summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAaron Kennedy <aaron.kennedy@nokia.com>2010-03-24 05:40:05 (GMT)
committerAaron Kennedy <aaron.kennedy@nokia.com>2010-03-24 05:40:05 (GMT)
commitd19de14f84e9fca8bb709039d5d0331e6ddfe485 (patch)
treef01e97c72f21ed6abef881c846825ccef83380ee /doc
parentf59619a3a4de074d0557ce17f9580a242e4e6c16 (diff)
downloadQt-d19de14f84e9fca8bb709039d5d0331e6ddfe485.zip
Qt-d19de14f84e9fca8bb709039d5d0331e6ddfe485.tar.gz
Qt-d19de14f84e9fca8bb709039d5d0331e6ddfe485.tar.bz2
Doc
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/src/declarative/scope.qdoc452
1 files changed, 206 insertions, 246 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/declarative/scope.qdoc b/doc/src/declarative/scope.qdoc
index 8ec784f..c588b45 100644
--- a/doc/src/declarative/scope.qdoc
+++ b/doc/src/declarative/scope.qdoc
@@ -39,344 +39,304 @@
**
****************************************************************************/
-/*!
-\page qdeclarativescope.html
-\title QML Scope
+/*
+
+
+
+and requires extension to
+fit naturally with QML.
-\tableofcontents
-NOTE: This documentation is out of data.
+JavaScript has only b
+JavaScript has a very simple built in scope is very simple
-\l {Property Binding}s and \l {Integrating JavaScript}{JavaScript} are executed in a scope chain
+script, and the precede d
+
+and \l {Integrating JavaScript}{JavaScript} are executed in a scope chain
automatically established by QML when a component instance is constructed. QML is a \e {dynamically scoped}
language. Different object instances instantiated from the same component can exist in
different scope chains.
\image qml-scope.png
-\section1 JavaScript Variable object
-Each binding and script block has its own distinct JavaScript variable object where local
-variables are stored. That is, local variables from different bindings and script blocks never
-conflict.
+*/
-\section1 Element Type Names
+/*!
+\page qdeclarativescope.html
+\title QML Scope
-Bindings or script blocks use element type names when accessing \l {Attached Properties} or
-enumeration values. The set of available element names is defined by the import list of the
-\l {QML Documents}{QML Document} in which the the binding or script block is defined.
+\tableofcontents
-These two examples show how to access attached properties and enumeration values with different
-types of import statements.
-\table
-\row
-\o
-\code
-import Qt 4.6
+QML property bindings, inline functions and imported JavaScript files all
+run in a JavaScript scope. Scope controls which variables an expression can
+access, and which variable takes precedence when two or more names conflict.
-Text {
- id: root
- scale: root.PathView.scale
- horizontalAlignment: Text.AlignLeft
-}
-\endcode
-\o
-\code
-import Qt 4.6 as MyQt
+As JavaScript's built-in scope mechanism is very simple, QML enhances it to fit
+more naturally with the QML language extensions.
-Text {
- id: root
- scale: root.MyQt.PathView.scale
- horizontalAlignment: MyQt.Text.AlignLeft
-}
-\endcode
-\endtable
+\section1 JavaScript Scope
-\section1 QML Local Scope
+QML's scope extensions do not interfere with JavaScript's natural scoping.
+JavaScript programmers can reuse their existing knowledge when programming
+functions, property bindings or imported JavaScript files in QML.
-Most variables references are resolved in the local scope. The local scope is controlled by the
-QML component in which the binding or script block was defined. The following example shows
-three different bindings, and the component that dictates each local scope.
+In the following example, the \c {addConstant()} method will add 13 to the
+parameter passed just as the programmer would expect irrespective of the
+value of the QML object's \c a and \c b properties.
-\table
-\row
-\o
\code
-// main.qml
-import Qt 4.6
+QtObject {
+ property int a: 3
+ property int b: 9
-Rectangle { // Local scope component for binding 1
- id: root
- property string text
-
- Button {
- text: root.text // binding 1
+ function addConstant(b) {
+ var a = 13;
+ return b + a;
}
-
- ListView {
- delegate: Component { // Local scope component for binding 2
- Rectangle {
- width: ListView.view.width // binding 2
- }
- }
- }
-
}
\endcode
-\o
-\code
-// Button.qml
-import Qt 4.6
-Rectangle { // Local scope component for binding 3
- id: root
- property string text
+That QML respects JavaScript's normal scoping rules even applies in bindings.
