diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock/test')
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_nc.cc | 170 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc | 1036 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc | 916 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/test/gmock_all_test.cc | 1 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | googlemock/test/gmock_generated_actions_nc_test.py | 137 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | googlemock/test/pump_test.py | 182 |
6 files changed, 869 insertions, 1573 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_nc.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_nc.cc deleted file mode 100644 index 59f4798..0000000 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_nc.cc +++ /dev/null @@ -1,170 +0,0 @@ -// Copyright 2008, Google Inc. -// All rights reserved. -// -// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without -// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are -// met: -// -// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright -// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. -// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above -// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer -// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the -// distribution. -// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its -// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from -// this software without specific prior written permission. -// -// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS -// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT -// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR -// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT -// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, -// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT -// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, -// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY -// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT -// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE -// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. - - -// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes. -// -// This file contains negative compilation tests for script-generated -// Google Mock actions. - -#include "gmock/gmock.h" - -using testing::Action; -using testing::Invoke; -using testing::WithArgs; - -int Nullary() { return 0; } -int Binary(int a, int b) { return a + b; } - -#if defined(TEST_NULLARY_WITH_ARGS) - -// Tests that WithArgs(action) doesn't compile. -void Test() { - Action<int(int)> a = WithArgs(Invoke(Nullary)); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_TOO_FEW_ARGS_FOR_WITH_ARGS) - -// Tests that you cannot pass too few arguments to the inner action in -// WithArgs(). -void Test() { - Action<int(int, int, int)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Binary)); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_TOO_MANY_ARGS_FOR_WITH_ARGS) - -// Tests that you cannot pass too many arguments to the inner action in -// WithArgs(). -void Test() { - Action<int(int, int, int)> a = WithArgs<1, 2, 0>(Invoke(Binary)); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_INCOMPATIBLE_ARG_TYPES_FOR_WITH_ARGS) - -// Tests that you cannot pass arguments of incompatible types to the -// inner action in WithArgs(). -void Test() { - Action<int(int, const char*, int)> a = WithArgs<1, 2>(Invoke(Binary)); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_WRONG_ARG_TYPE_IN_ACTION_MACRO) - -// Tests using an ACTION definition in a mock function whose argument -// types are incompatible. -ACTION(WrongArgType) { return 10/arg0; } - -void Test() { - Action<int(const char*)> a = WrongArgType(); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_WRONG_RETURN_TYPE_IN_ACTION_MACRO) - -// Tests using an ACTION definition in a mock function whose return -// types is incompatible. -ACTION(WrongReturnType) { return 10; } - -void Test() { - Action<const char*()> a = WrongReturnType(); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_EXCESSIVE_ARG_IN_ACTION_MACRO) - -// Tests using an ACTION definition in a mock function that doesn't -// provide enough arguments. -ACTION(UseExcessiveArg) { return arg0 + arg1; } - -void Test() { - Action<int(int)> a = UseExcessiveArg(); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_ACTION_MACRO_IN_CLASS) - -// Tests using ACTION in a class scope. -class Foo { - public: - // This won't compile as C++ doesn't allow defining a method of a - // nested class out-of-line in the enclosing class. - ACTION(Bar) { return arg0; } -}; - -#elif defined(TEST_ACTION_MACRO_IN_FUNCTION) - -// Tests using ACTION in a function body. -void Test() { - // This won't compile as C++ doesn't allow member templates in local - // classes. We may want to revisit this when C++0x is widely - // implemented. - ACTION(Bar) { return arg0; } -} - -#elif defined(TEST_SET_ARG_REFEREE_MUST_BE_USED_WITH_REFERENCE) - -// Verifies that using SetArgReferee<k>(...) where the k-th argument -// of the mock function is not a reference generates a compiler error. -void Test() { - Action<void(bool, int)> a = testing::SetArgReferee<1>(5); -} - -#elif defined(TEST_DELETE_ARG_MUST_BE_USED_WITH_POINTER) - -// Verifies that using DeleteArg<k>(...) where the k-th argument of the mock -// function is not a pointer generates a compiler error. -void Test() { - Action<void(int)> a = testing::DeleteArg<0>(); // NOLINT -} - -#elif defined(TEST_CANNOT_OVERLOAD_ACTION_TEMPLATE_ON_TEMPLATE_PARAM_NUMBER) - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE cannot be overloaded on the number of -// template parameters alone. - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(OverloadedAction, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p)) {} - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(OverloadedAction, - HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T1, typename, T2), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p)) {} - -#elif defined(TEST_CANNOT_OVERLOAD_ACTION_AND_ACTION_TEMPLATE_W_SAME_VALUE_PS) - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION_P cannot be overloaded when -// they have the same number of value parameters. - -ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, p) {} - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(OverloadedAction, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(p)) {} - -#else - -// Sanity check - this should compile. - -#endif diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc deleted file mode 100644 index 6490616..0000000 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1036 +0,0 @@ -// Copyright 2007, Google Inc. -// All rights reserved. -// -// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without -// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are -// met: -// -// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright -// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. -// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above -// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer -// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the -// distribution. -// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its -// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from -// this software without specific prior written permission. -// -// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS -// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT -// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR -// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT -// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, -// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT -// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, -// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY -// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT -// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE -// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. - - -// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes. -// -// This file tests the built-in actions generated by a script. - -#include "gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h" - -#include <functional> -#include <memory> -#include <sstream> -#include <string> -#include "gmock/gmock.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -namespace testing { -namespace gmock_generated_actions_test { - -using ::std::plus; -using ::std::string; -using testing::_; -using testing::Action; -using testing::ActionInterface; -using testing::ByRef; -using testing::DoAll; -using testing::Invoke; -using testing::Return; -using testing::SetArgPointee; -using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq; -using testing::Unused; - -// For suppressing compiler warnings on conversion possibly losing precision. -inline short Short(short n) { return n; } // NOLINT -inline char Char(char ch) { return ch; } - -// Sample functions and functors for testing various actions. -int Nullary() { return 1; } - -bool g_done = false; - -bool ByConstRef(const std::string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } - -const double g_double = 0; -bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; } - -struct UnaryFunctor { - int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; } -}; - -const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; } // NOLINT - -int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; } - -struct SumOf5Functor { - int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { - return a + b + c + d + e; - } -}; - -std::string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; -} - -int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { - return a + b + c + d + e + f; -} - -struct SumOf6Functor { - int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { - return a + b + c + d + e + f; - } -}; - -std::string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; -} - -std::string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7; -} - -std::string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8; -} - -std::string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9; -} - -std::string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, - const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9, - const char* s10) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10; -} - -// A helper that turns the type of a C-string literal from const -// char[N] to const char*. -inline const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; } - -// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...). - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) { - Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>(); // NOLINT - EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(2, &Nullary))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) { - Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true); // NOLINT - EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(UnaryFunctor()))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) { - Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5); - EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&SumOf5))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) { - Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5); - EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(SumOf5Functor()))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) { - Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6); - EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&SumOf6))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) { - Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6); - EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(SumOf6Functor()))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) { - Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*))> - a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"); - EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat7))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) { - Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*))> - a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8"); - EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat8))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) { - Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*))> - a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"); - EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat9))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) { - Action<std::string(std::string(*)( - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, - const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*))> - a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0"); - EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat10))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) { - Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), Short(1)); - EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Binary))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char* -// by passing it a C-string literal. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) { - Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", Short(1)); - EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Binary))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) { - Action<bool(bool (*function)(const std::string& s))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(std::string("Hi")); - // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary - // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the - // temporary object has already died. - EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ByConstRef))); -} - -// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a -// const reference. -TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) { - Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a = // NOLINT - InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double)); - // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value. - EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble))); - - double x = 0; - a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x)); // This calls ByRef() on a non-const. - EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble))); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2). -TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) { - int n = 0; - Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), // NOLINT - Return(2)); - EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&n))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, n); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3). -TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), // NOLINT - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4). -TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char ch = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a = // NOLINT - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', ch); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5). -TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char a = '\0', b = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - SetArgPointee<3>('b'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', a); - EXPECT_EQ('b', b); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6). -TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - SetArgPointee<3>('b'), - SetArgPointee<4>('c'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', a); - EXPECT_EQ('b', b); - EXPECT_EQ('c', c); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7). -TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - SetArgPointee<3>('b'), - SetArgPointee<4>('c'), - SetArgPointee<5>('d'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', a); - EXPECT_EQ('b', b); - EXPECT_EQ('c', c); - EXPECT_EQ('d', d); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8). -TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT - char*)> action = - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - SetArgPointee<3>('b'), - SetArgPointee<4>('c'), - SetArgPointee<5>('d'), - SetArgPointee<6>('e'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', a); - EXPECT_EQ('b', b); - EXPECT_EQ('c', c); - EXPECT_EQ('d', d); - EXPECT_EQ('e', e); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9). -TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT - char*, char*)> action = - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - SetArgPointee<3>('b'), - SetArgPointee<4>('c'), - SetArgPointee<5>('d'), - SetArgPointee<6>('e'), - SetArgPointee<7>('f'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', a); - EXPECT_EQ('b', b); - EXPECT_EQ('c', c); - EXPECT_EQ('d', d); - EXPECT_EQ('e', e); - EXPECT_EQ('f', f); -} - -// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10). -TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) { - int m = 0, n = 0; - char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0'; - char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0'; - Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT - char*, char*, char*)> action = - DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), - SetArgPointee<1>(2), - SetArgPointee<2>('a'), - SetArgPointee<3>('b'), - SetArgPointee<4>('c'), - SetArgPointee<5>('d'), - SetArgPointee<6>('e'), - SetArgPointee<7>('f'), - SetArgPointee<8>('g'), - Return(3)); - EXPECT_EQ( - 3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, m); - EXPECT_EQ(2, n); - EXPECT_EQ('a', a); - EXPECT_EQ('b', b); - EXPECT_EQ('c', c); - EXPECT_EQ('d', d); - EXPECT_EQ('e', e); - EXPECT_EQ('f', f); - EXPECT_EQ('g', g); -} - -TEST(DoAllTest, NoArgs) { - bool ran_first = false; - Action<bool()> a = - DoAll([&] { ran_first = true; }, [&] { return ran_first; }); - EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform({})); -} - -TEST(DoAllTest, MoveOnlyArgs) { - bool ran_first = false; - Action<int(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a = - DoAll(InvokeWithoutArgs([&] { ran_first = true; }), - [](std::unique_ptr<int> p) { return *p; }); - EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(7))))); - EXPECT_TRUE(ran_first); -} - -TEST(DoAllTest, ImplicitlyConvertsActionArguments) { - bool ran_first = false; - // Action<void(std::vector<int>)> isn't an - // Action<void(const std::vector<int>&) but can be converted. - Action<void(std::vector<int>)> first = [&] { ran_first = true; }; - Action<int(std::vector<int>)> a = - DoAll(first, [](std::vector<int> arg) { return arg.front(); }); - EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(std::vector<int>{7}))); - EXPECT_TRUE(ran_first); -} - -// The ACTION*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal -// parameter) in MSVC with -W4. Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in -// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro -// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma. Therefore -// we suppress them here. -// Also suppress C4503 decorated name length exceeded, name was truncated -#ifdef _MSC_VER -# pragma warning(push) -# pragma warning(disable:4100) -# pragma warning(disable:4503) -#endif -// Tests the ACTION*() macro family. - -// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the -// mock function arguments. -ACTION(Return5) { return 5; } - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) { - Action<double()> a1 = Return5(); - EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); - - Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5(); - EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, true))); -} - -// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void. -ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; } - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) { - Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1(); - int n = 0; - a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, &n)); - EXPECT_EQ(1, n); -} - -// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the -// argument. -ACTION(IncrementArg2) { - StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>(); - arg2_type temp = arg2; - (*temp)++; -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) { - Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2(); - int n = 0; - a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, false, &n)); - EXPECT_EQ(1, n); -} - -// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple -// via args_type and args. -ACTION(Sum2) { - StaticAssertTypeEq<std::tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>(); - args_type args_copy = args; - return std::get<0>(args_copy) + std::get<1>(args_copy); -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) { - Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2(); - int dummy = 0; - EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy))); -} - -// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function -// type. -int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag? 1 : 0; } - -ACTION(InvokeDummy) { - StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>(); - function_type* fp = &Dummy; - return (*fp)(true); -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) { - Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy(); - EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false))); -} - -// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's -// return type. -ACTION(InvokeDummy2) { - StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>(); - return_type result = Dummy(true); - return result; -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) { - Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2(); - EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true))); - EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false))); -} - -// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference. -ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) { - StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>(); - return &arg1; -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) { - Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg(); - const bool b = false; - EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(std::tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b))); -} - -// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference. -ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) { - StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>(); - return &arg0; -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) { - Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg(); - int n = 0; - EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(std::tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1))); -} - -// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace. -namespace action_test { -ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; } -} // namespace action_test - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) { - Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum(); - EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, 2))); -} - -// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with -// different argument numbers. -ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; } - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo(); - EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(2))); - - Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo(); - int dummy; - EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy))); -} - -// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action. -ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; } - -TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) { - Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9); - EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, true))); -} - -// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types -// and the parameter type. -ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) { - arg0_type t1 = arg0; - n_type t2 = n; - return t1 + t2; -} - -TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) { - Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9); - EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(Char(1), true))); -} - -// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function -// whose type is compatible. -TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) { - Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail"); - const std::string re = "re"; - std::tuple<const std::string> dummy = std::make_tuple(re); - EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(dummy)); -} - -// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the -// number of parameters. - -ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; } - -ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) { - return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value; -} - -ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) { - return arg0 ? true_value : false_value; -} - -TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) { - typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction; - - const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction(); - EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); - EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); - - const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi"); - EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); - EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); - - const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you"); - EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); - EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); -} - -// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3. - -ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; } - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) { - Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4); - EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(3000, true))); - - Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">"); - const std::string re = "re"; - std::tuple<const std::string> dummy = std::make_tuple(re); - EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(dummy)); -} - -ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; } - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; } - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) { - return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) { - return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) { - return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, - a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) { - return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, - a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) { - arg0_type t0 = arg0; - last_param_type t9 = last_param; - return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) { - Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); - EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10, - a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); -} - -// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types. - -ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) { - // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types. - std::string prefix_str(prefix); - char suffix_char = static_cast<char>(suffix); - return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) { - Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo = - PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r'); - Action<std::string(const char*)> promo = - PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r')); - EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("ba")))); - EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("ba")))); -} - -// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a -// straight-forward pattern. - -// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its -// parameters. -ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) { - std::stringstream ss; - ss << a << b << c; - return ss.str(); -} - -// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a -// string, or the second parameter is an int. - -// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first -// parameter to std::string. -template <typename T1, typename T2> -// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to -// implement ConcatImpl. We shouldn't change the name as this -// pattern requires the user to use it directly. -ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2> -Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, T2 c) { - GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_PUSH_() - if (true) { - GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_POP_() - // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without - // explicit template arguments. - return ConcatImpl(a, b, c); - } else { - // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with - // explicit template arguments. It doesn't really need to be - // executed as this is a compile-time verification. - return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c); - } -} - -// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the -// second parameter to int. -template <typename T1, typename T2> -ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2> -Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) { - return ConcatImpl(a, b, c); -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) { - Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2); - EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); - - a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3); - EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); -} - -// Verifies the type of an ACTION*. - -ACTION(DoFoo) {} -ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {} -ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) { - // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable. - DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo(); - - // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable. - DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1); - - // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk - // variable, and so on. - DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2'); - PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3'); - PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4'); - PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5'); - PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6'); - PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 = - Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7'); - PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 = - Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8'); - PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 = - Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9'); - PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 = - Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0'); - - // Avoid "unused variable" warnings. - (void)a0; - (void)a1; - (void)a2; - (void)a3; - (void)a4; - (void)a5; - (void)a6; - (void)a7; - (void)a8; - (void)a9; - (void)a10; -} - -// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated -// with reference-typed parameters. - -ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; } -ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; } -ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; } -ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) { - return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9; -} - -TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) { - int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3; - const std::tuple<> empty = std::make_tuple(); - - Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x); - EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty)); - - a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y); - EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty)); - - a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z); - EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty)); - - int n[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; - a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, - int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], n[7], - n[8], n[9]); - EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty)); -} - - -class TenArgConstructorClass { - public: - TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5, - int a6, int a7, int a8, int a9, int a10) - : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) { - } - int value_; -}; - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), - AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) { - return new T; -} - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) { - const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(); - int* p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); - delete p; -} - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) { - return new T(a0); -} - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) { - const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42); - int* p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); - EXPECT_EQ(42, *p); - delete p; -} - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k), - AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) { - delete std::get<k>(args); -} - -// Resets a bool variable in the destructor. -class BoolResetter { - public: - explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {} - ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; } - private: - bool* value_; -}; - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) { - const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>(); - int n = 0; - bool b = true; - BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b); - a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&n, resetter)); - EXPECT_FALSE(b); // Verifies that resetter is deleted. -} - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class, - Pointer), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) { - return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee)); -} - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) { - const Action<std::shared_ptr<int>()> a = - ReturnSmartPointer<std::shared_ptr>(42); - std::shared_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); - EXPECT_EQ(42, *p); -} - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters. -template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5, - unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9> -struct GiantTemplate { - public: - explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {} - int value; -}; - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant, - HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS( - typename, T1, - typename, T2, - typename, T3, - int, k4, - bool, k5, - unsigned int, k6, - class, T7, - class, T8, - class, T9, - template <typename T> class, T10), - AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) { - return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value); -} - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) { - using Giant = GiantTemplate<std::shared_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5, true, 6, - char, unsigned, int>; - const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, - unsigned, int, std::shared_ptr>(42); - Giant giant = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); - EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value); -} - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters. -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), - AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) { - return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10; -} - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) { - const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); - EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(std::make_tuple())); -} - -// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded -// on the number of value parameters. - -ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; } - -ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; } - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), - AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) { - return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2; -} - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, - HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), - AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) { - return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3; -} - -ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, - HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k), - AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) { - return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k; -} - -TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) { - const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum(); - const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1); - const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2); - const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3); - const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5); - EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(std::make_tuple())); - EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); - EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple())); - EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(std::make_tuple())); - EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(std::make_tuple())); -} - - -} // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test -} // namespace testing diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc index 4bcb5df..53bb029 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@ // // This file tests the built-in actions in gmock-actions.h. +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#pragma warning(push) +#pragma warning(disable : 4577) +#endif + +#include "gmock/gmock-more-actions.h" + #include <functional> #include <memory> #include <sstream> #include <string> -#include "gmock/gmock-actions.h" #include "gmock/gmock.h" #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" @@ -46,12 +52,9 @@ namespace gmock_more_actions_test { using ::std::plus; using ::std::string; -using testing::_; using testing::Action; -using testing::ActionInterface; using testing::DeleteArg; using testing::Invoke; -using testing::Return; using testing::ReturnArg; using testing::ReturnPointee; using testing::SaveArg; @@ -68,55 +71,27 @@ inline char Char(char ch) { return ch; } // Sample functions and functors for testing Invoke() and etc. int Nullary() { return 1; } -class NullaryFunctor { - public: - int operator()() { return 2; } -}; - bool g_done = false; -void VoidNullary() { g_done = true; } - -class VoidNullaryFunctor { - public: - void operator()() { g_done = true; } -}; bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; } -const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; } - -void VoidUnary(int /* n */) { g_done = true; } - bool ByConstRef(const std::string& s) { return s == "Hi"; } const double g_double = 0; bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; } -std::string ByNonConstRef(std::string& s) { return s += "+"; } // NOLINT - struct UnaryFunctor { int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; } }; const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; } // NOLINT -void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; } - int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; } // NOLINT -void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; } - int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; } int SumOfFirst2(int a, int b, Unused, Unused) { return a + b; } -void VoidFunctionWithFourArguments(char, int, float, double) { g_done = true; } - -std::string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4; -} - int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; } struct