summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/googlemock
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAbseil Team <absl-team@google.com>2022-04-09 01:39:39 (GMT)
committerCopybara-Service <copybara-worker@google.com>2022-04-09 01:40:07 (GMT)
commita1cc8c55195661a58ad60c3bb062a0b9c302710d (patch)
tree4a2dc2bc70e5cbcf086e8090796b4675958c518c /googlemock
parent5f467ec04df33024e3c6760fa403b5cd5d8e9ace (diff)
downloadgoogletest-a1cc8c55195661a58ad60c3bb062a0b9c302710d.zip
googletest-a1cc8c55195661a58ad60c3bb062a0b9c302710d.tar.gz
googletest-a1cc8c55195661a58ad60c3bb062a0b9c302710d.tar.bz2
Add support for move-only and &&-qualified actions in WillOnce.
This provides a type-safe way for an action to express that it wants to be called only once, or to capture move-only objects. It is a generalization of the type system-evading hack in ByMove, with the improvement that it works for _any_ action (including user-defined ones), and correctly expresses that the action can only be used with WillOnce. I'll make existing actions benefit in a future commit. PiperOrigin-RevId: 440496139 Change-Id: I4145d191cca5655995ef41360bb126c123cb41d3
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock')
-rw-r--r--googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h269
-rw-r--r--googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h8
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc338
3 files changed, 581 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h
index 2c4ce36..4ae18da 100644
--- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h
+++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h
@@ -262,9 +262,65 @@ GMOCK_DEFINE_DEFAULT_ACTION_FOR_RETURN_TYPE_(double, 0);
#undef GMOCK_DEFINE_DEFAULT_ACTION_FOR_RETURN_TYPE_
-// Simple two-arg form of std::disjunction.
-template <typename P, typename Q>
-using disjunction = typename ::std::conditional<P::value, P, Q>::type;
+// Partial implementations of metaprogramming types from the standard library
+// not available in C++11.
+
+template <typename P>
+struct negation
+ // NOLINTNEXTLINE
+ : std::integral_constant<bool, bool(!P::value)> {};
+
+// Base case: with zero predicates the answer is always true.
+template <typename...>
+struct conjunction : std::true_type {};
+
+// With a single predicate, the answer is that predicate.
+template <typename P1>
+struct conjunction<P1> : P1 {};
+
+// With multiple predicates the answer is the first predicate if that is false,
+// and we recurse otherwise.
+template <typename P1, typename... Ps>
+struct conjunction<P1, Ps...>
+ : std::conditional<bool(P1::value), conjunction<Ps...>, P1>::type {};
+
+template <typename...>
+struct disjunction : std::false_type {};
+
+template <typename P1>
+struct disjunction<P1> : P1 {};
+
+template <typename P1, typename... Ps>
+struct disjunction<P1, Ps...>
+ // NOLINTNEXTLINE
+ : std::conditional<!bool(P1::value), disjunction<Ps...>, P1>::type {};
+
+template <typename...>
+using void_t = void;
+
+// Like std::invoke_result_t from C++17, but works only for objects with call
+// operators (not e.g. member function pointers, which we don't need specific
+// support for in OnceAction because std::function deals with them).
+template <typename F, typename... Args>
+using call_result_t = decltype(std::declval<F>()(std::declval<Args>()...));
+
+template <typename Void, typename R, typename F, typename... Args>
+struct is_callable_r_impl : std::false_type {};
+
+// Specialize the struct for those template arguments where call_result_t is
+// well-formed. When it's not, the generic template above is chosen, resulting
+// in std::false_type.
+template <typename R, typename F, typename... Args>
+struct is_callable_r_impl<void_t<call_result_t<F, Args...>>, R, F, Args...>
+ : std::conditional<
+ std::is_same<R, void>::value, //
+ std::true_type, //
+ std::is_convertible<call_result_t<F, Args...>, R>>::type {};
+
+// Like std::is_invocable_r from C++17, but works only for objects with call
+// operators. See the note on call_result_t.
