summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/html/ExternalFiles.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQuincey Koziol <koziol@hdfgroup.org>1998-07-08 14:54:54 (GMT)
committerQuincey Koziol <koziol@hdfgroup.org>1998-07-08 14:54:54 (GMT)
commitbd1e676c521d881b3143829f493a28b5ced1294b (patch)
tree69c50f9fe21ce87f293d8617a6bd51b4cc1e0244 /doc/html/ExternalFiles.html
parent73345095897d9698bb1f2f7df830bf80a56dc65a (diff)
downloadhdf5-bd1e676c521d881b3143829f493a28b5ced1294b.zip
hdf5-bd1e676c521d881b3143829f493a28b5ced1294b.tar.gz
hdf5-bd1e676c521d881b3143829f493a28b5ced1294b.tar.bz2
[svn-r467] Restructuring documentation.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/html/ExternalFiles.html')
-rw-r--r--doc/html/ExternalFiles.html278
1 files changed, 278 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/html/ExternalFiles.html b/doc/html/ExternalFiles.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..39ebd2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/html/ExternalFiles.html
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
+<html>
+ <head>
+ <title>External Files in HDF5</title>
+ </head>
+
+ <body>
+ <center><h1>External Files in HDF5</h1></center>
+
+ <h3>Overview of Layers</h3>
+
+ <p>This table shows some of the layers of HDF5. Each layer calls
+ functions at the same or lower layers and never functions at
+ higher layers. An object identifier (OID) takes various forms
+ at the various layers: at layer 0 an OID is an absolute physical
+ file address; at layers 1 and 2 it's an absolute virtual file
+ address. At layers 3 through 6 it's a relative address, and at
+ layers 7 and above it's an object handle.
+
+ <p><center>
+ <table border cellpadding=4 width="60%">
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-7</td>
+ <td>Groups</td>
+ <td>Datasets</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-6</td>
+ <td>Indirect Storage</td>
+ <td>Symbol Tables</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-5</td>
+ <td>B-trees</td>
+ <td>Object Hdrs</td>
+ <td>Heaps</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-4</td>
+ <td>Caching</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-3</td>
+ <td>H5F chunk I/O</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-2</td>
+ <td>H5F low</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-1</td>
+ <td>File Family</td>
+ <td>Split Meta/Raw</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr align=center>
+ <td>Layer-0</td>
+ <td>Section-2 I/O</td>
+ <td>Standard I/O</td>
+ <td>Malloc/Free</td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+ </center>
+
+ <h3>Single Address Space</h3>
+
+ <p>The simplest form of hdf5 file is a single file containing only
+ hdf5 data. The file begins with the boot block, which is
+ followed until the end of the file by hdf5 data. The next most
+ complicated file allows non-hdf5 data (user defined data or
+ internal wrappers) to appear before the boot block and after the
+ end of the hdf5 data. The hdf5 data is treated as a single
+ linear address space in both cases.
+
+ <p>The next level of complexity comes when non-hdf5 data is
+ interspersed with the hdf5 data. We handle that by including
+ the non-hdf5 interspersed data in the hdf5 address space and
+ simply not referencing it (eventually we might add those
+ addresses to a "do-not-disturb" list using the same mechanism as
+ the hdf5 free list, but it's not absolutely necessary). This is
+ implemented except for the "do-not-disturb" list.
+
+ <p>The most complicated single address space hdf5 file is when we
+ allow the address space to be split among multiple physical
+ files. For instance, a >2GB file can be split into smaller
+ chunks and transfered to a 32 bit machine, then accessed as a
+ single logical hdf5 file. The library already supports >32 bit
+ addresses, so at layer 1 we split a 64-bit address into a 32-bit
+ file number and a 32-bit offset (the 64 and 32 are
+ arbitrary). The rest of the library still operates with a linear
+ address space.
+
+ <p>Another variation might be a family of two files where all the
+ meta data is stored in one file and all the raw data is stored
+ in another file to allow the HDF5 wrapper to be easily replaced
+ with some other wrapper.
