summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGeorg Brandl <georg@python.org>2008-06-07 17:11:00 (GMT)
committerGeorg Brandl <georg@python.org>2008-06-07 17:11:00 (GMT)
commitafd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63 (patch)
tree71463b89e0445d6fece11f4db0c9141c43354fc5
parent60fbf7f8bb83dd10a8d71ae763f845e688399fa0 (diff)
downloadcpython-afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63.zip
cpython-afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63.tar.gz
cpython-afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63.tar.bz2
Backport docs for abc module to 2.6.
-rw-r--r--Doc/library/abc.rst195
-rw-r--r--Doc/library/python.rst1
2 files changed, 196 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/library/abc.rst b/Doc/library/abc.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3ce2a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Doc/library/abc.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+:mod:`abc` --- Abstract Base Classes
+====================================
+
+.. module:: abc
+ :synopsis: Abstract base classes according to PEP 3119.
+.. moduleauthor:: Guido van Rossum
+.. sectionauthor:: Georg Brandl
+.. much of the content adapted from docstrings
+
+.. versionadded:: 2.6
+
+This module provides the infrastructure for defining abstract base classes
+(ABCs) in Python, as outlined in :pep:`3119`; see the PEP for why this
+was added to Python. (See also, :pep:`3141` regarding a type hierarchy
+for numbers based on ABCs.)
+
+The :mod:`collections` module has some concrete classes that derive from
+ABCs; these can, of course, be further derived. In addition the
+:mod:`collections` module has some ABCs that can be used to test whether
+a class or instance provides a particular interface, for example, is it
+hashable or a mapping.
+
+
+This module provides the following class:
+
+.. class:: ABCMeta
+
+ Metaclass for defining Abstract Base Classes (ABCs).
+
+ Use this metaclass to create an ABC. An ABC can be subclassed directly, and
+ then acts as a mix-in class. You can also register unrelated concrete
+ classes (even built-in classes) and unrelated ABCs as "virtual subclasses" --
+ these and their descendants will be considered subclasses of the registering
+ ABC by the built-in :func:`issubclass` function, but the registering ABC
+ won't show up in their MRO (Method Resolution Order) nor will method
+ implementations defined by the registering ABC be callable (not even via
+ :func:`super`). [#]_
+
+ Classes created with a metaclass of :class:`ABCMeta` have the following method:
+
+ .. method:: register(subclass)
+
+ Register *subclass* as a "virtual subclass" of this ABC. For
+ example::
+
+ from abc import ABCMeta
+
+ class MyABC:
+ __metaclass__ = ABCMeta
+
+ MyABC.register(tuple)
+
+ assert issubclass(tuple, MyABC)
+ assert isinstance((), MyABC)
+
+ You can also override this method in an abstract base class:
+
+ .. method:: __subclasshook__(subclass)
+
+ (Must be defined as a class method.)
+
+ Check whether *subclass* is considered a subclass of this ABC. This means
+ that you can customize the behavior of ``issubclass`` further without the
+ need to call :meth:`register` on every class you want to consider a
+ subclass of the ABC. (This class method is called from the
+ :meth:`__subclasscheck__` method of the ABC.)
+
+ This method should return ``True``, ``False`` or ``NotImplemented``. If
+ it returns ``True``, the *subclass* is considered a subclass of this ABC.
+ If it returns ``False``, the *subclass* is not considered a subclass of
+ this ABC, even if it would normally be one. If it returns
+ ``NotImplemented``, the subclass check is continued with the usual
+ mechanism.
+
+ .. XXX explain the "usual mechanism"
+
+
+ For a demonstration of these concepts, look at this example ABC definition::
+
+ class Foo(object):
+ def __getitem__(self, index):
+ ...
+ def __len__(self):
+ ...