+template <typename R, typename F, typename... Args>
+using is_callable_r = is_callable_r_impl<void, R, F, Args...>;
} // namespace internal
@@ -596,6 +652,213 @@ inline PolymorphicAction<Impl> MakePolymorphicAction(const Impl& impl) {
namespace internal {
+template <typename F>
+class TypedExpectation;
+
+// Specialized for function types below.
+template <typename F>
+class OnceAction;
+
+// An action that can only be used once.
+//
+// This is what is accepted by WillOnce, which doesn't require the underlying
+// action to be copy-constructible (only move-constructible), and promises to
+// invoke it as an rvalue reference. This allows the action to work with
+// move-only types like std::move_only_function in a type-safe manner.
+//
+// For example:
+//
+// // Assume we have some API that needs to accept a unique pointer to some
+// // non-copyable object Foo.
+// void AcceptUniquePointer(std::unique_ptr<Foo> foo);
+//
+// // We can define an action that provides a Foo to that API. Because It
+// // has to give away its unique pointer, it must not be called more than
+// // once, so its call operator is &&-qualified.
+// struct ProvideFoo {
+// std::unique_ptr<Foo> foo;
+//
+// void operator()() && {
+// AcceptUniquePointer(std::move(Foo));
+// }
+// };
+//
+// // This action can be used with WillOnce.
+// EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call)
+// .WillOnce(ProvideFoo{std::make_unique<Foo>(...)});
+//
+// // But a call to WillRepeatedly will fail to compile. This is correct,
+// // since the action cannot correctly be used repeatedly.
+// EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call)
+// .WillRepeatedly(ProvideFoo{std::make_unique<Foo>(...)});
+//
+// A less-contrived example would be an action that returns an arbitrary type,
+// whose &&-qualified call operator is capable of dealing with move-only types.
+template <typename Result, typename... Args>
+class OnceAction<Result(Args...)> final {
+ private:
+ // True iff we can use the given callable type (or lvalue reference) directly
+ // via ActionAdaptor.
+ template <typename Callable>
+ using IsDirectlyCompatible = internal::conjunction<
+ // It must be possible to capture the callable in ActionAdaptor.
+ std::is_constructible<typename std::decay<Callable>::type, Callable>,
+ // The callable must be compatible with our signature.
+ internal::is_callable_r<Result, typename std::decay<Callable>::type,
+ Args...>>;
+
+ // True iff we can use the given callable type via ActionAdaptor once we
+ // ignore incoming arguments.
+ template <typename Callable>
+ using IsCompatibleAfterIgnoringArguments = internal::conjunction<
+ // It must be possible to capture the callable in a lambda.
+ std::is_constructible<typename std::decay<Callable>::type, Callable>,
+ // The callable must be invocable with zero arguments, returning something
+ // convertible to Result.
+ internal::is_callable_r<Result, typename std::decay<Callable>::type>>;
+
+ public:
+ // Construct from a callable that is directly compatible with our mocked
+ // signature: it accepts our function type's arguments and returns something
+ // convertible to our result type.
+ template <typename Callable,
+ typename std::enable_if<
+ internal::conjunction<
+ // Teach clang on macOS that we're not talking about a
+ // copy/move constructor here. Otherwise it gets confused
+ // when checking the is_constructible requirement of our
+ // traits above.
+ internal::negation<std::is_same<
+ OnceAction, typename std::decay<Callable>::type>>,
+ IsDirectlyCompatible<Callable>> //
+ ::value,
+ int>::type = 0>
+ OnceAction(Callable&& callable) // NOLINT
+ : action_(ActionAdaptor<typename std::decay<Callable>::type>(
+ {}, std::forward<Callable>(callable))) {}
+
+ // As above, but for a callable that ignores the mocked function's arguments.
+ template <typename Callable,
+ typename std::enable_if<
+ internal::conjunction<
+ // Teach clang on macOS that we're not talking about a
+ // copy/move constructor here. Otherwise it gets confused
+ // when checking the is_constructible requirement of our
+ // traits above.
+ internal::negation<std::is_same<
+ OnceAction, typename std::decay<Callable>::type>>,
+ // Exclude callables for which the overload above works.
