Fixed HDFFV-10404

Description:
    Applied the typo fixes from user's report.
    The previous pull request couldn't be merged because it was too old,
    and it was too complicated for me to resolve conflicts.
Platform tested:
    Linux/64 (jelly) - very minor

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/src/H5HFcache.c b/src/H5HFcache.c
index 84d5c5f..0c5d3aa 100644
--- a/src/H5HFcache.c
+++ b/src/H5HFcache.c
@@ -702,12 +702,12 @@ H5HF__cache_hdr_pre_serialize(H5F_t *f, void *_thing, haddr_t addr, size_t len,
      *
      * Do this with a call to H5HF__cache_verify_hdr_descendants_clean().
      *
-     * Note that decendants need not be clean if the pre_serialize call
+     * Note that descendants need not be clean if the pre_serialize call
      * is made during a cache serialization instead of an entry or cache
      * flush.
      *
      * Note also that with the recent change in the definition of flush 
-     * dependency, not all decendants need be clean -- only direct flush 
+     * dependency, not all descendants need be clean -- only direct flush 
      * dependency children.
      *
      * Finally, observe that the H5HF__cache_verify_hdr_descendants_clean()
@@ -2643,11 +2643,11 @@ H5HF__cache_dblock_fsf_size(const void *_thing, hsize_t *fsf_size)
  *
  *		The implementation of flush dependencies has been changed.
  *		Prior to this change, a flush dependency parent could be 
- *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency decendants
+ *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency descendants
  *		were clean.  In the new definition, a flush dependency 
  *		parent can be flushed if all its immediate flush dependency
  *		children are clean, regardless of any other dirty 
- *		decendants.  
+ *		descendants.  
  *
  *		Further, metadata cache entries are now allowed to have 
  *		multiple flush dependency parents.  
@@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ H5HF__cache_verify_hdr_descendants_clean(H5F_t *f, H5HF_hdr_t *hdr,
                     H5_BEGIN_TAG(hdr->heap_addr)
 
                     if(NULL == (root_iblock = (H5HF_indirect_t *)H5AC_protect(f, H5AC_FHEAP_IBLOCK, root_iblock_addr, NULL, H5AC__READ_ONLY_FLAG)))
-                        HGOTO_ERROR_TAG(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_protect() faild.")
+                        HGOTO_ERROR_TAG(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_protect() failed.")
 
                     H5_END_TAG
 
@@ -2889,7 +2889,7 @@ H5HF__cache_verify_hdr_descendants_clean(H5F_t *f, H5HF_hdr_t *hdr,
                     H5_BEGIN_TAG(hdr->heap_addr)
 
                     if(NULL == (iblock = (H5HF_indirect_t *)H5AC_protect(f, H5AC_FHEAP_IBLOCK, root_iblock_addr, NULL, H5AC__READ_ONLY_FLAG)))
-                        HGOTO_ERROR_TAG(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_protect() faild.")
+                        HGOTO_ERROR_TAG(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_protect() failed.")
 