+
+ <p>The <code>H5Fcreate</code> and <code>H5Fopen</code> functions
+ would need to be modified to pass file-type info down to layer 2
+ so the correct drivers can be called and parameters passed to
+ the drivers to initialize them.
+
+ <h4>Implementation</h4>
+
+ <p>I've implemented fixed-size family members. The entire hdf5
+ file is partitioned into members where each member is the same
+ size. The family scheme is used if one passes a name to
+ <code>H5F_open</code> (which is called by <code>H5Fopen()</code>
+ and <code>H5Fcreate</code>) that contains a
+ <code>printf(3c)</code>-style integer format specifier.
+ Currently, the default low-level file driver is used for all
+ family members (H5F_LOW_DFLT, usually set to be Section 2 I/O or
+ Section 3 stdio), but we'll probably eventually want to pass
+ that as a parameter of the file access template, which hasn't
+ been implemented yet. When creating a family, a default family
+ member size is used (defined at the top H5Ffamily.c, currently
+ 64MB) but that also should be settable in the file access
+ template. When opening an existing family, the size of the first
+ member is used to determine the member size (flushing/closing a
+ family ensures that the first member is the correct size) but
+ the other family members don't have to be that large (the local
+ address space, however, is logically the same size for all
+ members).
+
+ <p>I haven't implemented a split meta/raw family yet but am rather
+ curious to see how it would perform. I was planning to use the
+ `.h5' extension for the meta data file and `.raw' for the raw
+ data file. The high-order bit in the address would determine
+ whether the address refers to meta data or raw data. If the user
+ passes a name that ends with `.raw' to <code>H5F_open</code>
+ then we'll chose the split family and use the default low level
+ driver for each of the two family members. Eventually we'll
+ want to pass these kinds of things through the file access
+ template instead of relying on naming convention.
+
+ <h3>External Raw Data</h3>
+
+ <p>We also need the ability to point to raw data that isn't in the
+ HDF5 linear address space. For instance, a dataset might be
+ striped across several raw data files.
+
+ <p>Fortunately, the only two packages that need to be aware of
+ this are the packages for reading/writing contiguous raw data
+ and discontiguous raw data. Since contiguous raw data is a
+ special case, I'll discuss how to implement external raw data in
+ the discontiguous case.
+
+ <p>Discontiguous data is stored as a B-tree whose keys are the
+ chunk indices and whose leaf nodes point to the raw data by
+ storing a file address. So what we need is some way to name the
+ external files, and a way to efficiently store the external file
+ name for each chunk.
+
+ <p>I propose adding to the object header an <em>External File
+ List</em> message that is a 1-origin array of file names.
+ Then, in the B-tree, each key has an index into the External
+ File List (or zero for the HDF5 file) for the file where the
+ chunk can be found. The external file index is only used at
+ the leaf nodes to get to the raw data (the entire B-tree is in
+ the HDF5 file) but because of the way keys are copied among
+ the B-tree nodes, it's much easier to store the index with
+ every key.
+
+ <h3>Multiple HDF5 Files</h3>
+
+ <p>One might also want to combine two or more HDF5 files in a
+ manner similar to mounting file systems in Unix. That is, the
+ group structure and meta data from one file appear as though
+ they exist in the first file. One opens File-A, and then
+ <em>mounts</em> File-B at some point in File-A, the <em>mount
+ point</em>, so that traversing into the mount point actually
+ causes one to enter the root object of File-B. File-A and
+ File-B are each complete HDF5 files and can be accessed
+ individually without mounting them.
+
+ <p>We need a couple additional pieces of machinery to make this
+ work. First, an haddr_t type (a file address) doesn't contain
+ any info about which HDF5 file's address space the address
+ belongs to. But since haddr_t is an opaque type except at
+ layers 2 and below, it should be quite easy to add a pointer to
+ the HDF5 file. This would also remove the H5F_t argument from
+ most of the low-level functions since it would be part of the
+ OID.