+ // We'd rather provide the arguments if possible.
+ internal::negation<IsDirectlyCompatible<Callable>>,
+ IsCompatibleAfterIgnoringArguments<Callable>>::value,
+ int>::type = 0>
+ OnceAction(Callable&& callable) // NOLINT
+ // Call the constructor above with a callable
+ // that ignores the input arguments.
+ : OnceAction(IgnoreIncomingArguments<typename std::decay<Callable>::type>{
+ std::forward<Callable>(callable)}) {}
+
+ // A fallback constructor for anything that is convertible to Action, for use
+ // with legacy actions that uses older styles like implementing
+ // ActionInterface or a conversion operator to Action. Modern code should
+ // implement a call operator with appropriate restrictions.
+ template <typename T,
+ typename std::enable_if<
+ internal::conjunction<
+ // Teach clang on macOS that we're not talking about a
+ // copy/move constructor here. Otherwise it gets confused
+ // when checking the is_constructible requirement of our
+ // traits above.
+ internal::negation<
+ std::is_same<OnceAction, typename std::decay<T>::type>>,
+ // Exclude the overloads above, which we want to take
+ // precedence.
+ internal::negation<IsDirectlyCompatible<T>>,
+ internal::negation<IsCompatibleAfterIgnoringArguments<T>>,
+ // It must be possible to turn the object into an action of
+ // the appropriate type.
+ std::is_convertible<T, Action<Result(Args...)>> //
+ >::value,
+ int>::type = 0>
+ OnceAction(T&& action) : action_(std::forward<T>(action)) {} // NOLINT
+
+ // We are naturally copyable because we store only an Action, but semantically
+ // we should not be copyable.
+ OnceAction(const OnceAction&) = delete;
+ OnceAction& operator=(const OnceAction&) = delete;
+ OnceAction(OnceAction&&) = default;
+
+ private:
+ // Allow TypedExpectation::WillOnce to use our type-unsafe API below.
+ friend class TypedExpectation<Result(Args...)>;
+
+ // An adaptor that wraps a callable that is compatible with our signature and
+ // being invoked as an rvalue reference so that it can be used as an
+ // Action. This throws away type safety, but that's fine because this is only
+ // used by WillOnce, which we know calls at most once.
+ template <typename Callable>
+ class ActionAdaptor final {
+ public:
+ // A tag indicating that the (otherwise universal) constructor is accepting
+ // the callable itself, instead of e.g. stealing calls for the move
+ // constructor.
+ struct CallableTag final {};
+
+ template <typename F>
+ explicit ActionAdaptor(CallableTag, F&& callable)
+ : callable_(std::make_shared<Callable>(std::forward<F>(callable))) {}
+
+ // Rather than explicitly returning Result, we return whatever the wrapped
+ // callable returns. This allows for compatibility with existing uses like
+ // the following, when the mocked function returns void:
+ //
+ // EXPECT_CALL(mock_fn_, Call)
+ // .WillOnce([&] {
+ // [...]
+ // return 0;
+ // });
+ //
+ // This works with Action since such a callable can be turned into
+ // std::function<void()>. If we use an explicit return type of Result here
+ // then it *doesn't* work with OnceAction, because we'll get a "void
+ // function should not return a value" error.
+ //
+ // We need not worry about incompatible result types because the SFINAE on
+ // OnceAction already checks this for us. std::is_invocable_r_v itself makes
+ // the same allowance for void result types.
+ template <typename... ArgRefs>
+ internal::call_result_t<Callable, ArgRefs...> operator()(
+ ArgRefs&&... args) const {
+ return std::move(*callable_)(std::forward<ArgRefs>(args)...);
+ }
+
+ private:
+ // We must put the callable on the heap so that we are copyable, which
+ // Action needs.
+ std::shared_ptr<Callable> callable_;
+ };
+
+ // An adaptor that makes a callable that accepts zero arguments callable with
+ // our mocked arguments.
+ template <typename Callable>
+ struct IgnoreIncomingArguments {
+ internal::call_result_t<Callable> operator()(Args&&...) {
+ return std::move(callable)();
+ }
+
+ Callable callable;
+ };
+
+ // Return an Action that calls the underlying callable in a type-safe manner.
