you?) - -So, the rule of thumb is: if you need to mock `Foo` and it's owned by others, define the mock class in `Foo`'s package (better, in a `testing` sub-package such that you can clearly separate production code and testing utilities), and put it in a `mock_foo.h`. Then everyone can reference `mock_foo.h` from their tests. If `Foo` ever changes, there is only one copy of `MockFoo` to change, and only tests that depend on the changed methods need to be fixed. - -Another way to do it: you can introduce a thin layer `FooAdaptor` on top of `Foo` and code to this new interface. Since you own `FooAdaptor`, you can absorb changes in `Foo` much more easily. While this is more work initially, carefully choosing the adaptor interface can make your code easier to write and more readable (a net win in the long run), as you can choose `FooAdaptor` to fit your specific domain much better than `Foo` does. - -# Using Mocks in Tests # -Once you have a mock class, using it is easy. The typical work flow is: - - 1. Import the Google Mock names from the `testing` namespace such that you can use them unqualified (You only have to do it once per file. Remember that namespaces are a good idea and good for your health.). - 1. Create some mock objects. - 1. Specify your expectations on them (How many times will a method be called? With what arguments? What should it do? etc.). - 1. Exercise some code that uses the mocks; optionally, check the result using Google Test assertions. If a mock method is called more than expected or with wrong arguments, you'll get an error immediately. - 1. When a mock is destructed, Google Mock will automatically check whether all expectations on it have been satisfied. - -Here's an example: - -``` -#include "path/to/mock-turtle.h" -#include "gmock/gmock.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" -using ::testing::AtLeast; // #1 - -TEST(PainterTest, CanDrawSomething) { - MockTurtle turtle; // #2 - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown()) // #3 - .Times(AtLeast(1)); - - Painter painter(&turtle); // #4 - - EXPECT_TRUE(painter.DrawCircle(0, 0, 10)); -} // #5 - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // The following line must be executed to initialize Google Mock - // (and Google Test) before running the tests. - ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -As you might have guessed, this test checks that `PenDown()` is called at least once. If the `painter` object didn't call this method, your test will fail with a message like this: - -``` -path/to/my_test.cc:119: Failure -Actual function call count doesn't match this expectation: -Actually: never called; -Expected: called at least once. -``` - -**Tip 1:** If you run the test from an Emacs buffer, you can hit `<Enter>` on the line number displayed in the error message to jump right to the failed expectation. - -**Tip 2:** If your mock objects are never deleted, the final verification won't happen. Therefore it's a good idea to use a heap leak checker in your tests when you allocate mocks on the heap. - -**Important note:** Google Mock requires expectations to be set **before** the mock functions are called, otherwise the behavior is **undefined**. In particular, you mustn't interleave `EXPECT_CALL()`s and calls to the mock functions. - -This means `EXPECT_CALL()` should be read as expecting that a call will occur _in the future_, not that a call has occurred. Why does Google Mock work like that? Well, specifying the expectation beforehand allows Google Mock to report a violation as soon as it arises, when the context (stack trace, etc) is still available. This makes debugging much easier. - -Admittedly, this test is contrived and doesn't do much. You can easily achieve the same effect without using Google Mock. However, as we shall reveal soon, Google Mock allows you to do _much more_ with the mocks. - -## Using Google Mock with Any Testing Framework ## -If you want to use something other than Google Test (e.g. [CppUnit](http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/cppunit/index.php?title=Main_Page) or -[CxxTest](http://cxxtest.tigris.org/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // The following line causes Google Mock to throw an exception on failure, - // which will be interpreted by your testing framework as a test failure. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - ... whatever your testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -This approach has a catch: it makes Google Mock throw an exception -from a mock object's destructor sometimes. With some compilers, this -sometimes causes the test program to crash. You'll still be able to -notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure. - -A better solution is to use Google Test's -[event listener API](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/V1_6_AdvancedGuide#Extending_Google_Test_by_Handling_Test_Events) -to report a test failure to your testing framework properly. You'll need to -implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it -should be straightforward. - -If this turns out to be too much work, we suggest that you stick with -Google Test, which works with Google Mock seamlessly (in fact, it is -technically part of Google Mock.). If there is a reason that you -cannot use Google Test, please let us know. - -# Setting Expectations # -The key to using a mock object successfully is to set the _right expectations_ on it. If you set the expectations too strict, your test will fail as the result of unrelated changes. If you set them too loose, bugs can slip through. You want to do it just right such that your test can catch exactly the kind of bugs you intend it to catch. Google Mock provides the necessary means for you to do it "just right." - -## General Syntax ## -In Google Mock we use the `EXPECT_CALL()` macro to set an expectation on a mock method. The general syntax is: - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .Times(cardinality) - .WillOnce(action) - .WillRepeatedly(action); -``` - -The macro has two arguments: first the mock object, and then the method and its arguments. Note that the two are separated by a comma (`,`), not a period (`.`). (Why using a comma? The answer is that it was necessary for technical reasons.) - -The macro can be followed by some optional _clauses_ that provide more information about the expectation. We'll discuss how each clause works in the coming sections. - -This syntax is designed to make an expectation read like English. For example, you can probably guess that - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .Times(5) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(150)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(200)); -``` - -says that the `turtle` object's `GetX()` method will be called five times, it will return 100 the first time, 150 the second time, and then 200 every time. Some people like to call this style of syntax a Domain-Specific Language (DSL). - -**Note:** Why do we use a macro to do this? It serves two purposes: first it makes expectations easily identifiable (either by `grep` or by a human reader), and second it allows Google Mock to include the source file location of a failed expectation in messages, making debugging easier. - -## Matchers: What Arguments Do We Expect? ## -When a mock function takes arguments, we must specify what arguments we are expecting; for example: - -``` -// Expects the turtle to move forward by 100 units. -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(100)); -``` - -Sometimes you may not want to be too specific (Remember that talk about tests being too rigid? Over specification leads to brittle tests and obscures the intent of tests. Therefore we encourage you to specify only what's necessary - no more, no less.). If you care to check that `Forward()` will be called but aren't interested in its actual argument, write `_` as the argument, which means "anything goes": - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... -// Expects the turtle to move forward. -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); -``` - -`_` is an instance of what we call **matchers**. A matcher is like a predicate and can test whether an argument is what we'd expect. You can use a matcher inside `EXPECT_CALL()` wherever a function argument is expected. - -A list of built-in matchers can be found in the [CheatSheet](V1_6_CheatSheet.md). For example, here's the `Ge` (greater than or equal) matcher: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(Ge(100))); -``` - -This checks that the turtle will be told to go forward by at least 100 units. - -## Cardinalities: How Many Times Will It Be Called? ## -The first clause we can specify following an `EXPECT_CALL()` is `Times()`. We call its argument a **cardinality** as it tells _how many times_ the call should occur. It allows us to repeat an expectation many times without actually writing it as many times. More importantly, a cardinality can be "fuzzy", just like a matcher can be. This allows a user to express the intent of a test exactly. - -An interesting special case is when we say `Times(0)`. You may have guessed - it means that the function shouldn't be called with the given arguments at all, and Google Mock will report a Google Test failure whenever the function is (wrongfully) called. - -We've seen `AtLeast(n)` as an example of fuzzy cardinalities earlier. For the list of built-in cardinalities you can use, see the [CheatSheet](V1_6_CheatSheet.md). - -The `Times()` clause can be omitted. **If you omit `Times()`, Google Mock will infer the cardinality for you.** The rules are easy to remember: - - * If **neither** `WillOnce()` **nor** `WillRepeatedly()` is in the `EXPECT_CALL()`, the inferred cardinality is `Times(1)`. - * If there are `n WillOnce()`'s but **no** `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 1, the cardinality is `Times(n)`. - * If there are `n WillOnce()`'s and **one** `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 0, the cardinality is `Times(AtLeast(n))`. - -**Quick quiz:** what do you think will happen if a function is expected to be called twice but actually called four times? - -## Actions: What Should It Do? ## -Remember that a mock object doesn't really have a working implementation? We as users have to tell it what to do when a method is invoked. This is easy in Google Mock. - -First, if the return type of a mock function is a built-in type or a pointer, the function has a **default action** (a `void` function will just return, a `bool` function will return `false`, and other functions will return 0). If you don't say anything, this behavior will be used. - -Second, if a mock function doesn't have a default action, or the default action doesn't suit you, you can specify the action to be taken each time the expectation matches using a series of `WillOnce()` clauses followed by an optional `WillRepeatedly()`. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(200)) - .WillOnce(Return(300)); -``` - -This says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called _exactly three times_ (Google Mock inferred this from how many `WillOnce()` clauses we've written, since we didn't explicitly write `Times()`), and will return 100, 200, and 300 respectively. - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(200)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(300)); -``` - -says that `turtle.GetY()` will be called _at least twice_ (Google Mock knows this as we've written two `WillOnce()` clauses and a `WillRepeatedly()` while having no explicit `Times()`), will return 100 the first time, 200 the second time, and 300 from the third time on. - -Of course, if you explicitly write a `Times()`, Google Mock will not try to infer the cardinality itself. What if the number you specified is larger than there are `WillOnce()` clauses? Well, after all `WillOnce()`s are used up, Google Mock will do the _default_ action for the function every time (unless, of course, you have a `WillRepeatedly()`.). - -What can we do inside `WillOnce()` besides `Return()`? You can return a reference using `ReturnRef(variable)`, or invoke a pre-defined function, among [others](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CheatSheet#Actions). - -**Important note:** The `EXPECT_CALL()` statement evaluates the action clause only once, even though the action may be performed many times. Therefore you must be careful about side effects. The following may not do what you want: - -``` -int n = 100; -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) -.Times(4) -.WillRepeatedly(Return(n++)); -``` - -Instead of returning 100, 101, 102, ..., consecutively, this mock function will always return 100 as `n++` is only evaluated once. Similarly, `Return(new Foo)` will create a new `Foo` object when the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed, and will return the same pointer every time. If you want the side effect to happen every time, you need to define a custom action, which we'll teach in the [CookBook](V1_6_CookBook.md). - -Time for another quiz! What do you think the following means? - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) -.Times(4) -.WillOnce(Return(100)); -``` - -Obviously `turtle.GetY()` is expected to be called four times. But if you think it will return 100 every time, think twice! Remember that one `WillOnce()` clause will be consumed each time the function is invoked and the default action will be taken afterwards. So the right answer is that `turtle.GetY()` will return 100 the first time, but **return 0 from the second time on**, as returning 0 is the default action for `int` functions. - -## Using Multiple Expectations ## -So far we've only shown examples where you have a single expectation. More realistically, you're going to specify expectations on multiple mock methods, which may be from multiple mock objects. - -By default, when a mock method is invoked, Google Mock will search the expectations in the **reverse order** they are defined, and stop when an active expectation that matches the arguments is found (you can think of it as "newer rules override older ones."). If the matching expectation cannot take any more calls, you will get an upper-bound-violated failure. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); // #1 -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(10)) // #2 - .Times(2); -``` - -If `Forward(10)` is called three times in a row, the third time it will be an error, as the last matching expectation (#2) has been saturated. If, however, the third `Forward(10)` call is replaced by `Forward(20)`, then it would be OK, as now #1 will be the matching expectation. - -**Side note:** Why does Google Mock search for a match in the _reverse_ order of the expectations? The reason is that this allows a user to set up the default expectations in a mock object's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase and then customize the mock by writing more specific expectations in the test body. So, if you have two expectations on the same method, you want to put the one with more specific matchers **after** the other, or the more specific rule would be shadowed by the more general one that comes after it. - -## Ordered vs Unordered Calls ## -By default, an expectation can match a call even though an earlier expectation hasn't been satisfied. In other words, the calls don't have to occur in the order the expectations are specified. - -Sometimes, you may want all the expected calls to occur in a strict order. To say this in Google Mock is easy: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence;... -TEST(FooTest, DrawsLineSegment) { - ... - { - InSequence dummy; - - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown()); - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(100)); - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenUp()); - } - Foo(); -} -``` - -By creating an object of type `InSequence`, all expectations in its scope are put into a _sequence_ and have to occur _sequentially_. Since we are just relying on the constructor and destructor of this object to do the actual work, its name is really irrelevant. - -In this example, we test that `Foo()` calls the three expected functions in the order as written. If a call is made out-of-order, it will be an error. - -(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](V1_6_CookBook.md).) - -## All Expectations Are Sticky (Unless Said Otherwise) ## -Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. How would you test that the turtle is asked to go to the origin _exactly twice_ (you want to ignore any other instructions it receives)? - -After you've come up with your answer, take a look at ours and compare notes (solve it yourself first - don't cheat!): - -``` -using ::testing::_;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(_, _)) // #1 - .Times(AnyNumber()); -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(0, 0)) // #2 - .Times(2); -``` - -Suppose `turtle.GoTo(0, 0)` is called three times. In the third time, Google Mock will see that the arguments match expectation #2 (remember that we always pick the last matching expectation). Now, since we said that there should be only two such calls, Google Mock will report an error immediately. This is basically what we've told you in the "Using Multiple Expectations" section above. - -This example shows that **expectations in Google Mock are "sticky" by default**, in the sense that they remain active even after we have reached their invocation upper bounds. This is an important rule to remember, as it affects the meaning of the spec, and is **different** to how it's done in many other mocking frameworks (Why'd we do that? Because we think our rule makes the common cases easier to express and understand.). - -Simple? Let's see if you've really understood it: what does the following code say? - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... -for (int i = n; i > 0; i--) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)); -} -``` - -If you think it says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called `n` times and will return 10, 20, 30, ..., consecutively, think twice! The problem is that, as we said, expectations are sticky. So, the second time `turtle.GetX()` is called, the last (latest) `EXPECT_CALL()` statement will match, and will immediately lead to an "upper bound exceeded" error - this piece of code is not very useful! - -One correct way of saying that `turtle.GetX()` will return 10, 20, 30, ..., is to explicitly say that the expectations are _not_ sticky. In other words, they should _retire_ as soon as they are saturated: - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... -for (int i = n; i > 0; i--) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -} -``` - -And, there's a better way to do it: in this case, we expect the calls to occur in a specific order, and we line up the actions to match the order. Since the order is important here, we should make it explicit using a sequence: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -using ::testing::Return; -... -{ - InSequence s; - - for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); - } -} -``` - -By the way, the other situation where an expectation may _not_ be sticky is when it's in a sequence - as soon as another expectation that comes after it in the sequence has been used, it automatically retires (and will never be used to match any call). - -## Uninteresting Calls ## -A mock object may have many methods, and not all of them are that interesting. For example, in some tests we may not care about how many times `GetX()` and `GetY()` get called. - -In Google Mock, if you are not interested in a method, just don't say anything about it. If a call to this method occurs, you'll see a warning in the test output, but it won't be a failure. - -# What Now? # -Congratulations! You've learned enough about Google Mock to start using it. Now, you might want to join the [googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion group and actually write some tests using Google Mock - it will be fun. Hey, it may even be addictive - you've been warned. - -Then, if you feel like increasing your mock quotient, you should move on to the [CookBook](V1_6_CookBook.md). You can learn many advanced features of Google Mock there -- and advance your level of enjoyment and testing bliss.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_6/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md deleted file mode 100644 index f74715d..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_6/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,628 +0,0 @@ - - -Please send your questions to the -[googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion -group. If you need help with compiler errors, make sure you have -tried [Google Mock Doctor](#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error.md) first. - -## When I call a method on my mock object, the method for the real object is invoked instead. What's the problem? ## - -In order for a method to be mocked, it must be _virtual_, unless you use the [high-perf dependency injection technique](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods). - -## I wrote some matchers. After I upgraded to a new version of Google Mock, they no longer compile. What's going on? ## - -After version 1.4.0 of Google Mock was released, we had an idea on how -to make it easier to write matchers that can generate informative -messages efficiently. We experimented with this idea and liked what -we saw. Therefore we decided to implement it. - -Unfortunately, this means that if you have defined your own matchers -by implementing `MatcherInterface` or using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`, -your definitions will no longer compile. Matchers defined using the -`MATCHER*` family of macros are not affected. - -Sorry for the hassle if your matchers are affected. We believe it's -in everyone's long-term interest to make this change sooner than -later. Fortunately, it's usually not hard to migrate an existing -matcher to the new API. Here's what you need to do: - -If you wrote your matcher like this: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` - -you'll need to change it to: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` -(i.e. rename `Matches()` to `MatchAndExplain()` and give it a second -argument of type `MatchResultListener*`.) - -If you were also using `ExplainMatchResultTo()` to improve the matcher -message: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the lastest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - - virtual void ExplainMatchResultTo(MyType value, - ::std::ostream* os) const { - // Prints some helpful information to os to help - // a user understand why value matches (or doesn't match). - *os << "the Foo property is " << value.GetFoo(); - } - ... -}; -``` - -you should move the logic of `ExplainMatchResultTo()` into -`MatchAndExplain()`, using the `MatchResultListener` argument where -the `::std::ostream` was used: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - *listener << "the Foo property is " << value.GetFoo(); - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` - -If your matcher is defined using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -you should rename the `Matches()` method to `MatchAndExplain()` and -add a `MatchResultListener*` argument (the same as what you need to do -for matchers defined by implementing `MatcherInterface`): -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -If your polymorphic matcher uses `ExplainMatchResultTo()` for better -failure messages: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -void ExplainMatchResultTo(const MyGreatMatcher& matcher, - MyType value, - ::std::ostream* os) { - // Prints some helpful information to os to help - // a user understand why value matches (or doesn't match). - *os << "the Bar property is " << value.GetBar(); -} -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -you'll need to move the logic inside `ExplainMatchResultTo()` to -`MatchAndExplain()`: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - *listener << "the Bar property is " << value.GetBar(); - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -For more information, you can read these -[two](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Writing_New_Monomorphic_Matchers) -[recipes](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Matchers) -from the cookbook. As always, you -are welcome to post questions on `googlemock@googlegroups.com` if you -need any help. - -## When using Google Mock, do I have to use Google Test as the testing framework? I have my favorite testing framework and don't want to switch. ## - -Google Mock works out of the box with Google Test. However, it's easy -to configure it to work with any testing framework of your choice. -[Here](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_ForDummies#Using_Google_Mock_with_Any_Testing_Framework) is how. - -## How am I supposed to make sense of these horrible template errors? ## - -If you are confused by the compiler errors gcc threw at you, -try consulting the _Google Mock Doctor_ tool first. What it does is to -scan stdin for gcc error messages, and spit out diagnoses on the -problems (we call them diseases) your code has. - -To "install", run command: -``` -alias gmd='<path to googlemock>/scripts/gmock_doctor.py' -``` - -To use it, do: -``` -<your-favorite-build-command> <your-test> 2>&1 | gmd -``` - -For example: -``` -make my_test 2>&1 | gmd -``` - -Or you can run `gmd` and copy-n-paste gcc's error messages to it. - -## Can I mock a variadic function? ## - -You cannot mock a variadic function (i.e. a function taking ellipsis -(`...`) arguments) directly in Google Mock. - -The problem is that in general, there is _no way_ for a mock object to -know how many arguments are passed to the variadic method, and what -the arguments' types are. Only the _author of the base class_ knows -the protocol, and we cannot look into his head. - -Therefore, to mock such a function, the _user_ must teach the mock -object how to figure out the number of arguments and their types. One -way to do it is to provide overloaded versions of the function. - -Ellipsis arguments are inherited from C and not really a C++ feature. -They are unsafe to use and don't work with arguments that have -constructors or destructors. Therefore we recommend to avoid them in -C++ as much as possible. - -## MSVC gives me warning C4301 or C4373 when I define a mock method with a const parameter. Why? ## - -If you compile this using Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 SP1: -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual void Bar(const int i) = 0; -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, void(const int i)); -}; -``` -You may get the following warning: -``` -warning C4301: 'MockFoo::Bar': overriding virtual function only differs from 'Foo::Bar' by const/volatile qualifier -``` - -This is a MSVC bug. The same code compiles fine with gcc ,for -example. If you use Visual C++ 2008 SP1, you would get the warning: -``` -warning C4373: 'MockFoo::Bar': virtual function overrides 'Foo::Bar', previous versions of the compiler did not override when parameters only differed by const/volatile qualifiers -``` - -In C++, if you _declare_ a function with a `const` parameter, the -`const` modifier is _ignored_. Therefore, the `Foo` base class above -is equivalent to: -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual void Bar(int i) = 0; // int or const int? Makes no difference. -}; -``` - -In fact, you can _declare_ Bar() with an `int` parameter, and _define_ -it with a `const int` parameter. The compiler will still match them -up. - -Since making a parameter `const` is meaningless in the method -_declaration_, we recommend to remove it in both `Foo` and `MockFoo`. -That should workaround the VC bug. - -Note that we are talking about the _top-level_ `const` modifier here. -If the function parameter is passed by pointer or reference, declaring -the _pointee_ or _referee_ as `const` is still meaningful. For -example, the following two declarations are _not_ equivalent: -``` -void Bar(int* p); // Neither p nor *p is const. -void Bar(const int* p); // p is not const, but *p is. -``` - -## I have a huge mock class, and Microsoft Visual C++ runs out of memory when compiling it. What can I do? ## - -We've noticed that when the `/clr` compiler flag is used, Visual C++ -uses 5~6 times as much memory when compiling a mock class. We suggest -to avoid `/clr` when compiling native C++ mocks. - -## I can't figure out why Google Mock thinks my expectations are not satisfied. What should I do? ## - -You might want to run your test with -`--gmock_verbose=info`. This flag lets Google Mock print a trace -of every mock function call it receives. By studying the trace, -you'll gain insights on why the expectations you set are not met. - -## How can I assert that a function is NEVER called? ## - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .Times(0); -``` - -## I have a failed test where Google Mock tells me TWICE that a particular expectation is not satisfied. Isn't this redundant? ## - -When Google Mock detects a failure, it prints relevant information -(the mock function arguments, the state of relevant expectations, and -etc) to help the user debug. If another failure is detected, Google -Mock will do the same, including printing the state of relevant -expectations. - -Sometimes an expectation's state didn't change between two failures, -and you'll see the same description of the state twice. They are -however _not_ redundant, as they refer to _different points in time_. -The fact they are the same _is_ interesting information. - -## I get a heap check failure when using a mock object, but using a real object is fine. What can be wrong? ## - -Does the class (hopefully a pure interface) you are mocking have a -virtual destructor? - -Whenever you derive from a base class, make sure its destructor is -virtual. Otherwise Bad Things will happen. Consider the following -code: - -``` -class Base { - public: - // Not virtual, but should be. - ~Base() { ... } - ... -}; - -class Derived : public Base { - public: - ... - private: - std::string value_; -}; - -... - Base* p = new Derived; - ... - delete p; // Surprise! ~Base() will be called, but ~Derived() will not - // - value_ is leaked. -``` - -By changing `~Base()` to virtual, `~Derived()` will be correctly -called when `delete p` is executed, and the heap checker -will be happy. - -## The "newer expectations override older ones" rule makes writing expectations awkward. Why does Google Mock do that? ## - -When people complain about this, often they are referring to code like: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. However, I have to write the expectations in the -// reverse order. This sucks big time!!! -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -The problem is that they didn't pick the **best** way to express the test's -intent. - -By default, expectations don't have to be matched in _any_ particular -order. If you want them to match in a certain order, you need to be -explicit. This is Google Mock's (and jMock's) fundamental philosophy: it's -easy to accidentally over-specify your tests, and we want to make it -harder to do so. - -There are two better ways to write the test spec. You could either -put the expectations in sequence: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. Using a sequence, we can write the expectations -// in their natural order. -{ - InSequence s; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -} -``` - -or you can put the sequence of actions in the same expectation: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -Back to the original questions: why does Google Mock search the -expectations (and `ON_CALL`s) from back to front? Because this -allows a user to set up a mock's behavior for the common case early -(e.g. in the mock's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase) -and customize it with more specific rules later. If Google Mock -searches from front to back, this very useful pattern won't be -possible. - -## Google Mock prints a warning when a function without EXPECT\_CALL is called, even if I have set its behavior using ON\_CALL. Would it be reasonable not to show the warning in this case? ## - -When choosing between being neat and being safe, we lean toward the -latter. So the answer is that we think it's better to show the -warning. - -Often people write `ON_CALL`s in the mock object's -constructor or `SetUp()`, as the default behavior rarely changes from -test to test. Then in the test body they set the expectations, which -are often different for each test. Having an `ON_CALL` in the set-up -part of a test doesn't mean that the calls are expected. If there's -no `EXPECT_CALL` and the method is called, it's possibly an error. If -we quietly let the call go through without notifying the user, bugs -may creep in unnoticed. - -If, however, you are sure that the calls are OK, you can write - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(...); -``` - -instead of - -``` -ON_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillByDefault(...); -``` - -This tells Google Mock that you do expect the calls and no warning should be -printed. - -Also, you can control the verbosity using the `--gmock_verbose` flag. -If you find the output too noisy when debugging, just choose a less -verbose level. - -## How can I delete the mock function's argument in an action? ## - -If you find yourself needing to perform some action that's not -supported by Google Mock directly, remember that you can define your own -actions using -[MakeAction()](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Writing_New_Actions) or -[MakePolymorphicAction()](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Actions), -or you can write a stub function and invoke it using -[Invoke()](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Using_Functions_Methods_Functors). - -## MOCK\_METHODn()'s second argument looks funny. Why don't you use the MOCK\_METHODn(Method, return\_type, arg\_1, ..., arg\_n) syntax? ## - -What?! I think it's beautiful. :-) - -While which syntax looks more natural is a subjective matter to some -extent, Google Mock's syntax was chosen for several practical advantages it -has. - -Try to mock a function that takes a map as an argument: -``` -virtual int GetSize(const map<int, std::string>& m); -``` - -Using the proposed syntax, it would be: -``` -MOCK_METHOD1(GetSize, int, const map<int, std::string>& m); -``` - -Guess what? You'll get a compiler error as the compiler thinks that -`const map<int, std::string>& m` are **two**, not one, arguments. To work -around this you can use `typedef` to give the map type a name, but -that gets in the way of your work. Google Mock's syntax avoids this -problem as the function's argument types are protected inside a pair -of parentheses: -``` -// This compiles fine. -MOCK_METHOD1(GetSize, int(const map<int, std::string>& m)); -``` - -You still need a `typedef` if the return type contains an unprotected -comma, but that's much rarer. - -Other advantages include: - 1. `MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, int, bool)` can leave a reader wonder whether the method returns `int` or `bool`, while there won't be such confusion using Google Mock's syntax. - 1. The way Google Mock describes a function type is nothing new, although many people may not be familiar with it. The same syntax was used in C, and the `function` library in `tr1` uses this syntax extensively. Since `tr1` will become a part of the new version of STL, we feel very comfortable to be consistent with it. - 1. The function type syntax is also used in other parts of Google Mock's API (e.g. the action interface) in order to make the implementation tractable. A user needs to learn it anyway in order to utilize Google Mock's more advanced features. We'd as well stick to the same syntax in `MOCK_METHOD*`! - -## My code calls a static/global function. Can I mock it? ## - -You can, but you need to make some changes. - -In general, if you find yourself needing to mock a static function, -it's a sign that your modules are too tightly coupled (and less -flexible, less reusable, less testable, etc). You are probably better -off defining a small interface and call the function through that -interface, which then can be easily mocked. It's a bit of work -initially, but usually pays for itself quickly. - -This Google Testing Blog -[post](http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) -says it excellently. Check it out. - -## My mock object needs to do complex stuff. It's a lot of pain to specify the actions. Google Mock sucks! ## - -I know it's not a question, but you get an answer for free any way. :-) - -With Google Mock, you can create mocks in C++ easily. And people might be -tempted to use them everywhere. Sometimes they work great, and -sometimes you may find them, well, a pain to use. So, what's wrong in -the latter case? - -When you write a test without using mocks, you exercise the code and -assert that it returns the correct value or that the system is in an -expected state. This is sometimes called "state-based testing". - -Mocks are great for what some call "interaction-based" testing: -instead of checking the system state at the very end, mock objects -verify that they are invoked the right way and report an error as soon -as it arises, giving you a handle on the precise context in which the -error was triggered. This is often more effective and economical to -do than state-based testing. - -If you are doing state-based testing and using a test double just to -simulate the real object, you are probably better off using a fake. -Using a mock in this case causes pain, as it's not a strong point for -mocks to perform complex actions. If you experience this and think -that mocks suck, you are just not using the right tool for your -problem. Or, you might be trying to solve the wrong problem. :-) - -## I got a warning "Uninteresting function call encountered - default action taken.." Should I panic? ## - -By all means, NO! It's just an FYI. - -What it means is that you have a mock function, you haven't set any -expectations on it (by Google Mock's rule this means that you are not -interested in calls to this function and therefore it can be called -any number of times), and it is called. That's OK - you didn't say -it's not OK to call the function! - -What if you actually meant to disallow this function to be called, but -forgot to write `EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()).Times(0)`? While -one can argue that it's the user's fault, Google Mock tries to be nice and -prints you a note. - -So, when you see the message and believe that there shouldn't be any -uninteresting calls, you should investigate what's going on. To make -your life easier, Google Mock prints the function name and arguments -when an uninteresting call is encountered. - -## I want to define a custom action. Should I use Invoke() or implement the action interface? ## - -Either way is fine - you want to choose the one that's more convenient -for your circumstance. - -Usually, if your action is for a particular function type, defining it -using `Invoke()` should be easier; if your action can be used in -functions of different types (e.g. if you are defining -`Return(value)`), `MakePolymorphicAction()` is -easiest. Sometimes you want precise control on what types of -functions the action can be used in, and implementing -`ActionInterface` is the way to go here. See the implementation of -`Return()` in `include/gmock/gmock-actions.h` for an example. - -## I'm using the set-argument-pointee action, and the compiler complains about "conflicting return type specified". What does it mean? ## - -You got this error as Google Mock has no idea what value it should return -when the mock method is called. `SetArgPointee()` says what the -side effect is, but doesn't say what the return value should be. You -need `DoAll()` to chain a `SetArgPointee()` with a `Return()`. - -See this [recipe](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_6_CookBook#Mocking_Side_Effects) for more details and an example. - - -## My question is not in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/w/list), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock/topics), - 1. ask it on [googlemock@googlegroups.com](mailto:googlemock@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/issues/list) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the revision number if you check out from SVN directly) of Google Mock you use (Google Mock is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_7/CheatSheet.md deleted file mode 100644 index db421e5..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/CheatSheet.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,556 +0,0 @@ - - -# Defining a Mock Class # - -## Mocking a Normal Class ## - -Given -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual ~Foo(); - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual string Describe(const char* name) = 0; - virtual string Describe(int type) = 0; - virtual bool Process(Bar elem, int count) = 0; -}; -``` -(note that `~Foo()` **must** be virtual) we can define its mock as -``` -#include "gmock/gmock.h" - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(Describe, string(const char* name)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Describe, string(int type)); - MOCK_METHOD2(Process, bool(Bar elem, int count)); -}; -``` - -To create a "nice" mock object which ignores all uninteresting calls, -or a "strict" mock object, which treats them as failures: -``` -NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; // The type is a subclass of MockFoo. -StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo; // The type is a subclass of MockFoo. -``` - -## Mocking a Class Template ## - -To mock -``` -template <typename Elem> -class StackInterface { - public: - ... - virtual ~StackInterface(); - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual void Push(const Elem& x) = 0; -}; -``` -(note that `~StackInterface()` **must** be virtual) just append `_T` to the `MOCK_*` macros: -``` -template <typename Elem> -class MockStack : public StackInterface<Elem> { - public: - ... - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const Elem& x)); -}; -``` - -## Specifying Calling Conventions for Mock Functions ## - -If your mock function doesn't use the default calling convention, you -can specify it by appending `_WITH_CALLTYPE` to any of the macros -described in the previous two sections and supplying the calling -convention as the first argument to the macro. For example, -``` - MOCK_METHOD_1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD2_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Bar, int(double x, double y)); -``` -where `STDMETHODCALLTYPE` is defined by `<objbase.h>` on Windows. - -# Using Mocks in Tests # - -The typical flow is: - 1. Import the Google Mock names you need to use. All Google Mock names are in the `testing` namespace unless they are macros or otherwise noted. - 1. Create the mock objects. - 1. Optionally, set the default actions of the mock objects. - 1. Set your expectations on the mock objects (How will they be called? What wil they do?). - 1. Exercise code that uses the mock objects; if necessary, check the result using [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) assertions. - 1. When a mock objects is destructed, Google Mock automatically verifies that all expectations on it have been satisfied. - -Here is an example: -``` -using ::testing::Return; // #1 - -TEST(BarTest, DoesThis) { - MockFoo foo; // #2 - - ON_CALL(foo, GetSize()) // #3 - .WillByDefault(Return(1)); - // ... other default actions ... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Describe(5)) // #4 - .Times(3) - .WillRepeatedly(Return("Category 5")); - // ... other expectations ... - - EXPECT_EQ("good", MyProductionFunction(&foo)); // #5 -} // #6 -``` - -# Setting Default Actions # - -Google Mock has a **built-in default action** for any function that -returns `void`, `bool`, a numeric value, or a pointer. - -To customize the default action for functions with return type `T` globally: -``` -using ::testing::DefaultValue; - -DefaultValue<T>::Set(value); // Sets the default value to be returned. -// ... use the mocks ... -DefaultValue<T>::Clear(); // Resets the default value. -``` - -To customize the default action for a particular method, use `ON_CALL()`: -``` -ON_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .With(multi_argument_matcher) ? - .WillByDefault(action); -``` - -# Setting Expectations # - -`EXPECT_CALL()` sets **expectations** on a mock method (How will it be -called? What will it do?): -``` -EXPECT_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .With(multi_argument_matcher) ? - .Times(cardinality) ? - .InSequence(sequences) * - .After(expectations) * - .WillOnce(action) * - .WillRepeatedly(action) ? - .RetiresOnSaturation(); ? -``` - -If `Times()` is omitted, the cardinality is assumed to be: - - * `Times(1)` when there is neither `WillOnce()` nor `WillRepeatedly()`; - * `Times(n)` when there are `n WillOnce()`s but no `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 1; or - * `Times(AtLeast(n))` when there are `n WillOnce()`s and a `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 0. - -A method with no `EXPECT_CALL()` is free to be invoked _any number of times_, and the default action will be taken each time. - -# Matchers # - -A **matcher** matches a _single_ argument. You can use it inside -`ON_CALL()` or `EXPECT_CALL()`, or use it to validate a value -directly: - -| `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` | Asserts that `value` matches `matcher`. | -|:------------------------------|:----------------------------------------| -| `ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher)` | The same as `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)`, except that it generates a **fatal** failure. | - -Built-in matchers (where `argument` is the function argument) are -divided into several categories: - -## Wildcard ## -|`_`|`argument` can be any value of the correct type.| -|:--|:-----------------------------------------------| -|`A<type>()` or `An<type>()`|`argument` can be any value of type `type`. | - -## Generic Comparison ## - -|`Eq(value)` or `value`|`argument == value`| -|:---------------------|:------------------| -|`Ge(value)` |`argument >= value`| -|`Gt(value)` |`argument > value` | -|`Le(value)` |`argument <= value`| -|`Lt(value)` |`argument < value` | -|`Ne(value)` |`argument != value`| -|`IsNull()` |`argument` is a `NULL` pointer (raw or smart).| -|`NotNull()` |`argument` is a non-null pointer (raw or smart).| -|`Ref(variable)` |`argument` is a reference to `variable`.| -|`TypedEq<type>(value)`|`argument` has type `type` and is equal to `value`. You may need to use this instead of `Eq(value)` when the mock function is overloaded.| - -Except `Ref()`, these matchers make a _copy_ of `value` in case it's -modified or destructed later. If the compiler complains that `value` -doesn't have a public copy constructor, try wrap it in `ByRef()`, -e.g. `Eq(ByRef(non_copyable_value))`. If you do that, make sure -`non_copyable_value` is not changed afterwards, or the meaning of your -matcher will be changed. - -## Floating-Point Matchers ## - -|`DoubleEq(a_double)`|`argument` is a `double` value approximately equal to `a_double`, treating two NaNs as unequal.| -|:-------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`FloatEq(a_float)` |`argument` is a `float` value approximately equal to `a_float`, treating two NaNs as unequal. | -|`NanSensitiveDoubleEq(a_double)`|`argument` is a `double` value approximately equal to `a_double`, treating two NaNs as equal. | -|`NanSensitiveFloatEq(a_float)`|`argument` is a `float` value approximately equal to `a_float`, treating two NaNs as equal. | - -The above matchers use ULP-based comparison (the same as used in -[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/)). They -automatically pick a reasonable error bound based on the absolute -value of the expected value. `DoubleEq()` and `FloatEq()` conform to -the IEEE standard, which requires comparing two NaNs for equality to -return false. The `NanSensitive*` version instead treats two NaNs as -equal, which is often what a user wants. - -|`DoubleNear(a_double, max_abs_error)`|`argument` is a `double` value close to `a_double` (absolute error <= `max_abs_error`), treating two NaNs as unequal.| -|:------------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`FloatNear(a_float, max_abs_error)` |`argument` is a `float` value close to `a_float` (absolute error <= `max_abs_error`), treating two NaNs as unequal. | -|`NanSensitiveDoubleNear(a_double, max_abs_error)`|`argument` is a `double` value close to `a_double` (absolute error <= `max_abs_error`), treating two NaNs as equal. | -|`NanSensitiveFloatNear(a_float, max_abs_error)`|`argument` is a `float` value close to `a_float` (absolute error <= `max_abs_error`), treating two NaNs as equal. | - -## String Matchers ## - -The `argument` can be either a C string or a C++ string object: - -|`ContainsRegex(string)`|`argument` matches the given regular expression.| -|:----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------| -|`EndsWith(suffix)` |`argument` ends with string `suffix`. | -|`HasSubstr(string)` |`argument` contains `string` as a sub-string. | -|`MatchesRegex(string)` |`argument` matches the given regular expression with the match starting at the first character and ending at the last character.| -|`StartsWith(prefix)` |`argument` starts with string `prefix`. | -|`StrCaseEq(string)` |`argument` is equal to `string`, ignoring case. | -|`StrCaseNe(string)` |`argument` is not equal to `string`, ignoring case.| -|`StrEq(string)` |`argument` is equal to `string`. | -|`StrNe(string)` |`argument` is not equal to `string`. | - -`ContainsRegex()` and `MatchesRegex()` use the regular expression -syntax defined -[here](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Regular_Expression_Syntax). -`StrCaseEq()`, `StrCaseNe()`, `StrEq()`, and `StrNe()` work for wide -strings as well. - -## Container Matchers ## - -Most STL-style containers support `==`, so you can use -`Eq(expected_container)` or simply `expected_container` to match a -container exactly. If you want to write the elements in-line, -match them more flexibly, or get more informative messages, you can use: - -| `ContainerEq(container)` | The same as `Eq(container)` except that the failure message also includes which elements are in one container but not the other. | -|:-------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `Contains(e)` | `argument` contains an element that matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. | -| `Each(e)` | `argument` is a container where _every_ element matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. | -| `ElementsAre(e0, e1, ..., en)` | `argument` has `n + 1` elements, where the i-th element matches `ei`, which can be a value or a matcher. 0 to 10 arguments are allowed. | -| `ElementsAreArray({ e0, e1, ..., en })`, `ElementsAreArray(array)`, or `ElementsAreArray(array, count)` | The same as `ElementsAre()` except that the expected element values/matchers come from an initializer list, vector, or C-style array. | -| `IsEmpty()` | `argument` is an empty container (`container.empty()`). | -| `Pointwise(m, container)` | `argument` contains the same number of elements as in `container`, and for all i, (the i-th element in `argument`, the i-th element in `container`) match `m`, which is a matcher on 2-tuples. E.g. `Pointwise(Le(), upper_bounds)` verifies that each element in `argument` doesn't exceed the corresponding element in `upper_bounds`. See more detail below. | -| `SizeIs(m)` | `argument` is a container whose size matches `m`. E.g. `SizeIs(2)` or `SizeIs(Lt(2))`. | -| `UnorderedElementsAre(e0, e1, ..., en)` | `argument` has `n + 1` elements, and under some permutation each element matches an `ei` (for a different `i`), which can be a value or a matcher. 0 to 10 arguments are allowed. | -| `UnorderedElementsAreArray({ e0, e1, ..., en })`, `UnorderedElementsAreArray(array)`, or `UnorderedElementsAreArray(array, count)` | The same as `UnorderedElementsAre()` except that the expected element values/matchers come from an initializer list, vector, or C-style array. | -| `WhenSorted(m)` | When `argument` is sorted using the `<` operator, it matches container matcher `m`. E.g. `WhenSorted(UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3))` verifies that `argument` contains elements `1`, `2`, and `3`, ignoring order. | -| `WhenSortedBy(comparator, m)` | The same as `WhenSorted(m)`, except that the given comparator instead of `<` is used to sort `argument`. E.g. `WhenSortedBy(std::greater<int>(), ElementsAre(3, 2, 1))`. | - -Notes: - - * These matchers can also match: - 1. a native array passed by reference (e.g. in `Foo(const int (&a)[5])`), and - 1. an array passed as a pointer and a count (e.g. in `Bar(const T* buffer, int len)` -- see [Multi-argument Matchers](#Multiargument_Matchers.md)). - * The array being matched may be multi-dimensional (i.e. its elements can be arrays). - * `m` in `Pointwise(m, ...)` should be a matcher for `std::tr1::tuple<T, U>` where `T` and `U` are the element type of the actual container and the expected container, respectively. For example, to compare two `Foo` containers where `Foo` doesn't support `operator==` but has an `Equals()` method, one might write: - -``` -using ::std::tr1::get; -MATCHER(FooEq, "") { - return get<0>(arg).Equals(get<1>(arg)); -} -... -EXPECT_THAT(actual_foos, Pointwise(FooEq(), expected_foos)); -``` - -## Member Matchers ## - -|`Field(&class::field, m)`|`argument.field` (or `argument->field` when `argument` is a plain pointer) matches matcher `m`, where `argument` is an object of type _class_.| -|:------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Key(e)` |`argument.first` matches `e`, which can be either a value or a matcher. E.g. `Contains(Key(Le(5)))` can verify that a `map` contains a key `<= 5`.| -|`Pair(m1, m2)` |`argument` is an `std::pair` whose `first` field matches `m1` and `second` field matches `m2`. | -|`Property(&class::property, m)`|`argument.property()` (or `argument->property()` when `argument` is a plain pointer) matches matcher `m`, where `argument` is an object of type _class_.| - -## Matching the Result of a Function or Functor ## - -|`ResultOf(f, m)`|`f(argument)` matches matcher `m`, where `f` is a function or functor.| -|:---------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------| - -## Pointer Matchers ## - -|`Pointee(m)`|`argument` (either a smart pointer or a raw pointer) points to a value that matches matcher `m`.| -|:-----------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| - -## Multiargument Matchers ## - -Technically, all matchers match a _single_ value. A "multi-argument" -matcher is just one that matches a _tuple_. The following matchers can -be used to match a tuple `(x, y)`: - -|`Eq()`|`x == y`| -|:-----|:-------| -|`Ge()`|`x >= y`| -|`Gt()`|`x > y` | -|`Le()`|`x <= y`| -|`Lt()`|`x < y` | -|`Ne()`|`x != y`| - -You can use the following selectors to pick a subset of the arguments -(or reorder them) to participate in the matching: - -|`AllArgs(m)`|Equivalent to `m`. Useful as syntactic sugar in `.With(AllArgs(m))`.| -|:-----------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Args<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(m)`|The tuple of the `k` selected (using 0-based indices) arguments matches `m`, e.g. `Args<1, 2>(Eq())`.| - -## Composite Matchers ## - -You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers: - -|`AllOf(m1, m2, ..., mn)`|`argument` matches all of the matchers `m1` to `mn`.| -|:-----------------------|:---------------------------------------------------| -|`AnyOf(m1, m2, ..., mn)`|`argument` matches at least one of the matchers `m1` to `mn`.| -|`Not(m)` |`argument` doesn't match matcher `m`. | - -## Adapters for Matchers ## - -|`MatcherCast<T>(m)`|casts matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`.| -|:------------------|:--------------------------------------| -|`SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)`| [safely casts](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Casting_Matchers) matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`. | -|`Truly(predicate)` |`predicate(argument)` returns something considered by C++ to be true, where `predicate` is a function or functor.| - -## Matchers as Predicates ## - -|`Matches(m)(value)`|evaluates to `true` if `value` matches `m`. You can use `Matches(m)` alone as a unary functor.| -|:------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`ExplainMatchResult(m, value, result_listener)`|evaluates to `true` if `value` matches `m`, explaining the result to `result_listener`. | -|`Value(value, m)` |evaluates to `true` if `value` matches `m`. | - -## Defining Matchers ## - -| `MATCHER(IsEven, "") { return (arg % 2) == 0; }` | Defines a matcher `IsEven()` to match an even number. | -|:-------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------| -| `MATCHER_P(IsDivisibleBy, n, "") { *result_listener << "where the remainder is " << (arg % n); return (arg % n) == 0; }` | Defines a macher `IsDivisibleBy(n)` to match a number divisible by `n`. | -| `MATCHER_P2(IsBetween, a, b, std::string(negation ? "isn't" : "is") + " between " + PrintToString(a) + " and " + PrintToString(b)) { return a <= arg && arg <= b; }` | Defines a matcher `IsBetween(a, b)` to match a value in the range [`a`, `b`]. | - -**Notes:** - - 1. The `MATCHER*` macros cannot be used inside a function or class. - 1. The matcher body must be _purely functional_ (i.e. it cannot have any side effect, and the result must not depend on anything other than the value being matched and the matcher parameters). - 1. You can use `PrintToString(x)` to convert a value `x` of any type to a string. - -## Matchers as Test Assertions ## - -|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/Primer#Assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| -|:---------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`EXPECT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a non-fatal failure if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`. | - -# Actions # - -**Actions** specify what a mock function should do when invoked. - -## Returning a Value ## - -|`Return()`|Return from a `void` mock function.| -|:---------|:----------------------------------| -|`Return(value)`|Return `value`. If the type of `value` is different to the mock function's return type, `value` is converted to the latter type <i>at the time the expectation is set</i>, not when the action is executed.| -|`ReturnArg<N>()`|Return the `N`-th (0-based) argument.| -|`ReturnNew<T>(a1, ..., ak)`|Return `new T(a1, ..., ak)`; a different object is created each time.| -|`ReturnNull()`|Return a null pointer. | -|`ReturnPointee(ptr)`|Return the value pointed to by `ptr`.| -|`ReturnRef(variable)`|Return a reference to `variable`. | -|`ReturnRefOfCopy(value)`|Return a reference to a copy of `value`; the copy lives as long as the action.| - -## Side Effects ## - -|`Assign(&variable, value)`|Assign `value` to variable.| -|:-------------------------|:--------------------------| -| `DeleteArg<N>()` | Delete the `N`-th (0-based) argument, which must be a pointer. | -| `SaveArg<N>(pointer)` | Save the `N`-th (0-based) argument to `*pointer`. | -| `SaveArgPointee<N>(pointer)` | Save the value pointed to by the `N`-th (0-based) argument to `*pointer`. | -| `SetArgReferee<N>(value)` | Assign value to the variable referenced by the `N`-th (0-based) argument. | -|`SetArgPointee<N>(value)` |Assign `value` to the variable pointed by the `N`-th (0-based) argument.| -|`SetArgumentPointee<N>(value)`|Same as `SetArgPointee<N>(value)`. Deprecated. Will be removed in v1.7.0.| -|`SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last)`|Copies the elements in source range [`first`, `last`) to the array pointed to by the `N`-th (0-based) argument, which can be either a pointer or an iterator. The action does not take ownership of the elements in the source range.| -|`SetErrnoAndReturn(error, value)`|Set `errno` to `error` and return `value`.| -|`Throw(exception)` |Throws the given exception, which can be any copyable value. Available since v1.1.0.| - -## Using a Function or a Functor as an Action ## - -|`Invoke(f)`|Invoke `f` with the arguments passed to the mock function, where `f` can be a global/static function or a functor.| -|:----------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`Invoke(object_pointer, &class::method)`|Invoke the {method on the object with the arguments passed to the mock function. | -|`InvokeWithoutArgs(f)`|Invoke `f`, which can be a global/static function or a functor. `f` must take no arguments. | -|`InvokeWithoutArgs(object_pointer, &class::method)`|Invoke the method on the object, which takes no arguments. | -|`InvokeArgument<N>(arg1, arg2, ..., argk)`|Invoke the mock function's `N`-th (0-based) argument, which must be a function or a functor, with the `k` arguments.| - -The return value of the invoked function is used as the return value -of the action. - -When defining a function or functor to be used with `Invoke*()`, you can declare any unused parameters as `Unused`: -``` - double Distance(Unused, double x, double y) { return sqrt(x*x + y*y); } - ... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo("Hi", _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(Distance)); -``` - -In `InvokeArgument<N>(...)`, if an argument needs to be passed by reference, wrap it inside `ByRef()`. For example, -``` - InvokeArgument<2>(5, string("Hi"), ByRef(foo)) -``` -calls the mock function's #2 argument, passing to it `5` and `string("Hi")` by value, and `foo` by reference. - -## Default Action ## - -|`DoDefault()`|Do the default action (specified by `ON_CALL()` or the built-in one).| -|:------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------| - -**Note:** due to technical reasons, `DoDefault()` cannot be used inside a composite action - trying to do so will result in a run-time error. - -## Composite Actions ## - -|`DoAll(a1, a2, ..., an)`|Do all actions `a1` to `an` and return the result of `an` in each invocation. The first `n - 1` sub-actions must return void. | -|:-----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -|`IgnoreResult(a)` |Perform action `a` and ignore its result. `a` must not return void. | -|`WithArg<N>(a)` |Pass the `N`-th (0-based) argument of the mock function to action `a` and perform it. | -|`WithArgs<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(a)`|Pass the selected (0-based) arguments of the mock function to action `a` and perform it. | -|`WithoutArgs(a)` |Perform action `a` without any arguments. | - -## Defining Actions ## - -| `ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }` | Defines an action `Sum()` to return the sum of the mock function's argument #0 and #1. | -|:--------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }` | Defines an action `Plus(n)` to return the sum of the mock function's argument #0 and `n`. | -| `ACTION_Pk(Foo, p1, ..., pk) { statements; }` | Defines a parameterized action `Foo(p1, ..., pk)` to execute the given `statements`. | - -The `ACTION*` macros cannot be used inside a function or class. - -# Cardinalities # - -These are used in `Times()` to specify how many times a mock function will be called: - -|`AnyNumber()`|The function can be called any number of times.| -|:------------|:----------------------------------------------| -|`AtLeast(n)` |The call is expected at least `n` times. | -|`AtMost(n)` |The call is expected at most `n` times. | -|`Between(m, n)`|The call is expected between `m` and `n` (inclusive) times.| -|`Exactly(n) or n`|The call is expected exactly `n` times. In particular, the call should never happen when `n` is 0.| - -# Expectation Order # - -By default, the expectations can be matched in _any_ order. If some -or all expectations must be matched in a given order, there are two -ways to specify it. They can be used either independently or -together. - -## The After Clause ## - -``` -using ::testing::Expectation; -... -Expectation init_x = EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitX()); -Expectation init_y = EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitY()); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .After(init_x, init_y); -``` -says that `Bar()` can be called only after both `InitX()` and -`InitY()` have been called. - -If you don't know how many pre-requisites an expectation has when you -write it, you can use an `ExpectationSet` to collect them: - -``` -using ::testing::ExpectationSet; -... -ExpectationSet all_inits; -for (int i = 0; i < element_count; i++) { - all_inits += EXPECT_CALL(foo, InitElement(i)); -} -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .After(all_inits); -``` -says that `Bar()` can be called only after all elements have been -initialized (but we don't care about which elements get initialized -before the others). - -Modifying an `ExpectationSet` after using it in an `.After()` doesn't -affect the meaning of the `.After()`. - -## Sequences ## - -When you have a long chain of sequential expectations, it's easier to -specify the order using **sequences**, which don't require you to given -each expectation in the chain a different name. <i>All expected<br> -calls</i> in the same sequence must occur in the order they are -specified. - -``` -using ::testing::Sequence; -Sequence s1, s2; -... -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Reset()) - .InSequence(s1, s2) - .WillOnce(Return(true)); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetSize()) - .InSequence(s1) - .WillOnce(Return(1)); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Describe(A<const char*>())) - .InSequence(s2) - .WillOnce(Return("dummy")); -``` -says that `Reset()` must be called before _both_ `GetSize()` _and_ -`Describe()`, and the latter two can occur in any order. - -To put many expectations in a sequence conveniently: -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -{ - InSequence dummy; - - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(...)...; -} -``` -says that all expected calls in the scope of `dummy` must occur in -strict order. The name `dummy` is irrelevant.) - -# Verifying and Resetting a Mock # - -Google Mock will verify the expectations on a mock object when it is destructed, or you can do it earlier: -``` -using ::testing::Mock; -... -// Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj; -// returns true iff successful. -Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_obj); -... -// Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj; -// also removes the default actions set by ON_CALL(); -// returns true iff successful. -Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_obj); -``` - -You can also tell Google Mock that a mock object can be leaked and doesn't -need to be verified: -``` -Mock::AllowLeak(&mock_obj); -``` - -# Mock Classes # - -Google Mock defines a convenient mock class template -``` -class MockFunction<R(A1, ..., An)> { - public: - MOCK_METHODn(Call, R(A1, ..., An)); -}; -``` -See this [recipe](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Using_Check_Points) for one application of it. - -# Flags # - -| `--gmock_catch_leaked_mocks=0` | Don't report leaked mock objects as failures. | -|:-------------------------------|:----------------------------------------------| -| `--gmock_verbose=LEVEL` | Sets the default verbosity level (`info`, `warning`, or `error`) of Google Mock messages. |
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_7/CookBook.md deleted file mode 100644 index 419a001..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/CookBook.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3432 +0,0 @@ - - -You can find recipes for using Google Mock here. If you haven't yet, -please read the [ForDummies](V1_7_ForDummies.md) document first to make sure you understand -the basics. - -**Note:** Google Mock lives in the `testing` name space. For -readability, it is recommended to write `using ::testing::Foo;` once in -your file before using the name `Foo` defined by Google Mock. We omit -such `using` statements in this page for brevity, but you should do it -in your own code. - -# Creating Mock Classes # - -## Mocking Private or Protected Methods ## - -You must always put a mock method definition (`MOCK_METHOD*`) in a -`public:` section of the mock class, regardless of the method being -mocked being `public`, `protected`, or `private` in the base class. -This allows `ON_CALL` and `EXPECT_CALL` to reference the mock function -from outside of the mock class. (Yes, C++ allows a subclass to change -the access level of a virtual function in the base class.) Example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - ... - virtual bool Transform(Gadget* g) = 0; - - protected: - virtual void Resume(); - - private: - virtual int GetTimeOut(); -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Transform, bool(Gadget* g)); - - // The following must be in the public section, even though the - // methods are protected or private in the base class. - MOCK_METHOD0(Resume, void()); - MOCK_METHOD0(GetTimeOut, int()); -}; -``` - -## Mocking Overloaded Methods ## - -You can mock overloaded functions as usual. No special attention is required: - -``` -class Foo { - ... - - // Must be virtual as we'll inherit from Foo. - virtual ~Foo(); - - // Overloaded on the types and/or numbers of arguments. - virtual int Add(Element x); - virtual int Add(int times, Element x); - - // Overloaded on the const-ness of this object. - virtual Bar& GetBar(); - virtual const Bar& GetBar() const; -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Add, int(Element x)); - MOCK_METHOD2(Add, int(int times, Element x); - - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetBar, const Bar&()); -}; -``` - -**Note:** if you don't mock all versions of the overloaded method, the -compiler will give you a warning about some methods in the base class -being hidden. To fix that, use `using` to bring them in scope: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - using Foo::Add; - MOCK_METHOD1(Add, int(Element x)); - // We don't want to mock int Add(int times, Element x); - ... -}; -``` - -## Mocking Class Templates ## - -To mock a class template, append `_T` to the `MOCK_*` macros: - -``` -template <typename Elem> -class StackInterface { - ... - // Must be virtual as we'll inherit from StackInterface. - virtual ~StackInterface(); - - virtual int GetSize() const = 0; - virtual void Push(const Elem& x) = 0; -}; - -template <typename Elem> -class MockStack : public StackInterface<Elem> { - ... - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0_T(GetSize, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1_T(Push, void(const Elem& x)); -}; -``` - -## Mocking Nonvirtual Methods ## - -Google Mock can mock non-virtual functions to be used in what we call _hi-perf -dependency injection_. - -In this case, instead of sharing a common base class with the real -class, your mock class will be _unrelated_ to the real class, but -contain methods with the same signatures. The syntax for mocking -non-virtual methods is the _same_ as mocking virtual methods: - -``` -// A simple packet stream class. None of its members is virtual. -class ConcretePacketStream { - public: - void AppendPacket(Packet* new_packet); - const Packet* GetPacket(size_t packet_number) const; - size_t NumberOfPackets() const; - ... -}; - -// A mock packet stream class. It inherits from no other, but defines -// GetPacket() and NumberOfPackets(). -class MockPacketStream { - public: - MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(GetPacket, const Packet*(size_t packet_number)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(NumberOfPackets, size_t()); - ... -}; -``` - -Note that the mock class doesn't define `AppendPacket()`, unlike the -real class. That's fine as long as the test doesn't need to call it. - -Next, you need a way to say that you want to use -`ConcretePacketStream` in production code, and use `MockPacketStream` -in tests. Since the functions are not virtual and the two classes are -unrelated, you must specify your choice at _compile time_ (as opposed -to run time). - -One way to do it is to templatize your code that needs to use a packet -stream. More specifically, you will give your code a template type -argument for the type of the packet stream. In production, you will -instantiate your template with `ConcretePacketStream` as the type -argument. In tests, you will instantiate the same template with -`MockPacketStream`. For example, you may write: - -``` -template <class PacketStream> -void CreateConnection(PacketStream* stream) { ... } - -template <class PacketStream> -class PacketReader { - public: - void ReadPackets(PacketStream* stream, size_t packet_num); -}; -``` - -Then you can use `CreateConnection<ConcretePacketStream>()` and -`PacketReader<ConcretePacketStream>` in production code, and use -`CreateConnection<MockPacketStream>()` and -`PacketReader<MockPacketStream>` in tests. - -``` - MockPacketStream mock_stream; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_stream, ...)...; - .. set more expectations on mock_stream ... - PacketReader<MockPacketStream> reader(&mock_stream); - ... exercise reader ... -``` - -## Mocking Free Functions ## - -It's possible to use Google Mock to mock a free function (i.e. a -C-style function or a static method). You just need to rewrite your -code to use an interface (abstract class). - -Instead of calling a free function (say, `OpenFile`) directly, -introduce an interface for it and have a concrete subclass that calls -the free function: - -``` -class FileInterface { - public: - ... - virtual bool Open(const char* path, const char* mode) = 0; -}; - -class File : public FileInterface { - public: - ... - virtual bool Open(const char* path, const char* mode) { - return OpenFile(path, mode); - } -}; -``` - -Your code should talk to `FileInterface` to open a file. Now it's -easy to mock out the function. - -This may seem much hassle, but in practice you often have multiple -related functions that you can put in the same interface, so the -per-function syntactic overhead will be much lower. - -If you are concerned about the performance overhead incurred by -virtual functions, and profiling confirms your concern, you can -combine this with the recipe for [mocking non-virtual methods](#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods.md). - -## The Nice, the Strict, and the Naggy ## - -If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock -will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is: - - * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called. - * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. - -However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call" -warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all -of them as errors. Google Mock lets you make the decision on a -per-mock-object basis. - -Suppose your test uses a mock class `MockFoo`: - -``` -TEST(...) { - MockFoo mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -If a method of `mock_foo` other than `DoThis()` is called, it will be -reported by Google Mock as a warning. However, if you rewrite your -test to use `NiceMock<MockFoo>` instead, the warning will be gone, -resulting in a cleaner test output: - -``` -using ::testing::NiceMock; - -TEST(...) { - NiceMock<MockFoo> mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -`NiceMock<MockFoo>` is a subclass of `MockFoo`, so it can be used -wherever `MockFoo` is accepted. - -It also works if `MockFoo`'s constructor takes some arguments, as -`NiceMock<MockFoo>` "inherits" `MockFoo`'s constructors: - -``` -using ::testing::NiceMock; - -TEST(...) { - NiceMock<MockFoo> mock_foo(5, "hi"); // Calls MockFoo(5, "hi"). - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... -} -``` - -The usage of `StrictMock` is similar, except that it makes all -uninteresting calls failures: - -``` -using ::testing::StrictMock; - -TEST(...) { - StrictMock<MockFoo> mock_foo; - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, DoThis()); - ... code that uses mock_foo ... - - // The test will fail if a method of mock_foo other than DoThis() - // is called. -} -``` - -There are some caveats though (I don't like them just as much as the -next guy, but sadly they are side effects of C++'s limitations): - - 1. `NiceMock<MockFoo>` and `StrictMock<MockFoo>` only work for mock methods defined using the `MOCK_METHOD*` family of macros **directly** in the `MockFoo` class. If a mock method is defined in a **base class** of `MockFoo`, the "nice" or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. In particular, nesting `NiceMock` and `StrictMock` (e.g. `NiceMock<StrictMock<MockFoo> >`) is **not** supported. - 1. The constructors of the base mock (`MockFoo`) cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which happens to be banned by the [Google C++ style guide](http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml). - 1. During the constructor or destructor of `MockFoo`, the mock object is _not_ nice or strict. This may cause surprises if the constructor or destructor calls a mock method on `this` object. (This behavior, however, is consistent with C++'s general rule: if a constructor or destructor calls a virtual method of `this` object, that method is treated as non-virtual. In other words, to the base class's constructor or destructor, `this` object behaves like an instance of the base class, not the derived class. This rule is required for safety. Otherwise a base constructor may use members of a derived class before they are initialized, or a base destructor may use members of a derived class after they have been destroyed.) - -Finally, you should be **very cautious** about when to use naggy or strict mocks, as they tend to make tests more brittle and harder to maintain. When you refactor your code without changing its externally visible behavior, ideally you should't need to update any tests. If your code interacts with a naggy mock, however, you may start to get spammed with warnings as the result of your change. Worse, if your code interacts with a strict mock, your tests may start to fail and you'll be forced to fix them. Our general recommendation is to use nice mocks (not yet the default) most of the time, use naggy mocks (the current default) when developing or debugging tests, and use strict mocks only as the last resort. - -## Simplifying the Interface without Breaking Existing Code ## - -Sometimes a method has a long list of arguments that is mostly -uninteresting. For example, - -``` -class LogSink { - public: - ... - virtual void send(LogSeverity severity, const char* full_filename, - const char* base_filename, int line, - const struct tm* tm_time, - const char* message, size_t message_len) = 0; -}; -``` - -This method's argument list is lengthy and hard to work with (let's -say that the `message` argument is not even 0-terminated). If we mock -it as is, using the mock will be awkward. If, however, we try to -simplify this interface, we'll need to fix all clients depending on -it, which is often infeasible. - -The trick is to re-dispatch the method in the mock class: - -``` -class ScopedMockLog : public LogSink { - public: - ... - virtual void send(LogSeverity severity, const char* full_filename, - const char* base_filename, int line, const tm* tm_time, - const char* message, size_t message_len) { - // We are only interested in the log severity, full file name, and - // log message. - Log(severity, full_filename, std::string(message, message_len)); - } - - // Implements the mock method: - // - // void Log(LogSeverity severity, - // const string& file_path, - // const string& message); - MOCK_METHOD3(Log, void(LogSeverity severity, const string& file_path, - const string& message)); -}; -``` - -By defining a new mock method with a trimmed argument list, we make -the mock class much more user-friendly. - -## Alternative to Mocking Concrete Classes ## - -Often you may find yourself using classes that don't implement -interfaces. In order to test your code that uses such a class (let's -call it `Concrete`), you may be tempted to make the methods of -`Concrete` virtual and then mock it. - -Try not to do that. - -Making a non-virtual function virtual is a big decision. It creates an -extension point where subclasses can tweak your class' behavior. This -weakens your control on the class because now it's harder to maintain -the class' invariants. You should make a function virtual only when -there is a valid reason for a subclass to override it. - -Mocking concrete classes directly is problematic as it creates a tight -coupling between the class and the tests - any small change in the -class may invalidate your tests and make test maintenance a pain. - -To avoid such problems, many programmers have been practicing "coding -to interfaces": instead of talking to the `Concrete` class, your code -would define an interface and talk to it. Then you implement that -interface as an adaptor on top of `Concrete`. In tests, you can easily -mock that interface to observe how your code is doing. - -This technique incurs some overhead: - - * You pay the cost of virtual function calls (usually not a problem). - * There is more abstraction for the programmers to learn. - -However, it can also bring significant benefits in addition to better -testability: - - * `Concrete`'s API may not fit your problem domain very well, as you may not be the only client it tries to serve. By designing your own interface, you have a chance to tailor it to your need - you may add higher-level functionalities, rename stuff, etc instead of just trimming the class. This allows you to write your code (user of the interface) in a more natural way, which means it will be more readable, more maintainable, and you'll be more productive. - * If `Concrete`'s implementation ever has to change, you don't have to rewrite everywhere it is used. Instead, you can absorb the change in your implementation of the interface, and your other code and tests will be insulated from this change. - -Some people worry that if everyone is practicing this technique, they -will end up writing lots of redundant code. This concern is totally -understandable. However, there are two reasons why it may not be the -case: - - * Different projects may need to use `Concrete` in different ways, so the best interfaces for them will be different. Therefore, each of them will have its own domain-specific interface on top of `Concrete`, and they will not be the same code. - * If enough projects want to use the same interface, they can always share it, just like they have been sharing `Concrete`. You can check in the interface and the adaptor somewhere near `Concrete` (perhaps in a `contrib` sub-directory) and let many projects use it. - -You need to weigh the pros and cons carefully for your particular -problem, but I'd like to assure you that the Java community has been -practicing this for a long time and it's a proven effective technique -applicable in a wide variety of situations. :-) - -## Delegating Calls to a Fake ## - -Some times you have a non-trivial fake implementation of an -interface. For example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - virtual ~Foo() {} - virtual char DoThis(int n) = 0; - virtual void DoThat(const char* s, int* p) = 0; -}; - -class FakeFoo : public Foo { - public: - virtual char DoThis(int n) { - return (n > 0) ? '+' : - (n < 0) ? '-' : '0'; - } - - virtual void DoThat(const char* s, int* p) { - *p = strlen(s); - } -}; -``` - -Now you want to mock this interface such that you can set expectations -on it. However, you also want to use `FakeFoo` for the default -behavior, as duplicating it in the mock object is, well, a lot of -work. - -When you define the mock class using Google Mock, you can have it -delegate its default action to a fake class you already have, using -this pattern: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Normal mock method definitions using Google Mock. - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThis, char(int n)); - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThat, void(const char* s, int* p)); - - // Delegates the default actions of the methods to a FakeFoo object. - // This must be called *before* the custom ON_CALL() statements. - void DelegateToFake() { - ON_CALL(*this, DoThis(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThis)); - ON_CALL(*this, DoThat(_, _)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThat)); - } - private: - FakeFoo fake_; // Keeps an instance of the fake in the mock. -}; -``` - -With that, you can use `MockFoo` in your tests as usual. Just remember -that if you don't explicitly set an action in an `ON_CALL()` or -`EXPECT_CALL()`, the fake will be called upon to do it: - -``` -using ::testing::_; - -TEST(AbcTest, Xyz) { - MockFoo foo; - foo.DelegateToFake(); // Enables the fake for delegation. - - // Put your ON_CALL(foo, ...)s here, if any. - - // No action specified, meaning to use the default action. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, _)); - - int n = 0; - EXPECT_EQ('+', foo.DoThis(5)); // FakeFoo::DoThis() is invoked. - foo.DoThat("Hi", &n); // FakeFoo::DoThat() is invoked. - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); -} -``` - -**Some tips:** - - * If you want, you can still override the default action by providing your own `ON_CALL()` or using `.WillOnce()` / `.WillRepeatedly()` in `EXPECT_CALL()`. - * In `DelegateToFake()`, you only need to delegate the methods whose fake implementation you intend to use. - * The general technique discussed here works for overloaded methods, but you'll need to tell the compiler which version you mean. To disambiguate a mock function (the one you specify inside the parentheses of `ON_CALL()`), see the "Selecting Between Overloaded Functions" section on this page; to disambiguate a fake function (the one you place inside `Invoke()`), use a `static_cast` to specify the function's type. For instance, if class `Foo` has methods `char DoThis(int n)` and `bool DoThis(double x) const`, and you want to invoke the latter, you need to write `Invoke(&fake_, static_cast<bool (FakeFoo::*)(double) const>(&FakeFoo::DoThis))` instead of `Invoke(&fake_, &FakeFoo::DoThis)` (The strange-looking thing inside the angled brackets of `static_cast` is the type of a function pointer to the second `DoThis()` method.). - * Having to mix a mock and a fake is often a sign of something gone wrong. Perhaps you haven't got used to the interaction-based way of testing yet. Or perhaps your interface is taking on too many roles and should be split up. Therefore, **don't abuse this**. We would only recommend to do it as an intermediate step when you are refactoring your code. - -Regarding the tip on mixing a mock and a fake, here's an example on -why it may be a bad sign: Suppose you have a class `System` for -low-level system operations. In particular, it does file and I/O -operations. And suppose you want to test how your code uses `System` -to do I/O, and you just want the file operations to work normally. If -you mock out the entire `System` class, you'll have to provide a fake -implementation for the file operation part, which suggests that -`System` is taking on too many roles. - -Instead, you can define a `FileOps` interface and an `IOOps` interface -and split `System`'s functionalities into the two. Then you can mock -`IOOps` without mocking `FileOps`. - -## Delegating Calls to a Real Object ## - -When using testing doubles (mocks, fakes, stubs, and etc), sometimes -their behaviors will differ from those of the real objects. This -difference could be either intentional (as in simulating an error such -that you can test the error handling code) or unintentional. If your -mocks have different behaviors than the real objects by mistake, you -could end up with code that passes the tests but fails in production. - -You can use the _delegating-to-real_ technique to ensure that your -mock has the same behavior as the real object while retaining the -ability to validate calls. This technique is very similar to the -delegating-to-fake technique, the difference being that we use a real -object instead of a fake. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AtLeast; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MockFoo() { - // By default, all calls are delegated to the real object. - ON_CALL(*this, DoThis()) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&real_, &Foo::DoThis)); - ON_CALL(*this, DoThat(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&real_, &Foo::DoThat)); - ... - } - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, ...); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, ...); - ... - private: - Foo real_; -}; -... - - MockFoo mock; - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, DoThis()) - .Times(3); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, DoThat("Hi")) - .Times(AtLeast(1)); - ... use mock in test ... -``` - -With this, Google Mock will verify that your code made the right calls -(with the right arguments, in the right order, called the right number -of times, etc), and a real object will answer the calls (so the -behavior will be the same as in production). This gives you the best -of both worlds. - -## Delegating Calls to a Parent Class ## - -Ideally, you should code to interfaces, whose methods are all pure -virtual. In reality, sometimes you do need to mock a virtual method -that is not pure (i.e, it already has an implementation). For example: - -``` -class Foo { - public: - virtual ~Foo(); - - virtual void Pure(int n) = 0; - virtual int Concrete(const char* str) { ... } -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Mocking a pure method. - MOCK_METHOD1(Pure, void(int n)); - // Mocking a concrete method. Foo::Concrete() is shadowed. - MOCK_METHOD1(Concrete, int(const char* str)); -}; -``` - -Sometimes you may want to call `Foo::Concrete()` instead of -`MockFoo::Concrete()`. Perhaps you want to do it as part of a stub -action, or perhaps your test doesn't need to mock `Concrete()` at all -(but it would be oh-so painful to have to define a new mock class -whenever you don't need to mock one of its methods). - -The trick is to leave a back door in your mock class for accessing the -real methods in the base class: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Mocking a pure method. - MOCK_METHOD1(Pure, void(int n)); - // Mocking a concrete method. Foo::Concrete() is shadowed. - MOCK_METHOD1(Concrete, int(const char* str)); - - // Use this to call Concrete() defined in Foo. - int FooConcrete(const char* str) { return Foo::Concrete(str); } -}; -``` - -Now, you can call `Foo::Concrete()` inside an action by: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Concrete(_)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(&foo, &MockFoo::FooConcrete)); -``` - -or tell the mock object that you don't want to mock `Concrete()`: - -``` -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - ON_CALL(foo, Concrete(_)) - .WillByDefault(Invoke(&foo, &MockFoo::FooConcrete)); -``` - -(Why don't we just write `Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concrete)`? If you do -that, `MockFoo::Concrete()` will be called (and cause an infinite -recursion) since `Foo::Concrete()` is virtual. That's just how C++ -works.) - -# Using Matchers # - -## Matching Argument Values Exactly ## - -You can specify exactly which arguments a mock method is expecting: - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)) - .WillOnce(Return('a')); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat("Hello", bar)); -``` - -## Using Simple Matchers ## - -You can use matchers to match arguments that have a certain property: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::Return; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(Ge(5))) // The argument must be >= 5. - .WillOnce(Return('a')); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat("Hello", NotNull())); - // The second argument must not be NULL. -``` - -A frequently used matcher is `_`, which matches anything: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::NotNull; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, NotNull())); -``` - -## Combining Matchers ## - -You can build complex matchers from existing ones using `AllOf()`, -`AnyOf()`, and `Not()`: - -``` -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::HasSubstr; -using ::testing::Ne; -using ::testing::Not; -... - // The argument must be > 5 and != 10. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(AllOf(Gt(5), - Ne(10)))); - - // The first argument must not contain sub-string "blah". - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(Not(HasSubstr("blah")), - NULL)); -``` - -## Casting Matchers ## - -Google Mock matchers are statically typed, meaning that the compiler -can catch your mistake if you use a matcher of the wrong type (for -example, if you use `Eq(5)` to match a `string` argument). Good for -you! - -Sometimes, however, you know what you're doing and want the compiler -to give you some slack. One example is that you have a matcher for -`long` and the argument you want to match is `int`. While the two -types aren't exactly the same, there is nothing really wrong with -using a `Matcher<long>` to match an `int` - after all, we can first -convert the `int` argument to a `long` before giving it to the -matcher. - -To support this need, Google Mock gives you the -`SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` function. It casts a matcher `m` to type -`Matcher<T>`. To ensure safety, Google Mock checks that (let `U` be the -type `m` accepts): - - 1. Type `T` can be implicitly cast to type `U`; - 1. When both `T` and `U` are built-in arithmetic types (`bool`, integers, and floating-point numbers), the conversion from `T` to `U` is not lossy (in other words, any value representable by `T` can also be represented by `U`); and - 1. When `U` is a reference, `T` must also be a reference (as the underlying matcher may be interested in the address of the `U` value). - -The code won't compile if any of these conditions isn't met. - -Here's one example: - -``` -using ::testing::SafeMatcherCast; - -// A base class and a child class. -class Base { ... }; -class Derived : public Base { ... }; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThis, void(Derived* derived)); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - // m is a Matcher<Base*> we got from somewhere. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(SafeMatcherCast<Derived*>(m))); -``` - -If you find `SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` too limiting, you can use a similar -function `MatcherCast<T>(m)`. The difference is that `MatcherCast` works -as long as you can `static_cast` type `T` to type `U`. - -`MatcherCast` essentially lets you bypass C++'s type system -(`static_cast` isn't always safe as it could throw away information, -for example), so be careful not to misuse/abuse it. - -## Selecting Between Overloaded Functions ## - -If you expect an overloaded function to be called, the compiler may -need some help on which overloaded version it is. - -To disambiguate functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object, -use the `Const()` argument wrapper. - -``` -using ::testing::ReturnRef; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetBar, const Bar&()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Bar bar1, bar2; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetBar()) // The non-const GetBar(). - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar1)); - EXPECT_CALL(Const(foo), GetBar()) // The const GetBar(). - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar2)); -``` - -(`Const()` is defined by Google Mock and returns a `const` reference -to its argument.) - -To disambiguate overloaded functions with the same number of arguments -but different argument types, you may need to specify the exact type -of a matcher, either by wrapping your matcher in `Matcher<type>()`, or -using a matcher whose type is fixed (`TypedEq<type>`, `An<type>()`, -etc): - -``` -using ::testing::An; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Matcher; -using ::testing::TypedEq; - -class MockPrinter : public Printer { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Print, void(int n)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Print, void(char c)); -}; - -TEST(PrinterTest, Print) { - MockPrinter printer; - - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(An<int>())); // void Print(int); - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(Matcher<int>(Lt(5)))); // void Print(int); - EXPECT_CALL(printer, Print(TypedEq<char>('a'))); // void Print(char); - - printer.Print(3); - printer.Print(6); - printer.Print('a'); -} -``` - -## Performing Different Actions Based on the Arguments ## - -When a mock method is called, the _last_ matching expectation that's -still active will be selected (think "newer overrides older"). So, you -can make a method do different things depending on its argument values -like this: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Return; -... - // The default case. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return('b')); - - // The more specific case. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(Lt(5))) - .WillRepeatedly(Return('a')); -``` - -Now, if `foo.DoThis()` is called with a value less than 5, `'a'` will -be returned; otherwise `'b'` will be returned. - -## Matching Multiple Arguments as a Whole ## - -Sometimes it's not enough to match the arguments individually. For -example, we may want to say that the first argument must be less than -the second argument. The `With()` clause allows us to match -all arguments of a mock function as a whole. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Lt; -using ::testing::Ne; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, InRange(Ne(0), _)) - .With(Lt()); -``` - -says that the first argument of `InRange()` must not be 0, and must be -less than the second argument. - -The expression inside `With()` must be a matcher of type -`Matcher<tr1::tuple<A1, ..., An> >`, where `A1`, ..., `An` are the -types of the function arguments. - -You can also write `AllArgs(m)` instead of `m` inside `.With()`. The -two forms are equivalent, but `.With(AllArgs(Lt()))` is more readable -than `.With(Lt())`. - -You can use `Args<k1, ..., kn>(m)` to match the `n` selected arguments -(as a tuple) against `m`. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Args; -using ::testing::Lt; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Blah(_, _, _)) - .With(AllOf(Args<0, 1>(Lt()), Args<1, 2>(Lt()))); -``` - -says that `Blah()` will be called with arguments `x`, `y`, and `z` where -`x < y < z`. - -As a convenience and example, Google Mock provides some matchers for -2-tuples, including the `Lt()` matcher above. See the [CheatSheet](V1_7_CheatSheet.md) for -the complete list. - -Note that if you want to pass the arguments to a predicate of your own -(e.g. `.With(Args<0, 1>(Truly(&MyPredicate)))`), that predicate MUST be -written to take a `tr1::tuple` as its argument; Google Mock will pass the `n` -selected arguments as _one_ single tuple to the predicate. - -## Using Matchers as Predicates ## - -Have you noticed that a matcher is just a fancy predicate that also -knows how to describe itself? Many existing algorithms take predicates -as arguments (e.g. those defined in STL's `<algorithm>` header), and -it would be a shame if Google Mock matchers are not allowed to -participate. - -Luckily, you can use a matcher where a unary predicate functor is -expected by wrapping it inside the `Matches()` function. For example, - -``` -#include <algorithm> -#include <vector> - -std::vector<int> v; -... -// How many elements in v are >= 10? -const int count = count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), Matches(Ge(10))); -``` - -Since you can build complex matchers from simpler ones easily using -Google Mock, this gives you a way to conveniently construct composite -predicates (doing the same using STL's `<functional>` header is just -painful). For example, here's a predicate that's satisfied by any -number that is >= 0, <= 100, and != 50: - -``` -Matches(AllOf(Ge(0), Le(100), Ne(50))) -``` - -## Using Matchers in Google Test Assertions ## - -Since matchers are basically predicates that also know how to describe -themselves, there is a way to take advantage of them in -[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) assertions. It's -called `ASSERT_THAT` and `EXPECT_THAT`: - -``` - ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher); // Asserts that value matches matcher. - EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher); // The non-fatal version. -``` - -For example, in a Google Test test you can write: - -``` -#include "gmock/gmock.h" - -using ::testing::AllOf; -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::Le; -using ::testing::MatchesRegex; -using ::testing::StartsWith; -... - - EXPECT_THAT(Foo(), StartsWith("Hello")); - EXPECT_THAT(Bar(), MatchesRegex("Line \\d+")); - ASSERT_THAT(Baz(), AllOf(Ge(5), Le(10))); -``` - -which (as you can probably guess) executes `Foo()`, `Bar()`, and -`Baz()`, and verifies that: - - * `Foo()` returns a string that starts with `"Hello"`. - * `Bar()` returns a string that matches regular expression `"Line \\d+"`. - * `Baz()` returns a number in the range [5, 10]. - -The nice thing about these macros is that _they read like -English_. They generate informative messages too. For example, if the -first `EXPECT_THAT()` above fails, the message will be something like: - -``` -Value of: Foo() - Actual: "Hi, world!" -Expected: starts with "Hello" -``` - -**Credit:** The idea of `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_THAT` was stolen from the -[Hamcrest](http://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/) project, which adds -`assertThat()` to JUnit. - -## Using Predicates as Matchers ## - -Google Mock provides a built-in set of matchers. In case you find them -lacking, you can use an arbitray unary predicate function or functor -as a matcher - as long as the predicate accepts a value of the type -you want. You do this by wrapping the predicate inside the `Truly()` -function, for example: - -``` -using ::testing::Truly; - -int IsEven(int n) { return (n % 2) == 0 ? 1 : 0; } -... - - // Bar() must be called with an even number. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Truly(IsEven))); -``` - -Note that the predicate function / functor doesn't have to return -`bool`. It works as long as the return value can be used as the -condition in statement `if (condition) ...`. - -## Matching Arguments that Are Not Copyable ## - -When you do an `EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(bar))`, Google Mock saves -away a copy of `bar`. When `Foo()` is called later, Google Mock -compares the argument to `Foo()` with the saved copy of `bar`. This -way, you don't need to worry about `bar` being modified or destroyed -after the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed. The same is true when you use -matchers like `Eq(bar)`, `Le(bar)`, and so on. - -But what if `bar` cannot be copied (i.e. has no copy constructor)? You -could define your own matcher function and use it with `Truly()`, as -the previous couple of recipes have shown. Or, you may be able to get -away from it if you can guarantee that `bar` won't be changed after -the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed. Just tell Google Mock that it should -save a reference to `bar`, instead of a copy of it. Here's how: - -``` -using ::testing::Eq; -using ::testing::ByRef; -using ::testing::Lt; -... - // Expects that Foo()'s argument == bar. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(Eq(ByRef(bar)))); - - // Expects that Foo()'s argument < bar. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_obj, Foo(Lt(ByRef(bar)))); -``` - -Remember: if you do this, don't change `bar` after the -`EXPECT_CALL()`, or the result is undefined. - -## Validating a Member of an Object ## - -Often a mock function takes a reference to object as an argument. When -matching the argument, you may not want to compare the entire object -against a fixed object, as that may be over-specification. Instead, -you may need to validate a certain member variable or the result of a -certain getter method of the object. You can do this with `Field()` -and `Property()`. More specifically, - -``` -Field(&Foo::bar, m) -``` - -is a matcher that matches a `Foo` object whose `bar` member variable -satisfies matcher `m`. - -``` -Property(&Foo::baz, m) -``` - -is a matcher that matches a `Foo` object whose `baz()` method returns -a value that satisfies matcher `m`. - -For example: - -> | `Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3))` | Matches `x` where `x.number >= 3`. | -|:-----------------------------|:-----------------------------------| -> | `Property(&Foo::name, StartsWith("John "))` | Matches `x` where `x.name()` starts with `"John "`. | - -Note that in `Property(&Foo::baz, ...)`, method `baz()` must take no -argument and be declared as `const`. - -BTW, `Field()` and `Property()` can also match plain pointers to -objects. For instance, - -``` -Field(&Foo::number, Ge(3)) -``` - -matches a plain pointer `p` where `p->number >= 3`. If `p` is `NULL`, -the match will always fail regardless of the inner matcher. - -What if you want to validate more than one members at the same time? -Remember that there is `AllOf()`. - -## Validating the Value Pointed to by a Pointer Argument ## - -C++ functions often take pointers as arguments. You can use matchers -like `IsNull()`, `NotNull()`, and other comparison matchers to match a -pointer, but what if you want to make sure the value _pointed to_ by -the pointer, instead of the pointer itself, has a certain property? -Well, you can use the `Pointee(m)` matcher. - -`Pointee(m)` matches a pointer iff `m` matches the value the pointer -points to. For example: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge; -using ::testing::Pointee; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Pointee(Ge(3)))); -``` - -expects `foo.Bar()` to be called with a pointer that points to a value -greater than or equal to 3. - -One nice thing about `Pointee()` is that it treats a `NULL` pointer as -a match failure, so you can write `Pointee(m)` instead of - -``` - AllOf(NotNull(), Pointee(m)) -``` - -without worrying that a `NULL` pointer will crash your test. - -Also, did we tell you that `Pointee()` works with both raw pointers -**and** smart pointers (`linked_ptr`, `shared_ptr`, `scoped_ptr`, and -etc)? - -What if you have a pointer to pointer? You guessed it - you can use -nested `Pointee()` to probe deeper inside the value. For example, -`Pointee(Pointee(Lt(3)))` matches a pointer that points to a pointer -that points to a number less than 3 (what a mouthful...). - -## Testing a Certain Property of an Object ## - -Sometimes you want to specify that an object argument has a certain -property, but there is no existing matcher that does this. If you want -good error messages, you should define a matcher. If you want to do it -quick and dirty, you could get away with writing an ordinary function. - -Let's say you have a mock function that takes an object of type `Foo`, -which has an `int bar()` method and an `int baz()` method, and you -want to constrain that the argument's `bar()` value plus its `baz()` -value is a given number. Here's how you can define a matcher to do it: - -``` -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; - -class BarPlusBazEqMatcher : public MatcherInterface<const Foo&> { - public: - explicit BarPlusBazEqMatcher(int expected_sum) - : expected_sum_(expected_sum) {} - - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(const Foo& foo, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return (foo.bar() + foo.baz()) == expected_sum_; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "bar() + baz() equals " << expected_sum_; - } - - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "bar() + baz() does not equal " << expected_sum_; - } - private: - const int expected_sum_; -}; - -inline Matcher<const Foo&> BarPlusBazEq(int expected_sum) { - return MakeMatcher(new BarPlusBazEqMatcher(expected_sum)); -} - -... - - EXPECT_CALL(..., DoThis(BarPlusBazEq(5)))...; -``` - -## Matching Containers ## - -Sometimes an STL container (e.g. list, vector, map, ...) is passed to -a mock function and you may want to validate it. Since most STL -containers support the `==` operator, you can write -`Eq(expected_container)` or simply `expected_container` to match a -container exactly. - -Sometimes, though, you may want to be more flexible (for example, the -first element must be an exact match, but the second element can be -any positive number, and so on). Also, containers used in tests often -have a small number of elements, and having to define the expected -container out-of-line is a bit of a hassle. - -You can use the `ElementsAre()` or `UnorderedElementsAre()` matcher in -such cases: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::ElementsAre; -using ::testing::Gt; -... - - MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, void(const vector<int>& numbers)); -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAre(1, Gt(0), _, 5))); -``` - -The above matcher says that the container must have 4 elements, which -must be 1, greater than 0, anything, and 5 respectively. - -If you instead write: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::UnorderedElementsAre; -... - - MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, void(const vector<int>& numbers)); -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(UnorderedElementsAre(1, Gt(0), _, 5))); -``` - -It means that the container must have 4 elements, which under some -permutation must be 1, greater than 0, anything, and 5 respectively. - -`ElementsAre()` and `UnorderedElementsAre()` are overloaded to take 0 -to 10 arguments. If more are needed, you can place them in a C-style -array and use `ElementsAreArray()` or `UnorderedElementsAreArray()` -instead: - -``` -using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; -... - - // ElementsAreArray accepts an array of element values. - const int expected_vector1[] = { 1, 5, 2, 4, ... }; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector1))); - - // Or, an array of element matchers. - Matcher<int> expected_vector2 = { 1, Gt(2), _, 3, ... }; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector2))); -``` - -In case the array needs to be dynamically created (and therefore the -array size cannot be inferred by the compiler), you can give -`ElementsAreArray()` an additional argument to specify the array size: - -``` -using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; -... - int* const expected_vector3 = new int[count]; - ... fill expected_vector3 with values ... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(ElementsAreArray(expected_vector3, count))); -``` - -**Tips:** - - * `ElementsAre*()` can be used to match _any_ container that implements the STL iterator pattern (i.e. it has a `const_iterator` type and supports `begin()/end()`), not just the ones defined in STL. It will even work with container types yet to be written - as long as they follows the above pattern. - * You can use nested `ElementsAre*()` to match nested (multi-dimensional) containers. - * If the container is passed by pointer instead of by reference, just write `Pointee(ElementsAre*(...))`. - * The order of elements _matters_ for `ElementsAre*()`. Therefore don't use it with containers whose element order is undefined (e.g. `hash_map`). - -## Sharing Matchers ## - -Under the hood, a Google Mock matcher object consists of a pointer to -a ref-counted implementation object. Copying matchers is allowed and -very efficient, as only the pointer is copied. When the last matcher -that references the implementation object dies, the implementation -object will be deleted. - -Therefore, if you have some complex matcher that you want to use again -and again, there is no need to build it everytime. Just assign it to a -matcher variable and use that variable repeatedly! For example, - -``` - Matcher<int> in_range = AllOf(Gt(5), Le(10)); - ... use in_range as a matcher in multiple EXPECT_CALLs ... -``` - -# Setting Expectations # - -## Knowing When to Expect ## - -`ON_CALL` is likely the single most under-utilized construct in Google Mock. - -There are basically two constructs for defining the behavior of a mock object: `ON_CALL` and `EXPECT_CALL`. The difference? `ON_CALL` defines what happens when a mock method is called, but _doesn't imply any expectation on the method being called._ `EXPECT_CALL` not only defines the behavior, but also sets an expectation that _the method will be called with the given arguments, for the given number of times_ (and _in the given order_ when you specify the order too). - -Since `EXPECT_CALL` does more, isn't it better than `ON_CALL`? Not really. Every `EXPECT_CALL` adds a constraint on the behavior of the code under test. Having more constraints than necessary is _baaad_ - even worse than not having enough constraints. - -This may be counter-intuitive. How could tests that verify more be worse than tests that verify less? Isn't verification the whole point of tests? - -The answer, lies in _what_ a test should verify. **A good test verifies the contract of the code.** If a test over-specifies, it doesn't leave enough freedom to the implementation. As a result, changing the implementation without breaking the contract (e.g. refactoring and optimization), which should be perfectly fine to do, can break such tests. Then you have to spend time fixing them, only to see them broken again the next time the implementation is changed. - -Keep in mind that one doesn't have to verify more than one property in one test. In fact, **it's a good style to verify only one thing in one test.** If you do that, a bug will likely break only one or two tests instead of dozens (which case would you rather debug?). If you are also in the habit of giving tests descriptive names that tell what they verify, you can often easily guess what's wrong just from the test log itself. - -So use `ON_CALL` by default, and only use `EXPECT_CALL` when you actually intend to verify that the call is made. For example, you may have a bunch of `ON_CALL`s in your test fixture to set the common mock behavior shared by all tests in the same group, and write (scarcely) different `EXPECT_CALL`s in different `TEST_F`s to verify different aspects of the code's behavior. Compared with the style where each `TEST` has many `EXPECT_CALL`s, this leads to tests that are more resilient to implementational changes (and thus less likely to require maintenance) and makes the intent of the tests more obvious (so they are easier to maintain when you do need to maintain them). - -## Ignoring Uninteresting Calls ## - -If you are not interested in how a mock method is called, just don't -say anything about it. In this case, if the method is ever called, -Google Mock will perform its default action to allow the test program -to continue. If you are not happy with the default action taken by -Google Mock, you can override it using `DefaultValue<T>::Set()` -(described later in this document) or `ON_CALL()`. - -Please note that once you expressed interest in a particular mock -method (via `EXPECT_CALL()`), all invocations to it must match some -expectation. If this function is called but the arguments don't match -any `EXPECT_CALL()` statement, it will be an error. - -## Disallowing Unexpected Calls ## - -If a mock method shouldn't be called at all, explicitly say so: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .Times(0); -``` - -If some calls to the method are allowed, but the rest are not, just -list all the expected calls: - -``` -using ::testing::AnyNumber; -using ::testing::Gt; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(Gt(10))) - .Times(AnyNumber()); -``` - -A call to `foo.Bar()` that doesn't match any of the `EXPECT_CALL()` -statements will be an error. - -## Expecting Ordered Calls ## - -Although an `EXPECT_CALL()` statement defined earlier takes precedence -when Google Mock tries to match a function call with an expectation, -by default calls don't have to happen in the order `EXPECT_CALL()` -statements are written. For example, if the arguments match the -matchers in the third `EXPECT_CALL()`, but not those in the first two, -then the third expectation will be used. - -If you would rather have all calls occur in the order of the -expectations, put the `EXPECT_CALL()` statements in a block where you -define a variable of type `InSequence`: - -``` - using ::testing::_; - using ::testing::InSequence; - - { - InSequence s; - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(5)); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, DoThat(_)) - .Times(2); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(6)); - } -``` - -In this example, we expect a call to `foo.DoThis(5)`, followed by two -calls to `bar.DoThat()` where the argument can be anything, which are -in turn followed by a call to `foo.DoThis(6)`. If a call occurred -out-of-order, Google Mock will report an error. - -## Expecting Partially Ordered Calls ## - -Sometimes requiring everything to occur in a predetermined order can -lead to brittle tests. For example, we may care about `A` occurring -before both `B` and `C`, but aren't interested in the relative order -of `B` and `C`. In this case, the test should reflect our real intent, -instead of being overly constraining. - -Google Mock allows you to impose an arbitrary DAG (directed acyclic -graph) on the calls. One way to express the DAG is to use the -[After](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CheatSheet#The_After_Clause) clause of `EXPECT_CALL`. - -Another way is via the `InSequence()` clause (not the same as the -`InSequence` class), which we borrowed from jMock 2. It's less -flexible than `After()`, but more convenient when you have long chains -of sequential calls, as it doesn't require you to come up with -different names for the expectations in the chains. Here's how it -works: - -If we view `EXPECT_CALL()` statements as nodes in a graph, and add an -edge from node A to node B wherever A must occur before B, we can get -a DAG. We use the term "sequence" to mean a directed path in this -DAG. Now, if we decompose the DAG into sequences, we just need to know -which sequences each `EXPECT_CALL()` belongs to in order to be able to -reconstruct the orginal DAG. - -So, to specify the partial order on the expectations we need to do two -things: first to define some `Sequence` objects, and then for each -`EXPECT_CALL()` say which `Sequence` objects it is part -of. Expectations in the same sequence must occur in the order they are -written. For example, - -``` - using ::testing::Sequence; - - Sequence s1, s2; - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, A()) - .InSequence(s1, s2); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, B()) - .InSequence(s1); - EXPECT_CALL(bar, C()) - .InSequence(s2); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, D()) - .InSequence(s2); -``` - -specifies the following DAG (where `s1` is `A -> B`, and `s2` is `A -> -C -> D`): - -``` - +---> B - | - A ---| - | - +---> C ---> D -``` - -This means that A must occur before B and C, and C must occur before -D. There's no restriction about the order other than these. - -## Controlling When an Expectation Retires ## - -When a mock method is called, Google Mock only consider expectations -that are still active. An expectation is active when created, and -becomes inactive (aka _retires_) when a call that has to occur later -has occurred. For example, in - -``` - using ::testing::_; - using ::testing::Sequence; - - Sequence s1, s2; - - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")) // #1 - .Times(AnyNumber()) - .InSequence(s1, s2); - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "Data set is empty.")) // #2 - .InSequence(s1); - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "User not found.")) // #3 - .InSequence(s2); -``` - -as soon as either #2 or #3 is matched, #1 will retire. If a warning -`"File too large."` is logged after this, it will be an error. - -Note that an expectation doesn't retire automatically when it's -saturated. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, _)); // #1 - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")); // #2 -``` - -says that there will be exactly one warning with the message `"File -too large."`. If the second warning contains this message too, #2 will -match again and result in an upper-bound-violated error. - -If this is not what you want, you can ask an expectation to retire as -soon as it becomes saturated: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, _)); // #1 - EXPECT_CALL(log, Log(WARNING, _, "File too large.")) // #2 - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -Here #2 can be used only once, so if you have two warnings with the -message `"File too large."`, the first will match #2 and the second -will match #1 - there will be no error. - -# Using Actions # - -## Returning References from Mock Methods ## - -If a mock function's return type is a reference, you need to use -`ReturnRef()` instead of `Return()` to return a result: - -``` -using ::testing::ReturnRef; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(GetBar, Bar&()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Bar bar; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetBar()) - .WillOnce(ReturnRef(bar)); -``` - -## Returning Live Values from Mock Methods ## - -The `Return(x)` action saves a copy of `x` when the action is -_created_, and always returns the same value whenever it's -executed. Sometimes you may want to instead return the _live_ value of -`x` (i.e. its value at the time when the action is _executed_.). - -If the mock function's return type is a reference, you can do it using -`ReturnRef(x)`, as shown in the previous recipe ("Returning References -from Mock Methods"). However, Google Mock doesn't let you use -`ReturnRef()` in a mock function whose return type is not a reference, -as doing that usually indicates a user error. So, what shall you do? - -You may be tempted to try `ByRef()`: - -``` -using testing::ByRef; -using testing::Return; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(GetValue, int()); -}; -... - int x = 0; - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(ByRef(x))); - x = 42; - EXPECT_EQ(42, foo.GetValue()); -``` - -Unfortunately, it doesn't work here. The above code will fail with error: - -``` -Value of: foo.GetValue() - Actual: 0 -Expected: 42 -``` - -The reason is that `Return(value)` converts `value` to the actual -return type of the mock function at the time when the action is -_created_, not when it is _executed_. (This behavior was chosen for -the action to be safe when `value` is a proxy object that references -some temporary objects.) As a result, `ByRef(x)` is converted to an -`int` value (instead of a `const int&`) when the expectation is set, -and `Return(ByRef(x))` will always return 0. - -`ReturnPointee(pointer)` was provided to solve this problem -specifically. It returns the value pointed to by `pointer` at the time -the action is _executed_: - -``` -using testing::ReturnPointee; -... - int x = 0; - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, GetValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(ReturnPointee(&x)); // Note the & here. - x = 42; - EXPECT_EQ(42, foo.GetValue()); // This will succeed now. -``` - -## Combining Actions ## - -Want to do more than one thing when a function is called? That's -fine. `DoAll()` allow you to do sequence of actions every time. Only -the return value of the last action in the sequence will be used. - -``` -using ::testing::DoAll; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, bool(int n)); -}; -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillOnce(DoAll(action_1, - action_2, - ... - action_n)); -``` - -## Mocking Side Effects ## - -Sometimes a method exhibits its effect not via returning a value but -via side effects. For example, it may change some global state or -modify an output argument. To mock side effects, in general you can -define your own action by implementing `::testing::ActionInterface`. - -If all you need to do is to change an output argument, the built-in -`SetArgPointee()` action is convenient: - -``` -using ::testing::SetArgPointee; - -class MockMutator : public Mutator { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Mutate, void(bool mutate, int* value)); - ... -}; -... - - MockMutator mutator; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, Mutate(true, _)) - .WillOnce(SetArgPointee<1>(5)); -``` - -In this example, when `mutator.Mutate()` is called, we will assign 5 -to the `int` variable pointed to by argument #1 -(0-based). - -`SetArgPointee()` conveniently makes an internal copy of the -value you pass to it, removing the need to keep the value in scope and -alive. The implication however is that the value must have a copy -constructor and assignment operator. - -If the mock method also needs to return a value as well, you can chain -`SetArgPointee()` with `Return()` using `DoAll()`: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Return; -using ::testing::SetArgPointee; - -class MockMutator : public Mutator { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(MutateInt, bool(int* value)); -}; -... - - MockMutator mutator; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, MutateInt(_)) - .WillOnce(DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(5), - Return(true))); -``` - -If the output argument is an array, use the -`SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last)` action instead. It copies the -elements in source range `[first, last)` to the array pointed to by -the `N`-th (0-based) argument: - -``` -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::SetArrayArgument; - -class MockArrayMutator : public ArrayMutator { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Mutate, void(int* values, int num_values)); - ... -}; -... - - MockArrayMutator mutator; - int values[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; - EXPECT_CALL(mutator, Mutate(NotNull(), 5)) - .WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(values, values + 5)); -``` - -This also works when the argument is an output iterator: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SeArrayArgument; - -class MockRolodex : public Rolodex { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(GetNames, void(std::back_insert_iterator<vector<string> >)); - ... -}; -... - - MockRolodex rolodex; - vector<string> names; - names.push_back("George"); - names.push_back("John"); - names.push_back("Thomas"); - EXPECT_CALL(rolodex, GetNames(_)) - .WillOnce(SetArrayArgument<0>(names.begin(), names.end())); -``` - -## Changing a Mock Object's Behavior Based on the State ## - -If you expect a call to change the behavior of a mock object, you can use `::testing::InSequence` to specify different behaviors before and after the call: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -using ::testing::Return; - -... - { - InSequence seq; - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, IsDirty()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(true)); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, Flush()); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, IsDirty()) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(false)); - } - my_mock.FlushIfDirty(); -``` - -This makes `my_mock.IsDirty()` return `true` before `my_mock.Flush()` is called and return `false` afterwards. - -If the behavior change is more complex, you can store the effects in a variable and make a mock method get its return value from that variable: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::SaveArg; -using ::testing::Return; - -ACTION_P(ReturnPointee, p) { return *p; } -... - int previous_value = 0; - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, GetPrevValue()) - .WillRepeatedly(ReturnPointee(&previous_value)); - EXPECT_CALL(my_mock, UpdateValue(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(SaveArg<0>(&previous_value)); - my_mock.DoSomethingToUpdateValue(); -``` - -Here `my_mock.GetPrevValue()` will always return the argument of the last `UpdateValue()` call. - -## Setting the Default Value for a Return Type ## - -If a mock method's return type is a built-in C++ type or pointer, by -default it will return 0 when invoked. You only need to specify an -action if this default value doesn't work for you. - -Sometimes, you may want to change this default value, or you may want -to specify a default value for types Google Mock doesn't know -about. You can do this using the `::testing::DefaultValue` class -template: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD0(CalculateBar, Bar()); -}; -... - - Bar default_bar; - // Sets the default return value for type Bar. - DefaultValue<Bar>::Set(default_bar); - - MockFoo foo; - - // We don't need to specify an action here, as the default - // return value works for us. - EXPECT_CALL(foo, CalculateBar()); - - foo.CalculateBar(); // This should return default_bar. - - // Unsets the default return value. - DefaultValue<Bar>::Clear(); -``` - -Please note that changing the default value for a type can make you -tests hard to understand. We recommend you to use this feature -judiciously. For example, you may want to make sure the `Set()` and -`Clear()` calls are right next to the code that uses your mock. - -## Setting the Default Actions for a Mock Method ## - -You've learned how to change the default value of a given -type. However, this may be too coarse for your purpose: perhaps you -have two mock methods with the same return type and you want them to -have different behaviors. The `ON_CALL()` macro allows you to -customize your mock's behavior at the method level: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::AnyNumber; -using ::testing::Gt; -using ::testing::Return; -... - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(_)) - .WillByDefault(Return(-1)); - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(0)) - .WillByDefault(Return(0)); - ON_CALL(foo, Sign(Gt(0))) - .WillByDefault(Return(1)); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Sign(_)) - .Times(AnyNumber()); - - foo.Sign(5); // This should return 1. - foo.Sign(-9); // This should return -1. - foo.Sign(0); // This should return 0. -``` - -As you may have guessed, when there are more than one `ON_CALL()` -statements, the news order take precedence over the older ones. In -other words, the **last** one that matches the function arguments will -be used. This matching order allows you to set up the common behavior -in a mock object's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase and -specialize the mock's behavior later. - -## Using Functions/Methods/Functors as Actions ## - -If the built-in actions don't suit you, you can easily use an existing -function, method, or functor as an action: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(Sum, int(int x, int y)); - MOCK_METHOD1(ComplexJob, bool(int x)); -}; - -int CalculateSum(int x, int y) { return x + y; } - -class Helper { - public: - bool ComplexJob(int x); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Helper helper; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Sum(_, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(CalculateSum)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, ComplexJob(_)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(&helper, &Helper::ComplexJob)); - - foo.Sum(5, 6); // Invokes CalculateSum(5, 6). - foo.ComplexJob(10); // Invokes helper.ComplexJob(10); -``` - -The only requirement is that the type of the function, etc must be -_compatible_ with the signature of the mock function, meaning that the -latter's arguments can be implicitly converted to the corresponding -arguments of the former, and the former's return type can be -implicitly converted to that of the latter. So, you can invoke -something whose type is _not_ exactly the same as the mock function, -as long as it's safe to do so - nice, huh? - -## Invoking a Function/Method/Functor Without Arguments ## - -`Invoke()` is very useful for doing actions that are more complex. It -passes the mock function's arguments to the function or functor being -invoked such that the callee has the full context of the call to work -with. If the invoked function is not interested in some or all of the -arguments, it can simply ignore them. - -Yet, a common pattern is that a test author wants to invoke a function -without the arguments of the mock function. `Invoke()` allows her to -do that using a wrapper function that throws away the arguments before -invoking an underlining nullary function. Needless to say, this can be -tedious and obscures the intent of the test. - -`InvokeWithoutArgs()` solves this problem. It's like `Invoke()` except -that it doesn't pass the mock function's arguments to the -callee. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeWithoutArgs; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(ComplexJob, bool(int n)); -}; - -bool Job1() { ... } -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, ComplexJob(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeWithoutArgs(Job1)); - - foo.ComplexJob(10); // Invokes Job1(). -``` - -## Invoking an Argument of the Mock Function ## - -Sometimes a mock function will receive a function pointer or a functor -(in other words, a "callable") as an argument, e.g. - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThis, bool(int n, bool (*fp)(int))); -}; -``` - -and you may want to invoke this callable argument: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(...); - // Will execute (*fp)(5), where fp is the - // second argument DoThis() receives. -``` - -Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no -lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you -really? - -Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem: - -``` - InvokeArgument<N>(arg_1, arg_2, ..., arg_m) -``` - -will invoke the `N`-th (0-based) argument the mock function receives, -with `arg_1`, `arg_2`, ..., and `arg_m`. No matter if the argument is -a function pointer or a functor, Google Mock handles them both. - -With that, you could write: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<1>(5)); - // Will execute (*fp)(5), where fp is the - // second argument DoThis() receives. -``` - -What if the callable takes an argument by reference? No problem - just -wrap it inside `ByRef()`: - -``` -... - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, bool(bool (*fp)(int, const Helper&))); -... -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::ByRef; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - - MockFoo foo; - Helper helper; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(5, ByRef(helper))); - // ByRef(helper) guarantees that a reference to helper, not a copy of it, - // will be passed to the callable. -``` - -What if the callable takes an argument by reference and we do **not** -wrap the argument in `ByRef()`? Then `InvokeArgument()` will _make a -copy_ of the argument, and pass a _reference to the copy_, instead of -a reference to the original value, to the callable. This is especially -handy when the argument is a temporary value: - -``` -... - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(bool (*f)(const double& x, const string& s))); -... -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::InvokeArgument; -... - - MockFoo foo; - ... - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_)) - .WillOnce(InvokeArgument<0>(5.0, string("Hi"))); - // Will execute (*f)(5.0, string("Hi")), where f is the function pointer - // DoThat() receives. Note that the values 5.0 and string("Hi") are - // temporary and dead once the EXPECT_CALL() statement finishes. Yet - // it's fine to perform this action later, since a copy of the values - // are kept inside the InvokeArgument action. -``` - -## Ignoring an Action's Result ## - -Sometimes you have an action that returns _something_, but you need an -action that returns `void` (perhaps you want to use it in a mock -function that returns `void`, or perhaps it needs to be used in -`DoAll()` and it's not the last in the list). `IgnoreResult()` lets -you do that. For example: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::Return; - -int Process(const MyData& data); -string DoSomething(); - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD1(Abc, void(const MyData& data)); - MOCK_METHOD0(Xyz, bool()); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Abc(_)) - // .WillOnce(Invoke(Process)); - // The above line won't compile as Process() returns int but Abc() needs - // to return void. - .WillOnce(IgnoreResult(Invoke(Process))); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Xyz()) - .WillOnce(DoAll(IgnoreResult(Invoke(DoSomething)), - // Ignores the string DoSomething() returns. - Return(true))); -``` - -Note that you **cannot** use `IgnoreResult()` on an action that already -returns `void`. Doing so will lead to ugly compiler errors. - -## Selecting an Action's Arguments ## - -Say you have a mock function `Foo()` that takes seven arguments, and -you have a custom action that you want to invoke when `Foo()` is -called. Trouble is, the custom action only wants three arguments: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -... - MOCK_METHOD7(Foo, bool(bool visible, const string& name, int x, int y, - const map<pair<int, int>, double>& weight, - double min_weight, double max_wight)); -... - -bool IsVisibleInQuadrant1(bool visible, int x, int y) { - return visible && x >= 0 && y >= 0; -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(IsVisibleInQuadrant1)); // Uh, won't compile. :-( -``` - -To please the compiler God, you can to define an "adaptor" that has -the same signature as `Foo()` and calls the custom action with the -right arguments: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -bool MyIsVisibleInQuadrant1(bool visible, const string& name, int x, int y, - const map<pair<int, int>, double>& weight, - double min_weight, double max_wight) { - return IsVisibleInQuadrant1(visible, x, y); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(MyIsVisibleInQuadrant1)); // Now it works. -``` - -But isn't this awkward? - -Google Mock provides a generic _action adaptor_, so you can spend your -time minding more important business than writing your own -adaptors. Here's the syntax: - -``` - WithArgs<N1, N2, ..., Nk>(action) -``` - -creates an action that passes the arguments of the mock function at -the given indices (0-based) to the inner `action` and performs -it. Using `WithArgs`, our original example can be written as: - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::WithArgs; -... - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)) - .WillOnce(WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(IsVisibleInQuadrant1))); - // No need to define your own adaptor. -``` - -For better readability, Google Mock also gives you: - - * `WithoutArgs(action)` when the inner `action` takes _no_ argument, and - * `WithArg<N>(action)` (no `s` after `Arg`) when the inner `action` takes _one_ argument. - -As you may have realized, `InvokeWithoutArgs(...)` is just syntactic -sugar for `WithoutArgs(Inovke(...))`. - -Here are more tips: - - * The inner action used in `WithArgs` and friends does not have to be `Invoke()` -- it can be anything. - * You can repeat an argument in the argument list if necessary, e.g. `WithArgs<2, 3, 3, 5>(...)`. - * You can change the order of the arguments, e.g. `WithArgs<3, 2, 1>(...)`. - * The types of the selected arguments do _not_ have to match the signature of the inner action exactly. It works as long as they can be implicitly converted to the corresponding arguments of the inner action. For example, if the 4-th argument of the mock function is an `int` and `my_action` takes a `double`, `WithArg<4>(my_action)` will work. - -## Ignoring Arguments in Action Functions ## - -The selecting-an-action's-arguments recipe showed us one way to make a -mock function and an action with incompatible argument lists fit -together. The downside is that wrapping the action in -`WithArgs<...>()` can get tedious for people writing the tests. - -If you are defining a function, method, or functor to be used with -`Invoke*()`, and you are not interested in some of its arguments, an -alternative to `WithArgs` is to declare the uninteresting arguments as -`Unused`. This makes the definition less cluttered and less fragile in -case the types of the uninteresting arguments change. It could also -increase the chance the action function can be reused. For example, -given - -``` - MOCK_METHOD3(Foo, double(const string& label, double x, double y)); - MOCK_METHOD3(Bar, double(int index, double x, double y)); -``` - -instead of - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; - -double DistanceToOriginWithLabel(const string& label, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} - -double DistanceToOriginWithIndex(int index, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} -... - - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithLabel)); - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithIndex)); -``` - -you could write - -``` -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Invoke; -using ::testing::Unused; - -double DistanceToOrigin(Unused, double x, double y) { - return sqrt(x*x + y*y); -} -... - - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); - EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) - .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); -``` - -## Sharing Actions ## - -Just like matchers, a Google Mock action object consists of a pointer -to a ref-counted implementation object. Therefore copying actions is -also allowed and very efficient. When the last action that references -the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be -deleted. - -If you have some complex action that you want to use again and again, -you may not have to build it from scratch everytime. If the action -doesn't have an internal state (i.e. if it always does the same thing -no matter how many times it has been called), you can assign it to an -action variable and use that variable repeatedly. For example: - -``` - Action<bool(int*)> set_flag = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(5), - Return(true)); - ... use set_flag in .WillOnce() and .WillRepeatedly() ... -``` - -However, if the action has its own state, you may be surprised if you -share the action object. Suppose you have an action factory -`IncrementCounter(init)` which creates an action that increments and -returns a counter whose initial value is `init`, using two actions -created from the same expression and using a shared action will -exihibit different behaviors. Example: - -``` - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis()) - .WillRepeatedly(IncrementCounter(0)); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat()) - .WillRepeatedly(IncrementCounter(0)); - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 1. - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 2. - foo.DoThat(); // Returns 1 - Blah() uses a different - // counter than Bar()'s. -``` - -versus - -``` - Action<int()> increment = IncrementCounter(0); - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis()) - .WillRepeatedly(increment); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat()) - .WillRepeatedly(increment); - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 1. - foo.DoThis(); // Returns 2. - foo.DoThat(); // Returns 3 - the counter is shared. -``` - -# Misc Recipes on Using Google Mock # - -## Making the Compilation Faster ## - -Believe it or not, the _vast majority_ of the time spent on compiling -a mock class is in generating its constructor and destructor, as they -perform non-trivial tasks (e.g. verification of the -expectations). What's more, mock methods with different signatures -have different types and thus their constructors/destructors need to -be generated by the compiler separately. As a result, if you mock many -different types of methods, compiling your mock class can get really -slow. - -If you are experiencing slow compilation, you can move the definition -of your mock class' constructor and destructor out of the class body -and into a `.cpp` file. This way, even if you `#include` your mock -class in N files, the compiler only needs to generate its constructor -and destructor once, resulting in a much faster compilation. - -Let's illustrate the idea using an example. Here's the definition of a -mock class before applying this recipe: - -``` -// File mock_foo.h. -... -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // Since we don't declare the constructor or the destructor, - // the compiler will generate them in every translation unit - // where this mock class is used. - - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(const char* str)); - ... more mock methods ... -}; -``` - -After the change, it would look like: - -``` -// File mock_foo.h. -... -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - // The constructor and destructor are declared, but not defined, here. - MockFoo(); - virtual ~MockFoo(); - - MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, int()); - MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, bool(const char* str)); - ... more mock methods ... -}; -``` -and -``` -// File mock_foo.cpp. -#include "path/to/mock_foo.h" - -// The definitions may appear trivial, but the functions actually do a -// lot of things through the constructors/destructors of the member -// variables used to implement the mock methods. -MockFoo::MockFoo() {} -MockFoo::~MockFoo() {} -``` - -## Forcing a Verification ## - -When it's being destoyed, your friendly mock object will automatically -verify that all expectations on it have been satisfied, and will -generate [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) failures -if not. This is convenient as it leaves you with one less thing to -worry about. That is, unless you are not sure if your mock object will -be destoyed. - -How could it be that your mock object won't eventually be destroyed? -Well, it might be created on the heap and owned by the code you are -testing. Suppose there's a bug in that code and it doesn't delete the -mock object properly - you could end up with a passing test when -there's actually a bug. - -Using a heap checker is a good idea and can alleviate the concern, but -its implementation may not be 100% reliable. So, sometimes you do want -to _force_ Google Mock to verify a mock object before it is -(hopefully) destructed. You can do this with -`Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_object)`: - -``` -TEST(MyServerTest, ProcessesRequest) { - using ::testing::Mock; - - MockFoo* const foo = new MockFoo; - EXPECT_CALL(*foo, ...)...; - // ... other expectations ... - - // server now owns foo. - MyServer server(foo); - server.ProcessRequest(...); - - // In case that server's destructor will forget to delete foo, - // this will verify the expectations anyway. - Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(foo); -} // server is destroyed when it goes out of scope here. -``` - -**Tip:** The `Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations()` function returns a -`bool` to indicate whether the verification was successful (`true` for -yes), so you can wrap that function call inside a `ASSERT_TRUE()` if -there is no point going further when the verification has failed. - -## Using Check Points ## - -Sometimes you may want to "reset" a mock object at various check -points in your test: at each check point, you verify that all existing -expectations on the mock object have been satisfied, and then you set -some new expectations on it as if it's newly created. This allows you -to work with a mock object in "phases" whose sizes are each -manageable. - -One such scenario is that in your test's `SetUp()` function, you may -want to put the object you are testing into a certain state, with the -help from a mock object. Once in the desired state, you want to clear -all expectations on the mock, such that in the `TEST_F` body you can -set fresh expectations on it. - -As you may have figured out, the `Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations()` -function we saw in the previous recipe can help you here. Or, if you -are using `ON_CALL()` to set default actions on the mock object and -want to clear the default actions as well, use -`Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_object)` instead. This function does what -`Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_object)` does and returns the -same `bool`, **plus** it clears the `ON_CALL()` statements on -`mock_object` too. - -Another trick you can use to achieve the same effect is to put the -expectations in sequences and insert calls to a dummy "check-point" -function at specific places. Then you can verify that the mock -function calls do happen at the right time. For example, if you are -exercising code: - -``` -Foo(1); -Foo(2); -Foo(3); -``` - -and want to verify that `Foo(1)` and `Foo(3)` both invoke -`mock.Bar("a")`, but `Foo(2)` doesn't invoke anything. You can write: - -``` -using ::testing::MockFunction; - -TEST(FooTest, InvokesBarCorrectly) { - MyMock mock; - // Class MockFunction<F> has exactly one mock method. It is named - // Call() and has type F. - MockFunction<void(string check_point_name)> check; - { - InSequence s; - - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar("a")); - EXPECT_CALL(check, Call("1")); - EXPECT_CALL(check, Call("2")); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar("a")); - } - Foo(1); - check.Call("1"); - Foo(2); - check.Call("2"); - Foo(3); -} -``` - -The expectation spec says that the first `Bar("a")` must happen before -check point "1", the second `Bar("a")` must happen after check point "2", -and nothing should happen between the two check points. The explicit -check points make it easy to tell which `Bar("a")` is called by which -call to `Foo()`. - -## Mocking Destructors ## - -Sometimes you want to make sure a mock object is destructed at the -right time, e.g. after `bar->A()` is called but before `bar->B()` is -called. We already know that you can specify constraints on the order -of mock function calls, so all we need to do is to mock the destructor -of the mock function. - -This sounds simple, except for one problem: a destructor is a special -function with special syntax and special semantics, and the -`MOCK_METHOD0` macro doesn't work for it: - -``` - MOCK_METHOD0(~MockFoo, void()); // Won't compile! -``` - -The good news is that you can use a simple pattern to achieve the same -effect. First, add a mock function `Die()` to your mock class and call -it in the destructor, like this: - -``` -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - // Add the following two lines to the mock class. - MOCK_METHOD0(Die, void()); - virtual ~MockFoo() { Die(); } -}; -``` - -(If the name `Die()` clashes with an existing symbol, choose another -name.) Now, we have translated the problem of testing when a `MockFoo` -object dies to testing when its `Die()` method is called: - -``` - MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo; - MockBar* bar = new MockBar; - ... - { - InSequence s; - - // Expects *foo to die after bar->A() and before bar->B(). - EXPECT_CALL(*bar, A()); - EXPECT_CALL(*foo, Die()); - EXPECT_CALL(*bar, B()); - } -``` - -And that's that. - -## Using Google Mock and Threads ## - -**IMPORTANT NOTE:** What we describe in this recipe is **ONLY** true on -platforms where Google Mock is thread-safe. Currently these are only -platforms that support the pthreads library (this includes Linux and Mac). -To make it thread-safe on other platforms we only need to implement -some synchronization operations in `"gtest/internal/gtest-port.h"`. - -In a **unit** test, it's best if you could isolate and test a piece of -code in a single-threaded context. That avoids race conditions and -dead locks, and makes debugging your test much easier. - -Yet many programs are multi-threaded, and sometimes to test something -we need to pound on it from more than one thread. Google Mock works -for this purpose too. - -Remember the steps for using a mock: - - 1. Create a mock object `foo`. - 1. Set its default actions and expectations using `ON_CALL()` and `EXPECT_CALL()`. - 1. The code under test calls methods of `foo`. - 1. Optionally, verify and reset the mock. - 1. Destroy the mock yourself, or let the code under test destroy it. The destructor will automatically verify it. - -If you follow the following simple rules, your mocks and threads can -live happily togeter: - - * Execute your _test code_ (as opposed to the code being tested) in _one_ thread. This makes your test easy to follow. - * Obviously, you can do step #1 without locking. - * When doing step #2 and #5, make sure no other thread is accessing `foo`. Obvious too, huh? - * #3 and #4 can be done either in one thread or in multiple threads - anyway you want. Google Mock takes care of the locking, so you don't have to do any - unless required by your test logic. - -If you violate the rules (for example, if you set expectations on a -mock while another thread is calling its methods), you get undefined -behavior. That's not fun, so don't do it. - -Google Mock guarantees that the action for a mock function is done in -the same thread that called the mock function. For example, in - -``` - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(1)) - .WillOnce(action1); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(2)) - .WillOnce(action2); -``` - -if `Foo(1)` is called in thread 1 and `Foo(2)` is called in thread 2, -Google Mock will execute `action1` in thread 1 and `action2` in thread -2. - -Google Mock does _not_ impose a sequence on actions performed in -different threads (doing so may create deadlocks as the actions may -need to cooperate). This means that the execution of `action1` and -`action2` in the above example _may_ interleave. If this is a problem, -you should add proper synchronization logic to `action1` and `action2` -to make the test thread-safe. - - -Also, remember that `DefaultValue<T>` is a global resource that -potentially affects _all_ living mock objects in your -program. Naturally, you won't want to mess with it from multiple -threads or when there still are mocks in action. - -## Controlling How Much Information Google Mock Prints ## - -When Google Mock sees something that has the potential of being an -error (e.g. a mock function with no expectation is called, a.k.a. an -uninteresting call, which is allowed but perhaps you forgot to -explicitly ban the call), it prints some warning messages, including -the arguments of the function and the return value. Hopefully this -will remind you to take a look and see if there is indeed a problem. - -Sometimes you are confident that your tests are correct and may not -appreciate such friendly messages. Some other times, you are debugging -your tests or learning about the behavior of the code you are testing, -and wish you could observe every mock call that happens (including -argument values and the return value). Clearly, one size doesn't fit -all. - -You can control how much Google Mock tells you using the -`--gmock_verbose=LEVEL` command-line flag, where `LEVEL` is a string -with three possible values: - - * `info`: Google Mock will print all informational messages, warnings, and errors (most verbose). At this setting, Google Mock will also log any calls to the `ON_CALL/EXPECT_CALL` macros. - * `warning`: Google Mock will print both warnings and errors (less verbose). This is the default. - * `error`: Google Mock will print errors only (least verbose). - -Alternatively, you can adjust the value of that flag from within your -tests like so: - -``` - ::testing::FLAGS_gmock_verbose = "error"; -``` - -Now, judiciously use the right flag to enable Google Mock serve you better! - -## Gaining Super Vision into Mock Calls ## - -You have a test using Google Mock. It fails: Google Mock tells you -that some expectations aren't satisfied. However, you aren't sure why: -Is there a typo somewhere in the matchers? Did you mess up the order -of the `EXPECT_CALL`s? Or is the code under test doing something -wrong? How can you find out the cause? - -Won't it be nice if you have X-ray vision and can actually see the -trace of all `EXPECT_CALL`s and mock method calls as they are made? -For each call, would you like to see its actual argument values and -which `EXPECT_CALL` Google Mock thinks it matches? - -You can unlock this power by running your test with the -`--gmock_verbose=info` flag. For example, given the test program: - -``` -using testing::_; -using testing::HasSubstr; -using testing::Return; - -class MockFoo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(F, void(const string& x, const string& y)); -}; - -TEST(Foo, Bar) { - MockFoo mock; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, F(_, _)).WillRepeatedly(Return()); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, F("a", "b")); - EXPECT_CALL(mock, F("c", HasSubstr("d"))); - - mock.F("a", "good"); - mock.F("a", "b"); -} -``` - -if you run it with `--gmock_verbose=info`, you will see this output: - -``` -[ RUN ] Foo.Bar - -foo_test.cc:14: EXPECT_CALL(mock, F(_, _)) invoked -foo_test.cc:15: EXPECT_CALL(mock, F("a", "b")) invoked -foo_test.cc:16: EXPECT_CALL(mock, F("c", HasSubstr("d"))) invoked -foo_test.cc:14: Mock function call matches EXPECT_CALL(mock, F(_, _))... - Function call: F(@0x7fff7c8dad40"a", @0x7fff7c8dad10"good") -foo_test.cc:15: Mock function call matches EXPECT_CALL(mock, F("a", "b"))... - Function call: F(@0x7fff7c8dada0"a", @0x7fff7c8dad70"b") -foo_test.cc:16: Failure -Actual function call count doesn't match EXPECT_CALL(mock, F("c", HasSubstr("d")))... - Expected: to be called once - Actual: never called - unsatisfied and active -[ FAILED ] Foo.Bar -``` - -Suppose the bug is that the `"c"` in the third `EXPECT_CALL` is a typo -and should actually be `"a"`. With the above message, you should see -that the actual `F("a", "good")` call is matched by the first -`EXPECT_CALL`, not the third as you thought. From that it should be -obvious that the third `EXPECT_CALL` is written wrong. Case solved. - -## Running Tests in Emacs ## - -If you build and run your tests in Emacs, the source file locations of -Google Mock and [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/) -errors will be highlighted. Just press `<Enter>` on one of them and -you'll be taken to the offending line. Or, you can just type `C-x `` -to jump to the next error. - -To make it even easier, you can add the following lines to your -`~/.emacs` file: - -``` -(global-set-key "\M-m" 'compile) ; m is for make -(global-set-key [M-down] 'next-error) -(global-set-key [M-up] '(lambda () (interactive) (next-error -1))) -``` - -Then you can type `M-m` to start a build, or `M-up`/`M-down` to move -back and forth between errors. - -## Fusing Google Mock Source Files ## - -Google Mock's implementation consists of dozens of files (excluding -its own tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in -fewer files instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gmock_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory -(starting with release 1.2.0). Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above -installed on your machine, just go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gmock_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h`, `gmock/gmock.h`, and `gmock-gtest-all.cc` in it. -These three files contain everything you need to use Google Mock (and -Google Test). Just copy them to anywhere you want and you are ready -to write tests and use mocks. You can use the -[scrpts/test/Makefile](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/scripts/test/Makefile) file as an example on how to compile your tests -against them. - -# Extending Google Mock # - -## Writing New Matchers Quickly ## - -The `MATCHER*` family of macros can be used to define custom matchers -easily. The syntax: - -``` -MATCHER(name, description_string_expression) { statements; } -``` - -will define a matcher with the given name that executes the -statements, which must return a `bool` to indicate if the match -succeeds. Inside the statements, you can refer to the value being -matched by `arg`, and refer to its type by `arg_type`. - -The description string is a `string`-typed expression that documents -what the matcher does, and is used to generate the failure message -when the match fails. It can (and should) reference the special -`bool` variable `negation`, and should evaluate to the description of -the matcher when `negation` is `false`, or that of the matcher's -negation when `negation` is `true`. - -For convenience, we allow the description string to be empty (`""`), -in which case Google Mock will use the sequence of words in the -matcher name as the description. - -For example: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, "") { return (arg % 7) == 0; } -``` -allows you to write -``` - // Expects mock_foo.Bar(n) to be called where n is divisible by 7. - EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo, Bar(IsDivisibleBy7())); -``` -or, -``` -using ::testing::Not; -... - EXPECT_THAT(some_expression, IsDivisibleBy7()); - EXPECT_THAT(some_other_expression, Not(IsDivisibleBy7())); -``` -If the above assertions fail, they will print something like: -``` - Value of: some_expression - Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 27 -... - Value of: some_other_expression - Expected: not (is divisible by 7) - Actual: 21 -``` -where the descriptions `"is divisible by 7"` and `"not (is divisible -by 7)"` are automatically calculated from the matcher name -`IsDivisibleBy7`. - -As you may have noticed, the auto-generated descriptions (especially -those for the negation) may not be so great. You can always override -them with a string expression of your own: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, std::string(negation ? "isn't" : "is") + - " divisible by 7") { - return (arg % 7) == 0; -} -``` - -Optionally, you can stream additional information to a hidden argument -named `result_listener` to explain the match result. For example, a -better definition of `IsDivisibleBy7` is: -``` -MATCHER(IsDivisibleBy7, "") { - if ((arg % 7) == 0) - return true; - - *result_listener << "the remainder is " << (arg % 7); - return false; -} -``` - -With this definition, the above assertion will give a better message: -``` - Value of: some_expression - Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 27 (the remainder is 6) -``` - -You should let `MatchAndExplain()` print _any additional information_ -that can help a user understand the match result. Note that it should -explain why the match succeeds in case of a success (unless it's -obvious) - this is useful when the matcher is used inside -`Not()`. There is no need to print the argument value itself, as -Google Mock already prints it for you. - -**Notes:** - - 1. The type of the value being matched (`arg_type`) is determined by the context in which you use the matcher and is supplied to you by the compiler, so you don't need to worry about declaring it (nor can you). This allows the matcher to be polymorphic. For example, `IsDivisibleBy7()` can be used to match any type where the value of `(arg % 7) == 0` can be implicitly converted to a `bool`. In the `Bar(IsDivisibleBy7())` example above, if method `Bar()` takes an `int`, `arg_type` will be `int`; if it takes an `unsigned long`, `arg_type` will be `unsigned long`; and so on. - 1. Google Mock doesn't guarantee when or how many times a matcher will be invoked. Therefore the matcher logic must be _purely functional_ (i.e. it cannot have any side effect, and the result must not depend on anything other than the value being matched and the matcher parameters). This requirement must be satisfied no matter how you define the matcher (e.g. using one of the methods described in the following recipes). In particular, a matcher can never call a mock function, as that will affect the state of the mock object and Google Mock. - -## Writing New Parameterized Matchers Quickly ## - -Sometimes you'll want to define a matcher that has parameters. For that you -can use the macro: -``` -MATCHER_P(name, param_name, description_string) { statements; } -``` -where the description string can be either `""` or a string expression -that references `negation` and `param_name`. - -For example: -``` -MATCHER_P(HasAbsoluteValue, value, "") { return abs(arg) == value; } -``` -will allow you to write: -``` - EXPECT_THAT(Blah("a"), HasAbsoluteValue(n)); -``` -which may lead to this message (assuming `n` is 10): -``` - Value of: Blah("a") - Expected: has absolute value 10 - Actual: -9 -``` - -Note that both the matcher description and its parameter are -printed, making the message human-friendly. - -In the matcher definition body, you can write `foo_type` to -reference the type of a parameter named `foo`. For example, in the -body of `MATCHER_P(HasAbsoluteValue, value)` above, you can write -`value_type` to refer to the type of `value`. - -Google Mock also provides `MATCHER_P2`, `MATCHER_P3`, ..., up to -`MATCHER_P10` to support multi-parameter matchers: -``` -MATCHER_Pk(name, param_1, ..., param_k, description_string) { statements; } -``` - -Please note that the custom description string is for a particular -**instance** of the matcher, where the parameters have been bound to -actual values. Therefore usually you'll want the parameter values to -be part of the description. Google Mock lets you do that by -referencing the matcher parameters in the description string -expression. - -For example, -``` - using ::testing::PrintToString; - MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, - std::string(negation ? "isn't" : "is") + " in range [" + - PrintToString(low) + ", " + PrintToString(hi) + "]") { - return low <= arg && arg <= hi; - } - ... - EXPECT_THAT(3, InClosedRange(4, 6)); -``` -would generate a failure that contains the message: -``` - Expected: is in range [4, 6] -``` - -If you specify `""` as the description, the failure message will -contain the sequence of words in the matcher name followed by the -parameter values printed as a tuple. For example, -``` - MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, "") { ... } - ... - EXPECT_THAT(3, InClosedRange(4, 6)); -``` -would generate a failure that contains the text: -``` - Expected: in closed range (4, 6) -``` - -For the purpose of typing, you can view -``` -MATCHER_Pk(Foo, p1, ..., pk, description_string) { ... } -``` -as shorthand for -``` -template <typename p1_type, ..., typename pk_type> -FooMatcherPk<p1_type, ..., pk_type> -Foo(p1_type p1, ..., pk_type pk) { ... } -``` - -When you write `Foo(v1, ..., vk)`, the compiler infers the types of -the parameters `v1`, ..., and `vk` for you. If you are not happy with -the result of the type inference, you can specify the types by -explicitly instantiating the template, as in `Foo<long, bool>(5, false)`. -As said earlier, you don't get to (or need to) specify -`arg_type` as that's determined by the context in which the matcher -is used. - -You can assign the result of expression `Foo(p1, ..., pk)` to a -variable of type `FooMatcherPk<p1_type, ..., pk_type>`. This can be -useful when composing matchers. Matchers that don't have a parameter -or have only one parameter have special types: you can assign `Foo()` -to a `FooMatcher`-typed variable, and assign `Foo(p)` to a -`FooMatcherP<p_type>`-typed variable. - -While you can instantiate a matcher template with reference types, -passing the parameters by pointer usually makes your code more -readable. If, however, you still want to pass a parameter by -reference, be aware that in the failure message generated by the -matcher you will see the value of the referenced object but not its -address. - -You can overload matchers with different numbers of parameters: -``` -MATCHER_P(Blah, a, description_string_1) { ... } -MATCHER_P2(Blah, a, b, description_string_2) { ... } -``` - -While it's tempting to always use the `MATCHER*` macros when defining -a new matcher, you should also consider implementing -`MatcherInterface` or using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()` instead (see -the recipes that follow), especially if you need to use the matcher a -lot. While these approaches require more work, they give you more -control on the types of the value being matched and the matcher -parameters, which in general leads to better compiler error messages -that pay off in the long run. They also allow overloading matchers -based on parameter types (as opposed to just based on the number of -parameters). - -## Writing New Monomorphic Matchers ## - -A matcher of argument type `T` implements -`::testing::MatcherInterface<T>` and does two things: it tests whether a -value of type `T` matches the matcher, and can describe what kind of -values it matches. The latter ability is used for generating readable -error messages when expectations are violated. - -The interface looks like this: - -``` -class MatchResultListener { - public: - ... - // Streams x to the underlying ostream; does nothing if the ostream - // is NULL. - template <typename T> - MatchResultListener& operator<<(const T& x); - - // Returns the underlying ostream. - ::std::ostream* stream(); -}; - -template <typename T> -class MatcherInterface { - public: - virtual ~MatcherInterface(); - - // Returns true iff the matcher matches x; also explains the match - // result to 'listener'. - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const = 0; - - // Describes this matcher to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const = 0; - - // Describes the negation of this matcher to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const; -}; -``` - -If you need a custom matcher but `Truly()` is not a good option (for -example, you may not be happy with the way `Truly(predicate)` -describes itself, or you may want your matcher to be polymorphic as -`Eq(value)` is), you can define a matcher to do whatever you want in -two steps: first implement the matcher interface, and then define a -factory function to create a matcher instance. The second step is not -strictly needed but it makes the syntax of using the matcher nicer. - -For example, you can define a matcher to test whether an `int` is -divisible by 7 and then use it like this: -``` -using ::testing::MakeMatcher; -using ::testing::Matcher; -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; - -class DivisibleBy7Matcher : public MatcherInterface<int> { - public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int n, MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return (n % 7) == 0; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is divisible by 7"; - } - - virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is not divisible by 7"; - } -}; - -inline Matcher<int> DivisibleBy7() { - return MakeMatcher(new DivisibleBy7Matcher); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(DivisibleBy7())); -``` - -You may improve the matcher message by streaming additional -information to the `listener` argument in `MatchAndExplain()`: - -``` -class DivisibleBy7Matcher : public MatcherInterface<int> { - public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int n, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - const int remainder = n % 7; - if (remainder != 0) { - *listener << "the remainder is " << remainder; - } - return remainder == 0; - } - ... -}; -``` - -Then, `EXPECT_THAT(x, DivisibleBy7());` may general a message like this: -``` -Value of: x -Expected: is divisible by 7 - Actual: 23 (the remainder is 2) -``` - -## Writing New Polymorphic Matchers ## - -You've learned how to write your own matchers in the previous -recipe. Just one problem: a matcher created using `MakeMatcher()` only -works for one particular type of arguments. If you want a -_polymorphic_ matcher that works with arguments of several types (for -instance, `Eq(x)` can be used to match a `value` as long as `value` == -`x` compiles -- `value` and `x` don't have to share the same type), -you can learn the trick from `"gmock/gmock-matchers.h"` but it's a bit -involved. - -Fortunately, most of the time you can define a polymorphic matcher -easily with the help of `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`. Here's how you can -define `NotNull()` as an example: - -``` -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -using ::testing::NotNull; -using ::testing::PolymorphicMatcher; - -class NotNullMatcher { - public: - // To implement a polymorphic matcher, first define a COPYABLE class - // that has three members MatchAndExplain(), DescribeTo(), and - // DescribeNegationTo(), like the following. - - // In this example, we want to use NotNull() with any pointer, so - // MatchAndExplain() accepts a pointer of any type as its first argument. - // In general, you can define MatchAndExplain() as an ordinary method or - // a method template, or even overload it. - template <typename T> - bool MatchAndExplain(T* p, - MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { - return p != NULL; - } - - // Describes the property of a value matching this matcher. - void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is not NULL"; } - - // Describes the property of a value NOT matching this matcher. - void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is NULL"; } -}; - -// To construct a polymorphic matcher, pass an instance of the class -// to MakePolymorphicMatcher(). Note the return type. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<NotNullMatcher> NotNull() { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(NotNullMatcher()); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(NotNull())); // The argument must be a non-NULL pointer. -``` - -**Note:** Your polymorphic matcher class does **not** need to inherit from -`MatcherInterface` or any other class, and its methods do **not** need -to be virtual. - -Like in a monomorphic matcher, you may explain the match result by -streaming additional information to the `listener` argument in -`MatchAndExplain()`. - -## Writing New Cardinalities ## - -A cardinality is used in `Times()` to tell Google Mock how many times -you expect a call to occur. It doesn't have to be exact. For example, -you can say `AtLeast(5)` or `Between(2, 4)`. - -If the built-in set of cardinalities doesn't suit you, you are free to -define your own by implementing the following interface (in namespace -`testing`): - -``` -class CardinalityInterface { - public: - virtual ~CardinalityInterface(); - - // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality. - virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0; - - // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality. - virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0; - - // Describes self to an ostream. - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const = 0; -}; -``` - -For example, to specify that a call must occur even number of times, -you can write - -``` -using ::testing::Cardinality; -using ::testing::CardinalityInterface; -using ::testing::MakeCardinality; - -class EvenNumberCardinality : public CardinalityInterface { - public: - virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const { - return (call_count % 2) == 0; - } - - virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const { - return false; - } - - virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "called even number of times"; - } -}; - -Cardinality EvenNumber() { - return MakeCardinality(new EvenNumberCardinality); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(3)) - .Times(EvenNumber()); -``` - -## Writing New Actions Quickly ## - -If the built-in actions don't work for you, and you find it -inconvenient to use `Invoke()`, you can use a macro from the `ACTION*` -family to quickly define a new action that can be used in your code as -if it's a built-in action. - -By writing -``` -ACTION(name) { statements; } -``` -in a namespace scope (i.e. not inside a class or function), you will -define an action with the given name that executes the statements. -The value returned by `statements` will be used as the return value of -the action. Inside the statements, you can refer to the K-th -(0-based) argument of the mock function as `argK`. For example: -``` -ACTION(IncrementArg1) { return ++(*arg1); } -``` -allows you to write -``` -... WillOnce(IncrementArg1()); -``` - -Note that you don't need to specify the types of the mock function -arguments. Rest assured that your code is type-safe though: -you'll get a compiler error if `*arg1` doesn't support the `++` -operator, or if the type of `++(*arg1)` isn't compatible with the mock -function's return type. - -Another example: -``` -ACTION(Foo) { - (*arg2)(5); - Blah(); - *arg1 = 0; - return arg0; -} -``` -defines an action `Foo()` that invokes argument #2 (a function pointer) -with 5, calls function `Blah()`, sets the value pointed to by argument -#1 to 0, and returns argument #0. - -For more convenience and flexibility, you can also use the following -pre-defined symbols in the body of `ACTION`: - -| `argK_type` | The type of the K-th (0-based) argument of the mock function | -|:------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------| -| `args` | All arguments of the mock function as a tuple | -| `args_type` | The type of all arguments of the mock function as a tuple | -| `return_type` | The return type of the mock function | -| `function_type` | The type of the mock function | - -For example, when using an `ACTION` as a stub action for mock function: -``` -int DoSomething(bool flag, int* ptr); -``` -we have: -| **Pre-defined Symbol** | **Is Bound To** | -|:-----------------------|:----------------| -| `arg0` | the value of `flag` | -| `arg0_type` | the type `bool` | -| `arg1` | the value of `ptr` | -| `arg1_type` | the type `int*` | -| `args` | the tuple `(flag, ptr)` | -| `args_type` | the type `std::tr1::tuple<bool, int*>` | -| `return_type` | the type `int` | -| `function_type` | the type `int(bool, int*)` | - -## Writing New Parameterized Actions Quickly ## - -Sometimes you'll want to parameterize an action you define. For that -we have another macro -``` -ACTION_P(name, param) { statements; } -``` - -For example, -``` -ACTION_P(Add, n) { return arg0 + n; } -``` -will allow you to write -``` -// Returns argument #0 + 5. -... WillOnce(Add(5)); -``` - -For convenience, we use the term _arguments_ for the values used to -invoke the mock function, and the term _parameters_ for the values -used to instantiate an action. - -Note that you don't need to provide the type of the parameter either. -Suppose the parameter is named `param`, you can also use the -Google-Mock-defined symbol `param_type` to refer to the type of the -parameter as inferred by the compiler. For example, in the body of -`ACTION_P(Add, n)` above, you can write `n_type` for the type of `n`. - -Google Mock also provides `ACTION_P2`, `ACTION_P3`, and etc to support -multi-parameter actions. For example, -``` -ACTION_P2(ReturnDistanceTo, x, y) { - double dx = arg0 - x; - double dy = arg1 - y; - return sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy); -} -``` -lets you write -``` -... WillOnce(ReturnDistanceTo(5.0, 26.5)); -``` - -You can view `ACTION` as a degenerated parameterized action where the -number of parameters is 0. - -You can also easily define actions overloaded on the number of parameters: -``` -ACTION_P(Plus, a) { ... } -ACTION_P2(Plus, a, b) { ... } -``` - -## Restricting the Type of an Argument or Parameter in an ACTION ## - -For maximum brevity and reusability, the `ACTION*` macros don't ask -you to provide the types of the mock function arguments and the action -parameters. Instead, we let the compiler infer the types for us. - -Sometimes, however, we may want to be more explicit about the types. -There are several tricks to do that. For example: -``` -ACTION(Foo) { - // Makes sure arg0 can be converted to int. - int n = arg0; - ... use n instead of arg0 here ... -} - -ACTION_P(Bar, param) { - // Makes sure the type of arg1 is const char*. - ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<const char*, arg1_type>(); - - // Makes sure param can be converted to bool. - bool flag = param; -} -``` -where `StaticAssertTypeEq` is a compile-time assertion in Google Test -that verifies two types are the same. - -## Writing New Action Templates Quickly ## - -Sometimes you want to give an action explicit template parameters that -cannot be inferred from its value parameters. `ACTION_TEMPLATE()` -supports that and can be viewed as an extension to `ACTION()` and -`ACTION_P*()`. - -The syntax: -``` -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ActionName, - HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(kind1, name1, ..., kind_m, name_m), - AND_n_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, ..., p_n)) { statements; } -``` - -defines an action template that takes _m_ explicit template parameters -and _n_ value parameters, where _m_ is between 1 and 10, and _n_ is -between 0 and 10. `name_i` is the name of the i-th template -parameter, and `kind_i` specifies whether it's a `typename`, an -integral constant, or a template. `p_i` is the name of the i-th value -parameter. - -Example: -``` -// DuplicateArg<k, T>(output) converts the k-th argument of the mock -// function to type T and copies it to *output. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(DuplicateArg, - // Note the comma between int and k: - HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k, typename, T), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(output)) { - *output = T(std::tr1::get<k>(args)); -} -``` - -To create an instance of an action template, write: -``` - ActionName<t1, ..., t_m>(v1, ..., v_n) -``` -where the `t`s are the template arguments and the -`v`s are the value arguments. The value argument -types are inferred by the compiler. For example: -``` -using ::testing::_; -... - int n; - EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo(_, _)) - .WillOnce(DuplicateArg<1, unsigned char>(&n)); -``` - -If you want to explicitly specify the value argument types, you can -provide additional template arguments: -``` - ActionName<t1, ..., t_m, u1, ..., u_k>(v1, ..., v_n) -``` -where `u_i` is the desired type of `v_i`. - -`ACTION_TEMPLATE` and `ACTION`/`ACTION_P*` can be overloaded on the -number of value parameters, but not on the number of template -parameters. Without the restriction, the meaning of the following is -unclear: - -``` - OverloadedAction<int, bool>(x); -``` - -Are we using a single-template-parameter action where `bool` refers to -the type of `x`, or a two-template-parameter action where the compiler -is asked to infer the type of `x`? - -## Using the ACTION Object's Type ## - -If you are writing a function that returns an `ACTION` object, you'll -need to know its type. The type depends on the macro used to define -the action and the parameter types. The rule is relatively simple: -| **Given Definition** | **Expression** | **Has Type** | -|:---------------------|:---------------|:-------------| -| `ACTION(Foo)` | `Foo()` | `FooAction` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Foo, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS())` | `Foo<t1, ..., t_m>()` | `FooAction<t1, ..., t_m>` | -| `ACTION_P(Bar, param)` | `Bar(int_value)` | `BarActionP<int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Bar, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p1))` | `Bar<t1, ..., t_m>(int_value)` | `FooActionP<t1, ..., t_m, int>` | -| `ACTION_P2(Baz, p1, p2)` | `Baz(bool_value, int_value)` | `BazActionP2<bool, int>` | -| `ACTION_TEMPLATE(Baz, HAS_m_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(...), AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(p1, p2))` | `Baz<t1, ..., t_m>(bool_value, int_value)` | `FooActionP2<t1, ..., t_m, bool, int>` | -| ... | ... | ... | - -Note that we have to pick different suffixes (`Action`, `ActionP`, -`ActionP2`, and etc) for actions with different numbers of value -parameters, or the action definitions cannot be overloaded on the -number of them. - -## Writing New Monomorphic Actions ## - -While the `ACTION*` macros are very convenient, sometimes they are -inappropriate. For example, despite the tricks shown in the previous -recipes, they don't let you directly specify the types of the mock -function arguments and the action parameters, which in general leads -to unoptimized compiler error messages that can baffle unfamiliar -users. They also don't allow overloading actions based on parameter -types without jumping through some hoops. - -An alternative to the `ACTION*` macros is to implement -`::testing::ActionInterface<F>`, where `F` is the type of the mock -function in which the action will be used. For example: - -``` -template <typename F>class ActionInterface { - public: - virtual ~ActionInterface(); - - // Performs the action. Result is the return type of function type - // F, and ArgumentTuple is the tuple of arguments of F. - // - // For example, if F is int(bool, const string&), then Result would - // be int, and ArgumentTuple would be tr1::tuple<bool, const string&>. - virtual Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) = 0; -}; - -using ::testing::_; -using ::testing::Action; -using ::testing::ActionInterface; -using ::testing::MakeAction; - -typedef int IncrementMethod(int*); - -class IncrementArgumentAction : public ActionInterface<IncrementMethod> { - public: - virtual int Perform(const tr1::tuple<int*>& args) { - int* p = tr1::get<0>(args); // Grabs the first argument. - return *p++; - } -}; - -Action<IncrementMethod> IncrementArgument() { - return MakeAction(new IncrementArgumentAction); -} -... - - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Baz(_)) - .WillOnce(IncrementArgument()); - - int n = 5; - foo.Baz(&n); // Should return 5 and change n to 6. -``` - -## Writing New Polymorphic Actions ## - -The previous recipe showed you how to define your own action. This is -all good, except that you need to know the type of the function in -which the action will be used. Sometimes that can be a problem. For -example, if you want to use the action in functions with _different_ -types (e.g. like `Return()` and `SetArgPointee()`). - -If an action can be used in several types of mock functions, we say -it's _polymorphic_. The `MakePolymorphicAction()` function template -makes it easy to define such an action: - -``` -namespace testing { - -template <typename Impl> -PolymorphicAction<Impl> MakePolymorphicAction(const Impl& impl); - -} // namespace testing -``` - -As an example, let's define an action that returns the second argument -in the mock function's argument list. The first step is to define an -implementation class: - -``` -class ReturnSecondArgumentAction { - public: - template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> - Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const { - // To get the i-th (0-based) argument, use tr1::get<i>(args). - return tr1::get<1>(args); - } -}; -``` - -This implementation class does _not_ need to inherit from any -particular class. What matters is that it must have a `Perform()` -method template. This method template takes the mock function's -arguments as a tuple in a **single** argument, and returns the result of -the action. It can be either `const` or not, but must be invokable -with exactly one template argument, which is the result type. In other -words, you must be able to call `Perform<R>(args)` where `R` is the -mock function's return type and `args` is its arguments in a tuple. - -Next, we use `MakePolymorphicAction()` to turn an instance of the -implementation class into the polymorphic action we need. It will be -convenient to have a wrapper for this: - -``` -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicAction; -using ::testing::PolymorphicAction; - -PolymorphicAction<ReturnSecondArgumentAction> ReturnSecondArgument() { - return MakePolymorphicAction(ReturnSecondArgumentAction()); -} -``` - -Now, you can use this polymorphic action the same way you use the -built-in ones: - -``` -using ::testing::_; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - public: - MOCK_METHOD2(DoThis, int(bool flag, int n)); - MOCK_METHOD3(DoThat, string(int x, const char* str1, const char* str2)); -}; -... - - MockFoo foo; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis(_, _)) - .WillOnce(ReturnSecondArgument()); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThat(_, _, _)) - .WillOnce(ReturnSecondArgument()); - ... - foo.DoThis(true, 5); // Will return 5. - foo.DoThat(1, "Hi", "Bye"); // Will return "Hi". -``` - -## Teaching Google Mock How to Print Your Values ## - -When an uninteresting or unexpected call occurs, Google Mock prints the -argument values and the stack trace to help you debug. Assertion -macros like `EXPECT_THAT` and `EXPECT_EQ` also print the values in -question when the assertion fails. Google Mock and Google Test do this using -Google Test's user-extensible value printer. - -This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL -containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other -types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the -user can figure it out. -[Google Test's advanced guide](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Teaching_Google_Test_How_to_Print_Your_Values) -explains how to extend the printer to do a better job at -printing your particular type than to dump the bytes.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/Documentation.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_7/Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index d9181f2..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Mock **(the SVN trunk version)** -- **if you use a released version of Google Mock, please read the documentation for that specific version instead.** - - * [ForDummies](V1_7_ForDummies.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Mock. - * [CheatSheet](V1_7_CheatSheet.md) -- a quick reference. - * [CookBook](V1_7_CookBook.md) -- recipes for doing various tasks using Google Mock. - * [FrequentlyAskedQuestions](V1_7_FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Mock, read: - - * [DevGuide](DevGuide.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [Pump Manual](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/PumpManual) -- how we generate some of Google Mock's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_7/ForDummies.md deleted file mode 100644 index ee03c5b..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/ForDummies.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,439 +0,0 @@ - - -(**Note:** If you get compiler errors that you don't understand, be sure to consult [Google Mock Doctor](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_FrequentlyAskedQuestions#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error).) - -# What Is Google C++ Mocking Framework? # -When you write a prototype or test, often it's not feasible or wise to rely on real objects entirely. A **mock object** implements the same interface as a real object (so it can be used as one), but lets you specify at run time how it will be used and what it should do (which methods will be called? in which order? how many times? with what arguments? what will they return? etc). - -**Note:** It is easy to confuse the term _fake objects_ with mock objects. Fakes and mocks actually mean very different things in the Test-Driven Development (TDD) community: - - * **Fake** objects have working implementations, but usually take some shortcut (perhaps to make the operations less expensive), which makes them not suitable for production. An in-memory file system would be an example of a fake. - * **Mocks** are objects pre-programmed with _expectations_, which form a specification of the calls they are expected to receive. - -If all this seems too abstract for you, don't worry - the most important thing to remember is that a mock allows you to check the _interaction_ between itself and code that uses it. The difference between fakes and mocks will become much clearer once you start to use mocks. - -**Google C++ Mocking Framework** (or **Google Mock** for short) is a library (sometimes we also call it a "framework" to make it sound cool) for creating mock classes and using them. It does to C++ what [jMock](http://www.jmock.org/) and [EasyMock](http://www.easymock.org/) do to Java. - -Using Google Mock involves three basic steps: - - 1. Use some simple macros to describe the interface you want to mock, and they will expand to the implementation of your mock class; - 1. Create some mock objects and specify its expectations and behavior using an intuitive syntax; - 1. Exercise code that uses the mock objects. Google Mock will catch any violation of the expectations as soon as it arises. - -# Why Google Mock? # -While mock objects help you remove unnecessary dependencies in tests and make them fast and reliable, using mocks manually in C++ is _hard_: - - * Someone has to implement the mocks. The job is usually tedious and error-prone. No wonder people go great distance to avoid it. - * The quality of those manually written mocks is a bit, uh, unpredictable. You may see some really polished ones, but you may also see some that were hacked up in a hurry and have all sorts of ad hoc restrictions. - * The knowledge you gained from using one mock doesn't transfer to the next. - -In contrast, Java and Python programmers have some fine mock frameworks, which automate the creation of mocks. As a result, mocking is a proven effective technique and widely adopted practice in those communities. Having the right tool absolutely makes the difference. - -Google Mock was built to help C++ programmers. It was inspired by [jMock](http://www.jmock.org/) and [EasyMock](http://www.easymock.org/), but designed with C++'s specifics in mind. It is your friend if any of the following problems is bothering you: - - * You are stuck with a sub-optimal design and wish you had done more prototyping before it was too late, but prototyping in C++ is by no means "rapid". - * Your tests are slow as they depend on too many libraries or use expensive resources (e.g. a database). - * Your tests are brittle as some resources they use are unreliable (e.g. the network). - * You want to test how your code handles a failure (e.g. a file checksum error), but it's not easy to cause one. - * You need to make sure that your module interacts with other modules in the right way, but it's hard to observe the interaction; therefore you resort to observing the side effects at the end of the action, which is awkward at best. - * You want to "mock out" your dependencies, except that they don't have mock implementations yet; and, frankly, you aren't thrilled by some of those hand-written mocks. - -We encourage you to use Google Mock as: - - * a _design_ tool, for it lets you experiment with your interface design early and often. More iterations lead to better designs! - * a _testing_ tool to cut your tests' outbound dependencies and probe the interaction between your module and its collaborators. - -# Getting Started # -Using Google Mock is easy! Inside your C++ source file, just `#include` `"gtest/gtest.h"` and `"gmock/gmock.h"`, and you are ready to go. - -# A Case for Mock Turtles # -Let's look at an example. Suppose you are developing a graphics program that relies on a LOGO-like API for drawing. How would you test that it does the right thing? Well, you can run it and compare the screen with a golden screen snapshot, but let's admit it: tests like this are expensive to run and fragile (What if you just upgraded to a shiny new graphics card that has better anti-aliasing? Suddenly you have to update all your golden images.). It would be too painful if all your tests are like this. Fortunately, you learned about Dependency Injection and know the right thing to do: instead of having your application talk to the drawing API directly, wrap the API in an interface (say, `Turtle`) and code to that interface: - -``` -class Turtle { - ... - virtual ~Turtle() {} - virtual void PenUp() = 0; - virtual void PenDown() = 0; - virtual void Forward(int distance) = 0; - virtual void Turn(int degrees) = 0; - virtual void GoTo(int x, int y) = 0; - virtual int GetX() const = 0; - virtual int GetY() const = 0; -}; -``` - -(Note that the destructor of `Turtle` **must** be virtual, as is the case for **all** classes you intend to inherit from - otherwise the destructor of the derived class will not be called when you delete an object through a base pointer, and you'll get corrupted program states like memory leaks.) - -You can control whether the turtle's movement will leave a trace using `PenUp()` and `PenDown()`, and control its movement using `Forward()`, `Turn()`, and `GoTo()`. Finally, `GetX()` and `GetY()` tell you the current position of the turtle. - -Your program will normally use a real implementation of this interface. In tests, you can use a mock implementation instead. This allows you to easily check what drawing primitives your program is calling, with what arguments, and in which order. Tests written this way are much more robust (they won't break because your new machine does anti-aliasing differently), easier to read and maintain (the intent of a test is expressed in the code, not in some binary images), and run _much, much faster_. - -# Writing the Mock Class # -If you are lucky, the mocks you need to use have already been implemented by some nice people. If, however, you find yourself in the position to write a mock class, relax - Google Mock turns this task into a fun game! (Well, almost.) - -## How to Define It ## -Using the `Turtle` interface as example, here are the simple steps you need to follow: - - 1. Derive a class `MockTurtle` from `Turtle`. - 1. Take a _virtual_ function of `Turtle` (while it's possible to [mock non-virtual methods using templates](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods), it's much more involved). Count how many arguments it has. - 1. In the `public:` section of the child class, write `MOCK_METHODn();` (or `MOCK_CONST_METHODn();` if you are mocking a `const` method), where `n` is the number of the arguments; if you counted wrong, shame on you, and a compiler error will tell you so. - 1. Now comes the fun part: you take the function signature, cut-and-paste the _function name_ as the _first_ argument to the macro, and leave what's left as the _second_ argument (in case you're curious, this is the _type of the function_). - 1. Repeat until all virtual functions you want to mock are done. - -After the process, you should have something like: - -``` -#include "gmock/gmock.h" // Brings in Google Mock. -class MockTurtle : public Turtle { - public: - ... - MOCK_METHOD0(PenUp, void()); - MOCK_METHOD0(PenDown, void()); - MOCK_METHOD1(Forward, void(int distance)); - MOCK_METHOD1(Turn, void(int degrees)); - MOCK_METHOD2(GoTo, void(int x, int y)); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetX, int()); - MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetY, int()); -}; -``` - -You don't need to define these mock methods somewhere else - the `MOCK_METHOD*` macros will generate the definitions for you. It's that simple! Once you get the hang of it, you can pump out mock classes faster than your source-control system can handle your check-ins. - -**Tip:** If even this is too much work for you, you'll find the -`gmock_gen.py` tool in Google Mock's `scripts/generator/` directory (courtesy of the [cppclean](http://code.google.com/p/cppclean/) project) useful. This command-line -tool requires that you have Python 2.4 installed. You give it a C++ file and the name of an abstract class defined in it, -and it will print the definition of the mock class for you. Due to the -complexity of the C++ language, this script may not always work, but -it can be quite handy when it does. For more details, read the [user documentation](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/scripts/generator/README). - -## Where to Put It ## -When you define a mock class, you need to decide where to put its definition. Some people put it in a `*_test.cc`. This is fine when the interface being mocked (say, `Foo`) is owned by the same person or team. Otherwise, when the owner of `Foo` changes it, your test could break. (You can't really expect `Foo`'s maintainer to fix every test that uses `Foo`, can you?) - -So, the rule of thumb is: if you need to mock `Foo` and it's owned by others, define the mock class in `Foo`'s package (better, in a `testing` sub-package such that you can clearly separate production code and testing utilities), and put it in a `mock_foo.h`. Then everyone can reference `mock_foo.h` from their tests. If `Foo` ever changes, there is only one copy of `MockFoo` to change, and only tests that depend on the changed methods need to be fixed. - -Another way to do it: you can introduce a thin layer `FooAdaptor` on top of `Foo` and code to this new interface. Since you own `FooAdaptor`, you can absorb changes in `Foo` much more easily. While this is more work initially, carefully choosing the adaptor interface can make your code easier to write and more readable (a net win in the long run), as you can choose `FooAdaptor` to fit your specific domain much better than `Foo` does. - -# Using Mocks in Tests # -Once you have a mock class, using it is easy. The typical work flow is: - - 1. Import the Google Mock names from the `testing` namespace such that you can use them unqualified (You only have to do it once per file. Remember that namespaces are a good idea and good for your health.). - 1. Create some mock objects. - 1. Specify your expectations on them (How many times will a method be called? With what arguments? What should it do? etc.). - 1. Exercise some code that uses the mocks; optionally, check the result using Google Test assertions. If a mock method is called more than expected or with wrong arguments, you'll get an error immediately. - 1. When a mock is destructed, Google Mock will automatically check whether all expectations on it have been satisfied. - -Here's an example: - -``` -#include "path/to/mock-turtle.h" -#include "gmock/gmock.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" -using ::testing::AtLeast; // #1 - -TEST(PainterTest, CanDrawSomething) { - MockTurtle turtle; // #2 - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown()) // #3 - .Times(AtLeast(1)); - - Painter painter(&turtle); // #4 - - EXPECT_TRUE(painter.DrawCircle(0, 0, 10)); -} // #5 - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // The following line must be executed to initialize Google Mock - // (and Google Test) before running the tests. - ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -As you might have guessed, this test checks that `PenDown()` is called at least once. If the `painter` object didn't call this method, your test will fail with a message like this: - -``` -path/to/my_test.cc:119: Failure -Actual function call count doesn't match this expectation: -Actually: never called; -Expected: called at least once. -``` - -**Tip 1:** If you run the test from an Emacs buffer, you can hit `<Enter>` on the line number displayed in the error message to jump right to the failed expectation. - -**Tip 2:** If your mock objects are never deleted, the final verification won't happen. Therefore it's a good idea to use a heap leak checker in your tests when you allocate mocks on the heap. - -**Important note:** Google Mock requires expectations to be set **before** the mock functions are called, otherwise the behavior is **undefined**. In particular, you mustn't interleave `EXPECT_CALL()`s and calls to the mock functions. - -This means `EXPECT_CALL()` should be read as expecting that a call will occur _in the future_, not that a call has occurred. Why does Google Mock work like that? Well, specifying the expectation beforehand allows Google Mock to report a violation as soon as it arises, when the context (stack trace, etc) is still available. This makes debugging much easier. - -Admittedly, this test is contrived and doesn't do much. You can easily achieve the same effect without using Google Mock. However, as we shall reveal soon, Google Mock allows you to do _much more_ with the mocks. - -## Using Google Mock with Any Testing Framework ## -If you want to use something other than Google Test (e.g. [CppUnit](http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/cppunit/index.php?title=Main_Page) or -[CxxTest](http://cxxtest.tigris.org/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // The following line causes Google Mock to throw an exception on failure, - // which will be interpreted by your testing framework as a test failure. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - ... whatever your testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -This approach has a catch: it makes Google Mock throw an exception -from a mock object's destructor sometimes. With some compilers, this -sometimes causes the test program to crash. You'll still be able to -notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure. - -A better solution is to use Google Test's -[event listener API](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Extending_Google_Test_by_Handling_Test_Events) -to report a test failure to your testing framework properly. You'll need to -implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it -should be straightforward. - -If this turns out to be too much work, we suggest that you stick with -Google Test, which works with Google Mock seamlessly (in fact, it is -technically part of Google Mock.). If there is a reason that you -cannot use Google Test, please let us know. - -# Setting Expectations # -The key to using a mock object successfully is to set the _right expectations_ on it. If you set the expectations too strict, your test will fail as the result of unrelated changes. If you set them too loose, bugs can slip through. You want to do it just right such that your test can catch exactly the kind of bugs you intend it to catch. Google Mock provides the necessary means for you to do it "just right." - -## General Syntax ## -In Google Mock we use the `EXPECT_CALL()` macro to set an expectation on a mock method. The general syntax is: - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(mock_object, method(matchers)) - .Times(cardinality) - .WillOnce(action) - .WillRepeatedly(action); -``` - -The macro has two arguments: first the mock object, and then the method and its arguments. Note that the two are separated by a comma (`,`), not a period (`.`). (Why using a comma? The answer is that it was necessary for technical reasons.) - -The macro can be followed by some optional _clauses_ that provide more information about the expectation. We'll discuss how each clause works in the coming sections. - -This syntax is designed to make an expectation read like English. For example, you can probably guess that - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .Times(5) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(150)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(200)); -``` - -says that the `turtle` object's `GetX()` method will be called five times, it will return 100 the first time, 150 the second time, and then 200 every time. Some people like to call this style of syntax a Domain-Specific Language (DSL). - -**Note:** Why do we use a macro to do this? It serves two purposes: first it makes expectations easily identifiable (either by `grep` or by a human reader), and second it allows Google Mock to include the source file location of a failed expectation in messages, making debugging easier. - -## Matchers: What Arguments Do We Expect? ## -When a mock function takes arguments, we must specify what arguments we are expecting; for example: - -``` -// Expects the turtle to move forward by 100 units. -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(100)); -``` - -Sometimes you may not want to be too specific (Remember that talk about tests being too rigid? Over specification leads to brittle tests and obscures the intent of tests. Therefore we encourage you to specify only what's necessary - no more, no less.). If you care to check that `Forward()` will be called but aren't interested in its actual argument, write `_` as the argument, which means "anything goes": - -``` -using ::testing::_; -... -// Expects the turtle to move forward. -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); -``` - -`_` is an instance of what we call **matchers**. A matcher is like a predicate and can test whether an argument is what we'd expect. You can use a matcher inside `EXPECT_CALL()` wherever a function argument is expected. - -A list of built-in matchers can be found in the [CheatSheet](V1_7_CheatSheet.md). For example, here's the `Ge` (greater than or equal) matcher: - -``` -using ::testing::Ge;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(Ge(100))); -``` - -This checks that the turtle will be told to go forward by at least 100 units. - -## Cardinalities: How Many Times Will It Be Called? ## -The first clause we can specify following an `EXPECT_CALL()` is `Times()`. We call its argument a **cardinality** as it tells _how many times_ the call should occur. It allows us to repeat an expectation many times without actually writing it as many times. More importantly, a cardinality can be "fuzzy", just like a matcher can be. This allows a user to express the intent of a test exactly. - -An interesting special case is when we say `Times(0)`. You may have guessed - it means that the function shouldn't be called with the given arguments at all, and Google Mock will report a Google Test failure whenever the function is (wrongfully) called. - -We've seen `AtLeast(n)` as an example of fuzzy cardinalities earlier. For the list of built-in cardinalities you can use, see the [CheatSheet](V1_7_CheatSheet.md). - -The `Times()` clause can be omitted. **If you omit `Times()`, Google Mock will infer the cardinality for you.** The rules are easy to remember: - - * If **neither** `WillOnce()` **nor** `WillRepeatedly()` is in the `EXPECT_CALL()`, the inferred cardinality is `Times(1)`. - * If there are `n WillOnce()`'s but **no** `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 1, the cardinality is `Times(n)`. - * If there are `n WillOnce()`'s and **one** `WillRepeatedly()`, where `n` >= 0, the cardinality is `Times(AtLeast(n))`. - -**Quick quiz:** what do you think will happen if a function is expected to be called twice but actually called four times? - -## Actions: What Should It Do? ## -Remember that a mock object doesn't really have a working implementation? We as users have to tell it what to do when a method is invoked. This is easy in Google Mock. - -First, if the return type of a mock function is a built-in type or a pointer, the function has a **default action** (a `void` function will just return, a `bool` function will return `false`, and other functions will return 0). If you don't say anything, this behavior will be used. - -Second, if a mock function doesn't have a default action, or the default action doesn't suit you, you can specify the action to be taken each time the expectation matches using a series of `WillOnce()` clauses followed by an optional `WillRepeatedly()`. For example, - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(200)) - .WillOnce(Return(300)); -``` - -This says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called _exactly three times_ (Google Mock inferred this from how many `WillOnce()` clauses we've written, since we didn't explicitly write `Times()`), and will return 100, 200, and 300 respectively. - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) - .WillOnce(Return(100)) - .WillOnce(Return(200)) - .WillRepeatedly(Return(300)); -``` - -says that `turtle.GetY()` will be called _at least twice_ (Google Mock knows this as we've written two `WillOnce()` clauses and a `WillRepeatedly()` while having no explicit `Times()`), will return 100 the first time, 200 the second time, and 300 from the third time on. - -Of course, if you explicitly write a `Times()`, Google Mock will not try to infer the cardinality itself. What if the number you specified is larger than there are `WillOnce()` clauses? Well, after all `WillOnce()`s are used up, Google Mock will do the _default_ action for the function every time (unless, of course, you have a `WillRepeatedly()`.). - -What can we do inside `WillOnce()` besides `Return()`? You can return a reference using `ReturnRef(variable)`, or invoke a pre-defined function, among [others](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CheatSheet#Actions). - -**Important note:** The `EXPECT_CALL()` statement evaluates the action clause only once, even though the action may be performed many times. Therefore you must be careful about side effects. The following may not do what you want: - -``` -int n = 100; -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) -.Times(4) -.WillRepeatedly(Return(n++)); -``` - -Instead of returning 100, 101, 102, ..., consecutively, this mock function will always return 100 as `n++` is only evaluated once. Similarly, `Return(new Foo)` will create a new `Foo` object when the `EXPECT_CALL()` is executed, and will return the same pointer every time. If you want the side effect to happen every time, you need to define a custom action, which we'll teach in the [CookBook](V1_7_CookBook.md). - -Time for another quiz! What do you think the following means? - -``` -using ::testing::Return;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY()) -.Times(4) -.WillOnce(Return(100)); -``` - -Obviously `turtle.GetY()` is expected to be called four times. But if you think it will return 100 every time, think twice! Remember that one `WillOnce()` clause will be consumed each time the function is invoked and the default action will be taken afterwards. So the right answer is that `turtle.GetY()` will return 100 the first time, but **return 0 from the second time on**, as returning 0 is the default action for `int` functions. - -## Using Multiple Expectations ## -So far we've only shown examples where you have a single expectation. More realistically, you're going to specify expectations on multiple mock methods, which may be from multiple mock objects. - -By default, when a mock method is invoked, Google Mock will search the expectations in the **reverse order** they are defined, and stop when an active expectation that matches the arguments is found (you can think of it as "newer rules override older ones."). If the matching expectation cannot take any more calls, you will get an upper-bound-violated failure. Here's an example: - -``` -using ::testing::_;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); // #1 -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(10)) // #2 - .Times(2); -``` - -If `Forward(10)` is called three times in a row, the third time it will be an error, as the last matching expectation (#2) has been saturated. If, however, the third `Forward(10)` call is replaced by `Forward(20)`, then it would be OK, as now #1 will be the matching expectation. - -**Side note:** Why does Google Mock search for a match in the _reverse_ order of the expectations? The reason is that this allows a user to set up the default expectations in a mock object's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase and then customize the mock by writing more specific expectations in the test body. So, if you have two expectations on the same method, you want to put the one with more specific matchers **after** the other, or the more specific rule would be shadowed by the more general one that comes after it. - -## Ordered vs Unordered Calls ## -By default, an expectation can match a call even though an earlier expectation hasn't been satisfied. In other words, the calls don't have to occur in the order the expectations are specified. - -Sometimes, you may want all the expected calls to occur in a strict order. To say this in Google Mock is easy: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence;... -TEST(FooTest, DrawsLineSegment) { - ... - { - InSequence dummy; - - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown()); - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(100)); - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenUp()); - } - Foo(); -} -``` - -By creating an object of type `InSequence`, all expectations in its scope are put into a _sequence_ and have to occur _sequentially_. Since we are just relying on the constructor and destructor of this object to do the actual work, its name is really irrelevant. - -In this example, we test that `Foo()` calls the three expected functions in the order as written. If a call is made out-of-order, it will be an error. - -(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](V1_7_CookBook#Expecting_Partially_Ordered_Calls.md).) - -## All Expectations Are Sticky (Unless Said Otherwise) ## -Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. How would you test that the turtle is asked to go to the origin _exactly twice_ (you want to ignore any other instructions it receives)? - -After you've come up with your answer, take a look at ours and compare notes (solve it yourself first - don't cheat!): - -``` -using ::testing::_;... -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(_, _)) // #1 - .Times(AnyNumber()); -EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(0, 0)) // #2 - .Times(2); -``` - -Suppose `turtle.GoTo(0, 0)` is called three times. In the third time, Google Mock will see that the arguments match expectation #2 (remember that we always pick the last matching expectation). Now, since we said that there should be only two such calls, Google Mock will report an error immediately. This is basically what we've told you in the "Using Multiple Expectations" section above. - -This example shows that **expectations in Google Mock are "sticky" by default**, in the sense that they remain active even after we have reached their invocation upper bounds. This is an important rule to remember, as it affects the meaning of the spec, and is **different** to how it's done in many other mocking frameworks (Why'd we do that? Because we think our rule makes the common cases easier to express and understand.). - -Simple? Let's see if you've really understood it: what does the following code say? - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... -for (int i = n; i > 0; i--) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)); -} -``` - -If you think it says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called `n` times and will return 10, 20, 30, ..., consecutively, think twice! The problem is that, as we said, expectations are sticky. So, the second time `turtle.GetX()` is called, the last (latest) `EXPECT_CALL()` statement will match, and will immediately lead to an "upper bound exceeded" error - this piece of code is not very useful! - -One correct way of saying that `turtle.GetX()` will return 10, 20, 30, ..., is to explicitly say that the expectations are _not_ sticky. In other words, they should _retire_ as soon as they are saturated: - -``` -using ::testing::Return; -... -for (int i = n; i > 0; i--) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -} -``` - -And, there's a better way to do it: in this case, we expect the calls to occur in a specific order, and we line up the actions to match the order. Since the order is important here, we should make it explicit using a sequence: - -``` -using ::testing::InSequence; -using ::testing::Return; -... -{ - InSequence s; - - for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { - EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX()) - .WillOnce(Return(10*i)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); - } -} -``` - -By the way, the other situation where an expectation may _not_ be sticky is when it's in a sequence - as soon as another expectation that comes after it in the sequence has been used, it automatically retires (and will never be used to match any call). - -## Uninteresting Calls ## -A mock object may have many methods, and not all of them are that interesting. For example, in some tests we may not care about how many times `GetX()` and `GetY()` get called. - -In Google Mock, if you are not interested in a method, just don't say anything about it. If a call to this method occurs, you'll see a warning in the test output, but it won't be a failure. - -# What Now? # -Congratulations! You've learned enough about Google Mock to start using it. Now, you might want to join the [googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion group and actually write some tests using Google Mock - it will be fun. Hey, it may even be addictive - you've been warned. - -Then, if you feel like increasing your mock quotient, you should move on to the [CookBook](V1_7_CookBook.md). You can learn many advanced features of Google Mock there -- and advance your level of enjoyment and testing bliss.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/v1_7/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md deleted file mode 100644 index fa21233..0000000 --- a/googlemock/docs/v1_7/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,628 +0,0 @@ - - -Please send your questions to the -[googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion -group. If you need help with compiler errors, make sure you have -tried [Google Mock Doctor](#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error.md) first. - -## When I call a method on my mock object, the method for the real object is invoked instead. What's the problem? ## - -In order for a method to be mocked, it must be _virtual_, unless you use the [high-perf dependency injection technique](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Mocking_Nonvirtual_Methods). - -## I wrote some matchers. After I upgraded to a new version of Google Mock, they no longer compile. What's going on? ## - -After version 1.4.0 of Google Mock was released, we had an idea on how -to make it easier to write matchers that can generate informative -messages efficiently. We experimented with this idea and liked what -we saw. Therefore we decided to implement it. - -Unfortunately, this means that if you have defined your own matchers -by implementing `MatcherInterface` or using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`, -your definitions will no longer compile. Matchers defined using the -`MATCHER*` family of macros are not affected. - -Sorry for the hassle if your matchers are affected. We believe it's -in everyone's long-term interest to make this change sooner than -later. Fortunately, it's usually not hard to migrate an existing -matcher to the new API. Here's what you need to do: - -If you wrote your matcher like this: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` - -you'll need to change it to: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` -(i.e. rename `Matches()` to `MatchAndExplain()` and give it a second -argument of type `MatchResultListener*`.) - -If you were also using `ExplainMatchResultTo()` to improve the matcher -message: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the lastest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - - virtual void ExplainMatchResultTo(MyType value, - ::std::ostream* os) const { - // Prints some helpful information to os to help - // a user understand why value matches (or doesn't match). - *os << "the Foo property is " << value.GetFoo(); - } - ... -}; -``` - -you should move the logic of `ExplainMatchResultTo()` into -`MatchAndExplain()`, using the `MatchResultListener` argument where -the `::std::ostream` was used: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MatcherInterface; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyWonderfulMatcher : public MatcherInterface<MyType> { - public: - ... - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - *listener << "the Foo property is " << value.GetFoo(); - return value.GetFoo() > 5; - } - ... -}; -``` - -If your matcher is defined using `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -you should rename the `Matches()` method to `MatchAndExplain()` and -add a `MatchResultListener*` argument (the same as what you need to do -for matchers defined by implementing `MatcherInterface`): -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -If your polymorphic matcher uses `ExplainMatchResultTo()` for better -failure messages: -``` -// Old matcher definition that doesn't work with the latest -// Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool Matches(MyType value) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -void ExplainMatchResultTo(const MyGreatMatcher& matcher, - MyType value, - ::std::ostream* os) { - // Prints some helpful information to os to help - // a user understand why value matches (or doesn't match). - *os << "the Bar property is " << value.GetBar(); -} -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -you'll need to move the logic inside `ExplainMatchResultTo()` to -`MatchAndExplain()`: -``` -// New matcher definition that works with the latest Google Mock. -using ::testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher; -using ::testing::MatchResultListener; -... -class MyGreatMatcher { - public: - ... - bool MatchAndExplain(MyType value, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { - // Returns true if value matches. - *listener << "the Bar property is " << value.GetBar(); - return value.GetBar() < 42; - } - ... -}; -... MakePolymorphicMatcher(MyGreatMatcher()) ... -``` - -For more information, you can read these -[two](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Writing_New_Monomorphic_Matchers) -[recipes](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Matchers) -from the cookbook. As always, you -are welcome to post questions on `googlemock@googlegroups.com` if you -need any help. - -## When using Google Mock, do I have to use Google Test as the testing framework? I have my favorite testing framework and don't want to switch. ## - -Google Mock works out of the box with Google Test. However, it's easy -to configure it to work with any testing framework of your choice. -[Here](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_ForDummies#Using_Google_Mock_with_Any_Testing_Framework) is how. - -## How am I supposed to make sense of these horrible template errors? ## - -If you are confused by the compiler errors gcc threw at you, -try consulting the _Google Mock Doctor_ tool first. What it does is to -scan stdin for gcc error messages, and spit out diagnoses on the -problems (we call them diseases) your code has. - -To "install", run command: -``` -alias gmd='<path to googlemock>/scripts/gmock_doctor.py' -``` - -To use it, do: -``` -<your-favorite-build-command> <your-test> 2>&1 | gmd -``` - -For example: -``` -make my_test 2>&1 | gmd -``` - -Or you can run `gmd` and copy-n-paste gcc's error messages to it. - -## Can I mock a variadic function? ## - -You cannot mock a variadic function (i.e. a function taking ellipsis -(`...`) arguments) directly in Google Mock. - -The problem is that in general, there is _no way_ for a mock object to -know how many arguments are passed to the variadic method, and what -the arguments' types are. Only the _author of the base class_ knows -the protocol, and we cannot look into his head. - -Therefore, to mock such a function, the _user_ must teach the mock -object how to figure out the number of arguments and their types. One -way to do it is to provide overloaded versions of the function. - -Ellipsis arguments are inherited from C and not really a C++ feature. -They are unsafe to use and don't work with arguments that have -constructors or destructors. Therefore we recommend to avoid them in -C++ as much as possible. - -## MSVC gives me warning C4301 or C4373 when I define a mock method with a const parameter. Why? ## - -If you compile this using Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 SP1: -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual void Bar(const int i) = 0; -}; - -class MockFoo : public Foo { - ... - MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, void(const int i)); -}; -``` -You may get the following warning: -``` -warning C4301: 'MockFoo::Bar': overriding virtual function only differs from 'Foo::Bar' by const/volatile qualifier -``` - -This is a MSVC bug. The same code compiles fine with gcc ,for -example. If you use Visual C++ 2008 SP1, you would get the warning: -``` -warning C4373: 'MockFoo::Bar': virtual function overrides 'Foo::Bar', previous versions of the compiler did not override when parameters only differed by const/volatile qualifiers -``` - -In C++, if you _declare_ a function with a `const` parameter, the -`const` modifier is _ignored_. Therefore, the `Foo` base class above -is equivalent to: -``` -class Foo { - ... - virtual void Bar(int i) = 0; // int or const int? Makes no difference. -}; -``` - -In fact, you can _declare_ Bar() with an `int` parameter, and _define_ -it with a `const int` parameter. The compiler will still match them -up. - -Since making a parameter `const` is meaningless in the method -_declaration_, we recommend to remove it in both `Foo` and `MockFoo`. -That should workaround the VC bug. - -Note that we are talking about the _top-level_ `const` modifier here. -If the function parameter is passed by pointer or reference, declaring -the _pointee_ or _referee_ as `const` is still meaningful. For -example, the following two declarations are _not_ equivalent: -``` -void Bar(int* p); // Neither p nor *p is const. -void Bar(const int* p); // p is not const, but *p is. -``` - -## I have a huge mock class, and Microsoft Visual C++ runs out of memory when compiling it. What can I do? ## - -We've noticed that when the `/clr` compiler flag is used, Visual C++ -uses 5~6 times as much memory when compiling a mock class. We suggest -to avoid `/clr` when compiling native C++ mocks. - -## I can't figure out why Google Mock thinks my expectations are not satisfied. What should I do? ## - -You might want to run your test with -`--gmock_verbose=info`. This flag lets Google Mock print a trace -of every mock function call it receives. By studying the trace, -you'll gain insights on why the expectations you set are not met. - -## How can I assert that a function is NEVER called? ## - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .Times(0); -``` - -## I have a failed test where Google Mock tells me TWICE that a particular expectation is not satisfied. Isn't this redundant? ## - -When Google Mock detects a failure, it prints relevant information -(the mock function arguments, the state of relevant expectations, and -etc) to help the user debug. If another failure is detected, Google -Mock will do the same, including printing the state of relevant -expectations. - -Sometimes an expectation's state didn't change between two failures, -and you'll see the same description of the state twice. They are -however _not_ redundant, as they refer to _different points in time_. -The fact they are the same _is_ interesting information. - -## I get a heap check failure when using a mock object, but using a real object is fine. What can be wrong? ## - -Does the class (hopefully a pure interface) you are mocking have a -virtual destructor? - -Whenever you derive from a base class, make sure its destructor is -virtual. Otherwise Bad Things will happen. Consider the following -code: - -``` -class Base { - public: - // Not virtual, but should be. - ~Base() { ... } - ... -}; - -class Derived : public Base { - public: - ... - private: - std::string value_; -}; - -... - Base* p = new Derived; - ... - delete p; // Surprise! ~Base() will be called, but ~Derived() will not - // - value_ is leaked. -``` - -By changing `~Base()` to virtual, `~Derived()` will be correctly -called when `delete p` is executed, and the heap checker -will be happy. - -## The "newer expectations override older ones" rule makes writing expectations awkward. Why does Google Mock do that? ## - -When people complain about this, often they are referring to code like: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. However, I have to write the expectations in the -// reverse order. This sucks big time!!! -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -The problem is that they didn't pick the **best** way to express the test's -intent. - -By default, expectations don't have to be matched in _any_ particular -order. If you want them to match in a certain order, you need to be -explicit. This is Google Mock's (and jMock's) fundamental philosophy: it's -easy to accidentally over-specify your tests, and we want to make it -harder to do so. - -There are two better ways to write the test spec. You could either -put the expectations in sequence: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. Using a sequence, we can write the expectations -// in their natural order. -{ - InSequence s; - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); - EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -} -``` - -or you can put the sequence of actions in the same expectation: - -``` -// foo.Bar() should be called twice, return 1 the first time, and return -// 2 the second time. -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()) - .WillOnce(Return(1)) - .WillOnce(Return(2)) - .RetiresOnSaturation(); -``` - -Back to the original questions: why does Google Mock search the -expectations (and `ON_CALL`s) from back to front? Because this -allows a user to set up a mock's behavior for the common case early -(e.g. in the mock's constructor or the test fixture's set-up phase) -and customize it with more specific rules later. If Google Mock -searches from front to back, this very useful pattern won't be -possible. - -## Google Mock prints a warning when a function without EXPECT\_CALL is called, even if I have set its behavior using ON\_CALL. Would it be reasonable not to show the warning in this case? ## - -When choosing between being neat and being safe, we lean toward the -latter. So the answer is that we think it's better to show the -warning. - -Often people write `ON_CALL`s in the mock object's -constructor or `SetUp()`, as the default behavior rarely changes from -test to test. Then in the test body they set the expectations, which -are often different for each test. Having an `ON_CALL` in the set-up -part of a test doesn't mean that the calls are expected. If there's -no `EXPECT_CALL` and the method is called, it's possibly an error. If -we quietly let the call go through without notifying the user, bugs -may creep in unnoticed. - -If, however, you are sure that the calls are OK, you can write - -``` -EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillRepeatedly(...); -``` - -instead of - -``` -ON_CALL(foo, Bar(_)) - .WillByDefault(...); -``` - -This tells Google Mock that you do expect the calls and no warning should be -printed. - -Also, you can control the verbosity using the `--gmock_verbose` flag. -If you find the output too noisy when debugging, just choose a less -verbose level. - -## How can I delete the mock function's argument in an action? ## - -If you find yourself needing to perform some action that's not -supported by Google Mock directly, remember that you can define your own -actions using -[MakeAction()](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Writing_New_Actions) or -[MakePolymorphicAction()](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Actions), -or you can write a stub function and invoke it using -[Invoke()](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Using_Functions_Methods_Functors). - -## MOCK\_METHODn()'s second argument looks funny. Why don't you use the MOCK\_METHODn(Method, return\_type, arg\_1, ..., arg\_n) syntax? ## - -What?! I think it's beautiful. :-) - -While which syntax looks more natural is a subjective matter to some -extent, Google Mock's syntax was chosen for several practical advantages it -has. - -Try to mock a function that takes a map as an argument: -``` -virtual int GetSize(const map<int, std::string>& m); -``` - -Using the proposed syntax, it would be: -``` -MOCK_METHOD1(GetSize, int, const map<int, std::string>& m); -``` - -Guess what? You'll get a compiler error as the compiler thinks that -`const map<int, std::string>& m` are **two**, not one, arguments. To work -around this you can use `typedef` to give the map type a name, but -that gets in the way of your work. Google Mock's syntax avoids this -problem as the function's argument types are protected inside a pair -of parentheses: -``` -// This compiles fine. -MOCK_METHOD1(GetSize, int(const map<int, std::string>& m)); -``` - -You still need a `typedef` if the return type contains an unprotected -comma, but that's much rarer. - -Other advantages include: - 1. `MOCK_METHOD1(Foo, int, bool)` can leave a reader wonder whether the method returns `int` or `bool`, while there won't be such confusion using Google Mock's syntax. - 1. The way Google Mock describes a function type is nothing new, although many people may not be familiar with it. The same syntax was used in C, and the `function` library in `tr1` uses this syntax extensively. Since `tr1` will become a part of the new version of STL, we feel very comfortable to be consistent with it. - 1. The function type syntax is also used in other parts of Google Mock's API (e.g. the action interface) in order to make the implementation tractable. A user needs to learn it anyway in order to utilize Google Mock's more advanced features. We'd as well stick to the same syntax in `MOCK_METHOD*`! - -## My code calls a static/global function. Can I mock it? ## - -You can, but you need to make some changes. - -In general, if you find yourself needing to mock a static function, -it's a sign that your modules are too tightly coupled (and less -flexible, less reusable, less testable, etc). You are probably better -off defining a small interface and call the function through that -interface, which then can be easily mocked. It's a bit of work -initially, but usually pays for itself quickly. - -This Google Testing Blog -[post](http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) -says it excellently. Check it out. - -## My mock object needs to do complex stuff. It's a lot of pain to specify the actions. Google Mock sucks! ## - -I know it's not a question, but you get an answer for free any way. :-) - -With Google Mock, you can create mocks in C++ easily. And people might be -tempted to use them everywhere. Sometimes they work great, and -sometimes you may find them, well, a pain to use. So, what's wrong in -the latter case? - -When you write a test without using mocks, you exercise the code and -assert that it returns the correct value or that the system is in an -expected state. This is sometimes called "state-based testing". - -Mocks are great for what some call "interaction-based" testing: -instead of checking the system state at the very end, mock objects -verify that they are invoked the right way and report an error as soon -as it arises, giving you a handle on the precise context in which the -error was triggered. This is often more effective and economical to -do than state-based testing. - -If you are doing state-based testing and using a test double just to -simulate the real object, you are probably better off using a fake. -Using a mock in this case causes pain, as it's not a strong point for -mocks to perform complex actions. If you experience this and think -that mocks suck, you are just not using the right tool for your -problem. Or, you might be trying to solve the wrong problem. :-) - -## I got a warning "Uninteresting function call encountered - default action taken.." Should I panic? ## - -By all means, NO! It's just an FYI. - -What it means is that you have a mock function, you haven't set any -expectations on it (by Google Mock's rule this means that you are not -interested in calls to this function and therefore it can be called -any number of times), and it is called. That's OK - you didn't say -it's not OK to call the function! - -What if you actually meant to disallow this function to be called, but -forgot to write `EXPECT_CALL(foo, Bar()).Times(0)`? While -one can argue that it's the user's fault, Google Mock tries to be nice and -prints you a note. - -So, when you see the message and believe that there shouldn't be any -uninteresting calls, you should investigate what's going on. To make -your life easier, Google Mock prints the function name and arguments -when an uninteresting call is encountered. - -## I want to define a custom action. Should I use Invoke() or implement the action interface? ## - -Either way is fine - you want to choose the one that's more convenient -for your circumstance. - -Usually, if your action is for a particular function type, defining it -using `Invoke()` should be easier; if your action can be used in -functions of different types (e.g. if you are defining -`Return(value)`), `MakePolymorphicAction()` is -easiest. Sometimes you want precise control on what types of -functions the action can be used in, and implementing -`ActionInterface` is the way to go here. See the implementation of -`Return()` in `include/gmock/gmock-actions.h` for an example. - -## I'm using the set-argument-pointee action, and the compiler complains about "conflicting return type specified". What does it mean? ## - -You got this error as Google Mock has no idea what value it should return -when the mock method is called. `SetArgPointee()` says what the -side effect is, but doesn't say what the return value should be. You -need `DoAll()` to chain a `SetArgPointee()` with a `Return()`. - -See this [recipe](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/V1_7_CookBook#Mocking_Side_Effects) for more details and an example. - - -## My question is not in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/w/list), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock/topics), - 1. ask it on [googlemock@googlegroups.com](mailto:googlemock@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/issues/list) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the revision number if you check out from SVN directly) of Google Mock you use (Google Mock is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h index b3f654a..42648ad 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ // // This file implements some commonly used actions. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_ACTIONS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_ACTIONS_H_ @@ -46,9 +48,10 @@ #include "gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h" #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ // Defined by gtest-port.h via gmock-port.h. +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // Defined by gtest-port.h via gmock-port.h. +#include <functional> #include <type_traits> -#endif +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 namespace testing { @@ -96,7 +99,7 @@ struct BuiltInDefaultValueGetter<T, false> { template <typename T> class BuiltInDefaultValue { public: -#if GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // This function returns true iff type T has a built-in default value. static bool Exists() { return ::std::is_default_constructible<T>::value; @@ -107,7 +110,7 @@ class BuiltInDefaultValue { T, ::std::is_default_constructible<T>::value>::Get(); } -#else // GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ +#else // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // This function returns true iff type T has a built-in default value. static bool Exists() { return false; @@ -117,7 +120,7 @@ class BuiltInDefaultValue { return BuiltInDefaultValueGetter<T, false>::Get(); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 }; // This partial specialization says that we use the same built-in @@ -359,14 +362,20 @@ class Action { // Constructs a null Action. Needed for storing Action objects in // STL containers. - Action() : impl_(NULL) {} + Action() {} - // Constructs an Action from its implementation. A NULL impl is - // used to represent the "do-default" action. - explicit Action(ActionInterface<F>* impl) : impl_(impl) {} +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Construct an Action from a specified callable. + // This cannot take std::function directly, because then Action would not be + // directly constructible from lambda (it would require two conversions). + template <typename G, + typename = typename ::std::enable_if< + ::std::is_constructible<::std::function<F>, G>::value>::type> + Action(G&& fun) : fun_(::std::forward<G>(fun)) {} // NOLINT +#endif - // Copy constructor. - Action(const Action& action) : impl_(action.impl_) {} + // Constructs an Action from its implementation. + explicit Action(ActionInterface<F>* impl) : impl_(impl) {} // This constructor allows us to turn an Action<Func> object into an // Action<F>, as long as F's arguments can be implicitly converted @@ -376,7 +385,13 @@ class Action { explicit Action(const Action<Func>& action); // Returns true iff this is the DoDefault() action. - bool IsDoDefault() const { return impl_.get() == NULL; } + bool IsDoDefault() const { +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + return impl_ == nullptr && fun_ == nullptr; +#else + return impl_ == NULL; +#endif + } // Performs the action. Note that this method is const even though // the corresponding method in ActionInterface is not. The reason @@ -384,14 +399,15 @@ class Action { // another concrete action, not that the concrete action it binds to // cannot change state. (Think of the difference between a const // pointer and a pointer to const.) - Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const { - internal::Assert( - !IsDoDefault(), __FILE__, __LINE__, - "You are using DoDefault() inside a composite action like " - "DoAll() or WithArgs(). This is not supported for technical " - "reasons. Please instead spell out the default action, or " - "assign the default action to an Action variable and use " - "the variable in various places."); + Result Perform(ArgumentTuple args) const { + if (IsDoDefault()) { + internal::IllegalDoDefault(__FILE__, __LINE__); + } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + if (fun_ != nullptr) { + return internal::Apply(fun_, ::std::move(args)); + } +#endif return impl_->Perform(args); } @@ -399,6 +415,18 @@ class Action { template <typename F1, typename F2> friend class internal::ActionAdaptor; + template <typename G> + friend class Action; + + // In C++11, Action can be implemented either as a generic functor (through + // std::function), or legacy ActionInterface. In C++98, only ActionInterface + // is available. The invariants are as follows: + // * in C++98, impl_ is null iff this is the default action + // * in C++11, at most one of fun_ & impl_ may be nonnull; both are null iff + // this is the default action +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + ::std::function<F> fun_; +#endif internal::linked_ptr<ActionInterface<F> > impl_; }; @@ -530,6 +558,9 @@ struct ByMoveWrapper { // statement, and conversion of the result of Return to Action<T(U)> is a // good place for that. // +// The real life example of the above scenario happens when an invocation +// of gtl::Container() is passed into Return. +// template <typename R> class ReturnAction { public: @@ -749,7 +780,7 @@ class DoDefaultAction { // This template type conversion operator allows DoDefault() to be // used in any function. template <typename F> - operator Action<F>() const { return Action<F>(NULL); } + operator Action<F>() const { return Action<F>(); } // NOLINT }; // Implements the Assign action to set a given pointer referent to a @@ -885,6 +916,28 @@ class InvokeMethodWithoutArgsAction { GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(InvokeMethodWithoutArgsAction); }; +// Implements the InvokeWithoutArgs(callback) action. +template <typename CallbackType> +class InvokeCallbackWithoutArgsAction { + public: + // The c'tor takes ownership of the callback. + explicit InvokeCallbackWithoutArgsAction(CallbackType* callback) + : callback_(callback) { + callback->CheckIsRepeatable(); // Makes sure the callback is permanent. + } + + // This type conversion operator template allows Invoke(callback) to + // be used wherever the callback's return type can be implicitly + // converted to that of the mock function. + template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> + Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple&) const { return callback_->Run(); } + + private: + const internal::linked_ptr<CallbackType> callback_; + + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(InvokeCallbackWithoutArgsAction); +}; + // Implements the IgnoreResult(action) action. template <typename A> class IgnoreResultAction { @@ -1029,9 +1082,9 @@ class DoBothAction { // return sqrt(x*x + y*y); // } // ... -// EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) +// EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)) // .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithLabel)); -// EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) +// EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)) // .WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOriginWithIndex)); // // you could write @@ -1041,8 +1094,8 @@ class DoBothAction { // return sqrt(x*x + y*y); // } // ... -// EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); -// EXEPCT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); +// EXPECT_CALL(mock, Foo("abc", _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); +// EXPECT_CALL(mock, Bar(5, _, _)).WillOnce(Invoke(DistanceToOrigin)); typedef internal::IgnoredValue Unused; // This constructor allows us to turn an Action<From> object into an @@ -1052,7 +1105,13 @@ typedef internal::IgnoredValue Unused; template <typename To> template <typename From> Action<To>::Action(const Action<From>& from) - : impl_(new internal::ActionAdaptor<To, From>(from)) {} + : +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + fun_(from.fun_), +#endif + impl_(from.impl_ == NULL ? NULL + : new internal::ActionAdaptor<To, From>(from)) { +} // Creates an action that returns 'value'. 'value' is passed by value // instead of const reference - otherwise Return("string literal") diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-cardinalities.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-cardinalities.h index fc315f9..2ce16af 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-cardinalities.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-cardinalities.h @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ // cardinalities can be defined by the user implementing the // CardinalityInterface interface if necessary. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_CARDINALITIES_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_CARDINALITIES_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h index b5a889c..4ce7d35 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ -// This file was GENERATED by a script. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND!!! +// This file was GENERATED by command: +// pump.py gmock-generated-actions.h.pump +// DO NOT EDIT BY HAND!!! // Copyright 2007, Google Inc. // All rights reserved. @@ -35,6 +37,8 @@ // // This file implements some commonly used variadic actions. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ @@ -45,8 +49,8 @@ namespace testing { namespace internal { // InvokeHelper<F> knows how to unpack an N-tuple and invoke an N-ary -// function or method with the unpacked values, where F is a function -// type that takes N arguments. +// function, method, or callback with the unpacked values, where F is +// a function type that takes N arguments. template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> class InvokeHelper; @@ -64,6 +68,12 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<> > { const ::testing::tuple<>&) { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(); } + + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<>&) { + return callback->Run(); + } }; template <typename R, typename A1> @@ -80,6 +90,12 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1> > { const ::testing::tuple<A1>& args) { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(get<0>(args)); } + + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<A1>& args) { + return callback->Run(get<0>(args)); + } }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2> @@ -96,6 +112,12 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2> > { const ::testing::tuple<A1, A2>& args) { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(get<0>(args), get<1>(args)); } + + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<A1, A2>& args) { + return callback->Run(get<0>(args), get<1>(args)); + } }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3> @@ -113,6 +135,12 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3> > { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args)); } + + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3>& args) { + return callback->Run(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args)); + } }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4> @@ -132,6 +160,13 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4> > { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args), get<3>(args)); } + + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4>& args) { + return callback->Run(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args), + get<3>(args)); + } }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, @@ -152,6 +187,13 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5> > { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args), get<3>(args), get<4>(args)); } + + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5>& args) { + return callback->Run(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args), + get<3>(args), get<4>(args)); + } }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, @@ -172,6 +214,9 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6> > { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)(get<0>(args), get<1>(args), get<2>(args), get<3>(args), get<4>(args), get<5>(args)); } + + // There is no InvokeCallback() for 6-tuples, as google3 callbacks + // support 5 arguments at most. }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, @@ -194,6 +239,9 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7> > { get<2>(args), get<3>(args), get<4>(args), get<5>(args), get<6>(args)); } + + // There is no InvokeCallback() for 7-tuples, as google3 callbacks + // support 5 arguments at most. }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, @@ -217,6 +265,9 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8> > { get<2>(args), get<3>(args), get<4>(args), get<5>(args), get<6>(args), get<7>(args)); } + + // There is no InvokeCallback() for 8-tuples, as google3 callbacks + // support 5 arguments at most. }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, @@ -240,6 +291,9 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9> > { get<2>(args), get<3>(args), get<4>(args), get<5>(args), get<6>(args), get<7>(args), get<8>(args)); } + + // There is no InvokeCallback() for 9-tuples, as google3 callbacks + // support 5 arguments at most. }; template <typename R, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, @@ -265,6 +319,34 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, get<2>(args), get<3>(args), get<4>(args), get<5>(args), get<6>(args), get<7>(args), get<8>(args), get<9>(args)); } + + // There is no InvokeCallback() for 10-tuples, as google3 callbacks + // support 5 arguments at most. +}; + +// Implements the Invoke(callback) action. +template <typename CallbackType> +class InvokeCallbackAction { + public: + // The c'tor takes ownership of the callback. + explicit InvokeCallbackAction(CallbackType* callback) + : callback_(callback) { + callback->CheckIsRepeatable(); // Makes sure the callback is permanent. + } + + // This type conversion operator template allows Invoke(callback) to + // be used wherever the callback's type is compatible with that of + // the mock function, i.e. if the mock function's arguments can be + // implicitly converted to the callback's arguments and the + // callback's result can be implicitly converted to the mock + // function's result. + template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> + Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const { + return InvokeHelper<Result, ArgumentTuple>::InvokeCallback( + callback_.get(), args); + } + private: + const linked_ptr<CallbackType> callback_; }; // An INTERNAL macro for extracting the type of a tuple field. It's @@ -875,7 +957,7 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, // MORE INFORMATION: // // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'ACTION' -// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook. +// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md // An internal macro needed for implementing ACTION*(). #define GMOCK_ACTION_ARG_TYPES_AND_NAMES_UNUSED_\ @@ -1073,52 +1155,90 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()\ () #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p0)\ - (p0##_type gmock_p0) : p0(gmock_p0) + (p0##_type gmock_p0) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1)\ - (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1) + (p0##_type gmock_p0, \ + p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ - p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2) + p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ - p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3) + p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_5_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ - p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4) + p3##_type gmock_p3, \ + p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_6_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ - p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5) + p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_7_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ - p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6) + p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_8_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ - p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7) + p6##_type gmock_p6, \ + p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_9_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, \ p7, p8)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, \ - p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7), \ - p8(gmock_p8) + p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p8)) #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, \ p7, p8, p9)\ (p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, p8##_type gmock_p8, \ - p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7), \ - p8(gmock_p8), p9(gmock_p9) + p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p8)), \ + p9(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p9)) // Declares the fields for storing the value parameters. #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_DEFN_AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS() @@ -1354,7 +1474,8 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, template <typename p0##_type>\ class name##ActionP {\ public:\ - explicit name##ActionP(p0##_type gmock_p0) : p0(gmock_p0) {}\ + explicit name##ActionP(p0##_type gmock_p0) : \ + p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1362,7 +1483,8 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::Result return_type;\ typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple\ args_type;\ - explicit gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0) : p0(gmock_p0) {}\ + explicit gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0) : \ + p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1404,8 +1526,9 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type>\ class name##ActionP2 {\ public:\ - name##ActionP2(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(gmock_p0), \ - p1(gmock_p1) {}\ + name##ActionP2(p0##_type gmock_p0, \ + p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1413,8 +1536,9 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::Result return_type;\ typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple\ args_type;\ - gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(gmock_p0), \ - p1(gmock_p1) {}\ + gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, \ + p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1460,7 +1584,9 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, class name##ActionP3 {\ public:\ name##ActionP3(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ - p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2) {}\ + p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1469,7 +1595,9 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple\ args_type;\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ - p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2) {}\ + p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1519,8 +1647,11 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, class name##ActionP4 {\ public:\ name##ActionP4(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ - p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3) {}\ + p2##_type gmock_p2, \ + p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1529,8 +1660,10 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple\ args_type;\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ - p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3) {}\ + p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1587,8 +1720,11 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, public:\ name##ActionP5(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, \ - p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4) {}\ + p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1597,8 +1733,12 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, typedef typename ::testing::internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple\ args_type;\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ - p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(gmock_p0), \ - p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4) {}\ + p3##_type gmock_p3, \ + p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1657,8 +1797,12 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, public:\ name##ActionP6(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ - p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5) {}\ + p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1668,8 +1812,12 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, args_type;\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ - p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5) {}\ + p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1731,9 +1879,14 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, public:\ name##ActionP7(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ - p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), \ - p6(gmock_p6) {}\ + p5##_type gmock_p5, \ + p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1743,8 +1896,13 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, args_type;\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ - p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6) {}\ + p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1813,9 +1971,14 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, name##ActionP8(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6, \ - p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7) {}\ + p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::forward<p7##_type>(gmock_p7)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1825,9 +1988,15 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, args_type;\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ - p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(gmock_p0), \ - p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), \ - p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7) {}\ + p6##_type gmock_p6, \ + p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::forward<p7##_type>(gmock_p7)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1900,9 +2069,15 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, name##ActionP9(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, \ - p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7), \ - p8(gmock_p8) {}\ + p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::forward<p7##_type>(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::forward<p8##_type>(gmock_p8)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -1913,9 +2088,15 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, \ - p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7), p8(gmock_p8) {}\ + p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::forward<p7##_type>(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::forward<p8##_type>(gmock_p8)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -1992,9 +2173,17 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, name##ActionP10(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, \ - p8##_type gmock_p8, p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7), p8(gmock_p8), p9(gmock_p9) {}\ + p8##_type gmock_p8, \ + p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::forward<p7##_type>(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::forward<p8##_type>(gmock_p8)), \ + p9(::testing::internal::forward<p9##_type>(gmock_p9)) {}\ template <typename F>\ class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::ActionInterface<F> {\ public:\ @@ -2005,9 +2194,16 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6, gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, p8##_type gmock_p8, \ - p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7), p8(gmock_p8), p9(gmock_p9) {}\ + p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(::testing::internal::forward<p0##_type>(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::forward<p1##_type>(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::forward<p2##_type>(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::forward<p3##_type>(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::forward<p4##_type>(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::forward<p5##_type>(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::forward<p6##_type>(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::forward<p7##_type>(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::forward<p8##_type>(gmock_p8)), \ + p9(::testing::internal::forward<p9##_type>(gmock_p9)) {}\ virtual return_type Perform(const args_type& args) {\ return ::testing::internal::ActionHelper<return_type, gmock_Impl>::\ Perform(this, args);\ @@ -2369,7 +2565,7 @@ ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnNew, } // namespace testing -// Include any custom actions added by the local installation. +// Include any custom callback actions added by the local installation. // We must include this header at the end to make sure it can use the // declarations from this file. #include "gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h" diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump index 66d9f9d..4ec6679 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ $$ -*- mode: c++; -*- -$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert it to +$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert it to $$ gmock-generated-actions.h. $$ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ $$}} This meta comment fixes auto-indentation in editors. // // This file implements some commonly used variadic actions. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ @@ -49,12 +51,13 @@ namespace testing { namespace internal { // InvokeHelper<F> knows how to unpack an N-tuple and invoke an N-ary -// function or method with the unpacked values, where F is a function -// type that takes N arguments. +// function, method, or callback with the unpacked values, where F is +// a function type that takes N arguments. template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> class InvokeHelper; +$var max_callback_arity = 5 $range i 0..n $for i [[ $range j 1..i @@ -76,10 +79,48 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<$as> > { const ::testing::tuple<$as>&$args) { return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)($gets); } + + +$if i <= max_callback_arity [[ + template <typename CallbackType> + static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback, + const ::testing::tuple<$as>&$args) { + return callback->Run($gets); + } +]] $else [[ + // There is no InvokeCallback() for $i-tuples, as google3 callbacks + // support $max_callback_arity arguments at most. +]] + }; ]] +// Implements the Invoke(callback) action. +template <typename CallbackType> +class InvokeCallbackAction { + public: + // The c'tor takes ownership of the callback. + explicit InvokeCallbackAction(CallbackType* callback) + : callback_(callback) { + callback->CheckIsRepeatable(); // Makes sure the callback is permanent. + } + + // This type conversion operator template allows Invoke(callback) to + // be used wherever the callback's type is compatible with that of + // the mock function, i.e. if the mock function's arguments can be + // implicitly converted to the callback's arguments and the + // callback's result can be implicitly converted to the mock + // function's result. + template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple> + Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const { + return InvokeHelper<Result, ArgumentTuple>::InvokeCallback( + callback_.get(), args); + } + private: + const linked_ptr<CallbackType> callback_; +}; + // An INTERNAL macro for extracting the type of a tuple field. It's // subject to change without notice - DO NOT USE IN USER CODE! #define GMOCK_FIELD_(Tuple, N) \ @@ -357,7 +398,7 @@ $range j2 2..i // MORE INFORMATION: // // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'ACTION' -// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook. +// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md $range i 0..n $range k 0..n-1 @@ -486,7 +527,7 @@ _VALUE_PARAMS($for j, [[p$j]]) $for j [[, typename p$j##_type]] $for i [[ $range j 0..i-1 #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_$i[[]]_VALUE_PARAMS($for j, [[p$j]])\ - ($for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]])$if i>0 [[ : ]]$for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]] + ($for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]])$if i>0 [[ : ]]$for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p$j))]] ]] @@ -619,7 +660,7 @@ $var class_name = [[name##Action[[$if i==0 [[]] $elif i==1 [[P]] $range j 0..i-1 $var ctor_param_list = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]]]] $var param_types_and_names = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type p$j]]]] -$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]]]]] +$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::forward<p$j##_type>(gmock_p$j))]]]]]] $var param_field_decls = [[$for j [[ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h index 4fa5ca9..0474c89 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ // // This file implements function mockers of various arities. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_FUNCTION_MOCKERS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_FUNCTION_MOCKERS_H_ @@ -68,8 +70,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R()> : public typedef R F(); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With() { - return this->current_spec(); + MockSpec<F> With() { + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple()); } R Invoke() { @@ -88,9 +90,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1)> : public typedef R F(A1); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1)); - return this->current_spec(); + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1) { + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1)); } R Invoke(A1 a1) { @@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1))); } }; @@ -109,9 +110,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2)); - return this->current_spec(); + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2) { + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2) { @@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2))); } }; @@ -130,10 +131,9 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3) { @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3))); } }; @@ -152,10 +153,9 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4) { @@ -163,7 +163,9 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4))); } }; @@ -175,10 +177,9 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4, const Matcher<A5>& m5) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5) { @@ -186,7 +187,9 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4), internal::forward<A5>(a5))); } }; @@ -198,12 +201,10 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4, const Matcher<A5>& m5, const Matcher<A6>& m6) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, - m6)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6) { @@ -211,7 +212,10 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4), internal::forward<A5>(a5), + internal::forward<A6>(a6))); } }; @@ -223,12 +227,10 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4, const Matcher<A5>& m5, const Matcher<A6>& m6, const Matcher<A7>& m7) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, - m6, m7)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7) { @@ -236,7 +238,10 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4), internal::forward<A5>(a5), + internal::forward<A6>(a6), internal::forward<A7>(a7))); } }; @@ -248,12 +253,11 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4, const Matcher<A5>& m5, const Matcher<A6>& m6, const Matcher<A7>& m7, const Matcher<A8>& m8) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, - m6, m7, m8)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, + m8)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7, A8 a8) { @@ -261,7 +265,11 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4), internal::forward<A5>(a5), + internal::forward<A6>(a6), internal::forward<A7>(a7), + internal::forward<A8>(a8))); } }; @@ -273,13 +281,12 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4, const Matcher<A5>& m5, const Matcher<A6>& m6, const Matcher<A7>& m7, const Matcher<A8>& m8, const Matcher<A9>& m9) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, - m6, m7, m8, m9)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, + m8, m9)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7, A8 a8, A9 a9) { @@ -287,7 +294,11 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4), internal::forward<A5>(a5), + internal::forward<A6>(a6), internal::forward<A7>(a7), + internal::forward<A8>(a8), internal::forward<A9>(a9))); } }; @@ -300,13 +311,12 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10)> : public typedef R F(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, + MockSpec<F> With(const Matcher<A1>& m1, const Matcher<A2>& m2, const Matcher<A3>& m3, const Matcher<A4>& m4, const Matcher<A5>& m5, const Matcher<A6>& m6, const Matcher<A7>& m7, const Matcher<A8>& m8, const Matcher<A9>& m9, const Matcher<A10>& m10) { - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, - m6, m7, m8, m9, m10)); - return this->current_spec(); + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, + m8, m9, m10)); } R Invoke(A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7, A8 a8, A9 a9, @@ -315,11 +325,67 @@ class FunctionMocker<R(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10)> : public // by the C++ standard [14.6.4] here, as the base class type is // dependent on the template argument (and thus shouldn't be // looked into when resolving InvokeWith). - return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, - a10)); + return this->InvokeWith(ArgumentTuple(internal::forward<A1>(a1), + internal::forward<A2>(a2), internal::forward<A3>(a3), + internal::forward<A4>(a4), internal::forward<A5>(a5), + internal::forward<A6>(a6), internal::forward<A7>(a7), + internal::forward<A8>(a8), internal::forward<A9>(a9), + internal::forward<A10>(a10))); } }; +// Removes the given pointer; this is a helper for the expectation setter method +// for parameterless matchers. +// +// We want to make sure that the user cannot set a parameterless expectation on +// overloaded methods, including methods which are overloaded on const. Example: +// +// class MockClass { +// MOCK_METHOD0(GetName, string&()); +// MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetName, const string&()); +// }; +// +// TEST() { +// // This should be an error, as it's not clear which overload is expected. +// EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetName).WillOnce(ReturnRef(value)); +// } +// +// Here are the generated expectation-setter methods: +// +// class MockClass { +// // Overload 1 +// MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName() { ... } +// // Overload 2. Declared const so that the compiler will generate an +// // error when trying to resolve between this and overload 4 in +// // 'gmock_GetName(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)'. +// MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName( +// const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<string&()>*) const { +// // Removes const from this, calls overload 1 +// return AdjustConstness_(this)->gmock_GetName(); +// } +// +// // Overload 3 +// const string& gmock_GetName() const { ... } +// // Overload 4 +// MockSpec<const string&()> gmock_GetName( +// const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<const string&()>*) const { +// // Does not remove const, calls overload 3 +// return AdjustConstness_const(this)->gmock_GetName(); +// } +// } +// +template <typename MockType> +const MockType* AdjustConstness_const(const MockType* mock) { + return mock; +} + +// Removes const from and returns the given pointer; this is a helper for the +// expectation setter method for parameterless matchers. +template <typename MockType> +MockType* AdjustConstness_(const MockType* mock) { + return const_cast<MockType*>(mock); +} + } // namespace internal // The style guide prohibits "using" statements in a namespace scope @@ -353,324 +419,534 @@ using internal::FunctionMocker; GTEST_CONCAT_TOKEN_(gmock##constness##arity##_##Method##_, __LINE__) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD0_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - ) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 0), \ - this_method_does_not_take_0_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).Invoke(); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method() constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).With(); \ - } \ +#define GMOCK_METHOD0_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method() constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 0), \ + this_method_does_not_take_0_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).Invoke(); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method() constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, Method).With(); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(); \ + } \ mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(0, constness, \ - Method) + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD1_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 1), \ - this_method_does_not_take_1_argument); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD1_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 1), \ + this_method_does_not_take_1_argument); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(1, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD2_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 2), \ - this_method_does_not_take_2_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD2_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 2), \ + this_method_does_not_take_2_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(2, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD3_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 3), \ - this_method_does_not_take_3_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD3_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 3), \ + this_method_does_not_take_3_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(3, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD4_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 4), \ - this_method_does_not_take_4_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD4_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 4), \ + this_method_does_not_take_4_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(4, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD5_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 5), \ - this_method_does_not_take_5_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD5_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 5), \ + this_method_does_not_take_5_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a5)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(5, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD6_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 6), \ - this_method_does_not_take_6_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD6_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 6), \ + this_method_does_not_take_6_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a5), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a6)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(6, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD7_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 7), \ - this_method_does_not_take_7_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD7_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 7), \ + this_method_does_not_take_7_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a5), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a6), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a7)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, \ + gmock_a7); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(7, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD8_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 8), \ - this_method_does_not_take_8_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7, gmock_a8); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7, gmock_a8); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD8_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 8), \ + this_method_does_not_take_8_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a5), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a6), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a7), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a8)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, \ + gmock_a7, gmock_a8); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(8, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD9_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 9), \ - this_method_does_not_take_9_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7, gmock_a8, \ - gmock_a9); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7, gmock_a8, \ - gmock_a9); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD9_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 9), \ + this_method_does_not_take_9_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a5), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a6), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a7), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a8), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a9)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, \ + gmock_a7, gmock_a8, gmock_a9); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(9, constness, \ + Method) // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! -#define GMOCK_METHOD10_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ - GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9, \ - GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 10, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a10) constness { \ - GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_((::testing::tuple_size< \ - tn ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value \ - == 10), \ - this_method_does_not_take_10_arguments); \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method).Invoke(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7, gmock_a8, gmock_a9, \ - gmock_a10); \ - } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method(GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9, \ - GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 10, \ - __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a10) constness { \ - GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method).With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, \ - gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, gmock_a7, gmock_a8, gmock_a9, \ - gmock_a10); \ - } \ - mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, \ - Method) +#define GMOCK_METHOD10_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ + GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) \ + ct Method(GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9, \ + GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 10, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a10) constness { \ + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( \ + (::testing::tuple_size<tn ::testing::internal::Function< \ + __VA_ARGS__>::ArgumentTuple>::value == 10), \ + this_method_does_not_take_10_arguments); \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method) \ + .Invoke(::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a1), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a2), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a3), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a4), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a5), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a6), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a7), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a8), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a9), \ + ::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 10, __VA_ARGS__)>( \ + gmock_a10)); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a1, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a2, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a3, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a4, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a5, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a6, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a7, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a8, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a9, \ + GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, 10, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a10) constness { \ + GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, Method) \ + .With(gmock_a1, gmock_a2, gmock_a3, gmock_a4, gmock_a5, gmock_a6, \ + gmock_a7, gmock_a8, gmock_a9, gmock_a10); \ + } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>*) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this) \ + ->gmock_##Method(::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 1, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 2, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 3, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 4, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 5, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 6, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 7, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 8, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 9, __VA_ARGS__)>(), \ + ::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, 10, __VA_ARGS__)>()); \ + } \ + mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_(10, constness, \ + Method) #define MOCK_METHOD0(m, ...) GMOCK_METHOD0_(, , , m, __VA_ARGS__) #define MOCK_METHOD1(m, ...) GMOCK_METHOD1_(, , , m, __VA_ARGS__) @@ -880,7 +1156,7 @@ class MockFunction<R()> { MOCK_METHOD0_T(Call, R()); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R()> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R()> AsStdFunction() { return [this]() -> R { return this->Call(); }; @@ -899,9 +1175,9 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0)> { MOCK_METHOD1_T(Call, R(A0)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0) -> R { - return this->Call(a0); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -918,9 +1194,9 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1)> { MOCK_METHOD2_T(Call, R(A0, A1)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -937,9 +1213,9 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2)> { MOCK_METHOD3_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -956,9 +1232,10 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3)> { MOCK_METHOD4_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -976,9 +1253,10 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4)> { MOCK_METHOD5_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3), ::std::move(a4)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -996,9 +1274,10 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5)> { MOCK_METHOD6_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3), ::std::move(a4), ::std::move(a5)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -1016,9 +1295,10 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6)> { MOCK_METHOD7_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3), ::std::move(a4), ::std::move(a5), ::std::move(a6)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -1036,9 +1316,11 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7)> { MOCK_METHOD8_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3), ::std::move(a4), ::std::move(a5), ::std::move(a6), + ::std::move(a7)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -1056,10 +1338,12 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8)> { MOCK_METHOD9_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7, A8 a8) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3), ::std::move(a4), ::std::move(a5), ::std::move(a6), + ::std::move(a7), ::std::move(a8)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ @@ -1078,10 +1362,12 @@ class MockFunction<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9)> { MOCK_METHOD10_T(Call, R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R(A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9)> AsStdFunction() { return [this](A0 a0, A1 a1, A2 a2, A3 a3, A4 a4, A5 a5, A6 a6, A7 a7, A8 a8, A9 a9) -> R { - return this->Call(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9); + return this->Call(::std::move(a0), ::std::move(a1), ::std::move(a2), + ::std::move(a3), ::std::move(a4), ::std::move(a5), ::std::move(a6), + ::std::move(a7), ::std::move(a8), ::std::move(a9)); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.pump b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.pump index 811502d..f6e1781 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.pump +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.pump @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ $$ -*- mode: c++; -*- -$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert it to -$$ gmock-generated-function-mockers.h. +$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert +$$ it to gmock-generated-function-mockers.h. $$ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. // Copyright 2007, Google Inc. @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. // // This file implements function mockers of various arities. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_FUNCTION_MOCKERS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_FUNCTION_MOCKERS_H_ @@ -68,7 +70,7 @@ $for i [[ $range j 1..i $var typename_As = [[$for j [[, typename A$j]]]] $var As = [[$for j, [[A$j]]]] -$var as = [[$for j, [[a$j]]]] +$var as = [[$for j, [[internal::forward<A$j>(a$j)]]]] $var Aas = [[$for j, [[A$j a$j]]]] $var ms = [[$for j, [[m$j]]]] $var matchers = [[$for j, [[const Matcher<A$j>& m$j]]]] @@ -79,13 +81,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R($As)> : public typedef R F($As); typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; - MockSpec<F>& With($matchers) { - -$if i >= 1 [[ - this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple($ms)); - -]] - return this->current_spec(); + MockSpec<F> With($matchers) { + return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple($ms)); } R Invoke($Aas) { @@ -99,6 +96,58 @@ $if i >= 1 [[ ]] +// Removes the given pointer; this is a helper for the expectation setter method +// for parameterless matchers. +// +// We want to make sure that the user cannot set a parameterless expectation on +// overloaded methods, including methods which are overloaded on const. Example: +// +// class MockClass { +// MOCK_METHOD0(GetName, string&()); +// MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetName, const string&()); +// }; +// +// TEST() { +// // This should be an error, as it's not clear which overload is expected. +// EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetName).WillOnce(ReturnRef(value)); +// } +// +// Here are the generated expectation-setter methods: +// +// class MockClass { +// // Overload 1 +// MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName() { ... } +// // Overload 2. Declared const so that the compiler will generate an +// // error when trying to resolve between this and overload 4 in +// // 'gmock_GetName(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)'. +// MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName( +// const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<string&()>*) const { +// // Removes const from this, calls overload 1 +// return AdjustConstness_(this)->gmock_GetName(); +// } +// +// // Overload 3 +// const string& gmock_GetName() const { ... } +// // Overload 4 +// MockSpec<const string&()> gmock_GetName( +// const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<const string&()>*) const { +// // Does not remove const, calls overload 3 +// return AdjustConstness_const(this)->gmock_GetName(); +// } +// } +// +template <typename MockType> +const MockType* AdjustConstness_const(const MockType* mock) { + return mock; +} + +// Removes const from and returns the given pointer; this is a helper for the +// expectation setter method for parameterless matchers. +template <typename MockType> +MockType* AdjustConstness_(const MockType* mock) { + return const_cast<MockType*>(mock); +} + } // namespace internal // The style guide prohibits "using" statements in a namespace scope @@ -134,11 +183,14 @@ using internal::FunctionMocker; $for i [[ $range j 1..i -$var arg_as = [[$for j, \ - [[GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a$j]]]] -$var as = [[$for j, [[gmock_a$j]]]] -$var matcher_as = [[$for j, \ +$var arg_as = [[$for j, [[GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a$j]]]] +$var as = [[$for j, \ + [[::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__)>(gmock_a$j)]]]] +$var matcher_arg_as = [[$for j, \ [[GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a$j]]]] +$var matcher_as = [[$for j, [[gmock_a$j]]]] +$var anything_matchers = [[$for j, \ + [[::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__)>()]]]] // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!! #define GMOCK_METHOD$i[[]]_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \ GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \ @@ -149,11 +201,17 @@ $var matcher_as = [[$for j, \ GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \ return GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).Invoke($as); \ } \ - ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \ - gmock_##Method($matcher_as) constness { \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> \ + gmock_##Method($matcher_arg_as) constness { \ GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \ - return GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).With($as); \ + return GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).With($matcher_as); \ } \ + ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \ + const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \ + constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>* ) const { \ + return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this)-> \ + gmock_##Method($anything_matchers); \ + } \ mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method) @@ -263,7 +321,7 @@ class MockFunction; $for i [[ $range j 0..i-1 $var ArgTypes = [[$for j, [[A$j]]]] -$var ArgNames = [[$for j, [[a$j]]]] +$var ArgValues = [[$for j, [[::std::move(a$j)]]]] $var ArgDecls = [[$for j, [[A$j a$j]]]] template <typename R$for j [[, typename A$j]]> class MockFunction<R($ArgTypes)> { @@ -273,9 +331,9 @@ class MockFunction<R($ArgTypes)> { MOCK_METHOD$i[[]]_T(Call, R($ArgTypes)); #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ - std::function<R($ArgTypes)> AsStdFunction() { + ::std::function<R($ArgTypes)> AsStdFunction() { return [this]($ArgDecls) -> R { - return this->Call($ArgNames); + return this->Call($ArgValues); }; } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h index 57056fd..0d46d23 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ // // This file implements some commonly used variadic matchers. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_MATCHERS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_MATCHERS_H_ @@ -779,6 +781,9 @@ ElementsAre(const T1& e1, const T2& e2, const T3& e3, const T4& e4, // UnorderedElementsAre(e_1, e_2, ..., e_n) is an ElementsAre extension // that matches n elements in any order. We support up to n=10 arguments. +// +// If you have >10 elements, consider UnorderedElementsAreArray() or +// UnorderedPointwise() instead. inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreMatcher< ::testing::tuple<> > @@ -1268,7 +1273,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { // using testing::PrintToString; // // MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, -// string(negation ? "is not" : "is") + " in range [" + +// std::string(negation ? "is not" : "is") + " in range [" + // PrintToString(low) + ", " + PrintToString(hi) + "]") { // return low <= arg && arg <= hi; // } @@ -1376,18 +1381,21 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { // ================ // // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'MATCHER' -// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook. +// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/ +// CookBook.md #define MATCHER(name, description)\ class name##Matcher {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl()\ {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ @@ -1395,8 +1403,8 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1404,7 +1412,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(\ ::testing::tuple<>()));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1414,14 +1421,13 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { name##Matcher() {\ }\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##Matcher);\ };\ inline name##Matcher name() {\ return name##Matcher();\ }\ template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##Matcher::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1430,22 +1436,24 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ explicit gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0)\ - : p0(gmock_p0) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1453,18 +1461,17 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(\ ::testing::tuple<p0##_type>(p0)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ return ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>(\ new gmock_Impl<arg_type>(p0));\ }\ - explicit name##MatcherP(p0##_type gmock_p0) : p0(gmock_p0) {\ + explicit name##MatcherP(p0##_type gmock_p0) : \ + p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type>\ inline name##MatcherP<p0##_type> name(p0##_type p0) {\ @@ -1473,7 +1480,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename p0##_type>\ template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP<p0##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1482,23 +1489,26 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP2 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1506,20 +1516,19 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(\ ::testing::tuple<p0##_type, p1##_type>(p0, p1)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ return ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>(\ new gmock_Impl<arg_type>(p0, p1));\ }\ - name##MatcherP2(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(gmock_p0), \ - p1(gmock_p1) {\ + name##MatcherP2(p0##_type gmock_p0, \ + p1##_type gmock_p1) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP2);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type>\ inline name##MatcherP2<p0##_type, p1##_type> name(p0##_type p0, \ @@ -1530,7 +1539,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP2<p0##_type, \ p1##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1539,24 +1548,28 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP3 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1565,7 +1578,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::tuple<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type>(p0, p1, \ p2)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1573,13 +1585,14 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { new gmock_Impl<arg_type>(p0, p1, p2));\ }\ name##MatcherP3(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ - p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2) {\ + p2##_type gmock_p2) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP3);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type>\ inline name##MatcherP3<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type> name(p0##_type p0, \ @@ -1590,7 +1603,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP3<p0##_type, p1##_type, \ p2##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1600,26 +1613,31 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP4 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1628,7 +1646,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::tuple<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, \ p3##_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1636,15 +1653,17 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { new gmock_Impl<arg_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3));\ }\ name##MatcherP4(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ - p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3) {\ + p2##_type gmock_p2, \ + p3##_type gmock_p3) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP4);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type>\ @@ -1659,7 +1678,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP4<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, \ p3##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1669,28 +1688,33 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP5 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), \ - p4(gmock_p4) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1699,7 +1723,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::tuple<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, \ p4##_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1708,16 +1731,18 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { }\ name##MatcherP5(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, \ - p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4) {\ + p4##_type gmock_p4) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP5);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type, typename p4##_type>\ @@ -1732,7 +1757,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP5<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, \ p4##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1742,29 +1767,35 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP6 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), \ - p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1773,7 +1804,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { ::testing::tuple<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, \ p4##_type, p5##_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1782,17 +1812,20 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { }\ name##MatcherP6(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ - p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5) {\ + p5##_type gmock_p5) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP6);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type, typename p4##_type, typename p5##_type>\ @@ -1807,7 +1840,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP6<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, p4##_type, \ p5##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1818,31 +1851,38 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP7 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), \ - p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1852,7 +1892,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { p4##_type, p5##_type, p6##_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, \ p6)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1861,19 +1900,23 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { }\ name##MatcherP7(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ - p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), \ - p6(gmock_p6) {\ + p5##_type gmock_p5, \ + p6##_type gmock_p6) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP7);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type, typename p4##_type, typename p5##_type, \ @@ -1891,7 +1934,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { template <typename arg_type>\ bool name##MatcherP7<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, p4##_type, \ p5##_type, p6##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1902,32 +1945,40 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP8 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), \ - p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ - p7##_type p7;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ + p7##_type const p7;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -1937,7 +1988,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { p4##_type, p5##_type, p6##_type, p7##_type>(p0, p1, p2, \ p3, p4, p5, p6, p7)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -1947,20 +1997,24 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { name##MatcherP8(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6, \ - p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7) {\ + p7##_type gmock_p7) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ - p7##_type p7;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ + p7##_type const p7;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP8);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type, typename p4##_type, typename p5##_type, \ @@ -1980,7 +2034,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { bool name##MatcherP8<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, p4##_type, \ p5##_type, p6##_type, \ p7##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -1991,34 +2045,42 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP9 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, p8##_type gmock_p8)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), \ - p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7), \ - p8(gmock_p8) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p8)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ - p7##_type p7;\ - p8##_type p8;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ + p7##_type const p7;\ + p8##_type const p8;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -2028,7 +2090,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { p4##_type, p5##_type, p6##_type, p7##_type, \ p8##_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -2038,21 +2099,26 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { name##MatcherP9(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, \ - p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), \ - p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7), \ - p8(gmock_p8) {\ + p8##_type gmock_p8) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p8)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ - p7##_type p7;\ - p8##_type p8;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ + p7##_type const p7;\ + p8##_type const p8;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP9);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type, typename p4##_type, typename p5##_type, \ @@ -2073,7 +2139,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { bool name##MatcherP9<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, p4##_type, \ p5##_type, p6##_type, p7##_type, \ p8##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const @@ -2085,36 +2151,45 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { class name##MatcherP10 {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ gmock_Impl(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, p2##_type gmock_p2, \ p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, p5##_type gmock_p5, \ p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, p8##_type gmock_p8, \ p9##_type gmock_p9)\ - : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), \ - p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), p7(gmock_p7), \ - p8(gmock_p8), p9(gmock_p9) {}\ + : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p8)), \ + p9(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p9)) {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ - p7##_type p7;\ - p8##_type p8;\ - p9##_type p9;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ + p7##_type const p7;\ + p8##_type const p8;\ + p9##_type const p9;\ private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -2124,7 +2199,6 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { p4##_type, p5##_type, p6##_type, p7##_type, p8##_type, \ p9##_type>(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9)));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -2134,22 +2208,29 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { name##MatcherP10(p0##_type gmock_p0, p1##_type gmock_p1, \ p2##_type gmock_p2, p3##_type gmock_p3, p4##_type gmock_p4, \ p5##_type gmock_p5, p6##_type gmock_p6, p7##_type gmock_p7, \ - p8##_type gmock_p8, p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(gmock_p0), p1(gmock_p1), \ - p2(gmock_p2), p3(gmock_p3), p4(gmock_p4), p5(gmock_p5), p6(gmock_p6), \ - p7(gmock_p7), p8(gmock_p8), p9(gmock_p9) {\ + p8##_type gmock_p8, \ + p9##_type gmock_p9) : p0(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p0)), \ + p1(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p1)), \ + p2(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p2)), \ + p3(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p3)), \ + p4(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p4)), \ + p5(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p5)), \ + p6(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p6)), \ + p7(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p7)), \ + p8(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p8)), \ + p9(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p9)) {\ }\ - p0##_type p0;\ - p1##_type p1;\ - p2##_type p2;\ - p3##_type p3;\ - p4##_type p4;\ - p5##_type p5;\ - p6##_type p6;\ - p7##_type p7;\ - p8##_type p8;\ - p9##_type p9;\ + p0##_type const p0;\ + p1##_type const p1;\ + p2##_type const p2;\ + p3##_type const p3;\ + p4##_type const p4;\ + p5##_type const p5;\ + p6##_type const p6;\ + p7##_type const p7;\ + p8##_type const p8;\ + p9##_type const p9;\ private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(name##MatcherP10);\ };\ template <typename p0##_type, typename p1##_type, typename p2##_type, \ typename p3##_type, typename p4##_type, typename p5##_type, \ @@ -2172,7 +2253,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) { bool name##MatcherP10<p0##_type, p1##_type, p2##_type, p3##_type, \ p4##_type, p5##_type, p6##_type, p7##_type, p8##_type, \ p9##_type>::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h.pump b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h.pump index de30c2c..9fe0fd7 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h.pump +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h.pump @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ $$ -*- mode: c++; -*- -$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert it to -$$ gmock-generated-actions.h. +$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert +$$ it to gmock-generated-matchers.h. $$ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. $$ }} This line fixes auto-indentation of the following code in Emacs. @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ $$ }} This line fixes auto-indentation of the following code in Emacs. // // This file implements some commonly used variadic matchers. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_MATCHERS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_MATCHERS_H_ @@ -303,6 +305,9 @@ $for j, [[ // UnorderedElementsAre(e_1, e_2, ..., e_n) is an ElementsAre extension // that matches n elements in any order. We support up to n=$n arguments. +// +// If you have >$n elements, consider UnorderedElementsAreArray() or +// UnorderedPointwise() instead. $range i 0..n $for i [[ @@ -479,7 +484,7 @@ $$ // show up in the generated code. // using testing::PrintToString; // // MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi, -// string(negation ? "is not" : "is") + " in range [" + +// std::string(negation ? "is not" : "is") + " in range [" + // PrintToString(low) + ", " + PrintToString(hi) + "]") { // return low <= arg && arg <= hi; // } @@ -587,7 +592,7 @@ $$ // show up in the generated code. // ================ // // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'MATCHER' -// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook. +// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md $range i 0..n $for i @@ -604,32 +609,34 @@ $var template = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ ]]]] $var ctor_param_list = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]]]] $var impl_ctor_param_list = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]]]] -$var impl_inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]]]]] -$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]]]]] +$var impl_inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p$j))]]]]]] +$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p$j))]]]]]] $var params = [[$for j, [[p$j]]]] $var param_types = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[<$for j, [[p$j##_type]]>]]]] $var param_types_and_names = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type p$j]]]] $var param_field_decls = [[$for j [[ - p$j##_type p$j;\ + p$j##_type const p$j;\ ]]]] $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j [[ - p$j##_type p$j;\ + p$j##_type const p$j;\ ]]]] #define $macro_name(name$for j [[, p$j]], description)\$template class $class_name {\ public:\ template <typename arg_type>\ - class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\ + class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\ public:\ [[$if i==1 [[explicit ]]]]gmock_Impl($impl_ctor_param_list)\ $impl_inits {}\ virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ + ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\ virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\ *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\ }\ @@ -637,8 +644,8 @@ $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\ }\$param_field_decls private:\ - ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ - const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\ + ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\ + ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\ if (!gmock_description.empty())\ return gmock_description;\ return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\ @@ -646,7 +653,6 @@ $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(\ ::testing::tuple<$for j, [[p$j##_type]]>($for j, [[p$j]])));\ }\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\ };\ template <typename arg_type>\ operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\ @@ -656,14 +662,13 @@ $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j [[$if i==1 [[explicit ]]]]$class_name($ctor_param_list)$inits {\ }\$param_field_decls2 private:\ - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_($class_name);\ };\$template inline $class_name$param_types name($param_types_and_names) {\ return $class_name$param_types($params);\ }\$template template <typename arg_type>\ bool $class_name$param_types::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\ - arg_type arg, \ + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\ ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\ const ]] diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h index 4095f4d..96d6f39 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h @@ -51,10 +51,9 @@ // NiceMock<MockFoo>. // // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of -// their respective base class, with up-to 10 arguments. Therefore -// you can write NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock -// where MockFoo has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), -// for example. +// their respective base class. Therefore you can write +// NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo +// has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example. // // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>, // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using @@ -63,10 +62,8 @@ // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT // supported. -// -// Another known limitation is that the constructors of the base mock -// cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which are -// banned by the Google C++ style guide anyway. + +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_ @@ -79,15 +76,35 @@ namespace testing { template <class MockClass> class NiceMock : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - NiceMock() { + NiceMock() : MockClass() { + ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + NiceMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit NiceMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( @@ -163,7 +180,9 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass { internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - virtual ~NiceMock() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~NiceMock() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } @@ -175,15 +194,35 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass { template <class MockClass> class NaggyMock : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - NaggyMock() { + NaggyMock() : MockClass() { ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { + ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + NaggyMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit NaggyMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( @@ -259,7 +298,9 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass { internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - virtual ~NaggyMock() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~NaggyMock() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } @@ -271,15 +312,35 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass { template <class MockClass> class StrictMock : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - StrictMock() { + StrictMock() : MockClass() { + ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + StrictMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit StrictMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( @@ -355,7 +416,9 @@ class StrictMock : public MockClass { internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - virtual ~StrictMock() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~StrictMock() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.pump b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.pump index 3ee1ce7..7c2bf36 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.pump +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.pump @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ $$ -*- mode: c++; -*- -$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert it to -$$ gmock-generated-nice-strict.h. +$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert +$$ it to gmock-generated-nice-strict.h. $$ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. // Copyright 2008, Google Inc. @@ -52,10 +52,9 @@ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. // NiceMock<MockFoo>. // // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of -// their respective base class, with up-to $n arguments. Therefore -// you can write NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock -// where MockFoo has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), -// for example. +// their respective base class. Therefore you can write +// NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo +// has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example. // // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>, // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using @@ -64,10 +63,8 @@ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT // supported. -// -// Another known limitation is that the constructors of the base mock -// cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which are -// banned by the Google C++ style guide anyway. + +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_ @@ -91,15 +88,35 @@ $var method=[[$if kind==0 [[AllowUninterestingCalls]] template <class MockClass> class $clazz : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - $clazz() { + $clazz() : MockClass() { ::testing::Mock::$method( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit $clazz(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { + ::testing::Mock::$method( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + $clazz(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::$method( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit $clazz(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::$method( @@ -117,7 +134,9 @@ $range j 1..i ]] - virtual ~$clazz() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~$clazz() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-matchers.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-matchers.h index 33b37a7..adf4999 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-matchers.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-matchers.h @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ // matchers can be defined by the user implementing the // MatcherInterface<T> interface if necessary. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_MATCHERS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_MATCHERS_H_ @@ -47,10 +49,9 @@ #include <string> #include <utility> #include <vector> - +#include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h" #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" #if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ # include <initializer_list> // NOLINT -- must be after gtest.h @@ -180,13 +181,42 @@ class MatcherInterface : public MatcherDescriberInterface { // virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const; }; +namespace internal { + +// Converts a MatcherInterface<T> to a MatcherInterface<const T&>. +template <typename T> +class MatcherInterfaceAdapter : public MatcherInterface<const T&> { + public: + explicit MatcherInterfaceAdapter(const MatcherInterface<T>* impl) + : impl_(impl) {} + virtual ~MatcherInterfaceAdapter() { delete impl_; } + + virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { impl_->DescribeTo(os); } + + virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { + impl_->DescribeNegationTo(os); + } + + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(const T& x, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + return impl_->MatchAndExplain(x, listener); + } + + private: + const MatcherInterface<T>* const impl_; + + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MatcherInterfaceAdapter); +}; + +} // namespace internal + // A match result listener that stores the explanation in a string. class StringMatchResultListener : public MatchResultListener { public: StringMatchResultListener() : MatchResultListener(&ss_) {} // Returns the explanation accumulated so far. - internal::string str() const { return ss_.str(); } + std::string str() const { return ss_.str(); } // Clears the explanation accumulated so far. void Clear() { ss_.str(""); } @@ -253,12 +283,13 @@ class MatcherBase { public: // Returns true iff the matcher matches x; also explains the match // result to 'listener'. - bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const { + bool MatchAndExplain(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) x, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { return impl_->MatchAndExplain(x, listener); } // Returns true iff this matcher matches x. - bool Matches(T x) const { + bool Matches(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) x) const { DummyMatchResultListener dummy; return MatchAndExplain(x, &dummy); } @@ -272,7 +303,8 @@ class MatcherBase { } // Explains why x matches, or doesn't match, the matcher. - void ExplainMatchResultTo(T x, ::std::ostream* os) const { + void ExplainMatchResultTo(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) x, + ::std::ostream* os) const { StreamMatchResultListener listener(os); MatchAndExplain(x, &listener); } @@ -288,9 +320,18 @@ class MatcherBase { MatcherBase() {} // Constructs a matcher from its implementation. - explicit MatcherBase(const MatcherInterface<T>* impl) + explicit MatcherBase( + const MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)>* impl) : impl_(impl) {} + template <typename U> + explicit MatcherBase( + const MatcherInterface<U>* impl, + typename internal::EnableIf< + !internal::IsSame<U, GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(U)>::value>::type* = + NULL) + : impl_(new internal::MatcherInterfaceAdapter<U>(impl)) {} + virtual ~MatcherBase() {} private: @@ -305,7 +346,9 @@ class MatcherBase { // // If performance becomes a problem, we should see if using // shared_ptr helps. - ::testing::internal::linked_ptr<const MatcherInterface<T> > impl_; + ::testing::internal::linked_ptr< + const MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)> > + impl_; }; } // namespace internal @@ -324,7 +367,13 @@ class Matcher : public internal::MatcherBase<T> { explicit Matcher() {} // NOLINT // Constructs a matcher from its implementation. - explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<T>* impl) + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<T>(impl) {} + + template <typename U> + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<U>* impl, + typename internal::EnableIf<!internal::IsSame< + U, GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(U)>::value>::type* = NULL) : internal::MatcherBase<T>(impl) {} // Implicit constructor here allows people to write @@ -333,86 +382,170 @@ class Matcher : public internal::MatcherBase<T> { }; // The following two specializations allow the user to write str -// instead of Eq(str) and "foo" instead of Eq("foo") when a string +// instead of Eq(str) and "foo" instead of Eq("foo") when a std::string // matcher is expected. template <> -class GTEST_API_ Matcher<const internal::string&> - : public internal::MatcherBase<const internal::string&> { +class GTEST_API_ Matcher<const std::string&> + : public internal::MatcherBase<const std::string&> { public: Matcher() {} - explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const internal::string&>* impl) - : internal::MatcherBase<const internal::string&>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const std::string&>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<const std::string&>(impl) {} // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where - // str is a string object. - Matcher(const internal::string& s); // NOLINT + // str is a std::string object. + Matcher(const std::string& s); // NOLINT + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a ::string object. + Matcher(const ::string& s); // NOLINT +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING // Allows the user to write "foo" instead of Eq("foo") sometimes. Matcher(const char* s); // NOLINT }; template <> -class GTEST_API_ Matcher<internal::string> - : public internal::MatcherBase<internal::string> { +class GTEST_API_ Matcher<std::string> + : public internal::MatcherBase<std::string> { public: Matcher() {} - explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<internal::string>* impl) - : internal::MatcherBase<internal::string>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const std::string&>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<std::string>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<std::string>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<std::string>(impl) {} // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where // str is a string object. - Matcher(const internal::string& s); // NOLINT + Matcher(const std::string& s); // NOLINT + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a ::string object. + Matcher(const ::string& s); // NOLINT +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING // Allows the user to write "foo" instead of Eq("foo") sometimes. Matcher(const char* s); // NOLINT }; -#if GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING // The following two specializations allow the user to write str -// instead of Eq(str) and "foo" instead of Eq("foo") when a StringPiece +// instead of Eq(str) and "foo" instead of Eq("foo") when a ::string // matcher is expected. template <> -class GTEST_API_ Matcher<const StringPiece&> - : public internal::MatcherBase<const StringPiece&> { +class GTEST_API_ Matcher<const ::string&> + : public internal::MatcherBase<const ::string&> { public: Matcher() {} - explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const StringPiece&>* impl) - : internal::MatcherBase<const StringPiece&>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const ::string&>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<const ::string&>(impl) {} // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where - // str is a string object. - Matcher(const internal::string& s); // NOLINT + // str is a std::string object. + Matcher(const std::string& s); // NOLINT + + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a ::string object. + Matcher(const ::string& s); // NOLINT // Allows the user to write "foo" instead of Eq("foo") sometimes. Matcher(const char* s); // NOLINT +}; + +template <> +class GTEST_API_ Matcher< ::string> + : public internal::MatcherBase< ::string> { + public: + Matcher() {} + + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const ::string&>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase< ::string>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface< ::string>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase< ::string>(impl) {} + + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a std::string object. + Matcher(const std::string& s); // NOLINT - // Allows the user to pass StringPieces directly. - Matcher(StringPiece s); // NOLINT + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a ::string object. + Matcher(const ::string& s); // NOLINT + + // Allows the user to write "foo" instead of Eq("foo") sometimes. + Matcher(const char* s); // NOLINT }; +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +// The following two specializations allow the user to write str +// instead of Eq(str) and "foo" instead of Eq("foo") when a absl::string_view +// matcher is expected. template <> -class GTEST_API_ Matcher<StringPiece> - : public internal::MatcherBase<StringPiece> { +class GTEST_API_ Matcher<const absl::string_view&> + : public internal::MatcherBase<const absl::string_view&> { public: Matcher() {} - explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<StringPiece>* impl) - : internal::MatcherBase<StringPiece>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const absl::string_view&>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<const absl::string_view&>(impl) {} // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where - // str is a string object. - Matcher(const internal::string& s); // NOLINT + // str is a std::string object. + Matcher(const std::string& s); // NOLINT + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a ::string object. + Matcher(const ::string& s); // NOLINT +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING // Allows the user to write "foo" instead of Eq("foo") sometimes. Matcher(const char* s); // NOLINT - // Allows the user to pass StringPieces directly. - Matcher(StringPiece s); // NOLINT + // Allows the user to pass absl::string_views directly. + Matcher(absl::string_view s); // NOLINT }; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ + +template <> +class GTEST_API_ Matcher<absl::string_view> + : public internal::MatcherBase<absl::string_view> { + public: + Matcher() {} + + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<const absl::string_view&>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<absl::string_view>(impl) {} + explicit Matcher(const MatcherInterface<absl::string_view>* impl) + : internal::MatcherBase<absl::string_view>(impl) {} + + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a std::string object. + Matcher(const std::string& s); // NOLINT + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + // Allows the user to write str instead of Eq(str) sometimes, where + // str is a ::string object. + Matcher(const ::string& s); // NOLINT +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + + // Allows the user to write "foo" instead of Eq("foo") sometimes. + Matcher(const char* s); // NOLINT + + // Allows the user to pass absl::string_views directly. + Matcher(absl::string_view s); // NOLINT +}; +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + +// Prints a matcher in a human-readable format. +template <typename T> +std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const Matcher<T>& matcher) { + matcher.DescribeTo(&os); + return os; +} // The PolymorphicMatcher class template makes it easy to implement a // polymorphic matcher (i.e. a matcher that can match values of more @@ -441,7 +574,7 @@ class PolymorphicMatcher { template <typename T> operator Matcher<T>() const { - return Matcher<T>(new MonomorphicImpl<T>(impl_)); + return Matcher<T>(new MonomorphicImpl<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)>(impl_)); } private: @@ -515,7 +648,7 @@ template <typename T, typename M> class MatcherCastImpl { public: static Matcher<T> Cast(const M& polymorphic_matcher_or_value) { - // M can be a polymorhic matcher, in which case we want to use + // M can be a polymorphic matcher, in which case we want to use // its conversion operator to create Matcher<T>. Or it can be a value // that should be passed to the Matcher<T>'s constructor. // @@ -531,21 +664,18 @@ class MatcherCastImpl { return CastImpl( polymorphic_matcher_or_value, BooleanConstant< - internal::ImplicitlyConvertible<M, Matcher<T> >::value>()); + internal::ImplicitlyConvertible<M, Matcher<T> >::value>(), + BooleanConstant< + internal::ImplicitlyConvertible<M, T>::value>()); } private: - static Matcher<T> CastImpl(const M& value, BooleanConstant<false>) { - // M can't be implicitly converted to Matcher<T>, so M isn't a polymorphic - // matcher. It must be a value then. Use direct initialization to create - // a matcher. - return Matcher<T>(ImplicitCast_<T>(value)); - } - + template <bool Ignore> static Matcher<T> CastImpl(const M& polymorphic_matcher_or_value, - BooleanConstant<true>) { + BooleanConstant<true> /* convertible_to_matcher */, + BooleanConstant<Ignore>) { // M is implicitly convertible to Matcher<T>, which means that either - // M is a polymorhpic matcher or Matcher<T> has an implicit constructor + // M is a polymorphic matcher or Matcher<T> has an implicit constructor // from M. In both cases using the implicit conversion will produce a // matcher. // @@ -554,6 +684,29 @@ class MatcherCastImpl { // (first to create T from M and then to create Matcher<T> from T). return polymorphic_matcher_or_value; } + + // M can't be implicitly converted to Matcher<T>, so M isn't a polymorphic + // matcher. It's a value of a type implicitly convertible to T. Use direct + // initialization to create a matcher. + static Matcher<T> CastImpl( + const M& value, BooleanConstant<false> /* convertible_to_matcher */, + BooleanConstant<true> /* convertible_to_T */) { + return Matcher<T>(ImplicitCast_<T>(value)); + } + + // M can't be implicitly converted to either Matcher<T> or T. Attempt to use + // polymorphic matcher Eq(value) in this case. + // + // Note that we first attempt to perform an implicit cast on the value and + // only fall back to the polymorphic Eq() matcher afterwards because the + // latter calls bool operator==(const Lhs& lhs, const Rhs& rhs) in the end + // which might be undefined even when Rhs is implicitly convertible to Lhs + // (e.g. std::pair<const int, int> vs. std::pair<int, int>). + // + // We don't define this method inline as we need the declaration of Eq(). + static Matcher<T> CastImpl( + const M& value, BooleanConstant<false> /* convertible_to_matcher */, + BooleanConstant<false> /* convertible_to_T */); }; // This more specialized version is used when MatcherCast()'s argument @@ -574,6 +727,22 @@ class MatcherCastImpl<T, Matcher<U> > { // We delegate the matching logic to the source matcher. virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const { +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + using FromType = typename std::remove_cv<typename std::remove_pointer< + typename std::remove_reference<T>::type>::type>::type; + using ToType = typename std::remove_cv<typename std::remove_pointer< + typename std::remove_reference<U>::type>::type>::type; + // Do not allow implicitly converting base*/& to derived*/&. + static_assert( + // Do not trigger if only one of them is a pointer. That implies a + // regular conversion and not a down_cast. + (std::is_pointer<typename std::remove_reference<T>::type>::value != + std::is_pointer<typename std::remove_reference<U>::type>::value) || + std::is_same<FromType, ToType>::value || + !std::is_base_of<FromType, ToType>::value, + "Can't implicitly convert from <base> to <derived>"); +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + return source_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(static_cast<U>(x), listener); } @@ -646,7 +815,7 @@ class SafeMatcherCastImpl { // type U. GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( internal::is_reference<T>::value || !internal::is_reference<U>::value, - cannot_convert_non_referentce_arg_to_reference); + cannot_convert_non_reference_arg_to_reference); // In case both T and U are arithmetic types, enforce that the // conversion is not lossy. typedef GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(T) RawT; @@ -675,7 +844,7 @@ Matcher<T> A(); namespace internal { // If the explanation is not empty, prints it to the ostream. -inline void PrintIfNotEmpty(const internal::string& explanation, +inline void PrintIfNotEmpty(const std::string& explanation, ::std::ostream* os) { if (explanation != "" && os != NULL) { *os << ", " << explanation; @@ -685,11 +854,11 @@ inline void PrintIfNotEmpty(const internal::string& explanation, // Returns true if the given type name is easy to read by a human. // This is used to decide whether printing the type of a value might // be helpful. -inline bool IsReadableTypeName(const string& type_name) { +inline bool IsReadableTypeName(const std::string& type_name) { // We consider a type name readable if it's short or doesn't contain // a template or function type. return (type_name.length() <= 20 || - type_name.find_first_of("<(") == string::npos); + type_name.find_first_of("<(") == std::string::npos); } // Matches the value against the given matcher, prints the value and explains @@ -711,7 +880,7 @@ bool MatchPrintAndExplain(Value& value, const Matcher<T>& matcher, UniversalPrint(value, listener->stream()); #if GTEST_HAS_RTTI - const string& type_name = GetTypeName<Value>(); + const std::string& type_name = GetTypeName<Value>(); if (IsReadableTypeName(type_name)) *listener->stream() << " (of type " << type_name << ")"; #endif @@ -751,7 +920,7 @@ class TuplePrefix { typename tuple_element<N - 1, MatcherTuple>::type matcher = get<N - 1>(matchers); typedef typename tuple_element<N - 1, ValueTuple>::type Value; - Value value = get<N - 1>(values); + GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(Value) value = get<N - 1>(values); StringMatchResultListener listener; if (!matcher.MatchAndExplain(value, &listener)) { // TODO(wan): include in the message the name of the parameter @@ -856,10 +1025,12 @@ OutIter TransformTupleValues(Func f, const Tuple& t, OutIter out) { // Implements A<T>(). template <typename T> -class AnyMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<T> { +class AnyMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)> { public: - virtual bool MatchAndExplain( - T /* x */, MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { return true; } + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) /* x */, + MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { + return true; + } virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "is anything"; } virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { // This is mostly for completeness' safe, as it's not very useful @@ -1129,6 +1300,19 @@ class StrEqualityMatcher { bool case_sensitive) : string_(str), expect_eq_(expect_eq), case_sensitive_(case_sensitive) {} +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + bool MatchAndExplain(const absl::string_view& s, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (s.data() == NULL) { + return !expect_eq_; + } + // This should fail to compile if absl::string_view is used with wide + // strings. + const StringType& str = string(s); + return MatchAndExplain(str, listener); + } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // Accepts pointer types, particularly: // const char* // char* @@ -1145,7 +1329,7 @@ class StrEqualityMatcher { // Matches anything that can convert to StringType. // // This is a template, not just a plain function with const StringType&, - // because StringPiece has some interfering non-explicit constructors. + // because absl::string_view has some interfering non-explicit constructors. template <typename MatcheeStringType> bool MatchAndExplain(const MatcheeStringType& s, MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { @@ -1189,6 +1373,19 @@ class HasSubstrMatcher { explicit HasSubstrMatcher(const StringType& substring) : substring_(substring) {} +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + bool MatchAndExplain(const absl::string_view& s, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (s.data() == NULL) { + return false; + } + // This should fail to compile if absl::string_view is used with wide + // strings. + const StringType& str = string(s); + return MatchAndExplain(str, listener); + } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // Accepts pointer types, particularly: // const char* // char* @@ -1202,7 +1399,7 @@ class HasSubstrMatcher { // Matches anything that can convert to StringType. // // This is a template, not just a plain function with const StringType&, - // because StringPiece has some interfering non-explicit constructors. + // because absl::string_view has some interfering non-explicit constructors. template <typename MatcheeStringType> bool MatchAndExplain(const MatcheeStringType& s, MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { @@ -1236,6 +1433,19 @@ class StartsWithMatcher { explicit StartsWithMatcher(const StringType& prefix) : prefix_(prefix) { } +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + bool MatchAndExplain(const absl::string_view& s, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (s.data() == NULL) { + return false; + } + // This should fail to compile if absl::string_view is used with wide + // strings. + const StringType& str = string(s); + return MatchAndExplain(str, listener); + } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // Accepts pointer types, particularly: // const char* // char* @@ -1249,7 +1459,7 @@ class StartsWithMatcher { // Matches anything that can convert to StringType. // // This is a template, not just a plain function with const StringType&, - // because StringPiece has some interfering non-explicit constructors. + // because absl::string_view has some interfering non-explicit constructors. template <typename MatcheeStringType> bool MatchAndExplain(const MatcheeStringType& s, MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { @@ -1282,6 +1492,19 @@ class EndsWithMatcher { public: explicit EndsWithMatcher(const StringType& suffix) : suffix_(suffix) {} +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + bool MatchAndExplain(const absl::string_view& s, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (s.data() == NULL) { + return false; + } + // This should fail to compile if absl::string_view is used with wide + // strings. + const StringType& str = string(s); + return MatchAndExplain(str, listener); + } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // Accepts pointer types, particularly: // const char* // char* @@ -1295,7 +1518,7 @@ class EndsWithMatcher { // Matches anything that can convert to StringType. // // This is a template, not just a plain function with const StringType&, - // because StringPiece has some interfering non-explicit constructors. + // because absl::string_view has some interfering non-explicit constructors. template <typename MatcheeStringType> bool MatchAndExplain(const MatcheeStringType& s, MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { @@ -1328,6 +1551,13 @@ class MatchesRegexMatcher { MatchesRegexMatcher(const RE* regex, bool full_match) : regex_(regex), full_match_(full_match) {} +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + bool MatchAndExplain(const absl::string_view& s, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + return s.data() && MatchAndExplain(string(s), listener); + } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // Accepts pointer types, particularly: // const char* // char* @@ -1335,17 +1565,17 @@ class MatchesRegexMatcher { // wchar_t* template <typename CharType> bool MatchAndExplain(CharType* s, MatchResultListener* listener) const { - return s != NULL && MatchAndExplain(internal::string(s), listener); + return s != NULL && MatchAndExplain(std::string(s), listener); } - // Matches anything that can convert to internal::string. + // Matches anything that can convert to std::string. // - // This is a template, not just a plain function with const internal::string&, - // because StringPiece has some interfering non-explicit constructors. + // This is a template, not just a plain function with const std::string&, + // because absl::string_view has some interfering non-explicit constructors. template <class MatcheeStringType> bool MatchAndExplain(const MatcheeStringType& s, MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const { - const internal::string& s2(s); + const std::string& s2(s); return full_match_ ? RE::FullMatch(s2, *regex_) : RE::PartialMatch(s2, *regex_); } @@ -1353,13 +1583,13 @@ class MatchesRegexMatcher { void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << (full_match_ ? "matches" : "contains") << " regular expression "; - UniversalPrinter<internal::string>::Print(regex_->pattern(), os); + UniversalPrinter<std::string>::Print(regex_->pattern(), os); } void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "doesn't " << (full_match_ ? "match" : "contain") << " regular expression "; - UniversalPrinter<internal::string>::Print(regex_->pattern(), os); + UniversalPrinter<std::string>::Print(regex_->pattern(), os); } private: @@ -1441,12 +1671,13 @@ class Ge2Matcher : public PairMatchBase<Ge2Matcher, AnyGe> { // will prevent different instantiations of NotMatcher from sharing // the same NotMatcherImpl<T> class. template <typename T> -class NotMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<T> { +class NotMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)> { public: explicit NotMatcherImpl(const Matcher<T>& matcher) : matcher_(matcher) {} - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const { + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) x, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { return !matcher_.MatchAndExplain(x, listener); } @@ -1489,117 +1720,66 @@ class NotMatcher { // that will prevent different instantiations of BothOfMatcher from // sharing the same BothOfMatcherImpl<T> class. template <typename T> -class BothOfMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<T> { +class AllOfMatcherImpl + : public MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)> { public: - BothOfMatcherImpl(const Matcher<T>& matcher1, const Matcher<T>& matcher2) - : matcher1_(matcher1), matcher2_(matcher2) {} + explicit AllOfMatcherImpl(std::vector<Matcher<T> > matchers) + : matchers_(internal::move(matchers)) {} virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "("; - matcher1_.DescribeTo(os); - *os << ") and ("; - matcher2_.DescribeTo(os); + for (size_t i = 0; i < matchers_.size(); ++i) { + if (i != 0) *os << ") and ("; + matchers_[i].DescribeTo(os); + } *os << ")"; } virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "("; - matcher1_.DescribeNegationTo(os); - *os << ") or ("; - matcher2_.DescribeNegationTo(os); + for (size_t i = 0; i < matchers_.size(); ++i) { + if (i != 0) *os << ") or ("; + matchers_[i].DescribeNegationTo(os); + } *os << ")"; } - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const { + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) x, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { // If either matcher1_ or matcher2_ doesn't match x, we only need // to explain why one of them fails. - StringMatchResultListener listener1; - if (!matcher1_.MatchAndExplain(x, &listener1)) { - *listener << listener1.str(); - return false; - } + std::string all_match_result; - StringMatchResultListener listener2; - if (!matcher2_.MatchAndExplain(x, &listener2)) { - *listener << listener2.str(); - return false; + for (size_t i = 0; i < matchers_.size(); ++i) { + StringMatchResultListener slistener; + if (matchers_[i].MatchAndExplain(x, &slistener)) { + if (all_match_result.empty()) { + all_match_result = slistener.str(); + } else { + std::string result = slistener.str(); + if (!result.empty()) { + all_match_result += ", and "; + all_match_result += result; + } + } + } else { + *listener << slistener.str(); + return false; + } } // Otherwise we need to explain why *both* of them match. - const internal::string s1 = listener1.str(); - const internal::string s2 = listener2.str(); - - if (s1 == "") { - *listener << s2; - } else { - *listener << s1; - if (s2 != "") { - *listener << ", and " << s2; - } - } + *listener << all_match_result; return true; } private: - const Matcher<T> matcher1_; - const Matcher<T> matcher2_; + const std::vector<Matcher<T> > matchers_; - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(BothOfMatcherImpl); + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(AllOfMatcherImpl); }; #if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 -// MatcherList provides mechanisms for storing a variable number of matchers in -// a list structure (ListType) and creating a combining matcher from such a -// list. -// The template is defined recursively using the following template paramters: -// * kSize is the length of the MatcherList. -// * Head is the type of the first matcher of the list. -// * Tail denotes the types of the remaining matchers of the list. -template <int kSize, typename Head, typename... Tail> -struct MatcherList { - typedef MatcherList<kSize - 1, Tail...> MatcherListTail; - typedef ::std::pair<Head, typename MatcherListTail::ListType> ListType; - - // BuildList stores variadic type values in a nested pair structure. - // Example: - // MatcherList<3, int, string, float>::BuildList(5, "foo", 2.0) will return - // the corresponding result of type pair<int, pair<string, float>>. - static ListType BuildList(const Head& matcher, const Tail&... tail) { - return ListType(matcher, MatcherListTail::BuildList(tail...)); - } - - // CreateMatcher<T> creates a Matcher<T> from a given list of matchers (built - // by BuildList()). CombiningMatcher<T> is used to combine the matchers of the - // list. CombiningMatcher<T> must implement MatcherInterface<T> and have a - // constructor taking two Matcher<T>s as input. - template <typename T, template <typename /* T */> class CombiningMatcher> - static Matcher<T> CreateMatcher(const ListType& matchers) { - return Matcher<T>(new CombiningMatcher<T>( - SafeMatcherCast<T>(matchers.first), - MatcherListTail::template CreateMatcher<T, CombiningMatcher>( - matchers.second))); - } -}; - -// The following defines the base case for the recursive definition of -// MatcherList. -template <typename Matcher1, typename Matcher2> -struct MatcherList<2, Matcher1, Matcher2> { - typedef ::std::pair<Matcher1, Matcher2> ListType; - - static ListType BuildList(const Matcher1& matcher1, - const Matcher2& matcher2) { - return ::std::pair<Matcher1, Matcher2>(matcher1, matcher2); - } - - template <typename T, template <typename /* T */> class CombiningMatcher> - static Matcher<T> CreateMatcher(const ListType& matchers) { - return Matcher<T>(new CombiningMatcher<T>( - SafeMatcherCast<T>(matchers.first), - SafeMatcherCast<T>(matchers.second))); - } -}; - // VariadicMatcher is used for the variadic implementation of // AllOf(m_1, m_2, ...) and AnyOf(m_1, m_2, ...). // CombiningMatcher<T> is used to recursively combine the provided matchers @@ -1608,27 +1788,40 @@ template <template <typename T> class CombiningMatcher, typename... Args> class VariadicMatcher { public: VariadicMatcher(const Args&... matchers) // NOLINT - : matchers_(MatcherListType::BuildList(matchers...)) {} + : matchers_(matchers...) { + static_assert(sizeof...(Args) > 0, "Must have at least one matcher."); + } // This template type conversion operator allows an // VariadicMatcher<Matcher1, Matcher2...> object to match any type that // all of the provided matchers (Matcher1, Matcher2, ...) can match. template <typename T> operator Matcher<T>() const { - return MatcherListType::template CreateMatcher<T, CombiningMatcher>( - matchers_); + std::vector<Matcher<T> > values; + CreateVariadicMatcher<T>(&values, std::integral_constant<size_t, 0>()); + return Matcher<T>(new CombiningMatcher<T>(internal::move(values))); } private: - typedef MatcherList<sizeof...(Args), Args...> MatcherListType; + template <typename T, size_t I> + void CreateVariadicMatcher(std::vector<Matcher<T> >* values, + std::integral_constant<size_t, I>) const { + values->push_back(SafeMatcherCast<T>(std::get<I>(matchers_))); + CreateVariadicMatcher<T>(values, std::integral_constant<size_t, I + 1>()); + } + + template <typename T> + void CreateVariadicMatcher( + std::vector<Matcher<T> >*, + std::integral_constant<size_t, sizeof...(Args)>) const {} - const typename MatcherListType::ListType matchers_; + tuple<Args...> matchers_; GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(VariadicMatcher); }; template <typename... Args> -using AllOfMatcher = VariadicMatcher<BothOfMatcherImpl, Args...>; +using AllOfMatcher = VariadicMatcher<AllOfMatcherImpl, Args...>; #endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 @@ -1645,8 +1838,10 @@ class BothOfMatcher { // both Matcher1 and Matcher2 can match. template <typename T> operator Matcher<T>() const { - return Matcher<T>(new BothOfMatcherImpl<T>(SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher1_), - SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher2_))); + std::vector<Matcher<T> > values; + values.push_back(SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher1_)); + values.push_back(SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher2_)); + return Matcher<T>(new AllOfMatcherImpl<T>(internal::move(values))); } private: @@ -1661,68 +1856,69 @@ class BothOfMatcher { // that will prevent different instantiations of AnyOfMatcher from // sharing the same EitherOfMatcherImpl<T> class. template <typename T> -class EitherOfMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<T> { +class AnyOfMatcherImpl + : public MatcherInterface<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T)> { public: - EitherOfMatcherImpl(const Matcher<T>& matcher1, const Matcher<T>& matcher2) - : matcher1_(matcher1), matcher2_(matcher2) {} + explicit AnyOfMatcherImpl(std::vector<Matcher<T> > matchers) + : matchers_(internal::move(matchers)) {} virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "("; - matcher1_.DescribeTo(os); - *os << ") or ("; - matcher2_.DescribeTo(os); + for (size_t i = 0; i < matchers_.size(); ++i) { + if (i != 0) *os << ") or ("; + matchers_[i].DescribeTo(os); + } *os << ")"; } virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { *os << "("; - matcher1_.DescribeNegationTo(os); - *os << ") and ("; - matcher2_.DescribeNegationTo(os); + for (size_t i = 0; i < matchers_.size(); ++i) { + if (i != 0) *os << ") and ("; + matchers_[i].DescribeNegationTo(os); + } *os << ")"; } - virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const { + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) x, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + std::string no_match_result; + // If either matcher1_ or matcher2_ matches x, we just need to // explain why *one* of them matches. - StringMatchResultListener listener1; - if (matcher1_.MatchAndExplain(x, &listener1)) { - *listener << listener1.str(); - return true; - } - - StringMatchResultListener listener2; - if (matcher2_.MatchAndExplain(x, &listener2)) { - *listener << listener2.str(); - return true; + for (size_t i = 0; i < matchers_.size(); ++i) { + StringMatchResultListener slistener; + if (matchers_[i].MatchAndExplain(x, &slistener)) { + *listener << slistener.str(); + return true; + } else { + if (no_match_result.empty()) { + no_match_result = slistener.str(); + } else { + std::string result = slistener.str(); + if (!result.empty()) { + no_match_result += ", and "; + no_match_result += result; + } + } + } } // Otherwise we need to explain why *both* of them fail. - const internal::string s1 = listener1.str(); - const internal::string s2 = listener2.str(); - - if (s1 == "") { - *listener << s2; - } else { - *listener << s1; - if (s2 != "") { - *listener << ", and " << s2; - } - } + *listener << no_match_result; return false; } private: - const Matcher<T> matcher1_; - const Matcher<T> matcher2_; + const std::vector<Matcher<T> > matchers_; - GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(EitherOfMatcherImpl); + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(AnyOfMatcherImpl); }; #if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // AnyOfMatcher is used for the variadic implementation of AnyOf(m_1, m_2, ...). template <typename... Args> -using AnyOfMatcher = VariadicMatcher<EitherOfMatcherImpl, Args...>; +using AnyOfMatcher = VariadicMatcher<AnyOfMatcherImpl, Args...>; #endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 @@ -1740,8 +1936,10 @@ class EitherOfMatcher { // both Matcher1 and Matcher2 can match. template <typename T> operator Matcher<T>() const { - return Matcher<T>(new EitherOfMatcherImpl<T>( - SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher1_), SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher2_))); + std::vector<Matcher<T> > values; + values.push_back(SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher1_)); + values.push_back(SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher2_)); + return Matcher<T>(new AnyOfMatcherImpl<T>(internal::move(values))); } private: @@ -2037,6 +2235,82 @@ class FloatingEqMatcher { GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(FloatingEqMatcher); }; +// A 2-tuple ("binary") wrapper around FloatingEqMatcher: +// FloatingEq2Matcher() matches (x, y) by matching FloatingEqMatcher(x, false) +// against y, and FloatingEq2Matcher(e) matches FloatingEqMatcher(x, false, e) +// against y. The former implements "Eq", the latter "Near". At present, there +// is no version that compares NaNs as equal. +template <typename FloatType> +class FloatingEq2Matcher { + public: + FloatingEq2Matcher() { Init(-1, false); } + + explicit FloatingEq2Matcher(bool nan_eq_nan) { Init(-1, nan_eq_nan); } + + explicit FloatingEq2Matcher(FloatType max_abs_error) { + Init(max_abs_error, false); + } + + FloatingEq2Matcher(FloatType max_abs_error, bool nan_eq_nan) { + Init(max_abs_error, nan_eq_nan); + } + + template <typename T1, typename T2> + operator Matcher< ::testing::tuple<T1, T2> >() const { + return MakeMatcher( + new Impl< ::testing::tuple<T1, T2> >(max_abs_error_, nan_eq_nan_)); + } + template <typename T1, typename T2> + operator Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<T1, T2>&>() const { + return MakeMatcher( + new Impl<const ::testing::tuple<T1, T2>&>(max_abs_error_, nan_eq_nan_)); + } + + private: + static ::std::ostream& GetDesc(::std::ostream& os) { // NOLINT + return os << "an almost-equal pair"; + } + + template <typename Tuple> + class Impl : public MatcherInterface<Tuple> { + public: + Impl(FloatType max_abs_error, bool nan_eq_nan) : + max_abs_error_(max_abs_error), + nan_eq_nan_(nan_eq_nan) {} + + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(Tuple args, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (max_abs_error_ == -1) { + FloatingEqMatcher<FloatType> fm(::testing::get<0>(args), nan_eq_nan_); + return static_cast<Matcher<FloatType> >(fm).MatchAndExplain( + ::testing::get<1>(args), listener); + } else { + FloatingEqMatcher<FloatType> fm(::testing::get<0>(args), nan_eq_nan_, + max_abs_error_); + return static_cast<Matcher<FloatType> >(fm).MatchAndExplain( + ::testing::get<1>(args), listener); + } + } + virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "are " << GetDesc; + } + virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "aren't " << GetDesc; + } + + private: + FloatType max_abs_error_; + const bool nan_eq_nan_; + }; + + void Init(FloatType max_abs_error_val, bool nan_eq_nan_val) { + max_abs_error_ = max_abs_error_val; + nan_eq_nan_ = nan_eq_nan_val; + } + FloatType max_abs_error_; + bool nan_eq_nan_; +}; + // Implements the Pointee(m) matcher for matching a pointer whose // pointee matches matcher m. The pointer can be either raw or smart. template <typename InnerMatcher> @@ -2054,7 +2328,8 @@ class PointeeMatcher { // enough for implementing the DescribeTo() method of Pointee(). template <typename Pointer> operator Matcher<Pointer>() const { - return MakeMatcher(new Impl<Pointer>(matcher_)); + return Matcher<Pointer>( + new Impl<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(Pointer)>(matcher_)); } private: @@ -2098,6 +2373,7 @@ class PointeeMatcher { GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(PointeeMatcher); }; +#if GTEST_HAS_RTTI // Implements the WhenDynamicCastTo<T>(m) matcher that matches a pointer or // reference that matches inner_matcher when dynamic_cast<T> is applied. // The result of dynamic_cast<To> is forwarded to the inner matcher. @@ -2123,12 +2399,8 @@ class WhenDynamicCastToMatcherBase { protected: const Matcher<To> matcher_; - static string GetToName() { -#if GTEST_HAS_RTTI + static std::string GetToName() { return GetTypeName<To>(); -#else // GTEST_HAS_RTTI - return "the target type"; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_RTTI } private: @@ -2174,6 +2446,7 @@ class WhenDynamicCastToMatcher<To&> : public WhenDynamicCastToMatcherBase<To&> { return MatchPrintAndExplain(*to, this->matcher_, listener); } }; +#endif // GTEST_HAS_RTTI // Implements the Field() matcher for matching a field (i.e. member // variable) of an object. @@ -2182,15 +2455,21 @@ class FieldMatcher { public: FieldMatcher(FieldType Class::*field, const Matcher<const FieldType&>& matcher) - : field_(field), matcher_(matcher) {} + : field_(field), matcher_(matcher), whose_field_("whose given field ") {} + + FieldMatcher(const std::string& field_name, FieldType Class::*field, + const Matcher<const FieldType&>& matcher) + : field_(field), + matcher_(matcher), + whose_field_("whose field `" + field_name + "` ") {} void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is an object whose given field "; + *os << "is an object " << whose_field_; matcher_.DescribeTo(os); } void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is an object whose given field "; + *os << "is an object " << whose_field_; matcher_.DescribeNegationTo(os); } @@ -2208,7 +2487,7 @@ class FieldMatcher { // true_type iff the Field() matcher is used to match a pointer. bool MatchAndExplainImpl(false_type /* is_not_pointer */, const Class& obj, MatchResultListener* listener) const { - *listener << "whose given field is "; + *listener << whose_field_ << "is "; return MatchPrintAndExplain(obj.*field_, matcher_, listener); } @@ -2227,12 +2506,19 @@ class FieldMatcher { const FieldType Class::*field_; const Matcher<const FieldType&> matcher_; + // Contains either "whose given field " if the name of the field is unknown + // or "whose field `name_of_field` " if the name is known. + const std::string whose_field_; + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(FieldMatcher); }; // Implements the Property() matcher for matching a property // (i.e. return value of a getter method) of an object. -template <typename Class, typename PropertyType> +// +// Property is a const-qualified member function of Class returning +// PropertyType. +template <typename Class, typename PropertyType, typename Property> class PropertyMatcher { public: // The property may have a reference type, so 'const PropertyType&' @@ -2241,17 +2527,24 @@ class PropertyMatcher { // PropertyType being a reference or not. typedef GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(PropertyType) RefToConstProperty; - PropertyMatcher(PropertyType (Class::*property)() const, + PropertyMatcher(Property property, const Matcher<RefToConstProperty>& matcher) + : property_(property), + matcher_(matcher), + whose_property_("whose given property ") {} + + PropertyMatcher(const std::string& property_name, Property property, const Matcher<RefToConstProperty>& matcher) - : property_(property), matcher_(matcher) {} + : property_(property), + matcher_(matcher), + whose_property_("whose property `" + property_name + "` ") {} void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is an object whose given property "; + *os << "is an object " << whose_property_; matcher_.DescribeTo(os); } void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { - *os << "is an object whose given property "; + *os << "is an object " << whose_property_; matcher_.DescribeNegationTo(os); } @@ -2269,7 +2562,7 @@ class PropertyMatcher { // true_type iff the Property() matcher is used to match a pointer. bool MatchAndExplainImpl(false_type /* is_not_pointer */, const Class& obj, MatchResultListener* listener) const { - *listener << "whose given property is "; + *listener << whose_property_ << "is "; // Cannot pass the return value (for example, int) to MatchPrintAndExplain, // which takes a non-const reference as argument. #if defined(_PREFAST_ ) && _MSC_VER == 1800 @@ -2295,9 +2588,13 @@ class PropertyMatcher { return MatchAndExplainImpl(false_type(), *p, listener); } - PropertyType (Class::*property_)() const; + Property property_; const Matcher<RefToConstProperty> matcher_; + // Contains either "whose given property " if the name of the property is + // unknown or "whose property `name_of_property` " if the name is known. + const std::string whose_property_; + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(PropertyMatcher); }; @@ -2378,7 +2675,7 @@ class ResultOfMatcher { private: // Functors often define operator() as non-const method even though - // they are actualy stateless. But we need to use them even when + // they are actually stateless. But we need to use them even when // 'this' is a const pointer. It's the user's responsibility not to // use stateful callables with ResultOf(), which does't guarantee // how many times the callable will be invoked. @@ -2691,6 +2988,10 @@ class WhenSortedByMatcher { // container and the RHS container respectively. template <typename TupleMatcher, typename RhsContainer> class PointwiseMatcher { + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( + !IsHashTable<GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(RhsContainer)>::value, + use_UnorderedPointwise_with_hash_tables); + public: typedef internal::StlContainerView<RhsContainer> RhsView; typedef typename RhsView::type RhsStlContainer; @@ -2708,6 +3009,10 @@ class PointwiseMatcher { template <typename LhsContainer> operator Matcher<LhsContainer>() const { + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( + !IsHashTable<GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(LhsContainer)>::value, + use_UnorderedPointwise_with_hash_tables); + return MakeMatcher(new Impl<LhsContainer>(tuple_matcher_, rhs_)); } @@ -2758,12 +3063,15 @@ class PointwiseMatcher { typename LhsStlContainer::const_iterator left = lhs_stl_container.begin(); typename RhsStlContainer::const_iterator right = rhs_.begin(); for (size_t i = 0; i != actual_size; ++i, ++left, ++right) { - const InnerMatcherArg value_pair(*left, *right); - if (listener->IsInterested()) { StringMatchResultListener inner_listener; + // Create InnerMatcherArg as a temporarily object to avoid it outlives + // *left and *right. Dereference or the conversion to `const T&` may + // return temp objects, e.g for vector<bool>. if (!mono_tuple_matcher_.MatchAndExplain( - value_pair, &inner_listener)) { + InnerMatcherArg(ImplicitCast_<const LhsValue&>(*left), + ImplicitCast_<const RhsValue&>(*right)), + &inner_listener)) { *listener << "where the value pair ("; UniversalPrint(*left, listener->stream()); *listener << ", "; @@ -2773,7 +3081,9 @@ class PointwiseMatcher { return false; } } else { - if (!mono_tuple_matcher_.Matches(value_pair)) + if (!mono_tuple_matcher_.Matches( + InnerMatcherArg(ImplicitCast_<const LhsValue&>(*left), + ImplicitCast_<const RhsValue&>(*right)))) return false; } } @@ -2931,6 +3241,50 @@ class EachMatcher { GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(EachMatcher); }; +struct Rank1 {}; +struct Rank0 : Rank1 {}; + +namespace pair_getters { +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +using std::get; +template <typename T> +auto First(T& x, Rank1) -> decltype(get<0>(x)) { // NOLINT + return get<0>(x); +} +template <typename T> +auto First(T& x, Rank0) -> decltype((x.first)) { // NOLINT + return x.first; +} + +template <typename T> +auto Second(T& x, Rank1) -> decltype(get<1>(x)) { // NOLINT + return get<1>(x); +} +template <typename T> +auto Second(T& x, Rank0) -> decltype((x.second)) { // NOLINT + return x.second; +} +#else +template <typename T> +typename T::first_type& First(T& x, Rank0) { // NOLINT + return x.first; +} +template <typename T> +const typename T::first_type& First(const T& x, Rank0) { + return x.first; +} + +template <typename T> +typename T::second_type& Second(T& x, Rank0) { // NOLINT + return x.second; +} +template <typename T> +const typename T::second_type& Second(const T& x, Rank0) { + return x.second; +} +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +} // namespace pair_getters + // Implements Key(inner_matcher) for the given argument pair type. // Key(inner_matcher) matches an std::pair whose 'first' field matches // inner_matcher. For example, Contains(Key(Ge(5))) can be used to match an @@ -2951,9 +3305,9 @@ class KeyMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<PairType> { virtual bool MatchAndExplain(PairType key_value, MatchResultListener* listener) const { StringMatchResultListener inner_listener; - const bool match = inner_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(key_value.first, - &inner_listener); - const internal::string explanation = inner_listener.str(); + const bool match = inner_matcher_.MatchAndExplain( + pair_getters::First(key_value, Rank0()), &inner_listener); + const std::string explanation = inner_listener.str(); if (explanation != "") { *listener << "whose first field is a value " << explanation; } @@ -3035,18 +3389,18 @@ class PairMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<PairType> { if (!listener->IsInterested()) { // If the listener is not interested, we don't need to construct the // explanation. - return first_matcher_.Matches(a_pair.first) && - second_matcher_.Matches(a_pair.second); + return first_matcher_.Matches(pair_getters::First(a_pair, Rank0())) && + second_matcher_.Matches(pair_getters::Second(a_pair, Rank0())); } StringMatchResultListener first_inner_listener; - if (!first_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(a_pair.first, + if (!first_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(pair_getters::First(a_pair, Rank0()), &first_inner_listener)) { *listener << "whose first field does not match"; PrintIfNotEmpty(first_inner_listener.str(), listener->stream()); return false; } StringMatchResultListener second_inner_listener; - if (!second_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(a_pair.second, + if (!second_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(pair_getters::Second(a_pair, Rank0()), &second_inner_listener)) { *listener << "whose second field does not match"; PrintIfNotEmpty(second_inner_listener.str(), listener->stream()); @@ -3058,8 +3412,8 @@ class PairMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<PairType> { } private: - void ExplainSuccess(const internal::string& first_explanation, - const internal::string& second_explanation, + void ExplainSuccess(const std::string& first_explanation, + const std::string& second_explanation, MatchResultListener* listener) const { *listener << "whose both fields match"; if (first_explanation != "") { @@ -3166,7 +3520,7 @@ class ElementsAreMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<Container> { const bool listener_interested = listener->IsInterested(); // explanations[i] is the explanation of the element at index i. - ::std::vector<internal::string> explanations(count()); + ::std::vector<std::string> explanations(count()); StlContainerReference stl_container = View::ConstReference(container); typename StlContainer::const_iterator it = stl_container.begin(); size_t exam_pos = 0; @@ -3225,7 +3579,7 @@ class ElementsAreMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<Container> { if (listener_interested) { bool reason_printed = false; for (size_t i = 0; i != count(); ++i) { - const internal::string& s = explanations[i]; + const std::string& s = explanations[i]; if (!s.empty()) { if (reason_printed) { *listener << ",\nand "; @@ -3278,7 +3632,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ MatchMatrix { void Randomize(); - string DebugString() const; + std::string DebugString() const; private: size_t SpaceIndex(size_t ilhs, size_t irhs) const { @@ -3302,14 +3656,23 @@ typedef ::std::vector<ElementMatcherPair> ElementMatcherPairs; GTEST_API_ ElementMatcherPairs FindMaxBipartiteMatching(const MatchMatrix& g); -GTEST_API_ bool FindPairing(const MatchMatrix& matrix, - MatchResultListener* listener); +struct UnorderedMatcherRequire { + enum Flags { + Superset = 1 << 0, + Subset = 1 << 1, + ExactMatch = Superset | Subset, + }; +}; // Untyped base class for implementing UnorderedElementsAre. By // putting logic that's not specific to the element type here, we // reduce binary bloat and increase compilation speed. class GTEST_API_ UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase { protected: + explicit UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase( + UnorderedMatcherRequire::Flags matcher_flags) + : match_flags_(matcher_flags) {} + // A vector of matcher describers, one for each element matcher. // Does not own the describers (and thus can be used only when the // element matchers are alive). @@ -3321,10 +3684,12 @@ class GTEST_API_ UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase { // Describes the negation of this UnorderedElementsAre matcher. void DescribeNegationToImpl(::std::ostream* os) const; - bool VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched( - const ::std::vector<string>& element_printouts, - const MatchMatrix& matrix, - MatchResultListener* listener) const; + bool VerifyMatchMatrix(const ::std::vector<std::string>& element_printouts, + const MatchMatrix& matrix, + MatchResultListener* listener) const; + + bool FindPairing(const MatchMatrix& matrix, + MatchResultListener* listener) const; MatcherDescriberVec& matcher_describers() { return matcher_describers_; @@ -3334,13 +3699,17 @@ class GTEST_API_ UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase { return Message() << n << " element" << (n == 1 ? "" : "s"); } + UnorderedMatcherRequire::Flags match_flags() const { return match_flags_; } + private: + UnorderedMatcherRequire::Flags match_flags_; MatcherDescriberVec matcher_describers_; GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase); }; -// Implements unordered ElementsAre and unordered ElementsAreArray. +// Implements UnorderedElementsAre, UnorderedElementsAreArray, IsSubsetOf, and +// IsSupersetOf. template <typename Container> class UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<Container>, @@ -3353,10 +3722,10 @@ class UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl typedef typename StlContainer::const_iterator StlContainerConstIterator; typedef typename StlContainer::value_type Element; - // Constructs the matcher from a sequence of element values or - // element matchers. template <typename InputIter> - UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl(InputIter first, InputIter last) { + UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl(UnorderedMatcherRequire::Flags matcher_flags, + InputIter first, InputIter last) + : UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase(matcher_flags) { for (; first != last; ++first) { matchers_.push_back(MatcherCast<const Element&>(*first)); matcher_describers().push_back(matchers_.back().GetDescriber()); @@ -3376,38 +3745,36 @@ class UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl virtual bool MatchAndExplain(Container container, MatchResultListener* listener) const { StlContainerReference stl_container = View::ConstReference(container); - ::std::vector<string> element_printouts; - MatchMatrix matrix = AnalyzeElements(stl_container.begin(), - stl_container.end(), - &element_printouts, - listener); - - const size_t actual_count = matrix.LhsSize(); - if (actual_count == 0 && matchers_.empty()) { + ::std::vector<std::string> element_printouts; + MatchMatrix matrix = + AnalyzeElements(stl_container.begin(), stl_container.end(), + &element_printouts, listener); + + if (matrix.LhsSize() == 0 && matrix.RhsSize() == 0) { return true; } - if (actual_count != matchers_.size()) { - // The element count doesn't match. If the container is empty, - // there's no need to explain anything as Google Mock already - // prints the empty container. Otherwise we just need to show - // how many elements there actually are. - if (actual_count != 0 && listener->IsInterested()) { - *listener << "which has " << Elements(actual_count); + + if (match_flags() == UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch) { + if (matrix.LhsSize() != matrix.RhsSize()) { + // The element count doesn't match. If the container is empty, + // there's no need to explain anything as Google Mock already + // prints the empty container. Otherwise we just need to show + // how many elements there actually are. + if (matrix.LhsSize() != 0 && listener->IsInterested()) { + *listener << "which has " << Elements(matrix.LhsSize()); + } + return false; } - return false; } - return VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched(element_printouts, - matrix, listener) && + return VerifyMatchMatrix(element_printouts, matrix, listener) && FindPairing(matrix, listener); } private: - typedef ::std::vector<Matcher<const Element&> > MatcherVec; - template <typename ElementIter> MatchMatrix AnalyzeElements(ElementIter elem_first, ElementIter elem_last, - ::std::vector<string>* element_printouts, + ::std::vector<std::string>* element_printouts, MatchResultListener* listener) const { element_printouts->clear(); ::std::vector<char> did_match; @@ -3431,7 +3798,7 @@ class UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl return matrix; } - MatcherVec matchers_; + ::std::vector<Matcher<const Element&> > matchers_; GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl); }; @@ -3464,7 +3831,7 @@ class UnorderedElementsAreMatcher { TransformTupleValues(CastAndAppendTransform<const Element&>(), matchers_, ::std::back_inserter(matchers)); return MakeMatcher(new UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl<Container>( - matchers.begin(), matchers.end())); + UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch, matchers.begin(), matchers.end())); } private: @@ -3480,6 +3847,11 @@ class ElementsAreMatcher { template <typename Container> operator Matcher<Container>() const { + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( + !IsHashTable<GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(Container)>::value || + ::testing::tuple_size<MatcherTuple>::value < 2, + use_UnorderedElementsAre_with_hash_tables); + typedef GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(Container) RawContainer; typedef typename internal::StlContainerView<RawContainer>::type View; typedef typename View::value_type Element; @@ -3497,24 +3869,23 @@ class ElementsAreMatcher { GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(ElementsAreMatcher); }; -// Implements UnorderedElementsAreArray(). +// Implements UnorderedElementsAreArray(), IsSubsetOf(), and IsSupersetOf(). template <typename T> class UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher { public: - UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher() {} - template <typename Iter> - UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher(Iter first, Iter last) - : matchers_(first, last) {} + UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher(UnorderedMatcherRequire::Flags match_flags, + Iter first, Iter last) + : match_flags_(match_flags), matchers_(first, last) {} template <typename Container> operator Matcher<Container>() const { - return MakeMatcher( - new UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl<Container>(matchers_.begin(), - matchers_.end())); + return MakeMatcher(new UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImpl<Container>( + match_flags_, matchers_.begin(), matchers_.end())); } private: + UnorderedMatcherRequire::Flags match_flags_; ::std::vector<T> matchers_; GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher); @@ -3529,6 +3900,10 @@ class ElementsAreArrayMatcher { template <typename Container> operator Matcher<Container>() const { + GTEST_COMPILE_ASSERT_( + !IsHashTable<GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(Container)>::value, + use_UnorderedElementsAreArray_with_hash_tables); + return MakeMatcher(new ElementsAreMatcherImpl<Container>( matchers_.begin(), matchers_.end())); } @@ -3619,13 +3994,189 @@ BoundSecondMatcher<Tuple2Matcher, Second> MatcherBindSecond( // 'negation' is false; otherwise returns the description of the // negation of the matcher. 'param_values' contains a list of strings // that are the print-out of the matcher's parameters. -GTEST_API_ string FormatMatcherDescription(bool negation, - const char* matcher_name, - const Strings& param_values); +GTEST_API_ std::string FormatMatcherDescription(bool negation, + const char* matcher_name, + const Strings& param_values); + +// Implements a matcher that checks the value of a optional<> type variable. +template <typename ValueMatcher> +class OptionalMatcher { + public: + explicit OptionalMatcher(const ValueMatcher& value_matcher) + : value_matcher_(value_matcher) {} + + template <typename Optional> + operator Matcher<Optional>() const { + return MakeMatcher(new Impl<Optional>(value_matcher_)); + } + + template <typename Optional> + class Impl : public MatcherInterface<Optional> { + public: + typedef GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(Optional) OptionalView; + typedef typename OptionalView::value_type ValueType; + explicit Impl(const ValueMatcher& value_matcher) + : value_matcher_(MatcherCast<ValueType>(value_matcher)) {} + + virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "value "; + value_matcher_.DescribeTo(os); + } + + virtual void DescribeNegationTo(::std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "value "; + value_matcher_.DescribeNegationTo(os); + } + + virtual bool MatchAndExplain(Optional optional, + MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (!optional) { + *listener << "which is not engaged"; + return false; + } + const ValueType& value = *optional; + StringMatchResultListener value_listener; + const bool match = value_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(value, &value_listener); + *listener << "whose value " << PrintToString(value) + << (match ? " matches" : " doesn't match"); + PrintIfNotEmpty(value_listener.str(), listener->stream()); + return match; + } + + private: + const Matcher<ValueType> value_matcher_; + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(Impl); + }; + + private: + const ValueMatcher value_matcher_; + GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(OptionalMatcher); +}; + +namespace variant_matcher { +// Overloads to allow VariantMatcher to do proper ADL lookup. +template <typename T> +void holds_alternative() {} +template <typename T> +void get() {} + +// Implements a matcher that checks the value of a variant<> type variable. +template <typename T> +class VariantMatcher { + public: + explicit VariantMatcher(::testing::Matcher<const T&> matcher) + : matcher_(internal::move(matcher)) {} + + template <typename Variant> + bool MatchAndExplain(const Variant& value, + ::testing::MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (!listener->IsInterested()) { + return holds_alternative<T>(value) && matcher_.Matches(get<T>(value)); + } + + if (!holds_alternative<T>(value)) { + *listener << "whose value is not of type '" << GetTypeName() << "'"; + return false; + } + const T& elem = get<T>(value); + StringMatchResultListener elem_listener; + const bool match = matcher_.MatchAndExplain(elem, &elem_listener); + *listener << "whose value " << PrintToString(elem) + << (match ? " matches" : " doesn't match"); + PrintIfNotEmpty(elem_listener.str(), listener->stream()); + return match; + } + + void DescribeTo(std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "is a variant<> with value of type '" << GetTypeName() + << "' and the value "; + matcher_.DescribeTo(os); + } + + void DescribeNegationTo(std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "is a variant<> with value of type other than '" << GetTypeName() + << "' or the value "; + matcher_.DescribeNegationTo(os); + } + + private: + static std::string GetTypeName() { +#if GTEST_HAS_RTTI + GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_( + return internal::GetTypeName<T>()); +#endif + return "the element type"; + } + + const ::testing::Matcher<const T&> matcher_; +}; + +} // namespace variant_matcher + +namespace any_cast_matcher { + +// Overloads to allow AnyCastMatcher to do proper ADL lookup. +template <typename T> +void any_cast() {} + +// Implements a matcher that any_casts the value. +template <typename T> +class AnyCastMatcher { + public: + explicit AnyCastMatcher(const ::testing::Matcher<const T&>& matcher) + : matcher_(matcher) {} + + template <typename AnyType> + bool MatchAndExplain(const AnyType& value, + ::testing::MatchResultListener* listener) const { + if (!listener->IsInterested()) { + const T* ptr = any_cast<T>(&value); + return ptr != NULL && matcher_.Matches(*ptr); + } + + const T* elem = any_cast<T>(&value); + if (elem == NULL) { + *listener << "whose value is not of type '" << GetTypeName() << "'"; + return false; + } + + StringMatchResultListener elem_listener; + const bool match = matcher_.MatchAndExplain(*elem, &elem_listener); + *listener << "whose value " << PrintToString(*elem) + << (match ? " matches" : " doesn't match"); + PrintIfNotEmpty(elem_listener.str(), listener->stream()); + return match; + } + + void DescribeTo(std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "is an 'any' type with value of type '" << GetTypeName() + << "' and the value "; + matcher_.DescribeTo(os); + } + + void DescribeNegationTo(std::ostream* os) const { + *os << "is an 'any' type with value of type other than '" << GetTypeName() + << "' or the value "; + matcher_.DescribeNegationTo(os); + } + + private: + static std::string GetTypeName() { +#if GTEST_HAS_RTTI + GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_( + return internal::GetTypeName<T>()); +#endif + return "the element type"; + } + + const ::testing::Matcher<const T&> matcher_; +}; + +} // namespace any_cast_matcher } // namespace internal -// ElementsAreArray(first, last) +// ElementsAreArray(iterator_first, iterator_last) // ElementsAreArray(pointer, count) // ElementsAreArray(array) // ElementsAreArray(container) @@ -3674,20 +4225,26 @@ ElementsAreArray(::std::initializer_list<T> xs) { } #endif -// UnorderedElementsAreArray(first, last) +// UnorderedElementsAreArray(iterator_first, iterator_last) // UnorderedElementsAreArray(pointer, count) // UnorderedElementsAreArray(array) // UnorderedElementsAreArray(container) // UnorderedElementsAreArray({ e1, e2, ..., en }) // -// The UnorderedElementsAreArray() functions are like -// ElementsAreArray(...), but allow matching the elements in any order. +// UnorderedElementsAreArray() verifies that a bijective mapping onto a +// collection of matchers exists. +// +// The matchers can be specified as an array, a pointer and count, a container, +// an initializer list, or an STL iterator range. In each of these cases, the +// underlying matchers can be either values or matchers. + template <typename Iter> inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher< typename ::std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type> UnorderedElementsAreArray(Iter first, Iter last) { typedef typename ::std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type T; - return internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T>(first, last); + return internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T>( + internal::UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch, first, last); } template <typename T> @@ -3729,7 +4286,9 @@ UnorderedElementsAreArray(::std::initializer_list<T> xs) { const internal::AnythingMatcher _ = {}; // Creates a matcher that matches any value of the given type T. template <typename T> -inline Matcher<T> A() { return MakeMatcher(new internal::AnyMatcherImpl<T>()); } +inline Matcher<T> A() { + return Matcher<T>(new internal::AnyMatcherImpl<T>()); +} // Creates a matcher that matches any value of the given type T. template <typename T> @@ -3746,6 +4305,14 @@ inline internal::EqMatcher<T> Eq(T x) { return internal::EqMatcher<T>(x); } template <typename T> Matcher<T>::Matcher(T value) { *this = Eq(value); } +template <typename T, typename M> +Matcher<T> internal::MatcherCastImpl<T, M>::CastImpl( + const M& value, + internal::BooleanConstant<false> /* convertible_to_matcher */, + internal::BooleanConstant<false> /* convertible_to_T */) { + return Eq(value); +} + // Creates a monomorphic matcher that matches anything with type Lhs // and equal to rhs. A user may need to use this instead of Eq(...) // in order to resolve an overloading ambiguity. @@ -3874,6 +4441,7 @@ inline internal::PointeeMatcher<InnerMatcher> Pointee( return internal::PointeeMatcher<InnerMatcher>(inner_matcher); } +#if GTEST_HAS_RTTI // Creates a matcher that matches a pointer or reference that matches // inner_matcher when dynamic_cast<To> is applied. // The result of dynamic_cast<To> is forwarded to the inner matcher. @@ -3886,6 +4454,7 @@ WhenDynamicCastTo(const Matcher<To>& inner_matcher) { return MakePolymorphicMatcher( internal::WhenDynamicCastToMatcher<To>(inner_matcher)); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_RTTI // Creates a matcher that matches an object whose given field matches // 'matcher'. For example, @@ -3904,16 +4473,28 @@ inline PolymorphicMatcher< // to compile where bar is an int32 and m is a matcher for int64. } +// Same as Field() but also takes the name of the field to provide better error +// messages. +template <typename Class, typename FieldType, typename FieldMatcher> +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::FieldMatcher<Class, FieldType> > Field( + const std::string& field_name, FieldType Class::*field, + const FieldMatcher& matcher) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::FieldMatcher<Class, FieldType>( + field_name, field, MatcherCast<const FieldType&>(matcher))); +} + // Creates a matcher that matches an object whose given property // matches 'matcher'. For example, // Property(&Foo::str, StartsWith("hi")) // matches a Foo object x iff x.str() starts with "hi". template <typename Class, typename PropertyType, typename PropertyMatcher> -inline PolymorphicMatcher< - internal::PropertyMatcher<Class, PropertyType> > Property( - PropertyType (Class::*property)() const, const PropertyMatcher& matcher) { +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::PropertyMatcher< + Class, PropertyType, PropertyType (Class::*)() const> > +Property(PropertyType (Class::*property)() const, + const PropertyMatcher& matcher) { return MakePolymorphicMatcher( - internal::PropertyMatcher<Class, PropertyType>( + internal::PropertyMatcher<Class, PropertyType, + PropertyType (Class::*)() const>( property, MatcherCast<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(PropertyType)>(matcher))); // The call to MatcherCast() is required for supporting inner @@ -3922,6 +4503,50 @@ inline PolymorphicMatcher< // to compile where bar() returns an int32 and m is a matcher for int64. } +// Same as Property() above, but also takes the name of the property to provide +// better error messages. +template <typename Class, typename PropertyType, typename PropertyMatcher> +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::PropertyMatcher< + Class, PropertyType, PropertyType (Class::*)() const> > +Property(const std::string& property_name, + PropertyType (Class::*property)() const, + const PropertyMatcher& matcher) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::PropertyMatcher<Class, PropertyType, + PropertyType (Class::*)() const>( + property_name, property, + MatcherCast<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(PropertyType)>(matcher))); +} + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +// The same as above but for reference-qualified member functions. +template <typename Class, typename PropertyType, typename PropertyMatcher> +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::PropertyMatcher< + Class, PropertyType, PropertyType (Class::*)() const &> > +Property(PropertyType (Class::*property)() const &, + const PropertyMatcher& matcher) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::PropertyMatcher<Class, PropertyType, + PropertyType (Class::*)() const &>( + property, + MatcherCast<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(PropertyType)>(matcher))); +} + +// Three-argument form for reference-qualified member functions. +template <typename Class, typename PropertyType, typename PropertyMatcher> +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::PropertyMatcher< + Class, PropertyType, PropertyType (Class::*)() const &> > +Property(const std::string& property_name, + PropertyType (Class::*property)() const &, + const PropertyMatcher& matcher) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::PropertyMatcher<Class, PropertyType, + PropertyType (Class::*)() const &>( + property_name, property, + MatcherCast<GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(PropertyType)>(matcher))); +} +#endif + // Creates a matcher that matches an object iff the result of applying // a callable to x matches 'matcher'. // For example, @@ -3935,6 +4560,7 @@ inline PolymorphicMatcher< // concurrent access. // * If it is a function object, it has to define type result_type. // We recommend deriving your functor classes from std::unary_function. +// template <typename Callable, typename ResultOfMatcher> internal::ResultOfMatcher<Callable> ResultOf( Callable callable, const ResultOfMatcher& matcher) { @@ -3951,53 +4577,52 @@ internal::ResultOfMatcher<Callable> ResultOf( // String matchers. // Matches a string equal to str. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string> > - StrEq(const internal::string& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string>( - str, true, true)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string> > StrEq( + const std::string& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string>(str, true, true)); } // Matches a string not equal to str. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string> > - StrNe(const internal::string& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string>( - str, false, true)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string> > StrNe( + const std::string& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string>(str, false, true)); } // Matches a string equal to str, ignoring case. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string> > - StrCaseEq(const internal::string& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string>( - str, true, false)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string> > StrCaseEq( + const std::string& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string>(str, true, false)); } // Matches a string not equal to str, ignoring case. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string> > - StrCaseNe(const internal::string& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::string>( - str, false, false)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string> > StrCaseNe( + const std::string& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::string>(str, false, false)); } // Creates a matcher that matches any string, std::string, or C string // that contains the given substring. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::HasSubstrMatcher<internal::string> > - HasSubstr(const internal::string& substring) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::HasSubstrMatcher<internal::string>( - substring)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::HasSubstrMatcher<std::string> > HasSubstr( + const std::string& substring) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::HasSubstrMatcher<std::string>(substring)); } // Matches a string that starts with 'prefix' (case-sensitive). -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StartsWithMatcher<internal::string> > - StartsWith(const internal::string& prefix) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StartsWithMatcher<internal::string>( - prefix)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StartsWithMatcher<std::string> > StartsWith( + const std::string& prefix) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StartsWithMatcher<std::string>(prefix)); } // Matches a string that ends with 'suffix' (case-sensitive). -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::EndsWithMatcher<internal::string> > - EndsWith(const internal::string& suffix) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::EndsWithMatcher<internal::string>( - suffix)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::EndsWithMatcher<std::string> > EndsWith( + const std::string& suffix) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::EndsWithMatcher<std::string>(suffix)); } // Matches a string that fully matches regular expression 'regex'. @@ -4007,7 +4632,7 @@ inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::MatchesRegexMatcher> MatchesRegex( return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::MatchesRegexMatcher(regex, true)); } inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::MatchesRegexMatcher> MatchesRegex( - const internal::string& regex) { + const std::string& regex) { return MatchesRegex(new internal::RE(regex)); } @@ -4018,7 +4643,7 @@ inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::MatchesRegexMatcher> ContainsRegex( return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::MatchesRegexMatcher(regex, false)); } inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::MatchesRegexMatcher> ContainsRegex( - const internal::string& regex) { + const std::string& regex) { return ContainsRegex(new internal::RE(regex)); } @@ -4026,53 +4651,53 @@ inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::MatchesRegexMatcher> ContainsRegex( // Wide string matchers. // Matches a string equal to str. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring> > - StrEq(const internal::wstring& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring>( - str, true, true)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring> > StrEq( + const std::wstring& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring>(str, true, true)); } // Matches a string not equal to str. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring> > - StrNe(const internal::wstring& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring>( - str, false, true)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring> > StrNe( + const std::wstring& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring>(str, false, true)); } // Matches a string equal to str, ignoring case. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring> > - StrCaseEq(const internal::wstring& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring>( - str, true, false)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring> > +StrCaseEq(const std::wstring& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring>(str, true, false)); } // Matches a string not equal to str, ignoring case. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring> > - StrCaseNe(const internal::wstring& str) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StrEqualityMatcher<internal::wstring>( - str, false, false)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring> > +StrCaseNe(const std::wstring& str) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StrEqualityMatcher<std::wstring>(str, false, false)); } -// Creates a matcher that matches any wstring, std::wstring, or C wide string +// Creates a matcher that matches any ::wstring, std::wstring, or C wide string // that contains the given substring. -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::HasSubstrMatcher<internal::wstring> > - HasSubstr(const internal::wstring& substring) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::HasSubstrMatcher<internal::wstring>( - substring)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::HasSubstrMatcher<std::wstring> > HasSubstr( + const std::wstring& substring) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::HasSubstrMatcher<std::wstring>(substring)); } // Matches a string that starts with 'prefix' (case-sensitive). -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StartsWithMatcher<internal::wstring> > - StartsWith(const internal::wstring& prefix) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::StartsWithMatcher<internal::wstring>( - prefix)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::StartsWithMatcher<std::wstring> > +StartsWith(const std::wstring& prefix) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::StartsWithMatcher<std::wstring>(prefix)); } // Matches a string that ends with 'suffix' (case-sensitive). -inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::EndsWithMatcher<internal::wstring> > - EndsWith(const internal::wstring& suffix) { - return MakePolymorphicMatcher(internal::EndsWithMatcher<internal::wstring>( - suffix)); +inline PolymorphicMatcher<internal::EndsWithMatcher<std::wstring> > EndsWith( + const std::wstring& suffix) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::EndsWithMatcher<std::wstring>(suffix)); } #endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING || GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING @@ -4101,6 +4726,58 @@ inline internal::Lt2Matcher Lt() { return internal::Lt2Matcher(); } // first field != the second field. inline internal::Ne2Matcher Ne() { return internal::Ne2Matcher(); } +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// FloatEq(first field) matches the second field. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float> FloatEq() { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float>(); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// DoubleEq(first field) matches the second field. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double> DoubleEq() { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double>(); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// FloatEq(first field) matches the second field with NaN equality. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float> NanSensitiveFloatEq() { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float>(true); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// DoubleEq(first field) matches the second field with NaN equality. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double> NanSensitiveDoubleEq() { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double>(true); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// FloatNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float> FloatNear(float max_abs_error) { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float>(max_abs_error); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// DoubleNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double> DoubleNear(double max_abs_error) { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double>(max_abs_error); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// FloatNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field with NaN +// equality. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float> NanSensitiveFloatNear( + float max_abs_error) { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<float>(max_abs_error, true); +} + +// Creates a polymorphic matcher that matches a 2-tuple where +// DoubleNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field with NaN +// equality. +inline internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double> NanSensitiveDoubleNear( + double max_abs_error) { + return internal::FloatingEq2Matcher<double>(max_abs_error, true); +} + // Creates a matcher that matches any value of type T that m doesn't // match. template <typename InnerMatcher> @@ -4283,6 +4960,128 @@ inline internal::ContainsMatcher<M> Contains(M matcher) { return internal::ContainsMatcher<M>(matcher); } +// IsSupersetOf(iterator_first, iterator_last) +// IsSupersetOf(pointer, count) +// IsSupersetOf(array) +// IsSupersetOf(container) +// IsSupersetOf({e1, e2, ..., en}) +// +// IsSupersetOf() verifies that a surjective partial mapping onto a collection +// of matchers exists. In other words, a container matches +// IsSupersetOf({e1, ..., en}) if and only if there is a permutation +// {y1, ..., yn} of some of the container's elements where y1 matches e1, +// ..., and yn matches en. Obviously, the size of the container must be >= n +// in order to have a match. Examples: +// +// - {1, 2, 3} matches IsSupersetOf({Ge(3), Ne(0)}), as 3 matches Ge(3) and +// 1 matches Ne(0). +// - {1, 2} doesn't match IsSupersetOf({Eq(1), Lt(2)}), even though 1 matches +// both Eq(1) and Lt(2). The reason is that different matchers must be used +// for elements in different slots of the container. +// - {1, 1, 2} matches IsSupersetOf({Eq(1), Lt(2)}), as (the first) 1 matches +// Eq(1) and (the second) 1 matches Lt(2). +// - {1, 2, 3} matches IsSupersetOf(Gt(1), Gt(1)), as 2 matches (the first) +// Gt(1) and 3 matches (the second) Gt(1). +// +// The matchers can be specified as an array, a pointer and count, a container, +// an initializer list, or an STL iterator range. In each of these cases, the +// underlying matchers can be either values or matchers. + +template <typename Iter> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher< + typename ::std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type> +IsSupersetOf(Iter first, Iter last) { + typedef typename ::std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type T; + return internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T>( + internal::UnorderedMatcherRequire::Superset, first, last); +} + +template <typename T> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T> IsSupersetOf( + const T* pointer, size_t count) { + return IsSupersetOf(pointer, pointer + count); +} + +template <typename T, size_t N> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T> IsSupersetOf( + const T (&array)[N]) { + return IsSupersetOf(array, N); +} + +template <typename Container> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher< + typename Container::value_type> +IsSupersetOf(const Container& container) { + return IsSupersetOf(container.begin(), container.end()); +} + +#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ +template <typename T> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T> IsSupersetOf( + ::std::initializer_list<T> xs) { + return IsSupersetOf(xs.begin(), xs.end()); +} +#endif + +// IsSubsetOf(iterator_first, iterator_last) +// IsSubsetOf(pointer, count) +// IsSubsetOf(array) +// IsSubsetOf(container) +// IsSubsetOf({e1, e2, ..., en}) +// +// IsSubsetOf() verifies that an injective mapping onto a collection of matchers +// exists. In other words, a container matches IsSubsetOf({e1, ..., en}) if and +// only if there is a subset of matchers {m1, ..., mk} which would match the +// container using UnorderedElementsAre. Obviously, the size of the container +// must be <= n in order to have a match. Examples: +// +// - {1} matches IsSubsetOf({Gt(0), Lt(0)}), as 1 matches Gt(0). +// - {1, -1} matches IsSubsetOf({Lt(0), Gt(0)}), as 1 matches Gt(0) and -1 +// matches Lt(0). +// - {1, 2} doesn't matches IsSubsetOf({Gt(0), Lt(0)}), even though 1 and 2 both +// match Gt(0). The reason is that different matchers must be used for +// elements in different slots of the container. +// +// The matchers can be specified as an array, a pointer and count, a container, +// an initializer list, or an STL iterator range. In each of these cases, the +// underlying matchers can be either values or matchers. + +template <typename Iter> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher< + typename ::std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type> +IsSubsetOf(Iter first, Iter last) { + typedef typename ::std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type T; + return internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T>( + internal::UnorderedMatcherRequire::Subset, first, last); +} + +template <typename T> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T> IsSubsetOf( + const T* pointer, size_t count) { + return IsSubsetOf(pointer, pointer + count); +} + +template <typename T, size_t N> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T> IsSubsetOf( + const T (&array)[N]) { + return IsSubsetOf(array, N); +} + +template <typename Container> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher< + typename Container::value_type> +IsSubsetOf(const Container& container) { + return IsSubsetOf(container.begin(), container.end()); +} + +#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ +template <typename T> +inline internal::UnorderedElementsAreArrayMatcher<T> IsSubsetOf( + ::std::initializer_list<T> xs) { + return IsSubsetOf(xs.begin(), xs.end()); +} +#endif + // Matches an STL-style container or a native array that contains only // elements matching the given value or matcher. // @@ -4356,17 +5155,60 @@ inline bool ExplainMatchResult( return SafeMatcherCast<const T&>(matcher).MatchAndExplain(value, listener); } +// Returns a string representation of the given matcher. Useful for description +// strings of matchers defined using MATCHER_P* macros that accept matchers as +// their arguments. For example: +// +// MATCHER_P(XAndYThat, matcher, +// "X that " + DescribeMatcher<int>(matcher, negation) + +// " and Y that " + DescribeMatcher<double>(matcher, negation)) { +// return ExplainMatchResult(matcher, arg.x(), result_listener) && +// ExplainMatchResult(matcher, arg.y(), result_listener); +// } +template <typename T, typename M> +std::string DescribeMatcher(const M& matcher, bool negation = false) { + ::std::stringstream ss; + Matcher<T> monomorphic_matcher = SafeMatcherCast<T>(matcher); + if (negation) { + monomorphic_matcher.DescribeNegationTo(&ss); + } else { + monomorphic_matcher.DescribeTo(&ss); + } + return ss.str(); +} + #if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // Define variadic matcher versions. They are overloaded in // gmock-generated-matchers.h for the cases supported by pre C++11 compilers. template <typename... Args> -inline internal::AllOfMatcher<Args...> AllOf(const Args&... matchers) { - return internal::AllOfMatcher<Args...>(matchers...); +internal::AllOfMatcher<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...> AllOf( + const Args&... matchers) { + return internal::AllOfMatcher<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...>( + matchers...); +} + +template <typename... Args> +internal::AnyOfMatcher<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...> AnyOf( + const Args&... matchers) { + return internal::AnyOfMatcher<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...>( + matchers...); +} + +template <typename... Args> +internal::ElementsAreMatcher<tuple<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...>> +ElementsAre(const Args&... matchers) { + return internal::ElementsAreMatcher< + tuple<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...>>( + make_tuple(matchers...)); } template <typename... Args> -inline internal::AnyOfMatcher<Args...> AnyOf(const Args&... matchers) { - return internal::AnyOfMatcher<Args...>(matchers...); +internal::UnorderedElementsAreMatcher< + tuple<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...>> +UnorderedElementsAre(const Args&... matchers) { + return internal::UnorderedElementsAreMatcher< + tuple<typename std::decay<const Args&>::type...>>( + make_tuple(matchers...)); } #endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 @@ -4381,6 +5223,39 @@ inline internal::AnyOfMatcher<Args...> AnyOf(const Args&... matchers) { template <typename InnerMatcher> inline InnerMatcher AllArgs(const InnerMatcher& matcher) { return matcher; } +// Returns a matcher that matches the value of an optional<> type variable. +// The matcher implementation only uses '!arg' and requires that the optional<> +// type has a 'value_type' member type and that '*arg' is of type 'value_type' +// and is printable using 'PrintToString'. It is compatible with +// std::optional/std::experimental::optional. +// Note that to compare an optional type variable against nullopt you should +// use Eq(nullopt) and not Optional(Eq(nullopt)). The latter implies that the +// optional value contains an optional itself. +template <typename ValueMatcher> +inline internal::OptionalMatcher<ValueMatcher> Optional( + const ValueMatcher& value_matcher) { + return internal::OptionalMatcher<ValueMatcher>(value_matcher); +} + +// Returns a matcher that matches the value of a absl::any type variable. +template <typename T> +PolymorphicMatcher<internal::any_cast_matcher::AnyCastMatcher<T> > AnyWith( + const Matcher<const T&>& matcher) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::any_cast_matcher::AnyCastMatcher<T>(matcher)); +} + +// Returns a matcher that matches the value of a variant<> type variable. +// The matcher implementation uses ADL to find the holds_alternative and get +// functions. +// It is compatible with std::variant. +template <typename T> +PolymorphicMatcher<internal::variant_matcher::VariantMatcher<T> > VariantWith( + const Matcher<const T&>& matcher) { + return MakePolymorphicMatcher( + internal::variant_matcher::VariantMatcher<T>(matcher)); +} + // These macros allow using matchers to check values in Google Test // tests. ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher) and EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher) // succeed iff the value matches the matcher. If the assertion fails, @@ -4396,4 +5271,5 @@ inline InnerMatcher AllArgs(const InnerMatcher& matcher) { return matcher; } // We must include this header at the end to make sure it can use the // declarations from this file. #include "gmock/internal/custom/gmock-matchers.h" + #endif // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_MATCHERS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-actions.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-actions.h index 3d387b6..1106818 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-actions.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-actions.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ // // This file implements some actions that depend on gmock-generated-actions.h. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_MORE_ACTIONS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_MORE_ACTIONS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h index 3db899f..6c6b3e3 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ // Note that tests are implemented in gmock-matchers_test.cc rather than // gmock-more-matchers-test.cc. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_GMOCK_MORE_MATCHERS_H_ #define GMOCK_GMOCK_MORE_MATCHERS_H_ @@ -43,6 +45,18 @@ namespace testing { +// Silence C4100 (unreferenced formal +// parameter) for MSVC +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4100) +#if (_MSC_VER == 1900) +// and silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value +// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 14 +# pragma warning(disable:4800) + #endif +#endif + // Defines a matcher that matches an empty container. The container must // support both size() and empty(), which all STL-like containers provide. MATCHER(IsEmpty, negation ? "isn't empty" : "is empty") { @@ -53,6 +67,27 @@ MATCHER(IsEmpty, negation ? "isn't empty" : "is empty") { return false; } +// Define a matcher that matches a value that evaluates in boolean +// context to true. Useful for types that define "explicit operator +// bool" operators and so can't be compared for equality with true +// and false. +MATCHER(IsTrue, negation ? "is false" : "is true") { + return static_cast<bool>(arg); +} + +// Define a matcher that matches a value that evaluates in boolean +// context to false. Useful for types that define "explicit operator +// bool" operators and so can't be compared for equality with true +// and false. +MATCHER(IsFalse, negation ? "is true" : "is false") { + return !static_cast<bool>(arg); +} + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif + + } // namespace testing #endif // GMOCK_GMOCK_MORE_MATCHERS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h index fed7de6..9670b59 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ // where all clauses are optional, and .InSequence()/.After()/ // .WillOnce() can appear any number of times. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_SPEC_BUILDERS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_SPEC_BUILDERS_H_ @@ -65,11 +67,6 @@ #include <sstream> #include <string> #include <vector> - -#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -# include <stdexcept> // NOLINT -#endif - #include "gmock/gmock-actions.h" #include "gmock/gmock-cardinalities.h" #include "gmock/gmock-matchers.h" @@ -77,6 +74,10 @@ #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" +#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS +# include <stdexcept> // NOLINT +#endif + namespace testing { // An abstract handle of an expectation. @@ -148,15 +149,13 @@ class GTEST_API_ UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // action fails. // L = * virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformDefaultAction( - const void* untyped_args, - const string& call_description) const = 0; + void* untyped_args, const std::string& call_description) const = 0; // Performs the given action with the given arguments and returns // the action's result. // L = * virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformAction( - const void* untyped_action, - const void* untyped_args) const = 0; + const void* untyped_action, void* untyped_args) const = 0; // Writes a message that the call is uninteresting (i.e. neither // explicitly expected nor explicitly unexpected) to the given @@ -211,9 +210,8 @@ class GTEST_API_ UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // arguments. This function can be safely called from multiple // threads concurrently. The caller is responsible for deleting the // result. - UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedInvokeWith( - const void* untyped_args) - GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex); + UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedInvokeWith(void* untyped_args) + GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex); protected: typedef std::vector<const void*> UntypedOnCallSpecs; @@ -238,6 +236,14 @@ class GTEST_API_ UntypedFunctionMockerBase { UntypedOnCallSpecs untyped_on_call_specs_; // All expectations for this function mocker. + // + // It's undefined behavior to interleave expectations (EXPECT_CALLs + // or ON_CALLs) and mock function calls. Also, the order of + // expectations is important. Therefore it's a logic race condition + // to read/write untyped_expectations_ concurrently. In order for + // tools like tsan to catch concurrent read/write accesses to + // untyped_expectations, we deliberately leave accesses to it + // unprotected. UntypedExpectations untyped_expectations_; }; // class UntypedFunctionMockerBase @@ -263,12 +269,14 @@ class UntypedOnCallSpecBase { }; // Asserts that the ON_CALL() statement has a certain property. - void AssertSpecProperty(bool property, const string& failure_message) const { + void AssertSpecProperty(bool property, + const std::string& failure_message) const { Assert(property, file_, line_, failure_message); } // Expects that the ON_CALL() statement has a certain property. - void ExpectSpecProperty(bool property, const string& failure_message) const { + void ExpectSpecProperty(bool property, + const std::string& failure_message) const { Expect(property, file_, line_, failure_message); } @@ -362,7 +370,6 @@ enum CallReaction { kAllow, kWarn, kFail, - kDefault = kWarn // By default, warn about uninteresting calls. }; } // namespace internal @@ -690,7 +697,7 @@ GTEST_API_ extern ThreadLocal<Sequence*> g_gmock_implicit_sequence; class GTEST_API_ ExpectationBase { public: // source_text is the EXPECT_CALL(...) source that created this Expectation. - ExpectationBase(const char* file, int line, const string& source_text); + ExpectationBase(const char* file, int line, const std::string& source_text); virtual ~ExpectationBase(); @@ -738,12 +745,14 @@ class GTEST_API_ ExpectationBase { virtual Expectation GetHandle() = 0; // Asserts that the EXPECT_CALL() statement has the given property. - void AssertSpecProperty(bool property, const string& failure_message) const { + void AssertSpecProperty(bool property, + const std::string& failure_message) const { Assert(property, file_, line_, failure_message); } // Expects that the EXPECT_CALL() statement has the given property. - void ExpectSpecProperty(bool property, const string& failure_message) const { + void ExpectSpecProperty(bool property, + const std::string& failure_message) const { Expect(property, file_, line_, failure_message); } @@ -845,7 +854,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ ExpectationBase { // an EXPECT_CALL() statement finishes. const char* file_; // The file that contains the expectation. int line_; // The line number of the expectation. - const string source_text_; // The EXPECT_CALL(...) source text. + const std::string source_text_; // The EXPECT_CALL(...) source text. // True iff the cardinality is specified explicitly. bool cardinality_specified_; Cardinality cardinality_; // The cardinality of the expectation. @@ -880,8 +889,8 @@ class TypedExpectation : public ExpectationBase { typedef typename Function<F>::ArgumentMatcherTuple ArgumentMatcherTuple; typedef typename Function<F>::Result Result; - TypedExpectation(FunctionMockerBase<F>* owner, - const char* a_file, int a_line, const string& a_source_text, + TypedExpectation(FunctionMockerBase<F>* owner, const char* a_file, int a_line, + const std::string& a_source_text, const ArgumentMatcherTuple& m) : ExpectationBase(a_file, a_line, a_source_text), owner_(owner), @@ -1240,7 +1249,7 @@ class TypedExpectation : public ExpectationBase { // Logs a message including file and line number information. GTEST_API_ void LogWithLocation(testing::internal::LogSeverity severity, const char* file, int line, - const string& message); + const std::string& message); template <typename F> class MockSpec { @@ -1251,15 +1260,16 @@ class MockSpec { // Constructs a MockSpec object, given the function mocker object // that the spec is associated with. - explicit MockSpec(internal::FunctionMockerBase<F>* function_mocker) - : function_mocker_(function_mocker) {} + MockSpec(internal::FunctionMockerBase<F>* function_mocker, + const ArgumentMatcherTuple& matchers) + : function_mocker_(function_mocker), matchers_(matchers) {} // Adds a new default action spec to the function mocker and returns // the newly created spec. internal::OnCallSpec<F>& InternalDefaultActionSetAt( const char* file, int line, const char* obj, const char* call) { LogWithLocation(internal::kInfo, file, line, - string("ON_CALL(") + obj + ", " + call + ") invoked"); + std::string("ON_CALL(") + obj + ", " + call + ") invoked"); return function_mocker_->AddNewOnCallSpec(file, line, matchers_); } @@ -1267,20 +1277,24 @@ class MockSpec { // the newly created spec. internal::TypedExpectation<F>& InternalExpectedAt( const char* file, int line, const char* obj, const char* call) { - const string source_text(string("EXPECT_CALL(") + obj + ", " + call + ")"); + const std::string source_text(std::string("EXPECT_CALL(") + obj + ", " + + call + ")"); LogWithLocation(internal::kInfo, file, line, source_text + " invoked"); return function_mocker_->AddNewExpectation( file, line, source_text, matchers_); } + // This operator overload is used to swallow the superfluous parameter list + // introduced by the ON/EXPECT_CALL macros. See the macro comments for more + // explanation. + MockSpec<F>& operator()(const internal::WithoutMatchers&, void* const) { + return *this; + } + private: template <typename Function> friend class internal::FunctionMocker; - void SetMatchers(const ArgumentMatcherTuple& matchers) { - matchers_ = matchers; - } - // The function mocker that owns this spec. internal::FunctionMockerBase<F>* const function_mocker_; // The argument matchers specified in the spec. @@ -1388,19 +1402,20 @@ class ActionResultHolder : public UntypedActionResultHolderBase { template <typename F> static ActionResultHolder* PerformDefaultAction( const FunctionMockerBase<F>* func_mocker, - const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args, - const string& call_description) { - return new ActionResultHolder(Wrapper( - func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(args, call_description))); + typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args, + const std::string& call_description) { + return new ActionResultHolder(Wrapper(func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction( + internal::move(args), call_description))); } // Performs the given action and returns the result in a new-ed // ActionResultHolder. template <typename F> - static ActionResultHolder* - PerformAction(const Action<F>& action, - const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args) { - return new ActionResultHolder(Wrapper(action.Perform(args))); + static ActionResultHolder* PerformAction( + const Action<F>& action, + typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args) { + return new ActionResultHolder( + Wrapper(action.Perform(internal::move(args)))); } private: @@ -1428,9 +1443,9 @@ class ActionResultHolder<void> : public UntypedActionResultHolderBase { template <typename F> static ActionResultHolder* PerformDefaultAction( const FunctionMockerBase<F>* func_mocker, - const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args, - const string& call_description) { - func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(args, call_description); + typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args, + const std::string& call_description) { + func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(internal::move(args), call_description); return new ActionResultHolder; } @@ -1439,8 +1454,8 @@ class ActionResultHolder<void> : public UntypedActionResultHolderBase { template <typename F> static ActionResultHolder* PerformAction( const Action<F>& action, - const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args) { - action.Perform(args); + typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args) { + action.Perform(internal::move(args)); return new ActionResultHolder; } @@ -1459,7 +1474,7 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { typedef typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple; typedef typename Function<F>::ArgumentMatcherTuple ArgumentMatcherTuple; - FunctionMockerBase() : current_spec_(this) {} + FunctionMockerBase() {} // The destructor verifies that all expectations on this mock // function have been satisfied. If not, it will report Google Test @@ -1495,14 +1510,16 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // mutable state of this object, and thus can be called concurrently // without locking. // L = * - Result PerformDefaultAction(const ArgumentTuple& args, - const string& call_description) const { + Result PerformDefaultAction( + typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args, + const std::string& call_description) const { const OnCallSpec<F>* const spec = this->FindOnCallSpec(args); if (spec != NULL) { - return spec->GetAction().Perform(args); + return spec->GetAction().Perform(internal::move(args)); } - const string message = call_description + + const std::string message = + call_description + "\n The mock function has no default action " "set, and its return type has no default value set."; #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS @@ -1521,11 +1538,11 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // action fails. The caller is responsible for deleting the result. // L = * virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformDefaultAction( - const void* untyped_args, // must point to an ArgumentTuple - const string& call_description) const { - const ArgumentTuple& args = - *static_cast<const ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args); - return ResultHolder::PerformDefaultAction(this, args, call_description); + void* untyped_args, // must point to an ArgumentTuple + const std::string& call_description) const { + ArgumentTuple* args = static_cast<ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args); + return ResultHolder::PerformDefaultAction(this, internal::move(*args), + call_description); } // Performs the given action with the given arguments and returns @@ -1533,13 +1550,12 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // result. // L = * virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformAction( - const void* untyped_action, const void* untyped_args) const { + const void* untyped_action, void* untyped_args) const { // Make a copy of the action before performing it, in case the // action deletes the mock object (and thus deletes itself). const Action<F> action = *static_cast<const Action<F>*>(untyped_action); - const ArgumentTuple& args = - *static_cast<const ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args); - return ResultHolder::PerformAction(action, args); + ArgumentTuple* args = static_cast<ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args); + return ResultHolder::PerformAction(action, internal::move(*args)); } // Implements UntypedFunctionMockerBase::ClearDefaultActionsLocked(): @@ -1579,10 +1595,14 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // Returns the result of invoking this mock function with the given // arguments. This function can be safely called from multiple // threads concurrently. - Result InvokeWith(const ArgumentTuple& args) - GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) { + Result InvokeWith( + typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args) + GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) { + // const_cast is required since in C++98 we still pass ArgumentTuple around + // by const& instead of rvalue reference. + void* untyped_args = const_cast<void*>(static_cast<const void*>(&args)); scoped_ptr<ResultHolder> holder( - DownCast_<ResultHolder*>(this->UntypedInvokeWith(&args))); + DownCast_<ResultHolder*>(this->UntypedInvokeWith(untyped_args))); return holder->Unwrap(); } @@ -1598,16 +1618,16 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { } // Adds and returns an expectation spec for this mock function. - TypedExpectation<F>& AddNewExpectation( - const char* file, - int line, - const string& source_text, - const ArgumentMatcherTuple& m) - GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) { + TypedExpectation<F>& AddNewExpectation(const char* file, int line, + const std::string& source_text, + const ArgumentMatcherTuple& m) + GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) { Mock::RegisterUseByOnCallOrExpectCall(MockObject(), file, line); TypedExpectation<F>* const expectation = new TypedExpectation<F>(this, file, line, source_text, m); const linked_ptr<ExpectationBase> untyped_expectation(expectation); + // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to + // it is unprotected here. untyped_expectations_.push_back(untyped_expectation); // Adds this expectation into the implicit sequence if there is one. @@ -1619,10 +1639,6 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { return *expectation; } - // The current spec (either default action spec or expectation spec) - // being described on this function mocker. - MockSpec<F>& current_spec() { return current_spec_; } - private: template <typename Func> friend class TypedExpectation; @@ -1715,6 +1731,8 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { const ArgumentTuple& args) const GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) { g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld(); + // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to + // it is unprotected here. for (typename UntypedExpectations::const_reverse_iterator it = untyped_expectations_.rbegin(); it != untyped_expectations_.rend(); ++it) { @@ -1765,14 +1783,10 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { } } - // The current spec (either default action spec or expectation spec) - // being described on this function mocker. - MockSpec<F> current_spec_; - // There is no generally useful and implementable semantics of // copying a mock object, so copying a mock is usually a user error. // Thus we disallow copying function mockers. If the user really - // wants to copy a mock object, he should implement his own copy + // wants to copy a mock object, they should implement their own copy // operation, for example: // // class MockFoo : public Foo { @@ -1796,7 +1810,7 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase { // Reports an uninteresting call (whose description is in msg) in the // manner specified by 'reaction'. -void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const string& msg); +void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const std::string& msg); } // namespace internal @@ -1831,17 +1845,76 @@ inline Expectation::Expectation(internal::ExpectationBase& exp) // NOLINT } // namespace testing -// A separate macro is required to avoid compile errors when the name -// of the method used in call is a result of macro expansion. -// See CompilesWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro tests in -// internal/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc for more details. -#define GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call) \ - ((obj).gmock_##call).InternalDefaultActionSetAt(__FILE__, __LINE__, \ - #obj, #call) -#define ON_CALL(obj, call) GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call) - -#define GMOCK_EXPECT_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call) \ - ((obj).gmock_##call).InternalExpectedAt(__FILE__, __LINE__, #obj, #call) -#define EXPECT_CALL(obj, call) GMOCK_EXPECT_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call) +// Implementation for ON_CALL and EXPECT_CALL macros. A separate macro is +// required to avoid compile errors when the name of the method used in call is +// a result of macro expansion. See CompilesWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro +// tests in internal/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc for more details. +// +// This macro supports statements both with and without parameter matchers. If +// the parameter list is omitted, gMock will accept any parameters, which allows +// tests to be written that don't need to encode the number of method +// parameter. This technique may only be used for non-overloaded methods. +// +// // These are the same: +// ON_CALL(mock, NoArgsMethod()).WillByDefault(...); +// ON_CALL(mock, NoArgsMethod).WillByDefault(...); +// +// // As are these: +// ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod(_, _)).WillByDefault(...); +// ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod).WillByDefault(...); +// +// // Can also specify args if you want, of course: +// ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod(_, 45)).WillByDefault(...); +// +// // Overloads work as long as you specify parameters: +// ON_CALL(mock, OverloadedMethod(_)).WillByDefault(...); +// ON_CALL(mock, OverloadedMethod(_, _)).WillByDefault(...); +// +// // Oops! Which overload did you want? +// ON_CALL(mock, OverloadedMethod).WillByDefault(...); +// => ERROR: call to member function 'gmock_OverloadedMethod' is ambiguous +// +// How this works: The mock class uses two overloads of the gmock_Method +// expectation setter method plus an operator() overload on the MockSpec object. +// In the matcher list form, the macro expands to: +// +// // This statement: +// ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod(_, 45))... +// +// // ...expands to: +// mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(_, 45)(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)... +// |-------------v---------------||------------v-------------| +// invokes first overload swallowed by operator() +// +// // ...which is essentially: +// mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(_, 45)... +// +// Whereas the form without a matcher list: +// +// // This statement: +// ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod)... +// +// // ...expands to: +// mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)... +// |-----------------------v--------------------------| +// invokes second overload +// +// // ...which is essentially: +// mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(_, _)... +// +// The WithoutMatchers() argument is used to disambiguate overloads and to +// block the caller from accidentally invoking the second overload directly. The +// second argument is an internal type derived from the method signature. The +// failure to disambiguate two overloads of this method in the ON_CALL statement +// is how we block callers from setting expectations on overloaded methods. +#define GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(mock_expr, Setter, call) \ + ((mock_expr).gmock_##call)(::testing::internal::GetWithoutMatchers(), NULL) \ + .Setter(__FILE__, __LINE__, #mock_expr, #call) + +#define ON_CALL(obj, call) \ + GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, InternalDefaultActionSetAt, call) + +#define EXPECT_CALL(obj, call) \ + GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, InternalExpectedAt, call) #endif // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_SPEC_BUILDERS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock.h index 6735c71..6330294 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ // // This is the main header file a user should include. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_H_ @@ -59,8 +61,8 @@ #include "gmock/gmock-cardinalities.h" #include "gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h" #include "gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h" -#include "gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h" #include "gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h" +#include "gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h" #include "gmock/gmock-matchers.h" #include "gmock/gmock-more-actions.h" #include "gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h" @@ -71,6 +73,7 @@ namespace testing { // Declares Google Mock flags that we want a user to use programmatically. GMOCK_DECLARE_bool_(catch_leaked_mocks); GMOCK_DECLARE_string_(verbose); +GMOCK_DECLARE_int32_(default_mock_behavior); // Initializes Google Mock. This must be called before running the // tests. In particular, it parses the command line for the flags diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h index 7dc3b1a..92d910c 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ // pump.py gmock-generated-actions.h.pump // DO NOT EDIT BY HAND!!! +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump index d26c8a0..67c221f 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ $$ -*- mode: c++; -*- -$$ This is a Pump source file (http://go/pump). Please use Pump to convert +$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert $$ it to callback-actions.h. $$ $var max_callback_arity = 5 $$}} This meta comment fixes auto-indentation in editors. + +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_GENERATED_ACTIONS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-matchers.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-matchers.h index f2efef9..b9b7e3f 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-matchers.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-matchers.h @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ // ============================================================ // // Adds google3 callback support to CallableTraits. -// -#ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_CALLBACK_MATCHERS_H_ -#define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_CALLBACK_MATCHERS_H_ -#endif // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_CALLBACK_MATCHERS_H_ +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + +#ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_MATCHERS_H_ +#define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_MATCHERS_H_ +#endif // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_MATCHERS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-port.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-port.h index 9ce8bfe..ad9ae36 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-port.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-port.h @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ // // ** Custom implementation starts here ** +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_PORT_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GMOCK_PORT_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h index 7811e43..c9bfbc8 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ // This file contains template meta-programming utility classes needed // for implementing Google Mock. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_GENERATED_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_GENERATED_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ @@ -90,42 +92,48 @@ struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3> > { template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4> struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4> > { - typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, - Matcher<A4> > type; + typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4> > + type; }; template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5> struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5> > { typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4>, - Matcher<A5> > type; + Matcher<A5> > + type; }; template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5, typename A6> struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6> > { typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4>, - Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6> > type; + Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6> > + type; }; template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5, typename A6, typename A7> struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7> > { typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4>, - Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7> > type; + Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7> > + type; }; template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5, typename A6, typename A7, typename A8> struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8> > { typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4>, - Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7>, Matcher<A8> > type; + Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7>, Matcher<A8> > + type; }; template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5, typename A6, typename A7, typename A8, typename A9> struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9> > { typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4>, - Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7>, Matcher<A8>, Matcher<A9> > type; + Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7>, Matcher<A8>, + Matcher<A9> > + type; }; template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5, @@ -133,8 +141,9 @@ template <typename A1, typename A2, typename A3, typename A4, typename A5, struct MatcherTuple< ::testing::tuple<A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10> > { typedef ::testing::tuple<Matcher<A1>, Matcher<A2>, Matcher<A3>, Matcher<A4>, - Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7>, Matcher<A8>, Matcher<A9>, - Matcher<A10> > type; + Matcher<A5>, Matcher<A6>, Matcher<A7>, Matcher<A8>, + Matcher<A9>, Matcher<A10> > + type; }; // Template struct Function<F>, where F must be a function type, contains diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h.pump b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h.pump index 800af17..f13151b 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h.pump +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h.pump @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ $var n = 10 $$ The maximum arity we support. // This file contains template meta-programming utility classes needed // for implementing Google Mock. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_GENERATED_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_GENERATED_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h index e2ddb05..e0846d9 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h @@ -35,13 +35,14 @@ // Mock. They are subject to change without notice, so please DO NOT // USE THEM IN USER CODE. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ #include <stdio.h> #include <ostream> // NOLINT #include <string> - #include "gmock/internal/gmock-generated-internal-utils.h" #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" @@ -49,11 +50,23 @@ namespace testing { namespace internal { +// Silence MSVC C4100 (unreferenced formal parameter) and +// C4805('==': unsafe mix of type 'const int' and type 'const bool') +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4100) +# pragma warning(disable:4805) +#endif + +// Joins a vector of strings as if they are fields of a tuple; returns +// the joined string. +GTEST_API_ std::string JoinAsTuple(const Strings& fields); + // Converts an identifier name to a space-separated list of lower-case // words. Each maximum substring of the form [A-Za-z][a-z]*|\d+ is // treated as one word. For example, both "FooBar123" and // "foo_bar_123" are converted to "foo bar 123". -GTEST_API_ string ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(const char* id_name); +GTEST_API_ std::string ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(const char* id_name); // PointeeOf<Pointer>::type is the type of a value pointed to by a // Pointer, which can be either a smart pointer or a raw pointer. The @@ -114,9 +127,11 @@ struct LinkedPtrLessThan { // To gcc, // wchar_t == signed wchar_t != unsigned wchar_t == unsigned int #ifdef __GNUC__ +#if !defined(__WCHAR_UNSIGNED__) // signed/unsigned wchar_t are valid types. # define GMOCK_HAS_SIGNED_WCHAR_T_ 1 #endif +#endif // In what follows, we use the term "kind" to indicate whether a type // is bool, an integer type (excluding bool), a floating-point type, @@ -267,7 +282,7 @@ class FailureReporterInterface { // Reports a failure that occurred at the given source file location. virtual void ReportFailure(FailureType type, const char* file, int line, - const string& message) = 0; + const std::string& message) = 0; }; // Returns the failure reporter used by Google Mock. @@ -279,7 +294,7 @@ GTEST_API_ FailureReporterInterface* GetFailureReporter(); // inline this function to prevent it from showing up in the stack // trace. inline void Assert(bool condition, const char* file, int line, - const string& msg) { + const std::string& msg) { if (!condition) { GetFailureReporter()->ReportFailure(FailureReporterInterface::kFatal, file, line, msg); @@ -292,7 +307,7 @@ inline void Assert(bool condition, const char* file, int line) { // Verifies that condition is true; generates a non-fatal failure if // condition is false. inline void Expect(bool condition, const char* file, int line, - const string& msg) { + const std::string& msg) { if (!condition) { GetFailureReporter()->ReportFailure(FailureReporterInterface::kNonfatal, file, line, msg); @@ -328,10 +343,24 @@ GTEST_API_ bool LogIsVisible(LogSeverity severity); // stack_frames_to_skip is treated as 0, since we don't know which // function calls will be inlined by the compiler and need to be // conservative. -GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, - const string& message, +GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, const std::string& message, int stack_frames_to_skip); +// A marker class that is used to resolve parameterless expectations to the +// correct overload. This must not be instantiable, to prevent client code from +// accidentally resolving to the overload; for example: +// +// ON_CALL(mock, Method({}, nullptr))... +// +class WithoutMatchers { + private: + WithoutMatchers() {} + friend GTEST_API_ WithoutMatchers GetWithoutMatchers(); +}; + +// Internal use only: access the singleton instance of WithoutMatchers. +GTEST_API_ WithoutMatchers GetWithoutMatchers(); + // TODO(wan@google.com): group all type utilities together. // Type traits. @@ -504,8 +533,44 @@ struct RemoveConstFromKey<std::pair<const K, V> > { template <bool kValue> struct BooleanConstant {}; +// Emit an assertion failure due to incorrect DoDefault() usage. Out-of-lined to +// reduce code size. +GTEST_API_ void IllegalDoDefault(const char* file, int line); + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +// Helper types for Apply() below. +template <size_t... Is> struct int_pack { typedef int_pack type; }; + +template <class Pack, size_t I> struct append; +template <size_t... Is, size_t I> +struct append<int_pack<Is...>, I> : int_pack<Is..., I> {}; + +template <size_t C> +struct make_int_pack : append<typename make_int_pack<C - 1>::type, C - 1> {}; +template <> struct make_int_pack<0> : int_pack<> {}; + +template <typename F, typename Tuple, size_t... Idx> +auto ApplyImpl(F&& f, Tuple&& args, int_pack<Idx...>) -> decltype( + std::forward<F>(f)(std::get<Idx>(std::forward<Tuple>(args))...)) { + return std::forward<F>(f)(std::get<Idx>(std::forward<Tuple>(args))...); +} + +// Apply the function to a tuple of arguments. +template <typename F, typename Tuple> +auto Apply(F&& f, Tuple&& args) + -> decltype(ApplyImpl(std::forward<F>(f), std::forward<Tuple>(args), + make_int_pack<std::tuple_size<Tuple>::value>())) { + return ApplyImpl(std::forward<F>(f), std::forward<Tuple>(args), + make_int_pack<std::tuple_size<Tuple>::value>()); +} +#endif + + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif + } // namespace internal } // namespace testing #endif // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_INTERNAL_UTILS_H_ - diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-port.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-port.h index 63f4a68..79f4366 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-port.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-port.h @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ // end with _ are part of Google Mock's public API and can be used by // code outside Google Mock. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_PORT_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_INTERNAL_GMOCK_PORT_H_ @@ -50,15 +52,11 @@ // portability utilities to Google Test's gtest-port.h instead of // here, as Google Mock depends on Google Test. Only add a utility // here if it's truly specific to Google Mock. + #include "gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" #include "gmock/internal/custom/gmock-port.h" -// To avoid conditional compilation everywhere, we make it -// gmock-port.h's responsibility to #include the header implementing -// tr1/tuple. gmock-port.h does this via gtest-port.h, which is -// guaranteed to pull in the tuple header. - // For MS Visual C++, check the compiler version. At least VS 2003 is // required to compile Google Mock. #if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1310 @@ -72,18 +70,18 @@ #if !defined(GMOCK_DECLARE_bool_) // Macros for declaring flags. -#define GMOCK_DECLARE_bool_(name) extern GTEST_API_ bool GMOCK_FLAG(name) -#define GMOCK_DECLARE_int32_(name) \ +# define GMOCK_DECLARE_bool_(name) extern GTEST_API_ bool GMOCK_FLAG(name) +# define GMOCK_DECLARE_int32_(name) \ extern GTEST_API_ ::testing::internal::Int32 GMOCK_FLAG(name) -#define GMOCK_DECLARE_string_(name) \ +# define GMOCK_DECLARE_string_(name) \ extern GTEST_API_ ::std::string GMOCK_FLAG(name) // Macros for defining flags. -#define GMOCK_DEFINE_bool_(name, default_val, doc) \ +# define GMOCK_DEFINE_bool_(name, default_val, doc) \ GTEST_API_ bool GMOCK_FLAG(name) = (default_val) -#define GMOCK_DEFINE_int32_(name, default_val, doc) \ +# define GMOCK_DEFINE_int32_(name, default_val, doc) \ GTEST_API_ ::testing::internal::Int32 GMOCK_FLAG(name) = (default_val) -#define GMOCK_DEFINE_string_(name, default_val, doc) \ +# define GMOCK_DEFINE_string_(name, default_val, doc) \ GTEST_API_ ::std::string GMOCK_FLAG(name) = (default_val) #endif // !defined(GMOCK_DECLARE_bool_) diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.sln b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.sln index d949656..bb48f5b 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.sln +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.sln @@ -10,21 +10,35 @@ EndProject Global
GlobalSection(SolutionConfigurationPlatforms) = preSolution
Debug|Win32 = Debug|Win32
+ Debug|x64 = Debug|x64
Release|Win32 = Release|Win32
+ Release|x64 = Release|x64
EndGlobalSection
GlobalSection(ProjectConfigurationPlatforms) = postSolution
{34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
{34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
+ {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64
+ {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64
{34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
{34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32
+ {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64
+ {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64
{F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
{F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
+ {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64
+ {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64
{F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
{F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32
+ {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64
+ {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64
{E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
{E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
+ {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64
+ {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64
{E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
{E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32
+ {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64
+ {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64
EndGlobalSection
GlobalSection(SolutionProperties) = preSolution
HideSolutionNode = FALSE
diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.vcxproj b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.vcxproj index 21a85ef..7bc71d3 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.vcxproj +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock.vcxproj @@ -1,14 +1,22 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations">
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32">
<Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
<Platform>Win32</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
+ <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64">
+ <Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
+ <Platform>x64</Platform>
+ </ProjectConfiguration>
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32">
<Configuration>Release</Configuration>
<Platform>Win32</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
+ <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64">
+ <Configuration>Release</Configuration>
+ <Platform>x64</Platform>
+ </ProjectConfiguration>
</ItemGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="Globals">
<ProjectGuid>{34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}</ProjectGuid>
@@ -20,10 +28,23 @@ <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
<CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
<WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration">
+ <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
+ <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration">
<ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
<CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration">
+ <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
+ <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" />
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings">
@@ -32,23 +53,39 @@ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
<Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
</ImportGroup>
+ <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets">
+ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
+ <Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
+ </ImportGroup>
<ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets">
<Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
<Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
</ImportGroup>
+ <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets">
+ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
+ <Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
+ </ImportGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" />
<PropertyGroup>
<_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.30319.1</_ProjectFileVersion>
- <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
<IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
- <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
<IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
</PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">
+ <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">
+ <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
+ </PropertyGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">
<ClCompile>
<Optimization>Disabled</Optimization>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
- <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
<MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild>
<BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks>
<RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary>
@@ -58,10 +95,34 @@ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
</ClCompile>
</ItemDefinitionGroup>
+ <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">
+ <ClCompile>
+ <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks>
+ <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary>
+ <PrecompiledHeader>
+ </PrecompiledHeader>
+ <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel>
+ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
+ </ClCompile>
+ </ItemDefinitionGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">
<ClCompile>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
- <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary>
+ <PrecompiledHeader>
+ </PrecompiledHeader>
+ <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel>
+ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
+ </ClCompile>
+ </ItemDefinitionGroup>
+ <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">
+ <ClCompile>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
<RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary>
<PrecompiledHeader>
</PrecompiledHeader>
@@ -73,10 +134,12 @@ <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gmock-all.cc" />
<ClCompile Include="$(GTestDir)\src\gtest-all.cc">
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
</ClCompile>
</ItemGroup>
<Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" />
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets">
</ImportGroup>
-</Project>
+</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_config.props b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_config.props index 441f31c..017d710 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_config.props +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_config.props @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros">
<GTestDir>../../../googletest</GTestDir>
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ <Value>$(GTestDir)</Value>
</BuildMacro>
</ItemGroup>
-</Project>
+</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_main.vcxproj b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_main.vcxproj index 27fecd5..43da043 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_main.vcxproj +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_main.vcxproj @@ -1,14 +1,22 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations">
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32">
<Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
<Platform>Win32</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
+ <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64">
+ <Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
+ <Platform>x64</Platform>
+ </ProjectConfiguration>
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32">
<Configuration>Release</Configuration>
<Platform>Win32</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
+ <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64">
+ <Configuration>Release</Configuration>
+ <Platform>x64</Platform>
+ </ProjectConfiguration>
</ItemGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="Globals">
<ProjectGuid>{E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}</ProjectGuid>
@@ -20,10 +28,23 @@ <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
<CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
<WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration">
+ <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
+ <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration">
<ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
<CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration">
+ <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType>
+ <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" />
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings">
@@ -32,23 +53,39 @@ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
<Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
</ImportGroup>
+ <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets">
+ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
+ <Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
+ </ImportGroup>
<ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets">
<Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
<Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
</ImportGroup>
+ <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets">
+ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
+ <Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
+ </ImportGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" />
<PropertyGroup>
<_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.30319.1</_ProjectFileVersion>
- <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
<IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
- <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
<IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
</PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">
+ <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">
+ <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
+ </PropertyGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">
<ClCompile>
<Optimization>Disabled</Optimization>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
- <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
<MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild>
<BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks>
<RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary>
@@ -58,10 +95,34 @@ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
</ClCompile>
</ItemDefinitionGroup>
+ <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">
+ <ClCompile>
+ <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks>
+ <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary>
+ <PrecompiledHeader>
+ </PrecompiledHeader>
+ <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel>
+ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
+ </ClCompile>
+ </ItemDefinitionGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">
<ClCompile>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
- <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary>
+ <PrecompiledHeader>
+ </PrecompiledHeader>
+ <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel>
+ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
+ </ClCompile>
+ </ItemDefinitionGroup>
+ <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">
+ <ClCompile>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
<RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary>
<PrecompiledHeader>
</PrecompiledHeader>
@@ -79,10 +140,12 @@ <ItemGroup>
<ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gmock_main.cc">
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
</ClCompile>
</ItemGroup>
<Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" />
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets">
</ImportGroup>
-</Project>
+</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_test.vcxproj b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_test.vcxproj index 265439e..dcbeb58 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_test.vcxproj +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2010/gmock_test.vcxproj @@ -1,14 +1,22 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations">
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32">
<Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
<Platform>Win32</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
+ <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64">
+ <Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
+ <Platform>x64</Platform>
+ </ProjectConfiguration>
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32">
<Configuration>Release</Configuration>
<Platform>Win32</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
+ <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64">
+ <Configuration>Release</Configuration>
+ <Platform>x64</Platform>
+ </ProjectConfiguration>
</ItemGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="Globals">
<ProjectGuid>{F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}</ProjectGuid>
@@ -20,10 +28,23 @@ <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType>
<CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
<WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration">
+ <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType>
+ <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration">
<ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType>
<CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration">
+ <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType>
+ <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet>
+ <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" />
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings">
@@ -32,26 +53,44 @@ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
<Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
</ImportGroup>
+ <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets">
+ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
+ <Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
+ </ImportGroup>
<ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets">
<Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
<Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
</ImportGroup>
+ <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets">
+ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" />
+ <Import Project="gmock_config.props" />
+ </ImportGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" />
<PropertyGroup>
<_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.30319.1</_ProjectFileVersion>
- <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
<IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
<LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">true</LinkIncremental>
- <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">true</LinkIncremental>
+ <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
<IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
<LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">false</LinkIncremental>
+ <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">false</LinkIncremental>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">
+ <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
+ </PropertyGroup>
+ <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">
+ <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir>
+ <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">
<ClCompile>
<AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions>
<Optimization>Disabled</Optimization>
- <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
- <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
<MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild>
<BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks>
<RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary>
@@ -66,11 +105,29 @@ <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine>
</Link>
</ItemDefinitionGroup>
+ <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">
+ <ClCompile>
+ <AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions>
+ <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks>
+ <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary>
+ <PrecompiledHeader>
+ </PrecompiledHeader>
+ <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel>
+ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
+ </ClCompile>
+ <Link>
+ <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation>
+ <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem>
+ </Link>
+ </ItemDefinitionGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">
<ClCompile>
<AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions>
- <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
- <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
<RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary>
<PrecompiledHeader>
</PrecompiledHeader>
@@ -85,6 +142,24 @@ <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine>
</Link>
</ItemDefinitionGroup>
+ <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">
+ <ClCompile>
+ <AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions>
+ <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
+ <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
+ <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary>
+ <PrecompiledHeader>
+ </PrecompiledHeader>
+ <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel>
+ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat>
+ </ClCompile>
+ <Link>
+ <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation>
+ <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem>
+ <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences>
+ <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding>
+ </Link>
+ </ItemDefinitionGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<ProjectReference Include="gmock_main.vcxproj">
<Project>{e4ef614b-30df-4954-8c53-580a0bf6b589}</Project>
@@ -98,4 +173,4 @@ <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" />
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets">
</ImportGroup>
-</Project>
+</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.sln b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.sln index c59e07f..d4203a8 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.sln +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.sln @@ -10,21 +10,35 @@ EndProject Global GlobalSection(SolutionConfigurationPlatforms) = preSolution Debug|Win32 = Debug|Win32 + Debug|x64 = Debug|x64 Release|Win32 = Release|Win32 + Release|x64 = Release|x64 EndGlobalSection GlobalSection(ProjectConfigurationPlatforms) = postSolution {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 EndGlobalSection GlobalSection(SolutionProperties) = preSolution HideSolutionNode = FALSE diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.vcxproj b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.vcxproj index d5ddd09..c6b56e6 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.vcxproj +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock.vcxproj @@ -5,10 +5,18 @@ <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> <Platform>Win32</Platform> </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> <Configuration>Release</Configuration> <Platform>Win32</Platform> </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> </ItemGroup> <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> <ProjectGuid>{34681F0D-CE45-415D-B5F2-5C662DFE3BD5}</ProjectGuid> @@ -22,11 +30,22 @@ <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization> <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> + <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization> + <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> </ImportGroup> @@ -34,18 +53,34 @@ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> + </ImportGroup> <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> + </ImportGroup> <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> <PropertyGroup> <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.30319.1</_ProjectFileVersion> - <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> - <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> <ClCompile> <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> @@ -60,6 +95,19 @@ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> </ClCompile> </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + </ClCompile> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> <ClCompile> <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> @@ -71,11 +119,24 @@ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> </ClCompile> </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + </ClCompile> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> <ItemGroup> <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gmock-all.cc" /> <ClCompile Include="$(GTestDir)\src\gtest-all.cc"> <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> </ClCompile> </ItemGroup> <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_main.vcxproj b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_main.vcxproj index 76cc68b..42381df 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_main.vcxproj +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_main.vcxproj @@ -5,10 +5,18 @@ <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> <Platform>Win32</Platform> </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> <Configuration>Release</Configuration> <Platform>Win32</Platform> </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> </ItemGroup> <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> <ProjectGuid>{E4EF614B-30DF-4954-8C53-580A0BF6B589}</ProjectGuid> @@ -22,11 +30,22 @@ <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization> <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> + <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization> + <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> </ImportGroup> @@ -34,18 +53,34 @@ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> + </ImportGroup> <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> + </ImportGroup> <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> <PropertyGroup> <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.30319.1</_ProjectFileVersion> - <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> - <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> <ClCompile> <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> @@ -60,6 +95,19 @@ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> </ClCompile> </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + </ClCompile> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> <ClCompile> <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> @@ -71,6 +119,17 @@ <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> </ClCompile> </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + </ClCompile> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> <ItemGroup> <ProjectReference Include="gmock.vcxproj"> <Project>{34681f0d-ce45-415d-b5f2-5c662dfe3bd5}</Project> @@ -81,7 +140,9 @@ <ItemGroup> <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gmock_main.cc"> <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">../../include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> </ClCompile> </ItemGroup> <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> diff --git a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_test.vcxproj b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_test.vcxproj index 76ea553..01d1f20 100644 --- a/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_test.vcxproj +++ b/googlemock/msvc/2015/gmock_test.vcxproj @@ -5,10 +5,18 @@ <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> <Platform>Win32</Platform> </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> <Configuration>Release</Configuration> <Platform>Win32</Platform> </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> </ItemGroup> <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> <ProjectGuid>{F10D22F8-AC7B-4213-8720-608E7D878CD2}</ProjectGuid> @@ -22,11 +30,22 @@ <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization> <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> + <WholeProgramOptimization>true</WholeProgramOptimization> + <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>Unicode</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v140</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> </ImportGroup> @@ -34,19 +53,37 @@ <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> + </ImportGroup> <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + <Import Project="gmock_config.props" /> + </ImportGroup> <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> <PropertyGroup> <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.30319.1</_ProjectFileVersion> - <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">true</LinkIncremental> - <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">true</LinkIncremental> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">false</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">false</LinkIncremental> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> </PropertyGroup> <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> <ClCompile> @@ -68,10 +105,28 @@ <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> </Link> </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> <ClCompile> <AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions> - <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> <PrecompiledHeader> @@ -87,6 +142,24 @@ <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> </Link> </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <AdditionalOptions>/bigobj %(AdditionalOptions)</AdditionalOptions> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;$(GTestDir);%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> <ItemGroup> <ProjectReference Include="gmock_main.vcxproj"> <Project>{e4ef614b-30df-4954-8c53-580a0bf6b589}</Project> diff --git a/googlemock/scripts/fuse_gmock_files.py b/googlemock/scripts/fuse_gmock_files.py index cb7fdf2..9b6956f 100755 --- a/googlemock/scripts/fuse_gmock_files.py +++ b/googlemock/scripts/fuse_gmock_files.py @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ EXAMPLES This tool is experimental. In particular, it assumes that there is no conditional inclusion of Google Mock or Google Test headers. Please report any problems to googlemock@googlegroups.com. You can read -http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook for more +https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md for more information. """ diff --git a/googlemock/scripts/generator/README b/googlemock/scripts/generator/README index d6f9597..01fd463 100644 --- a/googlemock/scripts/generator/README +++ b/googlemock/scripts/generator/README @@ -1,11 +1,10 @@ The Google Mock class generator is an application that is part of cppclean. -For more information about cppclean, see the README.cppclean file or -visit http://code.google.com/p/cppclean/ +For more information about cppclean, visit http://code.google.com/p/cppclean/ -cppclean requires Python 2.3.5 or later. If you don't have Python installed -on your system, you will also need to install it. You can download Python -from: http://www.python.org/download/releases/ +The mock generator requires Python 2.3.5 or later. If you don't have Python +installed on your system, you will also need to install it. You can download +Python from: http://www.python.org/download/releases/ To use the Google Mock class generator, you need to call it on the command line passing the header file and class for which you want diff --git a/googlemock/scripts/generator/cpp/ast.py b/googlemock/scripts/generator/cpp/ast.py index 11cbe91..cce3272 100755 --- a/googlemock/scripts/generator/cpp/ast.py +++ b/googlemock/scripts/generator/cpp/ast.py @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ class Class(_GenericDeclaration): # TODO(nnorwitz): handle namespaces, etc. if self.bases: for token_list in self.bases: - # TODO(nnorwitz): bases are tokens, do name comparision. + # TODO(nnorwitz): bases are tokens, do name comparison. for token in token_list: if token.name == node.name: return True @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ class Function(_GenericDeclaration): def Requires(self, node): if self.parameters: - # TODO(nnorwitz): parameters are tokens, do name comparision. + # TODO(nnorwitz): parameters are tokens, do name comparison. for p in self.parameters: if p.name == node.name: return True @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ class AstBuilder(object): last_token = self._GetNextToken() return tokens, last_token - # TODO(nnorwitz): remove _IgnoreUpTo() it shouldn't be necesary. + # TODO(nnorwitz): remove _IgnoreUpTo() it shouldn't be necessary. def _IgnoreUpTo(self, token_type, token): unused_tokens = self._GetTokensUpTo(token_type, token) diff --git a/googlemock/scripts/upload.py b/googlemock/scripts/upload.py index 6e6f9a1..95239dc 100755 --- a/googlemock/scripts/upload.py +++ b/googlemock/scripts/upload.py @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ class AbstractRpcServer(object): The authentication process works as follows: 1) We get a username and password from the user 2) We use ClientLogin to obtain an AUTH token for the user - (see http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/AuthForInstalledApps.html). + (see https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/AuthForInstalledApps). 3) We pass the auth token to /_ah/login on the server to obtain an authentication cookie. If login was successful, it tries to redirect us to the URL we provided. @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ def EncodeMultipartFormData(fields, files): (content_type, body) ready for httplib.HTTP instance. Source: - http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/146306 + https://web.archive.org/web/20160116052001/code.activestate.com/recipes/146306 """ BOUNDARY = '-M-A-G-I-C---B-O-U-N-D-A-R-Y-' CRLF = '\r\n' @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ class SubversionVCS(VersionControlSystem): # svn cat translates keywords but svn diff doesn't. As a result of this # behavior patching.PatchChunks() fails with a chunk mismatch error. # This part was originally written by the Review Board development team - # who had the same problem (http://reviews.review-board.org/r/276/). + # who had the same problem (https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/276/). # Mapping of keywords to known aliases svn_keywords = { # Standard keywords @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ class SubversionVCS(VersionControlSystem): status_lines = status.splitlines() # If file is in a cl, the output will begin with # "\n--- Changelist 'cl_name':\n". See - # http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/changelist-design.txt + # https://web.archive.org/web/20090918234815/svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/changelist-design.txt if (len(status_lines) == 3 and not status_lines[0] and status_lines[1].startswith("--- Changelist")): diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock-cardinalities.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock-cardinalities.cc index 50ec728..335b966 100644 --- a/googlemock/src/gmock-cardinalities.cc +++ b/googlemock/src/gmock-cardinalities.cc @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ class BetweenCardinalityImpl : public CardinalityInterface { }; // Formats "n times" in a human-friendly way. -inline internal::string FormatTimes(int n) { +inline std::string FormatTimes(int n) { if (n == 1) { return "once"; } else if (n == 2) { diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock-internal-utils.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock-internal-utils.cc index fb53080..77caf2b 100644 --- a/googlemock/src/gmock-internal-utils.cc +++ b/googlemock/src/gmock-internal-utils.cc @@ -47,12 +47,31 @@ namespace testing { namespace internal { +// Joins a vector of strings as if they are fields of a tuple; returns +// the joined string. +GTEST_API_ std::string JoinAsTuple(const Strings& fields) { + switch (fields.size()) { + case 0: + return ""; + case 1: + return fields[0]; + default: + std::string result = "(" + fields[0]; + for (size_t i = 1; i < fields.size(); i++) { + result += ", "; + result += fields[i]; + } + result += ")"; + return result; + } +} + // Converts an identifier name to a space-separated list of lower-case // words. Each maximum substring of the form [A-Za-z][a-z]*|\d+ is // treated as one word. For example, both "FooBar123" and // "foo_bar_123" are converted to "foo bar 123". -GTEST_API_ string ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(const char* id_name) { - string result; +GTEST_API_ std::string ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(const char* id_name) { + std::string result; char prev_char = '\0'; for (const char* p = id_name; *p != '\0'; prev_char = *(p++)) { // We don't care about the current locale as the input is @@ -71,12 +90,12 @@ GTEST_API_ string ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(const char* id_name) { } // This class reports Google Mock failures as Google Test failures. A -// user can define another class in a similar fashion if he intends to +// user can define another class in a similar fashion if they intend to // use Google Mock with a testing framework other than Google Test. class GoogleTestFailureReporter : public FailureReporterInterface { public: virtual void ReportFailure(FailureType type, const char* file, int line, - const string& message) { + const std::string& message) { AssertHelper(type == kFatal ? TestPartResult::kFatalFailure : TestPartResult::kNonFatalFailure, @@ -128,8 +147,7 @@ GTEST_API_ bool LogIsVisible(LogSeverity severity) { // stack_frames_to_skip is treated as 0, since we don't know which // function calls will be inlined by the compiler and need to be // conservative. -GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, - const string& message, +GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, const std::string& message, int stack_frames_to_skip) { if (!LogIsVisible(severity)) return; @@ -170,5 +188,17 @@ GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, std::cout << ::std::flush; } +GTEST_API_ WithoutMatchers GetWithoutMatchers() { return WithoutMatchers(); } + +GTEST_API_ void IllegalDoDefault(const char* file, int line) { + internal::Assert( + false, file, line, + "You are using DoDefault() inside a composite action like " + "DoAll() or WithArgs(). This is not supported for technical " + "reasons. Please instead spell out the default action, or " + "assign the default action to an Action variable and use " + "the variable in various places."); +} + } // namespace internal } // namespace testing diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock-matchers.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock-matchers.cc index e742451..194d992 100644 --- a/googlemock/src/gmock-matchers.cc +++ b/googlemock/src/gmock-matchers.cc @@ -38,98 +38,133 @@ #include "gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h" #include <string.h> +#include <iostream> #include <sstream> #include <string> namespace testing { -// Constructs a matcher that matches a const string& whose value is +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const std::string& whose value is // equal to s. -Matcher<const internal::string&>::Matcher(const internal::string& s) { - *this = Eq(s); +Matcher<const std::string&>::Matcher(const std::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const std::string& whose value is +// equal to s. +Matcher<const std::string&>::Matcher(const ::string& s) { + *this = Eq(static_cast<std::string>(s)); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING -// Constructs a matcher that matches a const string& whose value is +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const std::string& whose value is // equal to s. -Matcher<const internal::string&>::Matcher(const char* s) { - *this = Eq(internal::string(s)); +Matcher<const std::string&>::Matcher(const char* s) { + *this = Eq(std::string(s)); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a string whose value is equal to s. -Matcher<internal::string>::Matcher(const internal::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } +// Constructs a matcher that matches a std::string whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<std::string>::Matcher(const std::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a string whose value is equal to s. -Matcher<internal::string>::Matcher(const char* s) { - *this = Eq(internal::string(s)); +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Constructs a matcher that matches a std::string whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<std::string>::Matcher(const ::string& s) { + *this = Eq(static_cast<std::string>(s)); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +// Constructs a matcher that matches a std::string whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<std::string>::Matcher(const char* s) { *this = Eq(std::string(s)); } -#if GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ -// Constructs a matcher that matches a const StringPiece& whose value is +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const ::string& whose value is // equal to s. -Matcher<const StringPiece&>::Matcher(const internal::string& s) { - *this = Eq(s); +Matcher<const ::string&>::Matcher(const std::string& s) { + *this = Eq(static_cast<::string>(s)); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a const StringPiece& whose value is +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const ::string& whose value is // equal to s. -Matcher<const StringPiece&>::Matcher(const char* s) { - *this = Eq(internal::string(s)); -} +Matcher<const ::string&>::Matcher(const ::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a const StringPiece& whose value is +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const ::string& whose value is // equal to s. -Matcher<const StringPiece&>::Matcher(StringPiece s) { - *this = Eq(s.ToString()); +Matcher<const ::string&>::Matcher(const char* s) { *this = Eq(::string(s)); } + +// Constructs a matcher that matches a ::string whose value is equal to s. +Matcher<::string>::Matcher(const std::string& s) { + *this = Eq(static_cast<::string>(s)); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a StringPiece whose value is equal to s. -Matcher<StringPiece>::Matcher(const internal::string& s) { +// Constructs a matcher that matches a ::string whose value is equal to s. +Matcher<::string>::Matcher(const ::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } + +// Constructs a matcher that matches a string whose value is equal to s. +Matcher<::string>::Matcher(const char* s) { *this = Eq(::string(s)); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const absl::string_view& whose value is +// equal to s. +Matcher<const absl::string_view&>::Matcher(const std::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a StringPiece whose value is equal to s. -Matcher<StringPiece>::Matcher(const char* s) { - *this = Eq(internal::string(s)); +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const absl::string_view& whose value is +// equal to s. +Matcher<const absl::string_view&>::Matcher(const ::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const absl::string_view& whose value is +// equal to s. +Matcher<const absl::string_view&>::Matcher(const char* s) { + *this = Eq(std::string(s)); } -// Constructs a matcher that matches a StringPiece whose value is equal to s. -Matcher<StringPiece>::Matcher(StringPiece s) { - *this = Eq(s.ToString()); +// Constructs a matcher that matches a const absl::string_view& whose value is +// equal to s. +Matcher<const absl::string_view&>::Matcher(absl::string_view s) { + *this = Eq(std::string(s)); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ -namespace internal { +// Constructs a matcher that matches a absl::string_view whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<absl::string_view>::Matcher(const std::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } -// Joins a vector of strings as if they are fields of a tuple; returns -// the joined string. -GTEST_API_ string JoinAsTuple(const Strings& fields) { - switch (fields.size()) { - case 0: - return ""; - case 1: - return fields[0]; - default: - string result = "(" + fields[0]; - for (size_t i = 1; i < fields.size(); i++) { - result += ", "; - result += fields[i]; - } - result += ")"; - return result; - } +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Constructs a matcher that matches a absl::string_view whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<absl::string_view>::Matcher(const ::string& s) { *this = Eq(s); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +// Constructs a matcher that matches a absl::string_view whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<absl::string_view>::Matcher(const char* s) { + *this = Eq(std::string(s)); +} + +// Constructs a matcher that matches a absl::string_view whose value is equal to +// s. +Matcher<absl::string_view>::Matcher(absl::string_view s) { + *this = Eq(std::string(s)); } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + +namespace internal { // Returns the description for a matcher defined using the MATCHER*() // macro where the user-supplied description string is "", if // 'negation' is false; otherwise returns the description of the // negation of the matcher. 'param_values' contains a list of strings // that are the print-out of the matcher's parameters. -GTEST_API_ string FormatMatcherDescription(bool negation, - const char* matcher_name, - const Strings& param_values) { - string result = ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(matcher_name); - if (param_values.size() >= 1) - result += " " + JoinAsTuple(param_values); +GTEST_API_ std::string FormatMatcherDescription(bool negation, + const char* matcher_name, + const Strings& param_values) { + std::string result = ConvertIdentifierNameToWords(matcher_name); + if (param_values.size() >= 1) result += " " + JoinAsTuple(param_values); return negation ? "not (" + result + ")" : result; } @@ -200,8 +235,7 @@ class MaxBipartiteMatchState { explicit MaxBipartiteMatchState(const MatchMatrix& graph) : graph_(&graph), left_(graph_->LhsSize(), kUnused), - right_(graph_->RhsSize(), kUnused) { - } + right_(graph_->RhsSize(), kUnused) {} // Returns the edges of a maximal match, each in the form {left, right}. ElementMatcherPairs Compute() { @@ -258,10 +292,8 @@ class MaxBipartiteMatchState { // bool TryAugment(size_t ilhs, ::std::vector<char>* seen) { for (size_t irhs = 0; irhs < graph_->RhsSize(); ++irhs) { - if ((*seen)[irhs]) - continue; - if (!graph_->HasEdge(ilhs, irhs)) - continue; + if ((*seen)[irhs]) continue; + if (!graph_->HasEdge(ilhs, irhs)) continue; // There's an available edge from ilhs to irhs. (*seen)[irhs] = 1; // Next a search is performed to determine whether @@ -288,7 +320,7 @@ class MaxBipartiteMatchState { // Each element of the left_ vector represents a left hand side node // (i.e. an element) and each element of right_ is a right hand side // node (i.e. a matcher). The values in the left_ vector indicate - // outflow from that node to a node on the the right_ side. The values + // outflow from that node to a node on the right_ side. The values // in the right_ indicate inflow, and specify which left_ node is // feeding that right_ node, if any. For example, left_[3] == 1 means // there's a flow from element #3 to matcher #1. Such a flow would also @@ -304,8 +336,7 @@ class MaxBipartiteMatchState { const size_t MaxBipartiteMatchState::kUnused; -GTEST_API_ ElementMatcherPairs -FindMaxBipartiteMatching(const MatchMatrix& g) { +GTEST_API_ ElementMatcherPairs FindMaxBipartiteMatching(const MatchMatrix& g) { return MaxBipartiteMatchState(g).Compute(); } @@ -314,7 +345,7 @@ static void LogElementMatcherPairVec(const ElementMatcherPairs& pairs, typedef ElementMatcherPairs::const_iterator Iter; ::std::ostream& os = *stream; os << "{"; - const char *sep = ""; + const char* sep = ""; for (Iter it = pairs.begin(); it != pairs.end(); ++it) { os << sep << "\n (" << "element #" << it->first << ", " @@ -324,38 +355,6 @@ static void LogElementMatcherPairVec(const ElementMatcherPairs& pairs, os << "\n}"; } -// Tries to find a pairing, and explains the result. -GTEST_API_ bool FindPairing(const MatchMatrix& matrix, - MatchResultListener* listener) { - ElementMatcherPairs matches = FindMaxBipartiteMatching(matrix); - - size_t max_flow = matches.size(); - bool result = (max_flow == matrix.RhsSize()); - - if (!result) { - if (listener->IsInterested()) { - *listener << "where no permutation of the elements can " - "satisfy all matchers, and the closest match is " - << max_flow << " of " << matrix.RhsSize() - << " matchers with the pairings:\n"; - LogElementMatcherPairVec(matches, listener->stream()); - } - return false; - } - - if (matches.size() > 1) { - if (listener->IsInterested()) { - const char *sep = "where:\n"; - for (size_t mi = 0; mi < matches.size(); ++mi) { - *listener << sep << " - element #" << matches[mi].first - << " is matched by matcher #" << matches[mi].second; - sep = ",\n"; - } - } - } - return true; -} - bool MatchMatrix::NextGraph() { for (size_t ilhs = 0; ilhs < LhsSize(); ++ilhs) { for (size_t irhs = 0; irhs < RhsSize(); ++irhs) { @@ -379,9 +378,9 @@ void MatchMatrix::Randomize() { } } -string MatchMatrix::DebugString() const { +std::string MatchMatrix::DebugString() const { ::std::stringstream ss; - const char *sep = ""; + const char* sep = ""; for (size_t i = 0; i < LhsSize(); ++i) { ss << sep; for (size_t j = 0; j < RhsSize(); ++j) { @@ -394,44 +393,83 @@ string MatchMatrix::DebugString() const { void UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase::DescribeToImpl( ::std::ostream* os) const { - if (matcher_describers_.empty()) { - *os << "is empty"; - return; - } - if (matcher_describers_.size() == 1) { - *os << "has " << Elements(1) << " and that element "; - matcher_describers_[0]->DescribeTo(os); - return; + switch (match_flags()) { + case UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch: + if (matcher_describers_.empty()) { + *os << "is empty"; + return; + } + if (matcher_describers_.size() == 1) { + *os << "has " << Elements(1) << " and that element "; + matcher_describers_[0]->DescribeTo(os); + return; + } + *os << "has " << Elements(matcher_describers_.size()) + << " and there exists some permutation of elements such that:\n"; + break; + case UnorderedMatcherRequire::Superset: + *os << "a surjection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n"; + break; + case UnorderedMatcherRequire::Subset: + *os << "an injection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n"; + break; } - *os << "has " << Elements(matcher_describers_.size()) - << " and there exists some permutation of elements such that:\n"; + const char* sep = ""; for (size_t i = 0; i != matcher_describers_.size(); ++i) { - *os << sep << " - element #" << i << " "; + *os << sep; + if (match_flags() == UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch) { + *os << " - element #" << i << " "; + } else { + *os << " - an element "; + } matcher_describers_[i]->DescribeTo(os); - sep = ", and\n"; + if (match_flags() == UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch) { + sep = ", and\n"; + } else { + sep = "\n"; + } } } void UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase::DescribeNegationToImpl( ::std::ostream* os) const { - if (matcher_describers_.empty()) { - *os << "isn't empty"; - return; - } - if (matcher_describers_.size() == 1) { - *os << "doesn't have " << Elements(1) - << ", or has " << Elements(1) << " that "; - matcher_describers_[0]->DescribeNegationTo(os); - return; + switch (match_flags()) { + case UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch: + if (matcher_describers_.empty()) { + *os << "isn't empty"; + return; + } + if (matcher_describers_.size() == 1) { + *os << "doesn't have " << Elements(1) << ", or has " << Elements(1) + << " that "; + matcher_describers_[0]->DescribeNegationTo(os); + return; + } + *os << "doesn't have " << Elements(matcher_describers_.size()) + << ", or there exists no permutation of elements such that:\n"; + break; + case UnorderedMatcherRequire::Superset: + *os << "no surjection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n"; + break; + case UnorderedMatcherRequire::Subset: + *os << "no injection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n"; + break; } - *os << "doesn't have " << Elements(matcher_describers_.size()) - << ", or there exists no permutation of elements such that:\n"; const char* sep = ""; for (size_t i = 0; i != matcher_describers_.size(); ++i) { - *os << sep << " - element #" << i << " "; + *os << sep; + if (match_flags() == UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch) { + *os << " - element #" << i << " "; + } else { + *os << " - an element "; + } matcher_describers_[i]->DescribeTo(os); - sep = ", and\n"; + if (match_flags() == UnorderedMatcherRequire::ExactMatch) { + sep = ", and\n"; + } else { + sep = "\n"; + } } } @@ -440,11 +478,9 @@ void UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase::DescribeNegationToImpl( // and better error reporting. // Returns false, writing an explanation to 'listener', if and only // if the success criteria are not met. -bool UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase:: -VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched( - const ::std::vector<string>& element_printouts, - const MatchMatrix& matrix, - MatchResultListener* listener) const { +bool UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase::VerifyMatchMatrix( + const ::std::vector<std::string>& element_printouts, + const MatchMatrix& matrix, MatchResultListener* listener) const { bool result = true; ::std::vector<char> element_matched(matrix.LhsSize(), 0); ::std::vector<char> matcher_matched(matrix.RhsSize(), 0); @@ -457,12 +493,11 @@ VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched( } } - { + if (match_flags() & UnorderedMatcherRequire::Superset) { const char* sep = "where the following matchers don't match any elements:\n"; for (size_t mi = 0; mi < matcher_matched.size(); ++mi) { - if (matcher_matched[mi]) - continue; + if (matcher_matched[mi]) continue; result = false; if (listener->IsInterested()) { *listener << sep << "matcher #" << mi << ": "; @@ -472,7 +507,7 @@ VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched( } } - { + if (match_flags() & UnorderedMatcherRequire::Subset) { const char* sep = "where the following elements don't match any matchers:\n"; const char* outer_sep = ""; @@ -480,8 +515,7 @@ VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched( outer_sep = "\nand "; } for (size_t ei = 0; ei < element_matched.size(); ++ei) { - if (element_matched[ei]) - continue; + if (element_matched[ei]) continue; result = false; if (listener->IsInterested()) { *listener << outer_sep << sep << "element #" << ei << ": " @@ -494,5 +528,46 @@ VerifyAllElementsAndMatchersAreMatched( return result; } +bool UnorderedElementsAreMatcherImplBase::FindPairing( + const MatchMatrix& matrix, MatchResultListener* listener) const { + ElementMatcherPairs matches = FindMaxBipartiteMatching(matrix); + + size_t max_flow = matches.size(); + if ((match_flags() & UnorderedMatcherRequire::Superset) && + max_flow < matrix.RhsSize()) { + if (listener->IsInterested()) { + *listener << "where no permutation of the elements can satisfy all " + "matchers, and the closest match is " + << max_flow << " of " << matrix.RhsSize() + << " matchers with the pairings:\n"; + LogElementMatcherPairVec(matches, listener->stream()); + } + return false; + } + if ((match_flags() & UnorderedMatcherRequire::Subset) && + max_flow < matrix.LhsSize()) { + if (listener->IsInterested()) { + *listener + << "where not all elements can be matched, and the closest match is " + << max_flow << " of " << matrix.RhsSize() + << " matchers with the pairings:\n"; + LogElementMatcherPairVec(matches, listener->stream()); + } + return false; + } + + if (matches.size() > 1) { + if (listener->IsInterested()) { + const char* sep = "where:\n"; + for (size_t mi = 0; mi < matches.size(); ++mi) { + *listener << sep << " - element #" << matches[mi].first + << " is matched by matcher #" << matches[mi].second; + sep = ",\n"; + } + } + } + return true; +} + } // namespace internal } // namespace testing diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc index 9551342..22d002f 100644 --- a/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc +++ b/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ #include <map> #include <set> #include <string> +#include <vector> #include "gmock/gmock.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" @@ -48,6 +49,15 @@ # include <unistd.h> // NOLINT #endif +// Silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value +// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 14,15 +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#if _MSC_VER <= 1900 +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4800) +#endif +#endif + namespace testing { namespace internal { @@ -58,16 +68,15 @@ GTEST_API_ GTEST_DEFINE_STATIC_MUTEX_(g_gmock_mutex); // Logs a message including file and line number information. GTEST_API_ void LogWithLocation(testing::internal::LogSeverity severity, const char* file, int line, - const string& message) { + const std::string& message) { ::std::ostringstream s; s << file << ":" << line << ": " << message << ::std::endl; Log(severity, s.str(), 0); } // Constructs an ExpectationBase object. -ExpectationBase::ExpectationBase(const char* a_file, - int a_line, - const string& a_source_text) +ExpectationBase::ExpectationBase(const char* a_file, int a_line, + const std::string& a_source_text) : file_(a_file), line_(a_line), source_text_(a_source_text), @@ -100,12 +109,19 @@ void ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites() return; } - for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin(); - it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) { - ExpectationBase* const prerequisite = it->expectation_base().get(); - if (!prerequisite->is_retired()) { - prerequisite->RetireAllPreRequisites(); - prerequisite->Retire(); + ::std::vector<ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this); + while (!expectations.empty()) { + ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back(); + expectations.pop_back(); + + for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = + exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin(); + it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) { + ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get(); + if (!next->is_retired()) { + next->Retire(); + expectations.push_back(next); + } } } } @@ -115,11 +131,18 @@ void ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites() bool ExpectationBase::AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied() const GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) { g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld(); - for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin(); - it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) { - if (!(it->expectation_base()->IsSatisfied()) || - !(it->expectation_base()->AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied())) - return false; + ::std::vector<const ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this); + while (!expectations.empty()) { + const ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back(); + expectations.pop_back(); + + for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = + exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin(); + it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) { + const ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get(); + if (!next->IsSatisfied()) return false; + expectations.push_back(next); + } } return true; } @@ -128,19 +151,28 @@ bool ExpectationBase::AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied() const void ExpectationBase::FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites(ExpectationSet* result) const GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) { g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld(); - for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin(); - it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) { - if (it->expectation_base()->IsSatisfied()) { - // If *it is satisfied and has a call count of 0, some of its - // pre-requisites may not be satisfied yet. - if (it->expectation_base()->call_count_ == 0) { - it->expectation_base()->FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites(result); + ::std::vector<const ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this); + while (!expectations.empty()) { + const ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back(); + expectations.pop_back(); + + for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = + exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin(); + it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) { + const ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get(); + + if (next->IsSatisfied()) { + // If *it is satisfied and has a call count of 0, some of its + // pre-requisites may not be satisfied yet. + if (next->call_count_ == 0) { + expectations.push_back(next); + } + } else { + // Now that we know next is unsatisfied, we are not so interested + // in whether its pre-requisites are satisfied. Therefore we + // don't iterate into it here. + *result += *it; } - } else { - // Now that we know *it is unsatisfied, we are not so interested - // in whether its pre-requisites are satisfied. Therefore we - // don't recursively call FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites() here. - *result += *it; } } } @@ -244,7 +276,7 @@ GTEST_API_ ThreadLocal<Sequence*> g_gmock_implicit_sequence; // Reports an uninteresting call (whose description is in msg) in the // manner specified by 'reaction'. -void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const string& msg) { +void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const std::string& msg) { // Include a stack trace only if --gmock_verbose=info is specified. const int stack_frames_to_skip = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) == kInfoVerbosity ? 3 : -1; @@ -255,11 +287,13 @@ void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const string& msg) { case kWarn: Log(kWarning, msg + - "\nNOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this " - "call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding " - "an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. " - "See https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#" - "knowing-when-to-expect for details.\n", + "\nNOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this " + "call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding " + "an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. " + "See " + "https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/" + "docs/CookBook.md#" + "knowing-when-to-expect for details.\n", stack_frames_to_skip); break; default: // FAIL @@ -335,9 +369,10 @@ const char* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::Name() const // Calculates the result of invoking this mock function with the given // arguments, prints it, and returns it. The caller is responsible // for deleting the result. -UntypedActionResultHolderBase* -UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args) - GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) { +UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith( + void* const untyped_args) GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) { + // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it + // is unprotected here. if (untyped_expectations_.size() == 0) { // No expectation is set on this mock method - we have an // uninteresting call. @@ -354,18 +389,21 @@ UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args) // the behavior of ReportUninterestingCall(). const bool need_to_report_uninteresting_call = // If the user allows this uninteresting call, we print it - // only when he wants informational messages. + // only when they want informational messages. reaction == kAllow ? LogIsVisible(kInfo) : - // If the user wants this to be a warning, we print it only - // when he wants to see warnings. - reaction == kWarn ? LogIsVisible(kWarning) : - // Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we - // should always print detailed information in the error. - true; + // If the user wants this to be a warning, we print + // it only when they want to see warnings. + reaction == kWarn + ? LogIsVisible(kWarning) + : + // Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we + // should always print detailed information in the error. + true; if (!need_to_report_uninteresting_call) { // Perform the action without printing the call information. - return this->UntypedPerformDefaultAction(untyped_args, ""); + return this->UntypedPerformDefaultAction( + untyped_args, "Function call: " + std::string(Name())); } // Warns about the uninteresting call. @@ -447,6 +485,8 @@ UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args) // Returns an Expectation object that references and co-owns exp, // which must be an expectation on this mock function. Expectation UntypedFunctionMockerBase::GetHandleOf(ExpectationBase* exp) { + // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it + // is unprotected here. for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it = untyped_expectations_.begin(); it != untyped_expectations_.end(); ++it) { @@ -509,6 +549,13 @@ bool UntypedFunctionMockerBase::VerifyAndClearExpectationsLocked() return expectations_met; } +CallReaction intToCallReaction(int mock_behavior) { + if (mock_behavior >= kAllow && mock_behavior <= kFail) { + return static_cast<internal::CallReaction>(mock_behavior); + } + return kWarn; +} + } // namespace internal // Class Mock. @@ -576,9 +623,15 @@ class MockObjectRegistry { leaked_count++; } if (leaked_count > 0) { - std::cout << "\nERROR: " << leaked_count - << " leaked mock " << (leaked_count == 1 ? "object" : "objects") - << " found at program exit.\n"; + std::cout << "\nERROR: " << leaked_count << " leaked mock " + << (leaked_count == 1 ? "object" : "objects") + << " found at program exit. Expectations on a mock object is " + "verified when the object is destructed. Leaking a mock " + "means that its expectations aren't verified, which is " + "usually a test bug. If you really intend to leak a mock, " + "you can suppress this error using " + "testing::Mock::AllowLeak(mock_object), or you may use a " + "fake or stub instead of a mock.\n"; std::cout.flush(); ::std::cerr.flush(); // RUN_ALL_TESTS() has already returned when this destructor is @@ -649,7 +702,8 @@ internal::CallReaction Mock::GetReactionOnUninterestingCalls( GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(internal::g_gmock_mutex) { internal::MutexLock l(&internal::g_gmock_mutex); return (g_uninteresting_call_reaction.count(mock_obj) == 0) ? - internal::kDefault : g_uninteresting_call_reaction[mock_obj]; + internal::intToCallReaction(GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior)) : + g_uninteresting_call_reaction[mock_obj]; } // Tells Google Mock to ignore mock_obj when checking for leaked mock @@ -821,3 +875,9 @@ InSequence::~InSequence() { } } // namespace testing + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#if _MSC_VER <= 1900 +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif +#endif diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock.cc index eac3d84..2308168 100644 --- a/googlemock/src/gmock.cc +++ b/googlemock/src/gmock.cc @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ GMOCK_DEFINE_string_(verbose, internal::kWarningVerbosity, " warning - prints warnings and errors.\n" " error - prints errors only."); +GMOCK_DEFINE_int32_(default_mock_behavior, 1, + "Controls the default behavior of mocks." + " Valid values:\n" + " 0 - by default, mocks act as NiceMocks.\n" + " 1 - by default, mocks act as NaggyMocks.\n" + " 2 - by default, mocks act as StrictMocks."); + namespace internal { // Parses a string as a command line flag. The string should have the @@ -120,6 +127,19 @@ static bool ParseGoogleMockStringFlag(const char* str, const char* flag, return true; } +static bool ParseGoogleMockIntFlag(const char* str, const char* flag, + int* value) { + // Gets the value of the flag as a string. + const char* const value_str = ParseGoogleMockFlagValue(str, flag, true); + + // Aborts if the parsing failed. + if (value_str == NULL) return false; + + // Sets *value to the value of the flag. + return ParseInt32(Message() << "The value of flag --" << flag, + value_str, value); +} + // The internal implementation of InitGoogleMock(). // // The type parameter CharType can be instantiated to either char or @@ -138,7 +158,9 @@ void InitGoogleMockImpl(int* argc, CharType** argv) { // Do we see a Google Mock flag? if (ParseGoogleMockBoolFlag(arg, "catch_leaked_mocks", &GMOCK_FLAG(catch_leaked_mocks)) || - ParseGoogleMockStringFlag(arg, "verbose", &GMOCK_FLAG(verbose))) { + ParseGoogleMockStringFlag(arg, "verbose", &GMOCK_FLAG(verbose)) || + ParseGoogleMockIntFlag(arg, "default_mock_behavior", + &GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior))) { // Yes. Shift the remainder of the argv list left by one. Note // that argv has (*argc + 1) elements, the last one always being // NULL. The following loop moves the trailing NULL element as diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock_main.