SumOf5Functor { @@ -125,11 +100,6 @@ struct SumOf5Functor { } }; -std::string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5; -} - int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) { return a + b + c + d + e + f; } @@ -140,11 +110,6 @@ struct SumOf6Functor { } }; -std::string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, - const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) { - return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6; -} - std::string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3, const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6, const char* s7) { @@ -636,7 +601,7 @@ TEST(ThrowActionTest, Times0) { // Tests that SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) sets the elements of the array // pointed to by the N-th (0-based) argument to values in range [first, last). TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArray) { - typedef void MyFunction(bool, int*, char*); + using MyFunction = void(bool, int*, char*); int numbers[] = { 1, 2, 3 }; Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(numbers, numbers + 3); @@ -672,7 +637,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArray) { // Tests SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) where first == last. TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithEmptyRange) { - typedef void MyFunction(bool, int*); + using MyFunction = void(bool, int*); int numbers[] = { 1, 2, 3 }; Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(numbers, numbers); @@ -688,7 +653,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithEmptyRange) { // Tests SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) where *first is convertible // (but not equal) to the argument type. TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithConvertibleType) { - typedef void MyFunction(bool, int*); + using MyFunction = void(bool, int*); char chars[] = { 97, 98, 99 }; Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(chars, chars + 3); @@ -703,7 +668,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithConvertibleType) { // Test SetArrayArgument<N>(first, last) with iterator as argument. TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithIteratorArgument) { - typedef void MyFunction(bool, std::back_insert_iterator<std::string>); + using MyFunction = void(bool, std::back_insert_iterator<std::string>); std::string letters = "abc"; Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(letters.begin(), letters.end()); @@ -721,5 +686,862 @@ TEST(ReturnPointeeTest, Works) { EXPECT_EQ(43, a.Perform(std::make_tuple())); } -} // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test +// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...). + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) { + Action<int(int, int (*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>(); // NOLINT + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(2, &Nullary))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) { + Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true); // NOLINT + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(UnaryFunctor()))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) { + Action<int(int (*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&SumOf5))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) { + Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(SumOf5Functor()))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) { + Action<int(int (*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6); + EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&SumOf6))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) { + Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6); + EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(SumOf6Functor()))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) { + Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"); + EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat7))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) { + Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8"); + EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat8))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) { + Action<std::string(std::string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"); + EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat9))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) { + Action<std::string(std::string(*)( + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, + const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*))> + a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0"); + EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat10))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) { + Action<const char*(const char* (*)(const char* input, short n))> // NOLINT + a = InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), Short(1)); + EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Binary))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char* +// by passing it a C-string literal. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) { + Action<const char*(const char* (*)(const char* input, short n))> // NOLINT + a = InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", Short(1)); + EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Binary))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) { + Action<bool(bool (*function)(const std::string& s))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(std::string("Hi")); + // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary + // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the + // temporary object has already died. + EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ByConstRef))); +} + +// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a +// const reference. +TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) { + Action<bool(bool (*)(const double& x))> a = // NOLINT + InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double)); + // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value. + EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble))); + + double x = 0; + a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x)); // This calls ByRef() on a non-const. + EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble))); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2). +TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) { + int n = 0; + Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), // NOLINT + Return(2)); + EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&n))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, n); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3). +TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), // NOLINT + SetArgPointee<1>(2), Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4). +TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char ch = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', ch); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5). +TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6). +TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), SetArgPointee<4>('c'), Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7). +TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action = // NOLINT + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), SetArgPointee<4>('c'), SetArgPointee<5>('d'), + Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8). +TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT + char*)> + action = + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + SetArgPointee<5>('d'), SetArgPointee<6>('e'), Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); + EXPECT_EQ('e', e); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9). +TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT + char*, char*)> + action = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), + SetArgPointee<2>('a'), SetArgPointee<3>('b'), + SetArgPointee<4>('c'), SetArgPointee<5>('d'), + SetArgPointee<6>('e'), SetArgPointee<7>('f'), Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); + EXPECT_EQ('e', e); + EXPECT_EQ('f', f); +} + +// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10). +TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) { + int m = 0, n = 0; + char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0'; + char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0'; + Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*, // NOLINT + char*, char*, char*)> + action = + DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1), SetArgPointee<1>(2), SetArgPointee<2>('a'), + SetArgPointee<3>('b'), SetArgPointee<4>('c'), + SetArgPointee<5>('d'), SetArgPointee<6>('e'), + SetArgPointee<7>('f'), SetArgPointee<8>('g'), Return(3)); + EXPECT_EQ( + 3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, m); + EXPECT_EQ(2, n); + EXPECT_EQ('a', a); + EXPECT_EQ('b', b); + EXPECT_EQ('c', c); + EXPECT_EQ('d', d); + EXPECT_EQ('e', e); + EXPECT_EQ('f', f); + EXPECT_EQ('g', g); +} + +TEST(DoAllTest, NoArgs) { + bool ran_first = false; + Action<bool()> a = + DoAll([&] { ran_first = true; }, [&] { return ran_first; }); + EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform({})); +} + +TEST(DoAllTest, MoveOnlyArgs) { + bool ran_first = false; + Action<int(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a = + DoAll(InvokeWithoutArgs([&] { ran_first = true; }), + [](std::unique_ptr<int> p) { return *p; }); + EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(7))))); + EXPECT_TRUE(ran_first); +} + +TEST(DoAllTest, ImplicitlyConvertsActionArguments) { + bool ran_first = false; + // Action<void(std::vector<int>)> isn't an + // Action<void(const std::vector<int>&) but can be converted. + Action<void(std::vector<int>)> first = [&] { ran_first = true; }; + Action<int(std::vector<int>)> a = + DoAll(first, [](std::vector<int> arg) { return arg.front(); }); + EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(std::vector<int>{7}))); + EXPECT_TRUE(ran_first); +} + +// The ACTION*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal +// parameter) in MSVC with -W4. Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in +// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro +// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma. Therefore +// we suppress them here. +// Also suppress C4503 decorated name length exceeded, name was truncated +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#pragma warning(push) +#pragma warning(disable : 4100) +#pragma warning(disable : 4503) +#endif +// Tests the ACTION*() macro family. + +// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the +// mock function arguments. +ACTION(Return5) { return 5; } + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) { + Action<double()> a1 = Return5(); + EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); + + Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5(); + EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, true))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void. +ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; } + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) { + Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1(); + int n = 0; + a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, &n)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, n); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the +// argument. +ACTION(IncrementArg2) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>(); + arg2_type temp = arg2; + (*temp)++; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) { + Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2(); + int n = 0; + a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, false, &n)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, n); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple +// via args_type and args. +ACTION(Sum2) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<std::tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>(); + args_type args_copy = args; + return std::get<0>(args_copy) + std::get<1>(args_copy); +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) { + Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2(); + int dummy = 0; + EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy))); +} + +namespace { + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function +// type. +int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag ? 1 : 0; } + +} // namespace + +ACTION(InvokeDummy) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>(); + function_type* fp = &Dummy; + return (*fp)(true); +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) { + Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy(); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false))); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's +// return type. +ACTION(InvokeDummy2) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>(); + return_type result = Dummy(true); + return result; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) { + Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2(); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true))); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference. +ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>(); + return &arg1; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) { + Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg(); + const bool b = false; + EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(std::tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference. +ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) { + StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>(); + return &arg0; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) { + Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg(); + int n = 0; + EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(std::tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace. +namespace action_test { +ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; } +} // namespace action_test + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) { + Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum(); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, 2))); +} + +// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with +// different argument numbers. +ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; } + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo(); + EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(2))); + + Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo(); + int dummy; + EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy))); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action. +ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; } + +TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) { + Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9); + EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, true))); +} + +// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types +// and the parameter type. +ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) { + arg0_type t1 = arg0; + n_type t2 = n; + return t1 + t2; +} + +TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) { + Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9); + EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(Char(1), true))); +} + +// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function +// whose type is compatible. +TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) { + Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail"); + const std::string re = "re"; + std::tuple<const std::string> dummy = std::make_tuple(re); + EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(dummy)); +} + +// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the +// number of parameters. + +ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; } + +ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) { + return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value; +} + +ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) { + return arg0 ? true_value : false_value; +} + +TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) { + using MyAction = Action<const char*(bool, const char*)>; + + const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction(); + EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); + EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); + + const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi"); + EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); + EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); + + const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you"); + EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world")))); + EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world")))); +} + +// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3. + +ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; } + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) { + Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4); + EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(3000, true))); + + Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">"); + const std::string re = "re"; + std::tuple<const std::string> dummy = std::make_tuple(re); + EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(dummy)); +} + +ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; } + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; } + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, + a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) { + return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, + a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) { + arg0_type t0 = arg0; + last_param_type t9 = last_param; + return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) { + Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); + EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10, + a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10))); +} + +// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types. + +ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) { + // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types. + std::string prefix_str(prefix); + char suffix_char = static_cast<char>(suffix); + return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) { + Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo = + PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r'); + Action<std::string(const char*)> promo = + PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r')); + EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("ba")))); + EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("ba")))); +} + +// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a +// straight-forward pattern. + +// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its +// parameters. +ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) { + std::stringstream ss; + ss << a << b << c; + return ss.str(); +} + +// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a +// string, or the second parameter is an int. + +// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first +// parameter to std::string. +template <typename T1, typename T2> +// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to +// implement ConcatImpl. We shouldn't change the name as this +// pattern requires the user to use it directly. +ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2> Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, + T2 c) { + GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_PUSH_() + if (true) { + GTEST_INTENTIONAL_CONST_COND_POP_() + // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without + // explicit template arguments. + return ConcatImpl(a, b, c); + } else { + // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with + // explicit template arguments. It doesn't really need to be + // executed as this is a compile-time