diff options
author | keithasaurus <592217+keithasaurus@users.noreply.github.com> | 2024-01-18 16:03:20 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-01-18 16:03:20 (GMT) |
commit | 2d3f6b56c5846df60b0b305e51a1d293ba0b2aae (patch) | |
tree | e0fed83c75016451538e8916aeca2f4e7908cd9d /Lib/dataclasses.py | |
parent | 339fc3c22446a148d27d9ec061594ac8d0abd33d (diff) | |
download | cpython-2d3f6b56c5846df60b0b305e51a1d293ba0b2aae.zip cpython-2d3f6b56c5846df60b0b305e51a1d293ba0b2aae.tar.gz cpython-2d3f6b56c5846df60b0b305e51a1d293ba0b2aae.tar.bz2 |
gh-114087: Speed up dataclasses._asdict_inner (#114088)
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib/dataclasses.py')
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/dataclasses.py | 100 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/dataclasses.py b/Lib/dataclasses.py index d0827e9..3335821 100644 --- a/Lib/dataclasses.py +++ b/Lib/dataclasses.py @@ -1332,58 +1332,69 @@ def asdict(obj, *, dict_factory=dict): def _asdict_inner(obj, dict_factory): - if type(obj) in _ATOMIC_TYPES: + obj_type = type(obj) + if obj_type in _ATOMIC_TYPES: return obj - elif _is_dataclass_instance(obj): - # fast path for the common case + elif hasattr(obj_type, _FIELDS): + # dataclass instance: fast path for the common case if dict_factory is dict: return { f.name: _asdict_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), dict) for f in fields(obj) } else: - result = [] - for f in fields(obj): - value = _asdict_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), dict_factory) - result.append((f.name, value)) - return dict_factory(result) - elif isinstance(obj, tuple) and hasattr(obj, '_fields'): - # obj is a namedtuple. Recurse into it, but the returned - # object is another namedtuple of the same type. This is - # similar to how other list- or tuple-derived classes are - # treated (see below), but we just need to create them - # differently because a namedtuple's __init__ needs to be - # called differently (see bpo-34363). - - # I'm not using namedtuple's _asdict() - # method, because: - # - it does not recurse in to the namedtuple fields and - # convert them to dicts (using dict_factory). - # - I don't actually want to return a dict here. The main - # use case here is json.dumps, and it handles converting - # namedtuples to lists. Admittedly we're losing some - # information here when we produce a json list instead of a - # dict. Note that if we returned dicts here instead of - # namedtuples, we could no longer call asdict() on a data - # structure where a namedtuple was used as a dict key. - - return type(obj)(*[_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj]) - elif isinstance(obj, (list, tuple)): - # Assume we can create an object of this type by passing in a - # generator (which is not true for namedtuples, handled - # above). - return type(obj)(_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj) - elif isinstance(obj, dict): - if hasattr(type(obj), 'default_factory'): + return dict_factory([ + (f.name, _asdict_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), dict_factory)) + for f in fields(obj) + ]) + # handle the builtin types first for speed; subclasses handled below + elif obj_type is list: + return [_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj] + elif obj_type is dict: + return { + _asdict_inner(k, dict_factory): _asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) + for k, v in obj.items() + } + elif obj_type is tuple: + return tuple([_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj]) + elif issubclass(obj_type, tuple): + if hasattr(obj, '_fields'): + # obj is a namedtuple. Recurse into it, but the returned + # object is another namedtuple of the same type. This is + # similar to how other list- or tuple-derived classes are + # treated (see below), but we just need to create them + # differently because a namedtuple's __init__ needs to be + # called differently (see bpo-34363). + + # I'm not using namedtuple's _asdict() + # method, because: + # - it does not recurse in to the namedtuple fields and + # convert them to dicts (using dict_factory). + # - I don't actually want to return a dict here. The main + # use case here is json.dumps, and it handles converting + # namedtuples to lists. Admittedly we're losing some + # information here when we produce a json list instead of a + # dict. Note that if we returned dicts here instead of + # namedtuples, we could no longer call asdict() on a data + # structure where a namedtuple was used as a dict key. + return obj_type(*[_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj]) + else: + return obj_type(_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj) + elif issubclass(obj_type, dict): + if hasattr(obj_type, 'default_factory'): # obj is a defaultdict, which has a different constructor from # dict as it requires the default_factory as its first arg. - result = type(obj)(getattr(obj, 'default_factory')) + result = obj_type(obj.default_factory) for k, v in obj.items(): result[_asdict_inner(k, dict_factory)] = _asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) return result - return type(obj)((_asdict_inner(k, dict_factory), - _asdict_inner(v, dict_factory)) - for k, v in obj.items()) + return obj_type((_asdict_inner(k, dict_factory), + _asdict_inner(v, dict_factory)) + for k, v in obj.items()) + elif issubclass(obj_type, list): + # Assume we can create an object of this type by passing in a + # generator + return obj_type(_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj) else: return copy.deepcopy(obj) @@ -1416,11 +1427,10 @@ def _astuple_inner(obj, tuple_factory): if type(obj) in _ATOMIC_TYPES: return obj elif _is_dataclass_instance(obj): - result = [] - for f in fields(obj): - value = _astuple_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), tuple_factory) - result.append(value) - return tuple_factory(result) + return tuple_factory([ + _astuple_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), tuple_factory) + for f in fields(obj) + ]) elif isinstance(obj, tuple) and hasattr(obj, '_fields'): # obj is a namedtuple. Recurse into it, but the returned # object is another namedtuple of the same type. This is |