+ // The action's Perform method must be called at most once.
+ //
+ // This is the transition from a type-safe API to a type-unsafe one, since
+ // "must be called at most once" is no longer reflecting in the type system.
+ Action<Result(Args...)> ReleaseAction() && { return std::move(action_); }
+
+ Action<Result(Args...)> action_;
+};
+
// Helper struct to specialize ReturnAction to execute a move instead of a copy
// on return. Useful for move-only types, but could be used on any type.
template <typename T>
diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h
index 8e4c5c6..917fa9a 100644
--- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h
+++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h
@@ -992,14 +992,16 @@ class TypedExpectation : public ExpectationBase {
return After(s1, s2, s3, s4).After(s5);
}
- // Implements the .WillOnce() clause.
- TypedExpectation& WillOnce(const Action<F>& action) {
+ // Implements the .WillOnce() clause for copyable actions.
+ TypedExpectation& WillOnce(OnceAction<F> once_action) {
ExpectSpecProperty(last_clause_ <= kWillOnce,
".WillOnce() cannot appear after "
".WillRepeatedly() or .RetiresOnSaturation().");
last_clause_ = kWillOnce;
- untyped_actions_.push_back(new Action<F>(action));
+ untyped_actions_.push_back(
+ new Action<F>(std::move(once_action).ReleaseAction()));
+
if (!cardinality_specified()) {
set_cardinality(Exactly(static_cast<int>(untyped_actions_.size())));
}
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
index 233b60c..7ff5780 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
@@ -55,37 +55,170 @@
#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+namespace testing {
namespace {
-using ::testing::_;
-using ::testing::Action;
-using ::testing::ActionInterface;
-using ::testing::Assign;
-using ::testing::ByMove;
-using ::testing::ByRef;
-using ::testing::DefaultValue;
-using ::testing::DoAll;
-using ::testing::DoDefault;
-using ::testing::IgnoreResult;
-using ::testing::Invoke;
-using ::testing::InvokeWithoutArgs;
-using ::testing::MakePolymorphicAction;
-using ::testing::PolymorphicAction;
-using ::testing::Return;
-using ::testing::ReturnNew;
-using ::testing::ReturnNull;
-using ::testing::ReturnRef;
-using ::testing::ReturnRefOfCopy;
-using ::testing::ReturnRoundRobin;
-using ::testing::SetArgPointee;
-using ::testing::SetArgumentPointee;
-using ::testing::Unused;
-using ::testing::WithArgs;
using ::testing::internal::BuiltInDefaultValue;
-#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
-using ::testing::SetErrnoAndReturn;
-#endif
+TEST(TypeTraits, Negation) {
+ // Direct use with std types.
+ static_assert(std::is_base_of<std::false_type,
+ internal::negation<std::true_type>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(std::is_base_of<std::true_type,
+ internal::negation<std::false_type>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ // With other types that fit the requirement of a value member that is
+ // convertible to bool.
+ static_assert(std::is_base_of<
+ std::true_type,
+ internal::negation<std::integral_constant<int, 0>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(std::is_base_of<
+ std::false_type,
+ internal::negation<std::integral_constant<int, 1>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(std::is_base_of<
+ std::false_type,
+ internal::negation<std::integral_constant<int, -1>>>::value,
+ "");
+}
+
+// Weird false/true types that aren't actually bool constants (but should still
+// be legal according to [meta.logical] because `bool(T::value)` is valid), are
+// distinct from std::false_type and std::true_type, and are distinct from other
+// instantiations of the same template.
+//
+// These let us check finicky details mandated by the standard like
+// "std::conjunction should evaluate to a type that inherits from the first
+// false-y input".
+template <int>
+struct MyFalse : std::integral_constant<int, 0> {};
+
+template <int>
+struct MyTrue : std::integral_constant<int, -1> {};
+
+TEST(TypeTraits, Conjunction) {
+ // Base case: always true.
