From e7360391fd958296f596f5c8397ba53064219ca0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "H. Joe Lee" Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 12:39:17 -0500 Subject: Fix typos (#3609) --- src/H5FDmpio.c | 2 +- testpar/API/t_span_tree.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- testpar/t_span_tree.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/H5FDmpio.c b/src/H5FDmpio.c index d0eb2c6..1210f4f 100644 --- a/src/H5FDmpio.c +++ b/src/H5FDmpio.c @@ -3744,7 +3744,7 @@ H5FD__mpio_truncate(H5FD_t *_file, hid_t H5_ATTR_UNUSED dxpl_id, bool H5_ATTR_UN /* In principle, it is possible for the size returned by the * call to MPI_File_get_size() to depend on whether writes from - * all proceeses have completed at the time process 0 makes the + * all processes have completed at the time process 0 makes the * call. * * In practice, most (all?) truncate calls will come after a barrier diff --git a/testpar/API/t_span_tree.c b/testpar/API/t_span_tree.c index bf52d85..a744905 100644 --- a/testpar/API/t_span_tree.c +++ b/testpar/API/t_span_tree.c @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ one in collective mode, 2) We will read two datasets with the same hyperslab selection settings, 1. independent read to read independent output, - independent read to read collecive output, + independent read to read collective output, Compare the result, If the result is the same, then collective write succeeds. 2. collective read to read independent output, @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ coll_write_test(int chunk_factor) For testing collective hyperslab selection write In this test, we are using independent read to check - the correctedness of collective write compared with + the correctness of collective write compared with independent write, In order to thoroughly test this feature, we choose @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ coll_write_test(int chunk_factor) mspaceid = H5Screate_simple(MSPACE_RANK, mdim, NULL); /* - * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs has the same + * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs have the same * size and shape as the selected hyperslabs for the file dataspace * Only the starting point is different. * The first selection @@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ coll_read_test(void) mspaceid = H5Screate_simple(MSPACE_RANK, mdim, NULL); /* - * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs has the same + * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs have the same * size and shape as the selected hyperslabs for the file dataspace. * Only the starting point is different. * The first selection @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ coll_read_test(void) ** sel_rank fastest changing indices, with origin (in the ** higher indices) as indicated by the start array. ** -** Note that this function, is hard coded to presume a +** Note that this function is hard-coded to presume a ** maximum dataspace rank of 5. ** ** While this maximum is declared as a constant, increasing @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t * Note that the following computation depends on the C99 * requirement that integer division discard any fraction * (truncation towards zero) to function correctly. As we - * now require C99, this shouldn't be a problem, but noting + * now require C99, this shouldn't be a problem, but note * it may save us some pain if we are ever obliged to support * pre-C99 compilers again. */ @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t /* Now set up the stride and block arrays, and portions of the start * and count arrays that will not be altered during the selection of - * the checker board. + * the checkerboard. */ i = 0; while (i < ds_offset) { @@ -1294,13 +1294,13 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t ** expected data. Return true if it does, and false ** otherwise. ** -** The supplied buffer is presumed to this process's slice +** The supplied buffer is presumed to be this process's slice ** of the target data set. Each such slice will be an ** n-cube of rank (rank -1) and the supplied edge_size with ** origin (mpi_rank, 0, ... , 0) in the target data set. ** ** Further, the buffer is presumed to be the result of reading -** or writing a checker board selection of an m (1 <= m < +** or writing a checkerboard selection of an m (1 <= m < ** rank) dimensional slice through this processes slice ** of the target data set. Also, this slice must be parallel ** to the fastest changing indices. @@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t ** with the natural numbers listed in order from the origin ** along the fastest changing axis. ** -** Thus for a 20x10x10 dataset, the value stored in location +** Thus, for a 20x10x10 dataset, the value stored in location ** (x, y, z) (assuming that z is the fastest changing index ** and x the slowest) is assumed to be: ** @@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t ** ** Further, supposing that this is process 10, this process's ** slice of the dataset would be a 10 x 10 2-cube with origin -** (10, 0, 0) in the data set, and would be initialize (prior +** (10, 0, 0) in the data set, and would be initialized (prior ** to the checkerboard selection) as follows: ** ** 1000, 1001, 1002, ... 