+
+ <p>The other thing we need is a table of mount points and some
+ functions that understand them. We would add the following
+ table to each H5F_t struct:
+
+ <p><code><pre>
+struct H5F_mount_t {
+ H5F_t *parent; /* Parent HDF5 file if any */
+ struct {
+ H5F_t *f; /* File which is mounted */
+ haddr_t where; /* Address of mount point */
+ } *mount; /* Array sorted by mount point */
+ intn nmounts; /* Number of mounted files */
+ intn alloc; /* Size of mount table */
+}
+ </pre></code>
+
+ <p>The <code>H5Fmount</code> function takes the ID of an open
+ file, the name of a to-be-mounted file, the name of the mount
+ point, and a file access template (like <code>H5Fopen</code>).
+ It opens the new file and adds a record to the parent's mount
+ table. The <code>H5Funmount</code> function takes the parent
+ file ID and the name of the mount point and closes the file
+ that's mounted at that point. The <code>H5Fclose</code>
+ function closes/unmounts files recursively.
+
+ <p>The <code>H5G_iname</code> function which translates a name to
+ a file address (<code>haddr_t</code>) looks at the mount table
+ at each step in the translation and switches files where
+ appropriate. All name-to-address translations occur through
+ this function.
+
+ <h3>How Long?</h3>
+
+ <p>I'm expecting to be able to implement the two new flavors of
+ single linear address space in about two days. It took two hours
+ to implement the malloc/free file driver at level zero and I
+ don't expect this to be much more work.
+
+ <p>I'm expecting three days to implement the external raw data for
+ discontiguous arrays. Adding the file index to the B-tree is
+ quite trivial; adding the external file list message shouldn't
+ be too hard since the object header message class from wich this
+ message derives is fully implemented; and changing
+ <code>H5F_istore_read</code> should be trivial. Most of the
+ time will be spent designing a way to cache Unix file
+ descriptors efficiently since the total number open files
+ allowed per process could be much smaller than the total number
+ of HDF5 files and external raw data files.
+
+ <p>I'm expecting four days to implement being able to mount one
+ HDF5 file on another. I was originally planning a lot more, but
+ making <code>haddr_t</code> opaque turned out to be much easier
+ than I planned (I did it last Fri). Most of the work will
+ probably be removing the redundant H5F_t arguments for lots of
+ functions.
+
+ <h3>Conclusion</h3>
+
+ <p>The external raw data could be implemented as a single linear
+ address space, but doing so would require one to allocate large
+ enough file addresses throughout the file (>32bits) before the
+ file was created. It would make mixing an HDF5 file family with
+ external raw data, or external HDF5 wrapper around an HDF4 file
+ a more difficult process. So I consider the implementation of
+ external raw data files as a single HDF5 linear address space a
+ kludge.
+
+ <p>The ability to mount one HDF5 file on another might not be a
+ very important feature especially since each HDF5 file must be a
+ complete file by itself. It's not possible to stripe an array
+ over multiple HDF5 files because the B-tree wouldn't be complete
+ in any one file, so the only choice is to stripe the array
+ across multiple raw data files and store the B-tree in the HDF5
+ file. On the other hand, it might be useful if one file
+ contains some public data which can be mounted by other files
+ (e.g., a mesh topology shared among collaborators and mounted by
+ files that contain other fields defined on the mesh). Of course
+ the applications can open the two files separately, but it might
+ be more portable if we support it in the library.
+
+ <p>So we're looking at about two weeks to implement all three
+ versions. I didn't get a chance to do any of them in AIO
+ although we had long-term plans for the first two with a
+ possibility of the third. They'll be much easier to implement in
+ HDF5 than AIO since I've been keeping these in mind from the
+ start.
+
+ <hr>
+ <address><a href="mailto:matzke@llnl.gov">Robb Matzke</a></address>
+<!-- Created: Sat Nov 8 18:08:52 EST 1997 -->
+<!-- hhmts start -->
+Last modified: Wed Nov 12 15:01:14 EST 1997
+<!-- hhmts end -->
+ </body>
+</html>