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock_main.cc index bd5be03..32ab534 100644 --- a/googlemock/src/gmock_main.cc +++ b/googlemock/src/gmock_main.cc @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ // causes a link error when _tmain is defined in a static library and UNICODE // is enabled. For this reason instead of _tmain, main function is used on // Windows. See the following link to track the current status of this bug: -// http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=394464 // NOLINT +// https://web.archive.org/web/20170912203238/connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/394464/wmain-link-error-in-the-static-library +// // NOLINT #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE # include <tchar.h> // NOLINT diff --git a/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel b/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0fe72a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +# +# Author: misterg@google.com (Gennadiy Civil) +# +# Bazel Build for Google C++ Testing Framework(Google Test)-googlemock + +licenses(["notice"]) + +""" gmock own tests """ + +cc_test( + name = "gmock_all_test", + size = "small", + srcs = glob( + include = [ + "gmock-*.cc", + ], + ), + linkopts = select({ + "//:windows": [], + "//:windows_msvc": [], + "//conditions:default": [ + "-pthread", + ], + }), + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +# Py tests + +py_library( + name = "gmock_test_utils", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gmock_test_utils.py"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gmock_leak_test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gmock_leak_test_.cc"], + deps = [ + "//:gtest_main", + ], +) + +py_test( + name = "gmock_leak_test", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["gmock_leak_test.py"], + data = [ + ":gmock_leak_test_", + ":gmock_test_utils", + ], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gmock_link_test", + size = "small", + srcs = [ + "gmock_link2_test.cc", + "gmock_link_test.cc", + "gmock_link_test.h", + ], + deps = [ + "//:gtest_main", + ], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gmock_output_test_", + srcs = ["gmock_output_test_.cc"], + deps = [ + "//:gtest", + ], +) + +py_test( + name = "gmock_output_test", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["gmock_output_test.py"], + data = [ + ":gmock_output_test_", + ":gmock_output_test_golden.txt", + ], + deps = [":gmock_test_utils"], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gmock_test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gmock_test.cc"], + deps = [ + "//:gtest_main", + ], +) diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc index f470de4..e8bdbee 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc @@ -33,6 +33,15 @@ // // This file tests the built-in actions. +// Silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value +// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 14,15 +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#if _MSC_VER <= 1900 +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4800) +#endif +#endif + #include "gmock/gmock-actions.h" #include <algorithm> #include <iterator> @@ -65,6 +74,7 @@ using testing::ReturnRef; using testing::ReturnRefOfCopy; using testing::SetArgPointee; using testing::SetArgumentPointee; +using testing::Unused; using testing::_; using testing::get; using testing::internal::BuiltInDefaultValue; @@ -78,10 +88,6 @@ using testing::tuple_element; using testing::SetErrnoAndReturn; #endif -#if GTEST_HAS_PROTOBUF_ -using testing::internal::TestMessage; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PROTOBUF_ - // Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T*>::Get() returns NULL. TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsNullForPointerTypes) { EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<int*>::Get() == NULL); @@ -107,7 +113,11 @@ TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsZeroForNumericTypes) { EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed wchar_t>::Get()); #endif #if GMOCK_WCHAR_T_IS_NATIVE_ +#if !defined(__WCHAR_UNSIGNED__) EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<wchar_t>::Get()); +#else + EXPECT_EQ(0U, BuiltInDefaultValue<wchar_t>::Get()); +#endif #endif EXPECT_EQ(0U, BuiltInDefaultValue<unsigned short>::Get()); // NOLINT EXPECT_EQ(0, BuiltInDefaultValue<signed short>::Get()); // NOLINT @@ -214,7 +224,7 @@ class MyNonDefaultConstructible { int value_; }; -#if GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, ExistsForDefaultConstructibleType) { EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<MyDefaultConstructible>::Exists()); @@ -224,7 +234,7 @@ TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsDefaultConstructedForDefaultConstructibleType) { EXPECT_EQ(42, BuiltInDefaultValue<MyDefaultConstructible>::Get().value()); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, DoesNotExistForNonDefaultConstructibleType) { EXPECT_FALSE(BuiltInDefaultValue<MyNonDefaultConstructible>::Exists()); @@ -700,6 +710,9 @@ class MockClass { MOCK_METHOD0(MakeUnique, std::unique_ptr<int>()); MOCK_METHOD0(MakeUniqueBase, std::unique_ptr<Base>()); MOCK_METHOD0(MakeVectorUnique, std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>>()); + MOCK_METHOD1(TakeUnique, int(std::unique_ptr<int>)); + MOCK_METHOD2(TakeUnique, + int(const std::unique_ptr<int>&, std::unique_ptr<int>)); #endif private: @@ -878,105 +891,6 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsWideCharPointer) { # endif } -#if GTEST_HAS_PROTOBUF_ - -// Tests that SetArgPointee<N>(proto_buffer) sets the v1 protobuf -// variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to proto_buffer. -TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProtoBufferType) { - TestMessage* const msg = new TestMessage; - msg->set_member("yes"); - TestMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, TestMessage*)> a = SetArgPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgPointee<N>(proto_buffer) makes a copy of proto_buffer - // s.t. the action works even when the original proto_buffer has - // died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg before using the - // action. - delete msg; - - TestMessage dest; - EXPECT_FALSE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &dest)); - EXPECT_TRUE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); -} - -// Tests that SetArgPointee<N>(proto_buffer) sets the -// ::ProtocolMessage variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) -// argument to proto_buffer. -TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProtoBufferBaseType) { - TestMessage* const msg = new TestMessage; - msg->set_member("yes"); - TestMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, ::ProtocolMessage*)> a = SetArgPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgPointee<N>(proto_buffer) makes a copy of proto_buffer - // s.t. the action works even when the original proto_buffer has - // died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg before using the - // action. - delete msg; - - TestMessage dest; - ::ProtocolMessage* const dest_base = &dest; - EXPECT_FALSE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, dest_base)); - EXPECT_TRUE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); -} - -// Tests that SetArgPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) sets the v2 -// protobuf variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to -// proto2_buffer. -TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProto2BufferType) { - using testing::internal::FooMessage; - FooMessage* const msg = new FooMessage; - msg->set_int_field(2); - msg->set_string_field("hi"); - FooMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, FooMessage*)> a = SetArgPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) makes a copy of - // proto2_buffer s.t. the action works even when the original - // proto2_buffer has died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg - // before using the action. - delete msg; - - FooMessage dest; - dest.set_int_field(0); - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &dest)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, dest.int_field()); - EXPECT_EQ("hi", dest.string_field()); -} - -// Tests that SetArgPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) sets the -// proto2::Message variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument -// to proto2_buffer. -TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProto2BufferBaseType) { - using testing::internal::FooMessage; - FooMessage* const msg = new FooMessage; - msg->set_int_field(2); - msg->set_string_field("hi"); - FooMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, ::proto2::Message*)> a = SetArgPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) makes a copy of - // proto2_buffer s.t. the action works even when the original - // proto2_buffer has died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg - // before using the action. - delete msg; - - FooMessage dest; - dest.set_int_field(0); - ::proto2::Message* const dest_base = &dest; - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, dest_base)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, dest.int_field()); - EXPECT_EQ("hi", dest.string_field()); -} - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PROTOBUF_ - // Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(v) sets the variable pointed to by // the N-th (0-based) argument to v. TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointee) { @@ -997,105 +911,6 @@ TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointee) { EXPECT_EQ('a', ch); } -#if GTEST_HAS_PROTOBUF_ - -// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) sets the v1 protobuf -// variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to proto_buffer. -TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProtoBufferType) { - TestMessage* const msg = new TestMessage; - msg->set_member("yes"); - TestMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, TestMessage*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) makes a copy of proto_buffer - // s.t. the action works even when the original proto_buffer has - // died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg before using the - // action. - delete msg; - - TestMessage dest; - EXPECT_FALSE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &dest)); - EXPECT_TRUE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); -} - -// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) sets the -// ::ProtocolMessage variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) -// argument to proto_buffer. -TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProtoBufferBaseType) { - TestMessage* const msg = new TestMessage; - msg->set_member("yes"); - TestMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, ::ProtocolMessage*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto_buffer) makes a copy of proto_buffer - // s.t. the action works even when the original proto_buffer has - // died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg before using the - // action. - delete msg; - - TestMessage dest; - ::ProtocolMessage* const dest_base = &dest; - EXPECT_FALSE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, dest_base)); - EXPECT_TRUE(orig_msg.Equals(dest)); -} - -// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) sets the v2 -// protobuf variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to -// proto2_buffer. -TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProto2BufferType) { - using testing::internal::FooMessage; - FooMessage* const msg = new FooMessage; - msg->set_int_field(2); - msg->set_string_field("hi"); - FooMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, FooMessage*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) makes a copy of - // proto2_buffer s.t. the action works even when the original - // proto2_buffer has died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg - // before using the action. - delete msg; - - FooMessage dest; - dest.set_int_field(0); - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &dest)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, dest.int_field()); - EXPECT_EQ("hi", dest.string_field()); -} - -// Tests that SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) sets the -// proto2::Message variable pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument -// to proto2_buffer. -TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointeeOfProto2BufferBaseType) { - using testing::internal::FooMessage; - FooMessage* const msg = new FooMessage; - msg->set_int_field(2); - msg->set_string_field("hi"); - FooMessage orig_msg; - orig_msg.CopyFrom(*msg); - - Action<void(bool, ::proto2::Message*)> a = SetArgumentPointee<1>(*msg); - // SetArgumentPointee<N>(proto2_buffer) makes a copy of - // proto2_buffer s.t. the action works even when the original - // proto2_buffer has died. We ensure this behavior by deleting msg - // before using the action. - delete msg; - - FooMessage dest; - dest.set_int_field(0); - ::proto2::Message* const dest_base = &dest; - a.Perform(make_tuple(true, dest_base)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, dest.int_field()); - EXPECT_EQ("hi", dest.string_field()); -} - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PROTOBUF_ - // Sample functions and functors for testing Invoke() and etc. int Nullary() { return 1; } @@ -1406,6 +1221,153 @@ TEST(MockMethodTest, CanReturnMoveOnlyValue_Invoke) { EXPECT_EQ(7, *vresult[0]); } +TEST(MockMethodTest, CanTakeMoveOnlyValue) { + MockClass mock; + auto make = [](int i) { return std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(i)); }; + + EXPECT_CALL(mock, TakeUnique(_)).WillRepeatedly([](std::unique_ptr<int> i) { + return *i; + }); + // DoAll() does not compile, since it would move from its arguments twice. + // EXPECT_CALL(mock, TakeUnique(_, _)) + // .WillRepeatedly(DoAll(Invoke([](std::unique_ptr<int> j) {}), + // Return(1))); + EXPECT_CALL(mock, TakeUnique(testing::Pointee(7))) + .WillOnce(Return(-7)) + .RetiresOnSaturation(); + EXPECT_CALL(mock, TakeUnique(testing::IsNull())) + .WillOnce(Return(-1)) + .RetiresOnSaturation(); + + EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.TakeUnique(make(5))); + EXPECT_EQ(-7, mock.TakeUnique(make(7))); + EXPECT_EQ(7, mock.TakeUnique(make(7))); + EXPECT_EQ(7, mock.TakeUnique(make(7))); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mock.TakeUnique({})); + + // Some arguments are moved, some passed by reference. + auto lvalue = make(6); + EXPECT_CALL(mock, TakeUnique(_, _)) + .WillOnce([](const std::unique_ptr<int>& i, std::unique_ptr<int> j) { + return *i * *j; + }); + EXPECT_EQ(42, mock.TakeUnique(lvalue, make(7))); + + // The unique_ptr can be saved by the action. + std::unique_ptr<int> saved; + EXPECT_CALL(mock, TakeUnique(_)).WillOnce([&saved](std::unique_ptr<int> i) { + saved = std::move(i); + return 0; + }); + EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.TakeUnique(make(42))); + EXPECT_EQ(42, *saved); +} + #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_ +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +// Tests for std::function based action. + +int Add(int val, int& ref, int* ptr) { // NOLINT + int result = val + ref + *ptr; + ref = 42; + *ptr = 43; + return result; +} + +int Deref(std::unique_ptr<int> ptr) { return *ptr; } + +struct Double { + template <typename T> + T operator()(T t) { return 2 * t; } +}; + +std::unique_ptr<int> UniqueInt(int i) { + return std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(i)); +} + +TEST(FunctorActionTest, ActionFromFunction) { + Action<int(int, int&, int*)> a = &Add; + int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3; + EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(std::forward_as_tuple(x, y, &z))); + EXPECT_EQ(42, y); + EXPECT_EQ(43, z); + + Action<int(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a1 = &Deref; + EXPECT_EQ(7, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(UniqueInt(7)))); +} + +TEST(FunctorActionTest, ActionFromLambda) { + Action<int(bool, int)> a1 = [](bool b, int i) { return b ? i : 0; }; + EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5))); + EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5))); + + std::unique_ptr<int> saved; + Action<void(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a2 = [&saved](std::unique_ptr<int> p) { + saved = std::move(p); + }; + a2.Perform(make_tuple(UniqueInt(5))); + EXPECT_EQ(5, *saved); +} + +TEST(FunctorActionTest, PolymorphicFunctor) { + Action<int(int)> ai = Double(); + EXPECT_EQ(2, ai.Perform(make_tuple(1))); + Action<double(double)> ad = Double(); // Double? Double double! + EXPECT_EQ(3.0, ad.Perform(make_tuple(1.5))); +} + +TEST(FunctorActionTest, TypeConversion) { + // Numeric promotions are allowed. + const Action<bool(int)> a1 = [](int i) { return i > 1; }; + const Action<int(bool)> a2 = Action<int(bool)>(a1); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(42))); + EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple(42))); + + // Implicit constructors are allowed. + const Action<bool(std::string)> s1 = [](std::string s) { return !s.empty(); }; + const Action<int(const char*)> s2 = Action<int(const char*)>(s1); + EXPECT_EQ(0, s2.Perform(make_tuple(""))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, s2.Perform(make_tuple("hello"))); + + // Also between the lambda and the action itself. + const Action<bool(std::string)> x = [](Unused) { return 42; }; + EXPECT_TRUE(x.Perform(make_tuple("hello"))); +} + +TEST(FunctorActionTest, UnusedArguments) { + // Verify that users can ignore uninteresting arguments. + Action<int(int, double y, double z)> a = + [](int i, Unused, Unused) { return 2 * i; }; + tuple<int, double, double> dummy = make_tuple(3, 7.3, 9.44); + EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(dummy)); +} + +// Test that basic built-in actions work with move-only arguments. +// TODO(rburny): Currently, almost all ActionInterface-based actions will not +// work, even if they only try to use other, copyable arguments. Implement them +// if necessary (but note that DoAll cannot work on non-copyable types anyway - +// so maybe it's better to make users use lambdas instead. +TEST(MoveOnlyArgumentsTest, ReturningActions) { + Action<int(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a = Return(1); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(nullptr))); + + a = testing::WithoutArgs([]() { return 7; }); + EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(make_tuple(nullptr))); + + Action<void(std::unique_ptr<int>, int*)> a2 = testing::SetArgPointee<1>(3); + int x = 0; + a2.Perform(make_tuple(nullptr, &x)); + EXPECT_EQ(x, 3); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + } // Unnamed namespace + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#if _MSC_VER == 1900 +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif +#endif + diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc index 64815e5..04c792b 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ TEST(ExactlyTest, HasCorrectBounds) { EXPECT_EQ(3, c.ConservativeUpperBound()); } -// Tests that a user can make his own cardinality by implementing +// Tests that a user can make their own cardinality by implementing // CardinalityInterface and calling MakeCardinality(). class EvenCardinality : public CardinalityInterface { diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc index 5ca5bc7..40bbe6d 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc @@ -81,12 +81,12 @@ bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; } const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; } -bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } +bool ByConstRef(const std::string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } const double g_double = 0; bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; } -string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; } // NOLINT +std::string ByNonConstRef(std::string& s) { return s += "+"; } // NOLINT struct UnaryFunctor { int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; } @@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; } int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; } -string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4; +std::string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4; } int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; } @@ -115,9 +115,9 @@ struct SumOf5Functor { } }; -string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; +std::string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; } int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { @@ -130,34 +130,34 @@ struct SumOf6Functor { } }; -string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; +std::string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; } -string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; +std::string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; } -string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; +std::string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; } -string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; +std::string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; } -string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, - const char* s10) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; +std::string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, + const char* s10) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; } // A helper that turns the type of a C-string literal from const @@ -208,38 +208,37 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) { // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function. TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) { - Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*))> a = - InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"); + Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"); EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7))); } // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function. TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) { - Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*))> a = - InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8"); + Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8"); EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8))); } // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function. TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) { - Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*))> a = - InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"); + Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"); EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9))); } // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function. TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) { - Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*))> a = - InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0"); + Action<std::string(std::string(*)( + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0"); EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10))); } @@ -260,8 +259,8 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) { // Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference. TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) { - Action<bool(bool(*function)(const string& s))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(string("Hi")); + Action<bool(bool (*function)(const std::string& s))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(std::string("Hi")); // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the // temporary object has already died. @@ -305,17 +304,18 @@ TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) { // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, const char*)> a = - WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4)); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, + const char*)> + a = WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4)); EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), 2.5, CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4")))); } // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*)> a = - WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5)); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*)> + a = WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5)); EXPECT_EQ("43210", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4")))); @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) { // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6)); EXPECT_EQ("012210", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2")))); @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) { // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7)); EXPECT_EQ("0123210", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) { // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8)); EXPECT_EQ("01230123", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) { // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9)); EXPECT_EQ("012312323", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) { // Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments. TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10)); EXPECT_EQ("0123210123", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), @@ -374,10 +374,10 @@ class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> { // NOLINT }; TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) { - Action<int(const string&, int, int)> a = // NOLINT + Action<int(const std::string&, int, int)> a = // NOLINT WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction)); - string s("hello"); - EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(tuple<const string&, int, int>(s, 2, 10))); + tuple<std::string, int, int> dummy = make_tuple(std::string("hi"), 2, 10); + EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(dummy)); } // Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order. @@ -754,7 +754,8 @@ TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) { TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) { Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail"); const std::string re = "re"; - EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(tuple<const std::string&>(re))); + tuple<const std::string> dummy = make_tuple(re); + EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(dummy)); } // Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the @@ -796,7 +797,8 @@ TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) { Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">"); const std::string re = "re"; - EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(tuple<const std::string&>(re))); + tuple<const std::string> dummy = make_tuple(re); + EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(dummy)); } ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; } diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc index a86a613..0ff3755 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ namespace testing { namespace gmock_generated_function_mockers_test { -using testing::internal::string; using testing::_; using testing::A; using testing::An; @@ -82,11 +81,11 @@ class FooInterface { virtual bool Unary(int x) = 0; virtual long Binary(short x, int y) = 0; // NOLINT virtual int Decimal(bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f, // NOLINT - float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, const string& k) - = 0; + float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, + const std::string& k) = 0; virtual bool TakesNonConstReference(int& n) = 0; // NOLINT - virtual string TakesConstReference(const int& n) = 0; + virtual std::string TakesConstReference(const int& n) = 0; #ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS virtual bool TakesConst(const int x) = 0; #endif // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS @@ -101,13 +100,14 @@ class FooInterface { virtual char OverloadedOnConstness() const = 0; virtual int TypeWithHole(int (*func)()) = 0; - virtual int TypeWithComma(const std::map<int, string>& a_map) = 0; + virtual int TypeWithComma(const std::map<int, std::string>& a_map) = 0; #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS STDMETHOD_(int, CTNullary)() = 0; STDMETHOD_(bool, CTUnary)(int x) = 0; - STDMETHOD_(int, CTDecimal)(bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f, // NOLINT - float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, const string& k) = 0; + STDMETHOD_(int, CTDecimal) + (bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f, // NOLINT + float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, const std::string& k) = 0; STDMETHOD_(char, CTConst)(int x) const = 0; #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS }; @@ -133,19 +133,19 @@ class MockFoo : public FooInterface { MOCK_METHOD1(Unary, bool(int)); // NOLINT MOCK_METHOD2(Binary, long(short, int)); // NOLINT MOCK_METHOD10(Decimal, int(bool, char, short, int, long, float, // NOLINT - double, unsigned, char*, const string& str)); + double, unsigned, char*, const std::string& str)); MOCK_METHOD1(TakesNonConstReference, bool(int&)); // NOLINT - MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConstReference, string(const int&)); + MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConstReference, std::string(const int&)); #ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConst, bool(const int)); // NOLINT #endif // Tests that the function return type can contain unprotected comma. - MOCK_METHOD0(ReturnTypeWithComma, std::map<int, string>()); + MOCK_METHOD0(ReturnTypeWithComma, std::map<int, std::string>()); MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(ReturnTypeWithComma, - std::map<int, string>(int)); // NOLINT + std::map<int, std::string>(int)); // NOLINT MOCK_METHOD0(OverloadedOnArgumentNumber, int()); // NOLINT MOCK_METHOD1(OverloadedOnArgumentNumber, int(int)); // NOLINT @@ -157,19 +157,21 @@ class MockFoo : public FooInterface { MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(OverloadedOnConstness, char()); // NOLINT MOCK_METHOD1(TypeWithHole, int(int (*)())); // NOLINT - MOCK_METHOD1(TypeWithComma, int(const std::map<int, string>&)); // NOLINT + MOCK_METHOD1(TypeWithComma, + int(const std::map<int, std::string>&)); // NOLINT #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS MOCK_METHOD0_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTNullary, int()); MOCK_METHOD1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTUnary, bool(int)); - MOCK_METHOD10_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTDecimal, int(bool b, char c, - short d, int e, long f, float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, - const string& k)); + MOCK_METHOD10_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTDecimal, + int(bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f, + float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, + const std::string& k)); MOCK_CONST_METHOD1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTConst, char(int)); // Tests that the function return type can contain unprotected comma. MOCK_METHOD0_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, CTReturnTypeWithComma, - std::map<int, string>()); + std::map<int, std::string>()); #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS private: @@ -291,7 +293,7 @@ TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnConstnessOfThis) { } TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksReturnTypeWithComma) { - const std::map<int, string> a_map; + const std::map<int, std::string> a_map; EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, ReturnTypeWithComma()) .WillOnce(Return(a_map)); EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, ReturnTypeWithComma(42)) @@ -341,7 +343,7 @@ TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsConstFunctionWithCallType) { } TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksReturnTypeWithCommaAndCallType) { - const std::map<int, string> a_map; + const std::map<int, std::string> a_map; EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTReturnTypeWithComma()) .WillOnce(Return(a_map)); @@ -618,5 +620,28 @@ TEST(MockFunctionTest, AsStdFunctionReturnsReference) { } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ +struct MockMethodSizes0 { + MOCK_METHOD0(func, void()); +}; +struct MockMethodSizes1 { + MOCK_METHOD1(func, void(int)); +}; +struct MockMethodSizes2 { + MOCK_METHOD2(func, void(int, int)); +}; +struct MockMethodSizes3 { + MOCK_METHOD3(func, void(int, int, int)); +}; +struct MockMethodSizes4 { + MOCK_METHOD4(func, void(int, int, int, int)); +}; + +TEST(MockFunctionTest, MockMethodSizeOverhead) { + EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes1)); + EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes2)); + EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes3)); + EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes4)); +} + } // namespace gmock_generated_function_mockers_test } // namespace testing diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc index e0a535a..2e5abe5 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc @@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize2) { } TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize5) { - CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, - Matcher<double>, Matcher<char*> >, - MatcherTuple<tuple<int, char, bool, double, char*> - >::type>(); + CompileAssertTypesEqual< + tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, Matcher<double>, + Matcher<char*> >, + MatcherTuple<tuple<int, char, bool, double, char*> >::type>(); } // Tests the Function template struct. @@ -97,8 +97,9 @@ TEST(FunctionTest, Binary) { CompileAssertTypesEqual<bool, F::Argument1>(); CompileAssertTypesEqual<const long&, F::Argument2>(); // NOLINT CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool, const long&>, F::ArgumentTuple>(); // NOLINT - CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<const long&> >, // NOLINT - F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>(); + CompileAssertTypesEqual< + tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<const long&> >, // NOLINT + F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>(); CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool, const long&), F::MakeResultVoid>(); // NOLINT CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(bool, const long&), // NOLINT F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>(); @@ -114,9 +115,10 @@ TEST(FunctionTest, LongArgumentList) { CompileAssertTypesEqual<const long&, F::Argument5>(); // NOLINT CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool, int, char*, int&, const long&>, // NOLINT F::ArgumentTuple>(); - CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<int>, Matcher<char*>, - Matcher<int&>, Matcher<const long&> >, // NOLINT - F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>(); + CompileAssertTypesEqual< + tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<int>, Matcher<char*>, Matcher<int&>, + Matcher<const long&> >, // NOLINT + F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>(); CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool, int, char*, int&, const long&), // NOLINT F::MakeResultVoid>(); CompileAssertTypesEqual< diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc index 0e9f77f..0ebd470 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc @@ -31,10 +31,19 @@ // // This file tests the built-in matchers generated by a script. +// Silence warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'int' to 'short', +// possible loss of data and C4100, unreferenced local parameter +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4244) +# pragma warning(disable:4100) +#endif + #include "gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h" #include <list> #include <map> +#include <memory> #include <set> #include <sstream> #include <string> @@ -57,6 +66,8 @@ using testing::get; using testing::make_tuple; using testing::tuple; using testing::_; +using testing::AllOf; +using testing::AnyOf; using testing::Args; using testing::Contains; using testing::ElementsAre; @@ -79,11 +90,10 @@ using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq; using testing::StrEq; using testing::Value; using testing::internal::ElementsAreArrayMatcher; -using testing::internal::string; // Returns the description of the given matcher. template <typename T> -string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) { +std::string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) { stringstream ss; m.DescribeTo(&ss); return ss.str(); @@ -91,7 +101,7 @@ string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) { // Returns the description of the negation of the given matcher. template <typename T> -string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) { +std::string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) { stringstream ss; m.DescribeNegationTo(&ss); return ss.str(); @@ -99,7 +109,7 @@ string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) { // Returns the reason why x matches, or doesn't match, m. template <typename MatcherType, typename Value> -string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) { +std::string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) { stringstream ss; m.ExplainMatchResultTo(x, &ss); return ss.str(); @@ -296,7 +306,7 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingOneElement) { } TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingManyElements) { - Matcher<list<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("one"), "two"); + Matcher<list<std::string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("one"), "two"); EXPECT_EQ("has 2 elements where\n" "element #0 is equal to \"one\",\n" "element #1 is equal to \"two\"", Describe(m)); @@ -314,7 +324,7 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingOneElment) { } TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingManyElements) { - Matcher<const list<string>& > m = ElementsAre("one", "two"); + Matcher<const list<std::string>&> m = ElementsAre("one", "two"); EXPECT_EQ("doesn't have 2 elements, or\n" "element #0 isn't equal to \"one\", or\n" "element #1 isn't equal to \"two\"", DescribeNegation(m)); @@ -365,21 +375,21 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanExplainMismatchRightSize) { } TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementVector) { - vector<string> test_vector; + vector<std::string> test_vector; test_vector.push_back("test string"); EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(StrEq("test string"))); } TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementList) { - list<string> test_list; + list<std::string> test_list; test_list.push_back("test string"); EXPECT_THAT(test_list, ElementsAre("test string")); } TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesThreeElementVector) { - vector<string> test_vector; + vector<std::string> test_vector; test_vector.push_back("one"); test_vector.push_back("two"); test_vector.push_back("three"); @@ -428,30 +438,30 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesTenElementVector) { } TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongSize) { - vector<string> test_vector; + vector<std::string> test_vector; test_vector.push_back("test string"); test_vector.push_back("test string"); - Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string")); + Matcher<vector<std::string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector)); } TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongValue) { - vector<string> test_vector; + vector<std::string> test_vector; test_vector.push_back("other string"); - Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string")); + Matcher<vector<std::string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector)); } TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongOrder) { - vector<string> test_vector; + vector<std::string> test_vector; test_vector.push_back("one"); test_vector.push_back("three"); test_vector.push_back("two"); - Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre( - StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three")); + Matcher<vector<std::string> > m = + ElementsAre(StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector)); } @@ -527,7 +537,7 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithTwoDimensionalNativeArray) { } TEST(ElementsAreTest, AcceptsStringLiteral) { - string array[] = { "hi", "one", "two" }; + std::string array[] = {"hi", "one", "two"}; EXPECT_THAT(array, ElementsAre("hi", "one", "two")); EXPECT_THAT(array, Not(ElementsAre("hi", "one", "too"))); } @@ -546,10 +556,10 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, AcceptsArrayWithUnknownSize) { // The size of kHi is not known in this test, but ElementsAre() should // still accept it. - string array1[] = { "hi" }; + std::string array1[] = {"hi"}; EXPECT_THAT(array1, ElementsAre(kHi)); - string array2[] = { "ho" }; + std::string array2[] = {"ho"}; EXPECT_THAT(array2, Not(ElementsAre(kHi))); } @@ -589,7 +599,7 @@ TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithValueArray) { TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithArraySize) { const char* a[] = { "one", "two", "three" }; - vector<string> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)); + vector<std::string> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)); EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a, GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a))); const char** p = a; @@ -600,7 +610,7 @@ TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithArraySize) { TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithoutArraySize) { const char* a[] = { "one", "two", "three" }; - vector<string> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)); + vector<std::string> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)); EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a)); test_vector[0] = "1"; @@ -608,10 +618,10 @@ TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithoutArraySize) { } TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithMatcherArray) { - const Matcher<string> kMatcherArray[] = - { StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three") }; + const Matcher<std::string> kMatcherArray[] = {StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), + StrEq("three")}; - vector<string> test_vector; + vector<std::string> test_vector; test_vector.push_back("one"); test_vector.push_back("two"); test_vector.push_back("three"); @@ -640,7 +650,7 @@ TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerList) { } TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerListOfCStrings) { - const string a[5] = { "a", "b", "c", "d", "e" }; + const std::string a[5] = {"a", "b", "c", "d", "e"}; EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray({ "a", "b", "c", "d", "e" })); EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray({ "a", "b", "c", "e", "d" }))); EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray({ "a", "b", "c", "d", "ef" }))); @@ -751,9 +761,9 @@ MATCHER(IsEven2, negation ? "is odd" : "is even") { // This also tests that the description string can reference matcher // parameters. -MATCHER_P2(EqSumOf, x, y, - string(negation ? "doesn't equal" : "equals") + " the sum of " + - PrintToString(x) + " and " + PrintToString(y)) { +MATCHER_P2(EqSumOf, x, y, std::string(negation ? "doesn't equal" : "equals") + + " the sum of " + PrintToString(x) + " and " + + PrintToString(y)) { if (arg == (x + y)) { *result_listener << "OK"; return true; @@ -1117,12 +1127,12 @@ TEST(ContainsTest, ListMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) { EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(Gt(2.5))); EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(Eq(2.0f))); - list<string> another_list; + list<std::string> another_list; another_list.push_back("fee"); another_list.push_back("fie"); another_list.push_back("foe"); another_list.push_back("fum"); - EXPECT_THAT(another_list, Contains(string("fee"))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_list, Contains(std::string("fee"))); } TEST(ContainsTest, ListDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) { @@ -1146,7 +1156,7 @@ TEST(ContainsTest, SetMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) { another_set.insert("fie"); another_set.insert("foe"); another_set.insert("fum"); - EXPECT_THAT(another_set, Contains(Eq(string("fum")))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_set, Contains(Eq(std::string("fum")))); } TEST(ContainsTest, SetDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) { @@ -1157,7 +1167,7 @@ TEST(ContainsTest, SetDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) { set<const char*> c_string_set; c_string_set.insert("hello"); - EXPECT_THAT(c_string_set, Not(Contains(string("hello").c_str()))); + EXPECT_THAT(c_string_set, Not(Contains(std::string("hello").c_str()))); } TEST(ContainsTest, ExplainsMatchResultCorrectly) { @@ -1189,13 +1199,14 @@ TEST(ContainsTest, MapMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) { my_map[bar] = 2; EXPECT_THAT(my_map, Contains(pair<const char* const, int>(bar, 2))); - map<string, int> another_map; + map<std::string, int> another_map; another_map["fee"] = 1; another_map["fie"] = 2; another_map["foe"] = 3; another_map["fum"] = 4; - EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const string, int>(string("fee"), 1))); - EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const string, int>("fie", 2))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_map, + Contains(pair<const std::string, int>(std::string("fee"), 1))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const std::string, int>("fie", 2))); } TEST(ContainsTest, MapDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) { @@ -1207,7 +1218,7 @@ TEST(ContainsTest, MapDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) { TEST(ContainsTest, ArrayMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) { const char* string_array[] = { "fee", "fie", "foe", "fum" }; - EXPECT_THAT(string_array, Contains(Eq(string("fum")))); + EXPECT_THAT(string_array, Contains(Eq(std::string("fum")))); } TEST(ContainsTest, ArrayDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) { @@ -1283,4 +1294,48 @@ TEST(AnyOfTest, DoesNotCallAnyOfUnqualified) { # pragma warning(pop) #endif +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + +TEST(AllOfTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) { + std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, AllOf(Pointee(Eq(3)), Pointee(Gt(0)), Pointee(Lt(5)))); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(AllOf(Pointee(Eq(3)), Pointee(Gt(0)), Pointee(Lt(3))))); +} + +TEST(AnyOfTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) { + std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, AnyOf(Pointee(Eq(5)), Pointee(Lt(0)), Pointee(Lt(5)))); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(AnyOf(Pointee(Eq(5)), Pointee(Lt(0)), Pointee(Gt(5))))); +} + +MATCHER(IsNotNull, "") { + return arg != nullptr; +} + +// Verifies that a matcher defined using MATCHER() can work on +// move-only types. +TEST(MatcherMacroTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) { + std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, IsNotNull()); + EXPECT_THAT(std::unique_ptr<int>(), Not(IsNotNull())); +} + +MATCHER_P(UniquePointee, pointee, "") { + return *arg == pointee; +} + +// Verifies that a matcher defined using MATCHER_P*() can work on +// move-only types. +TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) { + std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, UniquePointee(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(UniquePointee(2))); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LASNG_CXX11 + } // namespace + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc index 9d5ec60..f8633df 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ // implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is // included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to // prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. +// their code. #define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" #undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ @@ -69,6 +69,26 @@ namespace internal { namespace { +TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsEmptyTuple) { + EXPECT_EQ("", JoinAsTuple(Strings())); +} + +TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsOneTuple) { + const char* fields[] = {"1"}; + EXPECT_EQ("1", JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 1))); +} + +TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsTwoTuple) { + const char* fields[] = {"1", "a"}; + EXPECT_EQ("(1, a)", JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 2))); +} + +TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsTenTuple) { + const char* fields[] = {"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10"}; + EXPECT_EQ("(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)", + JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 10))); +} + TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameContainsNoWord) { EXPECT_EQ("", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("")); EXPECT_EQ("", ConvertIdentifierNameToWords("_")); @@ -319,11 +339,10 @@ TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize2) { TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize5) { tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, Matcher<long>, // NOLINT - Matcher<string> > + Matcher<std::string> > matchers(Eq(1), Eq('a'), Eq(true), Eq(2L), Eq("hi")); - tuple<int, char, bool, long, string> // NOLINT - values1(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hi"), - values2(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hello"), + tuple<int, char, bool, long, std::string> // NOLINT + values1(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hi"), values2(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hello"), values3(2, 'a', true, 2L, "hi"); EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values1)); @@ -375,7 +394,7 @@ class LogIsVisibleTest : public ::testing::Test { virtual void TearDown() { GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = original_verbose_; } - string original_verbose_; + std::string original_verbose_; }; TEST_F(LogIsVisibleTest, AlwaysReturnsTrueIfVerbosityIsInfo) { @@ -402,9 +421,9 @@ TEST_F(LogIsVisibleTest, WorksWhenVerbosityIsWarning) { // Verifies that Log() behaves correctly for the given verbosity level // and log severity. -void TestLogWithSeverity(const string& verbosity, LogSeverity severity, +void TestLogWithSeverity(const std::string& verbosity, LogSeverity severity, bool should_print) { - const string old_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string old_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = verbosity; CaptureStdout(); Log(severity, "Test log.\n", 0); @@ -423,7 +442,7 @@ void TestLogWithSeverity(const string& verbosity, LogSeverity severity, // Tests that when the stack_frames_to_skip parameter is negative, // Log() doesn't include the stack trace in the output. TEST(LogTest, NoStackTraceWhenStackFramesToSkipIsNegative) { - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kInfoVerbosity; CaptureStdout(); Log(kInfo, "Test log.\n", -1); @@ -432,7 +451,7 @@ TEST(LogTest, NoStackTraceWhenStackFramesToSkipIsNegative) { } struct MockStackTraceGetter : testing::internal::OsStackTraceGetterInterface { - virtual string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) { + virtual std::string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) { return (testing::Message() << max_depth << "::" << skip_count << "\n") .GetString(); } @@ -447,11 +466,11 @@ TEST(LogTest, NoSkippingStackFrameInOptMode) { CaptureStdout(); Log(kWarning, "Test log.\n", 100); - const string log = GetCapturedStdout(); + const std::string log = GetCapturedStdout(); - string expected_trace = + std::string expected_trace = (testing::Message() << GTEST_FLAG(stack_trace_depth) << "::").GetString(); - string expected_message = + std::string expected_message = "\nGMOCK WARNING:\n" "Test log.\n" "Stack trace:\n" + @@ -547,7 +566,7 @@ TEST(TypeTraitsTest, remove_reference) { // Verifies that Log() behaves correctly for the given verbosity level // and log severity. std::string GrabOutput(void(*logger)(), const char* verbosity) { - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = verbosity; CaptureStdout(); logger(); diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc index 9f62c3d..9f1a547 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ #include <limits> #include <list> #include <map> +#include <memory> #include <set> #include <sstream> #include <string> @@ -58,12 +59,11 @@ # include <forward_list> // NOLINT #endif -namespace testing { - -namespace internal { -GTEST_API_ string JoinAsTuple(const Strings& fields); -} // namespace internal +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +# include <type_traits> +#endif +namespace testing { namespace gmock_matchers_test { using std::greater; @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ using testing::internal::ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo; using testing::internal::FloatingEqMatcher; using testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription; using testing::internal::IsReadableTypeName; -using testing::internal::JoinAsTuple; using testing::internal::linked_ptr; using testing::internal::MatchMatrix; using testing::internal::RE; @@ -189,7 +188,7 @@ Matcher<int> GreaterThan(int n) { return MakeMatcher(new GreaterThanMatcher(n)); } -string OfType(const string& type_name) { +std::string OfType(const std::string& type_name) { #if GTEST_HAS_RTTI return " (of type " + type_name + ")"; #else @@ -199,28 +198,30 @@ string OfType(const string& type_name) { // Returns the description of the given matcher. template <typename T> -string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) { - stringstream ss; - m.DescribeTo(&ss); - return ss.str(); +std::string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) { + return DescribeMatcher<T>(m); } // Returns the description of the negation of the given matcher. template <typename T> -string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) { - stringstream ss; - m.DescribeNegationTo(&ss); - return ss.str(); +std::string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) { + return DescribeMatcher<T>(m, true); } // Returns the reason why x matches, or doesn't match, m. template <typename MatcherType, typename Value> -string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) { +std::string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) { StringMatchResultListener listener; ExplainMatchResult(m, x, &listener); return listener.str(); } +TEST(MonotonicMatcherTest, IsPrintable) { + stringstream ss; + ss << GreaterThan(5); + EXPECT_EQ("is > 5", ss.str()); +} + TEST(MatchResultListenerTest, StreamingWorks) { StringMatchResultListener listener; listener << "hi" << 5; @@ -332,6 +333,22 @@ TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromNULL) { EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(&n)); } +// Tests that matchers can be constructed from a variable that is not properly +// defined. This should be illegal, but many users rely on this accidentally. +struct Undefined { + virtual ~Undefined() = 0; + static const int kInt = 1; +}; + +TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeConstructedFromUndefinedVariable) { + Matcher<int> m1 = Undefined::kInt; + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(1)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(2)); +} + +// Test that a matcher parameterized with an abstract class compiles. +TEST(MatcherTest, CanAcceptAbstractClass) { Matcher<const Undefined&> m = _; } + // Tests that matchers are copyable. TEST(MatcherTest, IsCopyable) { // Tests the copy constructor. @@ -365,66 +382,132 @@ TEST(MatcherTest, MatchAndExplain) { } // Tests that a C-string literal can be implicitly converted to a -// Matcher<string> or Matcher<const string&>. +// Matcher<std::string> or Matcher<const std::string&>. TEST(StringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromCStringLiteral) { - Matcher<string> m1 = "hi"; + Matcher<std::string> m1 = "hi"; EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello")); - Matcher<const string&> m2 = "hi"; + Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = "hi"; EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello")); } // Tests that a string object can be implicitly converted to a -// Matcher<string> or Matcher<const string&>. +// Matcher<std::string> or Matcher<const std::string&>. TEST(StringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromString) { - Matcher<string> m1 = string("hi"); + Matcher<std::string> m1 = std::string("hi"); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello")); - Matcher<const string&> m2 = string("hi"); + Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = std::string("hi"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello")); } -#if GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Tests that a ::string object can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<std::string> or Matcher<const std::string&>. +TEST(StringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromGlobalString) { + Matcher<std::string> m1 = ::string("hi"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello")); + + Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = ::string("hi"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello")); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING // Tests that a C-string literal can be implicitly converted to a -// Matcher<StringPiece> or Matcher<const StringPiece&>. -TEST(StringPieceMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromCStringLiteral) { - Matcher<StringPiece> m1 = "cats"; +// Matcher<::string> or Matcher<const ::string&>. +TEST(GlobalStringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromCStringLiteral) { + Matcher< ::string> m1 = "hi"; + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello")); + + Matcher<const ::string&> m2 = "hi"; + EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello")); +} + +// Tests that a std::string object can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<::string> or Matcher<const ::string&>. +TEST(GlobalStringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromString) { + Matcher< ::string> m1 = std::string("hi"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello")); + + Matcher<const ::string&> m2 = std::string("hi"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello")); +} + +// Tests that a ::string object can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<::string> or Matcher<const ::string&>. +TEST(GlobalStringMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromGlobalString) { + Matcher< ::string> m1 = ::string("hi"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("hello")); + + Matcher<const ::string&> m2 = ::string("hi"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hello")); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +// Tests that a C-string literal can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<absl::string_view> or Matcher<const absl::string_view&>. +TEST(StringViewMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromCStringLiteral) { + Matcher<absl::string_view> m1 = "cats"; EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("cats")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("dogs")); - Matcher<const StringPiece&> m2 = "cats"; + Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m2 = "cats"; EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("cats")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("dogs")); } -// Tests that a string object can be implicitly converted to a -// Matcher<StringPiece> or Matcher<const StringPiece&>. -TEST(StringPieceMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromString) { - Matcher<StringPiece> m1 = string("cats"); +// Tests that a std::string object can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<absl::string_view> or Matcher<const absl::string_view&>. +TEST(StringViewMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromString) { + Matcher<absl::string_view> m1 = std::string("cats"); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("cats")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("dogs")); - Matcher<const StringPiece&> m2 = string("cats"); + Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m2 = std::string("cats"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("cats")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("dogs")); } -// Tests that a StringPiece object can be implicitly converted to a -// Matcher<StringPiece> or Matcher<const StringPiece&>. -TEST(StringPieceMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromStringPiece) { - Matcher<StringPiece> m1 = StringPiece("cats"); +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +// Tests that a ::string object can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<absl::string_view> or Matcher<const absl::string_view&>. +TEST(StringViewMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromGlobalString) { + Matcher<absl::string_view> m1 = ::string("cats"); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("cats")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("dogs")); - Matcher<const StringPiece&> m2 = StringPiece("cats"); + Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m2 = ::string("cats"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("cats")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("dogs")); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +// Tests that a absl::string_view object can be implicitly converted to a +// Matcher<absl::string_view> or Matcher<const absl::string_view&>. +TEST(StringViewMatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromStringView) { + Matcher<absl::string_view> m1 = absl::string_view("cats"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("cats")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("dogs")); + + Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m2 = absl::string_view("cats"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("cats")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("dogs")); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL // Tests that MakeMatcher() constructs a Matcher<T> from a // MatcherInterface* without requiring the user to explicitly @@ -609,11 +692,76 @@ TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromSameType) { EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1)); } +// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a value of the same type as the +// value type of the Matcher. +TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromAValue) { + Matcher<int> m = MatcherCast<int>(42); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(42)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(239)); +} + +// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a value of the type implicitly +// convertible to the value type of the Matcher. +TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromAnImplicitlyConvertibleValue) { + const int kExpected = 'c'; + Matcher<int> m = MatcherCast<int>('c'); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(kExpected)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(kExpected + 1)); +} + +struct NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq { + friend bool operator==( + const NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq& /* ignored */, + int rhs) { + return 42 == rhs; + } + friend bool operator==( + int lhs, + const NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq& /* ignored */) { + return lhs == 42; + } +}; + +// Tests that MatcherCast<T>(m) works when m is a neither a matcher nor +// implicitly convertible to the value type of the Matcher, but the value type +// of the matcher has operator==() overload accepting m. +TEST(MatcherCastTest, NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq) { + Matcher<NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq> m1 = + MatcherCast<NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq>(42); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq())); + + Matcher<NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq> m2 = + MatcherCast<NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq>(239); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq())); + + // When updating the following lines please also change the comment to + // namespace convertible_from_any. + Matcher<int> m3 = + MatcherCast<int>(NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq()); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(42)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(239)); +} + +// ConvertibleFromAny does not work with MSVC. resulting in +// error C2440: 'initializing': cannot convert from 'Eq' to 'M' +// No constructor could take the source type, or constructor overload +// resolution was ambiguous + +#if !defined _MSC_VER + +// The below ConvertibleFromAny struct is implicitly constructible from anything +// and when in the same namespace can interact with other tests. In particular, +// if it is in the same namespace as other tests and one removes +// NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq::operator==(int lhs, ...); +// then the corresponding test still compiles (and it should not!) by implicitly +// converting NonImplicitlyConstructibleTypeWithOperatorEq to ConvertibleFromAny +// in m3.Matcher(). +namespace convertible_from_any { // Implicitly convertible from any type. struct ConvertibleFromAny { ConvertibleFromAny(int a_value) : value(a_value) {} template <typename T> - explicit ConvertibleFromAny(const T& /*a_value*/) : value(-1) { + ConvertibleFromAny(const T& /*a_value*/) : value(-1) { ADD_FAILURE() << "Conversion constructor called"; } int value; @@ -639,6 +787,9 @@ TEST(MatcherCastTest, FromConvertibleFromAny) { EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(ConvertibleFromAny(1))); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(ConvertibleFromAny(2))); } +} // namespace convertible_from_any + +#endif // !defined _MSC_VER struct IntReferenceWrapper { IntReferenceWrapper(const int& a_value) : value(&a_value) {} @@ -744,6 +895,9 @@ TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromSameType) { EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(1)); } +#if !defined _MSC_VER + +namespace convertible_from_any { TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, ConversionConstructorIsUsed) { Matcher<ConvertibleFromAny> m = SafeMatcherCast<ConvertibleFromAny>(1); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(ConvertibleFromAny(1))); @@ -756,6 +910,9 @@ TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, FromConvertibleFromAny) { EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(ConvertibleFromAny(1))); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(ConvertibleFromAny(2))); } +} // namespace convertible_from_any + +#endif // !defined _MSC_VER TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, ValueIsNotCopied) { int n = 42; @@ -767,7 +924,7 @@ TEST(SafeMatcherCastTest, ValueIsNotCopied) { TEST(ExpectThat, TakesLiterals) { EXPECT_THAT(1, 1); EXPECT_THAT(1.0, 1.0); - EXPECT_THAT(string(), ""); + EXPECT_THAT(std::string(), ""); } TEST(ExpectThat, TakesFunctions) { @@ -867,15 +1024,11 @@ class Unprintable { public: Unprintable() : c_('a') {} + bool operator==(const Unprintable& /* rhs */) const { return true; } private: char c_; }; -inline bool operator==(const Unprintable& /* lhs */, - const Unprintable& /* rhs */) { - return true; -} - TEST(EqTest, CanDescribeSelf) { Matcher<Unprintable> m = Eq(Unprintable()); EXPECT_EQ("is equal to 1-byte object <61>", Describe(m)); @@ -914,7 +1067,7 @@ TEST(TypedEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) { // Type<T>::IsTypeOf(v) compiles iff the type of value v is T, where T // is a "bare" type (i.e. not in the form of const U or U&). If v's // type is not T, the compiler will generate a message about -// "undefined referece". +// "undefined reference". template <typename T> struct Type { static bool IsTypeOf(const T& /* v */) { return true; } @@ -973,7 +1126,7 @@ TEST(LeTest, CanDescribeSelf) { // Tests that Lt(v) matches anything < v. TEST(LtTest, ImplementsLessThan) { - Matcher<const string&> m1 = Lt("Hello"); + Matcher<const std::string&> m1 = Lt("Hello"); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("Abc")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("Hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches("Hello, world!")); @@ -1046,14 +1199,14 @@ TEST(IsNullTest, ReferenceToConstLinkedPtr) { EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(non_null_p)); } -#if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 TEST(IsNullTest, StdFunction) { const Matcher<std::function<void()>> m = IsNull(); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(std::function<void()>())); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches([]{})); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // Tests that IsNull() describes itself properly. TEST(IsNullTest, CanDescribeSelf) { @@ -1094,14 +1247,14 @@ TEST(NotNullTest, ReferenceToConstLinkedPtr) { EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(non_null_p)); } -#if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 TEST(NotNullTest, StdFunction) { const Matcher<std::function<void()>> m = NotNull(); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches([]{})); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(std::function<void()>())); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 // Tests that NotNull() describes itself properly. TEST(NotNullTest, CanDescribeSelf) { @@ -1125,7 +1278,7 @@ TEST(RefTest, CanDescribeSelf) { Matcher<int&> m = Ref(n); stringstream ss; ss << "references the variable @" << &n << " 5"; - EXPECT_EQ(string(ss.str()), Describe(m)); + EXPECT_EQ(ss.str(), Describe(m)); } // Test that Ref(non_const_varialbe) can be used as a matcher for a @@ -1169,27 +1322,34 @@ TEST(RefTest, ExplainsResult) { // Tests string comparison matchers. TEST(StrEqTest, MatchesEqualString) { - Matcher<const char*> m = StrEq(string("Hello")); + Matcher<const char*> m = StrEq(std::string("Hello")); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("Hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL)); - Matcher<const string&> m2 = StrEq("Hello"); + Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = StrEq("Hello"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hi")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m3 = StrEq("Hello"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("Hello"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("hello"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(StrEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) { - Matcher<string> m = StrEq("Hi-\'\"?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\xD3"); + Matcher<std::string> m = StrEq("Hi-\'\"?\\\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\xD3"); EXPECT_EQ("is equal to \"Hi-\'\\\"?\\\\\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\v\\xD3\"", Describe(m)); - string str("01204500800"); + std::string str("01204500800"); str[3] = '\0'; - Matcher<string> m2 = StrEq(str); + Matcher<std::string> m2 = StrEq(str); EXPECT_EQ("is equal to \"012\\04500800\"", Describe(m2)); str[0] = str[6] = str[7] = str[9] = str[10] = '\0'; - Matcher<string> m3 = StrEq(str); + Matcher<std::string> m3 = StrEq(str); EXPECT_EQ("is equal to \"\\012\\045\\0\\08\\0\\0\"", Describe(m3)); } @@ -1199,9 +1359,16 @@ TEST(StrNeTest, MatchesUnequalString) { EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(NULL)); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("Hello")); - Matcher<string> m2 = StrNe(string("Hello")); + Matcher<std::string> m2 = StrNe(std::string("Hello")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hello")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Matcher<const absl::string_view> m3 = StrNe("Hello"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view(""))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("Hello"))); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(StrNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) { @@ -1210,44 +1377,52 @@ TEST(StrNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) { } TEST(StrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringIgnoringCase) { - Matcher<const char*> m = StrCaseEq(string("Hello")); + Matcher<const char*> m = StrCaseEq(std::string("Hello")); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("Hello")); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches("hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("Hi")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(NULL)); - Matcher<const string&> m2 = StrCaseEq("Hello"); + Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = StrCaseEq("Hello"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hi")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m3 = StrCaseEq(std::string("Hello")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("Hello"))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("hello"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("Hi"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(StrCaseEqTest, MatchesEqualStringWith0IgnoringCase) { - string str1("oabocdooeoo"); - string str2("OABOCDOOEOO"); - Matcher<const string&> m0 = StrCaseEq(str1); - EXPECT_FALSE(m0.Matches(str2 + string(1, '\0'))); + std::string str1("oabocdooeoo"); + std::string str2("OABOCDOOEOO"); + Matcher<const std::string&> m0 = StrCaseEq(str1); + EXPECT_FALSE(m0.Matches(str2 + std::string(1, '\0'))); str1[3] = str2[3] = '\0'; - Matcher<const string&> m1 = StrCaseEq(str1); + Matcher<const std::string&> m1 = StrCaseEq(str1); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(str2)); str1[0] = str1[6] = str1[7] = str1[10] = '\0'; str2[0] = str2[6] = str2[7] = str2[10] = '\0'; - Matcher<const string&> m2 = StrCaseEq(str1); + Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = StrCaseEq(str1); str1[9] = str2[9] = '\0'; EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(str2)); - Matcher<const string&> m3 = StrCaseEq(str1); + Matcher<const std::string&> m3 = StrCaseEq(str1); EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(str2)); EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2 + "x")); str2.append(1, '\0'); EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(str2)); - EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(string(str2, 0, 9))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(std::string(str2, 0, 9))); } TEST(StrCaseEqTest, CanDescribeSelf) { - Matcher<string> m = StrCaseEq("Hi"); + Matcher<std::string> m = StrCaseEq("Hi"); EXPECT_EQ("is equal to (ignoring case) \"Hi\"", Describe(m)); } @@ -1258,9 +1433,17 @@ TEST(StrCaseNeTest, MatchesUnequalStringIgnoringCase) { EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("Hello")); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches("hello")); - Matcher<string> m2 = StrCaseNe(string("Hello")); + Matcher<std::string> m2 = StrCaseNe(std::string("Hello")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hello")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Matcher<const absl::string_view> m3 = StrCaseNe("Hello"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("Hi"))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("Hello"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("hello"))); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(StrCaseNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) { @@ -1270,9 +1453,9 @@ TEST(StrCaseNeTest, CanDescribeSelf) { // Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching string-typed values. TEST(HasSubstrTest, WorksForStringClasses) { - const Matcher<string> m1 = HasSubstr("foo"); - EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(string("I love food."))); - EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(string("tofo"))); + const Matcher<std::string> m1 = HasSubstr("foo"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(std::string("I love food."))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(std::string("tofo"))); const Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = HasSubstr("foo"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(std::string("I love food."))); @@ -1292,9 +1475,28 @@ TEST(HasSubstrTest, WorksForCStrings) { EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(NULL)); } +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +// Tests that HasSubstr() works for matching absl::string_view-typed values. +TEST(HasSubstrTest, WorksForStringViewClasses) { + const Matcher<absl::string_view> m1 = HasSubstr("foo"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(absl::string_view("I love food."))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(absl::string_view("tofo"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(absl::string_view())); + + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m2 = HasSubstr("foo"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(absl::string_view("I love food."))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(absl::string_view("tofo"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(absl::string_view())); + + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m3 = HasSubstr(""); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("foo"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // Tests that HasSubstr(s) describes itself properly. TEST(HasSubstrTest, CanDescribeSelf) { - Matcher<string> m = HasSubstr("foo\n\""); + Matcher<std::string> m = HasSubstr("foo\n\""); EXPECT_EQ("has substring \"foo\\n\\\"\"", Describe(m)); } @@ -1320,6 +1522,35 @@ TEST(KeyTest, MatchesCorrectly) { EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Key(Lt(25)))); } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +template <size_t I> +struct Tag {}; + +struct PairWithGet { + int member_1; + string member_2; + using first_type = int; + using second_type = string; + + const int& GetImpl(Tag<0>) const { return member_1; } + const string& GetImpl(Tag<1>) const { return member_2; } +}; +template <size_t I> +auto get(const PairWithGet& value) -> decltype(value.GetImpl(Tag<I>())) { + return value.GetImpl(Tag<I>()); +} +TEST(PairTest, MatchesPairWithGetCorrectly) { + PairWithGet p{25, "foo"}; + EXPECT_THAT(p, Key(25)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Key(42))); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Key(Ge(20))); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Key(Lt(25)))); + + std::vector<PairWithGet> v = {{11, "Foo"}, {29, "gMockIsBestMock"}}; + EXPECT_THAT(v, Contains(Key(29))); +} +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + TEST(KeyTest, SafelyCastsInnerMatcher) { Matcher<int> is_positive = Gt(0); Matcher<int> is_negative = Lt(0); @@ -1457,15 +1688,27 @@ TEST(PairTest, InsideContainsUsingMap) { EXPECT_THAT(container, Not(Contains(Pair(3, _)))); } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +TEST(PairTest, UseGetInsteadOfMembers) { + PairWithGet pair{7, "ABC"}; + EXPECT_THAT(pair, Pair(7, "ABC")); + EXPECT_THAT(pair, Pair(Ge(7), HasSubstr("AB"))); + EXPECT_THAT(pair, Not(Pair(Lt(7), "ABC"))); + + std::vector<PairWithGet> v = {{11, "Foo"}, {29, "gMockIsBestMock"}}; + EXPECT_THAT(v, ElementsAre(Pair(11, string("Foo")), Pair(Ge(10), Not("")))); +} +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Tests StartsWith(s). TEST(StartsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenPrefix) { - const Matcher<const char*> m1 = StartsWith(string("")); + const Matcher<const char*> m1 = StartsWith(std::string("")); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("Hi")); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL)); - const Matcher<const string&> m2 = StartsWith("Hi"); + const Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = StartsWith("Hi"); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hi")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hi Hi!")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("High")); @@ -1486,12 +1729,30 @@ TEST(EndsWithTest, MatchesStringWithGivenSuffix) { EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL)); - const Matcher<const string&> m2 = EndsWith(string("Hi")); + const Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = EndsWith(std::string("Hi")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Hi")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Wow Hi Hi")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("Super Hi")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("i")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("Hi ")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + const Matcher<const ::string&> m3 = EndsWith(::string("Hi")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches("Hi")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches("Wow Hi Hi")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches("Super Hi")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches("i")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches("Hi ")); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m4 = EndsWith(""); + EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches("Hi")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m4.Matches("")); + // Default-constructed absl::string_view should not match anything, in order + // to distinguish it from an empty string. + EXPECT_FALSE(m4.Matches(absl::string_view())); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(EndsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) { @@ -1507,32 +1768,61 @@ TEST(MatchesRegexTest, MatchesStringMatchingGivenRegex) { EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("abcz")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL)); - const Matcher<const string&> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("a.*z")); + const Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("a.*z")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("azbz")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("az1")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("1az")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m3 = MatchesRegex("a.*z"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("az"))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("abcz"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("1az"))); + // Default-constructed absl::string_view should not match anything, in order + // to distinguish it from an empty string. + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m4 = MatchesRegex(""); + EXPECT_FALSE(m4.Matches(absl::string_view())); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(MatchesRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) { - Matcher<const std::string> m1 = MatchesRegex(string("Hi.*")); + Matcher<const std::string> m1 = MatchesRegex(std::string("Hi.*")); EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"Hi.*\"", Describe(m1)); Matcher<const char*> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("a.*")); EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"a.*\"", Describe(m2)); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Matcher<const absl::string_view> m3 = MatchesRegex(new RE("0.*")); + EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"0.*\"", Describe(m3)); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } // Tests ContainsRegex(). TEST(ContainsRegexTest, MatchesStringContainingGivenRegex) { - const Matcher<const char*> m1 = ContainsRegex(string("a.*z")); + const Matcher<const char*> m1 = ContainsRegex(std::string("a.*z")); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("az")); EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches("0abcz1")); EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(NULL)); - const Matcher<const string&> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("a.*z")); + const Matcher<const std::string&> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("a.*z")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("azbz")); EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches("az1")); EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("1a")); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m3 = ContainsRegex(new RE("a.*z")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("azbz"))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("az1"))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view("1a"))); + // Default-constructed absl::string_view should not match anything, in order + // to distinguish it from an empty string. + EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(absl::string_view())); + const Matcher<const absl::string_view&> m4 = ContainsRegex(""); + EXPECT_FALSE(m4.Matches(absl::string_view())); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } TEST(ContainsRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) { @@ -1541,6 +1831,11 @@ TEST(ContainsRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) { Matcher<const char*> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("a.*")); EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"a.*\"", Describe(m2)); + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Matcher<const absl::string_view> m3 = ContainsRegex(new RE("0.*")); + EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"0.*\"", Describe(m3)); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } // Tests for wide strings. @@ -2018,6 +2313,150 @@ TEST(Ne2Test, CanDescribeSelf) { EXPECT_EQ("are an unequal pair", Describe(m)); } +// Tests that FloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where +// FloatEq(first field) matches the second field. +TEST(FloatEq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = FloatEq(); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(0.3f, 0.1f + 0.1f + 0.1f))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f))); +} + +// Tests that FloatEq() describes itself properly. +TEST(FloatEq2Test, CanDescribeSelf) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = FloatEq(); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveFloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where +// NanSensitiveFloatEq(first field) matches the second field. +TEST(NanSensitiveFloatEqTest, MatchesEqualArgumentsWithNaN) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveFloatEq(); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN(), + std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN(), 1.0f))); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveFloatEq() describes itself properly. +TEST(NanSensitiveFloatEqTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = NanSensitiveFloatEq(); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that DoubleEq() matches a 2-tuple where +// DoubleEq(first field) matches the second field. +TEST(DoubleEq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = DoubleEq(); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0, 1.0))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(0.3, 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1, 1.0))); +} + +// Tests that DoubleEq() describes itself properly. +TEST(DoubleEq2Test, CanDescribeSelf) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = DoubleEq(); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveDoubleEq() matches a 2-tuple where +// NanSensitiveDoubleEq(first field) matches the second field. +TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleEqTest, MatchesEqualArgumentsWithNaN) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleEq(); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), + std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), 1.0f))); +} + +// Tests that DoubleEq() describes itself properly. +TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleEqTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleEq(); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that FloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where +// FloatNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field. +TEST(FloatNear2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = FloatNear(0.5f); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.3f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.8f, 1.0f))); +} + +// Tests that FloatNear() describes itself properly. +TEST(FloatNear2Test, CanDescribeSelf) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = FloatNear(0.5f); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveFloatNear() matches a 2-tuple where +// NanSensitiveFloatNear(first field) matches the second field. +TEST(NanSensitiveFloatNearTest, MatchesNearbyArgumentsWithNaN) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveFloatNear(0.5f); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN(), + std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.6f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN(), 1.0f))); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveFloatNear() describes itself properly. +TEST(NanSensitiveFloatNearTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = + NanSensitiveFloatNear(0.5f); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that FloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where +// DoubleNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field. +TEST(DoubleNear2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = DoubleNear(0.5); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0, 1.0))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.3, 1.0))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.8, 1.0))); +} + +// Tests that DoubleNear() describes itself properly. +TEST(DoubleNear2Test, CanDescribeSelf) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = DoubleNear(0.5); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveDoubleNear() matches a 2-tuple where +// NanSensitiveDoubleNear(first field) matches the second field. +TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleNearTest, MatchesNearbyArgumentsWithNaN) { + typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl; + Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleNear(0.5f); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), + std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.6f, 1.0f))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN()))); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), 1.0f))); +} + +// Tests that NanSensitiveDoubleNear() describes itself properly. +TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleNearTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) { + Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = + NanSensitiveDoubleNear(0.5f); + EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m)); +} + // Tests that Not(m) matches any value that doesn't match m. TEST(NotTest, NegatesMatcher) { Matcher<int> m; @@ -2106,7 +2545,7 @@ TEST(AllOfTest, VariadicMatchesWhenAllMatch) { ::testing::AllOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11); Matcher<int> m = AllOf(Ne(1), Ne(2), Ne(3), Ne(4), Ne(5), Ne(6), Ne(7), Ne(8), Ne(9), Ne(10), Ne(11)); - EXPECT_THAT(Describe(m), EndsWith("and (isn't equal to 11))))))))))")); + EXPECT_THAT(Describe(m), EndsWith("and (isn't equal to 11)")); AllOfMatches(11, m); AllOfMatches(50, AllOf(Ne(1), Ne(2), Ne(3), Ne(4), Ne(5), Ne(6), Ne(7), Ne(8), Ne(9), Ne(10), Ne(11), Ne(12), Ne(13), Ne(14), Ne(15), @@ -2241,7 +2680,7 @@ TEST(AllOfTest, ExplainsResult) { } // Helper to allow easy testing of AnyOf matchers with num parameters. -void AnyOfMatches(int num, const Matcher<int>& m) { +static void AnyOfMatches(int num, const Matcher<int>& m) { SCOPED_TRACE(Describe(m)); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(0)); for (int i = 1; i <= num; ++i) { @@ -2250,6 +2689,18 @@ void AnyOfMatches(int num, const Matcher<int>& m) { EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(num + 1)); } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +static void AnyOfStringMatches(int num, const Matcher<std::string>& m) { + SCOPED_TRACE(Describe(m)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(std::to_string(0))); + + for (int i = 1; i <= num; ++i) { + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(std::to_string(i))); + } + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(std::to_string(num + 1))); +} +#endif + // Tests that AnyOf(m1, ..., mn) matches any value that matches at // least one of the given matchers. TEST(AnyOfTest, MatchesWhenAnyMatches) { @@ -2300,13 +2751,46 @@ TEST(AnyOfTest, VariadicMatchesWhenAnyMatches) { // on ADL. Matcher<int> m = ::testing::AnyOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11); - EXPECT_THAT(Describe(m), EndsWith("or (is equal to 11))))))))))")); + EXPECT_THAT(Describe(m), EndsWith("or (is equal to 11)")); AnyOfMatches(11, m); AnyOfMatches(50, AnyOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50)); + AnyOfStringMatches( + 50, AnyOf("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "11", "12", + "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21", "22", + "23", "24", "25", "26", "27", "28", "29", "30", "31", "32", + "33", "34", "35", "36", "37", "38", "39", "40", "41", "42", + "43", "44", "45", "46", "47", "48", "49", "50")); +} + +// Tests the variadic version of the ElementsAreMatcher +TEST(ElementsAreTest, HugeMatcher) { + vector<int> test_vector{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}; + + EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, + ElementsAre(Eq(1), Eq(2), Lt(13), Eq(4), Eq(5), Eq(6), Eq(7), + Eq(8), Eq(9), Eq(10), Gt(1), Eq(12))); +} + +// Tests the variadic version of the UnorderedElementsAreMatcher +TEST(ElementsAreTest, HugeMatcherStr) { + vector<string> test_vector{ + "literal_string", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", ""}; + + EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, UnorderedElementsAre("literal_string", _, _, _, _, _, + _, _, _, _, _, _)); +} + +// Tests the variadic version of the UnorderedElementsAreMatcher +TEST(ElementsAreTest, HugeMatcherUnordered) { + vector<int> test_vector{2, 1, 8, 5, 4, 6, 7, 3, 9, 12, 11, 10}; + + EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, UnorderedElementsAre( + Eq(2), Eq(1), Gt(7), Eq(5), Eq(4), Eq(6), Eq(7), + Eq(3), Eq(9), Eq(12), Eq(11), Ne(122))); } #endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 @@ -2583,6 +3067,22 @@ TEST(ExplainMatchResultTest, WorksInsideMATCHER) { EXPECT_THAT(0, Really(Eq(0))); } +TEST(DescribeMatcherTest, WorksWithValue) { + EXPECT_EQ("is equal to 42", DescribeMatcher<int>(42)); + EXPECT_EQ("isn't equal to 42", DescribeMatcher<int>(42, true)); +} + +TEST(DescribeMatcherTest, WorksWithMonomorphicMatcher) { + const Matcher<int> monomorphic = Le(0); + EXPECT_EQ("is <= 0", DescribeMatcher<int>(monomorphic)); + EXPECT_EQ("isn't <= 0", DescribeMatcher<int>(monomorphic, true)); +} + +TEST(DescribeMatcherTest, WorksWithPolymorphicMatcher) { + EXPECT_EQ("is even", DescribeMatcher<int>(PolymorphicIsEven())); + EXPECT_EQ("is odd", DescribeMatcher<int>(PolymorphicIsEven(), true)); +} + TEST(AllArgsTest, WorksForTuple) { EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(1, 2L), AllArgs(Lt())); EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(2L, 1), Not(AllArgs(Lt()))); @@ -2617,6 +3117,44 @@ TEST(AllArgsTest, WorksInWithClause) { EXPECT_EQ(2, helper.Helper('a', 1)); } +class OptionalMatchersHelper { + public: + OptionalMatchersHelper() {} + + MOCK_METHOD0(NoArgs, int()); + + MOCK_METHOD1(OneArg, int(int y)); + + MOCK_METHOD2(TwoArgs, int(char x, int y)); + + MOCK_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(char x)); + MOCK_METHOD2(Overloaded, int(char x, int y)); + + private: + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(OptionalMatchersHelper); +}; + +TEST(AllArgsTest, WorksWithoutMatchers) { + OptionalMatchersHelper helper; + + ON_CALL(helper, NoArgs).WillByDefault(Return(10)); + ON_CALL(helper, OneArg).WillByDefault(Return(20)); + ON_CALL(helper, TwoArgs).WillByDefault(Return(30)); + + EXPECT_EQ(10, helper.NoArgs()); + EXPECT_EQ(20, helper.OneArg(1)); + EXPECT_EQ(30, helper.TwoArgs('\1', 2)); + + EXPECT_CALL(helper, NoArgs).Times(1); + EXPECT_CALL(helper, OneArg).WillOnce(Return(100)); + EXPECT_CALL(helper, OneArg(17)).WillOnce(Return(200)); + EXPECT_CALL(helper, TwoArgs).Times(0); + + EXPECT_EQ(10, helper.NoArgs()); + EXPECT_EQ(100, helper.OneArg(1)); + EXPECT_EQ(200, helper.OneArg(17)); +} + // Tests that ASSERT_THAT() and EXPECT_THAT() work when the value // matches the matcher. TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksWhenMatcherIsSatisfied) { @@ -2685,9 +3223,9 @@ TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForMonomorphicMatcher) { Matcher<const char*> starts_with_he = StartsWith("he"); ASSERT_THAT("hello", starts_with_he); - Matcher<const string&> ends_with_ok = EndsWith("ok"); + Matcher<const std::string&> ends_with_ok = EndsWith("ok"); ASSERT_THAT("book", ends_with_ok); - const string bad = "bad"; + const std::string bad = "bad"; EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_THAT(bad, ends_with_ok), "Value of: bad\n" "Expected: ends with \"ok\"\n" @@ -2712,18 +3250,22 @@ class FloatingPointTest : public testing::Test { zero_bits_(Floating(0).bits()), one_bits_(Floating(1).bits()), infinity_bits_(Floating(Floating::Infinity()).bits()), - close_to_positive_zero_(AsBits(zero_bits_ + max_ulps_/2)), - close_to_negative_zero_(AsBits(zero_bits_ + max_ulps_ - max_ulps_/2)), - further_from_negative_zero_(-AsBits( + close_to_positive_zero_( + Floating::ReinterpretBits(zero_bits_ + max_ulps_/2)), + close_to_negative_zero_( + -Floating::ReinterpretBits(zero_bits_ + max_ulps_ - max_ulps_/2)), + further_from_negative_zero_(-Floating::ReinterpretBits( zero_bits_ + max_ulps_ + 1 - max_ulps_/2)), - close_to_one_(AsBits(one_bits_ + max_ulps_)), - further_from_one_(AsBits(one_bits_ + max_ulps_ + 1)), + close_to_one_(Floating::ReinterpretBits(one_bits_ + max_ulps_)), + further_from_one_(Floating::ReinterpretBits(one_bits_ + max_ulps_ + 1)), infinity_(Floating::Infinity()), - close_to_infinity_(AsBits(infinity_bits_ - max_ulps_)), - further_from_infinity_(AsBits(infinity_bits_ - max_ulps_ - 1)), + close_to_infinity_( + Floating::ReinterpretBits(infinity_bits_ - max_ulps_)), + further_from_infinity_( + Floating::ReinterpretBits(infinity_bits_ - max_ulps_ - 1)), max_(Floating::Max()), - nan1_(AsBits(Floating::kExponentBitMask | 1)), - nan2_(AsBits(Floating::kExponentBitMask | 200)) { + nan1_(Floating::ReinterpretBits(Floating::kExponentBitMask | 1)), + nan2_(Floating::ReinterpretBits(Floating::kExponentBitMask | 200)) { } void TestSize() { @@ -2778,7 +3320,7 @@ class FloatingPointTest : public testing::Test { // Pre-calculated numbers to be used by the tests. - const size_t max_ulps_; + const Bits max_ulps_; const Bits zero_bits_; // The bits that represent 0.0. const Bits one_bits_; // The bits that represent 1.0. @@ -2804,12 +3346,6 @@ class FloatingPointTest : public testing::Test { // Some NaNs. const RawType nan1_; const RawType nan2_; - - private: - template <typename T> - static RawType AsBits(T value) { - return Floating::ReinterpretBits(static_cast<Bits>(value)); - } }; // Tests floating-point matchers with fixed epsilons. @@ -3099,7 +3635,8 @@ TEST_F(DoubleNearTest, ExplainsResultWhenMatchFails) { EXPECT_EQ("which is 0.2 from 2", Explain(DoubleNear(2.0, 0.1), 2.2)); EXPECT_EQ("which is -0.3 from 2", Explain(DoubleNear(2.0, 0.1), 1.7)); - const string explanation = Explain(DoubleNear(2.1, 1e-10), 2.1 + 1.2e-10); + const std::string explanation = + Explain(DoubleNear(2.1, 1e-10), 2.1 + 1.2e-10); // Different C++ implementations may print floating-point numbers // slightly differently. EXPECT_TRUE(explanation == "which is 1.2e-10 from 2.1" || // GCC @@ -3186,7 +3723,6 @@ MATCHER_P(FieldIIs, inner_matcher, "") { } #if GTEST_HAS_RTTI - TEST(WhenDynamicCastToTest, SameType) { Derived derived; derived.i = 4; @@ -3244,7 +3780,7 @@ TEST(WhenDynamicCastToTest, AmbiguousCast) { TEST(WhenDynamicCastToTest, Describe) { Matcher<Base*> matcher = WhenDynamicCastTo<Derived*>(Pointee(_)); - const string prefix = + const std::string prefix = "when dynamic_cast to " + internal::GetTypeName<Derived*>() + ", "; EXPECT_EQ(prefix + "points to a value that is anything", Describe(matcher)); EXPECT_EQ(prefix + "does not point to a value that is anything", @@ -3278,7 +3814,6 @@ TEST(WhenDynamicCastToTest, BadReference) { Base& as_base_ref = derived; EXPECT_THAT(as_base_ref, Not(WhenDynamicCastTo<const OtherDerived&>(_))); } - #endif // GTEST_HAS_RTTI // Minimal const-propagating pointer. @@ -3337,9 +3872,9 @@ TEST(PointeeTest, CanDescribeSelf) { } TEST(PointeeTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { - const Matcher<const string*> m = Pointee(StartsWith("Hi")); + const Matcher<const std::string*> m = Pointee(StartsWith("Hi")); - EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const string*>(NULL))); + EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const std::string*>(NULL))); const Matcher<long*> m2 = Pointee(GreaterThan(1)); // NOLINT long n = 3; // NOLINT @@ -3400,11 +3935,14 @@ struct DerivedStruct : public AStruct { // Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is non-const. TEST(FieldTest, WorksForNonConstField) { Matcher<AStruct> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0)); + Matcher<AStruct> m_with_name = Field("x", &AStruct::x, Ge(0)); AStruct a; EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); a.x = -1; EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); } // Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is const. @@ -3412,9 +3950,13 @@ TEST(FieldTest, WorksForConstField) { AStruct a; Matcher<AStruct> m = Field(&AStruct::y, Ge(0.0)); + Matcher<AStruct> m_with_name = Field("y", &AStruct::y, Ge(0.0)); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); m = Field(&AStruct::y, Le(0.0)); + m_with_name = Field("y", &AStruct::y, Le(0.0)); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); } // Tests that Field(&Foo::field, ...) works when field is not copyable. @@ -3488,6 +4030,14 @@ TEST(FieldTest, CanDescribeSelf) { EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose given field isn't >= 0", DescribeNegation(m)); } +TEST(FieldTest, CanDescribeSelfWithFieldName) { + Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field("field_name", &AStruct::x, Ge(0)); + + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose field `field_name` is >= 0", Describe(m)); + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose field `field_name` isn't >= 0", + DescribeNegation(m)); +} + // Tests that Field() can explain the match result. TEST(FieldTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0)); @@ -3502,6 +4052,19 @@ TEST(FieldTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Explain(m, a)); } +TEST(FieldTest, CanExplainMatchResultWithFieldName) { + Matcher<const AStruct&> m = Field("field_name", &AStruct::x, Ge(0)); + + AStruct a; + a.x = 1; + EXPECT_EQ("whose field `field_name` is 1" + OfType("int"), Explain(m, a)); + + m = Field("field_name", &AStruct::x, GreaterThan(0)); + EXPECT_EQ("whose field `field_name` is 1" + OfType("int") + + ", which is 1 more than 0", + Explain(m, a)); +} + // Tests that Field() works when the argument is a pointer to const. TEST(FieldForPointerTest, WorksForPointerToConst) { Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0)); @@ -3559,6 +4122,14 @@ TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanDescribeSelf) { EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose given field isn't >= 0", DescribeNegation(m)); } +TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanDescribeSelfWithFieldName) { + Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field("field_name", &AStruct::x, Ge(0)); + + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose field `field_name` is >= 0", Describe(m)); + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose field `field_name` isn't >= 0", + DescribeNegation(m)); +} + // Tests that Field() can explain the result of matching a pointer. TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field(&AStruct::x, Ge(0)); @@ -3574,6 +4145,22 @@ TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { ", which is 1 more than 0", Explain(m, &a)); } +TEST(FieldForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResultWithFieldName) { + Matcher<const AStruct*> m = Field("field_name", &AStruct::x, Ge(0)); + + AStruct a; + a.x = 1; + EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const AStruct*>(NULL))); + EXPECT_EQ( + "which points to an object whose field `field_name` is 1" + OfType("int"), + Explain(m, &a)); + + m = Field("field_name", &AStruct::x, GreaterThan(0)); + EXPECT_EQ("which points to an object whose field `field_name` is 1" + + OfType("int") + ", which is 1 more than 0", + Explain(m, &a)); +} + // A user-defined class for testing Property(). class AClass { public: @@ -3585,15 +4172,20 @@ class AClass { void set_n(int new_n) { n_ = new_n; } // A getter that returns a reference to const. - const string& s() const { return s_; } + const std::string& s() const { return s_; } - void set_s(const string& new_s) { s_ = new_s; } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + const std::string& s_ref() const & { return s_; } +#endif + + void set_s(const std::string& new_s) { s_ = new_s; } // A getter that returns a reference to non-const. double& x() const { return x_; } + private: int n_; - string s_; + std::string s_; static double x_; }; @@ -3612,27 +4204,53 @@ class DerivedClass : public AClass { // returns a non-reference. TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForNonReferenceProperty) { Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0)); + Matcher<const AClass&> m_with_name = Property("n", &AClass::n, Ge(0)); AClass a; a.set_n(1); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); a.set_n(-1); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); } // Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property() // returns a reference to const. TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForReferenceToConstProperty) { Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::s, StartsWith("hi")); + Matcher<const AClass&> m_with_name = + Property("s", &AClass::s, StartsWith("hi")); + + AClass a; + a.set_s("hill"); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); + + a.set_s("hole"); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); +} + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +// Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property() is +// ref-qualified. +TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForRefQualifiedProperty) { + Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::s_ref, StartsWith("hi")); + Matcher<const AClass&> m_with_name = + Property("s", &AClass::s_ref, StartsWith("hi")); AClass a; a.set_s("hill"); EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); a.set_s("hole"); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); } +#endif // Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property() // returns a reference to non-const. @@ -3682,10 +4300,15 @@ TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForCompatibleMatcherType) { Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Matcher<signed char>(Ge(0))); + Matcher<const AClass&> m_with_name = + Property("n", &AClass::n, Matcher<signed char>(Ge(0))); + AClass a; EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); a.set_n(-1); EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a)); } // Tests that Property() can describe itself. @@ -3697,6 +4320,14 @@ TEST(PropertyTest, CanDescribeSelf) { DescribeNegation(m)); } +TEST(PropertyTest, CanDescribeSelfWithPropertyName) { + Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property("fancy_name", &AClass::n, Ge(0)); + + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose property `fancy_name` is >= 0", Describe(m)); + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose property `fancy_name` isn't >= 0", + DescribeNegation(m)); +} + // Tests that Property() can explain the match result. TEST(PropertyTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0)); @@ -3711,6 +4342,19 @@ TEST(PropertyTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Explain(m, a)); } +TEST(PropertyTest, CanExplainMatchResultWithPropertyName) { + Matcher<const AClass&> m = Property("fancy_name", &AClass::n, Ge(0)); + + AClass a; + a.set_n(1); + EXPECT_EQ("whose property `fancy_name` is 1" + OfType("int"), Explain(m, a)); + + m = Property("fancy_name", &AClass::n, GreaterThan(0)); + EXPECT_EQ("whose property `fancy_name` is 1" + OfType("int") + + ", which is 1 more than 0", + Explain(m, a)); +} + // Tests that Property() works when the argument is a pointer to const. TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, WorksForPointerToConst) { Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0)); @@ -3778,6 +4422,14 @@ TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanDescribeSelf) { DescribeNegation(m)); } +TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanDescribeSelfWithPropertyDescription) { + Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property("fancy_name", &AClass::n, Ge(0)); + + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose property `fancy_name` is >= 0", Describe(m)); + EXPECT_EQ("is an object whose property `fancy_name` isn't >= 0", + DescribeNegation(m)); +} + // Tests that Property() can explain the result of matching a pointer. TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property(&AClass::n, Ge(0)); @@ -3795,14 +4447,32 @@ TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResult) { Explain(m, &a)); } +TEST(PropertyForPointerTest, CanExplainMatchResultWithPropertyName) { + Matcher<const AClass*> m = Property("fancy_name", &AClass::n, Ge(0)); + + AClass a; + a.set_n(1); + EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, static_cast<const AClass*>(NULL))); + EXPECT_EQ("which points to an object whose property `fancy_name` is 1" + + OfType("int"), + Explain(m, &a)); + + m = Property("fancy_name", &AClass::n, GreaterThan(0)); + EXPECT_EQ("which points to an object whose property `fancy_name` is 1" + + OfType("int") + ", which is 1 more than 0", + Explain(m, &a)); +} + // Tests ResultOf. // Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a // function pointer. -string IntToStringFunction(int input) { return input == 1 ? "foo" : "bar"; } +std::string IntToStringFunction(int input) { + return input == 1 ? "foo" : "bar"; +} TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForFunctionPointers) { - Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(&IntToStringFunction, Eq(string("foo"))); + Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(&IntToStringFunction, Eq(std::string("foo"))); EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(1)); EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(2)); @@ -3868,12 +4538,12 @@ TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForReferenceToNonConstResults) { // Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f(x) // returns a reference to const. -const string& StringFunction(const string& input) { return input; } +const std::string& StringFunction(const std::string& input) { return input; } TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForReferenceToConstResults) { - string s = "foo"; - string s2 = s; - Matcher<const string&> matcher = ResultOf(&StringFunction, Ref(s)); + std::string s = "foo"; + std::string s2 = s; + Matcher<const std::string&> matcher = ResultOf(&StringFunction, Ref(s)); EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(s)); EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(s2)); @@ -3893,8 +4563,9 @@ TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForCompatibleMatcherTypes) { // a NULL function pointer. TEST(ResultOfDeathTest, DiesOnNullFunctionPointers) { EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED( - ResultOf(static_cast<string(*)(int dummy)>(NULL), Eq(string("foo"))), - "NULL function pointer is passed into ResultOf\\(\\)\\."); + ResultOf(static_cast<std::string (*)(int dummy)>(NULL), + Eq(std::string("foo"))), + "NULL function pointer is passed into ResultOf\\(\\)\\."); } // Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a @@ -3907,21 +4578,21 @@ TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForFunctionReferences) { // Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a // function object. -struct Functor : public ::std::unary_function<int, string> { +struct Functor : public ::std::unary_function<int, std::string> { result_type operator()(argument_type input) const { return IntToStringFunction(input); } }; TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForFunctors) { - Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(Functor(), Eq(string("foo"))); + Matcher<int> matcher = ResultOf(Functor(), Eq(std::string("foo"))); EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(1)); EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(2)); } // Tests that ResultOf(f, ...) compiles and works as expected when f is a -// functor with more then one operator() defined. ResultOf() must work +// functor with more than one operator() defined. ResultOf() must work // for each defined operator(). struct PolymorphicFunctor { typedef int result_type; @@ -4080,11 +4751,11 @@ TEST(IsEmptyTest, ImplementsIsEmpty) { } TEST(IsEmptyTest, WorksWithString) { - string text; + std::string text; EXPECT_THAT(text, IsEmpty()); text = "foo"; EXPECT_THAT(text, Not(IsEmpty())); - text = string("\0", 1); + text = std::string("\0", 1); EXPECT_THAT(text, Not(IsEmpty())); } @@ -4102,6 +4773,44 @@ TEST(IsEmptyTest, ExplainsResult) { EXPECT_EQ("whose size is 1", Explain(m, container)); } +TEST(IsTrueTest, IsTrueIsFalse) { + EXPECT_THAT(true, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(false, IsFalse()); + EXPECT_THAT(true, Not(IsFalse())); + EXPECT_THAT(false, Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(0, Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(0, IsFalse()); + EXPECT_THAT(NULL, Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(NULL, IsFalse()); + EXPECT_THAT(-1, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(-1, Not(IsFalse())); + EXPECT_THAT(1, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(1, Not(IsFalse())); + EXPECT_THAT(2, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(2, Not(IsFalse())); + int a = 42; + EXPECT_THAT(a, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(IsFalse())); + EXPECT_THAT(&a, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(&a, Not(IsFalse())); + EXPECT_THAT(false, Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(true, Not(IsFalse())); +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + EXPECT_THAT(std::true_type(), IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(std::true_type(), Not(IsFalse())); + EXPECT_THAT(std::false_type(), IsFalse()); + EXPECT_THAT(std::false_type(), Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(nullptr, Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(nullptr, IsFalse()); + std::unique_ptr<int> null_unique; + std::unique_ptr<int> nonnull_unique(new int(0)); + EXPECT_THAT(null_unique, Not(IsTrue())); + EXPECT_THAT(null_unique, IsFalse()); + EXPECT_THAT(nonnull_unique, IsTrue()); + EXPECT_THAT(nonnull_unique, Not(IsFalse())); +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +} + TEST(SizeIsTest, ImplementsSizeIs) { vector<int> container; EXPECT_THAT(container, SizeIs(0)); @@ -4115,7 +4824,7 @@ TEST(SizeIsTest, ImplementsSizeIs) { } TEST(SizeIsTest, WorksWithMap) { - map<string, int> container; + map<std::string, int> container; EXPECT_THAT(container, SizeIs(0)); EXPECT_THAT(container, Not(SizeIs(1))); container.insert(make_pair("foo", 1)); @@ -4235,7 +4944,7 @@ TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, DuplicateDifference) { #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST // Tests that mutliple missing values are reported. -// Using just vector here, so order is predicatble. +// Using just vector here, so order is predictable. TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesMissing) { static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8}; static const int test_vals[] = {2, 1, 5}; @@ -4248,7 +4957,7 @@ TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesMissing) { } // Tests that added values are reported. -// Using just vector here, so order is predicatble. +// Using just vector here, so order is predictable. TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesAdded) { static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8}; static const int test_vals[] = {1, 2, 92, 3, 5, 8, 46}; @@ -4380,13 +5089,13 @@ TEST(WhenSortedByTest, WorksForNonEmptyContainer) { } TEST(WhenSortedByTest, WorksForNonVectorContainer) { - list<string> words; + list<std::string> words; words.push_back("say"); words.push_back("hello"); words.push_back("world"); - EXPECT_THAT(words, WhenSortedBy(less<string>(), + EXPECT_THAT(words, WhenSortedBy(less<std::string>(), ElementsAre("hello", "say", "world"))); - EXPECT_THAT(words, Not(WhenSortedBy(less<string>(), + EXPECT_THAT(words, Not(WhenSortedBy(less<std::string>(), ElementsAre("say", "hello", "world")))); } @@ -4429,7 +5138,7 @@ TEST(WhenSortedTest, WorksForEmptyContainer) { } TEST(WhenSortedTest, WorksForNonEmptyContainer) { - list<string> words; + list<std::string> words; words.push_back("3"); words.push_back("1"); words.push_back("2"); @@ -4439,14 +5148,16 @@ TEST(WhenSortedTest, WorksForNonEmptyContainer) { } TEST(WhenSortedTest, WorksForMapTypes) { - map<string, int> word_counts; - word_counts["and"] = 1; - word_counts["the"] = 1; - word_counts["buffalo"] = 2; - EXPECT_THAT(word_counts, WhenSorted(ElementsAre( - Pair("and", 1), Pair("buffalo", 2), Pair("the", 1)))); - EXPECT_THAT(word_counts, Not(WhenSorted(ElementsAre( - Pair("and", 1), Pair("the", 1), Pair("buffalo", 2))))); + map<std::string, int> word_counts; + word_counts["and"] = 1; + word_counts["the"] = 1; + word_counts["buffalo"] = 2; + EXPECT_THAT(word_counts, + WhenSorted(ElementsAre(Pair("and", 1), Pair("buffalo", 2), + Pair("the", 1)))); + EXPECT_THAT(word_counts, + Not(WhenSorted(ElementsAre(Pair("and", 1), Pair("the", 1), + Pair("buffalo", 2))))); } TEST(WhenSortedTest, WorksForMultiMapTypes) { @@ -4654,6 +5365,250 @@ TEST(WhenSortedTest, WorksForVectorConstRefMatcherOnStreamlike) { EXPECT_THAT(s, Not(WhenSorted(ElementsAre(2, 1, 4, 5, 3)))); } +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksForNativeArray) { + const int subset[] = {1, 4}; + const int superset[] = {1, 2, 4}; + const int disjoint[] = {1, 0, 3}; + EXPECT_THAT(subset, IsSupersetOf(subset)); + EXPECT_THAT(subset, Not(IsSupersetOf(superset))); + EXPECT_THAT(superset, IsSupersetOf(subset)); + EXPECT_THAT(subset, Not(IsSupersetOf(disjoint))); + EXPECT_THAT(disjoint, Not(IsSupersetOf(subset))); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksWithDuplicates) { + const int not_enough[] = {1, 2}; + const int enough[] = {1, 1, 2}; + const int expected[] = {1, 1}; + EXPECT_THAT(not_enough, Not(IsSupersetOf(expected))); + EXPECT_THAT(enough, IsSupersetOf(expected)); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksForEmpty) { + vector<int> numbers; + vector<int> expected; + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSupersetOf(expected)); + expected.push_back(1); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSupersetOf(expected))); + expected.clear(); + numbers.push_back(1); + numbers.push_back(2); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSupersetOf(expected)); + expected.push_back(1); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSupersetOf(expected)); + expected.push_back(2); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSupersetOf(expected)); + expected.push_back(3); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSupersetOf(expected))); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksForStreamlike) { + const int a[5] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; + Streamlike<int> s(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)); + + vector<int> expected; + expected.push_back(1); + expected.push_back(2); + expected.push_back(5); + EXPECT_THAT(s, IsSupersetOf(expected)); + + expected.push_back(0); + EXPECT_THAT(s, Not(IsSupersetOf(expected))); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, TakesStlContainer) { + const int actual[] = {3, 1, 2}; + + ::std::list<int> expected; + expected.push_back(1); + expected.push_back(3); + EXPECT_THAT(actual, IsSupersetOf(expected)); + + expected.push_back(4); + EXPECT_THAT(actual, Not(IsSupersetOf(expected))); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, Describe) { + typedef std::vector<int> IntVec; + IntVec expected; + expected.push_back(111); + expected.push_back(222); + expected.push_back(333); + EXPECT_THAT( + Describe<IntVec>(IsSupersetOf(expected)), + Eq("a surjection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n" + " - an element is equal to 111\n" + " - an element is equal to 222\n" + " - an element is equal to 333")); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, DescribeNegation) { + typedef std::vector<int> IntVec; + IntVec expected; + expected.push_back(111); + expected.push_back(222); + expected.push_back(333); + EXPECT_THAT( + DescribeNegation<IntVec>(IsSupersetOf(expected)), + Eq("no surjection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n" + " - an element is equal to 111\n" + " - an element is equal to 222\n" + " - an element is equal to 333")); +} + +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, MatchAndExplain) { + std::vector<int> v; + v.push_back(2); + v.push_back(3); + std::vector<int> expected; + expected.push_back(1); + expected.push_back(2); + StringMatchResultListener listener; + ASSERT_FALSE(ExplainMatchResult(IsSupersetOf(expected), v, &listener)) + << listener.str(); + EXPECT_THAT(listener.str(), + Eq("where the following matchers don't match any elements:\n" + "matcher #0: is equal to 1")); + + v.push_back(1); + listener.Clear(); + ASSERT_TRUE(ExplainMatchResult(IsSupersetOf(expected), v, &listener)) + << listener.str(); + EXPECT_THAT(listener.str(), Eq("where:\n" + " - element #0 is matched by matcher #1,\n" + " - element #2 is matched by matcher #0")); +} + +#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ +TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) { + const int numbers[] = {1, 3, 6, 2, 4, 5}; + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSupersetOf({1, 2})); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSupersetOf({3, 0}))); +} +#endif + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksForNativeArray) { + const int subset[] = {1, 4}; + const int superset[] = {1, 2, 4}; + const int disjoint[] = {1, 0, 3}; + EXPECT_THAT(subset, IsSubsetOf(subset)); + EXPECT_THAT(subset, IsSubsetOf(superset)); + EXPECT_THAT(superset, Not(IsSubsetOf(subset))); + EXPECT_THAT(subset, Not(IsSubsetOf(disjoint))); + EXPECT_THAT(disjoint, Not(IsSubsetOf(subset))); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksWithDuplicates) { + const int not_enough[] = {1, 2}; + const int enough[] = {1, 1, 2}; + const int actual[] = {1, 1}; + EXPECT_THAT(actual, Not(IsSubsetOf(not_enough))); + EXPECT_THAT(actual, IsSubsetOf(enough)); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksForEmpty) { + vector<int> numbers; + vector<int> expected; + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSubsetOf(expected)); + expected.push_back(1); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSubsetOf(expected)); + expected.clear(); + numbers.push_back(1); + numbers.push_back(2); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSubsetOf(expected))); + expected.push_back(1); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSubsetOf(expected))); + expected.push_back(2); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSubsetOf(expected)); + expected.push_back(3); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSubsetOf(expected)); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksForStreamlike) { + const int a[5] = {1, 2}; + Streamlike<int> s(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)); + + vector<int> expected; + expected.push_back(1); + EXPECT_THAT(s, Not(IsSubsetOf(expected))); + expected.push_back(2); + expected.push_back(5); + EXPECT_THAT(s, IsSubsetOf(expected)); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, TakesStlContainer) { + const int actual[] = {3, 1, 2}; + + ::std::list<int> expected; + expected.push_back(1); + expected.push_back(3); + EXPECT_THAT(actual, Not(IsSubsetOf(expected))); + + expected.push_back(2); + expected.push_back(4); + EXPECT_THAT(actual, IsSubsetOf(expected)); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, Describe) { + typedef std::vector<int> IntVec; + IntVec expected; + expected.push_back(111); + expected.push_back(222); + expected.push_back(333); + + EXPECT_THAT( + Describe<IntVec>(IsSubsetOf(expected)), + Eq("an injection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n" + " - an element is equal to 111\n" + " - an element is equal to 222\n" + " - an element is equal to 333")); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, DescribeNegation) { + typedef std::vector<int> IntVec; + IntVec expected; + expected.push_back(111); + expected.push_back(222); + expected.push_back(333); + EXPECT_THAT( + DescribeNegation<IntVec>(IsSubsetOf(expected)), + Eq("no injection from elements to requirements exists such that:\n" + " - an element is equal to 111\n" + " - an element is equal to 222\n" + " - an element is equal to 333")); +} + +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, MatchAndExplain) { + std::vector<int> v; + v.push_back(2); + v.push_back(3); + std::vector<int> expected; + expected.push_back(1); + expected.push_back(2); + StringMatchResultListener listener; + ASSERT_FALSE(ExplainMatchResult(IsSubsetOf(expected), v, &listener)) + << listener.str(); + EXPECT_THAT(listener.str(), + Eq("where the following elements don't match any matchers:\n" + "element #1: 3")); + + expected.push_back(3); + listener.Clear(); + ASSERT_TRUE(ExplainMatchResult(IsSubsetOf(expected), v, &listener)) + << listener.str(); + EXPECT_THAT(listener.str(), Eq("where:\n" + " - element #0 is matched by matcher #1,\n" + " - element #1 is matched by matcher #2")); +} + +#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ +TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) { + const int numbers[] = {1, 2, 3}; + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSubsetOf({1, 2, 3, 4})); + EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSubsetOf({1, 2}))); +} +#endif + // Tests using ElementsAre() and ElementsAreArray() with stream-like // "containers". @@ -4763,7 +5718,7 @@ TEST(UnorderedElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerList) { } TEST(UnorderedElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerListOfCStrings) { - const string a[5] = {"a", "b", "c", "d", "e"}; + const std::string a[5] = {"a", "b", "c", "d", "e"}; EXPECT_THAT(a, UnorderedElementsAreArray({"a", "b", "c", "d", "e"})); EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(UnorderedElementsAreArray({"a", "b", "c", "d", "ef"}))); } @@ -4937,7 +5892,7 @@ TEST_F(UnorderedElementsAreTest, FailMessageUnmatchedMatcherAndElement) { } // Test helper for formatting element, matcher index pairs in expectations. -static string EMString(int element, int matcher) { +static std::string EMString(int element, int matcher) { stringstream ss; ss << "(element #" << element << ", matcher #" << matcher << ")"; return ss.str(); @@ -4946,7 +5901,7 @@ static string EMString(int element, int matcher) { TEST_F(UnorderedElementsAreTest, FailMessageImperfectMatchOnly) { // A situation where all elements and matchers have a match // associated with them, but the max matching is not perfect. - std::vector<string> v; + std::vector<std::string> v; v.push_back("a"); v.push_back("b"); v.push_back("c"); @@ -4955,7 +5910,7 @@ TEST_F(UnorderedElementsAreTest, FailMessageImperfectMatchOnly) { UnorderedElementsAre("a", "a", AnyOf("b", "c")), v, &listener)) << listener.str(); - string prefix = + std::string prefix = "where no permutation of the elements can satisfy all matchers, " "and the closest match is 2 of 3 matchers with the " "pairings:\n"; @@ -5238,28 +6193,6 @@ TEST(IsReadableTypeNameTest, ReturnsFalseForLongFunctionTypeNames) { EXPECT_FALSE(IsReadableTypeName("void (&)(int, bool, char, float)")); } -// Tests JoinAsTuple(). - -TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsEmptyTuple) { - EXPECT_EQ("", JoinAsTuple(Strings())); -} - -TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsOneTuple) { - const char* fields[] = {"1"}; - EXPECT_EQ("1", JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 1))); -} - -TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsTwoTuple) { - const char* fields[] = {"1", "a"}; - EXPECT_EQ("(1, a)", JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 2))); -} - -TEST(JoinAsTupleTest, JoinsTenTuple) { - const char* fields[] = {"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10"}; - EXPECT_EQ("(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)", - JoinAsTuple(Strings(fields, fields + 10))); -} - // Tests FormatMatcherDescription(). TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest, WorksForEmptyDescription) { @@ -5366,13 +6299,13 @@ TEST(EachTest, MatchesVectorWhenAllElementsMatch) { EXPECT_THAT(some_vector, Not(Each(3))); EXPECT_THAT(some_vector, Each(Lt(3.5))); - vector<string> another_vector; + vector<std::string> another_vector; another_vector.push_back("fee"); - EXPECT_THAT(another_vector, Each(string("fee"))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_vector, Each(std::string("fee"))); another_vector.push_back("fie"); another_vector.push_back("foe"); another_vector.push_back("fum"); - EXPECT_THAT(another_vector, Not(Each(string("fee")))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_vector, Not(Each(std::string("fee")))); } TEST(EachTest, MatchesMapWhenAllElementsMatch) { @@ -5381,15 +6314,15 @@ TEST(EachTest, MatchesMapWhenAllElementsMatch) { my_map[bar] = 2; EXPECT_THAT(my_map, Each(make_pair(bar, 2))); - map<string, int> another_map; - EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Each(make_pair(string("fee"), 1))); + map<std::string, int> another_map; + EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Each(make_pair(std::string("fee"), 1))); another_map["fee"] = 1; - EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Each(make_pair(string("fee"), 1))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Each(make_pair(std::string("fee"), 1))); another_map["fie"] = 2; another_map["foe"] = 3; another_map["fum"] = 4; - EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Not(Each(make_pair(string("fee"), 1)))); - EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Not(Each(make_pair(string("fum"), 1)))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Not(Each(make_pair(std::string("fee"), 1)))); + EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Not(Each(make_pair(std::string("fum"), 1)))); EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Each(Pair(_, Gt(0)))); } @@ -5483,6 +6416,16 @@ TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksForRhsNativeArray) { EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Not(Pointwise(Lt(), rhs))); } +// Test is effective only with sanitizers. +TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksForVectorOfBool) { + vector<bool> rhs(3, false); + rhs[1] = true; + vector<bool> lhs = rhs; + EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Pointwise(Eq(), rhs)); + rhs[0] = true; + EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Not(Pointwise(Eq(), rhs))); +} + #if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) { @@ -5648,5 +6591,198 @@ TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, AllowsMonomorphicInnerMatcher) { EXPECT_THAT(lhs, UnorderedPointwise(m2, rhs)); } +// Sample optional type implementation with minimal requirements for use with +// Optional matcher. +class SampleOptionalInt { + public: + typedef int value_type; + explicit SampleOptionalInt(int value) : value_(value), has_value_(true) {} + SampleOptionalInt() : value_(0), has_value_(false) {} + operator bool() const { + return has_value_; + } + const int& operator*() const { + return value_; + } + private: + int value_; + bool has_value_; +}; + +TEST(OptionalTest, DescribesSelf) { + const Matcher<SampleOptionalInt> m = Optional(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_EQ("value is equal to 1", Describe(m)); +} + +TEST(OptionalTest, ExplainsSelf) { + const Matcher<SampleOptionalInt> m = Optional(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_EQ("whose value 1 matches", Explain(m, SampleOptionalInt(1))); + EXPECT_EQ("whose value 2 doesn't match", Explain(m, SampleOptionalInt(2))); +} + +TEST(OptionalTest, MatchesNonEmptyOptional) { + const Matcher<SampleOptionalInt> m1 = Optional(1); + const Matcher<SampleOptionalInt> m2 = Optional(Eq(2)); + const Matcher<SampleOptionalInt> m3 = Optional(Lt(3)); + SampleOptionalInt opt(1); + EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(opt)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches(opt)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(opt)); +} + +TEST(OptionalTest, DoesNotMatchNullopt) { + const Matcher<SampleOptionalInt> m = Optional(1); + SampleOptionalInt empty; + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(empty)); +} + +class SampleVariantIntString { + public: + SampleVariantIntString(int i) : i_(i), has_int_(true) {} + SampleVariantIntString(const std::string& s) : s_(s), has_int_(false) {} + + template <typename T> + friend bool holds_alternative(const SampleVariantIntString& value) { + return value.has_int_ == internal::IsSame<T, int>::value; + } + + template <typename T> + friend const T& get(const SampleVariantIntString& value) { + return value.get_impl(static_cast<T*>(NULL)); + } + + private: + const int& get_impl(int*) const { return i_; } + const std::string& get_impl(std::string*) const { return s_; } + + int i_; + std::string s_; + bool has_int_; +}; + +TEST(VariantTest, DescribesSelf) { + const Matcher<SampleVariantIntString> m = VariantWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_THAT(Describe(m), ContainsRegex("is a variant<> with value of type " + "'.*' and the value is equal to 1")); +} + +TEST(VariantTest, ExplainsSelf) { + const Matcher<SampleVariantIntString> m = VariantWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleVariantIntString(1)), + ContainsRegex("whose value 1")); + EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleVariantIntString("A")), + HasSubstr("whose value is not of type '")); + EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleVariantIntString(2)), + "whose value 2 doesn't match"); +} + +TEST(VariantTest, FullMatch) { + Matcher<SampleVariantIntString> m = VariantWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(SampleVariantIntString(1))); + + m = VariantWith<std::string>(Eq("1")); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(SampleVariantIntString("1"))); +} + +TEST(VariantTest, TypeDoesNotMatch) { + Matcher<SampleVariantIntString> m = VariantWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(SampleVariantIntString("1"))); + + m = VariantWith<std::string>(Eq("1")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(SampleVariantIntString(1))); +} + +TEST(VariantTest, InnerDoesNotMatch) { + Matcher<SampleVariantIntString> m = VariantWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(SampleVariantIntString(2))); + + m = VariantWith<std::string>(Eq("1")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(SampleVariantIntString("2"))); +} + +class SampleAnyType { + public: + explicit SampleAnyType(int i) : index_(0), i_(i) {} + explicit SampleAnyType(const std::string& s) : index_(1), s_(s) {} + + template <typename T> + friend const T* any_cast(const SampleAnyType* any) { + return any->get_impl(static_cast<T*>(NULL)); + } + + private: + int index_; + int i_; + std::string s_; + + const int* get_impl(int*) const { return index_ == 0 ? &i_ : NULL; } + const std::string* get_impl(std::string*) const { + return index_ == 1 ? &s_ : NULL; + } +}; + +TEST(AnyWithTest, FullMatch) { + Matcher<SampleAnyType> m = AnyWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(SampleAnyType(1))); +} + +TEST(AnyWithTest, TestBadCastType) { + Matcher<SampleAnyType> m = AnyWith<std::string>(Eq("fail")); + EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(SampleAnyType(1))); +} + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +TEST(AnyWithTest, TestUseInContainers) { + std::vector<SampleAnyType> a; + a.emplace_back(1); + a.emplace_back(2); + a.emplace_back(3); + EXPECT_THAT( + a, ElementsAreArray({AnyWith<int>(1), AnyWith<int>(2), AnyWith<int>(3)})); + + std::vector<SampleAnyType> b; + b.emplace_back("hello"); + b.emplace_back("merhaba"); + b.emplace_back("salut"); + EXPECT_THAT(b, ElementsAreArray({AnyWith<std::string>("hello"), + AnyWith<std::string>("merhaba"), + AnyWith<std::string>("salut")})); +} +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +TEST(AnyWithTest, TestCompare) { + EXPECT_THAT(SampleAnyType(1), AnyWith<int>(Gt(0))); +} + +TEST(AnyWithTest, DescribesSelf) { + const Matcher<const SampleAnyType&> m = AnyWith<int>(Eq(1)); + EXPECT_THAT(Describe(m), ContainsRegex("is an 'any' type with value of type " + "'.*' and the value is equal to 1")); +} + +TEST(AnyWithTest, ExplainsSelf) { + const Matcher<const SampleAnyType&> m = AnyWith<int>(Eq(1)); + + EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleAnyType(1)), ContainsRegex("whose value 1")); + EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleAnyType("A")), + HasSubstr("whose value is not of type '")); + EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleAnyType(2)), "whose value 2 doesn't match"); +} + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + +TEST(PointeeTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) { + std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Pointee(Eq(3))); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Pointee(Eq(2)))); +} + +TEST(NotTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) { + std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3)); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Pointee(Eq(3))); + EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Pointee(Eq(2)))); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + } // namespace gmock_matchers_test } // namespace testing diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc index 77e15bd..b13518a 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc @@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; } void VoidUnary(int /* n */) { g_done = true; } -bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } +bool ByConstRef(const std::string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } const double g_double = 0; bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; } -string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; } // NOLINT +std::string ByNonConstRef(std::string& s) { return s += "+"; } // NOLINT struct UnaryFunctor { int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; } @@ -119,9 +119,9 @@ int SumOfFirst2(int a, int b, Unused, Unused) { return a + b; } void VoidFunctionWithFourArguments(char, int, float, double) { g_done = true; } -string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4; +std::string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4; } int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; } @@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ struct SumOf5Functor { } }; -string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; +std::string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; } int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { @@ -147,34 +147,34 @@ struct SumOf6Functor { } }; -string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; +std::string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; } -string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; +std::string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; } -string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; +std::string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; } -string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; +std::string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; } -string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, - const char* s10) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; +std::string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, + const char* s10) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; } class Foo { @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ class Foo { short Unary(long x) { return static_cast<short>(value_ + x); } // NOLINT - string Binary(const string& str, char c) const { return str + c; } + std::string Binary(const std::string& str, char c) const { return str + c; } int Ternary(int x, bool y, char z) { return value_ + x + y*z; } @@ -201,29 +201,29 @@ class Foo { return a + b + c + d + e + f; } - string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; + std::string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; } - string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; + std::string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; } - string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; + std::string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; } - string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, - const char* s10) { - return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; + std::string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, + const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, + const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, + const char* s10) { + return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; } private: @@ -280,9 +280,9 @@ inline const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; } // Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument function. TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes7Arguments) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = - Invoke(Concat7); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*)> + a = Invoke(Concat7); EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -291,9 +291,9 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes7Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument function. TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes8Arguments) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = - Invoke(Concat8); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> + a = Invoke(Concat8); EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -302,9 +302,10 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes8Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument function. TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes9Arguments) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*)> a = Invoke(Concat9); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*)> + a = Invoke(Concat9); EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -313,9 +314,10 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes9Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument function. TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes10Arguments) { - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*)> a = Invoke(Concat10); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*)> + a = Invoke(Concat10); EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -325,11 +327,10 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes10Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with functions with parameters declared as Unused. TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithUnusedParameters) { - Action<int(int, int, double, const string&)> a1 = - Invoke(SumOfFirst2); - string s("hi"); - EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform( - tuple<int, int, double, const string&>(10, 2, 5.6, s))); + Action<int(int, int, double, const std::string&)> a1 = Invoke(SumOfFirst2); + tuple<int, int, double, std::string> dummy = + make_tuple(10, 2, 5.6, std::string("hi")); + EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(dummy)); Action<int(int, int, bool, int*)> a2 = Invoke(SumOfFirst2); @@ -339,8 +340,7 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithUnusedParameters) { // Tests using Invoke() with methods with parameters declared as Unused. TEST(InvokeTest, MethodWithUnusedParameters) { Foo foo; - Action<int(string, bool, int, int)> a1 = - Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2); + Action<int(std::string, bool, int, int)> a1 = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2); EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("hi"), true, 10, 2))); Action<int(char, double, int, int)> a2 = @@ -379,10 +379,10 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Unary) { // Tests using Invoke() with a binary method. TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Binary) { Foo foo; - Action<string(const string&, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Binary); - string s("Hell"); - EXPECT_EQ("Hello", a.Perform( - tuple<const string&, char>(s, 'o'))); + Action<std::string(const std::string&, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Binary); + std::string s("Hell"); + tuple<std::string, char> dummy = make_tuple(s, 'o'); + EXPECT_EQ("Hello", a.Perform(dummy)); } // Tests using Invoke() with a ternary method. @@ -417,9 +417,9 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes6Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument method. TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes7Arguments) { Foo foo; - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = - Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat7); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*)> + a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat7); EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -429,9 +429,9 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes7Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument method. TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes8Arguments) { Foo foo; - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a = - Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat8); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> + a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat8); EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -441,9 +441,10 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes8Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument method. TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes9Arguments) { Foo foo; - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat9); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*)> + a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat9); EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -453,9 +454,10 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes9Arguments) { // Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument method. TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes10Arguments) { Foo foo; - Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat10); + Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*)> + a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat10); EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"), @@ -495,8 +497,8 @@ TEST(ReturnArgActionTest, WorksForMultiArgBoolArg0) { } TEST(ReturnArgActionTest, WorksForMultiArgStringArg2) { - const Action<string(int, int, string, int)> a = ReturnArg<2>(); - EXPECT_EQ("seven", a.Perform(make_tuple(5, 6, string("seven"), 8))); + const Action<std::string(int, int, std::string, int)> a = ReturnArg<2>(); + EXPECT_EQ("seven", a.Perform(make_tuple(5, 6, std::string("seven"), 8))); } TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForSameType) { diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc index d0adcbb..c419494 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc @@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ #include "gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h" #include <string> +#include <utility> #include "gmock/gmock.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" +#include "gtest/gtest.h" // This must not be defined inside the ::testing namespace, or it will // clash with ::testing::Mock. @@ -51,7 +52,6 @@ class Mock { namespace testing { namespace gmock_nice_strict_test { -using testing::internal::string; using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); using testing::HasSubstr; using testing::NaggyMock; @@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ using testing::internal::CaptureStdout; using testing::internal::GetCapturedStdout; #endif +// Class without default constructor. +class NotDefaultConstructible { + public: + explicit NotDefaultConstructible(int) {} +}; + // Defines some mock classes needed by the tests. class Foo { @@ -80,6 +86,7 @@ class MockFoo : public Foo { MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void()); MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, int(bool flag)); + MOCK_METHOD0(ReturnNonDefaultConstructible, NotDefaultConstructible()); private: GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockFoo); @@ -87,32 +94,50 @@ class MockFoo : public Foo { class MockBar { public: - explicit MockBar(const string& s) : str_(s) {} + explicit MockBar(const std::string& s) : str_(s) {} - MockBar(char a1, char a2, string a3, string a4, int a5, int a6, - const string& a7, const string& a8, bool a9, bool a10) { - str_ = string() + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + static_cast<char>(a5) + + MockBar(char a1, char a2, std::string a3, std::string a4, int a5, int a6, + const std::string& a7, const std::string& a8, bool a9, bool a10) { + str_ = std::string() + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + static_cast<char>(a5) + static_cast<char>(a6) + a7 + a8 + (a9 ? 'T' : 'F') + (a10 ? 'T' : 'F'); } virtual ~MockBar() {} - const string& str() const { return str_; } + const std::string& str() const { return str_; } MOCK_METHOD0(This, int()); - MOCK_METHOD2(That, string(int, bool)); + MOCK_METHOD2(That, std::string(int, bool)); private: - string str_; + std::string str_; GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockBar); }; +#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + +class MockBaz { + public: + class MoveOnly { + MoveOnly() = default; + + MoveOnly(const MoveOnly&) = delete; + operator=(const MoveOnly&) = delete; + + MoveOnly(MoveOnly&&) = default; + operator=(MoveOnly&&) = default; + }; + + MockBaz(MoveOnly) {} +} +#endif // GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + #if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION // Tests that a raw mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls. TEST(RawMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCall) { - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; MockFoo raw_foo; @@ -129,7 +154,7 @@ TEST(RawMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCall) { // Tests that a raw mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls // that delete the mock object. TEST(RawMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; MockFoo* const raw_foo = new MockFoo; @@ -150,7 +175,7 @@ TEST(RawMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { TEST(RawMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) { MockFoo raw_foo; - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info"; CaptureStdout(); raw_foo.DoThis(); @@ -188,7 +213,7 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { TEST(NiceMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) { NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info"; CaptureStdout(); nice_foo.DoThis(); @@ -208,6 +233,23 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) { nice_foo.DoThis(); } +// Tests that an unexpected call on a nice mock which returns a +// not-default-constructible type throws an exception and the exception contains +// the method's name. +TEST(NiceMockTest, ThrowsExceptionForUnknownReturnTypes) { + NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; +#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS + try { + nice_foo.ReturnNonDefaultConstructible(); + FAIL(); + } catch (const std::runtime_error& ex) { + EXPECT_THAT(ex.what(), HasSubstr("ReturnNonDefaultConstructible")); + } +#else + EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED({ nice_foo.ReturnNonDefaultConstructible(); }, ""); +#endif +} + // Tests that an unexpected call on a nice mock fails. TEST(NiceMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) { NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; @@ -237,6 +279,21 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) { nice_bar.That(5, true); } +TEST(NiceMockTest, AllowLeak) { + NiceMock<MockFoo>* leaked = new NiceMock<MockFoo>; + Mock::AllowLeak(leaked); + EXPECT_CALL(*leaked, DoThis()); + leaked->DoThis(); +} + +#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + +TEST(NiceMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) { + NiceMock<MockBaz> nice_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly()); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + #if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE // Tests that NiceMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined // class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an @@ -257,7 +314,7 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) { // Tests that a naggy mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls. TEST(NaggyMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCall) { - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo; @@ -274,7 +331,7 @@ TEST(NaggyMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCall) { // Tests that a naggy mock generates a warning for an uninteresting call // that deletes the mock object. TEST(NaggyMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { - const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + const std::string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; NaggyMock<MockFoo>* const naggy_foo = new NaggyMock<MockFoo>; @@ -330,6 +387,21 @@ TEST(NaggyMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) { naggy_bar.That(5, true); } +TEST(NaggyMockTest, AllowLeak) { + NaggyMock<MockFoo>* leaked = new NaggyMock<MockFoo>; + Mock::AllowLeak(leaked); + EXPECT_CALL(*leaked, DoThis()); + leaked->DoThis(); +} + +#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + +TEST(NaggyMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) { + NaggyMock<MockBaz> naggy_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly()); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + #if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE // Tests that NaggyMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined // class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an @@ -404,6 +476,21 @@ TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) { "Uninteresting mock function call"); } +TEST(StrictMockTest, AllowLeak) { + StrictMock<MockFoo>* leaked = new StrictMock<MockFoo>; + Mock::AllowLeak(leaked); + EXPECT_CALL(*leaked, DoThis()); + leaked->DoThis(); +} + +#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + +TEST(StrictMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) { + StrictMock<MockBaz> strict_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly()); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ + #if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE // Tests that StrictMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined // class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc index 59ea87c..715aac8 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc @@ -89,15 +89,18 @@ using testing::Mock; using testing::NaggyMock; using testing::Ne; using testing::Return; +using testing::SaveArg; using testing::Sequence; using testing::SetArgPointee; using testing::internal::ExpectationTester; using testing::internal::FormatFileLocation; +using testing::internal::kAllow; using testing::internal::kErrorVerbosity; +using testing::internal::kFail; using testing::internal::kInfoVerbosity; +using testing::internal::kWarn; using testing::internal::kWarningVerbosity; using testing::internal::linked_ptr; -using testing::internal::string; #if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION using testing::HasSubstr; @@ -692,6 +695,60 @@ TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WarnsOnTooFewActions) { b.DoB(); } +TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, WarningIsErrorWithFlag) { + int original_behavior = testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior); + + testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = kAllow; + CaptureStdout(); + { + MockA a; + a.DoA(0); + } + std::string output = GetCapturedStdout(); + EXPECT_TRUE(output.empty()) << output; + + testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = kWarn; + CaptureStdout(); + { + MockA a; + a.DoA(0); + } + std::string warning_output = GetCapturedStdout(); + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "GMOCK WARNING", warning_output); + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "Uninteresting mock function call", + warning_output); + + testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = kFail; + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ + MockA a; + a.DoA(0); + }, "Uninteresting mock function call"); + + // Out of bounds values are converted to kWarn + testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = -1; + CaptureStdout(); + { + MockA a; + a.DoA(0); + } + warning_output = GetCapturedStdout(); + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "GMOCK WARNING", warning_output); + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "Uninteresting mock function call", + warning_output); + testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = 3; + CaptureStdout(); + { + MockA a; + a.DoA(0); + } + warning_output = GetCapturedStdout(); + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "GMOCK WARNING", warning_output); + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "Uninteresting mock function call", + warning_output); + + testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = original_behavior; +} + #endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION // Tests the semantics of ON_CALL(). @@ -1954,7 +2011,7 @@ class MockC { public: MockC() {} - MOCK_METHOD6(VoidMethod, void(bool cond, int n, string s, void* p, + MOCK_METHOD6(VoidMethod, void(bool cond, int n, std::string s, void* p, const Printable& x, Unprintable y)); MOCK_METHOD0(NonVoidMethod, int()); // NOLINT @@ -1970,7 +2027,7 @@ class VerboseFlagPreservingFixture : public testing::Test { ~VerboseFlagPreservingFixture() { GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_verbose_flag_; } private: - const string saved_verbose_flag_; + const std::string saved_verbose_flag_; GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(VerboseFlagPreservingFixture); }; @@ -2062,8 +2119,8 @@ class GMockVerboseFlagTest : public VerboseFlagPreservingFixture { // contain the given function name in the stack trace. When it's // false, the output should be empty.) void VerifyOutput(const std::string& output, bool should_print, - const string& expected_substring, - const string& function_name) { + const std::string& expected_substring, + const std::string& function_name) { if (should_print) { EXPECT_THAT(output.c_str(), HasSubstr(expected_substring)); # ifndef NDEBUG @@ -2113,11 +2170,13 @@ class GMockVerboseFlagTest : public VerboseFlagPreservingFixture { // Tests how the flag affects uninteresting calls on a naggy mock. void TestUninterestingCallOnNaggyMock(bool should_print) { NaggyMock<MockA> a; - const string note = + const std::string note = "NOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this " "call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding " "an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. " - "See https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#" + "See " + "https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/" + "CookBook.md#" "knowing-when-to-expect for details."; // A void-returning function. @@ -2623,9 +2682,78 @@ TEST(SynchronizationTest, CanCallMockMethodInAction) { // EXPECT_CALL() did not specify an action. } +TEST(ParameterlessExpectationsTest, CanSetExpectationsWithoutMatchers) { + MockA a; + int do_a_arg0 = 0; + ON_CALL(a, DoA).WillByDefault(SaveArg<0>(&do_a_arg0)); + int do_a_47_arg0 = 0; + ON_CALL(a, DoA(47)).WillByDefault(SaveArg<0>(&do_a_47_arg0)); + + a.DoA(17); + EXPECT_THAT(do_a_arg0, 17); + EXPECT_THAT(do_a_47_arg0, 0); + a.DoA(47); + EXPECT_THAT(do_a_arg0, 17); + EXPECT_THAT(do_a_47_arg0, 47); + + ON_CALL(a, Binary).WillByDefault(Return(true)); + ON_CALL(a, Binary(_, 14)).WillByDefault(Return(false)); + EXPECT_THAT(a.Binary(14, 17), true); + EXPECT_THAT(a.Binary(17, 14), false); +} + +TEST(ParameterlessExpectationsTest, CanSetExpectationsForOverloadedMethods) { + MockB b; + ON_CALL(b, DoB()).WillByDefault(Return(9)); + ON_CALL(b, DoB(5)).WillByDefault(Return(11)); + + EXPECT_THAT(b.DoB(), 9); + EXPECT_THAT(b.DoB(1), 0); // default value + EXPECT_THAT(b.DoB(5), 11); +} + +struct MockWithConstMethods { + public: + MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(Foo, int(int)); + MOCK_CONST_METHOD2(Bar, int(int, const char*)); +}; + +TEST(ParameterlessExpectationsTest, CanSetExpectationsForConstMethods) { + MockWithConstMethods mock; + ON_CALL(mock, Foo).WillByDefault(Return(7)); + ON_CALL(mock, Bar).WillByDefault(Return(33)); + + EXPECT_THAT(mock.Foo(17), 7); + EXPECT_THAT(mock.Bar(27, "purple"), 33); +} + +class MockConstOverload { + public: + MOCK_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int)); + MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int)); +}; + +TEST(ParameterlessExpectationsTest, + CanSetExpectationsForConstOverloadedMethods) { + MockConstOverload mock; + ON_CALL(mock, Overloaded(_)).WillByDefault(Return(7)); + ON_CALL(mock, Overloaded(5)).WillByDefault(Return(9)); + ON_CALL(Const(mock), Overloaded(5)).WillByDefault(Return(11)); + ON_CALL(Const(mock), Overloaded(7)).WillByDefault(Return(13)); + + EXPECT_THAT(mock.Overloaded(1), 7); + EXPECT_THAT(mock.Overloaded(5), 9); + EXPECT_THAT(mock.Overloaded(7), 7); + + const MockConstOverload& const_mock = mock; + EXPECT_THAT(const_mock.Overloaded(1), 0); + EXPECT_THAT(const_mock.Overloaded(5), 11); + EXPECT_THAT(const_mock.Overloaded(7), 13); +} + } // namespace -// Allows the user to define his own main and then invoke gmock_main +// Allows the user to define their own main and then invoke gmock_main // from it. This might be necessary on some platforms which require // specific setup and teardown. #if GMOCK_RENAME_MAIN @@ -2634,7 +2762,6 @@ int gmock_main(int argc, char **argv) { int main(int argc, char **argv) { #endif // GMOCK_RENAME_MAIN testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - // Ensures that the tests pass no matter what value of // --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks and --gmock_verbose the user specifies. testing::GMOCK_FLAG(catch_leaked_mocks) = true; diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_ex_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_ex_test.cc index 3afed86..b03de82 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_ex_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_ex_test.cc @@ -34,9 +34,11 @@ #include "gmock/gmock.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" +#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS namespace { using testing::HasSubstr; + using testing::internal::GoogleTestFailureException; // A type that cannot be default constructed. @@ -52,8 +54,6 @@ class MockFoo { MOCK_METHOD0(GetNonDefaultConstructible, NonDefaultConstructible()); }; -#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS - TEST(DefaultValueTest, ThrowsRuntimeErrorWhenNoDefaultValue) { MockFoo mock; try { @@ -76,6 +76,6 @@ TEST(DefaultValueTest, ThrowsRuntimeErrorWhenNoDefaultValue) { } } -#endif } // unnamed namespace +#endif diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_leak_test.py b/googlemock/test/gmock_leak_test.py index 997680c..a2fee4b 100755 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_leak_test.py +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_leak_test.py @@ -33,10 +33,8 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' - import gmock_test_utils - PROGRAM_PATH = gmock_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gmock_leak_test_') TEST_WITH_EXPECT_CALL = [PROGRAM_PATH, '--gtest_filter=*ExpectCall*'] TEST_WITH_ON_CALL = [PROGRAM_PATH, '--gtest_filter=*OnCall*'] diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc index 4c310c3..2b48395 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_link2_test.cc @@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ #define LinkTest LinkTest2 -#include "test/gmock_link_test.h" +#include "test/gmock_link_test.h" diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.cc index 61e97d1..ef041be 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.cc @@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ #define LinkTest LinkTest1 -#include "test/gmock_link_test.h" +#include "test/gmock_link_test.h" diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h b/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h index 1f55f5b..06a1cf8 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h @@ -90,8 +90,10 @@ // Field // Property // ResultOf(function) +// ResultOf(callback) // Pointee // Truly(predicate) +// AddressSatisfies // AllOf // AnyOf // Not @@ -120,13 +122,15 @@ # include <errno.h> #endif -#include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" #include <iostream> #include <vector> +#include "gtest/gtest.h" +#include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" + using testing::_; using testing::A; +using testing::Action; using testing::AllOf; using testing::AnyOf; using testing::Assign; @@ -148,6 +152,8 @@ using testing::Invoke; using testing::InvokeArgument; using testing::InvokeWithoutArgs; using testing::IsNull; +using testing::IsSubsetOf; +using testing::IsSupersetOf; using testing::Le; using testing::Lt; using testing::Matcher; @@ -592,6 +598,22 @@ TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherElementsAreArray) { ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromVector(ElementsAreArray(arr))).WillByDefault(Return()); } +// Tests the linkage of the IsSubsetOf matcher. +TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherIsSubsetOf) { + Mock mock; + char arr[] = {'a', 'b'}; + + ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromVector(IsSubsetOf(arr))).WillByDefault(Return()); +} + +// Tests the linkage of the IsSupersetOf matcher. +TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherIsSupersetOf) { + Mock mock; + char arr[] = {'a', 'b'}; + + ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromVector(IsSupersetOf(arr))).WillByDefault(Return()); +} + // Tests the linkage of the ContainerEq matcher. TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherContainerEq) { Mock mock; diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test.py b/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test.py index eced8a8..8f57d46 100755 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test.py +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test.py @@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ """Tests the text output of Google C++ Mocking Framework. -SYNOPSIS - gmock_output_test.py --build_dir=BUILD/DIR --gengolden - # where BUILD/DIR contains the built gmock_output_test_ file. - gmock_output_test.py --gengolden - gmock_output_test.py +To update the golden file: +gmock_output_test.py --build_dir=BUILD/DIR --gengolden +# where BUILD/DIR contains the built gmock_output_test_ file. +gmock_output_test.py --gengolden +gmock_output_test.py """ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' import os import re import sys - import gmock_test_utils @@ -176,5 +175,8 @@ if __name__ == '__main__': golden_file = open(GOLDEN_PATH, 'wb') golden_file.write(output) golden_file.close() + # Suppress the error "googletest was imported but a call to its main() + # was never detected." + os._exit(0) else: gmock_test_utils.Main() diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc index 44cba34..1b59eb3 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_.cc @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" +// Silence C4100 (unreferenced formal parameter) +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4100) +#endif + using testing::_; using testing::AnyNumber; using testing::Ge; @@ -47,6 +53,7 @@ using testing::NaggyMock; using testing::Ref; using testing::Return; using testing::Sequence; +using testing::Value; class MockFoo { public: @@ -268,6 +275,15 @@ TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, CatchesLeakedMocks) { // Both foo1 and foo2 are deliberately leaked. } +MATCHER_P2(IsPair, first, second, "") { + return Value(arg.first, first) && Value(arg.second, second); +} + +TEST_F(GMockOutputTest, PrintsMatcher) { + const testing::Matcher<int> m1 = Ge(48); + EXPECT_THAT((std::pair<int, bool>(42, true)), IsPair(m1, true)); +} + void TestCatchesLeakedMocksInAdHocTests() { MockFoo* foo = new MockFoo; @@ -280,7 +296,6 @@ void TestCatchesLeakedMocksInAdHocTests() { int main(int argc, char **argv) { testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); - // Ensures that the tests pass no matter what value of // --gmock_catch_leaked_mocks and --gmock_verbose the user specifies. testing::GMOCK_FLAG(catch_leaked_mocks) = true; @@ -289,3 +304,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) { TestCatchesLeakedMocksInAdHocTests(); return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); } + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt b/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt index 689d5ee..dbcb211 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt @@ -288,6 +288,12 @@ Stack trace: [ OK ] GMockOutputTest.ExplicitActionsRunOutWithDefaultAction [ RUN ] GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks [ OK ] GMockOutputTest.CatchesLeakedMocks +[ RUN ] GMockOutputTest.PrintsMatcher +FILE:#: Failure +Value of: (std::pair<int, bool>(42, true)) +Expected: is pair (is >= 48, true) + Actual: (42, true) (of type std::pair<int, bool>) +[ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.PrintsMatcher [ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCall [ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallToVoidFunction [ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCall @@ -302,9 +308,10 @@ Stack trace: [ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.MismatchArgumentsAndWith [ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.UnexpectedCallWithDefaultAction [ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.ExcessiveCallWithDefaultAction +[ FAILED ] GMockOutputTest.PrintsMatcher FILE:#: ERROR: this mock object should be deleted but never is. Its address is @0x#. FILE:#: ERROR: this mock object should be deleted but never is. Its address is @0x#. FILE:#: ERROR: this mock object should be deleted but never is. Its address is @0x#. -ERROR: 3 leaked mock objects found at program exit. +ERROR: 3 leaked mock objects found at program exit. Expectations on a mock object is verified when the object is destructed. Leaking a mock means that its expectations aren't verified, which is usually a test bug. If you really intend to leak a mock, you can suppress this error using testing::Mock::AllowLeak(mock_object), or you may use a fake or stub instead of a mock. diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc index 0e97aee..e4e61f0 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ namespace testing { namespace { -// From <gtest/internal/gtest-port.h>. +// From gtest-port.h. using ::testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; // The maximum number of test threads (not including helper threads) @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ const int kRepeat = 50; class MockFoo { public: MOCK_METHOD1(Bar, int(int n)); // NOLINT - MOCK_METHOD2(Baz, char(const char* s1, const internal::string& s2)); // NOLINT + MOCK_METHOD2(Baz, char(const char* s1, const std::string& s2)); // NOLINT }; // Helper for waiting for the given thread to finish and then deleting it. diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_test.cc index d8d0c57..7007567 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_test.cc @@ -37,9 +37,11 @@ #include <string> #include "gtest/gtest.h" +#include "gtest/internal/custom/gtest.h" #if !defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_INIT_GOOGLE_TEST_FUNCTION_) +using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior); using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); using testing::InitGoogleMock; @@ -50,9 +52,9 @@ void TestInitGoogleMock(const Char* (&argv)[M], const Char* (&new_argv)[N], const ::std::string& expected_gmock_verbose) { const ::std::string old_verbose = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); - int argc = M; + int argc = M - 1; InitGoogleMock(&argc, const_cast<Char**>(argv)); - ASSERT_EQ(N, argc) << "The new argv has wrong number of elements."; + ASSERT_EQ(N - 1, argc) << "The new argv has wrong number of elements."; for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) { EXPECT_STREQ(new_argv[i], argv[i]); @@ -103,6 +105,26 @@ TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesSingleFlag) { TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "info"); } +TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesMultipleFlags) { + int old_default_behavior = GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior); + const wchar_t* argv[] = { + L"foo.exe", + L"--gmock_verbose=info", + L"--gmock_default_mock_behavior=2", + NULL + }; + + const wchar_t* new_argv[] = { + L"foo.exe", + NULL + }; + + TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "info"); + EXPECT_EQ(2, GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior)); + EXPECT_NE(2, old_default_behavior); + GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = old_default_behavior; +} + TEST(InitGoogleMockTest, ParsesUnrecognizedFlag) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", @@ -177,6 +199,26 @@ TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesSingleFlag) { TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "info"); } +TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesMultipleFlags) { + int old_default_behavior = GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior); + const wchar_t* argv[] = { + L"foo.exe", + L"--gmock_verbose=info", + L"--gmock_default_mock_behavior=2", + NULL + }; + + const wchar_t* new_argv[] = { + L"foo.exe", + NULL + }; + + TestInitGoogleMock(argv, new_argv, "info"); + EXPECT_EQ(2, GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior)); + EXPECT_NE(2, old_default_behavior); + GMOCK_FLAG(default_mock_behavior) = old_default_behavior; +} + TEST(WideInitGoogleMockTest, ParsesUnrecognizedFlag) { const wchar_t* argv[] = { L"foo.exe", diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_test_utils.py b/googlemock/test/gmock_test_utils.py index 20e3d3d..92b1ac1 100755 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_test_utils.py +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_test_utils.py @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env python -# # Copyright 2006, Google Inc. # All rights reserved. # @@ -36,19 +34,19 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' import os import sys - # Determines path to gtest_test_utils and imports it. SCRIPT_DIR = os.path.dirname(__file__) or '.' # isdir resolves symbolic links. -gtest_tests_util_dir = os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, '../gtest/test') +gtest_tests_util_dir = os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, '../../googletest/test') if os.path.isdir(gtest_tests_util_dir): GTEST_TESTS_UTIL_DIR = gtest_tests_util_dir else: - GTEST_TESTS_UTIL_DIR = os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, '../../gtest/test') - + GTEST_TESTS_UTIL_DIR = os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, '../../googletest/test') sys.path.append(GTEST_TESTS_UTIL_DIR) -import gtest_test_utils # pylint: disable-msg=C6204 + +# pylint: disable=C6204 +import gtest_test_utils def GetSourceDir(): diff --git a/googletest/.gitignore b/googletest/.gitignore deleted file mode 100644 index 4b7be4b..0000000 --- a/googletest/.gitignore +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ -# python -*.pyc diff --git a/googletest/CMakeLists.txt b/googletest/CMakeLists.txt index 621d0f0..ba2c2c2 100644 --- a/googletest/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/googletest/CMakeLists.txt @@ -44,8 +44,17 @@ endif() # as ${gtest_SOURCE_DIR} and to the root binary directory as # ${gtest_BINARY_DIR}. # Language "C" is required for find_package(Threads). -project(gtest CXX C) -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.2) +if (CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 3.0) + project(gtest CXX C) +else() + cmake_policy(SET CMP0048 NEW) + project(gtest VERSION 1.9.0 LANGUAGES CXX C) +endif() +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.4) + +if (POLICY CMP0063) # Visibility + cmake_policy(SET CMP0063 NEW) +endif (POLICY CMP0063) if (COMMAND set_up_hermetic_build) set_up_hermetic_build() @@ -63,11 +72,8 @@ config_compiler_and_linker() # Defined in internal_utils.cmake. # Where Google Test's .h files can be found. include_directories( - ${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include - ${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}) - -# Where Google Test's libraries can be found. -link_directories(${gtest_BINARY_DIR}/src) + "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include" + "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}") # Summary of tuple support for Microsoft Visual Studio: # Compiler version(MS) version(cmake) Support @@ -75,6 +81,8 @@ link_directories(${gtest_BINARY_DIR}/src) # <= VS 2010 <= 10 <= 1600 Use Google Tests's own tuple. # VS 2012 11 1700 std::tr1::tuple + _VARIADIC_MAX=10 # VS 2013 12 1800 std::tr1::tuple +# VS 2015 14 1900 std::tuple +# VS 2017 15 >= 1910 std::tuple if (MSVC AND MSVC_VERSION EQUAL 1700) add_definitions(/D _VARIADIC_MAX=10) endif() @@ -95,17 +103,33 @@ target_link_libraries(gtest_main gtest) # to the targets for when we are part of a parent build (ie being pulled # in via add_subdirectory() rather than being a standalone build). if (DEFINED CMAKE_VERSION AND NOT "${CMAKE_VERSION}" VERSION_LESS "2.8.11") - target_include_directories(gtest INTERFACE "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include") - target_include_directories(gtest_main INTERFACE "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + target_include_directories(gtest SYSTEM INTERFACE "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + target_include_directories(gtest_main SYSTEM INTERFACE "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include") endif() ######################################################################## # # Install rules -install(TARGETS gtest gtest_main - DESTINATION lib) -install(DIRECTORY ${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include/gtest - DESTINATION include) +if(INSTALL_GTEST) + install(TARGETS gtest gtest_main + RUNTIME DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR}" + ARCHIVE DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}" + LIBRARY DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}") + install(DIRECTORY "${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include/gtest" + DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR}") + + # configure and install pkgconfig files + configure_file( + cmake/gtest.pc.in + "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gtest.pc" + @ONLY) + configure_file( + cmake/gtest_main.pc.in + "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gtest_main.pc" + @ONLY) + install(FILES "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gtest.pc" "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gtest_main.pc" + DESTINATION "${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}/pkgconfig") +endif() ######################################################################## # @@ -147,28 +171,28 @@ if (gtest_build_tests) ############################################################ # C++ tests built with standard compiler flags. - cxx_test(gtest-death-test_test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-death-test-test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_environment_test gtest) - cxx_test(gtest-filepath_test gtest_main) - cxx_test(gtest-linked_ptr_test gtest_main) - cxx_test(gtest-listener_test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-filepath-test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-linked-ptr-test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-listener-test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_main_unittest gtest_main) - cxx_test(gtest-message_test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-message-test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_no_test_unittest gtest) - cxx_test(gtest-options_test gtest_main) - cxx_test(gtest-param-test_test gtest - test/gtest-param-test2_test.cc) - cxx_test(gtest-port_test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-options-test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-param-test-test gtest + test/googletest-param-test2-test.cc) + cxx_test(googletest-port-test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_pred_impl_unittest gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_premature_exit_test gtest test/gtest_premature_exit_test.cc) - cxx_test(gtest-printers_test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-printers-test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_prod_test gtest_main test/production.cc) cxx_test(gtest_repeat_test gtest) cxx_test(gtest_sole_header_test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_stress_test gtest) - cxx_test(gtest-test-part_test gtest_main) + cxx_test(googletest-test-part-test gtest_main) cxx_test(gtest_throw_on_failure_ex_test gtest) cxx_test(gtest-typed-test_test gtest_main test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc) @@ -190,10 +214,10 @@ if (gtest_build_tests) cxx_test_with_flags(gtest-death-test_ex_nocatch_test "${cxx_exception} -DGTEST_ENABLE_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS_=0" - gtest test/gtest-death-test_ex_test.cc) + gtest test/googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc) cxx_test_with_flags(gtest-death-test_ex_catch_test "${cxx_exception} -DGTEST_ENABLE_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS_=1" - gtest test/gtest-death-test_ex_test.cc) + gtest test/googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc) cxx_test_with_flags(gtest_no_rtti_unittest "${cxx_no_rtti}" gtest_main_no_rtti test/gtest_unittest.cc) @@ -214,73 +238,75 @@ if (gtest_build_tests) cxx_library(gtest_main_use_own_tuple "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" src/gtest-all.cc src/gtest_main.cc) - cxx_test_with_flags(gtest-tuple_test "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" - gtest_main_use_own_tuple test/gtest-tuple_test.cc) + cxx_test_with_flags(googletest-tuple-test "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" + gtest_main_use_own_tuple test/googletest-tuple-test.cc) cxx_test_with_flags(gtest_use_own_tuple_test "${cxx_use_own_tuple}" gtest_main_use_own_tuple - test/gtest-param-test_test.cc test/gtest-param-test2_test.cc) + test/googletest-param-test-test.cc test/googletest-param-test2-test.cc) endif() ############################################################ # Python tests. - cxx_executable(gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_break_on_failure_unittest) + cxx_executable(googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-break-on-failure-unittest) # Visual Studio .NET 2003 does not support STL with exceptions disabled. if (NOT MSVC OR MSVC_VERSION GREATER 1310) # 1310 is Visual Studio .NET 2003 cxx_executable_with_flags( - gtest_catch_exceptions_no_ex_test_ + googletest-catch-exceptions-no-ex-test_ "${cxx_no_exception}" gtest_main_no_exception - test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test_.cc) + test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc) endif() cxx_executable_with_flags( - gtest_catch_exceptions_ex_test_ + googletest-catch-exceptions-ex-test_ "${cxx_exception}" gtest_main - test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test_.cc) - py_test(gtest_catch_exceptions_test) + test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc) + py_test(googletest-catch-exceptions-test) - cxx_executable(gtest_color_test_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_color_test) + cxx_executable(googletest-color-test_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-color-test) - cxx_executable(gtest_env_var_test_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_env_var_test) + cxx_executable(googletest-env-var-test_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-env-var-test) - cxx_executable(gtest_filter_unittest_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_filter_unittest) + cxx_executable(googletest-filter-unittest_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-filter-unittest) cxx_executable(gtest_help_test_ test gtest_main) py_test(gtest_help_test) - cxx_executable(gtest_list_tests_unittest_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_list_tests_unittest) + cxx_executable(googletest-list-tests-unittest_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-list-tests-unittest) - cxx_executable(gtest_output_test_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_output_test) + cxx_executable(googletest-output-test_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-output-test --no_stacktrace_support) - cxx_executable(gtest_shuffle_test_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_shuffle_test) + cxx_executable(googletest-shuffle-test_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-shuffle-test) # MSVC 7.1 does not support STL with exceptions disabled. if (NOT MSVC OR MSVC_VERSION GREATER 1310) - cxx_executable(gtest_throw_on_failure_test_ test gtest_no_exception) - set_target_properties(gtest_throw_on_failure_test_ + cxx_executable(googletest-throw-on-failure-test_ test gtest_no_exception) + set_target_properties(googletest-throw-on-failure-test_ PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS "${cxx_no_exception}") - py_test(gtest_throw_on_failure_test) + py_test(googletest-throw-on-failure-test) endif() - cxx_executable(gtest_uninitialized_test_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_uninitialized_test) + cxx_executable(googletest-uninitialized-test_ test gtest) + py_test(googletest-uninitialized-test) cxx_executable(gtest_xml_outfile1_test_ test gtest_main) cxx_executable(gtest_xml_outfile2_test_ test gtest_main) py_test(gtest_xml_outfiles_test) + py_test(googletest-json-outfiles-test) cxx_executable(gtest_xml_output_unittest_ test gtest) - py_test(gtest_xml_output_unittest) + py_test(gtest_xml_output_unittest --no_stacktrace_support) + py_test(googletest-json-output-unittest --no_stacktrace_support) endif() diff --git a/googletest/Makefile.am b/googletest/Makefile.am index 29797e4..b44c841 100644 --- a/googletest/Makefile.am +++ b/googletest/Makefile.am @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ EXTRA_DIST += $(GTEST_SRC) # Sample files that we don't compile. EXTRA_DIST += \ samples/prime_tables.h \ + samples/sample1_unittest.cc \ samples/sample2_unittest.cc \ samples/sample3_unittest.cc \ samples/sample4_unittest.cc \ @@ -52,40 +53,40 @@ EXTRA_DIST += \ test/gtest-listener_test.cc \ test/gtest-message_test.cc \ test/gtest-options_test.cc \ - test/gtest-param-test2_test.cc \ - test/gtest-param-test2_test.cc \ - test/gtest-param-test_test.cc \ - test/gtest-param-test_test.cc \ + test/googletest-param-test2-test.cc \ + test/googletest-param-test2-test.cc \ + test/googletest-param-test-test.cc \ + test/googletest-param-test-test.cc \ test/gtest-param-test_test.h \ test/gtest-port_test.cc \ test/gtest_premature_exit_test.cc \ test/gtest-printers_test.cc \ test/gtest-test-part_test.cc \ - test/gtest-tuple_test.cc \ + test/googletest-tuple-test.cc \ test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc \ test/gtest-typed-test_test.cc \ test/gtest-typed-test_test.h \ test/gtest-unittest-api_test.cc \ - test/gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_.cc \ - test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test_.cc \ - test/gtest_color_test_.cc \ - test/gtest_env_var_test_.cc \ + test/googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_.cc \ + test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc \ + test/googletest-color-test_.cc \ + test/googletest-env-var-test_.cc \ test/gtest_environment_test.cc \ - test/gtest_filter_unittest_.cc \ + test/googletest-filter-unittest_.cc \ test/gtest_help_test_.cc \ - test/gtest_list_tests_unittest_.cc \ + test/googletest-list-tests-unittest_.cc \ test/gtest_main_unittest.cc \ test/gtest_no_test_unittest.cc \ - test/gtest_output_test_.cc \ + test/googletest-output-test_.cc \ test/gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc \ test/gtest_prod_test.cc \ test/gtest_repeat_test.cc \ - test/gtest_shuffle_test_.cc \ + test/googletest-shuffle-test_.cc \ test/gtest_sole_header_test.cc \ test/gtest_stress_test.cc \ test/gtest_throw_on_failure_ex_test.cc \ - test/gtest_throw_on_failure_test_.cc \ - test/gtest_uninitialized_test_.cc \ + test/googletest-throw-on-failure-test_.cc \ + test/googletest-uninitialized-test_.cc \ test/gtest_unittest.cc \ test/gtest_unittest.cc \ test/gtest_xml_outfile1_test_.cc \ @@ -96,19 +97,19 @@ EXTRA_DIST += \ # Python tests that we don't run. EXTRA_DIST += \ - test/gtest_break_on_failure_unittest.py \ - test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test.py \ - test/gtest_color_test.py \ - test/gtest_env_var_test.py \ - test/gtest_filter_unittest.py \ + test/googletest-break-on-failure-unittest.py \ + test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test.py \ + test/googletest-color-test.py \ + test/googletest-env-var-test.py \ + test/googletest-filter-unittest.py \ test/gtest_help_test.py \ - test/gtest_list_tests_unittest.py \ - test/gtest_output_test.py \ - test/gtest_output_test_golden_lin.txt \ - test/gtest_shuffle_test.py \ + test/googletest-list-tests-unittest.py \ + test/googletest-output-test.py \ + test/googletest-output-test_golden_lin.txt \ + test/googletest-shuffle-test.py \ test/gtest_test_utils.py \ - test/gtest_throw_on_failure_test.py \ - test/gtest_uninitialized_test.py \ + test/googletest-throw-on-failure-test.py \ + test/googletest-uninitialized-test.py \ test/gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py \ test/gtest_xml_output_unittest.py \ test/gtest_xml_test_utils.py @@ -120,16 +121,16 @@ EXTRA_DIST += \ # MSVC project files EXTRA_DIST += \ - msvc/gtest-md.sln \ - msvc/gtest-md.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest.sln \ - msvc/gtest.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest_main-md.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest_main.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest_prod_test-md.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest_prod_test.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest_unittest-md.vcproj \ - msvc/gtest_unittest.vcproj + msvc/2010/gtest-md.sln \ + msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest.sln \ + msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj \ + msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj # xcode project files EXTRA_DIST += \ @@ -216,40 +217,68 @@ pkginclude_internal_HEADERS = \ lib_libgtest_main_la_SOURCES = src/gtest_main.cc lib_libgtest_main_la_LIBADD = lib/libgtest.la -# Bulid rules for samples and tests. Automake's naming for some of +# Build rules for samples and tests. Automake's naming for some of # these variables isn't terribly obvious, so this is a brief # reference: # # TESTS -- Programs run automatically by "make check" # check_PROGRAMS -- Programs built by "make check" but not necessarily run -noinst_LTLIBRARIES = samples/libsamples.la - -samples_libsamples_la_SOURCES = \ - samples/sample1.cc \ - samples/sample1.h \ - samples/sample2.cc \ - samples/sample2.h \ - samples/sample3-inl.h \ - samples/sample4.cc \ - samples/sample4.h - TESTS= TESTS_ENVIRONMENT = GTEST_SOURCE_DIR="$(srcdir)/test" \ GTEST_BUILD_DIR="$(top_builddir)/test" check_PROGRAMS= # A simple sample on using gtest. -TESTS += samples/sample1_unittest -check_PROGRAMS += samples/sample1_unittest -samples_sample1_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample1_unittest.cc +TESTS += samples/sample1_unittest \ + samples/sample2_unittest \ + samples/sample3_unittest \ + samples/sample4_unittest \ + samples/sample5_unittest \ + samples/sample6_unittest \ + samples/sample7_unittest \ + samples/sample8_unittest \ + samples/sample9_unittest \ + samples/sample10_unittest +check_PROGRAMS += samples/sample1_unittest \ + samples/sample2_unittest \ + samples/sample3_unittest \ + samples/sample4_unittest \ + samples/sample5_unittest \ + samples/sample6_unittest \ + samples/sample7_unittest \ + samples/sample8_unittest \ + samples/sample9_unittest \ + samples/sample10_unittest + +samples_sample1_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample1_unittest.cc samples/sample1.cc samples_sample1_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ - lib/libgtest.la \ - samples/libsamples.la - -# Another sample. It also verifies that libgtest works. -TESTS += samples/sample10_unittest -check_PROGRAMS += samples/sample10_unittest + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample2_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample2_unittest.cc samples/sample2.cc +samples_sample2_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample3_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample3_unittest.cc +samples_sample3_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample4_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample4_unittest.cc samples/sample4.cc +samples_sample4_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample5_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample5_unittest.cc samples/sample1.cc +samples_sample5_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample6_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample6_unittest.cc +samples_sample6_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample7_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample7_unittest.cc +samples_sample7_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la +samples_sample8_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample8_unittest.cc +samples_sample8_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest_main.la \ + lib/libgtest.la + +# Also verify that libgtest works by itself. +samples_sample9_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample9_unittest.cc +samples_sample9_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest.la samples_sample10_unittest_SOURCES = samples/sample10_unittest.cc samples_sample10_unittest_LDADD = lib/libgtest.la diff --git a/googletest/README.md b/googletest/README.md index edd4408..e30fe80 100644 --- a/googletest/README.md +++ b/googletest/README.md @@ -1,23 +1,21 @@ +### Generic Build Instructions -### Generic Build Instructions ### +#### Setup -#### Setup #### +To build Google Test and your tests that use it, you need to tell your build +system where to find its headers and source files. The exact way to do it +depends on which build system you use, and is usually straightforward. -To build Google Test and your tests that use it, you need to tell your -build system where to find its headers and source files. The exact -way to do it depends on which build system you use, and is usually -straightforward. +#### Build -#### Build #### - -Suppose you put Google Test in directory `${GTEST_DIR}`. To build it, -create a library build target (or a project as called by Visual Studio -and Xcode) to compile +Suppose you put Google Test in directory `${GTEST_DIR}`. To build it, create a +library build target (or a project as called by Visual Studio and Xcode) to +compile ${GTEST_DIR}/src/gtest-all.cc with `${GTEST_DIR}/include` in the system header search path and `${GTEST_DIR}` -in the normal header search path. Assuming a Linux-like system and gcc, +in the normal header search path. Assuming a Linux-like system and gcc, something like the following will do: g++ -isystem ${GTEST_DIR}/include -I${GTEST_DIR} \ @@ -26,136 +24,239 @@ something like the following will do: (We need `-pthread` as Google Test uses threads.) -Next, you should compile your test source file with -`${GTEST_DIR}/include` in the system header search path, and link it -with gtest and any other necessary libraries: +Next, you should compile your test source file with `${GTEST_DIR}/include` in +the system header search path, and link it with gtest and any other necessary +libraries: g++ -isystem ${GTEST_DIR}/include -pthread path/to/your_test.cc libgtest.a \ -o your_test -As an example, the make/ directory contains a Makefile that you can -use to build Google Test on systems where GNU make is available -(e.g. Linux, Mac OS X, and Cygwin). It doesn't try to build Google -Test's own tests. Instead, it just builds the Google Test library and -a sample test. You can use it as a starting point for your own build -script. +As an example, the make/ directory contains a Makefile that you can use to build +Google Test on systems where GNU make is available (e.g. Linux, Mac OS X, and +Cygwin). It doesn't try to build Google Test's own tests. Instead, it just +builds the Google Test library and a sample test. You can use it as a starting +point for your own build script. -If the default settings are correct for your environment, the -following commands should succeed: +If the default settings are correct for your environment, the following commands +should succeed: cd ${GTEST_DIR}/make make ./sample1_unittest -If you see errors, try to tweak the contents of `make/Makefile` to make -them go away. There are instructions in `make/Makefile` on how to do -it. +If you see errors, try to tweak the contents of `make/Makefile` to make them go +away. There are instructions in `make/Makefile` on how to do it. -### Using CMake ### +### Using CMake Google Test comes with a CMake build script ( -[CMakeLists.txt](CMakeLists.txt)) that can be used on a wide range of platforms ("C" stands for -cross-platform.). If you don't have CMake installed already, you can -download it for free from <http://www.cmake.org/>. +[CMakeLists.txt](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt)) +that can be used on a wide range of platforms ("C" stands for cross-platform.). +If you don't have CMake installed already, you can download it for free from +<http://www.cmake.org/>. + +CMake works by generating native makefiles or build projects that can be used in +the compiler environment of your choice. You can either build Google Test as a +standalone project or it can be incorporated into an existing CMake build for +another project. -CMake works by generating native makefiles or build projects that can -be used in the compiler environment of your choice. The typical -workflow starts with: +#### Standalone CMake Project + +When building Google Test as a standalone project, the typical workflow starts +with: mkdir mybuild # Create a directory to hold the build output. cd mybuild cmake ${GTEST_DIR} # Generate native build scripts. -If you want to build Google Test's samples, you should replace the -last command with +If you want to build Google Test's samples, you should replace the last command +with cmake -Dgtest_build_samples=ON ${GTEST_DIR} -If you are on a \*nix system, you should now see a Makefile in the -current directory. Just type 'make' to build gtest. +If you are on a \*nix system, you should now see a Makefile in the current +directory. Just type 'make' to build gtest. -If you use Windows and have Visual Studio installed, a `gtest.sln` file -and several `.vcproj` files will be created. You can then build them -using Visual Studio. +If you use Windows and have Visual Studio installed, a `gtest.sln` file and +several `.vcproj` files will be created. You can then build them using Visual +Studio. On Mac OS X with Xcode installed, a `.xcodeproj` file will be generated. -### Legacy Build Scripts ### +#### Incorporating Into An Existing CMake Project + +If you want to use gtest in a project which already uses CMake, then a more +robust and flexible approach is to build gtest as part of that project directly. +This is done by making the GoogleTest source code available to the main build +and adding it using CMake's `add_subdirectory()` command. This has the +significant advantage that the same compiler and linker settings are used +between gtest and the rest of your project, so issues associated with using +incompatible libraries (eg debug/release), etc. are avoided. This is +particularly useful on Windows. Making GoogleTest's source code available to the +main build can be done a few different ways: + +* Download the GoogleTest source code manually and place it at a known + location. This is the least flexible approach and can make it more difficult + to use with continuous integration systems, etc. +* Embed the GoogleTest source code as a direct copy in the main project's + source tree. This is often the simplest approach, but is also the hardest to + keep up to date. Some organizations may not permit this method. +* Add GoogleTest as a git submodule or equivalent. This may not always be + possible or appropriate. Git submodules, for example, have their own set of + advantages and drawbacks. +* Use CMake to download GoogleTest as part of the build's configure step. This + is just a little more complex, but doesn't have the limitations of the other + methods. + +The last of the above methods is implemented with a small piece of CMake code in +a separate file (e.g. `CMakeLists.txt.in`) which is copied to the build area and +then invoked as a sub-build _during the CMake stage_. That directory is then +pulled into the main build with `add_subdirectory()`. For example: + +New file `CMakeLists.txt.in`: + + cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8.2) + + project(googletest-download NONE) + + include(ExternalProject) + ExternalProject_Add(googletest + GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/google/googletest.git + GIT_TAG master + SOURCE_DIR "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/googletest-src" + BINARY_DIR "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/googletest-build" + CONFIGURE_COMMAND "" + BUILD_COMMAND "" + INSTALL_COMMAND "" + TEST_COMMAND "" + ) + +Existing build's `CMakeLists.txt`: + + # Download and unpack googletest at configure time + configure_file(CMakeLists.txt.in googletest-download/CMakeLists.txt) + execute_process(COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -G "${CMAKE_GENERATOR}" . + RESULT_VARIABLE result + WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/googletest-download ) + if(result) + message(FATAL_ERROR "CMake step for googletest failed: ${result}") + endif() + execute_process(COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} --build . + RESULT_VARIABLE result + WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/googletest-download ) + if(result) + message(FATAL_ERROR "Build step for googletest failed: ${result}") + endif() + + # Prevent overriding the parent project's compiler/linker + # settings on Windows + set(gtest_force_shared_crt ON CACHE BOOL "" FORCE) + + # Add googletest directly to our build. This defines + # the gtest and gtest_main targets. + add_subdirectory(${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/googletest-src + ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/googletest-build + EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL) + + # The gtest/gtest_main targets carry header search path + # dependencies automatically when using CMake 2.8.11 or + # later. Otherwise we have to add them here ourselves. + if (CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 2.8.11) + include_directories("${gtest_SOURCE_DIR}/include") + endif() + + # Now simply link against gtest or gtest_main as needed. Eg + add_executable(example example.cpp) + target_link_libraries(example gtest_main) + add_test(NAME example_test COMMAND example) + +Note that this approach requires CMake 2.8.2 or later due to its use of the +`ExternalProject_Add()` command. The above technique is discussed in more detail +in [this separate article](http://crascit.com/2015/07/25/cmake-gtest/) which +also contains a link to a fully generalized implementation of the technique. + +##### Visual Studio Dynamic vs Static Runtimes + +By default, new Visual Studio projects link the C runtimes dynamically but +Google Test links them statically. This will generate an error that looks +something like the following: gtest.lib(gtest-all.obj) : error LNK2038: mismatch +detected for 'RuntimeLibrary': value 'MTd_StaticDebug' doesn't match value +'MDd_DynamicDebug' in main.obj + +Google Test already has a CMake option for this: `gtest_force_shared_crt` + +Enabling this option will make gtest link the runtimes dynamically too, and +match the project in which it is included. + +### Legacy Build Scripts Before settling on CMake, we have been providing hand-maintained build -projects/scripts for Visual Studio, Xcode, and Autotools. While we -continue to provide them for convenience, they are not actively -maintained any more. We highly recommend that you follow the -instructions in the previous two sections to integrate Google Test -with your existing build system. +projects/scripts for Visual Studio, Xcode, and Autotools. While we continue to +provide them for convenience, they are not actively maintained any more. We +highly recommend that you follow the instructions in the above sections to +integrate Google Test with your existing build system. If you still need to use the legacy build scripts, here's how: -The msvc\ folder contains two solutions with Visual C++ projects. -Open the `gtest.sln` or `gtest-md.sln` file using Visual Studio, and you -are ready to build Google Test the same way you build any Visual -Studio project. Files that have names ending with -md use DLL -versions of Microsoft runtime libraries (the /MD or the /MDd compiler -option). Files without that suffix use static versions of the runtime -libraries (the /MT or the /MTd option). Please note that one must use -the same option to compile both gtest and the test code. If you use -Visual Studio 2005 or above, we recommend the -md version as /MD is -the default for new projects in these versions of Visual Studio. - -On Mac OS X, open the `gtest.xcodeproj` in the `xcode/` folder using -Xcode. Build the "gtest" target. The universal binary framework will -end up in your selected build directory (selected in the Xcode -"Preferences..." -> "Building" pane and defaults to xcode/build). -Alternatively, at the command line, enter: +The msvc\ folder contains two solutions with Visual C++ projects. Open the +`gtest.sln` or `gtest-md.sln` file using Visual Studio, and you are ready to +build Google Test the same way you build any Visual Studio project. Files that +have names ending with -md use DLL versions of Microsoft runtime libraries (the +/MD or the /MDd compiler option). Files without that suffix use static versions +of the runtime libraries (the /MT or the /MTd option). Please note that one must +use the same option to compile both gtest and the test code. If you use Visual +Studio 2005 or above, we recommend the -md version as /MD is the default for new +projects in these versions of Visual Studio. + +On Mac OS X, open the `gtest.xcodeproj` in the `xcode/` folder using Xcode. +Build the "gtest" target. The universal binary framework will end up in your +selected build directory (selected in the Xcode "Preferences..." -> "Building" +pane and defaults to xcode/build). Alternatively, at the command line, enter: xcodebuild -This will build the "Release" configuration of gtest.framework in your -default build location. See the "xcodebuild" man page for more -information about building different configurations and building in -different locations. +This will build the "Release" configuration of gtest.framework in your default +build location. See the "xcodebuild" man page for more information about +building different configurations and building in different locations. -If you wish to use the Google Test Xcode project with Xcode 4.x and -above, you need to either: +If you wish to use the Google Test Xcode project with Xcode 4.x and above, you +need to either: - * update the SDK configuration options in xcode/Config/General.xconfig. - Comment options `SDKROOT`, `MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, and `GCC_VERSION`. If - you choose this route you lose the ability to target earlier versions - of MacOS X. - * Install an SDK for an earlier version. This doesn't appear to be - supported by Apple, but has been reported to work - (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5378518). +* update the SDK configuration options in xcode/Config/General.xconfig. + Comment options `SDKROOT`, `MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, and `GCC_VERSION`. If + you choose this route you lose the ability to target earlier versions of + MacOS X. +* Install an SDK for an earlier version. This doesn't appear to be supported + by Apple, but has been reported to work + (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5378518). -### Tweaking Google Test ### +### Tweaking Google Test -Google Test can be used in diverse environments. The default -configuration may not work (or may not work well) out of the box in -some environments. However, you can easily tweak Google Test by -defining control macros on the compiler command line. Generally, -these macros are named like `GTEST_XYZ` and you define them to either 1 -or 0 to enable or disable a certain feature. +Google Test can be used in diverse environments. The default configuration may +not work (or may not work well) out of the box in some environments. However, +you can easily tweak Google Test by defining control macros on the compiler +command line. Generally, these macros are named like `GTEST_XYZ` and you define +them to either 1 or 0 to enable or disable a certain feature. -We list the most frequently used macros below. For a complete list, -see file [include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h](include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h). +We list the most frequently used macros below. For a complete list, see file +[include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h). -### Choosing a TR1 Tuple Library ### +### Choosing a TR1 Tuple Library -Some Google Test features require the C++ Technical Report 1 (TR1) -tuple library, which is not yet available with all compilers. The -good news is that Google Test implements a subset of TR1 tuple that's -enough for its own need, and will automatically use this when the -compiler doesn't provide TR1 tuple. +Some Google Test features require the C++ Technical Report 1 (TR1) tuple +library, which is not yet available with all compilers. The good news is that +Google Test implements a subset of TR1 tuple that's enough for its own need, and +will automatically use this when the compiler doesn't provide TR1 tuple. -Usually you don't need to care about which tuple library Google Test -uses. However, if your project already uses TR1 tuple, you need to -tell Google Test to use the same TR1 tuple library the rest of your -project uses, or the two tuple implementations will clash. To do -that, add +Usually you don't need to care about which tuple library Google Test uses. +However, if your project already uses TR1 tuple, you need to tell Google Test to +use the same TR1 tuple library the rest of your project uses, or the two tuple +implementations will clash. To do that, add -DGTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE=0 -to the compiler flags while compiling Google Test and your tests. If -you want to force Google Test to use its own tuple library, just add +to the compiler flags while compiling Google Test and your tests. If you want to +force Google Test to use its own tuple library, just add -DGTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE=1 @@ -167,15 +268,15 @@ If you don't want Google Test to use tuple at all, add and all features using tuple will be disabled. -### Multi-threaded Tests ### +### Multi-threaded Tests -Google Test is thread-safe where the pthread library is available. -After `#include "gtest/gtest.h"`, you can check the `GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE` -macro to see whether this is the case (yes if the macro is `#defined` to -1, no if it's undefined.). +Google Test is thread-safe where the pthread library is available. After +`#include "gtest/gtest.h"`, you can check the `GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE` macro to see +whether this is the case (yes if the macro is `#defined` to 1, no if it's +undefined.). -If Google Test doesn't correctly detect whether pthread is available -in your environment, you can force it with +If Google Test doesn't correctly detect whether pthread is available in your +environment, you can force it with -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=1 @@ -183,26 +284,24 @@ or -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=0 -When Google Test uses pthread, you may need to add flags to your -compiler and/or linker to select the pthread library, or you'll get -link errors. If you use the CMake script or the deprecated Autotools -script, this is taken care of for you. If you use your own build -script, you'll need to read your compiler and linker's manual to -figure out what flags to add. +When Google Test uses pthread, you may need to add flags to your compiler and/or +linker to select the pthread library, or you'll get link errors. If you use the +CMake script or the deprecated Autotools script, this is taken care of for you. +If you use your own build script, you'll need to read your compiler and linker's +manual to figure out what flags to add. -### As a Shared Library (DLL) ### +### As a Shared Library (DLL) -Google Test is compact, so most users can build and link it as a -static library for the simplicity. You can choose to use Google Test -as a shared library (known as a DLL on Windows) if you prefer. +Google Test is compact, so most users can build and link it as a static library +for the simplicity. You can choose to use Google Test as a shared library (known +as a DLL on Windows) if you prefer. To compile *gtest* as a shared library, add -DGTEST_CREATE_SHARED_LIBRARY=1 -to the compiler flags. You'll also need to tell the linker to produce -a shared library instead - consult your linker's manual for how to do -it. +to the compiler flags. You'll also need to tell the linker to produce a shared +library instead - consult your linker's manual for how to do it. To compile your *tests* that use the gtest shared library, add @@ -210,31 +309,28 @@ To compile your *tests* that use the gtest shared library, add to the compiler flags. -Note: while the above steps aren't technically necessary today when -using some compilers (e.g. GCC), they may become necessary in the -future, if we decide to improve the speed of loading the library (see -<http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility> for details). Therefore you are -recommended to always add the above flags when using Google Test as a -shared library. Otherwise a future release of Google Test may break -your build script. +Note: while the above steps aren't technically necessary today when using some +compilers (e.g. GCC), they may become necessary in the future, if we decide to +improve the speed of loading the library (see +<http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility> for details). Therefore you are recommended +to always add the above flags when using Google Test as a shared library. +Otherwise a future release of Google Test may break your build script. -### Avoiding Macro Name Clashes ### +### Avoiding Macro Name Clashes -In C++, macros don't obey namespaces. Therefore two libraries that -both define a macro of the same name will clash if you `#include` both -definitions. In case a Google Test macro clashes with another -library, you can force Google Test to rename its macro to avoid the -conflict. +In C++, macros don't obey namespaces. Therefore two libraries that both define a +macro of the same name will clash if you `#include` both definitions. In case a +Google Test macro clashes with another library, you can force Google Test to +rename its macro to avoid the conflict. -Specifically, if both Google Test and some other code define macro -FOO, you can add +Specifically, if both Google Test and some other code define macro FOO, you can +add -DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_FOO=1 -to the compiler flags to tell Google Test to change the macro's name -from `FOO` to `GTEST_FOO`. Currently `FOO` can be `FAIL`, `SUCCEED`, -or `TEST`. For example, with `-DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_TEST=1`, you'll -need to write +to the compiler flags to tell Google Test to change the macro's name from `FOO` +to `GTEST_FOO`. Currently `FOO` can be `FAIL`, `SUCCEED`, or `TEST`. For +example, with `-DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_TEST=1`, you'll need to write GTEST_TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } @@ -243,38 +339,3 @@ instead of TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } in order to define a test. - -## Developing Google Test ## - -This section discusses how to make your own changes to Google Test. - -### Testing Google Test Itself ### - -To make sure your changes work as intended and don't break existing -functionality, you'll want to compile and run Google Test's own tests. -For that you can use CMake: - - mkdir mybuild - cd mybuild - cmake -Dgtest_build_tests=ON ${GTEST_DIR} - -Make sure you have Python installed, as some of Google Test's tests -are written in Python. If the cmake command complains about not being -able to find Python (`Could NOT find PythonInterp (missing: -PYTHON_EXECUTABLE)`), try telling it explicitly where your Python -executable can be found: - - cmake -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=path/to/python -Dgtest_build_tests=ON ${GTEST_DIR} - -Next, you can build Google Test and all of its own tests. On \*nix, -this is usually done by 'make'. To run the tests, do - - make test - -All tests should pass. - -Normally you don't need to worry about regenerating the source files, -unless you need to modify them. In that case, you should modify the -corresponding .pump files instead and run the pump.py Python script to -regenerate them. You can find pump.py in the [scripts/](scripts/) directory. -Read the [Pump manual](docs/PumpManual.md) for how to use it. diff --git a/googletest/build-aux/.keep b/googletest/build-aux/.keep deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29..0000000 --- a/googletest/build-aux/.keep +++ /dev/null diff --git a/googletest/cmake/gtest.pc.in b/googletest/cmake/gtest.pc.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e7967ad --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/cmake/gtest.pc.in @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +libdir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR@ +includedir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_INCLUDEDIR@ + +Name: gtest +Description: GoogleTest (without main() function) +Version: @PROJECT_VERSION@ +URL: https://github.com/google/googletest +Libs: -L${libdir} -lgtest @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ +Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@ @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ diff --git a/googletest/cmake/gtest_main.pc.in b/googletest/cmake/gtest_main.pc.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe25d9c --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/cmake/gtest_main.pc.in @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +libdir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR@ +includedir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_INCLUDEDIR@ + +Name: gtest_main +Description: GoogleTest (with main() function) +Version: @PROJECT_VERSION@ +URL: https://github.com/google/googletest +Requires: gtest +Libs: -L${libdir} -lgtest_main @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ +Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@ @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@ diff --git a/googletest/cmake/internal_utils.cmake b/googletest/cmake/internal_utils.cmake index 93b9e51..b78dbcc 100644 --- a/googletest/cmake/internal_utils.cmake +++ b/googletest/cmake/internal_utils.cmake @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ macro(fix_default_compiler_settings_) if (MSVC) # For MSVC, CMake sets certain flags to defaults we want to override. # This replacement code is taken from sample in the CMake Wiki at - # http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Dynamic_Replace. + # https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/community/wikis/FAQ#dynamic-replace. foreach (flag_var CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_MINSIZEREL CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELWITHDEBINFO) @@ -48,9 +48,14 @@ endmacro() macro(config_compiler_and_linker) # Note: pthreads on MinGW is not supported, even if available # instead, we use windows threading primitives + unset(GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD) if (NOT gtest_disable_pthreads AND NOT MINGW) # Defines CMAKE_USE_PTHREADS_INIT and CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT. + set(THREADS_PREFER_PTHREAD_FLAG ON) find_package(Threads) + if (CMAKE_USE_PTHREADS_INIT) + set(GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD ON) + endif() endif() fix_default_compiler_settings_() @@ -82,18 +87,17 @@ macro(config_compiler_and_linker) # http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3232669 explains the issue. set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -wd4702") endif() - if (NOT (MSVC_VERSION GREATER 1900)) # 1900 is Visual Studio 2015 - # BigObj required for tests. - set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -bigobj") - endif() set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -D_UNICODE -DUNICODE -DWIN32 -D_WIN32") set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -DSTRICT -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN") set(cxx_exception_flags "-EHsc -D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=1") - set(cxx_no_exception_flags "-D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0") + set(cxx_no_exception_flags "-EHs-c- -D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0") set(cxx_no_rtti_flags "-GR-") elseif (CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX) - set(cxx_base_flags "-Wall -Wshadow") + set(cxx_base_flags "-Wall -Wshadow -Werror") + if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION VERSION_LESS 7.0.0) + set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -Wno-error=dangling-else") + endif() set(cxx_exception_flags "-fexceptions") set(cxx_no_exception_flags "-fno-exceptions") # Until version 4.3.2, GCC doesn't define a macro to indicate @@ -125,11 +129,13 @@ macro(config_compiler_and_linker) set(cxx_no_rtti_flags "") endif() - if (CMAKE_USE_PTHREADS_INIT) # The pthreads library is available and allowed. - set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=1") + # The pthreads library is available and allowed? + if (DEFINED GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD) + set(GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO "-DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=1") else() - set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=0") + set(GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO "-DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=0") endif() + set(cxx_base_flags "${cxx_base_flags} ${GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO}") # For building gtest's own tests and samples. set(cxx_exception "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} ${cxx_base_flags} ${cxx_exception_flags}") @@ -152,12 +158,16 @@ function(cxx_library_with_type name type cxx_flags) set_target_properties(${name} PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS "${cxx_flags}") + # Generate debug library name with a postfix. + set_target_properties(${name} + PROPERTIES + DEBUG_POSTFIX "d") if (BUILD_SHARED_LIBS OR type STREQUAL "SHARED") set_target_properties(${name} PROPERTIES COMPILE_DEFINITIONS "GTEST_CREATE_SHARED_LIBRARY=1") endif() - if (CMAKE_USE_PTHREADS_INIT) + if (DEFINED GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD) target_link_libraries(${name} ${CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT}) endif() endfunction() @@ -180,6 +190,10 @@ endfunction() # is built from the given source files with the given compiler flags. function(cxx_executable_with_flags name cxx_flags libs) add_executable(${name} ${ARGN}) + if (MSVC AND (NOT (MSVC_VERSION LESS 1700))) # 1700 is Visual Studio 2012. + # BigObj required for tests. + set(cxx_flags "${cxx_flags} -bigobj") + endif() if (cxx_flags) set_target_properties(${name} PROPERTIES @@ -234,23 +248,33 @@ endfunction() # creates a Python test with the given name whose main module is in # test/name.py. It does nothing if Python is not installed. function(py_test name) - # We are not supporting Python tests on Linux yet as they consider - # all Linux environments to be google3 and try to use google3 features. if (PYTHONINTERP_FOUND) - # ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} is known at configuration time, so we can - # directly bind it from cmake. ${CTEST_CONFIGURATION_TYPE} is known - # only at ctest runtime (by calling ctest -c <Configuration>), so - # we have to escape $ to delay variable substitution here. if (${CMAKE_MAJOR_VERSION}.${CMAKE_MINOR_VERSION} GREATER 3.1) - add_test( - NAME ${name} - COMMAND ${PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test/${name}.py - --build_dir=${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/$<CONFIGURATION>) + if (CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES) + # Multi-configuration build generators as for Visual Studio save + # output in a subdirectory of CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR (Debug, + # Release etc.), so we have to provide it here. + add_test( + NAME ${name} + COMMAND ${PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test/${name}.py + --build_dir=${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/$<CONFIG> ${ARGN}) + else (CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES) + # Single-configuration build generators like Makefile generators + # don't have subdirs below CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR. + add_test( + NAME ${name} + COMMAND ${PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test/${name}.py + --build_dir=${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR} ${ARGN}) + endif (CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES) else (${CMAKE_MAJOR_VERSION}.${CMAKE_MINOR_VERSION} GREATER 3.1) + # ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR} is known at configuration time, so we can + # directly bind it from cmake. ${CTEST_CONFIGURATION_TYPE} is known + # only at ctest runtime (by calling ctest -c <Configuration>), so + # we have to escape $ to delay variable substitution here. add_test( ${name} ${PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test/${name}.py - --build_dir=${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/\${CTEST_CONFIGURATION_TYPE}) + --build_dir=${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/\${CTEST_CONFIGURATION_TYPE} ${ARGN}) endif (${CMAKE_MAJOR_VERSION}.${CMAKE_MINOR_VERSION} GREATER 3.1) - endif() + endif(PYTHONINTERP_FOUND) endfunction() diff --git a/googletest/configure.ac b/googletest/configure.ac index cc592e1..254c8c4 100644 --- a/googletest/configure.ac +++ b/googletest/configure.ac @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ m4_include(m4/acx_pthread.m4) # "[1.0.1]"). It also asumes that there won't be any closing parenthesis # between "AC_INIT(" and the closing ")" including comments and strings. AC_INIT([Google C++ Testing Framework], - [1.7.0], + [1.8.0], [googletestframework@googlegroups.com], [gtest]) diff --git a/googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md b/googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index 93a6520..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2182 +0,0 @@ - - -Now that you have read [Primer](Primer.md) and learned how to write tests -using Google Test, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document -will show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex -failure messages, propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your -test fixtures, and use various flags with your tests. - -# More Assertions # - -This section covers some less frequently used, but still significant, -assertions. - -## Explicit Success and Failure ## - -These three assertions do not actually test a value or expression. Instead, -they generate a success or failure directly. Like the macros that actually -perform a test, you may stream a custom failure message into the them. - -| `SUCCEED();` | -|:-------------| - -Generates a success. This does NOT make the overall test succeed. A test is -considered successful only if none of its assertions fail during its execution. - -Note: `SUCCEED()` is purely documentary and currently doesn't generate any -user-visible output. However, we may add `SUCCEED()` messages to Google Test's -output in the future. - -| `FAIL();` | `ADD_FAILURE();` | `ADD_FAILURE_AT("`_file\_path_`", `_line\_number_`);` | -|:-----------|:-----------------|:------------------------------------------------------| - -`FAIL()` generates a fatal failure, while `ADD_FAILURE()` and `ADD_FAILURE_AT()` generate a nonfatal -failure. These are useful when control flow, rather than a Boolean expression, -deteremines the test's success or failure. For example, you might want to write -something like: - -``` -switch(expression) { - case 1: ... some checks ... - case 2: ... some other checks - ... - default: FAIL() << "We shouldn't get here."; -} -``` - -Note: you can only use `FAIL()` in functions that return `void`. See the [Assertion Placement section](#assertion-placement) for more information. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Exception Assertions ## - -These are for verifying that a piece of code throws (or does not -throw) an exception of the given type: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | `EXPECT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of the given type | -| `ASSERT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of any type | -| `ASSERT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't throw any exception | - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_THROW(Foo(5), bar_exception); - -EXPECT_NO_THROW({ - int n = 5; - Bar(&n); -}); -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.1.0. - -## Predicate Assertions for Better Error Messages ## - -Even though Google Test has a rich set of assertions, they can never be -complete, as it's impossible (nor a good idea) to anticipate all the scenarios -a user might run into. Therefore, sometimes a user has to use `EXPECT_TRUE()` -to check a complex expression, for lack of a better macro. This has the problem -of not showing you the values of the parts of the expression, making it hard to -understand what went wrong. As a workaround, some users choose to construct the -failure message by themselves, streaming it into `EXPECT_TRUE()`. However, this -is awkward especially when the expression has side-effects or is expensive to -evaluate. - -Google Test gives you three different options to solve this problem: - -### Using an Existing Boolean Function ### - -If you already have a function or a functor that returns `bool` (or a type -that can be implicitly converted to `bool`), you can use it in a _predicate -assertion_ to get the function arguments printed for free: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | _pred1(val1)_ returns true | -| `ASSERT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred2(val1, val2)_ returns true | -| ... | ... | ... | - -In the above, _predn_ is an _n_-ary predicate function or functor, where -_val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are its arguments. The assertion succeeds -if the predicate returns `true` when applied to the given arguments, and fails -otherwise. When the assertion fails, it prints the value of each argument. In -either case, the arguments are evaluated exactly once. - -Here's an example. Given - -``` -// Returns true iff m and n have no common divisors except 1. -bool MutuallyPrime(int m, int n) { ... } -const int a = 3; -const int b = 4; -const int c = 10; -``` - -the assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, a, b);` will succeed, while the -assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, b, c);` will fail with the message - -<pre> -!MutuallyPrime(b, c) is false, where<br> -b is 4<br> -c is 10<br> -</pre> - -**Notes:** - - 1. If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see [this FAQ](FAQ.md#the-compiler-complains-no-matching-function-to-call-when-i-use-assert_predn-how-do-i-fix-it) for how to resolve it. - 1. Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need a higher-arity assertion, let us know. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac - -### Using a Function That Returns an AssertionResult ### - -While `EXPECT_PRED*()` and friends are handy for a quick job, the -syntax is not satisfactory: you have to use different macros for -different arities, and it feels more like Lisp than C++. The -`::testing::AssertionResult` class solves this problem. - -An `AssertionResult` object represents the result of an assertion -(whether it's a success or a failure, and an associated message). You -can create an `AssertionResult` using one of these factory -functions: - -``` -namespace testing { - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// succeeded. -AssertionResult AssertionSuccess(); - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// failed. -AssertionResult AssertionFailure(); - -} -``` - -You can then use the `<<` operator to stream messages to the -`AssertionResult` object. - -To provide more readable messages in Boolean assertions -(e.g. `EXPECT_TRUE()`), write a predicate function that returns -`AssertionResult` instead of `bool`. For example, if you define -`IsEven()` as: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -instead of: - -``` -bool IsEven(int n) { - return (n % 2) == 0; -} -``` - -the failed assertion `EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(4)))` will print: - -<pre> -Value of: IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false (*3 is odd*)<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -instead of a more opaque - -<pre> -Value of: IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -If you want informative messages in `EXPECT_FALSE` and `ASSERT_FALSE` -as well, and are fine with making the predicate slower in the success -case, you can supply a success message: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess() << n << " is even"; - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -Then the statement `EXPECT_FALSE(IsEven(Fib(6)))` will print - -<pre> -Value of: IsEven(Fib(6))<br> -Actual: true (8 is even)<br> -Expected: false<br> -</pre> - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.4.1. - -### Using a Predicate-Formatter ### - -If you find the default message generated by `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED*` and -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_(TRUE|FALSE)` unsatisfactory, or some arguments to your -predicate do not support streaming to `ostream`, you can instead use the -following _predicate-formatter assertions_ to _fully_ customize how the -message is formatted: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`);` | _pred\_format1(val1)_ is successful | -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred\_format2(val1, val2)_ is successful | -| `...` | `...` | `...` | - -The difference between this and the previous two groups of macros is that instead of -a predicate, `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*` take a _predicate-formatter_ -(_pred\_formatn_), which is a function or functor with the signature: - -`::testing::AssertionResult PredicateFormattern(const char* `_expr1_`, const char* `_expr2_`, ... const char* `_exprn_`, T1 `_val1_`, T2 `_val2_`, ... Tn `_valn_`);` - -where _val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are the values of the predicate -arguments, and _expr1_, _expr2_, ..., and _exprn_ are the corresponding -expressions as they appear in the source code. The types `T1`, `T2`, ..., and -`Tn` can be either value types or reference types. For example, if an -argument has type `Foo`, you can declare it as either `Foo` or `const Foo&`, -whichever is appropriate. - -A predicate-formatter returns a `::testing::AssertionResult` object to indicate -whether the assertion has succeeded or not. The only way to create such an -object is to call one of these factory functions: - -As an example, let's improve the failure message in the previous example, which uses `EXPECT_PRED2()`: - -``` -// Returns the smallest prime common divisor of m and n, -// or 1 when m and n are mutually prime. -int SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(int m, int n) { ... } - -// A predicate-formatter for asserting that two integers are mutually prime. -::testing::AssertionResult AssertMutuallyPrime(const char* m_expr, - const char* n_expr, - int m, - int n) { - if (MutuallyPrime(m, n)) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() - << m_expr << " and " << n_expr << " (" << m << " and " << n - << ") are not mutually prime, " << "as they have a common divisor " - << SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(m, n); -} -``` - -With this predicate-formatter, we can use - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(AssertMutuallyPrime, b, c); -``` - -to generate the message - -<pre> -b and c (4 and 10) are not mutually prime, as they have a common divisor 2.<br> -</pre> - -As you may have realized, many of the assertions we introduced earlier are -special cases of `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. In fact, most of them are -indeed defined using `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -## Floating-Point Comparison ## - -Comparing floating-point numbers is tricky. Due to round-off errors, it is -very unlikely that two floating-points will match exactly. Therefore, -`ASSERT_EQ` 's naive comparison usually doesn't work. And since floating-points -can have a wide value range, no single fixed error bound works. It's better to -compare by a fixed relative error bound, except for values close to 0 due to -the loss of precision there. - -In general, for floating-point comparison to make sense, the user needs to -carefully choose the error bound. If they don't want or care to, comparing in -terms of Units in the Last Place (ULPs) is a good default, and Google Test -provides assertions to do this. Full details about ULPs are quite long; if you -want to learn more, see -[this article on float comparison](http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/comparingfloats/comparingfloats.htm). - -### Floating-Point Macros ### - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(`_val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(`_val1, val2_`);` | the two `float` values are almost equal | -| `ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_val1, val2_`);` | the two `double` values are almost equal | - -By "almost equal", we mean the two values are within 4 ULP's from each -other. - -The following assertions allow you to choose the acceptable error bound: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NEAR(`_val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | `EXPECT_NEAR`_(val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | the difference between _val1_ and _val2_ doesn't exceed the given absolute error | - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Floating-Point Predicate-Format Functions ### - -Some floating-point operations are useful, but not that often used. In order -to avoid an explosion of new macros, we provide them as predicate-format -functions that can be used in predicate assertion macros (e.g. -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2`, etc). - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::FloatLE, val1, val2); -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::DoubleLE, val1, val2); -``` - -Verifies that _val1_ is less than, or almost equal to, _val2_. You can -replace `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2` in the above table with `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Windows HRESULT assertions ## - -These assertions test for `HRESULT` success or failure. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a success `HRESULT` | -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a failure `HRESULT` | - -The generated output contains the human-readable error message -associated with the `HRESULT` code returned by _expression_. - -You might use them like this: - -``` -CComPtr shell; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell.CoCreateInstance(L"Shell.Application")); -CComVariant empty; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell->ShellExecute(CComBSTR(url), empty, empty, empty, empty)); -``` - -_Availability_: Windows. - -## Type Assertions ## - -You can call the function -``` -::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>(); -``` -to assert that types `T1` and `T2` are the same. The function does -nothing if the assertion is satisfied. If the types are different, -the function call will fail to compile, and the compiler error message -will likely (depending on the compiler) show you the actual values of -`T1` and `T2`. This is mainly useful inside template code. - -_Caveat:_ When used inside a member function of a class template or a -function template, `StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>()` is effective _only if_ -the function is instantiated. For example, given: -``` -template <typename T> class Foo { - public: - void Bar() { ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<int, T>(); } -}; -``` -the code: -``` -void Test1() { Foo<bool> foo; } -``` -will _not_ generate a compiler error, as `Foo<bool>::Bar()` is never -actually instantiated. Instead, you need: -``` -void Test2() { Foo<bool> foo; foo.Bar(); } -``` -to cause a compiler error. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Assertion Placement ## - -You can use assertions in any C++ function. In particular, it doesn't -have to be a method of the test fixture class. The one constraint is -that assertions that generate a fatal failure (`FAIL*` and `ASSERT_*`) -can only be used in void-returning functions. This is a consequence of -Google Test not using exceptions. By placing it in a non-void function -you'll get a confusing compile error like -`"error: void value not ignored as it ought to be"`. - -If you need to use assertions in a function that returns non-void, one option -is to make the function return the value in an out parameter instead. For -example, you can rewrite `T2 Foo(T1 x)` to `void Foo(T1 x, T2* result)`. You -need to make sure that `*result` contains some sensible value even when the -function returns prematurely. As the function now returns `void`, you can use -any assertion inside of it. - -If changing the function's type is not an option, you should just use -assertions that generate non-fatal failures, such as `ADD_FAILURE*` and -`EXPECT_*`. - -_Note_: Constructors and destructors are not considered void-returning -functions, according to the C++ language specification, and so you may not use -fatal assertions in them. You'll get a compilation error if you try. A simple -workaround is to transfer the entire body of the constructor or destructor to a -private void-returning method. However, you should be aware that a fatal -assertion failure in a constructor does not terminate the current test, as your -intuition might suggest; it merely returns from the constructor early, possibly -leaving your object in a partially-constructed state. Likewise, a fatal -assertion failure in a destructor may leave your object in a -partially-destructed state. Use assertions carefully in these situations! - -# Teaching Google Test How to Print Your Values # - -When a test assertion such as `EXPECT_EQ` fails, Google Test prints the -argument values to help you debug. It does this using a -user-extensible value printer. - -This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL -containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other -types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the -user can figure it out. - -As mentioned earlier, the printer is _extensible_. That means -you can teach it to do a better job at printing your particular type -than to dump the bytes. To do that, define `<<` for your type: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Bar { ... }; // We want Google Test to be able to print instances of this. - -// It's important that the << operator is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Bar& bar) { - return os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -Sometimes, this might not be an option: your team may consider it bad -style to have a `<<` operator for `Bar`, or `Bar` may already have a -`<<` operator that doesn't do what you want (and you cannot change -it). If so, you can instead define a `PrintTo()` function like this: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Bar { ... }; - -// It's important that PrintTo() is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -void PrintTo(const Bar& bar, ::std::ostream* os) { - *os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -If you have defined both `<<` and `PrintTo()`, the latter will be used -when Google Test is concerned. This allows you to customize how the value -appears in Google Test's output without affecting code that relies on the -behavior of its `<<` operator. - -If you want to print a value `x` using Google Test's value printer -yourself, just call `::testing::PrintToString(`_x_`)`, which -returns an `std::string`: - -``` -vector<pair<Bar, int> > bar_ints = GetBarIntVector(); - -EXPECT_TRUE(IsCorrectBarIntVector(bar_ints)) - << "bar_ints = " << ::testing::PrintToString(bar_ints); -``` - -# Death Tests # - -In many applications, there are assertions that can cause application failure -if a condition is not met. These sanity checks, which ensure that the program -is in a known good state, are there to fail at the earliest possible time after -some program state is corrupted. If the assertion checks the wrong condition, -then the program may proceed in an erroneous state, which could lead to memory -corruption, security holes, or worse. Hence it is vitally important to test -that such assertion statements work as expected. - -Since these precondition checks cause the processes to die, we call such tests -_death tests_. More generally, any test that checks that a program terminates -(except by throwing an exception) in an expected fashion is also a death test. - -Note that if a piece of code throws an exception, we don't consider it "death" -for the purpose of death tests, as the caller of the code could catch the exception -and avoid the crash. If you want to verify exceptions thrown by your code, -see [Exception Assertions](#exception-assertions). - -If you want to test `EXPECT_*()/ASSERT_*()` failures in your test code, see [Catching Failures](#catching-failures). - -## How to Write a Death Test ## - -Google Test has the following macros to support death tests: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`);` | `EXPECT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`);` | _statement_ crashes with the given error | -| `ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`);` | `EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`);` | if death tests are supported, verifies that _statement_ crashes with the given error; otherwise verifies nothing | -| `ASSERT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`);` | `EXPECT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`);` |_statement_ exits with the given error and its exit code matches _predicate_ | - -where _statement_ is a statement that is expected to cause the process to -die, _predicate_ is a function or function object that evaluates an integer -exit status, and _regex_ is a regular expression that the stderr output of -_statement_ is expected to match. Note that _statement_ can be _any valid -statement_ (including _compound statement_) and doesn't have to be an -expression. - -As usual, the `ASSERT` variants abort the current test function, while the -`EXPECT` variants do not. - -**Note:** We use the word "crash" here to mean that the process -terminates with a _non-zero_ exit status code. There are two -possibilities: either the process has called `exit()` or `_exit()` -with a non-zero value, or it may be killed by a signal. - -This means that if _statement_ terminates the process with a 0 exit -code, it is _not_ considered a crash by `EXPECT_DEATH`. Use -`EXPECT_EXIT` instead if this is the case, or if you want to restrict -the exit code more precisely. - -A predicate here must accept an `int` and return a `bool`. The death test -succeeds only if the predicate returns `true`. Google Test defines a few -predicates that handle the most common cases: - -``` -::testing::ExitedWithCode(exit_code) -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program exited normally with the given exit -code. - -``` -::testing::KilledBySignal(signal_number) // Not available on Windows. -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program was killed by the given signal. - -The `*_DEATH` macros are convenient wrappers for `*_EXIT` that use a predicate -that verifies the process' exit code is non-zero. - -Note that a death test only cares about three things: - - 1. does _statement_ abort or exit the process? - 1. (in the case of `ASSERT_EXIT` and `EXPECT_EXIT`) does the exit status satisfy _predicate_? Or (in the case of `ASSERT_DEATH` and `EXPECT_DEATH`) is the exit status non-zero? And - 1. does the stderr output match _regex_? - -In particular, if _statement_ generates an `ASSERT_*` or `EXPECT_*` failure, it will **not** cause the death test to fail, as Google Test assertions don't abort the process. - -To write a death test, simply use one of the above macros inside your test -function. For example, - -``` -TEST(MyDeathTest, Foo) { - // This death test uses a compound statement. - ASSERT_DEATH({ int n = 5; Foo(&n); }, "Error on line .* of Foo()"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, NormalExit) { - EXPECT_EXIT(NormalExit(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, KillMyself) { - EXPECT_EXIT(KillMyself(), ::testing::KilledBySignal(SIGKILL), "Sending myself unblockable signal"); -} -``` - -verifies that: - - * calling `Foo(5)` causes the process to die with the given error message, - * calling `NormalExit()` causes the process to print `"Success"` to stderr and exit with exit code 0, and - * calling `KillMyself()` kills the process with signal `SIGKILL`. - -The test function body may contain other assertions and statements as well, if -necessary. - -_Important:_ We strongly recommend you to follow the convention of naming your -test case (not test) `*DeathTest` when it contains a death test, as -demonstrated in the above example. The `Death Tests And Threads` section below -explains why. - -If a test fixture class is shared by normal tests and death tests, you -can use typedef to introduce an alias for the fixture class and avoid -duplicating its code: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { - // normal test -} - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, DoesThat) { - // death test -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Cygwin, and Mac (the latter three are supported since v1.3.0). `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED` are new in v1.4.0. - -## Regular Expression Syntax ## - -On POSIX systems (e.g. Linux, Cygwin, and Mac), Google Test uses the -[POSIX extended regular expression](http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html#tag_09_04) -syntax in death tests. To learn about this syntax, you may want to read this [Wikipedia entry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). - -On Windows, Google Test uses its own simple regular expression -implementation. It lacks many features you can find in POSIX extended -regular expressions. For example, we don't support union (`"x|y"`), -grouping (`"(xy)"`), brackets (`"[xy]"`), and repetition count -(`"x{5,7}"`), among others. Below is what we do support (Letter `A` denotes a -literal character, period (`.`), or a single `\\` escape sequence; `x` -and `y` denote regular expressions.): - -| `c` | matches any literal character `c` | -|:----|:----------------------------------| -| `\\d` | matches any decimal digit | -| `\\D` | matches any character that's not a decimal digit | -| `\\f` | matches `\f` | -| `\\n` | matches `\n` | -| `\\r` | matches `\r` | -| `\\s` | matches any ASCII whitespace, including `\n` | -| `\\S` | matches any character that's not a whitespace | -| `\\t` | matches `\t` | -| `\\v` | matches `\v` | -| `\\w` | matches any letter, `_`, or decimal digit | -| `\\W` | matches any character that `\\w` doesn't match | -| `\\c` | matches any literal character `c`, which must be a punctuation | -| `\\.` | matches the `.` character | -| `.` | matches any single character except `\n` | -| `A?` | matches 0 or 1 occurrences of `A` | -| `A*` | matches 0 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `A+` | matches 1 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `^` | matches the beginning of a string (not that of each line) | -| `$` | matches the end of a string (not that of each line) | -| `xy` | matches `x` followed by `y` | - -To help you determine which capability is available on your system, -Google Test defines macro `GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE=1` when it uses POSIX -extended regular expressions, or `GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE=1` when it uses -the simple version. If you want your death tests to work in both -cases, you can either `#if` on these macros or use the more limited -syntax only. - -## How It Works ## - -Under the hood, `ASSERT_EXIT()` spawns a new process and executes the -death test statement in that process. The details of of how precisely -that happens depend on the platform and the variable -`::testing::GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style)` (which is initialized from the -command-line flag `--gtest_death_test_style`). - - * On POSIX systems, `fork()` (or `clone()` on Linux) is used to spawn the child, after which: - * If the variable's value is `"fast"`, the death test statement is immediately executed. - * If the variable's value is `"threadsafe"`, the child process re-executes the unit test binary just as it was originally invoked, but with some extra flags to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run. - * On Windows, the child is spawned using the `CreateProcess()` API, and re-executes the binary to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run - much like the `threadsafe` mode on POSIX. - -Other values for the variable are illegal and will cause the death test to -fail. Currently, the flag's default value is `"fast"`. However, we reserve the -right to change it in the future. Therefore, your tests should not depend on -this. - -In either case, the parent process waits for the child process to complete, and checks that - - 1. the child's exit status satisfies the predicate, and - 1. the child's stderr matches the regular expression. - -If the death test statement runs to completion without dying, the child -process will nonetheless terminate, and the assertion fails. - -## Death Tests And Threads ## - -The reason for the two death test styles has to do with thread safety. Due to -well-known problems with forking in the presence of threads, death tests should -be run in a single-threaded context. Sometimes, however, it isn't feasible to -arrange that kind of environment. For example, statically-initialized modules -may start threads before main is ever reached. Once threads have been created, -it may be difficult or impossible to clean them up. - -Google Test has three features intended to raise awareness of threading issues. - - 1. A warning is emitted if multiple threads are running when a death test is encountered. - 1. Test cases with a name ending in "DeathTest" are run before all other tests. - 1. It uses `clone()` instead of `fork()` to spawn the child process on Linux (`clone()` is not available on Cygwin and Mac), as `fork()` is more likely to cause the child to hang when the parent process has multiple threads. - -It's perfectly fine to create threads inside a death test statement; they are -executed in a separate process and cannot affect the parent. - -## Death Test Styles ## - -The "threadsafe" death test style was introduced in order to help mitigate the -risks of testing in a possibly multithreaded environment. It trades increased -test execution time (potentially dramatically so) for improved thread safety. -We suggest using the faster, default "fast" style unless your test has specific -problems with it. - -You can choose a particular style of death tests by setting the flag -programmatically: - -``` -::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; -``` - -You can do this in `main()` to set the style for all death tests in the -binary, or in individual tests. Recall that flags are saved before running each -test and restored afterwards, so you need not do that yourself. For example: - -``` -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestOne) { - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; - // This test is run in the "threadsafe" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestTwo) { - // This test is run in the "fast" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "fast"; - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Caveats ## - -The _statement_ argument of `ASSERT_EXIT()` can be any valid C++ statement. -If it leaves the current function via a `return` statement or by throwing an exception, -the death test is considered to have failed. Some Google Test macros may return -from the current function (e.g. `ASSERT_TRUE()`), so be sure to avoid them in _statement_. - -Since _statement_ runs in the child process, any in-memory side effect (e.g. -modifying a variable, releasing memory, etc) it causes will _not_ be observable -in the parent process. In particular, if you release memory in a death test, -your program will fail the heap check as the parent process will never see the -memory reclaimed. To solve this problem, you can - - 1. try not to free memory in a death test; - 1. free the memory again in the parent process; or - 1. do not use the heap checker in your program. - -Due to an implementation detail, you cannot place multiple death test -assertions on the same line; otherwise, compilation will fail with an unobvious -error message. - -Despite the improved thread safety afforded by the "threadsafe" style of death -test, thread problems such as deadlock are still possible in the presence of -handlers registered with `pthread_atfork(3)`. - -# Using Assertions in Sub-routines # - -## Adding Traces to Assertions ## - -If a test sub-routine is called from several places, when an assertion -inside it fails, it can be hard to tell which invocation of the -sub-routine the failure is from. You can alleviate this problem using -extra logging or custom failure messages, but that usually clutters up -your tests. A better solution is to use the `SCOPED_TRACE` macro: - -| `SCOPED_TRACE(`_message_`);` | -|:-----------------------------| - -where _message_ can be anything streamable to `std::ostream`. This -macro will cause the current file name, line number, and the given -message to be added in every failure message. The effect will be -undone when the control leaves the current lexical scope. - -For example, - -``` -10: void Sub1(int n) { -11: EXPECT_EQ(1, Bar(n)); -12: EXPECT_EQ(2, Bar(n + 1)); -13: } -14: -15: TEST(FooTest, Bar) { -16: { -17: SCOPED_TRACE("A"); // This trace point will be included in -18: // every failure in this scope. -19: Sub1(1); -20: } -21: // Now it won't. -22: Sub1(9); -23: } -``` - -could result in messages like these: - -``` -path/to/foo_test.cc:11: Failure -Value of: Bar(n) -Expected: 1 - Actual: 2 - Trace: -path/to/foo_test.cc:17: A - -path/to/foo_test.cc:12: Failure -Value of: Bar(n + 1) -Expected: 2 - Actual: 3 -``` - -Without the trace, it would've been difficult to know which invocation -of `Sub1()` the two failures come from respectively. (You could add an -extra message to each assertion in `Sub1()` to indicate the value of -`n`, but that's tedious.) - -Some tips on using `SCOPED_TRACE`: - - 1. With a suitable message, it's often enough to use `SCOPED_TRACE` at the beginning of a sub-routine, instead of at each call site. - 1. When calling sub-routines inside a loop, make the loop iterator part of the message in `SCOPED_TRACE` such that you can know which iteration the failure is from. - 1. Sometimes the line number of the trace point is enough for identifying the particular invocation of a sub-routine. In this case, you don't have to choose a unique message for `SCOPED_TRACE`. You can simply use `""`. - 1. You can use `SCOPED_TRACE` in an inner scope when there is one in the outer scope. In this case, all active trace points will be included in the failure messages, in reverse order they are encountered. - 1. The trace dump is clickable in Emacs' compilation buffer - hit return on a line number and you'll be taken to that line in the source file! - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Propagating Fatal Failures ## - -A common pitfall when using `ASSERT_*` and `FAIL*` is not understanding that -when they fail they only abort the _current function_, not the entire test. For -example, the following test will segfault: -``` -void Subroutine() { - // Generates a fatal failure and aborts the current function. - ASSERT_EQ(1, 2); - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} - -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // The intended behavior is for the fatal failure - // in Subroutine() to abort the entire test. - // The actual behavior: the function goes on after Subroutine() returns. - int* p = NULL; - *p = 3; // Segfault! -} -``` - -Since we don't use exceptions, it is technically impossible to -implement the intended behavior here. To alleviate this, Google Test -provides two solutions. You could use either the -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_NO_FATAL_FAILURE` assertions or the -`HasFatalFailure()` function. They are described in the following two -subsections. - -### Asserting on Subroutines ### - -As shown above, if your test calls a subroutine that has an `ASSERT_*` -failure in it, the test will continue after the subroutine -returns. This may not be what you want. - -Often people want fatal failures to propagate like exceptions. For -that Google Test offers the following macros: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't generate any new fatal failures in the current thread. | - -Only failures in the thread that executes the assertion are checked to -determine the result of this type of assertions. