Use Py_VISIT in all tp_traverse methods, instead of traversing manually or

using a custom, nearly-identical macro. This probably changes how some of
these functions are compiled, which may result in fractionally slower (or
faster) execution. Considering the nature of traversal, visiting much of the
address space in unpredictable patterns, I'd argue the code readability and
maintainability is well worth it ;P

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/Objects/tupleobject.c b/Objects/tupleobject.c
index 10b7aaf..2161ab9 100644
--- a/Objects/tupleobject.c
+++ b/Objects/tupleobject.c
@@ -438,16 +438,9 @@ static int
 tupletraverse(PyTupleObject *o, visitproc visit, void *arg)
 {
 	Py_ssize_t i;
-	PyObject *x;
-
-	for (i = o->ob_size; --i >= 0; ) {
-		x = o->ob_item[i];
-		if (x != NULL) {
-			int err = visit(x, arg);
-			if (err)
-				return err;
-		}
-	}
+
+	for (i = o->ob_size; --i >= 0; )
+		Py_VISIT(o->ob_item[i]);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -802,9 +795,8 @@ tupleiter_dealloc(tupleiterobject *it)
 static int
 tupleiter_traverse(tupleiterobject *it, visitproc visit, void *arg)
 {
-	if (it->it_seq == NULL)
-		return 0;
-	return visit((PyObject *)it->it_seq, arg);
+	Py_VISIT(it->it_seq);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static PyObject *