verification. + return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c); + } +} + +// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the +// second parameter to int. +template <typename T1, typename T2> +ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2> Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) { + return ConcatImpl(a, b, c); +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) { + Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2); + EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); + + a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3); + EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); +} + +// Verifies the type of an ACTION*. + +ACTION(DoFoo) {} +ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {} +ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) { + // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable. + DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo(); + + // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable. + DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1); + + // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk + // variable, and so on. + DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2'); + PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3'); + PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4'); + PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5'); + PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6'); + PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7'); + PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8'); + PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9'); + PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 = + Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0'); + + // Avoid "unused variable" warnings. + (void)a0; + (void)a1; + (void)a2; + (void)a3; + (void)a4; + (void)a5; + (void)a6; + (void)a7; + (void)a8; + (void)a9; + (void)a10; +} + +// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated +// with reference-typed parameters. + +ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; } +ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; } +ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; } +ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) { + return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9; +} + +TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) { + int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3; + const std::tuple<> empty = std::make_tuple(); + + Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty)); + + a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty)); + + a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z); + EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty)); + + int n[10] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}; + a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, + int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], + n[7], n[8], n[9]); + EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty)); +} + +class TenArgConstructorClass { + public: + TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5, int a6, int a7, + int a8, int a9, int a10) + : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) {} + int value_; +}; + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew, HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), + AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) { + return new T; +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) { + const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(); + int* p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); + delete p; +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew, HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T), + AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) { + return new T(a0); +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) { + const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42); + int* p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(42, *p); + delete p; +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg, HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k), + AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) { + delete std::get<k>(args); +} + +// Resets a bool variable in the destructor. +class BoolResetter { + public: + explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {} + ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; } + + private: + bool* value_; +}; + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) { + const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>(); + int n = 0; + bool b = true; + auto* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b); + a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&n, resetter)); + EXPECT_FALSE(b); // Verifies that resetter is deleted. +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer, + HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class, + Pointer), + AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) { + return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee)); +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) { + const Action<std::shared_ptr<int>()> a = + ReturnSmartPointer<std::shared_ptr>(42); + std::shared_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(42, *p); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters. +template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5, + unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9> +struct GiantTemplate { + public: + explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {} + int value; +}; + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant, + HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T1, typename, T2, typename, T3, + int, k4, bool, k5, unsigned int, k6, + class, T7, class, T8, class, T9, + template <typename T> class, T10), + AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) { + return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value); +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) { + using Giant = GiantTemplate<std::shared_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5, true, 6, + char, unsigned, int>; + const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, + unsigned, int, std::shared_ptr>(42); + Giant giant = a.Perform(std::make_tuple()); + EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters. +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), + AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10; +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) { + const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); + EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(std::make_tuple())); +} + +// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded +// on the number of value parameters. + +ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; } + +ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; } + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), + AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2; +} + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number), + AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3; +} + +ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum, HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k), + AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) { + return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k; +} + +TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) { + const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum(); + const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1); + const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2); + const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3); + const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5); + EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(std::make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(std::make_tuple())); + EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(std::make_tuple())); +} + +} // namespace gmock_more_actions_test } // namespace testing diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_all_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_all_test.cc index 6187d4a..fffbb8b 100644 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_all_test.cc +++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_all_test.cc @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ // below list of actual *_test.cc files might change). #include "test/gmock-actions_test.cc" #include "test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc" -#include "test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc" #include "test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc" #include "test/gmock-matchers_test.cc" #include "test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc" diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_generated_actions_nc_test.py b/googlemock/test/gmock_generated_actions_nc_test.py deleted file mode 100755 index 499a103..0000000 --- a/googlemock/test/gmock_generated_actions_nc_test.