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads are ignored. - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(Foo()); - -int i; -EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE({ - i = Bar(); -}); -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. Assertions from multiple threads -are currently not supported. - -### Checking for Failures in the Current Test ### - -`HasFatalFailure()` in the `::testing::Test` class returns `true` if an -assertion in the current test has suffered a fatal failure. This -allows functions to catch fatal failures in a sub-routine and return -early. - -``` -class Test { - public: - ... - static bool HasFatalFailure(); -}; -``` - -The typical usage, which basically simulates the behavior of a thrown -exception, is: - -``` -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // Aborts if Subroutine() had a fatal failure. - if (HasFatalFailure()) - return; - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} -``` - -If `HasFatalFailure()` is used outside of `TEST()` , `TEST_F()` , or a test -fixture, you must add the `::testing::Test::` prefix, as in: - -``` -if (::testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) - return; -``` - -Similarly, `HasNonfatalFailure()` returns `true` if the current test -has at least one non-fatal failure, and `HasFailure()` returns `true` -if the current test has at least one failure of either kind. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. `HasNonfatalFailure()` and -`HasFailure()` are available since version 1.4.0. - -# Logging Additional Information # - -In your test code, you can call `RecordProperty("key", value)` to log -additional information, where `value` can be either a string or an `int`. The _last_ value recorded for a key will be emitted to the XML output -if you specify one. For example, the test - -``` -TEST_F(WidgetUsageTest, MinAndMaxWidgets) { - RecordProperty("MaximumWidgets", ComputeMaxUsage()); - RecordProperty("MinimumWidgets", ComputeMinUsage()); -} -``` - -will output XML like this: - -``` -... - <testcase name="MinAndMaxWidgets" status="run" time="6" classname="WidgetUsageTest" - MaximumWidgets="12" - MinimumWidgets="9" /> -... -``` - -_Note_: - * `RecordProperty()` is a static member of the `Test` class. Therefore it needs to be prefixed with `::testing::Test::` if used outside of the `TEST` body and the test fixture class. - * `key` must be a valid XML attribute name, and cannot conflict with the ones already used by Google Test (`name`, `status`, `time`, `classname`, `type_param`, and `value_param`). - * Calling `RecordProperty()` outside of the lifespan of a test is allowed. If it's called outside of a test but between a test case's `SetUpTestCase()` and `TearDownTestCase()` methods, it will be attributed to the XML element for the test case. If it's called outside of all test cases (e.g. in a test environment), it will be attributed to the top-level XML element. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Sharing Resources Between Tests in the Same Test Case # - - - -Google Test creates a new test fixture object for each test in order to make -tests independent and easier to debug. However, sometimes tests use resources -that are expensive to set up, making the one-copy-per-test model prohibitively -expensive. - -If the tests don't change the resource, there's no harm in them sharing a -single resource copy. So, in addition to per-test set-up/tear-down, Google Test -also supports per-test-case set-up/tear-down. To use it: - - 1. In your test fixture class (say `FooTest` ), define as `static` some member variables to hold the shared resources. - 1. In the same test fixture class, define a `static void SetUpTestCase()` function (remember not to spell it as **`SetupTestCase`** with a small `u`!) to set up the shared resources and a `static void TearDownTestCase()` function to tear them down. - -That's it! Google Test automatically calls `SetUpTestCase()` before running the -_first test_ in the `FooTest` test case (i.e. before creating the first -`FooTest` object), and calls `TearDownTestCase()` after running the _last test_ -in it (i.e. after deleting the last `FooTest` object). In between, the tests -can use the shared resources. - -Remember that the test order is undefined, so your code can't depend on a test -preceding or following another. Also, the tests must either not modify the -state of any shared resource, or, if they do modify the state, they must -restore the state to its original value before passing control to the next -test. - -Here's an example of per-test-case set-up and tear-down: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // Per-test-case set-up. - // Called before the first test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void SetUpTestCase() { - shared_resource_ = new ...; - } - - // Per-test-case tear-down. - // Called after the last test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void TearDownTestCase() { - delete shared_resource_; - shared_resource_ = NULL; - } - - // You can define per-test set-up and tear-down logic as usual. - virtual void SetUp() { ... } - virtual void TearDown() { ... } - - // Some expensive resource shared by all tests. - static T* shared_resource_; -}; - -T* FooTest::shared_resource_ = NULL; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Global Set-Up and Tear-Down # - -Just as you can do set-up and tear-down at the test level and the test case -level, you can also do it at the test program level. Here's how. - -First, you subclass the `::testing::Environment` class to define a test -environment, which knows how to set-up and tear-down: - -``` -class Environment { - public: - virtual ~Environment() {} - // Override this to define how to set up the environment. - virtual void SetUp() {} - // Override this to define how to tear down the environment. - virtual void TearDown() {} -}; -``` - -Then, you register an instance of your environment class with Google Test by -calling the `::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` function: - -``` -Environment* AddGlobalTestEnvironment(Environment* env); -``` - -Now, when `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is called, it first calls the `SetUp()` method of -the environment object, then runs the tests if there was no fatal failures, and -finally calls `TearDown()` of the environment object. - -It's OK to register multiple environment objects. In this case, their `SetUp()` -will be called in the order they are registered, and their `TearDown()` will be -called in the reverse order. - -Note that Google Test takes ownership of the registered environment objects. -Therefore **do not delete them** by yourself. - -You should call `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` before `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is -called, probably in `main()`. If you use `gtest_main`, you need to call -this before `main()` starts for it to take effect. One way to do this is to -define a global variable like this: - -``` -::testing::Environment* const foo_env = ::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); -``` - -However, we strongly recommend you to write your own `main()` and call -`AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` there, as relying on initialization of global -variables makes the code harder to read and may cause problems when you -register multiple environments from different translation units and the -environments have dependencies among them (remember that the compiler doesn't -guarantee the order in which global variables from different translation units -are initialized). - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -# Value Parameterized Tests # - -_Value-parameterized tests_ allow you to test your code with different -parameters without writing multiple copies of the same test. - -Suppose you write a test for your code and then realize that your code is affected by a presence of a Boolean command line flag. - -``` -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFoo) { - // A code to test foo(). -} -``` - -Usually people factor their test code into a function with a Boolean parameter in such situations. The function sets the flag, then executes the testing code. - -``` -void TestFooHelper(bool flag_value) { - flag = flag_value; - // A code to test foo(). -} - -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFoo) { - TestFooHelper(false); - TestFooHelper(true); -} -``` - -But this setup has serious drawbacks. First, when a test assertion fails in your tests, it becomes unclear what value of the parameter caused it to fail. You can stream a clarifying message into your `EXPECT`/`ASSERT` statements, but it you'll have to do it with all of them. Second, you have to add one such helper function per test. What if you have ten tests? Twenty? A hundred? - -Value-parameterized tests will let you write your test only once and then easily instantiate and run it with an arbitrary number of parameter values. - -Here are some other situations when value-parameterized tests come handy: - - * You want to test different implementations of an OO interface. - * You want to test your code over various inputs (a.k.a. data-driven testing). This feature is easy to abuse, so please exercise your good sense when doing it! - -## How to Write Value-Parameterized Tests ## - -To write value-parameterized tests, first you should define a fixture -class. It must be derived from both `::testing::Test` and -`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>` (the latter is a pure interface), -where `T` is the type of your parameter values. For convenience, you -can just derive the fixture class from `::testing::TestWithParam<T>`, -which itself is derived from both `::testing::Test` and -`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>`. `T` can be any copyable type. If -it's a raw pointer, you are responsible for managing the lifespan of -the pointed values. - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char*> { - // You can implement all the usual fixture class members here. - // To access the test parameter, call GetParam() from class - // TestWithParam<T>. -}; - -// Or, when you want to add parameters to a pre-existing fixture class: -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -class BarTest : public BaseTest, - public ::testing::WithParamInterface<const char*> { - ... -}; -``` - -Then, use the `TEST_P` macro to define as many test patterns using -this fixture as you want. The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or -"pattern", whichever you prefer to think. - -``` -TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, access the test parameter with the GetParam() method - // of the TestWithParam<T> class: - EXPECT_TRUE(foo.Blah(GetParam())); - ... -} - -TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { - ... -} -``` - -Finally, you can use `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` to instantiate the test -case with any set of parameters you want. Google Test defines a number of -functions for generating test parameters. They return what we call -(surprise!) _parameter generators_. Here is a summary of them, -which are all in the `testing` namespace: - -| `Range(begin, end[, step])` | Yields values `{begin, begin+step, begin+step+step, ...}`. The values do not include `end`. `step` defaults to 1. | -|:----------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `Values(v1, v2, ..., vN)` | Yields values `{v1, v2, ..., vN}`. | -| `ValuesIn(container)` and `ValuesIn(begin, end)` | Yields values from a C-style array, an STL-style container, or an iterator range `[begin, end)`. `container`, `begin`, and `end` can be expressions whose values are determined at run time. | -| `Bool()` | Yields sequence `{false, true}`. | -| `Combine(g1, g2, ..., gN)` | Yields all combinations (the Cartesian product for the math savvy) of the values generated by the `N` generators. This is only available if your system provides the `<tr1/tuple>` header. If you are sure your system does, and Google Test disagrees, you can override it by defining `GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE=1`. See comments in [include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h](../include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h) for more information. | - -For more details, see the comments at the definitions of these functions in the [source code](../include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h). - -The following statement will instantiate tests from the `FooTest` test case -each with parameter values `"meeny"`, `"miny"`, and `"moe"`. - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(InstantiationName, - FooTest, - ::testing::Values("meeny", "miny", "moe")); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern (yes, you can -instantiate it more than once), the first argument to -`INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` is a prefix that will be added to the actual -test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes for different -instantiations. The tests from the instantiation above will have these -names: - - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/2` for `"moe"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/2` for `"moe"` - -You can use these names in [--gtest\_filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests). - -This statement will instantiate all tests from `FooTest` again, each -with parameter values `"cat"` and `"dog"`: - -``` -const char* pets[] = {"cat", "dog"}; -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AnotherInstantiationName, FooTest, - ::testing::ValuesIn(pets)); -``` - -The tests from the instantiation above will have these names: - - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"dog"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"dog"` - -Please note that `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` will instantiate _all_ -tests in the given test case, whether their definitions come before or -_after_ the `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` statement. - -You can see -[these](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) -[files](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) for more examples. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; since version 1.2.0. - -## Creating Value-Parameterized Abstract Tests ## - -In the above, we define and instantiate `FooTest` in the same source -file. Sometimes you may want to define value-parameterized tests in a -library and let other people instantiate them later. This pattern is -known as <i>abstract tests</i>. As an example of its application, when you -are designing an interface you can write a standard suite of abstract -tests (perhaps using a factory function as the test parameter) that -all implementations of the interface are expected to pass. When -someone implements the interface, he can instantiate your suite to get -all the interface-conformance tests for free. - -To define abstract tests, you should organize your code like this: - - 1. Put the definition of the parameterized test fixture class (e.g. `FooTest`) in a header file, say `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _declaring_ your abstract tests. - 1. Put the `TEST_P` definitions in `foo_param_test.cc`, which includes `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _implementing_ your abstract tests. - -Once they are defined, you can instantiate them by including -`foo_param_test.h`, invoking `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()`, and linking -with `foo_param_test.cc`. You can instantiate the same abstract test -case multiple times, possibly in different source files. - -# Typed Tests # - -Suppose you have multiple implementations of the same interface and -want to make sure that all of them satisfy some common requirements. -Or, you may have defined several types that are supposed to conform to -the same "concept" and you want to verify it. In both cases, you want -the same test logic repeated for different types. - -While you can write one `TEST` or `TEST_F` for each type you want to -test (and you may even factor the test logic into a function template -that you invoke from the `TEST`), it's tedious and doesn't scale: -if you want _m_ tests over _n_ types, you'll end up writing _m\*n_ -`TEST`s. - -_Typed tests_ allow you to repeat the same test logic over a list of -types. You only need to write the test logic once, although you must -know the type list when writing typed tests. Here's how you do it: - -First, define a fixture class template. It should be parameterized -by a type. Remember to derive it from `::testing::Test`: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - public: - ... - typedef std::list<T> List; - static T shared_; - T value_; -}; -``` - -Next, associate a list of types with the test case, which will be -repeated for each type in the list: - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -TYPED_TEST_CASE(FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -The `typedef` is necessary for the `TYPED_TEST_CASE` macro to parse -correctly. Otherwise the compiler will think that each comma in the -type list introduces a new macro argument. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST()` instead of `TEST_F()` to define a typed test -for this test case. You can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to the special name TypeParam to get the type - // parameter. Since we are inside a derived class template, C++ requires - // us to visit the members of FooTest via 'this'. - TypeParam n = this->value_; - - // To visit static members of the fixture, add the 'TestFixture::' - // prefix. - n += TestFixture::shared_; - - // To refer to typedefs in the fixture, add the 'typename TestFixture::' - // prefix. The 'typename' is required to satisfy the compiler. - typename TestFixture::List values; - values.push_back(n); - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Type-Parameterized Tests # - -_Type-parameterized tests_ are like typed tests, except that they -don't require you to know the list of types ahead of time. Instead, -you can define the test logic first and instantiate it with different -type lists later. You can even instantiate it more than once in the -same program. - -If you are designing an interface or concept, you can define a suite -of type-parameterized tests to verify properties that any valid -implementation of the interface/concept should have. Then, the author -of each implementation can just instantiate the test suite with his -type to verify that it conforms to the requirements, without having to -write similar tests repeatedly. Here's an example: - -First, define a fixture class template, as we did with typed tests: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -``` - -Next, declare that you will define a type-parameterized test case: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest); -``` - -The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern", whichever you -prefer to think. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST_P()` to define a type-parameterized test. You -can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to TypeParam to get the type parameter. - TypeParam n = 0; - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -Now the tricky part: you need to register all test patterns using the -`REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro before you can instantiate them. -The first argument of the macro is the test case name; the rest are -the names of the tests in this test case: - -``` -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest, - DoesBlah, HasPropertyA); -``` - -Finally, you are free to instantiate the pattern with the types you -want. If you put the above code in a header file, you can `#include` -it in multiple C++ source files and instantiate it multiple times. - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern, the first argument -to the `INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro is a prefix that will be -added to the actual test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes -for different instances. - -In the special case where the type list contains only one type, you -can write that type directly without `::testing::Types<...>`, like this: - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, int); -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Testing Private Code # - -If you change your software's internal implementation, your tests should not -break as long as the change is not observable by users. Therefore, per the -_black-box testing principle_, most of the time you should test your code -through its public interfaces. - -If you still find yourself needing to test internal implementation code, -consider if there's a better design that wouldn't require you to do so. If you -absolutely have to test non-public interface code though, you can. There are -two cases to consider: - - * Static functions (_not_ the same as static member functions!) or unnamed namespaces, and - * Private or protected class members - -## Static Functions ## - -Both static functions and definitions/declarations in an unnamed namespace are -only visible within the same translation unit. To test them, you can `#include` -the entire `.cc` file being tested in your `*_test.cc` file. (`#include`ing `.cc` -files is not a good way to reuse code - you should not do this in production -code!) - -However, a better approach is to move the private code into the -`foo::internal` namespace, where `foo` is the namespace your project normally -uses, and put the private declarations in a `*-internal.h` file. Your -production `.cc` files and your tests are allowed to include this internal -header, but your clients are not. This way, you can fully test your internal -implementation without leaking it to your clients. - -## Private Class Members ## - -Private class members are only accessible from within the class or by friends. -To access a class' private members, you can declare your test fixture as a -friend to the class and define accessors in your fixture. Tests using the -fixture can then access the private members of your production class via the -accessors in the fixture. Note that even though your fixture is a friend to -your production class, your tests are not automatically friends to it, as they -are technically defined in sub-classes of the fixture. - -Another way to test private members is to refactor them into an implementation -class, which is then declared in a `*-internal.h` file. Your clients aren't -allowed to include this header but your tests can. Such is called the Pimpl -(Private Implementation) idiom. - -Or, you can declare an individual test as a friend of your class by adding this -line in the class body: - -``` -FRIEND_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName); -``` - -For example, -``` -// foo.h -#include "gtest/gtest_prod.h" - -// Defines FRIEND_TEST. -class Foo { - ... - private: - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull); - int Bar(void* x); -}; - -// foo_test.cc -... -TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull) { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_EQ(0, foo.Bar(NULL)); - // Uses Foo's private member Bar(). -} -``` - -Pay special attention when your class is defined in a namespace, as you should -define your test fixtures and tests in the same namespace if you want them to -be friends of your class. For example, if the code to be tested looks like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { - -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Bar); - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Baz); - ... - definition of the class Foo - ... -}; - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -Your test code should be something like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -# Catching Failures # - -If you are building a testing utility on top of Google Test, you'll -want to test your utility. What framework would you use to test it? -Google Test, of course. - -The challenge is to verify that your testing utility reports failures -correctly. In frameworks that report a failure by throwing an -exception, you could catch the exception and assert on it. But Google -Test doesn't use exceptions, so how do we test that a piece of code -generates an expected failure? - -`"gtest/gtest-spi.h"` contains some constructs to do this. After -`#include`ing this header, you can use - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:--------------------------------------------------| - -to assert that _statement_ generates a fatal (e.g. `ASSERT_*`) failure -whose message contains the given _substring_, or use - -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------| - -if you are expecting a non-fatal (e.g. `EXPECT_*`) failure. - -For technical reasons, there are some caveats: - - 1. You cannot stream a failure message to either macro. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot reference local non-static variables or non-static members of `this` object. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot return a value. - -_Note:_ Google Test is designed with threads in mind. Once the -synchronization primitives in `"gtest/internal/gtest-port.h"` have -been implemented, Google Test will become thread-safe, meaning that -you can then use assertions in multiple threads concurrently. Before -that, however, Google Test only supports single-threaded usage. Once -thread-safe, `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` and `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE()` -will capture failures in the current thread only. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads will be ignored. If -you want to capture failures from all threads instead, you should use -the following macros: - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------------------| -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | - -# Getting the Current Test's Name # - -Sometimes a function may need to know the name of the currently running test. -For example, you may be using the `SetUp()` method of your test fixture to set -the golden file name based on which test is running. The `::testing::TestInfo` -class has this information: - -``` -namespace testing { - -class TestInfo { - public: - // Returns the test case name and the test name, respectively. - // - // Do NOT delete or free the return value - it's managed by the - // TestInfo class. - const char* test_case_name() const; - const char* name() const; -}; - -} // namespace testing -``` - - -> To obtain a `TestInfo` object for the currently running test, call -`current_test_info()` on the `UnitTest` singleton object: - -``` -// Gets information about the currently running test. -// Do NOT delete the returned object - it's managed by the UnitTest class. -const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); -printf("We are in test %s of test case %s.\n", - test_info->name(), test_info->test_case_name()); -``` - -`current_test_info()` returns a null pointer if no test is running. In -particular, you cannot find the test case name in `TestCaseSetUp()`, -`TestCaseTearDown()` (where you know the test case name implicitly), or -functions called from them. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Extending Google Test by Handling Test Events # - -Google Test provides an <b>event listener API</b> to let you receive -notifications about the progress of a test program and test -failures. The events you can listen to include the start and end of -the test program, a test case, or a test method, among others. You may -use this API to augment or replace the standard console output, -replace the XML output, or provide a completely different form of -output, such as a GUI or a database. You can also use test events as -checkpoints to implement a resource leak checker, for example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Defining Event Listeners ## - -To define a event listener, you subclass either -[testing::TestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L991) -or [testing::EmptyTestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L1044). -The former is an (abstract) interface, where <i>each pure virtual method<br> -can be overridden to handle a test event</i> (For example, when a test -starts, the `OnTestStart()` method will be called.). The latter provides -an empty implementation of all methods in the interface, such that a -subclass only needs to override the methods it cares about. - -When an event is fired, its context is passed to the handler function -as an argument. The following argument types are used: - * [UnitTest](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L1151) reflects the state of the entire test program, - * [TestCase](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L778) has information about a test case, which can contain one or more tests, - * [TestInfo](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L644) contains the state of a test, and - * [TestPartResult](../include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h#L47) represents the result of a test assertion. - -An event handler function can examine the argument it receives to find -out interesting information about the event and the test program's -state. Here's an example: - -``` - class MinimalistPrinter : public ::testing::EmptyTestEventListener { - // Called before a test starts. - virtual void OnTestStart(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s starting.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - - // Called after a failed assertion or a SUCCEED() invocation. - virtual void OnTestPartResult( - const ::testing::TestPartResult& test_part_result) { - printf("%s in %s:%d\n%s\n", - test_part_result.failed() ? "*** Failure" : "Success", - test_part_result.file_name(), - test_part_result.line_number(), - test_part_result.summary()); - } - - // Called after a test ends. - virtual void OnTestEnd(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s ending.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - }; -``` - -## Using Event Listeners ## - -To use the event listener you have defined, add an instance of it to -the Google Test event listener list (represented by class -[TestEventListeners](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L1064) -- note the "s" at the end of the name) in your -`main()` function, before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - // Gets hold of the event listener list. - ::testing::TestEventListeners& listeners = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners(); - // Adds a listener to the end. Google Test takes the ownership. - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -There's only one problem: the default test result printer is still in -effect, so its output will mingle with the output from your minimalist -printer. To suppress the default printer, just release it from the -event listener list and delete it. You can do so by adding one line: -``` - ... - delete listeners.Release(listeners.default_result_printer()); - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -Now, sit back and enjoy a completely different output from your -tests. For more details, you can read this -[sample](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc). - -You may append more than one listener to the list. When an `On*Start()` -or `OnTestPartResult()` event is fired, the listeners will receive it in -the order they appear in the list (since new listeners are added to -the end of the list, the default text printer and the default XML -generator will receive the event first). An `On*End()` event will be -received by the listeners in the _reverse_ order. This allows output by -listeners added later to be framed by output from listeners added -earlier. - -## Generating Failures in Listeners ## - -You may use failure-raising macros (`EXPECT_*()`, `ASSERT_*()`, -`FAIL()`, etc) when processing an event. There are some restrictions: - - 1. You cannot generate any failure in `OnTestPartResult()` (otherwise it will cause `OnTestPartResult()` to be called recursively). - 1. A listener that handles `OnTestPartResult()` is not allowed to generate any failure. - -When you add listeners to the listener list, you should put listeners -that handle `OnTestPartResult()` _before_ listeners that can generate -failures. This ensures that failures generated by the latter are -attributed to the right test by the former. - -We have a sample of failure-raising listener -[here](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc). - -# Running Test Programs: Advanced Options # - -Google Test test programs are ordinary executables. Once built, you can run -them directly and affect their behavior via the following environment variables -and/or command line flags. For the flags to work, your programs must call -`::testing::InitGoogleTest()` before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -To see a list of supported flags and their usage, please run your test -program with the `--help` flag. You can also use `-h`, `-?`, or `/?` -for short. This feature is added in version 1.3.0. - -If an option is specified both by an environment variable and by a -flag, the latter takes precedence. Most of the options can also be -set/read in code: to access the value of command line flag -`--gtest_foo`, write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(foo)`. A common pattern is -to set the value of a flag before calling `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` -to change the default value of the flag: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // Disables elapsed time by default. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; - - // This allows the user to override the flag on the command line. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Selecting Tests ## - -This section shows various options for choosing which tests to run. - -### Listing Test Names ### - -Sometimes it is necessary to list the available tests in a program before -running them so that a filter may be applied if needed. Including the flag -`--gtest_list_tests` overrides all other flags and lists tests in the following -format: -``` -TestCase1. - TestName1 - TestName2 -TestCase2. - TestName -``` - -None of the tests listed are actually run if the flag is provided. There is no -corresponding environment variable for this flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Running a Subset of the Tests ### - -By default, a Google Test program runs all tests the user has defined. -Sometimes, you want to run only a subset of the tests (e.g. for debugging or -quickly verifying a change). If you set the `GTEST_FILTER` environment variable -or the `--gtest_filter` flag to a filter string, Google Test will only run the -tests whose full names (in the form of `TestCaseName.TestName`) match the -filter. - -The format of a filter is a '`:`'-separated list of wildcard patterns (called -the positive patterns) optionally followed by a '`-`' and another -'`:`'-separated pattern list (called the negative patterns). A test matches the -filter if and only if it matches any of the positive patterns but does not -match any of the negative patterns. - -A pattern may contain `'*'` (matches any string) or `'?'` (matches any single -character). For convenience, the filter `'*-NegativePatterns'` can be also -written as `'-NegativePatterns'`. - -For example: - - * `./foo_test` Has no flag, and thus runs all its tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*` Also runs everything, due to the single match-everything `*` value. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*` Runs everything in test case `FooTest`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*Null*:*Constructor*` Runs any test whose full name contains either `"Null"` or `"Constructor"`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=-*DeathTest.*` Runs all non-death tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*-FooTest.Bar` Runs everything in test case `FooTest` except `FooTest.Bar`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Disabling Tests ### - -If you have a broken test that you cannot fix right away, you can add the -`DISABLED_` prefix to its name. This will exclude it from execution. This is -better than commenting out the code or using `#if 0`, as disabled tests are -still compiled (and thus won't rot). - -If you need to disable all tests in a test case, you can either add `DISABLED_` -to the front of the name of each test, or alternatively add it to the front of -the test case name. - -For example, the following tests won't be run by Google Test, even though they -will still be compiled: - -``` -// Tests that Foo does Abc. -TEST(FooTest, DISABLED_DoesAbc) { ... } - -class DISABLED_BarTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -// Tests that Bar does Xyz. -TEST_F(DISABLED_BarTest, DoesXyz) { ... } -``` - -_Note:_ This feature should only be used for temporary pain-relief. You still -have to fix the disabled tests at a later date. As a reminder, Google Test will -print a banner warning you if a test program contains any disabled tests. - -_Tip:_ You can easily count the number of disabled tests you have -using `grep`. This number can be used as a metric for improving your -test quality. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Enabling Disabled Tests ### - -To include [disabled tests](#temporarily-disabling-tests) in test -execution, just invoke the test program with the -`--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests` flag or set the -`GTEST_ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS` environment variable to a value other -than `0`. You can combine this with the -[--gtest\_filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests) flag to further select -which disabled tests to run. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Repeating the Tests ## - -Once in a while you'll run into a test whose result is hit-or-miss. Perhaps it -will fail only 1% of the time, making it rather hard to reproduce the bug under -a debugger. This can be a major source of frustration. - -The `--gtest_repeat` flag allows you to repeat all (or selected) test methods -in a program many times. Hopefully, a flaky test will eventually fail and give -you a chance to debug. Here's how to use it: - -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times and don't stop at failures. | -|:---------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------| -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=-1` | A negative count means repeating forever. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times, stopping at the first failure. This is especially useful when running under a debugger: when the testfails, it will drop into the debugger and you can then inspect variables and stacks. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_filter=FooBar` | Repeat the tests whose name matches the filter 1000 times. | - -If your test program contains global set-up/tear-down code registered -using `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()`, it will be repeated in each -iteration as well, as the flakiness may be in it. You can also specify -the repeat count by setting the `GTEST_REPEAT` environment variable. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Shuffling the Tests ## - -You can specify the `--gtest_shuffle` flag (or set the `GTEST_SHUFFLE` -environment variable to `1`) to run the tests in a program in a random -order. This helps to reveal bad dependencies between tests. - -By default, Google Test uses a random seed calculated from the current -time. Therefore you'll get a different order every time. The console -output includes the random seed value, such that you can reproduce an -order-related test failure later. To specify the random seed -explicitly, use the `--gtest_random_seed=SEED` flag (or set the -`GTEST_RANDOM_SEED` environment variable), where `SEED` is an integer -between 0 and 99999. The seed value 0 is special: it tells Google Test -to do the default behavior of calculating the seed from the current -time. - -If you combine this with `--gtest_repeat=N`, Google Test will pick a -different random seed and re-shuffle the tests in each iteration. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Controlling Test Output ## - -This section teaches how to tweak the way test results are reported. - -### Colored Terminal Output ### - -Google Test can use colors in its terminal output to make it easier to spot -the separation between tests, and whether tests passed. - -You can set the GTEST\_COLOR environment variable or set the `--gtest_color` -command line flag to `yes`, `no`, or `auto` (the default) to enable colors, -disable colors, or let Google Test decide. When the value is `auto`, Google -Test will use colors if and only if the output goes to a terminal and (on -non-Windows platforms) the `TERM` environment variable is set to `xterm` or -`xterm-color`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Suppressing the Elapsed Time ### - -By default, Google Test prints the time it takes to run each test. To -suppress that, run the test program with the `--gtest_print_time=0` -command line flag. Setting the `GTEST_PRINT_TIME` environment -variable to `0` has the same effect. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. (In Google Test 1.3.0 and lower, -the default behavior is that the elapsed time is **not** printed.) - -### Generating an XML Report ### - -Google Test can emit a detailed XML report to a file in addition to its normal -textual output. The report contains the duration of each test, and thus can -help you identify slow tests. - -To generate the XML report, set the `GTEST_OUTPUT` environment variable or the -`--gtest_output` flag to the string `"xml:_path_to_output_file_"`, which will -create the file at the given location. You can also just use the string -`"xml"`, in which case the output can be found in the `test_detail.xml` file in -the current directory. - -If you specify a directory (for example, `"xml:output/directory/"` on Linux or -`"xml:output\directory\"` on Windows), Google Test will create the XML file in -that directory, named after the test executable (e.g. `foo_test.xml` for test -program `foo_test` or `foo_test.exe`). If the file already exists (perhaps left -over from a previous run), Google Test will pick a different name (e.g. -`foo_test_1.xml`) to avoid overwriting it. - -The report uses the format described here. It is based on the -`junitreport` Ant task and can be parsed by popular continuous build -systems like [Hudson](https://hudson.dev.java.net/). Since that format -was originally intended for Java, a little interpretation is required -to make it apply to Google Test tests, as shown here: - -``` -<testsuites name="AllTests" ...> - <testsuite name="test_case_name" ...> - <testcase name="test_name" ...> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - - * The root `<testsuites>` element corresponds to the entire test program. - * `<testsuite>` elements correspond to Google Test test cases. - * `<testcase>` elements correspond to Google Test test functions. - -For instance, the following program - -``` -TEST(MathTest, Addition) { ... } -TEST(MathTest, Subtraction) { ... } -TEST(LogicTest, NonContradiction) { ... } -``` - -could generate this report: - -``` -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> -<testsuites tests="3" failures="1" errors="0" time="35" name="AllTests"> - <testsuite name="MathTest" tests="2" failures="1" errors="0" time="15"> - <testcase name="Addition" status="run" time="7" classname=""> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, 1)
 Actual: 3
Expected: 2" type=""/> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, -1)
 Actual: 1
Expected: 0" type=""/> - </testcase> - <testcase name="Subtraction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> - <testsuite name="LogicTest" tests="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="5"> - <testcase name="NonContradiction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - -Things to note: - - * The `tests` attribute of a `<testsuites>` or `<testsuite>` element tells how many test functions the Google Test program or test case contains, while the `failures` attribute tells how many of them failed. - * The `time` attribute expresses the duration of the test, test case, or entire test program in milliseconds. - * Each `<failure>` element corresponds to a single failed Google Test assertion. - * Some JUnit concepts don't apply to Google Test, yet we have to conform to the DTD. Therefore you'll see some dummy elements and attributes in the report. You can safely ignore these parts. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Controlling How Failures Are Reported ## - -### Turning Assertion Failures into Break-Points ### - -When running test programs under a debugger, it's very convenient if the -debugger can catch an assertion failure and automatically drop into interactive -mode. Google Test's _break-on-failure_ mode supports this behavior. - -To enable it, set the `GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a value -other than `0` . Alternatively, you can use the `--gtest_break_on_failure` -command line flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Disabling Catching Test-Thrown Exceptions ### - -Google Test can be used either with or without exceptions enabled. If -a test throws a C++ exception or (on Windows) a structured exception -(SEH), by default Google Test catches it, reports it as a test -failure, and continues with the next test method. This maximizes the -coverage of a test run. Also, on Windows an uncaught exception will -cause a pop-up window, so catching the exceptions allows you to run -the tests automatically. - -When debugging the test failures, however, you may instead want the -exceptions to be handled by the debugger, such that you can examine -the call stack when an exception is thrown. To achieve that, set the -`GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS` environment variable to `0`, or use the -`--gtest_catch_exceptions=0` flag when running the tests. - -**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Letting Another Testing Framework Drive ### - -If you work on a project that has already been using another testing -framework and is not ready to completely switch to Google Test yet, -you can get much of Google Test's benefit by using its assertions in -your existing tests. Just change your `main()` function to look -like: - -``` -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - // Important: Google Test must be initialized. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - ... whatever your existing testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -With that, you can use Google Test assertions in addition to the -native assertions your testing framework provides, for example: - -``` -void TestFooDoesBar() { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_LE(foo.Bar(1), 100); // A Google Test assertion. - CPPUNIT_ASSERT(foo.IsEmpty()); // A native assertion. -} -``` - -If a Google Test assertion fails, it will print an error message and -throw an exception, which will be treated as a failure by your host -testing framework. If you compile your code with exceptions disabled, -a failed Google Test assertion will instead exit your program with a -non-zero code, which will also signal a test failure to your test -runner. - -If you don't write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true;` in -your `main()`, you can alternatively enable this feature by specifying -the `--gtest_throw_on_failure` flag on the command-line or setting the -`GTEST_THROW_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a non-zero value. - -Death tests are _not_ supported when other test framework is used to organize tests. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.3.0. - -## Distributing Test Functions to Multiple Machines ## - -If you have more than one machine you can use to run a test program, -you might want to run the test functions in parallel and get the -result faster. We call this technique _sharding_, where each machine -is called a _shard_. - -Google Test is compatible with test sharding. To take advantage of -this feature, your test runner (not part of Google Test) needs to do -the following: - - 1. Allocate a number of machines (shards) to run the tests. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` environment variable to the total number of shards. It must be the same for all shards. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` environment variable to the index of the shard. Different shards must be assigned different indices, which must be in the range `[0, GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS - 1]`. - 1. Run the same test program on all shards. When Google Test sees the above two environment variables, it will select a subset of the test functions to run. Across all shards, each test function in the program will be run exactly once. - 1. Wait for all shards to finish, then collect and report the results. - -Your project may have tests that were written without Google Test and -thus don't understand this protocol. In order for your test runner to -figure out which test supports sharding, it can set the environment -variable `GTEST_SHARD_STATUS_FILE` to a non-existent file path. If a -test program supports sharding, it will create this file to -acknowledge the fact (the actual contents of the file are not -important at this time; although we may stick some useful information -in it in the future.); otherwise it will not create it. - -Here's an example to make it clear. Suppose you have a test program -`foo_test` that contains the following 5 test functions: -``` -TEST(A, V) -TEST(A, W) -TEST(B, X) -TEST(B, Y) -TEST(B, Z) -``` -and you have 3 machines at your disposal. To run the test functions in -parallel, you would set `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` to 3 on all machines, and -set `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` to 0, 1, and 2 on the machines respectively. -Then you would run the same `foo_test` on each machine. - -Google Test reserves the right to change how the work is distributed -across the shards, but here's one possible scenario: - - * Machine #0 runs `A.V` and `B.X`. - * Machine #1 runs `A.W` and `B.Y`. - * Machine #2 runs `B.Z`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -# Fusing Google Test Source Files # - -Google Test's implementation consists of ~30 files (excluding its own -tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in two files (a -`.h` and a `.cc`) instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gtest_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory (since release 1.3.0). -Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above installed on your machine, just -go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gtest_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h` and `gtest/gtest-all.cc` in it. These files contain -everything you need to use Google Test. Just copy them to anywhere -you want and you are ready to write tests. You can use the -[scripts/test/Makefile](../scripts/test/Makefile) -file as an example on how to compile your tests against them. - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've now learned more advanced Google Test tools and are -ready to tackle more complex testing tasks. If you want to dive even deeper, you -can read the [Frequently-Asked Questions](FAQ.md). diff --git a/googletest/docs/DevGuide.md b/googletest/docs/DevGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index 06467a3..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/DevGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,126 +0,0 @@ - - -If you are interested in understanding the internals of Google Test, -building from source, or contributing ideas or modifications to the -project, then this document is for you. - -# Introduction # - -First, let's give you some background of the project. - -## Licensing ## - -All Google Test source and pre-built packages are provided under the [New BSD License](http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php). - -## The Google Test Community ## - -The Google Test community exists primarily through the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework) and the GitHub repository. -You are definitely encouraged to contribute to the -discussion and you can also help us to keep the effectiveness of the -group high by following and promoting the guidelines listed here. - -### Please Be Friendly ### - -Showing courtesy and respect to others is a vital part of the Google -culture, and we strongly encourage everyone participating in Google -Test development to join us in accepting nothing less. Of course, -being courteous is not the same as failing to constructively disagree -with each other, but it does mean that we should be respectful of each -other when enumerating the 42 technical reasons that a particular -proposal may not be the best choice. There's never a reason to be -antagonistic or dismissive toward anyone who is sincerely trying to -contribute to a discussion. - -Sure, C++ testing is serious business and all that, but it's also -a lot of fun. Let's keep it that way. Let's strive to be one of the -friendliest communities in all of open source. - -As always, discuss Google Test in the official GoogleTest discussion group. -You don't have to actually submit code in order to sign up. Your participation -itself is a valuable contribution. - -# Working with the Code # - -If you want to get your hands dirty with the code inside Google Test, -this is the section for you. - -## Compiling from Source ## - -Once you check out the code, you can find instructions on how to -compile it in the [README](../README.md) file. - -## Testing ## - -A testing framework is of no good if itself is not thoroughly tested. -Tests should be written for any new code, and changes should be -verified to not break existing tests before they are submitted for -review. To perform the tests, follow the instructions in -[README](../README.md) and verify that there are no failures. - -# Contributing Code # - -We are excited that Google Test is now open source, and hope to get -great patches from the community. Before you fire up your favorite IDE -and begin hammering away at that new feature, though, please take the -time to read this section and understand the process. While it seems -rigorous, we want to keep a high standard of quality in the code -base. - -## Contributor License Agreements ## - -You must sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) before we can -accept any code. The CLA protects you and us. - - * If you are an individual writing original source code and you're sure you own the intellectual property, then you'll need to sign an [individual CLA](http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html). - * If you work for a company that wants to allow you to contribute your work to Google Test, then you'll need to sign a [corporate CLA](http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html). - -Follow either of the two links above to access the appropriate CLA and -instructions for how to sign and return it. - -## Coding Style ## - -To keep the source consistent, readable, diffable and easy to merge, -we use a fairly rigid coding style, as defined by the [google-styleguide](http://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/) project. All patches will be expected -to conform to the style outlined [here](http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml). - -## Updating Generated Code ## - -Some of Google Test's source files are generated by the Pump tool (a -Python script). If you need to update such files, please modify the -source (`foo.h.pump`) and re-generate the C++ file using Pump. You -can read the PumpManual for details. - -## Submitting Patches ## - -Please do submit code. Here's what you need to do: - - 1. A submission should be a set of changes that addresses one issue in the [issue tracker](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues). Please don't mix more than one logical change per submittal, because it makes the history hard to follow. If you want to make a change that doesn't have a corresponding issue in the issue tracker, please create one. - 1. Also, coordinate with team members that are listed on the issue in question. This ensures that work isn't being duplicated and communicating your plan early also generally leads to better patches. - 1. Ensure that your code adheres to the [Google Test source code style](#Coding_Style.md). - 1. Ensure that there are unit tests for your code. - 1. Sign a Contributor License Agreement. - 1. Create a Pull Request in the usual way. - -## Google Test Committers ## - -The current members of the Google Test engineering team are the only -committers at present. In the great tradition of eating one's own -dogfood, we will be requiring each new Google Test engineering team -member to earn the right to become a committer by following the -procedures in this document, writing consistently great code, and -demonstrating repeatedly that he or she truly gets the zen of Google -Test. - -# Release Process # - -We follow a typical release process: - - 1. A release branch named `release-X.Y` is created. - 1. Bugs are fixed and features are added in trunk; those individual patches are merged into the release branch until it's stable. - 1. An individual point release (the `Z` in `X.Y.Z`) is made by creating a tag from the branch. - 1. Repeat steps 2 and 3 throughout one release cycle (as determined by features or time). - 1. Go back to step 1 to create another release branch and so on. - ---- - -This page is based on the [Making GWT Better](http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html) guide from the [Google Web Toolkit](http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/) project. Except as otherwise [noted](http://code.google.com/policies.html#restrictions), the content of this page is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/). diff --git a/googletest/docs/Documentation.md b/googletest/docs/Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 8ca1aac..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Test **(the SVN trunk version)** --- **if you use a released version of Google Test, please read the -documentation for that specific version instead.** - - * [Primer](Primer.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Test. - * [Samples](Samples.md) -- learn from examples. - * [AdvancedGuide](AdvancedGuide.md) -- learn more about Google Test. - * [XcodeGuide](XcodeGuide.md) -- how to use Google Test in Xcode on Mac. - * [Frequently-Asked Questions](FAQ.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Test, read: - - * [DevGuide](DevGuide.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [PumpManual](PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Test's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/FAQ.md b/googletest/docs/FAQ.md deleted file mode 100644 index 5fd6cb7..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/FAQ.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1087 +0,0 @@ - - -If you cannot find the answer to your question here, and you have read -[Primer](Primer.md) and [AdvancedGuide](AdvancedGuide.md), send it to -googletestframework@googlegroups.com. - -## Why should I use Google Test instead of my favorite C++ testing framework? ## - -First, let us say clearly that we don't want to get into the debate of -which C++ testing framework is **the best**. There exist many fine -frameworks for writing C++ tests, and we have tremendous respect for -the developers and users of them. We don't think there is (or will -be) a single best framework - you have to pick the right tool for the -particular task you are tackling. - -We created Google Test because we couldn't find the right combination -of features and conveniences in an existing framework to satisfy _our_ -needs. The following is a list of things that _we_ like about Google -Test. We don't claim them to be unique to Google Test - rather, the -combination of them makes Google Test the choice for us. We hope this -list can help you decide whether it is for you too. - - * Google Test is designed to be portable: it doesn't require exceptions or RTTI; it works around various bugs in various compilers and environments; etc. As a result, it works on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows and several embedded operating systems. - * Nonfatal assertions (`EXPECT_*`) have proven to be great time savers, as they allow a test to report multiple failures in a single edit-compile-test cycle. - * It's easy to write assertions that generate informative messages: you just use the stream syntax to append any additional information, e.g. `ASSERT_EQ(5, Foo(i)) << " where i = " << i;`. It doesn't require a new set of macros or special functions. - * Google Test automatically detects your tests and doesn't require you to enumerate them in order to run them. - * Death tests are pretty handy for ensuring that your asserts in production code are triggered by the right conditions. - * `SCOPED_TRACE` helps you understand the context of an assertion failure when it comes from inside a sub-routine or loop. - * You can decide which tests to run using name patterns. This saves time when you want to quickly reproduce a test failure. - * Google Test can generate XML test result reports that can be parsed by popular continuous build system like Hudson. - * Simple things are easy in Google Test, while hard things are possible: in addition to advanced features like [global test environments](AdvancedGuide.md#global-set-up-and-tear-down) and tests parameterized by [values](AdvancedGuide.md#value-parameterized-tests) or [types](docs/AdvancedGuide.md#typed-tests), Google Test supports various ways for the user to extend the framework -- if Google Test doesn't do something out of the box, chances are that a user can implement the feature using Google Test's public API, without changing Google Test itself. In particular, you can: - * expand your testing vocabulary by defining [custom predicates](AdvancedGuide.md#predicate-assertions-for-better-error-messages), - * teach Google Test how to [print your types](AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values), - * define your own testing macros or utilities and verify them using Google Test's [Service Provider Interface](AdvancedGuide.md#catching-failures), and - * reflect on the test cases or change the test output format by intercepting the [test events](AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events). - -## I'm getting warnings when compiling Google Test. Would you fix them? ## - -We strive to minimize compiler warnings Google Test generates. Before releasing a new version, we test to make sure that it doesn't generate warnings when compiled using its CMake script on Windows, Linux, and Mac OS. - -Unfortunately, this doesn't mean you are guaranteed to see no warnings when compiling Google Test in your environment: - - * You may be using a different compiler as we use, or a different version of the same compiler. We cannot possibly test for all compilers. - * You may be compiling on a different platform as we do. - * Your project may be using different compiler flags as we do. - -It is not always possible to make Google Test warning-free for everyone. Or, it may not be desirable if the warning is rarely enabled and fixing the violations makes the code more complex. - -If you see warnings when compiling Google Test, we suggest that you use the `-isystem` flag (assuming your are using GCC) to mark Google Test headers as system headers. That'll suppress warnings from Google Test headers. - -## Why should not test case names and test names contain underscore? ## - -Underscore (`_`) is special, as C++ reserves the following to be used by -the compiler and the standard library: - - 1. any identifier that starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter, and - 1. any identifier that containers two consecutive underscores (i.e. `__`) _anywhere_ in its name. - -User code is _prohibited_ from using such identifiers. - -Now let's look at what this means for `TEST` and `TEST_F`. - -Currently `TEST(TestCaseName, TestName)` generates a class named -`TestCaseName_TestName_Test`. What happens if `TestCaseName` or `TestName` -contains `_`? - - 1. If `TestCaseName` starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter (say, `_Foo`), we end up with `_Foo_TestName_Test`, which is reserved and thus invalid. - 1. If `TestCaseName` ends with an `_` (say, `Foo_`), we get `Foo__TestName_Test`, which is invalid. - 1. If `TestName` starts with an `_` (say, `_Bar`), we get `TestCaseName__Bar_Test`, which is invalid. - 1. If `TestName` ends with an `_` (say, `Bar_`), we get `TestCaseName_Bar__Test`, which is invalid. - -So clearly `TestCaseName` and `TestName` cannot start or end with `_` -(Actually, `TestCaseName` can start with `_` -- as long as the `_` isn't -followed by an upper-case letter. But that's getting complicated. So -for simplicity we just say that it cannot start with `_`.). - -It may seem fine for `TestCaseName` and `TestName` to contain `_` in the -middle. However, consider this: -``` cpp -TEST(Time, Flies_Like_An_Arrow) { ... } -TEST(Time_Flies, Like_An_Arrow) { ... } -``` - -Now, the two `TEST`s will both generate the same class -(`Time_Files_Like_An_Arrow_Test`). That's not good. - -So for simplicity, we just ask the users to avoid `_` in `TestCaseName` -and `TestName`. The rule is more constraining than necessary, but it's -simple and easy to remember. It also gives Google Test some wiggle -room in case its implementation needs to change in the future. - -If you violate the rule, there may not be immediately consequences, -but your test may (just may) break with a new compiler (or a new -version of the compiler you are using) or with a new version of Google -Test. Therefore it's best to follow the rule. - -## Why is it not recommended to install a pre-compiled copy of Google Test (for example, into /usr/local)? ## - -In the early days, we said that you could install -compiled Google Test libraries on `*`nix systems using `make install`. -Then every user of your machine can write tests without -recompiling Google Test. - -This seemed like a good idea, but it has a -got-cha: every user needs to compile his tests using the _same_ compiler -flags used to compile the installed Google Test libraries; otherwise -he may run into undefined behaviors (i.e. the tests can behave -strangely and may even crash for no obvious reasons). - -Why? Because C++ has this thing called the One-Definition Rule: if -two C++ source files contain different definitions of the same -class/function/variable, and you link them together, you violate the -rule. The linker may or may not catch the error (in many cases it's -not required by the C++ standard to catch the violation). If it -doesn't, you get strange run-time behaviors that are unexpected and -hard to debug. - -If you compile Google Test and your test code using different compiler -flags, they may see different definitions of the same -class/function/variable (e.g. due to the use of `#if` in Google Test). -Therefore, for your sanity, we recommend to avoid installing pre-compiled -Google Test libraries. Instead, each project should compile -Google Test itself such that it can be sure that the same flags are -used for both Google Test and the tests. - -## How do I generate 64-bit binaries on Windows (using Visual Studio 2008)? ## - -(Answered by Trevor Robinson) - -Load the supplied Visual Studio solution file, either `msvc\gtest-md.sln` or -`msvc\gtest.sln`. Go through the migration wizard to migrate the -solution and project files to Visual Studio 2008. Select -`Configuration Manager...` from the `Build` menu. Select `<New...>` from -the `Active solution platform` dropdown. Select `x64` from the new -platform dropdown, leave `Copy settings from` set to `Win32` and -`Create new project platforms` checked, then click `OK`. You now have -`Win32` and `x64` platform configurations, selectable from the -`Standard` toolbar, which allow you to toggle between building 32-bit or -64-bit binaries (or both at once using Batch Build). - -In order to prevent build output files from overwriting one another, -you'll need to change the `Intermediate Directory` settings for the -newly created platform configuration across all the projects. To do -this, multi-select (e.g. using shift-click) all projects (but not the -solution) in the `Solution Explorer`. Right-click one of them and -select `Properties`. In the left pane, select `Configuration Properties`, -and from the `Configuration` dropdown, select `All Configurations`. -Make sure the selected platform is `x64`. For the -`Intermediate Directory` setting, change the value from -`$(PlatformName)\$(ConfigurationName)` to -`$(OutDir)\$(ProjectName)`. Click `OK` and then build the -solution. When the build is complete, the 64-bit binaries will be in -the `msvc\x64\Debug` directory. - -## Can I use Google Test on MinGW? ## - -We haven't tested this ourselves, but Per Abrahamsen reported that he -was able to compile and install Google Test successfully when using -MinGW from Cygwin. You'll need to configure it with: - -`PATH/TO/configure CC="gcc -mno-cygwin" CXX="g++ -mno-cygwin"` - -You should be able to replace the `-mno-cygwin` option with direct links -to the real MinGW binaries, but we haven't tried that. - -Caveats: - - * There are many warnings when compiling. - * `make check` will produce some errors as not all tests for Google Test itself are compatible with MinGW. - -We also have reports on successful cross compilation of Google Test -MinGW binaries on Linux using -[these instructions](http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Cross-Compiling_Under_Linux#Cross-compiling_under_Linux_for_MS_Windows) -on the WxWidgets site. - -Please contact `googletestframework@googlegroups.com` if you are -interested in improving the support for MinGW. - -## Why does Google Test support EXPECT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) but not EXPECT\_NE(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_NE(NULL, ptr)? ## - -Due to some peculiarity of C++, it requires some non-trivial template -meta programming tricks to support using `NULL` as an argument of the -`EXPECT_XX()` and `ASSERT_XX()` macros. Therefore we only do it where -it's most needed (otherwise we make the implementation of Google Test -harder to maintain and more error-prone than necessary). - -The `EXPECT_EQ()` macro takes the _expected_ value as its first -argument and the _actual_ value as the second. It's reasonable that -someone wants to write `EXPECT_EQ(NULL, some_expression)`, and this -indeed was requested several times. Therefore we implemented it. - -The need for `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)` isn't nearly as strong. When the -assertion fails, you already know that `ptr` must be `NULL`, so it -doesn't add any information to print ptr in this case. That means -`EXPECT_TRUE(ptr != NULL)` works just as well. - -If we were to support `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)`, for consistency we'll -have to support `EXPECT_NE(ptr, NULL)` as well, as unlike `EXPECT_EQ`, -we don't have a convention on the order of the two arguments for -`EXPECT_NE`. This means using the template meta programming tricks -twice in the implementation, making it even harder to understand and -maintain. We believe the benefit doesn't justify the cost. - -Finally, with the growth of Google Mock's [matcher](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#using-matchers-in-google-test-assertions) library, we are -encouraging people to use the unified `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` -syntax more often in tests. One significant advantage of the matcher -approach is that matchers can be easily combined to form new matchers, -while the `EXPECT_NE`, etc, macros cannot be easily -combined. Therefore we want to invest more in the matchers than in the -`EXPECT_XX()` macros. - -## Does Google Test support running tests in parallel? ## - -Test runners tend to be tightly coupled with the build/test -environment, and Google Test doesn't try to solve the problem of -running tests in parallel. Instead, we tried to make Google Test work -nicely with test runners. For example, Google Test's XML report -contains the time spent on each test, and its `gtest_list_tests` and -`gtest_filter` flags can be used for splitting the execution of test -methods into multiple processes. These functionalities can help the -test runner run the tests in parallel. - -## Why don't Google Test run the tests in different threads to speed things up? ## - -It's difficult to write thread-safe code. Most tests are not written -with thread-safety in mind, and thus may not work correctly in a -multi-threaded setting. - -If you think about it, it's already hard to make your code work when -you know what other threads are doing. It's much harder, and -sometimes even impossible, to make your code work when you don't know -what other threads are doing (remember that test methods can be added, -deleted, or modified after your test was written). If you want to run -the tests in parallel, you'd better run them in different processes. - -## Why aren't Google Test assertions implemented using exceptions? ## - -Our original motivation was to be able to use Google Test in projects -that disable exceptions. Later we realized some additional benefits -of this approach: - - 1. Throwing in a destructor is undefined behavior in C++. Not using exceptions means Google Test's assertions are safe to use in destructors. - 1. The `EXPECT_*` family of macros will continue even after a failure, allowing multiple failures in a `TEST` to be reported in a single run. This is a popular feature, as in C++ the edit-compile-test cycle is usually quite long and being able to fixing more than one thing at a time is a blessing. - 1. If assertions are implemented using exceptions, a test may falsely ignore a failure if it's caught by user code: -``` cpp -try { ... ASSERT_TRUE(...) ... } -catch (...) { ... } -``` -The above code will pass even if the `ASSERT_TRUE` throws. While it's unlikely for someone to write this in a test, it's possible to run into this pattern when you write assertions in callbacks that are called by the code under test. - -The downside of not using exceptions is that `ASSERT_*` (implemented -using `return`) will only abort the current function, not the current -`TEST`. - -## Why do we use two different macros for tests with and without fixtures? ## - -Unfortunately, C++'s macro system doesn't allow us to use the same -macro for both cases. One possibility is to provide only one macro -for tests with fixtures, and require the user to define an empty -fixture sometimes: - -``` cpp -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -or -``` cpp -typedef ::testing::Test FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThat) { ... } -``` - -Yet, many people think this is one line too many. :-) Our goal was to -make it really easy to write tests, so we tried to make simple tests -trivial to create. That means using a separate macro for such tests. - -We think neither approach is ideal, yet either of them is reasonable. -In the end, it probably doesn't matter much either way. - -## Why don't we use structs as test fixtures? ## - -We like to use structs only when representing passive data. This -distinction between structs and classes is good for documenting the -intent of the code's author. Since test fixtures have logic like -`SetUp()` and `TearDown()`, they are better defined as classes. - -## Why are death tests implemented as assertions instead of using a test runner? ## - -Our goal was to make death tests as convenient for a user as C++ -possibly allows. In particular: - - * The runner-style requires to split the information into two pieces: the definition of the death test itself, and the specification for the runner on how to run the death test and what to expect. The death test would be written in C++, while the runner spec may or may not be. A user needs to carefully keep the two in sync. `ASSERT_DEATH(statement, expected_message)` specifies all necessary information in one place, in one language, without boilerplate code. It is very declarative. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` has a similar syntax and error-reporting semantics as other Google Test assertions, and thus is easy to learn. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can be mixed with other assertions and other logic at your will. You are not limited to one death test per test method. For example, you can write something like: -``` cpp - if (FooCondition()) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Bar(), "blah"); - } else { - ASSERT_EQ(5, Bar()); - } -``` -If you prefer one death test per test method, you can write your tests in that style too, but we don't want to impose that on the users. The fewer artificial limitations the better. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can reference local variables in the current function, and you can decide how many death tests you want based on run-time information. For example, -``` cpp - const int count = GetCount(); // Only known at run time. - for (int i = 1; i <= count; i++) { - ASSERT_DEATH({ - double* buffer = new double[i]; - ... initializes buffer ... - Foo(buffer, i) - }, "blah blah"); - } -``` -The runner-based approach tends to be more static and less flexible, or requires more user effort to get this kind of flexibility. - -Another interesting thing about `ASSERT_DEATH` is that it calls `fork()` -to create a child process to run the death test. This is lightening -fast, as `fork()` uses copy-on-write pages and incurs almost zero -overhead, and the child process starts from the user-supplied -statement directly, skipping all global and local initialization and -any code leading to the given statement. If you launch the child -process from scratch, it can take seconds just to load everything and -start running if the test links to many libraries dynamically. - -## My death test modifies some state, but the change seems lost after the death test finishes. Why? ## - -Death tests (`EXPECT_DEATH`, etc) are executed in a sub-process s.t. the -expected crash won't kill the test program (i.e. the parent process). As a -result, any in-memory side effects they incur are observable in their -respective sub-processes, but not in the parent process. You can think of them -as running in a parallel universe, more or less. - -## The compiler complains about "undefined references" to some static const member variables, but I did define them in the class body. What's wrong? ## - -If your class has a static data member: - -``` cpp -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - static const int kBar = 100; -}; -``` - -You also need to define it _outside_ of the class body in `foo.cc`: - -``` cpp -const int Foo::kBar; // No initializer here. -``` - -Otherwise your code is **invalid C++**, and may break in unexpected ways. In -particular, using it in Google Test comparison assertions (`EXPECT_EQ`, etc) -will generate an "undefined reference" linker error. - -## I have an interface that has several implementations. Can I write a set of tests once and repeat them over all the implementations? ## - -Google Test doesn't yet have good support for this kind of tests, or -data-driven tests in general. We hope to be able to make improvements in this -area soon. - -## Can I derive a test fixture from another? ## - -Yes. - -Each test fixture has a corresponding and same named test case. This means only -one test case can use a particular fixture. Sometimes, however, multiple test -cases may want to use the same or slightly different fixtures. For example, you -may want to make sure that all of a GUI library's test cases don't leak -important system resources like fonts and brushes. - -In Google Test, you share a fixture among test cases by putting the shared -logic in a base test fixture, then deriving from that base a separate fixture -for each test case that wants to use this common logic. You then use `TEST_F()` -to write tests using each derived fixture. - -Typically, your code looks like this: - -``` cpp -// Defines a base test fixture. -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -// Derives a fixture FooTest from BaseTest. -class FooTest : public BaseTest { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - BaseTest::SetUp(); // Sets up the base fixture first. - ... additional set-up work ... - } - virtual void TearDown() { - ... clean-up work for FooTest ... - BaseTest::TearDown(); // Remember to tear down the base fixture - // after cleaning up FooTest! - } - ... functions and variables for FooTest ... -}; - -// Tests that use the fixture FooTest. -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -... additional fixtures derived from BaseTest ... -``` - -If necessary, you can continue to derive test fixtures from a derived fixture. -Google Test has no limit on how deep the hierarchy can be. - -For a complete example using derived test fixtures, see -[sample5](../samples/sample5_unittest.cc). - -## My compiler complains "void value not ignored as it ought to be." What does this mean? ## - -You're probably using an `ASSERT_*()` in a function that doesn't return `void`. -`ASSERT_*()` can only be used in `void` functions. - -## My death test hangs (or seg-faults). How do I fix it? ## - -In Google Test, death tests are run in a child process and the way they work is -delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work. -Please make sure you have read this. - -In particular, death tests don't like having multiple threads in the parent -process. So the first thing you can try is to eliminate creating threads -outside of `EXPECT_DEATH()`. - -Sometimes this is impossible as some library you must use may be creating -threads before `main()` is even reached. In this case, you can try to minimize -the chance of conflicts by either moving as many activities as possible inside -`EXPECT_DEATH()` (in the extreme case, you want to move everything inside), or -leaving as few things as possible in it. Also, you can try to set the death -test style to `"threadsafe"`, which is safer but slower, and see if it helps. - -If you go with thread-safe death tests, remember that they rerun the test -program from the beginning in the child process. Therefore make sure your -program can run side-by-side with itself and is deterministic. - -In the end, this boils down to good concurrent programming. You have to make -sure that there is no race conditions or dead locks in your program. No silver -bullet - sorry! - -## Should I use the constructor/destructor of the test fixture or the set-up/tear-down function? ## - -The first thing to remember is that Google Test does not reuse the -same test fixture object across multiple tests. For each `TEST_F`, -Google Test will create a fresh test fixture object, _immediately_ -call `SetUp()`, run the test body, call `TearDown()`, and then -_immediately_ delete the test fixture object. - -When you need to write per-test set-up and tear-down logic, you have -the choice between using the test fixture constructor/destructor or -`SetUp()/TearDown()`. The former is usually preferred, as it has the -following benefits: - - * By initializing a member variable in the constructor, we have the option to make it `const`, which helps prevent accidental changes to its value and makes the tests more obviously correct. - * In case we need to subclass the test fixture class, the subclass' constructor is guaranteed to call the base class' constructor first, and the subclass' destructor is guaranteed to call the base class' destructor afterward. With `SetUp()/TearDown()`, a subclass may make the mistake of forgetting to call the base class' `SetUp()/TearDown()` or call them at the wrong moment. - -You may still want to use `SetUp()/TearDown()` in the following rare cases: - * If the tear-down operation could throw an exception, you must use `TearDown()` as opposed to the destructor, as throwing in a destructor leads to undefined behavior and usually will kill your program right away. Note that many standard libraries (like STL) may throw when exceptions are enabled in the compiler. Therefore you should prefer `TearDown()` if you want to write portable tests that work with or without exceptions. - * The assertion macros throw an exception when flag `--gtest_throw_on_failure` is specified. Therefore, you shouldn't use Google Test assertions in a destructor if you plan to run your tests with this flag. - * In a constructor or destructor, you cannot make a virtual function call on this object. (You can call a method declared as virtual, but it will be statically bound.) Therefore, if you need to call a method that will be overriden in a derived class, you have to use `SetUp()/TearDown()`. - -## The compiler complains "no matching function to call" when I use ASSERT\_PREDn. How do I fix it? ## - -If the predicate function you use in `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*` is -overloaded or a template, the compiler will have trouble figuring out which -overloaded version it should use. `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT*` and -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT*` don't have this problem. - -If you see this error, you might want to switch to -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*`, which will also give you a better failure -message. If, however, that is not an option, you can resolve the problem by -explicitly telling the compiler which version to pick. - -For example, suppose you have - -``` cpp -bool IsPositive(int n) { - return n > 0; -} -bool IsPositive(double x) { - return x > 0; -} -``` - -you will get a compiler error if you write - -``` cpp -EXPECT_PRED1(IsPositive, 5); -``` - -However, this will work: - -``` cpp -EXPECT_PRED1(*static_cast<bool (*)(int)>*(IsPositive), 5); -``` - -(The stuff inside the angled brackets for the `static_cast` operator is the -type of the function pointer for the `int`-version of `IsPositive()`.) - -As another example, when you have a template function - -``` cpp -template <typename T> -bool IsNegative(T x) { - return x < 0; -} -``` - -you can use it in a predicate assertion like this: - -``` cpp -ASSERT_PRED1(IsNegative*<int>*, -5); -``` - -Things are more interesting if your template has more than one parameters. The -following won't compile: - -``` cpp -ASSERT_PRED2(*GreaterThan<int, int>*, 5, 0); -``` - - -as the C++ pre-processor thinks you are giving `ASSERT_PRED2` 4 arguments, -which is one more than expected. The workaround is to wrap the predicate -function in parentheses: - -``` cpp -ASSERT_PRED2(*(GreaterThan<int, int>)*, 5, 0); -``` - - -## My compiler complains about "ignoring return value" when I call RUN\_ALL\_TESTS(). Why? ## - -Some people had been ignoring the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. That is, -instead of - -``` cpp -return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -they write - -``` cpp -RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -This is wrong and dangerous. A test runner needs to see the return value of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` in order to determine if a test has passed. If your `main()` -function ignores it, your test will be considered successful even if it has a -Google Test assertion failure. Very bad. - -To help the users avoid this dangerous bug, the implementation of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` causes gcc to raise this warning, when the return value is -ignored. If you see this warning, the fix is simple: just make sure its value -is used as the return value of `main()`. - -## My compiler complains that a constructor (or destructor) cannot return a value. What's going on? ## - -Due to a peculiarity of C++, in order to support the syntax for streaming -messages to an `ASSERT_*`, e.g. - -``` cpp -ASSERT_EQ(1, Foo()) << "blah blah" << foo; -``` - -we had to give up using `ASSERT*` and `FAIL*` (but not `EXPECT*` and -`ADD_FAILURE*`) in constructors and destructors. The workaround is to move the -content of your constructor/destructor to a private void member function, or -switch to `EXPECT_*()` if that works. This section in the user's guide explains -it. - -## My set-up function is not called. Why? ## - -C++ is case-sensitive. It should be spelled as `SetUp()`. Did you -spell it as `Setup()`? - -Similarly, sometimes people spell `SetUpTestCase()` as `SetupTestCase()` and -wonder why it's never called. - -## How do I jump to the line of a failure in Emacs directly? ## - -Google Test's failure message format is understood by Emacs and many other -IDEs, like acme and XCode. If a Google Test message is in a compilation buffer -in Emacs, then it's clickable. You can now hit `enter` on a message to jump to -the corresponding source code, or use `C-x `` to jump to the next failure. - -## I have several test cases which share the same test fixture logic, do I have to define a new test fixture class for each of them? This seems pretty tedious. ## - -You don't have to. Instead of - -``` cpp -class FooTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -class BarTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -you can simply `typedef` the test fixtures: -``` cpp -typedef BaseTest FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef BaseTest BarTest; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -## The Google Test output is buried in a whole bunch of log messages. What do I do? ## - -The Google Test output is meant to be a concise and human-friendly report. If -your test generates textual output itself, it will mix with the Google Test -output, making it hard to read. However, there is an easy solution to this -problem. - -Since most log messages go to stderr, we decided to let Google Test output go -to stdout. This way, you can easily separate the two using redirection. For -example: -``` -./my_test > googletest_output.txt -``` - -## Why should I prefer test fixtures over global variables? ## - -There are several good reasons: - 1. It's likely your test needs to change the states of its global variables. This makes it difficult to keep side effects from escaping one test and contaminating others, making debugging difficult. By using fixtures, each test has a fresh set of variables that's different (but with the same names). Thus, tests are kept independent of each other. - 1. Global variables pollute the global namespace. - 1. Test fixtures can be reused via subclassing, which cannot be done easily with global variables. This is useful if many test cases have something in common. - -## How do I test private class members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -You should try to write testable code, which means classes should be easily -tested from their public interface. One way to achieve this is the Pimpl idiom: -you move all private members of a class into a helper class, and make all -members of the helper class public. - -You have several other options that don't require using `FRIEND_TEST`: - * Write the tests as members of the fixture class: -``` cpp -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - void Test1() {...} // This accesses private members of class Foo. - void Test2() {...} // So does this one. -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - Test1(); -} - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - Test2(); -} -``` - * In the fixture class, write accessors for the tested class' private members, then use the accessors in your tests: -``` cpp -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - T1 get_private_member1(Foo* obj) { - return obj->private_member1_; - } -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... - get_private_member1(x) - ... -} -``` - * If the methods are declared **protected**, you can change their access level in a test-only subclass: -``` cpp -class YourClass { - ... - protected: // protected access for testability. - int DoSomethingReturningInt(); - ... -}; - -// in the your_class_test.cc file: -class TestableYourClass : public YourClass { - ... - public: using YourClass::DoSomethingReturningInt; // changes access rights - ... -}; - -TEST_F(YourClassTest, DoSomethingTest) { - TestableYourClass obj; - assertEquals(expected_value, obj.DoSomethingReturningInt()); -} -``` - -## How do I test private class static members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -We find private static methods clutter the header file. They are -implementation details and ideally should be kept out of a .h. So often I make -them free functions instead. - -Instead of: -``` cpp -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - private: - static bool Func(int n); -}; - -// foo.cc -bool Foo::Func(int n) { ... } - -// foo_test.cc -EXPECT_TRUE(Foo::Func(12345)); -``` - -You probably should better write: -``` cpp -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... -}; - -// foo.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n) { ... } -} - -// foo_test.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n); -} - -EXPECT_TRUE(internal::Func(12345)); -``` - -## I would like to run a test several times with different parameters. Do I need to write several similar copies of it? ## - -No. You can use a feature called [value-parameterized tests](AdvancedGuide.md#Value_Parameterized_Tests) which -lets you repeat your tests with different parameters, without defining it more than once. - -## How do I test a file that defines main()? ## - -To test a `foo.cc` file, you need to compile and link it into your unit test -program. However, when the file contains a definition for the `main()` -function, it will clash with the `main()` of your unit test, and will result in -a build error. - -The right solution is to split it into three files: - 1. `foo.h` which contains the declarations, - 1. `foo.cc` which contains the definitions except `main()`, and - 1. `foo_main.cc` which contains nothing but the definition of `main()`. - -Then `foo.cc` can be easily tested. - -If you are adding tests to an existing file and don't want an intrusive change -like this, there is a hack: just include the entire `foo.cc` file in your unit -test. For example: -``` cpp -// File foo_unittest.cc - -// The headers section -... - -// Renames main() in foo.cc to make room for the unit test main() -#define main FooMain - -#include "a/b/foo.cc" - -// The tests start here. -... -``` - - -However, please remember this is a hack and should only be used as the last -resort. - -## What can the statement argument in ASSERT\_DEATH() be? ## - -`ASSERT_DEATH(_statement_, _regex_)` (or any death assertion macro) can be used -wherever `_statement_` is valid. So basically `_statement_` can be any C++ -statement that makes sense in the current context. In particular, it can -reference global and/or local variables, and can be: - * a simple function call (often the case), - * a complex expression, or - * a compound statement. - -Some examples are shown here: - -``` cpp -// A death test can be a simple function call. -TEST(MyDeathTest, FunctionCall) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Xyz(5), "Xyz failed"); -} - -// Or a complex expression that references variables and functions. -TEST(MyDeathTest, ComplexExpression) { - const bool c = Condition(); - ASSERT_DEATH((c ? Func1(0) : object2.Method("test")), - "(Func1|Method) failed"); -} - -// Death assertions can be used any where in a function. In -// particular, they can be inside a loop. -TEST(MyDeathTest, InsideLoop) { - // Verifies that Foo(0), Foo(1), ..., and Foo(4) all die. - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - EXPECT_DEATH_M(Foo(i), "Foo has \\d+ errors", - ::testing::Message() << "where i is " << i); - } -} - -// A death assertion can contain a compound statement. -TEST(MyDeathTest, CompoundStatement) { - // Verifies that at lease one of Bar(0), Bar(1), ..., and - // Bar(4) dies. - ASSERT_DEATH({ - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - Bar(i); - } - }, - "Bar has \\d+ errors");} -``` - -`googletest_unittest.cc` contains more examples if you are interested. - -## What syntax does the regular expression in ASSERT\_DEATH use? ## - -On POSIX systems, Google Test uses the POSIX Extended regular -expression syntax -(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). -On Windows, it uses a limited variant of regular expression -syntax. For more details, see the -[regular expression syntax](AdvancedGuide.md#Regular_Expression_Syntax). - -## I have a fixture class Foo, but TEST\_F(Foo, Bar) gives me error "no matching function for call to Foo::Foo()". Why? ## - -Google Test needs to be able to create objects of your test fixture class, so -it must have a default constructor. Normally the compiler will define one for -you. However, there are cases where you have to define your own: - * If you explicitly declare a non-default constructor for class `Foo`, then you need to define a default constructor, even if it would be empty. - * If `Foo` has a const non-static data member, then you have to define the default constructor _and_ initialize the const member in the initializer list of the constructor. (Early versions of `gcc` doesn't force you to initialize the const member. It's a bug that has been fixed in `gcc 4`.) - -## Why does ASSERT\_DEATH complain about previous threads that were already joined? ## - -With the Linux pthread library, there is no turning back once you cross the -line from single thread to multiple threads. The first time you create a -thread, a manager thread is created in addition, so you get 3, not 2, threads. -Later when the thread you create joins the main thread, the thread count -decrements by 1, but the manager thread will never be killed, so you still have -2 threads, which means you cannot safely run a death test. - -The new NPTL thread library doesn't suffer from this problem, as it doesn't -create a manager thread. However, if you don't control which machine your test -runs on, you shouldn't depend on this. - -## Why does Google Test require the entire test case, instead of individual tests, to be named FOODeathTest when it uses ASSERT\_DEATH? ## - -Google Test does not interleave tests from different test cases. That is, it -runs all tests in one test case first, and then runs all tests in the next test -case, and so on. Google Test does this because it needs to set up a test case -before the first test in it is run, and tear it down afterwords. Splitting up -the test case would require multiple set-up and tear-down processes, which is -inefficient and makes the semantics unclean. - -If we were to determine the order of tests based on test name instead of test -case name, then we would have a problem with the following situation: - -``` cpp -TEST_F(FooTest, AbcDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Uvw) { ... } - -TEST_F(BarTest, DefDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Xyz) { ... } -``` - -Since `FooTest.AbcDeathTest` needs to run before `BarTest.Xyz`, and we don't -interleave tests from different test cases, we need to run all tests in the -`FooTest` case before running any test in the `BarTest` case. This contradicts -with the requirement to run `BarTest.DefDeathTest` before `FooTest.Uvw`. - -## But I don't like calling my entire test case FOODeathTest when it contains both death tests and non-death tests. What do I do? ## - -You don't have to, but if you like, you may split up the test case into -`FooTest` and `FooDeathTest`, where the names make it clear that they are -related: - -``` cpp -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Uvw) { ... EXPECT_DEATH(...) ... } -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Xyz) { ... ASSERT_DEATH(...) ... } -``` - -## The compiler complains about "no match for 'operator<<'" when I use an assertion. What gives? ## - -If you use a user-defined type `FooType` in an assertion, you must make sure -there is an `std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const FooType&)` function -defined such that we can print a value of `FooType`. - -In addition, if `FooType` is declared in a name space, the `<<` operator also -needs to be defined in the _same_ name space. - -## How do I suppress the memory leak messages on Windows? ## - -Since the statically initialized Google Test singleton requires allocations on -the heap, the Visual C++ memory leak detector will report memory leaks at the -end of the program run. The easiest way to avoid this is to use the -`_CrtMemCheckpoint` and `_CrtMemDumpAllObjectsSince` calls to not report any -statically initialized heap objects. See MSDN for more details and additional -heap check/debug routines. - -## I am building my project with Google Test in Visual Studio and all I'm getting is a bunch of linker errors (or warnings). Help! ## - -You may get a number of the following linker error or warnings if you -attempt to link your test project with the Google Test library when -your project and the are not built using the same compiler settings. - - * LNK2005: symbol already defined in object - * LNK4217: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported in function 'function' - * LNK4049: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported - -The Google Test project (gtest.vcproj) has the Runtime Library option -set to /MT (use multi-threaded static libraries, /MTd for debug). If -your project uses something else, for example /MD (use multi-threaded -DLLs, /MDd for debug), you need to change the setting in the Google -Test project to match your project's. - -To update this setting open the project properties in the Visual -Studio IDE then select the branch Configuration Properties | C/C++ | -Code Generation and change the option "Runtime Library". You may also try -using gtest-md.vcproj instead of gtest.vcproj. - -## I put my tests in a library and Google Test doesn't run them. What's happening? ## -Have you read a -[warning](Primer.md#important-note-for-visual-c-users) on -the Google Test Primer page? - -## I want to use Google Test with Visual Studio but don't know where to start. ## -Many people are in your position and one of the posted his solution to -our mailing list. - -## I am seeing compile errors mentioning std::type\_traits when I try to use Google Test on Solaris. ## -Google Test uses parts of the standard C++ library that SunStudio does not support. -Our users reported success using alternative implementations. Try running the build after runing this commad: - -`export CC=cc CXX=CC CXXFLAGS='-library=stlport4'` - -## How can my code detect if it is running in a test? ## - -If you write code that sniffs whether it's running in a test and does -different things accordingly, you are leaking test-only logic into -production code and there is no easy way to ensure that the test-only -code paths aren't run by mistake in production. Such cleverness also -leads to -[Heisenbugs](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unusual_software_bug#Heisenbug). -Therefore we strongly advise against the practice, and Google Test doesn't -provide a way to do it. - -In general, the recommended way to cause the code to behave -differently under test is [dependency injection](http://jamesshore.com/Blog/Dependency-Injection-Demystified.html). -You can inject different functionality from the test and from the -production code. Since your production code doesn't link in the -for-test logic at all, there is no danger in accidentally running it. - -However, if you _really_, _really_, _really_ have no choice, and if -you follow the rule of ending your test program names with `_test`, -you can use the _horrible_ hack of sniffing your executable name -(`argv[0]` in `main()`) to know whether the code is under test. - -## Google Test defines a macro that clashes with one defined by another library. How do I deal with that? ## - -In C++, macros don't obey namespaces. Therefore two libraries that -both define a macro of the same name will clash if you `#include` both -definitions. In case a Google Test macro clashes with another -library, you can force Google Test to rename its macro to avoid the -conflict. - -Specifically, if both Google Test and some other code define macro -`FOO`, you can add -``` - -DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_FOO=1 -``` -to the compiler flags to tell Google Test to change the macro's name -from `FOO` to `GTEST_FOO`. For example, with `-DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_TEST=1`, you'll need to write -``` cpp - GTEST_TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -instead of -``` cpp - TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -in order to define a test. - -Currently, the following `TEST`, `FAIL`, `SUCCEED`, and the basic comparison assertion macros can have alternative names. You can see the full list of covered macros [here](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=if+!GTEST_DONT_DEFINE_\w%2B+package:http://googletest\.googlecode\.com+file:/include/gtest/gtest.h). More information can be found in the "Avoiding Macro Name Clashes" section of the README file. - - -## Is it OK if I have two separate `TEST(Foo, Bar)` test methods defined in different namespaces? ## - -Yes. - -The rule is **all test methods in the same test case must use the same fixture class**. This means that the following is **allowed** because both tests use the same fixture class (`::testing::Test`). - -``` cpp -namespace foo { -TEST(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo - -namespace bar { -TEST(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo -``` - -However, the following code is **not allowed** and will produce a runtime error from Google Test because the test methods are using different test fixture classes with the same test case name. - -``` cpp -namespace foo { -class CoolTest : public ::testing::Test {}; // Fixture foo::CoolTest -TEST_F(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo - -namespace bar { -class CoolTest : public ::testing::Test {}; // Fixture: bar::CoolTest -TEST_F(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo -``` - -## How do I build Google Testing Framework with Xcode 4? ## - -If you try to build Google Test's Xcode project with Xcode 4.0 or later, you may encounter an error message that looks like -"Missing SDK in target gtest\_framework: /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk". That means that Xcode does not support the SDK the project is targeting. See the Xcode section in the [README](../README.md) file on how to resolve this. - -## My question is not covered in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](../docs), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/googletestframework), - 1. ask it on [googletestframework@googlegroups.com](mailto:googletestframework@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the commit hash if you check out from Git directly) of Google Test you use (Google Test is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter. diff --git a/googletest/docs/Pkgconfig.md b/googletest/docs/Pkgconfig.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9761289 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/docs/Pkgconfig.md @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +## Using GoogleTest from various build systems ## + +GoogleTest comes with pkg-config files that can be used to determine all +necessary flags for compiling and linking to GoogleTest (and GoogleMock). +Pkg-config is a standardised plain-text format containing + + * the includedir (-I) path + * necessary macro (-D) definitions + * further required flags (-pthread) + * the library (-L) path + * the library (-l) to link to + +All current build systems support pkg-config in one way or another. For +all examples here we assume you want to compile the sample +`samples/sample3_unittest.cc`. + + +### CMake ### + +Using `pkg-config` in CMake is fairly easy: + +``` +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0) + +cmake_policy(SET CMP0048 NEW) +project(my_gtest_pkgconfig VERSION 0.0.1 LANGUAGES CXX) + +find_package(PkgConfig) +pkg_search_module(GTEST REQUIRED gtest_main) + +add_executable(testapp samples/sample3_unittest.cc) +target_link_libraries(testapp ${GTEST_LDFLAGS}) +target_compile_options(testapp PUBLIC ${GTEST_CFLAGS}) + +include(CTest) +add_test(first_and_only_test testapp) +``` + +It is generally recommended that you use `target_compile_options` + `_CFLAGS` +over `target_include_directories` + `_INCLUDE_DIRS` as the former includes not +just -I flags (GoogleTest might require a macro indicating to internal headers +that all libraries have been compiled with threading enabled. In addition, +GoogleTest might also require `-pthread` in the compiling step, and as such +splitting the pkg-config `Cflags` variable into include dirs and macros for +`target_compile_definitions()` might still miss this). The same recommendation +goes for using `_LDFLAGS` over the more commonplace `_LIBRARIES`, which +happens to discard `-L` flags and `-pthread`. + + +### Autotools ### + +Finding GoogleTest in Autoconf and using it from Automake is also fairly easy: + +In your `configure.ac`: + +``` +AC_PREREQ([2.69]) +AC_INIT([my_gtest_pkgconfig], [0.0.1]) +AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([samples/sample3_unittest.cc]) +AC_PROG_CXX + +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([GTEST], [gtest_main]) + +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign subdir-objects]) +AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile]) +AC_OUTPUT +``` + +and in your `Makefile.am`: + +``` +check_PROGRAMS = testapp +TESTS = $(check_PROGRAMS) + +testapp_SOURCES = samples/sample3_unittest.cc +testapp_CXXFLAGS = $(GTEST_CFLAGS) +testapp_LDADD = $(GTEST_LIBS) +``` + + +### Meson ### + +Meson natively uses pkgconfig to query dependencies: + +``` +project('my_gtest_pkgconfig', 'cpp', version : '0.0.1') + +gtest_dep = dependency('gtest_main') + +testapp = executable( + 'testapp', + files(['samples/sample3_unittest.cc']), + dependencies : gtest_dep, + install : false) + +test('first_and_only_test', testapp) +``` + + +### Plain Makefiles ### + +Since `pkg-config` is a small Unix command-line utility, it can be used +in handwritten `Makefile`s too: + +``` +GTEST_CFLAGS = `pkg-config --cflags gtest_main` +GTEST_LIBS = `pkg-config --libs gtest_main` + +.PHONY: tests all + +tests: all + ./testapp + +all: testapp + +testapp: testapp.o + $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $< -o $@ $(GTEST_LIBS) + +testapp.o: samples/sample3_unittest.cc + $(CXX) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) $< -c -o $@ $(GTEST_CFLAGS) +``` + + +### Help! pkg-config can't find GoogleTest! ### + +Let's say you have a `CMakeLists.txt` along the lines of the one in this +tutorial and you try to run `cmake`. It is very possible that you get a +failure along the lines of: + +``` +-- Checking for one of the modules 'gtest_main' +CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:640 (message): + None of the required 'gtest_main' found +``` + +These failures are common if you installed GoogleTest yourself and have not +sourced it from a distro or other package manager. If so, you need to tell +pkg-config where it can find the `.pc` files containing the information. +Say you installed GoogleTest to `/usr/local`, then it might be that the +`.pc` files are installed under `/usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig`. If you set + +``` +export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig +``` + +pkg-config will also try to look in `PKG_CONFIG_PATH` to find `gtest_main.pc`. diff --git a/googletest/docs/Primer.md b/googletest/docs/Primer.md deleted file mode 100644 index 474c1d2..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/Primer.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,502 +0,0 @@ - - -# Introduction: Why Google C++ Testing Framework? # - -_Google C++ Testing Framework_ helps you write better C++ tests. - -No matter whether you work on Linux, Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, -Google Test can help you. - -So what makes a good test, and how does Google C++ Testing Framework fit in? We believe: - 1. Tests should be _independent_ and _repeatable_. It's a pain to debug a test that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. Google C++ Testing Framework isolates the tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, Google C++ Testing Framework allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging. - 1. Tests should be well _organized_ and reflect the structure of the tested code. Google C++ Testing Framework groups related tests into test cases that can share data and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch projects and start to work on a new code base. - 1. Tests should be _portable_ and _reusable_. The open-source community has a lot of code that is platform-neutral, its tests should also be platform-neutral. Google C++ Testing Framework works on different OSes, with different compilers (gcc, MSVC, and others), with or without exceptions, so Google C++ Testing Framework tests can easily work with a variety of configurations. (Note that the current release only contains build scripts for Linux - we are actively working on scripts for other platforms.) - 1. When tests fail, they should provide as much _information_ about the problem as possible. Google C++ Testing Framework doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile cycle. - 1. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores and let them focus on the test _content_. Google C++ Testing Framework automatically keeps track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them in order to run them. - 1. Tests should be _fast_. With Google C++ Testing Framework, you can reuse shared resources across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making tests depend on each other. - -Since Google C++ Testing Framework is based on the popular xUnit -architecture, you'll feel right at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. -If not, it will take you about 10 minutes to learn the basics and get started. -So let's go! - -_Note:_ We sometimes refer to Google C++ Testing Framework informally -as _Google Test_. - -# Setting up a New Test Project # - -To write a test program using Google Test, you need to compile Google -Test into a library and link your test with it. We provide build -files for some popular build systems: `msvc/` for Visual Studio, -`xcode/` for Mac Xcode, `make/` for GNU make, `codegear/` for Borland -C++ Builder, and the autotools script (deprecated) and -`CMakeLists.txt` for CMake (recommended) in the Google Test root -directory. If your build system is not on this list, you can take a -look at `make/Makefile` to learn how Google Test should be compiled -(basically you want to compile `src/gtest-all.cc` with `GTEST_ROOT` -and `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path, where `GTEST_ROOT` -is the Google Test root directory). - -Once you are able to compile the Google Test library, you should -create a project or build target for your test program. Make sure you -have `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path so that the -compiler can find `"gtest/gtest.h"` when compiling your test. Set up -your test project to link with the Google Test library (for example, -in Visual Studio, this is done by adding a dependency on -`gtest.vcproj`). - -If you still have questions, take a look at how Google Test's own -tests are built and use them as examples. - -# Basic Concepts # - -When using Google Test, you start by writing _assertions_, which are statements -that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be _success_, -_nonfatal failure_, or _fatal failure_. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts -the current function; otherwise the program continues normally. - -_Tests_ use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes -or has a failed assertion, then it _fails_; otherwise it _succeeds_. - -A _test case_ contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test -cases that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a -test case need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a -_test fixture_ class. - -A _test program_ can contain multiple test cases. - -We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual -assertion level and building up to tests and test cases. - -# Assertions # - -Google Test assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a -class or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion -fails, Google Test prints the assertion's source file and line number location, -along with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message -which will be appended to Google Test's message. - -The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different -effects on the current function. `ASSERT_*` versions generate fatal failures -when they fail, and **abort the current function**. `EXPECT_*` versions generate -nonfatal failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually `EXPECT_*` -are preferred, as they allow more than one failures to be reported in a test. -However, you should use `ASSERT_*` if it doesn't make sense to continue when -the assertion in question fails. - -Since a failed `ASSERT_*` returns from the current function immediately, -possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak. -Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so -keep this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion -errors. - -To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the -`<<` operator, or a sequence of such operators. An example: -``` -ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length"; - -for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) { - EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i; -} -``` - -Anything that can be streamed to an `ostream` can be streamed to an assertion -macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string -(`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is -streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed. - -## Basic Assertions ## - -These assertions do basic true/false condition testing. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is true | -| `ASSERT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is false | - -Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and -returns from the current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal -failure, allowing the function to continue running. In either case, an -assertion failure means its containing test fails. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Binary Comparison ## - -This section describes assertions that compare two values. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -|`ASSERT_EQ(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`|`EXPECT_EQ(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`| _val1_ `==` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`|`EXPECT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`| _val1_ `!=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`|`EXPECT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`| _val1_ `<` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`|`EXPECT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`| _val1_ `<=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`|`EXPECT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`| _val1_ `>` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`|`EXPECT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);`| _val1_ `>=` _val2_ | - -In the event of a failure, Google Test prints both _val1_ and _val2_. - -Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison -operator or you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the -arguments to support the `<<` operator for streaming to an `ostream`, -but it's no longer necessary since v1.6.0 (if `<<` is supported, it -will be called to print the arguments when the assertion fails; -otherwise Google Test will attempt to print them in the best way it -can. For more details and how to customize the printing of the -arguments, see this Google Mock [recipe](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#teaching-google-mock-how-to-print-your-values).). - -These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the -corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). If the corresponding -operator is defined, prefer using the `ASSERT_*()` macros because they will -print out not only the result of the comparison, but the two operands as well. - -Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the -arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function, -the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e. the compiler is free to -choose any order) and your code should not depend on any particular argument -evaluation order. - -`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it -tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value. -Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use -`ASSERT_STREQ()` , which will be described later on. In particular, to assert -that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(NULL, c_string)` . However, to -compare two `string` objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`. - -Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string` -and `wstring`). - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -_Historical note_: Before February 2016 `*_EQ` had a convention of calling it as -`ASSERT_EQ(expected, actual)`, so lots of existing code uses this order. -Now `*_EQ` treats both parameters in the same way. - -## String Comparison ## - -The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare -two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_STREQ(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(`_str1_`, `_str_2`);` | the two C strings have the same content | -| `ASSERT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content | -| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case | -| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content, ignoring case | - -Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. - -`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a -comparison of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 -narrow strings. - -A `NULL` pointer and an empty string are considered _different_. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -See also: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and -regular expression matching, for example), see the [Advanced Google Test Guide](AdvancedGuide.md). - -# Simple Tests # - -To create a test: - 1. Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function, These are ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. - 1. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, use the various Google Test assertions to check values. - 1. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds. - -``` -TEST(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - - -`TEST()` arguments go from general to specific. The _first_ argument is the -name of the test case, and the _second_ argument is the test's name within the -test case. Both names must be valid C++ identifiers, and they should not contain underscore (`_`). A test's _full name_ consists of its containing test case and its -individual name. Tests from different test cases can have the same individual -name. - -For example, let's take a simple integer function: -``` -int Factorial(int n); // Returns the factorial of n -``` - -A test case for this function might look like: -``` -// Tests factorial of 0. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(0)); -} - -// Tests factorial of positive numbers. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(1)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, Factorial(2)); - EXPECT_EQ(6, Factorial(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(40320, Factorial(8)); -} -``` - -Google Test groups the test results by test cases, so logically-related tests -should be in the same test case; in other words, the first argument to their -`TEST()` should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests, -`HandlesZeroInput` and `HandlesPositiveInput`, that belong to the same test -case `FactorialTest`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests # - -If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, -you can use a _test fixture_. It allows you to reuse the same configuration of -objects for several different tests. - -To create a fixture, just: - 1. Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:` or `public:` as we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. - 1. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. - 1. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as `Setup()` with a small `u` - don't let that happen to you. - 1. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read this [FAQ entry](FAQ.md#should-i-use-the-constructordestructor-of-the-test-fixture-or-the-set-uptear-down-function). - 1. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. - -When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to -access objects and subroutines in the test fixture: -``` -TEST_F(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - -Like `TEST()`, the first argument is the test case name, but for `TEST_F()` -this must be the name of the test fixture class. You've probably guessed: `_F` -is for fixture. - -Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro -that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler -error. - -Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a -`TEST_F()`, or you'll get the compiler error "`virtual outside class -declaration`". - -For each test defined with `TEST_F()`, Google Test will: - 1. Create a _fresh_ test fixture at runtime - 1. Immediately initialize it via `SetUp()` , - 1. Run the test - 1. Clean up by calling `TearDown()` - 1. Delete the test fixture. Note that different tests in the same test case have different test fixture objects, and Google Test always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one. Google Test does not reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests. - -As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named `Queue`, which -has the following interface: -``` -template <typename E> // E is the element type. -class Queue { - public: - Queue(); - void Enqueue(const E& element); - E* Dequeue(); // Returns NULL if the queue is empty. - size_t size() const; - ... -}; -``` - -First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name -`FooTest` where `Foo` is the class being tested. -``` -class QueueTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - q1_.Enqueue(1); - q2_.Enqueue(2); - q2_.Enqueue(3); - } - - // virtual void TearDown() {} - - Queue<int> q0_; - Queue<int> q1_; - Queue<int> q2_; -}; -``` - -In this case, `TearDown()` is not needed since we don't have to clean up after -each test, other than what's already done by the destructor. - -Now we'll write tests using `TEST_F()` and this fixture. -``` -TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) { - EXPECT_EQ(0, q0_.size()); -} - -TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) { - int* n = q0_.Dequeue(); - EXPECT_EQ(NULL, n); - - n = q1_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(1, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(0, q1_.size()); - delete n; - - n = q2_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(2, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(1, q2_.size()); - delete n; -} -``` - -The above uses both `ASSERT_*` and `EXPECT_*` assertions. The rule of thumb is -to use `EXPECT_*` when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors -after the assertion failure, and use `ASSERT_*` when continuing after failure -doesn't make sense. For example, the second assertion in the `Dequeue` test is -`ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL)`, as we need to dereference the pointer `n` later, -which would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`. - -When these tests run, the following happens: - 1. Google Test constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1` ). - 1. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . - 1. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . - 1. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. - 1. `t1` is destructed. - 1. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time running the `DequeueWorks` test. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -_Note_: Google Test automatically saves all _Google Test_ flags when a test -object is constructed, and restores them when it is destructed. - -# Invoking the Tests # - -`TEST()` and `TEST_F()` implicitly register their tests with Google Test. So, unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all your defined tests in order to run them. - -After defining your tests, you can run them with `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` , which returns `0` if all the tests are successful, or `1` otherwise. Note that `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` runs _all tests_ in your link unit -- they can be from different test cases, or even different source files. - -When invoked, the `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` macro: - 1. Saves the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Creates a test fixture object for the first test. - 1. Initializes it via `SetUp()`. - 1. Runs the test on the fixture object. - 1. Cleans up the fixture via `TearDown()`. - 1. Deletes the fixture. - 1. Restores the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run. - -In addition, if the text fixture's constructor generates a fatal failure in -step 2, there is no point for step 3 - 5 and they are thus skipped. Similarly, -if step 3 generates a fatal failure, step 4 will be skipped. - -_Important_: You must not ignore the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or `gcc` -will give you a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the -automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its -exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus your `main()` function must -return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -Also, you should call `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` only **once**. Calling it more than once -conflicts with some advanced Google Test features (e.g. thread-safe death -tests) and thus is not supported. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Writing the main() Function # - -You can start from this boilerplate: -``` -#include "this/package/foo.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -namespace { - -// The fixture for testing class Foo. -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // You can remove any or all of the following functions if its body - // is empty. - - FooTest() { - // You can do set-up work for each test here. - } - - virtual ~FooTest() { - // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here. - } - - // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up - // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods: - - virtual void SetUp() { - // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right - // before each test). - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right - // before the destructor). - } - - // Objects declared here can be used by all tests in the test case for Foo. -}; - -// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc. -TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) { - const string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat"; - const string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat"; - Foo f; - EXPECT_EQ(0, f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath)); -} - -// Tests that Foo does Xyz. -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) { - // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo. -} - -} // namespace - -int main(int argc, char **argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -The `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` function parses the command line for Google -Test flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to control a -test program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in [AdvancedGuide](AdvancedGuide.md). -You must call this function before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or the flags -won't be properly initialized. - -On Windows, `InitGoogleTest()` also works with wide strings, so it can be used -in programs compiled in `UNICODE` mode as well. - -But maybe you think that writing all those main() functions is too much work? We agree with you completely and that's why Google Test provides a basic implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with gtest\_main library and you are good to go. - -## Important note for Visual C++ users ## -If you put your tests into a library and your `main()` function is in a different library or in your .exe file, those tests will not run. The reason is a [bug](https://connect.microsoft.com/feedback/viewfeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=244410&siteid=210) in Visual C++. When you define your tests, Google Test creates certain static objects to register them. These objects are not referenced from elsewhere but their constructors are still supposed to run. When Visual C++ linker sees that nothing in the library is referenced from other places it throws the library out. You have to reference your library with tests from your main program to keep the linker from discarding it. Here is how to do it. Somewhere in your library code declare a function: -``` -__declspec(dllexport) int PullInMyLibrary() { return 0; } -``` -If you put your tests in a static library (not DLL) then `__declspec(dllexport)` is not required. Now, in your main program, write a code that invokes that function: -``` -int PullInMyLibrary(); -static int dummy = PullInMyLibrary(); -``` -This will keep your tests referenced and will make them register themselves at startup. - -In addition, if you define your tests in a static library, add `/OPT:NOREF` to your main program linker options. If you use MSVC++ IDE, go to your .exe project properties/Configuration Properties/Linker/Optimization and set References setting to `Keep Unreferenced Data (/OPT:NOREF)`. This will keep Visual C++ linker from discarding individual symbols generated by your tests from the final executable. - -There is one more pitfall, though. If you use Google Test as a static library (that's how it is defined in gtest.vcproj) your tests must also reside in a static library. If you have to have them in a DLL, you _must_ change Google Test to build into a DLL as well. Otherwise your tests will not run correctly or will not run at all. The general conclusion here is: make your life easier - do not write your tests in libraries! - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've learned the Google Test basics. You can start writing -and running Google Test tests, read some [samples](Samples.md), or continue with -[AdvancedGuide](AdvancedGuide.md), which describes many more useful Google Test features. - -# Known Limitations # - -Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is -thread-safe on systems where the `pthreads` library is available. It -is currently _unsafe_ to use Google Test assertions from two threads -concurrently on other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is -not an issue as usually the assertions are done in the main thread. If -you want to help, you can volunteer to implement the necessary -synchronization primitives in `gtest-port.h` for your platform. diff --git a/googletest/docs/PumpManual.md b/googletest/docs/PumpManual.md index 8184f15..827bb24 100644 --- a/googletest/docs/PumpManual.md +++ b/googletest/docs/PumpManual.md @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ maintain. ## Highlights ## * The implementation is in a single Python script and thus ultra portable: no build or installation is needed and it works cross platforms. - * Pump tries to be smart with respect to [Google's style guide](http://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/): it breaks long lines (easy to have when they are generated) at acceptable places to fit within 80 columns and indent the continuation lines correctly. + * Pump tries to be smart with respect to [Google's style guide](https://github.com/google/styleguide): it breaks long lines (easy to have when they are generated) at acceptable places to fit within 80 columns and indent the continuation lines correctly. * The format is human-readable and more concise than XML. * The format works relatively well with Emacs' C++ mode. @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ improving Pump. ## Real Examples ## -You can find real-world applications of Pump in [Google Test](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgoogletest\.googlecode\.com) and [Google Mock](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgooglemock\.googlecode\.com). The source file `foo.h.pump` generates `foo.h`. +You can find real-world applications of Pump in [Google Test](https://github.com/google/googletest/tree/master/googletest) and [Google Mock](https://github.com/google/googletest/tree/master/googlemock). The source file `foo.h.pump` generates `foo.h`. ## Tips ## diff --git a/googletest/docs/Samples.md b/googletest/docs/Samples.md deleted file mode 100644 index f21d200..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/Samples.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -If you're like us, you'd like to look at some Google Test sample code. The -[samples folder](../samples) has a number of well-commented samples showing how to use a -variety of Google Test features. - - * [Sample #1](../samples/sample1_unittest.cc) shows the basic steps of using Google Test to test C++ functions. - * [Sample #2](../samples/sample2_unittest.cc) shows a more complex unit test for a class with multiple member functions. - * [Sample #3](../samples/sample3_unittest.cc) uses a test fixture. - * [Sample #4](../samples/sample4_unittest.cc) is another basic example of using Google Test. - * [Sample #5](../samples/sample5_unittest.cc) teaches how to reuse a test fixture in multiple test cases by deriving sub-fixtures from it. - * [Sample #6](../samples/sample6_unittest.cc) demonstrates type-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #7](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) teaches the basics of value-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #8](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) shows using `Combine()` in value-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #9](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc) shows use of the listener API to modify Google Test's console output and the use of its reflection API to inspect test results. - * [Sample #10](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc) shows use of the listener API to implement a primitive memory leak checker. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md b/googletest/docs/V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index 34e19c2..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2096 +0,0 @@ - - -Now that you have read [Primer](V1_5_Primer.md) and learned how to write tests -using Google Test, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document -will show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex -failure messages, propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your -test fixtures, and use various flags with your tests. - -# More Assertions # - -This section covers some less frequently used, but still significant, -assertions. - -## Explicit Success and Failure ## - -These three assertions do not actually test a value or expression. Instead, -they generate a success or failure directly. Like the macros that actually -perform a test, you may stream a custom failure message into the them. - -| `SUCCEED();` | -|:-------------| - -Generates a success. This does NOT make the overall test succeed. A test is -considered successful only if none of its assertions fail during its execution. - -Note: `SUCCEED()` is purely documentary and currently doesn't generate any -user-visible output. However, we may add `SUCCEED()` messages to Google Test's -output in the future. - -| `FAIL();` | `ADD_FAILURE();` | -|:-----------|:-----------------| - -`FAIL*` generates a fatal failure while `ADD_FAILURE*` generates a nonfatal -failure. These are useful when control flow, rather than a Boolean expression, -deteremines the test's success or failure. For example, you might want to write -something like: - -``` -switch(expression) { - case 1: ... some checks ... - case 2: ... some other checks - ... - default: FAIL() << "We shouldn't get here."; -} -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Exception Assertions ## - -These are for verifying that a piece of code throws (or does not -throw) an exception of the given type: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | `EXPECT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of the given type | -| `ASSERT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of any type | -| `ASSERT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't throw any exception | - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_THROW(Foo(5), bar_exception); - -EXPECT_NO_THROW({ - int n = 5; - Bar(&n); -}); -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.1.0. - -## Predicate Assertions for Better Error Messages ## - -Even though Google Test has a rich set of assertions, they can never be -complete, as it's impossible (nor a good idea) to anticipate all the scenarios -a user might run into. Therefore, sometimes a user has to use `EXPECT_TRUE()` -to check a complex expression, for lack of a better macro. This has the problem -of not showing you the values of the parts of the expression, making it hard to -understand what went wrong. As a workaround, some users choose to construct the -failure message by themselves, streaming it into `EXPECT_TRUE()`. However, this -is awkward especially when the expression has side-effects or is expensive to -evaluate. - -Google Test gives you three different options to solve this problem: - -### Using an Existing Boolean Function ### - -If you already have a function or a functor that returns `bool` (or a type -that can be implicitly converted to `bool`), you can use it in a _predicate -assertion_ to get the function arguments printed for free: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | _pred1(val1)_ returns true | -| `ASSERT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred2(val1, val2)_ returns true | -| ... | ... | ... | - -In the above, _predn_ is an _n_-ary predicate function or functor, where -_val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are its arguments. The assertion succeeds -if the predicate returns `true` when applied to the given arguments, and fails -otherwise. When the assertion fails, it prints the value of each argument. In -either case, the arguments are evaluated exactly once. - -Here's an example. Given - -``` -// Returns true iff m and n have no common divisors except 1. -bool MutuallyPrime(int m, int n) { ... } -const int a = 3; -const int b = 4; -const int c = 10; -``` - -the assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, a, b);` will succeed, while the -assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, b, c);` will fail with the message - -<pre> -!MutuallyPrime(b, c) is false, where<br> -b is 4<br> -c is 10<br> -</pre> - -**Notes:** - - 1. If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see [this](V1_5_FAQ.md#the-compiler-complains-about-undefined-references-to-some-static-const-member-variables-but-i-did-define-them-in-the-class-body-whats-wrong) for how to resolve it. - 1. Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need a higher-arity assertion, let us know. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac - -### Using a Function That Returns an AssertionResult ### - -While `EXPECT_PRED*()` and friends are handy for a quick job, the -syntax is not satisfactory: you have to use different macros for -different arities, and it feels more like Lisp than C++. The -`::testing::AssertionResult` class solves this problem. - -An `AssertionResult` object represents the result of an assertion -(whether it's a success or a failure, and an associated message). You -can create an `AssertionResult` using one of these factory -functions: - -``` -namespace testing { - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// succeeded. -AssertionResult AssertionSuccess(); - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// failed. -AssertionResult AssertionFailure(); - -} -``` - -You can then use the `<<` operator to stream messages to the -`AssertionResult` object. - -To provide more readable messages in Boolean assertions -(e.g. `EXPECT_TRUE()`), write a predicate function that returns -`AssertionResult` instead of `bool`. For example, if you define -`IsEven()` as: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -instead of: - -``` -bool IsEven(int n) { - return (n % 2) == 0; -} -``` - -the failed assertion `EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(4)))` will print: - -<pre> -Value of: !IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false (*3 is odd*)<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -instead of a more opaque - -<pre> -Value of: !IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -If you want informative messages in `EXPECT_FALSE` and `ASSERT_FALSE` -as well, and are fine with making the predicate slower in the success -case, you can supply a success message: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess() << n << " is even"; - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -Then the statement `EXPECT_FALSE(IsEven(Fib(6)))` will print - -<pre> -Value of: !IsEven(Fib(6))<br> -Actual: true (8 is even)<br> -Expected: false<br> -</pre> - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.4.1. - -### Using a Predicate-Formatter ### - -If you find the default message generated by `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED*` and -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_(TRUE|FALSE)` unsatisfactory, or some arguments to your -predicate do not support streaming to `ostream`, you can instead use the -following _predicate-formatter assertions_ to _fully_ customize how the -message is formatted: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`); | _pred\_format1(val1)_ is successful | -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred\_format2(val1, val2)_ is successful | -| `...` | `...` | `...` | - -The difference between this and the previous two groups of macros is that instead of -a predicate, `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*` take a _predicate-formatter_ -(_pred\_formatn_), which is a function or functor with the signature: - -`::testing::AssertionResult PredicateFormattern(const char* `_expr1_`, const char* `_expr2_`, ... const char* `_exprn_`, T1 `_val1_`, T2 `_val2_`, ... Tn `_valn_`);` - -where _val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are the values of the predicate -arguments, and _expr1_, _expr2_, ..., and _exprn_ are the corresponding -expressions as they appear in the source code. The types `T1`, `T2`, ..., and -`Tn` can be either value types or reference types. For example, if an -argument has type `Foo`, you can declare it as either `Foo` or `const Foo&`, -whichever is appropriate. - -A predicate-formatter returns a `::testing::AssertionResult` object to indicate -whether the assertion has succeeded or not. The only way to create such an -object is to call one of these factory functions: - -As an example, let's improve the failure message in the previous example, which uses `EXPECT_PRED2()`: - -``` -// Returns the smallest prime common divisor of m and n, -// or 1 when m and n are mutually prime. -int SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(int m, int n) { ... } - -// A predicate-formatter for asserting that two integers are mutually prime. -::testing::AssertionResult AssertMutuallyPrime(const char* m_expr, - const char* n_expr, - int m, - int n) { - if (MutuallyPrime(m, n)) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() - << m_expr << " and " << n_expr << " (" << m << " and " << n - << ") are not mutually prime, " << "as they have a common divisor " - << SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(m, n); -} -``` - -With this predicate-formatter, we can use - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(AssertMutuallyPrime, b, c); -``` - -to generate the message - -<pre> -b and c (4 and 10) are not mutually prime, as they have a common divisor 2.<br> -</pre> - -As you may have realized, many of the assertions we introduced earlier are -special cases of `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. In fact, most of them are -indeed defined using `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -## Floating-Point Comparison ## - -Comparing floating-point numbers is tricky. Due to round-off errors, it is -very unlikely that two floating-points will match exactly. Therefore, -`ASSERT_EQ` 's naive comparison usually doesn't work. And since floating-points -can have a wide value range, no single fixed error bound works. It's better to -compare by a fixed relative error bound, except for values close to 0 due to -the loss of precision there. - -In general, for floating-point comparison to make sense, the user needs to -carefully choose the error bound. If they don't want or care to, comparing in -terms of Units in the Last Place (ULPs) is a good default, and Google Test -provides assertions to do this. Full details about ULPs are quite long; if you -want to learn more, see -[this article on float comparison](http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/comparingfloats/comparingfloats.htm). - -### Floating-Point Macros ### - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | `EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | the two `float` values are almost equal | -| `ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | `EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | the two `double` values are almost equal | - -By "almost equal", we mean the two values are within 4 ULP's from each -other. - -The following assertions allow you to choose the acceptable error bound: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NEAR(`_val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | `EXPECT_NEAR`_(val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | the difference between _val1_ and _val2_ doesn't exceed the given absolute error | - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Floating-Point Predicate-Format Functions ### - -Some floating-point operations are useful, but not that often used. In order -to avoid an explosion of new macros, we provide them as predicate-format -functions that can be used in predicate assertion macros (e.g. -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2`, etc). - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::FloatLE, val1, val2); -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::DoubleLE, val1, val2); -``` - -Verifies that _val1_ is less than, or almost equal to, _val2_. You can -replace `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2` in the above table with `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Windows HRESULT assertions ## - -These assertions test for `HRESULT` success or failure. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a success `HRESULT` | -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a failure `HRESULT` | - -The generated output contains the human-readable error message -associated with the `HRESULT` code returned by _expression_. - -You might use them like this: - -``` -CComPtr shell; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell.CoCreateInstance(L"Shell.Application")); -CComVariant empty; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell->ShellExecute(CComBSTR(url), empty, empty, empty, empty)); -``` - -_Availability_: Windows. - -## Type Assertions ## - -You can call the function -``` -::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>(); -``` -to assert that types `T1` and `T2` are the same. The function does -nothing if the assertion is satisfied. If the types are different, -the function call will fail to compile, and the compiler error message -will likely (depending on the compiler) show you the actual values of -`T1` and `T2`. This is mainly useful inside template code. - -_Caveat:_ When used inside a member function of a class template or a -function template, `StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>()` is effective _only if_ -the function is instantiated. For example, given: -``` -template <typename T> class Foo { - public: - void Bar() { ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<int, T>(); } -}; -``` -the code: -``` -void Test1() { Foo<bool> foo; } -``` -will _not_ generate a compiler error, as `Foo<bool>::Bar()` is never -actually instantiated. Instead, you need: -``` -void Test2() { Foo<bool> foo; foo.Bar(); } -``` -to cause a compiler error. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Assertion Placement ## - -You can use assertions in any C++ function. In particular, it doesn't -have to be a method of the test fixture class. The one constraint is -that assertions that generate a fatal failure (`FAIL*` and `ASSERT_*`) -can only be used in void-returning functions. This is a consequence of -Google Test not using exceptions. By placing it in a non-void function -you'll get a confusing compile error like -`"error: void value not ignored as it ought to be"`. - -If you need to use assertions in a function that returns non-void, one option -is to make the function return the value in an out parameter instead. For -example, you can rewrite `T2 Foo(T1 x)` to `void Foo(T1 x, T2* result)`. You -need to make sure that `*result` contains some sensible value even when the -function returns prematurely. As the function now returns `void`, you can use -any assertion inside of it. - -If changing the function's type is not an option, you should just use -assertions that generate non-fatal failures, such as `ADD_FAILURE*` and -`EXPECT_*`. - -_Note_: Constructors and destructors are not considered void-returning -functions, according to the C++ language specification, and so you may not use -fatal assertions in them. You'll get a compilation error if you try. A simple -workaround is to transfer the entire body of the constructor or destructor to a -private void-returning method. However, you should be aware that a fatal -assertion failure in a constructor does not terminate the current test, as your -intuition might suggest; it merely returns from the constructor early, possibly -leaving your object in a partially-constructed state. Likewise, a fatal -assertion failure in a destructor may leave your object in a -partially-destructed state. Use assertions carefully in these situations! - -# Death Tests # - -In many applications, there are assertions that can cause application failure -if a condition is not met. These sanity checks, which ensure that the program -is in a known good state, are there to fail at the earliest possible time after -some program state is corrupted. If the assertion checks the wrong condition, -then the program may proceed in an erroneous state, which could lead to memory -corruption, security holes, or worse. Hence it is vitally important to test -that such assertion statements work as expected. - -Since these precondition checks cause the processes to die, we call such tests -_death tests_. More generally, any test that checks that a program terminates -in an expected fashion is also a death test. - -If you want to test `EXPECT_*()/ASSERT_*()` failures in your test code, see [Catching Failures](#catching-failures). - -## How to Write a Death Test ## - -Google Test has the following macros to support death tests: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`); | `EXPECT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`); | _statement_ crashes with the given error | -| `ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`); | `EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`); | if death tests are supported, verifies that _statement_ crashes with the given error; otherwise verifies nothing | -| `ASSERT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`); | `EXPECT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`); |_statement_ exits with the given error and its exit code matches _predicate_ | - -where _statement_ is a statement that is expected to cause the process to -die, _predicate_ is a function or function object that evaluates an integer -exit status, and _regex_ is a regular expression that the stderr output of -_statement_ is expected to match. Note that _statement_ can be _any valid -statement_ (including _compound statement_) and doesn't have to be an -expression. - -As usual, the `ASSERT` variants abort the current test function, while the -`EXPECT` variants do not. - -**Note:** We use the word "crash" here to mean that the process -terminates with a _non-zero_ exit status code. There are two -possibilities: either the process has called `exit()` or `_exit()` -with a non-zero value, or it may be killed by a signal. - -This means that if _statement_ terminates the process with a 0 exit -code, it is _not_ considered a crash by `EXPECT_DEATH`. Use -`EXPECT_EXIT` instead if this is the case, or if you want to restrict -the exit code more precisely. - -A predicate here must accept an `int` and return a `bool`. The death test -succeeds only if the predicate returns `true`. Google Test defines a few -predicates that handle the most common cases: - -``` -::testing::ExitedWithCode(exit_code) -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program exited normally with the given exit -code. - -``` -::testing::KilledBySignal(signal_number) // Not available on Windows. -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program was killed by the given signal. - -The `*_DEATH` macros are convenient wrappers for `*_EXIT` that use a predicate -that verifies the process' exit code is non-zero. - -Note that a death test only cares about three things: - - 1. does _statement_ abort or exit the process? - 1. (in the case of `ASSERT_EXIT` and `EXPECT_EXIT`) does the exit status satisfy _predicate_? Or (in the case of `ASSERT_DEATH` and `EXPECT_DEATH`) is the exit status non-zero? And - 1. does the stderr output match _regex_? - -In particular, if _statement_ generates an `ASSERT_*` or `EXPECT_*` failure, it will **not** cause the death test to fail, as Google Test assertions don't abort the process. - -To write a death test, simply use one of the above macros inside your test -function. For example, - -``` -TEST(My*DeathTest*, Foo) { - // This death test uses a compound statement. - ASSERT_DEATH({ int n = 5; Foo(&n); }, "Error on line .* of Foo()"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, NormalExit) { - EXPECT_EXIT(NormalExit(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, KillMyself) { - EXPECT_EXIT(KillMyself(), ::testing::KilledBySignal(SIGKILL), "Sending myself unblockable signal"); -} -``` - -verifies that: - - * calling `Foo(5)` causes the process to die with the given error message, - * calling `NormalExit()` causes the process to print `"Success"` to stderr and exit with exit code 0, and - * calling `KillMyself()` kills the process with signal `SIGKILL`. - -The test function body may contain other assertions and statements as well, if -necessary. - -_Important:_ We strongly recommend you to follow the convention of naming your -test case (not test) `*DeathTest` when it contains a death test, as -demonstrated in the above example. The `Death Tests And Threads` section below -explains why. - -If a test fixture class is shared by normal tests and death tests, you -can use typedef to introduce an alias for the fixture class and avoid -duplicating its code: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { - // normal test -} - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, DoesThat) { - // death test -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Cygwin, and Mac (the latter three are supported since v1.3.0). `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED` are new in v1.4.0. - -## Regular Expression Syntax ## - -On POSIX systems (e.g. Linux, Cygwin, and Mac), Google Test uses the -[POSIX extended regular expression](http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html#tag_09_04) -syntax in death tests. To learn about this syntax, you may want to read this [Wikipedia entry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). - -On Windows, Google Test uses its own simple regular expression -implementation. It lacks many features you can find in POSIX extended -regular expressions. For example, we don't support union (`"x|y"`), -grouping (`"(xy)"`), brackets (`"[xy]"`), and repetition count -(`"x{5,7}"`), among others. Below is what we do support (`A` denotes a -literal character, period (`.`), or a single `\\` escape sequence; `x` -and `y` denote regular expressions.): - -| `c` | matches any literal character `c` | -|:----|:----------------------------------| -| `\\d` | matches any decimal digit | -| `\\D` | matches any character that's not a decimal digit | -| `\\f` | matches `\f` | -| `\\n` | matches `\n` | -| `\\r` | matches `\r` | -| `\\s` | matches any ASCII whitespace, including `\n` | -| `\\S` | matches any character that's not a whitespace | -| `\\t` | matches `\t` | -| `\\v` | matches `\v` | -| `\\w` | matches any letter, `_`, or decimal digit | -| `\\W` | matches any character that `\\w` doesn't match | -| `\\c` | matches any literal character `c`, which must be a punctuation | -| `.` | matches any single character except `\n` | -| `A?` | matches 0 or 1 occurrences of `A` | -| `A*` | matches 0 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `A+` | matches 1 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `^` | matches the beginning of a string (not that of each line) | -| `$` | matches the end of a string (not that of each line) | -| `xy` | matches `x` followed by `y` | - -To help you determine which capability is available on your system, -Google Test defines macro `GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE=1` when it uses POSIX -extended regular expressions, or `GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE=1` when it uses -the simple version. If you want your death tests to work in both -cases, you can either `#if` on these macros or use the more limited -syntax only. - -## How It Works ## - -Under the hood, `ASSERT_EXIT()` spawns a new process and executes the -death test statement in that process. The details of of how precisely -that happens depend on the platform and the variable -`::testing::GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style)` (which is initialized from the -command-line flag `--gtest_death_test_style`). - - * On POSIX systems, `fork()` (or `clone()` on Linux) is used to spawn the child, after which: - * If the variable's value is `"fast"`, the death test statement is immediately executed. - * If the variable's value is `"threadsafe"`, the child process re-executes the unit test binary just as it was originally invoked, but with some extra flags to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run. - * On Windows, the child is spawned using the `CreateProcess()` API, and re-executes the binary to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run - much like the `threadsafe` mode on POSIX. - -Other values for the variable are illegal and will cause the death test to -fail. Currently, the flag's default value is `"fast"`. However, we reserve the -right to change it in the future. Therefore, your tests should not depend on -this. - -In either case, the parent process waits for the child process to complete, and checks that - - 1. the child's exit status satisfies the predicate, and - 1. the child's stderr matches the regular expression. - -If the death test statement runs to completion without dying, the child -process will nonetheless terminate, and the assertion fails. - -## Death Tests And Threads ## - -The reason for the two death test styles has to do with thread safety. Due to -well-known problems with forking in the presence of threads, death tests should -be run in a single-threaded context. Sometimes, however, it isn't feasible to -arrange that kind of environment. For example, statically-initialized modules -may start threads before main is ever reached. Once threads have been created, -it may be difficult or impossible to clean them up. - -Google Test has three features intended to raise awareness of threading issues. - - 1. A warning is emitted if multiple threads are running when a death test is encountered. - 1. Test cases with a name ending in "DeathTest" are run before all other tests. - 1. It uses `clone()` instead of `fork()` to spawn the child process on Linux (`clone()` is not available on Cygwin and Mac), as `fork()` is more likely to cause the child to hang when the parent process has multiple threads. - -It's perfectly fine to create threads inside a death test statement; they are -executed in a separate process and cannot affect the parent. - -## Death Test Styles ## - -The "threadsafe" death test style was introduced in order to help mitigate the -risks of testing in a possibly multithreaded environment. It trades increased -test execution time (potentially dramatically so) for improved thread safety. -We suggest using the faster, default "fast" style unless your test has specific -problems with it. - -You can choose a particular style of death tests by setting the flag -programmatically: - -``` -::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; -``` - -You can do this in `main()` to set the style for all death tests in the -binary, or in individual tests. Recall that flags are saved before running each -test and restored afterwards, so you need not do that yourself. For example: - -``` -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestOne) { - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; - // This test is run in the "threadsafe" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestTwo) { - // This test is run in the "fast" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "fast"; - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Caveats ## - -The _statement_ argument of `ASSERT_EXIT()` can be any valid C++ statement -except that it can not return from the current function. This means -_statement_ should not contain `return` or a macro that might return (e.g. -`ASSERT_TRUE()` ). If _statement_ returns before it crashes, Google Test will -print an error message, and the test will fail. - -Since _statement_ runs in the child process, any in-memory side effect (e.g. -modifying a variable, releasing memory, etc) it causes will _not_ be observable -in the parent process. In particular, if you release memory in a death test, -your program will fail the heap check as the parent process will never see the -memory reclaimed. To solve this problem, you can - - 1. try not to free memory in a death test; - 1. free the memory again in the parent process; or - 1. do not use the heap checker in your program. - -Due to an implementation detail, you cannot place multiple death test -assertions on the same line; otherwise, compilation will fail with an unobvious -error message. - -Despite the improved thread safety afforded by the "threadsafe" style of death -test, thread problems such as deadlock are still possible in the presence of -handlers registered with `pthread_atfork(3)`. - -# Using Assertions in Sub-routines # - -## Adding Traces to Assertions ## - -If a test sub-routine is called from several places, when an assertion -inside it fails, it can be hard to tell which invocation of the -sub-routine the failure is from. You can alleviate this problem using -extra logging or custom failure messages, but that usually clutters up -your tests. A better solution is to use the `SCOPED_TRACE` macro: - -| `SCOPED_TRACE(`_message_`);` | -|:-----------------------------| - -where _message_ can be anything streamable to `std::ostream`. This -macro will cause the current file name, line number, and the given -message to be added in every failure message. The effect will be -undone when the control leaves the current lexical scope. - -For example, - -``` -10: void Sub1(int n) { -11: EXPECT_EQ(1, Bar(n)); -12: EXPECT_EQ(2, Bar(n + 1)); -13: } -14: -15: TEST(FooTest, Bar) { -16: { -17: SCOPED_TRACE("A"); // This trace point will be included in -18: // every failure in this scope. -19: Sub1(1); -20: } -21: // Now it won't. -22: Sub1(9); -23: } -``` - -could result in messages like these: - -``` -path/to/foo_test.cc:11: Failure -Value of: Bar(n) -Expected: 1 - Actual: 2 - Trace: -path/to/foo_test.cc:17: A - -path/to/foo_test.cc:12: Failure -Value of: Bar(n + 1) -Expected: 2 - Actual: 3 -``` - -Without the trace, it would've been difficult to know which invocation -of `Sub1()` the two failures come from respectively. (You could add an -extra message to each assertion in `Sub1()` to indicate the value of -`n`, but that's tedious.) - -Some tips on using `SCOPED_TRACE`: - - 1. With a suitable message, it's often enough to use `SCOPED_TRACE` at the beginning of a sub-routine, instead of at each call site. - 1. When calling sub-routines inside a loop, make the loop iterator part of the message in `SCOPED_TRACE` such that you can know which iteration the failure is from. - 1. Sometimes the line number of the trace point is enough for identifying the particular invocation of a sub-routine. In this case, you don't have to choose a unique message for `SCOPED_TRACE`. You can simply use `""`. - 1. You can use `SCOPED_TRACE` in an inner scope when there is one in the outer scope. In this case, all active trace points will be included in the failure messages, in reverse order they are encountered. - 1. The trace dump is clickable in Emacs' compilation buffer - hit return on a line number and you'll be taken to that line in the source file! - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Propagating Fatal Failures ## - -A common pitfall when using `ASSERT_*` and `FAIL*` is not understanding that -when they fail they only abort the _current function_, not the entire test. For -example, the following test will segfault: -``` -void Subroutine() { - // Generates a fatal failure and aborts the current function. - ASSERT_EQ(1, 2); - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} - -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // The intended behavior is for the fatal failure - // in Subroutine() to abort the entire test. - // The actual behavior: the function goes on after Subroutine() returns. - int* p = NULL; - *p = 3; // Segfault! -} -``` - -Since we don't use exceptions, it is technically impossible to -implement the intended behavior here. To alleviate this, Google Test -provides two solutions. You could use either the -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_NO_FATAL_FAILURE` assertions or the -`HasFatalFailure()` function. They are described in the following two -subsections. - - - -### Asserting on Subroutines ### - -As shown above, if your test calls a subroutine that has an `ASSERT_*` -failure in it, the test will continue after the subroutine -returns. This may not be what you want. - -Often people want fatal failures to propagate like exceptions. For -that Google Test offers the following macros: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't generate any new fatal failures in the current thread. | - -Only failures in the thread that executes the assertion are checked to -determine the result of this type of assertions. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads are ignored. - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(Foo()); - -int i; -EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE({ - i = Bar(); -}); -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. Assertions from multiple threads -are currently not supported. - -### Checking for Failures in the Current Test ### - -`HasFatalFailure()` in the `::testing::Test` class returns `true` if an -assertion in the current test has suffered a fatal failure. This -allows functions to catch fatal failures in a sub-routine and return -early. - -``` -class Test { - public: - ... - static bool HasFatalFailure(); -}; -``` - -The typical usage, which basically simulates the behavior of a thrown -exception, is: - -``` -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // Aborts if Subroutine() had a fatal failure. - if (HasFatalFailure()) - return; - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} -``` - -If `HasFatalFailure()` is used outside of `TEST()` , `TEST_F()` , or a test -fixture, you must add the `::testing::Test::` prefix, as in: - -``` -if (::testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) - return; -``` - -Similarly, `HasNonfatalFailure()` returns `true` if the current test -has at least one non-fatal failure, and `HasFailure()` returns `true` -if the current test has at least one failure of either kind. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. `HasNonfatalFailure()` and -`HasFailure()` are available since version 1.4.0. - -# Logging Additional Information # - -In your test code, you can call `RecordProperty("key", value)` to log -additional information, where `value` can be either a C string or a 32-bit -integer. The _last_ value recorded for a key will be emitted to the XML output -if you specify one. For example, the test - -``` -TEST_F(WidgetUsageTest, MinAndMaxWidgets) { - RecordProperty("MaximumWidgets", ComputeMaxUsage()); - RecordProperty("MinimumWidgets", ComputeMinUsage()); -} -``` - -will output XML like this: - -``` -... - <testcase name="MinAndMaxWidgets" status="run" time="6" classname="WidgetUsageTest" - MaximumWidgets="12" - MinimumWidgets="9" /> -... -``` - -_Note_: - * `RecordProperty()` is a static member of the `Test` class. Therefore it needs to be prefixed with `::testing::Test::` if used outside of the `TEST` body and the test fixture class. - * `key` must be a valid XML attribute name, and cannot conflict with the ones already used by Google Test (`name`, `status`, `time`, and `classname`). - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Sharing Resources Between Tests in the Same Test Case # - - - -Google Test creates a new test fixture object for each test in order to make -tests independent and easier to debug. However, sometimes tests use resources -that are expensive to set up, making the one-copy-per-test model prohibitively -expensive. - -If the tests don't change the resource, there's no harm in them sharing a -single resource copy. So, in addition to per-test set-up/tear-down, Google Test -also supports per-test-case set-up/tear-down. To use it: - - 1. In your test fixture class (say `FooTest` ), define as `static` some member variables to hold the shared resources. - 1. In the same test fixture class, define a `static void SetUpTestCase()` function (remember not to spell it as **`SetupTestCase`** with a small `u`!) to set up the shared resources and a `static void TearDownTestCase()` function to tear them down. - -That's it! Google Test automatically calls `SetUpTestCase()` before running the -_first test_ in the `FooTest` test case (i.e. before creating the first -`FooTest` object), and calls `TearDownTestCase()` after running the _last test_ -in it (i.e. after deleting the last `FooTest` object). In between, the tests -can use the shared resources. - -Remember that the test order is undefined, so your code can't depend on a test -preceding or following another. Also, the tests must either not modify the -state of any shared resource, or, if they do modify the state, they must -restore the state to its original value before passing control to the next -test. - -Here's an example of per-test-case set-up and tear-down: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // Per-test-case set-up. - // Called before the first test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void SetUpTestCase() { - shared_resource_ = new ...; - } - - // Per-test-case tear-down. - // Called after the last test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void TearDownTestCase() { - delete shared_resource_; - shared_resource_ = NULL; - } - - // You can define per-test set-up and tear-down logic as usual. - virtual void SetUp() { ... } - virtual void TearDown() { ... } - - // Some expensive resource shared by all tests. - static T* shared_resource_; -}; - -T* FooTest::shared_resource_ = NULL; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Global Set-Up and Tear-Down # - -Just as you can do set-up and tear-down at the test level and the test case -level, you can also do it at the test program level. Here's how. - -First, you subclass the `::testing::Environment` class to define a test -environment, which knows how to set-up and tear-down: - -``` -class Environment { - public: - virtual ~Environment() {} - // Override this to define how to set up the environment. - virtual void SetUp() {} - // Override this to define how to tear down the environment. - virtual void TearDown() {} -}; -``` - -Then, you register an instance of your environment class with Google Test by -calling the `::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` function: - -``` -Environment* AddGlobalTestEnvironment(Environment* env); -``` - -Now, when `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is called, it first calls the `SetUp()` method of -the environment object, then runs the tests if there was no fatal failures, and -finally calls `TearDown()` of the environment object. - -It's OK to register multiple environment objects. In this case, their `SetUp()` -will be called in the order they are registered, and their `TearDown()` will be -called in the reverse order. - -Note that Google Test takes ownership of the registered environment objects. -Therefore **do not delete them** by yourself. - -You should call `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` before `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is -called, probably in `main()`. If you use `gtest_main`, you need to call -this before `main()` starts for it to take effect. One way to do this is to -define a global variable like this: - -``` -::testing::Environment* const foo_env = ::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); -``` - -However, we strongly recommend you to write your own `main()` and call -`AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` there, as relying on initialization of global -variables makes the code harder to read and may cause problems when you -register multiple environments from different translation units and the -environments have dependencies among them (remember that the compiler doesn't -guarantee the order in which global variables from different translation units -are initialized). - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -# Value Parameterized Tests # - -_Value-parameterized tests_ allow you to test your code with different -parameters without writing multiple copies of the same test. - -Suppose you write a test for your code and then realize that your code is affected by a presence of a Boolean command line flag. - -``` -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFoo) { - // A code to test foo(). -} -``` - -Usually people factor their test code into a function with a Boolean parameter in such situations. The function sets the flag, then executes the testing code. - -``` -void TestFooHelper(bool flag_value) { - flag = flag_value; - // A code to test foo(). -} - -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFooo) { - TestFooHelper(false); - TestFooHelper(true); -} -``` - -But this setup has serious drawbacks. First, when a test assertion fails in your tests, it becomes unclear what value of the parameter caused it to fail. You can stream a clarifying message into your `EXPECT`/`ASSERT` statements, but it you'll have to do it with all of them. Second, you have to add one such helper function per test. What if you have ten tests? Twenty? A hundred? - -Value-parameterized tests will let you write your test only once and then easily instantiate and run it with an arbitrary number of parameter values. - -Here are some other situations when value-parameterized tests come handy: - - * You wan to test different implementations of an OO interface. - * You want to test your code over various inputs (a.k.a. data-driven testing). This feature is easy to abuse, so please exercise your good sense when doing it! - -## How to Write Value-Parameterized Tests ## - -To write value-parameterized tests, first you should define a fixture -class. It must be derived from `::testing::TestWithParam<T>`, where `T` -is the type of your parameter values. `TestWithParam<T>` is itself -derived from `::testing::Test`. `T` can be any copyable type. If it's -a raw pointer, you are responsible for managing the lifespan of the -pointed values. - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char*> { - // You can implement all the usual fixture class members here. - // To access the test parameter, call GetParam() from class - // TestWithParam<T>. -}; -``` - -Then, use the `TEST_P` macro to define as many test patterns using -this fixture as you want. The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or -"pattern", whichever you prefer to think. - -``` -TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, access the test parameter with the GetParam() method - // of the TestWithParam<T> class: - EXPECT_TRUE(foo.Blah(GetParam())); - ... -} - -TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { - ... -} -``` - -Finally, you can use `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` to instantiate the test -case with any set of parameters you want. Google Test defines a number of -functions for generating test parameters. They return what we call -(surprise!) _parameter generators_. Here is a summary of them, -which are all in the `testing` namespace: - -| `Range(begin, end[, step])` | Yields values `{begin, begin+step, begin+step+step, ...}`. The values do not include `end`. `step` defaults to 1. | -|:----------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `Values(v1, v2, ..., vN)` | Yields values `{v1, v2, ..., vN}`. | -| `ValuesIn(container)` and `ValuesIn(begin, end)` | Yields values from a C-style array, an STL-style container, or an iterator range `[begin, end)`. | -| `Bool()` | Yields sequence `{false, true}`. | -| `Combine(g1, g2, ..., gN)` | Yields all combinations (the Cartesian product for the math savvy) of the values generated by the `N` generators. This is only available if your system provides the `<tr1/tuple>` header. If you are sure your system does, and Google Test disagrees, you can override it by defining `GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE=1`. See comments in [include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h](../include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h) for more information. | - -For more details, see the comments at the definitions of these functions in the [source code](../include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h). - -The following statement will instantiate tests from the `FooTest` test case -each with parameter values `"meeny"`, `"miny"`, and `"moe"`. - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(InstantiationName, - FooTest, - ::testing::Values("meeny", "miny", "moe")); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern (yes, you can -instantiate it more than once), the first argument to -`INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` is a prefix that will be added to the actual -test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes for different -instantiations. The tests from the instantiation above will have these -names: - - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/2` for `"moe"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/2` for `"moe"` - -You can use these names in [--gtest\-filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests). - -This statement will instantiate all tests from `FooTest` again, each -with parameter values `"cat"` and `"dog"`: - -``` -const char* pets[] = {"cat", "dog"}; -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AnotherInstantiationName, FooTest, - ::testing::ValuesIn(pets)); -``` - -The tests from the instantiation above will have these names: - - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"dog"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"dog"` - -Please note that `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` will instantiate _all_ -tests in the given test case, whether their definitions come before or -_after_ the `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` statement. - -You can see -[these](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) -[files](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) for more examples. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; since version 1.2.0. - -## Creating Value-Parameterized Abstract Tests ## - -In the above, we define and instantiate `FooTest` in the same source -file. Sometimes you may want to define value-parameterized tests in a -library and let other people instantiate them later. This pattern is -known as <i>abstract tests</i>. As an example of its application, when you -are designing an interface you can write a standard suite of abstract -tests (perhaps using a factory function as the test parameter) that -all implementations of the interface are expected to pass. When -someone implements the interface, he can instantiate your suite to get -all the interface-conformance tests for free. - -To define abstract tests, you should organize your code like this: - - 1. Put the definition of the parameterized test fixture class (e.g. `FooTest`) in a header file, say `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _declaring_ your abstract tests. - 1. Put the `TEST_P` definitions in `foo_param_test.cc`, which includes `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _implementing_ your abstract tests. - -Once they are defined, you can instantiate them by including -`foo_param_test.h`, invoking `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()`, and linking -with `foo_param_test.cc`. You can instantiate the same abstract test -case multiple times, possibly in different source files. - -# Typed Tests # - -Suppose you have multiple implementations of the same interface and -want to make sure that all of them satisfy some common requirements. -Or, you may have defined several types that are supposed to conform to -the same "concept" and you want to verify it. In both cases, you want -the same test logic repeated for different types. - -While you can write one `TEST` or `TEST_F` for each type you want to -test (and you may even factor the test logic into a function template -that you invoke from the `TEST`), it's tedious and doesn't scale: -if you want _m_ tests over _n_ types, you'll end up writing _m\*n_ -`TEST`s. - -_Typed tests_ allow you to repeat the same test logic over a list of -types. You only need to write the test logic once, although you must -know the type list when writing typed tests. Here's how you do it: - -First, define a fixture class template. It should be parameterized -by a type. Remember to derive it from `::testing::Test`: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - public: - ... - typedef std::list<T> List; - static T shared_; - T value_; -}; -``` - -Next, associate a list of types with the test case, which will be -repeated for each type in the list: - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -TYPED_TEST_CASE(FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -The `typedef` is necessary for the `TYPED_TEST_CASE` macro to parse -correctly. Otherwise the compiler will think that each comma in the -type list introduces a new macro argument. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST()` instead of `TEST_F()` to define a typed test -for this test case. You can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to the special name TypeParam to get the type - // parameter. Since we are inside a derived class template, C++ requires - // us to visit the members of FooTest via 'this'. - TypeParam n = this->value_; - - // To visit static members of the fixture, add the 'TestFixture::' - // prefix. - n += TestFixture::shared_; - - // To refer to typedefs in the fixture, add the 'typename TestFixture::' - // prefix. The 'typename' is required to satisfy the compiler. - typename TestFixture::List values; - values.push_back(n); - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Type-Parameterized Tests # - -_Type-parameterized tests_ are like typed tests, except that they -don't require you to know the list of types ahead of time. Instead, -you can define the test logic first and instantiate it with different -type lists later. You can even instantiate it more than once in the -same program. - -If you are designing an interface or concept, you can define a suite -of type-parameterized tests to verify properties that any valid -implementation of the interface/concept should have. Then, the author -of each implementation can just instantiate the test suite with his -type to verify that it conforms to the requirements, without having to -write similar tests repeatedly. Here's an example: - -First, define a fixture class template, as we did with typed tests: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -``` - -Next, declare that you will define a type-parameterized test case: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest); -``` - -The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern", whichever you -prefer to think. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST_P()` to define a type-parameterized test. You -can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to TypeParam to get the type parameter. - TypeParam n = 0; - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -Now the tricky part: you need to register all test patterns using the -`REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro before you can instantiate them. -The first argument of the macro is the test case name; the rest are -the names of the tests in this test case: - -``` -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest, - DoesBlah, HasPropertyA); -``` - -Finally, you are free to instantiate the pattern with the types you -want. If you put the above code in a header file, you can `#include` -it in multiple C++ source files and instantiate it multiple times. - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern, the first argument -to the `INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro is a prefix that will be -added to the actual test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes -for different instances. - -In the special case where the type list contains only one type, you -can write that type directly without `::testing::Types<...>`, like this: - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, int); -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Testing Private Code # - -If you change your software's internal implementation, your tests should not -break as long as the change is not observable by users. Therefore, per the -_black-box testing principle_, most of the time you should test your code -through its public interfaces. - -If you still find yourself needing to test internal implementation code, -consider if there's a better design that wouldn't require you to do so. If you -absolutely have to test non-public interface code though, you can. There are -two cases to consider: - - * Static functions (_not_ the same as static member functions!) or unnamed namespaces, and - * Private or protected class members - -## Static Functions ## - -Both static functions and definitions/declarations in an unnamed namespace are -only visible within the same translation unit. To test them, you can `#include` -the entire `.cc` file being tested in your `*_test.cc` file. (`#include`ing `.cc` -files is not a good way to reuse code - you should not do this in production -code!) - -However, a better approach is to move the private code into the -`foo::internal` namespace, where `foo` is the namespace your project normally -uses, and put the private declarations in a `*-internal.h` file. Your -production `.cc` files and your tests are allowed to include this internal -header, but your clients are not. This way, you can fully test your internal -implementation without leaking it to your clients. - -## Private Class Members ## - -Private class members are only accessible from within the class or by friends. -To access a class' private members, you can declare your test fixture as a -friend to the class and define accessors in your fixture. Tests using the -fixture can then access the private members of your production class via the -accessors in the fixture. Note that even though your fixture is a friend to -your production class, your tests are not automatically friends to it, as they -are technically defined in sub-classes of the fixture. - -Another way to test private members is to refactor them into an implementation -class, which is then declared in a `*-internal.h` file. Your clients aren't -allowed to include this header but your tests can. Such is called the Pimpl -(Private Implementation) idiom. - -Or, you can declare an individual test as a friend of your class by adding this -line in the class body: - -``` -FRIEND_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName); -``` - -For example, -``` -// foo.h -#include <gtest/gtest_prod.h> - -// Defines FRIEND_TEST. -class Foo { - ... - private: - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull); - int Bar(void* x); -}; - -// foo_test.cc -... -TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull) { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_EQ(0, foo.Bar(NULL)); - // Uses Foo's private member Bar(). -} -``` - -Pay special attention when your class is defined in a namespace, as you should -define your test fixtures and tests in the same namespace if you want them to -be friends of your class. For example, if the code to be tested looks like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { - -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Bar); - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Baz); - ... - definition of the class Foo - ... -}; - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -Your test code should be something like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -# Catching Failures # - -If you are building a testing utility on top of Google Test, you'll -want to test your utility. What framework would you use to test it? -Google Test, of course. - -The challenge is to verify that your testing utility reports failures -correctly. In frameworks that report a failure by throwing an -exception, you could catch the exception and assert on it. But Google -Test doesn't use exceptions, so how do we test that a piece of code -generates an expected failure? - -`<gtest/gtest-spi.h>` contains some constructs to do this. After -`#include`ing this header, you can use - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:--------------------------------------------------| - -to assert that _statement_ generates a fatal (e.g. `ASSERT_*`) failure -whose message contains the given _substring_, or use - -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------| - -if you are expecting a non-fatal (e.g. `EXPECT_*`) failure. - -For technical reasons, there are some caveats: - - 1. You cannot stream a failure message to either macro. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot reference local non-static variables or non-static members of `this` object. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot return a value. - -_Note:_ Google Test is designed with threads in mind. Once the -synchronization primitives in `<gtest/internal/gtest-port.h>` have -been implemented, Google Test will become thread-safe, meaning that -you can then use assertions in multiple threads concurrently. Before - -that, however, Google Test only supports single-threaded usage. Once -thread-safe, `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` and `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE()` -will capture failures in the current thread only. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads will be ignored. If -you want to capture failures from all threads instead, you should use -the following macros: - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------------------| -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | - -# Getting the Current Test's Name # - -Sometimes a function may need to know the name of the currently running test. -For example, you may be using the `SetUp()` method of your test fixture to set -the golden file name based on which test is running. The `::testing::TestInfo` -class has this information: - -``` -namespace testing { - -class TestInfo { - public: - // Returns the test case name and the test name, respectively. - // - // Do NOT delete or free the return value - it's managed by the - // TestInfo class. - const char* test_case_name() const; - const char* name() const; -}; - -} // namespace testing -``` - - -> To obtain a `TestInfo` object for the currently running test, call -`current_test_info()` on the `UnitTest` singleton object: - -``` -// Gets information about the currently running test. -// Do NOT delete the returned object - it's managed by the UnitTest class. -const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); -printf("We are in test %s of test case %s.\n", - test_info->name(), test_info->test_case_name()); -``` - -`current_test_info()` returns a null pointer if no test is running. In -particular, you cannot find the test case name in `TestCaseSetUp()`, -`TestCaseTearDown()` (where you know the test case name implicitly), or -functions called from them. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Extending Google Test by Handling Test Events # - -Google Test provides an <b>event listener API</b> to let you receive -notifications about the progress of a test program and test -failures. The events you can listen to include the start and end of -the test program, a test case, or a test method, among others. You may -use this API to augment or replace the standard console output, -replace the XML output, or provide a completely different form of -output, such as a GUI or a database. You can also use test events as -checkpoints to implement a resource leak checker, for example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Defining Event Listeners ## - -To define a event listener, you subclass either -[testing::TestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L855) -or [testing::EmptyTestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L905). -The former is an (abstract) interface, where <i>each pure virtual method<br> -can be overridden to handle a test event</i> (For example, when a test -starts, the `OnTestStart()` method will be called.). The latter provides -an empty implementation of all methods in the interface, such that a -subclass only needs to override the methods it cares about. - -When an event is fired, its context is passed to the handler function -as an argument. The following argument types are used: - * [UnitTest](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L1007) reflects the state of the entire test program, - * [TestCase](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L689) has information about a test case, which can contain one or more tests, - * [TestInfo](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L599) contains the state of a test, and - * [TestPartResult](../include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h#L42) represents the result of a test assertion. - -An event handler function can examine the argument it receives to find -out interesting information about the event and the test program's -state. Here's an example: - -``` - class MinimalistPrinter : public ::testing::EmptyTestEventListener { - // Called before a test starts. - virtual void OnTestStart(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s starting.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - - // Called after a failed assertion or a SUCCESS(). - virtual void OnTestPartResult( - const ::testing::TestPartResult& test_part_result) { - printf("%s in %s:%d\n%s\n", - test_part_result.failed() ? "*** Failure" : "Success", - test_part_result.file_name(), - test_part_result.line_number(), - test_part_result.summary()); - } - - // Called after a test ends. - virtual void OnTestEnd(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s ending.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - }; -``` - -## Using Event Listeners ## - -To use the event listener you have defined, add an instance of it to -the Google Test event listener list (represented by class -[TestEventListeners](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L929) -- note the "s" at the end of the name) in your -`main()` function, before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - // Gets hold of the event listener list. - ::testing::TestEventListeners& listeners = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners(); - // Adds a listener to the end. Google Test takes the ownership. - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -There's only one problem: the default test result printer is still in -effect, so its output will mingle with the output from your minimalist -printer. To suppress the default printer, just release it from the -event listener list and delete it. You can do so by adding one line: -``` - ... - delete listeners.Release(listeners.default_result_printer()); - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -Now, sit back and enjoy a completely different output from your -tests. For more details, you can read this -[sample](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc). - -You may append more than one listener to the list. When an `On*Start()` -or `OnTestPartResult()` event is fired, the listeners will receive it in -the order they appear in the list (since new listeners are added to -the end of the list, the default text printer and the default XML -generator will receive the event first). An `On*End()` event will be -received by the listeners in the _reverse_ order. This allows output by -listeners added later to be framed by output from listeners added -earlier. - -## Generating Failures in Listeners ## - -You may use failure-raising macros (`EXPECT_*()`, `ASSERT_*()`, -`FAIL()`, etc) when processing an event. There are some restrictions: - - 1. You cannot generate any failure in `OnTestPartResult()` (otherwise it will cause `OnTestPartResult()` to be called recursively). - 1. A listener that handles `OnTestPartResult()` is not allowed to generate any failure. - -When you add listeners to the listener list, you should put listeners -that handle `OnTestPartResult()` _before_ listeners that can generate -failures. This ensures that failures generated by the latter are -attributed to the right test by the former. - -We have a sample of failure-raising listener -[here](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc). - -# Running Test Programs: Advanced Options # - -Google Test test programs are ordinary executables. Once built, you can run -them directly and affect their behavior via the following environment variables -and/or command line flags. For the flags to work, your programs must call -`::testing::InitGoogleTest()` before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -To see a list of supported flags and their usage, please run your test -program with the `--help` flag. You can also use `-h`, `-?`, or `/?` -for short. This feature is added in version 1.3.0. - -If an option is specified both by an environment variable and by a -flag, the latter takes precedence. Most of the options can also be -set/read in code: to access the value of command line flag -`--gtest_foo`, write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(foo)`. A common pattern is -to set the value of a flag before calling `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` -to change the default value of the flag: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // Disables elapsed time by default. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; - - // This allows the user to override the flag on the command line. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Selecting Tests ## - -This section shows various options for choosing which tests to run. - -### Listing Test Names ### - -Sometimes it is necessary to list the available tests in a program before -running them so that a filter may be applied if needed. Including the flag -`--gtest_list_tests` overrides all other flags and lists tests in the following -format: -``` -TestCase1. - TestName1 - TestName2 -TestCase2. - TestName -``` - -None of the tests listed are actually run if the flag is provided. There is no -corresponding environment variable for this flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Running a Subset of the Tests ### - -By default, a Google Test program runs all tests the user has defined. -Sometimes, you want to run only a subset of the tests (e.g. for debugging or -quickly verifying a change). If you set the `GTEST_FILTER` environment variable -or the `--gtest_filter` flag to a filter string, Google Test will only run the -tests whose full names (in the form of `TestCaseName.TestName`) match the -filter. - -The format of a filter is a '`:`'-separated list of wildcard patterns (called -the positive patterns) optionally followed by a '`-`' and another -'`:`'-separated pattern list (called the negative patterns). A test matches the -filter if and only if it matches any of the positive patterns but does not -match any of the negative patterns. - -A pattern may contain `'*'` (matches any string) or `'?'` (matches any single -character). For convenience, the filter `'*-NegativePatterns'` can be also -written as `'-NegativePatterns'`. - -For example: - - * `./foo_test` Has no flag, and thus runs all its tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*` Also runs everything, due to the single match-everything `*` value. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*` Runs everything in test case `FooTest`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*Null*:*Constructor*` Runs any test whose full name contains either `"Null"` or `"Constructor"`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=-*DeathTest.*` Runs all non-death tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*-FooTest.Bar` Runs everything in test case `FooTest` except `FooTest.Bar`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Disabling Tests ### - -If you have a broken test that you cannot fix right away, you can add the -`DISABLED_` prefix to its name. This will exclude it from execution. This is -better than commenting out the code or using `#if 0`, as disabled tests are -still compiled (and thus won't rot). - -If you need to disable all tests in a test case, you can either add `DISABLED_` -to the front of the name of each test, or alternatively add it to the front of -the test case name. - -For example, the following tests won't be run by Google Test, even though they -will still be compiled: - -``` -// Tests that Foo does Abc. -TEST(FooTest, DISABLED_DoesAbc) { ... } - -class DISABLED_BarTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -// Tests that Bar does Xyz. -TEST_F(DISABLED_BarTest, DoesXyz) { ... } -``` - -_Note:_ This feature should only be used for temporary pain-relief. You still -have to fix the disabled tests at a later date. As a reminder, Google Test will -print a banner warning you if a test program contains any disabled tests. - -_Tip:_ You can easily count the number of disabled tests you have -using `grep`. This number can be used as a metric for improving your -test quality. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Enabling Disabled Tests ### - -To include [disabled tests](#temporarily-disabling-tests) in test -execution, just invoke the test program with the -`--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests` flag or set the -`GTEST_ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS` environment variable to a value other -than `0`. You can combine this with the -[--gtest\_filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests) flag to further select -which disabled tests to run. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Repeating the Tests ## - -Once in a while you'll run into a test whose result is hit-or-miss. Perhaps it -will fail only 1% of the time, making it rather hard to reproduce the bug under -a debugger. This can be a major source of frustration. - -The `--gtest_repeat` flag allows you to repeat all (or selected) test methods -in a program many times. Hopefully, a flaky test will eventually fail and give -you a chance to debug. Here's how to use it: - -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times and don't stop at failures. | -|:---------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------| -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=-1` | A negative count means repeating forever. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times, stopping at the first failure. This is especially useful when running under a debugger: when the testfails, it will drop into the debugger and you can then inspect variables and stacks. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_filter=FooBar` | Repeat the tests whose name matches the filter 1000 times. | - -If your test program contains global set-up/tear-down code registered -using `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()`, it will be repeated in each -iteration as well, as the flakiness may be in it. You can also specify -the repeat count by setting the `GTEST_REPEAT` environment variable. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Shuffling the Tests ## - -You can specify the `--gtest_shuffle` flag (or set the `GTEST_SHUFFLE` -environment variable to `1`) to run the tests in a program in a random -order. This helps to reveal bad dependencies between tests. - -By default, Google Test uses a random seed calculated from the current -time. Therefore you'll get a different order every time. The console -output includes the random seed value, such that you can reproduce an -order-related test failure later. To specify the random seed -explicitly, use the `--gtest_random_seed=SEED` flag (or set the -`GTEST_RANDOM_SEED` environment variable), where `SEED` is an integer -between 0 and 99999. The seed value 0 is special: it tells Google Test -to do the default behavior of calculating the seed from the current -time. - -If you combine this with `--gtest_repeat=N`, Google Test will pick a -different random seed and re-shuffle the tests in each iteration. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Controlling Test Output ## - -This section teaches how to tweak the way test results are reported. - -### Colored Terminal Output ### - -Google Test can use colors in its terminal output to make it easier to spot -the separation between tests, and whether tests passed. - -You can set the GTEST\_COLOR environment variable or set the `--gtest_color` -command line flag to `yes`, `no`, or `auto` (the default) to enable colors, -disable colors, or let Google Test decide. When the value is `auto`, Google -Test will use colors if and only if the output goes to a terminal and (on -non-Windows platforms) the `TERM` environment variable is set to `xterm` or -`xterm-color`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Suppressing the Elapsed Time ### - -By default, Google Test prints the time it takes to run each test. To -suppress that, run the test program with the `--gtest_print_time=0` -command line flag. Setting the `GTEST_PRINT_TIME` environment -variable to `0` has the same effect. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. (In Google Test 1.3.0 and lower, -the default behavior is that the elapsed time is **not** printed.) - -### Generating an XML Report ### - -Google Test can emit a detailed XML report to a file in addition to its normal -textual output. The report contains the duration of each test, and thus can -help you identify slow tests. - -To generate the XML report, set the `GTEST_OUTPUT` environment variable or the -`--gtest_output` flag to the string `"xml:_path_to_output_file_"`, which will -create the file at the given location. You can also just use the string -`"xml"`, in which case the output can be found in the `test_detail.xml` file in -the current directory. - -If you specify a directory (for example, `"xml:output/directory/"` on Linux or -`"xml:output\directory\"` on Windows), Google Test will create the XML file in -that directory, named after the test executable (e.g. `foo_test.xml` for test -program `foo_test` or `foo_test.exe`). If the file already exists (perhaps left -over from a previous run), Google Test will pick a different name (e.g. -`foo_test_1.xml`) to avoid overwriting it. - -The report uses the format described here. It is based on the -`junitreport` Ant task and can be parsed by popular continuous build -systems like [Hudson](https://hudson.dev.java.net/). Since that format -was originally intended for Java, a little interpretation is required -to make it apply to Google Test tests, as shown here: - -``` -<testsuites name="AllTests" ...> - <testsuite name="test_case_name" ...> - <testcase name="test_name" ...> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - - * The root `<testsuites>` element corresponds to the entire test program. - * `<testsuite>` elements correspond to Google Test test cases. - * `<testcase>` elements correspond to Google Test test functions. - -For instance, the following program - -``` -TEST(MathTest, Addition) { ... } -TEST(MathTest, Subtraction) { ... } -TEST(LogicTest, NonContradiction) { ... } -``` - -could generate this report: - -``` -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> -<testsuites tests="3" failures="1" errors="0" time="35" name="AllTests"> - <testsuite name="MathTest" tests="2" failures="1"* errors="0" time="15"> - <testcase name="Addition" status="run" time="7" classname=""> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, 1)
 Actual: 3
Expected: 2" type=""/> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, -1)
 Actual: 1
Expected: 0" type=""/> - </testcase> - <testcase name="Subtraction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> - <testsuite name="LogicTest" tests="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="5"> - <testcase name="NonContradiction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - -Things to note: - - * The `tests` attribute of a `<testsuites>` or `<testsuite>` element tells how many test functions the Google Test program or test case contains, while the `failures` attribute tells how many of them failed. - * The `time` attribute expresses the duration of the test, test case, or entire test program in milliseconds. - * Each `<failure>` element corresponds to a single failed Google Test assertion. - * Some JUnit concepts don't apply to Google Test, yet we have to conform to the DTD. Therefore you'll see some dummy elements and attributes in the report. You can safely ignore these parts. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Controlling How Failures Are Reported ## - -### Turning Assertion Failures into Break-Points ### - -When running test programs under a debugger, it's very convenient if the -debugger can catch an assertion failure and automatically drop into interactive -mode. Google Test's _break-on-failure_ mode supports this behavior. - -To enable it, set the `GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a value -other than `0` . Alternatively, you can use the `--gtest_break_on_failure` -command line flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Suppressing Pop-ups Caused by Exceptions ### - -On Windows, Google Test may be used with exceptions enabled. Even when -exceptions are disabled, an application can still throw structured exceptions -(SEH's). If a test throws an exception, by default Google Test doesn't try to -catch it. Instead, you'll see a pop-up dialog, at which point you can attach -the process to a debugger and easily find out what went wrong. - -However, if you don't want to see the pop-ups (for example, if you run the -tests in a batch job), set the `GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS` environment variable to -a non- `0` value, or use the `--gtest_catch_exceptions` flag. Google Test now -catches all test-thrown exceptions and logs them as failures. - -_Availability:_ Windows. `GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS` and -`--gtest_catch_exceptions` have no effect on Google Test's behavior on Linux or -Mac, even if exceptions are enabled. It is possible to add support for catching -exceptions on these platforms, but it is not implemented yet. - -### Letting Another Testing Framework Drive ### - -If you work on a project that has already been using another testing -framework and is not ready to completely switch to Google Test yet, -you can get much of Google Test's benefit by using its assertions in -your existing tests. Just change your `main()` function to look -like: - -``` -#include <gtest/gtest.h> - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - // Important: Google Test must be initialized. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - ... whatever your existing testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -With that, you can use Google Test assertions in addition to the -native assertions your testing framework provides, for example: - -``` -void TestFooDoesBar() { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_LE(foo.Bar(1), 100); // A Google Test assertion. - CPPUNIT_ASSERT(foo.IsEmpty()); // A native assertion. -} -``` - -If a Google Test assertion fails, it will print an error message and -throw an exception, which will be treated as a failure by your host -testing framework. If you compile your code with exceptions disabled, -a failed Google Test assertion will instead exit your program with a -non-zero code, which will also signal a test failure to your test -runner. - -If you don't write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true;` in -your `main()`, you can alternatively enable this feature by specifying -the `--gtest_throw_on_failure` flag on the command-line or setting the -`GTEST_THROW_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a non-zero value. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.3.0. - -## Distributing Test Functions to Multiple Machines ## - -If you have more than one machine you can use to run a test program, -you might want to run the test functions in parallel and get the -result faster. We call this technique _sharding_, where each machine -is called a _shard_. - -Google Test is compatible with test sharding. To take advantage of -this feature, your test runner (not part of Google Test) needs to do -the following: - - 1. Allocate a number of machines (shards) to run the tests. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` environment variable to the total number of shards. It must be the same for all shards. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` environment variable to the index of the shard. Different shards must be assigned different indices, which must be in the range `[0, GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS - 1]`. - 1. Run the same test program on all shards. When Google Test sees the above two environment variables, it will select a subset of the test functions to run. Across all shards, each test function in the program will be run exactly once. - 1. Wait for all shards to finish, then collect and report the results. - -Your project may have tests that were written without Google Test and -thus don't understand this protocol. In order for your test runner to -figure out which test supports sharding, it can set the environment -variable `GTEST_SHARD_STATUS_FILE` to a non-existent file path. If a -test program supports sharding, it will create this file to -acknowledge the fact (the actual contents of the file are not -important at this time; although we may stick some useful information -in it in the future.); otherwise it will not create it. - -Here's an example to make it clear. Suppose you have a test program -`foo_test` that contains the following 5 test functions: -``` -TEST(A, V) -TEST(A, W) -TEST(B, X) -TEST(B, Y) -TEST(B, Z) -``` -and you have 3 machines at your disposal. To run the test functions in -parallel, you would set `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` to 3 on all machines, and -set `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` to 0, 1, and 2 on the machines respectively. -Then you would run the same `foo_test` on each machine. - -Google Test reserves the right to change how the work is distributed -across the shards, but here's one possible scenario: - - * Machine #0 runs `A.V` and `B.X`. - * Machine #1 runs `A.W` and `B.Y`. - * Machine #2 runs `B.Z`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -# Fusing Google Test Source Files # - -Google Test's implementation consists of ~30 files (excluding its own -tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in two files (a -`.h` and a `.cc`) instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gtest_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory (since release 1.3.0). -Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above installed on your machine, just -go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gtest_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h` and `gtest/gtest-all.cc` in it. These files contain -everything you need to use Google Test. Just copy them to anywhere -you want and you are ready to write tests. You can use the -[scrpts/test/Makefile](../scripts/test/Makefile) -file as an example on how to compile your tests against them. - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've now learned more advanced Google Test tools and are -ready to tackle more complex testing tasks. If you want to dive even deeper, you -can read the [FAQ](V1_5_FAQ.md). diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_5_Documentation.md b/googletest/docs/V1_5_Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 46bba2e..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_5_Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all official documentation wiki pages for Google Test **1.5.0** -- **if you use a different version of Google Test, make sure to read the documentation for that version instead.** - - * [Primer](V1_5_Primer.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Test. - * [Samples](Samples.md) -- learn from examples. - * [AdvancedGuide](V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md) -- learn more about Google Test. - * [XcodeGuide](V1_5_XcodeGuide.md) -- how to use Google Test in Xcode on Mac. - * [Frequently-Asked Questions](V1_5_FAQ.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Test, read: - - * DevGuide -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [PumpManual](V1_5_PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Test's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_5_FAQ.md b/googletest/docs/V1_5_FAQ.md deleted file mode 100644 index e870aff..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_5_FAQ.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,886 +0,0 @@ - - -If you cannot find the answer to your question here, and you have read -[Primer](V1_5_Primer.md) and [AdvancedGuide](V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md), send it to -googletestframework@googlegroups.com. - -## Why should I use Google Test instead of my favorite C++ testing framework? ## - -First, let's say clearly that we don't want to get into the debate of -which C++ testing framework is **the best**. There exist many fine -frameworks for writing C++ tests, and we have tremendous respect for -the developers and users of them. We don't think there is (or will -be) a single best framework - you have to pick the right tool for the -particular task you are tackling. - -We created Google Test because we couldn't find the right combination -of features and conveniences in an existing framework to satisfy _our_ -needs. The following is a list of things that _we_ like about Google -Test. We don't claim them to be unique to Google Test - rather, the -combination of them makes Google Test the choice for us. We hope this -list can help you decide whether it is for you too. - - * Google Test is designed to be portable. It works where many STL types (e.g. `std::string` and `std::vector`) don't compile. It doesn't require exceptions or RTTI. As a result, it runs on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows and several embedded operating systems. - * Nonfatal assertions (`EXPECT_*`) have proven to be great time savers, as they allow a test to report multiple failures in a single edit-compile-test cycle. - * It's easy to write assertions that generate informative messages: you just use the stream syntax to append any additional information, e.g. `ASSERT_EQ(5, Foo(i)) << " where i = " << i;`. It doesn't require a new set of macros or special functions. - * Google Test automatically detects your tests and doesn't require you to enumerate them in order to run them. - * No framework can anticipate all your needs, so Google Test provides `EXPECT_PRED*` to make it easy to extend your assertion vocabulary. For a nicer syntax, you can define your own assertion macros trivially in terms of `EXPECT_PRED*`. - * Death tests are pretty handy for ensuring that your asserts in production code are triggered by the right conditions. - * `SCOPED_TRACE` helps you understand the context of an assertion failure when it comes from inside a sub-routine or loop. - * You can decide which tests to run using name patterns. This saves time when you want to quickly reproduce a test failure. - -## How do I generate 64-bit binaries on Windows (using Visual Studio 2008)? ## - -(Answered by Trevor Robinson) - -Load the supplied Visual Studio solution file, either `msvc\gtest-md.sln` or -`msvc\gtest.sln`. Go through the migration wizard to migrate the -solution and project files to Visual Studio 2008. Select -`Configuration Manager...` from the `Build` menu. Select `<New...>` from -the `Active solution platform` dropdown. Select `x64` from the new -platform dropdown, leave `Copy settings from` set to `Win32` and -`Create new project platforms` checked, then click `OK`. You now have -`Win32` and `x64` platform configurations, selectable from the -`Standard` toolbar, which allow you to toggle between building 32-bit or -64-bit binaries (or both at once using Batch Build). - -In order to prevent build output files from overwriting one another, -you'll need to change the `Intermediate Directory` settings for the -newly created platform configuration across all the projects. To do -this, multi-select (e.g. using shift-click) all projects (but not the -solution) in the `Solution Explorer`. Right-click one of them and -select `Properties`. In the left pane, select `Configuration Properties`, -and from the `Configuration` dropdown, select `All Configurations`. -Make sure the selected platform is `x64`. For the -`Intermediate Directory` setting, change the value from -`$(PlatformName)\$(ConfigurationName)` to -`$(OutDir)\$(ProjectName)`. Click `OK` and then build the -solution. When the build is complete, the 64-bit binaries will be in -the `msvc\x64\Debug` directory. - -## Can I use Google Test on MinGW? ## - -We haven't tested this ourselves, but Per Abrahamsen reported that he -was able to compile and install Google Test successfully when using -MinGW from Cygwin. You'll need to configure it with: - -`PATH/TO/configure CC="gcc -mno-cygwin" CXX="g++ -mno-cygwin"` - -You should be able to replace the `-mno-cygwin` option with direct links -to the real MinGW binaries, but we haven't tried that. - -Caveats: - - * There are many warnings when compiling. - * `make check` will produce some errors as not all tests for Google Test itself are compatible with MinGW. - -We also have reports on successful cross compilation of Google Test MinGW binaries on Linux using [these instructions](http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Cross-Compiling_Under_Linux#Cross-compiling_under_Linux_for_MS_Windows) on the WxWidgets site. - -Please contact `googletestframework@googlegroups.com` if you are -interested in improving the support for MinGW. - -## Why does Google Test support EXPECT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) but not EXPECT\_NE(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_NE(NULL, ptr)? ## - -Due to some peculiarity of C++, it requires some non-trivial template -meta programming tricks to support using `NULL` as an argument of the -`EXPECT_XX()` and `ASSERT_XX()` macros. Therefore we only do it where -it's most needed (otherwise we make the implementation of Google Test -harder to maintain and more error-prone than necessary). - -The `EXPECT_EQ()` macro takes the _expected_ value as its first -argument and the _actual_ value as the second. It's reasonable that -someone wants to write `EXPECT_EQ(NULL, some_expression)`, and this -indeed was requested several times. Therefore we implemented it. - -The need for `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)` isn't nearly as strong. When the -assertion fails, you already know that `ptr` must be `NULL`, so it -doesn't add any information to print ptr in this case. That means -`EXPECT_TRUE(ptr ! NULL)` works just as well. - -If we were to support `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)`, for consistency we'll -have to support `EXPECT_NE(ptr, NULL)` as well, as unlike `EXPECT_EQ`, -we don't have a convention on the order of the two arguments for -`EXPECT_NE`. This means using the template meta programming tricks -twice in the implementation, making it even harder to understand and -maintain. We believe the benefit doesn't justify the cost. - -Finally, with the growth of Google Mock's [matcher](../../CookBook.md#using-matchers-in-google-test-assertions) library, we are -encouraging people to use the unified `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` -syntax more often in tests. One significant advantage of the matcher -approach is that matchers can be easily combined to form new matchers, -while the `EXPECT_NE`, etc, macros cannot be easily -combined. Therefore we want to invest more in the matchers than in the -`EXPECT_XX()` macros. - -## Does Google Test support running tests in parallel? ## - -Test runners tend to be tightly coupled with the build/test -environment, and Google Test doesn't try to solve the problem of -running tests in parallel. Instead, we tried to make Google Test work -nicely with test runners. For example, Google Test's XML report -contains the time spent on each test, and its `gtest_list_tests` and -`gtest_filter` flags can be used for splitting the execution of test -methods into multiple processes. These functionalities can help the -test runner run the tests in parallel. - -## Why don't Google Test run the tests in different threads to speed things up? ## - -It's difficult to write thread-safe code. Most tests are not written -with thread-safety in mind, and thus may not work correctly in a -multi-threaded setting. - -If you think about it, it's already hard to make your code work when -you know what other threads are doing. It's much harder, and -sometimes even impossible, to make your code work when you don't know -what other threads are doing (remember that test methods can be added, -deleted, or modified after your test was written). If you want to run -the tests in parallel, you'd better run them in different processes. - -## Why aren't Google Test assertions implemented using exceptions? ## - -Our original motivation was to be able to use Google Test in projects -that disable exceptions. Later we realized some additional benefits -of this approach: - - 1. Throwing in a destructor is undefined behavior in C++. Not using exceptions means Google Test's assertions are safe to use in destructors. - 1. The `EXPECT_*` family of macros will continue even after a failure, allowing multiple failures in a `TEST` to be reported in a single run. This is a popular feature, as in C++ the edit-compile-test cycle is usually quite long and being able to fixing more than one thing at a time is a blessing. - 1. If assertions are implemented using exceptions, a test may falsely ignore a failure if it's caught by user code: -``` -try { ... ASSERT_TRUE(...) ... } -catch (...) { ... } -``` -The above code will pass even if the `ASSERT_TRUE` throws. While it's unlikely for someone to write this in a test, it's possible to run into this pattern when you write assertions in callbacks that are called by the code under test. - -The downside of not using exceptions is that `ASSERT_*` (implemented -using `return`) will only abort the current function, not the current -`TEST`. - -## Why do we use two different macros for tests with and without fixtures? ## - -Unfortunately, C++'s macro system doesn't allow us to use the same -macro for both cases. One possibility is to provide only one macro -for tests with fixtures, and require the user to define an empty -fixture sometimes: - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -or -``` -typedef ::testing::Test FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThat) { ... } -``` - -Yet, many people think this is one line too many. :-) Our goal was to -make it really easy to write tests, so we tried to make simple tests -trivial to create. That means using a separate macro for such tests. - -We think neither approach is ideal, yet either of them is reasonable. -In the end, it probably doesn't matter much either way. - -## Why don't we use structs as test fixtures? ## - -We like to use structs only when representing passive data. This -distinction between structs and classes is good for documenting the -intent of the code's author. Since test fixtures have logic like -`SetUp()` and `TearDown()`, they are better defined as classes. - -## Why are death tests implemented as assertions instead of using a test runner? ## - -Our goal was to make death tests as convenient for a user as C++ -possibly allows. In particular: - - * The runner-style requires to split the information into two pieces: the definition of the death test itself, and the specification for the runner on how to run the death test and what to expect. The death test would be written in C++, while the runner spec may or may not be. A user needs to carefully keep the two in sync. `ASSERT_DEATH(statement, expected_message)` specifies all necessary information in one place, in one language, without boilerplate code. It is very declarative. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` has a similar syntax and error-reporting semantics as other Google Test assertions, and thus is easy to learn. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can be mixed with other assertions and other logic at your will. You are not limited to one death test per test method. For example, you can write something like: -``` - if (FooCondition()) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Bar(), "blah"); - } else { - ASSERT_EQ(5, Bar()); - } -``` -If you prefer one death test per test method, you can write your tests in that style too, but we don't want to impose that on the users. The fewer artificial limitations the better. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can reference local variables in the current function, and you can decide how many death tests you want based on run-time information. For example, -``` - const int count = GetCount(); // Only known at run time. - for (int i = 1; i <= count; i++) { - ASSERT_DEATH({ - double* buffer = new double[i]; - ... initializes buffer ... - Foo(buffer, i) - }, "blah blah"); - } -``` -The runner-based approach tends to be more static and less flexible, or requires more user effort to get this kind of flexibility. - -Another interesting thing about `ASSERT_DEATH` is that it calls `fork()` -to create a child process to run the death test. This is lightening -fast, as `fork()` uses copy-on-write pages and incurs almost zero -overhead, and the child process starts from the user-supplied -statement directly, skipping all global and local initialization and -any code leading to the given statement. If you launch the child -process from scratch, it can take seconds just to load everything and -start running if the test links to many libraries dynamically. - -## My death test modifies some state, but the change seems lost after the death test finishes. Why? ## - -Death tests (`EXPECT_DEATH`, etc) are executed in a sub-process s.t. the -expected crash won't kill the test program (i.e. the parent process). As a -result, any in-memory side effects they incur are observable in their -respective sub-processes, but not in the parent process. You can think of them -as running in a parallel universe, more or less. - -## The compiler complains about "undefined references" to some static const member variables, but I did define them in the class body. What's wrong? ## - -If your class has a static data member: - -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - static const int kBar = 100; -}; -``` - -You also need to define it _outside_ of the class body in `foo.cc`: - -``` -const int Foo::kBar; // No initializer here. -``` - -Otherwise your code is **invalid C++**, and may break in unexpected ways. In -particular, using it in Google Test comparison assertions (`EXPECT_EQ`, etc) -will generate an "undefined reference" linker error. - -## I have an interface that has several implementations. Can I write a set of tests once and repeat them over all the implementations? ## - -Google Test doesn't yet have good support for this kind of tests, or -data-driven tests in general. We hope to be able to make improvements in this -area soon. - -## Can I derive a test fixture from another? ## - -Yes. - -Each test fixture has a corresponding and same named test case. This means only -one test case can use a particular fixture. Sometimes, however, multiple test -cases may want to use the same or slightly different fixtures. For example, you -may want to make sure that all of a GUI library's test cases don't leak -important system resources like fonts and brushes. - -In Google Test, you share a fixture among test cases by putting the shared -logic in a base test fixture, then deriving from that base a separate fixture -for each test case that wants to use this common logic. You then use `TEST_F()` -to write tests using each derived fixture. - -Typically, your code looks like this: - -``` -// Defines a base test fixture. -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -// Derives a fixture FooTest from BaseTest. -class FooTest : public BaseTest { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - BaseTest::SetUp(); // Sets up the base fixture first. - ... additional set-up work ... - } - virtual void TearDown() { - ... clean-up work for FooTest ... - BaseTest::TearDown(); // Remember to tear down the base fixture - // after cleaning up FooTest! - } - ... functions and variables for FooTest ... -}; - -// Tests that use the fixture FooTest. -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -... additional fixtures derived from BaseTest ... -``` - -If necessary, you can continue to derive test fixtures from a derived fixture. -Google Test has no limit on how deep the hierarchy can be. - -For a complete example using derived test fixtures, see -`samples/sample5_unittest.cc`. - -## My compiler complains "void value not ignored as it ought to be." What does this mean? ## - -You're probably using an `ASSERT_*()` in a function that doesn't return `void`. -`ASSERT_*()` can only be used in `void` functions. - -## My death test hangs (or seg-faults). How do I fix it? ## - -In Google Test, death tests are run in a child process and the way they work is -delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work. -Please make sure you have read this. - -In particular, death tests don't like having multiple threads in the parent -process. So the first thing you can try is to eliminate creating threads -outside of `EXPECT_DEATH()`. - -Sometimes this is impossible as some library you must use may be creating -threads before `main()` is even reached. In this case, you can try to minimize -the chance of conflicts by either moving as many activities as possible inside -`EXPECT_DEATH()` (in the extreme case, you want to move everything inside), or -leaving as few things as possible in it. Also, you can try to set the death -test style to `"threadsafe"`, which is safer but slower, and see if it helps. - -If you go with thread-safe death tests, remember that they rerun the test -program from the beginning in the child process. Therefore make sure your -program can run side-by-side with itself and is deterministic. - -In the end, this boils down to good concurrent programming. You have to make -sure that there is no race conditions or dead locks in your program. No silver -bullet - sorry! - -## Should I use the constructor/destructor of the test fixture or the set-up/tear-down function? ## - -The first thing to remember is that Google Test does not reuse the -same test fixture object across multiple tests. For each `TEST_F`, -Google Test will create a fresh test fixture object, _immediately_ -call `SetUp()`, run the test, call `TearDown()`, and then -_immediately_ delete the test fixture object. Therefore, there is no -need to write a `SetUp()` or `TearDown()` function if the constructor -or destructor already does the job. - -You may still want to use `SetUp()/TearDown()` in the following cases: - * If the tear-down operation could throw an exception, you must use `TearDown()` as opposed to the destructor, as throwing in a destructor leads to undefined behavior and usually will kill your program right away. Note that many standard libraries (like STL) may throw when exceptions are enabled in the compiler. Therefore you should prefer `TearDown()` if you want to write portable tests that work with or without exceptions. - * The Google Test team is considering making the assertion macros throw on platforms where exceptions are enabled (e.g. Windows, Mac OS, and Linux client-side), which will eliminate the need for the user to propagate failures from a subroutine to its caller. Therefore, you shouldn't use Google Test assertions in a destructor if your code could run on such a platform. - * In a constructor or destructor, you cannot make a virtual function call on this object. (You can call a method declared as virtual, but it will be statically bound.) Therefore, if you need to call a method that will be overriden in a derived class, you have to use `SetUp()/TearDown()`. - -## The compiler complains "no matching function to call" when I use ASSERT\_PREDn. How do I fix it? ## - -If the predicate function you use in `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*` is -overloaded or a template, the compiler will have trouble figuring out which -overloaded version it should use. `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT*` and -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT*` don't have this problem. - -If you see this error, you might want to switch to -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*`, which will also give you a better failure -message. If, however, that is not an option, you can resolve the problem by -explicitly telling the compiler which version to pick. - -For example, suppose you have - -``` -bool IsPositive(int n) { - return n > 0; -} -bool IsPositive(double x) { - return x > 0; -} -``` - -you will get a compiler error if you write - -``` -EXPECT_PRED1(IsPositive, 5); -``` - -However, this will work: - -``` -EXPECT_PRED1(*static_cast<bool (*)(int)>*(IsPositive), 5); -``` - -(The stuff inside the angled brackets for the `static_cast` operator is the -type of the function pointer for the `int`-version of `IsPositive()`.) - -As another example, when you have a template function - -``` -template <typename T> -bool IsNegative(T x) { - return x < 0; -} -``` - -you can use it in a predicate assertion like this: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED1(IsNegative*<int>*, -5); -``` - -Things are more interesting if your template has more than one parameters. The -following won't compile: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED2(*GreaterThan<int, int>*, 5, 0); -``` - - -as the C++ pre-processor thinks you are giving `ASSERT_PRED2` 4 arguments, -which is one more than expected. The workaround is to wrap the predicate -function in parentheses: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED2(*(GreaterThan<int, int>)*, 5, 0); -``` - - -## My compiler complains about "ignoring return value" when I call RUN\_ALL\_TESTS(). Why? ## - -Some people had been ignoring the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. That is, -instead of - -``` -return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -they write - -``` -RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -This is wrong and dangerous. A test runner needs to see the return value of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` in order to determine if a test has passed. If your `main()` -function ignores it, your test will be considered successful even if it has a -Google Test assertion failure. Very bad. - -To help the users avoid this dangerous bug, the implementation of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` causes gcc to raise this warning, when the return value is -ignored. If you see this warning, the fix is simple: just make sure its value -is used as the return value of `main()`. - -## My compiler complains that a constructor (or destructor) cannot return a value. What's going on? ## - -Due to a peculiarity of C++, in order to support the syntax for streaming -messages to an `ASSERT_*`, e.g. - -``` -ASSERT_EQ(1, Foo()) << "blah blah" << foo; -``` - -we had to give up using `ASSERT*` and `FAIL*` (but not `EXPECT*` and -`ADD_FAILURE*`) in constructors and destructors. The workaround is to move the -content of your constructor/destructor to a private void member function, or -switch to `EXPECT_*()` if that works. This section in the user's guide explains -it. - -## My set-up function is not called. Why? ## - -C++ is case-sensitive. It should be spelled as `SetUp()`. Did you -spell it as `Setup()`? - -Similarly, sometimes people spell `SetUpTestCase()` as `SetupTestCase()` and -wonder why it's never called. - -## How do I jump to the line of a failure in Emacs directly? ## - -Google Test's failure message format is understood by Emacs and many other -IDEs, like acme and XCode. If a Google Test message is in a compilation buffer -in Emacs, then it's clickable. You can now hit `enter` on a message to jump to -the corresponding source code, or use `C-x `` to jump to the next failure. - -## I have several test cases which share the same test fixture logic, do I have to define a new test fixture class for each of them? This seems pretty tedious. ## - -You don't have to. Instead of - -``` -class FooTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -class BarTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -you can simply `typedef` the test fixtures: -``` -typedef BaseTest FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef BaseTest BarTest; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -## The Google Test output is buried in a whole bunch of log messages. What do I do? ## - -The Google Test output is meant to be a concise and human-friendly report. If -your test generates textual output itself, it will mix with the Google Test -output, making it hard to read. However, there is an easy solution to this -problem. - -Since most log messages go to stderr, we decided to let Google Test output go -to stdout. This way, you can easily separate the two using redirection. For -example: -``` -./my_test > googletest_output.txt -``` - -## Why should I prefer test fixtures over global variables? ## - -There are several good reasons: - 1. It's likely your test needs to change the states of its global variables. This makes it difficult to keep side effects from escaping one test and contaminating others, making debugging difficult. By using fixtures, each test has a fresh set of variables that's different (but with the same names). Thus, tests are kept independent of each other. - 1. Global variables pollute the global namespace. - 1. Test fixtures can be reused via subclassing, which cannot be done easily with global variables. This is useful if many test cases have something in common. - -## How do I test private class members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -You should try to write testable code, which means classes should be easily -tested from their public interface. One way to achieve this is the Pimpl idiom: -you move all private members of a class into a helper class, and make all -members of the helper class public. - -You have several other options that don't require using `FRIEND_TEST`: - * Write the tests as members of the fixture class: -``` -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - void Test1() {...} // This accesses private members of class Foo. - void Test2() {...} // So does this one. -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - Test1(); -} - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - Test2(); -} -``` - * In the fixture class, write accessors for the tested class' private members, then use the accessors in your tests: -``` -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - T1 get_private_member1(Foo* obj) { - return obj->private_member1_; - } -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... - get_private_member1(x) - ... -} -``` - * If the methods are declared **protected**, you can change their access level in a test-only subclass: -``` -class YourClass { - ... - protected: // protected access for testability. - int DoSomethingReturningInt(); - ... -}; - -// in the your_class_test.cc file: -class TestableYourClass : public YourClass { - ... - public: using YourClass::DoSomethingReturningInt; // changes access rights - ... -}; - -TEST_F(YourClassTest, DoSomethingTest) { - TestableYourClass obj; - assertEquals(expected_value, obj.DoSomethingReturningInt()); -} -``` - -## How do I test private class static members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -We find private static methods clutter the header file. They are -implementation details and ideally should be kept out of a .h. So often I make -them free functions instead. - -Instead of: -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - private: - static bool Func(int n); -}; - -// foo.cc -bool Foo::Func(int n) { ... } - -// foo_test.cc -EXPECT_TRUE(Foo::Func(12345)); -``` - -You probably should better write: -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... -}; - -// foo.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n) { ... } -} - -// foo_test.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n); -} - -EXPECT_TRUE(internal::Func(12345)); -``` - -## I would like to run a test several times with different parameters. Do I need to write several similar copies of it? ## - -No. You can use a feature called [value-parameterized tests](V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md#Value_Parameterized_Tests) which -lets you repeat your tests with different parameters, without defining it more than once. - -## How do I test a file that defines main()? ## - -To test a `foo.cc` file, you need to compile and link it into your unit test -program. However, when the file contains a definition for the `main()` -function, it will clash with the `main()` of your unit test, and will result in -a build error. - -The right solution is to split it into three files: - 1. `foo.h` which contains the declarations, - 1. `foo.cc` which contains the definitions except `main()`, and - 1. `foo_main.cc` which contains nothing but the definition of `main()`. - -Then `foo.cc` can be easily tested. - -If you are adding tests to an existing file and don't want an intrusive change -like this, there is a hack: just include the entire `foo.cc` file in your unit -test. For example: -``` -// File foo_unittest.cc - -// The headers section -... - -// Renames main() in foo.cc to make room for the unit test main() -#define main FooMain - -#include "a/b/foo.cc" - -// The tests start here. -... -``` - - -However, please remember this is a hack and should only be used as the last -resort. - -## What can the statement argument in ASSERT\_DEATH() be? ## - -`ASSERT_DEATH(_statement_, _regex_)` (or any death assertion macro) can be used -wherever `_statement_` is valid. So basically `_statement_` can be any C++ -statement that makes sense in the current context. In particular, it can -reference global and/or local variables, and can be: - * a simple function call (often the case), - * a complex expression, or - * a compound statement. - -> Some examples are shown here: - -``` -// A death test can be a simple function call. -TEST(MyDeathTest, FunctionCall) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Xyz(5), "Xyz failed"); -} - -// Or a complex expression that references variables and functions. -TEST(MyDeathTest, ComplexExpression) { - const bool c = Condition(); - ASSERT_DEATH((c ? Func1(0) : object2.Method("test")), - "(Func1|Method) failed"); -} - -// Death assertions can be used any where in a function. In -// particular, they can be inside a loop. -TEST(MyDeathTest, InsideLoop) { - // Verifies that Foo(0), Foo(1), ..., and Foo(4) all die. - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - EXPECT_DEATH_M(Foo(i), "Foo has \\d+ errors", - ::testing::Message() << "where i is " << i); - } -} - -// A death assertion can contain a compound statement. -TEST(MyDeathTest, CompoundStatement) { - // Verifies that at lease one of Bar(0), Bar(1), ..., and - // Bar(4) dies. - ASSERT_DEATH({ - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - Bar(i); - } - }, - "Bar has \\d+ errors");} -``` - -`googletest_unittest.cc` contains more examples if you are interested. - -## What syntax does the regular expression in ASSERT\_DEATH use? ## - -On POSIX systems, Google Test uses the POSIX Extended regular -expression syntax -(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). On -Windows, it uses a limited variant of regular expression syntax. For -more details, see the [regular expression syntax](V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md#Regular_Expression_Syntax). - -## I have a fixture class Foo, but TEST\_F(Foo, Bar) gives me error "no matching function for call to Foo::Foo()". Why? ## - -Google Test needs to be able to create objects of your test fixture class, so -it must have a default constructor. Normally the compiler will define one for -you. However, there are cases where you have to define your own: - * If you explicitly declare a non-default constructor for class `Foo`, then you need to define a default constructor, even if it would be empty. - * If `Foo` has a const non-static data member, then you have to define the default constructor _and_ initialize the const member in the initializer list of the constructor. (Early versions of `gcc` doesn't force you to initialize the const member. It's a bug that has been fixed in `gcc 4`.) - -## Why does ASSERT\_DEATH complain about previous threads that were already joined? ## - -With the Linux pthread library, there is no turning back once you cross the -line from single thread to multiple threads. The first time you create a -thread, a manager thread is created in addition, so you get 3, not 2, threads. -Later when the thread you create joins the main thread, the thread count -decrements by 1, but the manager thread will never be killed, so you still have -2 threads, which means you cannot safely run a death test. - -The new NPTL thread library doesn't suffer from this problem, as it doesn't -create a manager thread. However, if you don't control which machine your test -runs on, you shouldn't depend on this. - -## Why does Google Test require the entire test case, instead of individual tests, to be named FOODeathTest when it uses ASSERT\_DEATH? ## - -Google Test does not interleave tests from different test cases. That is, it -runs all tests in one test case first, and then runs all tests in the next test -case, and so on. Google Test does this because it needs to set up a test case -before the first test in it is run, and tear it down afterwords. Splitting up -the test case would require multiple set-up and tear-down processes, which is -inefficient and makes the semantics unclean. - -If we were to determine the order of tests based on test name instead of test -case name, then we would have a problem with the following situation: - -``` -TEST_F(FooTest, AbcDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Uvw) { ... } - -TEST_F(BarTest, DefDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Xyz) { ... } -``` - -Since `FooTest.AbcDeathTest` needs to run before `BarTest.Xyz`, and we don't -interleave tests from different test cases, we need to run all tests in the -`FooTest` case before running any test in the `BarTest` case. This contradicts -with the requirement to run `BarTest.DefDeathTest` before `FooTest.Uvw`. - -## But I don't like calling my entire test case FOODeathTest when it contains both death tests and non-death tests. What do I do? ## - -You don't have to, but if you like, you may split up the test case into -`FooTest` and `FooDeathTest`, where the names make it clear that they are -related: - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Uvw) { ... EXPECT_DEATH(...) ... } -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Xyz) { ... ASSERT_DEATH(...) ... } -``` - -## The compiler complains about "no match for 'operator<<'" when I use an assertion. What gives? ## - -If you use a user-defined type `FooType` in an assertion, you must make sure -there is an `std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const FooType&)` function -defined such that we can print a value of `FooType`. - -In addition, if `FooType` is declared in a name space, the `<<` operator also -needs to be defined in the _same_ name space. - -## How do I suppress the memory leak messages on Windows? ## - -Since the statically initialized Google Test singleton requires allocations on -the heap, the Visual C++ memory leak detector will report memory leaks at the -end of the program run. The easiest way to avoid this is to use the -`_CrtMemCheckpoint` and `_CrtMemDumpAllObjectsSince` calls to not report any -statically initialized heap objects. See MSDN for more details and additional -heap check/debug routines. - -## I am building my project with Google Test in Visual Studio and all I'm getting is a bunch of linker errors (or warnings). Help! ## - -You may get a number of the following linker error or warnings if you -attempt to link your test project with the Google Test library when -your project and the are not built using the same compiler settings. - - * LNK2005: symbol already defined in object - * LNK4217: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported in function 'function' - * LNK4049: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported - -The Google Test project (gtest.vcproj) has the Runtime Library option -set to /MT (use multi-threaded static libraries, /MTd for debug). If -your project uses something else, for example /MD (use multi-threaded -DLLs, /MDd for debug), you need to change the setting in the Google -Test project to match your project's. - -To update this setting open the project properties in the Visual -Studio IDE then select the branch Configuration Properties | C/C++ | -Code Generation and change the option "Runtime Library". You may also try -using gtest-md.vcproj instead of gtest.vcproj. - -## I put my tests in a library and Google Test doesn't run them. What's happening? ## -Have you read a -[warning](V1_5_Primer.md#important-note-for-visual-c-users) on -the Google Test Primer page? - -## I want to use Google Test with Visual Studio but don't know where to start. ## -Many people are in your position and one of the posted his solution to -our mailing list. Here is his link: -http://hassanjamilahmad.blogspot.com/2009/07/gtest-starters-help.html. - -## My question is not covered in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/w/list), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework/topics), - 1. ask it on [googletestframework@googlegroups.com](mailto:googletestframework@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/issues/list) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the revision number if you check out from SVN directly) of Google Test you use (Google Test is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_5_Primer.md b/googletest/docs/V1_5_Primer.