summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGeorg Brandl <georg@python.org>2010-02-06 18:44:44 (GMT)
committerGeorg Brandl <georg@python.org>2010-02-06 18:44:44 (GMT)
commit6f82cd309c735debd5f6476c21e30c1f91375017 (patch)
treefb28e09c5c59991120121a6afed02349f3cdf70e /Doc
parent2d798ac619788e32cf15425802db0fa8179d6865 (diff)
downloadcpython-6f82cd309c735debd5f6476c21e30c1f91375017.zip
cpython-6f82cd309c735debd5f6476c21e30c1f91375017.tar.gz
cpython-6f82cd309c735debd5f6476c21e30c1f91375017.tar.bz2
#5341: fix "builtin" where used as an adjective ("built-in" is correct).
Diffstat (limited to 'Doc')
-rw-r--r--Doc/faq/design.rst7
-rw-r--r--Doc/faq/extending.rst2
-rw-r--r--Doc/faq/library.rst25
-rw-r--r--Doc/faq/programming.rst13
-rw-r--r--Doc/howto/doanddont.rst8
-rw-r--r--Doc/library/inspect.rst2
6 files changed, 30 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/faq/design.rst b/Doc/faq/design.rst
index 5be6add..957c2c9 100644
--- a/Doc/faq/design.rst
+++ b/Doc/faq/design.rst
@@ -664,9 +664,10 @@ order to remind you of that fact, it does not return the sorted list. This way,
you won't be fooled into accidentally overwriting a list when you need a sorted
copy but also need to keep the unsorted version around.
-In Python 2.4 a new builtin -- :func:`sorted` -- has been added. This function
-creates a new list from a provided iterable, sorts it and returns it. For
-example, here's how to iterate over the keys of a dictionary in sorted order::
+In Python 2.4 a new built-in function -- :func:`sorted` -- has been added.
+This function creates a new list from a provided iterable, sorts it and returns
+it. For example, here's how to iterate over the keys of a dictionary in sorted
+order::
for key in sorted(mydict):
... # do whatever with mydict[key]...
diff --git a/Doc/faq/extending.rst b/Doc/faq/extending.rst
index 622b787..3f3c8b1 100644
--- a/Doc/faq/extending.rst
+++ b/Doc/faq/extending.rst
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ extension module using g++ (e.g., ``g++ -shared -o mymodule.so mymodule.o``).
Can I create an object class with some methods implemented in C and others in Python (e.g. through inheritance)?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-In Python 2.2, you can inherit from builtin classes such as :class:`int`,
+In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as :class:`int`,
:class:`list`, :class:`dict`, etc.
The Boost Python Library (BPL, http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/index.html)
diff --git a/Doc/faq/library.rst b/Doc/faq/library.rst
index b672a66..9c458da 100644
--- a/Doc/faq/library.rst
+++ b/Doc/faq/library.rst
@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ your topic of interest will usually find something helpful.
Where is the math.py (socket.py, regex.py, etc.) source file?
-------------------------------------------------------------
-If you can't find a source file for a module it may be a builtin or dynamically
-loaded module implemented in C, C++ or other compiled language. In this case
-you may not have the source file or it may be something like mathmodule.c,
-somewhere in a C source directory (not on the Python Path).
+If you can't find a source file for a module it may be a built-in or
+dynamically loaded module implemented in C, C++ or other compiled language.
+In this case you may not have the source file or it may be something like
+mathmodule.c, somewhere in a C source directory (not on the Python Path).
There are (at least) three kinds of modules in Python:
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ therefore atomic from the point of view of a Python program.
In theory, this means an exact accounting requires an exact understanding of the
PVM bytecode implementation. In practice, it means that operations on shared
-variables of builtin data types (ints, lists, dicts, etc) that "look atomic"
+variables of built-in data types (ints, lists, dicts, etc) that "look atomic"
really are.
For example, the following operations are all atomic (L, L1, L2 are lists, D,
@@ -502,9 +502,9 @@ I can't seem to use os.read() on a pipe created with os.popen(); why?
:func:`os.read` is a low-level function which takes a file descriptor, a small
integer representing the opened file. :func:`os.popen` creates a high-level
-file object, the same type returned by the builtin :func:`open` function. Thus,
-to read n bytes from a pipe p created with :func:`os.popen`, you need to use
-``p.read(n)``.
+file object, the same type returned by the built-in :func:`open` function.
+Thus, to read n bytes from a pipe p created with :func:`os.popen`, you need to
+use ``p.read(n)``.
