diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'generic')
-rw-r--r-- | generic/tclCompExpr.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/generic/tclCompExpr.c b/generic/tclCompExpr.c index 3fdcc22..36e1c9d 100644 --- a/generic/tclCompExpr.c +++ b/generic/tclCompExpr.c @@ -1919,7 +1919,8 @@ ParseLexeme( literal = Tcl_NewObj(); if (TclParseNumber(NULL, literal, NULL, start, numBytes, &end, TCL_PARSE_NO_WHITESPACE) == TCL_OK) { - if (!isalnum(UCHAR(*end)) && UCHAR(*end) != '_') { + if (end < start + numBytes && !isalnum(UCHAR(*end)) + && UCHAR(*end) != '_') { number: TclInitStringRep(literal, start, end-start); @@ -1932,16 +1933,38 @@ ParseLexeme( return (end-start); } else { unsigned char lexeme; - const char *p = start; - while (p < end) { - if (!isalnum(UCHAR(*p++))) { - goto number; + + /* + * We have a number followed directly by bareword characters + * (alpha, digit, underscore). Is this a number followed by + * bareword syntax error? Or should we join into one bareword? + * Example: Inf + luence + () becomes a valid function call. + * [Bug 3401704] + */ + if (literal->typePtr == &tclDoubleType) { + const char *p = start; + while (p < end) { + if (!isalnum(UCHAR(*p++))) { + /* + * The number has non-bareword characters, so we + * must treat it as a number. + */ + goto number; + } } } ParseLexeme(end, numBytes-(end-start), &lexeme, NULL); if ((NODE_TYPE & lexeme) == BINARY) { + /* + * The bareword characters following the number take the + * form of an operator (eq, ne, in, ni, ...) so we treat + * as number + operator. + */ goto number; } + /* + * Otherwise, fall through and parse the whole as a bareword. + */ } } |