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6960d2c..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_5_Primer.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,497 +0,0 @@ - - -# Introduction: Why Google C++ Testing Framework? # - -_Google C++ Testing Framework_ helps you write better C++ tests. - -No matter whether you work on Linux, Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, -Google Test can help you. - -So what makes a good test, and how does Google C++ Testing Framework fit in? We believe: - 1. Tests should be _independent_ and _repeatable_. It's a pain to debug a test that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. Google C++ Testing Framework isolates the tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, Google C++ Testing Framework allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging. - 1. Tests should be well _organized_ and reflect the structure of the tested code. Google C++ Testing Framework groups related tests into test cases that can share data and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch projects and start to work on a new code base. - 1. Tests should be _portable_ and _reusable_. The open-source community has a lot of code that is platform-neutral, its tests should also be platform-neutral. Google C++ Testing Framework works on different OSes, with different compilers (gcc, MSVC, and others), with or without exceptions, so Google C++ Testing Framework tests can easily work with a variety of configurations. (Note that the current release only contains build scripts for Linux - we are actively working on scripts for other platforms.) - 1. When tests fail, they should provide as much _information_ about the problem as possible. Google C++ Testing Framework doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile cycle. - 1. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores and let them focus on the test _content_. Google C++ Testing Framework automatically keeps track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them in order to run them. - 1. Tests should be _fast_. With Google C++ Testing Framework, you can reuse shared resources across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making tests depend on each other. - -Since Google C++ Testing Framework is based on the popular xUnit -architecture, you'll feel right at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. -If not, it will take you about 10 minutes to learn the basics and get started. -So let's go! - -_Note:_ We sometimes refer to Google C++ Testing Framework informally -as _Google Test_. - -# Setting up a New Test Project # - -To write a test program using Google Test, you need to compile Google -Test into a library and link your test with it. We provide build -files for some popular build systems (`msvc/` for Visual Studio, -`xcode/` for Mac Xcode, `make/` for GNU make, `codegear/` for Borland -C++ Builder, and the autotools script in the -Google Test root directory). If your build system is not on this -list, you can take a look at `make/Makefile` to learn how Google Test -should be compiled (basically you want to compile `src/gtest-all.cc` -with `GTEST_ROOT` and `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path, -where `GTEST_ROOT` is the Google Test root directory). - -Once you are able to compile the Google Test library, you should -create a project or build target for your test program. Make sure you -have `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path so that the -compiler can find `<gtest/gtest.h>` when compiling your test. Set up -your test project to link with the Google Test library (for example, -in Visual Studio, this is done by adding a dependency on -`gtest.vcproj`). - -If you still have questions, take a look at how Google Test's own -tests are built and use them as examples. - -# Basic Concepts # - -When using Google Test, you start by writing _assertions_, which are statements -that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be _success_, -_nonfatal failure_, or _fatal failure_. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts -the current function; otherwise the program continues normally. - -_Tests_ use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes -or has a failed assertion, then it _fails_; otherwise it _succeeds_. - -A _test case_ contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test -cases that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a -test case need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a -_test fixture_ class. - -A _test program_ can contain multiple test cases. - -We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual -assertion level and building up to tests and test cases. - -# Assertions # - -Google Test assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a -class or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion -fails, Google Test prints the assertion's source file and line number location, -along with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message -which will be appended to Google Test's message. - -The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different -effects on the current function. `ASSERT_*` versions generate fatal failures -when they fail, and **abort the current function**. `EXPECT_*` versions generate -nonfatal failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually `EXPECT_*` -are preferred, as they allow more than one failures to be reported in a test. -However, you should use `ASSERT_*` if it doesn't make sense to continue when -the assertion in question fails. - -Since a failed `ASSERT_*` returns from the current function immediately, -possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak. -Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so -keep this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion -errors. - -To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the -`<<` operator, or a sequence of such operators. An example: -``` -ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length"; - -for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) { - EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i; -} -``` - -Anything that can be streamed to an `ostream` can be streamed to an assertion -macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string -(`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is -streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed. - -## Basic Assertions ## - -These assertions do basic true/false condition testing. -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is true | -| `ASSERT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is false | - -Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and -returns from the current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal -failure, allowing the function to continue running. In either case, an -assertion failure means its containing test fails. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Binary Comparison ## - -This section describes assertions that compare two values. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -|`ASSERT_EQ(`_expected_`, `_actual_`);`|`EXPECT_EQ(`_expected_`, `_actual_`);`| _expected_ `==` _actual_ | -|`ASSERT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `!=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `<` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `<=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `>` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `>=` _val2_ | - -In the event of a failure, Google Test prints both _val1_ and _val2_ -. In `ASSERT_EQ*` and `EXPECT_EQ*` (and all other equality assertions -we'll introduce later), you should put the expression you want to test -in the position of _actual_, and put its expected value in _expected_, -as Google Test's failure messages are optimized for this convention. - -Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison operator or -you'll get a compiler error. Values must also support the `<<` operator for -streaming to an `ostream`. All built-in types support this. - -These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the -corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). If the corresponding -operator is defined, prefer using the `ASSERT_*()` macros because they will -print out not only the result of the comparison, but the two operands as well. - -Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the -arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function, -the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e. the compiler is free to -choose any order) and your code should not depend on any particular argument -evaluation order. - -`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it -tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value. -Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use -`ASSERT_STREQ()` , which will be described later on. In particular, to assert -that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(NULL, c_string)` . However, to -compare two `string` objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`. - -Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string` -and `wstring`). - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## String Comparison ## - -The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare -two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_STREQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | the two C strings have the same content | -| `ASSERT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content | -| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case | -| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content, ignoring case | - -Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. - -`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a -comparison of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 -narrow strings. - -A `NULL` pointer and an empty string are considered _different_. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -See also: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and -regular expression matching, for example), see the [AdvancedGuide Advanced -Google Test Guide]. - -# Simple Tests # - -To create a test: - 1. Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function, These are ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. - 1. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, use the various Google Test assertions to check values. - 1. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds. - -``` -TEST(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - - -`TEST()` arguments go from general to specific. The _first_ argument is the -name of the test case, and the _second_ argument is the test's name within the -test case. Remember that a test case can contain any number of individual -tests. A test's _full name_ consists of its containing test case and its -individual name. Tests from different test cases can have the same individual -name. - -For example, let's take a simple integer function: -``` -int Factorial(int n); // Returns the factorial of n -``` - -A test case for this function might look like: -``` -// Tests factorial of 0. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(0)); -} - -// Tests factorial of positive numbers. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(1)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, Factorial(2)); - EXPECT_EQ(6, Factorial(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(40320, Factorial(8)); -} -``` - -Google Test groups the test results by test cases, so logically-related tests -should be in the same test case; in other words, the first argument to their -`TEST()` should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests, -`HandlesZeroInput` and `HandlesPositiveInput`, that belong to the same test -case `FactorialTest`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests # - -If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, -you can use a _test fixture_. It allows you to reuse the same configuration of -objects for several different tests. - -To create a fixture, just: - 1. Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:` or `public:` as we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. - 1. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. - 1. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as `Setup()` with a small `u` - don't let that happen to you. - 1. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read this [FAQ entry](V1_5_FAQ.md#should-i-use-the-constructordestructor-of-the-test-fixture-or-the-set-uptear-down-function). - 1. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. - -When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to -access objects and subroutines in the test fixture: -``` -TEST_F(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - -Like `TEST()`, the first argument is the test case name, but for `TEST_F()` -this must be the name of the test fixture class. You've probably guessed: `_F` -is for fixture. - -Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro -that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler -error. - -Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a -`TEST_F()`, or you'll get the compiler error "`virtual outside class -declaration`". - -For each test defined with `TEST_F()`, Google Test will: - 1. Create a _fresh_ test fixture at runtime - 1. Immediately initialize it via `SetUp()` , - 1. Run the test - 1. Clean up by calling `TearDown()` - 1. Delete the test fixture. Note that different tests in the same test case have different test fixture objects, and Google Test always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one. Google Test does not reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests. - -As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named `Queue`, which -has the following interface: -``` -template <typename E> // E is the element type. -class Queue { - public: - Queue(); - void Enqueue(const E& element); - E* Dequeue(); // Returns NULL if the queue is empty. - size_t size() const; - ... -}; -``` - -First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name -`FooTest` where `Foo` is the class being tested. -``` -class QueueTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - q1_.Enqueue(1); - q2_.Enqueue(2); - q2_.Enqueue(3); - } - - // virtual void TearDown() {} - - Queue<int> q0_; - Queue<int> q1_; - Queue<int> q2_; -}; -``` - -In this case, `TearDown()` is not needed since we don't have to clean up after -each test, other than what's already done by the destructor. - -Now we'll write tests using `TEST_F()` and this fixture. -``` -TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) { - EXPECT_EQ(0, q0_.size()); -} - -TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) { - int* n = q0_.Dequeue(); - EXPECT_EQ(NULL, n); - - n = q1_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(1, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(0, q1_.size()); - delete n; - - n = q2_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(2, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(1, q2_.size()); - delete n; -} -``` - -The above uses both `ASSERT_*` and `EXPECT_*` assertions. The rule of thumb is -to use `EXPECT_*` when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors -after the assertion failure, and use `ASSERT_*` when continuing after failure -doesn't make sense. For example, the second assertion in the `Dequeue` test is -`ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL)`, as we need to dereference the pointer `n` later, -which would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`. - -When these tests run, the following happens: - 1. Google Test constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1` ). - 1. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . - 1. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . - 1. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. - 1. `t1` is destructed. - 1. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time running the `DequeueWorks` test. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -_Note_: Google Test automatically saves all _Google Test_ flags when a test -object is constructed, and restores them when it is destructed. - -# Invoking the Tests # - -`TEST()` and `TEST_F()` implicitly register their tests with Google Test. So, unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all your defined tests in order to run them. - -After defining your tests, you can run them with `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` , which returns `0` if all the tests are successful, or `1` otherwise. Note that `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` runs _all tests_ in your link unit -- they can be from different test cases, or even different source files. - -When invoked, the `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` macro: - 1. Saves the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Creates a test fixture object for the first test. - 1. Initializes it via `SetUp()`. - 1. Runs the test on the fixture object. - 1. Cleans up the fixture via `TearDown()`. - 1. Deletes the fixture. - 1. Restores the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run. - -In addition, if the text fixture's constructor generates a fatal failure in -step 2, there is no point for step 3 - 5 and they are thus skipped. Similarly, -if step 3 generates a fatal failure, step 4 will be skipped. - -_Important_: You must not ignore the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or `gcc` -will give you a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the -automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its -exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus your `main()` function must -return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -Also, you should call `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` only **once**. Calling it more than once -conflicts with some advanced Google Test features (e.g. thread-safe death -tests) and thus is not supported. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Writing the main() Function # - -You can start from this boilerplate: -``` -#include "this/package/foo.h" -#include <gtest/gtest.h> - -namespace { - -// The fixture for testing class Foo. -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // You can remove any or all of the following functions if its body - // is empty. - - FooTest() { - // You can do set-up work for each test here. - } - - virtual ~FooTest() { - // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here. - } - - // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up - // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods: - - virtual void SetUp() { - // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right - // before each test). - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right - // before the destructor). - } - - // Objects declared here can be used by all tests in the test case for Foo. -}; - -// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc. -TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) { - const string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat"; - const string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat"; - Foo f; - EXPECT_EQ(0, f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath)); -} - -// Tests that Foo does Xyz. -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) { - // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo. -} - -} // namespace - -int main(int argc, char **argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -The `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` function parses the command line for Google -Test flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to control a -test program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in [AdvancedGuide](V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md). -You must call this function before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or the flags -won't be properly initialized. - -On Windows, `InitGoogleTest()` also works with wide strings, so it can be used -in programs compiled in `UNICODE` mode as well. - -But maybe you think that writing all those main() functions is too much work? We agree with you completely and that's why Google Test provides a basic implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with gtest\_main library and you are good to go. - -## Important note for Visual C++ users ## -If you put your tests into a library and your `main()` function is in a different library or in your .exe file, those tests will not run. The reason is a [bug](https://connect.microsoft.com/feedback/viewfeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=244410&siteid=210) in Visual C++. When you define your tests, Google Test creates certain static objects to register them. These objects are not referenced from elsewhere but their constructors are still supposed to run. When Visual C++ linker sees that nothing in the library is referenced from other places it throws the library out. You have to reference your library with tests from your main program to keep the linker from discarding it. Here is how to do it. Somewhere in your library code declare a function: -``` -__declspec(dllexport) int PullInMyLibrary() { return 0; } -``` -If you put your tests in a static library (not DLL) then `__declspec(dllexport)` is not required. Now, in your main program, write a code that invokes that function: -``` -int PullInMyLibrary(); -static int dummy = PullInMyLibrary(); -``` -This will keep your tests referenced and will make them register themselves at startup. - -In addition, if you define your tests in a static library, add `/OPT:NOREF` to your main program linker options. If you use MSVC++ IDE, go to your .exe project properties/Configuration Properties/Linker/Optimization and set References setting to `Keep Unreferenced Data (/OPT:NOREF)`. This will keep Visual C++ linker from discarding individual symbols generated by your tests from the final executable. - -There is one more pitfall, though. If you use Google Test as a static library (that's how it is defined in gtest.vcproj) your tests must also reside in a static library. If you have to have them in a DLL, you _must_ change Google Test to build into a DLL as well. Otherwise your tests will not run correctly or will not run at all. The general conclusion here is: make your life easier - do not write your tests in libraries! - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've learned the Google Test basics. You can start writing -and running Google Test tests, read some [samples](Samples.md), or continue with -[AdvancedGuide](V1_5_AdvancedGuide.md), which describes many more useful Google Test features. - -# Known Limitations # - -Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is -thread-safe on systems where the `pthreads` library is available. It -is currently _unsafe_ to use Google Test assertions from two threads -concurrently on other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is -not an issue as usually the assertions are done in the main thread. If -you want to help, you can volunteer to implement the necessary -synchronization primitives in `gtest-port.h` for your platform. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_5_PumpManual.md b/googletest/docs/V1_5_PumpManual.md deleted file mode 100644 index 1571078..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_5_PumpManual.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,177 +0,0 @@ - - -<b>P</b>ump is <b>U</b>seful for <b>M</b>eta <b>P</b>rogramming. - -# The Problem # - -Template and macro libraries often need to define many classes, -functions, or macros that vary only (or almost only) in the number of -arguments they take. It's a lot of repetitive, mechanical, and -error-prone work. - -Variadic templates and variadic macros can alleviate the problem. -However, while both are being considered by the C++ committee, neither -is in the standard yet or widely supported by compilers. Thus they -are often not a good choice, especially when your code needs to be -portable. And their capabilities are still limited. - -As a result, authors of such libraries often have to write scripts to -generate their implementation. However, our experience is that it's -tedious to write such scripts, which tend to reflect the structure of -the generated code poorly and are often hard to read and edit. For -example, a small change needed in the generated code may require some -non-intuitive, non-trivial changes in the script. This is especially -painful when experimenting with the code. - -# Our Solution # - -Pump (for Pump is Useful for Meta Programming, Pretty Useful for Meta -Programming, or Practical Utility for Meta Programming, whichever you -prefer) is a simple meta-programming tool for C++. The idea is that a -programmer writes a `foo.pump` file which contains C++ code plus meta -code that manipulates the C++ code. The meta code can handle -iterations over a range, nested iterations, local meta variable -definitions, simple arithmetic, and conditional expressions. You can -view it as a small Domain-Specific Language. The meta language is -designed to be non-intrusive (s.t. it won't confuse Emacs' C++ mode, -for example) and concise, making Pump code intuitive and easy to -maintain. - -## Highlights ## - - * The implementation is in a single Python script and thus ultra portable: no build or installation is needed and it works cross platforms. - * Pump tries to be smart with respect to [Google's style guide](http://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/): it breaks long lines (easy to have when they are generated) at acceptable places to fit within 80 columns and indent the continuation lines correctly. - * The format is human-readable and more concise than XML. - * The format works relatively well with Emacs' C++ mode. - -## Examples ## - -The following Pump code (where meta keywords start with `$`, `[[` and `]]` are meta brackets, and `$$` starts a meta comment that ends with the line): - -``` -$var n = 3 $$ Defines a meta variable n. -$range i 0..n $$ Declares the range of meta iterator i (inclusive). -$for i [[ - $$ Meta loop. -// Foo$i does blah for $i-ary predicates. -$range j 1..i -template <size_t N $for j [[, typename A$j]]> -class Foo$i { -$if i == 0 [[ - blah a; -]] $elif i <= 2 [[ - blah b; -]] $else [[ - blah c; -]] -}; - -]] -``` - -will be translated by the Pump compiler to: - -``` -// Foo0 does blah for 0-ary predicates. -template <size_t N> -class Foo0 { - blah a; -}; - -// Foo1 does blah for 1-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1> -class Foo1 { - blah b; -}; - -// Foo2 does blah for 2-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2> -class Foo2 { - blah b; -}; - -// Foo3 does blah for 3-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3> -class Foo3 { - blah c; -}; -``` - -In another example, - -``` -$range i 1..n -Func($for i + [[a$i]]); -$$ The text between i and [[ is the separator between iterations. -``` - -will generate one of the following lines (without the comments), depending on the value of `n`: - -``` -Func(); // If n is 0. -Func(a1); // If n is 1. -Func(a1 + a2); // If n is 2. -Func(a1 + a2 + a3); // If n is 3. -// And so on... -``` - -## Constructs ## - -We support the following meta programming constructs: - -| `$var id = exp` | Defines a named constant value. `$id` is valid util the end of the current meta lexical block. | -|:----------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| $range id exp..exp | Sets the range of an iteration variable, which can be reused in multiple loops later. | -| $for id sep [[code ](.md)] | Iteration. The range of `id` must have been defined earlier. `$id` is valid in `code`. | -| `$($)` | Generates a single `$` character. | -| `$id` | Value of the named constant or iteration variable. | -| `$(exp)` | Value of the expression. | -| `$if exp [[ code ]] else_branch` | Conditional. | -| `[[ code ]]` | Meta lexical block. | -| `cpp_code` | Raw C++ code. | -| `$$ comment` | Meta comment. | - -**Note:** To give the user some freedom in formatting the Pump source -code, Pump ignores a new-line character if it's right after `$for foo` -or next to `[[` or `]]`. Without this rule you'll often be forced to write -very long lines to get the desired output. Therefore sometimes you may -need to insert an extra new-line in such places for a new-line to show -up in your output. - -## Grammar ## - -``` -code ::= atomic_code* -atomic_code ::= $var id = exp - | $var id = [[ code ]] - | $range id exp..exp - | $for id sep [[ code ]] - | $($) - | $id - | $(exp) - | $if exp [[ code ]] else_branch - | [[ code ]] - | cpp_code -sep ::= cpp_code | empty_string -else_branch ::= $else [[ code ]] - | $elif exp [[ code ]] else_branch - | empty_string -exp ::= simple_expression_in_Python_syntax -``` - -## Code ## - -You can find the source code of Pump in [scripts/pump.py](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/browse/trunk/scripts/pump.py). It is still -very unpolished and lacks automated tests, although it has been -successfully used many times. If you find a chance to use it in your -project, please let us know what you think! We also welcome help on -improving Pump. - -## Real Examples ## - -You can find real-world applications of Pump in [Google Test](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgoogletest\.googlecode\.com) and [Google Mock](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgooglemock\.googlecode\.com). The source file `foo.h.pump` generates `foo.h`. - -## Tips ## - - * If a meta variable is followed by a letter or digit, you can separate them using `[[]]`, which inserts an empty string. For example `Foo$j[[]]Helper` generate `Foo1Helper` when `j` is 1. - * To avoid extra-long Pump source lines, you can break a line anywhere you want by inserting `[[]]` followed by a new line. Since any new-line character next to `[[` or `]]` is ignored, the generated code won't contain this new line.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_5_XcodeGuide.md b/googletest/docs/V1_5_XcodeGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index bf24bf5..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_5_XcodeGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,93 +0,0 @@ - - -This guide will explain how to use the Google Testing Framework in your Xcode projects on Mac OS X. This tutorial begins by quickly explaining what to do for experienced users. After the quick start, the guide goes provides additional explanation about each step. - -# Quick Start # - -Here is the quick guide for using Google Test in your Xcode project. - - 1. Download the source from the [website](http://code.google.com/p/googletest) using this command: `svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only` - 1. Open up the `gtest.xcodeproj` in the `googletest-read-only/xcode/` directory and build the gtest.framework. - 1. Create a new "Shell Tool" target in your Xcode project called something like "UnitTests" - 1. Add the gtest.framework to your project and add it to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Edit the "UnitTests" executable and add an environment variable named "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" with a value equal to the path to the framework containing the gtest.framework relative to the compiled executable. - 1. Build and Go - -The following sections further explain each of the steps listed above in depth, describing in more detail how to complete it including some variations. - -# Get the Source # - -Currently, the gtest.framework discussed here isn't available in a tagged release of Google Test, it is only available in the trunk. As explained at the Google Test [site](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/checkout">svn), you can get the code from anonymous SVN with this command: - -``` -svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only -``` - -Alternatively, if you are working with Subversion in your own code base, you can add Google Test as an external dependency to your own Subversion repository. By following this approach, everyone that checks out your svn repository will also receive a copy of Google Test (a specific version, if you wish) without having to check it out explicitly. This makes the set up of your project simpler and reduces the copied code in the repository. - -To use `svn:externals`, decide where you would like to have the external source reside. You might choose to put the external source inside the trunk, because you want it to be part of the branch when you make a release. However, keeping it outside the trunk in a version-tagged directory called something like `third-party/googletest/1.0.1`, is another option. Once the location is established, use `svn propedit svn:externals _directory_` to set the svn:externals property on a directory in your repository. This directory won't contain the code, but be its versioned parent directory. - -The command `svn propedit` will bring up your Subversion editor, making editing the long, (potentially multi-line) property simpler. This same method can be used to check out a tagged branch, by using the appropriate URL (e.g. `http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release-1.0.1`). Additionally, the svn:externals property allows the specification of a particular revision of the trunk with the `-r_##_` option (e.g. `externals/src/googletest -r60 http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk`). - -Here is an example of using the svn:externals properties on a trunk (read via `svn propget`) of a project. This value checks out a copy of Google Test into the `trunk/externals/src/googletest/` directory. - -``` -[Computer:svn] user$ svn propget svn:externals trunk -externals/src/googletest http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk -``` - -# Add the Framework to Your Project # - -The next step is to build and add the gtest.framework to your own project. This guide describes two common ways below. - - * **Option 1** --- The simplest way to add Google Test to your own project, is to open gtest.xcodeproj (found in the xcode/ directory of the Google Test trunk) and build the framework manually. Then, add the built framework into your project using the "Add->Existing Framework..." from the context menu or "Project->Add..." from the main menu. The gtest.framework is relocatable and contains the headers and object code that you'll need to make tests. This method requires rebuilding every time you upgrade Google Test in your project. - * **Option 2** --- If you are going to be living off the trunk of Google Test, incorporating its latest features into your unit tests (or are a Google Test developer yourself). You'll want to rebuild the framework every time the source updates. to do this, you'll need to add the gtest.xcodeproj file, not the framework itself, to your own Xcode project. Then, from the build products that are revealed by the project's disclosure triangle, you can find the gtest.framework, which can be added to your targets (discussed below). - -# Make a Test Target # - -To start writing tests, make a new "Shell Tool" target. This target template is available under BSD, Cocoa, or Carbon. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of the target. - -Next, you'll want to add gtest.framework in two different ways, depending upon which option you chose above. - - * **Option 1** --- During compilation, Xcode will need to know that you are linking against the gtest.framework. Add the gtest.framework to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of your test target. This will include the Google Test headers in your header search path, and will tell the linker where to find the library. - * **Option 2** --- If your working out of the trunk, you'll also want to add gtest.framework to your "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of your test target. In addition, you'll want to add the gtest.framework as a dependency to your unit test target. This way, Xcode will make sure that gtest.framework is up to date, every time your build your target. Finally, if you don't share build directories with Google Test, you'll have to copy the gtest.framework into your own build products directory using a "Run Script" build phase. - -# Set Up the Executable Run Environment # - -Since the unit test executable is a shell tool, it doesn't have a bundle with a `Contents/Frameworks` directory, in which to place gtest.framework. Instead, the dynamic linker must be told at runtime to search for the framework in another location. This can be accomplished by setting the "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" environment variable in the "Edit Active Executable ..." Arguments tab, under "Variables to be set in the environment:". The path for this value is the path (relative or absolute) of the directory containing the gtest.framework. - -If you haven't set up the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH, correctly, you might get a message like this: - -``` -[Session started at 2008-08-15 06:23:57 -0600.] - dyld: Library not loaded: @loader_path/../Frameworks/gtest.framework/Versions/A/gtest - Referenced from: /Users/username/Documents/Sandbox/gtestSample/build/Debug/WidgetFrameworkTest - Reason: image not found -``` - -To correct this problem, got to the directory containing the executable named in "Referenced from:" value in the error message above. Then, with the terminal in this location, find the relative path to the directory containing the gtest.framework. That is the value you'll need to set as the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH. - -# Build and Go # - -Now, when you click "Build and Go", the test will be executed. Dumping out something like this: - -``` -[Session started at 2008-08-06 06:36:13 -0600.] -[==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case. -[----------] Global test environment set-up. -[----------] 2 tests from WidgetInitializerTest -[ RUN ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConstructor -[ OK ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConstructor -[ RUN ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConversion -[ OK ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConversion -[----------] Global test environment tear-down -[==========] 2 tests from 1 test case ran. -[ PASSED ] 2 tests. - -The Debugger has exited with status 0. -``` - -# Summary # - -Unit testing is a valuable way to ensure your data model stays valid even during rapid development or refactoring. The Google Testing Framework is a great unit testing framework for C and C++ which integrates well with an Xcode development environment.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index 78864b1..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2178 +0,0 @@ - - -Now that you have read [Primer](V1_6_Primer.md) and learned how to write tests -using Google Test, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document -will show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex -failure messages, propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your -test fixtures, and use various flags with your tests. - -# More Assertions # - -This section covers some less frequently used, but still significant, -assertions. - -## Explicit Success and Failure ## - -These three assertions do not actually test a value or expression. Instead, -they generate a success or failure directly. Like the macros that actually -perform a test, you may stream a custom failure message into the them. - -| `SUCCEED();` | -|:-------------| - -Generates a success. This does NOT make the overall test succeed. A test is -considered successful only if none of its assertions fail during its execution. - -Note: `SUCCEED()` is purely documentary and currently doesn't generate any -user-visible output. However, we may add `SUCCEED()` messages to Google Test's -output in the future. - -| `FAIL();` | `ADD_FAILURE();` | `ADD_FAILURE_AT("`_file\_path_`", `_line\_number_`);` | -|:-----------|:-----------------|:------------------------------------------------------| - -`FAIL()` generates a fatal failure, while `ADD_FAILURE()` and `ADD_FAILURE_AT()` generate a nonfatal -failure. These are useful when control flow, rather than a Boolean expression, -deteremines the test's success or failure. For example, you might want to write -something like: - -``` -switch(expression) { - case 1: ... some checks ... - case 2: ... some other checks - ... - default: FAIL() << "We shouldn't get here."; -} -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Exception Assertions ## - -These are for verifying that a piece of code throws (or does not -throw) an exception of the given type: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | `EXPECT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of the given type | -| `ASSERT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of any type | -| `ASSERT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't throw any exception | - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_THROW(Foo(5), bar_exception); - -EXPECT_NO_THROW({ - int n = 5; - Bar(&n); -}); -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.1.0. - -## Predicate Assertions for Better Error Messages ## - -Even though Google Test has a rich set of assertions, they can never be -complete, as it's impossible (nor a good idea) to anticipate all the scenarios -a user might run into. Therefore, sometimes a user has to use `EXPECT_TRUE()` -to check a complex expression, for lack of a better macro. This has the problem -of not showing you the values of the parts of the expression, making it hard to -understand what went wrong. As a workaround, some users choose to construct the -failure message by themselves, streaming it into `EXPECT_TRUE()`. However, this -is awkward especially when the expression has side-effects or is expensive to -evaluate. - -Google Test gives you three different options to solve this problem: - -### Using an Existing Boolean Function ### - -If you already have a function or a functor that returns `bool` (or a type -that can be implicitly converted to `bool`), you can use it in a _predicate -assertion_ to get the function arguments printed for free: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | _pred1(val1)_ returns true | -| `ASSERT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred2(val1, val2)_ returns true | -| ... | ... | ... | - -In the above, _predn_ is an _n_-ary predicate function or functor, where -_val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are its arguments. The assertion succeeds -if the predicate returns `true` when applied to the given arguments, and fails -otherwise. When the assertion fails, it prints the value of each argument. In -either case, the arguments are evaluated exactly once. - -Here's an example. Given - -``` -// Returns true iff m and n have no common divisors except 1. -bool MutuallyPrime(int m, int n) { ... } -const int a = 3; -const int b = 4; -const int c = 10; -``` - -the assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, a, b);` will succeed, while the -assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, b, c);` will fail with the message - -<pre> -!MutuallyPrime(b, c) is false, where<br> -b is 4<br> -c is 10<br> -</pre> - -**Notes:** - - 1. If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see [this](v1_6_FAQ.md#ithe-compiler-complains-about-undefined-references-to-some-static-const-member-variables-but-i-did-define-them-in-the-class-body-whats-wrong) for how to resolve it. - 1. Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need a higher-arity assertion, let us know. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac - -### Using a Function That Returns an AssertionResult ### - -While `EXPECT_PRED*()` and friends are handy for a quick job, the -syntax is not satisfactory: you have to use different macros for -different arities, and it feels more like Lisp than C++. The -`::testing::AssertionResult` class solves this problem. - -An `AssertionResult` object represents the result of an assertion -(whether it's a success or a failure, and an associated message). You -can create an `AssertionResult` using one of these factory -functions: - -``` -namespace testing { - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// succeeded. -AssertionResult AssertionSuccess(); - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// failed. -AssertionResult AssertionFailure(); - -} -``` - -You can then use the `<<` operator to stream messages to the -`AssertionResult` object. - -To provide more readable messages in Boolean assertions -(e.g. `EXPECT_TRUE()`), write a predicate function that returns -`AssertionResult` instead of `bool`. For example, if you define -`IsEven()` as: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -instead of: - -``` -bool IsEven(int n) { - return (n % 2) == 0; -} -``` - -the failed assertion `EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(4)))` will print: - -<pre> -Value of: !IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false (*3 is odd*)<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -instead of a more opaque - -<pre> -Value of: !IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -If you want informative messages in `EXPECT_FALSE` and `ASSERT_FALSE` -as well, and are fine with making the predicate slower in the success -case, you can supply a success message: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess() << n << " is even"; - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -Then the statement `EXPECT_FALSE(IsEven(Fib(6)))` will print - -<pre> -Value of: !IsEven(Fib(6))<br> -Actual: true (8 is even)<br> -Expected: false<br> -</pre> - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.4.1. - -### Using a Predicate-Formatter ### - -If you find the default message generated by `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED*` and -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_(TRUE|FALSE)` unsatisfactory, or some arguments to your -predicate do not support streaming to `ostream`, you can instead use the -following _predicate-formatter assertions_ to _fully_ customize how the -message is formatted: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`); | _pred\_format1(val1)_ is successful | -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred\_format2(val1, val2)_ is successful | -| `...` | `...` | `...` | - -The difference between this and the previous two groups of macros is that instead of -a predicate, `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*` take a _predicate-formatter_ -(_pred\_formatn_), which is a function or functor with the signature: - -`::testing::AssertionResult PredicateFormattern(const char* `_expr1_`, const char* `_expr2_`, ... const char* `_exprn_`, T1 `_val1_`, T2 `_val2_`, ... Tn `_valn_`);` - -where _val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are the values of the predicate -arguments, and _expr1_, _expr2_, ..., and _exprn_ are the corresponding -expressions as they appear in the source code. The types `T1`, `T2`, ..., and -`Tn` can be either value types or reference types. For example, if an -argument has type `Foo`, you can declare it as either `Foo` or `const Foo&`, -whichever is appropriate. - -A predicate-formatter returns a `::testing::AssertionResult` object to indicate -whether the assertion has succeeded or not. The only way to create such an -object is to call one of these factory functions: - -As an example, let's improve the failure message in the previous example, which uses `EXPECT_PRED2()`: - -``` -// Returns the smallest prime common divisor of m and n, -// or 1 when m and n are mutually prime. -int SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(int m, int n) { ... } - -// A predicate-formatter for asserting that two integers are mutually prime. -::testing::AssertionResult AssertMutuallyPrime(const char* m_expr, - const char* n_expr, - int m, - int n) { - if (MutuallyPrime(m, n)) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() - << m_expr << " and " << n_expr << " (" << m << " and " << n - << ") are not mutually prime, " << "as they have a common divisor " - << SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(m, n); -} -``` - -With this predicate-formatter, we can use - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(AssertMutuallyPrime, b, c); -``` - -to generate the message - -<pre> -b and c (4 and 10) are not mutually prime, as they have a common divisor 2.<br> -</pre> - -As you may have realized, many of the assertions we introduced earlier are -special cases of `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. In fact, most of them are -indeed defined using `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -## Floating-Point Comparison ## - -Comparing floating-point numbers is tricky. Due to round-off errors, it is -very unlikely that two floating-points will match exactly. Therefore, -`ASSERT_EQ` 's naive comparison usually doesn't work. And since floating-points -can have a wide value range, no single fixed error bound works. It's better to -compare by a fixed relative error bound, except for values close to 0 due to -the loss of precision there. - -In general, for floating-point comparison to make sense, the user needs to -carefully choose the error bound. If they don't want or care to, comparing in -terms of Units in the Last Place (ULPs) is a good default, and Google Test -provides assertions to do this. Full details about ULPs are quite long; if you -want to learn more, see -[this article on float comparison](http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/comparingfloats/comparingfloats.htm). - -### Floating-Point Macros ### - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | `EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | the two `float` values are almost equal | -| `ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | `EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | the two `double` values are almost equal | - -By "almost equal", we mean the two values are within 4 ULP's from each -other. - -The following assertions allow you to choose the acceptable error bound: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NEAR(`_val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | `EXPECT_NEAR`_(val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | the difference between _val1_ and _val2_ doesn't exceed the given absolute error | - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Floating-Point Predicate-Format Functions ### - -Some floating-point operations are useful, but not that often used. In order -to avoid an explosion of new macros, we provide them as predicate-format -functions that can be used in predicate assertion macros (e.g. -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2`, etc). - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::FloatLE, val1, val2); -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::DoubleLE, val1, val2); -``` - -Verifies that _val1_ is less than, or almost equal to, _val2_. You can -replace `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2` in the above table with `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Windows HRESULT assertions ## - -These assertions test for `HRESULT` success or failure. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a success `HRESULT` | -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a failure `HRESULT` | - -The generated output contains the human-readable error message -associated with the `HRESULT` code returned by _expression_. - -You might use them like this: - -``` -CComPtr shell; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell.CoCreateInstance(L"Shell.Application")); -CComVariant empty; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell->ShellExecute(CComBSTR(url), empty, empty, empty, empty)); -``` - -_Availability_: Windows. - -## Type Assertions ## - -You can call the function -``` -::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>(); -``` -to assert that types `T1` and `T2` are the same. The function does -nothing if the assertion is satisfied. If the types are different, -the function call will fail to compile, and the compiler error message -will likely (depending on the compiler) show you the actual values of -`T1` and `T2`. This is mainly useful inside template code. - -_Caveat:_ When used inside a member function of a class template or a -function template, `StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>()` is effective _only if_ -the function is instantiated. For example, given: -``` -template <typename T> class Foo { - public: - void Bar() { ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<int, T>(); } -}; -``` -the code: -``` -void Test1() { Foo<bool> foo; } -``` -will _not_ generate a compiler error, as `Foo<bool>::Bar()` is never -actually instantiated. Instead, you need: -``` -void Test2() { Foo<bool> foo; foo.Bar(); } -``` -to cause a compiler error. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Assertion Placement ## - -You can use assertions in any C++ function. In particular, it doesn't -have to be a method of the test fixture class. The one constraint is -that assertions that generate a fatal failure (`FAIL*` and `ASSERT_*`) -can only be used in void-returning functions. This is a consequence of -Google Test not using exceptions. By placing it in a non-void function -you'll get a confusing compile error like -`"error: void value not ignored as it ought to be"`. - -If you need to use assertions in a function that returns non-void, one option -is to make the function return the value in an out parameter instead. For -example, you can rewrite `T2 Foo(T1 x)` to `void Foo(T1 x, T2* result)`. You -need to make sure that `*result` contains some sensible value even when the -function returns prematurely. As the function now returns `void`, you can use -any assertion inside of it. - -If changing the function's type is not an option, you should just use -assertions that generate non-fatal failures, such as `ADD_FAILURE*` and -`EXPECT_*`. - -_Note_: Constructors and destructors are not considered void-returning -functions, according to the C++ language specification, and so you may not use -fatal assertions in them. You'll get a compilation error if you try. A simple -workaround is to transfer the entire body of the constructor or destructor to a -private void-returning method. However, you should be aware that a fatal -assertion failure in a constructor does not terminate the current test, as your -intuition might suggest; it merely returns from the constructor early, possibly -leaving your object in a partially-constructed state. Likewise, a fatal -assertion failure in a destructor may leave your object in a -partially-destructed state. Use assertions carefully in these situations! - -# Teaching Google Test How to Print Your Values # - -When a test assertion such as `EXPECT_EQ` fails, Google Test prints the -argument values to help you debug. It does this using a -user-extensible value printer. - -This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL -containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other -types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the -user can figure it out. - -As mentioned earlier, the printer is _extensible_. That means -you can teach it to do a better job at printing your particular type -than to dump the bytes. To do that, define `<<` for your type: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Bar { ... }; // We want Google Test to be able to print instances of this. - -// It's important that the << operator is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Bar& bar) { - return os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -Sometimes, this might not be an option: your team may consider it bad -style to have a `<<` operator for `Bar`, or `Bar` may already have a -`<<` operator that doesn't do what you want (and you cannot change -it). If so, you can instead define a `PrintTo()` function like this: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Bar { ... }; - -// It's important that PrintTo() is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -void PrintTo(const Bar& bar, ::std::ostream* os) { - *os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -If you have defined both `<<` and `PrintTo()`, the latter will be used -when Google Test is concerned. This allows you to customize how the value -appears in Google Test's output without affecting code that relies on the -behavior of its `<<` operator. - -If you want to print a value `x` using Google Test's value printer -yourself, just call `::testing::PrintToString(`_x_`)`, which -returns an `std::string`: - -``` -vector<pair<Bar, int> > bar_ints = GetBarIntVector(); - -EXPECT_TRUE(IsCorrectBarIntVector(bar_ints)) - << "bar_ints = " << ::testing::PrintToString(bar_ints); -``` - -# Death Tests # - -In many applications, there are assertions that can cause application failure -if a condition is not met. These sanity checks, which ensure that the program -is in a known good state, are there to fail at the earliest possible time after -some program state is corrupted. If the assertion checks the wrong condition, -then the program may proceed in an erroneous state, which could lead to memory -corruption, security holes, or worse. Hence it is vitally important to test -that such assertion statements work as expected. - -Since these precondition checks cause the processes to die, we call such tests -_death tests_. More generally, any test that checks that a program terminates -(except by throwing an exception) in an expected fashion is also a death test. - -Note that if a piece of code throws an exception, we don't consider it "death" -for the purpose of death tests, as the caller of the code could catch the exception -and avoid the crash. If you want to verify exceptions thrown by your code, -see [Exception Assertions](#exception-assertions). - -If you want to test `EXPECT_*()/ASSERT_*()` failures in your test code, see [Catching Failures](#catching-failures). - -## How to Write a Death Test ## - -Google Test has the following macros to support death tests: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`); | `EXPECT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`); | _statement_ crashes with the given error | -| `ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`); | `EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`); | if death tests are supported, verifies that _statement_ crashes with the given error; otherwise verifies nothing | -| `ASSERT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`); | `EXPECT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`); |_statement_ exits with the given error and its exit code matches _predicate_ | - -where _statement_ is a statement that is expected to cause the process to -die, _predicate_ is a function or function object that evaluates an integer -exit status, and _regex_ is a regular expression that the stderr output of -_statement_ is expected to match. Note that _statement_ can be _any valid -statement_ (including _compound statement_) and doesn't have to be an -expression. - -As usual, the `ASSERT` variants abort the current test function, while the -`EXPECT` variants do not. - -**Note:** We use the word "crash" here to mean that the process -terminates with a _non-zero_ exit status code. There are two -possibilities: either the process has called `exit()` or `_exit()` -with a non-zero value, or it may be killed by a signal. - -This means that if _statement_ terminates the process with a 0 exit -code, it is _not_ considered a crash by `EXPECT_DEATH`. Use -`EXPECT_EXIT` instead if this is the case, or if you want to restrict -the exit code more precisely. - -A predicate here must accept an `int` and return a `bool`. The death test -succeeds only if the predicate returns `true`. Google Test defines a few -predicates that handle the most common cases: - -``` -::testing::ExitedWithCode(exit_code) -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program exited normally with the given exit -code. - -``` -::testing::KilledBySignal(signal_number) // Not available on Windows. -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program was killed by the given signal. - -The `*_DEATH` macros are convenient wrappers for `*_EXIT` that use a predicate -that verifies the process' exit code is non-zero. - -Note that a death test only cares about three things: - - 1. does _statement_ abort or exit the process? - 1. (in the case of `ASSERT_EXIT` and `EXPECT_EXIT`) does the exit status satisfy _predicate_? Or (in the case of `ASSERT_DEATH` and `EXPECT_DEATH`) is the exit status non-zero? And - 1. does the stderr output match _regex_? - -In particular, if _statement_ generates an `ASSERT_*` or `EXPECT_*` failure, it will **not** cause the death test to fail, as Google Test assertions don't abort the process. - -To write a death test, simply use one of the above macros inside your test -function. For example, - -``` -TEST(My*DeathTest*, Foo) { - // This death test uses a compound statement. - ASSERT_DEATH({ int n = 5; Foo(&n); }, "Error on line .* of Foo()"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, NormalExit) { - EXPECT_EXIT(NormalExit(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, KillMyself) { - EXPECT_EXIT(KillMyself(), ::testing::KilledBySignal(SIGKILL), "Sending myself unblockable signal"); -} -``` - -verifies that: - - * calling `Foo(5)` causes the process to die with the given error message, - * calling `NormalExit()` causes the process to print `"Success"` to stderr and exit with exit code 0, and - * calling `KillMyself()` kills the process with signal `SIGKILL`. - -The test function body may contain other assertions and statements as well, if -necessary. - -_Important:_ We strongly recommend you to follow the convention of naming your -test case (not test) `*DeathTest` when it contains a death test, as -demonstrated in the above example. The `Death Tests And Threads` section below -explains why. - -If a test fixture class is shared by normal tests and death tests, you -can use typedef to introduce an alias for the fixture class and avoid -duplicating its code: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { - // normal test -} - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, DoesThat) { - // death test -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Cygwin, and Mac (the latter three are supported since v1.3.0). `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED` are new in v1.4.0. - -## Regular Expression Syntax ## - -On POSIX systems (e.g. Linux, Cygwin, and Mac), Google Test uses the -[POSIX extended regular expression](http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html#tag_09_04) -syntax in death tests. To learn about this syntax, you may want to read this [Wikipedia entry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). - -On Windows, Google Test uses its own simple regular expression -implementation. It lacks many features you can find in POSIX extended -regular expressions. For example, we don't support union (`"x|y"`), -grouping (`"(xy)"`), brackets (`"[xy]"`), and repetition count -(`"x{5,7}"`), among others. Below is what we do support (`A` denotes a -literal character, period (`.`), or a single `\\` escape sequence; `x` -and `y` denote regular expressions.): - -| `c` | matches any literal character `c` | -|:----|:----------------------------------| -| `\\d` | matches any decimal digit | -| `\\D` | matches any character that's not a decimal digit | -| `\\f` | matches `\f` | -| `\\n` | matches `\n` | -| `\\r` | matches `\r` | -| `\\s` | matches any ASCII whitespace, including `\n` | -| `\\S` | matches any character that's not a whitespace | -| `\\t` | matches `\t` | -| `\\v` | matches `\v` | -| `\\w` | matches any letter, `_`, or decimal digit | -| `\\W` | matches any character that `\\w` doesn't match | -| `\\c` | matches any literal character `c`, which must be a punctuation | -| `.` | matches any single character except `\n` | -| `A?` | matches 0 or 1 occurrences of `A` | -| `A*` | matches 0 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `A+` | matches 1 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `^` | matches the beginning of a string (not that of each line) | -| `$` | matches the end of a string (not that of each line) | -| `xy` | matches `x` followed by `y` | - -To help you determine which capability is available on your system, -Google Test defines macro `GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE=1` when it uses POSIX -extended regular expressions, or `GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE=1` when it uses -the simple version. If you want your death tests to work in both -cases, you can either `#if` on these macros or use the more limited -syntax only. - -## How It Works ## - -Under the hood, `ASSERT_EXIT()` spawns a new process and executes the -death test statement in that process. The details of of how precisely -that happens depend on the platform and the variable -`::testing::GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style)` (which is initialized from the -command-line flag `--gtest_death_test_style`). - - * On POSIX systems, `fork()` (or `clone()` on Linux) is used to spawn the child, after which: - * If the variable's value is `"fast"`, the death test statement is immediately executed. - * If the variable's value is `"threadsafe"`, the child process re-executes the unit test binary just as it was originally invoked, but with some extra flags to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run. - * On Windows, the child is spawned using the `CreateProcess()` API, and re-executes the binary to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run - much like the `threadsafe` mode on POSIX. - -Other values for the variable are illegal and will cause the death test to -fail. Currently, the flag's default value is `"fast"`. However, we reserve the -right to change it in the future. Therefore, your tests should not depend on -this. - -In either case, the parent process waits for the child process to complete, and checks that - - 1. the child's exit status satisfies the predicate, and - 1. the child's stderr matches the regular expression. - -If the death test statement runs to completion without dying, the child -process will nonetheless terminate, and the assertion fails. - -## Death Tests And Threads ## - -The reason for the two death test styles has to do with thread safety. Due to -well-known problems with forking in the presence of threads, death tests should -be run in a single-threaded context. Sometimes, however, it isn't feasible to -arrange that kind of environment. For example, statically-initialized modules -may start threads before main is ever reached. Once threads have been created, -it may be difficult or impossible to clean them up. - -Google Test has three features intended to raise awareness of threading issues. - - 1. A warning is emitted if multiple threads are running when a death test is encountered. - 1. Test cases with a name ending in "DeathTest" are run before all other tests. - 1. It uses `clone()` instead of `fork()` to spawn the child process on Linux (`clone()` is not available on Cygwin and Mac), as `fork()` is more likely to cause the child to hang when the parent process has multiple threads. - -It's perfectly fine to create threads inside a death test statement; they are -executed in a separate process and cannot affect the parent. - -## Death Test Styles ## - -The "threadsafe" death test style was introduced in order to help mitigate the -risks of testing in a possibly multithreaded environment. It trades increased -test execution time (potentially dramatically so) for improved thread safety. -We suggest using the faster, default "fast" style unless your test has specific -problems with it. - -You can choose a particular style of death tests by setting the flag -programmatically: - -``` -::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; -``` - -You can do this in `main()` to set the style for all death tests in the -binary, or in individual tests. Recall that flags are saved before running each -test and restored afterwards, so you need not do that yourself. For example: - -``` -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestOne) { - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; - // This test is run in the "threadsafe" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestTwo) { - // This test is run in the "fast" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "fast"; - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Caveats ## - -The _statement_ argument of `ASSERT_EXIT()` can be any valid C++ statement. -If it leaves the current function via a `return` statement or by throwing an exception, -the death test is considered to have failed. Some Google Test macros may return -from the current function (e.g. `ASSERT_TRUE()`), so be sure to avoid them in _statement_. - -Since _statement_ runs in the child process, any in-memory side effect (e.g. -modifying a variable, releasing memory, etc) it causes will _not_ be observable -in the parent process. In particular, if you release memory in a death test, -your program will fail the heap check as the parent process will never see the -memory reclaimed. To solve this problem, you can - - 1. try not to free memory in a death test; - 1. free the memory again in the parent process; or - 1. do not use the heap checker in your program. - -Due to an implementation detail, you cannot place multiple death test -assertions on the same line; otherwise, compilation will fail with an unobvious -error message. - -Despite the improved thread safety afforded by the "threadsafe" style of death -test, thread problems such as deadlock are still possible in the presence of -handlers registered with `pthread_atfork(3)`. - -# Using Assertions in Sub-routines # - -## Adding Traces to Assertions ## - -If a test sub-routine is called from several places, when an assertion -inside it fails, it can be hard to tell which invocation of the -sub-routine the failure is from. You can alleviate this problem using -extra logging or custom failure messages, but that usually clutters up -your tests. A better solution is to use the `SCOPED_TRACE` macro: - -| `SCOPED_TRACE(`_message_`);` | -|:-----------------------------| - -where _message_ can be anything streamable to `std::ostream`. This -macro will cause the current file name, line number, and the given -message to be added in every failure message. The effect will be -undone when the control leaves the current lexical scope. - -For example, - -``` -10: void Sub1(int n) { -11: EXPECT_EQ(1, Bar(n)); -12: EXPECT_EQ(2, Bar(n + 1)); -13: } -14: -15: TEST(FooTest, Bar) { -16: { -17: SCOPED_TRACE("A"); // This trace point will be included in -18: // every failure in this scope. -19: Sub1(1); -20: } -21: // Now it won't. -22: Sub1(9); -23: } -``` - -could result in messages like these: - -``` -path/to/foo_test.cc:11: Failure -Value of: Bar(n) -Expected: 1 - Actual: 2 - Trace: -path/to/foo_test.cc:17: A - -path/to/foo_test.cc:12: Failure -Value of: Bar(n + 1) -Expected: 2 - Actual: 3 -``` - -Without the trace, it would've been difficult to know which invocation -of `Sub1()` the two failures come from respectively. (You could add an -extra message to each assertion in `Sub1()` to indicate the value of -`n`, but that's tedious.) - -Some tips on using `SCOPED_TRACE`: - - 1. With a suitable message, it's often enough to use `SCOPED_TRACE` at the beginning of a sub-routine, instead of at each call site. - 1. When calling sub-routines inside a loop, make the loop iterator part of the message in `SCOPED_TRACE` such that you can know which iteration the failure is from. - 1. Sometimes the line number of the trace point is enough for identifying the particular invocation of a sub-routine. In this case, you don't have to choose a unique message for `SCOPED_TRACE`. You can simply use `""`. - 1. You can use `SCOPED_TRACE` in an inner scope when there is one in the outer scope. In this case, all active trace points will be included in the failure messages, in reverse order they are encountered. - 1. The trace dump is clickable in Emacs' compilation buffer - hit return on a line number and you'll be taken to that line in the source file! - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Propagating Fatal Failures ## - -A common pitfall when using `ASSERT_*` and `FAIL*` is not understanding that -when they fail they only abort the _current function_, not the entire test. For -example, the following test will segfault: -``` -void Subroutine() { - // Generates a fatal failure and aborts the current function. - ASSERT_EQ(1, 2); - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} - -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // The intended behavior is for the fatal failure - // in Subroutine() to abort the entire test. - // The actual behavior: the function goes on after Subroutine() returns. - int* p = NULL; - *p = 3; // Segfault! -} -``` - -Since we don't use exceptions, it is technically impossible to -implement the intended behavior here. To alleviate this, Google Test -provides two solutions. You could use either the -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_NO_FATAL_FAILURE` assertions or the -`HasFatalFailure()` function. They are described in the following two -subsections. - -### Asserting on Subroutines ### - -As shown above, if your test calls a subroutine that has an `ASSERT_*` -failure in it, the test will continue after the subroutine -returns. This may not be what you want. - -Often people want fatal failures to propagate like exceptions. For -that Google Test offers the following macros: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't generate any new fatal failures in the current thread. | - -Only failures in the thread that executes the assertion are checked to -determine the result of this type of assertions. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads are ignored. - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(Foo()); - -int i; -EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE({ - i = Bar(); -}); -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. Assertions from multiple threads -are currently not supported. - -### Checking for Failures in the Current Test ### - -`HasFatalFailure()` in the `::testing::Test` class returns `true` if an -assertion in the current test has suffered a fatal failure. This -allows functions to catch fatal failures in a sub-routine and return -early. - -``` -class Test { - public: - ... - static bool HasFatalFailure(); -}; -``` - -The typical usage, which basically simulates the behavior of a thrown -exception, is: - -``` -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // Aborts if Subroutine() had a fatal failure. - if (HasFatalFailure()) - return; - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} -``` - -If `HasFatalFailure()` is used outside of `TEST()` , `TEST_F()` , or a test -fixture, you must add the `::testing::Test::` prefix, as in: - -``` -if (::testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) - return; -``` - -Similarly, `HasNonfatalFailure()` returns `true` if the current test -has at least one non-fatal failure, and `HasFailure()` returns `true` -if the current test has at least one failure of either kind. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. `HasNonfatalFailure()` and -`HasFailure()` are available since version 1.4.0. - -# Logging Additional Information # - -In your test code, you can call `RecordProperty("key", value)` to log -additional information, where `value` can be either a C string or a 32-bit -integer. The _last_ value recorded for a key will be emitted to the XML output -if you specify one. For example, the test - -``` -TEST_F(WidgetUsageTest, MinAndMaxWidgets) { - RecordProperty("MaximumWidgets", ComputeMaxUsage()); - RecordProperty("MinimumWidgets", ComputeMinUsage()); -} -``` - -will output XML like this: - -``` -... - <testcase name="MinAndMaxWidgets" status="run" time="6" classname="WidgetUsageTest" - MaximumWidgets="12" - MinimumWidgets="9" /> -... -``` - -_Note_: - * `RecordProperty()` is a static member of the `Test` class. Therefore it needs to be prefixed with `::testing::Test::` if used outside of the `TEST` body and the test fixture class. - * `key` must be a valid XML attribute name, and cannot conflict with the ones already used by Google Test (`name`, `status`, `time`, and `classname`). - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Sharing Resources Between Tests in the Same Test Case # - - - -Google Test creates a new test fixture object for each test in order to make -tests independent and easier to debug. However, sometimes tests use resources -that are expensive to set up, making the one-copy-per-test model prohibitively -expensive. - -If the tests don't change the resource, there's no harm in them sharing a -single resource copy. So, in addition to per-test set-up/tear-down, Google Test -also supports per-test-case set-up/tear-down. To use it: - - 1. In your test fixture class (say `FooTest` ), define as `static` some member variables to hold the shared resources. - 1. In the same test fixture class, define a `static void SetUpTestCase()` function (remember not to spell it as **`SetupTestCase`** with a small `u`!) to set up the shared resources and a `static void TearDownTestCase()` function to tear them down. - -That's it! Google Test automatically calls `SetUpTestCase()` before running the -_first test_ in the `FooTest` test case (i.e. before creating the first -`FooTest` object), and calls `TearDownTestCase()` after running the _last test_ -in it (i.e. after deleting the last `FooTest` object). In between, the tests -can use the shared resources. - -Remember that the test order is undefined, so your code can't depend on a test -preceding or following another. Also, the tests must either not modify the -state of any shared resource, or, if they do modify the state, they must -restore the state to its original value before passing control to the next -test. - -Here's an example of per-test-case set-up and tear-down: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // Per-test-case set-up. - // Called before the first test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void SetUpTestCase() { - shared_resource_ = new ...; - } - - // Per-test-case tear-down. - // Called after the last test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void TearDownTestCase() { - delete shared_resource_; - shared_resource_ = NULL; - } - - // You can define per-test set-up and tear-down logic as usual. - virtual void SetUp() { ... } - virtual void TearDown() { ... } - - // Some expensive resource shared by all tests. - static T* shared_resource_; -}; - -T* FooTest::shared_resource_ = NULL; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Global Set-Up and Tear-Down # - -Just as you can do set-up and tear-down at the test level and the test case -level, you can also do it at the test program level. Here's how. - -First, you subclass the `::testing::Environment` class to define a test -environment, which knows how to set-up and tear-down: - -``` -class Environment { - public: - virtual ~Environment() {} - // Override this to define how to set up the environment. - virtual void SetUp() {} - // Override this to define how to tear down the environment. - virtual void TearDown() {} -}; -``` - -Then, you register an instance of your environment class with Google Test by -calling the `::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` function: - -``` -Environment* AddGlobalTestEnvironment(Environment* env); -``` - -Now, when `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is called, it first calls the `SetUp()` method of -the environment object, then runs the tests if there was no fatal failures, and -finally calls `TearDown()` of the environment object. - -It's OK to register multiple environment objects. In this case, their `SetUp()` -will be called in the order they are registered, and their `TearDown()` will be -called in the reverse order. - -Note that Google Test takes ownership of the registered environment objects. -Therefore **do not delete them** by yourself. - -You should call `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` before `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is -called, probably in `main()`. If you use `gtest_main`, you need to call -this before `main()` starts for it to take effect. One way to do this is to -define a global variable like this: - -``` -::testing::Environment* const foo_env = ::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); -``` - -However, we strongly recommend you to write your own `main()` and call -`AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` there, as relying on initialization of global -variables makes the code harder to read and may cause problems when you -register multiple environments from different translation units and the -environments have dependencies among them (remember that the compiler doesn't -guarantee the order in which global variables from different translation units -are initialized). - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -# Value Parameterized Tests # - -_Value-parameterized tests_ allow you to test your code with different -parameters without writing multiple copies of the same test. - -Suppose you write a test for your code and then realize that your code is affected by a presence of a Boolean command line flag. - -``` -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFoo) { - // A code to test foo(). -} -``` - -Usually people factor their test code into a function with a Boolean parameter in such situations. The function sets the flag, then executes the testing code. - -``` -void TestFooHelper(bool flag_value) { - flag = flag_value; - // A code to test foo(). -} - -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFooo) { - TestFooHelper(false); - TestFooHelper(true); -} -``` - -But this setup has serious drawbacks. First, when a test assertion fails in your tests, it becomes unclear what value of the parameter caused it to fail. You can stream a clarifying message into your `EXPECT`/`ASSERT` statements, but it you'll have to do it with all of them. Second, you have to add one such helper function per test. What if you have ten tests? Twenty? A hundred? - -Value-parameterized tests will let you write your test only once and then easily instantiate and run it with an arbitrary number of parameter values. - -Here are some other situations when value-parameterized tests come handy: - - * You want to test different implementations of an OO interface. - * You want to test your code over various inputs (a.k.a. data-driven testing). This feature is easy to abuse, so please exercise your good sense when doing it! - -## How to Write Value-Parameterized Tests ## - -To write value-parameterized tests, first you should define a fixture -class. It must be derived from both `::testing::Test` and -`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>` (the latter is a pure interface), -where `T` is the type of your parameter values. For convenience, you -can just derive the fixture class from `::testing::TestWithParam<T>`, -which itself is derived from both `::testing::Test` and -`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>`. `T` can be any copyable type. If -it's a raw pointer, you are responsible for managing the lifespan of -the pointed values. - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char*> { - // You can implement all the usual fixture class members here. - // To access the test parameter, call GetParam() from class - // TestWithParam<T>. -}; - -// Or, when you want to add parameters to a pre-existing fixture class: -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -class BarTest : public BaseTest, - public ::testing::WithParamInterface<const char*> { - ... -}; -``` - -Then, use the `TEST_P` macro to define as many test patterns using -this fixture as you want. The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or -"pattern", whichever you prefer to think. - -``` -TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, access the test parameter with the GetParam() method - // of the TestWithParam<T> class: - EXPECT_TRUE(foo.Blah(GetParam())); - ... -} - -TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { - ... -} -``` - -Finally, you can use `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` to instantiate the test -case with any set of parameters you want. Google Test defines a number of -functions for generating test parameters. They return what we call -(surprise!) _parameter generators_. Here is a summary of them, -which are all in the `testing` namespace: - -| `Range(begin, end[, step])` | Yields values `{begin, begin+step, begin+step+step, ...}`. The values do not include `end`. `step` defaults to 1. | -|:----------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `Values(v1, v2, ..., vN)` | Yields values `{v1, v2, ..., vN}`. | -| `ValuesIn(container)` and `ValuesIn(begin, end)` | Yields values from a C-style array, an STL-style container, or an iterator range `[begin, end)`. `container`, `begin`, and `end` can be expressions whose values are determined at run time. | -| `Bool()` | Yields sequence `{false, true}`. | -| `Combine(g1, g2, ..., gN)` | Yields all combinations (the Cartesian product for the math savvy) of the values generated by the `N` generators. This is only available if your system provides the `<tr1/tuple>` header. If you are sure your system does, and Google Test disagrees, you can override it by defining `GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE=1`. See comments in [include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h](../include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h) for more information. | - -For more details, see the comments at the definitions of these functions in the [source code](../include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h). - -The following statement will instantiate tests from the `FooTest` test case -each with parameter values `"meeny"`, `"miny"`, and `"moe"`. - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(InstantiationName, - FooTest, - ::testing::Values("meeny", "miny", "moe")); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern (yes, you can -instantiate it more than once), the first argument to -`INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` is a prefix that will be added to the actual -test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes for different -instantiations. The tests from the instantiation above will have these -names: - - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/2` for `"moe"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/2` for `"moe"` - -You can use these names in [--gtest\-filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests). - -This statement will instantiate all tests from `FooTest` again, each -with parameter values `"cat"` and `"dog"`: - -``` -const char* pets[] = {"cat", "dog"}; -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AnotherInstantiationName, FooTest, - ::testing::ValuesIn(pets)); -``` - -The tests from the instantiation above will have these names: - - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"dog"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"dog"` - -Please note that `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` will instantiate _all_ -tests in the given test case, whether their definitions come before or -_after_ the `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` statement. - -You can see -[these](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) -[files](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) for more examples. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; since version 1.2.0. - -## Creating Value-Parameterized Abstract Tests ## - -In the above, we define and instantiate `FooTest` in the same source -file. Sometimes you may want to define value-parameterized tests in a -library and let other people instantiate them later. This pattern is -known as <i>abstract tests</i>. As an example of its application, when you -are designing an interface you can write a standard suite of abstract -tests (perhaps using a factory function as the test parameter) that -all implementations of the interface are expected to pass. When -someone implements the interface, he can instantiate your suite to get -all the interface-conformance tests for free. - -To define abstract tests, you should organize your code like this: - - 1. Put the definition of the parameterized test fixture class (e.g. `FooTest`) in a header file, say `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _declaring_ your abstract tests. - 1. Put the `TEST_P` definitions in `foo_param_test.cc`, which includes `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _implementing_ your abstract tests. - -Once they are defined, you can instantiate them by including -`foo_param_test.h`, invoking `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()`, and linking -with `foo_param_test.cc`. You can instantiate the same abstract test -case multiple times, possibly in different source files. - -# Typed Tests # - -Suppose you have multiple implementations of the same interface and -want to make sure that all of them satisfy some common requirements. -Or, you may have defined several types that are supposed to conform to -the same "concept" and you want to verify it. In both cases, you want -the same test logic repeated for different types. - -While you can write one `TEST` or `TEST_F` for each type you want to -test (and you may even factor the test logic into a function template -that you invoke from the `TEST`), it's tedious and doesn't scale: -if you want _m_ tests over _n_ types, you'll end up writing _m\*n_ -`TEST`s. - -_Typed tests_ allow you to repeat the same test logic over a list of -types. You only need to write the test logic once, although you must -know the type list when writing typed tests. Here's how you do it: - -First, define a fixture class template. It should be parameterized -by a type. Remember to derive it from `::testing::Test`: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - public: - ... - typedef std::list<T> List; - static T shared_; - T value_; -}; -``` - -Next, associate a list of types with the test case, which will be -repeated for each type in the list: - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -TYPED_TEST_CASE(FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -The `typedef` is necessary for the `TYPED_TEST_CASE` macro to parse -correctly. Otherwise the compiler will think that each comma in the -type list introduces a new macro argument. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST()` instead of `TEST_F()` to define a typed test -for this test case. You can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to the special name TypeParam to get the type - // parameter. Since we are inside a derived class template, C++ requires - // us to visit the members of FooTest via 'this'. - TypeParam n = this->value_; - - // To visit static members of the fixture, add the 'TestFixture::' - // prefix. - n += TestFixture::shared_; - - // To refer to typedefs in the fixture, add the 'typename TestFixture::' - // prefix. The 'typename' is required to satisfy the compiler. - typename TestFixture::List values; - values.push_back(n); - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Type-Parameterized Tests # - -_Type-parameterized tests_ are like typed tests, except that they -don't require you to know the list of types ahead of time. Instead, -you can define the test logic first and instantiate it with different -type lists later. You can even instantiate it more than once in the -same program. - -If you are designing an interface or concept, you can define a suite -of type-parameterized tests to verify properties that any valid -implementation of the interface/concept should have. Then, the author -of each implementation can just instantiate the test suite with his -type to verify that it conforms to the requirements, without having to -write similar tests repeatedly. Here's an example: - -First, define a fixture class template, as we did with typed tests: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -``` - -Next, declare that you will define a type-parameterized test case: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest); -``` - -The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern", whichever you -prefer to think. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST_P()` to define a type-parameterized test. You -can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to TypeParam to get the type parameter. - TypeParam n = 0; - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -Now the tricky part: you need to register all test patterns using the -`REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro before you can instantiate them. -The first argument of the macro is the test case name; the rest are -the names of the tests in this test case: - -``` -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest, - DoesBlah, HasPropertyA); -``` - -Finally, you are free to instantiate the pattern with the types you -want. If you put the above code in a header file, you can `#include` -it in multiple C++ source files and instantiate it multiple times. - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern, the first argument -to the `INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro is a prefix that will be -added to the actual test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes -for different instances. - -In the special case where the type list contains only one type, you -can write that type directly without `::testing::Types<...>`, like this: - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, int); -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Testing Private Code # - -If you change your software's internal implementation, your tests should not -break as long as the change is not observable by users. Therefore, per the -_black-box testing principle_, most of the time you should test your code -through its public interfaces. - -If you still find yourself needing to test internal implementation code, -consider if there's a better design that wouldn't require you to do so. If you -absolutely have to test non-public interface code though, you can. There are -two cases to consider: - - * Static functions (_not_ the same as static member functions!) or unnamed namespaces, and - * Private or protected class members - -## Static Functions ## - -Both static functions and definitions/declarations in an unnamed namespace are -only visible within the same translation unit. To test them, you can `#include` -the entire `.cc` file being tested in your `*_test.cc` file. (`#include`ing `.cc` -files is not a good way to reuse code - you should not do this in production -code!) - -However, a better approach is to move the private code into the -`foo::internal` namespace, where `foo` is the namespace your project normally -uses, and put the private declarations in a `*-internal.h` file. Your -production `.cc` files and your tests are allowed to include this internal -header, but your clients are not. This way, you can fully test your internal -implementation without leaking it to your clients. - -## Private Class Members ## - -Private class members are only accessible from within the class or by friends. -To access a class' private members, you can declare your test fixture as a -friend to the class and define accessors in your fixture. Tests using the -fixture can then access the private members of your production class via the -accessors in the fixture. Note that even though your fixture is a friend to -your production class, your tests are not automatically friends to it, as they -are technically defined in sub-classes of the fixture. - -Another way to test private members is to refactor them into an implementation -class, which is then declared in a `*-internal.h` file. Your clients aren't -allowed to include this header but your tests can. Such is called the Pimpl -(Private Implementation) idiom. - -Or, you can declare an individual test as a friend of your class by adding this -line in the class body: - -``` -FRIEND_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName); -``` - -For example, -``` -// foo.h -#include "gtest/gtest_prod.h" - -// Defines FRIEND_TEST. -class Foo { - ... - private: - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull); - int Bar(void* x); -}; - -// foo_test.cc -... -TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull) { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_EQ(0, foo.Bar(NULL)); - // Uses Foo's private member Bar(). -} -``` - -Pay special attention when your class is defined in a namespace, as you should -define your test fixtures and tests in the same namespace if you want them to -be friends of your class. For example, if the code to be tested looks like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { - -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Bar); - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Baz); - ... - definition of the class Foo - ... -}; - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -Your test code should be something like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -# Catching Failures # - -If you are building a testing utility on top of Google Test, you'll -want to test your utility. What framework would you use to test it? -Google Test, of course. - -The challenge is to verify that your testing utility reports failures -correctly. In frameworks that report a failure by throwing an -exception, you could catch the exception and assert on it. But Google -Test doesn't use exceptions, so how do we test that a piece of code -generates an expected failure? - -`"gtest/gtest-spi.h"` contains some constructs to do this. After -`#include`ing this header, you can use - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:--------------------------------------------------| - -to assert that _statement_ generates a fatal (e.g. `ASSERT_*`) failure -whose message contains the given _substring_, or use - -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------| - -if you are expecting a non-fatal (e.g. `EXPECT_*`) failure. - -For technical reasons, there are some caveats: - - 1. You cannot stream a failure message to either macro. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot reference local non-static variables or non-static members of `this` object. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot return a value. - -_Note:_ Google Test is designed with threads in mind. Once the -synchronization primitives in `"gtest/internal/gtest-port.h"` have -been implemented, Google Test will become thread-safe, meaning that -you can then use assertions in multiple threads concurrently. Before - -that, however, Google Test only supports single-threaded usage. Once -thread-safe, `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` and `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE()` -will capture failures in the current thread only. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads will be ignored. If -you want to capture failures from all threads instead, you should use -the following macros: - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------------------| -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | - -# Getting the Current Test's Name # - -Sometimes a function may need to know the name of the currently running test. -For example, you may be using the `SetUp()` method of your test fixture to set -the golden file name based on which test is running. The `::testing::TestInfo` -class has this information: - -``` -namespace testing { - -class TestInfo { - public: - // Returns the test case name and the test name, respectively. - // - // Do NOT delete or free the return value - it's managed by the - // TestInfo class. - const char* test_case_name() const; - const char* name() const; -}; - -} // namespace testing -``` - - -> To obtain a `TestInfo` object for the currently running test, call -`current_test_info()` on the `UnitTest` singleton object: - -``` -// Gets information about the currently running test. -// Do NOT delete the returned object - it's managed by the UnitTest class. -const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); -printf("We are in test %s of test case %s.\n", - test_info->name(), test_info->test_case_name()); -``` - -`current_test_info()` returns a null pointer if no test is running. In -particular, you cannot find the test case name in `TestCaseSetUp()`, -`TestCaseTearDown()` (where you know the test case name implicitly), or -functions called from them. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Extending Google Test by Handling Test Events # - -Google Test provides an <b>event listener API</b> to let you receive -notifications about the progress of a test program and test -failures. The events you can listen to include the start and end of -the test program, a test case, or a test method, among others. You may -use this API to augment or replace the standard console output, -replace the XML output, or provide a completely different form of -output, such as a GUI or a database. You can also use test events as -checkpoints to implement a resource leak checker, for example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Defining Event Listeners ## - -To define a event listener, you subclass either -[testing::TestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L855) -or [testing::EmptyTestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L905). -The former is an (abstract) interface, where <i>each pure virtual method<br> -can be overridden to handle a test event</i> (For example, when a test -starts, the `OnTestStart()` method will be called.). The latter provides -an empty implementation of all methods in the interface, such that a -subclass only needs to override the methods it cares about. - -When an event is fired, its context is passed to the handler function -as an argument. The following argument types are used: - * [UnitTest](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L1007) reflects the state of the entire test program, - * [TestCase](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L689) has information about a test case, which can contain one or more tests, - * [TestInfo](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L599) contains the state of a test, and - * [TestPartResult](../include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h#L42) represents the result of a test assertion. - -An event handler function can examine the argument it receives to find -out interesting information about the event and the test program's -state. Here's an example: - -``` - class MinimalistPrinter : public ::testing::EmptyTestEventListener { - // Called before a test starts. - virtual void OnTestStart(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s starting.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - - // Called after a failed assertion or a SUCCEED() invocation. - virtual void OnTestPartResult( - const ::testing::TestPartResult& test_part_result) { - printf("%s in %s:%d\n%s\n", - test_part_result.failed() ? "*** Failure" : "Success", - test_part_result.file_name(), - test_part_result.line_number(), - test_part_result.summary()); - } - - // Called after a test ends. - virtual void OnTestEnd(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s ending.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - }; -``` - -## Using Event Listeners ## - -To use the event listener you have defined, add an instance of it to -the Google Test event listener list (represented by class -[TestEventListeners](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L929) -- note the "s" at the end of the name) in your -`main()` function, before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - // Gets hold of the event listener list. - ::testing::TestEventListeners& listeners = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners(); - // Adds a listener to the end. Google Test takes the ownership. - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -There's only one problem: the default test result printer is still in -effect, so its output will mingle with the output from your minimalist -printer. To suppress the default printer, just release it from the -event listener list and delete it. You can do so by adding one line: -``` - ... - delete listeners.Release(listeners.default_result_printer()); - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -Now, sit back and enjoy a completely different output from your -tests. For more details, you can read this -[sample](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc). - -You may append more than one listener to the list. When an `On*Start()` -or `OnTestPartResult()` event is fired, the listeners will receive it in -the order they appear in the list (since new listeners are added to -the end of the list, the default text printer and the default XML -generator will receive the event first). An `On*End()` event will be -received by the listeners in the _reverse_ order. This allows output by -listeners added later to be framed by output from listeners added -earlier. - -## Generating Failures in Listeners ## - -You may use failure-raising macros (`EXPECT_*()`, `ASSERT_*()`, -`FAIL()`, etc) when processing an event. There are some restrictions: - - 1. You cannot generate any failure in `OnTestPartResult()` (otherwise it will cause `OnTestPartResult()` to be called recursively). - 1. A listener that handles `OnTestPartResult()` is not allowed to generate any failure. - -When you add listeners to the listener list, you should put listeners -that handle `OnTestPartResult()` _before_ listeners that can generate -failures. This ensures that failures generated by the latter are -attributed to the right test by the former. - -We have a sample of failure-raising listener -[here](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc). - -# Running Test Programs: Advanced Options # - -Google Test test programs are ordinary executables. Once built, you can run -them directly and affect their behavior via the following environment variables -and/or command line flags. For the flags to work, your programs must call -`::testing::InitGoogleTest()` before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -To see a list of supported flags and their usage, please run your test -program with the `--help` flag. You can also use `-h`, `-?`, or `/?` -for short. This feature is added in version 1.3.0. - -If an option is specified both by an environment variable and by a -flag, the latter takes precedence. Most of the options can also be -set/read in code: to access the value of command line flag -`--gtest_foo`, write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(foo)`. A common pattern is -to set the value of a flag before calling `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` -to change the default value of the flag: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // Disables elapsed time by default. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; - - // This allows the user to override the flag on the command line. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Selecting Tests ## - -This section shows various options for choosing which tests to run. - -### Listing Test Names ### - -Sometimes it is necessary to list the available tests in a program before -running them so that a filter may be applied if needed. Including the flag -`--gtest_list_tests` overrides all other flags and lists tests in the following -format: -``` -TestCase1. - TestName1 - TestName2 -TestCase2. - TestName -``` - -None of the tests listed are actually run if the flag is provided. There is no -corresponding environment variable for this flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Running a Subset of the Tests ### - -By default, a Google Test program runs all tests the user has defined. -Sometimes, you want to run only a subset of the tests (e.g. for debugging or -quickly verifying a change). If you set the `GTEST_FILTER` environment variable -or the `--gtest_filter` flag to a filter string, Google Test will only run the -tests whose full names (in the form of `TestCaseName.TestName`) match the -filter. - -The format of a filter is a '`:`'-separated list of wildcard patterns (called -the positive patterns) optionally followed by a '`-`' and another -'`:`'-separated pattern list (called the negative patterns). A test matches the -filter if and only if it matches any of the positive patterns but does not -match any of the negative patterns. - -A pattern may contain `'*'` (matches any string) or `'?'` (matches any single -character). For convenience, the filter `'*-NegativePatterns'` can be also -written as `'-NegativePatterns'`. - -For example: - - * `./foo_test` Has no flag, and thus runs all its tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*` Also runs everything, due to the single match-everything `*` value. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*` Runs everything in test case `FooTest`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*Null*:*Constructor*` Runs any test whose full name contains either `"Null"` or `"Constructor"`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=-*DeathTest.*` Runs all non-death tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*-FooTest.Bar` Runs everything in test case `FooTest` except `FooTest.Bar`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Disabling Tests ### - -If you have a broken test that you cannot fix right away, you can add the -`DISABLED_` prefix to its name. This will exclude it from execution. This is -better than commenting out the code or using `#if 0`, as disabled tests are -still compiled (and thus won't rot). - -If you need to disable all tests in a test case, you can either add `DISABLED_` -to the front of the name of each test, or alternatively add it to the front of -the test case name. - -For example, the following tests won't be run by Google Test, even though they -will still be compiled: - -``` -// Tests that Foo does Abc. -TEST(FooTest, DISABLED_DoesAbc) { ... } - -class DISABLED_BarTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -// Tests that Bar does Xyz. -TEST_F(DISABLED_BarTest, DoesXyz) { ... } -``` - -_Note:_ This feature should only be used for temporary pain-relief. You still -have to fix the disabled tests at a later date. As a reminder, Google Test will -print a banner warning you if a test program contains any disabled tests. - -_Tip:_ You can easily count the number of disabled tests you have -using `grep`. This number can be used as a metric for improving your -test quality. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Enabling Disabled Tests ### - -To include [disabled tests](#temporarily-disabling-tests) in test -execution, just invoke the test program with the -`--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests` flag or set the -`GTEST_ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS` environment variable to a value other -than `0`. You can combine this with the -[--gtest\-filter](#running-a-subset-of-the_tests) flag to further select -which disabled tests to run. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Repeating the Tests ## - -Once in a while you'll run into a test whose result is hit-or-miss. Perhaps it -will fail only 1% of the time, making it rather hard to reproduce the bug under -a debugger. This can be a major source of frustration. - -The `--gtest_repeat` flag allows you to repeat all (or selected) test methods -in a program many times. Hopefully, a flaky test will eventually fail and give -you a chance to debug. Here's how to use it: - -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times and don't stop at failures. | -|:---------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------| -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=-1` | A negative count means repeating forever. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times, stopping at the first failure. This is especially useful when running under a debugger: when the testfails, it will drop into the debugger and you can then inspect variables and stacks. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_filter=FooBar` | Repeat the tests whose name matches the filter 1000 times. | - -If your test program contains global set-up/tear-down code registered -using `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()`, it will be repeated in each -iteration as well, as the flakiness may be in it. You can also specify -the repeat count by setting the `GTEST_REPEAT` environment variable. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Shuffling the Tests ## - -You can specify the `--gtest_shuffle` flag (or set the `GTEST_SHUFFLE` -environment variable to `1`) to run the tests in a program in a random -order. This helps to reveal bad dependencies between tests. - -By default, Google Test uses a random seed calculated from the current -time. Therefore you'll get a different order every time. The console -output includes the random seed value, such that you can reproduce an -order-related test failure later. To specify the random seed -explicitly, use the `--gtest_random_seed=SEED` flag (or set the -`GTEST_RANDOM_SEED` environment variable), where `SEED` is an integer -between 0 and 99999. The seed value 0 is special: it tells Google Test -to do the default behavior of calculating the seed from the current -time. - -If you combine this with `--gtest_repeat=N`, Google Test will pick a -different random seed and re-shuffle the tests in each iteration. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Controlling Test Output ## - -This section teaches how to tweak the way test results are reported. - -### Colored Terminal Output ### - -Google Test can use colors in its terminal output to make it easier to spot -the separation between tests, and whether tests passed. - -You can set the GTEST\_COLOR environment variable or set the `--gtest_color` -command line flag to `yes`, `no`, or `auto` (the default) to enable colors, -disable colors, or let Google Test decide. When the value is `auto`, Google -Test will use colors if and only if the output goes to a terminal and (on -non-Windows platforms) the `TERM` environment variable is set to `xterm` or -`xterm-color`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Suppressing the Elapsed Time ### - -By default, Google Test prints the time it takes to run each test. To -suppress that, run the test program with the `--gtest_print_time=0` -command line flag. Setting the `GTEST_PRINT_TIME` environment -variable to `0` has the same effect. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. (In Google Test 1.3.0 and lower, -the default behavior is that the elapsed time is **not** printed.) - -### Generating an XML Report ### - -Google Test can emit a detailed XML report to a file in addition to its normal -textual output. The report contains the duration of each test, and thus can -help you identify slow tests. - -To generate the XML report, set the `GTEST_OUTPUT` environment variable or the -`--gtest_output` flag to the string `"xml:_path_to_output_file_"`, which will -create the file at the given location. You can also just use the string -`"xml"`, in which case the output can be found in the `test_detail.xml` file in -the current directory. - -If you specify a directory (for example, `"xml:output/directory/"` on Linux or -`"xml:output\directory\"` on Windows), Google Test will create the XML file in -that directory, named after the test executable (e.g. `foo_test.xml` for test -program `foo_test` or `foo_test.exe`). If the file already exists (perhaps left -over from a previous run), Google Test will pick a different name (e.g. -`foo_test_1.xml`) to avoid overwriting it. - -The report uses the format described here. It is based on the -`junitreport` Ant task and can be parsed by popular continuous build -systems like [Hudson](https://hudson.dev.java.net/). Since that format -was originally intended for Java, a little interpretation is required -to make it apply to Google Test tests, as shown here: - -``` -<testsuites name="AllTests" ...> - <testsuite name="test_case_name" ...> - <testcase name="test_name" ...> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - - * The root `<testsuites>` element corresponds to the entire test program. - * `<testsuite>` elements correspond to Google Test test cases. - * `<testcase>` elements correspond to Google Test test functions. - -For instance, the following program - -``` -TEST(MathTest, Addition) { ... } -TEST(MathTest, Subtraction) { ... } -TEST(LogicTest, NonContradiction) { ... } -``` - -could generate this report: - -``` -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> -<testsuites tests="3" failures="1" errors="0" time="35" name="AllTests"> - <testsuite name="MathTest" tests="2" failures="1" errors="0" time="15"> - <testcase name="Addition" status="run" time="7" classname=""> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, 1)
 Actual: 3
Expected: 2" type=""/> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, -1)
 Actual: 1
Expected: 0" type=""/> - </testcase> - <testcase name="Subtraction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> - <testsuite name="LogicTest" tests="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="5"> - <testcase name="NonContradiction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - -Things to note: - - * The `tests` attribute of a `<testsuites>` or `<testsuite>` element tells how many test functions the Google Test program or test case contains, while the `failures` attribute tells how many of them failed. - * The `time` attribute expresses the duration of the test, test case, or entire test program in milliseconds. - * Each `<failure>` element corresponds to a single failed Google Test assertion. - * Some JUnit concepts don't apply to Google Test, yet we have to conform to the DTD. Therefore you'll see some dummy elements and attributes in the report. You can safely ignore these parts. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Controlling How Failures Are Reported ## - -### Turning Assertion Failures into Break-Points ### - -When running test programs under a debugger, it's very convenient if the -debugger can catch an assertion failure and automatically drop into interactive -mode. Google Test's _break-on-failure_ mode supports this behavior. - -To enable it, set the `GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a value -other than `0` . Alternatively, you can use the `--gtest_break_on_failure` -command line flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Disabling Catching Test-Thrown Exceptions ### - -Google Test can be used either with or without exceptions enabled. If -a test throws a C++ exception or (on Windows) a structured exception -(SEH), by default Google Test catches it, reports it as a test -failure, and continues with the next test method. This maximizes the -coverage of a test run. Also, on Windows an uncaught exception will -cause a pop-up window, so catching the exceptions allows you to run -the tests automatically. - -When debugging the test failures, however, you may instead want the -exceptions to be handled by the debugger, such that you can examine -the call stack when an exception is thrown. To achieve that, set the -`GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS` environment variable to `0`, or use the -`--gtest_catch_exceptions=0` flag when running the tests. - -**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Letting Another Testing Framework Drive ### - -If you work on a project that has already been using another testing -framework and is not ready to completely switch to Google Test yet, -you can get much of Google Test's benefit by using its assertions in -your existing tests. Just change your `main()` function to look -like: - -``` -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - // Important: Google Test must be initialized. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - ... whatever your existing testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -With that, you can use Google Test assertions in addition to the -native assertions your testing framework provides, for example: - -``` -void TestFooDoesBar() { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_LE(foo.Bar(1), 100); // A Google Test assertion. - CPPUNIT_ASSERT(foo.IsEmpty()); // A native assertion. -} -``` - -If a Google Test assertion fails, it will print an error message and -throw an exception, which will be treated as a failure by your host -testing framework. If you compile your code with exceptions disabled, -a failed Google Test assertion will instead exit your program with a -non-zero code, which will also signal a test failure to your test -runner. - -If you don't write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true;` in -your `main()`, you can alternatively enable this feature by specifying -the `--gtest_throw_on_failure` flag on the command-line or setting the -`GTEST_THROW_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a non-zero value. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.3.0. - -## Distributing Test Functions to Multiple Machines ## - -If you have more than one machine you can use to run a test program, -you might want to run the test functions in parallel and get the -result faster. We call this technique _sharding_, where each machine -is called a _shard_. - -Google Test is compatible with test sharding. To take advantage of -this feature, your test runner (not part of Google Test) needs to do -the following: - - 1. Allocate a number of machines (shards) to run the tests. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` environment variable to the total number of shards. It must be the same for all shards. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` environment variable to the index of the shard. Different shards must be assigned different indices, which must be in the range `[0, GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS - 1]`. - 1. Run the same test program on all shards. When Google Test sees the above two environment variables, it will select a subset of the test functions to run. Across all shards, each test function in the program will be run exactly once. - 1. Wait for all shards to finish, then collect and report the results. - -Your project may have tests that were written without Google Test and -thus don't understand this protocol. In order for your test runner to -figure out which test supports sharding, it can set the environment -variable `GTEST_SHARD_STATUS_FILE` to a non-existent file path. If a -test program supports sharding, it will create this file to -acknowledge the fact (the actual contents of the file are not -important at this time; although we may stick some useful information -in it in the future.); otherwise it will not create it. - -Here's an example to make it clear. Suppose you have a test program -`foo_test` that contains the following 5 test functions: -``` -TEST(A, V) -TEST(A, W) -TEST(B, X) -TEST(B, Y) -TEST(B, Z) -``` -and you have 3 machines at your disposal. To run the test functions in -parallel, you would set `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` to 3 on all machines, and -set `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` to 0, 1, and 2 on the machines respectively. -Then you would run the same `foo_test` on each machine. - -Google Test reserves the right to change how the work is distributed -across the shards, but here's one possible scenario: - - * Machine #0 runs `A.V` and `B.X`. - * Machine #1 runs `A.W` and `B.Y`. - * Machine #2 runs `B.Z`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -# Fusing Google Test Source Files # - -Google Test's implementation consists of ~30 files (excluding its own -tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in two files (a -`.h` and a `.cc`) instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gtest_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory (since release 1.3.0). -Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above installed on your machine, just -go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gtest_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h` and `gtest/gtest-all.cc` in it. These files contain -everything you need to use Google Test. Just copy them to anywhere -you want and you are ready to write tests. You can use the -[scripts/test/Makefile](../scripts/test/Makefile) -file as an example on how to compile your tests against them. - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've now learned more advanced Google Test tools and are -ready to tackle more complex testing tasks. If you want to dive even deeper, you -can read the [Frequently-Asked Questions](V1_6_FAQ.md). diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_Documentation.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index ca92466..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Test **1.6** --- **if you use a released version of Google Test, please read the -documentation for that specific version instead.** - - * [Primer](V1_6_Primer.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Test. - * [Samples](V1_6_Samples.md) -- learn from examples. - * [AdvancedGuide](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md) -- learn more about Google Test. - * [XcodeGuide](V1_6_XcodeGuide.md) -- how to use Google Test in Xcode on Mac. - * [Frequently-Asked Questions](V1_6_FAQ.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Test, read: - - * [DevGuide](DevGuide.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [PumpManual](V1_6_PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Test's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_FAQ.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_FAQ.md deleted file mode 100644 index 2b7f784..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_FAQ.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1038 +0,0 @@ - - -If you cannot find the answer to your question here, and you have read -[Primer](V1_6_Primer.md) and [AdvancedGuide](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md), send it to -googletestframework@googlegroups.com. - -## Why should I use Google Test instead of my favorite C++ testing framework? ## - -First, let us say clearly that we don't want to get into the debate of -which C++ testing framework is **the best**. There exist many fine -frameworks for writing C++ tests, and we have tremendous respect for -the developers and users of them. We don't think there is (or will -be) a single best framework - you have to pick the right tool for the -particular task you are tackling. - -We created Google Test because we couldn't find the right combination -of features and conveniences in an existing framework to satisfy _our_ -needs. The following is a list of things that _we_ like about Google -Test. We don't claim them to be unique to Google Test - rather, the -combination of them makes Google Test the choice for us. We hope this -list can help you decide whether it is for you too. - - * Google Test is designed to be portable: it doesn't require exceptions or RTTI; it works around various bugs in various compilers and environments; etc. As a result, it works on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows and several embedded operating systems. - * Nonfatal assertions (`EXPECT_*`) have proven to be great time savers, as they allow a test to report multiple failures in a single edit-compile-test cycle. - * It's easy to write assertions that generate informative messages: you just use the stream syntax to append any additional information, e.g. `ASSERT_EQ(5, Foo(i)) << " where i = " << i;`. It doesn't require a new set of macros or special functions. - * Google Test automatically detects your tests and doesn't require you to enumerate them in order to run them. - * Death tests are pretty handy for ensuring that your asserts in production code are triggered by the right conditions. - * `SCOPED_TRACE` helps you understand the context of an assertion failure when it comes from inside a sub-routine or loop. - * You can decide which tests to run using name patterns. This saves time when you want to quickly reproduce a test failure. - * Google Test can generate XML test result reports that can be parsed by popular continuous build system like Hudson. - * Simple things are easy in Google Test, while hard things are possible: in addition to advanced features like [global test environments](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#Global_Set-Up_and_Tear-Down) and tests parameterized by [values](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#value-parameterized-tests) or [types](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#typed-tests), Google Test supports various ways for the user to extend the framework -- if Google Test doesn't do something out of the box, chances are that a user can implement the feature using Google Test's public API, without changing Google Test itself. In particular, you can: - * expand your testing vocabulary by defining [custom predicates](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#predicate-assertions-for-better-error-messages), - * teach Google Test how to [print your types](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values), - * define your own testing macros or utilities and verify them using Google Test's [Service Provider Interface](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#catching-failures), and - * reflect on the test cases or change the test output format by intercepting the [test events](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events). - -## I'm getting warnings when compiling Google Test. Would you fix them? ## - -We strive to minimize compiler warnings Google Test generates. Before releasing a new version, we test to make sure that it doesn't generate warnings when compiled using its CMake script on Windows, Linux, and Mac OS. - -Unfortunately, this doesn't mean you are guaranteed to see no warnings when compiling Google Test in your environment: - - * You may be using a different compiler as we use, or a different version of the same compiler. We cannot possibly test for all compilers. - * You may be compiling on a different platform as we do. - * Your project may be using different compiler flags as we do. - -It is not always possible to make Google Test warning-free for everyone. Or, it may not be desirable if the warning is rarely enabled and fixing the violations makes the code more complex. - -If you see warnings when compiling Google Test, we suggest that you use the `-isystem` flag (assuming your are using GCC) to mark Google Test headers as system headers. That'll suppress warnings from Google Test headers. - -## Why should not test case names and test names contain underscore? ## - -Underscore (`_`) is special, as C++ reserves the following to be used by -the compiler and the standard library: - - 1. any identifier that starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter, and - 1. any identifier that containers two consecutive underscores (i.e. `__`) _anywhere_ in its name. - -User code is _prohibited_ from using such identifiers. - -Now let's look at what this means for `TEST` and `TEST_F`. - -Currently `TEST(TestCaseName, TestName)` generates a class named -`TestCaseName_TestName_Test`. What happens if `TestCaseName` or `TestName` -contains `_`? - - 1. If `TestCaseName` starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter (say, `_Foo`), we end up with `_Foo_TestName_Test`, which is reserved and thus invalid. - 1. If `TestCaseName` ends with an `_` (say, `Foo_`), we get `Foo__TestName_Test`, which is invalid. - 1. If `TestName` starts with an `_` (say, `_Bar`), we get `TestCaseName__Bar_Test`, which is invalid. - 1. If `TestName` ends with an `_` (say, `Bar_`), we get `TestCaseName_Bar__Test`, which is invalid. - -So clearly `TestCaseName` and `TestName` cannot start or end with `_` -(Actually, `TestCaseName` can start with `_` -- as long as the `_` isn't -followed by an upper-case letter. But that's getting complicated. So -for simplicity we just say that it cannot start with `_`.). - -It may seem fine for `TestCaseName` and `TestName` to contain `_` in the -middle. However, consider this: -``` -TEST(Time, Flies_Like_An_Arrow) { ... } -TEST(Time_Flies, Like_An_Arrow) { ... } -``` - -Now, the two `TEST`s will both generate the same class -(`Time_Files_Like_An_Arrow_Test`). That's not good. - -So for simplicity, we just ask the users to avoid `_` in `TestCaseName` -and `TestName`. The rule is more constraining than necessary, but it's -simple and easy to remember. It also gives Google Test some wiggle -room in case its implementation needs to change in the future. - -If you violate the rule, there may not be immediately consequences, -but your test may (just may) break with a new compiler (or a new -version of the compiler you are using) or with a new version of Google -Test. Therefore it's best to follow the rule. - -## Why is it not recommended to install a pre-compiled copy of Google Test (for example, into /usr/local)? ## - -In the early days, we said that you could install -compiled Google Test libraries on `*`nix systems using `make install`. -Then every user of your machine can write tests without -recompiling Google Test. - -This seemed like a good idea, but it has a -got-cha: every user needs to compile his tests using the _same_ compiler -flags used to compile the installed Google Test libraries; otherwise -he may run into undefined behaviors (i.e. the tests can behave -strangely and may even crash for no obvious reasons). - -Why? Because C++ has this thing called the One-Definition Rule: if -two C++ source files contain different definitions of the same -class/function/variable, and you link them together, you violate the -rule. The linker may or may not catch the error (in many cases it's -not required by the C++ standard to catch the violation). If it -doesn't, you get strange run-time behaviors that are unexpected and -hard to debug. - -If you compile Google Test and your test code using different compiler -flags, they may see different definitions of the same -class/function/variable (e.g. due to the use of `#if` in Google Test). -Therefore, for your sanity, we recommend to avoid installing pre-compiled -Google Test libraries. Instead, each project should compile -Google Test itself such that it can be sure that the same flags are -used for both Google Test and the tests. - -## How do I generate 64-bit binaries on Windows (using Visual Studio 2008)? ## - -(Answered by Trevor Robinson) - -Load the supplied Visual Studio solution file, either `msvc\gtest-md.sln` or -`msvc\gtest.sln`. Go through the migration wizard to migrate the -solution and project files to Visual Studio 2008. Select -`Configuration Manager...` from the `Build` menu. Select `<New...>` from -the `Active solution platform` dropdown. Select `x64` from the new -platform dropdown, leave `Copy settings from` set to `Win32` and -`Create new project platforms` checked, then click `OK`. You now have -`Win32` and `x64` platform configurations, selectable from the -`Standard` toolbar, which allow you to toggle between building 32-bit or -64-bit binaries (or both at once using Batch Build). - -In order to prevent build output files from overwriting one another, -you'll need to change the `Intermediate Directory` settings for the -newly created platform configuration across all the projects. To do -this, multi-select (e.g. using shift-click) all projects (but not the -solution) in the `Solution Explorer`. Right-click one of them and -select `Properties`. In the left pane, select `Configuration Properties`, -and from the `Configuration` dropdown, select `All Configurations`. -Make sure the selected platform is `x64`. For the -`Intermediate Directory` setting, change the value from -`$(PlatformName)\$(ConfigurationName)` to -`$(OutDir)\$(ProjectName)`. Click `OK` and then build the -solution. When the build is complete, the 64-bit binaries will be in -the `msvc\x64\Debug` directory. - -## Can I use Google Test on MinGW? ## - -We haven't tested this ourselves, but Per Abrahamsen reported that he -was able to compile and install Google Test successfully when using -MinGW from Cygwin. You'll need to configure it with: - -`PATH/TO/configure CC="gcc -mno-cygwin" CXX="g++ -mno-cygwin"` - -You should be able to replace the `-mno-cygwin` option with direct links -to the real MinGW binaries, but we haven't tried that. - -Caveats: - - * There are many warnings when compiling. - * `make check` will produce some errors as not all tests for Google Test itself are compatible with MinGW. - -We also have reports on successful cross compilation of Google Test -MinGW binaries on Linux using -[these instructions](http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Cross-Compiling_Under_Linux#Cross-compiling_under_Linux_for_MS_Windows) -on the WxWidgets site. - -Please contact `googletestframework@googlegroups.com` if you are -interested in improving the support for MinGW. - -## Why does Google Test support EXPECT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) but not EXPECT\_NE(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_NE(NULL, ptr)? ## - -Due to some peculiarity of C++, it requires some non-trivial template -meta programming tricks to support using `NULL` as an argument of the -`EXPECT_XX()` and `ASSERT_XX()` macros. Therefore we only do it where -it's most needed (otherwise we make the implementation of Google Test -harder to maintain and more error-prone than necessary). - -The `EXPECT_EQ()` macro takes the _expected_ value as its first -argument and the _actual_ value as the second. It's reasonable that -someone wants to write `EXPECT_EQ(NULL, some_expression)`, and this -indeed was requested several times. Therefore we implemented it. - -The need for `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)` isn't nearly as strong. When the -assertion fails, you already know that `ptr` must be `NULL`, so it -doesn't add any information to print ptr in this case. That means -`EXPECT_TRUE(ptr ! NULL)` works just as well. - -If we were to support `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)`, for consistency we'll -have to support `EXPECT_NE(ptr, NULL)` as well, as unlike `EXPECT_EQ`, -we don't have a convention on the order of the two arguments for -`EXPECT_NE`. This means using the template meta programming tricks -twice in the implementation, making it even harder to understand and -maintain. We believe the benefit doesn't justify the cost. - -Finally, with the growth of Google Mock's [matcher](../../CookBook.md#using-matchers-in-google-test-assertions) library, we are -encouraging people to use the unified `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` -syntax more often in tests. One significant advantage of the matcher -approach is that matchers can be easily combined to form new matchers, -while the `EXPECT_NE`, etc, macros cannot be easily -combined. Therefore we want to invest more in the matchers than in the -`EXPECT_XX()` macros. - -## Does Google Test support running tests in parallel? ## - -Test runners tend to be tightly coupled with the build/test -environment, and Google Test doesn't try to solve the problem of -running tests in parallel. Instead, we tried to make Google Test work -nicely with test runners. For example, Google Test's XML report -contains the time spent on each test, and its `gtest_list_tests` and -`gtest_filter` flags can be used for splitting the execution of test -methods into multiple processes. These functionalities can help the -test runner run the tests in parallel. - -## Why don't Google Test run the tests in different threads to speed things up? ## - -It's difficult to write thread-safe code. Most tests are not written -with thread-safety in mind, and thus may not work correctly in a -multi-threaded setting. - -If you think about it, it's already hard to make your code work when -you know what other threads are doing. It's much harder, and -sometimes even impossible, to make your code work when you don't know -what other threads are doing (remember that test methods can be added, -deleted, or modified after your test was written). If you want to run -the tests in parallel, you'd better run them in different processes. - -## Why aren't Google Test assertions implemented using exceptions? ## - -Our original motivation was to be able to use Google Test in projects -that disable exceptions. Later we realized some additional benefits -of this approach: - - 1. Throwing in a destructor is undefined behavior in C++. Not using exceptions means Google Test's assertions are safe to use in destructors. - 1. The `EXPECT_*` family of macros will continue even after a failure, allowing multiple failures in a `TEST` to be reported in a single run. This is a popular feature, as in C++ the edit-compile-test cycle is usually quite long and being able to fixing more than one thing at a time is a blessing. - 1. If assertions are implemented using exceptions, a test may falsely ignore a failure if it's caught by user code: -``` -try { ... ASSERT_TRUE(...) ... } -catch (...) { ... } -``` -The above code will pass even if the `ASSERT_TRUE` throws. While it's unlikely for someone to write this in a test, it's possible to run into this pattern when you write assertions in callbacks that are called by the code under test. - -The downside of not using exceptions is that `ASSERT_*` (implemented -using `return`) will only abort the current function, not the current -`TEST`. - -## Why do we use two different macros for tests with and without fixtures? ## - -Unfortunately, C++'s macro system doesn't allow us to use the same -macro for both cases. One possibility is to provide only one macro -for tests with fixtures, and require the user to define an empty -fixture sometimes: - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -or -``` -typedef ::testing::Test FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThat) { ... } -``` - -Yet, many people think this is one line too many. :-) Our goal was to -make it really easy to write tests, so we tried to make simple tests -trivial to create. That means using a separate macro for such tests. - -We think neither approach is ideal, yet either of them is reasonable. -In the end, it probably doesn't matter much either way. - -## Why don't we use structs as test fixtures? ## - -We like to use structs only when representing passive data. This -distinction between structs and classes is good for documenting the -intent of the code's author. Since test fixtures have logic like -`SetUp()` and `TearDown()`, they are better defined as classes. - -## Why are death tests implemented as assertions instead of using a test runner? ## - -Our goal was to make death tests as convenient for a user as C++ -possibly allows. In particular: - - * The runner-style requires to split the information into two pieces: the definition of the death test itself, and the specification for the runner on how to run the death test and what to expect. The death test would be written in C++, while the runner spec may or may not be. A user needs to carefully keep the two in sync. `ASSERT_DEATH(statement, expected_message)` specifies all necessary information in one place, in one language, without boilerplate code. It is very declarative. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` has a similar syntax and error-reporting semantics as other Google Test assertions, and thus is easy to learn. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can be mixed with other assertions and other logic at your will. You are not limited to one death test per test method. For example, you can write something like: -``` - if (FooCondition()) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Bar(), "blah"); - } else { - ASSERT_EQ(5, Bar()); - } -``` -If you prefer one death test per test method, you can write your tests in that style too, but we don't want to impose that on the users. The fewer artificial limitations the better. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can reference local variables in the current function, and you can decide how many death tests you want based on run-time information. For example, -``` - const int count = GetCount(); // Only known at run time. - for (int i = 1; i <= count; i++) { - ASSERT_DEATH({ - double* buffer = new double[i]; - ... initializes buffer ... - Foo(buffer, i) - }, "blah blah"); - } -``` -The runner-based approach tends to be more static and less flexible, or requires more user effort to get this kind of flexibility. - -Another interesting thing about `ASSERT_DEATH` is that it calls `fork()` -to create a child process to run the death test. This is lightening -fast, as `fork()` uses copy-on-write pages and incurs almost zero -overhead, and the child process starts from the user-supplied -statement directly, skipping all global and local initialization and -any code leading to the given statement. If you launch the child -process from scratch, it can take seconds just to load everything and -start running if the test links to many libraries dynamically. - -## My death test modifies some state, but the change seems lost after the death test finishes. Why? ## - -Death tests (`EXPECT_DEATH`, etc) are executed in a sub-process s.t. the -expected crash won't kill the test program (i.e. the parent process). As a -result, any in-memory side effects they incur are observable in their -respective sub-processes, but not in the parent process. You can think of them -as running in a parallel universe, more or less. - -## The compiler complains about "undefined references" to some static const member variables, but I did define them in the class body. What's wrong? ## - -If your class has a static data member: - -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - static const int kBar = 100; -}; -``` - -You also need to define it _outside_ of the class body in `foo.cc`: - -``` -const int Foo::kBar; // No initializer here. -``` - -Otherwise your code is **invalid C++**, and may break in unexpected ways. In -particular, using it in Google Test comparison assertions (`EXPECT_EQ`, etc) -will generate an "undefined reference" linker error. - -## I have an interface that has several implementations. Can I write a set of tests once and repeat them over all the implementations? ## - -Google Test doesn't yet have good support for this kind of tests, or -data-driven tests in general. We hope to be able to make improvements in this -area soon. - -## Can I derive a test fixture from another? ## - -Yes. - -Each test fixture has a corresponding and same named test case. This means only -one test case can use a particular fixture. Sometimes, however, multiple test -cases may want to use the same or slightly different fixtures. For example, you -may want to make sure that all of a GUI library's test cases don't leak -important system resources like fonts and brushes. - -In Google Test, you share a fixture among test cases by putting the shared -logic in a base test fixture, then deriving from that base a separate fixture -for each test case that wants to use this common logic. You then use `TEST_F()` -to write tests using each derived fixture. - -Typically, your code looks like this: - -``` -// Defines a base test fixture. -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -// Derives a fixture FooTest from BaseTest. -class FooTest : public BaseTest { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - BaseTest::SetUp(); // Sets up the base fixture first. - ... additional set-up work ... - } - virtual void TearDown() { - ... clean-up work for FooTest ... - BaseTest::TearDown(); // Remember to tear down the base fixture - // after cleaning up FooTest! - } - ... functions and variables for FooTest ... -}; - -// Tests that use the fixture FooTest. -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -... additional fixtures derived from BaseTest ... -``` - -If necessary, you can continue to derive test fixtures from a derived fixture. -Google Test has no limit on how deep the hierarchy can be. - -For a complete example using derived test fixtures, see -[sample5](../samples/sample5_unittest.cc). - -## My compiler complains "void value not ignored as it ought to be." What does this mean? ## - -You're probably using an `ASSERT_*()` in a function that doesn't return `void`. -`ASSERT_*()` can only be used in `void` functions. - -## My death test hangs (or seg-faults). How do I fix it? ## - -In Google Test, death tests are run in a child process and the way they work is -delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work. -Please make sure you have read this. - -In particular, death tests don't like having multiple threads in the parent -process. So the first thing you can try is to eliminate creating threads -outside of `EXPECT_DEATH()`. - -Sometimes this is impossible as some library you must use may be creating -threads before `main()` is even reached. In this case, you can try to minimize -the chance of conflicts by either moving as many activities as possible inside -`EXPECT_DEATH()` (in the extreme case, you want to move everything inside), or -leaving as few things as possible in it. Also, you can try to set the death -test style to `"threadsafe"`, which is safer but slower, and see if it helps. - -If you go with thread-safe death tests, remember that they rerun the test -program from the beginning in the child process. Therefore make sure your -program can run side-by-side with itself and is deterministic. - -In the end, this boils down to good concurrent programming. You have to make -sure that there is no race conditions or dead locks in your program. No silver -bullet - sorry! - -## Should I use the constructor/destructor of the test fixture or the set-up/tear-down function? ## - -The first thing to remember is that Google Test does not reuse the -same test fixture object across multiple tests. For each `TEST_F`, -Google Test will create a fresh test fixture object, _immediately_ -call `SetUp()`, run the test, call `TearDown()`, and then -_immediately_ delete the test fixture object. Therefore, there is no -need to write a `SetUp()` or `TearDown()` function if the constructor -or destructor already does the job. - -You may still want to use `SetUp()/TearDown()` in the following cases: - * If the tear-down operation could throw an exception, you must use `TearDown()` as opposed to the destructor, as throwing in a destructor leads to undefined behavior and usually will kill your program right away. Note that many standard libraries (like STL) may throw when exceptions are enabled in the compiler. Therefore you should prefer `TearDown()` if you want to write portable tests that work with or without exceptions. - * The Google Test team is considering making the assertion macros throw on platforms where exceptions are enabled (e.g. Windows, Mac OS, and Linux client-side), which will eliminate the need for the user to propagate failures from a subroutine to its caller. Therefore, you shouldn't use Google Test assertions in a destructor if your code could run on such a platform. - * In a constructor or destructor, you cannot make a virtual function call on this object. (You can call a method declared as virtual, but it will be statically bound.) Therefore, if you need to call a method that will be overriden in a derived class, you have to use `SetUp()/TearDown()`. - -## The compiler complains "no matching function to call" when I use ASSERT\_PREDn. How do I fix it? ## - -If the predicate function you use in `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*` is -overloaded or a template, the compiler will have trouble figuring out which -overloaded version it should use. `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT*` and -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT*` don't have this problem. - -If you see this error, you might want to switch to -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*`, which will also give you a better failure -message. If, however, that is not an option, you can resolve the problem by -explicitly telling the compiler which version to pick. - -For example, suppose you have - -``` -bool IsPositive(int n) { - return n > 0; -} -bool IsPositive(double x) { - return x > 0; -} -``` - -you will get a compiler error if you write - -``` -EXPECT_PRED1(IsPositive, 5); -``` - -However, this will work: - -``` -EXPECT_PRED1(*static_cast<bool (*)(int)>*(IsPositive), 5); -``` - -(The stuff inside the angled brackets for the `static_cast` operator is the -type of the function pointer for the `int`-version of `IsPositive()`.) - -As another example, when you have a template function - -``` -template <typename T> -bool IsNegative(T x) { - return x < 0; -} -``` - -you can use it in a predicate assertion like this: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED1(IsNegative*<int>*, -5); -``` - -Things are more interesting if your template has more than one parameters. The -following won't compile: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED2(*GreaterThan<int, int>*, 5, 0); -``` - - -as the C++ pre-processor thinks you are giving `ASSERT_PRED2` 4 arguments, -which is one more than expected. The workaround is to wrap the predicate -function in parentheses: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED2(*(GreaterThan<int, int>)*, 5, 0); -``` - - -## My compiler complains about "ignoring return value" when I call RUN\_ALL\_TESTS(). Why? ## - -Some people had been ignoring the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. That is, -instead of - -``` -return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -they write - -``` -RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -This is wrong and dangerous. A test runner needs to see the return value of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` in order to determine if a test has passed. If your `main()` -function ignores it, your test will be considered successful even if it has a -Google Test assertion failure. Very bad. - -To help the users avoid this dangerous bug, the implementation of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` causes gcc to raise this warning, when the return value is -ignored. If you see this warning, the fix is simple: just make sure its value -is used as the return value of `main()`. - -## My compiler complains that a constructor (or destructor) cannot return a value. What's going on? ## - -Due to a peculiarity of C++, in order to support the syntax for streaming -messages to an `ASSERT_*`, e.g. - -``` -ASSERT_EQ(1, Foo()) << "blah blah" << foo; -``` - -we had to give up using `ASSERT*` and `FAIL*` (but not `EXPECT*` and -`ADD_FAILURE*`) in constructors and destructors. The workaround is to move the -content of your constructor/destructor to a private void member function, or -switch to `EXPECT_*()` if that works. This section in the user's guide explains -it. - -## My set-up function is not called. Why? ## - -C++ is case-sensitive. It should be spelled as `SetUp()`. Did you -spell it as `Setup()`? - -Similarly, sometimes people spell `SetUpTestCase()` as `SetupTestCase()` and -wonder why it's never called. - -## How do I jump to the line of a failure in Emacs directly? ## - -Google Test's failure message format is understood by Emacs and many other -IDEs, like acme and XCode. If a Google Test message is in a compilation buffer -in Emacs, then it's clickable. You can now hit `enter` on a message to jump to -the corresponding source code, or use `C-x `` to jump to the next failure. - -## I have several test cases which share the same test fixture logic, do I have to define a new test fixture class for each of them? This seems pretty tedious. ## - -You don't have to. Instead of - -``` -class FooTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -class BarTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -you can simply `typedef` the test fixtures: -``` -typedef BaseTest FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef BaseTest BarTest; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -## The Google Test output is buried in a whole bunch of log messages. What do I do? ## - -The Google Test output is meant to be a concise and human-friendly report. If -your test generates textual output itself, it will mix with the Google Test -output, making it hard to read. However, there is an easy solution to this -problem. - -Since most log messages go to stderr, we decided to let Google Test output go -to stdout. This way, you can easily separate the two using redirection. For -example: -``` -./my_test > googletest_output.txt -``` - -## Why should I prefer test fixtures over global variables? ## - -There are several good reasons: - 1. It's likely your test needs to change the states of its global variables. This makes it difficult to keep side effects from escaping one test and contaminating others, making debugging difficult. By using fixtures, each test has a fresh set of variables that's different (but with the same names). Thus, tests are kept independent of each other. - 1. Global variables pollute the global namespace. - 1. Test fixtures can be reused via subclassing, which cannot be done easily with global variables. This is useful if many test cases have something in common. - -## How do I test private class members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -You should try to write testable code, which means classes should be easily -tested from their public interface. One way to achieve this is the Pimpl idiom: -you move all private members of a class into a helper class, and make all -members of the helper class public. - -You have several other options that don't require using `FRIEND_TEST`: - * Write the tests as members of the fixture class: -``` -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - void Test1() {...} // This accesses private members of class Foo. - void Test2() {...} // So does this one. -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - Test1(); -} - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - Test2(); -} -``` - * In the fixture class, write accessors for the tested class' private members, then use the accessors in your tests: -``` -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - T1 get_private_member1(Foo* obj) { - return obj->private_member1_; - } -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... - get_private_member1(x) - ... -} -``` - * If the methods are declared **protected**, you can change their access level in a test-only subclass: -``` -class YourClass { - ... - protected: // protected access for testability. - int DoSomethingReturningInt(); - ... -}; - -// in the your_class_test.cc file: -class TestableYourClass : public YourClass { - ... - public: using YourClass::DoSomethingReturningInt; // changes access rights - ... -}; - -TEST_F(YourClassTest, DoSomethingTest) { - TestableYourClass obj; - assertEquals(expected_value, obj.DoSomethingReturningInt()); -} -``` - -## How do I test private class static members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -We find private static methods clutter the header file. They are -implementation details and ideally should be kept out of a .h. So often I make -them free functions instead. - -Instead of: -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - private: - static bool Func(int n); -}; - -// foo.cc -bool Foo::Func(int n) { ... } - -// foo_test.cc -EXPECT_TRUE(Foo::Func(12345)); -``` - -You probably should better write: -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... -}; - -// foo.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n) { ... } -} - -// foo_test.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n); -} - -EXPECT_TRUE(internal::Func(12345)); -``` - -## I would like to run a test several times with different parameters. Do I need to write several similar copies of it? ## - -No. You can use a feature called [value-parameterized tests](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#Value_Parameterized_Tests) which -lets you repeat your tests with different parameters, without defining it more than once. - -## How do I test a file that defines main()? ## - -To test a `foo.cc` file, you need to compile and link it into your unit test -program. However, when the file contains a definition for the `main()` -function, it will clash with the `main()` of your unit test, and will result in -a build error. - -The right solution is to split it into three files: - 1. `foo.h` which contains the declarations, - 1. `foo.cc` which contains the definitions except `main()`, and - 1. `foo_main.cc` which contains nothing but the definition of `main()`. - -Then `foo.cc` can be easily tested. - -If you are adding tests to an existing file and don't want an intrusive change -like this, there is a hack: just include the entire `foo.cc` file in your unit -test. For example: -``` -// File foo_unittest.cc - -// The headers section -... - -// Renames main() in foo.cc to make room for the unit test main() -#define main FooMain - -#include "a/b/foo.cc" - -// The tests start here. -... -``` - - -However, please remember this is a hack and should only be used as the last -resort. - -## What can the statement argument in ASSERT\_DEATH() be? ## - -`ASSERT_DEATH(_statement_, _regex_)` (or any death assertion macro) can be used -wherever `_statement_` is valid. So basically `_statement_` can be any C++ -statement that makes sense in the current context. In particular, it can -reference global and/or local variables, and can be: - * a simple function call (often the case), - * a complex expression, or - * a compound statement. - -> Some examples are shown here: - -``` -// A death test can be a simple function call. -TEST(MyDeathTest, FunctionCall) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Xyz(5), "Xyz failed"); -} - -// Or a complex expression that references variables and functions. -TEST(MyDeathTest, ComplexExpression) { - const bool c = Condition(); - ASSERT_DEATH((c ? Func1(0) : object2.Method("test")), - "(Func1|Method) failed"); -} - -// Death assertions can be used any where in a function. In -// particular, they can be inside a loop. -TEST(MyDeathTest, InsideLoop) { - // Verifies that Foo(0), Foo(1), ..., and Foo(4) all die. - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - EXPECT_DEATH_M(Foo(i), "Foo has \\d+ errors", - ::testing::Message() << "where i is " << i); - } -} - -// A death assertion can contain a compound statement. -TEST(MyDeathTest, CompoundStatement) { - // Verifies that at lease one of Bar(0), Bar(1), ..., and - // Bar(4) dies. - ASSERT_DEATH({ - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - Bar(i); - } - }, - "Bar has \\d+ errors");} -``` - -`googletest_unittest.cc` contains more examples if you are interested. - -## What syntax does the regular expression in ASSERT\_DEATH use? ## - -On POSIX systems, Google Test uses the POSIX Extended regular -expression syntax -(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). -On Windows, it uses a limited variant of regular expression -syntax. For more details, see the -[regular expression syntax](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md#Regular_Expression_Syntax). - -## I have a fixture class Foo, but TEST\_F(Foo, Bar) gives me error "no matching function for call to Foo::Foo()". Why? ## - -Google Test needs to be able to create objects of your test fixture class, so -it must have a default constructor. Normally the compiler will define one for -you. However, there are cases where you have to define your own: - * If you explicitly declare a non-default constructor for class `Foo`, then you need to define a default constructor, even if it would be empty. - * If `Foo` has a const non-static data member, then you have to define the default constructor _and_ initialize the const member in the initializer list of the constructor. (Early versions of `gcc` doesn't force you to initialize the const member. It's a bug that has been fixed in `gcc 4`.) - -## Why does ASSERT\_DEATH complain about previous threads that were already joined? ## - -With the Linux pthread library, there is no turning back once you cross the -line from single thread to multiple threads. The first time you create a -thread, a manager thread is created in addition, so you get 3, not 2, threads. -Later when the thread you create joins the main thread, the thread count -decrements by 1, but the manager thread will never be killed, so you still have -2 threads, which means you cannot safely run a death test. - -The new NPTL thread library doesn't suffer from this problem, as it doesn't -create a manager thread. However, if you don't control which machine your test -runs on, you shouldn't depend on this. - -## Why does Google Test require the entire test case, instead of individual tests, to be named FOODeathTest when it uses ASSERT\_DEATH? ## - -Google Test does not interleave tests from different test cases. That is, it -runs all tests in one test case first, and then runs all tests in the next test -case, and so on. Google Test does this because it needs to set up a test case -before the first test in it is run, and tear it down afterwords. Splitting up -the test case would require multiple set-up and tear-down processes, which is -inefficient and makes the semantics unclean. - -If we were to determine the order of tests based on test name instead of test -case name, then we would have a problem with the following situation: - -``` -TEST_F(FooTest, AbcDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Uvw) { ... } - -TEST_F(BarTest, DefDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Xyz) { ... } -``` - -Since `FooTest.AbcDeathTest` needs to run before `BarTest.Xyz`, and we don't -interleave tests from different test cases, we need to run all tests in the -`FooTest` case before running any test in the `BarTest` case. This contradicts -with the requirement to run `BarTest.DefDeathTest` before `FooTest.Uvw`. - -## But I don't like calling my entire test case FOODeathTest when it contains both death tests and non-death tests. What do I do? ## - -You don't have to, but if you like, you may split up the test case into -`FooTest` and `FooDeathTest`, where the names make it clear that they are -related: - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Uvw) { ... EXPECT_DEATH(...) ... } -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Xyz) { ... ASSERT_DEATH(...) ... } -``` - -## The compiler complains about "no match for 'operator<<'" when I use an assertion. What gives? ## - -If you use a user-defined type `FooType` in an assertion, you must make sure -there is an `std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const FooType&)` function -defined such that we can print a value of `FooType`. - -In addition, if `FooType` is declared in a name space, the `<<` operator also -needs to be defined in the _same_ name space. - -## How do I suppress the memory leak messages on Windows? ## - -Since the statically initialized Google Test singleton requires allocations on -the heap, the Visual C++ memory leak detector will report memory leaks at the -end of the program run. The easiest way to avoid this is to use the -`_CrtMemCheckpoint` and `_CrtMemDumpAllObjectsSince` calls to not report any -statically initialized heap objects. See MSDN for more details and additional -heap check/debug routines. - -## I am building my project with Google Test in Visual Studio and all I'm getting is a bunch of linker errors (or warnings). Help! ## - -You may get a number of the following linker error or warnings if you -attempt to link your test project with the Google Test library when -your project and the are not built using the same compiler settings. - - * LNK2005: symbol already defined in object - * LNK4217: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported in function 'function' - * LNK4049: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported - -The Google Test project (gtest.vcproj) has the Runtime Library option -set to /MT (use multi-threaded static libraries, /MTd for debug). If -your project uses something else, for example /MD (use multi-threaded -DLLs, /MDd for debug), you need to change the setting in the Google -Test project to match your project's. - -To update this setting open the project properties in the Visual -Studio IDE then select the branch Configuration Properties | C/C++ | -Code Generation and change the option "Runtime Library". You may also try -using gtest-md.vcproj instead of gtest.vcproj. - -## I put my tests in a library and Google Test doesn't run them. What's happening? ## -Have you read a -[warning](V1_6_Primer.md#important-note-for-visual-c-users) on -the Google Test Primer page? - -## I want to use Google Test with Visual Studio but don't know where to start. ## -Many people are in your position and one of the posted his solution to -our mailing list. Here is his link: -http://hassanjamilahmad.blogspot.com/2009/07/gtest-starters-help.html. - -## I am seeing compile errors mentioning std::type\_traits when I try to use Google Test on Solaris. ## -Google Test uses parts of the standard C++ library that SunStudio does not support. -Our users reported success using alternative implementations. Try running the build after runing this commad: - -`export CC=cc CXX=CC CXXFLAGS='-library=stlport4'` - -## How can my code detect if it is running in a test? ## - -If you write code that sniffs whether it's running in a test and does -different things accordingly, you are leaking test-only logic into -production code and there is no easy way to ensure that the test-only -code paths aren't run by mistake in production. Such cleverness also -leads to -[Heisenbugs](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unusual_software_bug#Heisenbug). -Therefore we strongly advise against the practice, and Google Test doesn't -provide a way to do it. - -In general, the recommended way to cause the code to behave -differently under test is [dependency injection](http://jamesshore.com/Blog/Dependency-Injection-Demystified.html). -You can inject different functionality from the test and from the -production code. Since your production code doesn't link in the -for-test logic at all, there is no danger in accidentally running it. - -However, if you _really_, _really_, _really_ have no choice, and if -you follow the rule of ending your test program names with `_test`, -you can use the _horrible_ hack of sniffing your executable name -(`argv[0]` in `main()`) to know whether the code is under test. - -## Google Test defines a macro that clashes with one defined by another library. How do I deal with that? ## - -In C++, macros don't obey namespaces. Therefore two libraries that -both define a macro of the same name will clash if you `#include` both -definitions. In case a Google Test macro clashes with another -library, you can force Google Test to rename its macro to avoid the -conflict. - -Specifically, if both Google Test and some other code define macro -`FOO`, you can add -``` - -DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_FOO=1 -``` -to the compiler flags to tell Google Test to change the macro's name -from `FOO` to `GTEST_FOO`. For example, with `-DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_TEST=1`, you'll need to write -``` - GTEST_TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -instead of -``` - TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -in order to define a test. - -Currently, the following `TEST`, `FAIL`, `SUCCEED`, and the basic comparison assertion macros can have alternative names. You can see the full list of covered macros [here](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=if+!GTEST_DONT_DEFINE_\w%2B+package:http://googletest\.googlecode\.com+file:/include/gtest/gtest.h). More information can be found in the "Avoiding Macro Name Clashes" section of the README file. - -## My question is not covered in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/w/list), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework/topics), - 1. ask it on [googletestframework@googlegroups.com](mailto:googletestframework@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/issues/list) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the revision number if you check out from SVN directly) of Google Test you use (Google Test is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_Primer.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_Primer.md deleted file mode 100644 index 8d840ef..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_Primer.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,501 +0,0 @@ - - -# Introduction: Why Google C++ Testing Framework? # - -_Google C++ Testing Framework_ helps you write better C++ tests. - -No matter whether you work on Linux, Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, -Google Test can help you. - -So what makes a good test, and how does Google C++ Testing Framework fit in? We believe: - 1. Tests should be _independent_ and _repeatable_. It's a pain to debug a test that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. Google C++ Testing Framework isolates the tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, Google C++ Testing Framework allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging. - 1. Tests should be well _organized_ and reflect the structure of the tested code. Google C++ Testing Framework groups related tests into test cases that can share data and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch projects and start to work on a new code base. - 1. Tests should be _portable_ and _reusable_. The open-source community has a lot of code that is platform-neutral, its tests should also be platform-neutral. Google C++ Testing Framework works on different OSes, with different compilers (gcc, MSVC, and others), with or without exceptions, so Google C++ Testing Framework tests can easily work with a variety of configurations. (Note that the current release only contains build scripts for Linux - we are actively working on scripts for other platforms.) - 1. When tests fail, they should provide as much _information_ about the problem as possible. Google C++ Testing Framework doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile cycle. - 1. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores and let them focus on the test _content_. Google C++ Testing Framework automatically keeps track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them in order to run them. - 1. Tests should be _fast_. With Google C++ Testing Framework, you can reuse shared resources across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making tests depend on each other. - -Since Google C++ Testing Framework is based on the popular xUnit -architecture, you'll feel right at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. -If not, it will take you about 10 minutes to learn the basics and get started. -So let's go! - -_Note:_ We sometimes refer to Google C++ Testing Framework informally -as _Google Test_. - -# Setting up a New Test Project # - -To write a test program using Google Test, you need to compile Google -Test into a library and link your test with it. We provide build -files for some popular build systems: `msvc/` for Visual Studio, -`xcode/` for Mac Xcode, `make/` for GNU make, `codegear/` for Borland -C++ Builder, and the autotools script (deprecated) and -`CMakeLists.txt` for CMake (recommended) in the Google Test root -directory. If your build system is not on this list, you can take a -look at `make/Makefile` to learn how Google Test should be compiled -(basically you want to compile `src/gtest-all.cc` with `GTEST_ROOT` -and `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path, where `GTEST_ROOT` -is the Google Test root directory). - -Once you are able to compile the Google Test library, you should -create a project or build target for your test program. Make sure you -have `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path so that the -compiler can find `"gtest/gtest.h"` when compiling your test. Set up -your test project to link with the Google Test library (for example, -in Visual Studio, this is done by adding a dependency on -`gtest.vcproj`). - -If you still have questions, take a look at how Google Test's own -tests are built and use them as examples. - -# Basic Concepts # - -When using Google Test, you start by writing _assertions_, which are statements -that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be _success_, -_nonfatal failure_, or _fatal failure_. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts -the current function; otherwise the program continues normally. - -_Tests_ use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes -or has a failed assertion, then it _fails_; otherwise it _succeeds_. - -A _test case_ contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test -cases that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a -test case need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a -_test fixture_ class. - -A _test program_ can contain multiple test cases. - -We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual -assertion level and building up to tests and test cases. - -# Assertions # - -Google Test assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a -class or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion -fails, Google Test prints the assertion's source file and line number location, -along with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message -which will be appended to Google Test's message. - -The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different -effects on the current function. `ASSERT_*` versions generate fatal failures -when they fail, and **abort the current function**. `EXPECT_*` versions generate -nonfatal failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually `EXPECT_*` -are preferred, as they allow more than one failures to be reported in a test. -However, you should use `ASSERT_*` if it doesn't make sense to continue when -the assertion in question fails. - -Since a failed `ASSERT_*` returns from the current function immediately, -possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak. -Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so -keep this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion -errors. - -To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the -`<<` operator, or a sequence of such operators. An example: -``` -ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length"; - -for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) { - EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i; -} -``` - -Anything that can be streamed to an `ostream` can be streamed to an assertion -macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string -(`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is -streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed. - -## Basic Assertions ## - -These assertions do basic true/false condition testing. -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is true | -| `ASSERT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is false | - -Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and -returns from the current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal -failure, allowing the function to continue running. In either case, an -assertion failure means its containing test fails. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Binary Comparison ## - -This section describes assertions that compare two values. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -|`ASSERT_EQ(`_expected_`, `_actual_`);`|`EXPECT_EQ(`_expected_`, `_actual_`);`| _expected_ `==` _actual_ | -|`ASSERT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `!=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `<` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `<=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `>` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `>=` _val2_ | - -In the event of a failure, Google Test prints both _val1_ and _val2_ -. In `ASSERT_EQ*` and `EXPECT_EQ*` (and all other equality assertions -we'll introduce later), you should put the expression you want to test -in the position of _actual_, and put its expected value in _expected_, -as Google Test's failure messages are optimized for this convention. - -Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison -operator or you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the -arguments to support the `<<` operator for streaming to an `ostream`, -but it's no longer necessary since v1.6.0 (if `<<` is supported, it -will be called to print the arguments when the assertion fails; -otherwise Google Test will attempt to print them in the best way it -can. For more details and how to customize the printing of the -arguments, see this Google Mock [recipe](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#teaching-google-mock-how-to-print-your-values).). - -These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the -corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). If the corresponding -operator is defined, prefer using the `ASSERT_*()` macros because they will -print out not only the result of the comparison, but the two operands as well. - -Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the -arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function, -the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e. the compiler is free to -choose any order) and your code should not depend on any particular argument -evaluation order. - -`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it -tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value. -Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use -`ASSERT_STREQ()` , which will be described later on. In particular, to assert -that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(NULL, c_string)` . However, to -compare two `string` objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`. - -Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string` -and `wstring`). - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## String Comparison ## - -The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare -two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_STREQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | the two C strings have the same content | -| `ASSERT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content | -| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case | -| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content, ignoring case | - -Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. - -`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a -comparison of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 -narrow strings. - -A `NULL` pointer and an empty string are considered _different_. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -See also: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and -regular expression matching, for example), see the [Advanced Google Test Guide](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md). - -# Simple Tests # - -To create a test: - 1. Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function, These are ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. - 1. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, use the various Google Test assertions to check values. - 1. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds. - -``` -TEST(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - - -`TEST()` arguments go from general to specific. The _first_ argument is the -name of the test case, and the _second_ argument is the test's name within the -test case. Both names must be valid C++ identifiers, and they should not contain underscore (`_`). A test's _full name_ consists of its containing test case and its -individual name. Tests from different test cases can have the same individual -name. - -For example, let's take a simple integer function: -``` -int Factorial(int n); // Returns the factorial of n -``` - -A test case for this function might look like: -``` -// Tests factorial of 0. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(0)); -} - -// Tests factorial of positive numbers. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(1)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, Factorial(2)); - EXPECT_EQ(6, Factorial(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(40320, Factorial(8)); -} -``` - -Google Test groups the test results by test cases, so logically-related tests -should be in the same test case; in other words, the first argument to their -`TEST()` should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests, -`HandlesZeroInput` and `HandlesPositiveInput`, that belong to the same test -case `FactorialTest`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests # - -If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, -you can use a _test fixture_. It allows you to reuse the same configuration of -objects for several different tests. - -To create a fixture, just: - 1. Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:` or `public:` as we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. - 1. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. - 1. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as `Setup()` with a small `u` - don't let that happen to you. - 1. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read this [FAQ entry](V1_6_FAQ.md#should-i-use-the-constructordestructor-of-the-test-fixture-or-the-set-uptear-down-function). - 1. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. - -When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to -access objects and subroutines in the test fixture: -``` -TEST_F(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - -Like `TEST()`, the first argument is the test case name, but for `TEST_F()` -this must be the name of the test fixture class. You've probably guessed: `_F` -is for fixture. - -Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro -that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler -error. - -Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a -`TEST_F()`, or you'll get the compiler error "`virtual outside class -declaration`". - -For each test defined with `TEST_F()`, Google Test will: - 1. Create a _fresh_ test fixture at runtime - 1. Immediately initialize it via `SetUp()` , - 1. Run the test - 1. Clean up by calling `TearDown()` - 1. Delete the test fixture. Note that different tests in the same test case have different test fixture objects, and Google Test always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one. Google Test does not reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests. - -As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named `Queue`, which -has the following interface: -``` -template <typename E> // E is the element type. -class Queue { - public: - Queue(); - void Enqueue(const E& element); - E* Dequeue(); // Returns NULL if the queue is empty. - size_t size() const; - ... -}; -``` - -First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name -`FooTest` where `Foo` is the class being tested. -``` -class QueueTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - q1_.Enqueue(1); - q2_.Enqueue(2); - q2_.Enqueue(3); - } - - // virtual void TearDown() {} - - Queue<int> q0_; - Queue<int> q1_; - Queue<int> q2_; -}; -``` - -In this case, `TearDown()` is not needed since we don't have to clean up after -each test, other than what's already done by the destructor. - -Now we'll write tests using `TEST_F()` and this fixture. -``` -TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) { - EXPECT_EQ(0, q0_.size()); -} - -TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) { - int* n = q0_.Dequeue(); - EXPECT_EQ(NULL, n); - - n = q1_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(1, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(0, q1_.size()); - delete n; - - n = q2_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(2, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(1, q2_.size()); - delete n; -} -``` - -The above uses both `ASSERT_*` and `EXPECT_*` assertions. The rule of thumb is -to use `EXPECT_*` when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors -after the assertion failure, and use `ASSERT_*` when continuing after failure -doesn't make sense. For example, the second assertion in the `Dequeue` test is -`ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL)`, as we need to dereference the pointer `n` later, -which would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`. - -When these tests run, the following happens: - 1. Google Test constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1` ). - 1. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . - 1. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . - 1. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. - 1. `t1` is destructed. - 1. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time running the `DequeueWorks` test. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -_Note_: Google Test automatically saves all _Google Test_ flags when a test -object is constructed, and restores them when it is destructed. - -# Invoking the Tests # - -`TEST()` and `TEST_F()` implicitly register their tests with Google Test. So, unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all your defined tests in order to run them. - -After defining your tests, you can run them with `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` , which returns `0` if all the tests are successful, or `1` otherwise. Note that `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` runs _all tests_ in your link unit -- they can be from different test cases, or even different source files. - -When invoked, the `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` macro: - 1. Saves the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Creates a test fixture object for the first test. - 1. Initializes it via `SetUp()`. - 1. Runs the test on the fixture object. - 1. Cleans up the fixture via `TearDown()`. - 1. Deletes the fixture. - 1. Restores the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run. - -In addition, if the text fixture's constructor generates a fatal failure in -step 2, there is no point for step 3 - 5 and they are thus skipped. Similarly, -if step 3 generates a fatal failure, step 4 will be skipped. - -_Important_: You must not ignore the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or `gcc` -will give you a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the -automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its -exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus your `main()` function must -return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -Also, you should call `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` only **once**. Calling it more than once -conflicts with some advanced Google Test features (e.g. thread-safe death -tests) and thus is not supported. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Writing the main() Function # - -You can start from this boilerplate: -``` -#include "this/package/foo.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -namespace { - -// The fixture for testing class Foo. -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // You can remove any or all of the following functions if its body - // is empty. - - FooTest() { - // You can do set-up work for each test here. - } - - virtual ~FooTest() { - // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here. - } - - // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up - // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods: - - virtual void SetUp() { - // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right - // before each test). - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right - // before the destructor). - } - - // Objects declared here can be used by all tests in the test case for Foo. -}; - -// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc. -TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) { - const string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat"; - const string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat"; - Foo f; - EXPECT_EQ(0, f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath)); -} - -// Tests that Foo does Xyz. -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) { - // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo. -} - -} // namespace - -int main(int argc, char **argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -The `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` function parses the command line for Google -Test flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to control a -test program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in [AdvancedGuide](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md). -You must call this function before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or the flags -won't be properly initialized. - -On Windows, `InitGoogleTest()` also works with wide strings, so it can be used -in programs compiled in `UNICODE` mode as well. - -But maybe you think that writing all those main() functions is too much work? We agree with you completely and that's why Google Test provides a basic implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with gtest\_main library and you are good to go. - -## Important note for Visual C++ users ## -If you put your tests into a library and your `main()` function is in a different library or in your .exe file, those tests will not run. The reason is a [bug](https://connect.microsoft.com/feedback/viewfeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=244410&siteid=210) in Visual C++. When you define your tests, Google Test creates certain static objects to register them. These objects are not referenced from elsewhere but their constructors are still supposed to run. When Visual C++ linker sees that nothing in the library is referenced from other places it throws the library out. You have to reference your library with tests from your main program to keep the linker from discarding it. Here is how to do it. Somewhere in your library code declare a function: -``` -__declspec(dllexport) int PullInMyLibrary() { return 0; } -``` -If you put your tests in a static library (not DLL) then `__declspec(dllexport)` is not required. Now, in your main program, write a code that invokes that function: -``` -int PullInMyLibrary(); -static int dummy = PullInMyLibrary(); -``` -This will keep your tests referenced and will make them register themselves at startup. - -In addition, if you define your tests in a static library, add `/OPT:NOREF` to your main program linker options. If you use MSVC++ IDE, go to your .exe project properties/Configuration Properties/Linker/Optimization and set References setting to `Keep Unreferenced Data (/OPT:NOREF)`. This will keep Visual C++ linker from discarding individual symbols generated by your tests from the final executable. - -There is one more pitfall, though. If you use Google Test as a static library (that's how it is defined in gtest.vcproj) your tests must also reside in a static library. If you have to have them in a DLL, you _must_ change Google Test to build into a DLL as well. Otherwise your tests will not run correctly or will not run at all. The general conclusion here is: make your life easier - do not write your tests in libraries! - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've learned the Google Test basics. You can start writing -and running Google Test tests, read some [samples](V1_6_Samples.md), or continue with -[AdvancedGuide](V1_6_AdvancedGuide.md), which describes many more useful Google Test features. - -# Known Limitations # - -Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is -thread-safe on systems where the `pthreads` library is available. It -is currently _unsafe_ to use Google Test assertions from two threads -concurrently on other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is -not an issue as usually the assertions are done in the main thread. If -you want to help, you can volunteer to implement the necessary -synchronization primitives in `gtest-port.h` for your platform. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_PumpManual.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_PumpManual.md deleted file mode 100644 index 8184f15..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_PumpManual.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,177 +0,0 @@ - - -<b>P</b>ump is <b>U</b>seful for <b>M</b>eta <b>P</b>rogramming. - -# The Problem # - -Template and macro libraries often need to define many classes, -functions, or macros that vary only (or almost only) in the number of -arguments they take. It's a lot of repetitive, mechanical, and -error-prone work. - -Variadic templates and variadic macros can alleviate the problem. -However, while both are being considered by the C++ committee, neither -is in the standard yet or widely supported by compilers. Thus they -are often not a good choice, especially when your code needs to be -portable. And their capabilities are still limited. - -As a result, authors of such libraries often have to write scripts to -generate their implementation. However, our experience is that it's -tedious to write such scripts, which tend to reflect the structure of -the generated code poorly and are often hard to read and edit. For -example, a small change needed in the generated code may require some -non-intuitive, non-trivial changes in the script. This is especially -painful when experimenting with the code. - -# Our Solution # - -Pump (for Pump is Useful for Meta Programming, Pretty Useful for Meta -Programming, or Practical Utility for Meta Programming, whichever you -prefer) is a simple meta-programming tool for C++. The idea is that a -programmer writes a `foo.pump` file which contains C++ code plus meta -code that manipulates the C++ code. The meta code can handle -iterations over a range, nested iterations, local meta variable -definitions, simple arithmetic, and conditional expressions. You can -view it as a small Domain-Specific Language. The meta language is -designed to be non-intrusive (s.t. it won't confuse Emacs' C++ mode, -for example) and concise, making Pump code intuitive and easy to -maintain. - -## Highlights ## - - * The implementation is in a single Python script and thus ultra portable: no build or installation is needed and it works cross platforms. - * Pump tries to be smart with respect to [Google's style guide](http://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/): it breaks long lines (easy to have when they are generated) at acceptable places to fit within 80 columns and indent the continuation lines correctly. - * The format is human-readable and more concise than XML. - * The format works relatively well with Emacs' C++ mode. - -## Examples ## - -The following Pump code (where meta keywords start with `$`, `[[` and `]]` are meta brackets, and `$$` starts a meta comment that ends with the line): - -``` -$var n = 3 $$ Defines a meta variable n. -$range i 0..n $$ Declares the range of meta iterator i (inclusive). -$for i [[ - $$ Meta loop. -// Foo$i does blah for $i-ary predicates. -$range j 1..i -template <size_t N $for j [[, typename A$j]]> -class Foo$i { -$if i == 0 [[ - blah a; -]] $elif i <= 2 [[ - blah b; -]] $else [[ - blah c; -]] -}; - -]] -``` - -will be translated by the Pump compiler to: - -``` -// Foo0 does blah for 0-ary predicates. -template <size_t N> -class Foo0 { - blah a; -}; - -// Foo1 does blah for 1-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1> -class Foo1 { - blah b; -}; - -// Foo2 does blah for 2-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2> -class Foo2 { - blah b; -}; - -// Foo3 does blah for 3-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3> -class Foo3 { - blah c; -}; -``` - -In another example, - -``` -$range i 1..n -Func($for i + [[a$i]]); -$$ The text between i and [[ is the separator between iterations. -``` - -will generate one of the following lines (without the comments), depending on the value of `n`: - -``` -Func(); // If n is 0. -Func(a1); // If n is 1. -Func(a1 + a2); // If n is 2. -Func(a1 + a2 + a3); // If n is 3. -// And so on... -``` - -## Constructs ## - -We support the following meta programming constructs: - -| `$var id = exp` | Defines a named constant value. `$id` is valid util the end of the current meta lexical block. | -|:----------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `$range id exp..exp` | Sets the range of an iteration variable, which can be reused in multiple loops later. | -| `$for id sep [[ code ]]` | Iteration. The range of `id` must have been defined earlier. `$id` is valid in `code`. | -| `$($)` | Generates a single `$` character. | -| `$id` | Value of the named constant or iteration variable. | -| `$(exp)` | Value of the expression. | -| `$if exp [[ code ]] else_branch` | Conditional. | -| `[[ code ]]` | Meta lexical block. | -| `cpp_code` | Raw C++ code. | -| `$$ comment` | Meta comment. | - -**Note:** To give the user some freedom in formatting the Pump source -code, Pump ignores a new-line character if it's right after `$for foo` -or next to `[[` or `]]`. Without this rule you'll often be forced to write -very long lines to get the desired output. Therefore sometimes you may -need to insert an extra new-line in such places for a new-line to show -up in your output. - -## Grammar ## - -``` -code ::= atomic_code* -atomic_code ::= $var id = exp - | $var id = [[ code ]] - | $range id exp..exp - | $for id sep [[ code ]] - | $($) - | $id - | $(exp) - | $if exp [[ code ]] else_branch - | [[ code ]] - | cpp_code -sep ::= cpp_code | empty_string -else_branch ::= $else [[ code ]] - | $elif exp [[ code ]] else_branch - | empty_string -exp ::= simple_expression_in_Python_syntax -``` - -## Code ## - -You can find the source code of Pump in [scripts/pump.py](../scripts/pump.py). It is still -very unpolished and lacks automated tests, although it has been -successfully used many times. If you find a chance to use it in your -project, please let us know what you think! We also welcome help on -improving Pump. - -## Real Examples ## - -You can find real-world applications of Pump in [Google Test](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgoogletest\.googlecode\.com) and [Google Mock](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgooglemock\.googlecode\.com). The source file `foo.h.pump` generates `foo.h`. - -## Tips ## - - * If a meta variable is followed by a letter or digit, you can separate them using `[[]]`, which inserts an empty string. For example `Foo$j[[]]Helper` generate `Foo1Helper` when `j` is 1. - * To avoid extra-long Pump source lines, you can break a line anywhere you want by inserting `[[]]` followed by a new line. Since any new-line character next to `[[` or `]]` is ignored, the generated code won't contain this new line. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_Samples.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_Samples.md deleted file mode 100644 index f21d200..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_Samples.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -If you're like us, you'd like to look at some Google Test sample code. The -[samples folder](../samples) has a number of well-commented samples showing how to use a -variety of Google Test features. - - * [Sample #1](../samples/sample1_unittest.cc) shows the basic steps of using Google Test to test C++ functions. - * [Sample #2](../samples/sample2_unittest.cc) shows a more complex unit test for a class with multiple member functions. - * [Sample #3](../samples/sample3_unittest.cc) uses a test fixture. - * [Sample #4](../samples/sample4_unittest.cc) is another basic example of using Google Test. - * [Sample #5](../samples/sample5_unittest.cc) teaches how to reuse a test fixture in multiple test cases by deriving sub-fixtures from it. - * [Sample #6](../samples/sample6_unittest.cc) demonstrates type-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #7](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) teaches the basics of value-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #8](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) shows using `Combine()` in value-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #9](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc) shows use of the listener API to modify Google Test's console output and the use of its reflection API to inspect test results. - * [Sample #10](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc) shows use of the listener API to implement a primitive memory leak checker. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_6_XcodeGuide.md b/googletest/docs/V1_6_XcodeGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index bf24bf5..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_6_XcodeGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,93 +0,0 @@ - - -This guide will explain how to use the Google Testing Framework in your Xcode projects on Mac OS X. This tutorial begins by quickly explaining what to do for experienced users. After the quick start, the guide goes provides additional explanation about each step. - -# Quick Start # - -Here is the quick guide for using Google Test in your Xcode project. - - 1. Download the source from the [website](http://code.google.com/p/googletest) using this command: `svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only` - 1. Open up the `gtest.xcodeproj` in the `googletest-read-only/xcode/` directory and build the gtest.framework. - 1. Create a new "Shell Tool" target in your Xcode project called something like "UnitTests" - 1. Add the gtest.framework to your project and add it to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Edit the "UnitTests" executable and add an environment variable named "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" with a value equal to the path to the framework containing the gtest.framework relative to the compiled executable. - 1. Build and Go - -The following sections further explain each of the steps listed above in depth, describing in more detail how to complete it including some variations. - -# Get the Source # - -Currently, the gtest.framework discussed here isn't available in a tagged release of Google Test, it is only available in the trunk. As explained at the Google Test [site](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/checkout">svn), you can get the code from anonymous SVN with this command: - -``` -svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only -``` - -Alternatively, if you are working with Subversion in your own code base, you can add Google Test as an external dependency to your own Subversion repository. By following this approach, everyone that checks out your svn repository will also receive a copy of Google Test (a specific version, if you wish) without having to check it out explicitly. This makes the set up of your project simpler and reduces the copied code in the repository. - -To use `svn:externals`, decide where you would like to have the external source reside. You might choose to put the external source inside the trunk, because you want it to be part of the branch when you make a release. However, keeping it outside the trunk in a version-tagged directory called something like `third-party/googletest/1.0.1`, is another option. Once the location is established, use `svn propedit svn:externals _directory_` to set the svn:externals property on a directory in your repository. This directory won't contain the code, but be its versioned parent directory. - -The command `svn propedit` will bring up your Subversion editor, making editing the long, (potentially multi-line) property simpler. This same method can be used to check out a tagged branch, by using the appropriate URL (e.g. `http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release-1.0.1`). Additionally, the svn:externals property allows the specification of a particular revision of the trunk with the `-r_##_` option (e.g. `externals/src/googletest -r60 http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk`). - -Here is an example of using the svn:externals properties on a trunk (read via `svn propget`) of a project. This value checks out a copy of Google Test into the `trunk/externals/src/googletest/` directory. - -``` -[Computer:svn] user$ svn propget svn:externals trunk -externals/src/googletest http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk -``` - -# Add the Framework to Your Project # - -The next step is to build and add the gtest.framework to your own project. This guide describes two common ways below. - - * **Option 1** --- The simplest way to add Google Test to your own project, is to open gtest.xcodeproj (found in the xcode/ directory of the Google Test trunk) and build the framework manually. Then, add the built framework into your project using the "Add->Existing Framework..." from the context menu or "Project->Add..." from the main menu. The gtest.framework is relocatable and contains the headers and object code that you'll need to make tests. This method requires rebuilding every time you upgrade Google Test in your project. - * **Option 2** --- If you are going to be living off the trunk of Google Test, incorporating its latest features into your unit tests (or are a Google Test developer yourself). You'll want to rebuild the framework every time the source updates. to do this, you'll need to add the gtest.xcodeproj file, not the framework itself, to your own Xcode project. Then, from the build products that are revealed by the project's disclosure triangle, you can find the gtest.framework, which can be added to your targets (discussed below). - -# Make a Test Target # - -To start writing tests, make a new "Shell Tool" target. This target template is available under BSD, Cocoa, or Carbon. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of the target. - -Next, you'll want to add gtest.framework in two different ways, depending upon which option you chose above. - - * **Option 1** --- During compilation, Xcode will need to know that you are linking against the gtest.framework. Add the gtest.framework to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of your test target. This will include the Google Test headers in your header search path, and will tell the linker where to find the library. - * **Option 2** --- If your working out of the trunk, you'll also want to add gtest.framework to your "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of your test target. In addition, you'll want to add the gtest.framework as a dependency to your unit test target. This way, Xcode will make sure that gtest.framework is up to date, every time your build your target. Finally, if you don't share build directories with Google Test, you'll have to copy the gtest.framework into your own build products directory using a "Run Script" build phase. - -# Set Up the Executable Run Environment # - -Since the unit test executable is a shell tool, it doesn't have a bundle with a `Contents/Frameworks` directory, in which to place gtest.framework. Instead, the dynamic linker must be told at runtime to search for the framework in another location. This can be accomplished by setting the "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" environment variable in the "Edit Active Executable ..." Arguments tab, under "Variables to be set in the environment:". The path for this value is the path (relative or absolute) of the directory containing the gtest.framework. - -If you haven't set up the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH, correctly, you might get a message like this: - -``` -[Session started at 2008-08-15 06:23:57 -0600.] - dyld: Library not loaded: @loader_path/../Frameworks/gtest.framework/Versions/A/gtest - Referenced from: /Users/username/Documents/Sandbox/gtestSample/build/Debug/WidgetFrameworkTest - Reason: image not found -``` - -To correct this problem, got to the directory containing the executable named in "Referenced from:" value in the error message above. Then, with the terminal in this location, find the relative path to the directory containing the gtest.framework. That is the value you'll need to set as the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH. - -# Build and Go # - -Now, when you click "Build and Go", the test will be executed. Dumping out something like this: - -``` -[Session started at 2008-08-06 06:36:13 -0600.] -[==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case. -[----------] Global test environment set-up. -[----------] 2 tests from WidgetInitializerTest -[ RUN ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConstructor -[ OK ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConstructor -[ RUN ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConversion -[ OK ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConversion -[----------] Global test environment tear-down -[==========] 2 tests from 1 test case ran. -[ PASSED ] 2 tests. - -The Debugger has exited with status 0. -``` - -# Summary # - -Unit testing is a valuable way to ensure your data model stays valid even during rapid development or refactoring. The Google Testing Framework is a great unit testing framework for C and C++ which integrates well with an Xcode development environment.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index dd4af8f..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2181 +0,0 @@ - - -Now that you have read [Primer](V1_7_Primer.md) and learned how to write tests -using Google Test, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document -will show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex -failure messages, propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your -test fixtures, and use various flags with your tests. - -# More Assertions # - -This section covers some less frequently used, but still significant, -assertions. - -## Explicit Success and Failure ## - -These three assertions do not actually test a value or expression. Instead, -they generate a success or failure directly. Like the macros that actually -perform a test, you may stream a custom failure message into the them. - -| `SUCCEED();` | -|:-------------| - -Generates a success. This does NOT make the overall test succeed. A test is -considered successful only if none of its assertions fail during its execution. - -Note: `SUCCEED()` is purely documentary and currently doesn't generate any -user-visible output. However, we may add `SUCCEED()` messages to Google Test's -output in the future. - -| `FAIL();` | `ADD_FAILURE();` | `ADD_FAILURE_AT("`_file\_path_`", `_line\_number_`);` | -|:-----------|:-----------------|:------------------------------------------------------| - -`FAIL()` generates a fatal failure, while `ADD_FAILURE()` and `ADD_FAILURE_AT()` generate a nonfatal -failure. These are useful when control flow, rather than a Boolean expression, -deteremines the test's success or failure. For example, you might want to write -something like: - -``` -switch(expression) { - case 1: ... some checks ... - case 2: ... some other checks - ... - default: FAIL() << "We shouldn't get here."; -} -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Exception Assertions ## - -These are for verifying that a piece of code throws (or does not -throw) an exception of the given type: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | `EXPECT_THROW(`_statement_, _exception\_type_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of the given type | -| `ASSERT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_ANY_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ throws an exception of any type | -| `ASSERT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_THROW(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't throw any exception | - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_THROW(Foo(5), bar_exception); - -EXPECT_NO_THROW({ - int n = 5; - Bar(&n); -}); -``` - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.1.0. - -## Predicate Assertions for Better Error Messages ## - -Even though Google Test has a rich set of assertions, they can never be -complete, as it's impossible (nor a good idea) to anticipate all the scenarios -a user might run into. Therefore, sometimes a user has to use `EXPECT_TRUE()` -to check a complex expression, for lack of a better macro. This has the problem -of not showing you the values of the parts of the expression, making it hard to -understand what went wrong. As a workaround, some users choose to construct the -failure message by themselves, streaming it into `EXPECT_TRUE()`. However, this -is awkward especially when the expression has side-effects or is expensive to -evaluate. - -Google Test gives you three different options to solve this problem: - -### Using an Existing Boolean Function ### - -If you already have a function or a functor that returns `bool` (or a type -that can be implicitly converted to `bool`), you can use it in a _predicate -assertion_ to get the function arguments printed for free: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED1(`_pred1, val1_`);` | _pred1(val1)_ returns true | -| `ASSERT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED2(`_pred2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred2(val1, val2)_ returns true | -| ... | ... | ... | - -In the above, _predn_ is an _n_-ary predicate function or functor, where -_val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are its arguments. The assertion succeeds -if the predicate returns `true` when applied to the given arguments, and fails -otherwise. When the assertion fails, it prints the value of each argument. In -either case, the arguments are evaluated exactly once. - -Here's an example. Given - -``` -// Returns true iff m and n have no common divisors except 1. -bool MutuallyPrime(int m, int n) { ... } -const int a = 3; -const int b = 4; -const int c = 10; -``` - -the assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, a, b);` will succeed, while the -assertion `EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, b, c);` will fail with the message - -<pre> -!MutuallyPrime(b, c) is false, where<br> -b is 4<br> -c is 10<br> -</pre> - -**Notes:** - - 1. If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see [this](V1_7_FAQ.md#the-compiler-complains-about-undefined-references-to-some-static-const-member-variables-but-i-did-define-them-in-the-class-body-whats-wrong) for how to resolve it. - 1. Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need a higher-arity assertion, let us know. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac - -### Using a Function That Returns an AssertionResult ### - -While `EXPECT_PRED*()` and friends are handy for a quick job, the -syntax is not satisfactory: you have to use different macros for -different arities, and it feels more like Lisp than C++. The -`::testing::AssertionResult` class solves this problem. - -An `AssertionResult` object represents the result of an assertion -(whether it's a success or a failure, and an associated message). You -can create an `AssertionResult` using one of these factory -functions: - -``` -namespace testing { - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// succeeded. -AssertionResult AssertionSuccess(); - -// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has -// failed. -AssertionResult AssertionFailure(); - -} -``` - -You can then use the `<<` operator to stream messages to the -`AssertionResult` object. - -To provide more readable messages in Boolean assertions -(e.g. `EXPECT_TRUE()`), write a predicate function that returns -`AssertionResult` instead of `bool`. For example, if you define -`IsEven()` as: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -instead of: - -``` -bool IsEven(int n) { - return (n % 2) == 0; -} -``` - -the failed assertion `EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(4)))` will print: - -<pre> -Value of: IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false (*3 is odd*)<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -instead of a more opaque - -<pre> -Value of: IsEven(Fib(4))<br> -Actual: false<br> -Expected: true<br> -</pre> - -If you want informative messages in `EXPECT_FALSE` and `ASSERT_FALSE` -as well, and are fine with making the predicate slower in the success -case, you can supply a success message: - -``` -::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { - if ((n % 2) == 0) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess() << n << " is even"; - else - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; -} -``` - -Then the statement `EXPECT_FALSE(IsEven(Fib(6)))` will print - -<pre> -Value of: IsEven(Fib(6))<br> -Actual: true (8 is even)<br> -Expected: false<br> -</pre> - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.4.1. - -### Using a Predicate-Formatter ### - -If you find the default message generated by `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED*` and -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_(TRUE|FALSE)` unsatisfactory, or some arguments to your -predicate do not support streaming to `ostream`, you can instead use the -following _predicate-formatter assertions_ to _fully_ customize how the -message is formatted: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT1(`_pred\_format1, val1_`); | _pred\_format1(val1)_ is successful | -| `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(`_pred\_format2, val1, val2_`);` | _pred\_format2(val1, val2)_ is successful | -| `...` | `...` | `...` | - -The difference between this and the previous two groups of macros is that instead of -a predicate, `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*` take a _predicate-formatter_ -(_pred\_formatn_), which is a function or functor with the signature: - -`::testing::AssertionResult PredicateFormattern(const char* `_expr1_`, const char* `_expr2_`, ... const char* `_exprn_`, T1 `_val1_`, T2 `_val2_`, ... Tn `_valn_`);` - -where _val1_, _val2_, ..., and _valn_ are the values of the predicate -arguments, and _expr1_, _expr2_, ..., and _exprn_ are the corresponding -expressions as they appear in the source code. The types `T1`, `T2`, ..., and -`Tn` can be either value types or reference types. For example, if an -argument has type `Foo`, you can declare it as either `Foo` or `const Foo&`, -whichever is appropriate. - -A predicate-formatter returns a `::testing::AssertionResult` object to indicate -whether the assertion has succeeded or not. The only way to create such an -object is to call one of these factory functions: - -As an example, let's improve the failure message in the previous example, which uses `EXPECT_PRED2()`: - -``` -// Returns the smallest prime common divisor of m and n, -// or 1 when m and n are mutually prime. -int SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(int m, int n) { ... } - -// A predicate-formatter for asserting that two integers are mutually prime. -::testing::AssertionResult AssertMutuallyPrime(const char* m_expr, - const char* n_expr, - int m, - int n) { - if (MutuallyPrime(m, n)) - return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); - - return ::testing::AssertionFailure() - << m_expr << " and " << n_expr << " (" << m << " and " << n - << ") are not mutually prime, " << "as they have a common divisor " - << SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(m, n); -} -``` - -With this predicate-formatter, we can use - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(AssertMutuallyPrime, b, c); -``` - -to generate the message - -<pre> -b and c (4 and 10) are not mutually prime, as they have a common divisor 2.<br> -</pre> - -As you may have realized, many of the assertions we introduced earlier are -special cases of `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. In fact, most of them are -indeed defined using `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -## Floating-Point Comparison ## - -Comparing floating-point numbers is tricky. Due to round-off errors, it is -very unlikely that two floating-points will match exactly. Therefore, -`ASSERT_EQ` 's naive comparison usually doesn't work. And since floating-points -can have a wide value range, no single fixed error bound works. It's better to -compare by a fixed relative error bound, except for values close to 0 due to -the loss of precision there. - -In general, for floating-point comparison to make sense, the user needs to -carefully choose the error bound. If they don't want or care to, comparing in -terms of Units in the Last Place (ULPs) is a good default, and Google Test -provides assertions to do this. Full details about ULPs are quite long; if you -want to learn more, see -[this article on float comparison](http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/comparingfloats/comparingfloats.htm). - -### Floating-Point Macros ### - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | `EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | the two `float` values are almost equal | -| `ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | `EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(`_expected, actual_`);` | the two `double` values are almost equal | - -By "almost equal", we mean the two values are within 4 ULP's from each -other. - -The following assertions allow you to choose the acceptable error bound: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NEAR(`_val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | `EXPECT_NEAR`_(val1, val2, abs\_error_`);` | the difference between _val1_ and _val2_ doesn't exceed the given absolute error | - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Floating-Point Predicate-Format Functions ### - -Some floating-point operations are useful, but not that often used. In order -to avoid an explosion of new macros, we provide them as predicate-format -functions that can be used in predicate assertion macros (e.g. -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2`, etc). - -``` -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::FloatLE, val1, val2); -EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::DoubleLE, val1, val2); -``` - -Verifies that _val1_ is less than, or almost equal to, _val2_. You can -replace `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2` in the above table with `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Windows HRESULT assertions ## - -These assertions test for `HRESULT` success or failure. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a success `HRESULT` | -| `ASSERT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_FAILED(`_expression_`);` | _expression_ is a failure `HRESULT` | - -The generated output contains the human-readable error message -associated with the `HRESULT` code returned by _expression_. - -You might use them like this: - -``` -CComPtr shell; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell.CoCreateInstance(L"Shell.Application")); -CComVariant empty; -ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell->ShellExecute(CComBSTR(url), empty, empty, empty, empty)); -``` - -_Availability_: Windows. - -## Type Assertions ## - -You can call the function -``` -::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>(); -``` -to assert that types `T1` and `T2` are the same. The function does -nothing if the assertion is satisfied. If the types are different, -the function call will fail to compile, and the compiler error message -will likely (depending on the compiler) show you the actual values of -`T1` and `T2`. This is mainly useful inside template code. - -_Caveat:_ When used inside a member function of a class template or a -function template, `StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>()` is effective _only if_ -the function is instantiated. For example, given: -``` -template <typename T> class Foo { - public: - void Bar() { ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<int, T>(); } -}; -``` -the code: -``` -void Test1() { Foo<bool> foo; } -``` -will _not_ generate a compiler error, as `Foo<bool>::Bar()` is never -actually instantiated. Instead, you need: -``` -void Test2() { Foo<bool> foo; foo.Bar(); } -``` -to cause a compiler error. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Assertion Placement ## - -You can use assertions in any C++ function. In particular, it doesn't -have to be a method of the test fixture class. The one constraint is -that assertions that generate a fatal failure (`FAIL*` and `ASSERT_*`) -can only be used in void-returning functions. This is a consequence of -Google Test not using exceptions. By placing it in a non-void function -you'll get a confusing compile error like -`"error: void value not ignored as it ought to be"`. - -If you need to use assertions in a function that returns non-void, one option -is to make the function return the value in an out parameter instead. For -example, you can rewrite `T2 Foo(T1 x)` to `void Foo(T1 x, T2* result)`. You -need to make sure that `*result` contains some sensible value even when the -function returns prematurely. As the function now returns `void`, you can use -any assertion inside of it. - -If changing the function's type is not an option, you should just use -assertions that generate non-fatal failures, such as `ADD_FAILURE*` and -`EXPECT_*`. - -_Note_: Constructors and destructors are not considered void-returning -functions, according to the C++ language specification, and so you may not use -fatal assertions in them. You'll get a compilation error if you try. A simple -workaround is to transfer the entire body of the constructor or destructor to a -private void-returning method. However, you should be aware that a fatal -assertion failure in a constructor does not terminate the current test, as your -intuition might suggest; it merely returns from the constructor early, possibly -leaving your object in a partially-constructed state. Likewise, a fatal -assertion failure in a destructor may leave your object in a -partially-destructed state. Use assertions carefully in these situations! - -# Teaching Google Test How to Print Your Values # - -When a test assertion such as `EXPECT_EQ` fails, Google Test prints the -argument values to help you debug. It does this using a -user-extensible value printer. - -This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL -containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other -types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the -user can figure it out. - -As mentioned earlier, the printer is _extensible_. That means -you can teach it to do a better job at printing your particular type -than to dump the bytes. To do that, define `<<` for your type: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Bar { ... }; // We want Google Test to be able to print instances of this. - -// It's important that the << operator is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Bar& bar) { - return os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -Sometimes, this might not be an option: your team may consider it bad -style to have a `<<` operator for `Bar`, or `Bar` may already have a -`<<` operator that doesn't do what you want (and you cannot change -it). If so, you can instead define a `PrintTo()` function like this: - -``` -#include <iostream> - -namespace foo { - -class Bar { ... }; - -// It's important that PrintTo() is defined in the SAME -// namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely on that. -void PrintTo(const Bar& bar, ::std::ostream* os) { - *os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os -} - -} // namespace foo -``` - -If you have defined both `<<` and `PrintTo()`, the latter will be used -when Google Test is concerned. This allows you to customize how the value -appears in Google Test's output without affecting code that relies on the -behavior of its `<<` operator. - -If you want to print a value `x` using Google Test's value printer -yourself, just call `::testing::PrintToString(`_x_`)`, which -returns an `std::string`: - -``` -vector<pair<Bar, int> > bar_ints = GetBarIntVector(); - -EXPECT_TRUE(IsCorrectBarIntVector(bar_ints)) - << "bar_ints = " << ::testing::PrintToString(bar_ints); -``` - -# Death Tests # - -In many applications, there are assertions that can cause application failure -if a condition is not met. These sanity checks, which ensure that the program -is in a known good state, are there to fail at the earliest possible time after -some program state is corrupted. If the assertion checks the wrong condition, -then the program may proceed in an erroneous state, which could lead to memory -corruption, security holes, or worse. Hence it is vitally important to test -that such assertion statements work as expected. - -Since these precondition checks cause the processes to die, we call such tests -_death tests_. More generally, any test that checks that a program terminates -(except by throwing an exception) in an expected fashion is also a death test. - -Note that if a piece of code throws an exception, we don't consider it "death" -for the purpose of death tests, as the caller of the code could catch the exception -and avoid the crash. If you want to verify exceptions thrown by your code, -see [Exception Assertions](#exception-assertions). - -If you want to test `EXPECT_*()/ASSERT_*()` failures in your test code, see [Catching Failures](#catching-failures). - -## How to Write a Death Test ## - -Google Test has the following macros to support death tests: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`); | `EXPECT_DEATH(`_statement, regex_`); | _statement_ crashes with the given error | -| `ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`); | `EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(`_statement, regex_`); | if death tests are supported, verifies that _statement_ crashes with the given error; otherwise verifies nothing | -| `ASSERT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`); | `EXPECT_EXIT(`_statement, predicate, regex_`); |_statement_ exits with the given error and its exit code matches _predicate_ | - -where _statement_ is a statement that is expected to cause the process to -die, _predicate_ is a function or function object that evaluates an integer -exit status, and _regex_ is a regular expression that the stderr output of -_statement_ is expected to match. Note that _statement_ can be _any valid -statement_ (including _compound statement_) and doesn't have to be an -expression. - -As usual, the `ASSERT` variants abort the current test function, while the -`EXPECT` variants do not. - -**Note:** We use the word "crash" here to mean that the process -terminates with a _non-zero_ exit status code. There are two -possibilities: either the process has called `exit()` or `_exit()` -with a non-zero value, or it may be killed by a signal. - -This means that if _statement_ terminates the process with a 0 exit -code, it is _not_ considered a crash by `EXPECT_DEATH`. Use -`EXPECT_EXIT` instead if this is the case, or if you want to restrict -the exit code more precisely. - -A predicate here must accept an `int` and return a `bool`. The death test -succeeds only if the predicate returns `true`. Google Test defines a few -predicates that handle the most common cases: - -``` -::testing::ExitedWithCode(exit_code) -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program exited normally with the given exit -code. - -``` -::testing::KilledBySignal(signal_number) // Not available on Windows. -``` - -This expression is `true` if the program was killed by the given signal. - -The `*_DEATH` macros are convenient wrappers for `*_EXIT` that use a predicate -that verifies the process' exit code is non-zero. - -Note that a death test only cares about three things: - - 1. does _statement_ abort or exit the process? - 1. (in the case of `ASSERT_EXIT` and `EXPECT_EXIT`) does the exit status satisfy _predicate_? Or (in the case of `ASSERT_DEATH` and `EXPECT_DEATH`) is the exit status non-zero? And - 1. does the stderr output match _regex_? - -In particular, if _statement_ generates an `ASSERT_*` or `EXPECT_*` failure, it will **not** cause the death test to fail, as Google Test assertions don't abort the process. - -To write a death test, simply use one of the above macros inside your test -function. For example, - -``` -TEST(MyDeathTest, Foo) { - // This death test uses a compound statement. - ASSERT_DEATH({ int n = 5; Foo(&n); }, "Error on line .* of Foo()"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, NormalExit) { - EXPECT_EXIT(NormalExit(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success"); -} -TEST(MyDeathTest, KillMyself) { - EXPECT_EXIT(KillMyself(), ::testing::KilledBySignal(SIGKILL), "Sending myself unblockable signal"); -} -``` - -verifies that: - - * calling `Foo(5)` causes the process to die with the given error message, - * calling `NormalExit()` causes the process to print `"Success"` to stderr and exit with exit code 0, and - * calling `KillMyself()` kills the process with signal `SIGKILL`. - -The test function body may contain other assertions and statements as well, if -necessary. - -_Important:_ We strongly recommend you to follow the convention of naming your -test case (not test) `*DeathTest` when it contains a death test, as -demonstrated in the above example. The `Death Tests And Threads` section below -explains why. - -If a test fixture class is shared by normal tests and death tests, you -can use typedef to introduce an alias for the fixture class and avoid -duplicating its code: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { - // normal test -} - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, DoesThat) { - // death test -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Cygwin, and Mac (the latter three are supported since v1.3.0). `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED` are new in v1.4.0. - -## Regular Expression Syntax ## - -On POSIX systems (e.g. Linux, Cygwin, and Mac), Google Test uses the -[POSIX extended regular expression](http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html#tag_09_04) -syntax in death tests. To learn about this syntax, you may want to read this [Wikipedia entry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). - -On Windows, Google Test uses its own simple regular expression -implementation. It lacks many features you can find in POSIX extended -regular expressions. For example, we don't support union (`"x|y"`), -grouping (`"(xy)"`), brackets (`"[xy]"`), and repetition count -(`"x{5,7}"`), among others. Below is what we do support (Letter `A` denotes a -literal character, period (`.`), or a single `\\` escape sequence; `x` -and `y` denote regular expressions.): - -| `c` | matches any literal character `c` | -|:----|:----------------------------------| -| `\\d` | matches any decimal digit | -| `\\D` | matches any character that's not a decimal digit | -| `\\f` | matches `\f` | -| `\\n` | matches `\n` | -| `\\r` | matches `\r` | -| `\\s` | matches any ASCII whitespace, including `\n` | -| `\\S` | matches any character that's not a whitespace | -| `\\t` | matches `\t` | -| `\\v` | matches `\v` | -| `\\w` | matches any letter, `_`, or decimal digit | -| `\\W` | matches any character that `\\w` doesn't match | -| `\\c` | matches any literal character `c`, which must be a punctuation | -| `\\.` | matches the `.` character | -| `.` | matches any single character except `\n` | -| `A?` | matches 0 or 1 occurrences of `A` | -| `A*` | matches 0 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `A+` | matches 1 or many occurrences of `A` | -| `^` | matches the beginning of a string (not that of each line) | -| `$` | matches the end of a string (not that of each line) | -| `xy` | matches `x` followed by `y` | - -To help you determine which capability is available on your system, -Google Test defines macro `GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE=1` when it uses POSIX -extended regular expressions, or `GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE=1` when it uses -the simple version. If you want your death tests to work in both -cases, you can either `#if` on these macros or use the more limited -syntax only. - -## How It Works ## - -Under the hood, `ASSERT_EXIT()` spawns a new process and executes the -death test statement in that process. The details of of how precisely -that happens depend on the platform and the variable -`::testing::GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style)` (which is initialized from the -command-line flag `--gtest_death_test_style`). - - * On POSIX systems, `fork()` (or `clone()` on Linux) is used to spawn the child, after which: - * If the variable's value is `"fast"`, the death test statement is immediately executed. - * If the variable's value is `"threadsafe"`, the child process re-executes the unit test binary just as it was originally invoked, but with some extra flags to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run. - * On Windows, the child is spawned using the `CreateProcess()` API, and re-executes the binary to cause just the single death test under consideration to be run - much like the `threadsafe` mode on POSIX. - -Other values for the variable are illegal and will cause the death test to -fail. Currently, the flag's default value is `"fast"`. However, we reserve the -right to change it in the future. Therefore, your tests should not depend on -this. - -In either case, the parent process waits for the child process to complete, and checks that - - 1. the child's exit status satisfies the predicate, and - 1. the child's stderr matches the regular expression. - -If the death test statement runs to completion without dying, the child -process will nonetheless terminate, and the assertion fails. - -## Death Tests And Threads ## - -The reason for the two death test styles has to do with thread safety. Due to -well-known problems with forking in the presence of threads, death tests should -be run in a single-threaded context. Sometimes, however, it isn't feasible to -arrange that kind of environment. For example, statically-initialized modules -may start threads before main is ever reached. Once threads have been created, -it may be difficult or impossible to clean them up. - -Google Test has three features intended to raise awareness of threading issues. - - 1. A warning is emitted if multiple threads are running when a death test is encountered. - 1. Test cases with a name ending in "DeathTest" are run before all other tests. - 1. It uses `clone()` instead of `fork()` to spawn the child process on Linux (`clone()` is not available on Cygwin and Mac), as `fork()` is more likely to cause the child to hang when the parent process has multiple threads. - -It's perfectly fine to create threads inside a death test statement; they are -executed in a separate process and cannot affect the parent. - -## Death Test Styles ## - -The "threadsafe" death test style was introduced in order to help mitigate the -risks of testing in a possibly multithreaded environment. It trades increased -test execution time (potentially dramatically so) for improved thread safety. -We suggest using the faster, default "fast" style unless your test has specific -problems with it. - -You can choose a particular style of death tests by setting the flag -programmatically: - -``` -::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; -``` - -You can do this in `main()` to set the style for all death tests in the -binary, or in individual tests. Recall that flags are saved before running each -test and restored afterwards, so you need not do that yourself. For example: - -``` -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestOne) { - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; - // This test is run in the "threadsafe" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -TEST(MyDeathTest, TestTwo) { - // This test is run in the "fast" style: - ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); -} - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "fast"; - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Caveats ## - -The _statement_ argument of `ASSERT_EXIT()` can be any valid C++ statement. -If it leaves the current function via a `return` statement or by throwing an exception, -the death test is considered to have failed. Some Google Test macros may return -from the current function (e.g. `ASSERT_TRUE()`), so be sure to avoid them in _statement_. - -Since _statement_ runs in the child process, any in-memory side effect (e.g. -modifying a variable, releasing memory, etc) it causes will _not_ be observable -in the parent process. In particular, if you release memory in a death test, -your program will fail the heap check as the parent process will never see the -memory reclaimed. To solve this problem, you can - - 1. try not to free memory in a death test; - 1. free the memory again in the parent process; or - 1. do not use the heap checker in your program. - -Due to an implementation detail, you cannot place multiple death test -assertions on the same line; otherwise, compilation will fail with an unobvious -error message. - -Despite the improved thread safety afforded by the "threadsafe" style of death -test, thread problems such as deadlock are still possible in the presence of -handlers registered with `pthread_atfork(3)`. - -# Using Assertions in Sub-routines # - -## Adding Traces to Assertions ## - -If a test sub-routine is called from several places, when an assertion -inside it fails, it can be hard to tell which invocation of the -sub-routine the failure is from. You can alleviate this problem using -extra logging or custom failure messages, but that usually clutters up -your tests. A better solution is to use the `SCOPED_TRACE` macro: - -| `SCOPED_TRACE(`_message_`);` | -|:-----------------------------| - -where _message_ can be anything streamable to `std::ostream`. This -macro will cause the current file name, line number, and the given -message to be added in every failure message. The effect will be -undone when the control leaves the current lexical scope. - -For example, - -``` -10: void Sub1(int n) { -11: EXPECT_EQ(1, Bar(n)); -12: EXPECT_EQ(2, Bar(n + 1)); -13: } -14: -15: TEST(FooTest, Bar) { -16: { -17: SCOPED_TRACE("A"); // This trace point will be included in -18: // every failure in this scope. -19: Sub1(1); -20: } -21: // Now it won't. -22: Sub1(9); -23: } -``` - -could result in messages like these: - -``` -path/to/foo_test.cc:11: Failure -Value of: Bar(n) -Expected: 1 - Actual: 2 - Trace: -path/to/foo_test.cc:17: A - -path/to/foo_test.cc:12: Failure -Value of: Bar(n + 1) -Expected: 2 - Actual: 3 -``` - -Without the trace, it would've been difficult to know which invocation -of `Sub1()` the two failures come from respectively. (You could add an -extra message to each assertion in `Sub1()` to indicate the value of -`n`, but that's tedious.) - -Some tips on using `SCOPED_TRACE`: - - 1. With a suitable message, it's often enough to use `SCOPED_TRACE` at the beginning of a sub-routine, instead of at each call site. - 1. When calling sub-routines inside a loop, make the loop iterator part of the message in `SCOPED_TRACE` such that you can know which iteration the failure is from. - 1. Sometimes the line number of the trace point is enough for identifying the particular invocation of a sub-routine. In this case, you don't have to choose a unique message for `SCOPED_TRACE`. You can simply use `""`. - 1. You can use `SCOPED_TRACE` in an inner scope when there is one in the outer scope. In this case, all active trace points will be included in the failure messages, in reverse order they are encountered. - 1. The trace dump is clickable in Emacs' compilation buffer - hit return on a line number and you'll be taken to that line in the source file! - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Propagating Fatal Failures ## - -A common pitfall when using `ASSERT_*` and `FAIL*` is not understanding that -when they fail they only abort the _current function_, not the entire test. For -example, the following test will segfault: -``` -void Subroutine() { - // Generates a fatal failure and aborts the current function. - ASSERT_EQ(1, 2); - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} - -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // The intended behavior is for the fatal failure - // in Subroutine() to abort the entire test. - // The actual behavior: the function goes on after Subroutine() returns. - int* p = NULL; - *p = 3; // Segfault! -} -``` - -Since we don't use exceptions, it is technically impossible to -implement the intended behavior here. To alleviate this, Google Test -provides two solutions. You could use either the -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_NO_FATAL_FAILURE` assertions or the -`HasFatalFailure()` function. They are described in the following two -subsections. - -### Asserting on Subroutines ### - -As shown above, if your test calls a subroutine that has an `ASSERT_*` -failure in it, the test will continue after the subroutine -returns. This may not be what you want. - -Often people want fatal failures to propagate like exceptions. For -that Google Test offers the following macros: - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | `EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement_`);` | _statement_ doesn't generate any new fatal failures in the current thread. | - -Only failures in the thread that executes the assertion are checked to -determine the result of this type of assertions. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads are ignored. - -Examples: - -``` -ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(Foo()); - -int i; -EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE({ - i = Bar(); -}); -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. Assertions from multiple threads -are currently not supported. - -### Checking for Failures in the Current Test ### - -`HasFatalFailure()` in the `::testing::Test` class returns `true` if an -assertion in the current test has suffered a fatal failure. This -allows functions to catch fatal failures in a sub-routine and return -early. - -``` -class Test { - public: - ... - static bool HasFatalFailure(); -}; -``` - -The typical usage, which basically simulates the behavior of a thrown -exception, is: - -``` -TEST(FooTest, Bar) { - Subroutine(); - // Aborts if Subroutine() had a fatal failure. - if (HasFatalFailure()) - return; - // The following won't be executed. - ... -} -``` - -If `HasFatalFailure()` is used outside of `TEST()` , `TEST_F()` , or a test -fixture, you must add the `::testing::Test::` prefix, as in: - -``` -if (::testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) - return; -``` - -Similarly, `HasNonfatalFailure()` returns `true` if the current test -has at least one non-fatal failure, and `HasFailure()` returns `true` -if the current test has at least one failure of either kind. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. `HasNonfatalFailure()` and -`HasFailure()` are available since version 1.4.0. - -# Logging Additional Information # - -In your test code, you can call `RecordProperty("key", value)` to log -additional information, where `value` can be either a string or an `int`. The _last_ value recorded for a key will be emitted to the XML output -if you specify one. For example, the test - -``` -TEST_F(WidgetUsageTest, MinAndMaxWidgets) { - RecordProperty("MaximumWidgets", ComputeMaxUsage()); - RecordProperty("MinimumWidgets", ComputeMinUsage()); -} -``` - -will output XML like this: - -``` -... - <testcase name="MinAndMaxWidgets" status="run" time="6" classname="WidgetUsageTest" - MaximumWidgets="12" - MinimumWidgets="9" /> -... -``` - -_Note_: - * `RecordProperty()` is a static member of the `Test` class. Therefore it needs to be prefixed with `::testing::Test::` if used outside of the `TEST` body and the test fixture class. - * `key` must be a valid XML attribute name, and cannot conflict with the ones already used by Google Test (`name`, `status`, `time`, `classname`, `type_param`, and `value_param`). - * Calling `RecordProperty()` outside of the lifespan of a test is allowed. If it's called outside of a test but between a test case's `SetUpTestCase()` and `TearDownTestCase()` methods, it will be attributed to the XML element for the test case. If it's called outside of all test cases (e.g. in a test environment), it will be attributed to the top-level XML element. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Sharing Resources Between Tests in the Same Test Case # - - - -Google Test creates a new test fixture object for each test in order to make -tests independent and easier to debug. However, sometimes tests use resources -that are expensive to set up, making the one-copy-per-test model prohibitively -expensive. - -If the tests don't change the resource, there's no harm in them sharing a -single resource copy. So, in addition to per-test set-up/tear-down, Google Test -also supports per-test-case set-up/tear-down. To use it: - - 1. In your test fixture class (say `FooTest` ), define as `static` some member variables to hold the shared resources. - 1. In the same test fixture class, define a `static void SetUpTestCase()` function (remember not to spell it as **`SetupTestCase`** with a small `u`!) to set up the shared resources and a `static void TearDownTestCase()` function to tear them down. - -That's it! Google Test automatically calls `SetUpTestCase()` before running the -_first test_ in the `FooTest` test case (i.e. before creating the first -`FooTest` object), and calls `TearDownTestCase()` after running the _last test_ -in it (i.e. after deleting the last `FooTest` object). In between, the tests -can use the shared resources. - -Remember that the test order is undefined, so your code can't depend on a test -preceding or following another. Also, the tests must either not modify the -state of any shared resource, or, if they do modify the state, they must -restore the state to its original value before passing control to the next -test. - -Here's an example of per-test-case set-up and tear-down: -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // Per-test-case set-up. - // Called before the first test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void SetUpTestCase() { - shared_resource_ = new ...; - } - - // Per-test-case tear-down. - // Called after the last test in this test case. - // Can be omitted if not needed. - static void TearDownTestCase() { - delete shared_resource_; - shared_resource_ = NULL; - } - - // You can define per-test set-up and tear-down logic as usual. - virtual void SetUp() { ... } - virtual void TearDown() { ... } - - // Some expensive resource shared by all tests. - static T* shared_resource_; -}; - -T* FooTest::shared_resource_ = NULL; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - ... you can refer to shared_resource here ... -} -``` - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Global Set-Up and Tear-Down # - -Just as you can do set-up and tear-down at the test level and the test case -level, you can also do it at the test program level. Here's how. - -First, you subclass the `::testing::Environment` class to define a test -environment, which knows how to set-up and tear-down: - -``` -class Environment { - public: - virtual ~Environment() {} - // Override this to define how to set up the environment. - virtual void SetUp() {} - // Override this to define how to tear down the environment. - virtual void TearDown() {} -}; -``` - -Then, you register an instance of your environment class with Google Test by -calling the `::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` function: - -``` -Environment* AddGlobalTestEnvironment(Environment* env); -``` - -Now, when `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is called, it first calls the `SetUp()` method of -the environment object, then runs the tests if there was no fatal failures, and -finally calls `TearDown()` of the environment object. - -It's OK to register multiple environment objects. In this case, their `SetUp()` -will be called in the order they are registered, and their `TearDown()` will be -called in the reverse order. - -Note that Google Test takes ownership of the registered environment objects. -Therefore **do not delete them** by yourself. - -You should call `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` before `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is -called, probably in `main()`. If you use `gtest_main`, you need to call -this before `main()` starts for it to take effect. One way to do this is to -define a global variable like this: - -``` -::testing::Environment* const foo_env = ::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); -``` - -However, we strongly recommend you to write your own `main()` and call -`AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` there, as relying on initialization of global -variables makes the code harder to read and may cause problems when you -register multiple environments from different translation units and the -environments have dependencies among them (remember that the compiler doesn't -guarantee the order in which global variables from different translation units -are initialized). - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - - -# Value Parameterized Tests # - -_Value-parameterized tests_ allow you to test your code with different -parameters without writing multiple copies of the same test. - -Suppose you write a test for your code and then realize that your code is affected by a presence of a Boolean command line flag. - -``` -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFoo) { - // A code to test foo(). -} -``` - -Usually people factor their test code into a function with a Boolean parameter in such situations. The function sets the flag, then executes the testing code. - -``` -void TestFooHelper(bool flag_value) { - flag = flag_value; - // A code to test foo(). -} - -TEST(MyCodeTest, TestFoo) { - TestFooHelper(false); - TestFooHelper(true); -} -``` - -But this setup has serious drawbacks. First, when a test assertion fails in your tests, it becomes unclear what value of the parameter caused it to fail. You can stream a clarifying message into your `EXPECT`/`ASSERT` statements, but it you'll have to do it with all of them. Second, you have to add one such helper function per test. What if you have ten tests? Twenty? A hundred? - -Value-parameterized tests will let you write your test only once and then easily instantiate and run it with an arbitrary number of parameter values. - -Here are some other situations when value-parameterized tests come handy: - - * You want to test different implementations of an OO interface. - * You want to test your code over various inputs (a.k.a. data-driven testing). This feature is easy to abuse, so please exercise your good sense when doing it! - -## How to Write Value-Parameterized Tests ## - -To write value-parameterized tests, first you should define a fixture -class. It must be derived from both `::testing::Test` and -`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>` (the latter is a pure interface), -where `T` is the type of your parameter values. For convenience, you -can just derive the fixture class from `::testing::TestWithParam<T>`, -which itself is derived from both `::testing::Test` and -`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>`. `T` can be any copyable type. If -it's a raw pointer, you are responsible for managing the lifespan of -the pointed values. - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char*> { - // You can implement all the usual fixture class members here. - // To access the test parameter, call GetParam() from class - // TestWithParam<T>. -}; - -// Or, when you want to add parameters to a pre-existing fixture class: -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -class BarTest : public BaseTest, - public ::testing::WithParamInterface<const char*> { - ... -}; -``` - -Then, use the `TEST_P` macro to define as many test patterns using -this fixture as you want. The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or -"pattern", whichever you prefer to think. - -``` -TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, access the test parameter with the GetParam() method - // of the TestWithParam<T> class: - EXPECT_TRUE(foo.Blah(GetParam())); - ... -} - -TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { - ... -} -``` - -Finally, you can use `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` to instantiate the test -case with any set of parameters you want. Google Test defines a number of -functions for generating test parameters. They return what we call -(surprise!) _parameter generators_. Here is a summary of them, -which are all in the `testing` namespace: - -| `Range(begin, end[, step])` | Yields values `{begin, begin+step, begin+step+step, ...}`. The values do not include `end`. `step` defaults to 1. | -|:----------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `Values(v1, v2, ..., vN)` | Yields values `{v1, v2, ..., vN}`. | -| `ValuesIn(container)` and `ValuesIn(begin, end)` | Yields values from a C-style array, an STL-style container, or an iterator range `[begin, end)`. `container`, `begin`, and `end` can be expressions whose values are determined at run time. | -| `Bool()` | Yields sequence `{false, true}`. | -| `Combine(g1, g2, ..., gN)` | Yields all combinations (the Cartesian product for the math savvy) of the values generated by the `N` generators. This is only available if your system provides the `<tr1/tuple>` header. If you are sure your system does, and Google Test disagrees, you can override it by defining `GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE=1`. See comments in [include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h](../include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h) for more information. | - -For more details, see the comments at the definitions of these functions in the [source code](../include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h). - -The following statement will instantiate tests from the `FooTest` test case -each with parameter values `"meeny"`, `"miny"`, and `"moe"`. - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(InstantiationName, - FooTest, - ::testing::Values("meeny", "miny", "moe")); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern (yes, you can -instantiate it more than once), the first argument to -`INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` is a prefix that will be added to the actual -test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes for different -instantiations. The tests from the instantiation above will have these -names: - - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/2` for `"moe"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"meeny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"miny"` - * `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/2` for `"moe"` - -You can use these names in [--gtest\_filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests). - -This statement will instantiate all tests from `FooTest` again, each -with parameter values `"cat"` and `"dog"`: - -``` -const char* pets[] = {"cat", "dog"}; -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AnotherInstantiationName, FooTest, - ::testing::ValuesIn(pets)); -``` - -The tests from the instantiation above will have these names: - - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"dog"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"cat"` - * `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"dog"` - -Please note that `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` will instantiate _all_ -tests in the given test case, whether their definitions come before or -_after_ the `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` statement. - -You can see -[these](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) -[files](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) for more examples. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; since version 1.2.0. - -## Creating Value-Parameterized Abstract Tests ## - -In the above, we define and instantiate `FooTest` in the same source -file. Sometimes you may want to define value-parameterized tests in a -library and let other people instantiate them later. This pattern is -known as <i>abstract tests</i>. As an example of its application, when you -are designing an interface you can write a standard suite of abstract -tests (perhaps using a factory function as the test parameter) that -all implementations of the interface are expected to pass. When -someone implements the interface, he can instantiate your suite to get -all the interface-conformance tests for free. - -To define abstract tests, you should organize your code like this: - - 1. Put the definition of the parameterized test fixture class (e.g. `FooTest`) in a header file, say `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _declaring_ your abstract tests. - 1. Put the `TEST_P` definitions in `foo_param_test.cc`, which includes `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as _implementing_ your abstract tests. - -Once they are defined, you can instantiate them by including -`foo_param_test.h`, invoking `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()`, and linking -with `foo_param_test.cc`. You can instantiate the same abstract test -case multiple times, possibly in different source files. - -# Typed Tests # - -Suppose you have multiple implementations of the same interface and -want to make sure that all of them satisfy some common requirements. -Or, you may have defined several types that are supposed to conform to -the same "concept" and you want to verify it. In both cases, you want -the same test logic repeated for different types. - -While you can write one `TEST` or `TEST_F` for each type you want to -test (and you may even factor the test logic into a function template -that you invoke from the `TEST`), it's tedious and doesn't scale: -if you want _m_ tests over _n_ types, you'll end up writing _m\*n_ -`TEST`s. - -_Typed tests_ allow you to repeat the same test logic over a list of -types. You only need to write the test logic once, although you must -know the type list when writing typed tests. Here's how you do it: - -First, define a fixture class template. It should be parameterized -by a type. Remember to derive it from `::testing::Test`: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - public: - ... - typedef std::list<T> List; - static T shared_; - T value_; -}; -``` - -Next, associate a list of types with the test case, which will be -repeated for each type in the list: - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -TYPED_TEST_CASE(FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -The `typedef` is necessary for the `TYPED_TEST_CASE` macro to parse -correctly. Otherwise the compiler will think that each comma in the -type list introduces a new macro argument. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST()` instead of `TEST_F()` to define a typed test -for this test case. You can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to the special name TypeParam to get the type - // parameter. Since we are inside a derived class template, C++ requires - // us to visit the members of FooTest via 'this'. - TypeParam n = this->value_; - - // To visit static members of the fixture, add the 'TestFixture::' - // prefix. - n += TestFixture::shared_; - - // To refer to typedefs in the fixture, add the 'typename TestFixture::' - // prefix. The 'typename' is required to satisfy the compiler. - typename TestFixture::List values; - values.push_back(n); - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Type-Parameterized Tests # - -_Type-parameterized tests_ are like typed tests, except that they -don't require you to know the list of types ahead of time. Instead, -you can define the test logic first and instantiate it with different -type lists later. You can even instantiate it more than once in the -same program. - -If you are designing an interface or concept, you can define a suite -of type-parameterized tests to verify properties that any valid -implementation of the interface/concept should have. Then, the author -of each implementation can just instantiate the test suite with his -type to verify that it conforms to the requirements, without having to -write similar tests repeatedly. Here's an example: - -First, define a fixture class template, as we did with typed tests: - -``` -template <typename T> -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - ... -}; -``` - -Next, declare that you will define a type-parameterized test case: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest); -``` - -The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern", whichever you -prefer to think. - -Then, use `TYPED_TEST_P()` to define a type-parameterized test. You -can repeat this as many times as you want: - -``` -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { - // Inside a test, refer to TypeParam to get the type parameter. - TypeParam n = 0; - ... -} - -TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } -``` - -Now the tricky part: you need to register all test patterns using the -`REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro before you can instantiate them. -The first argument of the macro is the test case name; the rest are -the names of the tests in this test case: - -``` -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest, - DoesBlah, HasPropertyA); -``` - -Finally, you are free to instantiate the pattern with the types you -want. If you put the above code in a header file, you can `#include` -it in multiple C++ source files and instantiate it multiple times. - -``` -typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, MyTypes); -``` - -To distinguish different instances of the pattern, the first argument -to the `INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro is a prefix that will be -added to the actual test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes -for different instances. - -In the special case where the type list contains only one type, you -can write that type directly without `::testing::Types<...>`, like this: - -``` -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, int); -``` - -You can see `samples/sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac; -since version 1.1.0. - -# Testing Private Code # - -If you change your software's internal implementation, your tests should not -break as long as the change is not observable by users. Therefore, per the -_black-box testing principle_, most of the time you should test your code -through its public interfaces. - -If you still find yourself needing to test internal implementation code, -consider if there's a better design that wouldn't require you to do so. If you -absolutely have to test non-public interface code though, you can. There are -two cases to consider: - - * Static functions (_not_ the same as static member functions!) or unnamed namespaces, and - * Private or protected class members - -## Static Functions ## - -Both static functions and definitions/declarations in an unnamed namespace are -only visible within the same translation unit. To test them, you can `#include` -the entire `.cc` file being tested in your `*_test.cc` file. (`#include`ing `.cc` -files is not a good way to reuse code - you should not do this in production -code!) - -However, a better approach is to move the private code into the -`foo::internal` namespace, where `foo` is the namespace your project normally -uses, and put the private declarations in a `*-internal.h` file. Your -production `.cc` files and your tests are allowed to include this internal -header, but your clients are not. This way, you can fully test your internal -implementation without leaking it to your clients. - -## Private Class Members ## - -Private class members are only accessible from within the class or by friends. -To access a class' private members, you can declare your test fixture as a -friend to the class and define accessors in your fixture. Tests using the -fixture can then access the private members of your production class via the -accessors in the fixture. Note that even though your fixture is a friend to -your production class, your tests are not automatically friends to it, as they -are technically defined in sub-classes of the fixture. - -Another way to test private members is to refactor them into an implementation -class, which is then declared in a `*-internal.h` file. Your clients aren't -allowed to include this header but your tests can. Such is called the Pimpl -(Private Implementation) idiom. - -Or, you can declare an individual test as a friend of your class by adding this -line in the class body: - -``` -FRIEND_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName); -``` - -For example, -``` -// foo.h -#include "gtest/gtest_prod.h" - -// Defines FRIEND_TEST. -class Foo { - ... - private: - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull); - int Bar(void* x); -}; - -// foo_test.cc -... -TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull) { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_EQ(0, foo.Bar(NULL)); - // Uses Foo's private member Bar(). -} -``` - -Pay special attention when your class is defined in a namespace, as you should -define your test fixtures and tests in the same namespace if you want them to -be friends of your class. For example, if the code to be tested looks like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { - -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Bar); - FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Baz); - ... - definition of the class Foo - ... -}; - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -Your test code should be something like: - -``` -namespace my_namespace { -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -} // namespace my_namespace -``` - -# Catching Failures # - -If you are building a testing utility on top of Google Test, you'll -want to test your utility. What framework would you use to test it? -Google Test, of course. - -The challenge is to verify that your testing utility reports failures -correctly. In frameworks that report a failure by throwing an -exception, you could catch the exception and assert on it. But Google -Test doesn't use exceptions, so how do we test that a piece of code -generates an expected failure? - -`"gtest/gtest-spi.h"` contains some constructs to do this. After -`#include`ing this header, you can use - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:--------------------------------------------------| - -to assert that _statement_ generates a fatal (e.g. `ASSERT_*`) failure -whose message contains the given _substring_, or use - -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------| - -if you are expecting a non-fatal (e.g. `EXPECT_*`) failure. - -For technical reasons, there are some caveats: - - 1. You cannot stream a failure message to either macro. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot reference local non-static variables or non-static members of `this` object. - 1. _statement_ in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` cannot return a value. - -_Note:_ Google Test is designed with threads in mind. Once the -synchronization primitives in `"gtest/internal/gtest-port.h"` have -been implemented, Google Test will become thread-safe, meaning that -you can then use assertions in multiple threads concurrently. Before - -that, however, Google Test only supports single-threaded usage. Once -thread-safe, `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE()` and `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE()` -will capture failures in the current thread only. If _statement_ -creates new threads, failures in these threads will be ignored. If -you want to capture failures from all threads instead, you should use -the following macros: - -| `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | -|:-----------------------------------------------------------------| -| `EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(`_statement, substring_`);` | - -# Getting the Current Test's Name # - -Sometimes a function may need to know the name of the currently running test. -For example, you may be using the `SetUp()` method of your test fixture to set -the golden file name based on which test is running. The `::testing::TestInfo` -class has this information: - -``` -namespace testing { - -class TestInfo { - public: - // Returns the test case name and the test name, respectively. - // - // Do NOT delete or free the return value - it's managed by the - // TestInfo class. - const char* test_case_name() const; - const char* name() const; -}; - -} // namespace testing -``` - - -> To obtain a `TestInfo` object for the currently running test, call -`current_test_info()` on the `UnitTest` singleton object: - -``` -// Gets information about the currently running test. -// Do NOT delete the returned object - it's managed by the UnitTest class. -const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); -printf("We are in test %s of test case %s.\n", - test_info->name(), test_info->test_case_name()); -``` - -`current_test_info()` returns a null pointer if no test is running. In -particular, you cannot find the test case name in `TestCaseSetUp()`, -`TestCaseTearDown()` (where you know the test case name implicitly), or -functions called from them. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Extending Google Test by Handling Test Events # - -Google Test provides an <b>event listener API</b> to let you receive -notifications about the progress of a test program and test -failures. The events you can listen to include the start and end of -the test program, a test case, or a test method, among others. You may -use this API to augment or replace the standard console output, -replace the XML output, or provide a completely different form of -output, such as a GUI or a database. You can also use test events as -checkpoints to implement a resource leak checker, for example. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Defining Event Listeners ## - -To define a event listener, you subclass either -[testing::TestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L855) -or [testing::EmptyTestEventListener](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L905). -The former is an (abstract) interface, where <i>each pure virtual method<br> -can be overridden to handle a test event</i> (For example, when a test -starts, the `OnTestStart()` method will be called.). The latter provides -an empty implementation of all methods in the interface, such that a -subclass only needs to override the methods it cares about. - -When an event is fired, its context is passed to the handler function -as an argument. The following argument types are used: - * [UnitTest](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L1007) reflects the state of the entire test program, - * [TestCase](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L689) has information about a test case, which can contain one or more tests, - * [TestInfo](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L599) contains the state of a test, and - * [TestPartResult](../include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h#L42) represents the result of a test assertion. - -An event handler function can examine the argument it receives to find -out interesting information about the event and the test program's -state. Here's an example: - -``` - class MinimalistPrinter : public ::testing::EmptyTestEventListener { - // Called before a test starts. - virtual void OnTestStart(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s starting.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - - // Called after a failed assertion or a SUCCEED() invocation. - virtual void OnTestPartResult( - const ::testing::TestPartResult& test_part_result) { - printf("%s in %s:%d\n%s\n", - test_part_result.failed() ? "*** Failure" : "Success", - test_part_result.file_name(), - test_part_result.line_number(), - test_part_result.summary()); - } - - // Called after a test ends. - virtual void OnTestEnd(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { - printf("*** Test %s.%s ending.\n", - test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); - } - }; -``` - -## Using Event Listeners ## - -To use the event listener you have defined, add an instance of it to -the Google Test event listener list (represented by class -[TestEventListeners](../include/gtest/gtest.h#L929) -- note the "s" at the end of the name) in your -`main()` function, before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - // Gets hold of the event listener list. - ::testing::TestEventListeners& listeners = - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners(); - // Adds a listener to the end. Google Test takes the ownership. - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -There's only one problem: the default test result printer is still in -effect, so its output will mingle with the output from your minimalist -printer. To suppress the default printer, just release it from the -event listener list and delete it. You can do so by adding one line: -``` - ... - delete listeners.Release(listeners.default_result_printer()); - listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -Now, sit back and enjoy a completely different output from your -tests. For more details, you can read this -[sample](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc). - -You may append more than one listener to the list. When an `On*Start()` -or `OnTestPartResult()` event is fired, the listeners will receive it in -the order they appear in the list (since new listeners are added to -the end of the list, the default text printer and the default XML -generator will receive the event first). An `On*End()` event will be -received by the listeners in the _reverse_ order. This allows output by -listeners added later to be framed by output from listeners added -earlier. - -## Generating Failures in Listeners ## - -You may use failure-raising macros (`EXPECT_*()`, `ASSERT_*()`, -`FAIL()`, etc) when processing an event. There are some restrictions: - - 1. You cannot generate any failure in `OnTestPartResult()` (otherwise it will cause `OnTestPartResult()` to be called recursively). - 1. A listener that handles `OnTestPartResult()` is not allowed to generate any failure. - -When you add listeners to the listener list, you should put listeners -that handle `OnTestPartResult()` _before_ listeners that can generate -failures. This ensures that failures generated by the latter are -attributed to the right test by the former. - -We have a sample of failure-raising listener -[here](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc). - -# Running Test Programs: Advanced Options # - -Google Test test programs are ordinary executables. Once built, you can run -them directly and affect their behavior via the following environment variables -and/or command line flags. For the flags to work, your programs must call -`::testing::InitGoogleTest()` before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -To see a list of supported flags and their usage, please run your test -program with the `--help` flag. You can also use `-h`, `-?`, or `/?` -for short. This feature is added in version 1.3.0. - -If an option is specified both by an environment variable and by a -flag, the latter takes precedence. Most of the options can also be -set/read in code: to access the value of command line flag -`--gtest_foo`, write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(foo)`. A common pattern is -to set the value of a flag before calling `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` -to change the default value of the flag: -``` -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - // Disables elapsed time by default. - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; - - // This allows the user to override the flag on the command line. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -## Selecting Tests ## - -This section shows various options for choosing which tests to run. - -### Listing Test Names ### - -Sometimes it is necessary to list the available tests in a program before -running them so that a filter may be applied if needed. Including the flag -`--gtest_list_tests` overrides all other flags and lists tests in the following -format: -``` -TestCase1. - TestName1 - TestName2 -TestCase2. - TestName -``` - -None of the tests listed are actually run if the flag is provided. There is no -corresponding environment variable for this flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Running a Subset of the Tests ### - -By default, a Google Test program runs all tests the user has defined. -Sometimes, you want to run only a subset of the tests (e.g. for debugging or -quickly verifying a change). If you set the `GTEST_FILTER` environment variable -or the `--gtest_filter` flag to a filter string, Google Test will only run the -tests whose full names (in the form of `TestCaseName.TestName`) match the -filter. - -The format of a filter is a '`:`'-separated list of wildcard patterns (called -the positive patterns) optionally followed by a '`-`' and another -'`:`'-separated pattern list (called the negative patterns). A test matches the -filter if and only if it matches any of the positive patterns but does not -match any of the negative patterns. - -A pattern may contain `'*'` (matches any string) or `'?'` (matches any single -character). For convenience, the filter `'*-NegativePatterns'` can be also -written as `'-NegativePatterns'`. - -For example: - - * `./foo_test` Has no flag, and thus runs all its tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*` Also runs everything, due to the single match-everything `*` value. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*` Runs everything in test case `FooTest`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*Null*:*Constructor*` Runs any test whose full name contains either `"Null"` or `"Constructor"`. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=-*DeathTest.*` Runs all non-death tests. - * `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*-FooTest.Bar` Runs everything in test case `FooTest` except `FooTest.Bar`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Disabling Tests ### - -If you have a broken test that you cannot fix right away, you can add the -`DISABLED_` prefix to its name. This will exclude it from execution. This is -better than commenting out the code or using `#if 0`, as disabled tests are -still compiled (and thus won't rot). - -If you need to disable all tests in a test case, you can either add `DISABLED_` -to the front of the name of each test, or alternatively add it to the front of -the test case name. - -For example, the following tests won't be run by Google Test, even though they -will still be compiled: - -``` -// Tests that Foo does Abc. -TEST(FooTest, DISABLED_DoesAbc) { ... } - -class DISABLED_BarTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -// Tests that Bar does Xyz. -TEST_F(DISABLED_BarTest, DoesXyz) { ... } -``` - -_Note:_ This feature should only be used for temporary pain-relief. You still -have to fix the disabled tests at a later date. As a reminder, Google Test will -print a banner warning you if a test program contains any disabled tests. - -_Tip:_ You can easily count the number of disabled tests you have -using `grep`. This number can be used as a metric for improving your -test quality. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Temporarily Enabling Disabled Tests ### - -To include [disabled tests](#temporarily-disabling-tests) in test -execution, just invoke the test program with the -`--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests` flag or set the -`GTEST_ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS` environment variable to a value other -than `0`. You can combine this with the -[--gtest\_filter](#running-a-subset-of-the-tests) flag to further select -which disabled tests to run. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -## Repeating the Tests ## - -Once in a while you'll run into a test whose result is hit-or-miss. Perhaps it -will fail only 1% of the time, making it rather hard to reproduce the bug under -a debugger. This can be a major source of frustration. - -The `--gtest_repeat` flag allows you to repeat all (or selected) test methods -in a program many times. Hopefully, a flaky test will eventually fail and give -you a chance to debug. Here's how to use it: - -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times and don't stop at failures. | -|:---------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------| -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=-1` | A negative count means repeating forever. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure` | Repeat foo\_test 1000 times, stopping at the first failure. This is especially useful when running under a debugger: when the testfails, it will drop into the debugger and you can then inspect variables and stacks. | -| `$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_filter=FooBar` | Repeat the tests whose name matches the filter 1000 times. | - -If your test program contains global set-up/tear-down code registered -using `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()`, it will be repeated in each -iteration as well, as the flakiness may be in it. You can also specify -the repeat count by setting the `GTEST_REPEAT` environment variable. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Shuffling the Tests ## - -You can specify the `--gtest_shuffle` flag (or set the `GTEST_SHUFFLE` -environment variable to `1`) to run the tests in a program in a random -order. This helps to reveal bad dependencies between tests. - -By default, Google Test uses a random seed calculated from the current -time. Therefore you'll get a different order every time. The console -output includes the random seed value, such that you can reproduce an -order-related test failure later. To specify the random seed -explicitly, use the `--gtest_random_seed=SEED` flag (or set the -`GTEST_RANDOM_SEED` environment variable), where `SEED` is an integer -between 0 and 99999. The seed value 0 is special: it tells Google Test -to do the default behavior of calculating the seed from the current -time. - -If you combine this with `--gtest_repeat=N`, Google Test will pick a -different random seed and re-shuffle the tests in each iteration. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.4.0. - -## Controlling Test Output ## - -This section teaches how to tweak the way test results are reported. - -### Colored Terminal Output ### - -Google Test can use colors in its terminal output to make it easier to spot -the separation between tests, and whether tests passed. - -You can set the GTEST\_COLOR environment variable or set the `--gtest_color` -command line flag to `yes`, `no`, or `auto` (the default) to enable colors, -disable colors, or let Google Test decide. When the value is `auto`, Google -Test will use colors if and only if the output goes to a terminal and (on -non-Windows platforms) the `TERM` environment variable is set to `xterm` or -`xterm-color`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Suppressing the Elapsed Time ### - -By default, Google Test prints the time it takes to run each test. To -suppress that, run the test program with the `--gtest_print_time=0` -command line flag. Setting the `GTEST_PRINT_TIME` environment -variable to `0` has the same effect. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. (In Google Test 1.3.0 and lower, -the default behavior is that the elapsed time is **not** printed.) - -### Generating an XML Report ### - -Google Test can emit a detailed XML report to a file in addition to its normal -textual output. The report contains the duration of each test, and thus can -help you identify slow tests. - -To generate the XML report, set the `GTEST_OUTPUT` environment variable or the -`--gtest_output` flag to the string `"xml:_path_to_output_file_"`, which will -create the file at the given location. You can also just use the string -`"xml"`, in which case the output can be found in the `test_detail.xml` file in -the current directory. - -If you specify a directory (for example, `"xml:output/directory/"` on Linux or -`"xml:output\directory\"` on Windows), Google Test will create the XML file in -that directory, named after the test executable (e.g. `foo_test.xml` for test -program `foo_test` or `foo_test.exe`). If the file already exists (perhaps left -over from a previous run), Google Test will pick a different name (e.g. -`foo_test_1.xml`) to avoid overwriting it. - -The report uses the format described here. It is based on the -`junitreport` Ant task and can be parsed by popular continuous build -systems like [Jenkins](http://jenkins-ci.org/). Since that format -was originally intended for Java, a little interpretation is required -to make it apply to Google Test tests, as shown here: - -``` -<testsuites name="AllTests" ...> - <testsuite name="test_case_name" ...> - <testcase name="test_name" ...> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - <failure message="..."/> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - - * The root `<testsuites>` element corresponds to the entire test program. - * `<testsuite>` elements correspond to Google Test test cases. - * `<testcase>` elements correspond to Google Test test functions. - -For instance, the following program - -``` -TEST(MathTest, Addition) { ... } -TEST(MathTest, Subtraction) { ... } -TEST(LogicTest, NonContradiction) { ... } -``` - -could generate this report: - -``` -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> -<testsuites tests="3" failures="1" errors="0" time="35" name="AllTests"> - <testsuite name="MathTest" tests="2" failures="1" errors="0" time="15"> - <testcase name="Addition" status="run" time="7" classname=""> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, 1)
