diff options
author | Mario Corchero <mariocj89@gmail.com> | 2018-12-08 11:25:02 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Withers <chris@withers.org> | 2018-12-08 11:25:02 (GMT) |
commit | f05df0a4b679d0acfd0b1fe6187ba2d553b37afa (patch) | |
tree | 5a048fb3c7aef3ffebb5a955ae2259823d0b1d8f /Misc | |
parent | 3cf74384b53b998fa846dc2590cedf9ad2a0d5fd (diff) | |
download | cpython-f05df0a4b679d0acfd0b1fe6187ba2d553b37afa.zip cpython-f05df0a4b679d0acfd0b1fe6187ba2d553b37afa.tar.gz cpython-f05df0a4b679d0acfd0b1fe6187ba2d553b37afa.tar.bz2 |
bpo-35330: Don't call the wrapped object if `side_effect` is set (GH10973)
* tests: Further validate `wraps` functionality in `unittest.mock.Mock`
Add more tests to validate how `wraps` interacts with other features of
mocks.
* Don't call the wrapped object if `side_effect` is set
When a object is wrapped using `Mock(wraps=...)`, if an user sets a
`side_effect` in one of their methods, return the value of `side_effect`
and don't call the original object.
* Refactor what to be called on `mock_call`
When a `Mock` is called, it should return looking up in the following
order: `side_effect`, `return_value`, `wraps`. If any of the first two
return `mock.DEFAULT`, lookup in the next option.
It makes no sense to check for `wraps` returning default, as it is
supposed to be the original implementation and there is nothing to
fallback to.
Diffstat (limited to 'Misc')
-rw-r--r-- | Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-12-06-00-43-13.bpo-35330.abB4BN.rst | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-12-06-00-43-13.bpo-35330.abB4BN.rst b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-12-06-00-43-13.bpo-35330.abB4BN.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..24d0ab8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-12-06-00-43-13.bpo-35330.abB4BN.rst @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +When a :class:`Mock` instance was used to wrap an object, if `side_effect` +is used in one of the mocks of it methods, don't call the original +implementation and return the result of using the side effect the same way +that it is done with return_value. |