summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/PLAN.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuido van Rossum <guido@python.org>2001-08-30 21:18:04 (GMT)
committerGuido van Rossum <guido@python.org>2001-08-30 21:18:04 (GMT)
commiteb9f384c283195a87a585ae7ef0ff66667493af6 (patch)
treefe663ba90ab2cc3bb32277289edc071b67d35fd4 /PLAN.txt
parent91ee798892faedf75949c57eee12f9d8308cac17 (diff)
downloadcpython-eb9f384c283195a87a585ae7ef0ff66667493af6.zip
cpython-eb9f384c283195a87a585ae7ef0ff66667493af6.tar.gz
cpython-eb9f384c283195a87a585ae7ef0ff66667493af6.tar.bz2
Group some projects into "Done" and "To do". Get rid of Tim's merge
scratchpad -- the merge is long behind us.
Diffstat (limited to 'PLAN.txt')
-rw-r--r--PLAN.txt259
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 213 deletions
diff --git a/PLAN.txt b/PLAN.txt
index 23f4894..559b125 100644
--- a/PLAN.txt
+++ b/PLAN.txt
@@ -1,18 +1,40 @@
Project: core implementation
****************************
-Tasks:
-
-Do binary operators properly. nb_add should try to call self.__add__
-and other.__radd__. I think I'll exclude base types that define any
-binary operator without setting the CHECKTYPES flag. *** This is
-done, AFAICT. Even supports __truediv__ and __floordiv__. ***
+Still to do
+-----------
Fix comparisons. There's some nasty stuff here: when two types are
not the same, and they're not instances, the fallback code doesn't
account for the possibility that they might be subtypes of a common
base type that defines a comparison.
+Check for conflicts between base classes. I fear that the rules used
+to decide whether multiple bases have conflicting instance variables
+aren't strict enough. I think that sometimes two different classes
+adding __dict__ may be incompatible after all.
+
+Check for order conflicts. Suppose there are two base classes X and
+Y. Suppose class B derives from X and Y, and class C from Y and X (in
+that order). Now suppose class D derives from B and C. In which
+order should the base classes X and Y be searched? This is an order
+conflict, and should be disallowed; currently the test for this is not
+implemented.
+
+Allow __class__ assignment.
+
+Make __dynamic__ the default.
+
+Add __del__ handlers.
+
+Done (mostly)
+-------------
+
+Do binary operators properly. nb_add should try to call self.__add__
+and other.__radd__. I think I'll exclude base types that define any
+binary operator without setting the CHECKTYPES flag. *** This is
+done, AFAICT. Even supports __truediv__ and __floordiv__. ***
+
Fix subtype_dealloc(). This currently searches through the list of
base types until it finds a type whose tp_dealloc is not
subtype_dealloc. I think this is not safe. I think the alloc/dealloc
@@ -32,18 +54,6 @@ appropriately. For now, the old "abstract subclass" test is still
there, and there may be some places where PyObject_IsSubclass() is
called where PyType_IsSubtype() would be more appropriate. ***
-Check for conflicts between base classes. I fear that the rules used
-to decide whether multiple bases have conflicting instance variables
-aren't strict enough. I think that sometimes two different classes
-adding __dict__ may be incompatible after all.
-
-Check for order conflicts. Suppose there are two base classes X and
-Y. Suppose class B derives from X and Y, and class C from Y and X (in
-that order). Now suppose class D derives from B and C. In which
-order should the base classes X and Y be searched? This is an order
-conflict, and should be disallowed; currently the test for this is not
-implemented.
-
Clean up the GC interface. Currently, tp_basicsize includes the GC
head size iff tp_flags includes the GC flag bit. This makes object
size math a pain (e.g. to see if two object types have the same
@@ -54,7 +64,8 @@ that improves the API in this area, but it's backwards incompatible.