 Actual: 3
Expected: 2" type=""/> - <failure message="Value of: add(1, -1)
 Actual: 1
Expected: 0" type=""/> - </testcase> - <testcase name="Subtraction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> - <testsuite name="LogicTest" tests="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="5"> - <testcase name="NonContradiction" status="run" time="5" classname=""> - </testcase> - </testsuite> -</testsuites> -``` - -Things to note: - - * The `tests` attribute of a `<testsuites>` or `<testsuite>` element tells how many test functions the Google Test program or test case contains, while the `failures` attribute tells how many of them failed. - * The `time` attribute expresses the duration of the test, test case, or entire test program in milliseconds. - * Each `<failure>` element corresponds to a single failed Google Test assertion. - * Some JUnit concepts don't apply to Google Test, yet we have to conform to the DTD. Therefore you'll see some dummy elements and attributes in the report. You can safely ignore these parts. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Controlling How Failures Are Reported ## - -### Turning Assertion Failures into Break-Points ### - -When running test programs under a debugger, it's very convenient if the -debugger can catch an assertion failure and automatically drop into interactive -mode. Google Test's _break-on-failure_ mode supports this behavior. - -To enable it, set the `GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a value -other than `0` . Alternatively, you can use the `--gtest_break_on_failure` -command line flag. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Disabling Catching Test-Thrown Exceptions ### - -Google Test can be used either with or without exceptions enabled. If -a test throws a C++ exception or (on Windows) a structured exception -(SEH), by default Google Test catches it, reports it as a test -failure, and continues with the next test method. This maximizes the -coverage of a test run. Also, on Windows an uncaught exception will -cause a pop-up window, so catching the exceptions allows you to run -the tests automatically. - -When debugging the test failures, however, you may instead want the -exceptions to be handled by the debugger, such that you can examine -the call stack when an exception is thrown. To achieve that, set the -`GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS` environment variable to `0`, or use the -`--gtest_catch_exceptions=0` flag when running the tests. - -**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -### Letting Another Testing Framework Drive ### - -If you work on a project that has already been using another testing -framework and is not ready to completely switch to Google Test yet, -you can get much of Google Test's benefit by using its assertions in -your existing tests. Just change your `main()` function to look -like: - -``` -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -int main(int argc, char** argv) { - ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true; - // Important: Google Test must be initialized. - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - - ... whatever your existing testing framework requires ... -} -``` - -With that, you can use Google Test assertions in addition to the -native assertions your testing framework provides, for example: - -``` -void TestFooDoesBar() { - Foo foo; - EXPECT_LE(foo.Bar(1), 100); // A Google Test assertion. - CPPUNIT_ASSERT(foo.IsEmpty()); // A native assertion. -} -``` - -If a Google Test assertion fails, it will print an error message and -throw an exception, which will be treated as a failure by your host -testing framework. If you compile your code with exceptions disabled, -a failed Google Test assertion will instead exit your program with a -non-zero code, which will also signal a test failure to your test -runner. - -If you don't write `::testing::GTEST_FLAG(throw_on_failure) = true;` in -your `main()`, you can alternatively enable this feature by specifying -the `--gtest_throw_on_failure` flag on the command-line or setting the -`GTEST_THROW_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a non-zero value. - -Death tests are _not_ supported when other test framework is used to organize tests. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since v1.3.0. - -## Distributing Test Functions to Multiple Machines ## - -If you have more than one machine you can use to run a test program, -you might want to run the test functions in parallel and get the -result faster. We call this technique _sharding_, where each machine -is called a _shard_. - -Google Test is compatible with test sharding. To take advantage of -this feature, your test runner (not part of Google Test) needs to do -the following: - - 1. Allocate a number of machines (shards) to run the tests. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` environment variable to the total number of shards. It must be the same for all shards. - 1. On each shard, set the `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` environment variable to the index of the shard. Different shards must be assigned different indices, which must be in the range `[0, GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS - 1]`. - 1. Run the same test program on all shards. When Google Test sees the above two environment variables, it will select a subset of the test functions to run. Across all shards, each test function in the program will be run exactly once. - 1. Wait for all shards to finish, then collect and report the results. - -Your project may have tests that were written without Google Test and -thus don't understand this protocol. In order for your test runner to -figure out which test supports sharding, it can set the environment -variable `GTEST_SHARD_STATUS_FILE` to a non-existent file path. If a -test program supports sharding, it will create this file to -acknowledge the fact (the actual contents of the file are not -important at this time; although we may stick some useful information -in it in the future.); otherwise it will not create it. - -Here's an example to make it clear. Suppose you have a test program -`foo_test` that contains the following 5 test functions: -``` -TEST(A, V) -TEST(A, W) -TEST(B, X) -TEST(B, Y) -TEST(B, Z) -``` -and you have 3 machines at your disposal. To run the test functions in -parallel, you would set `GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS` to 3 on all machines, and -set `GTEST_SHARD_INDEX` to 0, 1, and 2 on the machines respectively. -Then you would run the same `foo_test` on each machine. - -Google Test reserves the right to change how the work is distributed -across the shards, but here's one possible scenario: - - * Machine #0 runs `A.V` and `B.X`. - * Machine #1 runs `A.W` and `B.Y`. - * Machine #2 runs `B.Z`. - -_Availability:_ Linux, Windows, Mac; since version 1.3.0. - -# Fusing Google Test Source Files # - -Google Test's implementation consists of ~30 files (excluding its own -tests). Sometimes you may want them to be packaged up in two files (a -`.h` and a `.cc`) instead, such that you can easily copy them to a new -machine and start hacking there. For this we provide an experimental -Python script `fuse_gtest_files.py` in the `scripts/` directory (since release 1.3.0). -Assuming you have Python 2.4 or above installed on your machine, just -go to that directory and run -``` -python fuse_gtest_files.py OUTPUT_DIR -``` - -and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files -`gtest/gtest.h` and `gtest/gtest-all.cc` in it. These files contain -everything you need to use Google Test. Just copy them to anywhere -you want and you are ready to write tests. You can use the -[scripts/test/Makefile](../scripts/test/Makefile) -file as an example on how to compile your tests against them. - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've now learned more advanced Google Test tools and are -ready to tackle more complex testing tasks. If you want to dive even deeper, you -can read the [Frequently-Asked Questions](V1_7_FAQ.md). diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_Documentation.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_Documentation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 282697a..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_Documentation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -This page lists all documentation wiki pages for Google Test **(the SVN trunk version)** --- **if you use a released version of Google Test, please read the -documentation for that specific version instead.** - - * [Primer](V1_7_Primer.md) -- start here if you are new to Google Test. - * [Samples](V1_7_Samples.md) -- learn from examples. - * [AdvancedGuide](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md) -- learn more about Google Test. - * [XcodeGuide](V1_7_XcodeGuide.md) -- how to use Google Test in Xcode on Mac. - * [Frequently-Asked Questions](V1_7_FAQ.md) -- check here before asking a question on the mailing list. - -To contribute code to Google Test, read: - - * [DevGuide](DevGuide.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. - * [PumpManual](V1_7_PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Test's source files.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_FAQ.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_FAQ.md deleted file mode 100644 index 3dd914d..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_FAQ.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1082 +0,0 @@ - - -If you cannot find the answer to your question here, and you have read -[Primer](V1_7_Primer.md) and [AdvancedGuide](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md), send it to -googletestframework@googlegroups.com. - -## Why should I use Google Test instead of my favorite C++ testing framework? ## - -First, let us say clearly that we don't want to get into the debate of -which C++ testing framework is **the best**. There exist many fine -frameworks for writing C++ tests, and we have tremendous respect for -the developers and users of them. We don't think there is (or will -be) a single best framework - you have to pick the right tool for the -particular task you are tackling. - -We created Google Test because we couldn't find the right combination -of features and conveniences in an existing framework to satisfy _our_ -needs. The following is a list of things that _we_ like about Google -Test. We don't claim them to be unique to Google Test - rather, the -combination of them makes Google Test the choice for us. We hope this -list can help you decide whether it is for you too. - - * Google Test is designed to be portable: it doesn't require exceptions or RTTI; it works around various bugs in various compilers and environments; etc. As a result, it works on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows and several embedded operating systems. - * Nonfatal assertions (`EXPECT_*`) have proven to be great time savers, as they allow a test to report multiple failures in a single edit-compile-test cycle. - * It's easy to write assertions that generate informative messages: you just use the stream syntax to append any additional information, e.g. `ASSERT_EQ(5, Foo(i)) << " where i = " << i;`. It doesn't require a new set of macros or special functions. - * Google Test automatically detects your tests and doesn't require you to enumerate them in order to run them. - * Death tests are pretty handy for ensuring that your asserts in production code are triggered by the right conditions. - * `SCOPED_TRACE` helps you understand the context of an assertion failure when it comes from inside a sub-routine or loop. - * You can decide which tests to run using name patterns. This saves time when you want to quickly reproduce a test failure. - * Google Test can generate XML test result reports that can be parsed by popular continuous build system like Hudson. - * Simple things are easy in Google Test, while hard things are possible: in addition to advanced features like [global test environments](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#global-set-up-and-tear-down) and tests parameterized by [values](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#value-parameterized-tests) or [types](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#typed-tests), Google Test supports various ways for the user to extend the framework -- if Google Test doesn't do something out of the box, chances are that a user can implement the feature using Google Test's public API, without changing Google Test itself. In particular, you can: - * expand your testing vocabulary by defining [custom predicates](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#predicate-assertions-for-better-error-messages), - * teach Google Test how to [print your types](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values), - * define your own testing macros or utilities and verify them using Google Test's [Service Provider Interface](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#catching-failures), and - * reflect on the test cases or change the test output format by intercepting the [test events](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events). - -## I'm getting warnings when compiling Google Test. Would you fix them? ## - -We strive to minimize compiler warnings Google Test generates. Before releasing a new version, we test to make sure that it doesn't generate warnings when compiled using its CMake script on Windows, Linux, and Mac OS. - -Unfortunately, this doesn't mean you are guaranteed to see no warnings when compiling Google Test in your environment: - - * You may be using a different compiler as we use, or a different version of the same compiler. We cannot possibly test for all compilers. - * You may be compiling on a different platform as we do. - * Your project may be using different compiler flags as we do. - -It is not always possible to make Google Test warning-free for everyone. Or, it may not be desirable if the warning is rarely enabled and fixing the violations makes the code more complex. - -If you see warnings when compiling Google Test, we suggest that you use the `-isystem` flag (assuming your are using GCC) to mark Google Test headers as system headers. That'll suppress warnings from Google Test headers. - -## Why should not test case names and test names contain underscore? ## - -Underscore (`_`) is special, as C++ reserves the following to be used by -the compiler and the standard library: - - 1. any identifier that starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter, and - 1. any identifier that containers two consecutive underscores (i.e. `__`) _anywhere_ in its name. - -User code is _prohibited_ from using such identifiers. - -Now let's look at what this means for `TEST` and `TEST_F`. - -Currently `TEST(TestCaseName, TestName)` generates a class named -`TestCaseName_TestName_Test`. What happens if `TestCaseName` or `TestName` -contains `_`? - - 1. If `TestCaseName` starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter (say, `_Foo`), we end up with `_Foo_TestName_Test`, which is reserved and thus invalid. - 1. If `TestCaseName` ends with an `_` (say, `Foo_`), we get `Foo__TestName_Test`, which is invalid. - 1. If `TestName` starts with an `_` (say, `_Bar`), we get `TestCaseName__Bar_Test`, which is invalid. - 1. If `TestName` ends with an `_` (say, `Bar_`), we get `TestCaseName_Bar__Test`, which is invalid. - -So clearly `TestCaseName` and `TestName` cannot start or end with `_` -(Actually, `TestCaseName` can start with `_` -- as long as the `_` isn't -followed by an upper-case letter. But that's getting complicated. So -for simplicity we just say that it cannot start with `_`.). - -It may seem fine for `TestCaseName` and `TestName` to contain `_` in the -middle. However, consider this: -``` -TEST(Time, Flies_Like_An_Arrow) { ... } -TEST(Time_Flies, Like_An_Arrow) { ... } -``` - -Now, the two `TEST`s will both generate the same class -(`Time_Files_Like_An_Arrow_Test`). That's not good. - -So for simplicity, we just ask the users to avoid `_` in `TestCaseName` -and `TestName`. The rule is more constraining than necessary, but it's -simple and easy to remember. It also gives Google Test some wiggle -room in case its implementation needs to change in the future. - -If you violate the rule, there may not be immediately consequences, -but your test may (just may) break with a new compiler (or a new -version of the compiler you are using) or with a new version of Google -Test. Therefore it's best to follow the rule. - -## Why is it not recommended to install a pre-compiled copy of Google Test (for example, into /usr/local)? ## - -In the early days, we said that you could install -compiled Google Test libraries on `*`nix systems using `make install`. -Then every user of your machine can write tests without -recompiling Google Test. - -This seemed like a good idea, but it has a -got-cha: every user needs to compile his tests using the _same_ compiler -flags used to compile the installed Google Test libraries; otherwise -he may run into undefined behaviors (i.e. the tests can behave -strangely and may even crash for no obvious reasons). - -Why? Because C++ has this thing called the One-Definition Rule: if -two C++ source files contain different definitions of the same -class/function/variable, and you link them together, you violate the -rule. The linker may or may not catch the error (in many cases it's -not required by the C++ standard to catch the violation). If it -doesn't, you get strange run-time behaviors that are unexpected and -hard to debug. - -If you compile Google Test and your test code using different compiler -flags, they may see different definitions of the same -class/function/variable (e.g. due to the use of `#if` in Google Test). -Therefore, for your sanity, we recommend to avoid installing pre-compiled -Google Test libraries. Instead, each project should compile -Google Test itself such that it can be sure that the same flags are -used for both Google Test and the tests. - -## How do I generate 64-bit binaries on Windows (using Visual Studio 2008)? ## - -(Answered by Trevor Robinson) - -Load the supplied Visual Studio solution file, either `msvc\gtest-md.sln` or -`msvc\gtest.sln`. Go through the migration wizard to migrate the -solution and project files to Visual Studio 2008. Select -`Configuration Manager...` from the `Build` menu. Select `<New...>` from -the `Active solution platform` dropdown. Select `x64` from the new -platform dropdown, leave `Copy settings from` set to `Win32` and -`Create new project platforms` checked, then click `OK`. You now have -`Win32` and `x64` platform configurations, selectable from the -`Standard` toolbar, which allow you to toggle between building 32-bit or -64-bit binaries (or both at once using Batch Build). - -In order to prevent build output files from overwriting one another, -you'll need to change the `Intermediate Directory` settings for the -newly created platform configuration across all the projects. To do -this, multi-select (e.g. using shift-click) all projects (but not the -solution) in the `Solution Explorer`. Right-click one of them and -select `Properties`. In the left pane, select `Configuration Properties`, -and from the `Configuration` dropdown, select `All Configurations`. -Make sure the selected platform is `x64`. For the -`Intermediate Directory` setting, change the value from -`$(PlatformName)\$(ConfigurationName)` to -`$(OutDir)\$(ProjectName)`. Click `OK` and then build the -solution. When the build is complete, the 64-bit binaries will be in -the `msvc\x64\Debug` directory. - -## Can I use Google Test on MinGW? ## - -We haven't tested this ourselves, but Per Abrahamsen reported that he -was able to compile and install Google Test successfully when using -MinGW from Cygwin. You'll need to configure it with: - -`PATH/TO/configure CC="gcc -mno-cygwin" CXX="g++ -mno-cygwin"` - -You should be able to replace the `-mno-cygwin` option with direct links -to the real MinGW binaries, but we haven't tried that. - -Caveats: - - * There are many warnings when compiling. - * `make check` will produce some errors as not all tests for Google Test itself are compatible with MinGW. - -We also have reports on successful cross compilation of Google Test -MinGW binaries on Linux using -[these instructions](http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Cross-Compiling_Under_Linux#Cross-compiling_under_Linux_for_MS_Windows) -on the WxWidgets site. - -Please contact `googletestframework@googlegroups.com` if you are -interested in improving the support for MinGW. - -## Why does Google Test support EXPECT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_EQ(NULL, ptr) but not EXPECT\_NE(NULL, ptr) and ASSERT\_NE(NULL, ptr)? ## - -Due to some peculiarity of C++, it requires some non-trivial template -meta programming tricks to support using `NULL` as an argument of the -`EXPECT_XX()` and `ASSERT_XX()` macros. Therefore we only do it where -it's most needed (otherwise we make the implementation of Google Test -harder to maintain and more error-prone than necessary). - -The `EXPECT_EQ()` macro takes the _expected_ value as its first -argument and the _actual_ value as the second. It's reasonable that -someone wants to write `EXPECT_EQ(NULL, some_expression)`, and this -indeed was requested several times. Therefore we implemented it. - -The need for `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)` isn't nearly as strong. When the -assertion fails, you already know that `ptr` must be `NULL`, so it -doesn't add any information to print ptr in this case. That means -`EXPECT_TRUE(ptr != NULL)` works just as well. - -If we were to support `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)`, for consistency we'll -have to support `EXPECT_NE(ptr, NULL)` as well, as unlike `EXPECT_EQ`, -we don't have a convention on the order of the two arguments for -`EXPECT_NE`. This means using the template meta programming tricks -twice in the implementation, making it even harder to understand and -maintain. We believe the benefit doesn't justify the cost. - -Finally, with the growth of Google Mock's [matcher](../../CookBook.md#using-matchers-in-google-test-assertions) library, we are -encouraging people to use the unified `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` -syntax more often in tests. One significant advantage of the matcher -approach is that matchers can be easily combined to form new matchers, -while the `EXPECT_NE`, etc, macros cannot be easily -combined. Therefore we want to invest more in the matchers than in the -`EXPECT_XX()` macros. - -## Does Google Test support running tests in parallel? ## - -Test runners tend to be tightly coupled with the build/test -environment, and Google Test doesn't try to solve the problem of -running tests in parallel. Instead, we tried to make Google Test work -nicely with test runners. For example, Google Test's XML report -contains the time spent on each test, and its `gtest_list_tests` and -`gtest_filter` flags can be used for splitting the execution of test -methods into multiple processes. These functionalities can help the -test runner run the tests in parallel. - -## Why don't Google Test run the tests in different threads to speed things up? ## - -It's difficult to write thread-safe code. Most tests are not written -with thread-safety in mind, and thus may not work correctly in a -multi-threaded setting. - -If you think about it, it's already hard to make your code work when -you know what other threads are doing. It's much harder, and -sometimes even impossible, to make your code work when you don't know -what other threads are doing (remember that test methods can be added, -deleted, or modified after your test was written). If you want to run -the tests in parallel, you'd better run them in different processes. - -## Why aren't Google Test assertions implemented using exceptions? ## - -Our original motivation was to be able to use Google Test in projects -that disable exceptions. Later we realized some additional benefits -of this approach: - - 1. Throwing in a destructor is undefined behavior in C++. Not using exceptions means Google Test's assertions are safe to use in destructors. - 1. The `EXPECT_*` family of macros will continue even after a failure, allowing multiple failures in a `TEST` to be reported in a single run. This is a popular feature, as in C++ the edit-compile-test cycle is usually quite long and being able to fixing more than one thing at a time is a blessing. - 1. If assertions are implemented using exceptions, a test may falsely ignore a failure if it's caught by user code: -``` -try { ... ASSERT_TRUE(...) ... } -catch (...) { ... } -``` -The above code will pass even if the `ASSERT_TRUE` throws. While it's unlikely for someone to write this in a test, it's possible to run into this pattern when you write assertions in callbacks that are called by the code under test. - -The downside of not using exceptions is that `ASSERT_*` (implemented -using `return`) will only abort the current function, not the current -`TEST`. - -## Why do we use two different macros for tests with and without fixtures? ## - -Unfortunately, C++'s macro system doesn't allow us to use the same -macro for both cases. One possibility is to provide only one macro -for tests with fixtures, and require the user to define an empty -fixture sometimes: - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -or -``` -typedef ::testing::Test FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThat) { ... } -``` - -Yet, many people think this is one line too many. :-) Our goal was to -make it really easy to write tests, so we tried to make simple tests -trivial to create. That means using a separate macro for such tests. - -We think neither approach is ideal, yet either of them is reasonable. -In the end, it probably doesn't matter much either way. - -## Why don't we use structs as test fixtures? ## - -We like to use structs only when representing passive data. This -distinction between structs and classes is good for documenting the -intent of the code's author. Since test fixtures have logic like -`SetUp()` and `TearDown()`, they are better defined as classes. - -## Why are death tests implemented as assertions instead of using a test runner? ## - -Our goal was to make death tests as convenient for a user as C++ -possibly allows. In particular: - - * The runner-style requires to split the information into two pieces: the definition of the death test itself, and the specification for the runner on how to run the death test and what to expect. The death test would be written in C++, while the runner spec may or may not be. A user needs to carefully keep the two in sync. `ASSERT_DEATH(statement, expected_message)` specifies all necessary information in one place, in one language, without boilerplate code. It is very declarative. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` has a similar syntax and error-reporting semantics as other Google Test assertions, and thus is easy to learn. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can be mixed with other assertions and other logic at your will. You are not limited to one death test per test method. For example, you can write something like: -``` - if (FooCondition()) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Bar(), "blah"); - } else { - ASSERT_EQ(5, Bar()); - } -``` -If you prefer one death test per test method, you can write your tests in that style too, but we don't want to impose that on the users. The fewer artificial limitations the better. - * `ASSERT_DEATH` can reference local variables in the current function, and you can decide how many death tests you want based on run-time information. For example, -``` - const int count = GetCount(); // Only known at run time. - for (int i = 1; i <= count; i++) { - ASSERT_DEATH({ - double* buffer = new double[i]; - ... initializes buffer ... - Foo(buffer, i) - }, "blah blah"); - } -``` -The runner-based approach tends to be more static and less flexible, or requires more user effort to get this kind of flexibility. - -Another interesting thing about `ASSERT_DEATH` is that it calls `fork()` -to create a child process to run the death test. This is lightening -fast, as `fork()` uses copy-on-write pages and incurs almost zero -overhead, and the child process starts from the user-supplied -statement directly, skipping all global and local initialization and -any code leading to the given statement. If you launch the child -process from scratch, it can take seconds just to load everything and -start running if the test links to many libraries dynamically. - -## My death test modifies some state, but the change seems lost after the death test finishes. Why? ## - -Death tests (`EXPECT_DEATH`, etc) are executed in a sub-process s.t. the -expected crash won't kill the test program (i.e. the parent process). As a -result, any in-memory side effects they incur are observable in their -respective sub-processes, but not in the parent process. You can think of them -as running in a parallel universe, more or less. - -## The compiler complains about "undefined references" to some static const member variables, but I did define them in the class body. What's wrong? ## - -If your class has a static data member: - -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - static const int kBar = 100; -}; -``` - -You also need to define it _outside_ of the class body in `foo.cc`: - -``` -const int Foo::kBar; // No initializer here. -``` - -Otherwise your code is **invalid C++**, and may break in unexpected ways. In -particular, using it in Google Test comparison assertions (`EXPECT_EQ`, etc) -will generate an "undefined reference" linker error. - -## I have an interface that has several implementations. Can I write a set of tests once and repeat them over all the implementations? ## - -Google Test doesn't yet have good support for this kind of tests, or -data-driven tests in general. We hope to be able to make improvements in this -area soon. - -## Can I derive a test fixture from another? ## - -Yes. - -Each test fixture has a corresponding and same named test case. This means only -one test case can use a particular fixture. Sometimes, however, multiple test -cases may want to use the same or slightly different fixtures. For example, you -may want to make sure that all of a GUI library's test cases don't leak -important system resources like fonts and brushes. - -In Google Test, you share a fixture among test cases by putting the shared -logic in a base test fixture, then deriving from that base a separate fixture -for each test case that wants to use this common logic. You then use `TEST_F()` -to write tests using each derived fixture. - -Typically, your code looks like this: - -``` -// Defines a base test fixture. -class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... -}; - -// Derives a fixture FooTest from BaseTest. -class FooTest : public BaseTest { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - BaseTest::SetUp(); // Sets up the base fixture first. - ... additional set-up work ... - } - virtual void TearDown() { - ... clean-up work for FooTest ... - BaseTest::TearDown(); // Remember to tear down the base fixture - // after cleaning up FooTest! - } - ... functions and variables for FooTest ... -}; - -// Tests that use the fixture FooTest. -TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } - -... additional fixtures derived from BaseTest ... -``` - -If necessary, you can continue to derive test fixtures from a derived fixture. -Google Test has no limit on how deep the hierarchy can be. - -For a complete example using derived test fixtures, see -[sample5](../samples/sample5_unittest.cc). - -## My compiler complains "void value not ignored as it ought to be." What does this mean? ## - -You're probably using an `ASSERT_*()` in a function that doesn't return `void`. -`ASSERT_*()` can only be used in `void` functions. - -## My death test hangs (or seg-faults). How do I fix it? ## - -In Google Test, death tests are run in a child process and the way they work is -delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work. -Please make sure you have read this. - -In particular, death tests don't like having multiple threads in the parent -process. So the first thing you can try is to eliminate creating threads -outside of `EXPECT_DEATH()`. - -Sometimes this is impossible as some library you must use may be creating -threads before `main()` is even reached. In this case, you can try to minimize -the chance of conflicts by either moving as many activities as possible inside -`EXPECT_DEATH()` (in the extreme case, you want to move everything inside), or -leaving as few things as possible in it. Also, you can try to set the death -test style to `"threadsafe"`, which is safer but slower, and see if it helps. - -If you go with thread-safe death tests, remember that they rerun the test -program from the beginning in the child process. Therefore make sure your -program can run side-by-side with itself and is deterministic. - -In the end, this boils down to good concurrent programming. You have to make -sure that there is no race conditions or dead locks in your program. No silver -bullet - sorry! - -## Should I use the constructor/destructor of the test fixture or the set-up/tear-down function? ## - -The first thing to remember is that Google Test does not reuse the -same test fixture object across multiple tests. For each `TEST_F`, -Google Test will create a fresh test fixture object, _immediately_ -call `SetUp()`, run the test, call `TearDown()`, and then -_immediately_ delete the test fixture object. Therefore, there is no -need to write a `SetUp()` or `TearDown()` function if the constructor -or destructor already does the job. - -You may still want to use `SetUp()/TearDown()` in the following cases: - * If the tear-down operation could throw an exception, you must use `TearDown()` as opposed to the destructor, as throwing in a destructor leads to undefined behavior and usually will kill your program right away. Note that many standard libraries (like STL) may throw when exceptions are enabled in the compiler. Therefore you should prefer `TearDown()` if you want to write portable tests that work with or without exceptions. - * The assertion macros throw an exception when flag `--gtest_throw_on_failure` is specified. Therefore, you shouldn't use Google Test assertions in a destructor if you plan to run your tests with this flag. - * In a constructor or destructor, you cannot make a virtual function call on this object. (You can call a method declared as virtual, but it will be statically bound.) Therefore, if you need to call a method that will be overriden in a derived class, you have to use `SetUp()/TearDown()`. - -## The compiler complains "no matching function to call" when I use ASSERT\_PREDn. How do I fix it? ## - -If the predicate function you use in `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*` is -overloaded or a template, the compiler will have trouble figuring out which -overloaded version it should use. `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT*` and -`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT*` don't have this problem. - -If you see this error, you might want to switch to -`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*`, which will also give you a better failure -message. If, however, that is not an option, you can resolve the problem by -explicitly telling the compiler which version to pick. - -For example, suppose you have - -``` -bool IsPositive(int n) { - return n > 0; -} -bool IsPositive(double x) { - return x > 0; -} -``` - -you will get a compiler error if you write - -``` -EXPECT_PRED1(IsPositive, 5); -``` - -However, this will work: - -``` -EXPECT_PRED1(*static_cast<bool (*)(int)>*(IsPositive), 5); -``` - -(The stuff inside the angled brackets for the `static_cast` operator is the -type of the function pointer for the `int`-version of `IsPositive()`.) - -As another example, when you have a template function - -``` -template <typename T> -bool IsNegative(T x) { - return x < 0; -} -``` - -you can use it in a predicate assertion like this: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED1(IsNegative*<int>*, -5); -``` - -Things are more interesting if your template has more than one parameters. The -following won't compile: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED2(*GreaterThan<int, int>*, 5, 0); -``` - - -as the C++ pre-processor thinks you are giving `ASSERT_PRED2` 4 arguments, -which is one more than expected. The workaround is to wrap the predicate -function in parentheses: - -``` -ASSERT_PRED2(*(GreaterThan<int, int>)*, 5, 0); -``` - - -## My compiler complains about "ignoring return value" when I call RUN\_ALL\_TESTS(). Why? ## - -Some people had been ignoring the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. That is, -instead of - -``` -return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -they write - -``` -RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -``` - -This is wrong and dangerous. A test runner needs to see the return value of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` in order to determine if a test has passed. If your `main()` -function ignores it, your test will be considered successful even if it has a -Google Test assertion failure. Very bad. - -To help the users avoid this dangerous bug, the implementation of -`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` causes gcc to raise this warning, when the return value is -ignored. If you see this warning, the fix is simple: just make sure its value -is used as the return value of `main()`. - -## My compiler complains that a constructor (or destructor) cannot return a value. What's going on? ## - -Due to a peculiarity of C++, in order to support the syntax for streaming -messages to an `ASSERT_*`, e.g. - -``` -ASSERT_EQ(1, Foo()) << "blah blah" << foo; -``` - -we had to give up using `ASSERT*` and `FAIL*` (but not `EXPECT*` and -`ADD_FAILURE*`) in constructors and destructors. The workaround is to move the -content of your constructor/destructor to a private void member function, or -switch to `EXPECT_*()` if that works. This section in the user's guide explains -it. - -## My set-up function is not called. Why? ## - -C++ is case-sensitive. It should be spelled as `SetUp()`. Did you -spell it as `Setup()`? - -Similarly, sometimes people spell `SetUpTestCase()` as `SetupTestCase()` and -wonder why it's never called. - -## How do I jump to the line of a failure in Emacs directly? ## - -Google Test's failure message format is understood by Emacs and many other -IDEs, like acme and XCode. If a Google Test message is in a compilation buffer -in Emacs, then it's clickable. You can now hit `enter` on a message to jump to -the corresponding source code, or use `C-x `` to jump to the next failure. - -## I have several test cases which share the same test fixture logic, do I have to define a new test fixture class for each of them? This seems pretty tedious. ## - -You don't have to. Instead of - -``` -class FooTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -class BarTest : public BaseTest {}; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -you can simply `typedef` the test fixtures: -``` -typedef BaseTest FooTest; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef BaseTest BarTest; - -TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } -``` - -## The Google Test output is buried in a whole bunch of log messages. What do I do? ## - -The Google Test output is meant to be a concise and human-friendly report. If -your test generates textual output itself, it will mix with the Google Test -output, making it hard to read. However, there is an easy solution to this -problem. - -Since most log messages go to stderr, we decided to let Google Test output go -to stdout. This way, you can easily separate the two using redirection. For -example: -``` -./my_test > googletest_output.txt -``` - -## Why should I prefer test fixtures over global variables? ## - -There are several good reasons: - 1. It's likely your test needs to change the states of its global variables. This makes it difficult to keep side effects from escaping one test and contaminating others, making debugging difficult. By using fixtures, each test has a fresh set of variables that's different (but with the same names). Thus, tests are kept independent of each other. - 1. Global variables pollute the global namespace. - 1. Test fixtures can be reused via subclassing, which cannot be done easily with global variables. This is useful if many test cases have something in common. - -## How do I test private class members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -You should try to write testable code, which means classes should be easily -tested from their public interface. One way to achieve this is the Pimpl idiom: -you move all private members of a class into a helper class, and make all -members of the helper class public. - -You have several other options that don't require using `FRIEND_TEST`: - * Write the tests as members of the fixture class: -``` -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - void Test1() {...} // This accesses private members of class Foo. - void Test2() {...} // So does this one. -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - Test1(); -} - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { - Test2(); -} -``` - * In the fixture class, write accessors for the tested class' private members, then use the accessors in your tests: -``` -class Foo { - friend class FooTest; - ... -}; - -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - ... - T1 get_private_member1(Foo* obj) { - return obj->private_member1_; - } -}; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { - ... - get_private_member1(x) - ... -} -``` - * If the methods are declared **protected**, you can change their access level in a test-only subclass: -``` -class YourClass { - ... - protected: // protected access for testability. - int DoSomethingReturningInt(); - ... -}; - -// in the your_class_test.cc file: -class TestableYourClass : public YourClass { - ... - public: using YourClass::DoSomethingReturningInt; // changes access rights - ... -}; - -TEST_F(YourClassTest, DoSomethingTest) { - TestableYourClass obj; - assertEquals(expected_value, obj.DoSomethingReturningInt()); -} -``` - -## How do I test private class static members without writing FRIEND\_TEST()s? ## - -We find private static methods clutter the header file. They are -implementation details and ideally should be kept out of a .h. So often I make -them free functions instead. - -Instead of: -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... - private: - static bool Func(int n); -}; - -// foo.cc -bool Foo::Func(int n) { ... } - -// foo_test.cc -EXPECT_TRUE(Foo::Func(12345)); -``` - -You probably should better write: -``` -// foo.h -class Foo { - ... -}; - -// foo.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n) { ... } -} - -// foo_test.cc -namespace internal { - bool Func(int n); -} - -EXPECT_TRUE(internal::Func(12345)); -``` - -## I would like to run a test several times with different parameters. Do I need to write several similar copies of it? ## - -No. You can use a feature called [value-parameterized tests](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#Value_Parameterized_Tests) which -lets you repeat your tests with different parameters, without defining it more than once. - -## How do I test a file that defines main()? ## - -To test a `foo.cc` file, you need to compile and link it into your unit test -program. However, when the file contains a definition for the `main()` -function, it will clash with the `main()` of your unit test, and will result in -a build error. - -The right solution is to split it into three files: - 1. `foo.h` which contains the declarations, - 1. `foo.cc` which contains the definitions except `main()`, and - 1. `foo_main.cc` which contains nothing but the definition of `main()`. - -Then `foo.cc` can be easily tested. - -If you are adding tests to an existing file and don't want an intrusive change -like this, there is a hack: just include the entire `foo.cc` file in your unit -test. For example: -``` -// File foo_unittest.cc - -// The headers section -... - -// Renames main() in foo.cc to make room for the unit test main() -#define main FooMain - -#include "a/b/foo.cc" - -// The tests start here. -... -``` - - -However, please remember this is a hack and should only be used as the last -resort. - -## What can the statement argument in ASSERT\_DEATH() be? ## - -`ASSERT_DEATH(_statement_, _regex_)` (or any death assertion macro) can be used -wherever `_statement_` is valid. So basically `_statement_` can be any C++ -statement that makes sense in the current context. In particular, it can -reference global and/or local variables, and can be: - * a simple function call (often the case), - * a complex expression, or - * a compound statement. - -> Some examples are shown here: - -``` -// A death test can be a simple function call. -TEST(MyDeathTest, FunctionCall) { - ASSERT_DEATH(Xyz(5), "Xyz failed"); -} - -// Or a complex expression that references variables and functions. -TEST(MyDeathTest, ComplexExpression) { - const bool c = Condition(); - ASSERT_DEATH((c ? Func1(0) : object2.Method("test")), - "(Func1|Method) failed"); -} - -// Death assertions can be used any where in a function. In -// particular, they can be inside a loop. -TEST(MyDeathTest, InsideLoop) { - // Verifies that Foo(0), Foo(1), ..., and Foo(4) all die. - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - EXPECT_DEATH_M(Foo(i), "Foo has \\d+ errors", - ::testing::Message() << "where i is " << i); - } -} - -// A death assertion can contain a compound statement. -TEST(MyDeathTest, CompoundStatement) { - // Verifies that at lease one of Bar(0), Bar(1), ..., and - // Bar(4) dies. - ASSERT_DEATH({ - for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { - Bar(i); - } - }, - "Bar has \\d+ errors");} -``` - -`googletest_unittest.cc` contains more examples if you are interested. - -## What syntax does the regular expression in ASSERT\_DEATH use? ## - -On POSIX systems, Google Test uses the POSIX Extended regular -expression syntax -(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). -On Windows, it uses a limited variant of regular expression -syntax. For more details, see the -[regular expression syntax](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md#Regular_Expression_Syntax). - -## I have a fixture class Foo, but TEST\_F(Foo, Bar) gives me error "no matching function for call to Foo::Foo()". Why? ## - -Google Test needs to be able to create objects of your test fixture class, so -it must have a default constructor. Normally the compiler will define one for -you. However, there are cases where you have to define your own: - * If you explicitly declare a non-default constructor for class `Foo`, then you need to define a default constructor, even if it would be empty. - * If `Foo` has a const non-static data member, then you have to define the default constructor _and_ initialize the const member in the initializer list of the constructor. (Early versions of `gcc` doesn't force you to initialize the const member. It's a bug that has been fixed in `gcc 4`.) - -## Why does ASSERT\_DEATH complain about previous threads that were already joined? ## - -With the Linux pthread library, there is no turning back once you cross the -line from single thread to multiple threads. The first time you create a -thread, a manager thread is created in addition, so you get 3, not 2, threads. -Later when the thread you create joins the main thread, the thread count -decrements by 1, but the manager thread will never be killed, so you still have -2 threads, which means you cannot safely run a death test. - -The new NPTL thread library doesn't suffer from this problem, as it doesn't -create a manager thread. However, if you don't control which machine your test -runs on, you shouldn't depend on this. - -## Why does Google Test require the entire test case, instead of individual tests, to be named FOODeathTest when it uses ASSERT\_DEATH? ## - -Google Test does not interleave tests from different test cases. That is, it -runs all tests in one test case first, and then runs all tests in the next test -case, and so on. Google Test does this because it needs to set up a test case -before the first test in it is run, and tear it down afterwords. Splitting up -the test case would require multiple set-up and tear-down processes, which is -inefficient and makes the semantics unclean. - -If we were to determine the order of tests based on test name instead of test -case name, then we would have a problem with the following situation: - -``` -TEST_F(FooTest, AbcDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Uvw) { ... } - -TEST_F(BarTest, DefDeathTest) { ... } -TEST_F(BarTest, Xyz) { ... } -``` - -Since `FooTest.AbcDeathTest` needs to run before `BarTest.Xyz`, and we don't -interleave tests from different test cases, we need to run all tests in the -`FooTest` case before running any test in the `BarTest` case. This contradicts -with the requirement to run `BarTest.DefDeathTest` before `FooTest.Uvw`. - -## But I don't like calling my entire test case FOODeathTest when it contains both death tests and non-death tests. What do I do? ## - -You don't have to, but if you like, you may split up the test case into -`FooTest` and `FooDeathTest`, where the names make it clear that they are -related: - -``` -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; - -TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } -TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } - -typedef FooTest FooDeathTest; - -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Uvw) { ... EXPECT_DEATH(...) ... } -TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Xyz) { ... ASSERT_DEATH(...) ... } -``` - -## The compiler complains about "no match for 'operator<<'" when I use an assertion. What gives? ## - -If you use a user-defined type `FooType` in an assertion, you must make sure -there is an `std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const FooType&)` function -defined such that we can print a value of `FooType`. - -In addition, if `FooType` is declared in a name space, the `<<` operator also -needs to be defined in the _same_ name space. - -## How do I suppress the memory leak messages on Windows? ## - -Since the statically initialized Google Test singleton requires allocations on -the heap, the Visual C++ memory leak detector will report memory leaks at the -end of the program run. The easiest way to avoid this is to use the -`_CrtMemCheckpoint` and `_CrtMemDumpAllObjectsSince` calls to not report any -statically initialized heap objects. See MSDN for more details and additional -heap check/debug routines. - -## I am building my project with Google Test in Visual Studio and all I'm getting is a bunch of linker errors (or warnings). Help! ## - -You may get a number of the following linker error or warnings if you -attempt to link your test project with the Google Test library when -your project and the are not built using the same compiler settings. - - * LNK2005: symbol already defined in object - * LNK4217: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported in function 'function' - * LNK4049: locally defined symbol 'symbol' imported - -The Google Test project (gtest.vcproj) has the Runtime Library option -set to /MT (use multi-threaded static libraries, /MTd for debug). If -your project uses something else, for example /MD (use multi-threaded -DLLs, /MDd for debug), you need to change the setting in the Google -Test project to match your project's. - -To update this setting open the project properties in the Visual -Studio IDE then select the branch Configuration Properties | C/C++ | -Code Generation and change the option "Runtime Library". You may also try -using gtest-md.vcproj instead of gtest.vcproj. - -## I put my tests in a library and Google Test doesn't run them. What's happening? ## -Have you read a -[warning](V1_7_Primer.md#important-note-for-visual-c-users) on -the Google Test Primer page? - -## I want to use Google Test with Visual Studio but don't know where to start. ## -Many people are in your position and one of the posted his solution to -our mailing list. Here is his link: -http://hassanjamilahmad.blogspot.com/2009/07/gtest-starters-help.html. - -## I am seeing compile errors mentioning std::type\_traits when I try to use Google Test on Solaris. ## -Google Test uses parts of the standard C++ library that SunStudio does not support. -Our users reported success using alternative implementations. Try running the build after runing this commad: - -`export CC=cc CXX=CC CXXFLAGS='-library=stlport4'` - -## How can my code detect if it is running in a test? ## - -If you write code that sniffs whether it's running in a test and does -different things accordingly, you are leaking test-only logic into -production code and there is no easy way to ensure that the test-only -code paths aren't run by mistake in production. Such cleverness also -leads to -[Heisenbugs](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unusual_software_bug#Heisenbug). -Therefore we strongly advise against the practice, and Google Test doesn't -provide a way to do it. - -In general, the recommended way to cause the code to behave -differently under test is [dependency injection](http://jamesshore.com/Blog/Dependency-Injection-Demystified.html). -You can inject different functionality from the test and from the -production code. Since your production code doesn't link in the -for-test logic at all, there is no danger in accidentally running it. - -However, if you _really_, _really_, _really_ have no choice, and if -you follow the rule of ending your test program names with `_test`, -you can use the _horrible_ hack of sniffing your executable name -(`argv[0]` in `main()`) to know whether the code is under test. - -## Google Test defines a macro that clashes with one defined by another library. How do I deal with that? ## - -In C++, macros don't obey namespaces. Therefore two libraries that -both define a macro of the same name will clash if you `#include` both -definitions. In case a Google Test macro clashes with another -library, you can force Google Test to rename its macro to avoid the -conflict. - -Specifically, if both Google Test and some other code define macro -`FOO`, you can add -``` - -DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_FOO=1 -``` -to the compiler flags to tell Google Test to change the macro's name -from `FOO` to `GTEST_FOO`. For example, with `-DGTEST_DONT_DEFINE_TEST=1`, you'll need to write -``` - GTEST_TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -instead of -``` - TEST(SomeTest, DoesThis) { ... } -``` -in order to define a test. - -Currently, the following `TEST`, `FAIL`, `SUCCEED`, and the basic comparison assertion macros can have alternative names. You can see the full list of covered macros [here](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=if+!GTEST_DONT_DEFINE_\w%2B+package:http://googletest\.googlecode\.com+file:/include/gtest/gtest.h). More information can be found in the "Avoiding Macro Name Clashes" section of the README file. - - -## Is it OK if I have two separate `TEST(Foo, Bar)` test methods defined in different namespaces? ## - -Yes. - -The rule is **all test methods in the same test case must use the same fixture class**. This means that the following is **allowed** because both tests use the same fixture class (`::testing::Test`). - -``` -namespace foo { -TEST(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo - -namespace bar { -TEST(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo -``` - -However, the following code is **not allowed** and will produce a runtime error from Google Test because the test methods are using different test fixture classes with the same test case name. - -``` -namespace foo { -class CoolTest : public ::testing::Test {}; // Fixture foo::CoolTest -TEST_F(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo - -namespace bar { -class CoolTest : public ::testing::Test {}; // Fixture: bar::CoolTest -TEST_F(CoolTest, DoSomething) { - SUCCEED(); -} -} // namespace foo -``` - -## How do I build Google Testing Framework with Xcode 4? ## - -If you try to build Google Test's Xcode project with Xcode 4.0 or later, you may encounter an error message that looks like -"Missing SDK in target gtest\_framework: /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk". That means that Xcode does not support the SDK the project is targeting. See the Xcode section in the [README](../../README.MD) file on how to resolve this. - -## My question is not covered in your FAQ! ## - -If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are -some other resources you can use: - - 1. read other [wiki pages](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/w/list), - 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework/topics), - 1. ask it on [googletestframework@googlegroups.com](mailto:googletestframework@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework) before you can post.). - -Please note that creating an issue in the -[issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/issues/list) is _not_ -a good way to get your answer, as it is monitored infrequently by a -very small number of people. - -When asking a question, it's helpful to provide as much of the -following information as possible (people cannot help you if there's -not enough information in your question): - - * the version (or the revision number if you check out from SVN directly) of Google Test you use (Google Test is under active development, so it's possible that your problem has been solved in a later version), - * your operating system, - * the name and version of your compiler, - * the complete command line flags you give to your compiler, - * the complete compiler error messages (if the question is about compilation), - * the _actual_ code (ideally, a minimal but complete program) that has the problem you encounter. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_Primer.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_Primer.md deleted file mode 100644 index b1827c7..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_Primer.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,501 +0,0 @@ - - -# Introduction: Why Google C++ Testing Framework? # - -_Google C++ Testing Framework_ helps you write better C++ tests. - -No matter whether you work on Linux, Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, -Google Test can help you. - -So what makes a good test, and how does Google C++ Testing Framework fit in? We believe: - 1. Tests should be _independent_ and _repeatable_. It's a pain to debug a test that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. Google C++ Testing Framework isolates the tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, Google C++ Testing Framework allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging. - 1. Tests should be well _organized_ and reflect the structure of the tested code. Google C++ Testing Framework groups related tests into test cases that can share data and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch projects and start to work on a new code base. - 1. Tests should be _portable_ and _reusable_. The open-source community has a lot of code that is platform-neutral, its tests should also be platform-neutral. Google C++ Testing Framework works on different OSes, with different compilers (gcc, MSVC, and others), with or without exceptions, so Google C++ Testing Framework tests can easily work with a variety of configurations. (Note that the current release only contains build scripts for Linux - we are actively working on scripts for other platforms.) - 1. When tests fail, they should provide as much _information_ about the problem as possible. Google C++ Testing Framework doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile cycle. - 1. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores and let them focus on the test _content_. Google C++ Testing Framework automatically keeps track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them in order to run them. - 1. Tests should be _fast_. With Google C++ Testing Framework, you can reuse shared resources across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making tests depend on each other. - -Since Google C++ Testing Framework is based on the popular xUnit -architecture, you'll feel right at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. -If not, it will take you about 10 minutes to learn the basics and get started. -So let's go! - -_Note:_ We sometimes refer to Google C++ Testing Framework informally -as _Google Test_. - -# Setting up a New Test Project # - -To write a test program using Google Test, you need to compile Google -Test into a library and link your test with it. We provide build -files for some popular build systems: `msvc/` for Visual Studio, -`xcode/` for Mac Xcode, `make/` for GNU make, `codegear/` for Borland -C++ Builder, and the autotools script (deprecated) and -`CMakeLists.txt` for CMake (recommended) in the Google Test root -directory. If your build system is not on this list, you can take a -look at `make/Makefile` to learn how Google Test should be compiled -(basically you want to compile `src/gtest-all.cc` with `GTEST_ROOT` -and `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path, where `GTEST_ROOT` -is the Google Test root directory). - -Once you are able to compile the Google Test library, you should -create a project or build target for your test program. Make sure you -have `GTEST_ROOT/include` in the header search path so that the -compiler can find `"gtest/gtest.h"` when compiling your test. Set up -your test project to link with the Google Test library (for example, -in Visual Studio, this is done by adding a dependency on -`gtest.vcproj`). - -If you still have questions, take a look at how Google Test's own -tests are built and use them as examples. - -# Basic Concepts # - -When using Google Test, you start by writing _assertions_, which are statements -that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be _success_, -_nonfatal failure_, or _fatal failure_. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts -the current function; otherwise the program continues normally. - -_Tests_ use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes -or has a failed assertion, then it _fails_; otherwise it _succeeds_. - -A _test case_ contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test -cases that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a -test case need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a -_test fixture_ class. - -A _test program_ can contain multiple test cases. - -We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual -assertion level and building up to tests and test cases. - -# Assertions # - -Google Test assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a -class or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion -fails, Google Test prints the assertion's source file and line number location, -along with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message -which will be appended to Google Test's message. - -The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different -effects on the current function. `ASSERT_*` versions generate fatal failures -when they fail, and **abort the current function**. `EXPECT_*` versions generate -nonfatal failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually `EXPECT_*` -are preferred, as they allow more than one failures to be reported in a test. -However, you should use `ASSERT_*` if it doesn't make sense to continue when -the assertion in question fails. - -Since a failed `ASSERT_*` returns from the current function immediately, -possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak. -Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so -keep this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion -errors. - -To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the -`<<` operator, or a sequence of such operators. An example: -``` -ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length"; - -for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) { - EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i; -} -``` - -Anything that can be streamed to an `ostream` can be streamed to an assertion -macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string -(`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is -streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed. - -## Basic Assertions ## - -These assertions do basic true/false condition testing. -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_TRUE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is true | -| `ASSERT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | `EXPECT_FALSE(`_condition_`)`; | _condition_ is false | - -Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and -returns from the current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal -failure, allowing the function to continue running. In either case, an -assertion failure means its containing test fails. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## Binary Comparison ## - -This section describes assertions that compare two values. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -|`ASSERT_EQ(`_expected_`, `_actual_`);`|`EXPECT_EQ(`_expected_`, `_actual_`);`| _expected_ `==` _actual_ | -|`ASSERT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_NE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `!=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_LT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `<` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_LE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `<=` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_GT(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `>` _val2_ | -|`ASSERT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` |`EXPECT_GE(`_val1_`, `_val2_`);` | _val1_ `>=` _val2_ | - -In the event of a failure, Google Test prints both _val1_ and _val2_ -. In `ASSERT_EQ*` and `EXPECT_EQ*` (and all other equality assertions -we'll introduce later), you should put the expression you want to test -in the position of _actual_, and put its expected value in _expected_, -as Google Test's failure messages are optimized for this convention. - -Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison -operator or you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the -arguments to support the `<<` operator for streaming to an `ostream`, -but it's no longer necessary since v1.6.0 (if `<<` is supported, it -will be called to print the arguments when the assertion fails; -otherwise Google Test will attempt to print them in the best way it -can. For more details and how to customize the printing of the -arguments, see this Google Mock [recipe](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#teaching-google-mock-how-to-print-your-values).). - -These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the -corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). If the corresponding -operator is defined, prefer using the `ASSERT_*()` macros because they will -print out not only the result of the comparison, but the two operands as well. - -Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the -arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function, -the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e. the compiler is free to -choose any order) and your code should not depend on any particular argument -evaluation order. - -`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it -tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value. -Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use -`ASSERT_STREQ()` , which will be described later on. In particular, to assert -that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(NULL, c_string)` . However, to -compare two `string` objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`. - -Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string` -and `wstring`). - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -## String Comparison ## - -The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare -two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead. - -| **Fatal assertion** | **Nonfatal assertion** | **Verifies** | -|:--------------------|:-----------------------|:-------------| -| `ASSERT_STREQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | the two C strings have the same content | -| `ASSERT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content | -| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(`_expected\_str_`, `_actual\_str_`);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case | -| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);`| `EXPECT_STRCASENE(`_str1_`, `_str2_`);` | the two C strings have different content, ignoring case | - -Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. - -`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a -comparison of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 -narrow strings. - -A `NULL` pointer and an empty string are considered _different_. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -See also: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and -regular expression matching, for example), see the [Advanced Google Test Guide](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md). - -# Simple Tests # - -To create a test: - 1. Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function, These are ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. - 1. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, use the various Google Test assertions to check values. - 1. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds. - -``` -TEST(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - - -`TEST()` arguments go from general to specific. The _first_ argument is the -name of the test case, and the _second_ argument is the test's name within the -test case. Both names must be valid C++ identifiers, and they should not contain underscore (`_`). A test's _full name_ consists of its containing test case and its -individual name. Tests from different test cases can have the same individual -name. - -For example, let's take a simple integer function: -``` -int Factorial(int n); // Returns the factorial of n -``` - -A test case for this function might look like: -``` -// Tests factorial of 0. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(0)); -} - -// Tests factorial of positive numbers. -TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(1)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, Factorial(2)); - EXPECT_EQ(6, Factorial(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(40320, Factorial(8)); -} -``` - -Google Test groups the test results by test cases, so logically-related tests -should be in the same test case; in other words, the first argument to their -`TEST()` should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests, -`HandlesZeroInput` and `HandlesPositiveInput`, that belong to the same test -case `FactorialTest`. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests # - -If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, -you can use a _test fixture_. It allows you to reuse the same configuration of -objects for several different tests. - -To create a fixture, just: - 1. Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:` or `public:` as we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. - 1. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. - 1. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as `Setup()` with a small `u` - don't let that happen to you. - 1. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read this [FAQ entry](V1_7_FAQ.md#should-i-use-the-constructordestructor-of-the-test-fixture-or-the-set-uptear-down-function). - 1. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. - -When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to -access objects and subroutines in the test fixture: -``` -TEST_F(test_case_name, test_name) { - ... test body ... -} -``` - -Like `TEST()`, the first argument is the test case name, but for `TEST_F()` -this must be the name of the test fixture class. You've probably guessed: `_F` -is for fixture. - -Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro -that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler -error. - -Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a -`TEST_F()`, or you'll get the compiler error "`virtual outside class -declaration`". - -For each test defined with `TEST_F()`, Google Test will: - 1. Create a _fresh_ test fixture at runtime - 1. Immediately initialize it via `SetUp()` , - 1. Run the test - 1. Clean up by calling `TearDown()` - 1. Delete the test fixture. Note that different tests in the same test case have different test fixture objects, and Google Test always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one. Google Test does not reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests. - -As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named `Queue`, which -has the following interface: -``` -template <typename E> // E is the element type. -class Queue { - public: - Queue(); - void Enqueue(const E& element); - E* Dequeue(); // Returns NULL if the queue is empty. - size_t size() const; - ... -}; -``` - -First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name -`FooTest` where `Foo` is the class being tested. -``` -class QueueTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - virtual void SetUp() { - q1_.Enqueue(1); - q2_.Enqueue(2); - q2_.Enqueue(3); - } - - // virtual void TearDown() {} - - Queue<int> q0_; - Queue<int> q1_; - Queue<int> q2_; -}; -``` - -In this case, `TearDown()` is not needed since we don't have to clean up after -each test, other than what's already done by the destructor. - -Now we'll write tests using `TEST_F()` and this fixture. -``` -TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) { - EXPECT_EQ(0, q0_.size()); -} - -TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) { - int* n = q0_.Dequeue(); - EXPECT_EQ(NULL, n); - - n = q1_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(1, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(0, q1_.size()); - delete n; - - n = q2_.Dequeue(); - ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(2, *n); - EXPECT_EQ(1, q2_.size()); - delete n; -} -``` - -The above uses both `ASSERT_*` and `EXPECT_*` assertions. The rule of thumb is -to use `EXPECT_*` when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors -after the assertion failure, and use `ASSERT_*` when continuing after failure -doesn't make sense. For example, the second assertion in the `Dequeue` test is -`ASSERT_TRUE(n != NULL)`, as we need to dereference the pointer `n` later, -which would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`. - -When these tests run, the following happens: - 1. Google Test constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1` ). - 1. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . - 1. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . - 1. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. - 1. `t1` is destructed. - 1. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time running the `DequeueWorks` test. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -_Note_: Google Test automatically saves all _Google Test_ flags when a test -object is constructed, and restores them when it is destructed. - -# Invoking the Tests # - -`TEST()` and `TEST_F()` implicitly register their tests with Google Test. So, unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all your defined tests in order to run them. - -After defining your tests, you can run them with `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` , which returns `0` if all the tests are successful, or `1` otherwise. Note that `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` runs _all tests_ in your link unit -- they can be from different test cases, or even different source files. - -When invoked, the `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` macro: - 1. Saves the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Creates a test fixture object for the first test. - 1. Initializes it via `SetUp()`. - 1. Runs the test on the fixture object. - 1. Cleans up the fixture via `TearDown()`. - 1. Deletes the fixture. - 1. Restores the state of all Google Test flags. - 1. Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run. - -In addition, if the text fixture's constructor generates a fatal failure in -step 2, there is no point for step 3 - 5 and they are thus skipped. Similarly, -if step 3 generates a fatal failure, step 4 will be skipped. - -_Important_: You must not ignore the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or `gcc` -will give you a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the -automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its -exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus your `main()` function must -return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. - -Also, you should call `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` only **once**. Calling it more than once -conflicts with some advanced Google Test features (e.g. thread-safe death -tests) and thus is not supported. - -_Availability_: Linux, Windows, Mac. - -# Writing the main() Function # - -You can start from this boilerplate: -``` -#include "this/package/foo.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -namespace { - -// The fixture for testing class Foo. -class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { - protected: - // You can remove any or all of the following functions if its body - // is empty. - - FooTest() { - // You can do set-up work for each test here. - } - - virtual ~FooTest() { - // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here. - } - - // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up - // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods: - - virtual void SetUp() { - // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right - // before each test). - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right - // before the destructor). - } - - // Objects declared here can be used by all tests in the test case for Foo. -}; - -// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc. -TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) { - const string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat"; - const string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat"; - Foo f; - EXPECT_EQ(0, f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath)); -} - -// Tests that Foo does Xyz. -TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) { - // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo. -} - -} // namespace - -int main(int argc, char **argv) { - ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} -``` - -The `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` function parses the command line for Google -Test flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to control a -test program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in [AdvancedGuide](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md). -You must call this function before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or the flags -won't be properly initialized. - -On Windows, `InitGoogleTest()` also works with wide strings, so it can be used -in programs compiled in `UNICODE` mode as well. - -But maybe you think that writing all those main() functions is too much work? We agree with you completely and that's why Google Test provides a basic implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with gtest\_main library and you are good to go. - -## Important note for Visual C++ users ## -If you put your tests into a library and your `main()` function is in a different library or in your .exe file, those tests will not run. The reason is a [bug](https://connect.microsoft.com/feedback/viewfeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=244410&siteid=210) in Visual C++. When you define your tests, Google Test creates certain static objects to register them. These objects are not referenced from elsewhere but their constructors are still supposed to run. When Visual C++ linker sees that nothing in the library is referenced from other places it throws the library out. You have to reference your library with tests from your main program to keep the linker from discarding it. Here is how to do it. Somewhere in your library code declare a function: -``` -__declspec(dllexport) int PullInMyLibrary() { return 0; } -``` -If you put your tests in a static library (not DLL) then `__declspec(dllexport)` is not required. Now, in your main program, write a code that invokes that function: -``` -int PullInMyLibrary(); -static int dummy = PullInMyLibrary(); -``` -This will keep your tests referenced and will make them register themselves at startup. - -In addition, if you define your tests in a static library, add `/OPT:NOREF` to your main program linker options. If you use MSVC++ IDE, go to your .exe project properties/Configuration Properties/Linker/Optimization and set References setting to `Keep Unreferenced Data (/OPT:NOREF)`. This will keep Visual C++ linker from discarding individual symbols generated by your tests from the final executable. - -There is one more pitfall, though. If you use Google Test as a static library (that's how it is defined in gtest.vcproj) your tests must also reside in a static library. If you have to have them in a DLL, you _must_ change Google Test to build into a DLL as well. Otherwise your tests will not run correctly or will not run at all. The general conclusion here is: make your life easier - do not write your tests in libraries! - -# Where to Go from Here # - -Congratulations! You've learned the Google Test basics. You can start writing -and running Google Test tests, read some [samples](V1_7_Samples.md), or continue with -[AdvancedGuide](V1_7_AdvancedGuide.md), which describes many more useful Google Test features. - -# Known Limitations # - -Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is -thread-safe on systems where the `pthreads` library is available. It -is currently _unsafe_ to use Google Test assertions from two threads -concurrently on other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is -not an issue as usually the assertions are done in the main thread. If -you want to help, you can volunteer to implement the necessary -synchronization primitives in `gtest-port.h` for your platform. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md deleted file mode 100644 index 8184f15..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_PumpManual.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,177 +0,0 @@ - - -<b>P</b>ump is <b>U</b>seful for <b>M</b>eta <b>P</b>rogramming. - -# The Problem # - -Template and macro libraries often need to define many classes, -functions, or macros that vary only (or almost only) in the number of -arguments they take. It's a lot of repetitive, mechanical, and -error-prone work. - -Variadic templates and variadic macros can alleviate the problem. -However, while both are being considered by the C++ committee, neither -is in the standard yet or widely supported by compilers. Thus they -are often not a good choice, especially when your code needs to be -portable. And their capabilities are still limited. - -As a result, authors of such libraries often have to write scripts to -generate their implementation. However, our experience is that it's -tedious to write such scripts, which tend to reflect the structure of -the generated code poorly and are often hard to read and edit. For -example, a small change needed in the generated code may require some -non-intuitive, non-trivial changes in the script. This is especially -painful when experimenting with the code. - -# Our Solution # - -Pump (for Pump is Useful for Meta Programming, Pretty Useful for Meta -Programming, or Practical Utility for Meta Programming, whichever you -prefer) is a simple meta-programming tool for C++. The idea is that a -programmer writes a `foo.pump` file which contains C++ code plus meta -code that manipulates the C++ code. The meta code can handle -iterations over a range, nested iterations, local meta variable -definitions, simple arithmetic, and conditional expressions. You can -view it as a small Domain-Specific Language. The meta language is -designed to be non-intrusive (s.t. it won't confuse Emacs' C++ mode, -for example) and concise, making Pump code intuitive and easy to -maintain. - -## Highlights ## - - * The implementation is in a single Python script and thus ultra portable: no build or installation is needed and it works cross platforms. - * Pump tries to be smart with respect to [Google's style guide](http://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/): it breaks long lines (easy to have when they are generated) at acceptable places to fit within 80 columns and indent the continuation lines correctly. - * The format is human-readable and more concise than XML. - * The format works relatively well with Emacs' C++ mode. - -## Examples ## - -The following Pump code (where meta keywords start with `$`, `[[` and `]]` are meta brackets, and `$$` starts a meta comment that ends with the line): - -``` -$var n = 3 $$ Defines a meta variable n. -$range i 0..n $$ Declares the range of meta iterator i (inclusive). -$for i [[ - $$ Meta loop. -// Foo$i does blah for $i-ary predicates. -$range j 1..i -template <size_t N $for j [[, typename A$j]]> -class Foo$i { -$if i == 0 [[ - blah a; -]] $elif i <= 2 [[ - blah b; -]] $else [[ - blah c; -]] -}; - -]] -``` - -will be translated by the Pump compiler to: - -``` -// Foo0 does blah for 0-ary predicates. -template <size_t N> -class Foo0 { - blah a; -}; - -// Foo1 does blah for 1-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1> -class Foo1 { - blah b; -}; - -// Foo2 does blah for 2-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2> -class Foo2 { - blah b; -}; - -// Foo3 does blah for 3-ary predicates. -template <size_t N, typename A1, typename A2, typename A3> -class Foo3 { - blah c; -}; -``` - -In another example, - -``` -$range i 1..n -Func($for i + [[a$i]]); -$$ The text between i and [[ is the separator between iterations. -``` - -will generate one of the following lines (without the comments), depending on the value of `n`: - -``` -Func(); // If n is 0. -Func(a1); // If n is 1. -Func(a1 + a2); // If n is 2. -Func(a1 + a2 + a3); // If n is 3. -// And so on... -``` - -## Constructs ## - -We support the following meta programming constructs: - -| `$var id = exp` | Defines a named constant value. `$id` is valid util the end of the current meta lexical block. | -|:----------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| `$range id exp..exp` | Sets the range of an iteration variable, which can be reused in multiple loops later. | -| `$for id sep [[ code ]]` | Iteration. The range of `id` must have been defined earlier. `$id` is valid in `code`. | -| `$($)` | Generates a single `$` character. | -| `$id` | Value of the named constant or iteration variable. | -| `$(exp)` | Value of the expression. | -| `$if exp [[ code ]] else_branch` | Conditional. | -| `[[ code ]]` | Meta lexical block. | -| `cpp_code` | Raw C++ code. | -| `$$ comment` | Meta comment. | - -**Note:** To give the user some freedom in formatting the Pump source -code, Pump ignores a new-line character if it's right after `$for foo` -or next to `[[` or `]]`. Without this rule you'll often be forced to write -very long lines to get the desired output. Therefore sometimes you may -need to insert an extra new-line in such places for a new-line to show -up in your output. - -## Grammar ## - -``` -code ::= atomic_code* -atomic_code ::= $var id = exp - | $var id = [[ code ]] - | $range id exp..exp - | $for id sep [[ code ]] - | $($) - | $id - | $(exp) - | $if exp [[ code ]] else_branch - | [[ code ]] - | cpp_code -sep ::= cpp_code | empty_string -else_branch ::= $else [[ code ]] - | $elif exp [[ code ]] else_branch - | empty_string -exp ::= simple_expression_in_Python_syntax -``` - -## Code ## - -You can find the source code of Pump in [scripts/pump.py](../scripts/pump.py). It is still -very unpolished and lacks automated tests, although it has been -successfully used many times. If you find a chance to use it in your -project, please let us know what you think! We also welcome help on -improving Pump. - -## Real Examples ## - -You can find real-world applications of Pump in [Google Test](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgoogletest\.googlecode\.com) and [Google Mock](http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=file%3A\.pump%24+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fgooglemock\.googlecode\.com). The source file `foo.h.pump` generates `foo.h`. - -## Tips ## - - * If a meta variable is followed by a letter or digit, you can separate them using `[[]]`, which inserts an empty string. For example `Foo$j[[]]Helper` generate `Foo1Helper` when `j` is 1. - * To avoid extra-long Pump source lines, you can break a line anywhere you want by inserting `[[]]` followed by a new line. Since any new-line character next to `[[` or `]]` is ignored, the generated code won't contain this new line. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_Samples.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_Samples.md deleted file mode 100644 index f21d200..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_Samples.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -If you're like us, you'd like to look at some Google Test sample code. The -[samples folder](../samples) has a number of well-commented samples showing how to use a -variety of Google Test features. - - * [Sample #1](../samples/sample1_unittest.cc) shows the basic steps of using Google Test to test C++ functions. - * [Sample #2](../samples/sample2_unittest.cc) shows a more complex unit test for a class with multiple member functions. - * [Sample #3](../samples/sample3_unittest.cc) uses a test fixture. - * [Sample #4](../samples/sample4_unittest.cc) is another basic example of using Google Test. - * [Sample #5](../samples/sample5_unittest.cc) teaches how to reuse a test fixture in multiple test cases by deriving sub-fixtures from it. - * [Sample #6](../samples/sample6_unittest.cc) demonstrates type-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #7](../samples/sample7_unittest.cc) teaches the basics of value-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #8](../samples/sample8_unittest.cc) shows using `Combine()` in value-parameterized tests. - * [Sample #9](../samples/sample9_unittest.cc) shows use of the listener API to modify Google Test's console output and the use of its reflection API to inspect test results. - * [Sample #10](../samples/sample10_unittest.cc) shows use of the listener API to implement a primitive memory leak checker. diff --git a/googletest/docs/V1_7_XcodeGuide.md b/googletest/docs/V1_7_XcodeGuide.md deleted file mode 100644 index bf24bf5..0000000 --- a/googletest/docs/V1_7_XcodeGuide.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,93 +0,0 @@ - - -This guide will explain how to use the Google Testing Framework in your Xcode projects on Mac OS X. This tutorial begins by quickly explaining what to do for experienced users. After the quick start, the guide goes provides additional explanation about each step. - -# Quick Start # - -Here is the quick guide for using Google Test in your Xcode project. - - 1. Download the source from the [website](http://code.google.com/p/googletest) using this command: `svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only` - 1. Open up the `gtest.xcodeproj` in the `googletest-read-only/xcode/` directory and build the gtest.framework. - 1. Create a new "Shell Tool" target in your Xcode project called something like "UnitTests" - 1. Add the gtest.framework to your project and add it to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Edit the "UnitTests" executable and add an environment variable named "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" with a value equal to the path to the framework containing the gtest.framework relative to the compiled executable. - 1. Build and Go - -The following sections further explain each of the steps listed above in depth, describing in more detail how to complete it including some variations. - -# Get the Source # - -Currently, the gtest.framework discussed here isn't available in a tagged release of Google Test, it is only available in the trunk. As explained at the Google Test [site](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/checkout">svn), you can get the code from anonymous SVN with this command: - -``` -svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only -``` - -Alternatively, if you are working with Subversion in your own code base, you can add Google Test as an external dependency to your own Subversion repository. By following this approach, everyone that checks out your svn repository will also receive a copy of Google Test (a specific version, if you wish) without having to check it out explicitly. This makes the set up of your project simpler and reduces the copied code in the repository. - -To use `svn:externals`, decide where you would like to have the external source reside. You might choose to put the external source inside the trunk, because you want it to be part of the branch when you make a release. However, keeping it outside the trunk in a version-tagged directory called something like `third-party/googletest/1.0.1`, is another option. Once the location is established, use `svn propedit svn:externals _directory_` to set the svn:externals property on a directory in your repository. This directory won't contain the code, but be its versioned parent directory. - -The command `svn propedit` will bring up your Subversion editor, making editing the long, (potentially multi-line) property simpler. This same method can be used to check out a tagged branch, by using the appropriate URL (e.g. `http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release-1.0.1`). Additionally, the svn:externals property allows the specification of a particular revision of the trunk with the `-r_##_` option (e.g. `externals/src/googletest -r60 http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk`). - -Here is an example of using the svn:externals properties on a trunk (read via `svn propget`) of a project. This value checks out a copy of Google Test into the `trunk/externals/src/googletest/` directory. - -``` -[Computer:svn] user$ svn propget svn:externals trunk -externals/src/googletest http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk -``` - -# Add the Framework to Your Project # - -The next step is to build and add the gtest.framework to your own project. This guide describes two common ways below. - - * **Option 1** --- The simplest way to add Google Test to your own project, is to open gtest.xcodeproj (found in the xcode/ directory of the Google Test trunk) and build the framework manually. Then, add the built framework into your project using the "Add->Existing Framework..." from the context menu or "Project->Add..." from the main menu. The gtest.framework is relocatable and contains the headers and object code that you'll need to make tests. This method requires rebuilding every time you upgrade Google Test in your project. - * **Option 2** --- If you are going to be living off the trunk of Google Test, incorporating its latest features into your unit tests (or are a Google Test developer yourself). You'll want to rebuild the framework every time the source updates. to do this, you'll need to add the gtest.xcodeproj file, not the framework itself, to your own Xcode project. Then, from the build products that are revealed by the project's disclosure triangle, you can find the gtest.framework, which can be added to your targets (discussed below). - -# Make a Test Target # - -To start writing tests, make a new "Shell Tool" target. This target template is available under BSD, Cocoa, or Carbon. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of the target. - -Next, you'll want to add gtest.framework in two different ways, depending upon which option you chose above. - - * **Option 1** --- During compilation, Xcode will need to know that you are linking against the gtest.framework. Add the gtest.framework to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of your test target. This will include the Google Test headers in your header search path, and will tell the linker where to find the library. - * **Option 2** --- If your working out of the trunk, you'll also want to add gtest.framework to your "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of your test target. In addition, you'll want to add the gtest.framework as a dependency to your unit test target. This way, Xcode will make sure that gtest.framework is up to date, every time your build your target. Finally, if you don't share build directories with Google Test, you'll have to copy the gtest.framework into your own build products directory using a "Run Script" build phase. - -# Set Up the Executable Run Environment # - -Since the unit test executable is a shell tool, it doesn't have a bundle with a `Contents/Frameworks` directory, in which to place gtest.framework. Instead, the dynamic linker must be told at runtime to search for the framework in another location. This can be accomplished by setting the "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" environment variable in the "Edit Active Executable ..." Arguments tab, under "Variables to be set in the environment:". The path for this value is the path (relative or absolute) of the directory containing the gtest.framework. - -If you haven't set up the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH, correctly, you might get a message like this: - -``` -[Session started at 2008-08-15 06:23:57 -0600.] - dyld: Library not loaded: @loader_path/../Frameworks/gtest.framework/Versions/A/gtest - Referenced from: /Users/username/Documents/Sandbox/gtestSample/build/Debug/WidgetFrameworkTest - Reason: image not found -``` - -To correct this problem, got to the directory containing the executable named in "Referenced from:" value in the error message above. Then, with the terminal in this location, find the relative path to the directory containing the gtest.framework. That is the value you'll need to set as the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH. - -# Build and Go # - -Now, when you click "Build and Go", the test will be executed. Dumping out something like this: - -``` -[Session started at 2008-08-06 06:36:13 -0600.] -[==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case. -[----------] Global test environment set-up. -[----------] 2 tests from WidgetInitializerTest -[ RUN ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConstructor -[ OK ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConstructor -[ RUN ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConversion -[ OK ] WidgetInitializerTest.TestConversion -[----------] Global test environment tear-down -[==========] 2 tests from 1 test case ran. -[ PASSED ] 2 tests. - -The Debugger has exited with status 0. -``` - -# Summary # - -Unit testing is a valuable way to ensure your data model stays valid even during rapid development or refactoring. The Google Testing Framework is a great unit testing framework for C and C++ which integrates well with an Xcode development environment.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/docs/XcodeGuide.md b/googletest/docs/XcodeGuide.md index bf24bf5..1c60a33 100644 --- a/googletest/docs/XcodeGuide.md +++ b/googletest/docs/XcodeGuide.md @@ -6,19 +6,19 @@ This guide will explain how to use the Google Testing Framework in your Xcode pr Here is the quick guide for using Google Test in your Xcode project. - 1. Download the source from the [website](http://code.google.com/p/googletest) using this command: `svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only` + 1. Download the source from the [website](https://github.com/google/googletest) using this command: `svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only`. 1. Open up the `gtest.xcodeproj` in the `googletest-read-only/xcode/` directory and build the gtest.framework. - 1. Create a new "Shell Tool" target in your Xcode project called something like "UnitTests" - 1. Add the gtest.framework to your project and add it to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of "UnitTests" - 1. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of "UnitTests" + 1. Create a new "Shell Tool" target in your Xcode project called something like "UnitTests". + 1. Add the gtest.framework to your project and add it to the "Link Binary with Libraries" build phase of "UnitTests". + 1. Add your unit test source code to the "Compile Sources" build phase of "UnitTests". 1. Edit the "UnitTests" executable and add an environment variable named "DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH" with a value equal to the path to the framework containing the gtest.framework relative to the compiled executable. - 1. Build and Go + 1. Build and Go. The following sections further explain each of the steps listed above in depth, describing in more detail how to complete it including some variations. # Get the Source # -Currently, the gtest.framework discussed here isn't available in a tagged release of Google Test, it is only available in the trunk. As explained at the Google Test [site](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/checkout">svn), you can get the code from anonymous SVN with this command: +Currently, the gtest.framework discussed here isn't available in a tagged release of Google Test, it is only available in the trunk. As explained at the Google Test [site](https://github.com/google/googletest), you can get the code from anonymous SVN with this command: ``` svn checkout http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ googletest-read-only @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Alternatively, if you are working with Subversion in your own code base, you can To use `svn:externals`, decide where you would like to have the external source reside. You might choose to put the external source inside the trunk, because you want it to be part of the branch when you make a release. However, keeping it outside the trunk in a version-tagged directory called something like `third-party/googletest/1.0.1`, is another option. Once the location is established, use `svn propedit svn:externals _directory_` to set the svn:externals property on a directory in your repository. This directory won't contain the code, but be its versioned parent directory. -The command `svn propedit` will bring up your Subversion editor, making editing the long, (potentially multi-line) property simpler. This same method can be used to check out a tagged branch, by using the appropriate URL (e.g. `http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release-1.0.1`). Additionally, the svn:externals property allows the specification of a particular revision of the trunk with the `-r_##_` option (e.g. `externals/src/googletest -r60 http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk`). +The command `svn propedit` will bring up your Subversion editor, making editing the long, (potentially multi-line) property simpler. This same method can be used to check out a tagged branch, by using the appropriate URL (e.g. `https://github.com/google/googletest/releases/tag/release-1.0.1`). Additionally, the svn:externals property allows the specification of a particular revision of the trunk with the `-r_##_` option (e.g. `externals/src/googletest -r60 http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk`). Here is an example of using the svn:externals properties on a trunk (read via `svn propget`) of a project. This value checks out a copy of Google Test into the `trunk/externals/src/googletest/` directory. @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ If you haven't set up the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH, correctly, you might get a mess Reason: image not found ``` -To correct this problem, got to the directory containing the executable named in "Referenced from:" value in the error message above. Then, with the terminal in this location, find the relative path to the directory containing the gtest.framework. That is the value you'll need to set as the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH. +To correct this problem, go to to the directory containing the executable named in "Referenced from:" value in the error message above. Then, with the terminal in this location, find the relative path to the directory containing the gtest.framework. That is the value you'll need to set as the DYLD\_FRAMEWORK\_PATH. # Build and Go # @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ The Debugger has exited with status 0. # Summary # -Unit testing is a valuable way to ensure your data model stays valid even during rapid development or refactoring. The Google Testing Framework is a great unit testing framework for C and C++ which integrates well with an Xcode development environment.
\ No newline at end of file +Unit testing is a valuable way to ensure your data model stays valid even during rapid development or refactoring. The Google Testing Framework is a great unit testing framework for C and C++ which integrates well with an Xcode development environment. diff --git a/googletest/docs/advanced.md b/googletest/docs/advanced.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..feb8ad6 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/docs/advanced.md @@ -0,0 +1,2536 @@ +# Advanced googletest Topics + + +## Introduction + +Now that you have read the [googletest Primer](primer) and learned how to write +tests using googletest, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document will +show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex failure messages, +propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your test fixtures, and use various +flags with your tests. + +## More Assertions + +This section covers some less frequently used, but still significant, +assertions. + +### Explicit Success and Failure + +These three assertions do not actually test a value or expression. Instead, they +generate a success or failure directly. Like the macros that actually perform a +test, you may stream a custom failure message into them. + +```c++ +SUCCEED(); +``` + +Generates a success. This does **NOT** make the overall test succeed. A test is +considered successful only if none of its assertions fail during its execution. + +NOTE: `SUCCEED()` is purely documentary and currently doesn't generate any +user-visible output. However, we may add `SUCCEED()` messages to googletest's +output in the future. + +```c++ +FAIL(); +ADD_FAILURE(); +ADD_FAILURE_AT("file_path", line_number); +``` + +`FAIL()` generates a fatal failure, while `ADD_FAILURE()` and `ADD_FAILURE_AT()` +generate a nonfatal failure. These are useful when control flow, rather than a +Boolean expression, determines the test's success or failure. For example, you +might want to write something like: + +```c++ +switch(expression) { + case 1: + ... some checks ... + case 2: + ... some other checks ... + default: + FAIL() << "We shouldn't get here."; +} +``` + +NOTE: you can only use `FAIL()` in functions that return `void`. See the +[Assertion Placement section](#assertion-placement) for more information. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Exception Assertions + +These are for verifying that a piece of code throws (or does not throw) an +exception of the given type: + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | -------- +`ASSERT_THROW(statement, exception_type);` | `EXPECT_THROW(statement, exception_type);` | `statement` throws an exception of the given type +`ASSERT_ANY_THROW(statement);` | `EXPECT_ANY_THROW(statement);` | `statement` throws an exception of any type +`ASSERT_NO_THROW(statement);` | `EXPECT_NO_THROW(statement);` | `statement` doesn't throw any exception + +Examples: + +```c++ +ASSERT_THROW(Foo(5), bar_exception); + +EXPECT_NO_THROW({ + int n = 5; + Bar(&n); +}); +``` + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac; requires exceptions to be enabled in the +build environment (note that `google3` **disables** exceptions). + +### Predicate Assertions for Better Error Messages + +Even though googletest has a rich set of assertions, they can never be complete, +as it's impossible (nor a good idea) to anticipate all scenarios a user might +run into. Therefore, sometimes a user has to use `EXPECT_TRUE()` to check a +complex expression, for lack of a better macro. This has the problem of not +showing you the values of the parts of the expression, making it hard to +understand what went wrong. As a workaround, some users choose to construct the +failure message by themselves, streaming it into `EXPECT_TRUE()`. However, this +is awkward especially when the expression has side-effects or is expensive to +evaluate. + +googletest gives you three different options to solve this problem: + +#### Using an Existing Boolean Function + +If you already have a function or functor that returns `bool` (or a type that +can be implicitly converted to `bool`), you can use it in a *predicate +assertion* to get the function arguments printed for free: + +| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies | +| -------------------- | -------------------- | --------------------------- | +| `ASSERT_PRED1(pred1, | `EXPECT_PRED1(pred1, | `pred1(val1)` is true | +: val1);` : val1);` : : +| `ASSERT_PRED2(pred2, | `EXPECT_PRED2(pred2, | `pred2(val1, val2)` is true | +: val1, val2);` : val1, val2);` : : +| `...` | `...` | ... | + +In the above, `predn` is an `n`-ary predicate function or functor, where `val1`, +`val2`, ..., and `valn` are its arguments. The assertion succeeds if the +predicate returns `true` when applied to the given arguments, and fails +otherwise. When the assertion fails, it prints the value of each argument. In +either case, the arguments are evaluated exactly once. + +Here's an example. Given + +```c++ +// Returns true iff m and n have no common divisors except 1. +bool MutuallyPrime(int m, int n) { ... } + +const int a = 3; +const int b = 4; +const int c = 10; +``` + +the assertion + +```c++ + EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, a, b); +``` + +will succeed, while the assertion + +```c++ + EXPECT_PRED2(MutuallyPrime, b, c); +``` + +will fail with the message + +```none +MutuallyPrime(b, c) is false, where +b is 4 +c is 10 +``` + +> NOTE: +> +> 1. If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using +> `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see +> [this](faq#OverloadedPredicate) for how to resolve it. +> 1. Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need +> a higher-arity assertion, let [us](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues) know. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Using a Function That Returns an AssertionResult + +While `EXPECT_PRED*()` and friends are handy for a quick job, the syntax is not +satisfactory: you have to use different macros for different arities, and it +feels more like Lisp than C++. The `::testing::AssertionResult` class solves +this problem. + +An `AssertionResult` object represents the result of an assertion (whether it's +a success or a failure, and an associated message). You can create an +`AssertionResult` using one of these factory functions: + +```c++ +namespace testing { + +// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has +// succeeded. +AssertionResult AssertionSuccess(); + +// Returns an AssertionResult object to indicate that an assertion has +// failed. +AssertionResult AssertionFailure(); + +} +``` + +You can then use the `<<` operator to stream messages to the `AssertionResult` +object. + +To provide more readable messages in Boolean assertions (e.g. `EXPECT_TRUE()`), +write a predicate function that returns `AssertionResult` instead of `bool`. For +example, if you define `IsEven()` as: + +```c++ +::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { + if ((n % 2) == 0) + return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); + else + return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; +} +``` + +instead of: + +```c++ +bool IsEven(int n) { + return (n % 2) == 0; +} +``` + +the failed assertion `EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(4)))` will print: + +```none +Value of: IsEven(Fib(4)) + Actual: false (3 is odd) +Expected: true +``` + +instead of a more opaque + +```none +Value of: IsEven(Fib(4)) + Actual: false +Expected: true +``` + +If you want informative messages in `EXPECT_FALSE` and `ASSERT_FALSE` as well +(one third of Boolean assertions in the Google code base are negative ones), and +are fine with making the predicate slower in the success case, you can supply a +success message: + +```c++ +::testing::AssertionResult IsEven(int n) { + if ((n % 2) == 0) + return ::testing::AssertionSuccess() << n << " is even"; + else + return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd"; +} +``` + +Then the statement `EXPECT_FALSE(IsEven(Fib(6)))` will print + +```none + Value of: IsEven(Fib(6)) + Actual: true (8 is even) + Expected: false +``` + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Using a Predicate-Formatter + +If you find the default message generated by `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED*` and +`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_(TRUE|FALSE)` unsatisfactory, or some arguments to your +predicate do not support streaming to `ostream`, you can instead use the +following *predicate-formatter assertions* to *fully* customize how the message +is formatted: + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------ | -------- +`ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT1(pred_format1, val1);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT1(pred_format1, val1);` | `pred_format1(val1)` is successful +`ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2(pred_format2, val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(pred_format2, val1, val2);` | `pred_format2(val1, val2)` is successful +`...` | `...` | ... + +The difference between this and the previous group of macros is that instead of +a predicate, `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*` take a *predicate-formatter* +(`pred_formatn`), which is a function or functor with the signature: + +```c++ +::testing::AssertionResult PredicateFormattern(const char* expr1, + const char* expr2, + ... + const char* exprn, + T1 val1, + T2 val2, + ... + Tn valn); +``` + +where `val1`, `val2`, ..., and `valn` are the values of the predicate arguments, +and `expr1`, `expr2`, ..., and `exprn` are the corresponding expressions as they +appear in the source code. The types `T1`, `T2`, ..., and `Tn` can be either +value types or reference types. For example, if an argument has type `Foo`, you +can declare it as either `Foo` or `const Foo&`, whichever is appropriate. + +As an example, let's improve the failure message in `MutuallyPrime()`, which was +used with `EXPECT_PRED2()`: + +```c++ +// Returns the smallest prime common divisor of m and n, +// or 1 when m and n are mutually prime. +int SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(int m, int n) { ... } + +// A predicate-formatter for asserting that two integers are mutually prime. +::testing::AssertionResult AssertMutuallyPrime(const char* m_expr, + const char* n_expr, + int m, + int n) { + if (MutuallyPrime(m, n)) return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); + + return ::testing::AssertionFailure() << m_expr << " and " << n_expr + << " (" << m << " and " << n << ") are not mutually prime, " + << "as they have a common divisor " << SmallestPrimeCommonDivisor(m, n); +} +``` + +With this predicate-formatter, we can use + +```c++ + EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(AssertMutuallyPrime, b, c); +``` + +to generate the message + +```none +b and c (4 and 10) are not mutually prime, as they have a common divisor 2. +``` + +As you may have realized, many of the built-in assertions we introduced earlier +are special cases of `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. In fact, most of them are +indeed defined using `(EXPECT|ASSERT)_PRED_FORMAT*`. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Floating-Point Comparison + +Comparing floating-point numbers is tricky. Due to round-off errors, it is very +unlikely that two floating-points will match exactly. Therefore, `ASSERT_EQ` 's +naive comparison usually doesn't work. And since floating-points can have a wide +value range, no single fixed error bound works. It's better to compare by a +fixed relative error bound, except for values close to 0 due to the loss of +precision there. + +In general, for floating-point comparison to make sense, the user needs to +carefully choose the error bound. If they don't want or care to, comparing in +terms of Units in the Last Place (ULPs) is a good default, and googletest +provides assertions to do this. Full details about ULPs are quite long; if you +want to learn more, see +[here](https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/comparing-floating-point-numbers-2012-edition/). + +#### Floating-Point Macros + +| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies | +| ----------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------------- | +| `ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(val1, | `EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(val1, | the two `float` values | +: val2);` : val2);` : are almost equal : +| `ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(val1, | `EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(val1, | the two `double` values | +: val2);` : val2);` : are almost equal : + +By "almost equal" we mean the values are within 4 ULP's from each other. + +NOTE: `CHECK_DOUBLE_EQ()` in `base/logging.h` uses a fixed absolute error bound, +so its result may differ from that of the googletest macros. That macro is +unsafe and has been deprecated. Please don't use it any more. + +The following assertions allow you to choose the acceptable error bound: + +| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies | +| ------------------ | ------------------------ | ------------------------- | +| `ASSERT_NEAR(val1, | `EXPECT_NEAR(val1, val2, | the difference between | +: val2, abs_error);` : abs_error);` : `val1` and `val2` doesn't : +: : : exceed the given absolute : +: : : error : + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Floating-Point Predicate-Format Functions + +Some floating-point operations are useful, but not that often used. In order to +avoid an explosion of new macros, we provide them as predicate-format functions +that can be used in predicate assertion macros (e.g. `EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2`, +etc). + +```c++ +EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::FloatLE, val1, val2); +EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(::testing::DoubleLE, val1, val2); +``` + +Verifies that `val1` is less than, or almost equal to, `val2`. You can replace +`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2` in the above table with `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT2`. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Asserting Using gMock Matchers + +Google-developed C++ mocking framework [gMock](../../googlemock) comes with a +library of matchers for validating arguments passed to mock objects. A gMock +*matcher* is basically a predicate that knows how to describe itself. It can be +used in these assertion macros: + +| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies | +| ------------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------------- | +| `ASSERT_THAT(value, | `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher);` | value matches matcher | +: matcher);` : : : + +For example, `StartsWith(prefix)` is a matcher that matches a string starting +with `prefix`, and you can write: + +```c++ +using ::testing::StartsWith; +... + // Verifies that Foo() returns a string starting with "Hello". + EXPECT_THAT(Foo(), StartsWith("Hello")); +``` + +Read this [recipe](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#using-matchers-in-google-test-assertions) in +the gMock Cookbook for more details. + +gMock has a rich set of matchers. You can do many things googletest cannot do +alone with them. For a list of matchers gMock provides, read +[this](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#using-matchers). Especially useful among them are +some [protocol buffer matchers](https://github.com/google/nucleus/blob/master/nucleus/testing/protocol-buffer-matchers.h). It's easy to write +your [own matchers](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#writing-new-matchers-quickly) too. + +For example, you can use gMock's +[EqualsProto](https://github.com/google/nucleus/blob/master/nucleus/testing/protocol-buffer-matchers.h) +to compare protos in your tests: + +```c++ +#include "testing/base/public/gmock.h" +using ::testing::EqualsProto; +... + EXPECT_THAT(actual_proto, EqualsProto("foo: 123 bar: 'xyz'")); + EXPECT_THAT(*actual_proto_ptr, EqualsProto(expected_proto)); +``` + +gMock is bundled with googletest, so you don't need to add any build dependency +in order to take advantage of this. Just include `"testing/base/public/gmock.h"` +and you're ready to go. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, and Mac. + +### More String Assertions + +(Please read the [previous](#AssertThat) section first if you haven't.) + +You can use the gMock [string matchers](../../googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md#string-matchers) +with `EXPECT_THAT()` or `ASSERT_THAT()` to do more string comparison tricks +(sub-string, prefix, suffix, regular expression, and etc). For example, + +```c++ +using ::testing::HasSubstr; +using ::testing::MatchesRegex; +... + ASSERT_THAT(foo_string, HasSubstr("needle")); + EXPECT_THAT(bar_string, MatchesRegex("\\w*\\d+")); +``` + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +If the string contains a well-formed HTML or XML document, you can check whether +its DOM tree matches an [XPath +expression](http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/#contents): + +```c++ +// Currently still in //template/prototemplate/testing:xpath_matcher +#include "template/prototemplate/testing/xpath_matcher.h" +using prototemplate::testing::MatchesXPath; +EXPECT_THAT(html_string, MatchesXPath("//a[text()='click here']")); +``` + +**Availability**: Linux. + +### Windows HRESULT assertions + +These assertions test for `HRESULT` success or failure. + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +-------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | -------- +`ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(expression)` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(expression)` | `expression` is a success `HRESULT` +`ASSERT_HRESULT_FAILED(expression)` | `EXPECT_HRESULT_FAILED(expression)` | `expression` is a failure `HRESULT` + +The generated output contains the human-readable error message associated with +the `HRESULT` code returned by `expression`. + +You might use them like this: + +```c++ +CComPtr<IShellDispatch2> shell; +ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell.CoCreateInstance(L"Shell.Application")); +CComVariant empty; +ASSERT_HRESULT_SUCCEEDED(shell->ShellExecute(CComBSTR(url), empty, empty, empty, empty)); +``` + +**Availability**: Windows. + +### Type Assertions + +You can call the function + +```c++ +::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>(); +``` + +to assert that types `T1` and `T2` are the same. The function does nothing if +the assertion is satisfied. If the types are different, the function call will +fail to compile, and the compiler error message will likely (depending on the +compiler) show you the actual values of `T1` and `T2`. This is mainly useful +inside template code. + +**Caveat**: When used inside a member function of a class template or a function +template, `StaticAssertTypeEq<T1, T2>()` is effective only if the function is +instantiated. For example, given: + +```c++ +template <typename T> class Foo { + public: + void Bar() { ::testing::StaticAssertTypeEq<int, T>(); } +}; +``` + +the code: + +```c++ +void Test1() { Foo<bool> foo; } +``` + +will not generate a compiler error, as `Foo<bool>::Bar()` is never actually +instantiated. Instead, you need: + +```c++ +void Test2() { Foo<bool> foo; foo.Bar(); } +``` + +to cause a compiler error. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Assertion Placement + +You can use assertions in any C++ function. In particular, it doesn't have to be +a method of the test fixture class. The one constraint is that assertions that +generate a fatal failure (`FAIL*` and `ASSERT_*`) can only be used in +void-returning functions. This is a consequence of Google's not using +exceptions. By placing it in a non-void function you'll get a confusing compile +error like `"error: void value not ignored as it ought to be"` or `"cannot +initialize return object of type 'bool' with an rvalue of type 'void'"` or +`"error: no viable conversion from 'void' to 'string'"`. + +If you need to use fatal assertions in a function that returns non-void, one +option is to make the function return the value in an out parameter instead. For +example, you can rewrite `T2 Foo(T1 x)` to `void Foo(T1 x, T2* result)`. You +need to make sure that `*result` contains some sensible value even when the +function returns prematurely. As the function now returns `void`, you can use +any assertion inside of it. + +If changing the function's type is not an option, you should just use assertions +that generate non-fatal failures, such as `ADD_FAILURE*` and `EXPECT_*`. + +NOTE: Constructors and destructors are not considered void-returning functions, +according to the C++ language specification, and so you may not use fatal +assertions in them. You'll get a compilation error if you try. A simple +workaround is to transfer the entire body of the constructor or destructor to a +private void-returning method. However, you should be aware that a fatal +assertion failure in a constructor does not terminate the current test, as your +intuition might suggest; it merely returns from the constructor early, possibly +leaving your object in a partially-constructed state. Likewise, a fatal +assertion failure in a destructor may leave your object in a +partially-destructed state. Use assertions carefully in these situations! + +## Teaching googletest How to Print Your Values + +When a test assertion such as `EXPECT_EQ` fails, googletest prints the argument +values to help you debug. It does this using a user-extensible value printer. + +This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL +containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other types, it +prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the user can figure it out. + +As mentioned earlier, the printer is *extensible*. That means you can teach it +to do a better job at printing your particular type than to dump the bytes. To +do that, define `<<` for your type: + +```c++ +// Streams are allowed only for logging. Don't include this for +// any other purpose. +#include <ostream> + +namespace foo { + +class Bar { // We want googletest to be able to print instances of this. +... + // Create a free inline friend function. + friend ::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Bar& bar) { + return os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os + } +}; + +// If you can't declare the function in the class it's important that the +// << operator is defined in the SAME namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up +// rules rely on that. +::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const Bar& bar) { + return os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os +} + +} // namespace foo +``` + +Sometimes, this might not be an option: your team may consider it bad style to +have a `<<` operator for `Bar`, or `Bar` may already have a `<<` operator that +doesn't do what you want (and you cannot change it). If so, you can instead +define a `PrintTo()` function like this: + +```c++ +// Streams are allowed only for logging. Don't include this for +// any other purpose. +#include <ostream> + +namespace foo { + +class Bar { + ... + friend void PrintTo(const Bar& bar, ::std::ostream* os) { + *os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os + } +}; + +// If you can't declare the function in the class it's important that PrintTo() +// is defined in the SAME namespace that defines Bar. C++'s look-up rules rely +// on that. +void PrintTo(const Bar& bar, ::std::ostream* os) { + *os << bar.DebugString(); // whatever needed to print bar to os +} + +} // namespace foo +``` + +If you have defined both `<<` and `PrintTo()`, the latter will be used when +googletest is concerned. This allows you to customize how the value appears in +googletest's output without affecting code that relies on the behavior of its +`<<` operator. + +If you want to print a value `x` using googletest's value printer yourself, just +call `::testing::PrintToString(x)`, which returns an `std::string`: + +```c++ +vector<pair<Bar, int> > bar_ints = GetBarIntVector(); + +EXPECT_TRUE(IsCorrectBarIntVector(bar_ints)) + << "bar_ints = " << ::testing::PrintToString(bar_ints); +``` + +## Death Tests + +In many applications, there are assertions that can cause application failure if +a condition is not met. These sanity checks, which ensure that the program is in +a known good state, are there to fail at the earliest possible time after some +program state is corrupted. If the assertion checks the wrong condition, then +the program may proceed in an erroneous state, which could lead to memory +corruption, security holes, or worse. Hence it is vitally important to test that +such assertion statements work as expected. + +Since these precondition checks cause the processes to die, we call such tests +_death tests_. More generally, any test that checks that a program terminates +(except by throwing an exception) in an expected fashion is also a death test. + + +Note that if a piece of code throws an exception, we don't consider it "death" +for the purpose of death tests, as the caller of the code could catch the +exception and avoid the crash. If you want to verify exceptions thrown by your +code, see [Exception Assertions](#ExceptionAssertions). + +If you want to test `EXPECT_*()/ASSERT_*()` failures in your test code, see +Catching Failures + +### How to Write a Death Test + +googletest has the following macros to support death tests: + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | -------- +`ASSERT_DEATH(statement, regex);` | `EXPECT_DEATH(statement, regex);` | `statement` crashes with the given error +`ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(statement, regex);` | `EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(statement, regex);` | if death tests are supported, verifies that `statement` crashes with the given error; otherwise verifies nothing +`ASSERT_EXIT(statement, predicate, regex);` | `EXPECT_EXIT(statement, predicate, regex);` | `statement` exits with the given error, and its exit code matches `predicate` + +where `statement` is a statement that is expected to cause the process to die, +`predicate` is a function or function object that evaluates an integer exit +status, and `regex` is a (Perl) regular expression that the stderr output of +`statement` is expected to match. Note that `statement` can be *any valid +statement* (including *compound statement*) and doesn't have to be an +expression. + + +As usual, the `ASSERT` variants abort the current test function, while the +`EXPECT` variants do not. + +> NOTE: We use the word "crash" here to mean that the process terminates with a +> *non-zero* exit status code. There are two possibilities: either the process +> has called `exit()` or `_exit()` with a non-zero value, or it may be killed by +> a signal. +> +> This means that if `*statement*` terminates the process with a 0 exit code, it +> is *not* considered a crash by `EXPECT_DEATH`. Use `EXPECT_EXIT` instead if +> this is the case, or if you want to restrict the exit code more precisely. + +A predicate here must accept an `int` and return a `bool`. The death test +succeeds only if the predicate returns `true`. googletest defines a few +predicates that handle the most common cases: + +```c++ +::testing::ExitedWithCode(exit_code) +``` + +This expression is `true` if the program exited normally with the given exit +code. + +```c++ +::testing::KilledBySignal(signal_number) // Not available on Windows. +``` + +This expression is `true` if the program was killed by the given signal. + +The `*_DEATH` macros are convenient wrappers for `*_EXIT` that use a predicate +that verifies the process' exit code is non-zero. + +Note that a death test only cares about three things: + +1. does `statement` abort or exit the process? +2. (in the case of `ASSERT_EXIT` and `EXPECT_EXIT`) does the exit status + satisfy `predicate`? Or (in the case of `ASSERT_DEATH` and `EXPECT_DEATH`) + is the exit status non-zero? And +3. does the stderr output match `regex`? + +In particular, if `statement` generates an `ASSERT_*` or `EXPECT_*` failure, it +will **not** cause the death test to fail, as googletest assertions don't abort +the process. + +To write a death test, simply use one of the above macros inside your test +function. For example, + +```c++ +TEST(MyDeathTest, Foo) { + // This death test uses a compound statement. + ASSERT_DEATH({ + int n = 5; + Foo(&n); + }, "Error on line .* of Foo()"); +} + +TEST(MyDeathTest, NormalExit) { + EXPECT_EXIT(NormalExit(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success"); +} + +TEST(MyDeathTest, KillMyself) { + EXPECT_EXIT(KillMyself(), ::testing::KilledBySignal(SIGKILL), + "Sending myself unblockable signal"); +} +``` + +verifies that: + +* calling `Foo(5)` causes the process to die with the given error message, +* calling `NormalExit()` causes the process to print `"Success"` to stderr and + exit with exit code 0, and +* calling `KillMyself()` kills the process with signal `SIGKILL`. + +The test function body may contain other assertions and statements as well, if +necessary. + +### Death Test Naming + +IMPORTANT: We strongly recommend you to follow the convention of naming your +**test case** (not test) `*DeathTest` when it contains a death test, as +demonstrated in the above example. The [Death Tests And +Threads](#death-tests-and-threads) section below explains why. + +If a test fixture class is shared by normal tests and death tests, you can use +`using` or `typedef` to introduce an alias for the fixture class and avoid +duplicating its code: + +```c++ +class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; + +using FooDeathTest = FooTest; + +TEST_F(FooTest, DoesThis) { + // normal test +} + +TEST_F(FooDeathTest, DoesThat) { + // death test +} +``` + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Cygwin, and Mac + +### Regular Expression Syntax + + +On POSIX systems (e.g. Linux, Cygwin, and Mac), googletest uses the +[POSIX extended regular expression](http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html#tag_09_04) +syntax. To learn about this syntax, you may want to read this +[Wikipedia entry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Extended_Regular_Expressions). + +On Windows, googletest uses its own simple regular expression implementation. It +lacks many features. For example, we don't support union (`"x|y"`), grouping +(`"(xy)"`), brackets (`"[xy]"`), and repetition count (`"x{5,7}"`), among +others. Below is what we do support (`A` denotes a literal character, period +(`.`), or a single `\\ ` escape sequence; `x` and `y` denote regular +expressions.): + +Expression | Meaning +---------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- +`c` | matches any literal character `c` +`\\d` | matches any decimal digit +`\\D` | matches any character that's not a decimal digit +`\\f` | matches `\f` +`\\n` | matches `\n` +`\\r` | matches `\r` +`\\s` | matches any ASCII whitespace, including `\n` +`\\S` | matches any character that's not a whitespace +`\\t` | matches `\t` +`\\v` | matches `\v` +`\\w` | matches any letter, `_`, or decimal digit +`\\W` | matches any character that `\\w` doesn't match +`\\c` | matches any literal character `c`, which must be a punctuation +`.` | matches any single character except `\n` +`A?` | matches 0 or 1 occurrences of `A` +`A*` | matches 0 or many occurrences of `A` +`A+` | matches 1 or many occurrences of `A` +`^` | matches the beginning of a string (not that of each line) +`$` | matches the end of a string (not that of each line) +`xy` | matches `x` followed by `y` + +To help you determine which capability is available on your system, googletest +defines macros to govern which regular expression it is using. The macros are: +<!--absl:google3-begin(google3-only)-->`GTEST_USES_PCRE=1`, or +<!--absl:google3-end--> `GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE=1` or `GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE=1`. If +you want your death tests to work in all cases, you can either `#if` on these +macros or use the more limited syntax only. + +### How It Works + +Under the hood, `ASSERT_EXIT()` spawns a new process and executes the death test +statement in that process. The details of how precisely that happens depend on +the platform and the variable ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style) (which is +initialized from the command-line flag `--gtest_death_test_style`). + +* On POSIX systems, `fork()` (or `clone()` on Linux) is used to spawn the + child, after which: + * If the variable's value is `"fast"`, the death test statement is + immediately executed. + * If the variable's value is `"threadsafe"`, the child process re-executes + the unit test binary just as it was originally invoked, but with some + extra flags to cause just the single death test under consideration to + be run. +* On Windows, the child is spawned using the `CreateProcess()` API, and + re-executes the binary to cause just the single death test under + consideration to be run - much like the `threadsafe` mode on POSIX. + +Other values for the variable are illegal and will cause the death test to fail. +Currently, the flag's default value is +"fast". However, we reserve +the right to change it in the future. Therefore, your tests should not depend on +this. In either case, the parent process waits for the child process to +complete, and checks that + +1. the child's exit status satisfies the predicate, and +2. the child's stderr matches the regular expression. + +If the death test statement runs to completion without dying, the child process +will nonetheless terminate, and the assertion fails. + +### Death Tests And Threads + +The reason for the two death test styles has to do with thread safety. Due to +well-known problems with forking in the presence of threads, death tests should +be run in a single-threaded context. Sometimes, however, it isn't feasible to +arrange that kind of environment. For example, statically-initialized modules +may start threads before main is ever reached. Once threads have been created, +it may be difficult or impossible to clean them up. + +googletest has three features intended to raise awareness of threading issues. + +1. A warning is emitted if multiple threads are running when a death test is + encountered. +2. Test cases with a name ending in "DeathTest" are run before all other tests. +3. It uses `clone()` instead of `fork()` to spawn the child process on Linux + (`clone()` is not available on Cygwin and Mac), as `fork()` is more likely + to cause the child to hang when the parent process has multiple threads. + +It's perfectly fine to create threads inside a death test statement; they are +executed in a separate process and cannot affect the parent. + +### Death Test Styles + + +The "threadsafe" death test style was introduced in order to help mitigate the +risks of testing in a possibly multithreaded environment. It trades increased +test execution time (potentially dramatically so) for improved thread safety. + +The automated testing framework does not set the style flag. You can choose a +particular style of death tests by setting the flag programmatically: + +```c++ +testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style="threadsafe" +``` + +You can do this in `main()` to set the style for all death tests in the binary, +or in individual tests. Recall that flags are saved before running each test and +restored afterwards, so you need not do that yourself. For example: + +```c++ +int main(int argc, char** argv) { + InitGoogle(argv[0], &argc, &argv, true); + ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "fast"; + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +} + +TEST(MyDeathTest, TestOne) { + ::testing::FLAGS_gtest_death_test_style = "threadsafe"; + // This test is run in the "threadsafe" style: + ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); +} + +TEST(MyDeathTest, TestTwo) { + // This test is run in the "fast" style: + ASSERT_DEATH(ThisShouldDie(), ""); +} +``` + + +### Caveats + +The `statement` argument of `ASSERT_EXIT()` can be any valid C++ statement. If +it leaves the current function via a `return` statement or by throwing an +exception, the death test is considered to have failed. Some googletest macros +may return from the current function (e.g. `ASSERT_TRUE()`), so be sure to avoid +them in `statement`. + +Since `statement` runs in the child process, any in-memory side effect (e.g. +modifying a variable, releasing memory, etc) it causes will *not* be observable +in the parent process. In particular, if you release memory in a death test, +your program will fail the heap check as the parent process will never see the +memory reclaimed. To solve this problem, you can + +1. try not to free memory in a death test; +2. free the memory again in the parent process; or +3. do not use the heap checker in your program. + +Due to an implementation detail, you cannot place multiple death test assertions +on the same line; otherwise, compilation will fail with an unobvious error +message. + +Despite the improved thread safety afforded by the "threadsafe" style of death +test, thread problems such as deadlock are still possible in the presence of +handlers registered with `pthread_atfork(3)`. + + +## Using Assertions in Sub-routines + +### Adding Traces to Assertions + +If a test sub-routine is called from several places, when an assertion inside it +fails, it can be hard to tell which invocation of the sub-routine the failure is +from. +You can alleviate this problem using extra logging or custom failure messages, +but that usually clutters up your tests. A better solution is to use the +`SCOPED_TRACE` macro or the `ScopedTrace` utility: + +```c++ +SCOPED_TRACE(message); +ScopedTrace trace("file_path", line_number, message); +``` + +where `message` can be anything streamable to `std::ostream`. `SCOPED_TRACE` +macro will cause the current file name, line number, and the given message to be +added in every failure message. `ScopedTrace` accepts explicit file name and +line number in arguments, which is useful for writing test helpers. The effect +will be undone when the control leaves the current lexical scope. + +For example, + +```c++ +10: void Sub1(int n) { +11: EXPECT_EQ(1, Bar(n)); +12: EXPECT_EQ(2, Bar(n + 1)); +13: } +14: +15: TEST(FooTest, Bar) { +16: { +17: SCOPED_TRACE("A"); // This trace point will be included in +18: // every failure in this scope. +19: Sub1(1); +20: } +21: // Now it won't. +22: Sub1(9); +23: } +``` + +could result in messages like these: + +```none +path/to/foo_test.cc:11: Failure +Value of: Bar(n) +Expected: 1 + Actual: 2 + Trace: +path/to/foo_test.cc:17: A + +path/to/foo_test.cc:12: Failure +Value of: Bar(n + 1) +Expected: 2 + Actual: 3 +``` + +Without the trace, it would've been difficult to know which invocation of +`Sub1()` the two failures come from respectively. (You could add + +an extra message to each assertion in `Sub1()` to indicate the value of `n`, but +that's tedious.) + +Some tips on using `SCOPED_TRACE`: + +1. With a suitable message, it's often enough to use `SCOPED_TRACE` at the + beginning of a sub-routine, instead of at each call site. +2. When calling sub-routines inside a loop, make the loop iterator part of the + message in `SCOPED_TRACE` such that you can know which iteration the failure + is from. +3. Sometimes the line number of the trace point is enough for identifying the + particular invocation of a sub-routine. In this case, you don't have to + choose a unique message for `SCOPED_TRACE`. You can simply use `""`. +4. You can use `SCOPED_TRACE` in an inner scope when there is one in the outer + scope. In this case, all active trace points will be included in the failure + messages, in reverse order they are encountered. +5. The trace dump is clickable in Emacs - hit `return` on a line number and + you'll be taken to that line in the source file! + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Propagating Fatal Failures + +A common pitfall when using `ASSERT_*` and `FAIL*` is not understanding that +when they fail they only abort the _current function_, not the entire test. For +example, the following test will segfault: + +```c++ +void Subroutine() { + // Generates a fatal failure and aborts the current function. + ASSERT_EQ(1, 2); + + // The following won't be executed. + ... +} + +TEST(FooTest, Bar) { + Subroutine(); // The intended behavior is for the fatal failure + // in Subroutine() to abort the entire test. + + // The actual behavior: the function goes on after Subroutine() returns. + int* p = NULL; + *p = 3; // Segfault! +} +``` + +To alleviate this, googletest provides three different solutions. You could use +either exceptions, the `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_NO_FATAL_FAILURE` assertions or the +`HasFatalFailure()` function. They are described in the following two +subsections. + +#### Asserting on Subroutines with an exception + +The following code can turn ASSERT-failure into an exception: + +```c++ +class ThrowListener : public testing::EmptyTestEventListener { + void OnTestPartResult(const testing::TestPartResult& result) override { + if (result.type() == testing::TestPartResult::kFatalFailure) { + throw testing::AssertionException(result); + } + } +}; +int main(int argc, char** argv) { + ... + testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners().Append(new ThrowListener); + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +} +``` + +This listener should be added after other listeners if you have any, otherwise +they won't see failed `OnTestPartResult`. + +#### Asserting on Subroutines + +As shown above, if your test calls a subroutine that has an `ASSERT_*` failure +in it, the test will continue after the subroutine returns. This may not be what +you want. + +Often people want fatal failures to propagate like exceptions. For that +googletest offers the following macros: + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | -------- +`ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(statement);` | `EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(statement);` | `statement` doesn't generate any new fatal failures in the current thread. + +Only failures in the thread that executes the assertion are checked to determine +the result of this type of assertions. If `statement` creates new threads, +failures in these threads are ignored. + +Examples: + +```c++ +ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(Foo()); + +int i; +EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE({ + i = Bar(); +}); +``` + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. Assertions from multiple threads are +currently not supported on Windows. + +#### Checking for Failures in the Current Test + +`HasFatalFailure()` in the `::testing::Test` class returns `true` if an +assertion in the current test has suffered a fatal failure. This allows +functions to catch fatal failures in a sub-routine and return early. + +```c++ +class Test { + public: + ... + static bool HasFatalFailure(); +}; +``` + +The typical usage, which basically simulates the behavior of a thrown exception, +is: + +```c++ +TEST(FooTest, Bar) { + Subroutine(); + // Aborts if Subroutine() had a fatal failure. + if (HasFatalFailure()) return; + + // The following won't be executed. + ... +} +``` + +If `HasFatalFailure()` is used outside of `TEST()` , `TEST_F()` , or a test +fixture, you must add the `::testing::Test::` prefix, as in: + +```c++ +if (::testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; +``` + +Similarly, `HasNonfatalFailure()` returns `true` if the current test has at +least one non-fatal failure, and `HasFailure()` returns `true` if the current +test has at least one failure of either kind. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +## Logging Additional Information + +In your test code, you can call `RecordProperty("key", value)` to log additional +information, where `value` can be either a string or an `int`. The *last* value +recorded for a key will be emitted to the [XML output](#XmlReport) if you +specify one. For example, the test + +```c++ +TEST_F(WidgetUsageTest, MinAndMaxWidgets) { + RecordProperty("MaximumWidgets", ComputeMaxUsage()); + RecordProperty("MinimumWidgets", ComputeMinUsage()); +} +``` + +will output XML like this: + +```xml + ... + <testcase name="MinAndMaxWidgets" status="run" time="0.006" classname="WidgetUsageTest" MaximumWidgets="12" MinimumWidgets="9" /> + ... +``` + +> NOTE: +> +> * `RecordProperty()` is a static member of the `Test` class. Therefore it +> needs to be prefixed with `::testing::Test::` if used outside of the +> `TEST` body and the test fixture class. +> * `*key*` must be a valid XML attribute name, and cannot conflict with the +> ones already used by googletest (`name`, `status`, `time`, `classname`, +> `type_param`, and `value_param`). +> * Calling `RecordProperty()` outside of the lifespan of a test is allowed. +> If it's called outside of a test but between a test case's +> `SetUpTestCase()` and `TearDownTestCase()` methods, it will be attributed +> to the XML element for the test case. If it's called outside of all test +> cases (e.g. in a test environment), it will be attributed to the top-level +> XML element. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +## Sharing Resources Between Tests in the Same Test Case + +googletest creates a new test fixture object for each test in order to make +tests independent and easier to debug. However, sometimes tests use resources +that are expensive to set up, making the one-copy-per-test model prohibitively +expensive. + +If the tests don't change the resource, there's no harm in their sharing a +single resource copy. So, in addition to per-test set-up/tear-down, googletest +also supports per-test-case set-up/tear-down. To use it: + +1. In your test fixture class (say `FooTest` ), declare as `static` some member + variables to hold the shared resources. +1. Outside your test fixture class (typically just below it), define those + member variables, optionally giving them initial values. +1. In the same test fixture class, define a `static void SetUpTestCase()` + function (remember not to spell it as **`SetupTestCase`** with a small `u`!) + to set up the shared resources and a `static void TearDownTestCase()` + function to tear them down. + +That's it! googletest automatically calls `SetUpTestCase()` before running the +*first test* in the `FooTest` test case (i.e. before creating the first +`FooTest` object), and calls `TearDownTestCase()` after running the *last test* +in it (i.e. after deleting the last `FooTest` object). In between, the tests can +use the shared resources. + +Remember that the test order is undefined, so your code can't depend on a test +preceding or following another. Also, the tests must either not modify the state +of any shared resource, or, if they do modify the state, they must restore the +state to its original value before passing control to the next test. + +Here's an example of per-test-case set-up and tear-down: + +```c++ +class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { + protected: + // Per-test-case set-up. + // Called before the first test in this test case. + // Can be omitted if not needed. + static void SetUpTestCase() { + shared_resource_ = new ...; + } + + // Per-test-case tear-down. + // Called after the last test in this test case. + // Can be omitted if not needed. + static void TearDownTestCase() { + delete shared_resource_; + shared_resource_ = NULL; + } + + // You can define per-test set-up logic as usual. + virtual void SetUp() { ... } + + // You can define per-test tear-down logic as usual. + virtual void TearDown() { ... } + + // Some expensive resource shared by all tests. + static T* shared_resource_; +}; + +T* FooTest::shared_resource_ = NULL; + +TEST_F(FooTest, Test1) { + ... you can refer to shared_resource_ here ... +} + +TEST_F(FooTest, Test2) { + ... you can refer to shared_resource_ here ... +} +``` + +NOTE: Though the above code declares `SetUpTestCase()` protected, it may +sometimes be necessary to declare it public, such as when using it with +`TEST_P`. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +## Global Set-Up and Tear-Down + +Just as you can do set-up and tear-down at the test level and the test case +level, you can also do it at the test program level. Here's how. + +First, you subclass the `::testing::Environment` class to define a test +environment, which knows how to set-up and tear-down: + +```c++ +class Environment { + public: + virtual ~Environment() {} + + // Override this to define how to set up the environment. + virtual void SetUp() {} + + // Override this to define how to tear down the environment. + virtual void TearDown() {} +}; +``` + +Then, you register an instance of your environment class with googletest by +calling the `::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` function: + +```c++ +Environment* AddGlobalTestEnvironment(Environment* env); +``` + +Now, when `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is called, it first calls the `SetUp()` method of +the environment object, then runs the tests if there was no fatal failures, and +finally calls `TearDown()` of the environment object. + +It's OK to register multiple environment objects. In this case, their `SetUp()` +will be called in the order they are registered, and their `TearDown()` will be +called in the reverse order. + +Note that googletest takes ownership of the registered environment objects. +Therefore **do not delete them** by yourself. + +You should call `AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` before `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` is called, +probably in `main()`. If you use `gtest_main`, you need to call this before +`main()` starts for it to take effect. One way to do this is to define a global +variable like this: + +```c++ +::testing::Environment* const foo_env = + ::testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); +``` + +However, we strongly recommend you to write your own `main()` and call +`AddGlobalTestEnvironment()` there, as relying on initialization of global +variables makes the code harder to read and may cause problems when you register +multiple environments from different translation units and the environments have +dependencies among them (remember that the compiler doesn't guarantee the order +in which global variables from different translation units are initialized). + +## Value-Parameterized Tests + +*Value-parameterized tests* allow you to test your code with different +parameters without writing multiple copies of the same test. This is useful in a +number of situations, for example: + +* You have a piece of code whose behavior is affected by one or more + command-line flags. You want to make sure your code performs correctly for + various values of those flags. +* You want to test different implementations of an OO interface. +* You want to test your code over various inputs (a.k.a. data-driven testing). + This feature is easy to abuse, so please exercise your good sense when doing + it! + +### How to Write Value-Parameterized Tests + +To write value-parameterized tests, first you should define a fixture class. It +must be derived from both `::testing::Test` and +`::testing::WithParamInterface<T>` (the latter is a pure interface), where `T` +is the type of your parameter values. For convenience, you can just derive the +fixture class from `::testing::TestWithParam<T>`, which itself is derived from +both `::testing::Test` and `::testing::WithParamInterface<T>`. `T` can be any +copyable type. If it's a raw pointer, you are responsible for managing the +lifespan of the pointed values. + +NOTE: If your test fixture defines `SetUpTestCase()` or `TearDownTestCase()` +they must be declared **public** rather than **protected** in order to use +`TEST_P`. + +```c++ +class FooTest : + public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char*> { + // You can implement all the usual fixture class members here. + // To access the test parameter, call GetParam() from class + // TestWithParam<T>. +}; + +// Or, when you want to add parameters to a pre-existing fixture class: +class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { + ... +}; +class BarTest : public BaseTest, + public ::testing::WithParamInterface<const char*> { + ... +}; +``` + +Then, use the `TEST_P` macro to define as many test patterns using this fixture +as you want. The `_P` suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern", whichever you +prefer to think. + +```c++ +TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { + // Inside a test, access the test parameter with the GetParam() method + // of the TestWithParam<T> class: + EXPECT_TRUE(foo.Blah(GetParam())); + ... +} + +TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { + ... +} +``` + +Finally, you can use `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` to instantiate the test case with +any set of parameters you want. googletest defines a number of functions for +generating test parameters. They return what we call (surprise!) *parameter +generators*. Here is a summary of them, which are all in the `testing` +namespace: + +| Parameter Generator | Behavior | +| ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | +| `Range(begin, end [, step])` | Yields values `{begin, begin+step, | +: : begin+step+step, ...}`. The values do not : +: : include `end`. `step` defaults to 1. : +| `Values(v1, v2, ..., vN)` | Yields values `{v1, v2, ..., vN}`. | +| `ValuesIn(container)` and | Yields values from a C-style array, an | +: `ValuesIn(begin,end)` : STL-style container, or an iterator range : +: : `[begin, end)`. : +| `Bool()` | Yields sequence `{false, true}`. | +| `Combine(g1, g2, ..., gN)` | Yields all combinations (Cartesian product) | +: : as std\:\:tuples of the values generated by : +: : the `N` generators. : + +For more details, see the comments at the definitions of these functions. + +The following statement will instantiate tests from the `FooTest` test case each +with parameter values `"meeny"`, `"miny"`, and `"moe"`. + +```c++ +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(InstantiationName, + FooTest, + ::testing::Values("meeny", "miny", "moe")); +``` + +NOTE: The code above must be placed at global or namespace scope, not at +function scope. + +NOTE: Don't forget this step! If you do your test will silently pass, but none +of its cases will ever run! + +To distinguish different instances of the pattern (yes, you can instantiate it +more than once), the first argument to `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` is a prefix +that will be added to the actual test case name. Remember to pick unique +prefixes for different instantiations. The tests from the instantiation above +will have these names: + +* `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"meeny"` +* `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"miny"` +* `InstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/2` for `"moe"` +* `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"meeny"` +* `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"miny"` +* `InstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/2` for `"moe"` + +You can use these names in [`--gtest_filter`](#TestFilter). + +This statement will instantiate all tests from `FooTest` again, each with +parameter values `"cat"` and `"dog"`: + +```c++ +const char* pets[] = {"cat", "dog"}; +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AnotherInstantiationName, FooTest, + ::testing::ValuesIn(pets)); +``` + +The tests from the instantiation above will have these names: + +* `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/0` for `"cat"` +* `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.DoesBlah/1` for `"dog"` +* `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/0` for `"cat"` +* `AnotherInstantiationName/FooTest.HasBlahBlah/1` for `"dog"` + +Please note that `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` will instantiate *all* tests in the +given test case, whether their definitions come before or *after* the +`INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P` statement. + +You can see sample7_unittest.cc and sample8_unittest.cc for more examples. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac + +### Creating Value-Parameterized Abstract Tests + +In the above, we define and instantiate `FooTest` in the *same* source file. +Sometimes you may want to define value-parameterized tests in a library and let +other people instantiate them later. This pattern is known as *abstract tests*. +As an example of its application, when you are designing an interface you can +write a standard suite of abstract tests (perhaps using a factory function as +the test parameter) that all implementations of the interface are expected to +pass. When someone implements the interface, they can instantiate your suite to +get all the interface-conformance tests for free. + +To define abstract tests, you should organize your code like this: + +1. Put the definition of the parameterized test fixture class (e.g. `FooTest`) + in a header file, say `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as *declaring* your + abstract tests. +1. Put the `TEST_P` definitions in `foo_param_test.cc`, which includes + `foo_param_test.h`. Think of this as *implementing* your abstract tests. + +Once they are defined, you can instantiate them by including `foo_param_test.h`, +invoking `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()`, and depending on the library target that +contains `foo_param_test.cc`. You can instantiate the same abstract test case +multiple times, possibly in different source files. + +### Specifying Names for Value-Parameterized Test Parameters + +The optional last argument to `INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()` allows the user to +specify a function or functor that generates custom test name suffixes based on +the test parameters. The function should accept one argument of type +`testing::TestParamInfo<class ParamType>`, and return `std::string`. + +`testing::PrintToStringParamName` is a builtin test suffix generator that +returns the value of `testing::PrintToString(GetParam())`. It does not work for +`std::string` or C strings. + +NOTE: test names must be non-empty, unique, and may only contain ASCII +alphanumeric characters. In particular, they [should not contain +underscores](https://g3doc.corp.google.com/third_party/googletest/googletest/g3doc/faq.md#no-underscores). + +```c++ +class MyTestCase : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; + +TEST_P(MyTestCase, MyTest) +{ + std::cout << "Example Test Param: " << GetParam() << std::endl; +} + +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(MyGroup, MyTestCase, testing::Range(0, 10), + testing::PrintToStringParamName()); +``` + +## Typed Tests</id> + +Suppose you have multiple implementations of the same interface and want to make +sure that all of them satisfy some common requirements. Or, you may have defined +several types that are supposed to conform to the same "concept" and you want to +verify it. In both cases, you want the same test logic repeated for different +types. + +While you can write one `TEST` or `TEST_F` for each type you want to test (and +you may even factor the test logic into a function template that you invoke from +the `TEST`), it's tedious and doesn't scale: if you want `m` tests over `n` +types, you'll end up writing `m*n` `TEST`s. + +*Typed tests* allow you to repeat the same test logic over a list of types. You +only need to write the test logic once, although you must know the type list +when writing typed tests. Here's how you do it: + +First, define a fixture class template. It should be parameterized by a type. +Remember to derive it from `::testing::Test`: + +```c++ +template <typename T> +class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { + public: + ... + typedef std::list<T> List; + static T shared_; + T value_; +}; +``` + +Next, associate a list of types with the test case, which will be repeated for +each type in the list: + +```c++ +using MyTypes = ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int>; +TYPED_TEST_CASE(FooTest, MyTypes); +``` + +The type alias (`using` or `typedef`) is necessary for the `TYPED_TEST_CASE` +macro to parse correctly. Otherwise the compiler will think that each comma in +the type list introduces a new macro argument. + +Then, use `TYPED_TEST()` instead of `TEST_F()` to define a typed test for this +test case. You can repeat this as many times as you want: + +```c++ +TYPED_TEST(FooTest, DoesBlah) { + // Inside a test, refer to the special name TypeParam to get the type + // parameter. Since we are inside a derived class template, C++ requires + // us to visit the members of FooTest via 'this'. + TypeParam n = this->value_; + + // To visit static members of the fixture, add the 'TestFixture::' + // prefix. + n += TestFixture::shared_; + + // To refer to typedefs in the fixture, add the 'typename TestFixture::' + // prefix. The 'typename' is required to satisfy the compiler. + typename TestFixture::List values; + + values.push_back(n); + ... +} + +TYPED_TEST(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } +``` + +You can see sample6_unittest.cc + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac + +## Type-Parameterized Tests + +*Type-parameterized tests* are like typed tests, except that they don't require +you to know the list of types ahead of time. Instead, you can define the test +logic first and instantiate it with different type lists later. You can even +instantiate it more than once in the same program. + +If you are designing an interface or concept, you can define a suite of +type-parameterized tests to verify properties that any valid implementation of +the interface/concept should have. Then, the author of each implementation can +just instantiate the test suite with their type to verify that it conforms to +the requirements, without having to write similar tests repeatedly. Here's an +example: + +First, define a fixture class template, as we did with typed tests: + +```c++ +template <typename T> +class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { + ... +}; +``` + +Next, declare that you will define a type-parameterized test case: + +```c++ +TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest); +``` + +Then, use `TYPED_TEST_P()` to define a type-parameterized test. You can repeat +this as many times as you want: + +```c++ +TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, DoesBlah) { + // Inside a test, refer to TypeParam to get the type parameter. + TypeParam n = 0; + ... +} + +TYPED_TEST_P(FooTest, HasPropertyA) { ... } +``` + +Now the tricky part: you need to register all test patterns using the +`REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro before you can instantiate them. The first +argument of the macro is the test case name; the rest are the names of the tests +in this test case: + +```c++ +REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(FooTest, + DoesBlah, HasPropertyA); +``` + +Finally, you are free to instantiate the pattern with the types you want. If you +put the above code in a header file, you can `#include` it in multiple C++ +source files and instantiate it multiple times. + +```c++ +typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes; +INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, MyTypes); +``` + +To distinguish different instances of the pattern, the first argument to the +`INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P` macro is a prefix that will be added to the +actual test case name. Remember to pick unique prefixes for different instances. + +In the special case where the type list contains only one type, you can write +that type directly without `::testing::Types<...>`, like this: + +```c++ +INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, int); +``` + +You can see `sample6_unittest.cc` for a complete example. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows (requires MSVC 8.0 or above), Mac + +## Testing Private Code + +If you change your software's internal implementation, your tests should not +break as long as the change is not observable by users. Therefore, **per the +black-box testing principle, most of the time you should test your code through +its public interfaces.** + +**If you still find yourself needing to test internal implementation code, +consider if there's a better design.** The desire to test internal +implementation is often a sign that the class is doing too much. Consider +extracting an implementation class, and testing it. Then use that implementation +class in the original class. + +If you absolutely have to test non-public interface code though, you can. There +are two cases to consider: + +* Static functions ( *not* the same as static member functions!) or unnamed + namespaces, and +* Private or protected class members + +To test them, we use the following special techniques: + +* Both static functions and definitions/declarations in an unnamed namespace + are only visible within the same translation unit. To test them, you can + `#include` the entire `.cc` file being tested in your `*_test.cc` file. + (#including `.cc` files is not a good way to reuse code - you should not do + this in production code!) + + However, a better approach is to move the private code into the + `foo::internal` namespace, where `foo` is the namespace your project + normally uses, and put the private declarations in a `*-internal.h` file. + Your production `.cc` files and your tests are allowed to include this + internal header, but your clients are not. This way, you can fully test your + internal implementation without leaking it to your clients. + +* Private class members are only accessible from within the class or by + friends. To access a class' private members, you can declare your test + fixture as a friend to the class and define accessors in your fixture. Tests + using the fixture can then access the private members of your production + class via the accessors in the fixture. Note that even though your fixture + is a friend to your production class, your tests are not automatically + friends to it, as they are technically defined in sub-classes of the + fixture. + + Another way to test private members is to refactor them into an + implementation class, which is then declared in a `*-internal.h` file. Your + clients aren't allowed to include this header but your tests can. Such is + called the + [Pimpl](https://www.gamedev.net/articles/programming/general-and-gameplay-programming/the-c-pimpl-r1794/) + (Private Implementation) idiom. + + Or, you can declare an individual test as a friend of your class by adding + this line in the class body: + + ```c++ + FRIEND_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName); + ``` + + For example, + + ```c++ + // foo.h + +#include "gtest/gtest_prod.h" + + class Foo { + ... + private: + FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull); + + int Bar(void* x); + }; + + // foo_test.cc + ... + TEST(FooTest, BarReturnsZeroOnNull) { + Foo foo; + EXPECT_EQ(0, foo.Bar(NULL)); // Uses Foo's private member Bar(). + } + ``` + + Pay special attention when your class is defined in a namespace, as you + should define your test fixtures and tests in the same namespace if you want + them to be friends of your class. For example, if the code to be tested + looks like: + + ```c++ + namespace my_namespace { + + class Foo { + friend class FooTest; + FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Bar); + FRIEND_TEST(FooTest, Baz); + ... definition of the class Foo ... + }; + + } // namespace my_namespace + ``` + + Your test code should be something like: + + ```c++ + namespace my_namespace { + + class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { + protected: + ... + }; + + TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } + TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } + + } // namespace my_namespace + ``` + + + ## "Catching" Failures + +If you are building a testing utility on top of googletest, you'll want to test +your utility. What framework would you use to test it? googletest, of course. + +The challenge is to verify that your testing utility reports failures correctly. +In frameworks that report a failure by throwing an exception, you could catch +the exception and assert on it. But googletest doesn't use exceptions, so how do +we test that a piece of code generates an expected failure? + +gunit-spi.h contains some constructs to do this. After #including this header, +you can use + +```c++ + EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(statement, substring); +``` + +to assert that `statement` generates a fatal (e.g. `ASSERT_*`) failure in the +current thread whose message contains the given `substring`, or use + +```c++ + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(statement, substring); +``` + +if you are expecting a non-fatal (e.g. `EXPECT_*`) failure. + +Only failures in the current thread are checked to determine the result of this +type of expectations. If `statement` creates new threads, failures in these +threads are also ignored. If you want to catch failures in other threads as +well, use one of the following macros instead: + +```c++ + EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(statement, substring); + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(statement, substring); +``` + +NOTE: Assertions from multiple threads are currently not supported on Windows. + +For technical reasons, there are some caveats: + +1. You cannot stream a failure message to either macro. + +1. `statement` in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE{_ON_ALL_THREADS}()` cannot reference + local non-static variables or non-static members of `this` object. + +1. `statement` in `EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE{_ON_ALL_THREADS}()()` cannot return a + value. + + +## Getting the Current Test's Name + +Sometimes a function may need to know the name of the currently running test. +For example, you may be using the `SetUp()` method of your test fixture to set +the golden file name based on which test is running. The `::testing::TestInfo` +class has this information: + +```c++ +namespace testing { + +class TestInfo { + public: + // Returns the test case name and the test name, respectively. + // + // Do NOT delete or free the return value - it's managed by the + // TestInfo class. + const char* test_case_name() const; + const char* name() const; +}; + +} +``` + +To obtain a `TestInfo` object for the currently running test, call +`current_test_info()` on the `UnitTest` singleton object: + +```c++ + // Gets information about the currently running test. + // Do NOT delete the returned object - it's managed by the UnitTest class. + const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = + ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); + + + + printf("We are in test %s of test case %s.\n", + test_info->name(), + test_info->test_case_name()); +``` + +`current_test_info()` returns a null pointer if no test is running. In +particular, you cannot find the test case name in `TestCaseSetUp()`, +`TestCaseTearDown()` (where you know the test case name implicitly), or +functions called from them. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +## Extending googletest by Handling Test Events + +googletest provides an **event listener API** to let you receive notifications +about the progress of a test program and test failures. The events you can +listen to include the start and end of the test program, a test case, or a test +method, among others. You may use this API to augment or replace the standard +console output, replace the XML output, or provide a completely different form +of output, such as a GUI or a database. You can also use test events as +checkpoints to implement a resource leak checker, for example. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Defining Event Listeners + +To define a event listener, you subclass either testing::TestEventListener or +testing::EmptyTestEventListener The former is an (abstract) interface, where +*each pure virtual method can be overridden to handle a test event* (For +example, when a test starts, the `OnTestStart()` method will be called.). The +latter provides an empty implementation of all methods in the interface, such +that a subclass only needs to override the methods it cares about. + +When an event is fired, its context is passed to the handler function as an +argument. The following argument types are used: + +* UnitTest reflects the state of the entire test program, +* TestCase has information about a test case, which can contain one or more + tests, +* TestInfo contains the state of a test, and +* TestPartResult represents the result of a test assertion. + +An event handler function can examine the argument it receives to find out +interesting information about the event and the test program's state. + +Here's an example: + +```c++ + class MinimalistPrinter : public ::testing::EmptyTestEventListener { + // Called before a test starts. + virtual void OnTestStart(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { + printf("*** Test %s.%s starting.\n", + test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); + } + + // Called after a failed assertion or a SUCCESS(). + virtual void OnTestPartResult(const ::testing::TestPartResult& test_part_result) { + printf("%s in %s:%d\n%s\n", + test_part_result.failed() ? "*** Failure" : "Success", + test_part_result.file_name(), + test_part_result.line_number(), + test_part_result.summary()); + } + + // Called after a test ends. + virtual void OnTestEnd(const ::testing::TestInfo& test_info) { + printf("*** Test %s.%s ending.\n", + test_info.test_case_name(), test_info.name()); + } + }; +``` + +### Using Event Listeners + +To use the event listener you have defined, add an instance of it to the +googletest event listener list (represented by class TestEventListeners - note +the "s" at the end of the name) in your `main()` function, before calling +`RUN_ALL_TESTS()`: + +```c++ +int main(int argc, char** argv) { + ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + // Gets hold of the event listener list. + ::testing::TestEventListeners& listeners = + ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners(); + // Adds a listener to the end. googletest takes the ownership. + listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +} +``` + +There's only one problem: the default test result printer is still in effect, so +its output will mingle with the output from your minimalist printer. To suppress +the default printer, just release it from the event listener list and delete it. +You can do so by adding one line: + +```c++ + ... + delete listeners.Release(listeners.default_result_printer()); + listeners.Append(new MinimalistPrinter); + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +``` + +Now, sit back and enjoy a completely different output from your tests. For more +details, you can read this sample9_unittest.cc + +You may append more than one listener to the list. When an `On*Start()` or +`OnTestPartResult()` event is fired, the listeners will receive it in the order +they appear in the list (since new listeners are added to the end of the list, +the default text printer and the default XML generator will receive the event +first). An `On*End()` event will be received by the listeners in the *reverse* +order. This allows output by listeners added later to be framed by output from +listeners added earlier. + +### Generating Failures in Listeners + +You may use failure-raising macros (`EXPECT_*()`, `ASSERT_*()`, `FAIL()`, etc) +when processing an event. There are some restrictions: + +1. You cannot generate any failure in `OnTestPartResult()` (otherwise it will + cause `OnTestPartResult()` to be called recursively). +1. A listener that handles `OnTestPartResult()` is not allowed to generate any + failure. + +When you add listeners to the listener list, you should put listeners that +handle `OnTestPartResult()` *before* listeners that can generate failures. This +ensures that failures generated by the latter are attributed to the right test +by the former. + +We have a sample of failure-raising listener sample10_unittest.cc + +## Running Test Programs: Advanced Options + +googletest test programs are ordinary executables. Once built, you can run them +directly and affect their behavior via the following environment variables +and/or command line flags. For the flags to work, your programs must call +`::testing::InitGoogleTest()` before calling `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. + +To see a list of supported flags and their usage, please run your test program +with the `--help` flag. You can also use `-h`, `-?`, or `/?` for short. + +If an option is specified both by an environment variable and by a flag, the +latter takes precedence. + +### Selecting Tests + +#### Listing Test Names + +Sometimes it is necessary to list the available tests in a program before +running them so that a filter may be applied if needed. Including the flag +`--gtest_list_tests` overrides all other flags and lists tests in the following +format: + +```none +TestCase1. + TestName1 + TestName2 +TestCase2. + TestName +``` + +None of the tests listed are actually run if the flag is provided. There is no +corresponding environment variable for this flag. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Running a Subset of the Tests + +By default, a googletest program runs all tests the user has defined. Sometimes, +you want to run only a subset of the tests (e.g. for debugging or quickly +verifying a change). If you set the `GTEST_FILTER` environment variable or the +`--gtest_filter` flag to a filter string, googletest will only run the tests +whose full names (in the form of `TestCaseName.TestName`) match the filter. + +The format of a filter is a '`:`'-separated list of wildcard patterns (called +the *positive patterns*) optionally followed by a '`-`' and another +'`:`'-separated pattern list (called the *negative patterns*). A test matches +the filter if and only if it matches any of the positive patterns but does not +match any of the negative patterns. + +A pattern may contain `'*'` (matches any string) or `'?'` (matches any single +character). For convenience, the filter + +`'*-NegativePatterns'` can be also written as `'-NegativePatterns'`. + +For example: + +* `./foo_test` Has no flag, and thus runs all its tests. +* `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*` Also runs everything, due to the single + match-everything `*` value. +* `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*` Runs everything in test case `FooTest` + . +* `./foo_test --gtest_filter=*Null*:*Constructor*` Runs any test whose full + name contains either `"Null"` or `"Constructor"` . +* `./foo_test --gtest_filter=-*DeathTest.*` Runs all non-death tests. +* `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*-FooTest.Bar` Runs everything in test + case `FooTest` except `FooTest.Bar`. +* `./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*:BarTest.*-FooTest.Bar:BarTest.Foo` Runs + everything in test case `FooTest` except `FooTest.Bar` and everything in + test case `BarTest` except `BarTest.Foo`. + +#### Temporarily Disabling Tests + +If you have a broken test that you cannot fix right away, you can add the +`DISABLED_` prefix to its name. This will exclude it from execution. This is +better than commenting out the code or using `#if 0`, as disabled tests are +still compiled (and thus won't rot). + +If you need to disable all tests in a test case, you can either add `DISABLED_` +to the front of the name of each test, or alternatively add it to the front of +the test case name. + +For example, the following tests won't be run by googletest, even though they +will still be compiled: + +```c++ +// Tests that Foo does Abc. +TEST(FooTest, DISABLED_DoesAbc) { ... } + +class DISABLED_BarTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; + +// Tests that Bar does Xyz. +TEST_F(DISABLED_BarTest, DoesXyz) { ... } +``` + +NOTE: This feature should only be used for temporary pain-relief. You still have +to fix the disabled tests at a later date. As a reminder, googletest will print +a banner warning you if a test program contains any disabled tests. + +TIP: You can easily count the number of disabled tests you have using `gsearch` +and/or `grep`. This number can be used as a metric for improving your test +quality. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Temporarily Enabling Disabled Tests + +To include disabled tests in test execution, just invoke the test program with +the `--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests` flag or set the +`GTEST_ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS` environment variable to a value other than `0`. +You can combine this with the `--gtest_filter` flag to further select which +disabled tests to run. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Repeating the Tests + +Once in a while you'll run into a test whose result is hit-or-miss. Perhaps it +will fail only 1% of the time, making it rather hard to reproduce the bug under +a debugger. This can be a major source of frustration. + +The `--gtest_repeat` flag allows you to repeat all (or selected) test methods in +a program many times. Hopefully, a flaky test will eventually fail and give you +a chance to debug. Here's how to use it: + +```none +$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 +Repeat foo_test 1000 times and don't stop at failures. + +$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=-1 +A negative count means repeating forever. + +$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure +Repeat foo_test 1000 times, stopping at the first failure. This +is especially useful when running under a debugger: when the test +fails, it will drop into the debugger and you can then inspect +variables and stacks. + +$ foo_test --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_filter=FooBar.* +Repeat the tests whose name matches the filter 1000 times. +``` + +If your test program contains [global set-up/tear-down](#GlobalSetUp) code, it +will be repeated in each iteration as well, as the flakiness may be in it. You +can also specify the repeat count by setting the `GTEST_REPEAT` environment +variable. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Shuffling the Tests + +You can specify the `--gtest_shuffle` flag (or set the `GTEST_SHUFFLE` +environment variable to `1`) to run the tests in a program in a random order. +This helps to reveal bad dependencies between tests. + +By default, googletest uses a random seed calculated from the current time. +Therefore you'll get a different order every time. The console output includes +the random seed value, such that you can reproduce an order-related test failure +later. To specify the random seed explicitly, use the `--gtest_random_seed=SEED` +flag (or set the `GTEST_RANDOM_SEED` environment variable), where `SEED` is an +integer in the range [0, 99999]. The seed value 0 is special: it tells +googletest to do the default behavior of calculating the seed from the current +time. + +If you combine this with `--gtest_repeat=N`, googletest will pick a different +random seed and re-shuffle the tests in each iteration. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Controlling Test Output + +#### Colored Terminal Output + +googletest can use colors in its terminal output to make it easier to spot the +important information: + +... +<span style="color:green">[----------]<span style="color:black"> 1 test from FooTest +<span style="color:green">[ RUN ]<span style="color:black"> FooTest.DoesAbc +<span style="color:green">[ OK ]<span style="color:black"> FooTest.DoesAbc +<span style="color:green">[----------]<span style="color:black"> 2 tests from BarTest +<span style="color:green">[ RUN ]<span style="color:black"> BarTest.HasXyzProperty +<span style="color:green">[ OK ]<span style="color:black"> BarTest.HasXyzProperty +<span style="color:green">[ RUN ]<span style="color:black"> BarTest.ReturnsTrueOnSuccess +... some error messages ... +<span style="color:red">[ FAILED ] <span style="color:black">BarTest.ReturnsTrueOnSuccess +... +<span style="color:green">[==========]<span style="color:black"> 30 tests from 14 test cases ran. +<span style="color:green">[ PASSED ]<span style="color:black"> 28 tests. +<span style="color:red">[ FAILED ]<span style="color:black"> 2 tests, listed below: +<span style="color:red">[ FAILED ]<span style="color:black"> BarTest.ReturnsTrueOnSuccess +<span style="color:red">[ FAILED ]<span style="color:black"> AnotherTest.DoesXyz + + 2 FAILED TESTS + +You can set the `GTEST_COLOR` environment variable or the `--gtest_color` +command line flag to `yes`, `no`, or `auto` (the default) to enable colors, +disable colors, or let googletest decide. When the value is `auto`, googletest +will use colors if and only if the output goes to a terminal and (on non-Windows +platforms) the `TERM` environment variable is set to `xterm` or `xterm-color`. + +> +> **Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Suppressing the Elapsed Time + +By default, googletest prints the time it takes to run each test. To disable +that, run the test program with the `--gtest_print_time=0` command line flag, or +set the GTEST_PRINT_TIME environment variable to `0`. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Suppressing UTF-8 Text Output + +In case of assertion failures, googletest prints expected and actual values of +type `string` both as hex-encoded strings as well as in readable UTF-8 text if +they contain valid non-ASCII UTF-8 characters. If you want to suppress the UTF-8 +text because, for example, you don't have an UTF-8 compatible output medium, run +the test program with `--gtest_print_utf8=0` or set the `GTEST_PRINT_UTF8` +environment variable to `0`. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + + +#### Generating an XML Report + +googletest can emit a detailed XML report to a file in addition to its normal +textual output. The report contains the duration of each test, and thus can help +you identify slow tests. The report is also used by the http://unittest +dashboard to show per-test-method error messages. + +To generate the XML report, set the `GTEST_OUTPUT` environment variable or the +`--gtest_output` flag to the string `"xml:path_to_output_file"`, which will +create the file at the given location. You can also just use the string `"xml"`, +in which case the output can be found in the `test_detail.xml` file in the +current directory. + +If you specify a directory (for example, `"xml:output/directory/"` on Linux or +`"xml:output\directory\"` on Windows), googletest will create the XML file in +that directory, named after the test executable (e.g. `foo_test.xml` for test +program `foo_test` or `foo_test.exe`). If the file already exists (perhaps left +over from a previous run), googletest will pick a different name (e.g. +`foo_test_1.xml`) to avoid overwriting it. + + +The report is based on the `junitreport` Ant task. Since that format was +originally intended for Java, a little interpretation is required to make it +apply to googletest tests, as shown here: + +```xml +<testsuites name="AllTests" ...> + <testsuite name="test_case_name" ...> + <testcase name="test_name" ...> + <failure message="..."/> + <failure message="..."/> + <failure message="..."/> + </testcase> + </testsuite> +</testsuites> +``` + +* The root `<testsuites>` element corresponds to the entire test program. +* `<testsuite>` elements correspond to googletest test cases. +* `<testcase>` elements correspond to googletest test functions. + +For instance, the following program + +```c++ +TEST(MathTest, Addition) { ... } +TEST(MathTest, Subtraction) { ... } +TEST(LogicTest, NonContradiction) { ... } +``` + +could generate this report: + +```xml +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<testsuites tests="3" failures="1" errors="0" time="0.035" timestamp="2011-10-31T18:52:42" name="AllTests"> + <testsuite name="MathTest" tests="2" failures="1" errors="0" time="0.015"> + <testcase name="Addition" status="run" time="0.007" classname=""> + <failure message="Value of: add(1, 1)
 Actual: 3
Expected: 2" type="">...</failure> + <failure message="Value of: add(1, -1)
 Actual: 1
