summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Radomski <github@mintwerk.de>2017-07-05 12:46:12 (GMT)
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2017-07-05 12:46:12 (GMT)
commit7a2df6c1e8d268cdcc4f7969dd56b5927c38888d (patch)
treea1fa1311c8b2b48b74994719ecc352ab171f9d63
parent7fb097283128ade8e3630a33516cf57b57688404 (diff)
parent799a95c560338643894ffd80510db8b48baa2f45 (diff)
downloaduscxml-7a2df6c1e8d268cdcc4f7969dd56b5927c38888d.zip
uscxml-7a2df6c1e8d268cdcc4f7969dd56b5927c38888d.tar.gz
uscxml-7a2df6c1e8d268cdcc4f7969dd56b5927c38888d.tar.bz2
Merge pull request #158 from tklab-tud/sradomski
Fixed typo
-rw-r--r--README.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 3c85a1b..7ba0406 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ For more detailled information, refer to the [documentation](http://tklab-tud.gi
## Benchmarks
-We did conceive a [series of benchmarks](https://github.com/tklab-tud/uscxml/tree/master/test/benchmarks) SCXML documents to evaluate the performance of the various SCXML implementations. The state-charts in the benchmarks are completely artificial and bear no resemblance to real-world state-charts. However, they may provide a general guidance to get an impression about the performance of the different implementations.
+We did conceive a [series of benchmark](https://github.com/tklab-tud/uscxml/tree/master/test/benchmarks) SCXML documents to evaluate the performance of the various SCXML implementations. The state-charts in the benchmarks are completely artificial and bear no resemblance to real-world state-charts. However, they may provide a general guidance to get an impression about the performance of the different implementations.
-The implementations each stress a specific feature of any SCXML `microstep(T)` implementation. Each contains a state `mark` that is continuously entered and exited as part of a sequence of spontaneous microsteps and measures the entries per second. For every implementation, the [benchmark is run](https://github.com/tklab-tud/uscxml/blob/master/contrib/benchmarks/run.sh) for a number of seconds and the iterations per seconds are averaged. The benchmarks exist in increasing complexity from very simple with, e.g., 4 states nested in a depth of 4 compounds up until 512 for state-charts with > 250.000 states.
+The state-charts each stress a specific feature of any SCXML `microstep(T)` implementation. Each contains a state `mark` that is continuously entered and exited as part of a sequence of spontaneous microsteps and measures the entries per second. For every implementation, the [benchmark is run](https://github.com/tklab-tud/uscxml/blob/master/contrib/benchmarks/run.sh) for a number of seconds and the iterations per seconds are averaged. The benchmarks exist in increasing complexity from very simple with, e.g., 4 states nested in a depth of 4 compounds up until 512 for state-charts with > 250.000 states.
**Note:** If you are the author / maintainer of one of the SCXML implementations being benchmarked below and feel that I misrepresent your implementation's performance, post an issue and I will set things straight.