1008, 1009 @@ -2398,11 +2398,11 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test(void) * * 1) Reads or writes exactly one chunk, * - * 2) Has no in memory buffer for any other chunk. + * 2) Has no in-memory buffer for any other chunk. * - * The test differers from Rob Latham's bug report in - * that is runs with an arbitrary number of proceeses, - * and uses a 1 dimensional dataset. + * The test differs from Rob Latham's bug report in + * that it runs with an arbitrary number of processes, + * and uses a 1-dimensional dataset. * * Return: void *------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/testpar/t_span_tree.c b/testpar/t_span_tree.c index 317f889..9dd5636 100644 --- a/testpar/t_span_tree.c +++ b/testpar/t_span_tree.c @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ coll_write_test(int chunk_factor) For testing collective hyperslab selection write In this test, we are using independent read to check - the correctedness of collective write compared with + the correctness of collective write compared with independent write, In order to thoroughly test this feature, we choose @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ coll_write_test(int chunk_factor) mspaceid = H5Screate_simple(MSPACE_RANK, mdim, NULL); /* - * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs has the same + * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs have the same * size and shape as the selected hyperslabs for the file dataspace * Only the starting point is different. * The first selection @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ coll_read_test(void) mspaceid = H5Screate_simple(MSPACE_RANK, mdim, NULL); /* - * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs has the same + * Select two hyperslabs in memory. Hyperslabs have the same * size and shape as the selected hyperslabs for the file dataspace. * Only the starting point is different. * The first selection @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ coll_read_test(void) ** sel_rank fastest changing indices, with origin (in the ** higher indices) as indicated by the start array. ** -** Note that this function, is hard coded to presume a +** Note that this function is hard-coded to presume a ** maximum dataspace rank of 5. ** ** While this maximum is declared as a constant, increasing @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t * Note that the following computation depends on the C99 * requirement that integer division discard any fraction * (truncation towards zero) to function correctly. As we - * now require C99, this shouldn't be a problem, but noting + * now require C99, this shouldn't be a problem, but note * it may save us some pain if we are ever obliged to support * pre-C99 compilers again. */ @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t /* Now set up the stride and block arrays, and portions of the start * and count arrays that will not be altered during the selection of - * the checker board. + * the checkerboard. */ i = 0; while (i < ds_offset) { @@ -1195,13 +1195,13 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t ** expected data. Return true if it does, and false ** otherwise. ** -** The supplied buffer is presumed to this process's slice +** The supplied buffer is presumed to be this process's slice ** of the target data set. Each such slice will be an ** n-cube of rank (rank -1) and the supplied edge_size with ** origin (mpi_rank, 0, ... , 0) in the target data set. ** ** Further, the buffer is presumed to be the result of reading -** or writing a checker board selection of an m (1 <= m < +** or writing a checkerboard selection of an m (1 <= m < ** rank) dimensional slice through this processes slice ** of the target data set. Also, this slice must be parallel ** to the fastest changing indices. @@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test__select_checker_board(const int mpi_rank, const hid_t t ** ** Further, supposing that this is process 10, this process's ** slice of the dataset would be a 10 x 10 2-cube with origin -** (10, 0, 0) in the data set, and would be initialize (prior +** (10, 0, 0) in the data set, and would be initialized (prior ** to the checkerboard selection) as follows: ** ** 1000, 1001, 1002, ... 1008, 1009 @@ -2285,9 +2285,9 @@ lower_dim_size_comp_test(void) * * 2) Has no in memory buffer for any other chunk. * - * The test differers from Rob Latham's bug report in - * that is runs with an arbitrary number of proceeses, - * and uses a 1 dimensional dataset. + * The test differs from Rob Latham's bug report in + * that it runs with an arbitrary number of processes, + * and uses a 1-dimensional dataset. * * Return: void * -- cgit v0.12