Expected: 0" type="">...</failure> + </testcase> + <testcase name="Subtraction" status="run" time="0.005" classname=""> + </testcase> + </testsuite> + <testsuite name="LogicTest" tests="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="0.005"> + <testcase name="NonContradiction" status="run" time="0.005" classname=""> + </testcase> + </testsuite> +</testsuites> +``` + +Things to note: + +* The `tests` attribute of a `<testsuites>` or `<testsuite>` element tells how + many test functions the googletest program or test case contains, while the + `failures` attribute tells how many of them failed. + +* The `time` attribute expresses the duration of the test, test case, or + entire test program in seconds. + +* The `timestamp` attribute records the local date and time of the test + execution. + +* Each `<failure>` element corresponds to a single failed googletest + assertion. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Generating an JSON Report + +googletest can also emit a JSON report as an alternative format to XML. To +generate the JSON report, set the `GTEST_OUTPUT` environment variable or the +`--gtest_output` flag to the string `"json:path_to_output_file"`, which will +create the file at the given location. You can also just use the string +`"json"`, in which case the output can be found in the `test_detail.json` file +in the current directory. + +The report format conforms to the following JSON Schema: + +```json +{ + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/schema#", + "type": "object", + "definitions": { + "TestCase": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { "type": "string" }, + "tests": { "type": "integer" }, + "failures": { "type": "integer" }, + "disabled": { "type": "integer" }, + "time": { "type": "string" }, + "testsuite": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "$ref": "#/definitions/TestInfo" + } + } + } + }, + "TestInfo": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "name": { "type": "string" }, + "status": { + "type": "string", + "enum": ["RUN", "NOTRUN"] + }, + "time": { "type": "string" }, + "classname": { "type": "string" }, + "failures": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "$ref": "#/definitions/Failure" + } + } + } + }, + "Failure": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "failures": { "type": "string" }, + "type": { "type": "string" } + } + } + }, + "properties": { + "tests": { "type": "integer" }, + "failures": { "type": "integer" }, + "disabled": { "type": "integer" }, + "errors": { "type": "integer" }, + "timestamp": { + "type": "string", + "format": "date-time" + }, + "time": { "type": "string" }, + "name": { "type": "string" }, + "testsuites": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "$ref": "#/definitions/TestCase" + } + } + } +} +``` + +The report uses the format that conforms to the following Proto3 using the [JSON +encoding](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#json): + +```proto +syntax = "proto3"; + +package googletest; + +import "google/protobuf/timestamp.proto"; +import "google/protobuf/duration.proto"; + +message UnitTest { + int32 tests = 1; + int32 failures = 2; + int32 disabled = 3; + int32 errors = 4; + google.protobuf.Timestamp timestamp = 5; + google.protobuf.Duration time = 6; + string name = 7; + repeated TestCase testsuites = 8; +} + +message TestCase { + string name = 1; + int32 tests = 2; + int32 failures = 3; + int32 disabled = 4; + int32 errors = 5; + google.protobuf.Duration time = 6; + repeated TestInfo testsuite = 7; +} + +message TestInfo { + string name = 1; + enum Status { + RUN = 0; + NOTRUN = 1; + } + Status status = 2; + google.protobuf.Duration time = 3; + string classname = 4; + message Failure { + string failures = 1; + string type = 2; + } + repeated Failure failures = 5; +} +``` + +For instance, the following program + +```c++ +TEST(MathTest, Addition) { ... } +TEST(MathTest, Subtraction) { ... } +TEST(LogicTest, NonContradiction) { ... } +``` + +could generate this report: + +```json +{ + "tests": 3, + "failures": 1, + "errors": 0, + "time": "0.035s", + "timestamp": "2011-10-31T18:52:42Z" + "name": "AllTests", + "testsuites": [ + { + "name": "MathTest", + "tests": 2, + "failures": 1, + "errors": 0, + "time": "0.015s", + "testsuite": [ + { + "name": "Addition", + "status": "RUN", + "time": "0.007s", + "classname": "", + "failures": [ + { + "message": "Value of: add(1, 1)\x0A Actual: 3\x0AExpected: 2", + "type": "" + }, + { + "message": "Value of: add(1, -1)\x0A Actual: 1\x0AExpected: 0", + "type": "" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "Subtraction", + "status": "RUN", + "time": "0.005s", + "classname": "" + } + ] + } + { + "name": "LogicTest", + "tests": 1, + "failures": 0, + "errors": 0, + "time": "0.005s", + "testsuite": [ + { + "name": "NonContradiction", + "status": "RUN", + "time": "0.005s", + "classname": "" + } + ] + } + ] +} +``` + +IMPORTANT: The exact format of the JSON document is subject to change. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Controlling How Failures Are Reported + +#### Turning Assertion Failures into Break-Points + +When running test programs under a debugger, it's very convenient if the +debugger can catch an assertion failure and automatically drop into interactive +mode. googletest's *break-on-failure* mode supports this behavior. + +To enable it, set the `GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE` environment variable to a value +other than `0` . Alternatively, you can use the `--gtest_break_on_failure` +command line flag. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +#### Disabling Catching Test-Thrown Exceptions + +googletest can be used either with or without exceptions enabled. If a test +throws a C++ exception or (on Windows) a structured exception (SEH), by default +googletest catches it, reports it as a test failure, and continues with the next +test method. This maximizes the coverage of a test run. Also, on Windows an +uncaught exception will cause a pop-up window, so catching the exceptions allows +you to run the tests automatically. + +When debugging the test failures, however, you may instead want the exceptions +to be handled by the debugger, such that you can examine the call stack when an +exception is thrown. To achieve that, set the `GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS` +environment variable to `0`, or use the `--gtest_catch_exceptions=0` flag when +running the tests. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + diff --git a/googletest/docs/faq.md b/googletest/docs/faq.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d613f7b --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/docs/faq.md @@ -0,0 +1,769 @@ +# Googletest FAQ + + +## Why should test case names and test names not contain underscore? + +Underscore (`_`) is special, as C++ reserves the following to be used by the +compiler and the standard library: + +1. any identifier that starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter, and +1. any identifier that contains two consecutive underscores (i.e. `__`) + *anywhere* in its name. + +User code is *prohibited* from using such identifiers. + +Now let's look at what this means for `TEST` and `TEST_F`. + +Currently `TEST(TestCaseName, TestName)` generates a class named +`TestCaseName_TestName_Test`. What happens if `TestCaseName` or `TestName` +contains `_`? + +1. If `TestCaseName` starts with an `_` followed by an upper-case letter (say, + `_Foo`), we end up with `_Foo_TestName_Test`, which is reserved and thus + invalid. +1. If `TestCaseName` ends with an `_` (say, `Foo_`), we get + `Foo__TestName_Test`, which is invalid. +1. If `TestName` starts with an `_` (say, `_Bar`), we get + `TestCaseName__Bar_Test`, which is invalid. +1. If `TestName` ends with an `_` (say, `Bar_`), we get + `TestCaseName_Bar__Test`, which is invalid. + +So clearly `TestCaseName` and `TestName` cannot start or end with `_` (Actually, +`TestCaseName` can start with `_` -- as long as the `_` isn't followed by an +upper-case letter. But that's getting complicated. So for simplicity we just say +that it cannot start with `_`.). + +It may seem fine for `TestCaseName` and `TestName` to contain `_` in the middle. +However, consider this: + +```c++ +TEST(Time, Flies_Like_An_Arrow) { ... } +TEST(Time_Flies, Like_An_Arrow) { ... } +``` + +Now, the two `TEST`s will both generate the same class +(`Time_Flies_Like_An_Arrow_Test`). That's not good. + +So for simplicity, we just ask the users to avoid `_` in `TestCaseName` and +`TestName`. The rule is more constraining than necessary, but it's simple and +easy to remember. It also gives googletest some wiggle room in case its +implementation needs to change in the future. + +If you violate the rule, there may not be immediate consequences, but your test +may (just may) break with a new compiler (or a new version of the compiler you +are using) or with a new version of googletest. Therefore it's best to follow +the rule. + +## Why does googletest support `EXPECT_EQ(NULL, ptr)` and `ASSERT_EQ(NULL, ptr)` but not `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)` and `ASSERT_NE(NULL, ptr)`? + +First of all you can use `EXPECT_NE(nullptr, ptr)` and `ASSERT_NE(nullptr, +ptr)`. This is the preferred syntax in the style guide because nullptr does not +have the type problems that NULL does. Which is why NULL does not work. + +Due to some peculiarity of C++, it requires some non-trivial template meta +programming tricks to support using `NULL` as an argument of the `EXPECT_XX()` +and `ASSERT_XX()` macros. Therefore we only do it where it's most needed +(otherwise we make the implementation of googletest harder to maintain and more +error-prone than necessary). + +The `EXPECT_EQ()` macro takes the *expected* value as its first argument and the +*actual* value as the second. It's reasonable that someone wants to write +`EXPECT_EQ(NULL, some_expression)`, and this indeed was requested several times. +Therefore we implemented it. + +The need for `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)` isn't nearly as strong. When the assertion +fails, you already know that `ptr` must be `NULL`, so it doesn't add any +information to print `ptr` in this case. That means `EXPECT_TRUE(ptr != NULL)` +works just as well. + +If we were to support `EXPECT_NE(NULL, ptr)`, for consistency we'll have to +support `EXPECT_NE(ptr, NULL)` as well, as unlike `EXPECT_EQ`, we don't have a +convention on the order of the two arguments for `EXPECT_NE`. This means using +the template meta programming tricks twice in the implementation, making it even +harder to understand and maintain. We believe the benefit doesn't justify the +cost. + +Finally, with the growth of the gMock matcher library, we are encouraging people +to use the unified `EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher)` syntax more often in tests. One +significant advantage of the matcher approach is that matchers can be easily +combined to form new matchers, while the `EXPECT_NE`, etc, macros cannot be +easily combined. Therefore we want to invest more in the matchers than in the +`EXPECT_XX()` macros. + +## I need to test that different implementations of an interface satisfy some common requirements. Should I use typed tests or value-parameterized tests? + +For testing various implementations of the same interface, either typed tests or +value-parameterized tests can get it done. It's really up to you the user to +decide which is more convenient for you, depending on your particular case. Some +rough guidelines: + +* Typed tests can be easier to write if instances of the different + implementations can be created the same way, modulo the type. For example, + if all these implementations have a public default constructor (such that + you can write `new TypeParam`), or if their factory functions have the same + form (e.g. `CreateInstance<TypeParam>()`). +* Value-parameterized tests can be easier to write if you need different code + patterns to create different implementations' instances, e.g. `new Foo` vs + `new Bar(5)`. To accommodate for the differences, you can write factory + function wrappers and pass these function pointers to the tests as their + parameters. +* When a typed test fails, the output includes the name of the type, which can + help you quickly identify which implementation is wrong. Value-parameterized + tests cannot do this, so there you'll have to look at the iteration number + to know which implementation the failure is from, which is less direct. +* If you make a mistake writing a typed test, the compiler errors can be + harder to digest, as the code is templatized. +* When using typed tests, you need to make sure you are testing against the + interface type, not the concrete types (in other words, you want to make + sure `implicit_cast<MyInterface*>(my_concrete_impl)` works, not just that + `my_concrete_impl` works). It's less likely to make mistakes in this area + when using value-parameterized tests. + +I hope I didn't confuse you more. :-) If you don't mind, I'd suggest you to give +both approaches a try. Practice is a much better way to grasp the subtle +differences between the two tools. Once you have some concrete experience, you +can much more easily decide which one to use the next time. + +## My death tests became very slow - what happened? + +In August 2008 we had to switch the default death test style from `fast` to +`threadsafe`, as the former is no longer safe now that threaded logging is the +default. This caused many death tests to slow down. Unfortunately this change +was necessary. + +Please read [Fixing Failing Death Tests](death_test_styles.md) for what you can +do. + +## I got some run-time errors about invalid proto descriptors when using `ProtocolMessageEquals`. Help! + +**Note:** `ProtocolMessageEquals` and `ProtocolMessageEquiv` are *deprecated* +now. Please use `EqualsProto`, etc instead. + +`ProtocolMessageEquals` and `ProtocolMessageEquiv` were redefined recently and +are now less tolerant on invalid protocol buffer definitions. In particular, if +you have a `foo.proto` that doesn't fully qualify the type of a protocol message +it references (e.g. `message<Bar>` where it should be `message<blah.Bar>`), you +will now get run-time errors like: + +``` +... descriptor.cc:...] Invalid proto descriptor for file "path/to/foo.proto": +... descriptor.cc:...] blah.MyMessage.my_field: ".Bar" is not defined. +``` + +If you see this, your `.proto` file is broken and needs to be fixed by making +the types fully qualified. The new definition of `ProtocolMessageEquals` and +`ProtocolMessageEquiv` just happen to reveal your bug. + +## My death test modifies some state, but the change seems lost after the death test finishes. Why? + +Death tests (`EXPECT_DEATH`, etc) are executed in a sub-process s.t. the +expected crash won't kill the test program (i.e. the parent process). As a +result, any in-memory side effects they incur are observable in their respective +sub-processes, but not in the parent process. You can think of them as running +in a parallel universe, more or less. + +In particular, if you use [gMock](../../googlemock) and the death test statement +invokes some mock methods, the parent process will think the calls have never +occurred. Therefore, you may want to move your `EXPECT_CALL` statements inside +the `EXPECT_DEATH` macro. + +## EXPECT_EQ(htonl(blah), blah_blah) generates weird compiler errors in opt mode. Is this a googletest bug? + +Actually, the bug is in `htonl()`. + +According to `'man htonl'`, `htonl()` is a *function*, which means it's valid to +use `htonl` as a function pointer. However, in opt mode `htonl()` is defined as +a *macro*, which breaks this usage. + +Worse, the macro definition of `htonl()` uses a `gcc` extension and is *not* +standard C++. That hacky implementation has some ad hoc limitations. In +particular, it prevents you from writing `Foo<sizeof(htonl(x))>()`, where `Foo` +is a template that has an integral argument. + +The implementation of `EXPECT_EQ(a, b)` uses `sizeof(... a ...)` inside a +template argument, and thus doesn't compile in opt mode when `a` contains a call +to `htonl()`. It is difficult to make `EXPECT_EQ` bypass the `htonl()` bug, as +the solution must work with different compilers on various platforms. + +`htonl()` has some other problems as described in `//util/endian/endian.h`, +which defines `ghtonl()` to replace it. `ghtonl()` does the same thing `htonl()` +does, only without its problems. We suggest you to use `ghtonl()` instead of +`htonl()`, both in your tests and production code. + +`//util/endian/endian.h` also defines `ghtons()`, which solves similar problems +in `htons()`. + +Don't forget to add `//util/endian` to the list of dependencies in the `BUILD` +file wherever `ghtonl()` and `ghtons()` are used. The library consists of a +single header file and will not bloat your binary. + +## The compiler complains about "undefined references" to some static const member variables, but I did define them in the class body. What's wrong? + +If your class has a static data member: + +```c++ +// foo.h +class Foo { + ... + static const int kBar = 100; +}; +``` + +You also need to define it *outside* of the class body in `foo.cc`: + +```c++ +const int Foo::kBar; // No initializer here. +``` + +Otherwise your code is **invalid C++**, and may break in unexpected ways. In +particular, using it in googletest comparison assertions (`EXPECT_EQ`, etc) will +generate an "undefined reference" linker error. The fact that "it used to work" +doesn't mean it's valid. It just means that you were lucky. :-) + +## Can I derive a test fixture from another? + +Yes. + +Each test fixture has a corresponding and same named test case. This means only +one test case can use a particular fixture. Sometimes, however, multiple test +cases may want to use the same or slightly different fixtures. For example, you +may want to make sure that all of a GUI library's test cases don't leak +important system resources like fonts and brushes. + +In googletest, you share a fixture among test cases by putting the shared logic +in a base test fixture, then deriving from that base a separate fixture for each +test case that wants to use this common logic. You then use `TEST_F()` to write +tests using each derived fixture. + +Typically, your code looks like this: + +```c++ +// Defines a base test fixture. +class BaseTest : public ::testing::Test { + protected: + ... +}; + +// Derives a fixture FooTest from BaseTest. +class FooTest : public BaseTest { + protected: + void SetUp() override { + BaseTest::SetUp(); // Sets up the base fixture first. + ... additional set-up work ... + } + + void TearDown() override { + ... clean-up work for FooTest ... + BaseTest::TearDown(); // Remember to tear down the base fixture + // after cleaning up FooTest! + } + + ... functions and variables for FooTest ... +}; + +// Tests that use the fixture FooTest. +TEST_F(FooTest, Bar) { ... } +TEST_F(FooTest, Baz) { ... } + +... additional fixtures derived from BaseTest ... +``` + +If necessary, you can continue to derive test fixtures from a derived fixture. +googletest has no limit on how deep the hierarchy can be. + +For a complete example using derived test fixtures, see [googletest +sample](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/samples/sample5_unittest.cc) + +## My compiler complains "void value not ignored as it ought to be." What does this mean? + +You're probably using an `ASSERT_*()` in a function that doesn't return `void`. +`ASSERT_*()` can only be used in `void` functions, due to exceptions being +disabled by our build system. Please see more details +[here](advanced.md#assertion-placement). + +## My death test hangs (or seg-faults). How do I fix it? + +In googletest, death tests are run in a child process and the way they work is +delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work. +Please make sure you have read [this](advanced.md#how-it-works). + +In particular, death tests don't like having multiple threads in the parent +process. So the first thing you can try is to eliminate creating threads outside +of `EXPECT_DEATH()`. For example, you may want to use [mocks](../../googlemock) +or fake objects instead of real ones in your tests. + +Sometimes this is impossible as some library you must use may be creating +threads before `main()` is even reached. In this case, you can try to minimize +the chance of conflicts by either moving as many activities as possible inside +`EXPECT_DEATH()` (in the extreme case, you want to move everything inside), or +leaving as few things as possible in it. Also, you can try to set the death test +style to `"threadsafe"`, which is safer but slower, and see if it helps. + +If you go with thread-safe death tests, remember that they rerun the test +program from the beginning in the child process. Therefore make sure your +program can run side-by-side with itself and is deterministic. + +In the end, this boils down to good concurrent programming. You have to make +sure that there is no race conditions or dead locks in your program. No silver +bullet - sorry! + +## Should I use the constructor/destructor of the test fixture or SetUp()/TearDown()? + +The first thing to remember is that googletest does **not** reuse the same test +fixture object across multiple tests. For each `TEST_F`, googletest will create +a **fresh** test fixture object, immediately call `SetUp()`, run the test body, +call `TearDown()`, and then delete the test fixture object. + +When you need to write per-test set-up and tear-down logic, you have the choice +between using the test fixture constructor/destructor or `SetUp()/TearDown()`. +The former is usually preferred, as it has the following benefits: + +* By initializing a member variable in the constructor, we have the option to + make it `const`, which helps prevent accidental changes to its value and + makes the tests more obviously correct. +* In case we need to subclass the test fixture class, the subclass' + constructor is guaranteed to call the base class' constructor *first*, and + the subclass' destructor is guaranteed to call the base class' destructor + *afterward*. With `SetUp()/TearDown()`, a subclass may make the mistake of + forgetting to call the base class' `SetUp()/TearDown()` or call them at the + wrong time. + +You may still want to use `SetUp()/TearDown()` in the following rare cases: + +* In the body of a constructor (or destructor), it's not possible to use the + `ASSERT_xx` macros. Therefore, if the set-up operation could cause a fatal + test failure that should prevent the test from running, it's necessary to + use a `CHECK` macro or to use `SetUp()` instead of a constructor. +* If the tear-down operation could throw an exception, you must use + `TearDown()` as opposed to the destructor, as throwing in a destructor leads + to undefined behavior and usually will kill your program right away. Note + that many standard libraries (like STL) may throw when exceptions are + enabled in the compiler. Therefore you should prefer `TearDown()` if you + want to write portable tests that work with or without exceptions. +* The googletest team is considering making the assertion macros throw on + platforms where exceptions are enabled (e.g. Windows, Mac OS, and Linux + client-side), which will eliminate the need for the user to propagate + failures from a subroutine to its caller. Therefore, you shouldn't use + googletest assertions in a destructor if your code could run on such a + platform. +* In a constructor or destructor, you cannot make a virtual function call on + this object. (You can call a method declared as virtual, but it will be + statically bound.) Therefore, if you need to call a method that will be + overridden in a derived class, you have to use `SetUp()/TearDown()`. + + +## The compiler complains "no matching function to call" when I use ASSERT_PRED*. How do I fix it? + +If the predicate function you use in `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*` is +overloaded or a template, the compiler will have trouble figuring out which +overloaded version it should use. `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT*` and +`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT*` don't have this problem. + +If you see this error, you might want to switch to +`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*`, which will also give you a better failure +message. If, however, that is not an option, you can resolve the problem by +explicitly telling the compiler which version to pick. + +For example, suppose you have + +```c++ +bool IsPositive(int n) { + return n > 0; +} + +bool IsPositive(double x) { + return x > 0; +} +``` + +you will get a compiler error if you write + +```c++ +EXPECT_PRED1(IsPositive, 5); +``` + +However, this will work: + +```c++ +EXPECT_PRED1(static_cast<bool (*)(int)>(IsPositive), 5); +``` + +(The stuff inside the angled brackets for the `static_cast` operator is the type +of the function pointer for the `int`-version of `IsPositive()`.) + +As another example, when you have a template function + +```c++ +template <typename T> +bool IsNegative(T x) { + return x < 0; +} +``` + +you can use it in a predicate assertion like this: + +```c++ +ASSERT_PRED1(IsNegative<int>, -5); +``` + +Things are more interesting if your template has more than one parameters. The +following won't compile: + +```c++ +ASSERT_PRED2(GreaterThan<int, int>, 5, 0); +``` + +as the C++ pre-processor thinks you are giving `ASSERT_PRED2` 4 arguments, which +is one more than expected. The workaround is to wrap the predicate function in +parentheses: + +```c++ +ASSERT_PRED2((GreaterThan<int, int>), 5, 0); +``` + + +## My compiler complains about "ignoring return value" when I call RUN_ALL_TESTS(). Why? + +Some people had been ignoring the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. That is, +instead of + +```c++ + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +``` + +they write + +```c++ + RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +``` + +This is **wrong and dangerous**. The testing services needs to see the return +value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` in order to determine if a test has passed. If your +`main()` function ignores it, your test will be considered successful even if it +has a googletest assertion failure. Very bad. + +We have decided to fix this (thanks to Michael Chastain for the idea). Now, your +code will no longer be able to ignore `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` when compiled with +`gcc`. If you do so, you'll get a compiler error. + +If you see the compiler complaining about you ignoring the return value of +`RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, the fix is simple: just make sure its value is used as the +return value of `main()`. + +But how could we introduce a change that breaks existing tests? Well, in this +case, the code was already broken in the first place, so we didn't break it. :-) + +## My compiler complains that a constructor (or destructor) cannot return a value. What's going on? + +Due to a peculiarity of C++, in order to support the syntax for streaming +messages to an `ASSERT_*`, e.g. + +```c++ + ASSERT_EQ(1, Foo()) << "blah blah" << foo; +``` + +we had to give up using `ASSERT*` and `FAIL*` (but not `EXPECT*` and +`ADD_FAILURE*`) in constructors and destructors. The workaround is to move the +content of your constructor/destructor to a private void member function, or +switch to `EXPECT_*()` if that works. This +[section](advanced.md#assertion-placement) in the user's guide explains it. + +## My SetUp() function is not called. Why? + +C++ is case-sensitive. Did you spell it as `Setup()`? + +Similarly, sometimes people spell `SetUpTestCase()` as `SetupTestCase()` and +wonder why it's never called. + +## How do I jump to the line of a failure in Emacs directly? + +googletest's failure message format is understood by Emacs and many other IDEs, +like acme and XCode. If a googletest message is in a compilation buffer in +Emacs, then it's clickable. + + +## I have several test cases which share the same test fixture logic, do I have to define a new test fixture class for each of them? This seems pretty tedious. + +You don't have to. Instead of + +```c++ +class FooTest : public BaseTest {}; + +TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } +TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } + +class BarTest : public BaseTest {}; + +TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } +TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } +``` + +you can simply `typedef` the test fixtures: + +```c++ +typedef BaseTest FooTest; + +TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } +TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } + +typedef BaseTest BarTest; + +TEST_F(BarTest, Abc) { ... } +TEST_F(BarTest, Def) { ... } +``` + +## googletest output is buried in a whole bunch of LOG messages. What do I do? + +The googletest output is meant to be a concise and human-friendly report. If +your test generates textual output itself, it will mix with the googletest +output, making it hard to read. However, there is an easy solution to this +problem. + +Since `LOG` messages go to stderr, we decided to let googletest output go to +stdout. This way, you can easily separate the two using redirection. For +example: + +```shell +$ ./my_test > gtest_output.txt +``` + + +## Why should I prefer test fixtures over global variables? + +There are several good reasons: + +1. It's likely your test needs to change the states of its global variables. + This makes it difficult to keep side effects from escaping one test and + contaminating others, making debugging difficult. By using fixtures, each + test has a fresh set of variables that's different (but with the same + names). Thus, tests are kept independent of each other. +1. Global variables pollute the global namespace. +1. Test fixtures can be reused via subclassing, which cannot be done easily + with global variables. This is useful if many test cases have something in + common. + + + ## What can the statement argument in ASSERT_DEATH() be? + +`ASSERT_DEATH(*statement*, *regex*)` (or any death assertion macro) can be used +wherever `*statement*` is valid. So basically `*statement*` can be any C++ +statement that makes sense in the current context. In particular, it can +reference global and/or local variables, and can be: + +* a simple function call (often the case), +* a complex expression, or +* a compound statement. + +Some examples are shown here: + +```c++ +// A death test can be a simple function call. +TEST(MyDeathTest, FunctionCall) { + ASSERT_DEATH(Xyz(5), "Xyz failed"); +} + +// Or a complex expression that references variables and functions. +TEST(MyDeathTest, ComplexExpression) { + const bool c = Condition(); + ASSERT_DEATH((c ? Func1(0) : object2.Method("test")), + "(Func1|Method) failed"); +} + +// Death assertions can be used any where in a function. In +// particular, they can be inside a loop. +TEST(MyDeathTest, InsideLoop) { + // Verifies that Foo(0), Foo(1), ..., and Foo(4) all die. + for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { + EXPECT_DEATH_M(Foo(i), "Foo has \\d+ errors", + ::testing::Message() << "where i is " << i); + } +} + +// A death assertion can contain a compound statement. +TEST(MyDeathTest, CompoundStatement) { + // Verifies that at lease one of Bar(0), Bar(1), ..., and + // Bar(4) dies. + ASSERT_DEATH({ + for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { + Bar(i); + } + }, + "Bar has \\d+ errors"); +} +``` + +gtest-death-test_test.cc contains more examples if you are interested. + +## I have a fixture class `FooTest`, but `TEST_F(FooTest, Bar)` gives me error ``"no matching function for call to `FooTest::FooTest()'"``. Why? + +Googletest needs to be able to create objects of your test fixture class, so it +must have a default constructor. Normally the compiler will define one for you. +However, there are cases where you have to define your own: + +* If you explicitly declare a non-default constructor for class `FooTest` + (`DISALLOW_EVIL_CONSTRUCTORS()` does this), then you need to define a + default constructor, even if it would be empty. +* If `FooTest` has a const non-static data member, then you have to define the + default constructor *and* initialize the const member in the initializer + list of the constructor. (Early versions of `gcc` doesn't force you to + initialize the const member. It's a bug that has been fixed in `gcc 4`.) + +## Why does ASSERT_DEATH complain about previous threads that were already joined? + +With the Linux pthread library, there is no turning back once you cross the line +from single thread to multiple threads. The first time you create a thread, a +manager thread is created in addition, so you get 3, not 2, threads. Later when +the thread you create joins the main thread, the thread count decrements by 1, +but the manager thread will never be killed, so you still have 2 threads, which +means you cannot safely run a death test. + +The new NPTL thread library doesn't suffer from this problem, as it doesn't +create a manager thread. However, if you don't control which machine your test +runs on, you shouldn't depend on this. + +## Why does googletest require the entire test case, instead of individual tests, to be named *DeathTest when it uses ASSERT_DEATH? + +googletest does not interleave tests from different test cases. That is, it runs +all tests in one test case first, and then runs all tests in the next test case, +and so on. googletest does this because it needs to set up a test case before +the first test in it is run, and tear it down afterwords. Splitting up the test +case would require multiple set-up and tear-down processes, which is inefficient +and makes the semantics unclean. + +If we were to determine the order of tests based on test name instead of test +case name, then we would have a problem with the following situation: + +```c++ +TEST_F(FooTest, AbcDeathTest) { ... } +TEST_F(FooTest, Uvw) { ... } + +TEST_F(BarTest, DefDeathTest) { ... } +TEST_F(BarTest, Xyz) { ... } +``` + +Since `FooTest.AbcDeathTest` needs to run before `BarTest.Xyz`, and we don't +interleave tests from different test cases, we need to run all tests in the +`FooTest` case before running any test in the `BarTest` case. This contradicts +with the requirement to run `BarTest.DefDeathTest` before `FooTest.Uvw`. + +## But I don't like calling my entire test case \*DeathTest when it contains both death tests and non-death tests. What do I do? + +You don't have to, but if you like, you may split up the test case into +`FooTest` and `FooDeathTest`, where the names make it clear that they are +related: + +```c++ +class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { ... }; + +TEST_F(FooTest, Abc) { ... } +TEST_F(FooTest, Def) { ... } + +using FooDeathTest = FooTest; + +TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Uvw) { ... EXPECT_DEATH(...) ... } +TEST_F(FooDeathTest, Xyz) { ... ASSERT_DEATH(...) ... } +``` + +## googletest prints the LOG messages in a death test's child process only when the test fails. How can I see the LOG messages when the death test succeeds? + +Printing the LOG messages generated by the statement inside `EXPECT_DEATH()` +makes it harder to search for real problems in the parent's log. Therefore, +googletest only prints them when the death test has failed. + +If you really need to see such LOG messages, a workaround is to temporarily +break the death test (e.g. by changing the regex pattern it is expected to +match). Admittedly, this is a hack. We'll consider a more permanent solution +after the fork-and-exec-style death tests are implemented. + +## The compiler complains about "no match for 'operator<<'" when I use an assertion. What gives? + +If you use a user-defined type `FooType` in an assertion, you must make sure +there is an `std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const FooType&)` function +defined such that we can print a value of `FooType`. + +In addition, if `FooType` is declared in a name space, the `<<` operator also +needs to be defined in the *same* name space. See go/totw/49 for details. + +## How do I suppress the memory leak messages on Windows? + +Since the statically initialized googletest singleton requires allocations on +the heap, the Visual C++ memory leak detector will report memory leaks at the +end of the program run. The easiest way to avoid this is to use the +`_CrtMemCheckpoint` and `_CrtMemDumpAllObjectsSince` calls to not report any +statically initialized heap objects. See MSDN for more details and additional +heap check/debug routines. + + +## How can my code detect if it is running in a test? + +If you write code that sniffs whether it's running in a test and does different +things accordingly, you are leaking test-only logic into production code and +there is no easy way to ensure that the test-only code paths aren't run by +mistake in production. Such cleverness also leads to +[Heisenbugs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenbug). Therefore we strongly +advise against the practice, and googletest doesn't provide a way to do it. + +In general, the recommended way to cause the code to behave differently under +test is [Dependency Injection](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection). You can inject +different functionality from the test and from the production code. Since your +production code doesn't link in the for-test logic at all (the +[`testonly`](http://go/testonly) attribute for BUILD targets helps to ensure +that), there is no danger in accidentally running it. + +However, if you *really*, *really*, *really* have no choice, and if you follow +the rule of ending your test program names with `_test`, you can use the +*horrible* hack of sniffing your executable name (`argv[0]` in `main()`) to know +whether the code is under test. + + +## How do I temporarily disable a test? + +If you have a broken test that you cannot fix right away, you can add the +DISABLED_ prefix to its name. This will exclude it from execution. This is +better than commenting out the code or using #if 0, as disabled tests are still +compiled (and thus won't rot). + +To include disabled tests in test execution, just invoke the test program with +the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag. + +## Is it OK if I have two separate `TEST(Foo, Bar)` test methods defined in different namespaces? + +Yes. + +The rule is **all test methods in the same test case must use the same fixture +class.** This means that the following is **allowed** because both tests use the +same fixture class (`::testing::Test`). + +```c++ +namespace foo { +TEST(CoolTest, DoSomething) { + SUCCEED(); +} +} // namespace foo + +namespace bar { +TEST(CoolTest, DoSomething) { + SUCCEED(); +} +} // namespace bar +``` + +However, the following code is **not allowed** and will produce a runtime error +from googletest because the test methods are using different test fixture +classes with the same test case name. + +```c++ +namespace foo { +class CoolTest : public ::testing::Test {}; // Fixture foo::CoolTest +TEST_F(CoolTest, DoSomething) { + SUCCEED(); +} +} // namespace foo + +namespace bar { +class CoolTest : public ::testing::Test {}; // Fixture: bar::CoolTest +TEST_F(CoolTest, DoSomething) { + SUCCEED(); +} +} // namespace bar +``` diff --git a/googletest/docs/primer.md b/googletest/docs/primer.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..02dea42 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/docs/primer.md @@ -0,0 +1,569 @@ +# Googletest Primer + + +## Introduction: Why googletest? + +*googletest* helps you write better C++ tests. + +googletest is a testing framework developed by the Testing +Technology team with Google's specific +requirements and constraints in mind. No matter whether you work on Linux, +Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, googletest can help you. And it +supports *any* kind of tests, not just unit tests. + +So what makes a good test, and how does googletest fit in? We believe: + +1. Tests should be *independent* and *repeatable*. It's a pain to debug a test + that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. googletest isolates the + tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, + googletest allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging. +1. Tests should be well *organized* and reflect the structure of the tested + code. googletest groups related tests into test cases that can share data + and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests + easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch + projects and start to work on a new code base. +1. Tests should be *portable* and *reusable*. Google has a lot of code that is + platform-neutral, its tests should also be platform-neutral. googletest + works on different OSes, with different compilers (gcc, icc, and MSVC), with + or without exceptions, so googletest tests can easily work with a variety of + configurations. +1. When tests fail, they should provide as much *information* about the problem + as possible. googletest doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it + only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up + tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. + Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile + cycle. +1. The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores + and let them focus on the test *content*. googletest automatically keeps + track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them + in order to run them. +1. Tests should be *fast*. With googletest, you can reuse shared resources + across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making + tests depend on each other. + +Since googletest is based on the popular xUnit architecture, you'll feel right +at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. If not, it will take you about 10 +minutes to learn the basics and get started. So let's go! + +## Beware of the nomenclature + +_Note:_ There might be some confusion of idea due to different +definitions of the terms _Test_, _Test Case_ and _Test Suite_, so beware +of misunderstanding these. + +Historically, googletest started to use the term _Test Case_ for grouping +related tests, whereas current publications including the International Software +Testing Qualifications Board ([ISTQB](http://www.istqb.org/)) and various +textbooks on Software Quality use the term _[Test +Suite](http://glossary.istqb.org/search/test%20suite)_ for this. + +The related term _Test_, as it is used in the googletest, is corresponding to +the term _[Test Case](http://glossary.istqb.org/search/test%20case)_ of ISTQB +and others. + +The term _Test_ is commonly of broad enough sense, including ISTQB's +definition of _Test Case_, so it's not much of a problem here. But the +term _Test Case_ as used in Google Test is of contradictory sense and thus confusing. + +Unfortunately replacing the term _Test Case_ by _Test Suite_ throughout the +googletest is not easy without breaking dependent projects, as `TestCase` is +part of the public API at various places. + +So for the time being, please be aware of the different definitions of +the terms: + +Meaning | googletest Term | [ISTQB](http://www.istqb.org/) Term +:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :---------------------------------- +Exercise a particular program path with specific input values and verify the results | [TEST()](#simple-tests) | [Test Case](http://glossary.istqb.org/search/test%20case) +A set of several tests related to one component | [TestCase](#basic-concepts) | [TestSuite](http://glossary.istqb.org/search/test%20suite) + +## Basic Concepts + +When using googletest, you start by writing *assertions*, which are statements +that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be *success*, +*nonfatal failure*, or *fatal failure*. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts the +current function; otherwise the program continues normally. + +*Tests* use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes +or has a failed assertion, then it *fails*; otherwise it *succeeds*. + +A *test case* contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test +cases that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a +test case need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a +*test fixture* class. + +A *test program* can contain multiple test cases. + +We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual +assertion level and building up to tests and test cases. + +## Assertions + +googletest assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a class +or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion fails, +googletest prints the assertion's source file and line number location, along +with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message which will +be appended to googletest's message. + +The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different effects +on the current function. `ASSERT_*` versions generate fatal failures when they +fail, and **abort the current function**. `EXPECT_*` versions generate nonfatal +failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually `EXPECT_*` are +preferred, as they allow more than one failure to be reported in a test. +However, you should use `ASSERT_*` if it doesn't make sense to continue when the +assertion in question fails. + +Since a failed `ASSERT_*` returns from the current function immediately, +possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak. +Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so keep +this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion errors. + +To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the +`<<` operator, or a sequence of such operators. An example: + +```c++ +ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length"; + +for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) { + EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i; +} +``` + +Anything that can be streamed to an `ostream` can be streamed to an assertion +macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string +(`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is +streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed. + +### Basic Assertions + +These assertions do basic true/false condition testing. + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +-------------------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------- +`ASSERT_TRUE(condition);` | `EXPECT_TRUE(condition);` | `condition` is true +`ASSERT_FALSE(condition);` | `EXPECT_FALSE(condition);` | `condition` is false + +Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and returns from the +current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal failure, allowing the +function to continue running. In either case, an assertion failure means its +containing test fails. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +### Binary Comparison + +This section describes assertions that compare two values. + +Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies +------------------------ | ------------------------ | -------------- +`ASSERT_EQ(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_EQ(val1, val2);` | `val1 == val2` +`ASSERT_NE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_NE(val1, val2);` | `val1 != val2` +`ASSERT_LT(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_LT(val1, val2);` | `val1 < val2` +`ASSERT_LE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_LE(val1, val2);` | `val1 <= val2` +`ASSERT_GT(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_GT(val1, val2);` | `val1 > val2` +`ASSERT_GE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_GE(val1, val2);` | `val1 >= val2` + +Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison operator or +you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the arguments to support the +`<<` operator for streaming to an `ostream`, but it's no longer necessary. If +`<<` is supported, it will be called to print the arguments when the assertion +fails; otherwise googletest will attempt to print them in the best way it can. +For more details and how to customize the printing of the arguments, see +gMock [recipe](../../googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#teaching-google-mock-how-to-print-your-values).). + +These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the +corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). Since this is +discouraged by the Google [C++ Style +Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Operator_Overloading), +you may need to use `ASSERT_TRUE()` or `EXPECT_TRUE()` to assert the equality of +two objects of a user-defined type. + +However, when possible, `ASSERT_EQ(actual, expected)` is preferred to +`ASSERT_TRUE(actual == expected)`, since it tells you `actual` and `expected`'s +values on failure. + +Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the +arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function, +the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e. the compiler is free to +choose any order) and your code should not depend on any particular argument +evaluation order. + +`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it +tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value. +Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use +`ASSERT_STREQ()`, which will be described later on. In particular, to assert +that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(c_string, NULL)`. Consider use +`ASSERT_EQ(c_string, nullptr)` if c++11 is supported. To compare two `string` +objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`. + +When doing pointer comparisons use `*_EQ(ptr, nullptr)` and `*_NE(ptr, nullptr)` +instead of `*_EQ(ptr, NULL)` and `*_NE(ptr, NULL)`. This is because `nullptr` is +typed while `NULL` is not. See [FAQ](faq.md#why-does-google-test-support-expect_eqnull-ptr-and-assert_eqnull-ptr-but-not-expect_nenull-ptr-and-assert_nenull-ptr) +for more details. + +If you're working with floating point numbers, you may want to use the floating +point variations of some of these macros in order to avoid problems caused by +rounding. See [Advanced googletest Topics](advanced.md) for details. + +Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string` +and `wstring`). + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +**Historical note**: Before February 2016 `*_EQ` had a convention of calling it +as `ASSERT_EQ(expected, actual)`, so lots of existing code uses this order. Now +`*_EQ` treats both parameters in the same way. + +### String Comparison + +The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare +two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead. + +| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies | +| ------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | +| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have the same content | +| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have different contents | +| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case | +| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have different contents, ignoring case | + +Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. A `NULL` +pointer and an empty string are considered *different*. + +`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a comparison +of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 narrow strings. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +**See also**: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and +regular expression matching, for example), see +[this](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/advanced.md) +in the Advanced googletest Guide. + +## Simple Tests + +To create a test: + +1. Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function, These are + ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. +1. In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, + use the various googletest assertions to check values. +1. The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the + test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the + entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds. + +```c++ +TEST(TestCaseName, TestName) { + ... test body ... +} +``` + +`TEST()` arguments go from general to specific. The *first* argument is the name +of the test case, and the *second* argument is the test's name within the test +case. Both names must be valid C++ identifiers, and they should not contain +underscore (`_`). A test's *full name* consists of its containing test case and +its individual name. Tests from different test cases can have the same +individual name. + +For example, let's take a simple integer function: + +```c++ +int Factorial(int n); // Returns the factorial of n +``` + +A test case for this function might look like: + +```c++ +// Tests factorial of 0. +TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) { + EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(0), 1); +} + +// Tests factorial of positive numbers. +TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) { + EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(1), 1); + EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(2), 2); + EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(3), 6); + EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(8), 40320); +} +``` + +googletest groups the test results by test cases, so logically-related tests +should be in the same test case; in other words, the first argument to their +`TEST()` should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests, +`HandlesZeroInput` and `HandlesPositiveInput`, that belong to the same test case +`FactorialTest`. + +When naming your test cases and tests, you should follow the same convention as +for [naming functions and +classes](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Function_Names). + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +## Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests + +If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, you +can use a *test fixture*. It allows you to reuse the same configuration of +objects for several different tests. + +To create a fixture: + +1. Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:` as + we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. +1. Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use. +1. If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare + the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as + **`Setup()`** with a small `u` - Use `override` in C++11 to make sure you + spelled it correctly +1. If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any + resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the + constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read + this [FAQ](faq.md#should-i-use-the-constructordestructor-of-the-test-fixture-or-the-set-uptear-down-function) entry. +1. If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share. + +When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to +access objects and subroutines in the test fixture: + +```c++ +TEST_F(TestCaseName, TestName) { + ... test body ... +} +``` + +Like `TEST()`, the first argument is the test case name, but for `TEST_F()` this +must be the name of the test fixture class. You've probably guessed: `_F` is for +fixture. + +Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro +that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler +error. + +Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a +`TEST_F()`, or you'll get the compiler error "`virtual outside class +declaration`". + +For each test defined with `TEST_F()` , googletest will create a *fresh* test +fixture at runtime, immediately initialize it via `SetUp()` , run the test, +clean up by calling `TearDown()` , and then delete the test fixture. Note that +different tests in the same test case have different test fixture objects, and +googletest always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one. +googletest does **not** reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any +changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests. + +As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named `Queue`, which has +the following interface: + +```c++ +template <typename E> // E is the element type. +class Queue { + public: + Queue(); + void Enqueue(const E& element); + E* Dequeue(); // Returns NULL if the queue is empty. + size_t size() const; + ... +}; +``` + +First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name +`FooTest` where `Foo` is the class being tested. + +```c++ +class QueueTest : public ::testing::Test { + protected: + void SetUp() override { + q1_.Enqueue(1); + q2_.Enqueue(2); + q2_.Enqueue(3); + } + + // void TearDown() override {} + + Queue<int> q0_; + Queue<int> q1_; + Queue<int> q2_; +}; +``` + +In this case, `TearDown()` is not needed since we don't have to clean up after +each test, other than what's already done by the destructor. + +Now we'll write tests using `TEST_F()` and this fixture. + +```c++ +TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) { + EXPECT_EQ(q0_.size(), 0); +} + +TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) { + int* n = q0_.Dequeue(); + EXPECT_EQ(n, nullptr); + + n = q1_.Dequeue(); + ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr); + EXPECT_EQ(*n, 1); + EXPECT_EQ(q1_.size(), 0); + delete n; + + n = q2_.Dequeue(); + ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr); + EXPECT_EQ(*n, 2); + EXPECT_EQ(q2_.size(), 1); + delete n; +} +``` + +The above uses both `ASSERT_*` and `EXPECT_*` assertions. The rule of thumb is +to use `EXPECT_*` when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors after +the assertion failure, and use `ASSERT_*` when continuing after failure doesn't +make sense. For example, the second assertion in the `Dequeue` test is +=ASSERT_NE(nullptr, n)=, as we need to dereference the pointer `n` later, which +would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`. + +When these tests run, the following happens: + +1. googletest constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1` ). +1. `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1` . +1. The first test ( `IsEmptyInitially` ) runs on `t1` . +1. `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes. +1. `t1` is destructed. +1. The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time + running the `DequeueWorks` test. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + + +## Invoking the Tests + +`TEST()` and `TEST_F()` implicitly register their tests with googletest. So, +unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all +your defined tests in order to run them. + +After defining your tests, you can run them with `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` , which +returns `0` if all the tests are successful, or `1` otherwise. Note that +`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` runs *all tests* in your link unit -- they can be from +different test cases, or even different source files. + +When invoked, the `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` macro: + +1. Saves the state of all googletest flags + +* Creates a test fixture object for the first test. + +* Initializes it via `SetUp()`. + +* Runs the test on the fixture object. + +* Cleans up the fixture via `TearDown()`. + +* Deletes the fixture. + +* Restores the state of all googletest flags + +* Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run. + +If a fatal failure happens the subsequent steps will be skipped. + +> IMPORTANT: You must **not** ignore the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or +> you will get a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the +> automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its +> exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus your `main()` function must +> return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. +> +> Also, you should call `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` only **once**. Calling it more than +> once conflicts with some advanced googletest features (e.g. thread-safe [death +> tests](advanced#death-tests)) and thus is not supported. + +**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac. + +## Writing the main() Function + +In `google3`, the simplest approach is to use the default main() function +provided by linking in `"//testing/base/public:gtest_main"`. If that doesn't +cover what you need, you should write your own main() function, which should +return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`. Link to `"//testing/base/public:gunit"`. +You can start from this boilerplate: + +```c++ +#include "this/package/foo.h" +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +namespace { + +// The fixture for testing class Foo. +class FooTest : public ::testing::Test { + protected: + // You can remove any or all of the following functions if its body + // is empty. + + FooTest() { + // You can do set-up work for each test here. + } + + ~FooTest() override { + // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here. + } + + // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up + // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods: + + void SetUp() override { + // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right + // before each test). + } + + void TearDown() override { + // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right + // before the destructor). + } + + // Objects declared here can be used by all tests in the test case for Foo. +}; + +// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc. +TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) { + const std::string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat"; + const std::string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat"; + Foo f; + EXPECT_EQ(f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath), 0); +} + +// Tests that Foo does Xyz. +TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) { + // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo. +} + +} // namespace + +int main(int argc, char **argv) { + ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +} +``` + + +The `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` function parses the command line for +googletest flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to +control a test program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in +[AdvancedGuide](advanced.md). You **must** call this function before calling +`RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or the flags won't be properly initialized. + +On Windows, `InitGoogleTest()` also works with wide strings, so it can be used +in programs compiled in `UNICODE` mode as well. + +But maybe you think that writing all those main() functions is too much work? We +agree with you completely and that's why Google Test provides a basic +implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with +gtest\_main library and you are good to go. + +NOTE: `ParseGUnitFlags()` is deprecated in favor of `InitGoogleTest()`. + + +## Known Limitations + +* Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is thread-safe + on systems where the `pthreads` library is available. It is currently + _unsafe_ to use Google Test assertions from two threads concurrently on + other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is not an issue as usually + the assertions are done in the main thread. If you want to help, you can + volunteer to implement the necessary synchronization primitives in + `gtest-port.h` for your platform. diff --git a/googletest/docs/samples.md b/googletest/docs/samples.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..18dcca3 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/docs/samples.md @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +# Googletest Samples {#samples} + +If you're like us, you'd like to look at [googletest +samples.](https://github.com/google/googletest/tree/master/googletest/samples) +The sample directory has a number of well-commented samples showing how to use a +variety of googletest features. + +* Sample #1 shows the basic steps of using googletest to test C++ functions. +* Sample #2 shows a more complex unit test for a class with multiple member + functions. +* Sample #3 uses a test fixture. +* Sample #4 teaches you how to use googletest and `googletest.h` together to + get the best of both libraries. +* Sample #5 puts shared testing logic in a base test fixture, and reuses it in + derived fixtures. +* Sample #6 demonstrates type-parameterized tests. +* Sample #7 teaches the basics of value-parameterized tests. +* Sample #8 shows using `Combine()` in value-parameterized tests. +* Sample #9 shows use of the listener API to modify Google Test's console + output and the use of its reflection API to inspect test results. +* Sample #10 shows use of the listener API to implement a primitive memory + leak checker. diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-death-test.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-death-test.h index 957a69c..59795e3 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-death-test.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-death-test.h @@ -29,11 +29,12 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file defines the public API for death tests. It is // #included by gtest.h so a user doesn't need to include this // directly. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_DEATH_TEST_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_DEATH_TEST_H_ @@ -99,10 +100,11 @@ GTEST_API_ bool InDeathTestChild(); // // On the regular expressions used in death tests: // +// GOOGLETEST_CM0005 DO NOT DELETE // On POSIX-compliant systems (*nix), we use the <regex.h> library, // which uses the POSIX extended regex syntax. // -// On other platforms (e.g. Windows), we only support a simple regex +// On other platforms (e.g. Windows or Mac), we only support a simple regex // syntax implemented as part of Google Test. This limited // implementation should be enough most of the time when writing // death tests; though it lacks many features you can find in PCRE @@ -198,9 +200,10 @@ class GTEST_API_ ExitedWithCode { const int exit_code_; }; -# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA // Tests that an exit code describes an exit due to termination by a // given signal. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0006 DO NOT DELETE class GTEST_API_ KilledBySignal { public: explicit KilledBySignal(int signum); @@ -272,6 +275,54 @@ class GTEST_API_ KilledBySignal { # endif // NDEBUG for EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST +// This macro is used for implementing macros such as +// EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED and ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED on systems where +// death tests are not supported. Those macros must compile on such systems +// iff EXPECT_DEATH and ASSERT_DEATH compile with the same parameters on +// systems that support death tests. This allows one to write such a macro +// on a system that does not support death tests and be sure that it will +// compile on a death-test supporting system. It is exposed publicly so that +// systems that have death-tests with stricter requirements than +// GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST can write their own equivalent of +// EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED and ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED. +// +// Parameters: +// statement - A statement that a macro such as EXPECT_DEATH would test +// for program termination. This macro has to make sure this +// statement is compiled but not executed, to ensure that +// EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED compiles with a certain +// parameter iff EXPECT_DEATH compiles with it. +// regex - A regex that a macro such as EXPECT_DEATH would use to test +// the output of statement. This parameter has to be +// compiled but not evaluated by this macro, to ensure that +// this macro only accepts expressions that a macro such as +// EXPECT_DEATH would accept. +// terminator - Must be an empty statement for EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED +// and a return statement for ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED. +// This ensures that ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED will not +// compile inside functions where ASSERT_DEATH doesn't +// compile. +// +// The branch that has an always false condition is used to ensure that +// statement and regex are compiled (and thus syntactically correct) but +// never executed. The unreachable code macro protects the terminator +// statement from generating an 'unreachable code' warning in case +// statement unconditionally returns or throws. The Message constructor at +// the end allows the syntax of streaming additional messages into the +// macro, for compilational compatibility with EXPECT_DEATH/ASSERT_DEATH. +# define GTEST_UNSUPPORTED_DEATH_TEST(statement, regex, terminator) \ + GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_ \ + if (::testing::internal::AlwaysTrue()) { \ + GTEST_LOG_(WARNING) \ + << "Death tests are not supported on this platform.\n" \ + << "Statement '" #statement "' cannot be verified."; \ + } else if (::testing::internal::AlwaysFalse()) { \ + ::testing::internal::RE::PartialMatch(".*", (regex)); \ + GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_(statement); \ + terminator; \ + } else \ + ::testing::Message() + // EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(statement, regex) and // ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(statement, regex) expand to real death tests if // death tests are supported; otherwise they just issue a warning. This is @@ -284,9 +335,9 @@ class GTEST_API_ KilledBySignal { ASSERT_DEATH(statement, regex) #else # define EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(statement, regex) \ - GTEST_UNSUPPORTED_DEATH_TEST_(statement, regex, ) + GTEST_UNSUPPORTED_DEATH_TEST(statement, regex, ) # define ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(statement, regex) \ - GTEST_UNSUPPORTED_DEATH_TEST_(statement, regex, return) + GTEST_UNSUPPORTED_DEATH_TEST(statement, regex, return) #endif } // namespace testing diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-message.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-message.h index fe879bc..3e3870c 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-message.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-message.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file defines the Message class. // @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ // to CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. Therefore DO NOT DEPEND ON IT in a user // program! +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_MESSAGE_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_MESSAGE_H_ @@ -196,7 +198,6 @@ class GTEST_API_ Message { std::string GetString() const; private: - #if GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN // These are needed as the Nokia Symbian Compiler cannot decide between // const T& and const T* in a function template. The Nokia compiler _can_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h index 038f9ba..3ea3338 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h @@ -34,10 +34,12 @@ // Authors: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) // // Macros and functions for implementing parameterized tests -// in Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// in Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This file is generated by a SCRIPT. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND! // +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_H_ @@ -79,7 +81,7 @@ TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { // Finally, you can use INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P to instantiate the test // case with any set of parameters you want. Google Test defines a number // of functions for generating test parameters. They return what we call -// (surprise!) parameter generators. Here is a summary of them, which +// (surprise!) parameter generators. Here is a summary of them, which // are all in the testing namespace: // // @@ -185,15 +187,10 @@ TEST_P(DerivedTest, DoesBlah) { # include <utility> #endif -// scripts/fuse_gtest.py depends on gtest's own header being #included -// *unconditionally*. Therefore these #includes cannot be moved -// inside #if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST. #include "gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - namespace testing { // Functions producing parameter generators. @@ -273,7 +270,7 @@ internal::ParamGenerator<T> Range(T start, T end) { // each with C-string values of "foo", "bar", and "baz": // // const char* strings[] = {"foo", "bar", "baz"}; -// INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(StringSequence, SrtingTest, ValuesIn(strings)); +// INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(StringSequence, StringTest, ValuesIn(strings)); // // This instantiates tests from test case StlStringTest // each with STL strings with values "a" and "b": @@ -1375,8 +1372,6 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder10<Generator1, Generator2, Generator3, } # endif // GTEST_HAS_COMBINE - - # define TEST_P(test_case_name, test_name) \ class GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_case_name, test_name) \ : public test_case_name { \ @@ -1390,8 +1385,8 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder10<Generator1, Generator2, Generator3, #test_case_name, \ ::testing::internal::CodeLocation(\ __FILE__, __LINE__))->AddTestPattern(\ - #test_case_name, \ - #test_name, \ + GTEST_STRINGIFY_(test_case_name), \ + GTEST_STRINGIFY_(test_name), \ new ::testing::internal::TestMetaFactory< \ GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(\ test_case_name, test_name)>()); \ @@ -1412,33 +1407,33 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder10<Generator1, Generator2, Generator3, // type testing::TestParamInfo<class ParamType>, and return std::string. // // testing::PrintToStringParamName is a builtin test suffix generator that -// returns the value of testing::PrintToString(GetParam()). It does not work -// for std::string or C strings. +// returns the value of testing::PrintToString(GetParam()). // // Note: test names must be non-empty, unique, and may only contain ASCII -// alphanumeric characters or underscore. - -# define INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(prefix, test_case_name, generator, ...) \ - ::testing::internal::ParamGenerator<test_case_name::ParamType> \ - gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerator_() { return generator; } \ - ::std::string gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerateName_( \ - const ::testing::TestParamInfo<test_case_name::ParamType>& info) { \ - return ::testing::internal::GetParamNameGen<test_case_name::ParamType> \ - (__VA_ARGS__)(info); \ - } \ - int gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_dummy_ GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_ = \ - ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->parameterized_test_registry(). \ - GetTestCasePatternHolder<test_case_name>(\ - #test_case_name, \ - ::testing::internal::CodeLocation(\ - __FILE__, __LINE__))->AddTestCaseInstantiation(\ - #prefix, \ - >est_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerator_, \ - >est_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerateName_, \ - __FILE__, __LINE__) +// alphanumeric characters or underscore. Because PrintToString adds quotes +// to std::string and C strings, it won't work for these types. + +#define INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(prefix, test_case_name, generator, ...) \ + static ::testing::internal::ParamGenerator<test_case_name::ParamType> \ + gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerator_() { \ + return generator; \ + } \ + static ::std::string gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerateName_( \ + const ::testing::TestParamInfo<test_case_name::ParamType>& info) { \ + return ::testing::internal::GetParamNameGen<test_case_name::ParamType>( \ + __VA_ARGS__)(info); \ + } \ + static int gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_dummy_ GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_ = \ + ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance() \ + ->parameterized_test_registry() \ + .GetTestCasePatternHolder<test_case_name>( \ + #test_case_name, \ + ::testing::internal::CodeLocation(__FILE__, __LINE__)) \ + ->AddTestCaseInstantiation( \ + #prefix, >est_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerator_, \ + >est_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerateName_, __FILE__, \ + __LINE__) } // namespace testing -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h.pump b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h.pump index 3078d6d..4dac9f2 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h.pump +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-param-test.h.pump @@ -33,10 +33,11 @@ $var maxtuple = 10 $$ Maximum number of Combine arguments we want to support. // Authors: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) // // Macros and functions for implementing parameterized tests -// in Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// in Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This file is generated by a SCRIPT. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND! // +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_H_ @@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ TEST_P(FooTest, HasBlahBlah) { // Finally, you can use INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P to instantiate the test // case with any set of parameters you want. Google Test defines a number // of functions for generating test parameters. They return what we call -// (surprise!) parameter generators. Here is a summary of them, which +// (surprise!) parameter generators. Here is a summary of them, which // are all in the testing namespace: // // @@ -184,15 +185,10 @@ TEST_P(DerivedTest, DoesBlah) { # include <utility> #endif -// scripts/fuse_gtest.py depends on gtest's own header being #included -// *unconditionally*. Therefore these #includes cannot be moved -// inside #if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST. #include "gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - namespace testing { // Functions producing parameter generators. @@ -272,7 +268,7 @@ internal::ParamGenerator<T> Range(T start, T end) { // each with C-string values of "foo", "bar", and "baz": // // const char* strings[] = {"foo", "bar", "baz"}; -// INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(StringSequence, SrtingTest, ValuesIn(strings)); +// INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(StringSequence, StringTest, ValuesIn(strings)); // // This instantiates tests from test case StlStringTest // each with STL strings with values "a" and "b": @@ -441,8 +437,6 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder$i<$for j, [[Generator$j]]> Combine( ]] # endif // GTEST_HAS_COMBINE - - # define TEST_P(test_case_name, test_name) \ class GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_case_name, test_name) \ : public test_case_name { \ @@ -456,8 +450,8 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder$i<$for j, [[Generator$j]]> Combine( #test_case_name, \ ::testing::internal::CodeLocation(\ __FILE__, __LINE__))->AddTestPattern(\ - #test_case_name, \ - #test_name, \ + GTEST_STRINGIFY_(test_case_name), \ + GTEST_STRINGIFY_(test_name), \ new ::testing::internal::TestMetaFactory< \ GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(\ test_case_name, test_name)>()); \ @@ -485,14 +479,14 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder$i<$for j, [[Generator$j]]> Combine( // to std::string and C strings, it won't work for these types. # define INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(prefix, test_case_name, generator, ...) \ - ::testing::internal::ParamGenerator<test_case_name::ParamType> \ + static ::testing::internal::ParamGenerator<test_case_name::ParamType> \ gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerator_() { return generator; } \ - ::std::string gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerateName_( \ + static ::std::string gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_EvalGenerateName_( \ const ::testing::TestParamInfo<test_case_name::ParamType>& info) { \ return ::testing::internal::GetParamNameGen<test_case_name::ParamType> \ (__VA_ARGS__)(info); \ } \ - int gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_dummy_ GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_ = \ + static int gtest_##prefix##test_case_name##_dummy_ GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_ = \ ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->parameterized_test_registry(). \ GetTestCasePatternHolder<test_case_name>(\ #test_case_name, \ @@ -505,6 +499,4 @@ internal::CartesianProductHolder$i<$for j, [[Generator$j]]> Combine( } // namespace testing -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-printers.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-printers.h index 8a33164..57eb5ae 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-printers.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-printers.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) -// Google Test - The Google C++ Testing Framework +// Google Test - The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework // // This file implements a universal value printer that can print a // value of any type T: @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ // 2. operator<<(ostream&, const T&) defined in either foo or the // global namespace. // +// However if T is an STL-style container then it is printed element-wise +// unless foo::PrintTo(const T&, ostream*) is defined. Note that +// operator<<() is ignored for container types. +// // If none of the above is defined, it will print the debug string of // the value if it is a protocol buffer, or print the raw bytes in the // value otherwise. @@ -92,6 +96,8 @@ // being defined as many user-defined container types don't have // value_type. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRINTERS_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRINTERS_H_ @@ -107,6 +113,12 @@ # include <tuple> #endif +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +#include "absl/strings/string_view.h" +#include "absl/types/optional.h" +#include "absl/types/variant.h" +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + namespace testing { // Definitions in the 'internal' and 'internal2' name spaces are @@ -125,7 +137,11 @@ enum TypeKind { kProtobuf, // a protobuf type kConvertibleToInteger, // a type implicitly convertible to BiggestInt // (e.g. a named or unnamed enum type) - kOtherType // anything else +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + kConvertibleToStringView, // a type implicitly convertible to + // absl::string_view +#endif + kOtherType // anything else }; // TypeWithoutFormatter<T, kTypeKind>::PrintValue(value, os) is called @@ -137,7 +153,8 @@ class TypeWithoutFormatter { public: // This default version is called when kTypeKind is kOtherType. static void PrintValue(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { - PrintBytesInObjectTo(reinterpret_cast<const unsigned char*>(&value), + PrintBytesInObjectTo(static_cast<const unsigned char*>( + reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&value)), sizeof(value), os); } }; @@ -151,10 +168,10 @@ template <typename T> class TypeWithoutFormatter<T, kProtobuf> { public: static void PrintValue(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { - const ::testing::internal::string short_str = value.ShortDebugString(); - const ::testing::internal::string pretty_str = - short_str.length() <= kProtobufOneLinerMaxLength ? - short_str : ("\n" + value.DebugString()); + std::string pretty_str = value.ShortDebugString(); + if (pretty_str.length() > kProtobufOneLinerMaxLength) { + pretty_str = "\n" + value.DebugString(); + } *os << ("<" + pretty_str + ">"); } }; @@ -175,6 +192,19 @@ class TypeWithoutFormatter<T, kConvertibleToInteger> { } }; +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +template <typename T> +class TypeWithoutFormatter<T, kConvertibleToStringView> { + public: + // Since T has neither operator<< nor PrintTo() but can be implicitly + // converted to absl::string_view, we print it as a absl::string_view. + // + // Note: the implementation is further below, as it depends on + // internal::PrintTo symbol which is defined later in the file. + static void PrintValue(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os); +}; +#endif + // Prints the given value to the given ostream. If the value is a // protocol message, its debug string is printed; if it's an enum or // of a type implicitly convertible to BiggestInt, it's printed as an @@ -202,10 +232,19 @@ class TypeWithoutFormatter<T, kConvertibleToInteger> { template <typename Char, typename CharTraits, typename T> ::std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& operator<<( ::std::basic_ostream<Char, CharTraits>& os, const T& x) { - TypeWithoutFormatter<T, - (internal::IsAProtocolMessage<T>::value ? kProtobuf : - internal::ImplicitlyConvertible<const T&, internal::BiggestInt>::value ? - kConvertibleToInteger : kOtherType)>::PrintValue(x, &os); + TypeWithoutFormatter<T, (internal::IsAProtocolMessage<T>::value + ? kProtobuf + : internal::ImplicitlyConvertible< + const T&, internal::BiggestInt>::value + ? kConvertibleToInteger + : +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + internal::ImplicitlyConvertible< + const T&, absl::string_view>::value + ? kConvertibleToStringView + : +#endif + kOtherType)>::PrintValue(x, &os); return os; } @@ -364,11 +403,18 @@ class UniversalPrinter; template <typename T> void UniversalPrint(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os); +enum DefaultPrinterType { + kPrintContainer, + kPrintPointer, + kPrintFunctionPointer, + kPrintOther, +}; +template <DefaultPrinterType type> struct WrapPrinterType {}; + // Used to print an STL-style container when the user doesn't define // a PrintTo() for it. template <typename C> -void DefaultPrintTo(IsContainer /* dummy */, - false_type /* is not a pointer */, +void DefaultPrintTo(WrapPrinterType<kPrintContainer> /* dummy */, const C& container, ::std::ostream* os) { const size_t kMaxCount = 32; // The maximum number of elements to print. *os << '{'; @@ -401,40 +447,34 @@ void DefaultPrintTo(IsContainer /* dummy */, // implementation-defined. Therefore they will be printed as raw // bytes.) template <typename T> -void DefaultPrintTo(IsNotContainer /* dummy */, - true_type /* is a pointer */, +void DefaultPrintTo(WrapPrinterType<kPrintPointer> /* dummy */, T* p, ::std::ostream* os) { if (p == NULL) { *os << "NULL"; } else { - // C++ doesn't allow casting from a function pointer to any object - // pointer. - // - // IsTrue() silences warnings: "Condition is always true", - // "unreachable code". - if (IsTrue(ImplicitlyConvertible<T*, const void*>::value)) { - // T is not a function type. We just call << to print p, - // relying on ADL to pick up user-defined << for their pointer - // types, if any. - *os << p; - } else { - // T is a function type, so '*os << p' doesn't do what we want - // (it just prints p as bool). We want to print p as a const - // void*. However, we cannot cast it to const void* directly, - // even using reinterpret_cast, as earlier versions of gcc - // (e.g. 3.4.5) cannot compile the cast when p is a function - // pointer. Casting to UInt64 first solves the problem. - *os << reinterpret_cast<const void*>( - reinterpret_cast<internal::UInt64>(p)); - } + // T is not a function type. We just call << to print p, + // relying on ADL to pick up user-defined << for their pointer + // types, if any. + *os << p; + } +} +template <typename T> +void DefaultPrintTo(WrapPrinterType<kPrintFunctionPointer> /* dummy */, + T* p, ::std::ostream* os) { + if (p == NULL) { + *os << "NULL"; + } else { + // T is a function type, so '*os << p' doesn't do what we want + // (it just prints p as bool). We want to print p as a const + // void*. + *os << reinterpret_cast<const void*>(p); } } // Used to print a non-container, non-pointer value when the user // doesn't define PrintTo() for it. template <typename T> -void DefaultPrintTo(IsNotContainer /* dummy */, - false_type /* is not a pointer */, +void DefaultPrintTo(WrapPrinterType<kPrintOther> /* dummy */, const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { ::testing_internal::DefaultPrintNonContainerTo(value, os); } @@ -452,11 +492,8 @@ void DefaultPrintTo(IsNotContainer /* dummy */, // wants). template <typename T> void PrintTo(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { - // DefaultPrintTo() is overloaded. The type of its first two - // arguments determine which version will be picked. If T is an - // STL-style container, the version for container will be called; if - // T is a pointer, the pointer version will be called; otherwise the - // generic version will be called. + // DefaultPrintTo() is overloaded. The type of its first argument + // determines which version will be picked. // // Note that we check for container types here, prior to we check // for protocol message types in our operator<<. The rationale is: @@ -468,13 +505,27 @@ void PrintTo(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { // elements; therefore we check for container types here to ensure // that our format is used. // - // The second argument of DefaultPrintTo() is needed to bypass a bug - // in Symbian's C++ compiler that prevents it from picking the right - // overload between: - // - // PrintTo(const T& x, ...); - // PrintTo(T* x, ...); - DefaultPrintTo(IsContainerTest<T>(0), is_pointer<T>(), value, os); + // Note that MSVC and clang-cl do allow an implicit conversion from + // pointer-to-function to pointer-to-object, but clang-cl warns on it. + // So don't use ImplicitlyConvertible if it can be helped since it will + // cause this warning, and use a separate overload of DefaultPrintTo for + // function pointers so that the `*os << p` in the object pointer overload + // doesn't cause that warning either. + DefaultPrintTo( + WrapPrinterType < + (sizeof(IsContainerTest<T>(0)) == sizeof(IsContainer)) && + !IsRecursiveContainer<T>::value + ? kPrintContainer + : !is_pointer<T>::value + ? kPrintOther +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + : std::is_function<typename std::remove_pointer<T>::type>::value +#else + : !internal::ImplicitlyConvertible<T, const void*>::value +#endif + ? kPrintFunctionPointer + : kPrintPointer > (), + value, os); } // The following list of PrintTo() overloads tells @@ -581,6 +632,17 @@ inline void PrintTo(const ::std::wstring& s, ::std::ostream* os) { } #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +// Overload for absl::string_view. +inline void PrintTo(absl::string_view sp, ::std::ostream* os) { + PrintTo(::std::string(sp), os); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +inline void PrintTo(std::nullptr_t, ::std::ostream* os) { *os << "(nullptr)"; } +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + #if GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE || GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ // Helper function for printing a tuple. T must be instantiated with // a tuple type. @@ -710,6 +772,48 @@ class UniversalPrinter { GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_POP_() }; +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + +// Printer for absl::optional + +template <typename T> +class UniversalPrinter<::absl::optional<T>> { + public: + static void Print(const ::absl::optional<T>& value, ::std::ostream* os) { + *os << '('; + if (!value) { + *os << "nullopt"; + } else { + UniversalPrint(*value, os); + } + *os << ')'; + } +}; + +// Printer for absl::variant + +template <typename... T> +class UniversalPrinter<::absl::variant<T...>> { + public: + static void Print(const ::absl::variant<T...>& value, ::std::ostream* os) { + *os << '('; + absl::visit(Visitor{os}, value); + *os << ')'; + } + + private: + struct Visitor { + template <typename U> + void operator()(const U& u) const { + *os << "'" << GetTypeName<U>() << "' with value "; + UniversalPrint(u, os); + } + ::std::ostream* os; + }; +}; + +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + // UniversalPrintArray(begin, len, os) prints an array of 'len' // elements, starting at address 'begin'. template <typename T> @@ -805,7 +909,7 @@ class UniversalTersePrinter<const char*> { if (str == NULL) { *os << "NULL"; } else { - UniversalPrint(string(str), os); + UniversalPrint(std::string(str), os); } } }; @@ -856,7 +960,7 @@ void UniversalPrint(const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { UniversalPrinter<T1>::Print(value, os); } -typedef ::std::vector<string> Strings; +typedef ::std::vector< ::std::string> Strings; // TuplePolicy<TupleT> must provide: // - tuple_size @@ -976,6 +1080,16 @@ Strings UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(const Tuple& value) { } // namespace internal +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +namespace internal2 { +template <typename T> +void TypeWithoutFormatter<T, kConvertibleToStringView>::PrintValue( + const T& value, ::std::ostream* os) { + internal::PrintTo(absl::string_view(value), os); +} +} // namespace internal2 +#endif + template <typename T> ::std::string PrintToString(const T& value) { ::std::stringstream ss; diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-spi.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-spi.h index f63fa9a..c21b029 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-spi.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-spi.h @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ // Utilities for testing Google Test itself and code that uses Google Test // (e.g. frameworks built on top of Google Test). +// GOOGLETEST_CM0004 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_SPI_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_SPI_H_ @@ -97,13 +99,12 @@ class GTEST_API_ SingleFailureChecker { public: // The constructor remembers the arguments. SingleFailureChecker(const TestPartResultArray* results, - TestPartResult::Type type, - const string& substr); + TestPartResult::Type type, const std::string& substr); ~SingleFailureChecker(); private: const TestPartResultArray* const results_; const TestPartResult::Type type_; - const string substr_; + const std::string substr_; GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SingleFailureChecker); }; diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h index 77eb844..301a012 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-test-part.h @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ // Author: mheule@google.com (Markus Heule) // +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_TEST_PART_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_TEST_PART_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-typed-test.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-typed-test.h index 5f69d56..00925af 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-typed-test.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-typed-test.h @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_TYPED_TEST_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_TYPED_TEST_H_ @@ -241,9 +243,10 @@ INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, FooTest, MyTypes); namespace GTEST_CASE_NAMESPACE_(CaseName) { \ typedef ::testing::internal::Templates<__VA_ARGS__>::type gtest_AllTests_; \ } \ - static const char* const GTEST_REGISTERED_TEST_NAMES_(CaseName) = \ - GTEST_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P_STATE_(CaseName).VerifyRegisteredTestNames(\ - __FILE__, __LINE__, #__VA_ARGS__) + static const char* const GTEST_REGISTERED_TEST_NAMES_(CaseName) \ + GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_ = \ + GTEST_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P_STATE_(CaseName).VerifyRegisteredTestNames( \ + __FILE__, __LINE__, #__VA_ARGS__) // The 'Types' template argument below must have spaces around it // since some compilers may choke on '>>' when passing a template diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h index f846c5b..a6c674b 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file defines the public API for Google Test. It should be // included by any test program that uses Google Test. @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ // registration from Barthelemy Dagenais' (barthelemy@prologique.com) // easyUnit framework. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_H_ @@ -82,6 +84,15 @@ namespace testing { +// Silence C4100 (unreferenced formal parameter) and 4805 +// unsafe mix of type 'const int' and type 'const bool' +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(push) +# pragma warning(disable:4805) +# pragma warning(disable:4100) +#endif + + // Declares the flags. // This flag temporary enables the disabled tests. @@ -115,6 +126,9 @@ GTEST_DECLARE_string_(output); // test. GTEST_DECLARE_bool_(print_time); +// This flags control whether Google Test prints UTF8 characters as text. +GTEST_DECLARE_bool_(print_utf8); + // This flag specifies the random number seed. GTEST_DECLARE_int32_(random_seed); @@ -135,7 +149,7 @@ GTEST_DECLARE_int32_(stack_trace_depth); // When this flag is specified, a failed assertion will throw an // exception if exceptions are enabled, or exit the program with a -// non-zero code otherwise. +// non-zero code otherwise. For use with an external test framework. GTEST_DECLARE_bool_(throw_on_failure); // When this flag is set with a "host:port" string, on supported @@ -160,6 +174,7 @@ class TestEventListenersAccessor; class TestEventRepeater; class UnitTestRecordPropertyTestHelper; class WindowsDeathTest; +class FuchsiaDeathTest; class UnitTestImpl* GetUnitTestImpl(); void ReportFailureInUnknownLocation(TestPartResult::Type result_type, const std::string& message); @@ -259,7 +274,9 @@ class GTEST_API_ AssertionResult { // Used in EXPECT_TRUE/FALSE(assertion_result). AssertionResult(const AssertionResult& other); +#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1910 GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(4800 /* forcing value to bool */) +#endif // Used in the EXPECT_TRUE/FALSE(bool_expression). // @@ -276,7 +293,9 @@ class GTEST_API_ AssertionResult { /*enabler*/ = NULL) : success_(success) {} +#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1910 GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_POP_() +#endif // Assignment operator. AssertionResult& operator=(AssertionResult other) { @@ -345,6 +364,15 @@ GTEST_API_ AssertionResult AssertionFailure(); // Deprecated; use AssertionFailure() << msg. GTEST_API_ AssertionResult AssertionFailure(const Message& msg); +} // namespace testing + +// Includes the auto-generated header that implements a family of generic +// predicate assertion macros. This include comes late because it relies on +// APIs declared above. +#include "gtest/gtest_pred_impl.h" + +namespace testing { + // The abstract class that all tests inherit from. // // In Google Test, a unit test program contains one or many TestCases, and @@ -355,7 +383,7 @@ GTEST_API_ AssertionResult AssertionFailure(const Message& msg); // this for you. // // The only time you derive from Test is when defining a test fixture -// to be used a TEST_F. For example: +// to be used in a TEST_F. For example: // // class FooTest : public testing::Test { // protected: @@ -550,9 +578,8 @@ class GTEST_API_ TestResult { // Returns the elapsed time, in milliseconds. TimeInMillis elapsed_time() const { return elapsed_time_; } - // Returns the i-th test part result among all the results. i can range - // from 0 to test_property_count() - 1. If i is not in that range, aborts - // the program. + // Returns the i-th test part result among all the results. i can range from 0 + // to total_part_count() - 1. If i is not in that range, aborts the program. const TestPartResult& GetTestPartResult(int i) const; // Returns the i-th test property. i can range from 0 to @@ -569,6 +596,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ TestResult { friend class internal::TestResultAccessor; friend class internal::UnitTestImpl; friend class internal::WindowsDeathTest; + friend class internal::FuchsiaDeathTest; // Gets the vector of TestPartResults. const std::vector<TestPartResult>& test_part_results() const { @@ -675,6 +703,9 @@ class GTEST_API_ TestInfo { // Returns the line where this test is defined. int line() const { return location_.line; } + // Return true if this test should not be run because it's in another shard. + bool is_in_another_shard() const { return is_in_another_shard_; } + // Returns true if this test should run, that is if the test is not // disabled (or it is disabled but the also_run_disabled_tests flag has // been specified) and its full name matches the user-specified filter. @@ -695,10 +726,9 @@ class GTEST_API_ TestInfo { // Returns true iff this test will appear in the XML report. bool is_reportable() const { - // For now, the XML report includes all tests matching the filter. - // In the future, we may trim tests that are excluded because of - // sharding. - return matches_filter_; + // The XML report includes tests matching the filter, excluding those + // run in other shards. + return matches_filter_ && !is_in_another_shard_; } // Returns the result of the test. @@ -762,6 +792,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ TestInfo { bool is_disabled_; // True iff this test is disabled bool matches_filter_; // True if this test matches the // user-specified filter. + bool is_in_another_shard_; // Will be run in another shard. internal::TestFactoryBase* const factory_; // The factory that creates // the test object @@ -986,6 +1017,18 @@ class Environment { virtual Setup_should_be_spelled_SetUp* Setup() { return NULL; } }; +#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS + +// Exception which can be thrown from TestEventListener::OnTestPartResult. +class GTEST_API_ AssertionException + : public internal::GoogleTestFailureException { + public: + explicit AssertionException(const TestPartResult& result) + : GoogleTestFailureException(result) {} +}; + +#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS + // The interface for tracing execution of tests. The methods are organized in // the order the corresponding events are fired. class TestEventListener { @@ -1014,6 +1057,8 @@ class TestEventListener { virtual void OnTestStart(const TestInfo& test_info) = 0; // Fired after a failed assertion or a SUCCEED() invocation. + // If you want to throw an exception from this function to skip to the next + // TEST, it must be AssertionException defined above, or inherited from it. virtual void OnTestPartResult(const TestPartResult& test_part_result) = 0; // Fired after the test ends. @@ -1180,14 +1225,12 @@ class GTEST_API_ UnitTest { // Returns the random seed used at the start of the current test run. int random_seed() const; -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Returns the ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry object used to keep track of // value-parameterized tests and instantiate and register them. // // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DO NOT USE IN A USER PROGRAM. internal::ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry& parameterized_test_registry() GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(mutex_); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Gets the number of successful test cases. int successful_test_case_count() const; @@ -1287,11 +1330,11 @@ class GTEST_API_ UnitTest { internal::UnitTestImpl* impl() { return impl_; } const internal::UnitTestImpl* impl() const { return impl_; } - // These classes and funcions are friends as they need to access private + // These classes and functions are friends as they need to access private // members of UnitTest. + friend class ScopedTrace; friend class Test; friend class internal::AssertHelper; - friend class internal::ScopedTrace; friend class internal::StreamingListenerTest; friend class internal::UnitTestRecordPropertyTestHelper; friend Environment* AddGlobalTestEnvironment(Environment* env); @@ -1388,11 +1431,9 @@ AssertionResult CmpHelperEQ(const char* lhs_expression, const char* rhs_expression, const T1& lhs, const T2& rhs) { -GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(4389 /* signed/unsigned mismatch */) if (lhs == rhs) { return AssertionSuccess(); } -GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_POP_() return CmpHelperEQFailure(lhs_expression, rhs_expression, lhs, rhs); } @@ -1706,7 +1747,6 @@ class GTEST_API_ AssertHelper { } // namespace internal -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // The pure interface class that all value-parameterized tests inherit from. // A value-parameterized class must inherit from both ::testing::Test and // ::testing::WithParamInterface. In most cases that just means inheriting @@ -1783,8 +1823,6 @@ template <typename T> class TestWithParam : public Test, public WithParamInterface<T> { }; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - // Macros for indicating success/failure in test code. // ADD_FAILURE unconditionally adds a failure to the current test. @@ -1857,22 +1895,18 @@ class TestWithParam : public Test, public WithParamInterface<T> { // AssertionResult. For more information on how to use AssertionResult with // these macros see comments on that class. #define EXPECT_TRUE(condition) \ - GTEST_TEST_BOOLEAN_((condition), #condition, false, true, \ + GTEST_TEST_BOOLEAN_(condition, #condition, false, true, \ GTEST_NONFATAL_FAILURE_) #define EXPECT_FALSE(condition) \ GTEST_TEST_BOOLEAN_(!(condition), #condition, true, false, \ GTEST_NONFATAL_FAILURE_) #define ASSERT_TRUE(condition) \ - GTEST_TEST_BOOLEAN_((condition), #condition, false, true, \ + GTEST_TEST_BOOLEAN_(condition, #condition, false, true, \ GTEST_FATAL_FAILURE_) #define ASSERT_FALSE(condition) \ GTEST_TEST_BOOLEAN_(!(condition), #condition, true, false, \ GTEST_FATAL_FAILURE_) -// Includes the auto-generated header that implements a family of -// generic predicate assertion macros. -#include "gtest/gtest_pred_impl.h" - // Macros for testing equalities and inequalities. // // * {ASSERT|EXPECT}_EQ(v1, v2): Tests that v1 == v2 @@ -1914,8 +1948,8 @@ class TestWithParam : public Test, public WithParamInterface<T> { // // Examples: // -// EXPECT_NE(5, Foo()); -// EXPECT_EQ(NULL, a_pointer); +// EXPECT_NE(Foo(), 5); +// EXPECT_EQ(a_pointer, NULL); // ASSERT_LT(i, array_size); // ASSERT_GT(records.size(), 0) << "There is no record left."; @@ -2101,6 +2135,57 @@ GTEST_API_ AssertionResult DoubleLE(const char* expr1, const char* expr2, #define EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(statement) \ GTEST_TEST_NO_FATAL_FAILURE_(statement, GTEST_NONFATAL_FAILURE_) +// Causes a trace (including the given source file path and line number, +// and the given message) to be included in every test failure message generated +// by code in the scope of the lifetime of an instance of this class. The effect +// is undone with the destruction of the instance. +// +// The message argument can be anything streamable to std::ostream. +// +// Example: +// testing::ScopedTrace trace("file.cc", 123, "message"); +// +class GTEST_API_ ScopedTrace { + public: + // The c'tor pushes the given source file location and message onto + // a trace stack maintained by Google Test. + + // Template version. Uses Message() to convert the values into strings. + // Slow, but flexible. + template <typename T> + ScopedTrace(const char* file, int line, const T& message) { + PushTrace(file, line, (Message() << message).GetString()); + } + + // Optimize for some known types. + ScopedTrace(const char* file, int line, const char* message) { + PushTrace(file, line, message ? message : "(null)"); + } + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + ScopedTrace(const char* file, int line, const ::string& message) { + PushTrace(file, line, message); + } +#endif + + ScopedTrace(const char* file, int line, const std::string& message) { + PushTrace(file, line, message); + } + + // The d'tor pops the info pushed by the c'tor. + // + // Note that the d'tor is not virtual in order to be efficient. + // Don't inherit from ScopedTrace! + ~ScopedTrace(); + + private: + void PushTrace(const char* file, int line, std::string message); + + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(ScopedTrace); +} GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_; // A ScopedTrace object does its job in its + // c'tor and d'tor. Therefore it doesn't + // need to be used otherwise. + // Causes a trace (including the source file path, the current line // number, and the given message) to be included in every test failure // message generated by code in the current scope. The effect is @@ -2112,9 +2197,14 @@ GTEST_API_ AssertionResult DoubleLE(const char* expr1, const char* expr2, // of the dummy variable name, thus allowing multiple SCOPED_TRACE()s // to appear in the same block - as long as they are on different // lines. +// +// Assuming that each thread maintains its own stack of traces. +// Therefore, a SCOPED_TRACE() would (correctly) only affect the +// assertions in its own thread. #define SCOPED_TRACE(message) \ - ::testing::internal::ScopedTrace GTEST_CONCAT_TOKEN_(gtest_trace_, __LINE__)(\ - __FILE__, __LINE__, ::testing::Message() << (message)) + ::testing::ScopedTrace GTEST_CONCAT_TOKEN_(gtest_trace_, __LINE__)(\ + __FILE__, __LINE__, (message)) + // Compile-time assertion for type equality. // StaticAssertTypeEq<type1, type2>() compiles iff type1 and type2 are @@ -2194,7 +2284,7 @@ bool StaticAssertTypeEq() { // name of the test within the test case. // // A test fixture class must be declared earlier. The user should put -// his test code between braces after using this macro. Example: +// the test code between braces after using this macro. Example: // // class FooTest : public testing::Test { // protected: @@ -2209,14 +2299,22 @@ bool StaticAssertTypeEq() { // } // // TEST_F(FooTest, ReturnsElementCountCorrectly) { -// EXPECT_EQ(0, a_.size()); -// EXPECT_EQ(1, b_.size()); +// EXPECT_EQ(a_.size(), 0); +// EXPECT_EQ(b_.size(), 1); // } #define TEST_F(test_fixture, test_name)\ GTEST_TEST_(test_fixture, test_name, test_fixture, \ ::testing::internal::GetTypeId<test_fixture>()) +// Returns a path to temporary directory. +// Tries to determine an appropriate directory for the platform. +GTEST_API_ std::string TempDir(); + +#ifdef _MSC_VER +# pragma warning(pop) +#endif + } // namespace testing // Use this function in main() to run all tests. It returns 0 if all diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_pred_impl.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_pred_impl.h index 30ae712..0c1105c 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_pred_impl.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_pred_impl.h @@ -27,18 +27,19 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -// This file is AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED on 10/31/2011 by command +// This file is AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED on 01/02/2018 by command // 'gen_gtest_pred_impl.py 5'. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND! // // Implements a family of generic predicate assertion macros. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRED_IMPL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRED_IMPL_H_ -// Makes sure this header is not included before gtest.h. -#ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_H_ -# error Do not include gtest_pred_impl.h directly. Include gtest.h instead. -#endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_H_ +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +namespace testing { // This header implements a family of generic predicate assertion // macros: @@ -66,8 +67,6 @@ // We also define the EXPECT_* variations. // // For now we only support predicates whose arity is at most 5. -// Please email googletestframework@googlegroups.com if you need -// support for higher arities. // GTEST_ASSERT_ is the basic statement to which all of the assertions // in this file reduce. Don't use this in your code. @@ -355,4 +354,6 @@ AssertionResult AssertPred5Helper(const char* pred_text, +} // namespace testing + #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRED_IMPL_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_prod.h b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_prod.h index da80ddc..71377f8 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_prod.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/gtest_prod.h @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// Google C++ Testing Framework definitions useful in production code. +// Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework definitions useful in production code. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0003 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PROD_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PROD_H_ @@ -40,17 +41,20 @@ // // class MyClass { // private: -// void MyMethod(); -// FRIEND_TEST(MyClassTest, MyMethod); +// void PrivateMethod(); +// FRIEND_TEST(MyClassTest, PrivateMethodWorks); // }; // // class MyClassTest : public testing::Test { // // ... // }; // -// TEST_F(MyClassTest, MyMethod) { -// // Can call MyClass::MyMethod() here. +// TEST_F(MyClassTest, PrivateMethodWorks) { +// // Can call MyClass::PrivateMethod() here. // } +// +// Note: The test class must be in the same namespace as the class being tested. +// For example, putting MyClassTest in an anonymous namespace will not work. #define FRIEND_TEST(test_case_name, test_name)\ friend class test_case_name##_##test_name##_Test diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest-port.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest-port.h index 7e744bd..aa5da29 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest-port.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest-port.h @@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ // GTEST_DEFINE_int32_(name, default_val, doc) // GTEST_DEFINE_string_(name, default_val, doc) // -// Test filtering: -// GTEST_TEST_FILTER_ENV_VAR_ - The name of an environment variable that -// will be used if --GTEST_FLAG(test_filter) -// is not provided. -// // Logging: // GTEST_LOG_(severity) // GTEST_CHECK_(condition) @@ -61,6 +56,12 @@ // GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(locks) // GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(locks) // +// Underlying library support features: +// GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ +// +// Exporting API symbols: +// GTEST_API_ - Specifier for exported symbols. +// // ** Custom implementation starts here ** #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GTEST_PORT_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest.h index c27412a..6f7c5e4 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/custom/gtest.h @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ // GTEST_OS_STACK_TRACE_GETTER_ - The name of an implementation of // OsStackTraceGetterInterface. // +// GTEST_CUSTOM_TEMPDIR_FUNCTION_ - An override for testing::TempDir(). +// See testing::TempDir for semantics and +// signature. +// // ** Custom implementation starts here ** #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_CUSTOM_GTEST_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-death-test-internal.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-death-test-internal.h index 2b3a78f..719aee6 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-death-test-internal.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-death-test-internal.h @@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Authors: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan), eefacm@gmail.com (Sean Mcafee) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file defines internal utilities needed for implementing // death tests. They are subject to change without notice. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_DEATH_TEST_INTERNAL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_DEATH_TEST_INTERNAL_H_ @@ -218,14 +218,18 @@ GTEST_API_ bool ExitedUnsuccessfully(int exit_status); // can be streamed. // This macro is for implementing ASSERT/EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH when compiled in -// NDEBUG mode. In this case we need the statements to be executed, the regex is -// ignored, and the macro must accept a streamed message even though the message -// is never printed. -# define GTEST_EXECUTE_STATEMENT_(statement, regex) \ - GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_ \ - if (::testing::internal::AlwaysTrue()) { \ - GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_(statement); \ - } else \ +// NDEBUG mode. In this case we need the statements to be executed and the macro +// must accept a streamed message even though the message is never printed. +// The regex object is not evaluated, but it is used to prevent "unused" +// warnings and to avoid an expression that doesn't compile in debug mode. +#define GTEST_EXECUTE_STATEMENT_(statement, regex) \ + GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_ \ + if (::testing::internal::AlwaysTrue()) { \ + GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_(statement); \ + } else if (!::testing::internal::AlwaysTrue()) { \ + const ::testing::internal::RE& gtest_regex = (regex); \ + static_cast<void>(gtest_regex); \ + } else \ ::testing::Message() // A class representing the parsed contents of the @@ -264,53 +268,6 @@ class InternalRunDeathTestFlag { // the flag is specified; otherwise returns NULL. InternalRunDeathTestFlag* ParseInternalRunDeathTestFlag(); -#else // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST - -// This macro is used for implementing macros such as -// EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED and ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED on systems where -// death tests are not supported. Those macros must compile on such systems -// iff EXPECT_DEATH and ASSERT_DEATH compile with the same parameters on -// systems that support death tests. This allows one to write such a macro -// on a system that does not support death tests and be sure that it will -// compile on a death-test supporting system. -// -// Parameters: -// statement - A statement that a macro such as EXPECT_DEATH would test -// for program termination. This macro has to make sure this -// statement is compiled but not executed, to ensure that -// EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED compiles with a certain -// parameter iff EXPECT_DEATH compiles with it. -// regex - A regex that a macro such as EXPECT_DEATH would use to test -// the output of statement. This parameter has to be -// compiled but not evaluated by this macro, to ensure that -// this macro only accepts expressions that a macro such as -// EXPECT_DEATH would accept. -// terminator - Must be an empty statement for EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED -// and a return statement for ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED. -// This ensures that ASSERT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED will not -// compile inside functions where ASSERT_DEATH doesn't -// compile. -// -// The branch that has an always false condition is used to ensure that -// statement and regex are compiled (and thus syntactically correct) but -// never executed. The unreachable code macro protects the terminator -// statement from generating an 'unreachable code' warning in case -// statement unconditionally returns or throws. The Message constructor at -// the end allows the syntax of streaming additional messages into the -// macro, for compilational compatibility with EXPECT_DEATH/ASSERT_DEATH. -# define GTEST_UNSUPPORTED_DEATH_TEST_(statement, regex, terminator) \ - GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_ \ - if (::testing::internal::AlwaysTrue()) { \ - GTEST_LOG_(WARNING) \ - << "Death tests are not supported on this platform.\n" \ - << "Statement '" #statement "' cannot be verified."; \ - } else if (::testing::internal::AlwaysFalse()) { \ - ::testing::internal::RE::PartialMatch(".*", (regex)); \ - GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_(statement); \ - terminator; \ - } else \ - ::testing::Message() - #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST } // namespace internal diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h index 7a13b4b..e18fe45 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h @@ -27,16 +27,17 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Author: keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray) // // Google Test filepath utilities // // This header file declares classes and functions used internally by // Google Test. They are subject to change without notice. // -// This file is #included in <gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h>. +// This file is #included in gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h. // Do not include this header file separately! +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_FILEPATH_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_FILEPATH_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h index ebd1cf6..45192e2 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h @@ -27,13 +27,14 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Authors: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan), eefacm@gmail.com (Sean Mcafee) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file declares functions and macros used internally by // Google Test. They are subject to change without notice. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_INTERNAL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_INTERNAL_H_ @@ -61,8 +62,8 @@ #include <vector> #include "gtest/gtest-message.h" -#include "gtest/internal/gtest-string.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h" +#include "gtest/internal/gtest-string.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h" // Due to C++ preprocessor weirdness, we need double indirection to @@ -76,6 +77,9 @@ #define GTEST_CONCAT_TOKEN_(foo, bar) GTEST_CONCAT_TOKEN_IMPL_(foo, bar) #define GTEST_CONCAT_TOKEN_IMPL_(foo, bar) foo ## bar +// Stringifies its argument. +#define GTEST_STRINGIFY_(name) #name + class ProtocolMessage; namespace proto2 { class Message; } @@ -96,7 +100,6 @@ template <typename T> namespace internal { struct TraceInfo; // Information about a trace point. -class ScopedTrace; // Implements scoped trace. class TestInfoImpl; // Opaque implementation of TestInfo class UnitTestImpl; // Opaque implementation of UnitTest @@ -152,30 +155,11 @@ class GTEST_API_ GoogleTestFailureException : public ::std::runtime_error { #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -// A helper class for creating scoped traces in user programs. -class GTEST_API_ ScopedTrace { - public: - // The c'tor pushes the given source file location and message onto - // a trace stack maintained by Google Test. - ScopedTrace(const char* file, int line, const Message& message); - - // The d'tor pops the info pushed by the c'tor. - // - // Note that the d'tor is not virtual in order to be efficient. - // Don't inherit from ScopedTrace! - ~ScopedTrace(); - - private: - GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(ScopedTrace); -} GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_; // A ScopedTrace object does its job in its - // c'tor and d'tor. Therefore it doesn't - // need to be used otherwise. - namespace edit_distance { // Returns the optimal edits to go from 'left' to 'right'. // All edits cost the same, with replace having lower priority than // add/remove. -// Simple implementation of the Wagner–Fischer algorithm. +// Simple implementation of the Wagner-Fischer algorithm. // See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagner-Fischer_algorithm enum EditType { kMatch, kAdd, kRemove, kReplace }; GTEST_API_ std::vector<EditType> CalculateOptimalEdits( @@ -502,9 +486,10 @@ typedef void (*SetUpTestCaseFunc)(); typedef void (*TearDownTestCaseFunc)(); struct CodeLocation { - CodeLocation(const string& a_file, int a_line) : file(a_file), line(a_line) {} + CodeLocation(const std::string& a_file, int a_line) + : file(a_file), line(a_line) {} - string file; + std::string file; int line; }; @@ -627,7 +612,7 @@ class TypeParameterizedTest { // Types). Valid values for 'index' are [0, N - 1] where N is the // length of Types. static bool Register(const char* prefix, - CodeLocation code_location, + const CodeLocation& code_location, const char* case_name, const char* test_names, int index) { typedef typename Types::Head Type; @@ -658,7 +643,7 @@ class TypeParameterizedTest { template <GTEST_TEMPLATE_ Fixture, class TestSel> class TypeParameterizedTest<Fixture, TestSel, Types0> { public: - static bool Register(const char* /*prefix*/, CodeLocation, + static bool Register(const char* /*prefix*/, const CodeLocation&, const char* /*case_name*/, const char* /*test_names*/, int /*index*/) { return true; @@ -704,7 +689,7 @@ class TypeParameterizedTestCase { template <GTEST_TEMPLATE_ Fixture, typename Types> class TypeParameterizedTestCase<Fixture, Templates0, Types> { public: - static bool Register(const char* /*prefix*/, CodeLocation, + static bool Register(const char* /*prefix*/, const CodeLocation&, const TypedTestCasePState* /*state*/, const char* /*case_name*/, const char* /*test_names*/) { return true; @@ -823,31 +808,6 @@ struct RemoveConst<T[N]> { #define GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(T) \ GTEST_REMOVE_CONST_(GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_(T)) -// Adds reference to a type if it is not a reference type, -// otherwise leaves it unchanged. This is the same as -// tr1::add_reference, which is not widely available yet. -template <typename T> -struct AddReference { typedef T& type; }; // NOLINT -template <typename T> -struct AddReference<T&> { typedef T& type; }; // NOLINT - -// A handy wrapper around AddReference that works when the argument T -// depends on template parameters. -#define GTEST_ADD_REFERENCE_(T) \ - typename ::testing::internal::AddReference<T>::type - -// Adds a reference to const on top of T as necessary. For example, -// it transforms -// -// char ==> const char& -// const char ==> const char& -// char& ==> const char& -// const char& ==> const char& -// -// The argument T must depend on some template parameters. -#define GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) \ - GTEST_ADD_REFERENCE_(const GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_(T)) - // ImplicitlyConvertible<From, To>::value is a compile-time bool // constant that's true iff type From can be implicitly converted to // type To. @@ -917,8 +877,11 @@ struct IsAProtocolMessage // a container class by checking the type of IsContainerTest<C>(0). // The value of the expression is insignificant. // -// Note that we look for both C::iterator and C::const_iterator. The -// reason is that C++ injects the name of a class as a member of the +// In C++11 mode we check the existence of a const_iterator and that an +// iterator is properly implemented for the container. +// +// For pre-C++11 that we look for both C::iterator and C::const_iterator. +// The reason is that C++ injects the name of a class as a member of the // class itself (e.g. you can refer to class iterator as either // 'iterator' or 'iterator::iterator'). If we look for C::iterator // only, for example, we would mistakenly think that a class named @@ -928,17 +891,96 @@ struct IsAProtocolMessage // IsContainerTest(typename C::const_iterator*) and // IsContainerTest(...) doesn't work with Visual Age C++ and Sun C++. typedef int IsContainer; +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +template <class C, + class Iterator = decltype(::std::declval<const C&>().begin()), + class = decltype(::std::declval<const C&>().end()), + class = decltype(++::std::declval<Iterator&>()), + class = decltype(*::std::declval<Iterator>()), + class = typename C::const_iterator> +IsContainer IsContainerTest(int /* dummy */) { + return 0; +} +#else template <class C> IsContainer IsContainerTest(int /* dummy */, typename C::iterator* /* it */ = NULL, typename C::const_iterator* /* const_it */ = NULL) { return 0; } +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 typedef char IsNotContainer; template <class C> IsNotContainer IsContainerTest(long /* dummy */) { return '\0'; } +// Trait to detect whether a type T is a hash table. +// The heuristic used is that the type contains an inner type `hasher` and does +// not contain an inner type `reverse_iterator`. +// If the container is iterable in reverse, then order might actually matter. +template <typename T> +struct IsHashTable { + private: + template <typename U> + static char test(typename U::hasher*, typename U::reverse_iterator*); + template <typename U> + static int test(typename U::hasher*, ...); + template <typename U> + static char test(...); + + public: + static const bool value = sizeof(test<T>(0, 0)) == sizeof(int); +}; + +template <typename T> +const bool IsHashTable<T>::value; + +template<typename T> +struct VoidT { + typedef void value_type; +}; + +template <typename T, typename = void> +struct HasValueType : false_type {}; +template <typename T> +struct HasValueType<T, VoidT<typename T::value_type> > : true_type { +}; + +template <typename C, + bool = sizeof(IsContainerTest<C>(0)) == sizeof(IsContainer), + bool = HasValueType<C>::value> +struct IsRecursiveContainerImpl; + +template <typename C, bool HV> +struct IsRecursiveContainerImpl<C, false, HV> : public false_type {}; + +// Since the IsRecursiveContainerImpl depends on the IsContainerTest we need to +// obey the same inconsistencies as the IsContainerTest, namely check if +// something is a container is relying on only const_iterator in C++11 and +// is relying on both const_iterator and iterator otherwise +template <typename C> +struct IsRecursiveContainerImpl<C, true, false> : public false_type {}; + +template <typename C> +struct IsRecursiveContainerImpl<C, true, true> { + #if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + typedef typename IteratorTraits<typename C::const_iterator>::value_type + value_type; +#else + typedef typename IteratorTraits<typename C::iterator>::value_type value_type; +#endif + typedef is_same<value_type, C> type; +}; + +// IsRecursiveContainer<Type> is a unary compile-time predicate that +// evaluates whether C is a recursive container type. A recursive container +// type is a container type whose value_type is equal to the container type +// itself. An example for a recursive container type is +// boost::filesystem::path, whose iterator has a value_type that is equal to +// boost::filesystem::path. +template <typename C> +struct IsRecursiveContainer : public IsRecursiveContainerImpl<C>::type {}; + // EnableIf<condition>::type is void when 'Cond' is true, and // undefined when 'Cond' is false. To use SFINAE to make a function // overload only apply when a particular expression is true, add @@ -1070,7 +1112,7 @@ class NativeArray { private: enum { kCheckTypeIsNotConstOrAReference = StaticAssertTypeEqHelper< - Element, GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(Element)>::value, + Element, GTEST_REMOVE_REFERENCE_AND_CONST_(Element)>::value }; // Initializes this object with a copy of the input. @@ -1115,7 +1157,7 @@ class NativeArray { #define GTEST_SUCCESS_(message) \ GTEST_MESSAGE_(message, ::testing::TestPartResult::kSuccess) -// Suppresses MSVC warnings 4072 (unreachable code) for the code following +// Suppress MSVC warning 4702 (unreachable code) for the code following // statement if it returns or throws (or doesn't return or throw in some // situations). #define GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_(statement) \ @@ -1235,4 +1277,3 @@ class GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_case_name, test_name) : public parent_class {\ void GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_case_name, test_name)::TestBody() #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_INTERNAL_H_ - diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h index 3602942..8e1caa0 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ // TODO(wan@google.com): rename this to safe_linked_ptr to avoid // confusion with normal linked_ptr. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_LINKED_PTR_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_LINKED_PTR_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h index 4d1d81d..ef22e89 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h @@ -43,17 +43,14 @@ // by the maximum arity of the implementation of tuple which is // currently set at 10. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_GENERATED_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_GENERATED_H_ -// scripts/fuse_gtest.py depends on gtest's own header being #included -// *unconditionally*. Therefore these #includes cannot be moved -// inside #if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST. #include "gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - namespace testing { // Forward declarations of ValuesIn(), which is implemented in @@ -3208,7 +3205,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator2 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -3240,7 +3237,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator2 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -3262,7 +3259,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator2 const typename ParamGenerator<T2>::iterator begin2_; const typename ParamGenerator<T2>::iterator end2_; typename ParamGenerator<T2>::iterator current2_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator2::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -3331,7 +3328,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator3 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -3367,7 +3364,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator3 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -3393,7 +3390,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator3 const typename ParamGenerator<T3>::iterator begin3_; const typename ParamGenerator<T3>::iterator end3_; typename ParamGenerator<T3>::iterator current3_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator3::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -3472,7 +3469,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator4 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -3512,8 +3509,8 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator4 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, - *current4_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + *current4_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -3543,7 +3540,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator4 const typename ParamGenerator<T4>::iterator begin4_; const typename ParamGenerator<T4>::iterator end4_; typename ParamGenerator<T4>::iterator current4_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator4::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -3630,7 +3627,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator5 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -3674,8 +3671,8 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator5 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, - *current4_, *current5_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + *current4_, *current5_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -3709,7 +3706,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator5 const typename ParamGenerator<T5>::iterator begin5_; const typename ParamGenerator<T5>::iterator end5_; typename ParamGenerator<T5>::iterator current5_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator5::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -3807,7 +3804,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator6 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -3855,8 +3852,8 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator6 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, - *current4_, *current5_, *current6_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + *current4_, *current5_, *current6_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -3894,7 +3891,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator6 const typename ParamGenerator<T6>::iterator begin6_; const typename ParamGenerator<T6>::iterator end6_; typename ParamGenerator<T6>::iterator current6_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator6::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -4001,7 +3998,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator7 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -4053,8 +4050,8 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator7 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, - *current4_, *current5_, *current6_, *current7_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + *current4_, *current5_, *current6_, *current7_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -4096,7 +4093,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator7 const typename ParamGenerator<T7>::iterator begin7_; const typename ParamGenerator<T7>::iterator end7_; typename ParamGenerator<T7>::iterator current7_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator7::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -4214,7 +4211,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator8 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -4270,8 +4267,8 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator8 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, - *current4_, *current5_, *current6_, *current7_, *current8_); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + *current4_, *current5_, *current6_, *current7_, *current8_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -4317,7 +4314,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator8 const typename ParamGenerator<T8>::iterator begin8_; const typename ParamGenerator<T8>::iterator end8_; typename ParamGenerator<T8>::iterator current8_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator8::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -4443,7 +4440,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator9 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -4503,9 +4500,9 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator9 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, *current4_, *current5_, *current6_, *current7_, *current8_, - *current9_); + *current9_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -4555,7 +4552,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator9 const typename ParamGenerator<T9>::iterator begin9_; const typename ParamGenerator<T9>::iterator end9_; typename ParamGenerator<T9>::iterator current9_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator9::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -4690,7 +4687,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator10 virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -4754,9 +4751,9 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator10 void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, + current_value_.reset(new ParamType(*current1_, *current2_, *current3_, *current4_, *current5_, *current6_, *current7_, *current8_, - *current9_, *current10_); + *current9_, *current10_)); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -4810,7 +4807,7 @@ class CartesianProductGenerator10 const typename ParamGenerator<T10>::iterator begin10_; const typename ParamGenerator<T10>::iterator end10_; typename ParamGenerator<T10>::iterator current10_; - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator10::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -5141,6 +5138,4 @@ CartesianProductHolder10(const Generator1& g1, const Generator2& g2, } // namespace internal } // namespace testing -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_GENERATED_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h.pump b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h.pump index 5c7c47a..856caba 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h.pump +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util-generated.h.pump @@ -42,17 +42,14 @@ $var maxtuple = 10 $$ Maximum number of Combine arguments we want to support. // by the maximum arity of the implementation of tuple which is // currently set at $maxtuple. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_GENERATED_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_GENERATED_H_ -// scripts/fuse_gtest.py depends on gtest's own header being #included -// *unconditionally*. Therefore these #includes cannot be moved -// inside #if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST. #include "gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - namespace testing { // Forward declarations of ValuesIn(), which is implemented in @@ -165,7 +162,7 @@ $for k [[ virtual ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>* Clone() const { return new Iterator(*this); } - virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return ¤t_value_; } + virtual const ParamType* Current() const { return current_value_.get(); } virtual bool Equals(const ParamIteratorInterface<ParamType>& other) const { // Having the same base generator guarantees that the other // iterator is of the same type and we can downcast. @@ -197,7 +194,7 @@ $for k [[ void ComputeCurrentValue() { if (!AtEnd()) - current_value_ = ParamType($for j, [[*current$(j)_]]); + current_value_.reset(new ParamType($for j, [[*current$(j)_]])); } bool AtEnd() const { // We must report iterator past the end of the range when either of the @@ -222,7 +219,7 @@ $for j [[ typename ParamGenerator<T$j>::iterator current$(j)_; ]] - ParamType current_value_; + linked_ptr<ParamType> current_value_; }; // class CartesianProductGenerator$i::Iterator // No implementation - assignment is unsupported. @@ -281,6 +278,4 @@ $for j [[ } // namespace internal } // namespace testing -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_GENERATED_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h index 82cab9b..a69d5de 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-param-util.h @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ // Type and function utilities for implementing parameterized tests. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_H_ @@ -41,16 +43,11 @@ #include <utility> #include <vector> -// scripts/fuse_gtest.py depends on gtest's own header being #included -// *unconditionally*. Therefore these #includes cannot be moved -// inside #if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST. #include "gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" #include "gtest/gtest-printers.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - namespace testing { // Input to a parameterized test name generator, describing a test parameter. @@ -472,7 +469,7 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase { virtual ~ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase() {} // Base part of test case name for display purposes. - virtual const string& GetTestCaseName() const = 0; + virtual const std::string& GetTestCaseName() const = 0; // Test case id to verify identity. virtual TypeId GetTestCaseTypeId() const = 0; // UnitTest class invokes this method to register tests in this @@ -511,7 +508,7 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseInfo : public ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase { : test_case_name_(name), code_location_(code_location) {} // Test case base name for display purposes. - virtual const string& GetTestCaseName() const { return test_case_name_; } + virtual const std::string& GetTestCaseName() const { return test_case_name_; } // Test case id to verify identity. virtual TypeId GetTestCaseTypeId() const { return GetTypeId<TestCase>(); } // TEST_P macro uses AddTestPattern() to record information @@ -529,11 +526,10 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseInfo : public ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase { } // INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P macro uses AddGenerator() to record information // about a generator. - int AddTestCaseInstantiation(const string& instantiation_name, + int AddTestCaseInstantiation(const std::string& instantiation_name, GeneratorCreationFunc* func, ParamNameGeneratorFunc* name_func, - const char* file, - int line) { + const char* file, int line) { instantiations_.push_back( InstantiationInfo(instantiation_name, func, name_func, file, line)); return 0; // Return value used only to run this method in namespace scope. @@ -550,13 +546,13 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseInfo : public ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase { for (typename InstantiationContainer::iterator gen_it = instantiations_.begin(); gen_it != instantiations_.end(); ++gen_it) { - const string& instantiation_name = gen_it->name; + const std::string& instantiation_name = gen_it->name; ParamGenerator<ParamType> generator((*gen_it->generator)()); ParamNameGeneratorFunc* name_func = gen_it->name_func; const char* file = gen_it->file; int line = gen_it->line; - string test_case_name; + std::string test_case_name; if ( !instantiation_name.empty() ) test_case_name = instantiation_name + "/"; test_case_name += test_info->test_case_base_name; @@ -609,8 +605,8 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseInfo : public ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase { test_base_name(a_test_base_name), test_meta_factory(a_test_meta_factory) {} - const string test_case_base_name; - const string test_base_name; + const std::string test_case_base_name; + const std::string test_base_name; const scoped_ptr<TestMetaFactoryBase<ParamType> > test_meta_factory; }; typedef ::std::vector<linked_ptr<TestInfo> > TestInfoContainer; @@ -651,7 +647,7 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseInfo : public ParameterizedTestCaseInfoBase { return true; } - const string test_case_name_; + const std::string test_case_name_; CodeLocation code_location_; TestInfoContainer tests_; InstantiationContainer instantiations_; @@ -726,6 +722,4 @@ class ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry { } // namespace internal } // namespace testing -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PARAM_UTIL_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port-arch.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port-arch.h index 74ab949..f83700e 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port-arch.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port-arch.h @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file defines the GTEST_OS_* macro. // It is separate from gtest-port.h so that custom/gtest-port.h can include it. @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ # define GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE 1 # elif WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION(WINAPI_PARTITION_APP) # define GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT 1 +# elif WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION(WINAPI_PARTITION_TV_TITLE) +# define GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE 1 +# define GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_TV_TITLE 1 # else // WINAPI_FAMILY defined but no known partition matched. // Default to desktop. @@ -69,6 +72,8 @@ # endif #elif defined __FreeBSD__ # define GTEST_OS_FREEBSD 1 +#elif defined __Fuchsia__ +# define GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA 1 #elif defined __linux__ # define GTEST_OS_LINUX 1 # if defined __ANDROID__ @@ -84,6 +89,8 @@ # define GTEST_OS_HPUX 1 #elif defined __native_client__ # define GTEST_OS_NACL 1 +#elif defined __NetBSD__ +# define GTEST_OS_NETBSD 1 #elif defined __OpenBSD__ # define GTEST_OS_OPENBSD 1 #elif defined __QNX__ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h index 0d53ad2..0a25ef3 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ // files are expected to #include this. Therefore, it cannot #include // any other Google Test header. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PORT_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_PORT_H_ @@ -73,11 +75,9 @@ // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS - Define it to 1/0 to indicate that exceptions // are enabled. // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING - Define it to 1/0 to indicate that ::string -// is/isn't available (some systems define -// ::string, which is different to std::string). -// GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING - Define it to 1/0 to indicate that ::string -// is/isn't available (some systems define -// ::wstring, which is different to std::wstring). +// is/isn't available +// GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING - Define it to 1/0 to indicate that ::wstring +// is/isn't available // GTEST_HAS_POSIX_RE - Define it to 1/0 to indicate that POSIX regular // expressions are/aren't available. // GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD - Define it to 1/0 to indicate that <pthread.h> @@ -109,6 +109,12 @@ // GTEST_CREATE_SHARED_LIBRARY // - Define to 1 when compiling Google Test itself // as a shared library. +// GTEST_DEFAULT_DEATH_TEST_STYLE +// - The default value of --gtest_death_test_style. +// The legacy default has been "fast" in the open +// source version since 2008. The recommended value +// is "threadsafe", and can be set in +// custom/gtest-port.h. // Platform-indicating macros // -------------------------- @@ -122,12 +128,14 @@ // GTEST_OS_AIX - IBM AIX // GTEST_OS_CYGWIN - Cygwin // GTEST_OS_FREEBSD - FreeBSD +// GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA - Fuchsia // GTEST_OS_HPUX - HP-UX // GTEST_OS_LINUX - Linux // GTEST_OS_LINUX_ANDROID - Google Android // GTEST_OS_MAC - Mac OS X // GTEST_OS_IOS - iOS // GTEST_OS_NACL - Google Native Client (NaCl) +// GTEST_OS_NETBSD - NetBSD // GTEST_OS_OPENBSD - OpenBSD // GTEST_OS_QNX - QNX // GTEST_OS_SOLARIS - Sun Solaris @@ -169,7 +177,6 @@ // GTEST_HAS_COMBINE - the Combine() function (for value-parameterized // tests) // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST - death tests -// GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - value-parameterized tests // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST - typed tests // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P - type-parameterized tests // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE - Google Test is thread-safe. @@ -177,7 +184,7 @@ // GTEST_HAS_POSIX_RE (see above) which users can // define themselves. // GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE - our own simple regex is used; -// the above two are mutually exclusive. +// the above RE\b(s) are mutually exclusive. // GTEST_CAN_COMPARE_NULL - accepts untyped NULL in EXPECT_EQ(). // Misc public macros @@ -206,6 +213,7 @@ // // C++11 feature wrappers: // +// testing::internal::forward - portability wrapper for std::forward. // testing::internal::move - portability wrapper for std::move. // // Synchronization: @@ -222,10 +230,9 @@ // // Regular expressions: // RE - a simple regular expression class using the POSIX -// Extended Regular Expression syntax on UNIX-like -// platforms, or a reduced regular exception syntax on -// other platforms, including Windows. -// +// Extended Regular Expression syntax on UNIX-like platforms +// or a reduced regular exception syntax on other +// platforms, including Windows. // Logging: // GTEST_LOG_() - logs messages at the specified severity level. // LogToStderr() - directs all log messages to stderr. @@ -271,10 +278,12 @@ # include <TargetConditionals.h> #endif +// Brings in the definition of HAS_GLOBAL_STRING. This must be done +// BEFORE we test HAS_GLOBAL_STRING. +#include <string> // NOLINT #include <algorithm> // NOLINT #include <iostream> // NOLINT #include <sstream> // NOLINT -#include <string> // NOLINT #include <utility> #include <vector> // NOLINT @@ -306,7 +315,7 @@ // GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(4800 4385) // /* code that triggers warnings C4800 and C4385 */ // GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_POP_() -#if _MSC_VER >= 1500 +#if _MSC_VER >= 1400 # define GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(warnings) \ __pragma(warning(push)) \ __pragma(warning(disable: warnings)) @@ -323,7 +332,7 @@ // -std={c,gnu}++{0x,11} is passed. The C++11 standard specifies a // value for __cplusplus, and recent versions of clang, gcc, and // probably other compilers set that too in C++11 mode. -# if __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ || __cplusplus >= 201103L +# if __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ || __cplusplus >= 201103L || _MSC_VER >= 1900 // Compiling in at least C++11 mode. # define GTEST_LANG_CXX11 1 # else @@ -355,12 +364,16 @@ #if GTEST_STDLIB_CXX11 # define GTEST_HAS_STD_BEGIN_AND_END_ 1 # define GTEST_HAS_STD_FORWARD_LIST_ 1 -# define GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ 1 +# if !defined(_MSC_VER) || (_MSC_FULL_VER >= 190023824) +// works only with VS2015U2 and better +# define GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_ 1 +# endif # define GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_ 1 # define GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ 1 -# define GTEST_HAS_STD_SHARED_PTR_ 1 -# define GTEST_HAS_STD_TYPE_TRAITS_ 1 # define GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_ 1 +# define GTEST_HAS_STD_SHARED_PTR_ 1 +# define GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_MAP_ 1 +# define GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_SET_ 1 #endif // C++11 specifies that <tuple> provides std::tuple. @@ -368,7 +381,8 @@ #if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 # define GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ 1 # if defined(__clang__) -// Inspired by http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#__has_include +// Inspired by +// https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#include-file-checking-macros # if defined(__has_include) && !__has_include(<tuple>) # undef GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ # endif @@ -380,7 +394,7 @@ # elif defined(__GLIBCXX__) // Inspired by boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp, // http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html and -// http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt01ch01.html#manual.intro.status.standard.200x +// https://web.archive.org/web/20140227044429/gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt01ch01.html#manual.intro.status.standard.200x # if __GNUC__ < 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 2) # undef GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ # endif @@ -459,8 +473,11 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; #ifndef GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS // The user didn't tell us whether exceptions are enabled, so we need // to figure it out. -# if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__) -// MSVC's and C++Builder's implementations of the STL use the _HAS_EXCEPTIONS +# if defined(_MSC_VER) && defined(_CPPUNWIND) +// MSVC defines _CPPUNWIND to 1 iff exceptions are enabled. +# define GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS 1 +# elif defined(__BORLANDC__) +// C++Builder's implementation of the STL uses the _HAS_EXCEPTIONS // macro to enable exceptions, so we'll do the same. // Assumes that exceptions are enabled by default. # ifndef _HAS_EXCEPTIONS @@ -504,15 +521,11 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; # define GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING 1 #elif !GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING // The user told us that ::std::string isn't available. -# error "Google Test cannot be used where ::std::string isn't available." +# error "::std::string isn't available." #endif // !defined(GTEST_HAS_STD_STRING) #ifndef GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING -// The user didn't tell us whether ::string is available, so we need -// to figure it out. - # define GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING 0 - #endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING #ifndef GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING @@ -606,8 +619,9 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; // // To disable threading support in Google Test, add -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=0 // to your compiler flags. -# define GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD (GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_HPUX \ - || GTEST_OS_QNX || GTEST_OS_FREEBSD || GTEST_OS_NACL) +#define GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD \ + (GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_HPUX || GTEST_OS_QNX || \ + GTEST_OS_FREEBSD || GTEST_OS_NACL || GTEST_OS_NETBSD || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA) #endif // GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD #if GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD @@ -622,7 +636,7 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; // Determines if hash_map/hash_set are available. // Only used for testing against those containers. #if !defined(GTEST_HAS_HASH_MAP_) -# if _MSC_VER +# if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER < 1900) # define GTEST_HAS_HASH_MAP_ 1 // Indicates that hash_map is available. # define GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ 1 // Indicates that hash_set is available. # endif // _MSC_VER @@ -635,6 +649,14 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; # if GTEST_OS_LINUX_ANDROID && defined(_STLPORT_MAJOR) // STLport, provided with the Android NDK, has neither <tr1/tuple> or <tuple>. # define GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE 0 +# elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1910) +// Prevent `warning C4996: 'std::tr1': warning STL4002: +// The non-Standard std::tr1 namespace and TR1-only machinery +// are deprecated and will be REMOVED.` +# define GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE 0 +# elif GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION) +// libc++ doesn't support TR1. +# define GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE 0 # else // The user didn't tell us not to do it, so we assume it's OK. # define GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE 1 @@ -644,6 +666,10 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; // Determines whether Google Test's own tr1 tuple implementation // should be used. #ifndef GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE +// We use our own tuple implementation on Symbian. +# if GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN +# define GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE 1 +# else // The user didn't tell us, so we need to figure it out. // We use our own TR1 tuple if we aren't sure the user has an @@ -657,7 +683,8 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; // support TR1 tuple. libc++ only provides std::tuple, in C++11 mode, // and it can be used with some compilers that define __GNUC__. # if (defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__CUDACC__) && (GTEST_GCC_VER_ >= 40000) \ - && !GTEST_OS_QNX && !defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)) || _MSC_VER >= 1600 + && !GTEST_OS_QNX && !defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)) \ + || (_MSC_VER >= 1600 && _MSC_VER < 1900) # define GTEST_ENV_HAS_TR1_TUPLE_ 1 # endif @@ -673,12 +700,11 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; # else # define GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE 1 # endif - +# endif // GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN #endif // GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE -// To avoid conditional compilation everywhere, we make it -// gtest-port.h's responsibility to #include the header implementing -// tuple. +// To avoid conditional compilation we make it gtest-port.h's responsibility +// to #include the header implementing tuple. #if GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ # include <tuple> // IWYU pragma: export # define GTEST_TUPLE_NAMESPACE_ ::std @@ -693,22 +719,6 @@ typedef struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION GTEST_CRITICAL_SECTION; # if GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE # include "gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h" // IWYU pragma: export // NOLINT -# elif GTEST_ENV_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ -# include <tuple> -// C++11 puts its tuple into the ::std namespace rather than -// ::std::tr1. gtest expects tuple to live in ::std::tr1, so put it there. -// This causes undefined behavior, but supported compilers react in -// the way we intend. -namespace std { -namespace tr1 { -using ::std::get; -using ::std::make_tuple; -using ::std::tuple; -using ::std::tuple_element; -using ::std::tuple_size; -} -} - # elif GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN // On Symbian, BOOST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE causes Boost's TR1 tuple library to @@ -738,15 +748,17 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; # define _TR1_FUNCTIONAL 1 # include <tr1/tuple> # undef _TR1_FUNCTIONAL // Allows the user to #include - // <tr1/functional> if he chooses to. + // <tr1/functional> if they choose to. # else # include <tr1/tuple> // NOLINT # endif // !GTEST_HAS_RTTI && GTEST_GCC_VER_ < 40302 -# else -// If the compiler is not GCC 4.0+, we assume the user is using a -// spec-conforming TR1 implementation. +// VS 2010 now has tr1 support. +# elif _MSC_VER >= 1600 # include <tuple> // IWYU pragma: export // NOLINT + +# else // GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE +# include <tr1/tuple> // IWYU pragma: export // NOLINT # endif // GTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE #endif // GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE @@ -796,19 +808,15 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; // Google Test does not support death tests for VC 7.1 and earlier as // abort() in a VC 7.1 application compiled as GUI in debug config // pops up a dialog window that cannot be suppressed programmatically. -#if (GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_CYGWIN || GTEST_OS_SOLARIS || \ - (GTEST_OS_MAC && !GTEST_OS_IOS) || \ - (GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_DESKTOP && _MSC_VER >= 1400) || \ +#if (GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_CYGWIN || GTEST_OS_SOLARIS || \ + (GTEST_OS_MAC && !GTEST_OS_IOS) || \ + (GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_DESKTOP && _MSC_VER >= 1400) || \ GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW || GTEST_OS_AIX || GTEST_OS_HPUX || \ - GTEST_OS_OPENBSD || GTEST_OS_QNX || GTEST_OS_FREEBSD) + GTEST_OS_OPENBSD || GTEST_OS_QNX || GTEST_OS_FREEBSD || \ + GTEST_OS_NETBSD || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA) # define GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST 1 #endif -// We don't support MSVC 7.1 with exceptions disabled now. Therefore -// all the compilers we care about are adequate for supporting -// value-parameterized tests. -#define GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST 1 - // Determines whether to support type-driven tests. // Typed tests need <typeinfo> and variadic macros, which GCC, VC++ 8.0, @@ -823,7 +831,7 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; // value-parameterized tests are enabled. The implementation doesn't // work on Sun Studio since it doesn't understand templated conversion // operators. -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST && GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE && !defined(__SUNPRO_CC) +#if (GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE || GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_) && !defined(__SUNPRO_CC) # define GTEST_HAS_COMBINE 1 #endif @@ -874,15 +882,39 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; # define GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_ #endif +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +# define GTEST_CXX11_EQUALS_DELETE_ = delete +#else // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +# define GTEST_CXX11_EQUALS_DELETE_ +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + +// Use this annotation before a function that takes a printf format string. +#if (defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__)) && !defined(COMPILER_ICC) +# if defined(__MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT) +// MinGW has two different printf implementations. Ensure the format macro +// matches the selected implementation. See +// https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/wiki2/gnu%20printf/. +# define GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_(string_index, first_to_check) \ + __attribute__((__format__(__MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT, string_index, \ + first_to_check))) +# else +# define GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_(string_index, first_to_check) \ + __attribute__((__format__(__printf__, string_index, first_to_check))) +# endif +#else +# define GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_(string_index, first_to_check) +#endif + + // A macro to disallow operator= // This should be used in the private: declarations for a class. -#define GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(type)\ - void operator=(type const &) +#define GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(type) \ + void operator=(type const &) GTEST_CXX11_EQUALS_DELETE_ // A macro to disallow copy constructor and operator= // This should be used in the private: declarations for a class. -#define GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(type)\ - type(type const &);\ +#define GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(type) \ + type(type const &) GTEST_CXX11_EQUALS_DELETE_; \ GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(type) // Tell the compiler to warn about unused return values for functions declared @@ -930,6 +962,11 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; #endif // GTEST_HAS_SEH +// GTEST_API_ qualifies all symbols that must be exported. The definitions below +// are guarded by #ifndef to give embedders a chance to define GTEST_API_ in +// gtest/internal/custom/gtest-port.h +#ifndef GTEST_API_ + #ifdef _MSC_VER # if GTEST_LINKED_AS_SHARED_LIBRARY # define GTEST_API_ __declspec(dllimport) @@ -938,11 +975,17 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; # endif #elif __GNUC__ >= 4 || defined(__clang__) # define GTEST_API_ __attribute__((visibility ("default"))) -#endif // _MSC_VER +#endif // _MSC_VER + +#endif // GTEST_API_ #ifndef GTEST_API_ # define GTEST_API_ -#endif +#endif // GTEST_API_ + +#ifndef GTEST_DEFAULT_DEATH_TEST_STYLE +# define GTEST_DEFAULT_DEATH_TEST_STYLE "fast" +#endif // GTEST_DEFAULT_DEATH_TEST_STYLE #ifdef __GNUC__ // Ask the compiler to never inline a given function. @@ -952,10 +995,12 @@ using ::std::tuple_size; #endif // _LIBCPP_VERSION is defined by the libc++ library from the LLVM project. -#if defined(__GLIBCXX__) || defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION) -# define GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ 1 -#else -# define GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ 0 +#if !defined(GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_) +# if defined(__GLIBCXX__) || (defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION) && !defined(_MSC_VER)) +# define GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ 1 +# else +# define GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ 0 +# endif #endif // A function level attribute to disable checking for use of uninitialized @@ -1098,6 +1143,16 @@ struct StaticAssertTypeEqHelper<T, T> { enum { value = true }; }; +// Same as std::is_same<>. +template <typename T, typename U> +struct IsSame { + enum { value = false }; +}; +template <typename T> +struct IsSame<T, T> { + enum { value = true }; +}; + // Evaluates to the number of elements in 'array'. #define GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(array) (sizeof(array) / sizeof(array[0])) @@ -1161,6 +1216,10 @@ class scoped_ptr { // Defines RE. +#if GTEST_USES_PCRE +// if used, PCRE is injected by custom/gtest-port.h +#elif GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE || GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE + // A simple C++ wrapper for <regex.h>. It uses the POSIX Extended // Regular Expression syntax. class GTEST_API_ RE { @@ -1172,11 +1231,11 @@ class GTEST_API_ RE { // Constructs an RE from a string. RE(const ::std::string& regex) { Init(regex.c_str()); } // NOLINT -#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +# if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING RE(const ::string& regex) { Init(regex.c_str()); } // NOLINT -#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +# endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING RE(const char* regex) { Init(regex); } // NOLINT ~RE(); @@ -1198,7 +1257,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ RE { return PartialMatch(str.c_str(), re); } -#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +# if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING static bool FullMatch(const ::string& str, const RE& re) { return FullMatch(str.c_str(), re); @@ -1207,7 +1266,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ RE { return PartialMatch(str.c_str(), re); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +# endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING static bool FullMatch(const char* str, const RE& re); static bool PartialMatch(const char* str, const RE& re); @@ -1221,20 +1280,22 @@ class GTEST_API_ RE { const char* pattern_; bool is_valid_; -#if GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE +# if GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE regex_t full_regex_; // For FullMatch(). regex_t partial_regex_; // For PartialMatch(). -#else // GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE +# else // GTEST_USES_SIMPLE_RE const char* full_pattern_; // For FullMatch(); -#endif +# endif GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(RE); }; +#endif // GTEST_USES_PCRE + // Formats a source file path and a line number as they would appear // in an error message from the compiler used to compile this code. GTEST_API_ ::std::string FormatFileLocation(const char* file, int line); @@ -1320,13 +1381,59 @@ inline void FlushInfoLog() { fflush(NULL); } GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << #posix_call << "failed with error " \ << gtest_error +// Adds reference to a type if it is not a reference type, +// otherwise leaves it unchanged. This is the same as +// tr1::add_reference, which is not widely available yet. +template <typename T> +struct AddReference { typedef T& type; }; // NOLINT +template <typename T> +struct AddReference<T&> { typedef T& type; }; // NOLINT + +// A handy wrapper around AddReference that works when the argument T +// depends on template parameters. +#define GTEST_ADD_REFERENCE_(T) \ + typename ::testing::internal::AddReference<T>::type + +// Transforms "T" into "const T&" according to standard reference collapsing +// rules (this is only needed as a backport for C++98 compilers that do not +// support reference collapsing). Specifically, it transforms: +// +// char ==> const char& +// const char ==> const char& +// char& ==> char& +// const char& ==> const char& +// +// Note that the non-const reference will not have "const" added. This is +// standard, and necessary so that "T" can always bind to "const T&". +template <typename T> +struct ConstRef { typedef const T& type; }; +template <typename T> +struct ConstRef<T&> { typedef T& type; }; + +// The argument T must depend on some template parameters. +#define GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(T) \ + typename ::testing::internal::ConstRef<T>::type + #if GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ +using std::forward; using std::move; + +template <typename T> +struct RvalueRef { + typedef T&& type; +}; #else // GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ template <typename T> const T& move(const T& t) { return t; } +template <typename T> +GTEST_ADD_REFERENCE_(T) forward(GTEST_ADD_REFERENCE_(T) t) { return t; } + +template <typename T> +struct RvalueRef { + typedef const T& type; +}; #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_ // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DO NOT USE IN USER CODE. @@ -1427,10 +1534,6 @@ GTEST_API_ void CaptureStderr(); GTEST_API_ std::string GetCapturedStderr(); #endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION - -// Returns a path to temporary directory. -GTEST_API_ std::string TempDir(); - // Returns the size (in bytes) of a file. GTEST_API_ size_t GetFileSize(FILE* file); @@ -1438,14 +1541,18 @@ GTEST_API_ size_t GetFileSize(FILE* file); GTEST_API_ std::string ReadEntireFile(FILE* file); // All command line arguments. -GTEST_API_ const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>& GetArgvs(); +GTEST_API_ std::vector<std::string> GetArgvs(); #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST -const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>& GetInjectableArgvs(); -void SetInjectableArgvs(const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>* - new_argvs); - +std::vector<std::string> GetInjectableArgvs(); +// Deprecated: pass the args vector by value instead. +void SetInjectableArgvs(const std::vector<std::string>* new_argvs); +void SetInjectableArgvs(const std::vector<std::string>& new_argvs); +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +void SetInjectableArgvs(const std::vector< ::string>& new_argvs); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +void ClearInjectableArgvs(); #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST @@ -1695,7 +1802,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ Mutex { // Initializes owner_thread_id_ and critical_section_ in static mutexes. void ThreadSafeLazyInit(); - // Per http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2004/02/23/78395.aspx, + // Per https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040223-00/?p=40503, // we assume that 0 is an invalid value for thread IDs. unsigned int owner_thread_id_; @@ -1979,8 +2086,13 @@ class MutexBase { extern ::testing::internal::MutexBase mutex // Defines and statically (i.e. at link time) initializes a static mutex. +// The initialization list here does not explicitly initialize each field, +// instead relying on default initialization for the unspecified fields. In +// particular, the owner_ field (a pthread_t) is not explicitly initialized. +// This allows initialization to work whether pthread_t is a scalar or struct. +// The flag -Wmissing-field-initializers must not be specified for this to work. # define GTEST_DEFINE_STATIC_MUTEX_(mutex) \ - ::testing::internal::MutexBase mutex = { PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER, false, pthread_t() } + ::testing::internal::MutexBase mutex = { PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER, false } // The Mutex class can only be used for mutexes created at runtime. It // shares its API with MutexBase otherwise. @@ -2037,7 +2149,7 @@ extern "C" inline void DeleteThreadLocalValue(void* value_holder) { // Implements thread-local storage on pthreads-based systems. template <typename T> -class ThreadLocal { +class GTEST_API_ ThreadLocal { public: ThreadLocal() : key_(CreateKey()), default_factory_(new DefaultValueHolderFactory()) {} @@ -2169,7 +2281,7 @@ class GTestMutexLock { typedef GTestMutexLock MutexLock; template <typename T> -class ThreadLocal { +class GTEST_API_ ThreadLocal { public: ThreadLocal() : value_() {} explicit ThreadLocal(const T& value) : value_(value) {} @@ -2188,12 +2300,13 @@ class ThreadLocal { GTEST_API_ size_t GetThreadCount(); // Passing non-POD classes through ellipsis (...) crashes the ARM -// compiler and generates a warning in Sun Studio. The Nokia Symbian +// compiler and generates a warning in Sun Studio before 12u4. The Nokia Symbian // and the IBM XL C/C++ compiler try to instantiate a copy constructor // for objects passed through ellipsis (...), failing for uncopyable // objects. We define this to ensure that only POD is passed through // ellipsis on these systems. -#if defined(__SYMBIAN32__) || defined(__IBMCPP__) || defined(__SUNPRO_CC) +#if defined(__SYMBIAN32__) || defined(__IBMCPP__) || \ + (defined(__SUNPRO_CC) && __SUNPRO_CC < 0x5130) // We lose support for NULL detection where the compiler doesn't like // passing non-POD classes through ellipsis (...). # define GTEST_ELLIPSIS_NEEDS_POD_ 1 @@ -2219,6 +2332,13 @@ template <bool bool_value> const bool bool_constant<bool_value>::value; typedef bool_constant<false> false_type; typedef bool_constant<true> true_type; +template <typename T, typename U> +struct is_same : public false_type {}; + +template <typename T> +struct is_same<T, T> : public true_type {}; + + template <typename T> struct is_pointer : public false_type {}; @@ -2230,6 +2350,7 @@ struct IteratorTraits { typedef typename Iterator::value_type value_type; }; + template <typename T> struct IteratorTraits<T*> { typedef T value_type; @@ -2395,7 +2516,7 @@ inline int Close(int fd) { return close(fd); } inline const char* StrError(int errnum) { return strerror(errnum); } #endif inline const char* GetEnv(const char* name) { -#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE || GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE | GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT +#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE || GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE || GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT // We are on Windows CE, which has no environment variables. static_cast<void>(name); // To prevent 'unused argument' warning. return NULL; @@ -2525,15 +2646,15 @@ typedef TypeWithSize<8>::Int TimeInMillis; // Represents time in milliseconds. # define GTEST_DECLARE_bool_(name) GTEST_API_ extern bool GTEST_FLAG(name) # define GTEST_DECLARE_int32_(name) \ GTEST_API_ extern ::testing::internal::Int32 GTEST_FLAG(name) -#define GTEST_DECLARE_string_(name) \ +# define GTEST_DECLARE_string_(name) \ GTEST_API_ extern ::std::string GTEST_FLAG(name) // Macros for defining flags. -#define GTEST_DEFINE_bool_(name, default_val, doc) \ +# define GTEST_DEFINE_bool_(name, default_val, doc) \ GTEST_API_ bool GTEST_FLAG(name) = (default_val) -#define GTEST_DEFINE_int32_(name, default_val, doc) \ +# define GTEST_DEFINE_int32_(name, default_val, doc) \ GTEST_API_ ::testing::internal::Int32 GTEST_FLAG(name) = (default_val) -#define GTEST_DEFINE_string_(name, default_val, doc) \ +# define GTEST_DEFINE_string_(name, default_val, doc) \ GTEST_API_ ::std::string GTEST_FLAG(name) = (default_val) #endif // !defined(GTEST_DECLARE_bool_) @@ -2556,7 +2677,8 @@ bool ParseInt32(const Message& src_text, const char* str, Int32* value); // corresponding to the given Google Test flag. bool BoolFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, bool default_val); GTEST_API_ Int32 Int32FromGTestEnv(const char* flag, Int32 default_val); -std::string StringFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, const char* default_val); +std::string OutputFlagAlsoCheckEnvVar(); +const char* StringFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, const char* default_val); } // namespace internal } // namespace testing diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-string.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-string.h index 97f1a7f..1d2436c 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-string.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-string.h @@ -27,17 +27,18 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Authors: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan), eefacm@gmail.com (Sean Mcafee) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file declares the String class and functions used internally by // Google Test. They are subject to change without notice. They should not used // by code external to Google Test. // -// This header file is #included by <gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h>. +// This header file is #included by gtest-internal.h. // It should not be #included by other files. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_STRING_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_STRING_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h index e9b4053..e64cede 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ // Implements a subset of TR1 tuple needed by Google Test and Google Mock. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TUPLE_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TUPLE_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h.pump b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h.pump index 429ddfe..2736360 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h.pump +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-tuple.h.pump @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ $$ This meta comment fixes auto-indentation in Emacs. }} // Implements a subset of TR1 tuple needed by Google Test and Google Mock. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TUPLE_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TUPLE_H_ diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h index e46f7cf..2681dbb 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ // Please contact googletestframework@googlegroups.com if you need // more. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TYPE_UTIL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TYPE_UTIL_H_ @@ -57,6 +59,22 @@ namespace testing { namespace internal { +// Canonicalizes a given name with respect to the Standard C++ Library. +// This handles removing the inline namespace within `std` that is +// used by various standard libraries (e.g., `std::__1`). Names outside +// of namespace std are returned unmodified. +inline std::string CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning(std::string s) { + static const char prefix[] = "std::__"; + if (s.compare(0, strlen(prefix), prefix) == 0) { + std::string::size_type end = s.find("::", strlen(prefix)); + if (end != s.npos) { + // Erase everything between the initial `std` and the second `::`. + s.erase(strlen("std"), end - strlen("std")); + } + } + return s; +} + // GetTypeName<T>() returns a human-readable name of type T. // NB: This function is also used in Google Mock, so don't move it inside of // the typed-test-only section below. @@ -75,7 +93,7 @@ std::string GetTypeName() { char* const readable_name = __cxa_demangle(name, 0, 0, &status); const std::string name_str(status == 0 ? readable_name : name); free(readable_name); - return name_str; + return CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning(name_str); # else return name; # endif // GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ || __HP_aCC diff --git a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h.pump b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h.pump index 251fdf0..8897795 100644 --- a/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h.pump +++ b/googletest/include/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h.pump @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ $var n = 50 $$ Maximum length of type lists we want to support. // Please contact googletestframework@googlegroups.com if you need // more. +// GOOGLETEST_CM0001 DO NOT DELETE + #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TYPE_UTIL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_INTERNAL_GTEST_TYPE_UTIL_H_ @@ -55,6 +57,22 @@ $var n = 50 $$ Maximum length of type lists we want to support. namespace testing { namespace internal { +// Canonicalizes a given name with respect to the Standard C++ Library. +// This handles removing the inline namespace within `std` that is +// used by various standard libraries (e.g., `std::__1`). Names outside +// of namespace std are returned unmodified. +inline std::string CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning(std::string s) { + static const char prefix[] = "std::__"; + if (s.compare(0, strlen(prefix), prefix) == 0) { + std::string::size_type end = s.find("::", strlen(prefix)); + if (end != s.npos) { + // Erase everything between the initial `std` and the second `::`. + s.erase(strlen("std"), end - strlen("std")); + } + } + return s; +} + // GetTypeName<T>() returns a human-readable name of type T. // NB: This function is also used in Google Mock, so don't move it inside of // the typed-test-only section below. @@ -73,7 +91,7 @@ std::string GetTypeName() { char* const readable_name = __cxa_demangle(name, 0, 0, &status); const std::string name_str(status == 0 ? readable_name : name); free(readable_name); - return name_str; + return CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning(name_str); # else return name; # endif // GTEST_HAS_CXXABI_H_ || __HP_aCC diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.sln b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.sln new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e36b33b --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.sln @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 11.00 +# Visual C++ Express 2010 +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest-md", "gtest-md.vcxproj", "{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}" +EndProject +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_main-md", "gtest_main-md.vcxproj", "{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}" +EndProject +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_prod_test-md", "gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj", "{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}" +EndProject +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_unittest-md", "gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj", "{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}" +EndProject +Global + GlobalSection(SolutionConfigurationPlatforms) = preSolution + Debug|Win32 = Debug|Win32 + Debug|x64 = Debug|x64 + Release|Win32 = Release|Win32 + Release|x64 = Release|x64 + EndGlobalSection + GlobalSection(ProjectConfigurationPlatforms) = postSolution + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + EndGlobalSection + GlobalSection(SolutionProperties) = preSolution + HideSolutionNode = FALSE + EndGlobalSection +EndGlobal diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..16a6ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtestd</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtestd</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest-all.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..69edeff --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest-md.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest-all.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.sln b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.sln new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cacd5c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.sln @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 11.00 +# Visual C++ Express 2010 +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest", "gtest.vcxproj", "{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}" +EndProject +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_main", "gtest_main.vcxproj", "{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}" +EndProject +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_unittest", "gtest_unittest.vcxproj", "{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}" +EndProject +Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_prod_test", "gtest_prod_test.vcxproj", "{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}" +EndProject +Global + GlobalSection(SolutionConfigurationPlatforms) = preSolution + Debug|Win32 = Debug|Win32 + Debug|x64 = Debug|x64 + Release|Win32 = Release|Win32 + Release|x64 = Release|x64 + EndGlobalSection + GlobalSection(ProjectConfigurationPlatforms) = postSolution + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Debug|Win32.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Debug|Win32.Build.0 = Debug|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Debug|x64.ActiveCfg = Debug|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Debug|x64.Build.0 = Debug|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Release|Win32.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Release|Win32.Build.0 = Release|Win32 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Release|x64.ActiveCfg = Release|x64 + {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Release|x64.Build.0 = Release|x64 + EndGlobalSection + GlobalSection(SolutionProperties) = preSolution + HideSolutionNode = FALSE + EndGlobalSection +EndGlobal diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a46f5c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtestd</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtestd</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest-all.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..69edeff --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest-all.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d77389 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_maind</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_main</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_maind</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_main</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib /> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest_main.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ProjectReference Include="gtest-md.vcxproj"> + <Project>{c8f6c172-56f2-4e76-b5fa-c3b423b31be8}</Project> + </ProjectReference> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..726c773 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main-md.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest_main.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8fb2589 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>StaticLibrary</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_maind</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_main</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_maind</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_main</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib> + <OutputFile>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)d.lib</OutputFile> + </Lib> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib> + <OutputFile>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)d.lib</OutputFile> + </Lib> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib> + <OutputFile>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName).lib</OutputFile> + </Lib> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_LIB;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Lib> + <OutputFile>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName).lib</OutputFile> + </Lib> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest_main.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ProjectReference Include="gtest.vcxproj"> + <Project>{c8f6c172-56f2-4e76-b5fa-c3b423b31be7}</Project> + </ProjectReference> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..726c773 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_main.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\src\gtest_main.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..830e5dc --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">true</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">true</LinkIncremental> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">false</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">false</LinkIncremental> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_prod_test</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_prod_test</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_prod_test</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_prod_test</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_prod_test.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_prod_test.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_prod_test.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + </ClCompile> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\production.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClInclude Include="..\..\test\production.h" /> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ProjectReference Include="gtest_main-md.vcxproj"> + <Project>{3af54c8a-10bf-4332-9147-f68ed9862033}</Project> + </ProjectReference> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac36731 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test-md.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_prod_test.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\production.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClInclude Include="..\..\test\production.h"> + <Filter>Header Files</Filter> + </ClInclude> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d42e135 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">true</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">true</LinkIncremental> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">false</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">false</LinkIncremental> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_prod_test.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_prod_test.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_prod_test.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + </ClCompile> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\production.cc"> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClInclude Include="..\..\test\production.h" /> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ProjectReference Include="gtest_main.vcxproj"> + <Project>{3af54c8a-10bf-4332-9147-f68ed9862032}</Project> + </ProjectReference> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac36731 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_prod_test.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_prod_test.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\production.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClInclude Include="..\..\test\production.h"> + <Filter>Header Files</Filter> + </ClInclude> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..93b0dc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">true</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">true</LinkIncremental> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">false</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">false</LinkIncremental> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_unittest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <TargetName>gtest_unittest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_unittest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <TargetName>gtest_unittest</TargetName> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_unittest.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebugDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_unittest.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDLL</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_unittest.cc"> + <Optimization Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">MinSpace</Optimization> + <Optimization Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">MinSpace</Optimization> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <BasicRuntimeChecks Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">Default</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <BasicRuntimeChecks Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">Default</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <DebugInformationFormat Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <DebugInformationFormat Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ProjectReference Include="gtest_main-md.vcxproj"> + <Project>{3af54c8a-10bf-4332-9147-f68ed9862033}</Project> + </ProjectReference> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..047dae5 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest-md.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_unittest.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec6abde --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations"> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|Win32"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Debug|x64"> + <Configuration>Debug</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|Win32"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>Win32</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + <ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64"> + <Configuration>Release</Configuration> + <Platform>x64</Platform> + </ProjectConfiguration> + </ItemGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="Globals"> + <ProjectGuid>{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}</ProjectGuid> + <Keyword>Win32Proj</Keyword> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" /> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="Configuration"> + <ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType> + <CharacterSet>MultiByte</CharacterSet> + <PlatformToolset>v100</PlatformToolset> + </PropertyGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.props" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings"> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <ImportGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'" Label="PropertySheets"> + <Import Project="$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props" Condition="exists('$(UserRootDir)\Microsoft.Cpp.$(Platform).user.props')" Label="LocalAppDataPlatform" /> + </ImportGroup> + <PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros" /> + <PropertyGroup> + <_ProjectFileVersion>10.0.40219.1</_ProjectFileVersion> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">true</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">true</LinkIncremental> + <OutDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">false</LinkIncremental> + <LinkIncremental Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">false</LinkIncremental> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <OutDir>$(SolutionDir)$(SolutionName)\$(Platform)-$(Configuration)\</OutDir> + <IntDir>$(OutDir)temp\$(ProjectName)\</IntDir> + </PropertyGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <MinimalRebuild>true</MinimalRebuild> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>EditAndContinue</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_unittest.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <Optimization>Disabled</Optimization> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <BasicRuntimeChecks>EnableFastChecks</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreadedDebug</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <ProgramDatabaseFile>$(OutDir)gtest_unittest.pdb</ProgramDatabaseFile> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + <TargetMachine>MachineX86</TargetMachine> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemDefinitionGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + <ClCompile> + <PreprocessorDefinitions>WIN32;_VARIADIC_MAX=10;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions> + <RuntimeLibrary>MultiThreaded</RuntimeLibrary> + <PrecompiledHeader>Use</PrecompiledHeader> + <WarningLevel>Level3</WarningLevel> + <DebugInformationFormat>ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories>..\..\include;..\..;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + </ClCompile> + <Link> + <GenerateDebugInformation>true</GenerateDebugInformation> + <SubSystem>Console</SubSystem> + <OptimizeReferences>true</OptimizeReferences> + <EnableCOMDATFolding>true</EnableCOMDATFolding> + </Link> + </ItemDefinitionGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_unittest.cc"> + <Optimization Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">MinSpace</Optimization> + <Optimization Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">MinSpace</Optimization> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <BasicRuntimeChecks Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">Default</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <BasicRuntimeChecks Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">Default</BasicRuntimeChecks> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <DebugInformationFormat Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|Win32'">ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <DebugInformationFormat Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|x64'">ProgramDatabase</DebugInformationFormat> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <AdditionalIncludeDirectories Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'">..;..\include;%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)</AdditionalIncludeDirectories> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|Win32'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + <PrecompiledHeader Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|x64'"> + </PrecompiledHeader> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ProjectReference Include="gtest_main.vcxproj"> + <Project>{3af54c8a-10bf-4332-9147-f68ed9862032}</Project> + </ProjectReference> + </ItemGroup> + <Import Project="$(VCTargetsPath)\Microsoft.Cpp.targets" /> + <ImportGroup Label="ExtensionTargets"> + </ImportGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj.filters b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj.filters new file mode 100644 index 0000000..047dae5 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/msvc/2010/gtest_unittest.vcxproj.filters @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> +<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> + <ItemGroup> + <Filter Include="Source Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx</Extensions> + </Filter> + <Filter Include="Header Files"> + <UniqueIdentifier>{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}</UniqueIdentifier> + <Extensions>h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd</Extensions> + </Filter> + </ItemGroup> + <ItemGroup> + <ClCompile Include="..\..\test\gtest_unittest.cc"> + <Filter>Source Files</Filter> + </ClCompile> + </ItemGroup> +</Project>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest-md.sln b/googletest/msvc/gtest-md.sln deleted file mode 100644 index f7908da..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest-md.sln +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 8.00
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest-md", "gtest-md.vcproj", "{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_main-md", "gtest_main-md.vcproj", "{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_prod_test-md", "gtest_prod_test-md.vcproj", "{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_unittest-md", "gtest_unittest-md.vcproj", "{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Global
- GlobalSection(SolutionConfiguration) = preSolution
- Debug = Debug
- Release = Release
- EndGlobalSection
- GlobalSection(ProjectConfiguration) = postSolution
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- EndGlobalSection
- GlobalSection(ExtensibilityGlobals) = postSolution
- EndGlobalSection
- GlobalSection(ExtensibilityAddIns) = postSolution
- EndGlobalSection
-EndGlobal
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest-md.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest-md.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index 1c35c3a..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest-md.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,126 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest-md"
- ProjectGUID="{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath="">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="3"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtestd.lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath=""..\include";".."">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB"
- RuntimeLibrary="2"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest.lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\src\gtest-all.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest.sln b/googletest/msvc/gtest.sln deleted file mode 100644 index ef4b057..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest.sln +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 8.00
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest", "gtest.vcproj", "{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_main", "gtest_main.vcproj", "{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_unittest", "gtest_unittest.vcproj", "{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Project("{8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}") = "gtest_prod_test", "gtest_prod_test.vcproj", "{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}"
- ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
- EndProjectSection
-EndProject
-Global
- GlobalSection(SolutionConfiguration) = preSolution
- Debug = Debug
- Release = Release
- EndGlobalSection
- GlobalSection(ProjectConfiguration) = postSolution
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Debug.ActiveCfg = Debug|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Debug.Build.0 = Debug|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Release.ActiveCfg = Release|Win32
- {24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}.Release.Build.0 = Release|Win32
- EndGlobalSection
- GlobalSection(ExtensibilityGlobals) = postSolution
- EndGlobalSection
- GlobalSection(ExtensibilityAddIns) = postSolution
- EndGlobalSection
-EndGlobal
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index a8373ce..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,126 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest"
- ProjectGUID="{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath="">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="5"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtestd.lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath=""..\include";".."">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB"
- RuntimeLibrary="4"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest.lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\src\gtest-all.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest_main-md.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest_main-md.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index b5379fe..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest_main-md.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,129 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest_main-md"
- ProjectGUID="{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath="">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="3"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)d.lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath=""..\include";".."">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB"
- RuntimeLibrary="2"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName).lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- <ProjectReference
- ReferencedProjectIdentifier="{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE8}"
- Name="gtest-md"/>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\src\gtest_main.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest_main.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest_main.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index e8b763c..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest_main.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,129 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest_main"
- ProjectGUID="{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath="">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_LIB"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="5"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)d.lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="4"
- CharacterSet="2"
- ReferencesPath=""..\include";".."">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_LIB"
- RuntimeLibrary="4"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLibrarianTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName).lib"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- <ProjectReference
- ReferencedProjectIdentifier="{C8F6C172-56F2-4E76-B5FA-C3B423B31BE7}"
- Name="gtest"/>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\src\gtest_main.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest_prod_test-md.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest_prod_test-md.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index 05b05d9..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest_prod_test-md.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,164 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest_prod_test-md"
- ProjectGUID="{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECB}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="3"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_prod_test.exe"
- LinkIncremental="2"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- ProgramDatabaseFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_prod_test.pdb"
- SubSystem="1"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- RuntimeLibrary="2"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_prod_test.exe"
- LinkIncremental="1"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- SubSystem="1"
- OptimizeReferences="2"
- EnableCOMDATFolding="2"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- <ProjectReference
- ReferencedProjectIdentifier="{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}"
- Name="gtest_main-md"/>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\gtest_prod_test.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\production.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\production.h">
- </File>
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest_prod_test.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest_prod_test.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index 6d7a2f0..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest_prod_test.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,164 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest_prod_test"
- ProjectGUID="{24848551-EF4F-47E8-9A9D-EA4D49BC3ECA}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="5"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_prod_test.exe"
- LinkIncremental="2"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- ProgramDatabaseFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_prod_test.pdb"
- SubSystem="1"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- RuntimeLibrary="4"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_prod_test.exe"
- LinkIncremental="1"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- SubSystem="1"
- OptimizeReferences="2"
- EnableCOMDATFolding="2"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- <ProjectReference
- ReferencedProjectIdentifier="{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}"
- Name="gtest_main"/>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\gtest_prod_test.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\production.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\production.h">
- </File>
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest_unittest-md.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest_unittest-md.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index 38a5e56..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest_unittest-md.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,147 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest_unittest-md"
- ProjectGUID="{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A2}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="3"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_unittest.exe"
- LinkIncremental="2"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- ProgramDatabaseFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_unittest.pdb"
- SubSystem="1"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- RuntimeLibrary="2"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_unittest.exe"
- LinkIncremental="1"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- SubSystem="1"
- OptimizeReferences="2"
- EnableCOMDATFolding="2"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- <ProjectReference
- ReferencedProjectIdentifier="{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862033}"
- Name="gtest_main-md"/>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\gtest_unittest.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="1"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- BasicRuntimeChecks="0"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/msvc/gtest_unittest.vcproj b/googletest/msvc/gtest_unittest.vcproj deleted file mode 100644 index cb1f52b..0000000 --- a/googletest/msvc/gtest_unittest.vcproj +++ /dev/null @@ -1,147 +0,0 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
-<VisualStudioProject
- ProjectType="Visual C++"
- Version="7.10"
- Name="gtest_unittest"
- ProjectGUID="{4D9FDFB5-986A-4139-823C-F4EE0ED481A1}"
- Keyword="Win32Proj">
- <Platforms>
- <Platform
- Name="Win32"/>
- </Platforms>
- <Configurations>
- <Configuration
- Name="Debug|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="0"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- MinimalRebuild="TRUE"
- BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
- RuntimeLibrary="5"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="4"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_unittest.exe"
- LinkIncremental="2"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- ProgramDatabaseFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_unittest.pdb"
- SubSystem="1"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- <Configuration
- Name="Release|Win32"
- OutputDirectory="$(SolutionName)/$(ConfigurationName)"
- IntermediateDirectory="$(OutDir)/$(ProjectName)"
- ConfigurationType="1"
- CharacterSet="2">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE"
- RuntimeLibrary="4"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="3"
- WarningLevel="3"
- Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="FALSE"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCCustomBuildTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCLinkerTool"
- OutputFile="$(OutDir)/gtest_unittest.exe"
- LinkIncremental="1"
- GenerateDebugInformation="TRUE"
- SubSystem="1"
- OptimizeReferences="2"
- EnableCOMDATFolding="2"
- TargetMachine="1"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCMIDLTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- <Tool
- Name="VCAuxiliaryManagedWrapperGeneratorTool"/>
- </Configuration>
- </Configurations>
- <References>
- <ProjectReference
- ReferencedProjectIdentifier="{3AF54C8A-10BF-4332-9147-F68ED9862032}"
- Name="gtest_main"/>
- </References>
- <Files>
- <Filter
- Name="Source Files"
- Filter="cpp;c;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
- UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}">
- <File
- RelativePath="..\test\gtest_unittest.cc">
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Debug|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- Optimization="1"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- BasicRuntimeChecks="0"
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"
- DebugInformationFormat="3"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- <FileConfiguration
- Name="Release|Win32">
- <Tool
- Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
- AdditionalIncludeDirectories=""..";"..\include""
- UsePrecompiledHeader="0"/>
- </FileConfiguration>
- </File>
- </Filter>
- <Filter
- Name="Header Files"
- Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
- UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}">
- </Filter>
- </Files>
- <Globals>
- </Globals>
-</VisualStudioProject>
diff --git a/googletest/samples/prime_tables.h b/googletest/samples/prime_tables.h index 92ce16a..55a3b44 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/prime_tables.h +++ b/googletest/samples/prime_tables.h @@ -103,11 +103,15 @@ class PreCalculatedPrimeTable : public PrimeTable { ::std::fill(is_prime_, is_prime_ + is_prime_size_, true); is_prime_[0] = is_prime_[1] = false; - for (int i = 2; i <= max; i++) { + // Checks every candidate for prime number (we know that 2 is the only even + // prime). + for (int i = 2; i*i <= max; i += i%2+1) { if (!is_prime_[i]) continue; // Marks all multiples of i (except i itself) as non-prime. - for (int j = 2*i; j <= max; j += i) { + // We are starting here from i-th multiplier, because all smaller + // complex numbers were already marked. + for (int j = i*i; j <= max; j += i) { is_prime_[j] = false; } } diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample1.cc b/googletest/samples/sample1.cc index f171e26..7c08b28 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample1.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample1.cc @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ bool IsPrime(int n) { // Try to divide n by every odd number i, starting from 3 for (int i = 3; ; i += 2) { - // We only have to try i up to the squre root of n + // We only have to try i up to the square root of n if (i > n/i) break; // Now, we have i <= n/i < n. diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample10_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample10_unittest.cc index 0051cd5..10aa762 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample10_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample10_unittest.cc @@ -35,18 +35,15 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include "gtest/gtest.h" - using ::testing::EmptyTestEventListener; using ::testing::InitGoogleTest; using ::testing::Test; -using ::testing::TestCase; using ::testing::TestEventListeners; using ::testing::TestInfo; using ::testing::TestPartResult; using ::testing::UnitTest; namespace { - // We will track memory used by this class. class Water { public: @@ -106,7 +103,6 @@ TEST(ListenersTest, LeaksWater) { Water* water = new Water; EXPECT_TRUE(water != NULL); } - } // namespace int main(int argc, char **argv) { diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample1_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample1_unittest.cc index aefc4f1..8376bb4 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample1_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample1_unittest.cc @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ #include <limits.h> #include "sample1.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - +namespace { // Step 2. Use the TEST macro to define your tests. // @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ TEST(IsPrimeTest, Positive) { EXPECT_FALSE(IsPrime(6)); EXPECT_TRUE(IsPrime(23)); } +} // namespace // Step 3. Call RUN_ALL_TESTS() in main(). // diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc index 4fa19b7..df522da 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ #include "sample2.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - +namespace { // In this example, we test the MyString class (a simple string). // Tests the default c'tor. @@ -107,3 +107,4 @@ TEST(MyString, Set) { s.Set(NULL); EXPECT_STREQ(NULL, s.c_string()); } +} // namespace diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample3_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample3_unittest.cc index bf3877d..7f51fd8 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample3_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample3_unittest.cc @@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ #include "sample3-inl.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - +namespace { // To use a test fixture, derive a class from testing::Test. -class QueueTest : public testing::Test { +class QueueTestSmpl3 : public testing::Test { protected: // You should make the members protected s.t. they can be // accessed from sub-classes. // virtual void SetUp() will be called before each test is run. You - // should define it if you need to initialize the varaibles. + // should define it if you need to initialize the variables. // Otherwise, this can be skipped. virtual void SetUp() { q1_.Enqueue(1); @@ -120,13 +120,13 @@ class QueueTest : public testing::Test { // instead of TEST. // Tests the default c'tor. -TEST_F(QueueTest, DefaultConstructor) { +TEST_F(QueueTestSmpl3, DefaultConstructor) { // You can access data in the test fixture here. EXPECT_EQ(0u, q0_.Size()); } // Tests Dequeue(). -TEST_F(QueueTest, Dequeue) { +TEST_F(QueueTestSmpl3, Dequeue) { int * n = q0_.Dequeue(); EXPECT_TRUE(n == NULL); @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ TEST_F(QueueTest, Dequeue) { } // Tests the Queue::Map() function. -TEST_F(QueueTest, Map) { +TEST_F(QueueTestSmpl3, Map) { MapTester(&q0_); MapTester(&q1_); MapTester(&q2_); } +} // namespace diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample4_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample4_unittest.cc index fa5afc7..7bf9ea3 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample4_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample4_unittest.cc @@ -29,10 +29,12 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) -#include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "sample4.h" +#include "gtest/gtest.h" +namespace { // Tests the Increment() method. + TEST(Counter, Increment) { Counter c; @@ -43,3 +45,5 @@ TEST(Counter, Increment) { EXPECT_EQ(1, c.Increment()); EXPECT_EQ(2, c.Increment()); } + +} // namespace diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample5_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample5_unittest.cc index 43d8e57..401a58a 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample5_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample5_unittest.cc @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ #include <limits.h> #include <time.h> -#include "sample3-inl.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "sample1.h" - +#include "sample3-inl.h" +namespace { // In this sample, we want to ensure that every test finishes within // ~5 seconds. If a test takes longer to run, we consider it a // failure. @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ TEST_F(QueueTest, Dequeue) { EXPECT_EQ(1u, q2_.Size()); delete n; } - +} // namespace // If necessary, you can derive further test fixtures from a derived // fixture itself. For example, you can derive another fixture from // QueueTest. Google Test imposes no limit on how deep the hierarchy diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc index 8f2036a..1faf0c3 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ #include "prime_tables.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - +namespace { // First, we define some factory functions for creating instances of // the implementations. You may be able to skip this step if all your // implementations can be constructed the same way. @@ -222,3 +222,4 @@ INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(OnTheFlyAndPreCalculated, // Instance name PrimeTableImplementations); // Type list #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P +} // namespace diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample7_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample7_unittest.cc index 1b651a2..efa9728 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample7_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample7_unittest.cc @@ -39,8 +39,7 @@ #include "prime_tables.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST +namespace { using ::testing::TestWithParam; using ::testing::Values; @@ -65,9 +64,9 @@ PrimeTable* CreatePreCalculatedPrimeTable() { // can refer to the test parameter by GetParam(). In this case, the test // parameter is a factory function which we call in fixture's SetUp() to // create and store an instance of PrimeTable. -class PrimeTableTest : public TestWithParam<CreatePrimeTableFunc*> { +class PrimeTableTestSmpl7 : public TestWithParam<CreatePrimeTableFunc*> { public: - virtual ~PrimeTableTest() { delete table_; } + virtual ~PrimeTableTestSmpl7() { delete table_; } virtual void SetUp() { table_ = (*GetParam())(); } virtual void TearDown() { delete table_; @@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ class PrimeTableTest : public TestWithParam<CreatePrimeTableFunc*> { PrimeTable* table_; }; -TEST_P(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) { +TEST_P(PrimeTableTestSmpl7, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) { EXPECT_FALSE(table_->IsPrime(-5)); EXPECT_FALSE(table_->IsPrime(0)); EXPECT_FALSE(table_->IsPrime(1)); @@ -87,7 +86,7 @@ TEST_P(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) { EXPECT_FALSE(table_->IsPrime(100)); } -TEST_P(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) { +TEST_P(PrimeTableTestSmpl7, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) { EXPECT_TRUE(table_->IsPrime(2)); EXPECT_TRUE(table_->IsPrime(3)); EXPECT_TRUE(table_->IsPrime(5)); @@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ TEST_P(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) { EXPECT_TRUE(table_->IsPrime(131)); } -TEST_P(PrimeTableTest, CanGetNextPrime) { +TEST_P(PrimeTableTestSmpl7, CanGetNextPrime) { EXPECT_EQ(2, table_->GetNextPrime(0)); EXPECT_EQ(3, table_->GetNextPrime(2)); EXPECT_EQ(5, table_->GetNextPrime(3)); @@ -112,19 +111,8 @@ TEST_P(PrimeTableTest, CanGetNextPrime) { // // Here, we instantiate our tests with a list of two PrimeTable object // factory functions: -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P( - OnTheFlyAndPreCalculated, - PrimeTableTest, - Values(&CreateOnTheFlyPrimeTable, &CreatePreCalculatedPrimeTable<1000>)); - -#else - -// Google Test may not support value-parameterized tests with some -// compilers. If we use conditional compilation to compile out all -// code referring to the gtest_main library, MSVC linker will not link -// that library at all and consequently complain about missing entry -// point defined in that library (fatal error LNK1561: entry point -// must be defined). This dummy test keeps gtest_main linked in. -TEST(DummyTest, ValueParameterizedTestsAreNotSupportedOnThisPlatform) {} +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(OnTheFlyAndPreCalculated, PrimeTableTestSmpl7, + Values(&CreateOnTheFlyPrimeTable, + &CreatePreCalculatedPrimeTable<1000>)); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST +} // namespace diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample8_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample8_unittest.cc index 7274334..b0ff2d1 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample8_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample8_unittest.cc @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ #include "prime_tables.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - +namespace { #if GTEST_HAS_COMBINE // Suppose we want to introduce a new, improved implementation of PrimeTable @@ -171,3 +171,4 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(MeaningfulTestParameters, TEST(DummyTest, CombineIsNotSupportedOnThisPlatform) {} #endif // GTEST_HAS_COMBINE +} // namespace diff --git a/googletest/samples/sample9_unittest.cc b/googletest/samples/sample9_unittest.cc index b2e2079..75584bb 100644 --- a/googletest/samples/sample9_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/samples/sample9_unittest.cc @@ -44,9 +44,7 @@ using ::testing::TestEventListeners; using ::testing::TestInfo; using ::testing::TestPartResult; using ::testing::UnitTest; - namespace { - // Provides alternative output mode which produces minimal amount of // information about tests. class TersePrinter : public EmptyTestEventListener { @@ -102,7 +100,6 @@ TEST(CustomOutputTest, Fails) { EXPECT_EQ(1, 2) << "This test fails in order to demonstrate alternative failure messages"; } - } // namespace int main(int argc, char **argv) { diff --git a/googletest/scripts/fuse_gtest_files.py b/googletest/scripts/fuse_gtest_files.py index 3f3e9f3..d0dd464 100755 --- a/googletest/scripts/fuse_gtest_files.py +++ b/googletest/scripts/fuse_gtest_files.py @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXAMPLES This tool is experimental. In particular, it assumes that there is no conditional inclusion of Google Test headers. Please report any problems to googletestframework@googlegroups.com. You can read -http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/GoogleTestAdvancedGuide for +https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/advanced.md for more information. """ diff --git a/googletest/scripts/gen_gtest_pred_impl.py b/googletest/scripts/gen_gtest_pred_impl.py index 3e7ab04..b43efdf 100755 --- a/googletest/scripts/gen_gtest_pred_impl.py +++ b/googletest/scripts/gen_gtest_pred_impl.py @@ -115,10 +115,9 @@ def HeaderPreamble(n): #ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRED_IMPL_H_ #define GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRED_IMPL_H_ -// Makes sure this header is not included before gtest.h. -#ifndef GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_H_ -# error Do not include gtest_pred_impl.h directly. Include gtest.h instead. -#endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_H_ +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +namespace testing { // This header implements a family of generic predicate assertion // macros: @@ -295,16 +294,17 @@ def HeaderPostamble(): return """ +} // namespace testing + #endif // GTEST_INCLUDE_GTEST_GTEST_PRED_IMPL_H_ """ def GenerateFile(path, content): - """Given a file path and a content string, overwrites it with the - given content.""" - + """Given a file path and a content string + overwrites it with the given content. + """ print 'Updating file %s . . .' % path - f = file(path, 'w+') print >>f, content, f.close() @@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ def GenerateFile(path, content): def GenerateHeader(n): """Given the maximum arity n, updates the header file that implements - the predicate assertions.""" - + the predicate assertions. + """ GenerateFile(HEADER, HeaderPreamble(n) + ''.join([ImplementationForArity(i) for i in OneTo(n)]) diff --git a/googletest/scripts/upload.py b/googletest/scripts/upload.py index 6e6f9a1..c852e4c 100755 --- a/googletest/scripts/upload.py +++ b/googletest/scripts/upload.py @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ class AbstractRpcServer(object): The authentication process works as follows: 1) We get a username and password from the user 2) We use ClientLogin to obtain an AUTH token for the user - (see http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/AuthForInstalledApps.html). + (see https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/AuthForInstalledApps). 3) We pass the auth token to /_ah/login on the server to obtain an authentication cookie. If login was successful, it tries to redirect us to the URL we provided. @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ def EncodeMultipartFormData(fields, files): (content_type, body) ready for httplib.HTTP instance. Source: - http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/146306 + https://web.archive.org/web/20160116052001/code.activestate.com/recipes/146306 """ BOUNDARY = '-M-A-G-I-C---B-O-U-N-D-A-R-Y-' CRLF = '\r\n' @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ class SubversionVCS(VersionControlSystem): else: self.rev_start = self.rev_end = None # Cache output from "svn list -r REVNO dirname". - # Keys: dirname, Values: 2-tuple (ouput for start rev and end rev). + # Keys: dirname, Values: 2-tuple (output for start rev and end rev). self.svnls_cache = {} # SVN base URL is required to fetch files deleted in an older revision. # Result is cached to not guess it over and over again in GetBaseFile(). @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ class SubversionVCS(VersionControlSystem): # svn cat translates keywords but svn diff doesn't. As a result of this # behavior patching.PatchChunks() fails with a chunk mismatch error. # This part was originally written by the Review Board development team - # who had the same problem (http://reviews.review-board.org/r/276/). + # who had the same problem (https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/276/). # Mapping of keywords to known aliases svn_keywords = { # Standard keywords @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ class SubversionVCS(VersionControlSystem): status_lines = status.splitlines() # If file is in a cl, the output will begin with # "\n--- Changelist 'cl_name':\n". See - # http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/changelist-design.txt + # https://web.archive.org/web/20090918234815/svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/changelist-design.txt if (len(status_lines) == 3 and not status_lines[0] and status_lines[1].startswith("--- Changelist")): diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-all.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-all.cc index 0a9cee5..5872a2e 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-all.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-all.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: mheule@google.com (Markus Heule) // -// Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // Sometimes it's desirable to build Google Test by compiling a single file. // This file serves this purpose. diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-death-test.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-death-test.cc index a01a369..564bcd2 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-death-test.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-death-test.cc @@ -62,26 +62,30 @@ # include <spawn.h> # endif // GTEST_OS_QNX +# if GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA +# include <lib/fdio/io.h> +# include <lib/fdio/spawn.h> +# include <zircon/processargs.h> +# include <zircon/syscalls.h> +# include <zircon/syscalls/port.h> +# endif // GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST #include "gtest/gtest-message.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-string.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick exists to -// prevent the accidental inclusion of gtest-internal-inl.h in the -// user's code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { // Constants. // The default death test style. -static const char kDefaultDeathTestStyle[] = "fast"; +// +// This is defined in internal/gtest-port.h as "fast", but can be overridden by +// a definition in internal/custom/gtest-port.h. The recommended value, which is +// used internally at Google, is "threadsafe". +static const char kDefaultDeathTestStyle[] = GTEST_DEFAULT_DEATH_TEST_STYLE; GTEST_DEFINE_string_( death_test_style, @@ -121,7 +125,7 @@ namespace internal { // Valid only for fast death tests. Indicates the code is running in the // child process of a fast style death test. -# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA static bool g_in_fast_death_test_child = false; # endif @@ -131,10 +135,10 @@ static bool g_in_fast_death_test_child = false; // tests. IMPORTANT: This is an internal utility. Using it may break the // implementation of death tests. User code MUST NOT use it. bool InDeathTestChild() { -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA - // On Windows, death tests are thread-safe regardless of the value of the - // death_test_style flag. + // On Windows and Fuchsia, death tests are thread-safe regardless of the value + // of the death_test_style flag. return !GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test).empty(); # else @@ -154,7 +158,7 @@ ExitedWithCode::ExitedWithCode(int exit_code) : exit_code_(exit_code) { // ExitedWithCode function-call operator. bool ExitedWithCode::operator()(int exit_status) const { -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA return exit_status == exit_code_; @@ -162,10 +166,10 @@ bool ExitedWithCode::operator()(int exit_status) const { return WIFEXITED(exit_status) && WEXITSTATUS(exit_status) == exit_code_; -# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA } -# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA // KilledBySignal constructor. KilledBySignal::KilledBySignal(int signum) : signum_(signum) { } @@ -182,7 +186,7 @@ bool KilledBySignal::operator()(int exit_status) const { # endif // defined(GTEST_KILLED_BY_SIGNAL_OVERRIDE_) return WIFSIGNALED(exit_status) && WTERMSIG(exit_status) == signum_; } -# endif // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# endif // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA namespace internal { @@ -193,7 +197,7 @@ namespace internal { static std::string ExitSummary(int exit_code) { Message m; -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA m << "Exited with exit status " << exit_code; @@ -209,7 +213,7 @@ static std::string ExitSummary(int exit_code) { m << " (core dumped)"; } # endif -# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA return m.GetString(); } @@ -220,7 +224,7 @@ bool ExitedUnsuccessfully(int exit_status) { return !ExitedWithCode(0)(exit_status); } -# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA // Generates a textual failure message when a death test finds more than // one thread running, or cannot determine the number of threads, prior // to executing the given statement. It is the responsibility of the @@ -233,9 +237,12 @@ static std::string DeathTestThreadWarning(size_t thread_count) { msg << "couldn't detect the number of threads."; else msg << "detected " << thread_count << " threads."; + msg << " See https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/advanced.md#death-tests-and-threads" + << " for more explanation and suggested solutions, especially if" + << " this is the last message you see before your test times out."; return msg.GetString(); } -# endif // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# endif // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA // Flag characters for reporting a death test that did not die. static const char kDeathTestLived = 'L'; @@ -243,6 +250,13 @@ static const char kDeathTestReturned = 'R'; static const char kDeathTestThrew = 'T'; static const char kDeathTestInternalError = 'I'; +#if GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + +// File descriptor used for the pipe in the child process. +static const int kFuchsiaReadPipeFd = 3; + +#endif + // An enumeration describing all of the possible ways that a death test can // conclude. DIED means that the process died while executing the test // code; LIVED means that process lived beyond the end of the test code; @@ -259,7 +273,7 @@ enum DeathTestOutcome { IN_PROGRESS, DIED, LIVED, RETURNED, THREW }; // message is propagated back to the parent process. Otherwise, the // message is simply printed to stderr. In either case, the program // then exits with status 1. -void DeathTestAbort(const std::string& message) { +static void DeathTestAbort(const std::string& message) { // On a POSIX system, this function may be called from a threadsafe-style // death test child process, which operates on a very small stack. Use // the heap for any additional non-minuscule memory requirements. @@ -563,7 +577,13 @@ bool DeathTestImpl::Passed(bool status_ok) { break; case DIED: if (status_ok) { +# if GTEST_USES_PCRE + // PCRE regexes support embedded NULs. + // GTEST_USES_PCRE is defined only in google3 mode + const bool matched = RE::PartialMatch(error_message, *regex()); +# else const bool matched = RE::PartialMatch(error_message.c_str(), *regex()); +# endif // GTEST_USES_PCRE if (matched) { success = true; } else { @@ -779,7 +799,200 @@ DeathTest::TestRole WindowsDeathTest::AssumeRole() { set_spawned(true); return OVERSEE_TEST; } -# else // We are not on Windows. + +# elif GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + +class FuchsiaDeathTest : public DeathTestImpl { + public: + FuchsiaDeathTest(const char* a_statement, + const RE* a_regex, + const char* file, + int line) + : DeathTestImpl(a_statement, a_regex), file_(file), line_(line) {} + virtual ~FuchsiaDeathTest() { + zx_status_t status = zx_handle_close(child_process_); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status == ZX_OK); + status = zx_handle_close(port_); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status == ZX_OK); + } + + // All of these virtual functions are inherited from DeathTest. + virtual int Wait(); + virtual TestRole AssumeRole(); + + private: + // The name of the file in which the death test is located. + const char* const file_; + // The line number on which the death test is located. + const int line_; + + zx_handle_t child_process_ = ZX_HANDLE_INVALID; + zx_handle_t port_ = ZX_HANDLE_INVALID; +}; + +// Utility class for accumulating command-line arguments. +class Arguments { + public: + Arguments() { + args_.push_back(NULL); + } + + ~Arguments() { + for (std::vector<char*>::iterator i = args_.begin(); i != args_.end(); + ++i) { + free(*i); + } + } + void AddArgument(const char* argument) { + args_.insert(args_.end() - 1, posix::StrDup(argument)); + } + + template <typename Str> + void AddArguments(const ::std::vector<Str>& arguments) { + for (typename ::std::vector<Str>::const_iterator i = arguments.begin(); + i != arguments.end(); + ++i) { + args_.insert(args_.end() - 1, posix::StrDup(i->c_str())); + } + } + char* const* Argv() { + return &args_[0]; + } + + int size() { + return args_.size() - 1; + } + + private: + std::vector<char*> args_; +}; + +// Waits for the child in a death test to exit, returning its exit +// status, or 0 if no child process exists. As a side effect, sets the +// outcome data member. +int FuchsiaDeathTest::Wait() { + if (!spawned()) + return 0; + + // Register to wait for the child process to terminate. + zx_status_t status_zx; + status_zx = zx_object_wait_async(child_process_, + port_, + 0 /* key */, + ZX_PROCESS_TERMINATED, + ZX_WAIT_ASYNC_ONCE); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status_zx == ZX_OK); + + // Wait for it to terminate, or an exception to be received. + zx_port_packet_t packet; + status_zx = zx_port_wait(port_, ZX_TIME_INFINITE, &packet); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status_zx == ZX_OK); + + if (ZX_PKT_IS_EXCEPTION(packet.type)) { + // Process encountered an exception. Kill it directly rather than letting + // other handlers process the event. + status_zx = zx_task_kill(child_process_); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status_zx == ZX_OK); + + // Now wait for |child_process_| to terminate. + zx_signals_t signals = 0; + status_zx = zx_object_wait_one( + child_process_, ZX_PROCESS_TERMINATED, ZX_TIME_INFINITE, &signals); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status_zx == ZX_OK); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(signals & ZX_PROCESS_TERMINATED); + } else { + // Process terminated. + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(ZX_PKT_IS_SIGNAL_ONE(packet.type)); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(packet.signal.observed & ZX_PROCESS_TERMINATED); + } + + ReadAndInterpretStatusByte(); + + zx_info_process_t buffer; + status_zx = zx_object_get_info( + child_process_, + ZX_INFO_PROCESS, + &buffer, + sizeof(buffer), + nullptr, + nullptr); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status_zx == ZX_OK); + + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(buffer.exited); + set_status(buffer.return_code); + return status(); +} + +// The AssumeRole process for a Fuchsia death test. It creates a child +// process with the same executable as the current process to run the +// death test. The child process is given the --gtest_filter and +// --gtest_internal_run_death_test flags such that it knows to run the +// current death test only. +DeathTest::TestRole FuchsiaDeathTest::AssumeRole() { + const UnitTestImpl* const impl = GetUnitTestImpl(); + const InternalRunDeathTestFlag* const flag = + impl->internal_run_death_test_flag(); + const TestInfo* const info = impl->current_test_info(); + const int death_test_index = info->result()->death_test_count(); + + if (flag != NULL) { + // ParseInternalRunDeathTestFlag() has performed all the necessary + // processing. + set_write_fd(kFuchsiaReadPipeFd); + return EXECUTE_TEST; + } + + CaptureStderr(); + // Flush the log buffers since the log streams are shared with the child. + FlushInfoLog(); + + // Build the child process command line. + const std::string filter_flag = + std::string("--") + GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ + kFilterFlag + "=" + + info->test_case_name() + "." + info->name(); + const std::string internal_flag = + std::string("--") + GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ + kInternalRunDeathTestFlag + "=" + + file_ + "|" + + StreamableToString(line_) + "|" + + StreamableToString(death_test_index); + Arguments args; + args.AddArguments(GetInjectableArgvs()); + args.AddArgument(filter_flag.c_str()); + args.AddArgument(internal_flag.c_str()); + + // Build the pipe for communication with the child. + zx_status_t status; + zx_handle_t child_pipe_handle; + uint32_t type; + status = fdio_pipe_half(&child_pipe_handle, &type); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status >= 0); + set_read_fd(status); + + // Set the pipe handle for the child. + fdio_spawn_action_t add_handle_action = {}; + add_handle_action.action = FDIO_SPAWN_ACTION_ADD_HANDLE; + add_handle_action.h.id = PA_HND(type, kFuchsiaReadPipeFd); + add_handle_action.h.handle = child_pipe_handle; + + // Spawn the child process. + status = fdio_spawn_etc(ZX_HANDLE_INVALID, FDIO_SPAWN_CLONE_ALL, + args.Argv()[0], args.Argv(), nullptr, 1, + &add_handle_action, &child_process_, nullptr); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status == ZX_OK); + + // Create an exception port and attach it to the |child_process_|, to allow + // us to suppress the system default exception handler from firing. + status = zx_port_create(0, &port_); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status == ZX_OK); + status = zx_task_bind_exception_port( + child_process_, port_, 0 /* key */, 0 /*options */); + GTEST_DEATH_TEST_CHECK_(status == ZX_OK); + + set_spawned(true); + return OVERSEE_TEST; +} + +#else // We are neither on Windows, nor on Fuchsia. // ForkingDeathTest provides implementations for most of the abstract // methods of the DeathTest interface. Only the AssumeRole method is @@ -883,11 +1096,10 @@ class ExecDeathTest : public ForkingDeathTest { ForkingDeathTest(a_statement, a_regex), file_(file), line_(line) { } virtual TestRole AssumeRole(); private: - static ::std::vector<testing::internal::string> - GetArgvsForDeathTestChildProcess() { - ::std::vector<testing::internal::string> args = GetInjectableArgvs(); + static ::std::vector<std::string> GetArgvsForDeathTestChildProcess() { + ::std::vector<std::string> args = GetInjectableArgvs(); # if defined(GTEST_EXTRA_DEATH_TEST_COMMAND_LINE_ARGS_) - ::std::vector<testing::internal::string> extra_args = + ::std::vector<std::string> extra_args = GTEST_EXTRA_DEATH_TEST_COMMAND_LINE_ARGS_(); args.insert(args.end(), extra_args.begin(), extra_args.end()); # endif // defined(GTEST_EXTRA_DEATH_TEST_COMMAND_LINE_ARGS_) @@ -986,6 +1198,7 @@ static int ExecDeathTestChildMain(void* child_arg) { } # endif // !GTEST_OS_QNX +# if GTEST_HAS_CLONE // Two utility routines that together determine the direction the stack // grows. // This could be accomplished more elegantly by a single recursive @@ -995,20 +1208,22 @@ static int ExecDeathTestChildMain(void* child_arg) { // GTEST_NO_INLINE_ is required to prevent GCC 4.6 from inlining // StackLowerThanAddress into StackGrowsDown, which then doesn't give // correct answer. -void StackLowerThanAddress(const void* ptr, bool* result) GTEST_NO_INLINE_; -void StackLowerThanAddress(const void* ptr, bool* result) { +static void StackLowerThanAddress(const void* ptr, + bool* result) GTEST_NO_INLINE_; +static void StackLowerThanAddress(const void* ptr, bool* result) { int dummy; *result = (&dummy < ptr); } // Make sure AddressSanitizer does not tamper with the stack here. GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_NO_SANITIZE_ADDRESS_ -bool StackGrowsDown() { +static bool StackGrowsDown() { int dummy; bool result; StackLowerThanAddress(&dummy, &result); return result; } +# endif // GTEST_HAS_CLONE // Spawns a child process with the same executable as the current process in // a thread-safe manner and instructs it to run the death test. The @@ -1200,6 +1415,13 @@ bool DefaultDeathTestFactory::Create(const char* statement, const RE* regex, *test = new WindowsDeathTest(statement, regex, file, line); } +# elif GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + + if (GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style) == "threadsafe" || + GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style) == "fast") { + *test = new FuchsiaDeathTest(statement, regex, file, line); + } + # else if (GTEST_FLAG(death_test_style) == "threadsafe") { @@ -1224,7 +1446,7 @@ bool DefaultDeathTestFactory::Create(const char* statement, const RE* regex, // Recreates the pipe and event handles from the provided parameters, // signals the event, and returns a file descriptor wrapped around the pipe // handle. This function is called in the child process only. -int GetStatusFileDescriptor(unsigned int parent_process_id, +static int GetStatusFileDescriptor(unsigned int parent_process_id, size_t write_handle_as_size_t, size_t event_handle_as_size_t) { AutoHandle parent_process_handle(::OpenProcess(PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE, @@ -1243,7 +1465,7 @@ int GetStatusFileDescriptor(unsigned int parent_process_id, reinterpret_cast<HANDLE>(write_handle_as_size_t); HANDLE dup_write_handle; - // The newly initialized handle is accessible only in in the parent + // The newly initialized handle is accessible only in the parent // process. To obtain one accessible within the child, we need to use // DuplicateHandle. if (!::DuplicateHandle(parent_process_handle.Get(), write_handle, @@ -1320,6 +1542,16 @@ InternalRunDeathTestFlag* ParseInternalRunDeathTestFlag() { write_fd = GetStatusFileDescriptor(parent_process_id, write_handle_as_size_t, event_handle_as_size_t); + +# elif GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + + if (fields.size() != 3 + || !ParseNaturalNumber(fields[1], &line) + || !ParseNaturalNumber(fields[2], &index)) { + DeathTestAbort("Bad --gtest_internal_run_death_test flag: " + + GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test)); + } + # else if (fields.size() != 4 diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-filepath.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-filepath.cc index 0292dc1..6b76ea0 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-filepath.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-filepath.cc @@ -26,14 +26,12 @@ // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -// -// Authors: keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray) -#include "gtest/gtest-message.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h" -#include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" #include <stdlib.h> +#include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" +#include "gtest/gtest-message.h" #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE # include <windows.h> @@ -48,6 +46,8 @@ # include <climits> // Some Linux distributions define PATH_MAX here. #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE +#include "gtest/internal/gtest-string.h" + #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS # define GTEST_PATH_MAX_ _MAX_PATH #elif defined(PATH_MAX) @@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ # define GTEST_PATH_MAX_ _POSIX_PATH_MAX #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS -#include "gtest/internal/gtest-string.h" - namespace testing { namespace internal { @@ -130,7 +128,7 @@ FilePath FilePath::RemoveExtension(const char* extension) const { return *this; } -// Returns a pointer to the last occurence of a valid path separator in +// Returns a pointer to the last occurrence of a valid path separator in // the FilePath. On Windows, for example, both '/' and '\' are valid path // separators. Returns NULL if no path separator was found. const char* FilePath::FindLastPathSeparator() const { diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-internal-inl.h b/googletest/src/gtest-internal-inl.h index ed8a682..c5a4265 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-internal-inl.h +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-internal-inl.h @@ -37,14 +37,6 @@ #ifndef GTEST_SRC_GTEST_INTERNAL_INL_H_ #define GTEST_SRC_GTEST_INTERNAL_INL_H_ -// GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ is defined to 1 iff the current translation unit is -// part of Google Test's implementation; otherwise it's undefined. -#if !GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ -// If this file is included from the user's code, just say no. -# error "gtest-internal-inl.h is part of Google Test's internal implementation." -# error "It must not be included except by Google Test itself." -#endif // GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ - #ifndef _WIN32_WCE # include <errno.h> #endif // !_WIN32_WCE @@ -67,7 +59,7 @@ # include <windows.h> // NOLINT #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS -#include "gtest/gtest.h" // NOLINT +#include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" namespace testing { @@ -94,6 +86,7 @@ const char kFilterFlag[] = "filter"; const char kListTestsFlag[] = "list_tests"; const char kOutputFlag[] = "output"; const char kPrintTimeFlag[] = "print_time"; +const char kPrintUTF8Flag[] = "print_utf8"; const char kRandomSeedFlag[] = "random_seed"; const char kRepeatFlag[] = "repeat"; const char kShuffleFlag[] = "shuffle"; @@ -174,6 +167,7 @@ class GTestFlagSaver { list_tests_ = GTEST_FLAG(list_tests); output_ = GTEST_FLAG(output); print_time_ = GTEST_FLAG(print_time); + print_utf8_ = GTEST_FLAG(print_utf8); random_seed_ = GTEST_FLAG(random_seed); repeat_ = GTEST_FLAG(repeat); shuffle_ = GTEST_FLAG(shuffle); @@ -195,6 +189,7 @@ class GTestFlagSaver { GTEST_FLAG(list_tests) = list_tests_; GTEST_FLAG(output) = output_; GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = print_time_; + GTEST_FLAG(print_utf8) = print_utf8_; GTEST_FLAG(random_seed) = random_seed_; GTEST_FLAG(repeat) = repeat_; GTEST_FLAG(shuffle) = shuffle_; @@ -216,6 +211,7 @@ class GTestFlagSaver { bool list_tests_; std::string output_; bool print_time_; + bool print_utf8_; internal::Int32 random_seed_; internal::Int32 repeat_; bool shuffle_; @@ -426,7 +422,7 @@ class OsStackTraceGetterInterface { // in the trace. // skip_count - the number of top frames to be skipped; doesn't count // against max_depth. - virtual string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) = 0; + virtual std::string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) = 0; // UponLeavingGTest() should be called immediately before Google Test calls // user code. It saves some information about the current stack that @@ -446,10 +442,20 @@ class OsStackTraceGetter : public OsStackTraceGetterInterface { public: OsStackTraceGetter() {} - virtual string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count); + virtual std::string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count); virtual void UponLeavingGTest(); private: +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + Mutex mutex_; // Protects all internal state. + + // We save the stack frame below the frame that calls user code. + // We do this because the address of the frame immediately below + // the user code changes between the call to UponLeavingGTest() + // and any calls to the stack trace code from within the user code. + void* caller_frame_ = nullptr; +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(OsStackTraceGetter); }; @@ -664,13 +670,11 @@ class GTEST_API_ UnitTestImpl { tear_down_tc)->AddTestInfo(test_info); } -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Returns ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry object used to keep track of // value-parameterized tests and instantiate and register them. internal::ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry& parameterized_test_registry() { return parameterized_test_registry_; } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Sets the TestCase object for the test that's currently running. void set_current_test_case(TestCase* a_current_test_case) { @@ -845,14 +849,12 @@ class GTEST_API_ UnitTestImpl { // shuffled order. std::vector<int> test_case_indices_; -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // ParameterizedTestRegistry object used to register value-parameterized // tests. internal::ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry parameterized_test_registry_; // Indicates whether RegisterParameterizedTests() has been called already. bool parameterized_tests_registered_; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Index of the last death test case registered. Initially -1. int last_death_test_case_; @@ -1032,7 +1034,7 @@ class TestResultAccessor { #if GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ // Streams test results to the given port on the given host machine. -class GTEST_API_ StreamingListener : public EmptyTestEventListener { +class StreamingListener : public EmptyTestEventListener { public: // Abstract base class for writing strings to a socket. class AbstractSocketWriter { @@ -1040,21 +1042,19 @@ class GTEST_API_ StreamingListener : public EmptyTestEventListener { virtual ~AbstractSocketWriter() {} // Sends a string to the socket. - virtual void Send(const string& message) = 0; + virtual void Send(const std::string& message) = 0; // Closes the socket. virtual void CloseConnection() {} // Sends a string and a newline to the socket. - void SendLn(const string& message) { - Send(message + "\n"); - } + void SendLn(const std::string& message) { Send(message + "\n"); } }; // Concrete class for actually writing strings to a socket. class SocketWriter : public AbstractSocketWriter { public: - SocketWriter(const string& host, const string& port) + SocketWriter(const std::string& host, const std::string& port) : sockfd_(-1), host_name_(host), port_num_(port) { MakeConnection(); } @@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ class GTEST_API_ StreamingListener : public EmptyTestEventListener { } // Sends a string to the socket. - virtual void Send(const string& message) { + virtual void Send(const std::string& message) { GTEST_CHECK_(sockfd_ != -1) << "Send() can be called only when there is a connection."; @@ -1091,17 +1091,19 @@ class GTEST_API_ StreamingListener : public EmptyTestEventListener { } int sockfd_; // socket file descriptor - const string host_name_; - const string port_num_; + const std::string host_name_; + const std::string port_num_; GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SocketWriter); }; // class SocketWriter // Escapes '=', '&', '%', and '\n' characters in str as "%xx". - static string UrlEncode(const char* str); + static std::string UrlEncode(const char* str); - StreamingListener(const string& host, const string& port) - : socket_writer_(new SocketWriter(host, port)) { Start(); } + StreamingListener(const std::string& host, const std::string& port) + : socket_writer_(new SocketWriter(host, port)) { + Start(); + } explicit StreamingListener(AbstractSocketWriter* socket_writer) : socket_writer_(socket_writer) { Start(); } @@ -1162,13 +1164,13 @@ class GTEST_API_ StreamingListener : public EmptyTestEventListener { private: // Sends the given message and a newline to the socket. - void SendLn(const string& message) { socket_writer_->SendLn(message); } + void SendLn(const std::string& message) { socket_writer_->SendLn(message); } // Called at the start of streaming to notify the receiver what // protocol we are using. void Start() { SendLn("gtest_streaming_protocol_version=1.0"); } - string FormatBool(bool value) { return value ? "1" : "0"; } + std::string FormatBool(bool value) { return value ? "1" : "0"; } const scoped_ptr<AbstractSocketWriter> socket_writer_; diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-port.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-port.cc index e5bf3dd..5fbb08b 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-port.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-port.cc @@ -63,19 +63,16 @@ # include <sys/types.h> #endif // GTEST_OS_AIX +#if GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA +# include <zircon/process.h> +# include <zircon/syscalls.h> +#endif // GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" #include "gtest/gtest-message.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h" #include "gtest/internal/gtest-string.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick exists to -// prevent the accidental inclusion of gtest-internal-inl.h in the -// user's code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { namespace internal { @@ -93,7 +90,7 @@ const int kStdErrFileno = STDERR_FILENO; namespace { template <typename T> -T ReadProcFileField(const string& filename, int field) { +T ReadProcFileField(const std::string& filename, int field) { std::string dummy; std::ifstream file(filename.c_str()); while (field-- > 0) { @@ -107,7 +104,7 @@ T ReadProcFileField(const string& filename, int field) { // Returns the number of active threads, or 0 when there is an error. size_t GetThreadCount() { - const string filename = + const std::string filename = (Message() << "/proc/" << getpid() << "/stat").GetString(); return ReadProcFileField<int>(filename, 19); } @@ -164,6 +161,25 @@ size_t GetThreadCount() { } } +#elif GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + +size_t GetThreadCount() { + int dummy_buffer; + size_t avail; + zx_status_t status = zx_object_get_info( + zx_process_self(), + ZX_INFO_PROCESS_THREADS, + &dummy_buffer, + 0, + nullptr, + &avail); + if (status == ZX_OK) { + return avail; + } else { + return 0; + } +} + #else size_t GetThreadCount() { @@ -248,7 +264,7 @@ Mutex::~Mutex() { // to clean them up. // TODO(yukawa): Switch to Slim Reader/Writer (SRW) Locks, which requires // nothing to clean it up but is available only on Vista and later. - // http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa904937.aspx + // https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/Sync/slim-reader-writer--srw--locks if (type_ == kDynamic) { ::DeleteCriticalSection(critical_section_); delete critical_section_; @@ -496,7 +512,7 @@ class ThreadLocalRegistryImpl { FALSE, thread_id); GTEST_CHECK_(thread != NULL); - // We need to to pass a valid thread ID pointer into CreateThread for it + // We need to pass a valid thread ID pointer into CreateThread for it // to work correctly under Win98. DWORD watcher_thread_id; HANDLE watcher_thread = ::CreateThread( @@ -671,7 +687,7 @@ bool AtomMatchesChar(bool escaped, char pattern_char, char ch) { } // Helper function used by ValidateRegex() to format error messages. -std::string FormatRegexSyntaxError(const char* regex, int index) { +static std::string FormatRegexSyntaxError(const char* regex, int index) { return (Message() << "Syntax error at index " << index << " in simple regular expression \"" << regex << "\": ").GetString(); } @@ -923,6 +939,7 @@ GTestLog::~GTestLog() { posix::Abort(); } } + // Disable Microsoft deprecation warnings for POSIX functions called from // this class (creat, dup, dup2, and close) GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(4996) @@ -1015,7 +1032,8 @@ static CapturedStream* g_captured_stderr = NULL; static CapturedStream* g_captured_stdout = NULL; // Starts capturing an output stream (stdout/stderr). -void CaptureStream(int fd, const char* stream_name, CapturedStream** stream) { +static void CaptureStream(int fd, const char* stream_name, + CapturedStream** stream) { if (*stream != NULL) { GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "Only one " << stream_name << " capturer can exist at a time."; @@ -1024,7 +1042,7 @@ void CaptureStream(int fd, const char* stream_name, CapturedStream** stream) { } // Stops capturing the output stream and returns the captured string. -std::string GetCapturedStream(CapturedStream** captured_stream) { +static std::string GetCapturedStream(CapturedStream** captured_stream) { const std::string content = (*captured_stream)->GetCapturedString(); delete *captured_stream; @@ -1055,23 +1073,9 @@ std::string GetCapturedStderr() { #endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION -std::string TempDir() { -#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE - return "\\temp\\"; -#elif GTEST_OS_WINDOWS - const char* temp_dir = posix::GetEnv("TEMP"); - if (temp_dir == NULL || temp_dir[0] == '\0') - return "\\temp\\"; - else if (temp_dir[strlen(temp_dir) - 1] == '\\') - return temp_dir; - else - return std::string(temp_dir) + "\\"; -#elif GTEST_OS_LINUX_ANDROID - return "/sdcard/"; -#else - return "/tmp/"; -#endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE -} + + + size_t GetFileSize(FILE* file) { fseek(file, 0, SEEK_END); @@ -1101,22 +1105,36 @@ std::string ReadEntireFile(FILE* file) { } #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST +static const std::vector<std::string>* g_injected_test_argvs = NULL; // Owned. -static const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>* g_injected_test_argvs = - NULL; // Owned. - -void SetInjectableArgvs(const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>* argvs) { - if (g_injected_test_argvs != argvs) - delete g_injected_test_argvs; - g_injected_test_argvs = argvs; -} - -const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>& GetInjectableArgvs() { +std::vector<std::string> GetInjectableArgvs() { if (g_injected_test_argvs != NULL) { return *g_injected_test_argvs; } return GetArgvs(); } + +void SetInjectableArgvs(const std::vector<std::string>* new_argvs) { + if (g_injected_test_argvs != new_argvs) delete g_injected_test_argvs; + g_injected_test_argvs = new_argvs; +} + +void SetInjectableArgvs(const std::vector<std::string>& new_argvs) { + SetInjectableArgvs( + new std::vector<std::string>(new_argvs.begin(), new_argvs.end())); +} + +#if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING +void SetInjectableArgvs(const std::vector< ::string>& new_argvs) { + SetInjectableArgvs( + new std::vector<std::string>(new_argvs.begin(), new_argvs.end())); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING + +void ClearInjectableArgvs() { + delete g_injected_test_argvs; + g_injected_test_argvs = NULL; +} #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE @@ -1191,11 +1209,12 @@ bool ParseInt32(const Message& src_text, const char* str, Int32* value) { bool BoolFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, bool default_value) { #if defined(GTEST_GET_BOOL_FROM_ENV_) return GTEST_GET_BOOL_FROM_ENV_(flag, default_value); -#endif // defined(GTEST_GET_BOOL_FROM_ENV_) +#else const std::string env_var = FlagToEnvVar(flag); const char* const string_value = posix::GetEnv(env_var.c_str()); return string_value == NULL ? default_value : strcmp(string_value, "0") != 0; +#endif // defined(GTEST_GET_BOOL_FROM_ENV_) } // Reads and returns a 32-bit integer stored in the environment @@ -1204,7 +1223,7 @@ bool BoolFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, bool default_value) { Int32 Int32FromGTestEnv(const char* flag, Int32 default_value) { #if defined(GTEST_GET_INT32_FROM_ENV_) return GTEST_GET_INT32_FROM_ENV_(flag, default_value); -#endif // defined(GTEST_GET_INT32_FROM_ENV_) +#else const std::string env_var = FlagToEnvVar(flag); const char* const string_value = posix::GetEnv(env_var.c_str()); if (string_value == NULL) { @@ -1222,37 +1241,36 @@ Int32 Int32FromGTestEnv(const char* flag, Int32 default_value) { } return result; +#endif // defined(GTEST_GET_INT32_FROM_ENV_) +} + +// As a special case for the 'output' flag, if GTEST_OUTPUT is not +// set, we look for XML_OUTPUT_FILE, which is set by the Bazel build +// system. The value of XML_OUTPUT_FILE is a filename without the +// "xml:" prefix of GTEST_OUTPUT. +// Note that this is meant to be called at the call site so it does +// not check that the flag is 'output' +// In essence this checks an env variable called XML_OUTPUT_FILE +// and if it is set we prepend "xml:" to its value, if it not set we return "" +std::string OutputFlagAlsoCheckEnvVar(){ + std::string default_value_for_output_flag = ""; + const char* xml_output_file_env = posix::GetEnv("XML_OUTPUT_FILE"); + if (NULL != xml_output_file_env) { + default_value_for_output_flag = std::string("xml:") + xml_output_file_env; + } + return default_value_for_output_flag; } // Reads and returns the string environment variable corresponding to // the given flag; if it's not set, returns default_value. -std::string StringFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, const char* default_value) { +const char* StringFromGTestEnv(const char* flag, const char* default_value) { #if defined(GTEST_GET_STRING_FROM_ENV_) return GTEST_GET_STRING_FROM_ENV_(flag, default_value); -#endif // defined(GTEST_GET_STRING_FROM_ENV_) +#else const std::string env_var = FlagToEnvVar(flag); - const char* value = posix::GetEnv(env_var.c_str()); - if (value != NULL) { - return value; - } - - // As a special case for the 'output' flag, if GTEST_OUTPUT is not - // set, we look for XML_OUTPUT_FILE, which is set by the Bazel build - // system. The value of XML_OUTPUT_FILE is a filename without the - // "xml:" prefix of GTEST_OUTPUT. - // - // The net priority order after flag processing is thus: - // --gtest_output command line flag - // GTEST_OUTPUT environment variable - // XML_OUTPUT_FILE environment variable - // 'default_value' - if (strcmp(flag, "output") == 0) { - value = posix::GetEnv("XML_OUTPUT_FILE"); - if (value != NULL) { - return std::string("xml:") + value; - } - } - return default_value; + const char* const value = posix::GetEnv(env_var.c_str()); + return value == NULL ? default_value : value; +#endif // defined(GTEST_GET_STRING_FROM_ENV_) } } // namespace internal diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-printers.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-printers.cc index a2df412..eeba17f 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-printers.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-printers.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) -// Google Test - The Google C++ Testing Framework +// Google Test - The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework // // This file implements a universal value printer that can print a // value of any type T: @@ -43,12 +43,13 @@ // defines Foo. #include "gtest/gtest-printers.h" -#include <ctype.h> #include <stdio.h> +#include <cctype> #include <cwchar> #include <ostream> // NOLINT #include <string> #include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h" +#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" namespace testing { @@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ namespace internal { // Depending on the value of a char (or wchar_t), we print it in one // of three formats: // - as is if it's a printable ASCII (e.g. 'a', '2', ' '), -// - as a hexidecimal escape sequence (e.g. '\x7F'), or +// - as a hexadecimal escape sequence (e.g. '\x7F'), or // - as a special escape sequence (e.g. '\r', '\n'). enum CharFormat { kAsIs, @@ -180,7 +181,10 @@ static CharFormat PrintAsCharLiteralTo(Char c, ostream* os) { *os << static_cast<char>(c); return kAsIs; } else { - *os << "\\x" + String::FormatHexInt(static_cast<UnsignedChar>(c)); + ostream::fmtflags flags = os->flags(); + *os << "\\x" << std::hex << std::uppercase + << static_cast<int>(static_cast<UnsignedChar>(c)); + os->flags(flags); return kHexEscape; } } @@ -227,7 +231,7 @@ void PrintCharAndCodeTo(Char c, ostream* os) { return; *os << " (" << static_cast<int>(c); - // For more convenience, we print c's code again in hexidecimal, + // For more convenience, we print c's code again in hexadecimal, // unless c was already printed in the form '\x##' or the code is in // [1, 9]. if (format == kHexEscape || (1 <= c && c <= 9)) { @@ -259,11 +263,12 @@ template <typename CharType> GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_NO_SANITIZE_MEMORY_ GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_NO_SANITIZE_ADDRESS_ GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_NO_SANITIZE_THREAD_ -static void PrintCharsAsStringTo( +static CharFormat PrintCharsAsStringTo( const CharType* begin, size_t len, ostream* os) { const char* const kQuoteBegin = sizeof(CharType) == 1 ? "\"" : "L\""; *os << kQuoteBegin; bool is_previous_hex = false; + CharFormat print_format = kAsIs; for (size_t index = 0; index < len; ++index) { const CharType cur = begin[index]; if (is_previous_hex && IsXDigit(cur)) { @@ -273,8 +278,13 @@ static void PrintCharsAsStringTo( *os << "\" " << kQuoteBegin; } is_previous_hex = PrintAsStringLiteralTo(cur, os) == kHexEscape; + // Remember if any characters required hex escaping. + if (is_previous_hex) { + print_format = kHexEscape; + } } *os << "\""; + return print_format; } // Prints a (const) char/wchar_t array of 'len' elements, starting at address @@ -344,15 +354,90 @@ void PrintTo(const wchar_t* s, ostream* os) { } #endif // wchar_t is native +namespace { + +bool ContainsUnprintableControlCodes(const char* str, size_t length) { + const unsigned char *s = reinterpret_cast<const unsigned char *>(str); + + for (size_t i = 0; i < length; i++) { + unsigned char ch = *s++; + if (std::iscntrl(ch)) { + switch (ch) { + case '\t': + case '\n': + case '\r': + break; + default: + return true; + } + } + } + return false; +} + +bool IsUTF8TrailByte(unsigned char t) { return 0x80 <= t && t<= 0xbf; } + +bool IsValidUTF8(const char* str, size_t length) { + const unsigned char *s = reinterpret_cast<const unsigned char *>(str); + + for (size_t i = 0; i < length;) { + unsigned char lead = s[i++]; + + if (lead <= 0x7f) { + continue; // single-byte character (ASCII) 0..7F + } + if (lead < 0xc2) { + return false; // trail byte or non-shortest form + } else if (lead <= 0xdf && (i + 1) <= length && IsUTF8TrailByte(s[i])) { + ++i; // 2-byte character + } else if (0xe0 <= lead && lead <= 0xef && (i + 2) <= length && + IsUTF8TrailByte(s[i]) && + IsUTF8TrailByte(s[i + 1]) && + // check for non-shortest form and surrogate + (lead != 0xe0 || s[i] >= 0xa0) && + (lead != 0xed || s[i] < 0xa0)) { + i += 2; // 3-byte character + } else if (0xf0 <= lead && lead <= 0xf4 && (i + 3) <= length && + IsUTF8TrailByte(s[i]) && + IsUTF8TrailByte(s[i + 1]) && + IsUTF8TrailByte(s[i + 2]) && + // check for non-shortest form + (lead != 0xf0 || s[i] >= 0x90) && + (lead != 0xf4 || s[i] < 0x90)) { + i += 3; // 4-byte character + } else { + return false; + } + } + return true; +} + +void ConditionalPrintAsText(const char* str, size_t length, ostream* os) { + if (!ContainsUnprintableControlCodes(str, length) && + IsValidUTF8(str, length)) { + *os << "\n As Text: \"" << str << "\""; + } +} + +} // anonymous namespace + // Prints a ::string object. #if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING void PrintStringTo(const ::string& s, ostream* os) { - PrintCharsAsStringTo(s.data(), s.size(), os); + if (PrintCharsAsStringTo(s.data(), s.size(), os) == kHexEscape) { + if (GTEST_FLAG(print_utf8)) { + ConditionalPrintAsText(s.data(), s.size(), os); + } + } } #endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING void PrintStringTo(const ::std::string& s, ostream* os) { - PrintCharsAsStringTo(s.data(), s.size(), os); + if (PrintCharsAsStringTo(s.data(), s.size(), os) == kHexEscape) { + if (GTEST_FLAG(print_utf8)) { + ConditionalPrintAsText(s.data(), s.size(), os); + } + } } // Prints a ::wstring object. diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-test-part.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-test-part.cc index fb0e354..4c5f2e3 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-test-part.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-test-part.cc @@ -29,18 +29,10 @@ // // Author: mheule@google.com (Markus Heule) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) #include "gtest/gtest-test-part.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick exists to -// prevent the accidental inclusion of gtest-internal-inl.h in the -// user's code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest-typed-test.cc b/googletest/src/gtest-typed-test.cc index df1eef4..b358243 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest-typed-test.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest-typed-test.cc @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) #include "gtest/gtest-typed-test.h" + #include "gtest/gtest.h" namespace testing { diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest.cc b/googletest/src/gtest.cc index d882ab2..bc66c97 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) #include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "gtest/internal/custom/gtest.h" @@ -133,19 +133,19 @@ # include <sys/types.h> // NOLINT #endif -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS # define vsnprintf _vsnprintf #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL +#include "absl/debugging/failure_signal_handler.h" +#include "absl/debugging/stacktrace.h" +#include "absl/debugging/symbolize.h" +#include "absl/strings/str_cat.h" +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + namespace testing { using internal::CountIf; @@ -167,8 +167,10 @@ static const char kDeathTestCaseFilter[] = "*DeathTest:*DeathTest/*"; // A test filter that matches everything. static const char kUniversalFilter[] = "*"; -// The default output file for XML output. -static const char kDefaultOutputFile[] = "test_detail.xml"; +// The default output format. +static const char kDefaultOutputFormat[] = "xml"; +// The default output file. +static const char kDefaultOutputFile[] = "test_detail"; // The environment variable name for the test shard index. static const char kTestShardIndex[] = "GTEST_SHARD_INDEX"; @@ -189,13 +191,14 @@ bool g_help_flag = false; } // namespace internal +// Bazel passes in the argument to '--test_filter' via the TESTBRIDGE_TEST_ONLY +// environment variable. static const char* GetDefaultFilter() { -#ifdef GTEST_TEST_FILTER_ENV_VAR_ - const char* const testbridge_test_only = getenv(GTEST_TEST_FILTER_ENV_VAR_); + const char* const testbridge_test_only = + internal::posix::GetEnv("TESTBRIDGE_TEST_ONLY"); if (testbridge_test_only != NULL) { return testbridge_test_only; } -#endif // GTEST_TEST_FILTER_ENV_VAR_ return kUniversalFilter; } @@ -232,15 +235,28 @@ GTEST_DEFINE_string_( "exclude). A test is run if it matches one of the positive " "patterns and does not match any of the negative patterns."); +GTEST_DEFINE_bool_( + install_failure_signal_handler, + internal::BoolFromGTestEnv("install_failure_signal_handler", false), + "If true and supported on the current platform, " GTEST_NAME_ " should " + "install a signal handler that dumps debugging information when fatal " + "signals are raised."); + GTEST_DEFINE_bool_(list_tests, false, "List all tests without running them."); +// The net priority order after flag processing is thus: +// --gtest_output command line flag +// GTEST_OUTPUT environment variable +// XML_OUTPUT_FILE environment variable +// '' GTEST_DEFINE_string_( output, - internal::StringFromGTestEnv("output", ""), - "A format (currently must be \"xml\"), optionally followed " - "by a colon and an output file name or directory. A directory " - "is indicated by a trailing pathname separator. " + internal::StringFromGTestEnv("output", + internal::OutputFlagAlsoCheckEnvVar().c_str()), + "A format (defaults to \"xml\" but can be specified to be \"json\"), " + "optionally followed by a colon and an output file name or directory. " + "A directory is indicated by a trailing pathname separator. " "Examples: \"xml:filename.xml\", \"xml::directoryname/\". " "If a directory is specified, output files will be created " "within that directory, with file-names based on the test " @@ -253,6 +269,12 @@ GTEST_DEFINE_bool_( "True iff " GTEST_NAME_ " should display elapsed time in text output."); +GTEST_DEFINE_bool_( + print_utf8, + internal::BoolFromGTestEnv("print_utf8", true), + "True iff " GTEST_NAME_ + " prints UTF8 characters as text."); + GTEST_DEFINE_int32_( random_seed, internal::Int32FromGTestEnv("random_seed", 0), @@ -294,7 +316,7 @@ GTEST_DEFINE_bool_( internal::BoolFromGTestEnv("throw_on_failure", false), "When this flag is specified, a failed assertion will throw an exception " "if exceptions are enabled or exit the program with a non-zero code " - "otherwise."); + "otherwise. For use with an external test framework."); #if GTEST_USE_OWN_FLAGFILE_FLAG_ GTEST_DEFINE_string_( @@ -310,7 +332,8 @@ namespace internal { // than kMaxRange. UInt32 Random::Generate(UInt32 range) { // These constants are the same as are used in glibc's rand(3). - state_ = (1103515245U*state_ + 12345U) % kMaxRange; + // Use wider types than necessary to prevent unsigned overflow diagnostics. + state_ = static_cast<UInt32>(1103515245ULL*state_ + 12345U) % kMaxRange; GTEST_CHECK_(range > 0) << "Cannot generate a number in the range [0, 0)."; @@ -384,12 +407,15 @@ void AssertHelper::operator=(const Message& message) const { GTEST_API_ GTEST_DEFINE_STATIC_MUTEX_(g_linked_ptr_mutex); // A copy of all command line arguments. Set by InitGoogleTest(). -::std::vector<testing::internal::string> g_argvs; +::std::vector<std::string> g_argvs; -const ::std::vector<testing::internal::string>& GetArgvs() { +::std::vector<std::string> GetArgvs() { #if defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_) - return GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_(); -#else // defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_) + // GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_() may return a container of std::string or + // ::string. This code converts it to the appropriate type. + const auto& custom = GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_(); + return ::std::vector<std::string>(custom.begin(), custom.end()); +#else // defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_) return g_argvs; #endif // defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_GET_ARGVS_) } @@ -428,12 +454,17 @@ std::string UnitTestOptions::GetAbsolutePathToOutputFile() { if (gtest_output_flag == NULL) return ""; + std::string format = GetOutputFormat(); + if (format.empty()) + format = std::string(kDefaultOutputFormat); + const char* const colon = strchr(gtest_output_flag, ':'); if (colon == NULL) - return internal::FilePath::ConcatPaths( + return internal::FilePath::MakeFileName( internal::FilePath( UnitTest::GetInstance()->original_working_dir()), - internal::FilePath(kDefaultOutputFile)).string(); + internal::FilePath(kDefaultOutputFile), 0, + format.c_str()).string(); internal::FilePath output_name(colon + 1); if (!output_name.IsAbsolutePath()) @@ -628,12 +659,12 @@ extern const TypeId kTestTypeIdInGoogleTest = GetTestTypeId(); // This predicate-formatter checks that 'results' contains a test part // failure of the given type and that the failure message contains the // given substring. -AssertionResult HasOneFailure(const char* /* results_expr */, - const char* /* type_expr */, - const char* /* substr_expr */, - const TestPartResultArray& results, - TestPartResult::Type type, - const string& substr) { +static AssertionResult HasOneFailure(const char* /* results_expr */, + const char* /* type_expr */, + const char* /* substr_expr */, + const TestPartResultArray& results, + TestPartResult::Type type, + const std::string& substr) { const std::string expected(type == TestPartResult::kFatalFailure ? "1 fatal failure" : "1 non-fatal failure"); @@ -667,13 +698,10 @@ AssertionResult HasOneFailure(const char* /* results_expr */, // The constructor of SingleFailureChecker remembers where to look up // test part results, what type of failure we expect, and what // substring the failure message should contain. -SingleFailureChecker:: SingleFailureChecker( - const TestPartResultArray* results, - TestPartResult::Type type, - const string& substr) - : results_(results), - type_(type), - substr_(substr) {} +SingleFailureChecker::SingleFailureChecker(const TestPartResultArray* results, + TestPartResult::Type type, + const std::string& substr) + : results_(results), type_(type), substr_(substr) {} // The destructor of SingleFailureChecker verifies that the given // TestPartResultArray contains exactly one failure that has the given @@ -1171,7 +1199,7 @@ class Hunk { // Print a unified diff header for one hunk. // The format is // "@@ -<left_start>,<left_length> +<right_start>,<right_length> @@" - // where the left/right parts are ommitted if unnecessary. + // where the left/right parts are omitted if unnecessary. void PrintHeader(std::ostream* ss) const { *ss << "@@ "; if (removes_) { @@ -1315,13 +1343,14 @@ AssertionResult EqFailure(const char* lhs_expression, const std::string& rhs_value, bool ignoring_case) { Message msg; - msg << " Expected: " << lhs_expression; + msg << "Expected equality of these values:"; + msg << "\n " << lhs_expression; if (lhs_value != lhs_expression) { - msg << "\n Which is: " << lhs_value; + msg << "\n Which is: " << lhs_value; } - msg << "\nTo be equal to: " << rhs_expression; + msg << "\n " << rhs_expression; if (rhs_value != rhs_expression) { - msg << "\n Which is: " << rhs_value; + msg << "\n Which is: " << rhs_value; } if (ignoring_case) { @@ -1663,7 +1692,7 @@ namespace { AssertionResult HRESULTFailureHelper(const char* expr, const char* expected, long hr) { // NOLINT -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE +# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE || GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_TV_TITLE // Windows CE doesn't support FormatMessage. const char error_text[] = ""; @@ -1720,7 +1749,7 @@ AssertionResult IsHRESULTFailure(const char* expr, long hr) { // NOLINT // Utility functions for encoding Unicode text (wide strings) in // UTF-8. -// A Unicode code-point can have upto 21 bits, and is encoded in UTF-8 +// A Unicode code-point can have up to 21 bits, and is encoded in UTF-8 // like this: // // Code-point length Encoding @@ -1784,7 +1813,7 @@ std::string CodePointToUtf8(UInt32 code_point) { return str; } -// The following two functions only make sense if the the system +// The following two functions only make sense if the system // uses UTF-16 for wide string encoding. All supported systems // with 16 bit wchar_t (Windows, Cygwin, Symbian OS) do use UTF-16. @@ -2138,8 +2167,9 @@ static std::string FormatWordList(const std::vector<std::string>& words) { return word_list.GetString(); } -bool ValidateTestPropertyName(const std::string& property_name, - const std::vector<std::string>& reserved_names) { +static bool ValidateTestPropertyName( + const std::string& property_name, + const std::vector<std::string>& reserved_names) { if (std::find(reserved_names.begin(), reserved_names.end(), property_name) != reserved_names.end()) { ADD_FAILURE() << "Reserved key used in RecordProperty(): " << property_name @@ -2436,6 +2466,8 @@ Result HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported( #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS try { return HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported(object, method, location); + } catch (const AssertionException&) { // NOLINT + // This failure was reported already. } catch (const internal::GoogleTestFailureException&) { // NOLINT // This exception type can only be thrown by a failed Google // Test assertion with the intention of letting another testing @@ -2557,7 +2589,6 @@ TestInfo* MakeAndRegisterTestInfo( return test_info; } -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST void ReportInvalidTestCaseType(const char* test_case_name, CodeLocation code_location) { Message errors; @@ -2571,13 +2602,10 @@ void ReportInvalidTestCaseType(const char* test_case_name, << "probably rename one of the classes to put the tests into different\n" << "test cases."; - fprintf(stderr, "%s %s", - FormatFileLocation(code_location.file.c_str(), - code_location.line).c_str(), - errors.GetString().c_str()); + GTEST_LOG_(ERROR) << FormatFileLocation(code_location.file.c_str(), + code_location.line) + << " " << errors.GetString(); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - } // namespace internal namespace { @@ -2615,12 +2643,10 @@ namespace internal { // and INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P into regular tests and registers those. // This will be done just once during the program runtime. void UnitTestImpl::RegisterParameterizedTests() { -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST if (!parameterized_tests_registered_) { parameterized_test_registry_.RegisterTests(); parameterized_tests_registered_ = true; } -#endif } } // namespace internal @@ -2885,10 +2911,10 @@ enum GTestColor { }; #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE && \ - !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT + !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW // Returns the character attribute for the given color. -WORD GetColorAttribute(GTestColor color) { +static WORD GetColorAttribute(GTestColor color) { switch (color) { case COLOR_RED: return FOREGROUND_RED; case COLOR_GREEN: return FOREGROUND_GREEN; @@ -2897,11 +2923,42 @@ WORD GetColorAttribute(GTestColor color) { } } +static int GetBitOffset(WORD color_mask) { + if (color_mask == 0) return 0; + + int bitOffset = 0; + while ((color_mask & 1) == 0) { + color_mask >>= 1; + ++bitOffset; + } + return bitOffset; +} + +static WORD GetNewColor(GTestColor color, WORD old_color_attrs) { + // Let's reuse the BG + static const WORD background_mask = BACKGROUND_BLUE | BACKGROUND_GREEN | + BACKGROUND_RED | BACKGROUND_INTENSITY; + static const WORD foreground_mask = FOREGROUND_BLUE | FOREGROUND_GREEN | + FOREGROUND_RED | FOREGROUND_INTENSITY; + const WORD existing_bg = old_color_attrs & background_mask; + + WORD new_color = + GetColorAttribute(color) | existing_bg | FOREGROUND_INTENSITY; + static const int bg_bitOffset = GetBitOffset(background_mask); + static const int fg_bitOffset = GetBitOffset(foreground_mask); + + if (((new_color & background_mask) >> bg_bitOffset) == + ((new_color & foreground_mask) >> fg_bitOffset)) { + new_color ^= FOREGROUND_INTENSITY; // invert intensity + } + return new_color; +} + #else // Returns the ANSI color code for the given color. COLOR_DEFAULT is // an invalid input. -const char* GetAnsiColorCode(GTestColor color) { +static const char* GetAnsiColorCode(GTestColor color) { switch (color) { case COLOR_RED: return "1"; case COLOR_GREEN: return "2"; @@ -2917,7 +2974,7 @@ bool ShouldUseColor(bool stdout_is_tty) { const char* const gtest_color = GTEST_FLAG(color).c_str(); if (String::CaseInsensitiveCStringEquals(gtest_color, "auto")) { -#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW // On Windows the TERM variable is usually not set, but the // console there does support colors. return stdout_is_tty; @@ -2953,7 +3010,7 @@ bool ShouldUseColor(bool stdout_is_tty) { // cannot simply emit special characters and have the terminal change colors. // This routine must actually emit the characters rather than return a string // that would be colored when printed, as can be done on Linux. -void ColoredPrintf(GTestColor color, const char* fmt, ...) { +static void ColoredPrintf(GTestColor color, const char* fmt, ...) { va_list args; va_start(args, fmt); @@ -2974,20 +3031,21 @@ void ColoredPrintf(GTestColor color, const char* fmt, ...) { } #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE && \ - !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT + !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_PHONE && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_RT && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW const HANDLE stdout_handle = GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE); // Gets the current text color. CONSOLE_SCREEN_BUFFER_INFO buffer_info; GetConsoleScreenBufferInfo(stdout_handle, &buffer_info); const WORD old_color_attrs = buffer_info.wAttributes; + const WORD new_color = GetNewColor(color, old_color_attrs); // We need to flush the stream buffers into the console before each // SetConsoleTextAttribute call lest it affect the text that is already // printed but has not yet reached the console. fflush(stdout); - SetConsoleTextAttribute(stdout_handle, - GetColorAttribute(color) | FOREGROUND_INTENSITY); + SetConsoleTextAttribute(stdout_handle, new_color); + vprintf(fmt, args); fflush(stdout); @@ -3001,12 +3059,12 @@ void ColoredPrintf(GTestColor color, const char* fmt, ...) { va_end(args); } -// Text printed in Google Test's text output and --gunit_list_tests +// Text printed in Google Test's text output and --gtest_list_tests // output to label the type parameter and value parameter for a test. static const char kTypeParamLabel[] = "TypeParam"; static const char kValueParamLabel[] = "GetParam()"; -void PrintFullTestCommentIfPresent(const TestInfo& test_info) { +static void PrintFullTestCommentIfPresent(const TestInfo& test_info) { const char* const type_param = test_info.type_param(); const char* const value_param = test_info.value_param(); @@ -3412,6 +3470,11 @@ class XmlUnitTestResultPrinter : public EmptyTestEventListener { // to delimit this attribute from prior attributes. static std::string TestPropertiesAsXmlAttributes(const TestResult& result); + // Streams an XML representation of the test properties of a TestResult + // object. + static void OutputXmlTestProperties(std::ostream* stream, + const TestResult& result); + // The output file. const std::string output_file_; @@ -3422,9 +3485,7 @@ class XmlUnitTestResultPrinter : public EmptyTestEventListener { XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::XmlUnitTestResultPrinter(const char* output_file) : output_file_(output_file) { if (output_file_.c_str() == NULL || output_file_.empty()) { - fprintf(stderr, "XML output file may not be null\n"); - fflush(stderr); - exit(EXIT_FAILURE); + GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "XML output file may not be null"; } } @@ -3449,11 +3510,8 @@ void XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::OnTestIterationEnd(const UnitTest& unit_test, // 3. To interpret the meaning of errno in a thread-safe way, // we need the strerror_r() function, which is not available on // Windows. - fprintf(stderr, - "Unable to open file \"%s\"\n", - output_file_.c_str()); - fflush(stderr); - exit(EXIT_FAILURE); + + GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "Unable to open file \"" << output_file_ << "\""; } std::stringstream stream; PrintXmlUnitTest(&stream, unit_test); @@ -3628,6 +3686,10 @@ void XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputXmlTestInfo(::std::ostream* stream, const TestResult& result = *test_info.result(); const std::string kTestcase = "testcase"; + if (test_info.is_in_another_shard()) { + return; + } + *stream << " <testcase"; OutputXmlAttribute(stream, kTestcase, "name", test_info.name()); @@ -3644,7 +3706,6 @@ void XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputXmlTestInfo(::std::ostream* stream, OutputXmlAttribute(stream, kTestcase, "time", FormatTimeInMillisAsSeconds(result.elapsed_time())); OutputXmlAttribute(stream, kTestcase, "classname", test_case_name); - *stream << TestPropertiesAsXmlAttributes(result); int failures = 0; for (int i = 0; i < result.total_part_count(); ++i) { @@ -3653,22 +3714,28 @@ void XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputXmlTestInfo(::std::ostream* stream, if (++failures == 1) { *stream << ">\n"; } - const string location = internal::FormatCompilerIndependentFileLocation( - part.file_name(), part.line_number()); - const string summary = location + "\n" + part.summary(); + const std::string location = + internal::FormatCompilerIndependentFileLocation(part.file_name(), + part.line_number()); + const std::string summary = location + "\n" + part.summary(); *stream << " <failure message=\"" << EscapeXmlAttribute(summary.c_str()) << "\" type=\"\">"; - const string detail = location + "\n" + part.message(); + const std::string detail = location + "\n" + part.message(); OutputXmlCDataSection(stream, RemoveInvalidXmlCharacters(detail).c_str()); *stream << "</failure>\n"; } } - if (failures == 0) + if (failures == 0 && result.test_property_count() == 0) { *stream << " />\n"; - else + } else { + if (failures == 0) { + *stream << ">\n"; + } + OutputXmlTestProperties(stream, result); *stream << " </testcase>\n"; + } } // Prints an XML representation of a TestCase object @@ -3723,7 +3790,6 @@ void XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::PrintXmlUnitTest(std::ostream* stream, OutputXmlAttribute(stream, kTestsuites, "random_seed", StreamableToString(unit_test.random_seed())); } - *stream << TestPropertiesAsXmlAttributes(unit_test.ad_hoc_test_result()); OutputXmlAttribute(stream, kTestsuites, "name", "AllTests"); @@ -3749,8 +3815,374 @@ std::string XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::TestPropertiesAsXmlAttributes( return attributes.GetString(); } +void XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputXmlTestProperties( + std::ostream* stream, const TestResult& result) { + const std::string kProperties = "properties"; + const std::string kProperty = "property"; + + if (result.test_property_count() <= 0) { + return; + } + + *stream << "<" << kProperties << ">\n"; + for (int i = 0; i < result.test_property_count(); ++i) { + const TestProperty& property = result.GetTestProperty(i); + *stream << "<" << kProperty; + *stream << " name=\"" << EscapeXmlAttribute(property.key()) << "\""; + *stream << " value=\"" << EscapeXmlAttribute(property.value()) << "\""; + *stream << "/>\n"; + } + *stream << "</" << kProperties << ">\n"; +} + // End XmlUnitTestResultPrinter + +// This class generates an JSON output file. +class JsonUnitTestResultPrinter : public EmptyTestEventListener { + public: + explicit JsonUnitTestResultPrinter(const char* output_file); + + virtual void OnTestIterationEnd(const UnitTest& unit_test, int iteration); + + private: + // Returns an JSON-escaped copy of the input string str. + static std::string EscapeJson(const std::string& str); + + //// Verifies that the given attribute belongs to the given element and + //// streams the attribute as JSON. + static void OutputJsonKey(std::ostream* stream, + const std::string& element_name, + const std::string& name, + const std::string& value, + const std::string& indent, + bool comma = true); + static void OutputJsonKey(std::ostream* stream, + const std::string& element_name, + const std::string& name, + int value, + const std::string& indent, + bool comma = true); + + // Streams a JSON representation of a TestInfo object. + static void OutputJsonTestInfo(::std::ostream* stream, + const char* test_case_name, + const TestInfo& test_info); + + // Prints a JSON representation of a TestCase object + static void PrintJsonTestCase(::std::ostream* stream, + const TestCase& test_case); + + // Prints a JSON summary of unit_test to output stream out. + static void PrintJsonUnitTest(::std::ostream* stream, + const UnitTest& unit_test); + + // Produces a string representing the test properties in a result as + // a JSON dictionary. + static std::string TestPropertiesAsJson(const TestResult& result, + const std::string& indent); + + // The output file. + const std::string output_file_; + + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(JsonUnitTestResultPrinter); +}; + +// Creates a new JsonUnitTestResultPrinter. +JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::JsonUnitTestResultPrinter(const char* output_file) + : output_file_(output_file) { + if (output_file_.empty()) { + GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "JSON output file may not be null"; + } +} + +void JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::OnTestIterationEnd(const UnitTest& unit_test, + int /*iteration*/) { + FILE* jsonout = NULL; + FilePath output_file(output_file_); + FilePath output_dir(output_file.RemoveFileName()); + + if (output_dir.CreateDirectoriesRecursively()) { + jsonout = posix::FOpen(output_file_.c_str(), "w"); + } + if (jsonout == NULL) { + // TODO(phosek): report the reason of the failure. + // + // We don't do it for now as: + // + // 1. There is no urgent need for it. + // 2. It's a bit involved to make the errno variable thread-safe on + // all three operating systems (Linux, Windows, and Mac OS). + // 3. To interpret the meaning of errno in a thread-safe way, + // we need the strerror_r() function, which is not available on + // Windows. + GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "Unable to open file \"" + << output_file_ << "\""; + } + std::stringstream stream; + PrintJsonUnitTest(&stream, unit_test); + fprintf(jsonout, "%s", StringStreamToString(&stream).c_str()); + fclose(jsonout); +} + +// Returns an JSON-escaped copy of the input string str. +std::string JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::EscapeJson(const std::string& str) { + Message m; + + for (size_t i = 0; i < str.size(); ++i) { + const char ch = str[i]; + switch (ch) { + case '\\': + case '"': + case '/': + m << '\\' << ch; + break; + case '\b': + m << "\\b"; + break; + case '\t': + m << "\\t"; + break; + case '\n': + m << "\\n"; + break; + case '\f': + m << "\\f"; + break; + case '\r': + m << "\\r"; + break; + default: + if (ch < ' ') { + m << "\\u00" << String::FormatByte(static_cast<unsigned char>(ch)); + } else { + m << ch; + } + break; + } + } + + return m.GetString(); +} + +// The following routines generate an JSON representation of a UnitTest +// object. + +// Formats the given time in milliseconds as seconds. +static std::string FormatTimeInMillisAsDuration(TimeInMillis ms) { + ::std::stringstream ss; + ss << (static_cast<double>(ms) * 1e-3) << "s"; + return ss.str(); +} + +// Converts the given epoch time in milliseconds to a date string in the +// RFC3339 format, without the timezone information. +static std::string FormatEpochTimeInMillisAsRFC3339(TimeInMillis ms) { + struct tm time_struct; + if (!PortableLocaltime(static_cast<time_t>(ms / 1000), &time_struct)) + return ""; + // YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss + return StreamableToString(time_struct.tm_year + 1900) + "-" + + String::FormatIntWidth2(time_struct.tm_mon + 1) + "-" + + String::FormatIntWidth2(time_struct.tm_mday) + "T" + + String::FormatIntWidth2(time_struct.tm_hour) + ":" + + String::FormatIntWidth2(time_struct.tm_min) + ":" + + String::FormatIntWidth2(time_struct.tm_sec) + "Z"; +} + +static inline std::string Indent(int width) { + return std::string(width, ' '); +} + +void JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputJsonKey( + std::ostream* stream, + const std::string& element_name, + const std::string& name, + const std::string& value, + const std::string& indent, + bool comma) { + const std::vector<std::string>& allowed_names = + GetReservedAttributesForElement(element_name); + + GTEST_CHECK_(std::find(allowed_names.begin(), allowed_names.end(), name) != + allowed_names.end()) + << "Key \"" << name << "\" is not allowed for value \"" << element_name + << "\"."; + + *stream << indent << "\"" << name << "\": \"" << EscapeJson(value) << "\""; + if (comma) + *stream << ",\n"; +} + +void JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputJsonKey( + std::ostream* stream, + const std::string& element_name, + const std::string& name, + int value, + const std::string& indent, + bool comma) { + const std::vector<std::string>& allowed_names = + GetReservedAttributesForElement(element_name); + + GTEST_CHECK_(std::find(allowed_names.begin(), allowed_names.end(), name) != + allowed_names.end()) + << "Key \"" << name << "\" is not allowed for value \"" << element_name + << "\"."; + + *stream << indent << "\"" << name << "\": " << StreamableToString(value); + if (comma) + *stream << ",\n"; +} + +// Prints a JSON representation of a TestInfo object. +void JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::OutputJsonTestInfo(::std::ostream* stream, + const char* test_case_name, + const TestInfo& test_info) { + const TestResult& result = *test_info.result(); + const std::string kTestcase = "testcase"; + const std::string kIndent = Indent(10); + + *stream << Indent(8) << "{\n"; + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestcase, "name", test_info.name(), kIndent); + + if (test_info.value_param() != NULL) { + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestcase, "value_param", + test_info.value_param(), kIndent); + } + if (test_info.type_param() != NULL) { + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestcase, "type_param", test_info.type_param(), + kIndent); + } + + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestcase, "status", + test_info.should_run() ? "RUN" : "NOTRUN", kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestcase, "time", + FormatTimeInMillisAsDuration(result.elapsed_time()), kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestcase, "classname", test_case_name, kIndent, false); + *stream << TestPropertiesAsJson(result, kIndent); + + int failures = 0; + for (int i = 0; i < result.total_part_count(); ++i) { + const TestPartResult& part = result.GetTestPartResult(i); + if (part.failed()) { + *stream << ",\n"; + if (++failures == 1) { + *stream << kIndent << "\"" << "failures" << "\": [\n"; + } + const std::string location = + internal::FormatCompilerIndependentFileLocation(part.file_name(), + part.line_number()); + const std::string message = EscapeJson(location + "\n" + part.message()); + *stream << kIndent << " {\n" + << kIndent << " \"failure\": \"" << message << "\",\n" + << kIndent << " \"type\": \"\"\n" + << kIndent << " }"; + } + } + + if (failures > 0) + *stream << "\n" << kIndent << "]"; + *stream << "\n" << Indent(8) << "}"; +} + +// Prints an JSON representation of a TestCase object +void JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::PrintJsonTestCase(std::ostream* stream, + const TestCase& test_case) { + const std::string kTestsuite = "testsuite"; + const std::string kIndent = Indent(6); + + *stream << Indent(4) << "{\n"; + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuite, "name", test_case.name(), kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuite, "tests", test_case.reportable_test_count(), + kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuite, "failures", test_case.failed_test_count(), + kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuite, "disabled", + test_case.reportable_disabled_test_count(), kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuite, "errors", 0, kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuite, "time", + FormatTimeInMillisAsDuration(test_case.elapsed_time()), kIndent, + false); + *stream << TestPropertiesAsJson(test_case.ad_hoc_test_result(), kIndent) + << ",\n"; + + *stream << kIndent << "\"" << kTestsuite << "\": [\n"; + + bool comma = false; + for (int i = 0; i < test_case.total_test_count(); ++i) { + if (test_case.GetTestInfo(i)->is_reportable()) { + if (comma) { + *stream << ",\n"; + } else { + comma = true; + } + OutputJsonTestInfo(stream, test_case.name(), *test_case.GetTestInfo(i)); + } + } + *stream << "\n" << kIndent << "]\n" << Indent(4) << "}"; +} + +// Prints a JSON summary of unit_test to output stream out. +void JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::PrintJsonUnitTest(std::ostream* stream, + const UnitTest& unit_test) { + const std::string kTestsuites = "testsuites"; + const std::string kIndent = Indent(2); + *stream << "{\n"; + + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "tests", unit_test.reportable_test_count(), + kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "failures", unit_test.failed_test_count(), + kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "disabled", + unit_test.reportable_disabled_test_count(), kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "errors", 0, kIndent); + if (GTEST_FLAG(shuffle)) { + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "random_seed", unit_test.random_seed(), + kIndent); + } + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "timestamp", + FormatEpochTimeInMillisAsRFC3339(unit_test.start_timestamp()), + kIndent); + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "time", + FormatTimeInMillisAsDuration(unit_test.elapsed_time()), kIndent, + false); + + *stream << TestPropertiesAsJson(unit_test.ad_hoc_test_result(), kIndent) + << ",\n"; + + OutputJsonKey(stream, kTestsuites, "name", "AllTests", kIndent); + *stream << kIndent << "\"" << kTestsuites << "\": [\n"; + + bool comma = false; + for (int i = 0; i < unit_test.total_test_case_count(); ++i) { + if (unit_test.GetTestCase(i)->reportable_test_count() > 0) { + if (comma) { + *stream << ",\n"; + } else { + comma = true; + } + PrintJsonTestCase(stream, *unit_test.GetTestCase(i)); + } + } + + *stream << "\n" << kIndent << "]\n" << "}\n"; +} + +// Produces a string representing the test properties in a result as +// a JSON dictionary. +std::string JsonUnitTestResultPrinter::TestPropertiesAsJson( + const TestResult& result, const std::string& indent) { + Message attributes; + for (int i = 0; i < result.test_property_count(); ++i) { + const TestProperty& property = result.GetTestProperty(i); + attributes << ",\n" << indent << "\"" << property.key() << "\": " + << "\"" << EscapeJson(property.value()) << "\""; + } + return attributes.GetString(); +} + +// End JsonUnitTestResultPrinter + #if GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ // Checks if str contains '=', '&', '%' or '\n' characters. If yes, @@ -3758,8 +4190,8 @@ std::string XmlUnitTestResultPrinter::TestPropertiesAsXmlAttributes( // example, replaces "=" with "%3D". This algorithm is O(strlen(str)) // in both time and space -- important as the input str may contain an // arbitrarily long test failure message and stack trace. -string StreamingListener::UrlEncode(const char* str) { - string result; +std::string StreamingListener::UrlEncode(const char* str) { + std::string result; result.reserve(strlen(str) + 1); for (char ch = *str; ch != '\0'; ch = *++str) { switch (ch) { @@ -3821,47 +4253,82 @@ void StreamingListener::SocketWriter::MakeConnection() { // End of class Streaming Listener #endif // GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS__ -// Class ScopedTrace +// class OsStackTraceGetter -// Pushes the given source file location and message onto a per-thread -// trace stack maintained by Google Test. -ScopedTrace::ScopedTrace(const char* file, int line, const Message& message) - GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(&UnitTest::mutex_) { - TraceInfo trace; - trace.file = file; - trace.line = line; - trace.message = message.GetString(); +const char* const OsStackTraceGetterInterface::kElidedFramesMarker = + "... " GTEST_NAME_ " internal frames ..."; - UnitTest::GetInstance()->PushGTestTrace(trace); -} +std::string OsStackTraceGetter::CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) + GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(mutex_) { +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + std::string result; -// Pops the info pushed by the c'tor. -ScopedTrace::~ScopedTrace() - GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(&UnitTest::mutex_) { - UnitTest::GetInstance()->PopGTestTrace(); -} + if (max_depth <= 0) { + return result; + } + max_depth = std::min(max_depth, kMaxStackTraceDepth); -// class OsStackTraceGetter + std::vector<void*> raw_stack(max_depth); + // Skips the frames requested by the caller, plus this function. + const int raw_stack_size = + absl::GetStackTrace(&raw_stack[0], max_depth, skip_count + 1); -const char* const OsStackTraceGetterInterface::kElidedFramesMarker = - "... " GTEST_NAME_ " internal frames ..."; + void* caller_frame = nullptr; + { + MutexLock lock(&mutex_); + caller_frame = caller_frame_; + } + + for (int i = 0; i < raw_stack_size; ++i) { + if (raw_stack[i] == caller_frame && + !GTEST_FLAG(show_internal_stack_frames)) { + // Add a marker to the trace and stop adding frames. + absl::StrAppend(&result, kElidedFramesMarker, "\n"); + break; + } -string OsStackTraceGetter::CurrentStackTrace(int /*max_depth*/, - int /*skip_count*/) { + char tmp[1024]; + const char* symbol = "(unknown)"; + if (absl::Symbolize(raw_stack[i], tmp, sizeof(tmp))) { + symbol = tmp; + } + + char line[1024]; + snprintf(line, sizeof(line), " %p: %s\n", raw_stack[i], symbol); + result += line; + } + + return result; + +#else // !GTEST_HAS_ABSL + static_cast<void>(max_depth); + static_cast<void>(skip_count); return ""; +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } -void OsStackTraceGetter::UponLeavingGTest() {} +void OsStackTraceGetter::UponLeavingGTest() GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(mutex_) { +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + void* caller_frame = nullptr; + if (absl::GetStackTrace(&caller_frame, 1, 3) <= 0) { + caller_frame = nullptr; + } + + MutexLock lock(&mutex_); + caller_frame_ = caller_frame; +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL +} // A helper class that creates the premature-exit file in its // constructor and deletes the file in its destructor. class ScopedPrematureExitFile { public: explicit ScopedPrematureExitFile(const char* premature_exit_filepath) - : premature_exit_filepath_(premature_exit_filepath) { + : premature_exit_filepath_(premature_exit_filepath ? + premature_exit_filepath : "") { // If a path to the premature-exit file is specified... - if (premature_exit_filepath != NULL && *premature_exit_filepath != '\0') { + if (!premature_exit_filepath_.empty()) { // create the file with a single "0" character in it. I/O // errors are ignored as there's nothing better we can do and we // don't want to fail the test because of this. @@ -3872,13 +4339,18 @@ class ScopedPrematureExitFile { } ~ScopedPrematureExitFile() { - if (premature_exit_filepath_ != NULL && *premature_exit_filepath_ != '\0') { - remove(premature_exit_filepath_); + if (!premature_exit_filepath_.empty()) { + int retval = remove(premature_exit_filepath_.c_str()); + if (retval) { + GTEST_LOG_(ERROR) << "Failed to remove premature exit filepath \"" + << premature_exit_filepath_ << "\" with error " + << retval; + } } } private: - const char* const premature_exit_filepath_; + const std::string premature_exit_filepath_; GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(ScopedPrematureExitFile); }; @@ -4148,6 +4620,11 @@ void UnitTest::AddTestPartResult( // when a failure happens and both the --gtest_break_on_failure and // the --gtest_catch_exceptions flags are specified. DebugBreak(); +#elif (!defined(__native_client__)) && \ + ((defined(__clang__) || defined(__GNUC__)) && \ + (defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__))) + // with clang/gcc we can achieve the same effect on x86 by invoking int3 + asm("int3"); #else // Dereference NULL through a volatile pointer to prevent the compiler // from removing. We use this rather than abort() or __builtin_trap() for @@ -4285,7 +4762,6 @@ const TestInfo* UnitTest::current_test_info() const // Returns the random seed used at the start of the current test run. int UnitTest::random_seed() const { return impl_->random_seed(); } -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Returns ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry object used to keep track of // value-parameterized tests and instantiate and register them. internal::ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry& @@ -4293,7 +4769,6 @@ internal::ParameterizedTestCaseRegistry& GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(mutex_) { return impl_->parameterized_test_registry(); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Creates an empty UnitTest. UnitTest::UnitTest() { @@ -4332,10 +4807,8 @@ UnitTestImpl::UnitTestImpl(UnitTest* parent) &default_global_test_part_result_reporter_), per_thread_test_part_result_reporter_( &default_per_thread_test_part_result_reporter_), -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST parameterized_test_registry_(), parameterized_tests_registered_(false), -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST last_death_test_case_(-1), current_test_case_(NULL), current_test_info_(NULL), @@ -4402,10 +4875,12 @@ void UnitTestImpl::ConfigureXmlOutput() { if (output_format == "xml") { listeners()->SetDefaultXmlGenerator(new XmlUnitTestResultPrinter( UnitTestOptions::GetAbsolutePathToOutputFile().c_str())); + } else if (output_format == "json") { + listeners()->SetDefaultXmlGenerator(new JsonUnitTestResultPrinter( + UnitTestOptions::GetAbsolutePathToOutputFile().c_str())); } else if (output_format != "") { - printf("WARNING: unrecognized output format \"%s\" ignored.\n", - output_format.c_str()); - fflush(stdout); + GTEST_LOG_(WARNING) << "WARNING: unrecognized output format \"" + << output_format << "\" ignored."; } } @@ -4420,9 +4895,8 @@ void UnitTestImpl::ConfigureStreamingOutput() { listeners()->Append(new StreamingListener(target.substr(0, pos), target.substr(pos+1))); } else { - printf("WARNING: unrecognized streaming target \"%s\" ignored.\n", - target.c_str()); - fflush(stdout); + GTEST_LOG_(WARNING) << "unrecognized streaming target \"" << target + << "\" ignored."; } } } @@ -4461,6 +4935,13 @@ void UnitTestImpl::PostFlagParsingInit() { // Configures listeners for streaming test results to the specified server. ConfigureStreamingOutput(); #endif // GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ + +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + if (GTEST_FLAG(install_failure_signal_handler)) { + absl::FailureSignalHandlerOptions options; + absl::InstallFailureSignalHandler(options); + } +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL } } @@ -4504,11 +4985,11 @@ TestCase* UnitTestImpl::GetTestCase(const char* test_case_name, Test::SetUpTestCaseFunc set_up_tc, Test::TearDownTestCaseFunc tear_down_tc) { // Can we find a TestCase with the given name? - const std::vector<TestCase*>::const_iterator test_case = - std::find_if(test_cases_.begin(), test_cases_.end(), + const std::vector<TestCase*>::const_reverse_iterator test_case = + std::find_if(test_cases_.rbegin(), test_cases_.rend(), TestCaseNameIs(test_case_name)); - if (test_case != test_cases_.end()) + if (test_case != test_cases_.rend()) return *test_case; // No. Let's create one. @@ -4549,13 +5030,8 @@ static void TearDownEnvironment(Environment* env) { env->TearDown(); } // All other functions called from RunAllTests() may safely assume that // parameterized tests are ready to be counted and run. bool UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() { - // Makes sure InitGoogleTest() was called. - if (!GTestIsInitialized()) { - printf("%s", - "\nThis test program did NOT call ::testing::InitGoogleTest " - "before calling RUN_ALL_TESTS(). Please fix it.\n"); - return false; - } + // True iff Google Test is initialized before RUN_ALL_TESTS() is called. + const bool gtest_is_initialized_before_run_all_tests = GTestIsInitialized(); // Do not run any test if the --help flag was specified. if (g_help_flag) @@ -4683,6 +5159,20 @@ bool UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() { repeater->OnTestProgramEnd(*parent_); + if (!gtest_is_initialized_before_run_all_tests) { + ColoredPrintf( + COLOR_RED, + "\nIMPORTANT NOTICE - DO NOT IGNORE:\n" + "This test program did NOT call " GTEST_INIT_GOOGLE_TEST_NAME_ + "() before calling RUN_ALL_TESTS(). This is INVALID. Soon " GTEST_NAME_ + " will start to enforce the valid usage. " + "Please fix it ASAP, or IT WILL START TO FAIL.\n"); // NOLINT +#if GTEST_FOR_GOOGLE_ + ColoredPrintf(COLOR_RED, + "For more details, see http://wiki/Main/ValidGUnitMain.\n"); +#endif // GTEST_FOR_GOOGLE_ + } + return !failed; } @@ -4784,8 +5274,8 @@ bool ShouldRunTestOnShard(int total_shards, int shard_index, int test_id) { // each TestCase and TestInfo object. // If shard_tests == true, further filters tests based on sharding // variables in the environment - see -// http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/GoogleTestAdvancedGuide. -// Returns the number of tests that should run. +// https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/advanced.md +// . Returns the number of tests that should run. int UnitTestImpl::FilterTests(ReactionToSharding shard_tests) { const Int32 total_shards = shard_tests == HONOR_SHARDING_PROTOCOL ? Int32FromEnvOrDie(kTestTotalShards, -1) : -1; @@ -4824,10 +5314,11 @@ int UnitTestImpl::FilterTests(ReactionToSharding shard_tests) { (GTEST_FLAG(also_run_disabled_tests) || !is_disabled) && matches_filter; - const bool is_selected = is_runnable && - (shard_tests == IGNORE_SHARDING_PROTOCOL || - ShouldRunTestOnShard(total_shards, shard_index, - num_runnable_tests)); + const bool is_in_another_shard = + shard_tests != IGNORE_SHARDING_PROTOCOL && + !ShouldRunTestOnShard(total_shards, shard_index, num_runnable_tests); + test_info->is_in_another_shard_ = is_in_another_shard; + const bool is_selected = is_runnable && !is_in_another_shard; num_runnable_tests += is_runnable; num_selected_tests += is_selected; @@ -4927,11 +5418,15 @@ OsStackTraceGetterInterface* UnitTestImpl::os_stack_trace_getter() { return os_stack_trace_getter_; } -// Returns the TestResult for the test that's currently running, or -// the TestResult for the ad hoc test if no test is running. +// Returns the most specific TestResult currently running. TestResult* UnitTestImpl::current_test_result() { - return current_test_info_ ? - &(current_test_info_->result_) : &ad_hoc_test_result_; + if (current_test_info_ != NULL) { + return ¤t_test_info_->result_; + } + if (current_test_case_ != NULL) { + return ¤t_test_case_->ad_hoc_test_result_; + } + return &ad_hoc_test_result_; } // Shuffles all test cases, and the tests within each test case, @@ -5012,9 +5507,8 @@ bool SkipPrefix(const char* prefix, const char** pstr) { // part can be omitted. // // Returns the value of the flag, or NULL if the parsing failed. -const char* ParseFlagValue(const char* str, - const char* flag, - bool def_optional) { +static const char* ParseFlagValue(const char* str, const char* flag, + bool def_optional) { // str and flag must not be NULL. if (str == NULL || flag == NULL) return NULL; @@ -5050,7 +5544,7 @@ const char* ParseFlagValue(const char* str, // // On success, stores the value of the flag in *value, and returns // true. On failure, returns false without changing *value. -bool ParseBoolFlag(const char* str, const char* flag, bool* value) { +static bool ParseBoolFlag(const char* str, const char* flag, bool* value) { // Gets the value of the flag as a string. const char* const value_str = ParseFlagValue(str, flag, true); @@ -5084,7 +5578,8 @@ bool ParseInt32Flag(const char* str, const char* flag, Int32* value) { // // On success, stores the value of the flag in *value, and returns // true. On failure, returns false without changing *value. -bool ParseStringFlag(const char* str, const char* flag, std::string* value) { +template <typename String> +static bool ParseStringFlag(const char* str, const char* flag, String* value) { // Gets the value of the flag as a string. const char* const value_str = ParseFlagValue(str, flag, false); @@ -5186,24 +5681,25 @@ static const char kColorEncodedHelpMessage[] = " Enable/disable colored output. The default is @Gauto@D.\n" " -@G-" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "print_time=0@D\n" " Don't print the elapsed time of each test.\n" -" @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "output=xml@Y[@G:@YDIRECTORY_PATH@G" +" @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "output=@Y(@Gjson@Y|@Gxml@Y)[@G:@YDIRECTORY_PATH@G" GTEST_PATH_SEP_ "@Y|@G:@YFILE_PATH]@D\n" -" Generate an XML report in the given directory or with the given file\n" -" name. @YFILE_PATH@D defaults to @Gtest_details.xml@D.\n" -#if GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ +" Generate a JSON or XML report in the given directory or with the given\n" +" file name. @YFILE_PATH@D defaults to @Gtest_details.xml@D.\n" +# if GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ " @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "stream_result_to=@YHOST@G:@YPORT@D\n" " Stream test results to the given server.\n" -#endif // GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ +# endif // GTEST_CAN_STREAM_RESULTS_ "\n" "Assertion Behavior:\n" -#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS " @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "death_test_style=@Y(@Gfast@Y|@Gthreadsafe@Y)@D\n" " Set the default death test style.\n" -#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS " @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "break_on_failure@D\n" " Turn assertion failures into debugger break-points.\n" " @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "throw_on_failure@D\n" -" Turn assertion failures into C++ exceptions.\n" +" Turn assertion failures into C++ exceptions for use by an external\n" +" test framework.\n" " @G--" GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_ "catch_exceptions=0@D\n" " Do not report exceptions as test failures. Instead, allow them\n" " to crash the program or throw a pop-up (on Windows).\n" @@ -5220,7 +5716,7 @@ static const char kColorEncodedHelpMessage[] = "(not one in your own code or tests), please report it to\n" "@G<" GTEST_DEV_EMAIL_ ">@D.\n"; -bool ParseGoogleTestFlag(const char* const arg) { +static bool ParseGoogleTestFlag(const char* const arg) { return ParseBoolFlag(arg, kAlsoRunDisabledTestsFlag, >EST_FLAG(also_run_disabled_tests)) || ParseBoolFlag(arg, kBreakOnFailureFlag, @@ -5238,6 +5734,7 @@ bool ParseGoogleTestFlag(const char* const arg) { ParseBoolFlag(arg, kListTestsFlag, >EST_FLAG(list_tests)) || ParseStringFlag(arg, kOutputFlag, >EST_FLAG(output)) || ParseBoolFlag(arg, kPrintTimeFlag, >EST_FLAG(print_time)) || + ParseBoolFlag(arg, kPrintUTF8Flag, >EST_FLAG(print_utf8)) || ParseInt32Flag(arg, kRandomSeedFlag, >EST_FLAG(random_seed)) || ParseInt32Flag(arg, kRepeatFlag, >EST_FLAG(repeat)) || ParseBoolFlag(arg, kShuffleFlag, >EST_FLAG(shuffle)) || @@ -5250,14 +5747,11 @@ bool ParseGoogleTestFlag(const char* const arg) { } #if GTEST_USE_OWN_FLAGFILE_FLAG_ -void LoadFlagsFromFile(const std::string& path) { +static void LoadFlagsFromFile(const std::string& path) { FILE* flagfile = posix::FOpen(path.c_str(), "r"); if (!flagfile) { - fprintf(stderr, - "Unable to open file \"%s\"\n", - GTEST_FLAG(flagfile).c_str()); - fflush(stderr); - exit(EXIT_FAILURE); + GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "Unable to open file \"" << GTEST_FLAG(flagfile) + << "\""; } std::string contents(ReadEntireFile(flagfile)); posix::FClose(flagfile); @@ -5352,6 +5846,10 @@ void InitGoogleTestImpl(int* argc, CharType** argv) { g_argvs.push_back(StreamableToString(argv[i])); } +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + absl::InitializeSymbolizer(g_argvs[0].c_str()); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + ParseGoogleTestFlagsOnly(argc, argv); GetUnitTestImpl()->PostFlagParsingInit(); } @@ -5385,4 +5883,45 @@ void InitGoogleTest(int* argc, wchar_t** argv) { #endif // defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_INIT_GOOGLE_TEST_FUNCTION_) } +std::string TempDir() { +#if defined(GTEST_CUSTOM_TEMPDIR_FUNCTION_) + return GTEST_CUSTOM_TEMPDIR_FUNCTION_(); +#endif + +#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE + return "\\temp\\"; +#elif GTEST_OS_WINDOWS + const char* temp_dir = internal::posix::GetEnv("TEMP"); + if (temp_dir == NULL || temp_dir[0] == '\0') + return "\\temp\\"; + else if (temp_dir[strlen(temp_dir) - 1] == '\\') + return temp_dir; + else + return std::string(temp_dir) + "\\"; +#elif GTEST_OS_LINUX_ANDROID + return "/sdcard/"; +#else + return "/tmp/"; +#endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE +} + +// Class ScopedTrace + +// Pushes the given source file location and message onto a per-thread +// trace stack maintained by Google Test. +void ScopedTrace::PushTrace(const char* file, int line, std::string message) { + internal::TraceInfo trace; + trace.file = file; + trace.line = line; + trace.message.swap(message); + + UnitTest::GetInstance()->PushGTestTrace(trace); +} + +// Pops the info pushed by the c'tor. +ScopedTrace::~ScopedTrace() + GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(&UnitTest::mutex_) { + UnitTest::GetInstance()->PopGTestTrace(); +} + } // namespace testing diff --git a/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc b/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc index f302822..f039d00 100644 --- a/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc +++ b/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc @@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// #include <stdio.h> - #include "gtest/gtest.h" GTEST_API_ int main(int argc, char **argv) { - printf("Running main() from gtest_main.cc\n"); + printf("Running main() from %s\n", __FILE__); testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); } diff --git a/googletest/test/BUILD.bazel b/googletest/test/BUILD.bazel new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a930d65 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/BUILD.bazel @@ -0,0 +1,527 @@ +# Copyright 2017 Google Inc. +# All Rights Reserved. +# +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +# +# Author: misterg@google.com (Gennadiy Civil) +# +# Bazel BUILD for The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) + +licenses(["notice"]) + +config_setting( + name = "windows", + values = {"cpu": "x64_windows"}, +) + +config_setting( + name = "windows_msvc", + values = {"cpu": "x64_windows_msvc"}, +) + +config_setting( + name = "has_absl", + values = {"define": "absl=1"}, +) + +#on windows exclude gtest-tuple.h and googletest-tuple-test.cc +cc_test( + name = "gtest_all_test", + size = "small", + srcs = glob( + include = [ + "gtest-*.cc", + "googletest-*.cc", + "*.h", + "googletest/include/gtest/**/*.h", + ], + exclude = [ + "gtest-unittest-api_test.cc", + "googletest-tuple-test.cc", + "googletest/src/gtest-all.cc", + "gtest_all_test.cc", + "gtest-death-test_ex_test.cc", + "gtest-listener_test.cc", + "gtest-unittest-api_test.cc", + "googletest-param-test-test.cc", + "googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc", + "googletest-color-test_.cc", + "googletest-env-var-test_.cc", + "googletest-filter-unittest_.cc", + "googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_.cc", + "googletest-listener-test.cc", + "googletest-output-test_.cc", + "googletest-list-tests-unittest_.cc", + "googletest-shuffle-test_.cc", + "googletest-uninitialized-test_.cc", + "googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc", + "googletest-param-test-test", + "googletest-throw-on-failure-test_.cc", + "googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_.cc", + "googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_.cc", + + ], + ) + select({ + "//:windows": [], + "//:windows_msvc": [], + "//conditions:default": [ + "googletest-tuple-test.cc", + ], + }), + copts = select({ + "//:windows": ["-DGTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE=0"], + "//:windows_msvc": ["-DGTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE=0"], + "//conditions:default": ["-DGTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE=1"], + }), + includes = [ + "googletest", + "googletest/include", + "googletest/include/internal", + "googletest/test", + ], + linkopts = select({ + "//:windows": [], + "//:windows_msvc": [], + "//conditions:default": [ + "-pthread", + ], + }), + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + + +# Tests death tests. +cc_test( + name = "googletest-death-test-test", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["googletest-death-test-test.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gtest_test_macro_stack_footprint_test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gtest_test_macro_stack_footprint_test.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +#These googletest tests have their own main() +cc_test( + name = "googletest-listener-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-listener-test.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gtest-unittest-api_test", + size = "small", + srcs = [ + "gtest-unittest-api_test.cc", + ], + deps = [ + "//:gtest", + ], +) + +cc_test( + name = "googletest-param-test-test", + size = "small", + srcs = [ + "googletest-param-test-test.cc", + "googletest-param-test-test.h", + "googletest-param-test2-test.cc", + ], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gtest_unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gtest_unittest.cc"], + args = ["--heap_check=strict"], + shard_count = 2, + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +# Py tests + +py_library( + name = "gtest_test_utils", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gtest_test_utils.py"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gtest_help_test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gtest_help_test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +py_test( + name = "gtest_help_test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gtest_help_test.py"], + data = [":gtest_help_test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-output-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-output-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + + +py_test( + name = "googletest-output-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-output-test.py"], + args = select({ + ":has_absl": [], + "//conditions:default": ["--no_stacktrace_support"], + }), + data = [ + "googletest-output-test-golden-lin.txt", + ":googletest-output-test_", + ], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-color-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-color-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-color-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-color-test.py"], + data = [":googletest-color-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-env-var-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-env-var-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-env-var-test", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["googletest-env-var-test.py"], + data = [":googletest-env-var-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-filter-unittest_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-filter-unittest_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-filter-unittest", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["googletest-filter-unittest.py"], + data = [":googletest-filter-unittest_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + + + +py_test( + name = "googletest-break-on-failure-unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-break-on-failure-unittest.py"], + data = [":googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + + +cc_test( + name = "gtest_assert_by_exception_test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gtest_assert_by_exception_test.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + + + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-throw-on-failure-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-throw-on-failure-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-throw-on-failure-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-throw-on-failure-test.py"], + data = [":googletest-throw-on-failure-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-list-tests-unittest_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-list-tests-unittest_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-list-tests-unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-list-tests-unittest.py"], + data = [":googletest-list-tests-unittest_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-shuffle-test_", + srcs = ["googletest-shuffle-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-shuffle-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-shuffle-test.py"], + data = [":googletest-shuffle-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-catch-exceptions-no-ex-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-catch-exceptions-ex-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc"], + copts = ["-fexceptions"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-catch-exceptions-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-catch-exceptions-test.py"], + data = [ + ":googletest-catch-exceptions-ex-test_", + ":googletest-catch-exceptions-no-ex-test_", + ], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gtest_xml_output_unittest_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +cc_test( + name = "gtest_no_test_unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gtest_no_test_unittest.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "gtest_xml_output_unittest", + size = "small", + srcs = [ + "gtest_xml_output_unittest.py", + "gtest_xml_test_utils.py", + ], + args = select({ + ":has_absl": [], + "//conditions:default": ["--no_stacktrace_support"], + }), + data = [ + # We invoke gtest_no_test_unittest to verify the XML output + # when the test program contains no test definition. + ":gtest_no_test_unittest", + ":gtest_xml_output_unittest_", + ], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gtest_xml_outfile1_test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gtest_xml_outfile1_test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gtest_xml_outfile2_test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gtest_xml_outfile2_test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +py_test( + name = "gtest_xml_outfiles_test", + size = "small", + srcs = [ + "gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py", + "gtest_xml_test_utils.py", + ], + data = [ + ":gtest_xml_outfile1_test_", + ":gtest_xml_outfile2_test_", + ], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-uninitialized-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-uninitialized-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-uninitialized-test", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["googletest-uninitialized-test.py"], + data = ["googletest-uninitialized-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "gtest_testbridge_test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["gtest_testbridge_test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest_main"], +) + +# Tests that filtering via testbridge works +py_test( + name = "gtest_testbridge_test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["gtest_testbridge_test.py"], + data = [":gtest_testbridge_test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + + +py_test( + name = "googletest-json-outfiles-test", + size = "small", + srcs = [ + "googletest-json-outfiles-test.py", + "gtest_json_test_utils.py", + ], + data = [ + ":gtest_xml_outfile1_test_", + ":gtest_xml_outfile2_test_", + ], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-json-output-unittest", + size = "medium", + srcs = [ + "googletest-json-output-unittest.py", + "gtest_json_test_utils.py", + ], + data = [ + # We invoke gtest_no_test_unittest to verify the JSON output + # when the test program contains no test definition. + ":gtest_no_test_unittest", + ":gtest_xml_output_unittest_", + ], + args = select({ + ":has_absl": [], + "//conditions:default": ["--no_stacktrace_support"], + }), + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) +# Verifies interaction of death tests and exceptions. +cc_test( + name = "googletest-death-test_ex_catch_test", + size = "medium", + srcs = ["googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc"], + copts = ["-fexceptions"], + defines = ["GTEST_ENABLE_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS_=1"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +cc_binary( + name = "googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_", + testonly = 1, + srcs = ["googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_.cc"], + deps = ["//:gtest"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test.py"], + data = [":googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) + +py_test( + name = "googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test", + size = "small", + srcs = ["googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test.py"], + data = [":googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_"], + deps = [":gtest_test_utils"], +) diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_break_on_failure_unittest.py b/googletest/test/googletest-break-on-failure-unittest.py index 78f3e0f..cd77547 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_break_on_failure_unittest.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-break-on-failure-unittest.py @@ -34,16 +34,14 @@ A user can ask Google Test to seg-fault when an assertion fails, using either the GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE environment variable or the --gtest_break_on_failure flag. This script tests such functionality -by invoking gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_ (a program written with +by invoking googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_ (a program written with Google Test) with different environments and command line flags. """ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' -import gtest_test_utils import os -import sys - +import gtest_test_utils # Constants. @@ -61,9 +59,9 @@ THROW_ON_FAILURE_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_THROW_ON_FAILURE' # The environment variable for enabling/disabling the catch-exceptions mode. CATCH_EXCEPTIONS_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS' -# Path to the gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_ program. +# Path to the googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_ program. EXE_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath( - 'gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_') + 'googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_') environ = gtest_test_utils.environ @@ -97,7 +95,7 @@ class GTestBreakOnFailureUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): """ def RunAndVerify(self, env_var_value, flag_value, expect_seg_fault): - """Runs gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_ and verifies that it does + """Runs googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_ and verifies that it does (or does not) have a seg-fault. Args: diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_.cc index dd07478..1231ec2 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_break_on_failure_unittest_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-break-on-failure-unittest_.cc @@ -80,8 +80,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) { SetUnhandledExceptionFilter(ExitWithExceptionCode); # endif -#endif - +#endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test.py index e6fc22f..69dbadf 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test.py @@ -30,15 +30,13 @@ """Tests Google Test's exception catching behavior. -This script invokes gtest_catch_exceptions_test_ and -gtest_catch_exceptions_ex_test_ (programs written with +This script invokes googletest-catch-exceptions-test_ and +googletest-catch-exceptions-ex-test_ (programs written with Google Test) and verifies their output. """ __author__ = 'vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev)' -import os - import gtest_test_utils # Constants. @@ -47,15 +45,15 @@ LIST_TESTS_FLAG = FLAG_PREFIX + 'list_tests' NO_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS_FLAG = FLAG_PREFIX + 'catch_exceptions=0' FILTER_FLAG = FLAG_PREFIX + 'filter' -# Path to the gtest_catch_exceptions_ex_test_ binary, compiled with +# Path to the googletest-catch-exceptions-ex-test_ binary, compiled with # exceptions enabled. EX_EXE_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath( - 'gtest_catch_exceptions_ex_test_') + 'googletest-catch-exceptions-ex-test_') -# Path to the gtest_catch_exceptions_test_ binary, compiled with +# Path to the googletest-catch-exceptions-test_ binary, compiled with # exceptions disabled. EXE_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath( - 'gtest_catch_exceptions_no_ex_test_') + 'googletest-catch-exceptions-no-ex-test_') environ = gtest_test_utils.environ SetEnvVar = gtest_test_utils.SetEnvVar diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc index d0fc82c..6aac625 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_catch_exceptions_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-catch-exceptions-test_.cc @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ // Author: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) // // Tests for Google Test itself. Tests in this file throw C++ or SEH -// exceptions, and the output is verified by gtest_catch_exceptions_test.py. +// exceptions, and the output is verified by +// googletest-catch-exceptions-test.py. #include "gtest/gtest.h" @@ -138,7 +139,7 @@ TEST_F(CxxExceptionInConstructorTest, ThrowsExceptionInConstructor) { } // Exceptions in destructors are not supported in C++11. -#if !defined(__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) && __cplusplus < 201103L +#if !GTEST_LANG_CXX11 class CxxExceptionInDestructorTest : public Test { public: static void TearDownTestCase() { diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_color_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-color-test.py index d02a53e..875d478 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_color_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-color-test.py @@ -36,12 +36,11 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' import os import gtest_test_utils - -IS_WINDOWS = os.name = 'nt' +IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt' COLOR_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_COLOR' COLOR_FLAG = 'gtest_color' -COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_color_test_') +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-color-test_') def SetEnvVar(env_var, value): @@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ def SetEnvVar(env_var, value): def UsesColor(term, color_env_var, color_flag): - """Runs gtest_color_test_ and returns its exit code.""" + """Runs googletest-color-test_ and returns its exit code.""" SetEnvVar('TERM', term) SetEnvVar(COLOR_ENV_VAR, color_env_var) diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_color_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-color-test_.cc index f61ebb8..f9a21e2 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_color_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-color-test_.cc @@ -36,15 +36,7 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ using testing::internal::ShouldUseColor; diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-death-test_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-death-test-test.cc index bb4a3d1..9d8f13c 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-death-test_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-death-test-test.cc @@ -56,15 +56,7 @@ using testing::internal::AlwaysTrue; # endif // GTEST_OS_LINUX # include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -# define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 # include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -# undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; @@ -208,7 +200,7 @@ int DieInDebugElse12(int* sideeffect) { return 12; } -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA // Tests the ExitedWithCode predicate. TEST(ExitStatusPredicateTest, ExitedWithCode) { @@ -280,7 +272,7 @@ TEST(ExitStatusPredicateTest, KilledBySignal) { EXPECT_FALSE(pred_kill(status_segv)); } -# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA // Tests that the death test macros expand to code which may or may not // be followed by operator<<, and that in either case the complete text @@ -313,14 +305,14 @@ void DieWithEmbeddedNul() { } # if GTEST_USES_PCRE + // Tests that EXPECT_DEATH and ASSERT_DEATH work when the error // message has a NUL character in it. TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, EmbeddedNulInMessage) { - // TODO(wan@google.com): <regex.h> doesn't support matching strings - // with embedded NUL characters - find a way to workaround it. EXPECT_DEATH(DieWithEmbeddedNul(), "my null world"); ASSERT_DEATH(DieWithEmbeddedNul(), "my null world"); } + # endif // GTEST_USES_PCRE // Tests that death test macros expand to code which interacts well with switch @@ -505,7 +497,7 @@ TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, AcceptsAnythingConvertibleToRE) { # if GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING - const string regex_str(regex_c_str); + const ::string regex_str(regex_c_str); EXPECT_DEATH(GlobalFunction(), regex_str); # endif // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_STRING @@ -625,7 +617,11 @@ TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, ReturnIsFailure) { TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, TestExpectDebugDeath) { int sideeffect = 0; - EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH(DieInDebugElse12(&sideeffect), "death.*DieInDebugElse12") + // Put the regex in a local variable to make sure we don't get an "unused" + // warning in opt mode. + const char* regex = "death.*DieInDebugElse12"; + + EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH(DieInDebugElse12(&sideeffect), regex) << "Must accept a streamed message"; # ifdef NDEBUG @@ -788,11 +784,12 @@ static void TestExitMacros() { // Of all signals effects on the process exit code, only those of SIGABRT // are documented on Windows. - // See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dwwzkt4c(VS.71).aspx. + // See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/query-bi/m/dwwzkt4c. EXPECT_EXIT(raise(SIGABRT), testing::ExitedWithCode(3), "") << "b_ar"; -# else +# elif !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + // Fuchsia has no unix signals. EXPECT_EXIT(raise(SIGKILL), testing::KilledBySignal(SIGKILL), "") << "foo"; ASSERT_EXIT(raise(SIGUSR2), testing::KilledBySignal(SIGUSR2), "") << "bar"; diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-death-test_ex_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc index b50a13d..3391074 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-death-test_ex_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ TEST(CxxExceptionDeathTest, PrintsMessageForStdExceptions) { "exceptional message"); // Verifies that the location is mentioned in the failure text. EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_DEATH(throw TestException(), ""), - "gtest-death-test_ex_test.cc"); + "googletest-death-test_ex_test.cc"); } # endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_env_var_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-env-var-test.py index 424075c..9c80e2a 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_env_var_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-env-var-test.py @@ -40,15 +40,15 @@ import gtest_test_utils IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt' IS_LINUX = os.name == 'posix' and os.uname()[0] == 'Linux' -COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_env_var_test_') +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-env-var-test_') environ = os.environ.copy() def AssertEq(expected, actual): if expected != actual: - print('Expected: %s' % (expected,)) - print(' Actual: %s' % (actual,)) + print 'Expected: %s' % (expected,) + print ' Actual: %s' % (actual,) raise AssertionError @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ def SetEnvVar(env_var, value): def GetFlag(flag): - """Runs gtest_env_var_test_ and returns its output.""" + """Runs googletest-env-var-test_ and returns its output.""" args = [COMMAND] if flag is not None: @@ -81,13 +81,14 @@ def TestFlag(flag, test_val, default_val): class GTestEnvVarTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): + def testEnvVarAffectsFlag(self): """Tests that environment variable should affect the corresponding flag.""" TestFlag('break_on_failure', '1', '0') TestFlag('color', 'yes', 'auto') TestFlag('filter', 'FooTest.Bar', '*') - SetEnvVar('XML_OUTPUT_FILE', None) # For 'output' test + SetEnvVar('XML_OUTPUT_FILE', None) # For 'output' test TestFlag('output', 'xml:tmp/foo.xml', '') TestFlag('print_time', '0', '1') TestFlag('repeat', '999', '1') @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ class GTestEnvVarTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): TestFlag('death_test_use_fork', '1', '0') TestFlag('stack_trace_depth', '0', '100') + def testXmlOutputFile(self): """Tests that $XML_OUTPUT_FILE affects the output flag.""" @@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ class GTestEnvVarTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): AssertEq('xml:tmp/bar.xml', GetFlag('output')) def testXmlOutputFileOverride(self): - """Tests that $XML_OUTPUT_FILE is overridden by $GTEST_OUTPUT""" + """Tests that $XML_OUTPUT_FILE is overridden by $GTEST_OUTPUT.""" SetEnvVar('GTEST_OUTPUT', 'xml:tmp/foo.xml') SetEnvVar('XML_OUTPUT_FILE', 'tmp/bar.xml') diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_env_var_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-env-var-test_.cc index 539afc9..74b9506 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_env_var_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-env-var-test_.cc @@ -36,9 +36,7 @@ #include <iostream> -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ using ::std::cout; @@ -117,7 +115,7 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv) { testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); if (argc != 2) { - cout << "Usage: gtest_env_var_test_ NAME_OF_FLAG\n"; + cout << "Usage: googletest-env-var-test_ NAME_OF_FLAG\n"; return 1; } diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-filepath_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-filepath-test.cc index da72986..29cea3d 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-filepath_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-filepath-test.cc @@ -27,28 +27,18 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Authors: keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray) // // Google Test filepath utilities // // This file tests classes and functions used internally by // Google Test. They are subject to change without notice. // -// This file is #included from gtest_unittest.cc, to avoid changing -// build or make-files for some existing Google Test clients. Do not -// #include this file anywhere else! +// This file is #included from gtest-internal.h. +// Do not #include this file anywhere else! #include "gtest/internal/gtest-filepath.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE # include <windows.h> // NOLINT diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_filter_unittest.py b/googletest/test/googletest-filter-unittest.py index ec0b151..1e554d5 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_filter_unittest.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-filter-unittest.py @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ A user can specify which test(s) in a Google Test program to run via either the GTEST_FILTER environment variable or the --gtest_filter flag. This script tests such functionality by invoking -gtest_filter_unittest_ (a program written with Google Test) with different +googletest-filter-unittest_ (a program written with Google Test) with different environments and command line flags. Note that test sharding may also influence which tests are filtered. Therefore, @@ -44,12 +44,8 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' import os import re -try: - from sets import Set as set # For Python 2.3 compatibility -except ImportError: - pass +import sets import sys - import gtest_test_utils # Constants. @@ -59,10 +55,12 @@ import gtest_test_utils # script in a subprocess to print whether the variable is STILL in # os.environ. We then use 'eval' to parse the child's output so that an # exception is thrown if the input is anything other than 'True' nor 'False'. -os.environ['EMPTY_VAR'] = '' -child = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( - [sys.executable, '-c', 'import os; print(\'EMPTY_VAR\' in os.environ)']) -CAN_PASS_EMPTY_ENV = eval(child.output) +CAN_PASS_EMPTY_ENV = False +if sys.executable: + os.environ['EMPTY_VAR'] = '' + child = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( + [sys.executable, '-c', 'import os; print \'EMPTY_VAR\' in os.environ']) + CAN_PASS_EMPTY_ENV = eval(child.output) # Check if this platform can unset environment variables in child processes. @@ -71,11 +69,14 @@ CAN_PASS_EMPTY_ENV = eval(child.output) # is NO LONGER in os.environ. # We use 'eval' to parse the child's output so that an exception # is thrown if the input is neither 'True' nor 'False'. -os.environ['UNSET_VAR'] = 'X' -del os.environ['UNSET_VAR'] -child = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( - [sys.executable, '-c', 'import os; print(\'UNSET_VAR\' not in os.environ)']) -CAN_UNSET_ENV = eval(child.output) +CAN_UNSET_ENV = False +if sys.executable: + os.environ['UNSET_VAR'] = 'X' + del os.environ['UNSET_VAR'] + child = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( + [sys.executable, '-c', 'import os; print \'UNSET_VAR\' not in os.environ' + ]) + CAN_UNSET_ENV = eval(child.output) # Checks if we should test with an empty filter. This doesn't @@ -97,10 +98,10 @@ SHARD_STATUS_FILE_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_SHARD_STATUS_FILE' FILTER_FLAG = 'gtest_filter' # The command line flag for including disabled tests. -ALSO_RUN_DISABED_TESTS_FLAG = 'gtest_also_run_disabled_tests' +ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS_FLAG = 'gtest_also_run_disabled_tests' -# Command to run the gtest_filter_unittest_ program. -COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_filter_unittest_') +# Command to run the googletest-filter-unittest_ program. +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-filter-unittest_') # Regex for determining whether parameterized tests are enabled in the binary. PARAM_TEST_REGEX = re.compile(r'/ParamTest') @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ LIST_TESTS_FLAG = '--gtest_list_tests' SUPPORTS_DEATH_TESTS = 'HasDeathTest' in gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( [COMMAND, LIST_TESTS_FLAG]).output -# Full names of all tests in gtest_filter_unittests_. +# Full names of all tests in googletest-filter-unittests_. PARAM_TESTS = [ 'SeqP/ParamTest.TestX/0', 'SeqP/ParamTest.TestX/1', @@ -246,14 +247,14 @@ class GTestFilterUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): for slice_var in list_of_sets: full_partition.extend(slice_var) self.assertEqual(len(set_var), len(full_partition)) - self.assertEqual(set(set_var), set(full_partition)) + self.assertEqual(sets.Set(set_var), sets.Set(full_partition)) def AdjustForParameterizedTests(self, tests_to_run): """Adjust tests_to_run in case value parameterized tests are disabled.""" global param_tests_present if not param_tests_present: - return list(set(tests_to_run) - set(PARAM_TESTS)) + return list(sets.Set(tests_to_run) - sets.Set(PARAM_TESTS)) else: return tests_to_run @@ -291,9 +292,10 @@ class GTestFilterUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): args=None, check_exit_0=False): """Checks that binary runs correct tests for the given filter and shard. - Runs all shards of gtest_filter_unittest_ with the given filter, and + Runs all shards of googletest-filter-unittest_ with the given filter, and verifies that the right set of tests were run. The union of tests run on each shard should be identical to tests_to_run, without duplicates. + If check_exit_0, . Args: gtest_filter: A filter to apply to the tests. @@ -328,7 +330,7 @@ class GTestFilterUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): def RunAndVerifyAllowingDisabled(self, gtest_filter, tests_to_run): """Checks that the binary runs correct set of tests for the given filter. - Runs gtest_filter_unittest_ with the given filter, and enables + Runs googletest-filter-unittest_ with the given filter, and enables disabled tests. Verifies that the right set of tests were run. Args: @@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ class GTestFilterUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): tests_to_run = self.AdjustForParameterizedTests(tests_to_run) # Construct the command line. - args = ['--%s' % ALSO_RUN_DISABED_TESTS_FLAG] + args = ['--%s' % ALSO_RUN_DISABLED_TESTS_FLAG] if gtest_filter is not None: args.append('--%s=%s' % (FILTER_FLAG, gtest_filter)) diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_filter_unittest_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-filter-unittest_.cc index 77deffc..e74a7a3 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_filter_unittest_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-filter-unittest_.cc @@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ TEST(DISABLED_FoobarbazTest, TestA) { FAIL() << "Expected failure."; } -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST class ParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> { }; @@ -129,7 +128,6 @@ TEST_P(ParamTest, TestY) { INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(SeqP, ParamTest, testing::Values(1, 2)); INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(SeqQ, ParamTest, testing::Values(5, 6)); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST } // namespace diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-json-outfiles-test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-json-outfiles-test.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..46010d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-json-outfiles-test.py @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# Copyright 2018, Google Inc. +# All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +"""Unit test for the gtest_json_output module.""" + +import json +import os +import gtest_json_test_utils +import gtest_test_utils + +GTEST_OUTPUT_SUBDIR = 'json_outfiles' +GTEST_OUTPUT_1_TEST = 'gtest_xml_outfile1_test_' +GTEST_OUTPUT_2_TEST = 'gtest_xml_outfile2_test_' + +EXPECTED_1 = { + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'timestamp': u'*', + u'name': u'AllTests', + u'testsuites': [{ + u'name': u'PropertyOne', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [{ + u'name': u'TestSomeProperties', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'PropertyOne', + u'SetUpProp': u'1', + u'TestSomeProperty': u'1', + u'TearDownProp': u'1', + }], + }], +} + +EXPECTED_2 = { + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'timestamp': u'*', + u'name': u'AllTests', + u'testsuites': [{ + u'name': u'PropertyTwo', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [{ + u'name': u'TestSomeProperties', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'PropertyTwo', + u'SetUpProp': u'2', + u'TestSomeProperty': u'2', + u'TearDownProp': u'2', + }], + }], +} + + +class GTestJsonOutFilesTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): + """Unit test for Google Test's JSON output functionality.""" + + def setUp(self): + # We want the trailing '/' that the last "" provides in os.path.join, for + # telling Google Test to create an output directory instead of a single file + # for xml output. + self.output_dir_ = os.path.join(gtest_test_utils.GetTempDir(), + GTEST_OUTPUT_SUBDIR, '') + self.DeleteFilesAndDir() + + def tearDown(self): + self.DeleteFilesAndDir() + + def DeleteFilesAndDir(self): + try: + os.remove(os.path.join(self.output_dir_, GTEST_OUTPUT_1_TEST + '.json')) + except os.error: + pass + try: + os.remove(os.path.join(self.output_dir_, GTEST_OUTPUT_2_TEST + '.json')) + except os.error: + pass + try: + os.rmdir(self.output_dir_) + except os.error: + pass + + def testOutfile1(self): + self._TestOutFile(GTEST_OUTPUT_1_TEST, EXPECTED_1) + + def testOutfile2(self): + self._TestOutFile(GTEST_OUTPUT_2_TEST, EXPECTED_2) + + def _TestOutFile(self, test_name, expected): + gtest_prog_path = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath(test_name) + command = [gtest_prog_path, '--gtest_output=json:%s' % self.output_dir_] + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command, + working_dir=gtest_test_utils.GetTempDir()) + self.assert_(p.exited) + self.assertEquals(0, p.exit_code) + + # TODO(wan@google.com): libtool causes the built test binary to be + # named lt-gtest_xml_outfiles_test_ instead of + # gtest_xml_outfiles_test_. To account for this possibility, we + # allow both names in the following code. We should remove this + # hack when Chandler Carruth's libtool replacement tool is ready. + output_file_name1 = test_name + '.json' + output_file1 = os.path.join(self.output_dir_, output_file_name1) + output_file_name2 = 'lt-' + output_file_name1 + output_file2 = os.path.join(self.output_dir_, output_file_name2) + self.assert_(os.path.isfile(output_file1) or os.path.isfile(output_file2), + output_file1) + + if os.path.isfile(output_file1): + with open(output_file1) as f: + actual = json.load(f) + else: + with open(output_file2) as f: + actual = json.load(f) + self.assertEqual(expected, gtest_json_test_utils.normalize(actual)) + + +if __name__ == '__main__': + os.environ['GTEST_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH'] = '0' + gtest_test_utils.Main() diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-json-output-unittest.py b/googletest/test/googletest-json-output-unittest.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..57dcd5f --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-json-output-unittest.py @@ -0,0 +1,618 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# Copyright 2018, Google Inc. +# All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +"""Unit test for the gtest_json_output module.""" + +import datetime +import errno +import json +import os +import re +import sys + +import gtest_json_test_utils +import gtest_test_utils + +GTEST_FILTER_FLAG = '--gtest_filter' +GTEST_LIST_TESTS_FLAG = '--gtest_list_tests' +GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG = '--gtest_output' +GTEST_DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE = 'test_detail.json' +GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME = 'gtest_xml_output_unittest_' + +# The flag indicating stacktraces are not supported +NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG = '--no_stacktrace_support' + +SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES = NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG not in sys.argv + +if SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES: + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE = '\nStack trace:\n*' +else: + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE = '' + +EXPECTED_NON_EMPTY = { + u'tests': 23, + u'failures': 4, + u'disabled': 2, + u'errors': 0, + u'timestamp': u'*', + u'time': u'*', + u'ad_hoc_property': u'42', + u'name': u'AllTests', + u'testsuites': [ + { + u'name': u'SuccessfulTest', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'Succeeds', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'SuccessfulTest' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'FailedTest', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 1, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'Fails', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'FailedTest', + u'failures': [ + { + u'failure': + u'gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*\n' + u'Expected equality of these values:\n' + u' 1\n 2' + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE, + u'type': u'' + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'DisabledTest', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 1, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'DISABLED_test_not_run', + u'status': u'NOTRUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'DisabledTest' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'MixedResultTest', + u'tests': 3, + u'failures': 1, + u'disabled': 1, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'Succeeds', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'MixedResultTest' + }, + { + u'name': u'Fails', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'MixedResultTest', + u'failures': [ + { + u'failure': + u'gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*\n' + u'Expected equality of these values:\n' + u' 1\n 2' + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE, + u'type': u'' + }, + { + u'failure': + u'gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*\n' + u'Expected equality of these values:\n' + u' 2\n 3' + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE, + u'type': u'' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'DISABLED_test', + u'status': u'NOTRUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'MixedResultTest' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'XmlQuotingTest', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 1, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'OutputsCData', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'XmlQuotingTest', + u'failures': [ + { + u'failure': + u'gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*\n' + u'Failed\nXML output: <?xml encoding="utf-8">' + u'<top><![CDATA[cdata text]]></top>' + + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE, + u'type': u'' + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'InvalidCharactersTest', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 1, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'InvalidCharactersInMessage', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'InvalidCharactersTest', + u'failures': [ + { + u'failure': + u'gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*\n' + u'Failed\nInvalid characters in brackets' + u' [\x01\x02]' + STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE, + u'type': u'' + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'PropertyRecordingTest', + u'tests': 4, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'SetUpTestCase': u'yes', + u'TearDownTestCase': u'aye', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'OneProperty', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'PropertyRecordingTest', + u'key_1': u'1' + }, + { + u'name': u'IntValuedProperty', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'PropertyRecordingTest', + u'key_int': u'1' + }, + { + u'name': u'ThreeProperties', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'PropertyRecordingTest', + u'key_1': u'1', + u'key_2': u'2', + u'key_3': u'3' + }, + { + u'name': u'TwoValuesForOneKeyUsesLastValue', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'PropertyRecordingTest', + u'key_1': u'2' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'NoFixtureTest', + u'tests': 3, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'RecordProperty', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'NoFixtureTest', + u'key': u'1' + }, + { + u'name': u'ExternalUtilityThatCallsRecordIntValuedProperty', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'NoFixtureTest', + u'key_for_utility_int': u'1' + }, + { + u'name': + u'ExternalUtilityThatCallsRecordStringValuedProperty', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'NoFixtureTest', + u'key_for_utility_string': u'1' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'TypedTest/0', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'HasTypeParamAttribute', + u'type_param': u'int', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'TypedTest/0' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'TypedTest/1', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'HasTypeParamAttribute', + u'type_param': u'long', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'TypedTest/1' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'Single/TypeParameterizedTestCase/0', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'HasTypeParamAttribute', + u'type_param': u'int', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'Single/TypeParameterizedTestCase/0' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'Single/TypeParameterizedTestCase/1', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'HasTypeParamAttribute', + u'type_param': u'long', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'Single/TypeParameterizedTestCase/1' + } + ] + }, + { + u'name': u'Single/ValueParamTest', + u'tests': 4, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [ + { + u'name': u'HasValueParamAttribute/0', + u'value_param': u'33', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'Single/ValueParamTest' + }, + { + u'name': u'HasValueParamAttribute/1', + u'value_param': u'42', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'Single/ValueParamTest' + }, + { + u'name': u'AnotherTestThatHasValueParamAttribute/0', + u'value_param': u'33', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'Single/ValueParamTest' + }, + { + u'name': u'AnotherTestThatHasValueParamAttribute/1', + u'value_param': u'42', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'Single/ValueParamTest' + } + ] + } + ] +} + +EXPECTED_FILTERED = { + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'timestamp': u'*', + u'name': u'AllTests', + u'ad_hoc_property': u'42', + u'testsuites': [{ + u'name': u'SuccessfulTest', + u'tests': 1, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'testsuite': [{ + u'name': u'Succeeds', + u'status': u'RUN', + u'time': u'*', + u'classname': u'SuccessfulTest', + }] + }], +} + +EXPECTED_EMPTY = { + u'tests': 0, + u'failures': 0, + u'disabled': 0, + u'errors': 0, + u'time': u'*', + u'timestamp': u'*', + u'name': u'AllTests', + u'testsuites': [], +} + +GTEST_PROGRAM_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath(GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME) + +SUPPORTS_TYPED_TESTS = 'TypedTest' in gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( + [GTEST_PROGRAM_PATH, GTEST_LIST_TESTS_FLAG], capture_stderr=False).output + + +class GTestJsonOutputUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): + """Unit test for Google Test's JSON output functionality. + """ + + # This test currently breaks on platforms that do not support typed and + # type-parameterized tests, so we don't run it under them. + if SUPPORTS_TYPED_TESTS: + + def testNonEmptyJsonOutput(self): + """Verifies JSON output for a Google Test binary with non-empty output. + + Runs a test program that generates a non-empty JSON output, and + tests that the JSON output is expected. + """ + self._TestJsonOutput(GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME, EXPECTED_NON_EMPTY, 1) + + def testEmptyJsonOutput(self): + """Verifies JSON output for a Google Test binary without actual tests. + + Runs a test program that generates an empty JSON output, and + tests that the JSON output is expected. + """ + + self._TestJsonOutput('gtest_no_test_unittest', EXPECTED_EMPTY, 0) + + def testTimestampValue(self): + """Checks whether the timestamp attribute in the JSON output is valid. + + Runs a test program that generates an empty JSON output, and checks if + the timestamp attribute in the testsuites tag is valid. + """ + actual = self._GetJsonOutput('gtest_no_test_unittest', [], 0) + date_time_str = actual['timestamp'] + # datetime.strptime() is only available in Python 2.5+ so we have to + # parse the expected datetime manually. + match = re.match(r'(\d+)-(\d\d)-(\d\d)T(\d\d):(\d\d):(\d\d)', date_time_str) + self.assertTrue( + re.match, + 'JSON datettime string %s has incorrect format' % date_time_str) + date_time_from_json = datetime.datetime( + year=int(match.group(1)), month=int(match.group(2)), + day=int(match.group(3)), hour=int(match.group(4)), + minute=int(match.group(5)), second=int(match.group(6))) + + time_delta = abs(datetime.datetime.now() - date_time_from_json) + # timestamp value should be near the current local time + self.assertTrue(time_delta < datetime.timedelta(seconds=600), + 'time_delta is %s' % time_delta) + + def testDefaultOutputFile(self): + """Verifies the default output file name. + + Confirms that Google Test produces an JSON output file with the expected + default name if no name is explicitly specified. + """ + output_file = os.path.join(gtest_test_utils.GetTempDir(), + GTEST_DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE) + gtest_prog_path = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath( + 'gtest_no_test_unittest') + try: + os.remove(output_file) + except OSError: + e = sys.exc_info()[1] + if e.errno != errno.ENOENT: + raise + + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess( + [gtest_prog_path, '%s=json' % GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG], + working_dir=gtest_test_utils.GetTempDir()) + self.assert_(p.exited) + self.assertEquals(0, p.exit_code) + self.assert_(os.path.isfile(output_file)) + + def testSuppressedJsonOutput(self): + """Verifies that no JSON output is generated. + + Tests that no JSON file is generated if the default JSON listener is + shut down before RUN_ALL_TESTS is invoked. + """ + + json_path = os.path.join(gtest_test_utils.GetTempDir(), + GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME + 'out.json') + if os.path.isfile(json_path): + os.remove(json_path) + + command = [GTEST_PROGRAM_PATH, + '%s=json:%s' % (GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG, json_path), + '--shut_down_xml'] + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) + if p.terminated_by_signal: + # p.signal is available only if p.terminated_by_signal is True. + self.assertFalse( + p.terminated_by_signal, + '%s was killed by signal %d' % (GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME, p.signal)) + else: + self.assert_(p.exited) + self.assertEquals(1, p.exit_code, + "'%s' exited with code %s, which doesn't match " + 'the expected exit code %s.' + % (command, p.exit_code, 1)) + + self.assert_(not os.path.isfile(json_path)) + + def testFilteredTestJsonOutput(self): + """Verifies JSON output when a filter is applied. + + Runs a test program that executes only some tests and verifies that + non-selected tests do not show up in the JSON output. + """ + + self._TestJsonOutput(GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME, EXPECTED_FILTERED, 0, + extra_args=['%s=SuccessfulTest.*' % GTEST_FILTER_FLAG]) + + def _GetJsonOutput(self, gtest_prog_name, extra_args, expected_exit_code): + """Returns the JSON output generated by running the program gtest_prog_name. + + Furthermore, the program's exit code must be expected_exit_code. + + Args: + gtest_prog_name: Google Test binary name. + extra_args: extra arguments to binary invocation. + expected_exit_code: program's exit code. + """ + json_path = os.path.join(gtest_test_utils.GetTempDir(), + gtest_prog_name + 'out.json') + gtest_prog_path = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath(gtest_prog_name) + + command = ( + [gtest_prog_path, '%s=json:%s' % (GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG, json_path)] + + extra_args + ) + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) + if p.terminated_by_signal: + self.assert_(False, + '%s was killed by signal %d' % (gtest_prog_name, p.signal)) + else: + self.assert_(p.exited) + self.assertEquals(expected_exit_code, p.exit_code, + "'%s' exited with code %s, which doesn't match " + 'the expected exit code %s.' + % (command, p.exit_code, expected_exit_code)) + with open(json_path) as f: + actual = json.load(f) + return actual + + def _TestJsonOutput(self, gtest_prog_name, expected, + expected_exit_code, extra_args=None): + """Checks the JSON output generated by the Google Test binary. + + Asserts that the JSON document generated by running the program + gtest_prog_name matches expected_json, a string containing another + JSON document. Furthermore, the program's exit code must be + expected_exit_code. + + Args: + gtest_prog_name: Google Test binary name. + expected: expected output. + expected_exit_code: program's exit code. + extra_args: extra arguments to binary invocation. + """ + + actual = self._GetJsonOutput(gtest_prog_name, extra_args or [], + expected_exit_code) + self.assertEqual(expected, gtest_json_test_utils.normalize(actual)) + + +if __name__ == '__main__': + if NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG in sys.argv: + # unittest.main() can't handle unknown flags + sys.argv.remove(NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG) + + os.environ['GTEST_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH'] = '1' + gtest_test_utils.Main() diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-linked_ptr_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-linked-ptr-test.cc index 6fcf512..6fcf512 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-linked_ptr_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-linked-ptr-test.cc diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_list_tests_unittest.py b/googletest/test/googletest-list-tests-unittest.py index f2d2fd1..a38073a 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_list_tests_unittest.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-list-tests-unittest.py @@ -33,25 +33,24 @@ A user can ask Google Test to list all tests by specifying the --gtest_list_tests flag. This script tests such functionality -by invoking gtest_list_tests_unittest_ (a program written with +by invoking googletest-list-tests-unittest_ (a program written with Google Test) the command line flags. """ __author__ = 'phanna@google.com (Patrick Hanna)' -import gtest_test_utils import re - +import gtest_test_utils # Constants. # The command line flag for enabling/disabling listing all tests. LIST_TESTS_FLAG = 'gtest_list_tests' -# Path to the gtest_list_tests_unittest_ program. -EXE_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_list_tests_unittest_') +# Path to the googletest-list-tests-unittest_ program. +EXE_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-list-tests-unittest_') -# The expected output when running gtest_list_tests_unittest_ with +# The expected output when running googletest-list-tests-unittest_ with # --gtest_list_tests EXPECTED_OUTPUT_NO_FILTER_RE = re.compile(r"""FooDeathTest\. Test1 @@ -95,7 +94,7 @@ MyInstantiation/ValueParamTest\. TestB/2 # GetParam\(\) = a very\\nlo{241}\.\.\. """) -# The expected output when running gtest_list_tests_unittest_ with +# The expected output when running googletest-list-tests-unittest_ with # --gtest_list_tests and --gtest_filter=Foo*. EXPECTED_OUTPUT_FILTER_FOO_RE = re.compile(r"""FooDeathTest\. Test1 @@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ FooTest\. def Run(args): - """Runs gtest_list_tests_unittest_ and returns the list of tests printed.""" + """Runs googletest-list-tests-unittest_ and returns the list of tests printed.""" return gtest_test_utils.Subprocess([EXE_PATH] + args, capture_stderr=False).output @@ -123,11 +122,12 @@ def Run(args): # The unit test. + class GTestListTestsUnitTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): """Tests using the --gtest_list_tests flag to list all tests.""" def RunAndVerify(self, flag_value, expected_output_re, other_flag): - """Runs gtest_list_tests_unittest_ and verifies that it prints + """Runs googletest-list-tests-unittest_ and verifies that it prints the correct tests. Args: diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_list_tests_unittest_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-list-tests-unittest_.cc index 907c176..907c176 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_list_tests_unittest_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-list-tests-unittest_.cc diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-listener_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-listener-test.cc index 9074768..639529c 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-listener_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-listener-test.cc @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ // // Author: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This file verifies Google Test event listeners receive events at the // right times. diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-message_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-message-test.cc index 175238e..175238e 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-message_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-message-test.cc diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-options_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-options-test.cc index 5586dc3..e4c0d04 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-options_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-options-test.cc @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Authors: keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray) // // Google Test UnitTestOptions tests // @@ -46,14 +45,7 @@ # include <direct.h> #endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { namespace internal { @@ -107,15 +99,17 @@ TEST(OutputFileHelpersTest, GetCurrentExecutableName) { const std::string exe_str = GetCurrentExecutableName().string(); #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS const bool success = - _strcmpi("gtest-options_test", exe_str.c_str()) == 0 || + _strcmpi("googletest-options-test", exe_str.c_str()) == 0 || _strcmpi("gtest-options-ex_test", exe_str.c_str()) == 0 || _strcmpi("gtest_all_test", exe_str.c_str()) == 0 || _strcmpi("gtest_dll_test", exe_str.c_str()) == 0; +#elif GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + const bool success = exe_str == "app"; #else // TODO(wan@google.com): remove the hard-coded "lt-" prefix when // Chandler Carruth's libtool replacement is ready. const bool success = - exe_str == "gtest-options_test" || + exe_str == "googletest-options-test" || exe_str == "gtest_all_test" || exe_str == "lt-gtest_all_test" || exe_str == "gtest_dll_test"; @@ -124,6 +118,8 @@ TEST(OutputFileHelpersTest, GetCurrentExecutableName) { FAIL() << "GetCurrentExecutableName() returns " << exe_str; } +#if !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + class XmlOutputChangeDirTest : public Test { protected: virtual void SetUp() { @@ -210,6 +206,8 @@ TEST_F(XmlOutputChangeDirTest, PreserveOriginalWorkingDirWithAbsolutePath) { #endif } +#endif // !GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA + } // namespace } // namespace internal } // namespace testing diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_output_test_golden_lin.txt b/googletest/test/googletest-output-test-golden-lin.txt index 2223d56..b0c5189 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_output_test_golden_lin.txt +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-output-test-golden-lin.txt @@ -1,13 +1,18 @@ The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Value of: false Actual: false Expected: true -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 2 -To be equal to: 3 -[0;32m[==========] [mRunning 66 tests from 29 test cases. +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 2 + 3 +Stack trace: (omitted) + +[0;32m[==========] [mRunning 68 tests from 30 test cases. [0;32m[----------] [mGlobal test environment set-up. FooEnvironment::SetUp() called. BarEnvironment::SetUp() called. @@ -33,237 +38,351 @@ BarEnvironment::SetUp() called. [0;32m[ OK ] [mPassingTest.PassingTest2 [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from NonfatalFailureTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mNonfatalFailureTest.EscapesStringOperands -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: kGoldenString - Which is: "\"Line" -To be equal to: actual - Which is: "actual \"string\"" -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: golden - Which is: "\"Line" -To be equal to: actual - Which is: "actual \"string\"" +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + kGoldenString + Which is: "\"Line" + actual + Which is: "actual \"string\"" +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + golden + Which is: "\"Line" + actual + Which is: "actual \"string\"" +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonfatalFailureTest.EscapesStringOperands [0;32m[ RUN ] [mNonfatalFailureTest.DiffForLongStrings -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: golden_str - Which is: "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2" -To be equal to: "Line 2" +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + golden_str + Which is: "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2" + "Line 2" With diff: @@ -1,2 @@ -\"Line\0 1\" Line 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonfatalFailureTest.DiffForLongStrings [0;32m[----------] [m3 tests from FatalFailureTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mFatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine (expecting a failure that x should be 1) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: x - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + x + Which is: 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine [0;32m[ RUN ] [mFatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine (expecting a failure that x should be 1) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: x - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + x + Which is: 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine [0;32m[ RUN ] [mFatalFailureTest.NonfatalFailureInSubroutine (expecting a failure on false) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Value of: false Actual: false Expected: true +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureTest.NonfatalFailureInSubroutine [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from LoggingTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mLoggingTest.InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions (expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i])) i == 0 i == 1 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Expected: (3) >= (a[i]), actual: 3 vs 9 +Stack trace: (omitted) + i == 2 i == 3 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Expected: (3) >= (a[i]), actual: 3 vs 6 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mLoggingTest.InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions -[0;32m[----------] [m6 tests from SCOPED_TRACETest +[0;32m[----------] [m7 tests from SCOPED_TRACETest +[0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.AcceptedValues +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Failed +Just checking that all these values work fine. +Google Test trace: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: (null) +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: 1337 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: std::string +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: literal string +Stack trace: (omitted) + +[0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.AcceptedValues [0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.ObeysScopes (expected to fail) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and should have a trace. Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Expected trace -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Expected trace +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.ObeysScopes [0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksInLoop (expected to fail) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 2 -To be equal to: n - Which is: 1 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 2 + n + Which is: 1 Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: i = 1 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: n - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: i = 1 +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + n + Which is: 2 Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: i = 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: i = 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksInLoop [0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksInSubroutine (expected to fail) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 2 -To be equal to: n - Which is: 1 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 2 + n + Which is: 1 Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: n = 1 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: n - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: n = 1 +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + n + Which is: 2 Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: n = 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: n = 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksInSubroutine [0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.CanBeNested (expected to fail) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: n - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + n + Which is: 2 Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: n = 2 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: n = 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.CanBeNested [0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.CanBeRepeated (expected to fail) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A. Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: A -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: A +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B. Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: B -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: A -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: B +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: A +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A, B, and C. Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: C -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: B -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: A -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: C +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: B +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: A +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A, B, and D. Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: D -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: B -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: A +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: D +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: B +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: A +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.CanBeRepeated [0;32m[ RUN ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksConcurrently (expecting 6 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive). Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Trace B -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Trace B +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive). Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Trace A -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Trace A +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive). Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Trace B -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Trace B +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive). -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive). Google Test trace: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Trace A -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Trace A +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive). +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksConcurrently +[0;32m[----------] [m1 test from ScopedTraceTest +[0;32m[ RUN ] [mScopedTraceTest.WithExplicitFileAndLine +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Failed +Check that the trace is attached to a particular location. +Google Test trace: +explicit_file.cc:123: expected trace message +Stack trace: (omitted) + +[0;31m[ FAILED ] [mScopedTraceTest.WithExplicitFileAndLine [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mNonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest.FailureInConstructor (expecting 5 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #2, in SetUp(). -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #3, in the test body. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #4, in TearDown. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest.FailureInConstructor [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest.FailureInConstructor (expecting 2 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest.FailureInConstructor [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mNonFatalFailureInSetUpTest.FailureInSetUp (expecting 4 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #1, in SetUp(). -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #2, in the test function. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #3, in TearDown(). -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonFatalFailureInSetUpTest.FailureInSetUp [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from FatalFailureInSetUpTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mFatalFailureInSetUpTest.FailureInSetUp (expecting 3 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #1, in SetUp(). -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #2, in TearDown(). -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureInSetUpTest.FailureInSetUp [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from AddFailureAtTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mAddFailureAtTest.MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber foo.cc:42: Failure Failed Expected failure in foo.cc +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mAddFailureAtTest.MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber [0;32m[----------] [m4 tests from MixedUpTestCaseTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mMixedUpTestCaseTest.FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo @@ -280,6 +399,8 @@ using two different test fixture classes. This can happen if the two classes are from different namespaces or translation units and have the same name. You should probably rename one of the classes to put the tests into different test cases. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mMixedUpTestCaseTest.ThisShouldFail [0;32m[ RUN ] [mMixedUpTestCaseTest.ThisShouldFailToo gtest.cc:#: Failure @@ -291,6 +412,8 @@ using two different test fixture classes. This can happen if the two classes are from different namespaces or translation units and have the same name. You should probably rename one of the classes to put the tests into different test cases. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mMixedUpTestCaseTest.ThisShouldFailToo [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mMixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest.TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail @@ -305,6 +428,8 @@ using two different test fixture classes. This can happen if the two classes are from different namespaces or translation units and have the same name. You should probably rename one of the classes to put the tests into different test cases. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mMixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest.TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case [0;32m[ RUN ] [mTEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case.DefinedUsingTEST_F @@ -319,6 +444,8 @@ test DefinedUsingTEST_F is defined using TEST_F but test DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail is defined using TEST. You probably want to change the TEST to TEST_F or move it to another test case. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mTEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case.DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case [0;32m[ RUN ] [mTEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case.DefinedUsingTEST @@ -333,6 +460,8 @@ test DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail is defined using TEST_F but test DefinedUsingTEST is defined using TEST. You probably want to change the TEST to TEST_F or move it to another test case. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mTEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case.DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail [0;32m[----------] [m8 tests from ExpectNonfatalFailureTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.CanReferenceGlobalVariables @@ -346,19 +475,27 @@ case. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures (expecting a failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: 2 failures -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure 1. +Stack trace: (omitted) + -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure 2. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure @@ -366,9 +503,13 @@ Expected non-fatal failure 2. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementReturns @@ -376,12 +517,16 @@ Expected fatal failure. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementReturns [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementThrows (expecting a failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectNonfatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementThrows [0;32m[----------] [m8 tests from ExpectFatalFailureTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.CanReferenceGlobalVariables @@ -395,19 +540,27 @@ Expected: 1 non-fatal failure gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures (expecting a failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: 2 failures -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure @@ -415,9 +568,13 @@ Expected fatal failure. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementReturns @@ -425,44 +582,57 @@ Expected non-fatal failure. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementReturns [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementThrows (expecting a failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFatalFailureTest.FailsWhenStatementThrows [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from TypedTest/0, where TypeParam = int [0;32m[ RUN ] [mTypedTest/0.Success [0;32m[ OK ] [mTypedTest/0.Success [0;32m[ RUN ] [mTypedTest/0.Failure -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: TypeParam() - Which is: 0 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + TypeParam() + Which is: 0 Expected failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mTypedTest/0.Failure, where TypeParam = int [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from Unsigned/TypedTestP/0, where TypeParam = unsigned char [0;32m[ RUN ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/0.Success [0;32m[ OK ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/0.Success [0;32m[ RUN ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/0.Failure -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1U - Which is: 1 -To be equal to: TypeParam() - Which is: '\0' +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1U + Which is: 1 + TypeParam() + Which is: '\0' Expected failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/0.Failure, where TypeParam = unsigned char [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from Unsigned/TypedTestP/1, where TypeParam = unsigned int [0;32m[ RUN ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/1.Success [0;32m[ OK ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/1.Success [0;32m[ RUN ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/1.Failure -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1U - Which is: 1 -To be equal to: TypeParam() - Which is: 0 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1U + Which is: 1 + TypeParam() + Which is: 0 Expected failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mUnsigned/TypedTestP/1.Failure, where TypeParam = unsigned int [0;32m[----------] [m4 tests from ExpectFailureTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectFatalFailure @@ -470,24 +640,36 @@ Expected failure gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Success: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Success: Succeeded +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure containing "Some other fatal failure expected." Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectFatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectNonFatalFailure @@ -495,24 +677,36 @@ Expected fatal failure. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Success: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Success: Succeeded +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure containing "Some other non-fatal failure." Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectNonFatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads @@ -520,24 +714,36 @@ Expected non-fatal failure. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Success: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Success: Succeeded +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure containing "Some other fatal failure expected." Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads @@ -545,96 +751,132 @@ Expected fatal failure. gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Success: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Success: Succeeded +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Fatal failure: Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) (expecting 1 failure) gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure containing "Some other non-fatal failure." Actual: -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Non-fatal failure: Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + + +Stack trace: (omitted) [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFailureTest.ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFailureWithThreadsTest.ExpectFatalFailure (expecting 2 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFailureWithThreadsTest.ExpectFatalFailure [0;32m[ RUN ] [mExpectFailureWithThreadsTest.ExpectNonFatalFailure (expecting 2 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + gtest.cc:#: Failure Expected: 1 non-fatal failure Actual: 0 failures +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mExpectFailureWithThreadsTest.ExpectNonFatalFailure [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest.InterceptOnlyCurrentThread (expecting 2 failures) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected fatal failure. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest.InterceptOnlyCurrentThread [0;32m[----------] [m1 test from PrintingFailingParams/FailingParamTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mPrintingFailingParams/FailingParamTest.Fails/0 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: GetParam() - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + GetParam() + Which is: 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mPrintingFailingParams/FailingParamTest.Fails/0, where GetParam() = 2 [0;32m[----------] [m2 tests from PrintingStrings/ParamTest [0;32m[ RUN ] [mPrintingStrings/ParamTest.Success/a [0;32m[ OK ] [mPrintingStrings/ParamTest.Success/a [0;32m[ RUN ] [mPrintingStrings/ParamTest.Failure/a -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: "b" -To be equal to: GetParam() - Which is: "a" +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + "b" + GetParam() + Which is: "a" Expected failure +Stack trace: (omitted) + [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mPrintingStrings/ParamTest.Failure/a, where GetParam() = "a" [0;32m[----------] [mGlobal test environment tear-down BarEnvironment::TearDown() called. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected non-fatal failure. +Stack trace: (omitted) + FooEnvironment::TearDown() called. -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Failed Expected fatal failure. -[0;32m[==========] [m66 tests from 29 test cases ran. +Stack trace: (omitted) + +[0;32m[==========] [m68 tests from 30 test cases ran. [0;32m[ PASSED ] [m22 tests. -[0;31m[ FAILED ] [m44 tests, listed below: +[0;31m[ FAILED ] [m46 tests, listed below: [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonfatalFailureTest.EscapesStringOperands [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonfatalFailureTest.DiffForLongStrings [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureTest.NonfatalFailureInSubroutine [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mLoggingTest.InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions +[0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.AcceptedValues [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.ObeysScopes [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksInLoop [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksInSubroutine [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.CanBeNested [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.CanBeRepeated [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mSCOPED_TRACETest.WorksConcurrently +[0;31m[ FAILED ] [mScopedTraceTest.WithExplicitFileAndLine [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest.FailureInConstructor [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest.FailureInConstructor [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mNonFatalFailureInSetUpTest.FailureInSetUp @@ -668,7 +910,7 @@ Expected fatal failure. [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mPrintingFailingParams/FailingParamTest.Fails/0, where GetParam() = 2 [0;31m[ FAILED ] [mPrintingStrings/ParamTest.Failure/a, where GetParam() = "a" -44 FAILED TESTS +46 FAILED TESTS [0;33m YOU HAVE 1 DISABLED TEST [mNote: Google Test filter = FatalFailureTest.*:LoggingTest.* @@ -677,24 +919,32 @@ Expected fatal failure. [----------] 3 tests from FatalFailureTest [ RUN ] FatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine (expecting a failure that x should be 1) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: x - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + x + Which is: 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [ FAILED ] FatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine (? ms) [ RUN ] FatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine (expecting a failure that x should be 1) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: x - Which is: 2 +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + x + Which is: 2 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [ FAILED ] FatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine (? ms) [ RUN ] FatalFailureTest.NonfatalFailureInSubroutine (expecting a failure on false) -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Value of: false Actual: false Expected: true +Stack trace: (omitted) + [ FAILED ] FatalFailureTest.NonfatalFailureInSubroutine (? ms) [----------] 3 tests from FatalFailureTest (? ms total) @@ -703,12 +953,16 @@ Expected: true (expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i])) i == 0 i == 1 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Expected: (3) >= (a[i]), actual: 3 vs 9 +Stack trace: (omitted) + i == 2 i == 3 -gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure +googletest-output-test_.cc:#: Failure Expected: (3) >= (a[i]), actual: 3 vs 6 +Stack trace: (omitted) + [ FAILED ] LoggingTest.InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions (? ms) [----------] 1 test from LoggingTest (? ms total) diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_output_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-output-test.py index 06dbee0..c1c3652 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_output_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-output-test.py @@ -29,13 +29,14 @@ # (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE # OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -"""Tests the text output of Google C++ Testing Framework. +"""Tests the text output of Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework. + SYNOPSIS - gtest_output_test.py --build_dir=BUILD/DIR --gengolden - # where BUILD/DIR contains the built gtest_output_test_ file. - gtest_output_test.py --gengolden - gtest_output_test.py + googletest_output_test.py --build_dir=BUILD/DIR --gengolden + # where BUILD/DIR contains the built googletest-output-test_ file. + googletest_output_test.py --gengolden + googletest_output_test.py """ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' @@ -51,12 +52,16 @@ import gtest_test_utils GENGOLDEN_FLAG = '--gengolden' CATCH_EXCEPTIONS_ENV_VAR_NAME = 'GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS' +# The flag indicating stacktraces are not supported +NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG = '--no_stacktrace_support' + +IS_LINUX = os.name == 'posix' and os.uname()[0] == 'Linux' IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt' # TODO(vladl@google.com): remove the _lin suffix. -GOLDEN_NAME = 'gtest_output_test_golden_lin.txt' +GOLDEN_NAME = 'googletest-output-test-golden-lin.txt' -PROGRAM_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_output_test_') +PROGRAM_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-output-test_') # At least one command we exercise must not have the # 'internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests' argument. @@ -99,7 +104,8 @@ def RemoveLocations(test_output): 'FILE_NAME:#: '. """ - return re.sub(r'.*[/\\](.+)(\:\d+|\(\d+\))\: ', r'\1:#: ', test_output) + return re.sub(r'.*[/\\]((googletest-output-test_|gtest).cc)(\:\d+|\(\d+\))\: ', + r'\1:#: ', test_output) def RemoveStackTraceDetails(output): @@ -189,7 +195,7 @@ def RemoveMatchingTests(test_output, pattern): def NormalizeOutput(output): - """Normalizes output (the output of gtest_output_test_.exe).""" + """Normalizes output (the output of googletest-output-test_.exe).""" output = ToUnixLineEnding(output) output = RemoveLocations(output) @@ -249,12 +255,12 @@ test_list = GetShellCommandOutput(COMMAND_LIST_TESTS) SUPPORTS_DEATH_TESTS = 'DeathTest' in test_list SUPPORTS_TYPED_TESTS = 'TypedTest' in test_list SUPPORTS_THREADS = 'ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest' in test_list -SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES = False +SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES = NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG not in sys.argv CAN_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILE = (SUPPORTS_DEATH_TESTS and SUPPORTS_TYPED_TESTS and SUPPORTS_THREADS and - not IS_WINDOWS) + SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES) class GTestOutputTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): def RemoveUnsupportedTests(self, test_output): @@ -279,7 +285,7 @@ class GTestOutputTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): def testOutput(self): output = GetOutputOfAllCommands() - golden_file = open(GOLDEN_PATH, 'r') + golden_file = open(GOLDEN_PATH, 'rb') # A mis-configured source control system can cause \r appear in EOL # sequences when we read the golden file irrespective of an operating # system used. Therefore, we need to strip those \r's from newlines @@ -310,18 +316,22 @@ class GTestOutputTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): if os.getenv('DEBUG_GTEST_OUTPUT_TEST'): open(os.path.join( gtest_test_utils.GetSourceDir(), - '_gtest_output_test_normalized_actual.txt'), 'wb').write( + '_googletest-output-test_normalized_actual.txt'), 'wb').write( normalized_actual) open(os.path.join( gtest_test_utils.GetSourceDir(), - '_gtest_output_test_normalized_golden.txt'), 'wb').write( + '_googletest-output-test_normalized_golden.txt'), 'wb').write( normalized_golden) self.assertEqual(normalized_golden, normalized_actual) if __name__ == '__main__': - if sys.argv[1:] == [GENGOLDEN_FLAG]: + if NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG in sys.argv: + # unittest.main() can't handle unknown flags + sys.argv.remove(NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG) + + if GENGOLDEN_FLAG in sys.argv: if CAN_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILE: output = GetOutputOfAllCommands() golden_file = open(GOLDEN_PATH, 'wb') @@ -330,9 +340,9 @@ if __name__ == '__main__': else: message = ( """Unable to write a golden file when compiled in an environment -that does not support all the required features (death tests, typed tests, -and multiple threads). Please generate the golden file using a binary built -with those features enabled.""") +that does not support all the required features (death tests, +typed tests, stack traces, and multiple threads). +Please build this test and generate the golden file using Blaze on Linux.""") sys.stderr.write(message) sys.exit(1) diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-output-test_.cc index 1070a9f..29fc993 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-output-test_.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under // various conditions. The output will then be verified by -// gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the +// googletest-output-test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the // desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO // FAIL. // @@ -37,15 +37,7 @@ #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ #include <stdlib.h> @@ -176,6 +168,16 @@ void SubWithTrace(int n) { SubWithoutTrace(n); } +TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, AcceptedValues) { + SCOPED_TRACE("literal string"); + SCOPED_TRACE(std::string("std::string")); + SCOPED_TRACE(1337); // streamable type + const char* null_value = NULL; + SCOPED_TRACE(null_value); + + ADD_FAILURE() << "Just checking that all these values work fine."; +} + // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { printf("(expected to fail)\n"); @@ -323,6 +325,13 @@ TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { } #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE +// Tests basic functionality of the ScopedTrace utility (most of its features +// are already tested in SCOPED_TRACETest). +TEST(ScopedTraceTest, WithExplicitFileAndLine) { + testing::ScopedTrace trace("explicit_file.cc", 123, "expected trace message"); + ADD_FAILURE() << "Check that the trace is attached to a particular location."; +} + TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for @@ -757,8 +766,6 @@ TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { // This #ifdef block tests the output of value-parameterized tests. -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - std::string ParamNameFunc(const testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) { return info.param; } @@ -779,8 +786,6 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingStrings, testing::Values(std::string("a")), ParamNameFunc); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - // This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a402c33 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test.py @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# +# Copyright 2015 Google Inc. All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +"""Verifies that Google Test warns the user when not initialized properly.""" + +__author__ = 'jmadill@google.com (Jamie Madill)' + +import gtest_test_utils + +binary_name = 'googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_' +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath(binary_name) + + +def Assert(condition): + if not condition: + raise AssertionError + + +def TestExitCodeAndOutput(command): + """Runs the given command and verifies its exit code and output.""" + + err = ('Parameterized test name \'"InvalidWithQuotes"\' is invalid') + + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) + Assert(p.terminated_by_signal) + + # Verify the output message contains appropriate output + Assert(err in p.output) + + +class GTestParamTestInvalidName1Test(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): + + def testExitCodeAndOutput(self): + TestExitCodeAndOutput(COMMAND) + + +if __name__ == '__main__': + gtest_test_utils.Main() diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..68dd470 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name1-test_.cc @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +// Copyright 2015, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: jmadill@google.com (Jamie Madill) + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +namespace { +class DummyTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char *> {}; + +TEST_P(DummyTest, Dummy) { +} + +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(InvalidTestName, + DummyTest, + ::testing::Values("InvalidWithQuotes"), + ::testing::PrintToStringParamName()); + +} // namespace + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { + testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +} + diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5766134 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test.py @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# +# Copyright 2015 Google Inc. All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +"""Verifies that Google Test warns the user when not initialized properly.""" + +__author__ = 'jmadill@google.com (Jamie Madill)' + +import gtest_test_utils + +binary_name = 'googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_' +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath(binary_name) + + +def Assert(condition): + if not condition: + raise AssertionError + + +def TestExitCodeAndOutput(command): + """Runs the given command and verifies its exit code and output.""" + + err = ('Duplicate parameterized test name \'a\'') + + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) + Assert(p.terminated_by_signal) + + # Check for appropriate output + Assert(err in p.output) + + +class GTestParamTestInvalidName2Test(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): + + def testExitCodeAndOutput(self): + TestExitCodeAndOutput(COMMAND) + +if __name__ == '__main__': + gtest_test_utils.Main() diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9a8ec4e --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-invalid-name2-test_.cc @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +// Copyright 2015, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: jmadill@google.com (Jamie Madill) + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +namespace { +class DummyTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<const char *> {}; + +std::string StringParamTestSuffix( + const testing::TestParamInfo<const char*>& info) { + return std::string(info.param); +} + +TEST_P(DummyTest, Dummy) { +} + +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(DuplicateTestNames, + DummyTest, + ::testing::Values("a", "b", "a", "c"), + StringParamTestSuffix); +} // namespace + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { + testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); +} + + diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-param-test_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.cc index 8b278bb..893b132 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-param-test_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.cc @@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - # include <algorithm> # include <iostream> # include <list> @@ -44,12 +42,8 @@ # include <string> # include <vector> -// To include gtest-internal-inl.h. -# define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 # include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" // for UnitTestOptions -# undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ - -# include "test/gtest-param-test_test.h" +# include "test/googletest-param-test-test.h" using ::std::vector; using ::std::sort; @@ -141,7 +135,7 @@ void VerifyGenerator(const ParamGenerator<T>& generator, << ", expected_values[i] is " << PrintValue(expected_values[i]) << ", *it is " << PrintValue(*it) << ", and 'it' is an iterator created with the copy constructor.\n"; - it++; + ++it; } EXPECT_TRUE(it == generator.end()) << "At the presumed end of sequence when accessing via an iterator " @@ -161,7 +155,7 @@ void VerifyGenerator(const ParamGenerator<T>& generator, << ", expected_values[i] is " << PrintValue(expected_values[i]) << ", *it is " << PrintValue(*it) << ", and 'it' is an iterator created with the copy constructor.\n"; - it++; + ++it; } EXPECT_TRUE(it == generator.end()) << "At the presumed end of sequence when accessing via an iterator " @@ -196,7 +190,7 @@ TEST(IteratorTest, ParamIteratorConformsToForwardIteratorConcept) { << "element same as its source points to"; // Verifies that iterator assignment works as expected. - it++; + ++it; EXPECT_FALSE(*it == *it2); it2 = it; EXPECT_TRUE(*it == *it2) << "Assigned iterators must point to the " @@ -215,7 +209,7 @@ TEST(IteratorTest, ParamIteratorConformsToForwardIteratorConcept) { // Verifies that prefix and postfix operator++() advance an iterator // all the same. it2 = it; - it++; + ++it; ++it2; EXPECT_TRUE(*it == *it2); } @@ -542,6 +536,51 @@ TEST(CombineTest, CombineWithMaxNumberOfParameters) { VerifyGenerator(gen, expected_values); } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + +class NonDefaultConstructAssignString { + public: + NonDefaultConstructAssignString(const std::string& s) : str_(s) {} + + const std::string& str() const { return str_; } + + private: + std::string str_; + + // Not default constructible + NonDefaultConstructAssignString(); + // Not assignable + void operator=(const NonDefaultConstructAssignString&); +}; + +TEST(CombineTest, NonDefaultConstructAssign) { + const ParamGenerator<tuple<int, NonDefaultConstructAssignString> > gen = + Combine(Values(0, 1), Values(NonDefaultConstructAssignString("A"), + NonDefaultConstructAssignString("B"))); + + ParamGenerator<tuple<int, NonDefaultConstructAssignString> >::iterator it = + gen.begin(); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, std::get<0>(*it)); + EXPECT_EQ("A", std::get<1>(*it).str()); + ++it; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, std::get<0>(*it)); + EXPECT_EQ("B", std::get<1>(*it).str()); + ++it; + + EXPECT_EQ(1, std::get<0>(*it)); + EXPECT_EQ("A", std::get<1>(*it).str()); + ++it; + + EXPECT_EQ(1, std::get<0>(*it)); + EXPECT_EQ("B", std::get<1>(*it).str()); + ++it; + + EXPECT_TRUE(it == gen.end()); +} + +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 # endif // GTEST_HAS_COMBINE // Tests that an generator produces correct sequence after being @@ -809,6 +848,34 @@ TEST_P(NamingTest, TestsReportCorrectNamesAndParameters) { INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(ZeroToFiveSequence, NamingTest, Range(0, 5)); +// Tests that macros in test names are expanded correctly. +class MacroNamingTest : public TestWithParam<int> {}; + +#define PREFIX_WITH_FOO(test_name) Foo##test_name +#define PREFIX_WITH_MACRO(test_name) Macro##test_name + +TEST_P(PREFIX_WITH_MACRO(NamingTest), PREFIX_WITH_FOO(SomeTestName)) { + const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = + ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); + + EXPECT_STREQ("FortyTwo/MacroNamingTest", test_info->test_case_name()); + EXPECT_STREQ("FooSomeTestName", test_info->name()); +} + +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(FortyTwo, MacroNamingTest, Values(42)); + +// Tests the same thing for non-parametrized tests. +class MacroNamingTestNonParametrized : public ::testing::Test {}; + +TEST_F(PREFIX_WITH_MACRO(NamingTestNonParametrized), + PREFIX_WITH_FOO(SomeTestName)) { + const ::testing::TestInfo* const test_info = + ::testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info(); + + EXPECT_STREQ("MacroNamingTestNonParametrized", test_info->test_case_name()); + EXPECT_STREQ("FooSomeTestName", test_info->name()); +} + // Tests that user supplied custom parameter names are working correctly. // Runs the test with a builtin helper method which uses PrintToString, // as well as a custom function and custom functor to ensure all possible @@ -817,8 +884,8 @@ class CustomFunctorNamingTest : public TestWithParam<std::string> {}; TEST_P(CustomFunctorNamingTest, CustomTestNames) {} struct CustomParamNameFunctor { - std::string operator()(const ::testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) { - return info.param; + std::string operator()(const ::testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& inf) { + return inf.param; } }; @@ -835,8 +902,8 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AllAllowedCharacters, CustomParamNameFunctor()); inline std::string CustomParamNameFunction( - const ::testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) { - return info.param; + const ::testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& inf) { + return inf.param; } class CustomFunctionNamingTest : public TestWithParam<std::string> {}; @@ -854,11 +921,10 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(CustomParamNameFunction, class CustomLambdaNamingTest : public TestWithParam<std::string> {}; TEST_P(CustomLambdaNamingTest, CustomTestNames) {} -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(CustomParamNameLambda, - CustomLambdaNamingTest, +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(CustomParamNameLambda, CustomLambdaNamingTest, Values(std::string("LambdaName")), - [](const ::testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) { - return info.param; + [](const ::testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& inf) { + return inf.param; }); #endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 @@ -1025,31 +1091,20 @@ TEST_F(ParameterizedDeathTest, GetParamDiesFromTestF) { INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(RangeZeroToFive, ParameterizedDerivedTest, Range(0, 5)); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - -TEST(CompileTest, CombineIsDefinedOnlyWhenGtestHasParamTestIsDefined) { -#if GTEST_HAS_COMBINE && !GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - FAIL() << "GTEST_HAS_COMBINE is defined while GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST is not\n" -#endif -} int main(int argc, char **argv) { -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Used in TestGenerationTest test case. AddGlobalTestEnvironment(TestGenerationTest::Environment::Instance()); // Used in GeneratorEvaluationTest test case. Tests that the updated value // will be picked up for instantiating tests in GeneratorEvaluationTest. GeneratorEvaluationTest::set_param_value(1); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Used in GeneratorEvaluationTest test case. Tests that value updated // here will NOT be used for instantiating tests in // GeneratorEvaluationTest. GeneratorEvaluationTest::set_param_value(2); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); } diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-param-test_test.h b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.h index 26ea122..ea1e884 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-param-test_test.h +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Authors: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This header file provides classes and functions used internally // for testing Google Test itself. @@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - // Test fixture for testing definition and instantiation of a test // in separate translation units. class ExternalInstantiationTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<int> { @@ -52,6 +50,4 @@ class InstantiationInMultipleTranslaionUnitsTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<int> { }; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - #endif // GTEST_TEST_GTEST_PARAM_TEST_TEST_H_ diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-param-test2_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test2-test.cc index 4a782fe..c6e3d1f 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-param-test2_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-param-test2-test.cc @@ -33,33 +33,30 @@ // Google Test work. #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -#include "test/gtest-param-test_test.h" - -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST +#include "googletest-param-test-test.h" using ::testing::Values; using ::testing::internal::ParamGenerator; // Tests that generators defined in a different translation unit // are functional. The test using extern_gen is defined -// in gtest-param-test_test.cc. +// in googletest-param-test-test.cc. ParamGenerator<int> extern_gen = Values(33); // Tests that a parameterized test case can be defined in one translation unit -// and instantiated in another. The test is defined in gtest-param-test_test.cc -// and ExternalInstantiationTest fixture class is defined in -// gtest-param-test_test.h. +// and instantiated in another. The test is defined in +// googletest-param-test-test.cc and ExternalInstantiationTest fixture class is +// defined in gtest-param-test_test.h. INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(MultiplesOf33, ExternalInstantiationTest, Values(33, 66)); // Tests that a parameterized test case can be instantiated // in multiple translation units. Another instantiation is defined -// in gtest-param-test_test.cc and InstantiationInMultipleTranslaionUnitsTest -// fixture is defined in gtest-param-test_test.h +// in googletest-param-test-test.cc and +// InstantiationInMultipleTranslaionUnitsTest fixture is defined in +// gtest-param-test_test.h INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(Sequence2, InstantiationInMultipleTranslaionUnitsTest, Values(42*3, 42*4, 42*5)); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-port_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-port-test.cc index c5067a4..15a629f 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-port_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-port-test.cc @@ -45,15 +45,7 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ using std::make_pair; using std::pair; @@ -75,7 +67,7 @@ TEST(IsXDigitTest, WorksForNarrowAscii) { } TEST(IsXDigitTest, ReturnsFalseForNarrowNonAscii) { - EXPECT_FALSE(IsXDigit('\x80')); + EXPECT_FALSE(IsXDigit(static_cast<char>('\x80'))); EXPECT_FALSE(IsXDigit(static_cast<char>('0' | '\x80'))); } @@ -304,7 +296,7 @@ TEST(FormatCompilerIndependentFileLocationTest, FormatsUknownFileAndLine) { EXPECT_EQ("unknown file", FormatCompilerIndependentFileLocation(NULL, -1)); } -#if GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_QNX +#if GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_QNX || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA void* ThreadFunc(void* data) { internal::Mutex* mutex = static_cast<internal::Mutex*>(data); mutex->Lock(); @@ -348,17 +340,17 @@ TEST(GetThreadCountTest, ReturnsCorrectValue) { TEST(GetThreadCountTest, ReturnsZeroWhenUnableToCountThreads) { EXPECT_EQ(0U, GetThreadCount()); } -#endif // GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_QNX +#endif // GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC || GTEST_OS_QNX || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA TEST(GtestCheckDeathTest, DiesWithCorrectOutputOnFailure) { const bool a_false_condition = false; const char regex[] = #ifdef _MSC_VER - "gtest-port_test\\.cc\\(\\d+\\):" + "googletest-port-test\\.cc\\(\\d+\\):" #elif GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE - "gtest-port_test\\.cc:[0-9]+" + "googletest-port-test\\.cc:[0-9]+" #else - "gtest-port_test\\.cc:\\d+" + "googletest-port-test\\.cc:\\d+" #endif // _MSC_VER ".*a_false_condition.*Extra info.*"; @@ -1209,7 +1201,7 @@ class DestructorTracker { : index_(GetNewIndex()) {} ~DestructorTracker() { // We never access DestructorCall::List() concurrently, so we don't need - // to protect this acccess with a mutex. + // to protect this access with a mutex. DestructorCall::List()[index_]->ReportDestroyed(); } diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-printers_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-printers-test.cc index af69f28..74825fc 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-printers_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-printers-test.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) -// Google Test - The Google C++ Testing Framework +// Google Test - The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework // // This file tests the universal value printer. @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" -// hash_map and hash_set are available under Visual C++, or on Linux. -#if GTEST_HAS_HASH_MAP_ -# include <hash_map> // NOLINT -#endif // GTEST_HAS_HASH_MAP_ -#if GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ -# include <hash_set> // NOLINT -#endif // GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ +#if GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_MAP_ +# include <unordered_map> // NOLINT +#endif // GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_MAP_ + +#if GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_SET_ +# include <unordered_set> // NOLINT +#endif // GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_SET_ #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FORWARD_LIST_ # include <forward_list> // NOLINT @@ -187,6 +187,25 @@ inline ::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, return os << "StreamableTemplateInFoo: " << x.value(); } +// A user-defined streamable but recursivly-defined container type in +// a user namespace, it mimics therefore std::filesystem::path or +// boost::filesystem::path. +class PathLike { + public: + struct iterator { + typedef PathLike value_type; + }; + + PathLike() {} + + iterator begin() const { return iterator(); } + iterator end() const { return iterator(); } + + friend ::std::ostream& operator<<(::std::ostream& os, const PathLike&) { + return os << "Streamable-PathLike"; + } +}; + } // namespace foo namespace testing { @@ -214,27 +233,11 @@ using ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrint; #if GTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE || GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ using ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings; #endif -using ::testing::internal::string; - -// The hash_* classes are not part of the C++ standard. STLport -// defines them in namespace std. MSVC defines them in ::stdext. GCC -// defines them in ::. -#ifdef _STLP_HASH_MAP // We got <hash_map> from STLport. -using ::std::hash_map; -using ::std::hash_set; -using ::std::hash_multimap; -using ::std::hash_multiset; -#elif _MSC_VER -using ::stdext::hash_map; -using ::stdext::hash_set; -using ::stdext::hash_multimap; -using ::stdext::hash_multiset; -#endif // Prints a value to a string using the universal value printer. This // is a helper for testing UniversalPrinter<T>::Print() for various types. template <typename T> -string Print(const T& value) { +std::string Print(const T& value) { ::std::stringstream ss; UniversalPrinter<T>::Print(value, &ss); return ss.str(); @@ -244,7 +247,7 @@ string Print(const T& value) { // value printer. This is a helper for testing // UniversalPrinter<T&>::Print() for various types. template <typename T> -string PrintByRef(const T& value) { +std::string PrintByRef(const T& value) { ::std::stringstream ss; UniversalPrinter<T&>::Print(value, &ss); return ss.str(); @@ -381,7 +384,7 @@ TEST(PrintBuiltInTypeTest, FloatingPoints) { // Since ::std::stringstream::operator<<(const void *) formats the pointer // output differently with different compilers, we have to create the expected // output first and use it as our expectation. -static string PrintPointer(const void *p) { +static std::string PrintPointer(const void* p) { ::std::stringstream expected_result_stream; expected_result_stream << p; return expected_result_stream.str(); @@ -569,7 +572,7 @@ struct Foo { TEST(PrintPointerTest, MemberVariablePointer) { EXPECT_TRUE(HasPrefix(Print(&Foo::value), Print(sizeof(&Foo::value)) + "-byte object ")); - int (Foo::*p) = NULL; // NOLINT + int Foo::*p = NULL; // NOLINT EXPECT_TRUE(HasPrefix(Print(p), Print(sizeof(p)) + "-byte object ")); } @@ -594,7 +597,7 @@ TEST(PrintPointerTest, MemberFunctionPointer) { // The difference between this and Print() is that it ensures that the // argument is a reference to an array. template <typename T, size_t N> -string PrintArrayHelper(T (&a)[N]) { +std::string PrintArrayHelper(T (&a)[N]) { return Print(a); } @@ -647,7 +650,7 @@ TEST(PrintArrayTest, WConstCharArrayWithTerminatingNul) { // Array of objects. TEST(PrintArrayTest, ObjectArray) { - string a[3] = { "Hi", "Hello", "Ni hao" }; + std::string a[3] = {"Hi", "Hello", "Ni hao"}; EXPECT_EQ("{ \"Hi\", \"Hello\", \"Ni hao\" }", PrintArrayHelper(a)); } @@ -784,22 +787,22 @@ TEST(PrintTypeWithGenericStreamingTest, TypeImplicitlyConvertible) { EXPECT_EQ("AllowsGenericStreamingAndImplicitConversionTemplate", Print(a)); } -#if GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL -// Tests printing StringPiece. +// Tests printing ::absl::string_view. -TEST(PrintStringPieceTest, SimpleStringPiece) { - const StringPiece sp = "Hello"; +TEST(PrintStringViewTest, SimpleStringView) { + const ::absl::string_view sp = "Hello"; EXPECT_EQ("\"Hello\"", Print(sp)); } -TEST(PrintStringPieceTest, UnprintableCharacters) { +TEST(PrintStringViewTest, UnprintableCharacters) { const char str[] = "NUL (\0) and \r\t"; - const StringPiece sp(str, sizeof(str) - 1); + const ::absl::string_view sp(str, sizeof(str) - 1); EXPECT_EQ("\"NUL (\\0) and \\r\\t\"", Print(sp)); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STRING_PIECE_ +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL // Tests printing STL containers. @@ -815,44 +818,44 @@ TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, NonEmptyDeque) { EXPECT_EQ("{ 1, 3 }", Print(non_empty)); } -#if GTEST_HAS_HASH_MAP_ +#if GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_MAP_ TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, OneElementHashMap) { - hash_map<int, char> map1; + ::std::unordered_map<int, char> map1; map1[1] = 'a'; EXPECT_EQ("{ (1, 'a' (97, 0x61)) }", Print(map1)); } TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashMultiMap) { - hash_multimap<int, bool> map1; + ::std::unordered_multimap<int, bool> map1; map1.insert(make_pair(5, true)); map1.insert(make_pair(5, false)); // Elements of hash_multimap can be printed in any order. - const string result = Print(map1); + const std::string result = Print(map1); EXPECT_TRUE(result == "{ (5, true), (5, false) }" || result == "{ (5, false), (5, true) }") << " where Print(map1) returns \"" << result << "\"."; } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_HASH_MAP_ +#endif // GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_MAP_ -#if GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ +#if GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_SET_ TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashSet) { - hash_set<string> set1; - set1.insert("hello"); - EXPECT_EQ("{ \"hello\" }", Print(set1)); + ::std::unordered_set<int> set1; + set1.insert(1); + EXPECT_EQ("{ 1 }", Print(set1)); } TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashMultiSet) { const int kSize = 5; int a[kSize] = { 1, 1, 2, 5, 1 }; - hash_multiset<int> set1(a, a + kSize); + ::std::unordered_multiset<int> set1(a, a + kSize); // Elements of hash_multiset can be printed in any order. - const string result = Print(set1); - const string expected_pattern = "{ d, d, d, d, d }"; // d means a digit. + const std::string result = Print(set1); + const std::string expected_pattern = "{ d, d, d, d, d }"; // d means a digit. // Verifies the result matches the expected pattern; also extracts // the numbers in the result. @@ -874,14 +877,11 @@ TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, HashMultiSet) { EXPECT_TRUE(std::equal(a, a + kSize, numbers.begin())); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ +#endif // GTEST_HAS_UNORDERED_SET_ TEST(PrintStlContainerTest, List) { - const string a[] = { - "hello", - "world" - }; - const list<string> strings(a, a + 2); + const std::string a[] = {"hello", "world"}; + const list<std::string> strings(a, a + 2); EXPECT_EQ("{ \"hello\", \"world\" }", Print(strings)); } @@ -1037,8 +1037,9 @@ TEST(PrintTr1TupleTest, VariousSizes) { // VC++ 2010's implementation of tuple of C++0x is deficient, requiring // an explicit type cast of NULL to be used. ::std::tr1::tuple<bool, char, short, testing::internal::Int32, // NOLINT - testing::internal::Int64, float, double, const char*, void*, string> - t10(false, 'a', 3, 4, 5, 1.5F, -2.5, str, + testing::internal::Int64, float, double, const char*, void*, + std::string> + t10(false, 'a', static_cast<short>(3), 4, 5, 1.5F, -2.5, str, // NOLINT ImplicitCast_<void*>(NULL), "10"); EXPECT_EQ("(false, 'a' (97, 0x61), 3, 4, 5, 1.5, -2.5, " + PrintPointer(str) + " pointing to \"8\", NULL, \"10\")", @@ -1096,8 +1097,9 @@ TEST(PrintStdTupleTest, VariousSizes) { // VC++ 2010's implementation of tuple of C++0x is deficient, requiring // an explicit type cast of NULL to be used. ::std::tuple<bool, char, short, testing::internal::Int32, // NOLINT - testing::internal::Int64, float, double, const char*, void*, string> - t10(false, 'a', 3, 4, 5, 1.5F, -2.5, str, + testing::internal::Int64, float, double, const char*, void*, + std::string> + t10(false, 'a', static_cast<short>(3), 4, 5, 1.5F, -2.5, str, // NOLINT ImplicitCast_<void*>(NULL), "10"); EXPECT_EQ("(false, 'a' (97, 0x61), 3, 4, 5, 1.5, -2.5, " + PrintPointer(str) + " pointing to \"8\", NULL, \"10\")", @@ -1113,6 +1115,12 @@ TEST(PrintStdTupleTest, NestedTuple) { #endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +TEST(PrintNullptrT, Basic) { + EXPECT_EQ("(nullptr)", Print(nullptr)); +} +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Tests printing user-defined unprintable types. // Unprintable types in the global namespace. @@ -1160,6 +1168,15 @@ TEST(PrintStreamableTypeTest, TemplateTypeInUserNamespace) { Print(::foo::StreamableTemplateInFoo<int>())); } +// Tests printing a user-defined recursive container type that has a << +// operator. +TEST(PrintStreamableTypeTest, PathLikeInUserNamespace) { + ::foo::PathLike x; + EXPECT_EQ("Streamable-PathLike", Print(x)); + const ::foo::PathLike cx; + EXPECT_EQ("Streamable-PathLike", Print(cx)); +} + // Tests printing user-defined types that have a PrintTo() function. TEST(PrintPrintableTypeTest, InUserNamespace) { EXPECT_EQ("PrintableViaPrintTo: 0", @@ -1202,13 +1219,13 @@ TEST(PrintReferenceTest, PrintsAddressAndValue) { // reference. TEST(PrintReferenceTest, HandlesFunctionPointer) { void (*fp)(int n) = &MyFunction; - const string fp_pointer_string = + const std::string fp_pointer_string = PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&fp)); // We cannot directly cast &MyFunction to const void* because the // standard disallows casting between pointers to functions and // pointers to objects, and some compilers (e.g. GCC 3.4) enforce // this limitation. - const string fp_string = PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>( + const std::string fp_string = PrintPointer(reinterpret_cast<const void*>( reinterpret_cast<internal::BiggestInt>(fp))); EXPECT_EQ("@" + fp_pointer_string + " " + fp_string, PrintByRef(fp)); @@ -1233,7 +1250,7 @@ TEST(PrintReferenceTest, HandlesMemberFunctionPointer) { // Tests that the universal printer prints a member variable pointer // passed by reference. TEST(PrintReferenceTest, HandlesMemberVariablePointer) { - int (Foo::*p) = &Foo::value; // NOLINT + int Foo::*p = &Foo::value; // NOLINT EXPECT_TRUE(HasPrefix( PrintByRef(p), "@" + PrintPointer(&p) + " " + Print(sizeof(p)) + "-byte object ")); @@ -1266,7 +1283,7 @@ TEST(FormatForComparisonFailureMessageTest, FormatsNonCharArrayAsPointer) { } // Tests formatting a char pointer when it's compared with another pointer. -// In this case we want to print it as a raw pointer, as the comparision is by +// In this case we want to print it as a raw pointer, as the comparison is by // pointer. // char pointer vs pointer @@ -1491,6 +1508,78 @@ TEST(PrintToStringTest, WorksForCharArrayWithEmbeddedNul) { EXPECT_PRINT_TO_STRING_(mutable_str_with_nul, "\"hello\\0 world\""); } + TEST(PrintToStringTest, ContainsNonLatin) { + // Sanity test with valid UTF-8. Prints both in hex and as text. + std::string non_ascii_str = ::std::string("오전 4:30"); + EXPECT_PRINT_TO_STRING_(non_ascii_str, + "\"\\xEC\\x98\\xA4\\xEC\\xA0\\x84 4:30\"\n" + " As Text: \"오전 4:30\""); + non_ascii_str = ::std::string("From ä — ẑ"); + EXPECT_PRINT_TO_STRING_(non_ascii_str, + "\"From \\xC3\\xA4 \\xE2\\x80\\x94 \\xE1\\xBA\\x91\"" + "\n As Text: \"From ä — ẑ\""); +} + +TEST(IsValidUTF8Test, IllFormedUTF8) { + // The following test strings are ill-formed UTF-8 and are printed + // as hex only (or ASCII, in case of ASCII bytes) because IsValidUTF8() is + // expected to fail, thus output does not contain "As Text:". + + static const char *const kTestdata[][2] = { + // 2-byte lead byte followed by a single-byte character. + {"\xC3\x74", "\"\\xC3t\""}, + // Valid 2-byte character followed by an orphan trail byte. + {"\xC3\x84\xA4", "\"\\xC3\\x84\\xA4\""}, + // Lead byte without trail byte. + {"abc\xC3", "\"abc\\xC3\""}, + // 3-byte lead byte, single-byte character, orphan trail byte. + {"x\xE2\x70\x94", "\"x\\xE2p\\x94\""}, + // Truncated 3-byte character. + {"\xE2\x80", "\"\\xE2\\x80\""}, + // Truncated 3-byte character followed by valid 2-byte char. + {"\xE2\x80\xC3\x84", "\"\\xE2\\x80\\xC3\\x84\""}, + // Truncated 3-byte character followed by a single-byte character. + {"\xE2\x80\x7A", "\"\\xE2\\x80z\""}, + // 3-byte lead byte followed by valid 3-byte character. + {"\xE2\xE2\x80\x94", "\"\\xE2\\xE2\\x80\\x94\""}, + // 4-byte lead byte followed by valid 3-byte character. + {"\xF0\xE2\x80\x94", "\"\\xF0\\xE2\\x80\\x94\""}, + // Truncated 4-byte character. + {"\xF0\xE2\x80", "\"\\xF0\\xE2\\x80\""}, + // Invalid UTF-8 byte sequences embedded in other chars. + {"abc\xE2\x80\x94\xC3\x74xyc", "\"abc\\xE2\\x80\\x94\\xC3txyc\""}, + {"abc\xC3\x84\xE2\x80\xC3\x84xyz", + "\"abc\\xC3\\x84\\xE2\\x80\\xC3\\x84xyz\""}, + // Non-shortest UTF-8 byte sequences are also ill-formed. + // The classics: xC0, xC1 lead byte. + {"\xC0\x80", "\"\\xC0\\x80\""}, + {"\xC1\x81", "\"\\xC1\\x81\""}, + // Non-shortest sequences. + {"\xE0\x80\x80", "\"\\xE0\\x80\\x80\""}, + {"\xf0\x80\x80\x80", "\"\\xF0\\x80\\x80\\x80\""}, + // Last valid code point before surrogate range, should be printed as text, + // too. + {"\xED\x9F\xBF", "\"\\xED\\x9F\\xBF\"\n As Text: \"\""}, + // Start of surrogate lead. Surrogates are not printed as text. + {"\xED\xA0\x80", "\"\\xED\\xA0\\x80\""}, + // Last non-private surrogate lead. + {"\xED\xAD\xBF", "\"\\xED\\xAD\\xBF\""}, + // First private-use surrogate lead. + {"\xED\xAE\x80", "\"\\xED\\xAE\\x80\""}, + // Last private-use surrogate lead. + {"\xED\xAF\xBF", "\"\\xED\\xAF\\xBF\""}, + // Mid-point of surrogate trail. + {"\xED\xB3\xBF", "\"\\xED\\xB3\\xBF\""}, + // First valid code point after surrogate range, should be printed as text, + // too. + {"\xEE\x80\x80", "\"\\xEE\\x80\\x80\"\n As Text: \"\""} + }; + + for (int i = 0; i < int(sizeof(kTestdata)/sizeof(kTestdata[0])); ++i) { + EXPECT_PRINT_TO_STRING_(kTestdata[i][0], kTestdata[i][1]); + } +} + #undef EXPECT_PRINT_TO_STRING_ TEST(UniversalTersePrintTest, WorksForNonReference) { @@ -1540,12 +1629,12 @@ TEST(UniversalPrintTest, WorksForCString) { const char* s1 = "abc"; ::std::stringstream ss1; UniversalPrint(s1, &ss1); - EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(s1) + " pointing to \"abc\"", string(ss1.str())); + EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(s1) + " pointing to \"abc\"", std::string(ss1.str())); char* s2 = const_cast<char*>(s1); ::std::stringstream ss2; UniversalPrint(s2, &ss2); - EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(s2) + " pointing to \"abc\"", string(ss2.str())); + EXPECT_EQ(PrintPointer(s2) + " pointing to \"abc\"", std::string(ss2.str())); const char* s3 = NULL; ::std::stringstream ss3; @@ -1632,6 +1721,32 @@ TEST(UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStringsTestWithStd, PrintsTersely) { #endif // GTEST_HAS_STD_TUPLE_ +#if GTEST_HAS_ABSL + +TEST(PrintOptionalTest, Basic) { + absl::optional<int> value; + EXPECT_EQ("(nullopt)", PrintToString(value)); + value = {7}; + EXPECT_EQ("(7)", PrintToString(value)); + EXPECT_EQ("(1.1)", PrintToString(absl::optional<double>{1.1})); + EXPECT_EQ("(\"A\")", PrintToString(absl::optional<std::string>{"A"})); +} + +struct NonPrintable { + unsigned char contents = 17; +}; + +TEST(PrintOneofTest, Basic) { + using Type = absl::variant<int, StreamableInGlobal, NonPrintable>; + EXPECT_EQ("('int' with value 7)", PrintToString(Type(7))); + EXPECT_EQ("('StreamableInGlobal' with value StreamableInGlobal)", + PrintToString(Type(StreamableInGlobal{}))); + EXPECT_EQ( + "('testing::gtest_printers_test::NonPrintable' with value 1-byte object " + "<11>)", + PrintToString(Type(NonPrintable{}))); +} +#endif // GTEST_HAS_ABSL + } // namespace gtest_printers_test } // namespace testing - diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_shuffle_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-shuffle-test.py index 30d0303..5ae9655 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_shuffle_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-shuffle-test.py @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' import os import gtest_test_utils -# Command to run the gtest_shuffle_test_ program. -COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_shuffle_test_') +# Command to run the googletest-shuffle-test_ program. +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-shuffle-test_') # The environment variables for test sharding. TOTAL_SHARDS_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS' @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ def GetTestsForAllIterations(extra_env, args): Args: extra_env: a map from environment variables to their values - args: command line flags to pass to gtest_shuffle_test_ + args: command line flags to pass to googletest-shuffle-test_ Returns: A list where the i-th element is the list of tests run in the i-th diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_shuffle_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-shuffle-test_.cc index 6fb441b..6fb441b 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_shuffle_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-shuffle-test_.cc diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-test-part_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-test-part-test.cc index ca8ba93..ca8ba93 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-test-part_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-test-part-test.cc diff --git a/googletest/test/googletest-test2_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-test2_test.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a758c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-test2_test.cc @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +// Copyright 2008, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) +// +// Tests for Google Test itself. This verifies that the basic constructs of +// Google Test work. + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" +#include "googletest-param-test-test.h" + +using ::testing::Values; +using ::testing::internal::ParamGenerator; + +// Tests that generators defined in a different translation unit +// are functional. The test using extern_gen_2 is defined +// in googletest-param-test-test.cc. +ParamGenerator<int> extern_gen_2 = Values(33); + +// Tests that a parameterized test case can be defined in one translation unit +// and instantiated in another. The test is defined in +// googletest-param-test-test.cc and ExternalInstantiationTest fixture class is +// defined in gtest-param-test_test.h. +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(MultiplesOf33, + ExternalInstantiationTest, + Values(33, 66)); + +// Tests that a parameterized test case can be instantiated +// in multiple translation units. Another instantiation is defined +// in googletest-param-test-test.cc and +// InstantiationInMultipleTranslaionUnitsTest fixture is defined in +// gtest-param-test_test.h +INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(Sequence2, + InstantiationInMultipleTranslaionUnitsTest, + Values(42*3, 42*4, 42*5)); + diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_throw_on_failure_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-throw-on-failure-test.py index 3e7740c..26ba32b 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_throw_on_failure_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-throw-on-failure-test.py @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ """Tests Google Test's throw-on-failure mode with exceptions disabled. -This script invokes gtest_throw_on_failure_test_ (a program written with +This script invokes googletest-throw-on-failure-test_ (a program written with Google Test) with different environments and command line flags. """ @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ import gtest_test_utils # The command line flag for enabling/disabling the throw-on-failure mode. THROW_ON_FAILURE = 'gtest_throw_on_failure' -# Path to the gtest_throw_on_failure_test_ program, compiled with +# Path to the googletest-throw-on-failure-test_ program, compiled with # exceptions disabled. EXE_PATH = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath( - 'gtest_throw_on_failure_test_') + 'googletest-throw-on-failure-test_') # Utilities. @@ -70,18 +70,18 @@ def SetEnvVar(env_var, value): def Run(command): """Runs a command; returns True/False if its exit code is/isn't 0.""" - print('Running "%s". . .' % ' '.join(command)) + print 'Running "%s". . .' % ' '.join(command) p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) return p.exited and p.exit_code == 0 # The tests. TODO(wan@google.com): refactor the class to share common -# logic with code in gtest_break_on_failure_unittest.py. +# logic with code in googletest-break-on-failure-unittest.py. class ThrowOnFailureTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): """Tests the throw-on-failure mode.""" def RunAndVerify(self, env_var_value, flag_value, should_fail): - """Runs gtest_throw_on_failure_test_ and verifies that it does + """Runs googletest-throw-on-failure-test_ and verifies that it does (or does not) exit with a non-zero code. Args: diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_throw_on_failure_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-throw-on-failure-test_.cc index 2b88fe3..0617c27 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_throw_on_failure_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-throw-on-failure-test_.cc @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ // Tests Google Test's throw-on-failure mode with exceptions disabled. // // This program must be compiled with exceptions disabled. It will be -// invoked by gtest_throw_on_failure_test.py, and is expected to exit +// invoked by googletest-throw-on-failure-test.py, and is expected to exit // with non-zero in the throw-on-failure mode or 0 otherwise. #include "gtest/gtest.h" diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-tuple_test.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-tuple-test.cc index bfaa3e0..bfaa3e0 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-tuple_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-tuple-test.cc diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_uninitialized_test.py b/googletest/test/googletest-uninitialized-test.py index 4358370..e3df5fa 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_uninitialized_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-uninitialized-test.py @@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' import gtest_test_utils - -COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('gtest_uninitialized_test_') +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath('googletest-uninitialized-test_') def Assert(condition): @@ -46,8 +45,8 @@ def Assert(condition): def AssertEq(expected, actual): if expected != actual: - print('Expected: %s' % (expected,)) - print(' Actual: %s' % (actual,)) + print 'Expected: %s' % (expected,) + print ' Actual: %s' % (actual,) raise AssertionError @@ -56,8 +55,8 @@ def TestExitCodeAndOutput(command): # Verifies that 'command' exits with code 1. p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) - Assert(p.exited) - AssertEq(1, p.exit_code) + if p.exited and p.exit_code == 0: + Assert('IMPORTANT NOTICE' in p.output); Assert('InitGoogleTest' in p.output) diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_uninitialized_test_.cc b/googletest/test/googletest-uninitialized-test_.cc index 4431698..2ba0e8b 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_uninitialized_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/googletest-uninitialized-test_.cc @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ TEST(DummyTest, Dummy) { // This test doesn't verify anything. We just need it to create a // realistic stage for testing the behavior of Google Test when - // RUN_ALL_TESTS() is called without testing::InitGoogleTest() being - // called first. + // RUN_ALL_TESTS() is called without + // testing::InitGoogleTest() being called first. } int main() { diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc index c284700..ad77c65 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ #include <vector> -#include "test/gtest-typed-test_test.h" +#include "gtest-typed-test_test.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test_test.cc index 93628ba..5e1b7b2 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest-typed-test_test.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) -#include "test/gtest-typed-test_test.h" +#include "gtest-typed-test_test.h" #include <set> #include <vector> diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest-unittest-api_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest-unittest-api_test.cc index b1f5168..1ebd431 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest-unittest-api_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest-unittest-api_test.cc @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ // // Author: vladl@google.com (Vlad Losev) // -// The Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// The Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // This file contains tests verifying correctness of data provided via // UnitTest's public methods. diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_all_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_all_test.cc index 955aa62..656066d 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_all_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_all_test.cc @@ -29,19 +29,19 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// Tests for Google C++ Testing Framework (Google Test) +// Tests for Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework (Google Test) // // Sometimes it's desirable to build most of Google Test's own tests // by compiling a single file. This file serves this purpose. -#include "test/gtest-filepath_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-linked_ptr_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-message_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-options_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-port_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc" -#include "test/gtest_prod_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-test-part_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-typed-test_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest-typed-test2_test.cc" -#include "test/gtest_unittest.cc" -#include "test/production.cc" +#include "googletest-filepath-test.cc" +#include "googletest-linked-ptr-test.cc" +#include "googletest-message-test.cc" +#include "googletest-options-test.cc" +#include "googletest-port-test.cc" +#include "gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc" +#include "gtest_prod_test.cc" +#include "googletest-test-part-test.cc" +#include "gtest-typed-test_test.cc" +#include "gtest-typed-test2_test.cc" +#include "gtest_unittest.cc" +#include "production.cc" diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_assert_by_exception_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_assert_by_exception_test.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2f0e34a --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_assert_by_exception_test.cc @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +// Copyright 2009, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) + +// Tests Google Test's assert-by-exception mode with exceptions enabled. + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <stdexcept> + +class ThrowListener : public testing::EmptyTestEventListener { + void OnTestPartResult(const testing::TestPartResult& result) override { + if (result.type() == testing::TestPartResult::kFatalFailure) { + throw testing::AssertionException(result); + } + } +}; + +// Prints the given failure message and exits the program with +// non-zero. We use this instead of a Google Test assertion to +// indicate a failure, as the latter is been tested and cannot be +// relied on. +void Fail(const char* msg) { + printf("FAILURE: %s\n", msg); + fflush(stdout); + exit(1); +} + +static void AssertFalse() { + ASSERT_EQ(2, 3) << "Expected failure"; +} + +// Tests that an assertion failure throws a subclass of +// std::runtime_error. +TEST(Test, Test) { + // A successful assertion shouldn't throw. + try { + EXPECT_EQ(3, 3); + } catch(...) { + Fail("A successful assertion wrongfully threw."); + } + + // A successful assertion shouldn't throw. + try { + EXPECT_EQ(3, 4); + } catch(...) { + Fail("A failed non-fatal assertion wrongfully threw."); + } + + // A failed assertion should throw. + try { + AssertFalse(); + } catch(const testing::AssertionException& e) { + if (strstr(e.what(), "Expected failure") != NULL) + throw; + + printf("%s", + "A failed assertion did throw an exception of the right type, " + "but the message is incorrect. Instead of containing \"Expected " + "failure\", it is:\n"); + Fail(e.what()); + } catch(...) { + Fail("A failed assertion threw the wrong type of exception."); + } + Fail("A failed assertion should've thrown but didn't."); +} + +int kTestForContinuingTest = 0; + +TEST(Test, Test2) { + // FIXME(sokolov): how to force Test2 to be after Test? + kTestForContinuingTest = 1; +} + +int main(int argc, char** argv) { + testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->listeners().Append(new ThrowListener); + + int result = RUN_ALL_TESTS(); + if (result == 0) { + printf("RUN_ALL_TESTS returned %d\n", result); + Fail("Expected failure instead."); + } + + if (kTestForContinuingTest == 0) { + Fail("Should have continued with other tests, but did not."); + } + return 0; +} diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_environment_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_environment_test.cc index 3cff19e..1d6dc12 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_environment_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_environment_test.cc @@ -34,10 +34,7 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 // Required for the next #include. #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { GTEST_DECLARE_string_(filter); diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_help_test.py b/googletest/test/gtest_help_test.py index 093c838..79ffbe4 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_help_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_help_test.py @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ # (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE # OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -"""Tests the --help flag of Google C++ Testing Framework. +"""Tests the --help flag of Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework. SYNOPSIS gtest_help_test.py --build_dir=BUILD/DIR diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_json_test_utils.py b/googletest/test/gtest_json_test_utils.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..62bbfc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_json_test_utils.py @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +# Copyright 2018, Google Inc. +# All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + +"""Unit test utilities for gtest_json_output.""" + +import re + + +def normalize(obj): + """Normalize output object. + + Args: + obj: Google Test's JSON output object to normalize. + + Returns: + Normalized output without any references to transient information that may + change from run to run. + """ + def _normalize(key, value): + if key == 'time': + return re.sub(r'^\d+(\.\d+)?s$', '*', value) + elif key == 'timestamp': + return re.sub(r'^\d{4}-\d\d-\d\dT\d\d:\d\d:\d\dZ$', '*', value) + elif key == 'failure': + value = re.sub(r'^.*[/\\](.*:)\d+\n', '\\1*\n', value) + return re.sub(r'Stack trace:\n(.|\n)*', 'Stack trace:\n*', value) + else: + return normalize(value) + if isinstance(obj, dict): + return {k: _normalize(k, v) for k, v in obj.items()} + if isinstance(obj, list): + return [normalize(x) for x in obj] + else: + return obj diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_main_unittest.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_main_unittest.cc index ecd9bb8..c979fce 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_main_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_main_unittest.cc @@ -41,5 +41,5 @@ TEST(GTestMainTest, ShouldSucceed) { } // namespace -// We are using the main() function defined in src/gtest_main.cc, so -// we don't define it here. +// We are using the main() function defined in gtest_main.cc, so we +// don't define it here. diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc index a84eff8..b466c15 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_pred_impl_unittest.cc @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -// This file is AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED on 10/31/2011 by command +// This file is AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED on 01/02/2018 by command // 'gen_gtest_pred_impl.py 5'. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND! // Regression test for gtest_pred_impl.h diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_prod_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_prod_test.cc index 060abce..c5cceab 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_prod_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_prod_test.cc @@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// Unit test for include/gtest/gtest_prod.h. +// Unit test for gtest_prod.h. +#include "production.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" -#include "test/production.h" // Tests that private members can be accessed from a TEST declared as // a friend of the class. diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_repeat_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_repeat_test.cc index 481012a..3171604 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_repeat_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_repeat_test.cc @@ -34,15 +34,7 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <iostream> #include "gtest/gtest.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { @@ -75,7 +67,7 @@ namespace { // Used for verifying that global environment set-up and tear-down are -// inside the gtest_repeat loop. +// inside the --gtest_repeat loop. int g_environment_set_up_count = 0; int g_environment_tear_down_count = 0; @@ -119,7 +111,6 @@ TEST(BarDeathTest, ThreadSafeAndFast) { EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(::testing::internal::posix::Abort(), ""); } -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST int g_param_test_count = 0; const int kNumberOfParamTests = 10; @@ -135,7 +126,6 @@ TEST_P(MyParamTest, ShouldPass) { INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(MyParamSequence, MyParamTest, testing::Range(0, kNumberOfParamTests)); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST // Resets the count for each test. void ResetCounts() { @@ -144,9 +134,7 @@ void ResetCounts() { g_should_fail_count = 0; g_should_pass_count = 0; g_death_test_count = 0; -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST g_param_test_count = 0; -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST } // Checks that the count for each test is expected. @@ -156,9 +144,7 @@ void CheckCounts(int expected) { GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(expected, g_should_fail_count); GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(expected, g_should_pass_count); GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(expected, g_death_test_count); -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(expected * kNumberOfParamTests, g_param_test_count); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST } // Tests the behavior of Google Test when --gtest_repeat is not specified. @@ -201,9 +187,7 @@ void TestRepeatWithFilterForSuccessfulTests(int repeat) { GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(0, g_should_fail_count); GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(repeat, g_should_pass_count); GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(repeat, g_death_test_count); -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(repeat * kNumberOfParamTests, g_param_test_count); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST } // Tests using --gtest_repeat when --gtest_filter specifies a set of @@ -219,15 +203,14 @@ void TestRepeatWithFilterForFailedTests(int repeat) { GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(repeat, g_should_fail_count); GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(0, g_should_pass_count); GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(0, g_death_test_count); -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST GTEST_CHECK_INT_EQ_(0, g_param_test_count); -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST } } // namespace int main(int argc, char **argv) { testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new MyEnvironment); TestRepeatUnspecified(); diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_stress_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_stress_test.cc index e7daa43..cac405f 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_stress_test.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_stress_test.cc @@ -34,15 +34,9 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" -#include <iostream> #include <vector> -// We must define this macro in order to #include -// gtest-internal-inl.h. This is how Google Test prevents a user from -// accidentally depending on its internal implementation. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_test_macro_stack_footprint_test.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_test_macro_stack_footprint_test.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..48958b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_test_macro_stack_footprint_test.cc @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +// Copyright 2013, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) +// +// Each TEST() expands to some static registration logic. GCC puts all +// such static initialization logic for a translation unit in a common, +// internal function. Since Google's build system restricts how much +// stack space a function can use, there's a limit on how many TEST()s +// one can put in a single C++ test file. This test ensures that a large +// number of TEST()s can be defined in the same translation unit. + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +// This macro defines 10 dummy tests. +#define TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name) \ + TEST(test_case_name, T0) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T1) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T2) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T3) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T4) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T5) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T6) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T7) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T8) {} \ + TEST(test_case_name, T9) {} + +// This macro defines 100 dummy tests. +#define HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 0) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 1) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 2) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 3) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 4) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 5) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 6) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 7) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 8) \ + TEN_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 9) + +// This macro defines 1000 dummy tests. +#define THOUSAND_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 0) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 1) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 2) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 3) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 4) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 5) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 6) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 7) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 8) \ + HUNDRED_TESTS_(test_case_name_prefix ## 9) + +// Ensures that we can define 1000 TEST()s in the same translation +// unit. +THOUSAND_TESTS_(T) + +int main(int argc, char **argv) { + testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); + + // We don't actually need to run the dummy tests - the purpose is to + // ensure that they compile. + return 0; +} diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_test_utils.py b/googletest/test/gtest_test_utils.py index 4acd36c..d7fc099 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_test_utils.py +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_test_utils.py @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env python -# # Copyright 2006, Google Inc. # All rights reserved. # @@ -29,20 +27,25 @@ # (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE # OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -"""Unit test utilities for Google C++ Testing Framework.""" +"""Unit test utilities for Google C++ Testing and Mocking Framework.""" +# Suppresses the 'Import not at the top of the file' lint complaint. +# pylint: disable-msg=C6204 __author__ = 'wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)' -import atexit import os -import shutil import sys + +IS_LINUX = os.name == 'posix' and os.uname()[0] == 'Linux' +IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt' +IS_CYGWIN = os.name == 'posix' and 'CYGWIN' in os.uname()[0] + +import atexit +import shutil import tempfile import unittest _test_module = unittest -# Suppresses the 'Import not at the top of the file' lint complaint. -# pylint: disable-msg=C6204 try: import subprocess _SUBPROCESS_MODULE_AVAILABLE = True @@ -53,9 +56,6 @@ except: GTEST_OUTPUT_VAR_NAME = 'GTEST_OUTPUT' -IS_WINDOWS = os.name == 'nt' -IS_CYGWIN = os.name == 'posix' and 'CYGWIN' in os.uname()[0] - # The environment variable for specifying the path to the premature-exit file. PREMATURE_EXIT_FILE_ENV_VAR = 'TEST_PREMATURE_EXIT_FILE' @@ -145,8 +145,6 @@ atexit.register(_RemoveTempDir) def GetTempDir(): - """Returns a directory for temporary files.""" - global _temp_dir if not _temp_dir: _temp_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp() @@ -178,7 +176,7 @@ def GetTestExecutablePath(executable_name, build_dir=None): 'Unable to find the test binary "%s". Please make sure to provide\n' 'a path to the binary via the --build_dir flag or the BUILD_DIR\n' 'environment variable.' % path) - sys.stdout.write(message) + print >> sys.stderr, message sys.exit(1) return path @@ -245,7 +243,7 @@ class Subprocess: p = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=stderr, cwd=working_dir, universal_newlines=True, env=env) - # communicate returns a tuple with the file obect for the child's + # communicate returns a tuple with the file object for the child's # output. self.output = p.communicate()[0] self._return_code = p.returncode diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_testbridge_test.py b/googletest/test/gtest_testbridge_test.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2075e12 --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_testbridge_test.py @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# +# Copyright 2018 Google LLC. All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +# distribution. +# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +# this software without specific prior written permission. +# +# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +"""Verifies that Google Test uses filter provided via testbridge.""" + +__author__ = 'rfj@google.com (Rohan Joyce)' + +import os + +import gtest_test_utils + +binary_name = 'gtest_testbridge_test_' +COMMAND = gtest_test_utils.GetTestExecutablePath(binary_name) +TESTBRIDGE_NAME = 'TESTBRIDGE_TEST_ONLY' + + +def Assert(condition): + if not condition: + raise AssertionError + + +class GTestTestFilterTest(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): + + def testTestExecutionIsFiltered(self): + """Tests that the test filter is picked up from the testbridge env var.""" + subprocess_env = os.environ.copy() + + subprocess_env[TESTBRIDGE_NAME] = '*.TestThatSucceeds' + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(COMMAND, env=subprocess_env) + + self.assertEquals(0, p.exit_code) + + Assert('filter = *.TestThatSucceeds' in p.output) + Assert('[ OK ] TestFilterTest.TestThatSucceeds' in p.output) + Assert('[ PASSED ] 1 test.' in p.output) + + +if __name__ == '__main__': + gtest_test_utils.Main() diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_testbridge_test_.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_testbridge_test_.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0bb069e --- /dev/null +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_testbridge_test_.cc @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +// Copyright 2018, Google LLC. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: rfj@google.com (Rohan Joyce) + +// This program is meant to be run by gtest_test_filter_test.py. Do not run +// it directly. + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +// These tests are used to detect if filtering is working. Only +// 'TestThatSucceeds' should ever run. + +TEST(TestFilterTest, TestThatSucceeds) {} + +TEST(TestFilterTest, TestThatFails) { + ASSERT_TRUE(false) << "This test should never be run."; +} diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_unittest.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_unittest.cc index 97fcd5a..46eb7b2 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_unittest.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_unittest.cc @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" -// Verifies that the command line flag variables can be accessed -// in code once <gtest/gtest.h> has been #included. -// Do not move it after other #includes. +// Verifies that the command line flag variables can be accessed in +// code once "gtest.h" has been #included. +// Do not move it after other gtest #includes. TEST(CommandLineFlagsTest, CanBeAccessedInCodeOnceGTestHIsIncluded) { bool dummy = testing::GTEST_FLAG(also_run_disabled_tests) || testing::GTEST_FLAG(break_on_failure) @@ -64,17 +64,12 @@ TEST(CommandLineFlagsTest, CanBeAccessedInCodeOnceGTestHIsIncluded) { #include <map> #include <vector> #include <ostream> +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +#include <unordered_set> +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ namespace testing { namespace internal { @@ -86,9 +81,9 @@ class StreamingListenerTest : public Test { class FakeSocketWriter : public StreamingListener::AbstractSocketWriter { public: // Sends a string to the socket. - virtual void Send(const string& message) { output_ += message; } + virtual void Send(const std::string& message) { output_ += message; } - string output_; + std::string output_; }; StreamingListenerTest() @@ -98,7 +93,7 @@ class StreamingListenerTest : public Test { CodeLocation(__FILE__, __LINE__), 0, NULL) {} protected: - string* output() { return &(fake_sock_writer_->output_); } + std::string* output() { return &(fake_sock_writer_->output_); } FakeSocketWriter* const fake_sock_writer_; StreamingListener streamer_; @@ -266,6 +261,8 @@ using testing::internal::IsContainer; using testing::internal::IsContainerTest; using testing::internal::IsNotContainer; using testing::internal::NativeArray; +using testing::internal::OsStackTraceGetter; +using testing::internal::OsStackTraceGetterInterface; using testing::internal::ParseInt32Flag; using testing::internal::RelationToSourceCopy; using testing::internal::RelationToSourceReference; @@ -282,6 +279,7 @@ using testing::internal::String; using testing::internal::TestEventListenersAccessor; using testing::internal::TestResultAccessor; using testing::internal::UInt32; +using testing::internal::UnitTestImpl; using testing::internal::WideStringToUtf8; using testing::internal::edit_distance::CalculateOptimalEdits; using testing::internal::edit_distance::CreateUnifiedDiff; @@ -382,6 +380,31 @@ TEST(GetTestTypeIdTest, ReturnsTheSameValueInsideOrOutsideOfGoogleTest) { EXPECT_EQ(kTestTypeIdInGoogleTest, GetTestTypeId()); } +// Tests CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning. + +using ::testing::internal::CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning; + +TEST(CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning, LeavesUnversionedNamesUnchanged) { + EXPECT_EQ("std::bind", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::bind")); + EXPECT_EQ("std::_", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::_")); + EXPECT_EQ("std::__foo", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__foo")); + EXPECT_EQ("gtl::__1::x", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("gtl::__1::x")); + EXPECT_EQ("__1::x", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("__1::x")); + EXPECT_EQ("::__1::x", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("::__1::x")); +} + +TEST(CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning, ElidesDoubleUnderNames) { + EXPECT_EQ("std::bind", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__1::bind")); + EXPECT_EQ("std::_", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__1::_")); + + EXPECT_EQ("std::bind", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__g::bind")); + EXPECT_EQ("std::_", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__g::_")); + + EXPECT_EQ("std::bind", + CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__google::bind")); + EXPECT_EQ("std::_", CanonicalizeForStdLibVersioning("std::__google::_")); +} + // Tests FormatTimeInMillisAsSeconds(). TEST(FormatTimeInMillisAsSecondsTest, FormatsZero) { @@ -546,7 +569,7 @@ TEST(CodePointToUtf8Test, CanEncode8To11Bits) { // 101 0111 0110 => 110-10101 10-110110 // Some compilers (e.g., GCC on MinGW) cannot handle non-ASCII codepoints - // in wide strings and wide chars. In order to accomodate them, we have to + // in wide strings and wide chars. In order to accommodate them, we have to // introduce such character constants as integers. EXPECT_EQ("\xD5\xB6", CodePointToUtf8(static_cast<wchar_t>(0x576))); @@ -1388,7 +1411,7 @@ class TestResultTest : public Test { delete r2; } - // Helper that compares two two TestPartResults. + // Helper that compares two TestPartResults. static void CompareTestPartResult(const TestPartResult& expected, const TestPartResult& actual) { EXPECT_EQ(expected.type(), actual.type()); @@ -1787,7 +1810,7 @@ TEST(Int32FromEnvOrDieDeathTest, AbortsOnFailure) { } // Tests that Int32FromEnvOrDie() aborts with an error message -// if the variable cannot be represnted by an Int32. +// if the variable cannot be represented by an Int32. TEST(Int32FromEnvOrDieDeathTest, AbortsOnInt32Overflow) { SetEnv(GTEST_FLAG_PREFIX_UPPER_ "VAR", "1234567891234567891234"); EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED( @@ -2430,7 +2453,7 @@ TEST(StringAssertionTest, ASSERT_STREQ) { ASSERT_STREQ(p1, p2); EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_STREQ("bad", "good"), - "Expected: \"bad\""); + " \"bad\"\n \"good\""); } // Tests ASSERT_STREQ with NULL arguments. @@ -3115,13 +3138,13 @@ TEST(DISABLED_TestCase, DISABLED_TestShouldNotRun) { FAIL() << "Unexpected failure: Test in disabled test case should not be run."; } -// Check that when all tests in a test case are disabled, SetupTestCase() and +// Check that when all tests in a test case are disabled, SetUpTestCase() and // TearDownTestCase() are not called. class DisabledTestsTest : public Test { protected: static void SetUpTestCase() { FAIL() << "Unexpected failure: All tests disabled in test case. " - "SetupTestCase() should not be called."; + "SetUpTestCase() should not be called."; } static void TearDownTestCase() { @@ -3368,7 +3391,7 @@ class NoFatalFailureTest : public Test { void DoAssertNoFatalFailureOnFails() { ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(Fails()); - ADD_FAILURE() << "shold not reach here."; + ADD_FAILURE() << "should not reach here."; } void DoExpectNoFatalFailureOnFails() { @@ -3528,35 +3551,39 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, EqFailure) { EqFailure("foo", "bar", foo_val, bar_val, false) .failure_message()); EXPECT_STREQ( - " Expected: foo\n" - " Which is: 5\n" - "To be equal to: bar\n" - " Which is: 6", + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " foo\n" + " Which is: 5\n" + " bar\n" + " Which is: 6", msg1.c_str()); const std::string msg2( EqFailure("foo", "6", foo_val, bar_val, false) .failure_message()); EXPECT_STREQ( - " Expected: foo\n" - " Which is: 5\n" - "To be equal to: 6", + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " foo\n" + " Which is: 5\n" + " 6", msg2.c_str()); const std::string msg3( EqFailure("5", "bar", foo_val, bar_val, false) .failure_message()); EXPECT_STREQ( - " Expected: 5\n" - "To be equal to: bar\n" - " Which is: 6", + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " 5\n" + " bar\n" + " Which is: 6", msg3.c_str()); const std::string msg4( EqFailure("5", "6", foo_val, bar_val, false).failure_message()); EXPECT_STREQ( - " Expected: 5\n" - "To be equal to: 6", + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " 5\n" + " 6", msg4.c_str()); const std::string msg5( @@ -3564,10 +3591,11 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, EqFailure) { std::string("\"x\""), std::string("\"y\""), true).failure_message()); EXPECT_STREQ( - " Expected: foo\n" - " Which is: \"x\"\n" - "To be equal to: bar\n" - " Which is: \"y\"\n" + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " foo\n" + " Which is: \"x\"\n" + " bar\n" + " Which is: \"y\"\n" "Ignoring case", msg5.c_str()); } @@ -3580,11 +3608,12 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, EqFailureWithDiff) { const std::string msg1( EqFailure("left", "right", left, right, false).failure_message()); EXPECT_STREQ( - " Expected: left\n" - " Which is: " + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " left\n" + " Which is: " "1\\n2XXX\\n3\\n5\\n6\\n7\\n8\\n9\\n10\\n11\\n12XXX\\n13\\n14\\n15\n" - "To be equal to: right\n" - " Which is: 1\\n2\\n3\\n4\\n5\\n6\\n7\\n8\\n9\\n11\\n12\\n13\\n14\n" + " right\n" + " Which is: 1\\n2\\n3\\n4\\n5\\n6\\n7\\n8\\n9\\n11\\n12\\n13\\n14\n" "With diff:\n@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@\n 1\n-2XXX\n+2\n 3\n+4\n 5\n 6\n" "@@ -7,8 +8,6 @@\n 8\n 9\n-10\n 11\n-12XXX\n+12\n 13\n 14\n-15\n", msg1.c_str()); @@ -3659,7 +3688,7 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, AssertFalseWithAssertionResult) { } #ifdef __BORLANDC__ -// Restores warnings after previous "#pragma option push" supressed them +// Restores warnings after previous "#pragma option push" suppressed them # pragma option pop #endif @@ -3679,9 +3708,10 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, ASSERT_EQ_Double) { TEST(AssertionTest, ASSERT_EQ) { ASSERT_EQ(5, 2 + 3); EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(5, 2*3), - " Expected: 5\n" - "To be equal to: 2*3\n" - " Which is: 6"); + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " 5\n" + " 2*3\n" + " Which is: 6"); } // Tests ASSERT_EQ(NULL, pointer). @@ -3689,7 +3719,7 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, ASSERT_EQ) { TEST(AssertionTest, ASSERT_EQ_NULL) { // A success. const char* p = NULL; - // Some older GCC versions may issue a spurious waring in this or the next + // Some older GCC versions may issue a spurious warning in this or the next // assertion statement. This warning should not be suppressed with // static_cast since the test verifies the ability to use bare NULL as the // expected parameter to the macro. @@ -3698,7 +3728,7 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, ASSERT_EQ_NULL) { // A failure. static int n = 0; EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(NULL, &n), - "To be equal to: &n\n"); + " &n\n Which is:"); } #endif // GTEST_CAN_COMPARE_NULL @@ -3714,7 +3744,7 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, ASSERT_EQ_0) { // A failure. EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(0, 5.6), - "Expected: 0"); + " 0\n 5.6"); } // Tests ASSERT_NE. @@ -3813,7 +3843,7 @@ void TestEq1(int x) { // Tests calling a test subroutine that's not part of a fixture. TEST(AssertionTest, NonFixtureSubroutine) { EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(TestEq1(2), - "To be equal to: x"); + " x\n Which is: 2"); } // An uncopyable class. @@ -3862,7 +3892,8 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, AssertWorksWithUncopyableObject) { EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(TestAssertNonPositive(), "IsPositiveUncopyable(y) evaluates to false, where\ny evaluates to -1"); EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(TestAssertEqualsUncopyable(), - "Expected: x\n Which is: 5\nTo be equal to: y\n Which is: -1"); + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " x\n Which is: 5\n y\n Which is: -1"); } // Tests that uncopyable objects can be used in expects. @@ -3874,7 +3905,8 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, ExpectWorksWithUncopyableObject) { "IsPositiveUncopyable(y) evaluates to false, where\ny evaluates to -1"); EXPECT_EQ(x, x); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(x, y), - "Expected: x\n Which is: 5\nTo be equal to: y\n Which is: -1"); + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " x\n Which is: 5\n y\n Which is: -1"); } enum NamedEnum { @@ -3950,13 +3982,13 @@ TEST(AssertionTest, AnonymousEnum) { // ICE's in C++Builder. EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(kCaseA, kCaseB), - "To be equal to: kCaseB"); + " kCaseB\n Which is: "); EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(kCaseA, kCaseC), - "Which is: 42"); + "\n Which is: 42"); # endif EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(kCaseA, kCaseC), - "Which is: -1"); + "\n Which is: -1"); } #endif // !GTEST_OS_MAC && !defined(__SUNPRO_CC) @@ -4382,7 +4414,7 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, ExpectFalseWithAssertionResult) { } #ifdef __BORLANDC__ -// Restores warnings after previous "#pragma option push" supressed them +// Restores warnings after previous "#pragma option push" suppressed them # pragma option pop #endif @@ -4390,9 +4422,10 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, ExpectFalseWithAssertionResult) { TEST(ExpectTest, EXPECT_EQ) { EXPECT_EQ(5, 2 + 3); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(5, 2*3), - " Expected: 5\n" - "To be equal to: 2*3\n" - " Which is: 6"); + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " 5\n" + " 2*3\n" + " Which is: 6"); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(5, 2 - 3), "2 - 3"); } @@ -4423,7 +4456,7 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, EXPECT_EQ_NULL) { // A failure. int n = 0; EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(NULL, &n), - "To be equal to: &n\n"); + " &n\n Which is:"); } #endif // GTEST_CAN_COMPARE_NULL @@ -4439,7 +4472,7 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, EXPECT_EQ_0) { // A failure. EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(0, 5.6), - "Expected: 0"); + " 0\n 5.6"); } // Tests EXPECT_NE. @@ -4539,7 +4572,7 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, EXPECT_ANY_THROW) { TEST(ExpectTest, ExpectPrecedence) { EXPECT_EQ(1 < 2, true); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(true, true && false), - "To be equal to: true && false"); + " true && false\n Which is: false"); } @@ -4656,7 +4689,7 @@ TEST(MacroTest, ADD_FAILURE_AT) { // Unfortunately, we cannot verify that the failure message contains // the right file path and line number the same way, as // EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() doesn't get to see the file path and - // line number. Instead, we do that in gtest_output_test_.cc. + // line number. Instead, we do that in googletest-output-test_.cc. } // Tests FAIL. @@ -4686,14 +4719,14 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, Bool) { EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ bool false_value = false; ASSERT_EQ(false_value, true); - }, "To be equal to: true"); + }, " false_value\n Which is: false\n true"); } // Tests using int values in {EXPECT|ASSERT}_EQ. TEST(EqAssertionTest, Int) { ASSERT_EQ(32, 32); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(32, 33), - "33"); + " 32\n 33"); } // Tests using time_t values in {EXPECT|ASSERT}_EQ. @@ -4710,9 +4743,9 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, Char) { ASSERT_EQ('z', 'z'); const char ch = 'b'; EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch), - "ch"); + " ch\n Which is: 'b'"); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ('a', ch), - "ch"); + " ch\n Which is: 'b'"); } // Tests using wchar_t values in {EXPECT|ASSERT}_EQ. @@ -4720,10 +4753,11 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, WideChar) { EXPECT_EQ(L'b', L'b'); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(L'\0', L'x'), - " Expected: L'\0'\n" - " Which is: L'\0' (0, 0x0)\n" - "To be equal to: L'x'\n" - " Which is: L'x' (120, 0x78)"); + "Expected equality of these values:\n" + " L'\0'\n" + " Which is: L'\0' (0, 0x0)\n" + " L'x'\n" + " Which is: L'x' (120, 0x78)"); static wchar_t wchar; wchar = L'b'; @@ -4731,7 +4765,7 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, WideChar) { "wchar"); wchar = 0x8119; EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<wchar_t>(0x8120), wchar), - "To be equal to: wchar"); + " wchar\n Which is: L'"); } // Tests using ::std::string values in {EXPECT|ASSERT}_EQ. @@ -4760,8 +4794,7 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, StdString) { static ::std::string str3(str1); str3.at(2) = '\0'; EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(str1, str3), - "To be equal to: str3\n" - " Which is: \"A \\0 in the middle\""); + " str3\n Which is: \"A \\0 in the middle\""); } #if GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING @@ -4881,9 +4914,9 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, CharPointer) { ASSERT_EQ(p1, p1); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(p0, p2), - "To be equal to: p2"); + " p2\n Which is:"); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(p1, p2), - "p2"); + " p2\n Which is:"); EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_EQ(reinterpret_cast<char*>(0x1234), reinterpret_cast<char*>(0xABC0)), "ABC0"); @@ -4903,9 +4936,9 @@ TEST(EqAssertionTest, WideCharPointer) { EXPECT_EQ(p0, p0); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(p0, p2), - "To be equal to: p2"); + " p2\n Which is:"); EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_EQ(p1, p2), - "p2"); + " p2\n Which is:"); void* pv3 = (void*)0x1234; // NOLINT void* pv4 = (void*)0xABC0; // NOLINT const wchar_t* p3 = reinterpret_cast<const wchar_t*>(pv3); @@ -5450,7 +5483,8 @@ TEST_F(SetUpTestCaseTest, Test2) { EXPECT_STREQ("123", shared_resource_); } -// The InitGoogleTestTest test case tests testing::InitGoogleTest(). + +// The ParseFlagsTest test case tests ParseGoogleTestFlagsOnly. // The Flags struct stores a copy of all Google Test flags. struct Flags { @@ -5536,8 +5570,8 @@ struct Flags { return flags; } - // Creates a Flags struct where the gtest_random_seed flag has - // the given value. + // Creates a Flags struct where the gtest_random_seed flag has the given + // value. static Flags RandomSeed(Int32 random_seed) { Flags flags; flags.random_seed = random_seed; @@ -5552,8 +5586,8 @@ struct Flags { return flags; } - // Creates a Flags struct where the gtest_shuffle flag has - // the given value. + // Creates a Flags struct where the gtest_shuffle flag has the given + // value. static Flags Shuffle(bool shuffle) { Flags flags; flags.shuffle = shuffle; @@ -5601,8 +5635,8 @@ struct Flags { bool throw_on_failure; }; -// Fixture for testing InitGoogleTest(). -class InitGoogleTestTest : public Test { +// Fixture for testing ParseGoogleTestFlagsOnly(). +class ParseFlagsTest : public Test { protected: // Clears the flags before each test. virtual void SetUp() { @@ -5663,16 +5697,16 @@ class InitGoogleTestTest : public Test { const bool saved_help_flag = ::testing::internal::g_help_flag; ::testing::internal::g_help_flag = false; -#if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION +# if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION CaptureStdout(); -#endif +# endif // Parses the command line. internal::ParseGoogleTestFlagsOnly(&argc1, const_cast<CharType**>(argv1)); -#if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION +# if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION const std::string captured_stdout = GetCapturedStdout(); -#endif +# endif // Verifies the flag values. CheckFlags(expected); @@ -5685,7 +5719,7 @@ class InitGoogleTestTest : public Test { // help message for the flags it recognizes. EXPECT_EQ(should_print_help, ::testing::internal::g_help_flag); -#if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION +# if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION const char* const expected_help_fragment = "This program contains tests written using"; if (should_print_help) { @@ -5694,7 +5728,7 @@ class InitGoogleTestTest : public Test { EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsNotSubstring, expected_help_fragment, captured_stdout); } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION +# endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION ::testing::internal::g_help_flag = saved_help_flag; } @@ -5702,14 +5736,14 @@ class InitGoogleTestTest : public Test { // This macro wraps TestParsingFlags s.t. the user doesn't need // to specify the array sizes. -#define GTEST_TEST_PARSING_FLAGS_(argv1, argv2, expected, should_print_help) \ +# define GTEST_TEST_PARSING_FLAGS_(argv1, argv2, expected, should_print_help) \ TestParsingFlags(sizeof(argv1)/sizeof(*argv1) - 1, argv1, \ sizeof(argv2)/sizeof(*argv2) - 1, argv2, \ expected, should_print_help) }; // Tests parsing an empty command line. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, Empty) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, Empty) { const char* argv[] = { NULL }; @@ -5722,7 +5756,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, Empty) { } // Tests parsing a command line that has no flag. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, NoFlag) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, NoFlag) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", NULL @@ -5737,7 +5771,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, NoFlag) { } // Tests parsing a bad --gtest_filter flag. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, FilterBad) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, FilterBad) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_filter", @@ -5754,7 +5788,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, FilterBad) { } // Tests parsing an empty --gtest_filter flag. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, FilterEmpty) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, FilterEmpty) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_filter=", @@ -5770,7 +5804,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, FilterEmpty) { } // Tests parsing a non-empty --gtest_filter flag. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, FilterNonEmpty) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, FilterNonEmpty) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_filter=abc", @@ -5786,7 +5820,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, FilterNonEmpty) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_break_on_failure. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureWithoutValue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, BreakOnFailureWithoutValue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_break_on_failure", @@ -5802,7 +5836,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureWithoutValue) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_break_on_failure=0. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_0) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_0) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_break_on_failure=0", @@ -5818,7 +5852,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_0) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_break_on_failure=f. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_f) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_f) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_break_on_failure=f", @@ -5834,7 +5868,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_f) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_break_on_failure=F. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_F) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_F) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_break_on_failure=F", @@ -5851,7 +5885,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureFalse_F) { // Tests parsing a --gtest_break_on_failure flag that has a "true" // definition. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureTrue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, BreakOnFailureTrue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_break_on_failure=1", @@ -5867,7 +5901,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, BreakOnFailureTrue) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_catch_exceptions. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, CatchExceptions) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, CatchExceptions) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_catch_exceptions", @@ -5883,7 +5917,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, CatchExceptions) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_death_test_use_fork. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, DeathTestUseFork) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, DeathTestUseFork) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_death_test_use_fork", @@ -5900,7 +5934,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, DeathTestUseFork) { // Tests having the same flag twice with different values. The // expected behavior is that the one coming last takes precedence. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, DuplicatedFlags) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, DuplicatedFlags) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_filter=a", @@ -5917,7 +5951,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, DuplicatedFlags) { } // Tests having an unrecognized flag on the command line. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, UnrecognizedFlag) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, UnrecognizedFlag) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_break_on_failure", @@ -5939,7 +5973,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, UnrecognizedFlag) { } // Tests having a --gtest_list_tests flag -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFlag) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ListTestsFlag) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_list_tests", @@ -5955,7 +5989,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFlag) { } // Tests having a --gtest_list_tests flag with a "true" value -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsTrue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ListTestsTrue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_list_tests=1", @@ -5971,7 +6005,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsTrue) { } // Tests having a --gtest_list_tests flag with a "false" value -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFalse) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ListTestsFalse) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_list_tests=0", @@ -5987,7 +6021,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFalse) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_list_tests=f. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFalse_f) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ListTestsFalse_f) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_list_tests=f", @@ -6003,7 +6037,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFalse_f) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_list_tests=F. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFalse_F) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ListTestsFalse_F) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_list_tests=F", @@ -6019,7 +6053,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ListTestsFalse_F) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_output (invalid). -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputEmpty) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, OutputEmpty) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_output", @@ -6036,7 +6070,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputEmpty) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_output=xml -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputXml) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, OutputXml) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_output=xml", @@ -6052,7 +6086,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputXml) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_output=xml:file -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputXmlFile) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, OutputXmlFile) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_output=xml:file", @@ -6068,7 +6102,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputXmlFile) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_output=xml:directory/path/ -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputXmlDirectory) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, OutputXmlDirectory) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_output=xml:directory/path/", @@ -6085,7 +6119,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, OutputXmlDirectory) { } // Tests having a --gtest_print_time flag -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFlag) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, PrintTimeFlag) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_print_time", @@ -6101,7 +6135,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFlag) { } // Tests having a --gtest_print_time flag with a "true" value -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeTrue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, PrintTimeTrue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_print_time=1", @@ -6117,7 +6151,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeTrue) { } // Tests having a --gtest_print_time flag with a "false" value -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFalse) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, PrintTimeFalse) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_print_time=0", @@ -6133,7 +6167,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFalse) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_print_time=f. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFalse_f) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, PrintTimeFalse_f) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_print_time=f", @@ -6149,7 +6183,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFalse_f) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_print_time=F. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFalse_F) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, PrintTimeFalse_F) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_print_time=F", @@ -6165,7 +6199,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, PrintTimeFalse_F) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_random_seed=number -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, RandomSeed) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, RandomSeed) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_random_seed=1000", @@ -6181,7 +6215,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, RandomSeed) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_repeat=number -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, Repeat) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, Repeat) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_repeat=1000", @@ -6197,7 +6231,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, Repeat) { } // Tests having a --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlag) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlag) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests", @@ -6214,7 +6248,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlag) { } // Tests having a --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag with a "true" value -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsTrue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsTrue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests=1", @@ -6231,7 +6265,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsTrue) { } // Tests having a --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag with a "false" value -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsFalse) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsFalse) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_also_run_disabled_tests=0", @@ -6248,7 +6282,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, AlsoRunDisabledTestsFalse) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_shuffle. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ShuffleWithoutValue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ShuffleWithoutValue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_shuffle", @@ -6264,7 +6298,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ShuffleWithoutValue) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_shuffle=0. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ShuffleFalse_0) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ShuffleFalse_0) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_shuffle=0", @@ -6279,9 +6313,8 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ShuffleFalse_0) { GTEST_TEST_PARSING_FLAGS_(argv, argv2, Flags::Shuffle(false), false); } -// Tests parsing a --gtest_shuffle flag that has a "true" -// definition. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ShuffleTrue) { +// Tests parsing a --gtest_shuffle flag that has a "true" definition. +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ShuffleTrue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_shuffle=1", @@ -6297,7 +6330,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ShuffleTrue) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_stack_trace_depth=number. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, StackTraceDepth) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, StackTraceDepth) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_stack_trace_depth=5", @@ -6312,7 +6345,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, StackTraceDepth) { GTEST_TEST_PARSING_FLAGS_(argv, argv2, Flags::StackTraceDepth(5), false); } -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, StreamResultTo) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, StreamResultTo) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_stream_result_to=localhost:1234", @@ -6329,7 +6362,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, StreamResultTo) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_throw_on_failure. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ThrowOnFailureWithoutValue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ThrowOnFailureWithoutValue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_throw_on_failure", @@ -6345,7 +6378,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ThrowOnFailureWithoutValue) { } // Tests parsing --gtest_throw_on_failure=0. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ThrowOnFailureFalse_0) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ThrowOnFailureFalse_0) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_throw_on_failure=0", @@ -6362,7 +6395,7 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ThrowOnFailureFalse_0) { // Tests parsing a --gtest_throw_on_failure flag that has a "true" // definition. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ThrowOnFailureTrue) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, ThrowOnFailureTrue) { const char* argv[] = { "foo.exe", "--gtest_throw_on_failure=1", @@ -6377,9 +6410,9 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, ThrowOnFailureTrue) { GTEST_TEST_PARSING_FLAGS_(argv, argv2, Flags::ThrowOnFailure(true), false); } -#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS +# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS // Tests parsing wide strings. -TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, WideStrings) { +TEST_F(ParseFlagsTest, WideStrings) { const wchar_t* argv[] = { L"foo.exe", L"--gtest_filter=Foo*", @@ -6405,13 +6438,13 @@ TEST_F(InitGoogleTestTest, WideStrings) { # endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS #if GTEST_USE_OWN_FLAGFILE_FLAG_ -class FlagfileTest : public InitGoogleTestTest { +class FlagfileTest : public ParseFlagsTest { public: virtual void SetUp() { - InitGoogleTestTest::SetUp(); + ParseFlagsTest::SetUp(); testdata_path_.Set(internal::FilePath( - internal::TempDir() + internal::GetCurrentExecutableName().string() + + testing::TempDir() + internal::GetCurrentExecutableName().string() + "_flagfile_test")); testing::internal::posix::RmDir(testdata_path_.c_str()); EXPECT_TRUE(testdata_path_.CreateFolder()); @@ -6419,7 +6452,7 @@ class FlagfileTest : public InitGoogleTestTest { virtual void TearDown() { testing::internal::posix::RmDir(testdata_path_.c_str()); - InitGoogleTestTest::TearDown(); + ParseFlagsTest::TearDown(); } internal::FilePath CreateFlagfile(const char* contents) { @@ -6558,6 +6591,7 @@ TEST_F(CurrentTestInfoTest, WorksForSecondTestInATestCase) { } // namespace testing + // These two lines test that we can define tests in a namespace that // has the name "testing" and is nested in another namespace. namespace my_namespace { @@ -6638,7 +6672,7 @@ TEST(StreamingAssertionsTest, Truth2) { } #ifdef __BORLANDC__ -// Restores warnings after previous "#pragma option push" supressed them +// Restores warnings after previous "#pragma option push" suppressed them # pragma option pop #endif @@ -6888,14 +6922,6 @@ TEST(StaticAssertTypeEqTest, CompilesForEqualTypes) { StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, IntAlias*>(); } -TEST(GetCurrentOsStackTraceExceptTopTest, ReturnsTheStackTrace) { - testing::UnitTest* const unit_test = testing::UnitTest::GetInstance(); - - // We don't have a stack walker in Google Test yet. - EXPECT_STREQ("", GetCurrentOsStackTraceExceptTop(unit_test, 0).c_str()); - EXPECT_STREQ("", GetCurrentOsStackTraceExceptTop(unit_test, 1).c_str()); -} - TEST(HasNonfatalFailureTest, ReturnsFalseWhenThereIsNoFailure) { EXPECT_FALSE(HasNonfatalFailure()); } @@ -7531,6 +7557,50 @@ TEST(IsContainerTestTest, WorksForContainer) { sizeof(IsContainerTest<std::map<int, double> >(0))); } +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +struct ConstOnlyContainerWithPointerIterator { + using const_iterator = int*; + const_iterator begin() const; + const_iterator end() const; +}; + +struct ConstOnlyContainerWithClassIterator { + struct const_iterator { + const int& operator*() const; + const_iterator& operator++(/* pre-increment */); + }; + const_iterator begin() const; + const_iterator end() const; +}; + +TEST(IsContainerTestTest, ConstOnlyContainer) { + EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsContainer), + sizeof(IsContainerTest<ConstOnlyContainerWithPointerIterator>(0))); + EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(IsContainer), + sizeof(IsContainerTest<ConstOnlyContainerWithClassIterator>(0))); +} +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + +// Tests IsHashTable. +struct AHashTable { + typedef void hasher; +}; +struct NotReallyAHashTable { + typedef void hasher; + typedef void reverse_iterator; +}; +TEST(IsHashTable, Basic) { + EXPECT_TRUE(testing::internal::IsHashTable<AHashTable>::value); + EXPECT_FALSE(testing::internal::IsHashTable<NotReallyAHashTable>::value); +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + EXPECT_FALSE(testing::internal::IsHashTable<std::vector<int>>::value); + EXPECT_TRUE(testing::internal::IsHashTable<std::unordered_set<int>>::value); +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 +#if GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ + EXPECT_TRUE(testing::internal::IsHashTable<__gnu_cxx::hash_set<int>>::value); +#endif // GTEST_HAS_HASH_SET_ +} + // Tests ArrayEq(). TEST(ArrayEqTest, WorksForDegeneratedArrays) { @@ -7704,3 +7774,24 @@ TEST(SkipPrefixTest, DoesNotSkipWhenPrefixDoesNotMatch) { EXPECT_EQ(str, p); } +// Tests ad_hoc_test_result(). + +class AdHocTestResultTest : public testing::Test { + protected: + static void SetUpTestCase() { + FAIL() << "A failure happened inside SetUpTestCase()."; + } +}; + +TEST_F(AdHocTestResultTest, AdHocTestResultForTestCaseShowsFailure) { + const testing::TestResult& test_result = testing::UnitTest::GetInstance() + ->current_test_case() + ->ad_hoc_test_result(); + EXPECT_TRUE(test_result.Failed()); +} + +TEST_F(AdHocTestResultTest, AdHocTestResultTestForUnitTestDoesNotShowFailure) { + const testing::TestResult& test_result = + testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()->ad_hoc_test_result(); + EXPECT_FALSE(test_result.Failed()); +} diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile1_test_.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile1_test_.cc index 531ced4..e3d1dd1 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile1_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile1_test_.cc @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Author: keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray) // // gtest_xml_outfile1_test_ writes some xml via TestProperty used by // gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile2_test_.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile2_test_.cc index 7b400b2..55eb8f3 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile2_test_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfile2_test_.cc @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. // -// Author: keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray) // // gtest_xml_outfile2_test_ writes some xml via TestProperty used by // gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py index 524e437..c7d3413 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_outfiles_test.py @@ -31,15 +31,11 @@ """Unit test for the gtest_xml_output module.""" -__author__ = "keith.ray@gmail.com (Keith Ray)" - import os from xml.dom import minidom, Node - import gtest_test_utils import gtest_xml_test_utils - GTEST_OUTPUT_SUBDIR = "xml_outfiles" GTEST_OUTPUT_1_TEST = "gtest_xml_outfile1_test_" GTEST_OUTPUT_2_TEST = "gtest_xml_outfile2_test_" @@ -47,7 +43,13 @@ GTEST_OUTPUT_2_TEST = "gtest_xml_outfile2_test_" EXPECTED_XML_1 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <testsuites tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*" timestamp="*" name="AllTests"> <testsuite name="PropertyOne" tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> - <testcase name="TestSomeProperties" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyOne" SetUpProp="1" TestSomeProperty="1" TearDownProp="1" /> + <testcase name="TestSomeProperties" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyOne"> + <properties> + <property name="SetUpProp" value="1"/> + <property name="TestSomeProperty" value="1"/> + <property name="TearDownProp" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> </testsuite> </testsuites> """ @@ -55,7 +57,13 @@ EXPECTED_XML_1 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> EXPECTED_XML_2 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <testsuites tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*" timestamp="*" name="AllTests"> <testsuite name="PropertyTwo" tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> - <testcase name="TestSomeProperties" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyTwo" SetUpProp="2" TestSomeProperty="2" TearDownProp="2" /> + <testcase name="TestSomeProperties" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyTwo"> + <properties> + <property name="SetUpProp" value="2"/> + <property name="TestSomeProperty" value="2"/> + <property name="TearDownProp" value="2"/> + </properties> + </testcase> </testsuite> </testsuites> """ @@ -105,7 +113,7 @@ class GTestXMLOutFilesTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): # TODO(wan@google.com): libtool causes the built test binary to be # named lt-gtest_xml_outfiles_test_ instead of - # gtest_xml_outfiles_test_. To account for this possibillity, we + # gtest_xml_outfiles_test_. To account for this possibility, we # allow both names in the following code. We should remove this # hack when Chandler Carruth's libtool replacement tool is ready. output_file_name1 = test_name + ".xml" diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest.py b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest.py index bcd5975..faedd4e 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest.py +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest.py @@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ """Unit test for the gtest_xml_output module""" -__author__ = 'eefacm@gmail.com (Sean Mcafee)' - import datetime import errno import os @@ -43,19 +41,28 @@ from xml.dom import minidom, Node import gtest_test_utils import gtest_xml_test_utils - GTEST_FILTER_FLAG = '--gtest_filter' GTEST_LIST_TESTS_FLAG = '--gtest_list_tests' -GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG = "--gtest_output" -GTEST_DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE = "test_detail.xml" -GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME = "gtest_xml_output_unittest_" +GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG = '--gtest_output' +GTEST_DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE = 'test_detail.xml' +GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME = 'gtest_xml_output_unittest_' + +# The flag indicating stacktraces are not supported +NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG = '--no_stacktrace_support' -SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES = False +# The environment variables for test sharding. +TOTAL_SHARDS_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_TOTAL_SHARDS' +SHARD_INDEX_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_SHARD_INDEX' +SHARD_STATUS_FILE_ENV_VAR = 'GTEST_SHARD_STATUS_FILE' + +SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES = NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG not in sys.argv if SUPPORTS_STACK_TRACES: STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE = '\nStack trace:\n*' else: STACK_TRACE_TEMPLATE = '' + # unittest.main() can't handle unknown flags + sys.argv.remove(NO_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT_FLAG) EXPECTED_NON_EMPTY_XML = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <testsuites tests="23" failures="4" disabled="2" errors="0" time="*" timestamp="*" name="AllTests" ad_hoc_property="42"> @@ -64,20 +71,23 @@ EXPECTED_NON_EMPTY_XML = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> </testsuite> <testsuite name="FailedTest" tests="1" failures="1" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> <testcase name="Fails" status="run" time="*" classname="FailedTest"> - <failure message="gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*
 Expected: 1
To be equal to: 2" type=""><![CDATA[gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:* - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: 2%(stack)s]]></failure> + <failure message="gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*
Expected equality of these values:
 1
 2" type=""><![CDATA[gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:* +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + 2%(stack)s]]></failure> </testcase> </testsuite> <testsuite name="MixedResultTest" tests="3" failures="1" disabled="1" errors="0" time="*"> <testcase name="Succeeds" status="run" time="*" classname="MixedResultTest"/> <testcase name="Fails" status="run" time="*" classname="MixedResultTest"> - <failure message="gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*
 Expected: 1
To be equal to: 2" type=""><![CDATA[gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:* - Expected: 1 -To be equal to: 2%(stack)s]]></failure> - <failure message="gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*
 Expected: 2
To be equal to: 3" type=""><![CDATA[gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:* - Expected: 2 -To be equal to: 3%(stack)s]]></failure> + <failure message="gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*
Expected equality of these values:
 1
 2" type=""><![CDATA[gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:* +Expected equality of these values: + 1 + 2%(stack)s]]></failure> + <failure message="gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:*
Expected equality of these values:
 2
 3" type=""><![CDATA[gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc:* +Expected equality of these values: + 2 + 3%(stack)s]]></failure> </testcase> <testcase name="DISABLED_test" status="notrun" time="*" classname="MixedResultTest"/> </testsuite> @@ -99,15 +109,45 @@ Invalid characters in brackets []%(stack)s]]></failure> <testcase name="DISABLED_test_not_run" status="notrun" time="*" classname="DisabledTest"/> </testsuite> <testsuite name="PropertyRecordingTest" tests="4" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*" SetUpTestCase="yes" TearDownTestCase="aye"> - <testcase name="OneProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest" key_1="1"/> - <testcase name="IntValuedProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest" key_int="1"/> - <testcase name="ThreeProperties" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest" key_1="1" key_2="2" key_3="3"/> - <testcase name="TwoValuesForOneKeyUsesLastValue" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest" key_1="2"/> + <testcase name="OneProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key_1" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> + <testcase name="IntValuedProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key_int" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> + <testcase name="ThreeProperties" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key_1" value="1"/> + <property name="key_2" value="2"/> + <property name="key_3" value="3"/> + </properties> + </testcase> + <testcase name="TwoValuesForOneKeyUsesLastValue" status="run" time="*" classname="PropertyRecordingTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key_1" value="2"/> + </properties> + </testcase> </testsuite> <testsuite name="NoFixtureTest" tests="3" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> - <testcase name="RecordProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest" key="1"/> - <testcase name="ExternalUtilityThatCallsRecordIntValuedProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest" key_for_utility_int="1"/> - <testcase name="ExternalUtilityThatCallsRecordStringValuedProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest" key_for_utility_string="1"/> + <testcase name="RecordProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> + <testcase name="ExternalUtilityThatCallsRecordIntValuedProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key_for_utility_int" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> + <testcase name="ExternalUtilityThatCallsRecordStringValuedProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key_for_utility_string" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> </testsuite> <testsuite name="Single/ValueParamTest" tests="4" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> <testcase name="HasValueParamAttribute/0" value_param="33" status="run" time="*" classname="Single/ValueParamTest" /> @@ -138,6 +178,23 @@ EXPECTED_FILTERED_TEST_XML = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> </testsuite> </testsuites>""" +EXPECTED_SHARDED_TEST_XML = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<testsuites tests="3" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*" timestamp="*" name="AllTests" ad_hoc_property="42"> + <testsuite name="SuccessfulTest" tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> + <testcase name="Succeeds" status="run" time="*" classname="SuccessfulTest"/> + </testsuite> + <testsuite name="NoFixtureTest" tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> + <testcase name="RecordProperty" status="run" time="*" classname="NoFixtureTest"> + <properties> + <property name="key" value="1"/> + </properties> + </testcase> + </testsuite> + <testsuite name="Single/ValueParamTest" tests="1" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*"> + <testcase name="AnotherTestThatHasValueParamAttribute/1" value_param="42" status="run" time="*" classname="Single/ValueParamTest" /> + </testsuite> +</testsuites>""" + EXPECTED_EMPTY_XML = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <testsuites tests="0" failures="0" disabled="0" errors="0" time="*" timestamp="*" name="AllTests"> @@ -179,7 +236,7 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): Runs a test program that generates an empty XML output, and checks if the timestamp attribute in the testsuites tag is valid. """ - actual = self._GetXmlOutput('gtest_no_test_unittest', [], 0) + actual = self._GetXmlOutput('gtest_no_test_unittest', [], {}, 0) date_time_str = actual.documentElement.getAttributeNode('timestamp').value # datetime.strptime() is only available in Python 2.5+ so we have to # parse the expected datetime manually. @@ -209,8 +266,7 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): 'gtest_no_test_unittest') try: os.remove(output_file) - except OSError: - e = sys.exc_info()[1] + except OSError, e: if e.errno != errno.ENOENT: raise @@ -237,7 +293,7 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): '--shut_down_xml'] p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) if p.terminated_by_signal: - # p.signal is avalable only if p.terminated_by_signal is True. + # p.signal is available only if p.terminated_by_signal is True. self.assertFalse( p.terminated_by_signal, '%s was killed by signal %d' % (GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME, p.signal)) @@ -260,7 +316,22 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): self._TestXmlOutput(GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME, EXPECTED_FILTERED_TEST_XML, 0, extra_args=['%s=SuccessfulTest.*' % GTEST_FILTER_FLAG]) - def _GetXmlOutput(self, gtest_prog_name, extra_args, expected_exit_code): + def testShardedTestXmlOutput(self): + """Verifies XML output when run using multiple shards. + + Runs a test program that executes only one shard and verifies that tests + from other shards do not show up in the XML output. + """ + + self._TestXmlOutput( + GTEST_PROGRAM_NAME, + EXPECTED_SHARDED_TEST_XML, + 0, + extra_env={SHARD_INDEX_ENV_VAR: '0', + TOTAL_SHARDS_ENV_VAR: '10'}) + + def _GetXmlOutput(self, gtest_prog_name, extra_args, extra_env, + expected_exit_code): """ Returns the xml output generated by running the program gtest_prog_name. Furthermore, the program's exit code must be expected_exit_code. @@ -271,7 +342,11 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): command = ([gtest_prog_path, '%s=xml:%s' % (GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG, xml_path)] + extra_args) - p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command) + environ_copy = os.environ.copy() + if extra_env: + environ_copy.update(extra_env) + p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(command, env=environ_copy) + if p.terminated_by_signal: self.assert_(False, '%s was killed by signal %d' % (gtest_prog_name, p.signal)) @@ -285,7 +360,7 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): return actual def _TestXmlOutput(self, gtest_prog_name, expected_xml, - expected_exit_code, extra_args=None): + expected_exit_code, extra_args=None, extra_env=None): """ Asserts that the XML document generated by running the program gtest_prog_name matches expected_xml, a string containing another @@ -294,7 +369,7 @@ class GTestXMLOutputUnitTest(gtest_xml_test_utils.GTestXMLTestCase): """ actual = self._GetXmlOutput(gtest_prog_name, extra_args or [], - expected_exit_code) + extra_env or {}, expected_exit_code) expected = minidom.parseString(expected_xml) self.NormalizeXml(actual.documentElement) self.AssertEquivalentNodes(expected.documentElement, diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc index 48b8771..2ee8838 100644 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_output_unittest_.cc @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -// Author: eefacm@gmail.com (Sean Mcafee) - // Unit test for Google Test XML output. // // A user can specify XML output in a Google Test program to run via diff --git a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_test_utils.py b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_test_utils.py index 341956b..1e03585 100755 --- a/googletest/test/gtest_xml_test_utils.py +++ b/googletest/test/gtest_xml_test_utils.py @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env python -# # Copyright 2006, Google Inc. # All rights reserved. # @@ -31,15 +29,10 @@ """Unit test utilities for gtest_xml_output""" -__author__ = 'eefacm@gmail.com (Sean Mcafee)' - import re from xml.dom import minidom, Node - import gtest_test_utils - -GTEST_OUTPUT_FLAG = '--gtest_output' GTEST_DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE = 'test_detail.xml' class GTestXMLTestCase(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): @@ -101,26 +94,29 @@ class GTestXMLTestCase(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): self.assertEquals( len(expected_children), len(actual_children), 'number of child elements differ in element ' + actual_node.tagName) - for child_id, child in expected_children.items(): + for child_id, child in expected_children.iteritems(): self.assert_(child_id in actual_children, '<%s> is not in <%s> (in element %s)' % (child_id, actual_children, actual_node.tagName)) self.AssertEquivalentNodes(child, actual_children[child_id]) identifying_attribute = { - 'testsuites': 'name', - 'testsuite': 'name', - 'testcase': 'name', - 'failure': 'message', - } + 'testsuites': 'name', + 'testsuite': 'name', + 'testcase': 'name', + 'failure': 'message', + 'property': 'name', + } def _GetChildren(self, element): """ Fetches all of the child nodes of element, a DOM Element object. Returns them as the values of a dictionary keyed by the IDs of the - children. For <testsuites>, <testsuite> and <testcase> elements, the ID - is the value of their "name" attribute; for <failure> elements, it is - the value of the "message" attribute; CDATA sections and non-whitespace + children. For <testsuites>, <testsuite>, <testcase>, and <property> + elements, the ID is the value of their "name" attribute; for <failure> + elements, it is the value of the "message" attribute; for <properties> + elements, it is the value of their parent's "name" attribute plus the + literal string "properties"; CDATA sections and non-whitespace text nodes are concatenated into a single CDATA section with ID "detail". An exception is raised if any element other than the above four is encountered, if two child elements with the same identifying @@ -130,11 +126,17 @@ class GTestXMLTestCase(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): children = {} for child in element.childNodes: if child.nodeType == Node.ELEMENT_NODE: - self.assert_(child.tagName in self.identifying_attribute, - 'Encountered unknown element <%s>' % child.tagName) - childID = child.getAttribute(self.identifying_attribute[child.tagName]) - self.assert_(childID not in children) - children[childID] = child + if child.tagName == 'properties': + self.assert_(child.parentNode is not None, + 'Encountered <properties> element without a parent') + child_id = child.parentNode.getAttribute('name') + '-properties' + else: + self.assert_(child.tagName in self.identifying_attribute, + 'Encountered unknown element <%s>' % child.tagName) + child_id = child.getAttribute( + self.identifying_attribute[child.tagName]) + self.assert_(child_id not in children) + children[child_id] = child elif child.nodeType in [Node.TEXT_NODE, Node.CDATA_SECTION_NODE]: if 'detail' not in children: if (child.nodeType == Node.CDATA_SECTION_NODE or @@ -187,8 +189,8 @@ class GTestXMLTestCase(gtest_test_utils.TestCase): # Replaces the source line information with a normalized form. cdata = re.sub(source_line_pat, '\\1*\n', child.nodeValue) # Removes the actual stack trace. - child.nodeValue = re.sub(r'\nStack trace:\n(.|\n)*', - '', cdata) + child.nodeValue = re.sub(r'Stack trace:\n(.|\n)*', + 'Stack trace:\n*', cdata) for child in element.childNodes: if child.nodeType == Node.ELEMENT_NODE: self.NormalizeXml(child) diff --git a/googletest/test/production.cc b/googletest/test/production.cc index 8b8a40b..006bb97 100644 --- a/googletest/test/production.cc +++ b/googletest/test/production.cc @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// This is part of the unit test for include/gtest/gtest_prod.h. +// This is part of the unit test for gtest_prod.h. #include "production.h" diff --git a/googletest/test/production.h b/googletest/test/production.h index 98fd5e4..0f01d83 100644 --- a/googletest/test/production.h +++ b/googletest/test/production.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ // // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) // -// This is part of the unit test for include/gtest/gtest_prod.h. +// This is part of the unit test for gtest_prod.h. #ifndef GTEST_TEST_PRODUCTION_H_ #define GTEST_TEST_PRODUCTION_H_ diff --git a/googletest/xcode/Config/DebugProject.xcconfig b/googletest/xcode/Config/DebugProject.xcconfig index 3d68157..645701e 100644 --- a/googletest/xcode/Config/DebugProject.xcconfig +++ b/googletest/xcode/Config/DebugProject.xcconfig @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ // examples. It is set in the "Based On:" dropdown in the "Project" info // dialog. // This file is based on the Xcode Configuration files in: -// http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/ +// https://github.com/google/google-toolbox-for-mac // #include "General.xcconfig" diff --git a/googletest/xcode/Config/FrameworkTarget.xcconfig b/googletest/xcode/Config/FrameworkTarget.xcconfig index 357b1c8..77081fb 100644 --- a/googletest/xcode/Config/FrameworkTarget.xcconfig +++ b/googletest/xcode/Config/FrameworkTarget.xcconfig @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ // These are Framework target settings for the gtest framework and examples. It // is set in the "Based On:" dropdown in the "Target" info dialog. // This file is based on the Xcode Configuration files in: -// http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/ +// https://github.com/google/google-toolbox-for-mac // // Dynamic libs need to be position independent diff --git a/googletest/xcode/Config/General.xcconfig b/googletest/xcode/Config/General.xcconfig index f23e322..1aba486 100644 --- a/googletest/xcode/Config/General.xcconfig +++ b/googletest/xcode/Config/General.xcconfig @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ // These are General configuration settings for the gtest framework and // examples. // This file is based on the Xcode Configuration files in: -// http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/ +// https://github.com/google/google-toolbox-for-mac // // Build for PPC and Intel, 32- and 64-bit diff --git a/googletest/xcode/Config/ReleaseProject.xcconfig b/googletest/xcode/Config/ReleaseProject.xcconfig index 5349f0a..df9a38f 100644 --- a/googletest/xcode/Config/ReleaseProject.xcconfig +++ b/googletest/xcode/Config/ReleaseProject.xcconfig @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ // and examples. It is set in the "Based On:" dropdown in the "Project" info // dialog. // This file is based on the Xcode Configuration files in: -// http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/ +// https://github.com/google/google-toolbox-for-mac // #include "General.xcconfig" diff --git a/googletest/xcode/Config/StaticLibraryTarget.xcconfig b/googletest/xcode/Config/StaticLibraryTarget.xcconfig index 3922fa5..d2424fe 100644 --- a/googletest/xcode/Config/StaticLibraryTarget.xcconfig +++ b/googletest/xcode/Config/StaticLibraryTarget.xcconfig @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ // These are static library target settings for libgtest.a. It // is set in the "Based On:" dropdown in the "Target" info dialog. // This file is based on the Xcode Configuration files in: -// http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/ +// https://github.com/google/google-toolbox-for-mac // // Static libs can be included in bundles so make them position independent diff --git a/googletest/xcode/Scripts/versiongenerate.py b/googletest/xcode/Scripts/versiongenerate.py index 81de8c9..bdd7541 100755 --- a/googletest/xcode/Scripts/versiongenerate.py +++ b/googletest/xcode/Scripts/versiongenerate.py @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ # (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE # OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -"""A script to prepare version informtion for use the gtest Info.plist file. +"""A script to prepare version information for use the gtest Info.plist file. This script extracts the version information from the configure.ac file and uses it to generate a header file containing the same information. The @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ 1. The AC_INIT macro will be contained within the first 1024 characters of configure.ac 2. The version string will be 3 integers separated by periods and will be - surrounded by squre brackets, "[" and "]" (e.g. [1.0.1]). The first + surrounded by square brackets, "[" and "]" (e.g. [1.0.1]). The first segment represents the major version, the second represents the minor version and the third represents the fix version. 3. No ")" character exists between the opening "(" and closing ")" of @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ config_file.close() # Extract the version string from the AC_INIT macro # The following init_expression means: -# Extract three integers separated by periods and surrounded by squre +# Extract three integers separated by periods and surrounded by square # brackets(e.g. "[1.0.1]") between "AC_INIT(" and ")". Do not be greedy # (*? is the non-greedy flag) since that would pull in everything between # the first "(" and the last ")" in the file. @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ file_data = """// // is executed in a "Run Script" build phase when creating gtest.framework. This // header file is not used during compilation of C-source. Rather, it simply // defines some version strings for substitution in the Info.plist. Because of -// this, we are not not restricted to C-syntax nor are we using include guards. +// this, we are not restricted to C-syntax nor are we using include guards. // #define GTEST_VERSIONINFO_SHORT %s.%s diff --git a/googletest/xcode/gtest.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj b/googletest/xcode/gtest.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj index aefaa88..003bff8 100644 --- a/googletest/xcode/gtest.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj +++ b/googletest/xcode/gtest.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj @@ -79,6 +79,13 @@ 4539C9390EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util-generated.h in Copy Headers Internal */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = 4539C9360EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util-generated.h */; }; 4539C93A0EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util.h in Copy Headers Internal */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = 4539C9370EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util.h */; }; 4567C8181264FF71007740BE /* gtest-printers.h in Headers */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = 4567C8171264FF71007740BE /* gtest-printers.h */; settings = {ATTRIBUTES = (Public, ); }; }; + F67D4F3E1C7F5D8B0017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h in Headers */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F3D1C7F5D8B0017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h */; }; + F67D4F3F1C7F5DA70017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h in Copy Headers Internal */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F3D1C7F5D8B0017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h */; }; + F67D4F441C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-port.h in Headers */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F411C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-port.h */; }; + F67D4F451C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-printers.h in Headers */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F421C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-printers.h */; }; + F67D4F461C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest.h in Headers */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F431C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest.h */; }; + F67D4F481C7F5E160017C729 /* gtest-port.h in Copy Headers Internal Custom */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F411C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-port.h */; }; + F67D4F491C7F5E260017C729 /* gtest-printers.h in Copy Headers Internal Custom */ = {isa = PBXBuildFile; fileRef = F67D4F421C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-printers.h */; }; /* End PBXBuildFile section */ /* Begin PBXContainerItemProxy section */ @@ -182,6 +189,7 @@ dstPath = Headers/internal; dstSubfolderSpec = 6; files = ( + F67D4F3F1C7F5DA70017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h in Copy Headers Internal */, 404884A00E2F7BE600CF7658 /* gtest-death-test-internal.h in Copy Headers Internal */, 404884A10E2F7BE600CF7658 /* gtest-filepath.h in Copy Headers Internal */, 404884A20E2F7BE600CF7658 /* gtest-internal.h in Copy Headers Internal */, @@ -196,6 +204,18 @@ name = "Copy Headers Internal"; runOnlyForDeploymentPostprocessing = 0; }; + F67D4F471C7F5DF60017C729 /* Copy Headers Internal Custom */ = { + isa = PBXCopyFilesBuildPhase; + buildActionMask = 2147483647; + dstPath = Headers/internal/custom; + dstSubfolderSpec = 6; + files = ( + F67D4F491C7F5E260017C729 /* gtest-printers.h in Copy Headers Internal Custom */, + F67D4F481C7F5E160017C729 /* gtest-port.h in Copy Headers Internal Custom */, + ); + name = "Copy Headers Internal Custom"; + runOnlyForDeploymentPostprocessing = 0; + }; /* End PBXCopyFilesBuildPhase section */ /* Begin PBXFileReference section */ @@ -244,6 +264,10 @@ 4539C9360EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util-generated.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = "gtest-param-util-generated.h"; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; 4539C9370EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = "gtest-param-util.h"; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; 4567C8171264FF71007740BE /* gtest-printers.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = "gtest-printers.h"; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; + F67D4F3D1C7F5D8B0017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = "gtest-port-arch.h"; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; + F67D4F411C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-port.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = "gtest-port.h"; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; + F67D4F421C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-printers.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = "gtest-printers.h"; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; + F67D4F431C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest.h */ = {isa = PBXFileReference; fileEncoding = 4; lastKnownFileType = sourcecode.c.h; path = gtest.h; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; /* End PBXFileReference section */ /* Begin PBXFrameworksBuildPhase section */ @@ -375,6 +399,7 @@ 404883E10E2F799B00CF7658 /* internal */ = { isa = PBXGroup; children = ( + F67D4F401C7F5DD00017C729 /* custom */, 404883E20E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-death-test-internal.h */, 404883E30E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-filepath.h */, 404883E40E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-internal.h */, @@ -382,6 +407,7 @@ 4539C9360EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util-generated.h */, 4539C9370EC280E200A70F4C /* gtest-param-util.h */, 404883E50E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-port.h */, + F67D4F3D1C7F5D8B0017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h */, 404883E60E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-string.h */, 40899F4D0FFA7271000B29AE /* gtest-tuple.h */, 3BF6F29F0E79B5AD000F2EEE /* gtest-type-util.h */, @@ -430,6 +456,16 @@ path = Resources; sourceTree = "<group>"; }; + F67D4F401C7F5DD00017C729 /* custom */ = { + isa = PBXGroup; + children = ( + F67D4F411C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-port.h */, + F67D4F421C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-printers.h */, + F67D4F431C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest.h */, + ); + path = custom; + sourceTree = "<group>"; + }; /* End PBXGroup section */ /* Begin PBXHeadersBuildPhase section */ @@ -437,10 +473,14 @@ isa = PBXHeadersBuildPhase; buildActionMask = 2147483647; files = ( + F67D4F451C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-printers.h in Headers */, 404884380E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-death-test.h in Headers */, 404884390E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-message.h in Headers */, 4539C9340EC280AE00A70F4C /* gtest-param-test.h in Headers */, + F67D4F461C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest.h in Headers */, + F67D4F441C7F5DD00017C729 /* gtest-port.h in Headers */, 4567C8181264FF71007740BE /* gtest-printers.h in Headers */, + F67D4F3E1C7F5D8B0017C729 /* gtest-port-arch.h in Headers */, 3BF6F2A50E79B616000F2EEE /* gtest-typed-test.h in Headers */, 4048843A0E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest-spi.h in Headers */, 4048843B0E2F799B00CF7658 /* gtest.h in Headers */, @@ -560,6 +600,7 @@ 8D07F2C10486CC7A007CD1D0 /* Sources */, 8D07F2BD0486CC7A007CD1D0 /* Headers */, 404884A50E2F7C0400CF7658 /* Copy Headers Internal */, + F67D4F471C7F5DF60017C729 /* Copy Headers Internal Custom */, 8D07F2BF0486CC7A007CD1D0 /* Resources */, ); buildRules = ( @@ -1026,6 +1067,9 @@ isa = XCBuildConfiguration; baseConfigurationReference = 40D4CDF10E30E07400294801 /* DebugProject.xcconfig */; buildSettings = { + CLANG_CXX_LANGUAGE_STANDARD = "gnu++0x"; + CLANG_CXX_LIBRARY = "libc++"; + MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET = 10.7; }; name = Debug; }; @@ -1033,6 +1077,9 @@ isa = XCBuildConfiguration; baseConfigurationReference = 40D4CDF40E30E07400294801 /* ReleaseProject.xcconfig */; buildSettings = { + CLANG_CXX_LANGUAGE_STANDARD = "gnu++0x"; + CLANG_CXX_LIBRARY = "libc++"; + MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET = 10.7; }; name = Release; }; diff --git a/travis.sh b/travis.sh deleted file mode 100755 index bdecbd9..0000000 --- a/travis.sh +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env sh -set -evx -env | sort - -mkdir build || true -mkdir build/$GTEST_TARGET || true -cd build/$GTEST_TARGET -cmake -Dgtest_build_samples=ON \ - -Dgmock_build_samples=ON \ - -Dgtest_build_tests=ON \ - -Dgmock_build_tests=ON \ - -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=$CXX_FLAGS \ - ../../$GTEST_TARGET -make -CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE=1 make test |