From 27306c24b9e0af8fc80742dc287acbe68b072119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dgp Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:30:47 +0000 Subject: Tidiness, comments, and tests. --- generic/tclCompExpr.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- tests/parseExpr.test | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/generic/tclCompExpr.c b/generic/tclCompExpr.c index 3fdcc22..36e1c9d 100644 --- a/generic/tclCompExpr.c +++ b/generic/tclCompExpr.c @@ -1919,7 +1919,8 @@ ParseLexeme( literal = Tcl_NewObj(); if (TclParseNumber(NULL, literal, NULL, start, numBytes, &end, TCL_PARSE_NO_WHITESPACE) == TCL_OK) { - if (!isalnum(UCHAR(*end)) && UCHAR(*end) != '_') { + if (end < start + numBytes && !isalnum(UCHAR(*end)) + && UCHAR(*end) != '_') { number: TclInitStringRep(literal, start, end-start); @@ -1932,16 +1933,38 @@ ParseLexeme( return (end-start); } else { unsigned char lexeme; - const char *p = start; - while (p < end) { - if (!isalnum(UCHAR(*p++))) { - goto number; + + /* + * We have a number followed directly by bareword characters + * (alpha, digit, underscore). Is this a number followed by + * bareword syntax error? Or should we join into one bareword? + * Example: Inf + luence + () becomes a valid function call. + * [Bug 3401704] + */ + if (literal->typePtr == &tclDoubleType) { + const char *p = start; + while (p < end) { + if (!isalnum(UCHAR(*p++))) { + /* + * The number has non-bareword characters, so we + * must treat it as a number. + */ + goto number; + } } } ParseLexeme(end, numBytes-(end-start), &lexeme, NULL); if ((NODE_TYPE & lexeme) == BINARY) { + /* + * The bareword characters following the number take the + * form of an operator (eq, ne, in, ni, ...) so we treat + * as number + operator. + */ goto number; } + /* + * Otherwise, fall through and parse the whole as a bareword. + */ } } diff --git a/tests/parseExpr.test b/tests/parseExpr.test index 7673dbe..1620a62 100644 --- a/tests/parseExpr.test +++ b/tests/parseExpr.test @@ -997,6 +997,67 @@ test parseExpr-21.63 {error message} -body { } -returnCodes error -result "missing close-brace in expression \"...12345678901234567890*\[\{abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv...\"" +test parseExpr-18.1 {LogSyntaxError procedure, error in expr longer than 60 chars} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser {(+0123456)*(+0123456)*(+0123456)*(+0123456)*(+0123456)*(+0123456)*(+0123456)/} -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result * + +test parseExpr-22.1 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 2a() 1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr 2 1 text 2 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.2 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser nana() 3 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr nan 1 text nan 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.3 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 2a() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr 2a() 1 operator 2a 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.4 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser nana() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr nana() 1 operator nana 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.5 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser nan9() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr nan9() 1 operator nan9 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.6 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 2_() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr 2_() 1 operator 2_ 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.7 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser nan_() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr nan_() 1 operator nan_ 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.8 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser nan!() -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result * +test parseExpr-22.9 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 1e3_() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr 1e3_() 1 operator 1e3_ 0 {}} +test parseExpr-22.10 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 1.3_() -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result * +test parseExpr-22.11 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 1e-3_() -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result * +test parseExpr-22.12 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser naneq() -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result * +test parseExpr-22.13 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser naner() -1 +} -result {- {} 0 subexpr naner() 1 operator naner 0 {}} + +test parseExpr-22.14 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 08 -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result {*invalid octal number*} +test parseExpr-22.15 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 0o8 -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result {*invalid octal number*} +test parseExpr-22.16 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 0o08 -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result {*invalid octal number*} +test parseExpr-22.17 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 0b2 -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result {*invalid binary number*} +test parseExpr-22.18 {Bug 3401704} -constraints testexprparser -body { + testexprparser 0b02 -1 +} -returnCodes error -match glob -result {*invalid binary number*} + + # cleanup ::tcltest::cleanupTests return -- cgit v0.12