+This totally evil, abomination of a binding will assign 12 to the QML object's
+\c a property.
- Text {
- text: root.text // binding 3
- }
+\code
+QtObject {
+ property int a
+
+ a: { var a = 12; a; }
}
\endcode
-\endtable
-Inside the local scope, four "sub-scopes" exist. Each sub-scope is searched in order when
-resolving a name; names in higher sub-scopes shadow those in lower sub-scopes.
+Every JavaScript expression, function or file in QML has its own unique
+variable object. Local variables declared in one will never conflict
+with local variables declared in another.
-\section2 IDs
+\section1 Element Names and Imported JavaScript Files
-IDs present in the component take precendence over other names. The QML engine enforces
-uniqueness of IDs within a component, so their names cannot conflict with one another.
+\l {QML Document}s include import statements that define the element names
+and JavaScript files visible to the document. In addition to their use in the
+QML declaration itself, element names are used by JavaScript code when accessing
+\l {Attached Properties} and enumeration values.
-Here is an example of using IDs within bindings:
+The effect of an import applies to every property binding, and JavaScript
+function in the QML document, even those in nested inline components. The
+following example shows a simple QML file that accesses some enumeration
+values and calls an imported JavaScript function.
\code
-Item {
- id: root
- width: nested.width
- Item {
- id: nested
- height: root.height
- }
-}
-\endcode
-
-\section2 Script Methods
-
-Methods declared in script blocks are searched immediately after IDs. In the case of multiple
-script blocks in the one component, the blocks are searched in the order in which they were
-declared - the nesting of script blocks within a component is not significant for name
-resolution.
-
-In the following example, \c {Method 1} shadows \c {Method 2} for the bindings, but not for
-\c {Method 3}.
+import Qt 4.6
+import "code.js" as Code
-\code
-Item {
- Script {
- function getValue() { return 10; } // Method 1
- }
+ListView {
+ snapMode: ListView.SnapToItem
- Rectangle {
- Script {
- function getValue() { return 11; } // Method 2
- function getValue2() { return getValue(); } // Method 3
+ delegate: Component {
+ Text {
+ elide: Text.ElideMiddle
+ text: "A really, really long string that will require eliding."
+ color: Code.defaultColor()
}
-
- x: getValue() // Resolves to Method 1, set to 10
- y: getValue2() // Resolves to Method 3, set to 11
}
}
\endcode
-\section2 Scope Object
-
-A scope object is associated with each binding and script block. Properties and methods of the
-scope object appear in the scope chain, immediately after \l {Script Methods}.
+\section1 Binding Scope Object
-In bindings and script blocks established explicitly in \l {QML Documents}, the scope object is
-always the element containing the binding or script block. The following example shows two
-bindings, one using grouped properties, and the corresponding scope object. These two bindings
-use the scope object to resolve variable references: \c height is a property on \l Rectangle,
-and \c parent is a property on \l Text.
+Property bindings are the most common use of JavaScript in QML. Property
+bindings associate the result of a JavaScript expression with a property of an
+object. The object to which the bound property belongs is known as the binding's
+scope object. In this QML simple declaration the \l Item object is the
+binding's scope object.
\code
-Item { // Scope object for Script block 1
- Script { // Script block 1
- function calculateValue() { ... }
- }
-
- Rectangle { // Scope object for Binding 1 and Script block 2
- Script { // Script block 2
- function calculateColor() { ... }
- }
- width: height * 2 // Binding 1
- }
-
- Text { // Scope object for Binding 2
- font.pixelSize: parent.height * 0.7 // binding 2
- }
+Item {
+ anchors.left: parent.left
}
\endcode
-One notable characteristic of the scope object is its interaction with \l {Attached Properties}.
-As attached properties exist on all objects, an attached property reference that is not
-explicitly prefixed by an id will \e always resolve to the attached property on the scope
-object.