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,137 +0,0 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env python -# -# Copyright 2008, Google Inc. -# All rights reserved. -# -# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without -# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are -# met: -# -# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright -# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. -# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above -# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer -# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the -# distribution. -# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its -# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from -# this software without specific prior written permission. -# -# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS -# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT -# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR -# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT -# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, -# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT -# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, -# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY -# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT -# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE -# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. - -# Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes. -# -# This file drives the negative compilation tests for script-generated -# Google Mock actions. - -"""Driver for the NC tests for script-generated Google Mock actions.""" - -import os -import sys - -IS_LINUX = os.name == "posix" and os.uname()[0] == "Linux" -if not IS_LINUX: - sys.stderr.write( - "WARNING: Negative compilation tests are not supported on this platform") - sys.exit(0) - -# Suppresses the 'Import not at the top of the file' lint complaint. -# pylint: disable-msg=C6204 -from google3.testing.pybase import fake_target_util -from google3.testing.pybase import googletest -# pylint: enable-msg=C6204 - - -class GMockGeneratedActionTest(googletest.TestCase): - """Negative compilation tests for generated Google Mock actions.""" - - # The class body is intentionally empty. The actual test*() methods - # will be defined at run time by a call to - # DefineNegativeCompilationTests() later. - pass - -# Defines a list of test specs, where each element is a tuple -# (test name, list of regexes for matching the compiler errors). -TEST_SPECS = [ - ("NULLARY_WITH_ARGS", [ - r"no matching function for call to 'WithArgs", - ]), - ("TOO_FEW_ARGS_FOR_WITH_ARGS", [ - r"no known conversion", - ]), - ("TOO_MANY_ARGS_FOR_WITH_ARGS", [ - r"no known conversion", - ]), - ("INCOMPATIBLE_ARG_TYPES_FOR_WITH_ARGS", [ - r"no known conversion", - ]), - ("WRONG_ARG_TYPE_IN_ACTION_MACRO", [ - r"invalid operands", - ]), - ( - "WRONG_RETURN_TYPE_IN_ACTION_MACRO", - [ - r"invalid conversion", # GCC - r"cannot initialize return object", # Clang - ]), - ( - "EXCESSIVE_ARG_IN_ACTION_MACRO", - [ - r"no match for 'operator\+'", # GCC - r"invalid operands to binary expression", # Clang - ]), - ( - "ACTION_MACRO_IN_CLASS", - [ - r"cannot define member function.*Bar.*within.*Foo", # GCC - r"ACTION\(Bar\)", # Clang - ]), - ( - "ACTION_MACRO_IN_FUNCTION", - [ - r"invalid declaration of member template in local class", # GCC - r"templates cannot be declared inside of a local class", # Clang - ]), - ("SET_ARG_REFEREE_MUST_BE_USED_WITH_REFERENCE", - [r"Argument must be a reference type"]), - ( - "DELETE_ARG_MUST_BE_USED_WITH_POINTER", - [ - r"argument given to 'delete', expected pointer", # GCC - r"cannot delete expression of type", # Clang - ]), - ( - "CANNOT_OVERLOAD_ACTION_TEMPLATE_ON_TEMPLATE_PARAM_NUMBER", - [ - r"wrong number of template arguments", # GCC - r"too many template parameters", # Clang - ]), - ( - "CANNOT_OVERLOAD_ACTION_AND_ACTION_TEMPLATE_W_SAME_VALUE_PS", - [ - r"wrong number of template arguments", # GCC - r"too many template parameters", # Clang - ]), - ("SANITY", None), -] - -# Define a test method in GMockGeneratedActionTest for each element in -# TEST_SPECS. -fake_target_util.DefineNegativeCompilationTests( - GMockGeneratedActionTest, - "google3/third_party/googletest/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_nc", # fake target - "gmock-generated-actions_nc.o", # object file - TEST_SPECS) - -if __name__ == "__main__": - googletest.main() diff --git a/googlemock/test/pump_test.py b/googlemock/test/pump_test.py deleted file mode 100755 index eb5a131..0000000 --- a/googlemock/test/pump_test.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,182 +0,0 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env python -# -# Copyright 2010, Google Inc. -# All rights reserved. -# -# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without -# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are -# met: -# -# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright -# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. -# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above -# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer -# in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the -# distribution. -# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its -# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from -# this software without specific prior written permission. -# -# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS -# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT -# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR -# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT -# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, -# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT -# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, -# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY -# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT -# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE -# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. - -"""Tests for the Pump meta-programming tool.""" - -from google3.testing.pybase import googletest -import google3.third_party.googletest.googlemock.scripts.pump - -pump = google3.third_party.googletest.googlemock.scripts.pump -Convert = pump.ConvertFromPumpSource -StripMetaComments = pump.StripMetaComments - - -class PumpTest(googletest.TestCase): - - def testConvertsEmptyToEmpty(self): - self.assertEquals('', Convert('').strip()) - - def testConvertsPlainCodeToSame(self): - self.assertEquals('#include <stdio.h>\n', - Convert('#include <stdio.h>\n')) - - def testConvertsLongIWYUPragmaToSame(self): - long_line = '// IWYU pragma: private, include "' + (80*'a') + '.h"\n' - self.assertEquals(long_line, Convert(long_line)) - - def testConvertsIWYUPragmaWithLeadingSpaceToSame(self): - long_line = ' // IWYU pragma: private, include "' + (80*'a') + '.h"\n' - self.assertEquals(long_line, Convert(long_line)) - - def testConvertsIWYUPragmaWithSlashStarLeaderToSame(self): - long_line = '/* IWYU pragma: private, include "' + (80*'a') + '.h"\n' - self.assertEquals(long_line, Convert(long_line)) - - def testConvertsIWYUPragmaWithSlashStarAndSpacesToSame(self): - long_line = ' /* IWYU pragma: private, include "' + (80*'a') + '.h"\n' - self.assertEquals(long_line, Convert(long_line)) - - def testIgnoresMetaComment(self): - self.assertEquals('', - Convert('$$ This is a Pump meta comment.\n').strip()) - - def testSimpleVarDeclarationWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('3\n', - Convert('$var m = 3\n' - '$m\n')) - - def testVarDeclarationCanReferenceEarlierVar(self): - self.assertEquals('43 != 3;\n', - Convert('$var a = 42\n' - '$var b = a + 1\n' - '$var c = (b - a)*3\n' - '$b != $c;\n')) - - def testSimpleLoopWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('1, 2, 3, 4, 5\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$range i 1..n\n' - '$for i, [[$i]]\n')) - - def testSimpleLoopWithCommentWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('1, 2, 3, 4, 5\n', - Convert('$var n = 5 $$ This is comment 1.\n' - '$range i 1..n $$ This is comment 2.\n' - '$for i, [[$i]]\n')) - - def testNonTrivialRangeExpressionsWork(self): - self.assertEquals('1, 2, 3, 4\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$range i (n/n)..(n - 1)\n' - '$for i, [[$i]]\n')) - - def testLoopWithoutSeparatorWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('a + 1 + 2 + 3;\n', - Convert('$range i 1..3\n' - 'a$for i [[ + $i]];\n')) - - def testCanGenerateDollarSign(self): - self.assertEquals('$\n', Convert('$($)\n')) - - def testCanIterpolateExpressions(self): - self.assertEquals('a[2] = 3;\n', - Convert('$var i = 1\n' - 'a[$(i + 1)] = $(i*4 - 1);\n')) - - def testConditionalWithoutElseBranchWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('true\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$if n > 0 [[true]]\n')) - - def testConditionalWithElseBranchWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('true -- really false\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$if n > 0 [[true]]\n' - '$else [[false]] -- \n' - '$if n > 10 [[really true]]\n' - '$else [[really false]]\n')) - - def testConditionalWithCascadingElseBranchWorks(self): - self.assertEquals('a\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$if n > 0 [[a]]\n' - '$elif n > 10 [[b]]\n' - '$else [[c]]\n')) - self.assertEquals('b\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$if n > 10 [[a]]\n' - '$elif n > 0 [[b]]\n' - '$else [[c]]\n')) - self.assertEquals('c\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - '$if n > 10 [[a]]\n' - '$elif n > 8 [[b]]\n' - '$else [[c]]\n')) - - def testNestedLexicalBlocksWork(self): - self.assertEquals('a = 5;\n', - Convert('$var n = 5\n' - 'a = [[$if n > 0 [[$n]]]];\n')) - - -class StripMetaCommentsTest(googletest.TestCase): - - def testReturnsSameStringIfItContainsNoComment(self): - self.assertEquals('', StripMetaComments('')) - self.assertEquals(' blah ', StripMetaComments(' blah ')) - self.assertEquals('A single $ is fine.', - StripMetaComments('A single $ is fine.')) - self.assertEquals('multiple\nlines', - StripMetaComments('multiple\nlines')) - - def testStripsSimpleComment(self): - self.assertEquals('yes\n', StripMetaComments('yes $$ or no?\n')) - - def testStripsSimpleCommentWithMissingNewline(self): - self.assertEquals('yes', StripMetaComments('yes $$ or no?')) - - def testStripsPureCommentLinesEntirely(self): - self.assertEquals('yes\n', - StripMetaComments('$$ a pure comment line.\n' - 'yes $$ or no?\n' - ' $$ another comment line.\n')) - - def testStripsCommentsFromMultiLineText(self): - self.assertEquals('multi-\n' - 'line\n' - 'text is fine.', - StripMetaComments('multi- $$ comment 1\n' - 'line\n' - 'text is fine. $$ comment 2')) - - -if __name__ == '__main__': - googletest.main() |