+ static_assert(std::is_base_of<std::true_type, internal::conjunction<>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ // One predicate: inherits from that predicate, regardless of value.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyFalse<0>, internal::conjunction<MyFalse<0>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyTrue<0>, internal::conjunction<MyTrue<0>>>::value, "");
+
+ // Multiple predicates, with at least one false: inherits from that one.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyFalse<1>, internal::conjunction<MyTrue<0>, MyFalse<1>,
+ MyTrue<2>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyFalse<1>, internal::conjunction<MyTrue<0>, MyFalse<1>,
+ MyFalse<2>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ // Short circuiting: in the case above, additional predicates need not even
+ // define a value member.
+ struct Empty {};
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyFalse<1>, internal::conjunction<MyTrue<0>, MyFalse<1>,
+ Empty>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ // All predicates true: inherits from the last.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyTrue<2>, internal::conjunction<MyTrue<0>, MyTrue<1>,
+ MyTrue<2>>>::value,
+ "");
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraits, Disjunction) {
+ // Base case: always false.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<std::false_type, internal::disjunction<>>::value, "");
+
+ // One predicate: inherits from that predicate, regardless of value.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyFalse<0>, internal::disjunction<MyFalse<0>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyTrue<0>, internal::disjunction<MyTrue<0>>>::value, "");
+
+ // Multiple predicates, with at least one true: inherits from that one.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyTrue<1>, internal::disjunction<MyFalse<0>, MyTrue<1>,
+ MyFalse<2>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyTrue<1>, internal::disjunction<MyFalse<0>, MyTrue<1>,
+ MyTrue<2>>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ // Short circuiting: in the case above, additional predicates need not even
+ // define a value member.
+ struct Empty {};
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyTrue<1>, internal::disjunction<MyFalse<0>, MyTrue<1>,
+ Empty>>::value,
+ "");
+
+ // All predicates false: inherits from the last.
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_base_of<MyFalse<2>, internal::disjunction<MyFalse<0>, MyFalse<1>,
+ MyFalse<2>>>::value,
+ "");
+}
+
+TEST(TypeTraits, IsInvocableRV) {
+ struct C {
+ int operator()() const { return 0; }
+ void operator()(int) & {}
+ std::string operator()(int) && { return ""; };
+ };
+
+ // The first overload is callable for const and non-const rvalues and lvalues.
+ // It can be used to obtain an int, void, or anything int is convertible too.
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<int, C>::value, "");
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<int, C&>::value, "");
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<int, const C>::value, "");
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<int, const C&>::value, "");
+
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<void, C>::value, "");
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<char, C>::value, "");
+
+ // It's possible to provide an int. If it's given to an lvalue, the result is
+ // void. Otherwise it is std::string (which is also treated as allowed for a
+ // void result type).
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<void, C&, int>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<int, C&, int>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<std::string, C&, int>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<void, const C&, int>::value, "");
+
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<std::string, C, int>::value, "");
+ static_assert(internal::is_callable_r<void, C, int>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<int, C, int>::value, "");
+
+ // It's not possible to provide other arguments.
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<void, C, std::string>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<void, C, int, int>::value, "");
+
+ // Nothing should choke when we try to call other arguments besides directly
+ // callable objects, but they should not show up as callable.
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<void, int>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<void, void (C::*)()>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!internal::is_callable_r<void, void (C::*)(), C*>::value, "");
+}
// Tests that BuiltInDefaultValue<T*>::Get() returns NULL.
TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsNullForPointerTypes) {
@@ -1428,6 +1561,154 @@ TEST(MockMethodTest, CanTakeMoveOnlyValue) {
EXPECT_EQ(42, *saved);
}
+// It should be possible to use callables with an &&-qualified call operator
+// with WillOnce, since they will be called only once. This allows actions to
+// contain and manipulate move-only types.
+TEST(MockMethodTest, ActionHasRvalueRefQualifiedCallOperator) {
+ struct Return17 {
+ int operator()() && { return 17; }
+ };
+
+ // Action is directly compatible with mocked function type.
+ {
+ MockFunction<int()> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(Return17());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+ }
+
+ // Action doesn't want mocked function arguments.