                     H5_END_TAG
 
@@ -2912,7 +2912,7 @@ H5HF__cache_verify_hdr_descendants_clean(H5F_t *f, H5HF_hdr_t *hdr,
              if(unprotect_root_iblock) {
                 HDassert(root_iblock);
                 if(H5AC_unprotect(f, H5AC_FHEAP_IBLOCK, root_iblock_addr, root_iblock, H5AC__NO_FLAGS_SET) < 0)
-                    HGOTO_ERROR(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTUNPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_unprotect() faild.")
+                    HGOTO_ERROR(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTUNPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_unprotect() failed.")
             } /* end if */
         } /* end else */
     } /* end if */
@@ -2982,7 +2982,7 @@ done:
  * Function:	H5HF__cache_verify_iblock_descendants_clean
  *
  * Purpose:	Sanity checking routine that verifies that all indirect 
- *		and direct blocks that are decendents of the supplied 
+ *		and direct blocks that are descendants of the supplied 
  *		instance of H5HF_indirect_t are clean.  Set *clean 
  *		to TRUE if this is the case, and to FALSE otherwise.
  *
@@ -3009,11 +3009,11 @@ done:
  *
  *		The implementation of flush dependencies has been changed.
  *		Prior to this change, a flush dependency parent could be 
- *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency decendants
+ *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency descendants
  *		were clean.  In the new definition, a flush dependency 
  *		parent can be flushed if all its immediate flush dependency
  *		children are clean, regardless of any other dirty 
- *		decendants.  
+ *		descendants.  
  *
  *		Further, metadata cache entries are now allowed to have 
  *		multiple flush dependency parents.  
@@ -3126,11 +3126,11 @@ done:
  *
  *		The implementation of flush dependencies has been changed.
  *		Prior to this change, a flush dependency parent could be 
- *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency decendants
+ *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency descendants
  *		were clean.  In the new definition, a flush dependency 
  *		parent can be flushed if all its immediate flush dependency
  *		children are clean, regardless of any other dirty 
- *		decendants.  
+ *		descendants.  
  *
  *		Further, metadata cache entries are now allowed to have 
  *		multiple flush dependency parents.  
@@ -3290,11 +3290,11 @@ done:
  *
  *		The implementation of flush dependencies has been changed.
  *		Prior to this change, a flush dependency parent could be 
- *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency decendants
+ *		flushed if and only if all its flush dependency descendants
  *		were clean.  In the new definition, a flush dependency 
  *		parent can be flushed if all its immediate flush dependency
  *		children are clean, regardless of any other dirty 
- *		decendants.  
+ *		descendants.  
  *
  *		Further, metadata cache entries are now allowed to have 
  *		multiple flush dependency parents.
@@ -3468,7 +3468,7 @@ H5HF__cache_verify_descendant_iblocks_clean(H5F_t *f, haddr_t fd_parent_addr,
                             H5_BEGIN_TAG(iblock->hdr->heap_addr)
 
                             if(NULL == (child_iblock = (H5HF_indirect_t *) H5AC_protect(f, H5AC_FHEAP_IBLOCK, child_iblock_addr, NULL, H5AC__READ_ONLY_FLAG)))
-                                HGOTO_ERROR_TAG(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_protect() faild.")
+                                HGOTO_ERROR_TAG(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_protect() failed.")
 
                             H5_END_TAG
 
@@ -3480,7 +3480,7 @@ H5HF__cache_verify_descendant_iblocks_clean(H5F_t *f, haddr_t fd_parent_addr,
                             /* pointer to the entry.  This is very slimy -- */
                             /* come up with a better solution.              */
                             if(H5AC_get_entry_ptr_from_addr(f, child_iblock_addr, (void **)(&child_iblock)) < 0)
-                                HGOTO_ERROR(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTGET, FAIL, "H5AC_get_entry_ptr_from_addr() faild.")
+                                HGOTO_ERROR(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTGET, FAIL, "H5AC_get_entry_ptr_from_addr() failed.")
                             HDassert(child_iblock);
                         } /* end else */
                     } /* end if */
@@ -3519,7 +3519,7 @@ H5HF__cache_verify_descendant_iblocks_clean(H5F_t *f, haddr_t fd_parent_addr,
                     /* if we protected the child iblock, unprotect it now */
                     if(unprotect_child_iblock) {
                         if(H5AC_unprotect(f, H5AC_FHEAP_IBLOCK, child_iblock_addr, child_iblock, H5AC__NO_FLAGS_SET) < 0)
-                            HGOTO_ERROR(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTUNPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_unprotect() faild.")
+                            HGOTO_ERROR(H5E_HEAP, H5E_CANTUNPROTECT, FAIL, "H5AC_unprotect() failed.")
                     } /* end if */
                 } /* end if */
             } /* end if */