+ def get_iterator(self):
+ return iter(self)
+
+ class MyIterable:
+ __metaclass__ = ABCMeta
+
+ @abstractmethod
+ def __iter__(self):
+ while False:
+ yield None
+
+ def get_iterator(self):
+ return self.__iter__()
+
+ @classmethod
+ def __subclasshook__(cls, C):
+ if cls is MyIterable:
+ if any("__iter__" in B.__dict__ for B in C.__mro__):
+ return True
+ return NotImplemented
+
+ MyIterable.register(Foo)
+
+ The ABC ``MyIterable`` defines the standard iterable method,
+ :meth:`__iter__`, as an abstract method. The implementation given here can
+ still be called from subclasses. The :meth:`get_iterator` method is also
+ part of the ``MyIterable`` abstract base class, but it does not have to be
+ overridden in non-abstract derived classes.
+
+ The :meth:`__subclasshook__` class method defined here says that any class
+ that has an :meth:`__iter__` method in its :attr:`__dict__` (or in that of
+ one of its base classes, accessed via the :attr:`__mro__` list) is
+ considered a ``MyIterable`` too.
+
+ Finally, the last line makes ``Foo`` a virtual subclass of ``MyIterable``,
+ even though it does not define an :meth:`__iter__` method (it uses the
+ old-style iterable protocol, defined in terms of :meth:`__len__` and
+ :meth:`__getitem__`). Note that this will not make ``get_iterator``
+ available as a method of ``Foo``, so it is provided separately.
+
+
+It also provides the following decorators:
+
+.. function:: abstractmethod(function)
+
+ A decorator indicating abstract methods.
+
+ Using this decorator requires that the class's metaclass is :class:`ABCMeta` or
+ is derived from it.
+ A class that has a metaclass derived from :class:`ABCMeta`
+ cannot be instantiated unless all of its abstract methods and
+ properties are overridden.
+ The abstract methods can be called using any of the the normal 'super' call
+ mechanisms.
+
+ Dynamically adding abstract methods to a class, or attempting to modify the
+ abstraction status of a method or class once it is created, are not
+ supported. The :func:`abstractmethod` only affects subclasses derived using
+ regular inheritance; "virtual subclasses" registered with the ABC's
+ :meth:`register` method are not affected.
+
+ Usage::
+
+ class C:
+ __metaclass__ = ABCMeta
+ @abstractmethod
+ def my_abstract_method(self, ...):
+ ...
+
+ .. note::
+
+ Unlike C++'s pure virtual functions, or Java abstract methods, these abstract
+ methods may have an implementation. This implementation can be
+ called via the :func:`super` mechanism from the class that
+ overrides it. This could be useful as an end-point for a
+ super-call in a framework that uses cooperative
+ multiple-inheritance.
+
+
+.. function:: abstractproperty(fget[, fset[, fdel[, doc]]])
+
+ A subclass of the built-in :func:`property`, indicating an abstract property.
+
+ Using this function requires that the class's metaclass is :class:`ABCMeta` or
+ is derived from it.
+ A class that has a metaclass derived from :class:`ABCMeta` cannot be
+ instantiated unless all of its abstract methods and properties are overridden.
+ The abstract properties can be called using any of the normal
+ 'super' call mechanisms.
+
+ Usage::
+
+ class C:
+ __metaclass__ = ABCMeta
+ @abstractproperty
+ def my_abstract_property(self):
+ ...
+
+ This defines a read-only property; you can also define a read-write abstract
+ property using the 'long' form of property declaration::
+
+ class C:
+ __metaclass__ = ABCMeta
+ def getx(self): ...
+ def setx(self, value): ...
+ x = abstractproperty(getx, setx)
+
+.. rubric:: Footnotes
+
+.. [#] C++ programmers should note that Python's virtual base class
+ concept is not the same as C++'s.
diff --git a/Doc/library/python.rst b/Doc/library/python.rst
index d9a37bb..e956f34 100644
--- a/Doc/library/python.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/python.rst
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ overview:
__main__.rst
warnings.rst
contextlib.rst
+ abc.rst
atexit.rst
traceback.rst
__future__.rst