-
-In the following example, \c {Binding 1} will resolve to the attached properties of the
-\l Rectangle element, as intended. However, due to the property search of the scope object,
-\c {Binding 2} will resolve to the attached properties of the \l Text element, which
-is probably not what was intended. This code can be corrected, by replacing \c {Binding 2}
-with this explicit element reference \c {root.ListView.view.width}.
+Bindings have access to the scope object's properties without qualification.
+In the previous example, the binding accesses the \l Item's \c parent property
+directly, without needing any form of object prefix. QML introduces a more
+structured, object-oriented approach to JavaScript, and consequently does not
+require (although it does support) use of the implicit \c this property.
+
+Care must be used when accessing \l {Attached Properties} from bindings due
+to their interaction with the scope object. Conceptually attached properties
+exist on \e all objects, even if they only have an effect on a subset of those.
+Consequently unqualified attached property reads will always resolve to an
+attached property on the scope object, which is not always what the programmer
+intended.
+
+For example, the \l PathView element attaches interpolated value properties to
+its delegates depending on their position in the path. As PathView only
+meaningfully attaches these properties to the root element in the delegate, any
+sub-element that accesses them must explicitly qualify the root object, as shown
+below.
\code
-import Qt 4.6
-
-ListView {
- delegate: Rectangle {
- id: root
- width: ListView.view.width // Binding 1
- Text {
- text: contactName
- width: ListView.view.width // Binding 2
+PathView {
+ delegate: Component {
+ Rectangle {
+ id: root
+ Image {
+ scale: root.PathView.scale
+ }
}
}
}
\endcode
-\e TODO
-
-\list
-\o scope object for PropertyChanges
-\endlist
-
-\section2 Root Object
+If the \l Image element omitted the \c root prefix, it would inadvertantly access
+the unset \c {PathView.scale} attached property on itself.
-Properties and methods on the local scope component's root object appear in the scope chain
-immediately after the \l {Scope Object}. If the scope object and root object are the same,
-this step has no effect.
+\section1 Component Scope
-This example uses the root object to easily propagate data throughout the component.
+Each QML component in a QML document defines a logical scope. Each document
+has at least one root component, but can also have other inline sub-components.
+The component scope is the union of the object ids within the component and the
+component's root element's properties.
\code
Item {
- property string description
- property int fontSize
+ property string title
Text {
- text: description
- font.pixelSize: fontSize
+ id: titleElement
+ text: "<b>" + title + "</b>"
+ font.pixelSize: 22
+ anchors.top: parent.top
+ }
+
+ Text {
+ text: titleElement.text
+ font.pixelSize: 18
+ anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
}
}
\endcode
-\section1 QML Component chain
-
-When a QML component is instantiated it is given a parent component instance. The parent
-component instance is immutable - it is not affected, for example, by changes in the instance's
-visual parent (in the case of visual elements). Should name resolution fail within the
-\l {QML Local Scope}, this parent chain is searched.
+The example above shows a simple QML component that displays a rich text title
+string at the top, and a smaller copy of the same text at the bottom. The first
+\c Text element directly accesses the component's \c title property when
+forming the text to display. That the root element's properties are directly
+accessible makes it trivial to distribute data throughout the component.
-For each component instance in the chain, the following are examined:
+The second \c Text element uses an id to access the first's text directly. IDs
+are specified explicitly by the QML programmer so they always take precedence
+over other property names (except for those in the \l {JavaScript Scope}). For
+example, in the unlikely event that the binding's \l {Binding Scope Object}{scope
+object} had a \c titleElement property in the previous example, the \c titleElement
+id would still take precedence.
-\list 1
-\o IDs
-\o Script Methods
-\o Root Object
-\endlist
+\section1 Component Instance Hierarchy
-This list is a sub-set of that in the \l {QML Local Scope}.
+In QML, component instances connect their component scopes together to form a
+scope hierarchy. Component instances can directly access the component scopes of
+their ancestors.
-A sub-component's parent component instance is set to the component that created it.
-In the following example, the two \c Button instances have the
-\c main.qml instance as their parent component instance. If the \c Button type was used from
-within another QML file, it may have a difference parent component instance, and consequently
-the \c buttonClicked() method may resolve differently.
+The easiest way to demonstrate this is with inline sub-components whose component
+scopes are implicitly scoped as children of the outer component.