How do I run a subprocess with pipes connected to both input and output?
@@ -603,10 +603,11 @@ Python file objects are a high-level layer of abstraction on top of C streams,
which in turn are a medium-level layer of abstraction on top of (among other
things) low-level C file descriptors.
-For most file objects you create in Python via the builtin ``file`` constructor,
-``f.close()`` marks the Python file object as being closed from Python's point
-of view, and also arranges to close the underlying C stream. This also happens
-automatically in f's destructor, when f becomes garbage.
+For most file objects you create in Python via the built-in ``file``
+constructor, ``f.close()`` marks the Python file object as being closed from
+Python's point of view, and also arranges to close the underlying C stream.
+This also happens automatically in ``f``'s destructor, when ``f`` becomes
+garbage.
But stdin, stdout and stderr are treated specially by Python, because of the
special status also given to them by C. Running ``sys.stdout.close()`` marks
diff --git a/Doc/faq/programming.rst b/Doc/faq/programming.rst
index 14507ed..c54bb28 100644
--- a/Doc/faq/programming.rst
+++ b/Doc/faq/programming.rst
@@ -178,9 +178,10 @@ it is much shorter and far faster to use ::
L2 = list(L1[:3]) # "list" is redundant if L1 is a list.
-Note that the functionally-oriented builtins such as :func:`map`, :func:`zip`,
-and friends can be a convenient accelerator for loops that perform a single
-task. For example to pair the elements of two lists together::
+Note that the functionally-oriented built-in functions such as :func:`map`,
+:func:`zip`, and friends can be a convenient accelerator for loops that
+perform a single task. For example to pair the elements of two lists
+together::
>>> zip([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6])
[(1, 4), (2, 5), (3, 6)]
@@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ on string objects <string-methods>`. Use regular expressions only when you're
not dealing with constant string patterns. You may still use :ref:`the old %
operations <string-formatting>` ``string % tuple`` and ``string % dictionary``.
-Be sure to use the :meth:`list.sort` builtin method to do sorting, and see the
+Be sure to use the :meth:`list.sort` built-in method to do sorting, and see the
`sorting mini-HOWTO <http://wiki.python.org/moin/HowTo/Sorting>`_ for examples
of moderately advanced usage. :meth:`list.sort` beats other techniques for
sorting in all but the most extreme circumstances.
@@ -346,7 +347,7 @@ Though a bit surprising at first, a moment's consideration explains this. On
one hand, requiring :keyword:`global` for assigned variables provides a bar
against unintended side-effects. On the other hand, if ``global`` was required
for all global references, you'd be using ``global`` all the time. You'd have
-to declare as global every reference to a builtin function or to a component of
+to declare as global every reference to a built-in function or to a component of
an imported module. This clutter would defeat the usefulness of the ``global``
declaration for identifying side-effects.
@@ -1059,7 +1060,7 @@ trailing newline from a string.
How do I iterate over a sequence in reverse order?
--------------------------------------------------
-Use the :func:`reversed` builtin function, which is new in Python 2.4::
+Use the :func:`reversed` built-in function, which is new in Python 2.4::
for x in reversed(sequence):
... # do something with x...
diff --git a/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst b/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst
index f795ead..f0c688b 100644
--- a/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst
+++ b/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ One of the most awful question asked on the newsgroup is why this code::
f.read()
does not work. Of course, it works just fine (assuming you have a file called
-"www".) But it does not work if somewhere in the module, the statement ``from os
-import *`` is present. The :mod:`os` module has a function called :func:`open`
-which returns an integer. While it is very useful, shadowing builtins is one of
-its least useful properties.
+"www".) But it does not work if somewhere in the module, the statement ``from
+os import *`` is present. The :mod:`os` module has a function called
+:func:`open` which returns an integer. While it is very useful, shadowing a
+builtin is one of its least useful properties.
Remember, you can never know for sure what names a module exports, so either
take what you need --- ``from module import name1, name2``, or keep them in the
diff --git a/Doc/library/inspect.rst b/Doc/library/inspect.rst
index 76c43c3..29dc6ae 100644
--- a/Doc/library/inspect.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/inspect.rst
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ attributes:
| frame | f_back | next outer frame object | |
| | | (this frame's caller) | |
+-----------+-----------------+---------------------------+-------+
-| | f_builtins | built-in namespace seen | |
+| | f_builtins | builtins namespace seen | |
| | | by this frame | |
+-----------+-----------------+---------------------------+-------+
| | f_code | code object being | |