summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc')
-rw-r--r--googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc142
1 files changed, 97 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc b/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
index fc4968b..b93f4e0 100644
--- a/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
+++ b/googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
-//
-// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
//
@@ -41,6 +40,7 @@
#include <map>
#include <set>
#include <string>
+#include <vector>
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
@@ -48,6 +48,15 @@
# include <unistd.h> // NOLINT
#endif
+// Silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value
+// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 14,15
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+#if _MSC_VER <= 1900
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable:4800)
+#endif
+#endif
+
namespace testing {
namespace internal {
@@ -99,12 +108,19 @@ void ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites()
return;
}
- for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
- it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
- ExpectationBase* const prerequisite = it->expectation_base().get();
- if (!prerequisite->is_retired()) {
- prerequisite->RetireAllPreRequisites();
- prerequisite->Retire();
+ ::std::vector<ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this);
+ while (!expectations.empty()) {
+ ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back();
+ expectations.pop_back();
+
+ for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it =
+ exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
+ it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
+ ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get();
+ if (!next->is_retired()) {
+ next->Retire();
+ expectations.push_back(next);
+ }
}
}
}
@@ -114,11 +130,18 @@ void ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites()
bool ExpectationBase::AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied() const
GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld();
- for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
- it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
- if (!(it->expectation_base()->IsSatisfied()) ||
- !(it->expectation_base()->AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied()))
- return false;
+ ::std::vector<const ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this);
+ while (!expectations.empty()) {
+ const ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back();
+ expectations.pop_back();
+
+ for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it =
+ exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
+ it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
+ const ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get();
+ if (!next->IsSatisfied()) return false;
+ expectations.push_back(next);
+ }
}
return true;
}
@@ -127,19 +150,28 @@ bool ExpectationBase::AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied() const
void ExpectationBase::FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites(ExpectationSet* result) const
GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld();
- for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
- it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
- if (it->expectation_base()->IsSatisfied()) {
- // If *it is satisfied and has a call count of 0, some of its
- // pre-requisites may not be satisfied yet.
- if (it->expectation_base()->call_count_ == 0) {
- it->expectation_base()->FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites(result);
+ ::std::vector<const ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this);
+ while (!expectations.empty()) {
+ const ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back();
+ expectations.pop_back();
+
+ for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it =
+ exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
+ it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
+ const ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get();
+
+ if (next->IsSatisfied()) {
+ // If *it is satisfied and has a call count of 0, some of its
+ // pre-requisites may not be satisfied yet.
+ if (next->call_count_ == 0) {
+ expectations.push_back(next);
+ }
+ } else {
+ // Now that we know next is unsatisfied, we are not so interested
+ // in whether its pre-requisites are satisfied. Therefore we
+ // don't iterate into it here.
+ *result += *it;
}
- } else {
- // Now that we know *it is unsatisfied, we are not so interested
- // in whether its pre-requisites are satisfied. Therefore we
- // don't recursively call FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites() here.
- *result += *it;
}
}
}
@@ -254,11 +286,13 @@ void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const std::string& msg) {
case kWarn:
Log(kWarning,
msg +
- "\nNOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this "
- "call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding "
- "an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. "
- "See https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#"
- "knowing-when-to-expect for details.\n",
+ "\nNOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this "
+ "call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding "
+ "an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. "
+ "See "
+ "https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/"
+ "docs/CookBook.md#"
+ "knowing-when-to-expect for details.\n",
stack_frames_to_skip);
break;
default: // FAIL
@@ -334,9 +368,10 @@ const char* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::Name() const
// Calculates the result of invoking this mock function with the given
// arguments, prints it, and returns it. The caller is responsible
// for deleting the result.
-UntypedActionResultHolderBase*
-UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args)
- GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
+UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(
+ void* const untyped_args) GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
+ // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it
+ // is unprotected here.
if (untyped_expectations_.size() == 0) {
// No expectation is set on this mock method - we have an
// uninteresting call.
@@ -355,16 +390,19 @@ UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args)
// If the user allows this uninteresting call, we print it
// only when they want informational messages.
reaction == kAllow ? LogIsVisible(kInfo) :
- // If the user wants this to be a warning, we print it only
- // when they want to see warnings.
- reaction == kWarn ? LogIsVisible(kWarning) :
- // Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we
- // should always print detailed information in the error.
- true;
+ // If the user wants this to be a warning, we print
+ // it only when they want to see warnings.
+ reaction == kWarn
+ ? LogIsVisible(kWarning)
+ :
+ // Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we
+ // should always print detailed information in the error.
+ true;
if (!need_to_report_uninteresting_call) {
// Perform the action without printing the call information.
- return this->UntypedPerformDefaultAction(untyped_args, "Function call: " + std::string(Name()));
+ return this->UntypedPerformDefaultAction(
+ untyped_args, "Function call: " + std::string(Name()));
}
// Warns about the uninteresting call.
@@ -446,6 +484,8 @@ UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args)
// Returns an Expectation object that references and co-owns exp,
// which must be an expectation on this mock function.
Expectation UntypedFunctionMockerBase::GetHandleOf(ExpectationBase* exp) {
+ // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it
+ // is unprotected here.
for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it =
untyped_expectations_.begin();
it != untyped_expectations_.end(); ++it) {
@@ -566,7 +606,7 @@ class MockObjectRegistry {
if (it->second.leakable) // The user said it's fine to leak this object.
continue;
- // TODO(wan@google.com): Print the type of the leaked object.
+ // FIXME: Print the type of the leaked object.
// This can help the user identify the leaked object.
std::cout << "\n";
const MockObjectState& state = it->second;
@@ -582,9 +622,15 @@ class MockObjectRegistry {
leaked_count++;
}
if (leaked_count > 0) {
- std::cout << "\nERROR: " << leaked_count
- << " leaked mock " << (leaked_count == 1 ? "object" : "objects")
- << " found at program exit.\n";
+ std::cout << "\nERROR: " << leaked_count << " leaked mock "
+ << (leaked_count == 1 ? "object" : "objects")
+ << " found at program exit. Expectations on a mock object is "
+ "verified when the object is destructed. Leaking a mock "
+ "means that its expectations aren't verified, which is "
+ "usually a test bug. If you really intend to leak a mock, "
+ "you can suppress this error using "
+ "testing::Mock::AllowLeak(mock_object), or you may use a "
+ "fake or stub instead of a mock.\n";
std::cout.flush();
::std::cerr.flush();
// RUN_ALL_TESTS() has already returned when this destructor is
@@ -736,7 +782,7 @@ void Mock::RegisterUseByOnCallOrExpectCall(const void* mock_obj,
const TestInfo* const test_info =
UnitTest::GetInstance()->current_test_info();
if (test_info != NULL) {
- // TODO(wan@google.com): record the test case name when the
+ // FIXME: record the test case name when the
// ON_CALL or EXPECT_CALL is invoked from SetUpTestCase() or
// TearDownTestCase().
state.first_used_test_case = test_info->test_case_name();
@@ -828,3 +874,9 @@ InSequence::~InSequence() {
}
} // namespace testing
+
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+#if _MSC_VER <= 1900
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
+#endif
generated by cgit v0.12 at 2024-09-01 11:05:53 (GMT)