Yet more doc update backporting

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/doc/subst.n b/doc/subst.n
index 829b077..71b17f6 100644
--- a/doc/subst.n
+++ b/doc/subst.n
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 '\" See the file "license.terms" for information on usage and redistribution
 '\" of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES.
 '\" 
-'\" RCS: @(#) $Id: subst.n,v 1.5 2002/04/18 16:31:40 dgp Exp $
+'\" RCS: @(#) $Id: subst.n,v 1.5.2.1 2004/10/27 14:23:58 dkf Exp $
 '\" 
 .so man.macros
 .TH subst n 7.4 Tcl "Tcl Built-In Commands"
@@ -66,31 +66,31 @@ When it performs its substitutions, \fIsubst\fR does not give any
 special treatment to double quotes or curly braces (except within
 command substitutions) so the script
 .CS
-\fBset a 44
-subst {xyz {$a}}\fR
+set a 44
+\fBsubst\fR {xyz {$a}}
 .CE
 returns ``\fBxyz {44}\fR'', not ``\fBxyz {$a}\fR''
 .VS 8.4
 and the script
 .CS
-\fBset a "p\\} q \\{r"
-subst {xyz {$a}}\fR
+set a "p\\} q \\{r"
+\fBsubst\fR {xyz {$a}}
 .CE
 return ``\fBxyz {p} q {r}\fR'', not ``\fBxyz {p\\} q \\{r}\fR''.
 .PP
 When command substitution is performed, it includes any variable
 substitution necessary to evaluate the script.  
 .CS
-\fBset a 44
-subst -novariables {$a [format $a]}\fR
+set a 44
+\fBsubst\fR -novariables {$a [format $a]}
 .CE
 returns ``\fB$a 44\fR'', not ``\fB$a $a\fR''.  Similarly, when
 variable substitution is performed, it includes any command
 substitution necessary to retrieve the value of the variable.
 .CS
-\fBproc b {} {return c}
+proc b {} {return c}
 array set a {c c [b] tricky}
-subst -nocommands {[b] $a([b])}\fR
+\fBsubst\fR -nocommands {[b] $a([b])}
 .CE
 returns ``\fB[b] c\fR'', not ``\fB[b] tricky\fR''.
 .PP
@@ -99,21 +99,21 @@ prevent substitution of the rest of the command substitution and the
 rest of \fIstring\fR respectively, giving script authors more options
 when processing text using \fIsubst\fR.  For example, the script
 .CS
-\fBsubst {abc,[break],def}\fR
+\fBsubst\fR {abc,[break],def}
 .CE
 returns ``\fBabc,\fR'', not ``\fBabc,,def\fR'' and the script
 .CS
-\fBsubst {abc,[continue;expr 1+2],def}\fR
+\fBsubst\fR {abc,[continue;expr 1+2],def}
 .CE
 returns ``\fBabc,,def\fR'', not ``\fBabc,3,def\fR''.
 .PP
 Other exceptional return codes substitute the returned value
 .CS
-\fBsubst {abc,[return foo;expr 1+2],def}\fR
+\fBsubst\fR {abc,[return foo;expr 1+2],def}
 .CE
 returns ``\fBabc,foo,def\fR'', not ``\fBabc,3,def\fR'' and
 .CS
-\fBsubst {abc,[return -code 10 foo;expr 1+2],def}\fR
+\fBsubst\fR {abc,[return -code 10 foo;expr 1+2],def}
 .CE
 also returns ``\fBabc,foo,def\fR'', not ``\fBabc,3,def\fR''.
 .VE