I think I know of a way to fix the incompatibility (by switching to a
different flag bit). *** Tim proposed a better idea: macros to access
tp_basicsize while hiding the nastiness. This is done now, so I think
-the rest of this task needn't be done. ***
+the rest of this task needn't be done. *** *** Neil checked in a
+much improved version of his idea, and it's all squared away. ***
Make the __dict__ of types declared with Python class statements
writable -- only statically declared types must have an immutable
@@ -109,14 +120,8 @@ More -- I'm sure new issues will crop up as we go.
Project: loose ends and follow-through
**************************************
-Tasks:
-
-Make more (most?) built-in types act as their own factory functions.
-
-Make more (most?) built-in types subtypable -- with or without
-overridable allocation. *** This includes descriptors! It should be
-possible to write descriptors in Python, so metaclasses can do clever
-things with them. ***
+Still to do
+-----------
Exceptions should be types. This changes the rules, since now almost
anything can be raised (as maybe it should). Or should we strive for
@@ -144,6 +149,18 @@ PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords() currently requires.) But should we do
this? It's additional work and not required for any of the other
parts.
+Done (mostly)
+-------------
+
+Make more (most?) built-in types act as their own factory functions.
+*** Done for all reasonable built-in types. ***
+
+Make more (most?) built-in types subtypable -- with or without
+overridable allocation. *** This includes descriptors! It should be
+possible to write descriptors in Python, so metaclasses can do clever
+things with them. *** *** Done for most reasonable built-in types,
+except for descriptors ***
+
Project: making classes use the new machinery
*********************************************
@@ -154,7 +171,8 @@ Try to get rid of all code in classobject.c by deferring to the new
mechanisms. How far can we get without breaking backwards
compatibility? This is underspecified because I haven't thought much
about it yet. Can we lose the use of PyInstance_Check() everywhere?
-I would hope so!
+I would hope so! *** I'm dropping this goal for now -- classic
+classes will be 99% unchanged. ***
Project: backwards compatibility
@@ -276,188 +294,3 @@ responses to the feedback. Give the community enough time to think
over this complicated proposal. Provide the community with a
prototype implementation to test. Try to do this *before* casting
everything in stone!
-
-MERGE BEGIN ****************************************************************
-Merge details (this section is Tim's scratchpad, but should help a lot if
-he dies of frustration while wrestling with CVS <0.9 wink>).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-08-01 Merging descr-branch back into trunk.
-
-Tagged trunk about 22:05:
- cvs tag date2001-08-01 python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-30 -j date2001-08-01 descr
-
-No conflicts (! first time ever!) ... but problems with pythoncore.dsp.
-Resolved.
-
-Rebuilt from scratch; ran all tests; checked into branch about 22:40.
-
-Merged descr-branch back into trunk (SEE BELOW -- this specific way of
-doing it was a bad idea):
-
- cvs -q -z3 up -j descr-branch python
-
-34 conflicts. Hmm! OK, looks like every file in the project with an
-embedded RCS Id is "a conflict". Others make no sense, e.g., a dozen
-conflicts in dictobject.c, sometimes enclosing identical(!) blobs of
-source code. And CVS remains utterly baffled by Python type object decls.
-Every line of ceval.c's generator code is in conflict blocks ... OK,
-there's no pattern or sense here, I'll just deal with it.
-
-Conflicts resolved; rebuilt from scratch; test_weakref fails. Didn't find
-an obvious reason and it was late, so committed it anyway. Tagged the
-trunk then with tag:
-
- after-descr-branch-merge
-
-Tracked the test_weakref failure to a botched conflict resolution in
-classobject.c; checked in a fix.
-
-LATER: The merge should have been done via:
-
- upd -j date2001-08-01 -j descr-branch python
-
-instead. This would have caused only one conflict, a baffler in
-bltinmodule.c. It would have avoided the classobject.c error I made.
-Luckily, except for that one, we got to the same place in the end anyway,
-apart from a few curious tabs-vs-spaces differences.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-30
-
-Doing this again while the expat and Windows installer changes are still
-fresh on my mind.