-\table
-\row
-\o
\code
-// main.qml
Item {
- function buttonClicked(var data) {
- print(data + " clicked");
- }
+ property color defaultColor: "blue"
- Button { text: "Button1" }
- Button { text: "Button2" }
-}
-\endcode
-\o
-\code
-// Button.qml
-Rectangle {
- id: root
- property string text
- width: 80
- height: 30
- Text {
- anchors.centerIn: parent
- text: root.text
- }
- MouseArea {
- anchors.fill: parent
- onClicked: buttonClicked(text)
+ ListView {
+ delegate: Component {
+ Rectangle {
+ color: defaultColor
+ }
+ }
}
}
\endcode
-\endtable
-The code above discourages the re-use of the \c Button component, as it has a hard dependency
-on the environment in which it is used. Tightly coupling two types together like this should
-only be used when the components are within the same module, and the author controls the
-implementations of both.
+The component instance hierarchy allows instances of the delegate component
+to access the \c defaultColor property of the \c Item element. Of course,
+had the delegate component had a property called \c defaultColor that would
+have taken precedence.
-In the following example, the \l ListView sets the parent component instance of each of its
-delegates to its own component instance. In this way, the main component can easily pass data
-into the \l ListView delegates.
+The component instance scope hierarchy extends to out-of-line components, too.
+In the following example, the \c TitlePage.qml component creates two
+\c TitleText instances. Even though the \c TitleText element is in a separate
+file, it still has access to the \c title property when it is used from within
+the \c TitlePage. QML is a dynamically scoped language - depending on where it
+is used, the \c title property may resolve differently.
\code
+// TitlePage.qml
+import Qt 4.6
Item {
- property color delegateColor: "red"
+ property string title
+
+ TitleText {
+ size: 22
+ anchors.top: parent.top
+ }
- ListView {
- delegate: Component {
- Rectangle {
- color: delegateColor
- }
- }
+ TitleText {
+ size: 18
+ anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
}
}
-\endcode
-\section1 QDeclarativeContext chain
-
-The \l QDeclarativeContext chain allows C++ applications to pass data into QML applications.
-\l QDeclarativeComponent object instances created from C++ are passed a \l QDeclarativeContext in which they
-are created. Variables defined in this context appear in the scope chain. Each QDeclarativeContext
-also defines a parent context. Variables in child QDeclarativeContext's shadow those in its parent.
+// TitleText.qml
+import Qt 4.6
+Text {
+ property int size
+ text: "<b>" + title + "</b>"
+ font.pixelSize: size
+}
+\endcode
-Consider the following QDeclarativeContext tree.
+Dynamic scoping is very powerful, but it must be used cautiously to prevent
+the behavior of QML code from becoming difficult to predict. In general it
+should only be used in cases where the two components are already tightly
+coupled in another way. When building reusable components, it is preferable
+to use property interfaces, like this:
-\image qml-context-tree.png
+\code
+// TitlePage.qml
+import Qt 4.6
+Item {
+ id: root
+ property string title
+
+ TitleText {
+ title: root.title
+ size: 22
+ anchors.top: parent.top
+ }
-The value of \c background in \c {Context 1} would be used if it was instantiated in
-\c {Context 1}, where as the value of the \c background in the root context would be used if
-the component instance was instantiated in \c {Context 2}.
+ TitleText {
+ title: root.title
+ size: 18
+ anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
+ }
+}
-\code
+// TitleText.qml
import Qt 4.6
+Text {
+ property string title
+ property int size
-Rectangle {
- id: myRect
- width: 100; height: 100
- color: background
+ text: "<b>" + title + "</b>"
+ font.pixelSize: size
}
\endcode
-\section1 QML Global Object
+\section1 JavaScript Global Object
+
+In addition to all the properties that a developer would normally expect on
+the JavaScript global object, QML adds some custom extensions to make UI or
+QML specific tasks a little easier. These extensions are described in the
+\l {QML Global Object} documentation.
+
+QML disallows element, id and property names that conflict with the properties
+on the global object to prevent any confusion. Programmers can be confident
+that \c Math.min(10, 9) will always work as expected!
-The \l {QML Global Object} contains all the properties of the JavaScript global object, plus some
-QML specific extensions.
*/