diff options
author | Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> | 2008-06-07 17:11:00 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> | 2008-06-07 17:11:00 (GMT) |
commit | afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63 (patch) | |
tree | 71463b89e0445d6fece11f4db0c9141c43354fc5 | |
parent | 60fbf7f8bb83dd10a8d71ae763f845e688399fa0 (diff) | |
download | cpython-afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63.zip cpython-afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63.tar.gz cpython-afd05da314af990099ab696a8f69978a6e982f63.tar.bz2 |
Backport docs for abc module to 2.6.
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/library/abc.rst | 195 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/library/python.rst | 1 |
2 files changed, 196 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/library/abc.rst b/Doc/library/abc.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a3ce2a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/Doc/library/abc.rst @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ +:mod:`abc` --- Abstract Base Classes +==================================== + +.. module:: abc + :synopsis: Abstract base classes according to PEP 3119. +.. moduleauthor:: Guido van Rossum +.. sectionauthor:: Georg Brandl +.. much of the content adapted from docstrings + +.. versionadded:: 2.6 + +This module provides the infrastructure for defining abstract base classes +(ABCs) in Python, as outlined in :pep:`3119`; see the PEP for why this +was added to Python. (See also, :pep:`3141` regarding a type hierarchy +for numbers based on ABCs.) + +The :mod:`collections` module has some concrete classes that derive from +ABCs; these can, of course, be further derived. In addition the +:mod:`collections` module has some ABCs that can be used to test whether +a class or instance provides a particular interface, for example, is it +hashable or a mapping. + + +This module provides the following class: + +.. class:: ABCMeta + + Metaclass for defining Abstract Base Classes (ABCs). + + Use this metaclass to create an ABC. An ABC can be subclassed directly, and + then acts as a mix-in class. You can also register unrelated concrete + classes (even built-in classes) and unrelated ABCs as "virtual subclasses" -- + these and their descendants will be considered subclasses of the registering + ABC by the built-in :func:`issubclass` function, but the registering ABC + won't show up in their MRO (Method Resolution Order) nor will method + implementations defined by the registering ABC be callable (not even via + :func:`super`). [#]_ + + Classes created with a metaclass of :class:`ABCMeta` have the following method: + + .. method:: register(subclass) + + Register *subclass* as a "virtual subclass" of this ABC. For + example:: + + from abc import ABCMeta + + class MyABC: + __metaclass__ = ABCMeta + + MyABC.register(tuple) + + assert issubclass(tuple, MyABC) + assert isinstance((), MyABC) + + You can also override this method in an abstract base class: + + .. method:: __subclasshook__(subclass) + + (Must be defined as a class method.) + + Check whether *subclass* is considered a subclass of this ABC. This means + that you can customize the behavior of ``issubclass`` further without the + need to call :meth:`register` on every class you want to consider a + subclass of the ABC. (This class method is called from the + :meth:`__subclasscheck__` method of the ABC.) + + This method should return ``True``, ``False`` or ``NotImplemented``. If + it returns ``True``, the *subclass* is considered a subclass of this ABC. + If it returns ``False``, the *subclass* is not considered a subclass of + this ABC, even if it would normally be one. If it returns + ``NotImplemented``, the subclass check is continued with the usual + mechanism. + + .. XXX explain the "usual mechanism" + + + For a demonstration of these concepts, look at this example ABC definition:: + + class Foo(object): + def __getitem__(self, index): + ... + def __len__(self): + ... + def get_iterator(self): + return iter(self) + + class MyIterable: + __metaclass__ = ABCMeta + + @abstractmethod + def __iter__(self): + while False: + yield None + + def get_iterator(self): + return self.__iter__() + + @classmethod + def __subclasshook__(cls, C): + if cls is MyIterable: + if any("__iter__" in B.__dict__ for B in C.__mro__): + return True + return NotImplemented + + MyIterable.register(Foo) + + The ABC ``MyIterable`` defines the standard iterable method, + :meth:`__iter__`, as an abstract method. The implementation given here can + still be called from subclasses. The :meth:`get_iterator` method is also + part of the ``MyIterable`` abstract base class, but it does not have to be + overridden in non-abstract derived classes. + + The :meth:`__subclasshook__` class method defined here says that any class + that has an :meth:`__iter__` method in its :attr:`__dict__` (or in that of + one of its base classes, accessed via the :attr:`__mro__` list) is + considered a ``MyIterable`` too. + + Finally, the last line makes ``Foo`` a virtual subclass of ``MyIterable``, + even though it does not define an :meth:`__iter__` method (it uses the + old-style iterable protocol, defined in terms of :meth:`__len__` and + :meth:`__getitem__`). Note that this will not make ``get_iterator`` + available as a method of ``Foo``, so it is provided separately. + + +It also provides the following decorators: + +.. function:: abstractmethod(function) + + A decorator indicating abstract methods. + + Using this decorator requires that the class's metaclass is :class:`ABCMeta` or + is derived from it. + A class that has a metaclass derived from :class:`ABCMeta` + cannot be instantiated unless all of its abstract methods and + properties are overridden. + The abstract methods can be called using any of the the normal 'super' call + mechanisms. + + Dynamically adding abstract methods to a class, or attempting to modify the + abstraction status of a method or class once it is created, are not + supported. The :func:`abstractmethod` only affects subclasses derived using + regular inheritance; "virtual subclasses" registered with the ABC's + :meth:`register` method are not affected. + + Usage:: + + class C: + __metaclass__ = ABCMeta + @abstractmethod + def my_abstract_method(self, ...): + ... + + .. note:: + + Unlike C++'s pure virtual functions, or Java abstract methods, these abstract + methods may have an implementation. This implementation can be + called via the :func:`super` mechanism from the class that + overrides it. This could be useful as an end-point for a + super-call in a framework that uses cooperative + multiple-inheritance. + + +.. function:: abstractproperty(fget[, fset[, fdel[, doc]]]) + + A subclass of the built-in :func:`property`, indicating an abstract property. + + Using this function requires that the class's metaclass is :class:`ABCMeta` or + is derived from it. + A class that has a metaclass derived from :class:`ABCMeta` cannot be + instantiated unless all of its abstract methods and properties are overridden. + The abstract properties can be called using any of the normal + 'super' call mechanisms. + + Usage:: + + class C: + __metaclass__ = ABCMeta + @abstractproperty + def my_abstract_property(self): + ... + + This defines a read-only property; you can also define a read-write abstract + property using the 'long' form of property declaration:: + + class C: + __metaclass__ = ABCMeta + def getx(self): ... + def setx(self, value): ... + x = abstractproperty(getx, setx) + +.. rubric:: Footnotes + +.. [#] C++ programmers should note that Python's virtual base class + concept is not the same as C++'s. diff --git a/Doc/library/python.rst b/Doc/library/python.rst index d9a37bb..e956f34 100644 --- a/Doc/library/python.rst +++ b/Doc/library/python.rst @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ overview: __main__.rst warnings.rst contextlib.rst + abc.rst atexit.rst traceback.rst __future__.rst |