-
-Tagged trunk about 23:50 EDT on the 29th:
- cvs tag date2001-07-30 python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch:
-
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-28 -j date2001-07-30 descr
-
-2 conflicts, resolved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-28
-
-Tagged trunk about 00:31 EDT:
- cvs tag date2001-07-28 python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-21 -j date2001-07-28 descr
-
-4 conflicts, all RCS Ids. Resolved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-21
-
-Tagged trunk about 01:00 EDT:
- cvs tag date2001-07-21 python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-17b -j date2001-07-21 descr
-
-4 conflicts, mostly RCS Id thingies. Resolved.
-
-Legit failure in new test_repr, because repr.py dispatches on the exact
-string returned by type(x). type(1L) and type('s') differ in descr-branch
-now, and repr.py didn't realize that, falling back to the "unknown type"
-case for longs and strings. Repaired descr-branch repr.py.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-19
-
-Removed the r22a1-branch tag (see next entry). Turns out Guido did add a
-r22a1 tag, so the r22a1-branch tag served no point anymore.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-18 2.2a1 releaase
-
-Immediately after the merge just below, I tagged descr-branch via
-
- cvs tag r22a1-branch descr
-
-Guido may or may not want to add another tag here (? maybe he wants to do
-some more Unix fiddling first).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-17 building 2.2a1 release, from descr-branch
-
-Tagged trunk about 22:00 EDT, like so:
- cvs tag date2001-07-17b python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch via:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-17a -j date2001-07-17b descr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-17
-
-Tagged trunk about 00:05 EDT, like so:
- cvs tag date2001-07-17a python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch via:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-16 -j date2001-07-17a descr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-16
-
-Tagged trunk about 15:20 EDT, like so:
- cvs tag date2001-07-16 python
-
-Guido then added all the other dist/ directories to descr-branch from that
-trunk tag.
-
-Tim then merged trunk delta into the branch via:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-15 -j date2001-07-16 descr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-15
-
-Tagged trunk about 15:44 EDT, like so:
- cvs tag date2001-07-15 python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch via:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-13 -j date2001-07-15 descr
-
-Four files with conflicts, all artificial RCS Id & Revision thingies.
-Resolved and committed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-13
-
-Tagged trunk about 22:13 EDT, like so:
- cvs tag date2001-07-13 python
-
-Merged trunk delta into branch via:
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-06 -j date2001-07-13 descr
-
-Six(!) files with conflicts, mostly related to NeilS's generator gc patches.
-Unsure why, but CVS seems always to think there are conflicts whenever a
-line in a type object decl gets changed, and the conflict marking seems
-maximally confused in these cases. Anyway, since I reviewed those patches
-on the trunk, good thing I'm merging them, and darned glad it's still fresh
-on my mind.
-
-Resolved the conflicts, and committed the changes in a few hours total.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-07
-
-Merge of trunk tag date2001-07-06 into descr-branch, via
- cvs -q -z3 up -j date2001-07-06 mergedescr
-was committed on 2001-07-07.
-
-Merge issues:
-
-(all resolved -- GvR)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-2001-07-06
-
-Tagged trunk a bit after midnight, like so:
-
-C:\Code>cvs tag date2001-07-06 python
-cvs server: Tagging python
-cvs server: Tagging python/dist
-cvs server: Tagging python/dist/src
-T python/dist/src/.cvsignore
-T python/dist/src/LICENSE
-T python/dist/src/Makefile.pre.in
-T python/dist/src/README
-... [& about 3000 lines more] ...
-
-This is the first trunk snapshot to be merged into the descr-branch.
-Gave it a date instead of a goofy name because there's going to be more
-than one of these, and at least it's obvious which of two ISO dates comes
-earlier. These tags should go away after all merging is complete.
-MERGE END ******************************************************************