diff options
| author | Quincey Koziol <koziol@hdfgroup.org> | 2011-04-20 16:17:08 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Quincey Koziol <koziol@hdfgroup.org> | 2011-04-20 16:17:08 (GMT) |
| commit | 4f17c3c59197ac215880ad168b040bec6b48092b (patch) | |
| tree | b097c964e900ccde29ddf15315f59f7339cbdc96 /config/gnu-flags | |
| parent | 697ca4c4fe283054eb44cae5ab9623d72deb392d (diff) | |
| download | hdf5-4f17c3c59197ac215880ad168b040bec6b48092b.zip hdf5-4f17c3c59197ac215880ad168b040bec6b48092b.tar.gz hdf5-4f17c3c59197ac215880ad168b040bec6b48092b.tar.bz2 | |
[svn-r20562] Description:
Bring r20561 from trunk to 1.8 branch:
Remove C++ specific flag from C compilation flags, for gcc 4.5 & 4.6
Tested on:
FreebSD/64 8.2 (freedom) w/gcc 4.6
Diffstat (limited to 'config/gnu-flags')
| -rw-r--r-- | config/gnu-flags | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/config/gnu-flags b/config/gnu-flags index 2ef29e5..1222c87 100644 --- a/config/gnu-flags +++ b/config/gnu-flags @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ case "$cc_vendor-$cc_version" in H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wsync-nand -Wframe-larger-than=16384 -Wpacked-bitfield-compat" # Append more extra warning flags that only gcc 4.5+ know about - H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-overflow=5 -Wc++0x-compat -Wjump-misses-init -Wunsuffixed-float-constants" + H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-overflow=5 -Wjump-misses-init -Wunsuffixed-float-constants" # Append more extra warning flags that only gcc 4.6+ know about H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wdouble-promotion -Wsuggest-attribute=const -Wtrampolines" @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ case "$cc_vendor-$cc_version" in H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wsync-nand -Wframe-larger-than=16384 -Wpacked-bitfield-compat" # Append more extra warning flags that only gcc 4.5+ know about - H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-overflow=5 -Wc++0x-compat -Wjump-misses-init -Wunsuffixed-float-constants" + H5_CFLAGS="$H5_CFLAGS -Wstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-overflow=5 -Wjump-misses-init -Wunsuffixed-float-constants" # Try out the new "stack protector" feature in gcc 4.1 # (Strictly speaking this isn't really a "warning" flag, so it's added to |