+ {
+ MockFunction<int(int)> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(Return17());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()(0));
+ }
+}
+
+// Edge case: if an action has both a const-qualified and an &&-qualified call
+// operator, there should be no "ambiguous call" errors. The &&-qualified
+// operator should be used by WillOnce (since it doesn't need to retain the
+// action beyond one call), and the const-qualified one by WillRepeatedly.
+TEST(MockMethodTest, ActionHasMultipleCallOperators) {
+ struct ReturnInt {
+ int operator()() && { return 17; }
+ int operator()() const& { return 19; }
+ };
+
+ // Directly compatible with mocked function type.
+ {
+ MockFunction<int()> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(ReturnInt()).WillRepeatedly(ReturnInt());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+ EXPECT_EQ(19, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+ EXPECT_EQ(19, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+ }
+
+ // Ignores function arguments.
+ {
+ MockFunction<int(int)> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(ReturnInt()).WillRepeatedly(ReturnInt());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(19, mock.AsStdFunction()(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(19, mock.AsStdFunction()(0));
+ }
+}
+
+// WillOnce should have no problem coping with a move-only action, whether it is
+// &&-qualified or not.
+TEST(MockMethodTest, MoveOnlyAction) {
+ // &&-qualified
+ {
+ struct Return17 {
+ Return17() = default;
+ Return17(Return17&&) = default;
+
+ Return17(const Return17&) = delete;
+ Return17 operator=(const Return17&) = delete;
+
+ int operator()() && { return 17; }
+ };
+
+ MockFunction<int()> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(Return17());
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+ }
+
+ // Not &&-qualified
+ {
+ struct Return17 {
+ Return17() = default;
+ Return17(Return17&&) = default;
+
+ Return17(const Return17&) = delete;
+ Return17 operator=(const Return17&) = delete;
+
+ int operator()() const { return 17; }
+ };
+
+ MockFunction<int()> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(Return17());
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+ }
+}
+
+// It should be possible to use an action that returns a value with a mock
+// function that doesn't, both through WillOnce and WillRepeatedly.
+TEST(MockMethodTest, ActionReturnsIgnoredValue) {
+ struct ReturnInt {
+ int operator()() const { return 0; }
+ };
+
+ MockFunction<void()> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(ReturnInt()).WillRepeatedly(ReturnInt());
+
+ mock.AsStdFunction()();
+ mock.AsStdFunction()();
+}
+
+// Despite the fanciness around move-only actions and so on, it should still be
+// possible to hand an lvalue reference to a copyable action to WillOnce.
+TEST(MockMethodTest, WillOnceCanAcceptLvalueReference) {
+ MockFunction<int()> mock;
+
+ const auto action = [] { return 17; };
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call).WillOnce(action);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()());
+}
+
+// A callable that doesn't use SFINAE to restrict its call operator's overload
+// set, but is still picky about which arguments it will accept.
+struct StaticAssertSingleArgument {
+ template <typename... Args>
+ static constexpr bool CheckArgs() {
+ static_assert(sizeof...(Args) == 1, "");
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ template <typename... Args, bool = CheckArgs<Args...>()>
+ int operator()(Args...) const {
+ return 17;
+ }
+};
+
+// WillOnce and WillRepeatedly should both work fine with naïve implementations
+// of actions that don't use SFINAE to limit the overload set for their call
+// operator. If they are compatible with the actual mocked signature, we
+// shouldn't probe them with no arguments and trip a static_assert.
+TEST(MockMethodTest, ActionSwallowsAllArguments) {
+ MockFunction<int(int)> mock;
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, Call)
+ .WillOnce(StaticAssertSingleArgument{})
+ .WillRepeatedly(StaticAssertSingleArgument{});
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(17, mock.AsStdFunction()(0));
+}
+
// Tests for std::function based action.
int Add(int val, int& ref, int* ptr) { // NOLINT
@@ -1552,7 +1833,8 @@ TEST(ActionMacro, LargeArity) {
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19)));
}
-} // Unnamed namespace
+} // namespace
+} // namespace testing
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#if _MSC_VER == 1900